Article

# Panium - Number Nineteen

Panijum – broj devetnaest

The Greats: Antiochus, Constantine, and the Last President

Velikani: Antioh, Konstantin i posljednji predsjednik

Author

Jeff Pippenger

Published

March 1, 2026

Formats

PDF
Word
Song MP3

The key to rightly dividing verses ten through sixteen of Daniel eleven is found in the basic prophetic applications that were employed over thirty years ago, in 1996, when The Time of the End magazine was published. Thirty years later, the Lord has revealed that another prophetic message is to be formalized as was the Millerite message formalized in 1831. In the omega history of these thirty years the message to be formalized is represented as a correction of a previous message of Islam, as represented by Josiah Litch and also a corrected message of the closed door, as represented by Samuel Snow, which is the symbol of the parable of the ten virgins. A message of Islam, accompanied with a warning of the progressive closing doors of probation as Christ finishes His work of judgment will be proclaimed. The message is twofold, possessing and internal and external line, which in turn represent the first two steps of the three-step testing process that always occurs when a prophecy is unsealed, as was the revelation of Jesus Christ on December 31, 2023.

Ključ za ispravno razdjeljivanje redaka deset do šesnaest jedanaestog poglavlja Daniela nalazi se u temeljnim proročkim primjenama koje su bile upotrijebljene prije više od trideset godina, 1996., kada je bio objavljen časopis The Time of the End. Trideset godina poslije, Gospodin je otkrio da još jedna proročka poruka treba biti formalizirana kao što je milleritska poruka bila formalizirana 1831. godine. U omega-povijesti ovih trideset godina poruka koju treba formalizirati prikazana je kao ispravak prethodne poruke o islamu, kako ju predstavlja Josiah Litch, a također i kao ispravljena poruka o zatvorenim vratima, kako ju predstavlja Samuel Snow, što je simbol prispodobe o deset djevica. Bit će proglašena poruka o islamu, popraćena upozorenjem o postupnom zatvaranju vrata milosti dok Krist dovršava svoje djelo suda. Ta je poruka dvostruka, posjeduje unutarnju i vanjsku liniju, koje pak predstavljaju prva dva koraka trostupanjskog procesa kušnje koji se uvijek događa kada je proročanstvo odpečaćeno, kao što je bilo otkrivenje Isusa Krista 31. prosinca 2023. godine.

The Time of the End magazine contains the basic overview of the future for America as represented in the last six verses of Daniel eleven which were unsealed at the time of the end in 1989. The magazine has been in the public record for thirty years and no one saw that a main theme of the magazine was the religious struggle between communism and the churches under the influence of Catholicism, especially in the Ukraine. That religious battle from the period of 1989, explains the context of the religious demise of Putin as represented by Ptolemy and Uzziah in the rebellion they both manifested at the temple in Jerusalem. The temple in Jerusalem was Uzziah’s temple, not Ptolemy’s temple. Both Putin and Zelenskyy desecrate the same temple in two different ways; one as an Egyptian and one as a Jew.

Časopis *The Time of the End* sadrži temeljni pregled budućnosti Amerike, kako je ona prikazana u posljednjih šest redaka jedanaestoga poglavlja Daniela, koji su bili otpečaćeni u vrijeme svršetka 1989. godine. Taj je časopis trideset godina bio javno dostupan, a nitko nije uočio da je jedna od njegovih glavnih tema bila vjerska borba između komunizma i crkava pod utjecajem katolicizma, osobito u Ukrajini. Ta vjerska bitka iz razdoblja 1989. godine objašnjava kontekst Putinova vjerskog pada, kako je prikazan Ptolemejem i Uzijom u pobuni koju su obojica očitovali u jeruzalemskom Hramu. Hram u Jeruzalemu bio je Uzijin hram, a ne Ptolemejev hram. I Putin i Zelenski oskvrnjuju isti Hram na dva različita načina: jedan kao Egipćanin, a drugi kao Židov.

The church that was struggling against the king of the south in 1989 was the Catholic church. And why not? Atheism of France delivered the deadly wound to the king of the north in 1798, so why wouldn’t the papacy retaliate against atheism’s long-drawn-out persecution of the Catholic church, especially in the Ukraine? More significant is that this clear testimony about the Ukraine came from a publication in 1996, that was citing the secular historians about the history of 1989. Now that the Lord is unsealing the hidden history of verse forty, He has pointed to the struggle between two orthodox churches to provide the prophetic and historical context of the battle of Raphia and its aftermath, and He had already included the necessary insights in The Time of the End magazine that was published thirty years ago.

Crkva koja se 1989. borila protiv kralja juga bila je Katolička crkva. A zašto i ne bi? Ateizam Francuske zadao je smrtonosnu ranu kralju sjevera 1798., pa zašto papinstvo ne bi uzvratilo na dugotrajni progon Katoličke crkve od strane ateizma, osobito u Ukrajini? Još je značajnije to što je ovo jasno svjedočanstvo o Ukrajini poteklo iz publikacije iz 1996. godine, koja je navodila svjetovne povjesničare o povijesti 1989. godine. Sada, dok Gospodin otpečaćuje skrivenu povijest četrdesetog retka, ukazao je na borbu između dviju pravoslavnih crkava kako bi pružio proročki i povijesni kontekst bitke kod Rafije i njezinih posljedica, a potrebne je uvide već uključio u časopis The Time of the End, objavljen prije trideset godina.

The demise of Napoleon aligns with the progressive demise of Lenin, Stalin and the system of the Soviet Union. When the prophetic southern kingdom moved its capital to Russia there were two major revolutions in 1917. The first is what is called the Russian revolution when the Czar was overthrown, and then in the same year the Bolshevik Revolution followed, which led to the civil war of 1917 unto 1922. In 1922 the Soviet Union was formed.

Propast Napoleona podudara se s postupnom propašću Lenjina, Staljina i sustava Sovjetskoga Saveza. Kada je proročko južno kraljevstvo premjestilo svoj glavni grad u Rusiju, dogodile su se dvije velike revolucije 1917. godine. Prva je ono što se naziva Ruskom revolucijom, kada je car svrgnut, a zatim je iste godine uslijedila boljševička revolucija, koja je dovela do građanskoga rata od 1917. do 1922. Godine 1922. osnovan je Sovjetski Savez.

The beginning of Russia as the spiritual king of the south represented a two-step revolution that led to civil war, then the formation of a confederacy of countries. The collapse of the Soviet Union was also two steps, beginning with the tearing down of the Berlin wall on November 9, 1989, which then led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union on December 31, 1991. As the last ruler of Russia, the king of the south, Vladimir Putin was typified by the first Russian ruler—Vladimir Lenin.

Početak Rusije kao duhovnoga kralja juga predstavljao je revoluciju u dva koraka koja je dovela do građanskoga rata, a zatim do oblikovanja konfederacije zemalja. Slom Sovjetskoga Saveza također se odvijao u dva koraka, počevši od rušenja Berlinskoga zida 9. studenoga 1989., što je potom dovelo do raspuštanja Sovjetskoga Saveza 31. prosinca 1991. Kao posljednji vladar Rusije, kralj juga, Vladimir Putin bio je predočen prvim ruskim vladarom — Vladimirom Lenjinom.

Vladimir means “a great leader” and Putin means “the path.” Lenin means “a great river,” but Vladimir Lenin chose the name of Lenin to hide his real name, which was Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov. Ilyich means “son of Elijah,” and Ulyanov means “youthful son of Elijah.”

Vladimir znači „veliki vođa“, a Putin znači „put“. Lenjin znači „velika rijeka“, ali Vladimir Lenjin izabrao je ime Lenjin kako bi prikrio svoje pravo ime, koje je glasilo Vladimir Iljič Uljanov. Iljič znači „sin Ilijin“, a Uljanov znači „mladenački sin Ilijin“.

The great Russian leader on the path, in the history represented by the battle of Raphia in 217 BC, was typified by the first leader of Russia, who as Vladimir Lenin was the great leader of the mighty river, but who hid his name. A name is a symbol of character, and for Vladimir to hide his two names represents a character that chose a great river of political thought, over a character represented by Elijah, which means “God is Jehovah.” The root of atheism is the denial of God, and atheism is a prime characteristic of the king of the south. The second and third given name of Lenin emphasize Elijah and his son, and the end of Russia as the king of the south is represented by Ptolemy IV, who was victorious at the battle of Raphia, but when Antiochus returned in 200 BC at the battle of Panium Ptolemy’s five-year-old son was then ruling. Lenin’s two original names identify Elijah and his son, and align with Ptolemy and his son. Elijah and the message to his children occurs in the latter days, just before “the great and dreadful day of the Lord;” which is where the battles of Raphia and Panium are also located.

Veliki ruski vođa na putu, u povijesti prikazanoj bitkom kod Rafije 217. pr. Kr., bio je predoznačen prvim vođom Rusije, koji je kao Vladimir Lenjin bio veliki vođa moćne rijeke, ali koji je sakrio svoje ime. Ime je simbol karaktera, a to što je Vladimir sakrio svoja dva imena predstavlja karakter koji je izabrao veliku rijeku političke misli umjesto karaktera predstavljenoga Ilijom, što znači „Bog je Jahve.” Korijen ateizma jest nijekanje Boga, a ateizam je glavno obilježje kralja juga. Lenjinovo drugo i treće dano ime naglašavaju Iliju i njegova sina, a kraj Rusije kao kralja juga prikazan je Ptolemejem IV., koji je bio pobjednik u bitki kod Rafije, ali kada se Antioh vratio 200. pr. Kr. u bitki kod Panija, tada je vladao Ptolemejev petogodišnji sin. Lenjinova dva izvorna imena identificiraju Iliju i njegova sina te se podudaraju s Ptolemejem i njegovim sinom. Ilija i poruka njegovoj djeci pojavljuju se u posljednjim danima, neposredno prije „velikoga i strašnoga dana Gospodnjega”, gdje su također smještene bitke kod Rafije i Panija.

> Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord: And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse. Malachi 4:5, 6.

> Evo, poslat ću vam proroka Iliju prije nego dođe veliki i strašni dan Gospodnji: I on će obratiti srce otaca k sinovima i srce sinova k njihovim ocima, da ne dođem i ne udarim zemlju prokletstvom. Malahija 4:5, 6.

The testimony of Uzziah and Ptolemy align in verse eleven of Daniel eleven, and Uzziah lived for eleven years after his rebellion and leprosy; whereas, Ptolemy ruled for a total of seventeen years, which is the same number of years between the battles of verse eleven and verse fifteen. The 250-year prophecy that began in 457 BC, ended in 207 BC in the middle of those two battles; ten years after Raphia and seven before Panium. Ptolemy IV’s reign began in 221 BC, and he died in 204 BC, so the seventeen years of Ptolemy are not the same line as the seventeen years from Raphia to Panium. Nor are they the same seventeen years that are represented by the conclusion of the 250-year prophecy beginning with Nero in 64 and ending in 313. From 313 to the first Sunday law in 321 is eight years, and nine years later in 330 Constantine divided the kingdom into east and west.

Svjedočanstvo Uzije i Ptolemeja podudara se u jedanaestom retku Daniela jedanaest, a Uzija je živio jedanaest godina nakon svoje pobune i gube; dok je Ptolemej vladao ukupno sedamnaest godina, što je isti broj godina između bitaka iz retka jedanaest i retka petnaest. Proročanstvo od 250 godina, koje je započelo 457. pr. Kr., završilo je 207. pr. Kr. usred tih dviju bitaka; deset godina nakon Rafije i sedam prije Panija. Vladavina Ptolemeja IV. započela je 221. pr. Kr., a umro je 204. pr. Kr., stoga sedamnaest Ptolemejevih godina nije ista linija kao sedamnaest godina od Rafije do Panija. Niti su to istih sedamnaest godina koje su prikazane završetkom proročanstva od 250 godina koje počinje s Neronom 64. godine, a završava 313. godine. Od 313. do prvoga zakona o nedjelji 321. godine ima osam godina, a devet godina poslije, 330. godine, Konstantin je podijelio kraljevstvo na istok i zapad.

In the very near future Putin and Russia will defeat Ukraine and the footsteps of Ptolemy and Uzziah will begin to repeat in the history represented by verse twelve. The two biblical witnesses place the final crisis for Putin in a church and state crisis. Their rebellion was manifested at the temple in Jerusalem, thus identifying Uzziah’s temple and religion as the point of prophetic reference.

U vrlo skoroj budućnosti Putin i Rusija porazit će Ukrajinu, a koraci Ptolemeja i Uzije počet će se ponavljati u povijesti prikazanoj u dvanaestom retku. Dva biblijska svjedoka smještaju završnu krizu za Putina u krizu crkve i države. Njihova se pobuna očitovala u hramu u Jeruzalemu, čime se Uzijin hram i religija prepoznaju kao točka proročkog upućivanja.

Zelenskyy, which means “green,” is the puppet of the globalist bureaucrats of the European Union and the United Nations, whose globalist agenda is aptly represented by the green political movement that worships mother earth. It is fitting that Zelenskyy was an actor, for he is clearly a proxy of other powers, and his name meaning “green” identifies the political philosophy that guides his movements on the chess board of human history. Checkmate is right around the corner for Zelenskyy.

Zelenskyj, što znači „zeleni“, marioneta je globalističkih birokrata Europske unije i Ujedinjenih naroda, čiji je globalistički program prikladno predstavljen zelenim političkim pokretom koji obožava majku zemlju. Prikladno je što je Zelenskyj bio glumac, jer je očito opunomoćenik drugih sila, a značenje njegova imena, „zeleni“, označuje političku filozofiju koja usmjerava njegove pokrete na šahovskoj ploči ljudske povijesti. Mat je odmah iza ugla za Zelenskyja.

In this final history the rebellion of Uzziah and Ptolemy will once again be acted out, but Ptolemy (Putin) died four years before the battle of Panium, and the last ruler of the king of the south is represented by a five-year-old child who is being handled by a series of corrupt and incompetent regents.

U ovoj završnoj povijesti pobuna Uzije i Ptolemeja ponovno će se odigrati, ali Ptolemej (Putin) umro je četiri godine prije bitke kod Panija, a posljednji vladar kralja juga prikazan je kao petogodišnje dijete kojim upravlja niz pokvarenih i nesposobnih regenta.

Ptolemy V was only about 5–6 years old when he ascended the throne in 204 BC (after his father’s mysterious death), and the Ptolemaic kingdom was paralyzed by a series of incompetent or corrupt regencies during his reign. The initial regency was from 204–202 BC, after Ptolemy IV’s death was concealed and his mother Arsinoe III murdered. The court favorites Sosibius, a longtime minister under Ptolemy IV, and Agathocles the brother of Ptolemy IV’s mistress Agathoclea, declared themselves regents. They forged or presented a will making them guardians, placed the young king under the care of Agathoclea and her family, and purged potential rivals. Sosibius handled much of the early administration.

Ptolemej V. imao je samo oko 5–6 godina kada je 204. pr. Kr. stupio na prijestolje (nakon tajanstvene smrti svojega oca), a Ptolemejsko je kraljevstvo tijekom njegove vladavine bilo paralizirano nizom nesposobnih ili pokvarenih regentstava. Početno je regentstvo trajalo od 204. do 202. pr. Kr., nakon što je smrt Ptolemeja IV. bila prikrivena, a njegova majka Arsinoja III. ubijena. Dvorski miljenici Sosibije, dugogodišnji ministar pod Ptolemejem IV., i Agatoklo, brat Agatokleje, ljubavnice Ptolemeja IV., proglasili su se regentima. Krivotvorili su ili predočili oporuku kojom su bili imenovani skrbnicima, stavili mladoga kralja pod brigu Agatokleje i njezine obitelji te uklonili moguće suparnike. Sosibije je vodio velik dio rane uprave.

A shift occurred around 202 BC, when Agathocles became the dominant regent, but was widely hated for debauchery and mismanagement. A popular uprising in Alexandria led to his brutal lynching by a mob, with the boy-king nominally approving. Subsequent regents were Tlepolemus the governor of Pelusium, and then Aristomenes. By the time of the battle of Panium in 200 BC, the kingdom was under this rotating series of regents and court advisors.

Do preokreta je došlo oko 202. pr. Kr., kada je Agatoklo postao prevladavajući regent, ali je bio naširoko omražen zbog razvrata i lošeg upravljanja. Narodni ustanak u Aleksandriji doveo je do njegova brutalnog linčovanja od strane svjetine, uz nominalno odobrenje dječaka-kralja. Naknadni regenti bili su Tlepolem, upravitelj Peluzija, a zatim Aristomen. Do vremena bitke kod Panija 200. pr. Kr., kraljevstvo se nalazilo pod tim izmjenjujućim nizom regenata i dvorskih savjetnika.

At the battle of Panium the Ptolemaic forces were led in the field by the general Scopas of Aetolia, a mercenary commander appointed under the regency, not by Ptolemy V himself. The young king had no real control—the decisions, military strategy, and kingdom’s overall weakness stemmed from the regents’ paralysis, internal revolts (like the native Egyptian uprisings), and court intrigue. This instability allowed Antiochus III the Great to decisively defeat Scopas at Panium, seizing Coele-Syria, including Judea permanently from Ptolemaic control.

U bitci kod Panija ptolemejskim je snagama na bojištu zapovijedao general Skopas iz Etolije, najamnički zapovjednik postavljen pod namjesništvom, a ne sam Ptolemej V. Mladi kralj nije imao stvarnu vlast — odluke, vojna strategija i sveukupna slabost kraljevstva proizlazile su iz paralize namjesnika, unutarnjih pobuna (poput ustanaka domaćih Egipćana) i dvorskih spletki. Ta je nestabilnost omogućila Antiohu III. Velikom da odlučno porazi Skopasa kod Panija i trajno preotme Koile-Siriju, uključujući Judeju, iz ptolemejske vlasti.

Historians discuss the probability that Ptolemy IV’s death was by poisoning, which is also part of the historical speculation concerning Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, as well as the queen of the south, Cleopatra. Putin prevails in the Ukrainian War, but then his demise begins with his desire to implement the controlling relationship that the Soviet Union formerly had with the Ukrainian church, which when removed in 1989, was the symbol of the victory of the king of the north over the king of the south.

Povjesničari raspravljaju o vjerojatnosti da je smrt Ptolemeja IV. bila posljedica trovanja, što je također dio povijesnih nagađanja u vezi s Vladimirom Lenjinom, Josifom Staljinom, kao i kraljicom juga, Kleopatrom. Putin prevladava u ukrajinskom ratu, ali tada njegov slom započinje njegovom željom da uspostavi odnos nadzora koji je Sovjetski Savez nekoć imao s ukrajinskom crkvom, što je, kada je 1989. bilo uklonjeno, bilo simbol pobjede kralja sjevera nad kraljem juga.

The Ukraine is the cradle of Eastern Slavic Orthodoxy. The baptism of Vladimir the Great took place in 988 in Kyiv. Moscow later claimed the title “Third Rome” after Constantinople fell, positioning itself as the rightful heir and spiritual guardian of all Russian lands, including the Ukraine as its “canonical territory”.

Ukrajina je kolijevka istočnoslavenskoga pravoslavlja. Krštenje Vladimira Velikoga zbilo se 988. godine u Kijevu. Moskva je poslije, nakon pada Carigrada, prisvojila naslov „Treći Rim“, postavljajući se kao zakonita baštinica i duhovna čuvarica svih ruskih zemalja, uključujući i Ukrajinu kao svoj „kanonski teritorij“.

The Moscow Patriarchate has always viewed Ukraine as spiritually inseparable from Russia with the motto of “One people, one faith,” which is a phrase Putin himself has repeatedly used. Ukraine, especially since 2014/2022, increasingly sees Moscow’s oversight as colonial and imperial domination rather than true spiritual motherhood. As of February 2026, there are two competing Orthodox structures. One is the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, which since 2019 has been independent from Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople. In Kyiv the Orthodox Church of Ukraine is considered as the truly national church.

Moskovski patrijarhat oduvijek je promatrao Ukrajinu kao duhovno neodvojivu od Rusije pod geslom „Jedan narod, jedna vjera”, što je izraz kojim se i sam Putin opetovano služio. Ukrajina, osobito od 2014./2022., sve više promatra moskovski nadzor kao kolonijalnu i imperijalnu dominaciju, a ne kao istinsko duhovno majčinstvo. Od veljače 2026. postoje dvije suparničke pravoslavne strukture. Jedna je Pravoslavna Crkva Ukrajine, koja je od 2019. neovisna pod ekumenskim patrijarhom Bartolomejem iz Carigrada. U Kijevu se Pravoslavna Crkva Ukrajine smatra istinski nacionalnom Crkvom.

Reader beware: the Orthodox Church of Ukraine is a different church than the Ukrainian Orthodox church. The Ukrainian Orthodox church is connected with Russia’s orthodox church, and for this reason Zelenskyy has been attacking it. The Vatican opposes the attacks of Zelenskyy that are already underway, but Putin’s rebellion of verse twelve follows his victory at Raphia, and is yet future.

Neka se čitatelj čuva: Pravoslavna Crkva Ukrajine drukčija je crkva od Ukrajinske pravoslavne crkve. Ukrajinska pravoslavna crkva povezana je s Ruskom pravoslavnom crkvom, i zbog toga ju je Zelenskyy napadao. Vatikan se protivi napadima Zelenskyya koji su već u tijeku, ali Putinova pobuna iz dvanaestoga retka slijedi nakon njegove pobjede kod Rafije i još je buduća.

The Ukrainian Orthodox Church was historically linked to the Moscow body. In the aftermath of the invasion of 2022, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church declared full autonomy in May 2022, but Ukrainian state investigations (DESS) have repeatedly argued it remains canonically and legally affiliated with Moscow. Ukraine passed a law in August 2024 (signed by Zelenskyy) banning any religious body tied to the Russian Orthodox Church (the “aggressor state”). The Ukrainian Orthodox Church has been ordered to fully sever ties or face court-ordered dissolution of its Kyiv Metropolis. As of late 2025 and early 2026, there are ongoing raids, parish transfers to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (over 1,300 since 2022), court cases, and UN experts warning of religious-freedom concerns regarding the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.

Ukrajinska pravoslavna crkva bila je povijesno povezana s Moskovskim patrijarhatom. Nakon invazije 2022. godine, Ukrajinska pravoslavna crkva proglasila je punu autonomiju u svibnju 2022., no ukrajinske državne istrage (DESS) opetovano su tvrdile da ona i dalje kanonski i pravno ostaje povezana s Moskvom. Ukrajina je u kolovozu 2024. donijela zakon (koji je potpisao Zelenskyy) kojim se zabranjuje svako vjersko tijelo povezano s Ruskom pravoslavnom crkvom („državom agresorom”). Ukrajinskoj pravoslavnoj crkvi naloženo je da u potpunosti prekine veze ili će se suočiti sa sudski naloženim raspuštanjem svoje Kijevske mitropolije. Krajem 2025. i početkom 2026. nastavljaju se racije, prijenosi župa u Pravoslavnu crkvu Ukrajine (više od 1.300 od 2022.), sudski postupci te upozorenja stručnjaka Ujedinjenih naroda na zabrinutosti u pogledu vjerskih sloboda u vezi s Ukrajinskom pravoslavnom crkvom.

The Vatican has publicly opposed any forced dissolution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Russia and Putin frame this as outright persecution of canonical Orthodoxy and have made protection of the “Russian Orthodox churches” an explicit demand in any peace negotiations. Russian propaganda consistently ties the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and the Ukrainian state attacks upon it as “Nazism” and as part of their “denazification” justification.

Vatikan se javno usprotivio bilo kakvom prisilnom raspuštanju Ukrajinske pravoslavne Crkve. Rusija i Putin to prikazuju kao otvoreni progon kanonskoga pravoslavlja te su zaštitu „ruskih pravoslavnih crkava” učinili izričitim zahtjevom u svim mirovnim pregovorima. Ruska propaganda dosljedno povezuje Ukrajinsku pravoslavnu Crkvu i napade ukrajinske države na nju s „nacizmom” te ih prikazuje kao dio svojega opravdanja za „denacifikaciju”.

Putin will presumptuously “enter the temple” and claim full spiritual dominion over Ukrainian Orthodoxy in attempt to re-subordinate the entire Ukrainian church structure under Moscow, demanding recognition as the rightful spiritual head of the Russian orthodox world.

Putin će drsko „ući u hram” i prisvojiti punu duhovnu vlast nad ukrajinskim pravoslavljem, nastojeći cijelu ukrajinsku crkvenu strukturu ponovno podvrgnuti Moskvi te zahtijevati da ga se prizna kao zakonitoga duhovnog poglavara ruskoga pravoslavnog svijeta.

This is the exact parallel to Ptolemy entering the Most Holy Place, while Uzziah is Zelenskyy seeking to burn incense. Ptolemy’s rebellion was in the Most Holy Place and Uzziah’s was in the holy place. A southern king, flushed with the victory of the “borderline,” ending the proxy-power of Nazism, and then overstepping into the place that belongs only to the realm of religion. Then will come a sudden providential humbling, and Putin will disappear from the scene (as Ptolemy IV died in 204 BC). After the power vacuum of a ‘weak-successors phase,’ the northern king returns with greater force and prevails at the modern battle of Panium in verse 15.

Ovo je točna usporednica s Ptolemejem koji ulazi u Svetinju nad svetinjama, dok je Uzija Zelenskyy koji nastoji prinijeti kad. Ptolemejeva pobuna bila je u Svetinji nad svetinjama, a Uzijina u Svetome mjestu. Južni kralj, obuzet pobjedom na „graničnoj crti“, okončavši posredničku moć nacizma, potom prekoračuje u mjesto koje pripada jedino području religije. Tada će doći iznenadno providonosno poniženje, a Putin će nestati sa scene (kao što je Ptolemej IV umro 204. pr. Kr.). Nakon vakuuma moći u fazi „slabih nasljednika“, sjeverni se kralj vraća s većom silom i odnosi prevagu u suvremenoj bitci kod Panija u 15. retku.

## Seventeen

Sedamnaest

Seventeen years occurs three times in the history where the battles of Raphia and Panium merge together, line upon line. The seventeen years from the edict of Milan where the eastern and western thrones of the empire were brought together through marriage, until the kingdom was divided and divorced in 330. The seventeen years beginning and ending are waymarks of two other related prophetic periods. Beginning with Nero in the year 64 a period of persecution is marked that ended in the history of Constantine the Great. The transition from Nero’s period of persecution unto the compromise represented by Constantine identifies the transition from the church of Smyrna unto the church of Pergamos. 313 and the edict of Milan identify the end of the church of Smyrna, and the end of the seventeen-year period is the year 330, which was the fulfillment of the three-hundred-and-sixty-year prophecy of Daniel 11:24.

Sedamnaest godina pojavljuje se tri puta u povijesti u kojoj se bitke kod Rafije i Panija spajaju zajedno, redak na redak. Sedamnaest godina od Milanskoga edikta, kada su istočna i zapadna prijestolja carstva bila sjedinjena brakom, pa sve dok kraljevstvo nije bilo podijeljeno i razvedeno 330. godine. Sedamnaest godina, i početak i završetak, putokazi su dvaju drugih povezanih proročkih razdoblja. Počevši s Neronom godine 64., označeno je razdoblje progonstva koje je završilo u povijesti Konstantina Velikoga. Prijelaz iz Neronova razdoblja progonstva u kompromis predstavljen Konstantinom prepoznaje prijelaz od crkve u Smirni do crkve u Pergamu. Godina 313. i Milanski edikt označuju kraj crkve u Smirni, a kraj sedamnaestogodišnjega razdoblja jest godina 330., koja je bila ispunjenje tristoezdesetogodišnjega proročanstva iz Daniela 11:24.

> He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers’ fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time. Daniel 11:24.

> Ući će mirno i u najplodnija mjesta pokrajine; i učinit će ono što nisu učinili ni njegovi oci ni oci njegovih otaca; razdijelit će među njima plijen i grabež i bogatstvo; da, smišljat će svoje naume protiv utvrda, ali samo za neko vrijeme. Daniel 11:24.

The seventeen years from 313 and the edict of Milan, begins with a fulfillment of prophecy and ends at the fulfillment of another prophecy. The first prophetic fulfillment which marks the beginning, identifies the transition from the church of Smyrna unto the church of Pergamos, and the prophecy that marks the end of those seventeen years, identifies the division of Rome into eastern and western Rome. The seventeen years is identified by prophetic history, not by any specific seventeen-year proclamation. The alpha of the division of the second church from the third church aligned with the division of the empire into east and west at the fulfillment of the time prophecy of 360 years. Those two prophecies establish a period of seventeen years, and they need to be established as a legitimate prophetic period based upon the witness of two or three; if seventeen is a valid prophetic symbol.

Sedamnaest godina od 313. i Milanskoga edikta započinje ispunjenjem jednoga proročanstva i završava ispunjenjem drugoga proročanstva. Prvo proročko ispunjenje koje označuje početak utvrđuje prijelaz od crkve Smirne do crkve Pergama, a proročanstvo koje označuje kraj tih sedamnaest godina utvrđuje podjelu Rima na istočni i zapadni Rim. Tih sedamnaest godina prepoznaje se po proročkoj povijesti, a ne po nekom posebnom sedamnaestogodišnjem proglasu. Alfa podjele druge crkve od treće crkve uskladila se s podjelom Carstva na istok i zapad pri ispunjenju vremenskoga proročanstva od 360 godina. Ta dva proročanstva uspostavljaju razdoblje od sedamnaest godina, i ono mora biti utvrđeno kao valjano proročko razdoblje na temelju svjedočanstva dvojice ili trojice, ako je sedamnaest valjan proročki simbol.

Those witnesses exist in another 250-year period which began in 457 BC. On that date the 2,300-year prophecy of Daniel 8:14 began. 457 BC is a prophetic starting point, and an established prophetic waymark. Extending 250 years into the future brings you to 207 BC, which is the history between the battles of Raphia and Panium. The battle of Raphia and Panium cannot be separated, for they are both engaged in by Antiochus the Great. From the battle of Raphia in 217 BC unto the battle of Panium in 200 BC is seventeen years. The 2,300-year prophecy identifies a change of dispensation at the beginning, when the third decree restored Judah’s national sovereignty and then at the ending there was a change of dispensation when Christ moved from the holy place to the Most Holy Place. 207 BC represents the change of dispensation of Egyptian rule over Judea, unto the Seleucid dispensation of rule over the glorious land. The dispensation of Seleucid control over the glorious land produced the revolt of the Maccabees in 167 BC.

Ti svjedoci postoje u drugom razdoblju od 250 godina koje je započelo 457. pr. Kr. Toga je datuma započelo Danijelovo proročanstvo o 2.300 godina iz Daniela 8,14. Godina 457. pr. Kr. proročanska je početna točka i utvrđena proročanska oznaka. Protegne li se 250 godina u budućnost, dolazi se do 207. pr. Kr., što je povijest između bitaka kod Rafije i Panija. Bitke kod Rafije i Panija ne mogu se razdvojiti, jer je u obje uključen Antioh Veliki. Od bitke kod Rafije 217. pr. Kr. do bitke kod Panija 200. pr. Kr. proteže se sedamnaest godina. Proročanstvo o 2.300 godina označava promjenu razdoblja na početku, kada je treći dekret obnovio Judinu nacionalnu suverenost, a zatim na završetku, kada je Krist prešao iz Svetinje u Svetinju nad svetinjama. Godina 207. pr. Kr. predstavlja promjenu razdoblja egipatske vlasti nad Judejom u seleukidsko razdoblje vlasti nad slavnom zemljom. Razdoblje seleukidske kontrole nad slavnom zemljom proizvelo je ustanak Makabejaca 167. pr. Kr.

The Nero period of 250 years ends with the history of Constantine the GREAT and the 250 years that conclude between the two battles is the history of Antiochus the GREAT. At the battle of Raphia, Ptolemy IV defeated Antiochus the Great and Ptolemy reigned for seventeen years. Both 250-year periods contain a distinct seventeen-year period. Both end in the history of a ruler who is known as the GREAT. Both 250-year periods begin at an established prophetic waymark and they both end at an established prophetic waymark.

Neronovo razdoblje od 250 godina završava s poviješću Konstantina VELIKOGA, a 250 godina koje se zaključuju između dviju bitaka jest povijest Antioha VELIKOGA. U bitci kod Rafije Ptolemej IV. porazio je Antioha Velikoga, a Ptolemej je vladao sedamnaest godina. Oba razdoblja od 250 godina sadrže zasebno sedamnaestogodišnje razdoblje. Oba završavaju u povijesti vladara koji je poznat kao VELIKI. Oba razdoblja od 250 godina započinju na utvrđenom proročkom orijentiru i oba završavaju na utvrđenom proročkom orijentiru.

The United States began on July 4, 1776 and 250 years later brings you to July 4, 2026 when Donald Trump, who is known as the one seeking to make America “great,” is going to celebrate those 250 years. 2026, like unto the 250 years from 457 BC concludes in the middle of the history of the modern battles of Raphia and Panium, known as the Ukrainian and Third World War. The reign of a southern king, the period of the first Sunday law and the period from the battle of Raphia to Panium provide three periods of seventeen years that are all connected with the same prophetic history. Three 250-year periods all arrive together in the same prophetic histories. The three periods of 250 years establish three lines of prophetic truth with history associated with Donald Trump, represented as either Constantine the Great, or Antiochus the Great.

Sjedinjene Američke Države započele su 4. srpnja 1776., a 250 godina kasnije dovodi vas do 4. srpnja 2026., kada će Donald Trump, koji je poznat kao onaj koji nastoji učiniti Ameriku „velikom“, proslaviti tih 250 godina. Godina 2026., poput 250 godina od 457. pr. Kr., završava usred povijesti suvremenih bitaka kod Rafije i Panija, poznatih kao ukrajinski i Treći svjetski rat. Vladavina južnoga kralja, razdoblje prvoga zakona o nedjelji i razdoblje od bitke kod Rafije do Panija pružaju tri razdoblja od sedamnaest godina koja su sva povezana s istom proročkom poviješću. Tri razdoblja od 250 godina sva zajedno prispijevaju u iste proročke povijesti. Ta tri razdoblja od 250 godina uspostavljaju tri linije proročke istine s poviješću povezanom s Donaldom Trumpom, predstavljenim ili kao Konstantin Veliki ili kao Antioh Veliki.

The three lines of 250 years provide three different, but complementary illustrations of the latter days. Nero’s line identifies the seventeen-year history of compromise that perfectly speaks to the prophetic characteristics of the formation of the image of the beast.

Tri razdoblja od po 250 godina pružaju tri različita, ali komplementarna prikaza posljednjih dana. Neronska linija prepoznaje sedamnaestogodišnju povijest kompromisa koja savršeno izražava proročke značajke oblikovanja slike Zvijeri.

> “The Lord has shown me clearly that the image of the beast will be formed before probation closes; for it is to be the great test for the people of God, by which their eternal destiny will be decided. Your position is such a jumble of inconsistencies that but few will be deceived.

> „Gospodin mi je jasno pokazao da će se slika zvijeri oblikovati prije završetka vremena milosti; jer ona treba biti velika kušnja za Božji narod, po kojoj će se odlučiti njihova vječna sudbina. Vaše je stajalište takva zbrka nedosljednosti da će tek rijetki biti zavedeni.“

> “In Revelation 13 this subject is plainly presented; [Revelation 13:11–17, quoted].

> „U Otkrivenju 13 ta je tema jasno izložena; [Otkrivenje 13,11–17, citirano].“

> “This is the test that the people of God must have before they are sealed. All who proved their loyalty to God by observing His law, and refusing to accept a spurious sabbath, will rank under the banner of the Lord God Jehovah, and will receive the seal of the living God. Those who yield the truth of heavenly origin and accept the Sunday sabbath, will receive the mark of the beast.” Manuscript Releases, volume 15, 15.

> „Ovo je kušnja koju Božji narod mora proći prije nego što bude zapečaćen. Svi koji su dokazali svoju vjernost Bogu držeći Njegov zakon i odbijajući prihvatiti lažnu subotu, stat će pod stijeg Gospoda Boga Jehove i primit će pečat živoga Boga. Oni koji se odreknu istine nebeskog podrijetla i prihvate nedjeljnu subotu, primit će žig zvijeri.” Manuscript Releases, svezak 15, 15.

The image of the beast is the combination of church and state, with the church in control of the relationship. The compromise of Constantine in attempting to bring paganism together with Christianity is the classic example of the compromise of the latter days.

Slika zvijeri jest spoj crkve i države, pri čemu crkva upravlja tim odnosom. Konstantinov kompromis, kojim je nastojao sjediniti poganstvo s kršćanstvom, klasičan je primjer kompromisa posljednjih dana.

> “In the movements now in progress in the United States to secure for the institutions and usages of the church the support of the state, Protestants are following in the steps of papists. Nay, more, they are opening the door for the papacy to regain in Protestant America the supremacy which she has lost in the Old World. And that which gives greater significance to this movement is the fact that the principal object contemplated is the enforcement of Sunday observance—a custom which originated with Rome, and which she claims as the sign of her authority. It is the spirit of the papacy—the spirit of conformity to worldly customs, the veneration for human traditions above the commandments of God—that is permeating the Protestant churches and leading them on to do the same work of Sunday exaltation which the papacy has done before them.

> „U pokretima koji su sada u tijeku u Sjedinjenim Državama da se ustanovama i običajima crkve osigura potpora države, protestanti idu stopama papista. Štoviše, oni otvaraju vrata da papinstvo u protestantskoj Americi ponovno zadobije vrhovništvo koje je izgubilo u Starome svijetu. A ono što ovomu pokretu daje još veće značenje jest činjenica da je glavni cilj koji se ima na umu nametanje svetkovanja nedjelje — običaja koji potječe iz Rima i za koji ona tvrdi da je znak njezina autoriteta. Duh papinstva — duh prilagođavanja svjetovnim običajima, štovanje ljudskih predaja iznad Božjih zapovijedi — prožima protestantske crkve i vodi ih da čine isto djelo uzdizanja nedjelje koje je papinstvo činilo prije njih.“

> “If the reader would understand the agencies to be employed in the soon-coming contest, he has but to trace the record of the means which Rome employed for the same object in ages past. If he would know how papists and Protestants united will deal with those who reject their dogmas, let him see the spirit which Rome manifested toward the Sabbath and its defenders.

> „Ako bi čitatelj želio razumjeti sredstva koja će se upotrijebiti u uskoro nadolazećem sukobu, treba samo slijediti zapis o sredstvima kojima se Rim služio za isti cilj u prošlim vjekovima. Ako želi znati kako će papisti i protestanti, ujedinjeni, postupati s onima koji odbacuju njihove dogme, neka vidi duh koji je Rim pokazao prema suboti i njezinim braniteljima.

> “Royal edicts, general councils, and church ordinances sustained by secular power were the steps by which the pagan festival attained its position of honor in the Christian world. The first public measure enforcing Sunday observance was the law enacted by Constantine. (A.D. 321) This edict required townspeople to rest on ‘the venerable day of the sun,’ but permitted countrymen to continue their agricultural pursuits. Though virtually a heathen statute, it was enforced by the emperor after his nominal acceptance of Christianity.” The Great Controversy, 574.

> „Kraljevski edikti, opći sabori i crkvene odredbe poduprte svjetovnom vlašću bili su koraci kojima je poganski blagdan zadobio svoj počasni položaj u kršćanskome svijetu. Prva javna mjera kojom se nametalo svetkovanje nedjelje bio je zakon što ga je donio Konstantin. (A.D. 321) Ovaj je edikt zahtijevao da stanovnici gradova počivaju na ‘časnom danu sunca’, ali je seoskom stanovništvu dopuštao da nastavi svoje poljodjelske poslove. Premda je u biti bio poganski zakon, car ga je proveo nakon svojega nominalnog prihvaćanja kršćanstva.” The Great Controversy, 574.

The progression of compromise that led to, and will again lead to the Sunday law is represented with the seventeen-year period from 313 to 330, with the first Sunday law of 321 as the midpoint of the history. At the beginning was a marriage of east and west, and at the end was the divorce of east and west. The first Sunday law is the middle waymark representing rebellion, just as the thirteenth letter of the Hebrew alphabet, when preceded by the first letter and followed by the twenty-second and last letter of the alphabet makes up the Hebrew word truth. Marriage at the beginning and divorce at the end identifies the alpha letter in agreement with the omega letter. The period of 250-years that began with Nero has the signature of Christ, and it speaks to a subject of present truth in the latter days.

Napredovanje kompromisa koje je dovelo do, i koje će ponovno dovesti do nedjeljnoga zakona prikazano je sedamnaestogodišnjim razdobljem od 313. do 330., pri čemu je prvi nedjeljni zakon iz 321. srednja točka te povijesti. Na početku je bio brak istoka i zapada, a na kraju razvod istoka i zapada. Prvi nedjeljni zakon jest srednji orijentir koji predstavlja pobunu, baš kao što trinaesto slovo hebrejskoga alfabeta, kada mu prethodi prvo slovo, a slijedi ga dvadeset drugo i posljednje slovo alfabeta, tvori hebrejsku riječ za istinu. Brak na početku i razvod na kraju poistovjećuju slovo alfa sa slovom omega. Razdoblje od 250 godina koje je započelo s Neronom nosi Kristov pečat i govori o predmetu sadašnje istine u posljednjim danima.

The 250-year period that begins with 457 BC is emphasizing the statecraft represented by Antiochus the Great as he stands within the seventeen-year period from Raphia to Panium. We understand it as statecraft, for in 457 BC a prophecy of 2,300 years also began. The 2,300 years is the internal line of prophecy that speaks to God’s work of redemption, which aligns with a symbol of churchcraft. Unlike the 250-year period that began with Nero, the period that begins in 457 BC is addressing the political role of the last American president who is seeking to make America and then the world great, as he promotes the erroneous Catholic concept of a golden age of a thousand years of peace.

Razdoblje od 250 godina koje započinje 457. pr. Kr. naglašava državničko umijeće predstavljeno Antiohom Velikim dok stoji unutar sedamnaestogodišnjeg razdoblja od Rafije do Panija. Razumijemo ga kao državničko umijeće, jer je 457. pr. Kr. također započelo proročanstvo od 2.300 godina. Tih 2.300 godina unutarnja je proročka linija koja govori o Božjem djelu otkupljenja, što je usklađeno sa simbolom crkvenoga umijeća. Za razliku od razdoblja od 250 godina koje je započelo s Neronom, razdoblje koje započinje 457. pr. Kr. obraća se političkoj ulozi posljednjega američkog predsjednika koji nastoji Ameriku, a zatim i svijet, učiniti velikima, dok promiče pogrešan katolički koncept zlatnoga doba od tisuću godina mira.

The 250 years of the United States, who is the earth beast of Revelation thirteen identifies the conclusion of the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, that ends where it began, in the midst of war. The victors of history, define the record of history that is preserved. The globalist dragon powered Democrats, view the current anarchy as a revolution, and the all-talk and no action Republicans view this current history as a civil war. The Democrats are representatives of the dragon of Bible prophecy, and the Republicans are represented as apostate Protestants, or in the terms of John in Revelation sixteen, they are the false prophet. The United States began in a war of revolution and it ends with a war of revolution. The Republican party began in a civil war and they end in a civil war. Republicans see the civil war that Democrats call a revolution.

Dvjestopedeset godina Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, koje su zemaljska zvijer iz trinaestog poglavlja Otkrivenja, označava zaključak šestoga kraljevstva biblijskog proročanstva, koje završava ondje gdje je i započelo, usred rata. Pobjednici povijesti određuju zapis povijesti koji se čuva. Demokrati, koje pokreće globalistički zmaj, sadašnje bezakonje promatraju kao revoluciju, a republikanci, koji su puni riječi, a bez djela, ovu sadašnju povijest promatraju kao građanski rat. Demokrati su predstavnici zmaja biblijskog proročanstva, a republikanci su prikazani kao otpali protestanti, ili, riječima Ivana u Otkrivenju šesnaest, oni su lažni prorok. Sjedinjene Američke Države započele su ratom revolucije i završavaju ratom revolucije. Republikanska stranka započela je u građanskom ratu i završava u građanskom ratu. Republikanci vide građanski rat koji demokrati nazivaju revolucijom.

Trump, as the last Republican president possesses the prophetic attributes of the first Republican president, who arrived in the external history of the Civil War. Lincoln’s external Civil War was also the internal history of Isaiah’s prophecy of chapter seven, verse eight that ended in 1863, the very year of the Emancipation Proclamation. The distinction between the two parties is a primary and foundational prophetic principle. It began with Cain and Abel, who in the time of Christ were represented by the Sadducees and the Pharisees, two classes of Cain who were to murder one Abel.

Trump, kao posljednji republikanski predsjednik, posjeduje proročke atribute prvoga republikanskog predsjednika, koji se pojavio u izvanjskoj povijesti Građanskoga rata. Lincolnov izvanjski Građanski rat bio je također unutarnja povijest Izaijina proročanstva iz sedmoga poglavlja, osmoga retka, koje je završilo 1863., upravo one godine kada je proglašena Proklamacija o emancipaciji. Razlika između dviju stranaka primarno je i temeljno proročko načelo. Ono je započelo s Kajinom i Abelom, koji su u Kristovo vrijeme bili predstavljeni saducejima i farizejima, dvjema klasama Kajina koje su trebale ubiti jednoga Abela.

The Pharisees and Sadducees represent those who agreed to crucify their Messiah, for different reasons, but agreement—just the same. The Pharisees professed to uphold the law, but didn’t, as with Republicans. The Pharisees professed to uphold the original divine law, but interpreted the law through their own bigoted logic. The original Law for the Pharisees is the Constitution for the Republicans, the very Constitution they claim to support, but don’t. The Sadducees rejected the power of God, and though a smaller sect than the Pharisees, the Sadducees controlled the religious and political landscape of Judea in the time of Christ. The Democrats are a smaller sect than the Republicans, so small they must cheat to stay in power, but stay in power they do, for their opponents who profess to uphold equal justice for all, do nothing to enforce the principles of the law they profess to uphold.

Farizeji i saduceji predstavljaju one koji su pristali razapeti svoga Mesiju, iz različitih razloga, ali ipak u suglasju. Farizeji su tvrdili da podupiru zakon, ali to nisu činili, kao i republikanci. Farizeji su tvrdili da podupiru izvorni božanski zakon, ali su zakon tumačili kroz vlastitu pristranu logiku. Izvorni Zakon za farizeje jest ono što je Ustav za republikance, upravo onaj Ustav za koji tvrde da ga podupiru, ali ga ne podupiru. Saduceji su odbacivali Božju silu, i premda su bili manja sljedba od farizeja, saduceji su u Kristovo vrijeme upravljali vjerskim i političkim krajolikom Judeje. Demokrati su manja sljedba od republikanaca, toliko malena da moraju varati kako bi ostali na vlasti, ali na vlasti ipak ostaju, jer njihovi protivnici, koji tvrde da podupiru jednaku pravdu za sve, ne čine ništa da provedu načela zakona za koja tvrde da ih podupiru.

There is nothing new under the sun, and the two political parties in the United States are as much a part of the prophetic landscape as were the Pharisees and Sadducees. There are of course many other parallels along this prophetic line, but it is only when you see the prophetic relationship of the two unholy powers, who though adversaries, become united against holiness, that you then see Ptolemy and Uzziah in the proper light. Both southern kings attempted to sacrifice at the same temple, but Ptolemy, from Egypt represents a dragon power—the Democrats. Uzziah, as king of Judea is the leader of the glorious land, who is apostate Protestantism, or the false prophet—the Republicans.

Nema ničega nova pod suncem, i dvije političke stranke u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama jednako su dio proročkog krajolika kao što su to bili farizeji i saduceji. Naravno, postoje i mnoge druge usporednice duž te proročke crte, ali tek kada uvidite proročki odnos dviju nesvetih sila, koje se, premda protivnice, ujedinjuju protiv svetosti, tada Ptolemeja i Uziju sagledavate u pravome svjetlu. Oba su južna kralja pokušala prinijeti žrtvu u istome hramu, ali Ptolemej, iz Egipta, predstavlja zmajsku silu — demokrate. Uzija, kao kralj Judeje, vođa je slavne zemlje, koji je otpali protestantizam, odnosno lažni prorok — republikanci.

The relationship of the dragon and false prophet is classically represented at Mount Carmel. At the mount, Ahab represented the dragon and Jezebel’s prophets of Baal and Ashtaroth represented the false prophets who stood against Elijah. The beast that is Jezebel was still behind the scenes in Samaria. The dragon united with the false prophet was also represented by pagan Rome and the Jews unification at the cross, as will be the unification of the Democrats and the Republicans at the Sunday law. The elements of a united power are represented by the Democrats and Republicans within the Republican horn of the earth beast. Those two unholy political powers are represented by Cain, and the line of Abel also possesses a twofold division.

Odnos između zmaja i lažnoga proroka klasično je prikazan na gori Karmelu. Na gori je Ahab predstavljao zmaja, a Jezabelini proroci Baala i Aštarote predstavljali su lažne proroke koji su stajali protiv Ilije. Zvijer koja je Jezabela još je uvijek bila u pozadini, u Samariji. Zmaj ujedinjen s lažnim prorokom također je bio prikazan u ujedinjenju poganskoga Rima i Židova na križu, kao što će biti i ujedinjenje demokrata i republikanaca pri nedjeljnom zakonu. Sastavni dijelovi ujedinjene sile prikazani su demokratima i republikancima unutar republikanskoga roga zemaljske zvijeri. Te dvije nesvete političke sile prikazane su Kajinom, a i Abelova loza posjeduje dvostruku podjelu.

Abel’s line, which in relation to Cain’s external line is the internal line, and is represented by two classes of virgins. The progression of the Protestant horn of the earth beast that is the United States is represented by a series of religious purging’s beginning with the church of Sardis in 1798, when the United States became the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Sardis was a church who had a name claiming that it lived, but it was dead. By 1798 the Protestant sects that had broken away from the papal church were already returning to Rome. Christians were first named Christians in Antioch.

Abelova loza, koja je u odnosu na Kajinovu izvanjsku lozu unutarnja loza, predstavljena je dvjema skupinama djevica. Napredovanje protestantskoga roga zvijeri iz zemlje, a to su Sjedinjene Države, predstavljeno je nizom vjerskih pročišćenja koja započinju s crkvom u Sardu godine 1798., kada su Sjedinjene Države postale šesto kraljevstvo biblijskoga proročanstva. Sard je bio crkva koja je imala ime da živi, ali je bila mrtva. Do 1798. protestantske sljedbe koje su se odvojile od papinske crkve već su se vraćale Rimu. Kršćani su prvi put nazvani kršćanima u Antiohiji.

> “It was in Antioch that the disciples were first called Christians. The name was given them because Christ was the main theme of their preaching, their teaching, and their conversation. Continually they were recounting the incidents that had occurred during the days of His earthly ministry, when His disciples were blessed with His personal presence. Untiringly they dwelt upon His teachings and His miracles of healing. With quivering lips and tearful eyes they spoke of His agony in the garden, His betrayal, trial, and execution, the forbearance and humility with which He had endured the contumely and torture imposed upon Him by His enemies, and the Godlike pity with which He had prayed for those who persecuted Him. His resurrection and ascension, and His work in heaven as the Mediator for fallen man, were topics on which they rejoiced to dwell. Well might the heathen call them Christians, since they preached Christ and addressed their prayers to God through Him.

> „U Antiohiji su učenici prvi put bili nazvani kršćanima. To im je ime dano zato što je Krist bio glavna tema njihova propovijedanja, njihova poučavanja i njihova razgovora. Neprestano su pripovijedali događaje koji su se zbili u danima Njegove zemaljske službe, kada su Njegovi učenici bili blagoslovljeni Njegovom osobnom prisutnošću. Neumorno su se zadržavali na Njegovim učenjima i Njegovim čudima iscjeljenja. Drhtećim usnama i suznim očima govorili su o Njegovoj agoniji u vrtu, Njegovoj izdaji, suđenju i pogubljenju, o strpljivosti i poniznosti s kojima je podnio porugu i mučenje što su Mu ih nametnuli Njegovi neprijatelji, i o božanskom sažaljenju s kojim je molio za one koji su Ga progonili. Njegovo uskrsnuće i uzašašće, te Njegovo djelo na nebu kao Posrednika za paloga čovjeka, bile su teme na kojima su se s radošću zadržavali. S pravom su ih pogani mogli nazivati kršćanima, budući da su propovijedali Krista i svoje molitve upućivali Bogu po Njemu.“

> “It was God who gave to them the name of Christian. This is a royal name, given to all who join themselves to Christ. It was of this name that James wrote later, ‘Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats? Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called?’ James 2:6, 7. And Peter declared, ‘If any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf.’ ‘If ye be reproached for the name of Christ, happy are ye; for the spirit of glory and of God resteth upon you.’ 1 Peter 4:16, 14.” Acts of the Apostles, 157.

> „Bog im je dao ime kršćani. To je kraljevsko ime, dano svima koji se sjedinjuju s Kristom. O tom je imenu Jakov kasnije pisao: ‘Ne tlače li vas bogataši i ne vuku li vas pred sudove? Ne hule li oni na ono krasno ime kojim ste nazvani?’ Jakov 2,6. 7. A Petar je izjavio: ‘Ako li tko trpi kao kršćanin, neka se ne stidi, nego neka slavi Boga zbog toga.’ ‘Ako vas pogrđuju zbog imena Kristova, blago vama, jer Duh slave i Duh Božji počiva na vama.’ 1. Petrova 4,16. 14.” Djela apostolska, 157.

The church of Ephesus was given the name of Christian which led to the persecuted church of Smyrna, that was followed by the church of compromise in the history of Pergamos. When the papacy took the throne, a separation identified God’s true church as the church in the wilderness. The Roman church was Thyatira. At the ending of the wilderness of twelve hundred and sixty years, the church of Protestantism arose, and from that point onward the Protestant horn is represented by a divine series of tests and purges.

Efeškoj crkvi bilo je dano ime kršćanske, što je dovelo do progonjene crkve Smirne, nakon koje je u povijesti Pergama uslijedila crkva kompromisa. Kad je papinstvo preuzelo prijestolje, razdvajanje je Božju pravu crkvu označilo kao crkvu u pustinji. Rimska je crkva bila Tijatira. Pri završetku pustinje od tisuću dvjesto i šezdeset godina pojavila se crkva protestantizma, i od te točke nadalje protestantski je rog prikazan božanskim nizom kušnji i čišćenja.

Protestantism began when Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses upon the door in 1517, and “23” years later in 1540 the Jesuit order began. In 2013 the 95th and final presentation of Habakkuk’s Tables was nailed to the door, and on March 13, 2013¸ the first Jesuit pope was inaugurated. Martin Luther was excommunicated in that very history by pope Leo. Go figure…

Protestantizam je započeo kada je Martin Luther 1517. pribio svojih 95 teza na vrata, a „23” godine kasnije, 1540., započeo je isusovački red. Godine 2013. 95. i posljednje izlaganje Habakukovih Tablica bilo je pribijeno na vrata, a 13. ožujka 2013. inauguriran je prvi isusovački papa. Martin Luther bio je izopćen upravo u toj povijesti od pape Lea. Prosudite sami…

In 1798 the church of Sardis claimed to hold to the name of “Protestant,” but by returning to Rome they were already failing to uphold their name. When Millerite Adventism took the torch of Protestantism in 1844, they represented a rebuke against Jeroboam the first king of Israel, a nation who were blood relatives of the tribe in Judah, where God had placed His temple. Jeroboam set up a counterfeit, based upon the religion that represented his nation’s former bondage. He repeated Aaron’s foundational rebellion of erecting an image of a beast with all the prophetic significance associated with the story. But at his dedication service Millerite Adventism rebuked his unwillingness to continue to direct true worship to the sanctuary where God lives. Jeroboam, wanted the focus of worship to be in Bethel and Dan, representing those from Sardis in 1844 who refused to follow Christ into the Most Holy Place.

Godine 1798. crkva u Sardu tvrdila je da drži ime „protestantska“, ali vraćajući se Rimu već nije uspijevala opravdati svoje ime. Kada je mileritski adventizam 1844. preuzeo baklju protestantizma, predstavljao je ukor Jeroboamu, prvome kralju Izraela, naroda koji je bio krvno srodan plemenu u Judi, gdje je Bog postavio svoj hram. Jeroboam je uspostavio krivotvorinu, zasnovanu na religiji koja je predstavljala prijašnje ropstvo njegova naroda. Ponovio je Aronovu temeljnu pobunu podignuvši lik zvijeri sa svim proročkim značenjem povezanim s tim izvještajem. Ali na svojoj posvetnoj službi mileritski adventizam ukorio je njegovu nespremnost da nastavi usmjeravati istinsko bogoslužje prema Svetištu u kojem Bog prebiva. Jeroboam je želio da središte bogoslužja bude u Betelu i Danu, predstavljajući one iz Sarda 1844. godine koji su odbili slijediti Krista u Svetinju nad svetinjama.

Millerite Adventism chose to return to the religion of Rome, and took up the very doctrinal arguments of those who had just been exposed as false prophets through their rejection of Miller’s message; as their theological masters in order to justify their rejection of the prophetic message of the seven times. Millerite Adventism, as with the disobedient prophet chose their own path, instead of following God’s direction. The path that is chosen by the foolish in all the tests and purges of the wise and foolish virgins from the Protestant reformation onward in prophetic history is the path which returns to the worship of the land that you were delivered from, and as they say, “all roads lead to Rome.” All roads except Jeremiah’s old paths.

Mileritski adventizam odlučio se vratiti religiji Rima te je, kako bi opravdao svoje odbacivanje proročke poruke o sedam vremena, prihvatio upravo one doktrinarne argumente onih koji su upravo bili razotkriveni kao lažni proroci svojim odbacivanjem Millerove poruke, kao svoje teološke učitelje. Mileritski adventizam, kao i neposlušni prorok, izabrao je vlastiti put, umjesto da slijedi Božju uputu. Put koji biraju ludi u svim kušnjama i pročišćenjima mudrih i ludih djevica od protestantske reformacije nadalje u proročkoj povijesti jest put koji se vraća štovanju zemlje iz koje ste bili izbavljeni, i kako kažu: „svi putovi vode u Rim“. Svi putovi osim Jeremijinih starih staza.

The Protestant reformation had been typified by Moses’ return to Egypt in order to lead God’s people into the Promised Land. Once out of the land of captivity God purposed to give His chosen people His law. In the line of Moses and the Protestant reformation rebellion was manifested immediately after the deliverance. God tested Sardis, a people who claimed to have a living name, but were dead by the time of the message of William Miller. Two purging’s took place in 1844; the first was the purge of the church of Sardis, who had claimed to be Protestants, but were proven to be dead; and then the Millerite’s were purged in the same year, in fulfillment of the parable of the ten virgins.

Protestantska reformacija bila je predoznačena Mojsijevim povratkom u Egipat kako bi poveo Božji narod u Obećanu zemlju. Nakon izlaska iz zemlje sužanjstva, Bog je naumio dati svome izabranom narodu svoj zakon. U slijedu Mojsija i protestantske reformacije pobuna se očitovala odmah nakon izbavljenja. Bog je iskušao Sard, narod koji je tvrdio da ima živo ime, ali je u vrijeme poruke Williama Millera bio mrtav. Godine 1844. dogodila su se dva očišćenja: prvo je bilo očišćenje crkve u Sardu, koja je tvrdila da je protestantska, ali se pokazalo da je mrtva; a potom su iste godine bili očišćeni i mileriti, kao ispunjenje prispodobe o deset djevica.

The Democrats and Republicans represent two political classes that together make up the Republican horn on the earth beast of Revelation thirteen. The wise and foolish virgins are two religious classes that together make up the Protestant horn on the earth beast. The wise virgins possess the first name given at Antioch. The wise virgins are Christians, but they are also Philadelphians who have the promise of receiving a name.

Demokrati i republikanci predstavljaju dvije političke klase koje zajedno tvore republikanski rog na zemaljskoj zvijeri iz Otkrivenja trinaest. Mudre i lude djevice dvije su vjerske klase koje zajedno tvore protestantski rog na zemaljskoj zvijeri. Mudre djevice posjeduju prvo ime dano u Antiohiji. Mudre djevice su kršćani, ali su također i Filadelfijci koji imaju obećanje da će primiti ime.

> Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name. Revelation 3:12.

> Onoga koji pobijedi učinit ću stupom u hramu Boga svojega, i više neće izići van; i napisat ću na njemu ime Boga svojega i ime grada Boga svojega, novoga Jeruzalema, koji silazi s neba od Boga mojega; i napisat ću na njemu svoje novo ime. Otkrivenje 3,12.

The first time God named His people Christian was at Antioch, and the history where the Laodicean movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand changes unto the Philadelphian movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand is also the history of Antiochus the Great, who the city of Antioch is named after, and who is represented at the end of a 250-year period between the battles of Raphia and Panium.

Prvi put kada je Bog svoj narod nazvao kršćanima bilo je u Antiohiji, a povijest u kojoj se laodicejski pokret sto četrdeset i četiri tisuće mijenja u filadelfijski pokret sto četrdeset i četiri tisuće također je povijest Antioha Velikoga, po kojemu je grad Antiohija dobio ime i koji je prikazan na kraju razdoblja od 250 godina između bitaka kod Raphije i Panija.

We will continue these things in the next article.

O tim ćemo stvarima nastaviti u sljedećem članku.

Back to Articles