focuses on protecting the wall of separation of church and state. This organization and this magazine does that, and the title of this magazine, because of that ruling in 1995, is called A Crack in the Wall. It was talking about the wall of separation of church and state. And here's one quote from Justice Souter. It said, Justice David Souter led the four dissenters, Souter charged that the majority had clearly misapplied the law. Now here's his quote, the court today for the first time approves direct funding of core religious activities by an arm of the state. In other words, the court for the first time in history rules that the secular power of the state can be used to support religious activities. That's 1995 on Simply a Club. In 1998, Wisconsin Supreme Court rules in favor of the state funds being used to support religious schools. By the way, you know how many, percentage wise, how many of the religious schools in Wisconsin are Catholic? 60%. So if you're a Seventh-day Adventist living in the state of Wisconsin today, you know that your tax dollars are going to support a Catholic school. And that, even that in itself, fools a lot of people because in the United States a religious school takes, the money it takes in is used to support that school and used to promote that school's agenda. But that isn't the way a Catholic school is set up. The Catholic church is very clear that every piece of property that it owns, whether it's a school, a hospital, a university, anything it owns is the property of one person. You know who owns every single thing in the Catholic church legally and technically? The Pope of Rome. So when you are sending money to a Catholic church school, he has no legal requirement to even use those funds in that school. If he wants to take those funds and do something else with them across the country, that is the setup. And that is exactly why the framers of the Constitution ruled not to do that. And that's exactly what's going on in the United States today. Now when something like this happens at the state level in the United States, if somebody protested it will work its way up to the Supreme Court and they can overrule that decision. The Supreme Court of the United States has already let it be known that it's not going to worry about that test. What does this mean? It means this, brothers and sisters. The principle of the image of the beast is already underway in the United States. The pieces of the puzzle that need to be put into place for the Sunday Law are already there and you're going to see this as we go on. I'm going to keep building on this. It's already there.