set up a truly one-world government. We're being over and over bombarded through the media about the pros, the good points of this. We see one of the media giants, Ted Turner, recently donates 1 billion dollars to the United Nations. Afterwards, some financial analyst demonstrated that he made money by doing this. This wasn't truly an offering. It had benefits across the line where he made money. Nonetheless, he continued to promote the United Nations before the world so they can better prepare us. Here's an article about the United Nations. At the bottom of this picture of a meeting in the United Nations, it says, at work, nobody said imposing a one-world government would be easy. It's common understanding, even in the secular world today, that we are moving towards a one-world government. Here, we're discussing the different, in this article, the different role that the United Nations in the United States has played in bringing about a one-world government and the pros and cons of it. Now, in this particular article, I want to read just a passage out of it. This is from U.S. News and World Report, December 16th, 1996. It's about a year old. Just speaking about the United Nations. With the Soviet veto muted by the end of the Cold War, Washington has been more successful than ever in using the UN as a tool of American diplomacy. Examine almost any major initiative containing rogue states like Libya and Iraq, promoting free trade, curbing nuclear weapon proliferation, cultivating democracy in troubled states from Haiti to Mozambique, and the UN is central to this strategy. Internationalizing its foreign policy through the UN cost the United States about two billion in fiscal year 1996, comparable to the annual annualized cost of a single aircraft carrier battle group. And as Washington ambassador to the United Nations, Madeleine Albright, likes to point out, the UN is a force multiplier. When the United States intervenes alone, we pay all the costs and run all the risk. When the UN acts, we pay one-fourth of the cost and the others provide the vast majority of troops, she says. A proponent of what she calls assertive multilateralism, Albright will soon be advocating these views from her new post as Secretary of State. Brothers and sisters, the benefits of the United Nations is promoted constantly before us and it comes from the Clinton political machine. We see here an article about land that Bill Clinton has gobbled up from the sovereignty of states to set aside and it's clear that the politicians of this country are well prepared to move in to the time when the United States has been prophesied as telling the whole world to set up an image of the beast which, by definition,