Article

# The Book of Daniel - Number One-Hundred and Seventy-Three

Knjiga proroka Daniela – sto sedamdeset i tri

The Papal Shadows: Unveiling the Influence and Intentions Behind “Hitler’s Pope”

Papinske sjene: razotkrivanje utjecaja i namjera iza „Hitlerova pape”

Author

Jeff Pippenger

Published

April 3, 2024

Formats

PDF
Word
Song MP3

In the book titled, Hitler’s Pope, the author John Cornwell starts the story of the future pope who reigned when Hitler ruled Germany, with his grandfather and Pope Pius IX, who were driven out of the City of Rome. When Pius IX fled from the city of Rome, disguised as a nun, the only man he took with him was the future pope’s grandfather. Cornwall addresses the close relationship of the two men, and thereafter identifies how the future pope’s father also was connected with the power center of the Catholic Church. In doing so he identifies the social, political and religious environment of the history from the time of Pius IX, through World War II. The overview of history is tremendously informative.

U knjizi pod naslovom Hitlerov papa autor John Cornwell započinje priču o budućem papi koji je vladao kada je Hitler vladao Njemačkom, s njegovim djedom i papom Pijem IX., koji su bili protjerani iz grada Rima. Kada je Pio IX. pobjegao iz grada Rima, prerušen u časnu sestru, jedini čovjek kojega je poveo sa sobom bio je djed budućega pape. Cornwell razmatra blizak odnos te dvojice ljudi, a zatim pokazuje kako je i otac budućega pape bio povezan sa središtem moći Katoličke Crkve. Čineći to, on predočuje društveno, političko i religijsko okruženje povijesti od vremena Pija IX. pa sve do Drugoga svjetskog rata. Taj pregled povijesti iznimno je informativan.

> “Another step in papal assumption was taken, when, in the eleventh century, Pope Gregory VII proclaimed the perfection of the Roman Church. Among the propositions which he put forth was one declaring that the church had never erred, nor would it ever err, according to the Scriptures. But the Scripture proofs did not accompany the assertion. The proud pontiff also claimed the power to depose emperors, and declared that no sentence which he pronounced could be reversed by anyone, but that it was his prerogative to reverse the decisions of all others.

> „Još je jedan korak u papinskom uzdizanju bio poduzet kada je, u jedanaestom stoljeću, papa Grgur VII. proglasio savršenstvo Rimske Crkve. Među tvrdnjama koje je iznio bila je i ona kojom se izjavljuje da Crkva nikada nije pogriješila niti će ikada pogriješiti, prema Svetome pismu. No biblijski dokazi nisu pratili tu tvrdnju. Oholi je pontif također prisvajao vlast da svrgava careve te je izjavio da nijednu presudu koju on izrekne nitko ne može opozvati, dok je njegova povlastica bila opozvati odluke svih drugih.“

> “A striking illustration of the tyrannical character of this advocate of infallibility was given in his treatment of the German emperor, Henry IV. For presuming to disregard the pope’s authority, this monarch was declared to be excommunicated and dethroned. Terrified by the desertion and threats of his own princes, who were encouraged in rebellion against him by the papal mandate, Henry felt the necessity of making his peace with Rome. In company with his wife and a faithful servant he crossed the Alps in midwinter, that he might humble himself before the pope. Upon reaching the castle whither Gregory had withdrawn, he was conducted, without his guards, into an outer court, and there, in the severe cold of winter, with uncovered head and naked feet, and in a miserable dress, he awaited the pope’s permission to come into his presence. Not until he had continued three days fasting and making confession, did the pontiff condescend to grant him pardon. Even then it was only upon condition that the emperor should await the sanction of the pope before resuming the insignia or exercising the power of royalty. And Gregory, elated with his triumph, boasted that it was his duty to pull down the pride of kings.” The Great Controversy, 57.

> „Upečatljiva ilustracija tiranskoga karaktera ovoga zagovornika nezabludivosti pružena je u njegovu postupanju prema njemačkom caru Henriku IV. Zato što se usudio zanemariti papin autoritet, ovome je vladaru objavljeno da je izopćen i svrgnut s prijestolja. Prestravljen napuštanjem i prijetnjama vlastitih knezova, koji su bili potaknuti na pobunu protiv njega papinskim nalogom, Henrik je osjetio nužnost da se pomiri s Rimom. U pratnji svoje žene i vjernoga sluge prešao je Alpe usred zime, kako bi se ponizio pred papom. Stigavši do dvorca u koji se Grgur bio povukao, bio je, bez svoje straže, odveden u vanjsko dvorište, i ondje je, na oštroj zimskoj hladnoći, nepokrivene glave i bosih nogu, u bijednoj odjeći, čekao papino dopuštenje da stupi pred njega. Tek nakon što je tri dana ustrajao u postu i ispovijedanju, pontif se udostojao podariti mu oprost. Čak je i tada to bilo samo pod uvjetom da car pričeka papino odobrenje prije nego što ponovno uzme kraljevska obilježja ili vrši kraljevsku vlast. A Grgur, ushićen svojim trijumfom, hvalio se da mu je dužnost oboriti oholost kraljeva.” Velika borba, 57.

Gregory VII was an “advocate of infallibility,” but the ridiculous claim was not made an official doctrine (dogma), until Pius IX, who made the foolish claim an established doctrine at the first Vatican Council. The doctrine was passed July 18, 1870, one hundred and fifty years to the day before the first disappointment of the one hundred and forty-four thousand.

Grgur VII. bio je „zagovornik nepogrešivosti”, no ta smiješna tvrdnja nije bila proglašena službenim naukom (dogmom) sve do Pija IX., koji je tu besmislenu tvrdnju učinio utvrđenim naukom na Prvom vatikanskom saboru. Taj je nauk usvojen 18. srpnja 1870., točno sto i pedeset godina prije prvoga razočaranja sto četrdeset i četiri tisuće.

What is informative about the history is that when Pius IX organized the first Vatican Council, and implemented his doctrine of infallibility, his motivation was brought about by his hatred of what was called “modernism.” It was not rooted in the idea that a pope could make no errors when defining biblical doctrines, it was a defense of the papal opposition to the influence that had been produced by the French Revolution. It was directed against what would ultimately be known as Communism.

Ono što je poučno u vezi s poviješću jest to da je, kada je Pio IX. organizirao Prvi vatikanski sabor i proveo svoj nauk o nezabludivosti, njegova motivacija proizišla iz njegove mržnje prema onome što se nazivalo „modernizmom”. Ona nije bila ukorijenjena u zamisli da papa ne može pogriješiti pri definiranju biblijskih nauka, nego je bila obrana papinskoga protivljenja utjecaju koji je proizvela Francuska revolucija. Bila je usmjerena protiv onoga što će na koncu postati poznato kao komunizam.

The French Revolution brought about an upheaval in the ruling structure of European nations, with a particular hatred for the monarchy that is the papacy. It was an Italian Republican revolt that had temporarily driven Pius IX, and his right-hand man out of Rome. The “modernism,” that was represented by the various philosophies that were produced by the French Revolution was Pius IX’s, arch enemy, and his doctrine of infallibility was designed to sustain every claim that the pope made against the modernists ideas that were produced by the French Revolution.

Francuska revolucija izazvala je prevrat u vladajućem ustrojstvu europskih naroda, uz osobitu mržnju prema monarhiji koja je papinstvo. Talijanski republikanski ustanak bio je taj koji je privremeno istjerao Pija IX. i njegovu desnu ruku iz Rima. „Modernizam”, koji su predstavljale razne filozofije proizašle iz Francuske revolucije, bio je zakleti neprijatelj Pija IX., a njegov nauk o nepogrješivosti bio je osmišljen da podupre svaku tvrdnju koju je papa iznosio protiv modernističkih ideja proizašlih iz Francuske revolucije.

Daniel chapter eleven, verse forty identifies that in 1798, the king of the south (atheistic France), delivered the deadly wound to the king of the north (the papacy).

Daniel, jedanaesto poglavlje, četrdeseti redak, utvrđuje da je 1798. godine kralj juga (ateistička Francuska) zadao smrtonosnu ranu kralju sjevera (papinstvu).

Pius IX’s doctrine of infallibility was connected with the war represented by verse forty of Daniel eleven, and from the latter part of 1869 to the following year Pius IX called together the first Vatican Council, known as Vatican 1, for the purpose of confirming that the pope was the head of Catholicism, and that Catholicism was the head of all the churches, as had been proclaimed by Justinian’s decree in the year 533.

Nauk o nezabludivosti Pija IX. bio je povezan s ratom prikazanim u četrdesetom retku jedanaestog poglavlja Daniela, a od potonjega dijela 1869. do sljedeće godine Pio IX. sazvao je Prvi vatikanski sabor, poznat kao Vaticanum I., sa svrhom da potvrdi kako je papa glava katolicizma i kako je katolicizam glava svih crkava, kao što je bilo proglašeno Justinijanovim dekretom godine 533.

The Second Vatican Council, also known as Vatican II, was held from 1962 to 1965. It was a landmark event in the history of the Catholic Church, and one of the most significant ecumenical councils in modern times. The council convened under the leadership of Pope John XXIII and continued during the pontificate of Pope Paul VI after John XXIII’s death in 1963. It is important to recognize the distinct difference between these two councils.

Drugi vatikanski sabor, također poznat kao Vatikan II., održan je od 1962. do 1965. godine. Bio je to prijeloman događaj u povijesti Katoličke Crkve i jedan od najznačajnijih ekumenskih sabora u novije doba. Sabor je sazvan pod vodstvom pape Ivana XXIII. te je nastavljen tijekom pontifikata pape Pavla VI. nakon smrti Ivana XXIII. 1963. godine. Važno je prepoznati jasnu razliku između ta dva sabora.

The first council was to establish what is called the “primacy,” of the pope, meaning that the pope is the supreme ruler, teacher and shepherd of the Church, responsible for preserving and interpreting the doctrines of faith. His authority consisted in defining dogmas, issuing doctrinal decrees, and making authoritative pronouncements on matters of faith and morals, known as papal infallibility. It includes the pope’s jurisdictional authority over the universal church, including the power to appoint bishops, regulate the sacraments, and govern the church’s administration.

Prvi sabor trebao je ustanoviti ono što se naziva papinim „primatom“, što znači da je papa vrhovni vladar, učitelj i pastir Crkve, odgovoran za očuvanje i tumačenje nauka vjere. Njegova se vlast sastojala u definiranju dogmi, izdavanju doktrinarnih dekreta i davanju autoritativnih izjava o pitanjima vjere i morala, poznatih kao papinska nezabludivost. To uključuje papinu jurisdikcijsku vlast nad sveopćom Crkvom, uključujući ovlast imenovanja biskupa, uređivanja sakramenata i upravljanja crkvenom upravom.

The second council was to redirect the church into an ecumenical entity. The councils were directly opposite propositions. The conservative first council was contradicted by the liberal second council. Those two factions were as different as night and day, and the prophecy that is attributed to the three secrets of Fatima identify an internal war fitly represented by these two councils.

Drugi je sabor trebao preusmjeriti Crkvu u ekumenski entitet. Ti su sabori bili izravno suprotstavljeni prijedlozi. Konzervativnom prvom saboru proturječio je liberalni drugi sabor. Te su se dvije frakcije razlikovale kao noć i dan, a proročanstvo koje se pripisuje trima fatimskim tajnama prepoznaje unutarnji rat, prikladno predstavljen tim dvama saborima.

The prophecy identifies a class who uphold the primacy represented by Pius IX as being represented by what is either called the “white pope,” the “good pope,” or the “good bishop”, and the other class, associated with Vatican II, are represented by the “black pope,” or the “bad pope,” or the “bad bishop.” The controversy of the two political concepts is represented when you visit the shrine of the miracle of Fatima, in Fatima, Portugal. When entering, the walkway is set between a statue of a black pope on one side, and a white pope on the other side.

Proročanstvo prepoznaje skupinu koja podupire primat predstavljen Pijom IX. kao onu koja je prikazana onim koji se naziva ili „bijeli papa”, ili „dobri papa”, ili „dobri biskup”, a druga skupina, povezana s Drugim vatikanskim saborom, prikazana je „crnim papom”, ili „lošim papom”, ili „lošim biskupom”. Spor dvaju političkih koncepata prikazan je kada posjetite svetište čuda u Fatimi, u Fatimi, Portugal. Pri ulasku, prolaz je postavljen između kipa crnog pape s jedne strane i bijelog pape s druge strane.

It therefore becomes part of the heritage of the man that would ultimately become what the book identifies as Hitler’s pope, that his roots are entwined in the struggle between modernism (the king of the south), and papal primacy (the king of the north).

Stoga to postaje dijelom baštine čovjeka koji će na koncu postati ono što knjiga označuje kao Hitlerova papu, tako da su njegovi korijeni isprepleteni u borbi između modernizma (kralja juga) i papinske prevlasti (kralja sjevera).

It is to be understood that the author of the book we are considering was a Catholic of good standing, and his stated purpose for writing the book was to shed light upon the claim that the pope that reigned during World War 2 had supported Hitler, the Nazi’s or had any culpability in the holocaust against the Jews, and others. When Cornwell addresses Pius XII’s grandfather, who was the right-hand man that ordained the Vatican 1 council, the history of the struggle between the kings of the south and north is being acted out in that very history. When the “Republicanism” revolution reached Italy, for about a year, the Italians drove Pius IX out of the city of Rome, and from then on, even after he returned, all the papacy has ever owned was the one hundred and ten acres, known as Vatican City.

Treba razumjeti da je autor knjige koju razmatramo bio katolik na dobru glasu te da je njegova izričita svrha pri pisanju te knjige bila rasvijetliti tvrdnju da je papa koji je vladao tijekom Drugoga svjetskog rata podupirao Hitlera, naciste ili da je snosio bilo kakvu krivnju za holokaust nad Židovima i drugima. Kada se Cornwell osvrće na djeda Pija XII., koji je bio desna ruka čovjeku što je sazvao Prvi vatikanski sabor, povijest borbe između kraljeva juga i sjevera odigrava se upravo u toj povijesti. Kada je revolucija „republikanizma” dosegla Italiju, Talijani su na otprilike godinu dana protjerali Pija IX. iz grada Rima, a otada nadalje, čak i nakon njegova povratka, sve što je papinstvo ikada posjedovalo bilo je sto deset jutara, poznatih kao Vatikanski Grad.

The only way he was even able to return to the Vatican is with the help of French troops, and a loan from the Rothschilds, the infamous Jewish bankers. To intelligently understand the papal complicity in the holocaust during World War II, requires some basic understanding of Europe’s attitude towards the Jews since the crucifixion of Christ. The book suggests that antisemitism and racism are two different attitudes, claiming Hitler’s hatred of the Jews was racist, for Hitler viewed the Jews as a lesser category of human beings, whereas antisemitism was the hatred of the Jews because they killed God. Whether they are one and the same, or there is actually a distinction between the two, the reality of the plight of the Jews is worth understanding.

Jedini način na koji se uopće mogao vratiti u Vatikan bio je uz pomoć francuskih postrojbi i zajma Rothschilda, zloglasnih židovskih bankara. Da bi se razumno razumjela papinska suučesnost u holokaustu tijekom Drugoga svjetskog rata, potrebno je imati neko osnovno razumijevanje europskoga stava prema Židovima od Kristova raspeća. Knjiga sugerira da su antisemitizam i rasizam dva različita stava, tvrdeći da je Hitlerova mržnja prema Židovima bila rasistička, jer je Hitler Židove smatrao nižom kategorijom ljudskih bića, dok je antisemitizam bio mržnja prema Židovima zato što su ubili Boga. Bilo da su to jedno te isto ili među njima doista postoji razlika, stvarnost stradanja Židova vrijedna je razumijevanja.

For instance, in America today if the word “ghetto,” is used most think it is the definition of the poor, run down side of town. But the term “ghetto,” originally referred to a section of a city, especially in Venice, Italy, where Jews were compelled to live during the Middle Ages. The first ghetto was established in Venice in 1516, when the Venetian Republic confined Jews to a designated area of the city known as the “geto nuovo” (new foundry), which eventually became known as the ghetto.

Na primjer, u Americi danas, ako se upotrijebi riječ „getto”, većina misli da je to naziv za siromašan, zapušten dio grada. No izraz „getto” izvorno se odnosio na dio grada, osobito u Veneciji, u Italiji, gdje su Židovi tijekom srednjega vijeka bili prisiljeni živjeti. Prvi geto uspostavljen je u Veneciji 1516. godine, kada je Mletačka Republika ograničila Židove na određeno gradsko područje poznato kao „geto nuovo” (nova ljevaonica), koje je s vremenom postalo poznato kao geto.

In Europe through the Middle Ages, Jews were restricted as to where they could live, and also the professions they were allowed to practice. The restrictions were based upon the old definition of antisemitism, which referred to the belief that the Jews had killed God, and that all of their subsequent problems had been brought upon themselves through their own actions.

U Europi su tijekom srednjega vijeka Židovi bili ograničeni glede mjesta na kojima su smjeli živjeti, kao i glede zanimanja kojima im je bilo dopušteno baviti se. Ograničenja su se temeljila na staroj definiciji antisemitizma, koja se odnosila na uvjerenje da su Židovi ubili Boga te da su svi njihovi kasniji problemi bili navučeni na njih same njihovim vlastitim djelima.

In the Middle Ages, it was an established tradition that Christians could not lend money or accept interest for a loan. The Jews were exempt from that restriction, and lending money became one of the professions that Jews were allowed to perform. The Jewish bankers, such as the Rothschild family, were the money changers in response to legal restrictions against what professions they were allowed to perform. When Pius IX needed funds to return to the Vatican, the frustration of no longer ruling the city of Rome was magnified by his need to reach out to the Jews for money.

U srednjem vijeku bilo je ustaljeno pravilo da kršćani nisu smjeli posuđivati novac niti primati kamate na zajam. Židovi su bili izuzeti od toga ograničenja, te je posuđivanje novca postalo jedno od zanimanja kojima je Židovima bilo dopušteno baviti se. Židovski bankari, poput obitelji Rothschild, bili su mjenjači novca kao odgovor na zakonska ograničenja glede toga kojim su se zanimanjima smjeli baviti. Kada je Pio IX. trebao sredstva da se vrati u Vatikan, ogorčenost zbog toga što više nije vladao gradom Rimom bila je još pojačana njegovom potrebom da se za novac obrati Židovima.

Prior to his being driven out of Rome Pius IX had appeared to be in one of two camps concerning the Jews and the church’s relation to the Jews. The two camps consisted of those who believed the Jews, no matter what happens to them, are simply getting what they deserve, and the other tended to show a little mercy towards the Jews. When Pius IX returned to the Vatican, after being driven out, the mercy he had sometimes manifested prior to his exile was never manifested again. Before his exile he had shut down the ghetto in the city of Rome, and after his return he re-established the ghetto, and began a taxation upon the Jews in order to regroup his financial losses.

Prije nego što je bio protjeran iz Rima, činilo se da je Pio IX. pripadao jednomu od dvaju tabora u pogledu Židova i odnosa Crkve prema Židovima. Ta su se dva tabora sastojala od onih koji su vjerovali da Židovi, ma što im se dogodilo, jednostavno dobivaju ono što zaslužuju, i od drugoga koji je bio sklon pokazati nešto milosrđa prema Židovima. Kada se Pio IX., nakon što je bio protjeran, vratio u Vatikan, milosrđe koje je ponekad očitovao prije svoga progonstva više se nikada nije očitovalo. Prije svoga progonstva ukinuo je geto u gradu Rimu, a nakon svojega povratka ponovno je uspostavio geto i započeo oporezivanje Židova kako bi nadoknadio svoje financijske gubitke.

Pope Pius IX’s right-hand man was Marcantonio Pacelli, the grandfather of Hitler’s pope. He was an attorney that belonged to a special class of attorneys that supported the papacy. His son became part of that same elite class of attorneys, as did his grandson, who would ultimately become Hitler’s pope. After the book runs through the history of Eugenio Pacelli’s grandfather, his father, and his youth and education, it addresses the position that Pacelli took up as he began his work for the papacy. As an attorney, descending from the elite papal attorneys, he was picked to head up a department that specialized in contracts, which are called concords. In 1901 Pacelli was brought into the office of the Papal Secretariat of State.

Desna ruka pape Pija IX. bio je Marcantonio Pacelli, djed Hitlerova pape. Bio je odvjetnik koji je pripadao posebnoj klasi odvjetnika što su podupirali papinstvo. Njegov sin postao je dijelom iste te elitne klase odvjetnika, kao i njegov unuk, koji će naposljetku postati Hitlerov papa. Nakon što knjiga izloži povijest djeda Eugenija Pacellija, njegova oca te njegove mladosti i obrazovanja, obraća se položaju koji je Pacelli preuzeo kada je započeo svoj rad za papinstvo. Kao odvjetnik, potekao iz elitnih papinskih odvjetnika, bio je izabran da vodi odjel specijaliziran za ugovore, koji se nazivaju konkordati. Godine 1901. Pacelli je doveden u ured Papinskoga državnog tajništva.

Pacelli became the envoy to the nations. Prophetically Pacelli became the legal point of contact that consummated the fornication of the kings of the earth with the papacy. In 1903, Pius X was coronated as pope. Immediately he began to attack the “intellectual poison” that produced “relativism and skepticism.” The man who ran Pius X’s effort to eradicate “modernism” was Umberto Benigni, who worked in the same office as Pacelli. Benigni once stated of a group of world-class historians, that they were men for whom, “history is nothing but a continual desperate attempt to vomit. For this sort of human being there is only one remedy: the inquisition!” To Benigni, a historian that expressed any sympathy with the ideas that came from the French Revolution were to be executed.

Pacelli je postao izaslanik narodima. U proročkom smislu Pacelli je postao pravna točka dodira koja je dovršila blud kraljeva zemaljskih s papinstvom. Godine 1903. Pio X. bio je okrunjen za papu. Odmah je počeo napadati „intelektualni otrov” koji je proizvodio „relativizam i skepticizam”. Čovjek koji je vodio nastojanje Pija X. da iskorijeni „modernizam” bio je Umberto Benigni, koji je radio u istom uredu kao i Pacelli. Benigni je jednom izjavio za skupinu povjesničara svjetskoga glasa da su to ljudi kojima „povijest nije ništa drugo doli neprestani očajnički pokušaj povraćanja. Za takvu vrstu ljudskih bića postoji samo jedan lijek: inkvizicija!” Prema Benigniju, povjesničar koji bi izrazio bilo kakvu simpatiju prema idejama proizišlima iz Francuske revolucije trebao je biti pogubljen.

Officially, Benigni ran the propaganda ministry for the papacy, but unofficially he also ran a clandestine spy network, designed to identify any Catholics that had any sympathy for the “modernism,” that had originated with the king of the south. Ultimately in 1910, his work produced a directive that obliged employees of the papacy to swear an oath, called the Antimodernist Oath. It is still in force. To be employed by the Vatican you must swear to a hatred of modernist ideas, which today we would call communistic ideas.

Službeno je Benigni vodio propagandno ministarstvo za papinstvo, ali je neslužbeno upravljao i tajnom špijunskom mrežom, osmišljenom kako bi se utvrdilo koji katolici gaje bilo kakvu naklonost prema „modernizmu“, koji je potekao od kralja juga. Naposljetku je 1910. njegovo djelovanje dovelo do direktive koja je obvezivala službenike papinstva da polože prisegu, nazvanu Antimodernistička prisega. Ona je još uvijek na snazi. Da biste bili zaposleni u Vatikanu, morate se zakleti na mržnju prema modernističkim idejama, koje bismo danas nazvali komunističkim idejama.

In the summary of Cronwell’s book, on the flyleaf it states, “In the first decade of the century, as a brilliant young Vatican lawyer, Pacelli helped shape an ideology of unprecedented papal power; during the 1920’s he employed cunning and blackmail to impose power in Germany. In 1933, Hitler became his perfect negotiating partner and a concordant was established that granted religious and educational advantages to the Catholic Church in exchange for Catholic withdrawal from social and political action. This ‘voluntary’ abdication of political Catholicism imposed from Rome facilitated the rise of Nazism.

U sažetku Cronwellove knjige, na zaštitnom listu stoji: „U prvom desetljeću stoljeća, kao briljantan mladi vatikanski pravnik, Pacelli je pomogao oblikovati ideologiju papinske moći bez presedana; tijekom 1920-ih služio se lukavstvom i ucjenom kako bi nametnuo vlast u Njemačkoj. Godine 1933. Hitler je postao njegov savršeni pregovarački partner te je uspostavljen konkordat koji je Katoličkoj Crkvi dodijelio vjerske i obrazovne povlastice u zamjenu za katoličko povlačenje iz društvenog i političkog djelovanja. Ta ‘dobrovoljna’ abdikacija političkog katolicizma, nametnuta iz Rima, olakšala je uspon nacizma.”

At a cabinet meeting on July 14, 1933, Adolph Hitler expressed his opinion that very month that the concordance manufactured by Pacelli with the Nazi’s gave Germany created “an area of trust…. In the developing struggle against international Jewry.”

Na sjednici vlade 14. srpnja 1933. Adolf Hitler izrazio je mišljenje da je upravo toga mjeseca konkordat koji je Pacelli sklopio s nacistima Njemačkoj stvorio „područje povjerenja…. u razvoju borbe protiv međunarodnog Židovstva.”

Cornwell’s book was not well received by Catholics who refused to accept the evidence that Pacelli was the primary reason that Hitler was able to rise to power, for Germany was a majority of Catholics. Pacelli had struck an agreement that prevented the Catholic publishing house, Catholic news agencies and Catholic schools from saying anything about the direction of Hitler from 1933 onward. The book traces the obvious anti-Semitic bent of Pacelli, who thereafter became the pope during World War II. At least three items can be established on very reliable historical sources from the book.

Cornwellova knjiga nije bila dobro primljena među katolicima koji su odbijali prihvatiti dokaze da je Pacelli bio glavni razlog što je Hitler uspio doći na vlast, jer je Njemačka bila većinski katolička. Pacelli je sklopio sporazum koji je spriječio katoličku izdavačku kuću, katoličke novinske agencije i katoličke škole da od 1933. nadalje govore bilo što o smjeru kojim je Hitler išao. Knjiga prati očiti Pacellijev antisemitski nagib, a on je potom tijekom Drugoga svjetskog rata postao papa. Na temelju knjige mogu se utvrditi najmanje tri činjenice na osnovi vrlo pouzdanih povijesnih izvora.

The first is the warfare of the king of the north and the king of the south, as represented in Daniel chapter eleven. In that warfare the enemies are Catholicism against atheism, the pope against Communism. The other point is that the pope employed Nazism as his proxy army against atheism during World War II, just as the pope employed apostate Protestantism in 1989, as its proxy army against the atheism of the USSR. The book also identifies the internal and external prophetic structure represented by the satanic messages that came forth from the miracle at Fatima.

Prva je rat kralja sjevera i kralja juga, kako je prikazan u jedanaestom poglavlju Daniela. U tom su ratu neprijateljske strane katolicizam protiv ateizma, papa protiv komunizma. Druga je točka da je papa tijekom Drugoga svjetskog rata upotrijebio nacizam kao svoju posredničku vojsku protiv ateizma, baš kao što je papa 1989. upotrijebio otpali protestantizam kao svoju posredničku vojsku protiv ateizma SSSR-a. Knjiga također identificira unutarnju i vanjsku proročku strukturu predstavljenu sotonskim porukama koje su proizišle iz čuda u Fatimi.

The borderline war of Raphia, represented in verses eleven and twelve of Daniel eleven, represent the war of the borderline currently playing out in the Ukraine. The ancient war was a hot war, the second is the second proxy war, with the proxy armies involved in mortal interaction. Raphia identifies the borderline war as being between the king of the north and the king of the south, but prophecy teaches that until the soon coming Sunday law, the whore of Tyre is forgotten, Jezebel is in Samaria, and Herodias skipped Herod’s birthday party. Those three witnesses of the role of the king of the north in this current history, is that she is behind the scenes pulling the strings. The hot wars, proxy wars and cold wars that happen while she is forgotten are accomplished by her proxy armies.

Pogranični rat kod Rafije, prikazan u jedanaestom i dvanaestom retku jedanaestog poglavlja Daniela, predstavlja pogranični rat koji se upravo odigrava u Ukrajini. Drevni rat bio je vrući rat, a drugi je drugi posrednički rat, pri čemu su posredničke vojske uključene u smrtonosni sukob. Rafija prepoznaje pogranični rat kao rat između kralja sjevera i kralja juga, no proročanstvo uči da je sve do uskoro dolazećega nedjeljnog zakona bludnica iz Tira zaboravljena, Jezebela je u Samariji, a Herodijada je preskočila Herodovu rođendansku gozbu. Ta tri svjedoka o ulozi kralja sjevera u ovoj sadašnjoj povijesti jesu da ona iza kulisa povlači konce. Vrući ratovi, posrednički ratovi i hladni ratovi koji se zbivaju dok je ona zaboravljena izvršavaju se po njezinim posredničkim vojskama.

Russia is the king of the south, and it is now involved in a borderline war that is being financed by the globalists of the Western world, primarily the progressive Democrats and RINO (Republican In Name Only) Republicans in the United States. When the United States is represented as the king of the north’s proxy army in verse forty of Daniel eleven, its two prophetic characteristics are military might and financial power. The United States is accomplishing the same work in Ukraine that it did in 1989, helping the Pope against Russia, and the proxy army on the ground, defending Ukraine, is so full of Nazi supporters that even the mainstream media cannot deny it. Rome is now using the same proxy armies that she used in the hot war that was World War II, and in 1989, to war against Russia. Read the book: Hitler’s Pope, the Secret History of Pius XII.

Rusija je kralj juga i sada je uključena u granični rat koji financiraju globalisti zapadnog svijeta, ponajprije progresivni demokrati i RINO republikanci (republikanci samo po imenu) u Sjedinjenim Državama. Kada su Sjedinjene Države u četrdesetom retku jedanaestog poglavlja Daniela prikazane kao posrednička vojska kralja sjevera, njihove dvije proročke značajke jesu vojna moć i financijska snaga. Sjedinjene Države u Ukrajini obavljaju isto djelo koje su činile 1989. godine, pomažući Papi protiv Rusije, a posrednička vojska na terenu, koja brani Ukrajinu, toliko je puna pristaša nacizma da to ni glavni mediji ne mogu zanijekati. Rim sada upotrebljava iste posredničke vojske koje je upotrebljavao u vrućem ratu, Drugom svjetskom ratu, i 1989. godine, za rat protiv Rusije. Pročitajte knjigu: Hitlerov papa, tajna povijest Pija XII.

We will continue this study in the next article.

Ovo ćemo proučavanje nastaviti u sljedećem članku.

> “In like manner, when God was about to open to the beloved John the history of the church for future ages, He gave him an assurance of the Saviour’s interest and care for His people by revealing to him ‘One like unto the Son of man,’ walking among the candlesticks, which symbolized the seven churches. While John was shown the last great struggles of the church with earthly powers, he was also permitted to behold the final victory and deliverance of the faithful. He saw the church brought into deadly conflict with the beast and his image, and the worship of that beast enforced on pain of death. But looking beyond the smoke and din of the battle, he beheld a company upon Mount Zion with the Lamb, having, instead of the mark of the beast, the ‘Father’s name written in their foreheads.’ And again he saw ‘them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name, stand on the sea of glass, having the harps of God’ and singing the song of Moses and the Lamb.

> „Na sličan način, kada je Bog namjeravao ljubljenomu Ivanu otvoriti povijest Crkve za buduća vremena, dao mu je jamstvo Spasiteljeva zanimanja i skrbi za svoj narod otkrivši mu ‘Jednoga slična Sinu čovječjemu’ kako hodi među svijećnjacima, koji su simbolizirali sedam crkava. Dok je Ivanu bilo pokazano posljednje veliko borbe Crkve sa zemaljskim silama, bilo mu je također dopušteno promatrati konačnu pobjedu i izbavljenje vjernih. Vidio je Crkvu dovedenu u smrtonosan sukob sa Zvijeri i njezinim kipom, te kako se pod prijetnjom smrti nameće štovanje te Zvijeri. Ali, gledajući dalje od dima i buke boja, ugledao je mnoštvo na gori Sionu s Janjetom, koje je, umjesto žiga Zvijeri, imalo ‘ime Oca njegova napisano na svojim čelima’. I opet je vidio ‘one koji pobijediše Zvijer i kip njezin, i žig njezin, i broj imena njezina, gdje stoje na staklenome moru i imaju harfe Božje’ te pjevaju pjesmu Mojsijevu i Janjetovu.“

> “These lessons are for our benefit. We need to stay our faith upon God, for there is just before us a time that will try men’s souls. Christ, upon the Mount of Olives, rehearsed the fearful judgments that were to precede His second coming: ‘Ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars.’ ‘Nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. All these are the beginning of sorrows.’ While these prophecies received a partial fulfillment at the destruction of Jerusalem, they have a more direct application to the last days.

> „Ove su pouke za našu korist. Svoju vjeru trebamo osloniti na Boga, jer je upravo pred nama vrijeme koje će iskušati duše ljudi. Krist je na Maslinskoj gori iznio strašne sudove koji su trebali prethoditi Njegovu drugom dolasku: ‘Čut ćete za ratove i glasove o ratovima.’ ‘Ustat će narod protiv naroda i kraljevstvo protiv kraljevstva; i bit će gladi, pošasti i potresa na raznim mjestima. A sve je to početak nevolja.’ Premda su se ta proročanstva djelomično ispunila pri razorenju Jeruzalema, ona se još izravnije odnose na posljednje dane.“

> “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecy is fast fulfilling. The Lord is at the door. There is soon to open before us a period of overwhelming interest to all living. The controversies of the past are to be revived; new controversies will arise. The scenes to be enacted in our world are not yet even dreamed of. Satan is at work through human agencies. Those who are making an effort to change the Constitution and secure a law enforcing Sunday observance little realize what will be the result. A crisis is just upon us.

> „Stojimo na pragu velikih i svečanih događaja. Proročanstvo se brzo ispunjava. Gospodin je pred vratima. Uskoro će se pred nama otvoriti razdoblje od silnoga značenja za sve žive. Sporovi iz prošlosti bit će oživljeni; pojavit će se novi sporovi. Prizori koji će se odigrati u našem svijetu još nisu ni sanjani. Sotona djeluje preko ljudskih oruđa. Oni koji nastoje promijeniti Ustav i ishoditi zakon kojim bi se nametnulo svetkovanje nedjelje malo shvaćaju kakav će biti ishod. Kriza je već neposredno pred nama.״

> “But God’s servants are not to trust to themselves in this great emergency. In the visions given to Isaiah, to Ezekiel, and to John we see how closely heaven is connected with the events taking place upon the earth and how great is the care of God for those who are loyal to Him. The world is not without a ruler. The program of coming events is in the hands of the Lord. The Majesty of heaven has the destiny of nations, as well as the concerns of His church, in His own charge.” Testimonies, volume 5, 752, 753.

> „Ali Božji sluge ne smiju se uzdati u same sebe u ovoj velikoj krizi. U viđenjima danima Izaiji, Ezekielu i Ivanu vidimo koliko je usko nebo povezano s događajima koji se zbivaju na zemlji i kolika je Božja skrb za one koji su Mu odani. Svijet nije bez vladara. Program budućih događaja nalazi se u rukama Gospodnjim. Veličanstvo neba drži sudbinu naroda, kao i potrebe svoje Crkve, u svojoj vlastitoj skrbi.” Testimonies, sv. 5, 752, 753.

Back to Articles