Article

# The Eighth is of the Seven - Number One

Osmi je od Sedmorice – Broj Jedan

Miller’s Two Rome’s

Millerova dva Rima

Author

Jeff Pippenger

Published

September 13, 2023

Formats

PDF
Word
Song MP3

William Miller based his prophetic message upon the framework of two desolating powers, which he correctly identified as pagan Rome and papal Rome.

William Miller utemeljio je svoju proročku poruku na okviru dviju pustošećih sila, koje je ispravno prepoznao kao poganski Rim i papinski Rim.

> “William Miller, when applying his hermeneutic, noticed in the various apocalyptic passages a recurring theme of controversy between the people of God and their enemies. In his analysis of the persecuting powers of God’s people throughout the ages he developed the concept of the two abominations, defined as paganism (the first abomination) symbolizing the persecuting force outside the church, and the papacy (the second abomination) representing the persecuting power within the church. It was the motif of the two abominations that characterized most of his following prophetic interpretations.” P. Gerard Damsteegt, Foundations of the Seventh-day Adventist Message and Mission, 22.

> „William Miller, primjenjujući svoju hermeneutiku, uočio je u raznim apokaliptičkim odlomcima ponavljajuću temu sukoba između Božjega naroda i njegovih neprijatelja. U svojoj analizi progoniteljskih sila Božjega naroda kroz vjekove razvio je pojam dviju gnusoba, određenih kao poganstvo (prva gnusoba), koje simbolizira progoniteljsku silu izvan Crkve, i papinstvo (druga gnusoba), koje predstavlja progoniteljsku vlast unutar Crkve. Motiv dviju gnusoba obilježio je većinu njegovih kasnijih proročkih tumačenja.” P. Gerard Damsteegt, Foundations of the Seventh-day Adventist Message and Mission, 22.

The theologians of Adventism acknowledge the fact that Miller’s framework of prophetic application was the two desolating powers of paganism and papalism, even if they only consider it as an analysis of Millerite history, and not as a truth that was given him by God.

Teolozi adventizma priznaju činjenicu da je okvir Millerove proročke primjene obuhvaćao dvije pustošeće sile, poganstvo i papinstvo, čak i ako to smatraju samo analizom mileritske povijesti, a ne istinom koja mu je bila dana od Boga.

> “God sent His angel to move upon the heart of a farmer who had not believed the Bible, to lead him to search the prophecies. Angels of God repeatedly visited that chosen one, to guide his mind and open to his understanding prophecies which had ever been dark to God’s people. The commencement of the chain of truth was given to him, and he was led on to search for link after link, until he looked with wonder and admiration upon the Word of God. He saw there a perfect chain of truth. That Word which he had regarded as uninspired now opened before his vision in its beauty and glory. He saw that one portion of Scripture explains another, and when one passage was closed to his understanding, he found in another part of the Word that which explained it. He regarded the sacred Word of God with joy and with the deepest respect and awe.” Early Writings, 230.

> „Bog je poslao svoga anđela da djeluje na srce jednoga zemljoradnika koji nije vjerovao Bibliji, kako bi ga poveo da istražuje proročanstva. Božji su anđeli toga izabranika opetovano posjećivali, da upravljaju njegovim umom i otvore njegovu razumijevanju proročanstva koja su Božjem narodu uvijek bila tamna. Njemu je bio dan početak lanca istine, te je bio vođen da istražuje kariku za karikom, dok nije s čuđenjem i divljenjem promatrao Božju Riječ. Ondje je vidio savršen lanac istine. Ta Riječ, koju je smatrao nenadahnutom, sada se otvorila pred njegovim pogledom u svojoj ljepoti i slavi. Vidio je da jedan dio Pisma tumači drugi, i kada bi mu jedan odlomak bio zatvoren za razumijevanje, nalazio je u drugom dijelu Riječi ono što ga je objašnjavalo. Svetu Božju Riječ promatrao je s radošću i s najdubljim poštovanjem i strahopoštovanjem.“ Early Writings, 230.

“His angel” is identified directly as Gabriel by Sister White.

„Njegov anđeo“ sestra White izravno poistovjećuje s Gabrijelom.

> “The words of the angel, ‘I am Gabriel, that stand in the presence of God,’ show that he holds a position of high honor in the heavenly courts. When he came with a message to Daniel, he said, ‘There is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael [Christ] your Prince.’ Daniel 10:21. Of Gabriel the Saviour speaks in the Revelation, saying that ‘He sent and signified it by His angel unto His servant John.’ Revelation 1:1. And to John the angel declared, ‘I am a fellow servant with thee and with thy brethren the prophets.’ Revelation 22:9, R.V. Wonderful thought—that the angel who stands next in honor to the Son of God is the one chosen to open the purposes of God to sinful men.” The Desire of Ages, 99.

> „Riječi anđela: ‘Ja sam Gabrijel, koji stojim pred Bogom’, pokazuju da on zauzima položaj velike časti u nebeskim dvorovima. Kada je došao s porukom Danielu, rekao je: ‘Nema nikoga tko se sa mnom drži u ovome, osim Mihaela [Krista], vašega Kneza.’ Daniel 10:21. O Gabrijelu Spasitelj govori u Otkrivenju, govoreći da je ‘On posla i objavi po svome anđelu svome sluzi Ivanu’. Otkrivenje 1:1. A Ivanu anđeo izjavi: ‘Ja sam susluga tvoj i tvoje braće proroka.’ Otkrivenje 22:9, R.V. Divna li misao — da je anđeo koji po časti stoji odmah do Sina Božjega upravo onaj koji je izabran da otkrije Božje namjere grešnim ljudima.” Čežnja vjekova, 99.

“Wonderful thought—that the angel who stands next in honor to the Son of God is the one chosen to open the purposes of God” to William Miller’s mind. Not only Gabriel, but angels in the plural guided his understanding of the prophecies “which had ever been dark to God’s people.” Gabriel and other angels led Miller through the Bible consecutively from Genesis onward. He therefore was led to the longest time prophecy in the Bible, which is the “seven times” (twenty-five hundred and twenty years) of Leviticus twenty-six, well before he was led to the twenty-three hundred days of Daniel chapter eight and verse fourteen.

„Divna misao — da je anđeo koji po časti stoji odmah do Sina Božjega onaj koji je izabran da otkrije Božje namjere“ umu Williama Millera. Ne samo Gabriel, nego i anđeli u množini vodili su njegovo razumijevanje proročanstava „koja su Božjem narodu oduvijek bila tamna“. Gabriel i drugi anđeli vodili su Millera kroz Bibliju uzastopce, počevši od Postanka nadalje. Stoga je bio doveden do najduljega vremenskog proročanstva u Bibliji, a to su „sedam vremena“ (dvije tisuće petsto dvadeset godina) iz Levitskoga zakonika dvadeset i šest, mnogo prije nego što je bio doveden do dvije tisuće i tristo dana iz Daniela, osmo poglavlje, četrnaesti redak.

> “I then devoted myself to prayer and to the reading of the word. I determined to lay aside all my prepossessions, to thoroughly compare Scripture with Scripture, and to pursue its study in a regular and methodical manner. I commenced with Genesis, and read verse by verse, proceeding no faster than the meaning of the several passages should be so unfolded, as to leave me free from embarrassment respecting any mysticism or contradictions. Whenever I found anything obscure, my practice was to compare it with all collateral passages; and by the help of CRUDEN, I examined all the texts of Scripture in which were found any of the prominent words contained in any obscure portion. Then by letting every word have its proper bearing on the subject of the text, if my view of it harmonized with every collateral passage in the Bible, it ceased to be a difficulty. In this way I pursued the study of the Bible, in my first perusal of it, for about two years, and was fully satisfied that it is its own interpreter. I found that by a comparison of Scripture with history, all the prophecies, as far as they have been fulfilled, had been fulfilled literally; that all the various figures, metaphors, parables, similitudes, etc. of the Bible, were either explained in their immediate connection, or the terms in which they were expressed were defined in other portions of the word, and when thus explained, are to be literally understood in accordance with such explanation. I was thus satisfied that the Bible is a system of revealed truths, so clearly and simply given, that the “wayfaring man, though a fool, need not err therein.’ …

> „Tada sam se posvetio molitvi i čitanju Riječi. Odlučio sam odložiti po strani sve svoje unaprijed stvorene predodžbe, temeljito uspoređivati Pismo s Pismom i pristupiti njegovu proučavanju na uredan i metodičan način. Započeo sam s Postankom i čitao redak po redak, napredujući ne brže nego što bi se značenje pojedinih odlomaka tako razjasnilo da me više ne bi zbunjivao ikakav misticizam ili proturječja. Kad god bih našao nešto nejasno, moja je praksa bila usporediti to sa svim srodnim odlomcima; i uz pomoć CRUDEN-a ispitivao sam sve biblijske tekstove u kojima su se nalazile neke od istaknutih riječi sadržanih u kojem nejasnom dijelu. Zatim, dopuštajući svakoj riječi da ima svoju pravu težinu u odnosu na predmet teksta, ako bi se moje razumijevanje toga usklađivalo sa svakim srodnim odlomkom u Bibliji, to mi više nije predstavljalo poteškoću. Na taj sam način, pri svom prvom čitanju Biblije, nastavio njezino proučavanje oko dvije godine i bio posve uvjeren da je ona sama sebi tumač. Uvidio sam da su, usporedbom Pisma s poviješću, sva proročanstva, koliko god su se ispunila, bila ispunjena doslovno; da su sve različite slike, metafore, prispodobe, usporedbe itd. u Bibliji bile ili objašnjene u svojoj neposrednoj povezanosti, ili su izrazi kojima su bile izrečene bili definirani u drugim dijelovima Riječi, te da ih, kada su tako objašnjene, treba razumjeti doslovno u skladu s takvim objašnjenjem. Tako sam se uvjerio da je Biblija sustav objavljenih istina, dan tako jasno i jednostavno da ni „putnik, makar bio i bezuman, ne mora na njemu zalutati.’ …“

> “From a farther study of the Scriptures, I concluded that the seven times of Gentile supremacy must commence when the Jews ceased to be an independent nation at the captivity of Manasseh, which the best chronologers assigned to B. C. 677; that the 2300 days commenced with the seventy weeks, which the best chronologers dated from B. C. 457; and that the 1335 days commencing with the taking away of the daily, and the setting up of the abomination that maketh desolate, Daniel chapter seven verse eleven, were to be dated from the setting up of the Papal supremacy, after the taking away of Pagan abominations, and which, according to the best historians I could consult, should be dated from about A. D. 508. Reckoning all these prophetic periods from the several dates assigned by the best chronologers for the events from which they should evidently be reckoned, they all would terminate together, about A. D. 1843. I was thus brought, in 1818, at the close of my two years study of the Scriptures, to the solemn conclusion, that in about twenty-five years from that time all the affairs of our present state would be wound up…” William Miller’s Apology and Defense, 6, 12.

> „Daljnjim proučavanjem Svetoga pisma zaključio sam da sedam vremena poganske prevlasti mora započeti onda kada su Židovi prestali biti neovisan narod, pri sužanjstvu Manašeovu, koje su najbolji kronolozi smještali u 677. g. pr. Kr.; da je 2300 dana započelo sa sedamdeset tjedana, koje su najbolji kronolozi datirali od 457. g. pr. Kr.; te da 1335 dana, koja započinju ukidanjem svagdašnje žrtve i postavljanjem gnusobe pustoši, Daniel, glava sedma, redak jedanaesti, treba datirati od uspostave papinske prevlasti, nakon uklanjanja poganskih gnusoba, i što bi se, prema najboljim povjesničarima koje sam mogao konzultirati, trebalo datirati otprilike od 508. g. po. Kr. Računajući sva ta proročka razdoblja od različitih datuma koje su najbolji kronolozi pripisali događajima od kojih ih očito treba računati, sva bi ona završila zajedno, oko 1843. g. po. Kr. Tako sam 1818. godine, na završetku svoje dvogodišnje prouke Svetoga pisma, bio doveden do svečanoga zaključka da će se za otprilike dvadeset i pet godina od toga vremena svi poslovi našega sadašnjeg stanja privesti svršetku…” William Miller’s Apology and Defense, 6, 12.

The rule of first mention establishes that the first thing mentioned is of the greatest importance, and the first thing mentioned in Revelation chapter one verse one is the communication process that the Father employs as He gives a message to Jesus, who in turn gives it to His angel, which then gives it to a prophet that then writes it out and sends it to the churches. When Adventism rejected the work and discoveries of William Miller, they not only rejected their foundations, but they also rejected the very communication process which led Miller to his understandings, and they rejected the process which is the only avenue for men to understand the Revelation of Jesus Christ that is opened up just before probation closes.

Pravilo prvoga spomena utvrđuje da je ono što se prvi put spominje od najveće važnosti, a prvo što se spominje u Otkrivenju, prvom poglavlju, prvom retku, jest proces priopćavanja koji Otac primjenjuje dok daje poruku Isusu, koji je zatim daje svome anđelu, a ovaj je potom daje proroku, koji je zatim zapisuje i šalje crkvama. Kada je adventizam odbacio rad i otkrića Williama Millera, nije odbacio samo svoje temelje, nego je odbacio i sam proces priopćavanja koji je Millera doveo do njegovih razumijevanja, te je odbacio proces koji je jedini put da ljudi razumiju Otkrivenje Isusa Krista koje se otvara neposredno prije nego što se zaključi vrijeme milosti.

Miller was led to understand that the seven times of Leviticus commenced in 677 BC. It was not until 1856 that the Lord used Hiram Edson to identify that the scattering of the seven times was also carried out against the northern ten tribes of Israel. The Lord was attempting to develop the understanding of the seven times in agreement with, but well beyond Miller’s foundational discovery of the seven times. But in 1856 the light presented by Hiram Edson came mysteriously to an end, for the eighth article in the series ended with the words of James White, then the Editor of the Review and Herald, “To be continued.” It was to be “continued” but not until post September 11, 2001 when the Lord led his people to the “old paths” and ultimately to the unfinished series of articles penned by Hiram Edson.

Miller je bio naveden da razumije kako sedam vremena iz Levitskog zakonika započinje 677. pr. Kr. Tek je 1856. Gospodin upotrijebio Hirama Edsona da utvrdi kako je rasijavanje sedam vremena također bilo izvršeno nad sjevernih deset Izraelovih plemena. Gospodin je nastojao razviti razumijevanje sedam vremena u skladu s Millerovim temeljnim otkrićem o sedam vremena, ali i znatno dalje od njega. No 1856. svjetlo koje je iznio Hiram Edson tajanstveno je došlo svome kraju, jer je osmi članak u nizu završio riječima Jamesa Whitea, tadašnjega urednika časopisa Review and Herald: „Nastavit će se.” Trebalo se „nastaviti”, ali ne sve do vremena nakon 11. rujna 2001., kada je Gospodin poveo svoj narod na „stare staze” i naposljetku do nedovršenoga niza članaka što ih je napisao Hiram Edson.

We are not currently addressing the rebellion that began shortly after the great disappointment, but to simply point out that even though Miller was led to the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six, it is clear that the Lord purposed to increase the initial understanding of the seven times beyond Miller’s foundational understanding of the subject. He chose Hiram Edson, the same servant from that very history that He had previously chosen to give the vision of Christ moving into the Most Holy Place on October 23, 1844.

Trenutačno se ne bavimo pobunom koja je započela ubrzo nakon velikog razočaranja, nego samo želimo istaknuti da je, premda je Miller bio vođen k „sedam vremena” iz Levitskog zakonika dvadeset šest, jasno da je Gospod namjeravao uvećati početno razumijevanje sedam vremena iznad Millerova temeljnog razumijevanja te teme. Izabrao je Hirama Edsona, istoga slugu iz same te povijesti kojega je prethodno izabrao da primi viđenje Krista kako 23. listopada 1844. prelazi u Svetinju nad svetinjama.

This is why I used the Adventist theologian’s words to acknowledge that the framework for all of Miller’s prophetic applications was based upon his understanding of the two desolating powers that in the book of Daniel are represented as the “daily” (paganism), which is always associated with either the “transgression” or “abomination,” both representing different aspects of the desolating power of papalism. Miller’s foundational understanding of the Roman powers has greatly increased since the history he represents.

Zato sam upotrijebio riječi adventističkoga teologa kako bih priznao da se okvir za sve Millerove proročke primjene temeljio na njegovu razumijevanju dviju sila pustošenja koje su u knjizi proroka Daniela predstavljene kao „svagdašnja“ (poganstvo), koja je uvijek povezana ili s „prijestupom“ ili s „gnusobom“, pri čemu oboje predstavljaju različite vidove pustošeće sile papinstva. Millerovo temeljno razumijevanje rimskih sila uvelike se povećalo od povijesti koju on prikazuje.

The angels of God, including Gabriel, led Miller to the understandings he proclaimed. Those understandings included the prophecies he proclaimed, the rules of biblical interpretation he used and also the framework that allowed him to organize the prophecies correctly. Miller was given the framework that the two desolating powers addressed in Daniel were pagan Rome and papal Rome. Future for America was led to the framework of the three desolating powers of the dragon, the beast and false prophet.

Božji anđeli, uključujući Gabriela, vodili su Millera do razumijevanja koja je objavljivao. Ta su razumijevanja uključivala proročanstva koja je objavljivao, pravila biblijskog tumačenja kojima se služio, kao i okvir koji mu je omogućio da ispravno organizira proročanstva. Milleru je bio dan okvir prema kojem su dvije pustošeće sile o kojima je riječ u Danielu bile poganski Rim i papinski Rim. Future for America bio je vođen do okvira o trima pustošećim silama zmaja, zvijeri i lažnog proroka.

> And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty. Revelation 16:13, 14.

> I vidjeh tri nečista duha, kao žabe, gdje izlaze iz usta zmajevih, i iz usta zvijeri, i iz usta lažnoga proroka. Jer to su duhovi đavolski, koji čine čudesa, i izlaze k kraljevima zemlje i svega svijeta da ih skupe na boj onoga velikoga dana Boga Svemogućega. Otkrivenje 16,13.14.

Future for America’s framework is built upon Miller’s work, but goes beyond where his work left off. Adventism left his framework and returned to the theology of apostate Protestantism and Rome. The same line of prophecy is taken up in the book of Revelation that is began in the book of Daniel.

Okvir knjige Future for America izgrađen je na Millerovu djelu, ali ide dalje od onoga gdje je njegovo djelo stalo. Adventizam je napustio njegov okvir i vratio se teologiji otpalog protestantizma i Rima. Ista se linija proročanstva, koja je započeta u knjizi Daniela, nastavlja u knjizi Otkrivenja.

> “Revelation is a sealed book, but it is also an opened book. It records marvelous events that are to take place in the last days of this earth’s history. The teachings of this book are definite, not mystical and unintelligible. In it the same line of prophecy is taken up as in Daniel. Some prophecies God has repeated, thus showing that importance must be given to them. The Lord does not repeat things that are of no great consequence.” Manuscript Releases, volume 9, 8.

> „Otkrivenje je zapečaćena knjiga, ali je i otvorena knjiga. Ono bilježi čudesne događaje koji se trebaju zbiti u posljednjim danima povijesti ove zemlje. Učenja ove knjige određena su, a ne mistična i nerazumljiva. U njoj se nastavlja ista linija proročanstva kao i u Danielu. Neka je proročanstva Bog ponovio, pokazujući time da im se mora pridati važnost. Gospodin ne ponavlja ono što nije od velike važnosti.” Manuscript Releases, sv. 9, 8.

Miller could not grasp the prophecies of the book of Revelation, for the line of paganism and papalism that is so firmly identified in Daniel is expanded in the book of Revelation to include the next persecuting power to arrive on the stage of prophetic history.

Miller nije mogao shvatiti proročanstva knjige Otkrivenja, jer se linija poganstva i papinstva, koja je tako jasno prepoznata u Danielu, u knjizi Otkrivenja proširuje kako bi uključila sljedeću progoniteljsku silu koja će stupiti na pozornicu proročke povijesti.

> “Through paganism, and then through the Papacy, Satan exerted his power for many centuries in an effort to blot from the earth God’s faithful witnesses. Pagans and papists were actuated by the same dragon spirit. They differed only in that the Papacy, making a pretense of serving God, was the more dangerous and cruel foe. Through the agency of Romanism, Satan took the world captive. The professed church of God was swept into the ranks of this delusion, and for more than a thousand years the people of God suffered under the dragon’s ire. And when the Papacy, robbed of its strength, was forced to desist from persecution, John beheld a new power coming up to echo the dragon’s voice, and carry forward the same cruel and blasphemous work. This power, the last that is to wage war against the church and the law of God, was symbolized by a beast with lamblike horns. The beasts preceding it had risen from the sea, but this came up out of the earth, representing the peaceful rise of the nation which is symbolized. The ‘two horns like a lamb’ well represent the character of the United States Government, as expressed in its two fundamental principles, Republicanism and Protestantism. These principles are the secret of our power and prosperity as a nation. Those who first found an asylum on the shores of America rejoiced that they had reached a country free from the arrogant claims of popery and the tyranny of kingly rule. They determined to establish a government upon the broad foundation of civil and religious liberty.

> „Kroz poganstvo, a zatim kroz papinstvo, Sotona je tijekom mnogih stoljeća provodio svoju moć nastojeći izbrisati s lica zemlje Božje vjerne svjedoke. Pogani i papisti bili su pokretani istim zmajskim duhom. Razlikovali su se jedino po tome što je papinstvo, pretvarajući se da služi Bogu, bilo opasniji i okrutniji neprijatelj. Posredstvom rimokatolicizma Sotona je svijet odveo u ropstvo. Ispovjedna Božja crkva bila je pometena u redove te zablude, i više od tisuću godina Božji je narod trpio pod zmajevim gnjevom. A kada je papinstvo, lišeno svoje snage, bilo prisiljeno prestati s progonstvom, Ivan je ugledao novu silu kako se podiže da odjekuje zmajevim glasom i nastavi isto okrutno i bogohulno djelo. Ta sila, posljednja koja će zaratiti protiv Crkve i Božjega Zakona, bila je predočena zvijeri s janjećim rogovima. Zvijeri koje su joj prethodile izišle su iz mora, a ova je izišla iz zemlje, što predstavlja miran uspon naroda koji je njome simboliziran. „Dva roga kao u janjeta“ prikladno predstavljaju karakter vlade Sjedinjenih Američkih Država, kako se očituje u njezinim dvama temeljnim načelima, republikanizmu i protestantizmu. Ta su načela tajna naše moći i blagostanja kao naroda. Oni koji su prvi našli utočište na obalama Amerike radovali su se što su stigli u zemlju slobodnu od oholih zahtjeva papinstva i tiranije kraljevske vlasti. Odlučili su uspostaviti vlast na širokom temelju građanske i vjerske slobode.“

> “But the stern tracing of the prophetic pencil reveals a change in this peaceful scene. The beast with lamblike horns speaks with the voice of a dragon, and ‘exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him.’ Prophecy declares that he will say to them that dwell on the earth that they should make an image to the beast, and that ‘he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads; and that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.’ Thus Protestantism follows in the steps of the Papacy.” Signs of the Times, November 1, 1899.

> „No strogo ocrtavanje proročkoga kista otkriva promjenu u ovom mirnom prizoru. Zvijer s janjećim rogovima govori glasom zmaja i ‘izvršuje svu vlast prve zvijeri pred njom’. Proročanstvo izjavljuje da će reći onima koji prebivaju na zemlji da načine sliku zvijeri te da ‘čini da svi, mali i veliki, bogati i siromašni, slobodni i robovi, prime žig na svoju desnicu ili na svoja čela; i da nitko ne može ni kupovati ni prodavati osim onoga koji ima žig, ili ime zvijeri, ili broj njezina imena.’ Tako protestantizam ide stopama papinstva.” Signs of the Times, November 1, 1899.

For Miller the sea beast and earth beast of Revelation thirteen represented pagan Rome followed by papal Rome. Miller also attempted to apply his framework to Revelation seventeen, but the healing of the deadly wound of the papacy, the prophetic role of the United States and the United Nations were outside the divine framework that had been given him by angels. For him the beast that came up out of the earth in Revelation thirteen was the papacy.

Za Millera su morska zvijer i zemaljska zvijer iz trinaestoga poglavlja Otkrivenja predstavljale poganski Rim, a potom papinski Rim. Miller je također nastojao primijeniti svoj okvir na sedamnaesto poglavlje Otkrivenja, ali izlječenje smrtonosne rane papinstva, proročka uloga Sjedinjenih Američkih Država i Ujedinjenih naroda bili su izvan božanskoga okvira koji su mu anđeli dali. Za njega je zvijer koja je izlazila iz zemlje u trinaestome poglavlju Otkrivenja bila papinstvo.

Miller was the messenger that was to be used to remove the mantle of Protestantism from the hands of the professed Protestants that had come out of the Dark Ages. The period when the United States would speak as a dragon, when Republicanism turned into a democracy and apostate Protestantism would combine with the apostate government and repeat the combination of church and state that is the image of the papacy was still future to his day. For that reason, he attempted to place the book of Revelation into the divine framework he had been given by angels.

Miller je bio glasnik kojim se trebalo poslužiti da se plašt protestantizma ukloni iz ruku nazoviprotestanata koji su izašli iz Mračnoga srednjeg vijeka. Razdoblje kada će Sjedinjene Države progovoriti kao zmaj, kada će se republikanizam pretvoriti u demokraciju i kada će se otpali protestantizam sjediniti s otpalošću vlasti te ponoviti spoj crkve i države, koji je slika papinstva, bilo je još buduće u njegovo doba. Iz toga je razloga nastojao smjestiti knjigu Otkrivenja u božanski okvir koji su mu dali anđeli.

He was chosen to understand the increase of knowledge that was produced in 1798 when the Ulai River vision of Daniel eight and nine was unsealed. Future for America was to understand the vision of the Hiddekel River of Daniel chapters ten through twelve that was unsealed in 1989, when, as described in Daniel eleven, verse forty, the countries representing the former Soviet Union were swept away by the papacy and the United States.

Bio je izabran da razumije porast znanja koji je nastao 1798. godine kada je bila otpečaćena vizija o rijeci Ulai iz Daniela osam i devet. Budućnost za Ameriku trebala je razumjeti viziju o rijeci Hiddekel iz Daniela deset do dvanaest, koja je bila otpečaćena 1989. godine, kada su, kao što je opisano u Danielu jedanaestom poglavlju, četrdesetom retku, zemlje koje predstavljaju bivši Sovjetski Savez bile pometene papinstvom i Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama.

The framework that was given by angels to Future for America was based upon the identification of, and application of prophecy in the context of the three-fold union of the dragon, the beast and false prophet.

Okvir koji su anđeli dali službi Future for America temeljio se na prepoznavanju i primjeni proročanstva u kontekstu trostrukog saveza zmaja, zvijeri i lažnog proroka.

> “The light that Daniel received from God was given especially for these last days. The visions he saw by the banks of the Ulai and the Hiddekel, the great rivers of Shinar, are now in process of fulfillment, and all the events foretold will soon come to pass.” Testimonies to Ministers, 112.

> „Svjetlost koju je Daniel primio od Boga bila je dana osobito za ove posljednje dane. Viđenja koja je vidio na obalama Ulaja i Hiddekelja, velikih rijeka Šinara, sada su u procesu ispunjenja, i svi prorečeni događaji uskoro će se zbiti.“ Testimonies to Ministers, 112.

The Millerites presented the first and second angel’s message, announcing the opening of the judgment. Future for America is presenting the third angel’s message.

Mileriti su iznijeli poruku prvoga i drugoga anđela, navješćujući početak suda. Future for America iznosi poruku trećega anđela.

> I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase. So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase. Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one: and every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour. For we are labourers together with God: ye are God’s husbandry, ye are God’s building. According to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation, and another buildeth thereon. But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon. For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ. 1 Corinthians 3:6–11.

> Ja posadih, Apolon zalije; ali Bog dade uzrast. Tako niti je što onaj koji sadi, niti onaj koji zalijeva, nego Bog koji daje uzrast. A onaj koji sadi i onaj koji zalijeva jedno su; i svaki će primiti svoju vlastitu nagradu po svome vlastitom trudu. Jer mi smo Božji suradnici: vi ste Božja njiva, vi ste Božja građevina. Po milosti Božjoj koja mi je dana, kao mudar graditelj, postavio sam temelj, a drugi na njemu gradi. Ali neka svaki pazi kako na njemu gradi. Jer drugoga temelja nitko ne može postaviti osim onoga koji je postavljen, a taj je Isus Krist. 1 Korinćanima 3:6–11.

To correctly present the third angel’s message you must also present the first two angels’ messages, for we are informed that there cannot be a third without a first and second. The first and second messages are the foundation and the third is the capstone, but the third message will never deny or contradict the first and second. If it does it is not the genuine message.

Da bi se ispravno iznijela poruka trećega anđela, morate iznijeti i poruke prva dva anđela, jer nam je rečeno da ne može biti treće bez prve i druge. Prva i druga poruka temelj su, a treća je zaglavni kamen, no treća poruka nikada neće nijekati niti proturječiti prvoj i drugoj. Ako to čini, nije istinska poruka.

> “The first and second messages were given in 1843 and 1844, and we are now under the proclamation of the third; but all three of the messages are still to be proclaimed. It is just as essential now as ever before that they shall be repeated to those who are seeking for the truth. By pen and voice we are to sound the proclamation, showing their order, and the application of the prophecies that bring us to the third angel’s message. There cannot be a third without the first and second. These messages we are to give to the world in publications, in discourses, showing in the line of prophetic history the things that have been and the things that will be.” Selected Messages, book 2, 104, 105.

> „Prva i druga poruka bile su dane 1843. i 1844. godine, a mi se sada nalazimo pod objavljivanjem treće; ali sve tri poruke još se uvijek trebaju objavljivati. Jednako je nužno sada kao i ikada prije da se one ponove onima koji traže istinu. Perom i glasom trebamo razglašavati ovu objavu, pokazujući njihov redoslijed i primjenu proročanstava koja nas dovode do poruke trećega anđela. Ne može biti treće bez prve i druge. Ove poruke trebamo dati svijetu u publikacijama, u propovijedima, prikazujući u nizu proročke povijesti ono što je bilo i ono što će biti.” Selected Messages, knjiga 2, 104, 105.

There is a very nice observation of Millerite history and our history. The Millerites were the beginning and we are the end. They presented and lived the first and second angel’s messages. We present the third angel. Their unsealed message (the Ulai vision) is found in two chapters of Daniel, and ours (the Hiddekel vision) is found in three chapters. They identified the first and second woes, and lived within the fulfillment of the second woe. We identify and live within the fulfillment of the third woe. Their framework of prophetic application was pagan Rome (the dragon) and papal Rome (the beast). Our framework for prophetic application is modern Rome as a three-fold beast.

Postoji vrlo lijepo zapažanje o mileritskoj povijesti i našoj povijesti. Mileriti su bili početak, a mi smo svršetak. Oni su iznijeli i živjeli prvu i drugu anđeosku poruku. Mi iznosimo treću anđeosku poruku. Njihova nezapečaćena poruka (viđenje Ulaja) nalazi se u dva poglavlja Daniela, a naša (viđenje Hiddekela) nalazi se u tri poglavlja. Oni su prepoznali prvu i drugu nevolju te su živjeli unutar ispunjenja druge nevolje. Mi prepoznajemo i živimo unutar ispunjenja treće nevolje. Njihov okvir proročke primjene bio je poganski Rim (zmaj) i papinski Rim (zvijer). Naš okvir za proročku primjenu jest suvremeni Rim kao trostruka zvijer.

As we begin to consider the characteristic of papal Rome in chapter seventeen of Revelation being the eighth that is of the seven it is worthwhile to consider what the Millerites understood of Rome during the foundational history. The third angel will have additional light, but that light will never contradict established truth.

Dok započinjemo razmatrati obilježje papinskoga Rima u sedamnaestom poglavlju Otkrivenja kao osmoga koji je od sedmorice, korisno je razmotriti što su mileriti razumjeli o Rimu tijekom povijesti temelja. Treći anđeo imat će dodatnu svjetlost, ali ta svjetlost nikada neće proturječiti utvrđenoj istini.

Daniel chapter two, seven, eight, eleven and twelve identify Rome, among other powers. We are considering Rome’s two phases prior to 1798; pagan and papal as the framework for Miller’s prophetic applications. Miller and the pioneers identify that “the robbers of thy people” in Daniel chapter eleven and verse fourteen represents Rome.

Drugo, sedmo, osmo, jedanaesto i dvanaesto poglavlje Daniela, među ostalim silama, prepoznaju Rim. Razmatramo dvije faze Rima prije 1798.; pogansku i papinsku, kao okvir za Millerove proročke primjene. Miller i pioniri prepoznaju da „razbojnici tvoga naroda” u Danielu, jedanaestom poglavlju i četrnaestom retku, predstavljaju Rim.

> And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall. Daniel 11:14.

> I u ona će se vremena mnogi podići protiv kralja juga; i nasilnici iz tvoga naroda uzvisit će se da utvrde viđenje; ali će pasti. Daniel 11,14.

There are at least two important points to consider within this verse. The word “vision” in the verse is one of two Hebrew words in the book of Daniel that are translated as “vision.” One of the Hebrew words translated as “vision” is châzôn, and means a dream, or a prophecy or a vision. The word châzôn identifies prophetic history, or a period of time, and it is found ten times in Daniel and always translated as “vision.”

Postoje najmanje dvije važne točke koje valja razmotriti unutar ovoga retka. Riječ „viđenje” u ovome retku jedna je od dviju hebrejskih riječi u knjizi proroka Daniela koje se prevode kao „viđenje”. Jedna od hebrejskih riječi prevedenih kao „viđenje” jest châzôn, a znači san, ili proročanstvo, ili viđenje. Riječ châzôn označava proročku povijest, ili vremensko razdoblje, i pojavljuje se deset puta u Danielu te se uvijek prevodi kao „viđenje”.

The other Hebrew word that is also translated as “vision” is mar-eh’ and means appearance. The word mar-eh’ is identifying a singular sight, a point in time. The Hebrew word mar-eh’ is found thirteen times in Daniel and it is translated as “vision” six times, four times as “countenance,” twice as “appearance” and once as “well favored.”

Druga hebrejska riječ koja se također prevodi kao „viđenje” jest mar-eh’ i znači pojava. Riječ mar-eh’ označuje pojedinačan prizor, određeni trenutak u vremenu. Hebrejska riječ mar-eh’ nalazi se trinaest puta u Danielu i prevodi se šest puta kao „viđenje”, četiri puta kao „lice”, dva puta kao „pojava” i jedanput kao „lijepa izgleda”.

The robbers of thy people represent Rome and it is therefore the prophetic subject of Rome that establishes the prophetic “vision” in the book of Daniel. For this reason, it is important to understand the significance of Rome as a prophetic symbol.

Razbojnici tvoga naroda predstavljaju Rim, i stoga je upravo proročki predmet Rima ono što uspostavlja proročko „viđenje” u knjizi proroka Daniela. Zbog toga je važno razumjeti značenje Rima kao proročkoga simbola.

Prophetic logic demands that the word “vision” representing prophetic history is the same “vision” that is addressed in the book of Revelation, for inspiration identifies that Daniel and Revelation are the same book, that they complement each other, that they bring each other to perfection and that the same line of prophecy that is located in Daniel is taken up in the Revelation. Those points set forth in the Spirit of Prophecy have already been included in this series of articles, so I won’t include them again. I will add another point that we have also already included from Sister White. That point is that all the books of the Bible meet and end in the book of Revelation. The “vision” of prophetic history (châzôn) that is found in Daniel and is established with the prophetic subject of Rome, represents the vision of prophetic history throughout the Bible. All the books of the Bible meet and end in the Revelation and God never contradicts Himself. Never! If you think He has, you are misunderstanding something. The very same Hebrew word (châzôn) is also translated as vision in the book of Proverbs.

Proročanska logika zahtijeva da riječ „viđenje“, koja predstavlja proročku povijest, bude isto ono „viđenje“ o kojemu je riječ u knjizi Otkrivenja, jer nadahnuće poistovjećuje Daniela i Otkrivenje kao istu knjigu, da se međusobno nadopunjuju, da jedno drugo dovode do savršenstva i da se ista linija proročanstva koja se nalazi u Danielu nastavlja u Otkrivenju. Te točke iznesene u Duhu Proroštva već su uključene u ovaj niz članaka, pa ih neću ponovno navoditi. Dodat ću još jednu točku koju smo također već uključili od sestre White. Ta je točka da se sve knjige Biblije susreću i završavaju u knjizi Otkrivenja. „Viđenje“ proročke povijesti (châzôn), koje se nalazi u Danielu i koje je uspostavljeno s proročkom temom Rima, predstavlja viđenje proročke povijesti kroz cijelu Bibliju. Sve knjige Biblije susreću se i završavaju u Otkrivenju, i Bog nikada ne proturječi samome sebi. Nikada! Ako mislite da jest, nešto pogrešno razumijete. Ista ta hebrejska riječ (châzôn) također se prevodi kao „viđenje“ u knjizi Izreka.

> Where there is no vision, the people perish: but he that keepeth the law, happy is he. Proverbs 29:18.

> Gdje nema viđenja, narod propada; a blažen je onaj koji drži zakon. Izreke 29,18.

That is the first point to consider about the verse. If we misunderstand Rome, then we cannot establish the vision of prophetic history. That fact essentially defines the efforts of Jesuits and others throughout history who have introduced counterfeit theology to destroy the prophetic subject of Rome. As we consider the foundational understanding of Rome, we should bear this in mind.

To je prva točka koju valja razmotriti u vezi s tim retkom. Ako pogrešno razumijemo Rim, tada ne možemo utvrditi viđenje proročke povijesti. Ta činjenica u biti određuje nastojanja isusovaca i drugih tijekom povijesti, koji su uveli krivotvorenu teologiju kako bi uništili proročku temu Rima. Dok razmatramo temeljno razumijevanje Rima, to bismo trebali imati na umu.

> “Those who become confused in their understanding of the word, who fail to see the meaning of antichrist, will surely place themselves on the side of antichrist. There is no time now for us to assimilate with the world. Daniel is standing in his lot and in his place. The prophecies of Daniel and of John are to be understood. They interpret each other. They give to the world truths which everyone should understand. These prophecies are to be witness in the world. By their fulfillment in these last days, they will explain themselves.” Kress Collection, 105.

> „Oni koji postanu zbunjeni u svojem razumijevanju Riječi, koji ne uspijevaju uvidjeti značenje antikrista, zasigurno će se svrstati na stranu antikrista. Sada nije vrijeme da se poistovjećujemo sa svijetom. Daniel stoji u svojem dijelu i na svojem mjestu. Proročanstva Daniela i Ivana trebaju se razumjeti. Ona tumače jedno drugo. Ona svijetu daju istine koje bi svatko trebao razumjeti. Ta proročanstva trebaju biti svjedočanstvo u svijetu. Svojim ispunjenjem u ovim posljednjim danima, ona će sama sebe objasniti.” Kress Collection, 105.

If you fail to see the meaning of antichrist (Rome) you will join Rome, and this warning is placed within the context of being able to or not being able to understand the books of Daniel and Revelation. The Millerites built the foundational understanding of Adventism upon their identification of Rome. They understood that Rome was represented by two desolating powers, that both were phases of Rome, but they were not at a place in history to see Rome as a three-fold union as represented in the book of Revelation. Daniel is therefore the foundation represented by the Millerites and Revelation is the capstone represented by Future for America. There is another point from Daniel eleven verse fourteen which we wish to identify.

Ako ne uspijete uvidjeti značenje antikrista (Rima), pridružit ćete se Rimu, a ovo je upozorenje smješteno u kontekst mogućnosti ili nemogućnosti razumijevanja knjiga Daniela i Otkrivenja. Milleriti su temeljno razumijevanje adventizma izgradili na svojoj identifikaciji Rima. Razumjeli su da je Rim prikazan dvjema pustošećim silama, da su obje bile faze Rima, ali se nisu nalazili na takvu mjestu u povijesti da bi Rim mogli vidjeti kao trostruki savez, kako je prikazan u knjizi Otkrivenja. Daniel je stoga temelj koji predstavljaju Milleriti, a Otkrivenje je zaglavni kamen koji predstavlja Future for America. Postoji još jedna točka iz Daniela jedanaest, četrnaesti redak, koju želimo istaknuti.

Miller and the pioneers understood that the image of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream represented the four kingdoms of Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece and Rome. They could not see beyond the fourth kingdom, for they understood that papal Rome was simply a second phase of Rome and therefore that the fourth kingdom had ended in 1798. From their vantage point of history the only prophetic waymark left was the Second Coming of Christ, where the rock that was cut out of the mountain would strike the feet of the image. The Millerites recognized prophetic distinctions between pagan and papal Rome, but being forced to align 1798 with Christ’s return they could see no further than four kingdoms.

Miller i pioniri razumjeli su da prikaz iz Nebukadnezarova sna predstavlja četiri kraljevstva: Babilon, Medo-Perziju, Grčku i Rim. Nisu mogli vidjeti dalje od četvrtoga kraljevstva, jer su razumjeli da je papinski Rim jednostavno druga faza Rima i stoga da je četvrto kraljevstvo završilo 1798. godine. Iz njihove povijesne perspektive jedini preostali proročki putokaz bio je Drugi Kristov dolazak, kada će stijena odvaljena od gore udariti u stopala kipa. Mileriti su prepoznavali proročke razlike između poganskoga i papinskoga Rima, ali, budući da su bili prisiljeni uskladiti 1798. godinu s Kristovim povratkom, nisu mogli vidjeti dalje od četiri kraljevstva.

> “We have come to a time when God’s sacred work is represented by the feet of the image in which the iron was mixed with the miry clay. God has a people, a chosen people, whose discernment must be sanctified, who must not become unholy by laying upon the foundation wood, hay, and stubble. Every soul who is loyal to the commandments of God will see that the distinguishing feature of our faith is the seventh-day Sabbath. If the government would honor the Sabbath as God has commanded, it would stand in the strength of God and in defense of the faith once delivered to the saints. But statesmen will uphold the spurious sabbath, and will mingle their religious faith with the observance of this child of the papacy, placing it above the Sabbath which the Lord has sanctified and blessed, setting it apart for man to keep holy, as a sign between Him and His people to a thousand generations. The mingling of churchcraft and statecraft is represented by the iron and the clay. This union is weakening all the power of the churches. This investing the church with the power of the state will bring evil results. Men have almost passed the point of God’s forbearance. They have invested their strength in politics, and have united with the papacy. But the time will come when God will punish those who have made void His law, and their evil work will recoil upon themselves.” Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, volume 4, 1168.

> „Došli smo u vrijeme kada je Božje sveto djelo prikazano stopalima kipa u kojima je željezo pomiješano s ilovačom. Bog ima narod, izabrani narod, čije rasuđivanje mora biti posvećeno, koji ne smije postati nesvet polažući na temelj drvo, sijeno i slamu. Svaka duša koja je odana Božjim zapovijedima uvidjet će da je obilježje po kojem se naša vjera razlikuje subota sedmoga dana. Kad bi vlast odavala čast suboti kako je Bog zapovjedio, stajala bi u Božjoj snazi i u obrani vjere jednom predane svetima. Ali će državnici podupirati krivotvorenu subotu i pomiješat će svoju vjersku vjeru s obdržavanjem toga djeteta papinstva, stavljajući je iznad subote koju je Gospodin posvetio i blagoslovio, izdvojivši je da je čovjek svetkuje kao sveti znak između Njega i Njegova naroda do tisuću naraštaja. Miješanje crkvenjaštva i državničke politike prikazano je željezom i ilovačom. Taj savez slabi svu moć crkava. To što se crkva zaodijeva vlašću države donijet će zle posljedice. Ljudi su gotovo prekoračili granicu Božje strpljivosti. Svoju su snagu uložili u politiku i sjedinili se s papinstvom. Ali doći će vrijeme kada će Bog kazniti one koji su njegov Zakon učinili ništavnim, i njihovo će se zlo djelo oboriti na njih same.” Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, svezak 4, 1168.

Revelation seventeen is the last identification of the kingdoms of Bible prophecy, and it identifies that seven kingdoms have fallen and that the eighth kingdom is the three-fold union of modern Rome. If the first reference to the kingdoms of Bible prophecy is Daniel chapter two, and it most certainly is; then the last reference should be illustrated by the first reference. How can the four kingdoms of Daniel chapter two agree with eight kingdoms in Revelation seventeen?

Otkrivenje sedamnaesto posljednje je prepoznavanje kraljevstava biblijskoga proroštva i ono utvrđuje da je sedam kraljevstava palo te da je osmo kraljevstvo trostruki savez suvremenoga Rima. Ako je prvo spominjanje kraljevstava biblijskoga proroštva u drugom poglavlju Daniela, a zasigurno jest, tada bi posljednje spominjanje trebalo biti prikazano prvim. Kako se četiri kraljevstva iz drugoga poglavlja Daniela mogu uskladiti s osam kraljevstava u Otkrivenju sedamnaestom?

Remember therefore as we proceed, the Millerites could not see prophetic events beyond their history. The message they understood and proclaimed identified the Second Coming of Christ as the next waymark of prophetic history. But if the Millerite understanding of Rome as the symbol that establishes the vision of prophetic history and also Daniel chapter two are both Millerite foundational truths, how can this agree with the eight kingdoms of chapter seventeen of Revelation?

Stoga imajmo na umu, dok nastavljamo, da mileriti nisu mogli vidjeti proročke događaje izvan svoje povijesti. Poruka koju su razumjeli i propovijedali poistovjećivala je Drugi Kristov dolazak sa sljedećim putokazom proročke povijesti. Ali ako su mileritsko razumijevanje Rima kao simbola koji uspostavlja viđenje proročke povijesti, a također i drugo poglavlje Daniela, obje temeljne mileritske istine, kako se to može uskladiti s osam kraljevstava iz sedamnaestog poglavlja Otkrivenja?

If you are uncertain if the image of Daniel two is foundational, all you need to do is consider the 1843 and 1850 pioneer charts. Both have the image of Daniel two portrayed upon them. Just as significantly is that Ellen White identifies that both charts were made by God’s direction and by His design.

Ako niste sigurni je li kip iz Daniela dva temeljni, sve što trebate učiniti jest razmotriti pionirske karte iz 1843. i 1850. Na objema je prikazan kip iz Daniela dva. Jednako je značajno i to što Ellen White potvrđuje da su obje karte bile izrađene Božjim vodstvom i prema Njegovu naumu.

> “I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until His hand was removed.” Early Writings, 74, 75.

> „Vidjela sam da je karta iz 1843. bila vođena rukom Gospodnjom i da se ne smije mijenjati; da su brojke bile onakve kakve ih je On želio; da je Njegova ruka bila nad njima i sakrila pogrešku u nekima od brojki, tako da je nitko nije mogao vidjeti, sve dok Njegova ruka nije bila uklonjena.“ Early Writings, 74, 75.

Of the 1850 chart she stated:

Za kartu iz 1850. godine izjavila je:

> “I saw that God was in the publishment of the chart by Brother Nichols. I saw that there was a prophecy of this chart in the Bible, and if this chart is designed for God’s people, if it [is] sufficient for one it is for another, and if one needed a new chart painted on a larger scale, all need it just as much.” Manuscript Releases, volume 13, 359.

> „Vidjela sam da je Bog bio u objavljivanju karte od strane brata Nicholsa. Vidjela sam da u Bibliji postoji proročanstvo o toj karti, i ako je ta karta namijenjena Božjem narodu, ako je dovoljna za jednoga, dovoljna je i za drugoga, a ako je jednomu bila potrebna nova karta izrađena u većem mjerilu, svima je potrebna jednako toliko.“ Manuscript Releases, svezak 13, 359.

There is an ancient proverb from the world that states, “Error has many paths, but truth has only one.” There are several various errors that have been employed to prevent people from recognizing that modern Rome in Revelation seventeen is the eighth head that is of the seven. One of those errors which is employed by the theologians of Adventism is a misrepresentation of the kingdoms of history. I am not here referring to the kingdoms of Bible prophecy, these are two different designations. The kingdoms of Bible prophecy are established upon the first mention in Daniel chapter two, but there were kingdoms of history that preceded Babylon. Ellen White clearly identifies who the kingdoms of history were, but the theologians of Adventism ignore the inspired testimony and create a sequence of kingdoms of history that clouds the understanding that Rome always comes up eighth and is of the seven. Yet it is Rome that establishes the vision.

Postoji drevna poslovica iz svijeta koja kaže: „Zabluda ima mnogo putova, ali istina samo jedan.” Postoji nekoliko različitih zabluda koje su bile upotrijebljene kako bi se ljude spriječilo da prepoznaju kako je suvremeni Rim u Otkrivenju sedamnaest osma glava koja je od sedam. Jedna od tih zabluda kojom se služe teolozi adventizma jest pogrešno prikazivanje kraljevstava povijesti. Ovdje ne govorim o kraljevstvima biblijskog proroštva; to su dvije različite oznake. Kraljevstva biblijskog proroštva uspostavljena su na temelju prvog spomena u drugom poglavlju Daniela, ali postojala su kraljevstva povijesti koja su prethodila Babilonu. Ellen White jasno utvrđuje koja su bila kraljevstva povijesti, ali teolozi adventizma zanemaruju nadahnuto svjedočanstvo i stvaraju slijed kraljevstava povijesti koji zamagljuje razumijevanje da Rim uvijek izlazi kao osmi i da je od sedam. Ipak, Rim je taj koji uspostavlja viđenje.

The theologians of Adventism and apostate Protestantism suggest that the kingdoms of history were Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome and on. Sister White informs us that there is a third kingdom of history, which they choose to leave out. Are they leaving out that kingdom, or are they leaving out the Spirit of Prophecy? Both.

Teolozi adventizma i otpaloga protestantizma tvrde da su kraljevstva povijesti bila Egipat, Asirija, Babilon, Medo-Perzija, Grčka, Rim i nadalje. Sestra White obavještava nas da postoji i treće kraljevstvo povijesti, koje oni odlučuju izostaviti. Izostavljaju li oni to kraljevstvo ili izostavljaju Duh proroštva? Oboje.

> “The history of nations that one after another have occupied their allotted time and place, unconsciously witnessing to the truth of which they themselves knew not the meaning, speaks to us. To every nation and to every individual of today God has assigned a place in His great plan. Today men and nations are being measured by the plummet in the hand of Him who makes no mistake. All are by their own choice deciding their destiny, and God is overruling all for the accomplishment of His purposes.

> „Povijest naroda koji su, jedan za drugim, zauzimali svoje određeno vrijeme i mjesto, nesvjesno svjedočeći za istinu čije značenje ni sami nisu poznavali, govori nam. Svakomu narodu i svakomu pojedincu današnjice Bog je odredio mjesto u svom velikom planu. Danas se ljudi i narodi mjere viskom u ruci Onoga koji ne griješi. Svi vlastitim izborom odlučuju o svojoj sudbini, a Bog svime upravlja radi ostvarenja svojih namjera.

> “The history which the great I AM has marked out in His word, uniting link after link in the prophetic chain, from eternity in the past to eternity in the future, tells us where we are today in the procession of the ages, and what may be expected in the time to come. All that prophecy has foretold as coming to pass, until the present time, has been traced on the pages of history, and we may be assured that all which is yet to come will be fulfilled in its order.

> „Povijest koju je veliki JA JESAM označio u svojoj Riječi, povezujući kariku za karikom u proročkom lancu, od vječnosti u prošlosti do vječnosti u budućnosti, govori nam gdje se danas nalazimo u slijedu vjekova i što se može očekivati u vremenu koje dolazi. Sve što je proročanstvo navijestilo da će se zbiti, sve do sadašnjega vremena, iscrtano je na stranicama povijesti, i možemo biti sigurni da će se sve što tek treba doći ispuniti svojim redom.“

> “The final overthrow of all earthly dominions is plainly foretold in the word of truth. In the prophecy uttered when sentence from God was pronounced upon the last king of Israel is given the message: ‘Thus saith the Lord God; Remove the diadem, and take off the crown: … exalt him that is low, and abase him that is high. I will overturn, overturn, overturn, it: and it shall be no more, until He come whose right it is; and I will give it Him.’ Ezekiel 21:26, 27.

> „Konačno obaranje svih zemaljskih vladavina jasno je prorečeno u riječi istine. U proročanstvu izrečenom kada je od Boga bila izrečena presuda nad posljednjim kraljem Izraela dana je poruka: ‘Ovako govori Gospod Jahve: Skini turban i uzmi krunu: … uzvisi poniženoga, a ponizi uzvišenoga. Prevratit ću, prevratit ću, prevratit ću je; i nje više neće biti, dok ne dođe Onaj kojemu po pravu pripada; i dat ću je Njemu.’ Ezekiel 21:26, 27.”

> “The crown removed from Israel passed successively to the kingdoms of Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome. God says, ‘It shall be no more, until He come whose right it is; and I will give it Him.’

> „Kruna uklonjena s Izraela uzastopno je prelazila na kraljevstva Babilona, Medo-Perzije, Grčke i Rima. Bog kaže: ‘Neće je više biti, dok ne dođe Onaj kojemu po pravu pripada; i dat ću je Njemu.’“

> “That time is at hand. Today the signs of the times declare that we are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Everything in our world is in agitation. Before our eyes is fulfilling the Saviour’s prophecy of the events to precede His coming: ‘Ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars…. Nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.’ Matthew 24:6, 7.

> „To je vrijeme blizu. Danas znakovi vremena objavljuju da stojimo na pragu velikih i svečanih događaja. Sve je u našem svijetu u previranju. Pred našim se očima ispunjava Spasiteljevo proročanstvo o događajima koji će prethoditi Njegovu dolasku: ‘Čut ćete za ratove i glasove o ratovima…. Ustat će narod protiv naroda i kraljevstvo protiv kraljevstva; i bit će gladi, pošasti i potresa na raznim mjestima.’ Matej 24:6, 7.”

> “The present is a time of overwhelming interest to all living. Rulers and statesmen, men who occupy positions of trust and authority, thinking men and women of all classes, have their attention fixed upon the events taking place about us. They are watching the strained, restless relations that exist among the nations. They observe the intensity that is taking possession of every earthly element, and they recognize that something great and decisive is about to take place—that the world is on the verge of a stupendous crisis.

> „Sadašnje je vrijeme od silnoga značenja za sve žive. Vladari i državnici, ljudi koji zauzimaju položaje povjerenja i vlasti, misaoni muškarci i žene svih staleža, upravljaju svoju pozornost na događaje koji se zbivaju oko nas. Oni promatraju napete, nemirne odnose koji vladaju među narodima. Zapažaju silinu koja obuzima svaki zemaljski čimbenik i prepoznaju da se nešto veliko i odlučujuće sprema dogoditi — da se svijet nalazi na rubu goleme krize.

> “Angels are now restraining the winds of strife, that they may not blow until the world shall be warned of its coming doom; but a storm is gathering, ready to burst upon the earth; and when God shall bid His angels loose the winds, there will be such a scene of strife as no pen can picture.

> „Anđeli sada zadržavaju vjetrove razdora, da ne pušu dok svijet ne bude upozoren na svoju nadolazeću propast; ali oluja se skuplja, spremna provaliti na zemlju; a kada Bog zapovjedi svojim anđelima da puste vjetrove, nastat će takav prizor sukoba kakav nijedno pero ne može opisati.

> “The Bible, and the Bible only, gives a correct view of these things. Here are revealed the great final scenes in the history of our world, events that already are casting their shadows before, the sound of their approach causing the earth to tremble and men’s hearts to fail them for fear.” Education, 178–180.

> „Biblija, i samo Biblija, daje ispravan pogled na ove stvari. Ovdje su otkriveni veliki završni prizori u povijesti našega svijeta, događaji koji već sada bacaju svoje sjene unaprijed, a zvuk njihova približavanja uzrokuje da zemlja drhti i da ljudska srca klonu od straha.“ Odgoj, 178–180.

This passage has much light for our time, but what I want to point out is that Sister White clearly identifies that the kingdom of history that preceded Babylon was Israel, not Assyria. The kingdoms of history that is used by theologians leave out Israel as a kingdom of history, in spite of the power and glory that was established during the reign of king Solomon, and in spite of inspiration’s direct testimony through Ezekiel and Ellen White that the crown of Israel passed to Babylon.

Ovaj odlomak nosi mnogo svjetla za naše vrijeme, ali ono na što želim ukazati jest da sestra White jasno utvrđuje kako je kraljevstvo povijesti koje je prethodilo Babilonu bio Izrael, a ne Asirija. Kraljevstva povijesti kojima se služe teolozi izostavljaju Izrael kao kraljevstvo povijesti, unatoč sili i slavi koja je bila uspostavljena tijekom vladavine kralja Salomona, i unatoč izravnom svjedočanstvu nadahnuća preko Ezekiela i Ellen White da je kruna Izraela prešla na Babilon.

If we apply the inspired commentary to the kingdoms of history, we find that Israel needs to be counted among those kingdoms. Israel, Assyria and Egypt are kingdoms of history that preceded the first kingdom of Bible prophecy which was Babylon. Therefore, the fourth kingdom of “history” was Babylon, the fifth was Medo-Persia, the sixth was Greece, the seventh was pagan Rome, and the eighth was papal Rome, which was of the seven for it represents the second phase of pagan Rome. With the kingdoms of history papal Rome is the eighth, and is of the seven.

Ako nadahnuti komentar primijenimo na kraljevstva povijesti, uviđamo da se Izrael mora ubrojiti među ta kraljevstva. Izrael, Asirija i Egipat kraljevstva su povijesti koja su prethodila prvome kraljevstvu biblijskog proročanstva, a to je bio Babilon. Stoga je četvrto kraljevstvo „povijesti” bio Babilon, peto Medo-Perzija, šesto Grčka, sedmo poganski Rim, a osmo papinski Rim, koji je bio od sedmorice jer predstavlja drugu fazu poganskog Rima. U sklopu kraljevstava povijesti papinski je Rim osmi i od sedmorice je.

In Daniel seven we have the kingdoms of Bible prophecy represented by beasts. Babylon is the lion that was followed by the bear of Medo-Persia. The third was Greece as the leopard, and then Rome as the “dreadful and terrible” beast that had “iron teeth.” The terrible beast in agreement with the image of Daniel two is Rome, the fourth kingdom of Bible prophecy.

U sedmom poglavlju Daniela imamo kraljevstva biblijskog proroštva prikazana zvijerima. Babilon je lav, kojega je slijedio medvjed Medo-Perzije. Treća je bila Grčka kao leopard, a zatim Rim kao „strašna i užasna“ zvijer koja je imala „željezne zube“. Strašna zvijer, u skladu s kipom iz drugog poglavlja Daniela, jest Rim, četvrto kraljevstvo biblijskog proroštva.

The Millerites understood the fourth kingdom to be Rome, so they understood the characteristics of the terrible beast as such, and simply applied all the prophetic characteristics of the beast unto the fourth kingdom. They saw the distinction between pagan Rome and papal Rome in the passage, but could not see a fifth kingdom of Bible prophecy, for they correctly used the first mention of the kingdoms of Bible prophecy as their point of reference. But the distinction between the two Rome’s is in the passage, which allows us to consider the distinction between the two Rome’s as representing two kingdoms. But this is not the point we are considering.

Mileriti su četvrto kraljevstvo razumjeli kao Rim, pa su tako i obilježja strašne zvijeri razumjeli u tom smislu te su jednostavno sva proročka obilježja zvijeri primijenili na četvrto kraljevstvo. U odlomku su vidjeli razliku između poganskoga Rima i papinskoga Rima, ali nisu mogli vidjeti peto kraljevstvo biblijskoga proroštva, jer su ispravno upotrijebili prvo spominjanje kraljevstava biblijskoga proroštva kao svoje uporište. No razlika između dvaju Rimova nalazi se u odlomku, što nam dopušta da razliku između dvaju Rimova promatramo kao predstavljanje dvaju kraljevstava. Ali to nije točka koju razmatramo.

> Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces. And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings. And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end. Daniel 7:23–26.

> Ovako reče: Četvrta zvijer bit će četvrto kraljevstvo na zemlji, koje će se razlikovati od svih kraljevstava, i proždrijet će svu zemlju, i pogazit će je, i satrti je na komade. A deset rogova iz toga kraljevstva deset je kraljeva koji će ustati; i drugi će ustati nakon njih; i on će se razlikovati od prvih i pokorit će tri kralja. I govorit će velike riječi protiv Svevišnjega, i iscrpljivat će svece Svevišnjega, i pomišljat će da promijeni vremena i zakon; i bit će mu predani u ruku do vremena i vremena i pola vremena. Ali sud će zasjesti, i oduzet će mu vlast da je zatru i unište do kraja. Daniel 7:23–26.

The fourth kingdom in Daniel two is Rome. The ten horns represent the ten nations that represent the kingdom of pagan Rome, and before papal Rome would take control of the world in 538, three of those kingdoms would be removed, or plucked up. Then the “little” “horn” of verse eight with “eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things,” would arise. If we have ten horns in the fourth kingdom and three are removed in order for the “little horn” to replace those three horns, then when the three horns are removed it leaves seven horns, and the little horn is the eighth, for Rome always comes up eighth and is of the seven. There is much light concerning Rome in its two phases in this chapter, but we are simply here providing a second witness that prophetically as well as historically, Rome comes up eighth and is of the seven.

Četvrto kraljevstvo u Danielu dva jest Rim. Deset rogova predstavljaju deset naroda koji predstavljaju kraljevstvo poganskoga Rima, a prije nego što bi papinski Rim 538. godine preuzeo nadzor nad svijetom, tri od tih kraljevstava bila bi uklonjena, ili iščupana. Tada bi se pojavio „mali“ „rog“ iz osmog retka, s „očima kao oči čovječje i ustima koja govore velike stvari“. Ako u četvrtom kraljevstvu imamo deset rogova i tri su uklonjena kako bi „mali rog“ zamijenio ta tri roga, tada uklanjanje triju rogova ostavlja sedam rogova, a mali rog je osmi, jer Rim uvijek izlazi kao osmi i od sedmorice je. U ovome poglavlju ima mnogo svjetla o Rimu u njegove dvije faze, ali mi ovdje jednostavno pružamo drugo svjedočanstvo da, proročki kao i povijesno, Rim izlazi kao osmi i od sedmorice je.

In chapter eight we find the enlargement of chapter seven. The chapter once again identifies the kingdoms of Bible prophecy but leaves off the first kingdom of Babylon for when Daniel received the vision of chapter eight it was very close to the end of Babylon. In the chapter Medo-Persia is represented by a ram that had two horns. Greece is represented by a goat with one horn that is broken and produces four horns out of the broken horn. Then a “little horn” follows after Greece, and once again the little horn is representing Rome. Though Rome was not a direct descendant from the empire of Greece, the passage portrays the little horn as coming out of one of the four horns that arose in the Greek kingdom after the first horn—representing Alexander the Great—was broken. Rome was not a descendant of the Greeks, but it began its conquering of the world from the area of Greece, and in that sense, it came out of one of those four horns.

U osmom poglavlju nalazimo proširenje sedmoga poglavlja. To poglavlje ponovno prepoznaje kraljevstva biblijskog proroštva, ali izostavlja prvo kraljevstvo, Babilon, jer kada je Daniel primio viđenje iz osmog poglavlja, kraj Babilona bio je vrlo blizu. U tom je poglavlju Medo-Perzija prikazana ovnom koji je imao dva roga. Grčka je prikazana jarcem s jednim rogom koji se lomi i iz kojega nastaju četiri roga. Zatim nakon Grčke slijedi „mali rog“, i ponovno mali rog predstavlja Rim. Premda Rim nije bio izravni nasljednik Grčkoga Carstva, odlomak prikazuje mali rog kako izlazi iz jednoga od četiri roga koja su nastala u grčkom kraljevstvu nakon što je prvi rog — koji predstavlja Aleksandra Velikoga — bio slomljen. Rim nije bio potomak Grka, ali je svoje osvajanje svijeta započeo s područja Grčke, i u tom je smislu izišao iz jednoga od tih četiriju rogova.

We therefore find in chapter eight a second witness to chapter seven. Medo-Persia had two horns, Greece had one and thereafter four more horns. That equals seven horns before Rome, as the little horn came out of one of Greece’s four horns. Two plus one plus four equals seven, then Rome, the little horn, is the eighth and it is of the seven. It is worth noting that in this passage that identifies that Rome comes out of one of the Greek horns is one of the greatest prophetic arguments that Miller and his co-laborers had to meet in their history.

Stoga u osmom poglavlju nalazimo drugo svjedočanstvo za sedmo poglavlje. Medo-Perzija je imala dva roga, Grčka jedan, a nakon toga još četiri roga. To daje sedam rogova prije Rima, budući da je mali rog izišao iz jednoga od četiri grčka roga. Dva plus jedan plus četiri jednako je sedam; tada je Rim, mali rog, osmi i on je od sedmorice. Vrijedi zapaziti da je u ovom odlomku, koji pokazuje da Rim izlazi iz jednoga od grčkih rogova, sadržan jedan od najvećih proročkih argumenata s kojima su se Miller i njegovi suradnici morali suočiti u svojoj povijesti.

The Protestants of that history insisted that the little horn of Rome could not be Rome, for the prophecy identifies that the little horn came out from one of the four Grecian horns. They therefore argued that the little horn represented Antiochus Epiphanes who was one of the Seleucid kings that carried on through history after the division of Alexander the Great’s demise. The argument of Millerite history over this issue was so great that on the 1843 chart the argument against the Protestant teaching that was based upon the fact that Daniel saw the little horn come out from one of the four Grecian horns and therefore could not identify Rome, for Rome did not descend from Greece. The argument impacted all the passages in Daniel where Rome is identified. The Protestant position included that the “robbers of thy people” in verse fourteen of Daniel eleven had to be Antiochus Epiphanes. The Millerites therefore included upon the chart that Sister White identified was “directed by the hand of the Lord and should not be altered,” a reference to Antiochus Epiphanes identifying why he could not have been that fourth kingdom. Does Rome establish the vision of prophetic history or did a Seleucid king that died over a hundred years before Christ was born represent the power that stood up against Christ at his crucifixion?

Protestanti te povijesti ustrajavali su na tome da mali rog Rima nije mogao biti Rim, jer proročanstvo određuje da je mali rog izišao iz jednoga od četiriju grčkih rogova. Stoga su tvrdili da mali rog predstavlja Antioha Epifana, koji je bio jedan od seleukidskih kraljeva što su nastavili kroz povijest nakon podjele nastale smrću Aleksandra Velikoga. Rasprava u mileritskoj povijesti o tom pitanju bila je toliko velika da je na karti iz 1843. godine prikazan argument protiv protestantskog učenja, utemeljen na činjenici da je Daniel vidio mali rog kako izlazi iz jednoga od četiriju grčkih rogova te stoga nije mogao označavati Rim, jer Rim nije proizišao iz Grčke. Taj je argument utjecao na sva mjesta u Danielu gdje je Rim prepoznat. Protestantsko je stajalište uključivalo i to da su „nasilnici tvoga naroda“ u četrnaestom retku jedanaestoga poglavlja Daniela morali biti Antioh Epifan. Mileriti su stoga na kartu, za koju je sestra White utvrdila da je „vođena rukom Gospodnjom i da se ne smije mijenjati“, uključili i upućivanje na Antioha Epifana, pojašnjavajući zašto on nije mogao biti to četvrto kraljevstvo. Uspostavlja li Rim viđenje proročke povijesti ili je seleukidski kralj koji je umro više od stotinu godina prije Kristova rođenja predstavljao silu koja je ustala protiv Krista pri njegovu raspeću?

The question that could be raised is, why was Daniel shown Rome coming out of one of the Grecian horns, if Rome was not a direct descendant of Greece? The answer is that the beginning of Rome’s rise to power began in that region which had formerly been Greek territory, but why was the prophecy portrayed in such a way to allow for that confusion?

Pitanje koje bi se moglo postaviti glasi: zašto je Danielu pokazano kako Rim izlazi iz jednoga od grčkih rogova, ako Rim nije bio izravni nasljednik Grčke? Odgovor je da je početak uspona Rima na vlast započeo na onome području koje je nekoć bilo grčki teritorij; no zašto je proročanstvo bilo prikazano na takav način da dopušta takvu zabunu?

At least one answer, beyond the importance of noting where Rome began to rise, is that the enigma of Rome always coming up eighth and being of the seven is answered by Rome being associated with the territory of Greece, in order to retain the enigma’s point of Rome being of the seven. The enigma is that important, though the Millerites could never have understood that concept from their vantage point in history. The fact that all the references upon not only the 1843, but also the 1850 chart are illustrations of subjects that are directly addressed in God’s prophetic Word, except for the one reference that emphasizes that Antiochus Epiphanes is not the power that stood against Christ, makes the addition to the chart very significant. How sad is it that when Adventism left their foundations, they find themselves today teaching that the power of verse fourteen of Daniel eleven is Antiochus Epiphanes and not Rome! They now teach what the Millerites opposed so strongly that they represented that controversy upon the 1843 chart!

Barem jedan odgovor, osim važnosti zapažanja gdje je Rim počeo uzdizati se, jest da je zagonetka o tome kako Rim uvijek izlazi kao osmi i jest od sedmorice razriješena time što se Rim povezuje s područjem Grčke, kako bi se sačuvala poanta zagonetke da je Rim od sedmorice. Ta je zagonetka toliko važna, premda mileriti iz svoje povijesne perspektive nikada nisu mogli razumjeti taj koncept. Činjenica da su sve reference ne samo na karti iz 1843., nego i na karti iz 1850., prikazi tema koje su izravno obrađene u Božjoj proročkoj Riječi, osim one jedne reference koja naglašava da Antioh Epifan nije sila koja je stala protiv Krista, čini taj dodatak karti veoma značajnim. Kako je žalosno to što se adventizam, nakon što je napustio svoje temelje, danas nalazi u položaju da naučava kako je sila iz četrnaestoga retka jedanaestoga poglavlja Daniela Antioh Epifan, a ne Rim! Oni sada naučavaju ono čemu su se mileriti tako snažno protivili da su tu polemiku prikazali na karti iz 1843.!

The kingdoms of history identify that Rome comes up eighth and is of the seven. The “little horn” in chapter seven that speaks “great words against the Most High” comes up eighth and is of the seven. The horns of chapter eight identify that Rome comes up eighth and is of the seven.

Kraljevstva povijesti pokazuju da se Rim uzdiže kao osmi i da je od sedmorice. „Mali rog” iz sedmoga poglavlja, koji govori „velike riječi protiv Svevišnjega”, uzdiže se kao osmi i od sedmorice je. Rogovi iz osmoga poglavlja pokazuju da se Rim uzdiže kao osmi i da je od sedmorice.

In the next article we will consider how modern Rome, as represented in Revelation seventeen comes up eighth and is of the seven. We will then return to Daniel two and identify why Daniel two’s four kingdoms, which is the first mention of the kingdoms of Bible prophecy, is in agreement with Revelation seventeen’s eight kingdoms.

U sljedećem ćemo članku razmotriti kako suvremeni Rim, kako je prikazan u Otkrivenju sedamnaest, postaje osmi i od sedmorice je. Zatim ćemo se vratiti na Daniela dva i utvrditi zašto su četiri kraljevstva iz Daniela dva, što je prvi spomen kraljevstava biblijskog proroštva, u skladu s osam kraljevstava iz Otkrivenja sedamnaest.

Back to Articles