Article

# Panium - Number Two

Panium - Broj dva

The Rise and Fall of the King of the South

Uspon i pad kralja Juga

Author

Jeff Pippenger

Published

February 27, 2025

Formats

PDF
Word
Song MP3

We left off the last article by writing, “Verses 10–15 represent three proxy wars accomplished by the king of the north, the papal power, from 1989 to the Sunday law.” These three proxy wars begin with the identification of the United States in verse 40 as “chariots, ships, and horsemen.”

Prethodni smo članak završili riječima: „Redci 10–15 predstavljaju tri posrednička rata koja je od 1989. do nedjeljnog zakona ostvario kralj sjevera, papinska sila.” Ta tri posrednička rata započinju poistovjećenjem Sjedinjenih Država u retku 40 kao „kola, lađa i konjanika.”

The next proxy war, represented by verse 11 and its historical fulfillment at the Battle of Raphia in 217 BC, was between Ptolemy IV Philopator, the southern king of Egypt, and Antiochus the Great, also called Antiochus Magnus, of the Seleucid Empire. Antiochus had fulfilled verse 10 when he retaliated against Egypt for his northern kingdom’s defeat and loss of possessions, retaking all the geography the southern kingdom had previously seized from his kingdom. He did so but stopped at the border of Egypt, thus fulfilling verse 10 and typifying 1989.

Sljedeći posrednički rat, predstavljen u retku 11 i povijesno ispunjen u bitci kod Rafije 217. pr. Kr., bio je između Ptolemeja IV. Filopatora, južnoga kralja Egipta, i Antioha Velikoga, također zvanoga Antioh Magn, iz Seleukidskoga Carstva. Antioh je ispunio redak 10 kada je uzvratio Egiptu zbog poraza svojega sjevernoga kraljevstva i gubitka posjeda, ponovno osvojivši sav zemljopisni prostor koji je južno kraljevstvo prethodno bilo otelo njegovu kraljevstvu. To je učinio, ali se zaustavio na granici Egipta, čime je ispunio redak 10 i predoznačio 1989.

> But his sons shall be stirred up, and shall assemble a multitude of great forces: and one shall certainly come, and overflow, and pass through: then shall he return, and be stirred up, even to his fortress. Daniel 11:10.

> Ali će se njegovi sinovi razjariti te će sabrati mnoštvo velikih vojnih snaga; i jedan će zacijelo doći, preplaviti i proći; potom će se vratiti i razjariti, sve do njegove tvrđave. Daniel 11:10.

The second proxy war was the Battle of Raphia. Raphia means the borderland. That battleground marks the point where Antiochus had ceased his previous invasion of verse 10. The three proxy wars are governed by truth, in the sense that the first proxy war aligns with the last proxy war. All three wars—verses 10, 11, and then the third war of verses 13–15—are waged by the same historical figure in their initial fulfillment. Antiochus Magnus is present in each of the three battles, prophetically tying them together into one line. Antiochus wins the first and last battles, but not the middle one, where the king of the south prevails.

Drugi posrednički rat bio je Bitka kod Rafije. Rafija znači pogranično područje. To bojište označuje točku na kojoj je Antioh prekinuo svoju prethodnu invaziju iz retka 10. Trima posredničkim ratovima upravlja istina, u smislu da je prvi posrednički rat usklađen s posljednjim posredničkim ratom. Sva tri rata — redci 10, 11, a zatim treći rat iz redaka 13–15 — u svojem početnom ispunjenju vodi ista povijesna osoba. Antioh Veliki prisutan je u svakoj od triju bitaka, proročki ih povezujući u jednu liniju. Antioh dobiva prvu i posljednju bitku, ali ne i srednju, u kojoj prevladava kralj juga.

Just as Raphia means borderland, so does Ukraine. The second proxy war, first fulfilled by the Battle of Raphia, is now being fulfilled in the Ukrainian war. Vladimir Putin is the king of the south, the prophetic descendant of the first modern king of the south, Vladimir Lenin. Putin has repeatedly claimed that Russia’s response to Ukraine is based on a disputed agreement that, upon Germany’s reunification, NATO would not expand further into former USSR territory. Putin’s motivation mirrors Ptolemy’s in verses 5–9 and Napoleon’s in 1797. All three southern kings justify their actions against the northern king based on a broken treaty.

Kao što Raphia znači pogranično područje, tako znači i Ukrajina. Drugi posrednički rat, koji se prvi put ispunio Bitkom kod Rafije, sada se ispunjava u ukrajinskom ratu. Vladimir Putin jest kralj juga, proročki potomak prvoga modernog kralja juga, Vladimira Lenjina. Putin je u više navrata tvrdio da se ruski odgovor na Ukrajinu temelji na osporavanom sporazumu prema kojem se, nakon ponovnoga ujedinjenja Njemačke, NATO neće dalje širiti na područje bivšega SSSR-a. Putinov motiv odražava motiv Ptolemeja u redcima 5–9 i Napoleonov motiv 1797. godine. Sva trojica južnih kraljeva opravdavaju svoje postupke protiv kralja sjevera na temelju prekršenoga saveza.

According to Isaiah 23, the whore of Tyre, representing the papal power, would be forgotten for seventy years, as the days of one king—a period repeatedly shown to be the time when the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, the earth beast of Revelation 13 (the United States), rules.

Prema Izaiji 23, tirska bludnica, koja predstavlja papinsku vlast, bit će zaboravljena sedamdeset godina, kao dani jednoga kralja — razdoblje za koje se više puta pokazuje da je vrijeme kada vlada šesto kraljevstvo biblijskog proročanstva, zemaljska zvijer iz Otkrivenja 13 (Sjedinjene Američke Države).

> And it shall come to pass in that day, that Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years, according to the days of one king: after the end of seventy years shall Tyre sing as an harlot. Take an harp, go about the city, thou harlot that hast been forgotten; make sweet melody, sing many songs, that thou mayest be remembered. And it shall come to pass after the end of seventy years, that the Lord will visit Tyre, and she shall turn to her hire, and shall commit fornication with all the kingdoms of the world upon the face of the earth. Isaiah 23:15–17.

> I dogodit će se u onaj dan da će Tir biti zaboravljen sedamdeset godina, prema danima jednoga kralja; nakon svršetka sedamdeset godina Tir će zapjevati kao bludnica. Uzmi harfu, obilazi grad, ti zaboravljena bludnice; zasviraj umilno, pjevaj mnoge pjesme, da bi te se sjetili. I dogodit će se nakon svršetka sedamdeset godina da će Gospod pohoditi Tir, i on će se vratiti svojoj zaradi te će bludničiti sa svim kraljevstvima svijeta po svem licu zemlje. Izaija 23:15–17.

The symbolic seventy-year period spans from 1798 to the Sunday law, which is the history represented by verse 40. It is not until the ending of the seventy years, or the approach of the Sunday law, that the whore reappears. For this reason, the warfare of the three battles in verses 10–15 is carried out by a proxy of the papal power, for she is prophetically forgotten during this period.

Simboličko razdoblje od sedamdeset godina proteže se od 1798. do nedjeljnog zakona, što je povijest prikazana u retku 40. Tek pri završetku sedamdeset godina, ili pri približavanju nedjeljnog zakona, bludnica se ponovno pojavljuje. Iz toga razloga ratovanje triju bitaka u retcima 10–15 provodi se posredstvom zastupnika papinske sile, jer je ona tijekom toga razdoblja proročki zaboravljena.

In the first and last proxy battles, the king of the north prevails over the king of the south. In the middle battle, the king of the south prevails over the king of the north. The Battle of Raphia was the initial historical fulfillment of verse 11, and the verse and their historical fulfillment make up two witnesses that are to be combined with the parallel passages of papal Rome’s three and a half prophetic days of rule. Thus, two passages of Scripture within Daniel 11, accompanied by their historical fulfillments, set forth the prophetic characteristics of verse 11’s battle of the borderland, first fulfilled at the Battle of Raphia and then again at the time of the end in 1798.

U prvoj i posljednjoj posredničkoj bitki kralj sjevera nadvladava kralja juga. U srednjoj bitki kralj juga nadvladava kralja sjevera. Bitka kod Rafije bila je početno povijesno ispunjenje 11. retka, a taj redak i njegovo povijesno ispunjenje sačinjavaju dva svjedoka koja treba povezati s usporednim odlomcima o tri i pol proročka dana vladavine papinskoga Rima. Tako dva odlomka Svetoga pisma unutar Daniela 11, popraćena svojim povijesnim ispunjenjima, iznose proročka obilježja bitke za pograničnu zemlju iz 11. retka, prvi put ispunjene u Bitki kod Rafije, a potom ponovno u vrijeme svršetka 1798. godine.

These lines of witness uphold that Vladimir Putin is the last Vladimir of the modern king of the south. “Vladimir” is often defined as meaning “ruler of the world,” but the word mir also correctly means “community.” Thus, Vladimir means “ruler of the community,” or “ruler of communism.” Putin identifies his involvement with Ukraine as based on a broken agreement addressing his concerns about NATO’s encroachment beyond the borders agreed upon after Germany’s unification. Putin’s direction is as much focused against NATO and the EU as it is against Zelenskyy and Ukraine. NATO and the EU’s encroachment upon territory Putin insists was to remain NATO-free parallels Ptolemy’s rage when the Seleucid king set the Egyptian princess bride aside for his former wife. That broken treaty pointed forward to the broken Treaty of Tolentino in 1797. In Daniel 11, when the southern king prevails over the northern king, it involves a broken treaty.

Ove linije svjedočanstva potvrđuju da je Vladimir Putin posljednji Vladimir suvremenoga kralja juga. „Vladimir“ se često definira u značenju „vladar svijeta“, no riječ mir također ispravno znači „zajednica“. Stoga Vladimir znači „vladar zajednice“ ili „vladar komunizma“. Putin svoje sudjelovanje u Ukrajini poistovjećuje s prekršenim sporazumom koji se odnosi na njegove zabrinutosti zbog zadiranja NATO-a preko granica dogovorenih nakon ujedinjenja Njemačke. Putinovo usmjerenje jednako je usredotočeno protiv NATO-a i EU-a kao i protiv Zelenskog i Ukrajine. Zadiranje NATO-a i EU-a na područje za koje Putin ustrajava da je trebalo ostati izvan NATO-a usporedno je s Ptolemejevim gnjevom kada je seleukidski kralj egipatsku princezu-nevjesta stavio na stranu zbog svoje prijašnje žene. Taj prekršeni ugovor upućivao je unaprijed na prekršeni Tolentinski ugovor 1797. godine. U Danielu 11, kada kralj juga nadvlada kralja sjevera, to uključuje prekršeni ugovor.

This broken treaty concerns the EU’s unwillingness to restrict NATO’s expansion beyond its borders when Germany was reunified. In this sense, Putin, the king of the south, is in a battle against the king of the north, represented by his proxy power. Just as the Nazis of World War II were a proxy for the Catholic Church, the Nazis of Ukraine become the symbol of the second proxy war of verses 10–15. Three world wars and three proxy wars—and in both lines, the Nazis are the proxy representative of the Catholic Church during the middle conflict.

Ovaj prekršeni sporazum tiče se nespremnosti Europske unije da ograniči širenje NATO-a izvan svojih granica u vrijeme kada je Njemačka ponovno ujedinjena. U tom smislu, Putin, kralj juga, nalazi se u borbi protiv kralja sjevera, predstavljenoga po svojoj posredničkoj sili. Kao što su nacisti u Drugome svjetskom ratu bili posrednik Katoličke crkve, tako nacisti Ukrajine postaju simbolom drugoga posredničkog rata iz redaka 10–15. Tri svjetska rata i tri posrednička rata — a u obje linije nacisti su posrednički predstavnik Katoličke crkve tijekom središnjega sukoba.

In the three original historical fulfillments of these proxy wars, Antiochus Magnus was in each battle. It has often been shown how the etymology of “Antiochus” and the symbolism associated with the Seleucid kingdom as the king of the north identify Antiochus as a symbol of the antichrist—the pope of Rome. But in the history of the three proxy wars, the whore of Tyre is forgotten, so the symbol of the “pope” represented in the name “Antiochus” stands for his proxy power. In the first and last battles, it is the United States openly doing the bidding for Rome. In verse 11, the proxy power is the Nazism of Ukraine, but it was and still is the ships and chariots of the United States that propped up Zelenskyy in the war. On the surface of the second proxy war, the United States is hidden, as is the pope during the seventy years of Isaiah 23. The United States is hidden in the very history where it develops all the characteristics of the beast, making it prophetically fitting that, once the second proxy war is underway, the United States is obscured by the proxy power of Nazism in Ukraine, though it remains the military and economic might of the earth beast that props up Ukraine until their demise.

U trima izvornim povijesnim ispunjenjima ovih posredničkih ratova, Antioh Veliki bio je prisutan u svakoj bitci. Često je pokazano kako etimologija imena „Antioh” i simbolika povezana sa seleukidskim kraljevstvom kao kraljem sjevera poistovjećuju Antioha kao simbol antikrista — rimskoga pape. No u povijesti triju posredničkih ratova bludnica iz Tira biva zaboravljena, pa simbol „pape”, predstavljen u imenu „Antioh”, označuje njegovu posredničku silu. U prvoj i posljednjoj bitci, Sjedinjene Države otvoreno izvršavaju naloge Rima. U 11. retku, posrednička sila jest nacizam Ukrajine, ali bile su i još uvijek jesu lađe i bojna kola Sjedinjenih Država one koje su poduprle Zelenskoga u ratu. Na površini drugoga posredničkog rata, Sjedinjene Države ostaju skrivene, kao što je i papa skriven tijekom sedamdeset godina iz Izaije 23. Sjedinjene Države skrivene su upravo u onoj povijesti u kojoj razvijaju sva obilježja zvijeri, što proročki čini prikladnim da, jednom kada je drugi posrednički rat u tijeku, Sjedinjene Države budu zastrte posredničkom silom nacizma u Ukrajini, premda i dalje ostaju vojna i gospodarska moć zemaljske zvijeri koja podupire Ukrajinu sve do njihove propasti.

When the king of the south went to Babylon and took the king of the north captive, and also when General Berthier took the pope captive, he walked right into the Vatican suggesting that the Ukrainian war will end with Putin’s victory at a point when any resistance from the Ukraine has been removed. The kingdom Ptolemy captured was Babylon, and the kingdom Napoleon captured was spiritual Babylon. Thus, Zelenskyy’s kingdom is represented by those subjects which provide him support. Now that Trump has withdrawn the support of the earth beast’s chariots horsemen and ships, Ukraine’s support is the EU, the very group that has been unwilling to hear Putin’s claims of the broken treaty concerning the encroachment of NATO.

Kada je kralj juga otišao u Babilon i odveo kralja sjevera u sužanjstvo, a također i kada je general Berthier odveo papu u sužanjstvo, ušao je ravno u Vatikan, što upućuje na to da će ukrajinski rat završiti Putinovom pobjedom u trenutku kada bude uklonjen svaki otpor iz Ukrajine. Kraljevstvo koje je Ptolemej osvojio bilo je Babilon, a kraljevstvo koje je Napoleon osvojio bilo je duhovni Babilon. Stoga je Zelenskijevo kraljevstvo predstavljeno onim podanicima koji mu pružaju potporu. Sada kada je Trump povukao potporu bojnim kolima, konjanicima i lađama zemaljske zvijeri, potpora Ukrajini jest EU, upravo ona skupina koja nije bila voljna čuti Putinove tvrdnje o prekršenom sporazumu glede zadiranja NATO-a.

The philosophy that guides the eurocrats of the EU is the Greenpeace movement. For this reason, Zelenskyy means, “green.” Zelenskyy is the symbolic head of the warmongers of the EU who are guided by the foolish global agenda of environmentalism. When the Ukraine war concludes Putin will celebrate not only a victory over Ukraine, but the entire EU and NATO.

Filozofija koja vodi eurokrate Europske unije jest pokret Greenpeace. Zbog toga Zelenskyy znači „zelen“. Zelenskyy je simbolički poglavar ratnih huškača Europske unije koje vodi bezumni globalni program environmentalizma. Kada se rat u Ukrajini okonča, Putin će slaviti ne samo pobjedu nad Ukrajinom, nego i nad cijelom Europskom unijom i NATO-om.

The three proxy wars therefore possess the signature of truth. The first and last proxy war the king of the south is defeated through an alliance between the sea beast and earth beast of Revelation thirteen. In the beginning the victory for the king of the north was brought about by an alliance between a conservative, Vatican I pope, who in the context of the Fatima secrets of Catholicism lore is the white or good pope. The current pope, who as I write this is on his deathbed is a Vatican II, liberal pope, who in the context of the Fatima secrets is the black or bad pope.

Tri posrednička rata stoga nose pečat istine. U prvome i posljednjem posredničkom ratu kralj juga biva poražen putem saveza između zvijeri iz mora i zvijeri iz zemlje iz Otkrivenja trinaest. Na početku je pobjeda kralja sjevera bila ostvarena savezom s konzervativnim papom Prvoga vatikanskog koncila, koji je, u kontekstu tajni iz Fatime prema katoličkoj predaji, bijeli ili dobri papa. Sadašnji papa, koji je, dok ovo pišem, na samrtnoj postelji, papa je Drugoga vatikanskog koncila, liberalni papa, koji je u kontekstu fatimskih tajni crni ili loši papa.

Verse fourteen identifies that when the “robbers of thy people” who exalt themselves and fall, enter into prophetic history the vision is established. In the fulfillment of verses thirteen through fifteen in the Battle of Panium in 200 BC pagan Rome inserted itself into the issues concerning that very battle. In the three verses which address the Battle of Panium, verse fourteen identifies that the vision is established by Rome.

Četrnaesti redak označava da se, kada „nasilnici među tvojim narodom”, koji se uzvisuju i padaju, stupe u proročku povijest, utvrđuje viđenje. U ispunjenju redaka trinaest do petnaest u bitci kod Panija 200. pr. Kr., poganski Rim umiješao se u pitanja koja su se odnosila upravo na tu bitku. U trima recima koji govore o bitci kod Panija, četrnaesti redak označava da Rim utvrđuje viđenje.

In the Battle of Panium history a conservative, Vatican I white pope will join forces with the last of the eight presidents that began in the period of Reagan, who previously formed an alliance with a conservative Vatican I pope. They did so in 1989 to bring down the former USSR, and at the end they do so to bring down the last ruler of that very kingdom.

U povijesnoj Bitki kod Panija, konzervativni bijeli papa Vatikana I udružit će snage s posljednjim od osmorice predsjednika koji su započeli u razdoblju Reagana, a koji je prethodno sklopio savez s konzervativnim papom Vatikana I. To su učinili 1989. kako bi srušili bivši SSSR, a na kraju to čine kako bi srušili posljednjega vladara upravo toga kraljevstva.

In the Reagan years and with the alliance of pope John Paul II and the USA, John Paul II came to believe he was the good pope of the prophecies of Fatima. Motivated by that conviction he began to travel the world to promote what he understood to be a fulfillment of the predictions of Fatima. In doing so he became the most travelled pope in history, as well as the most recognized pope of all time as he fulfilled Revelation thirteen’s prediction that there would be a time when the whole world would wonder after the beast. Pope John Paul II’s public persona typifies the conservative Vatican I pope who comes into an alliance with the last president of the USA.

U vrijeme Reaganovih godina i sa savezom pape Ivana Pavla II. i SAD-a, Ivan Pavao II. počeo je vjerovati da je on dobri papa iz fatimskih proročanstava. Potaknut tim uvjerenjem, počeo je putovati svijetom kako bi promicao ono što je razumijevao kao ispunjenje fatimskih predskazanja. Time je postao papa koji je najviše putovao u povijesti, kao i najprepoznatljiviji papa svih vremena, ispunjavajući predviđanje iz trinaestog poglavlja Otkrivenja da će doći vrijeme kada će se sav svijet diviti Zvijeri. Javna persona pape Ivana Pavla II. utjelovljuje konzervativnog papu Prvoga vatikanskog koncila koji stupa u savez s posljednjim predsjednikom SAD-a.

Therefore, one of the prophetic characteristics of the Reagan contemporary pope is that there is a point where his public image is marked as a waymark. That mark is in verse fourteen, when the robbers of thy people establish the vision. Pope John Paul II fulfills a prophetic characteristic of being the pope that the entire world wondered after, thus pointing forward to the conservative end time Vatican I pope who comes into an alliance with Trump. When that happens the vision is established, and what establishes the vision is the pope inserting himself into the history of Panium and the year 200 BC.

Stoga je jedno od proročkih obilježja suvremenoga pape u vremenu Reagana to da postoji točka u kojoj je njegova javna slika označena kao putokaz. Taj se znak nalazi u četrnaestom retku, kada razbojnici tvoga naroda uspostavljaju viđenje. Papa Ivan Pavao II ispunjava proročko obilježje time što je papa za kojim se čudio sav svijet, te tako upućuje unaprijed na konzervativnoga vatikanskoga papu I. iz vremena svršetka koji stupa u savez s Trumpom. Kada se to dogodi, viđenje je uspostavljeno, a ono što uspostavlja viđenje jest to što se papa umeće u povijest Panija i godinu 200. pr. Kr.

The beginning of the eight presidents illustrates the ending of the eight presidents and just before the Sunday law of verse sixteen the whore of Tyre who has been forgotten returns to open history as she forms an alliance with Reagan’s counterpart, Donald Trump. Together as represented by the alliance of Antiochus and Philip of Macedon they bring down the final generation of the southern kingdom as represented by the child king Ptolemy. A child in Bible prophecy is a symbol of the final generation, and after the Ukraine war Putin will repeat the history of the southern kings who are lifted up from military victories and lose their way in some type of church and state dilemma.

Početak osmorice predsjednika prikazuje završetak osmorice predsjednika, i neposredno prije nedjeljnog zakona iz šesnaestoga retka bludnica iz Tira, koja je bila zaboravljena, vraća se u otvorenu povijest dok sklapa savez s Reaganovim pandanom, Donaldom Trumpom. Zajedno, kako je prikazano savezom Antioha i Filipa Makedonskoga, oni obaraju posljednji naraštaj južnoga kraljevstva, prikazan djetetom-kraljem Ptolemejem. Dijete u biblijskom proročanstvu simbol je posljednjega naraštaja, a nakon ukrajinskoga rata Putin će ponoviti povijest južnih kraljeva koji se uzdižu vojnim pobjedama i gube svoj put u nekoj vrsti dileme između crkve i države.

Thus, verse ten, representing 1989 and the first proxy war is the beginning, or the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet. The Battle of Raphia in verse eleven representing the Ukraine war is the thirteenth letter in the Hebrew alphabet. The number 13 is a symbol of rebellion, and the proxy army in the Ukrainian war are Nazi’s, the premier symbol of rebellion in the modern world. Panium is the last letter in the Hebrew alphabet, which is made up of twenty-two letters. Thus, the Hebrew word truth which is created by bringing the first, thirteenth and twenty-second letters of the alphabet together to form the Hebrew word “truth,” identifies the structure of these three proxy wars as truth. The twenty-second and last letter of the Hebrew alphabet is a symbol of divinity being combined with humanity, and the fulfillment of the Battle of Panium in the near future takes place during Trump’s presidency. Trump is the twenty-second president to have served two terms.

Tako je deseti redak, koji predstavlja 1989. godinu i prvi posrednički rat, početak, odnosno prvo slovo hebrejskoga alfabeta. Bitka kod Rafije u jedanaestom retku, koja predstavlja rat u Ukrajini, trinaesto je slovo hebrejskoga alfabeta. Broj 13 simbol je pobune, a posrednička vojska u ukrajinskom ratu jesu nacisti, vrhunski simbol pobune u suvremenom svijetu. Panij je posljednje slovo hebrejskoga alfabeta, koji se sastoji od dvadeset i dva slova. Tako hebrejska riječ istina, koja nastaje spajanjem prvoga, trinaestoga i dvadeset i drugoga slova alfabeta kako bi se oblikovala hebrejska riječ „istina“, označava strukturu ovih triju posredničkih ratova kao istinu. Dvadeset i drugo, ujedno i posljednje slovo hebrejskoga alfabeta, simbol je božanstva sjedinjenoga s čovještvom, a ispunjenje Bitke kod Panija u bliskoj budućnosti zbiva se tijekom Trumpova predsjedništva. Trump je dvadeset i drugi predsjednik koji je služio dva mandata.

Panium has a double witness to a twofold alliance and in both references the alliance represents an alliance identifying a hierarchical relationship between two parties. The alliance between Philip and Antiochus was strategic, aimed at countering Ptolemaic and Roman influence in the eastern Mediterranean. However, their collaboration was not focused on the Battle of Panium itself—Antiochus conducted this campaign independently, without Philip’s direct military involvement. Philip’s role was more indirect, providing political and strategic support by tying down Roman and Ptolemaic allies in Greece and the Aegean, allowing Antiochus to focus on Coele-Syria. The historians all identify that Antiochus was the more powerful in the alliance, and that it was only Antiochus who actually fought the battle. Their alliance was concerning the broader area associated with Alexander’s former kingdom. Thus, the alliance has a premier leader and a lesser subordinate as represented by the name Caesarea-Philippi, the name for Panium when Christ walked among men. Caesarea-Philippi therefore aligns with Antiochus and Philip, for Caesar was the more powerful in the alliance symbolized by both Caesar Augustus and Herod Philip the tetrarch.

Panij ima dvostruko svjedočanstvo o dvostrukom savezu, i u oba se navoda savez prikazuje kao savez koji označuje hijerarhijski odnos između dviju strana. Savez između Filipa i Antioha bio je strateški, usmjeren na suprotstavljanje ptolomejskom i rimskom utjecaju u istočnom Sredozemlju. Međutim, njihova suradnja nije bila usmjerena na samu Bitku kod Panija — Antioh je ovaj pohod vodio samostalno, bez Filipova izravnog vojnog sudjelovanja. Filipova je uloga bila više neizravna, pružajući političku i stratešku potporu time što je vezivao rimske i ptolomejske saveznike u Grčkoj i na Egeju, omogućujući Antiohu da se usredotoči na Koile-Siriju. Svi povjesničari prepoznaju da je Antioh bio moćniji u tom savezu te da je jedino Antioh doista vodio bitku. Njihov se savez odnosio na šire područje povezano s negdašnjim Aleksandrovim kraljevstvom. Stoga savez ima vrhovnog vođu i manjega podređenog, kako je predstavljeno imenom Cezareja Filipova, imenom za Panij u vrijeme kada je Krist hodio među ljudima. Cezareja Filipova stoga se podudara s Antiohom i Filipom, jer je Cezar bio moćniji u savezu, što simboliziraju i car August Cezar i tetrarh Herod Filip.

The word “Tetrarch” means ruler over a fourth. Caesar ruled the entire kingdom, and Philip ruled over a fourth of a territory thus placing the symbol of Philip in a subjective relationship in the alliances of Panium and Caesarea-Philippi. With Herod Philip we see the symbol of two blood lines which are both symbols of a broken covenant relationship with God. We also see echoes of one fourth of the division of Alexander’s kingdom into four parts, or four tetrarchs. Philip means lover of horses.

Riječ „tetrarh“ znači vladar nad četvrtinom. Cezar je vladao cijelim kraljevstvom, a Filip je vladao nad četvrtinom područja, čime se simbol Filipa postavlja u subjektivan odnos unutar savezništava Panija i Cezareje-Filipove. U Herodu Filipu vidimo simbol dviju krvnih loza, koje su obje simboli prekinutoga savezničkog odnosa s Bogom. Također vidimo odjeke jedne četvrtine podjele Aleksandrova kraljevstva na četiri dijela, odnosno na četiri tetrarha. Filip znači ljubitelj konja.

At the Battle of Panium which is fulfilled at the conclusion of the Ukrainian war Antiochus Magnus, the United States will defeat Russia and will enter into an alliance with a lesser player represented by Philip. That lesser player will be involved but not directly in the battle. The battle will be between the USA and Putin, evidently directly connected with a religious controversy produced by Putin’s irritation and pride as illustrated by both Ptolemy IV Philopator after the Battle of Raphia, and by king Uzziah of Judah. Ptolemy and Uzziah were southern kings lifted up in pride by their military success who then desired to take up a sacred work which was only to be accomplished by the priests. Uzziah received leprosy for his efforts and Ptolemy in a rage slew 50,000 Jews in Alexandria.

U Bitki kod Panija, koja se ispunjava pri završetku ukrajinskoga rata, Antioh Veliki, Sjedinjene Američke Države porazit će Rusiju te će stupiti u savez s manjim čimbenikom predstavljenim Filipom. Taj manji čimbenik bit će uključen, ali ne izravno u bitku. Bitka će biti između SAD-a i Putina, očito izravno povezana s vjerskom kontroverzom izazvanom Putinovom razdraženošću i ohološću, kako je prikazano i kod Ptolemeja IV. Filopatora nakon Bitke kod Rafije, i kod judejskoga kralja Uzije. Ptolemej i Uzija bili su južni kraljevi uzdignuti u oholosti svojim vojnim uspjehom, koji su potom poželjeli poduzeti sveti posao koji su smjeli obavljati samo svećenici. Uzija je za svoj pokušaj bio pogođen gubom, a Ptolemej je u gnjevu pobio 50.000 Židova u Aleksandriji.

Verse thirteen identifies the battle between the final generation of the modern king of the community, or communism, Vladimir Putin’s Russia and the USA. Trump prevails in the battle, but he does so with an ally from a fourth part of the kingdom, who is not actually at the battle. We are near the conclusion of verse eleven as testified to by the current events. Putin will be victorious over Ukraine, as represented by Raphia. He will then begin his progressive demise as represented by Uzziah being placed into a house until his death, due to leprosy. After his victory at Raphia in 217 BC, Ptolemy IV Philopator’s reign deteriorated due to corruption, extravagance, and reliance on unscrupulous advisors. He died in 204 BC, likely assassinated or poisoned by his ministers, Sosibius and Agathocles, as part of a conspiracy to secure power for his young son, Ptolemy V. This turbulent end reflects the instability and intrigue common in Hellenistic royal courts, marking a significant turning point in the decline of Ptolemaic Egypt.

Trinaesti redak identificira bitku između završnoga naraštaja suvremenoga kralja zajednice, odnosno komunizma, Rusije Vladimira Putina i SAD-a. Trump prevladava u toj bitci, ali to čini uz saveznika iz četvrtoga dijela kraljevstva, koji zapravo nije u samoj bitci. Blizu smo završetka jedanaestoga retka, kako o tome svjedoče sadašnji događaji. Putin će odnijeti pobjedu nad Ukrajinom, kako je predočeno Rafijom. Potom će započeti njegova postupna propast, kako je predočeno time što je Uzija smješten u kuću do svoje smrti zbog gube. Nakon svoje pobjede kod Rafije 217. pr. Kr., vladavina Ptolemeja IV. Filopatora počela je nazadovati zbog korupcije, rasipnosti i oslanjanja na beskrupulozne savjetnike. Umro je 204. pr. Kr., vjerojatno ubijen ili otrovan od svojih ministara, Sosibija i Agatokla, kao dio urote radi osiguranja vlasti za njegova mladoga sina, Ptolemeja V. Taj burni svršetak odražava nestabilnost i spletke uobičajene na helenističkim kraljevskim dvorovima, označujući značajnu prekretnicu u propadanju ptolemejskoga Egipta.

A characteristic of the spiritual fulfillment of the king of the south which was typified by the literal fulfillments which took place in the struggle for world domination following Alexander’s death is “revolution.” France becomes the spiritual king of the south in the French Revolution time period. The modern king of the south, Russia was born in the Russian Revolution. As the philosophy introduced into the French Revolution matured from the anarchy of the French Revolution unto the communism of the Soviet revolution is a characteristic of the king of the south. Communism spread through the world with revolutions.

Obilježje duhovnog ispunjenja kralja juga, koje je bilo predočeno doslovnim ispunjenjima što su se zbila u borbi za svjetsku prevlast nakon Aleksandrove smrti, jest „revolucija“. Francuska postaje duhovni kralj juga u razdoblju Francuske revolucije. Suvremeni kralj juga, Rusija, rođen je u Ruskoj revoluciji. Kako je filozofija uvedena u Francuskoj revoluciji sazrijevala od anarhije Francuske revolucije do komunizma sovjetske revolucije, tako je to obilježje kralja juga. Komunizam se širio svijetom putem revolucija.

In modern times the CIA through the use of Non-Governmental Agencies has worked to overthrow nations around the globe, and the step-by-step plan which they have repeatedly employed is what is called color revolutions. The king of the south is a dragon power, and globalists are also the dragon power and the color revolutions of the CIA are markers of a dragon power. The history of France as the spiritual king of the south possesses a unique history that marks a conclusion of that particular line of prophecy.

U suvremeno doba CIA je, služeći se nevladinim agencijama, djelovala na svrgavanju nacija diljem svijeta, a plan korak po korak koji je opetovano primjenjivala jest ono što se naziva obojenim revolucijama. Kralj juga jest zmajeva sila, a globalisti su također zmajeva sila, i obojene revolucije CIA-e obilježja su zmajeve sile. Povijest Francuske kao duhovnoga kralja juga posjeduje jedinstvenu povijest koja označava završetak te posebne proročke linije.

That conclusion is represented by Napoleon. The French Revolution marks the beginning of France as the king of the south and Napoleon marks its end. Historians identify a series a steps which led Napoleon to his Waterloo, thus identifying a progressive ending to the first spiritual king of the south, as opposed to Babylon and Belshazzar being taken in one night. The first Vladimir of the modern king of the south, Vladimir Lenin died over a two-year period from a series of strokes. Some speculate Joseph Stalin poisoned him, just as some speculate the Ptolemy IV was poisoned by his counselors. The end of the modern king of the south as represented with the Soviet Union was also accomplished by a revolution.

Taj zaključak predstavljen je Napoleonom. Francuska revolucija označava početak Francuske kao kralja juga, a Napoleon označava njezin svršetak. Povjesničari prepoznaju niz koraka koji su Napoleona doveli do njegova Waterlooa, prepoznajući tako postupni svršetak prvoga duhovnog kralja juga, za razliku od Babilona i Belšacara, koji su bili osvojeni u jednoj noći. Prvi Vladimir suvremenoga kralja juga, Vladimir Lenjin, umirao je tijekom dvogodišnjega razdoblja od niza moždanih udara. Neki nagađaju da ga je Josif Staljin otrovao, kao što neki nagađaju da su Ptolemeja IV. otrovali njegovi savjetnici. Svršetak suvremenoga kralja juga, prikazanoga u Sovjetskom Savezu, također je ostvaren revolucijom.

The protest in Moscow that contributed to the demise of the USSR was the massive public resistance during the August 1991 Coup (August 19–21, 1991). This event, centered around the defense of the White House and Boris Yeltsin’s leadership, directly undermined the Soviet hardliners, exposed the regime’s fragility, and accelerated the USSR’s collapse. While earlier protests in Moscow (e.g., 1987–1990) and the Baltic Way (1989) built momentum, the August 1991 protests were the critical tipping point in Moscow, leading to the Soviet Union’s dissolution by the end of 1991. The beginning of Russia as the king of the south begins and ends in revolution. The ending of the USSR was a progressive disintegration of the kingdom, as was Ptolemy, Uzziah, Napoleon and even Vladimir Lenin. The ending of Putin is a progressive fall, which begins as soon as the Ukraine war is finished. His end is brought about at the Battle of Panium, when the USA takes control of the kingdom, while receiving support from an ally who is not actually at the battle.

Prosvjed u Moskvi koji je pridonio propasti SSSR-a bio je masovni javni otpor tijekom kolovoškoga puča 1991. (19.–21. kolovoza 1991.). Taj događaj, usredotočen na obranu Bijele kuće i vodstvo Borisa Jeljcina, izravno je potkopao sovjetske tvrdolinijaše, razotkrio krhkost režima i ubrzao raspad SSSR-a. Premda su raniji prosvjedi u Moskvi (npr. 1987.–1990.) i Baltički put (1989.) stvarali zamah, prosvjedi u kolovozu 1991. bili su presudna točka preokreta u Moskvi, koja je dovela do raspada Sovjetskoga Saveza do kraja 1991. godine. Početak Rusije kao kralja juga započinje i završava u revoluciji. Završetak SSSR-a bio je postupna dezintegracija kraljevstva, kao što je to bio slučaj s Ptolemejem, Uzijom, Napoleonom pa čak i Vladimirom Lenjinom. Putinov završetak jest postupni pad, koji započinje čim rat u Ukrajini bude završen. Njegov kraj nastupa u Bitki kod Panija, kada SAD preuzima nadzor nad kraljevstvom, primajući pritom potporu od saveznika koji zapravo nije na samoj bojišnici.

We will continue these lines in the next article.

Nastavit ćemo ove retke u sljedećem članku.

Back to Articles