Article

# Panium - Number Four

Panijum – broj četiri

An Alliance

Savezništvo

Author

Jeff Pippenger

Published

March 4, 2025

Formats

PDF
Word
Song MP3

In the history of Panium an alliance was formed between Antiochus Magnus and Philip of Macedon. The battle was directly carried out against the child Ptolemy V by Antiochus, and Philip contributed in the sense that his warfare in other parts of the realm prevented other armies from coming to the aid of the Egyptian child king. This means that Putin, the final king of the south—typified by the child king of Egypt (child meaning last generation prophetically) is defeated by Trump represented as Antiochus Magnus who defeated Ptolemy V at Panium and as Reagan defeated the USSR in 1989.

U povijesti Panija sklopljen je savez između Antioha Velikog i Filipa Makedonskoga. Bitka je bila izravno vođena protiv djeteta Ptolemeja V. od strane Antioha, a Filip je pridonio time što je njegovo ratovanje u drugim dijelovima kraljevstva spriječilo druge vojske da priteknu u pomoć egipatskom kralju-djetetu. To znači da je Putin, posljednji kralj juga — predočen kraljem-djetetom Egipta (dijete u proročkom smislu znači posljednji naraštaj) — poražen od Trumpa, predstavljenog Antiohom Velikim koji je porazio Ptolemeja V. kod Panija, kao što je Reagan porazio SSSR 1989. godine.

Philip means “a lover of horses” and “horses” symbolize both military and economic power. Horses pull chariots and are ridden by soldiers, and horses also move goods to the market. “Horses” are a symbol of “chariots, ships and horsemen” which is the primary symbol of the United States in its proxy relationship with the king of the north as set forth in verse forty.

Filip znači „ljubitelj konja“, a „konji“ simboliziraju i vojnu i gospodarsku moć. Konji vuku bojna kola i jašu ih vojnici, a konji također prevoze robu na tržnicu. „Konji“ su simbol „bojnih kola, lađa i konjanika“, što je glavni simbol Sjedinjenih Država u njihovu posredničkom odnosu s kraljem sjevera, kako je izloženo u četrdesetom retku.

Trump’s ally has two typifications in Philip of Macedon and Herod Philip the Tetrarch. Whether it is Herod Philip or Philip of Macedon the symbol identifies one who loves the power supplied to it by either Caesar or Antiochus, respectively. Philip loves horses, and one Philip was from Macedon, which held a central and foundational role in Alexander the Great’s kingdom.

Trumpov saveznik ima dvije tipologijske predslike u Filipu Makedonskom i Herodu Filipu Tetrarhu. Bilo da je riječ o Herodu Filipu ili Filipu Makedonskom, simbol označava onoga koji ljubi vlast koju mu daju, redom, Cezar ili Antioh. Filip ljubi konje, a jedan je Filip bio iz Makedonije, koja je imala središnju i temeljnu ulogu u kraljevstvu Aleksandra Velikoga.

It was his homeland, the kingdom he inherited from his father, Philip II, and the springboard for his vast empire. Located in the northern part of Greece, Macedon was distinct as the political and military core where Alexander was born (in Pella, 356 BC) and raised, and it provided the initial resources, manpower, and organizational structure that fueled his conquests. In essence, Macedon was the nucleus of Alexander’s kingdom—its starting point, military engine, and the region that anchored his identity as a Macedonian king, even as his empire grew far beyond its borders.

Bila je to njegova domovina, kraljevstvo koje je naslijedio od svoga oca, Filipa II., i odskočna daska za njegovo golemo carstvo. Smještena u sjevernom dijelu Grčke, Makedonija se izdvajala kao politička i vojna jezgra u kojoj se Aleksandar rodio (u Peli, 356. pr. Kr.) i odrastao, te mu je pružila početna sredstva, ljudstvo i organizacijsku strukturu koji su pokretali njegova osvajanja. U biti, Makedonija je bila središte Aleksandrova kraljevstva — njegovo polazište, vojni pokretač i područje koje je učvršćivalo njegov identitet makedonskoga kralja, čak i dok se njegovo carstvo širilo daleko izvan njezinih granica.

Macedon represents the northern area of Alexander’s fourfold kingdom. Thus, one Philip is the Tetrarch, meaning ‘a fourth part,’ and the other Philip is ‘one-fourth’ of the four winds of Alexander’s former empire.

Makedonija predstavlja sjeverno područje Aleksandrova četverodijelnog kraljevstva. Stoga je jedan Filip tetrarh, što znači „četvrti dio“, a drugi Filip jest „jedna četvrtina“ od četiriju vjetrova nekadašnjega Aleksandrova Carstva.

Herod represents one who rejects the covenant. Esau, the blood line that leads to Herod rejected his birthright. At the very beginning of the history of a chosen covenant people Esau becomes a symbol of those who reject the covenant Christ died to confirm. At the very point where God was going to expand his chosen covenant people into twelve tribes, Esau rebelled. At the end of ancient Israel, when at the cross the Jews claimed they had “no other king than Caesar” the Jewish nation became the symbol at the end which had been typified by Esau in the beginning. Herod’s family tree is made up of the blood line of Esau and the Jews, a blood line symbolized by a rebellious covenant breaker at the beginning and a rebellious covenant people at the end.

Herod predstavlja onoga koji odbacuje Savez. Ezav, krvna loza koja vodi do Heroda, odbacio je svoje prvorodstvo. Na samom početku povijesti izabranoga saveznog naroda Ezav postaje simbol onih koji odbacuju Savez koji je Krist umro potvrditi. Upravo u trenutku kada je Bog namjeravao proširiti svoj izabrani saveznički narod u dvanaest plemena, Ezav se pobunio. Na kraju staroga Izraela, kada su kod križa Židovi ustvrdili da nemaju „drugoga kralja osim cara“, židovski je narod na kraju postao simbol onoga što je na početku bilo predoznačeno Ezavom. Herodovo obiteljsko stablo sastavljeno je od krvne loze Ezava i Židova, loze koju na početku simbolizira buntovni prekršitelj Saveza, a na kraju buntovni saveznički narod.

Herod the Great imposed the taxes that brought Joseph and Mary to Bethlehem, and one of his three sons, Herod Antipas the son of Herod the Great ruled during the time of the cross. The period of Christ’s life from His birth to His death is symbolically represented by the family of Herod, thus identifying the history as the time of the chosen people’s visitation, a visitation the Jews by and large never saw.

Herod Veliki nametnuo je poreze koji su doveli Josipa i Mariju u Betlehem, a jedan od njegova tri sina, Herod Antipa, sin Heroda Velikoga, vladao je u vrijeme križa. Razdoblje Kristova života od njegova rođenja do njegove smrti simbolički je prikazano obitelji Herod, čime se ta povijest prepoznaje kao vrijeme pohođenja izabranoga naroda, pohođenja koje Židovi uglavnom nikada nisu vidjeli.

Herod the Great murdered the children in response to Jesus’ birth, thus repeating the history of the birth of Moses when Egypt was murdering children. The first child slaughter was an attempt to murder the expected chosen one and the last child slaughter was again an attempt to murder the expected chosen one. The one hundred and forty-four thousand sing the song of Moses and the Lamb, and prophetically a “song” represents an experience. The one hundred and forty-four thousand live in a period that possesses parallel experiences. One of those parallels arrived on January 22, 1973 with a Supreme Court ruling allowing abortions in the USA. In the following forty-nine years roughly 66 million potential candidates to be among the one hundred and forty-four thousand were slaughtered through federally sanctioned abortion.

Herod Veliki ubijao je djecu kao odgovor na Isusovo rođenje, ponavljajući tako povijest Mojsijeva rođenja kada je Egipat ubijao djecu. Prvo klanje djece bilo je pokušaj ubojstva očekivanoga izabranika, a posljednje klanje djece ponovno je bilo pokušaj ubojstva očekivanoga izabranika. Sto četrdeset i četiri tisuće pjevaju pjesmu Mojsijevu i Janjetovu, a proročki „pjesma” predstavlja iskustvo. Sto četrdeset i četiri tisuće žive u razdoblju koje posjeduje usporedna iskustva. Jedna od tih usporednica nastupila je 22. siječnja 1973. presudom Vrhovnoga suda kojom su u SAD-u dopušteni pobačaji. U sljedećih četrdeset i devet godina približno 66 milijuna mogućih kandidata da budu među sto četrdeset i četiri tisuće bilo je usmrćeno putem pobačaja odobrenih saveznom vlašću.

Power symbolizes military strength:

Sila simbolizira vojnu snagu:

> And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority. Revelation 13:2.

> I zvijer koju vidjeh bijaše kao leopard, i noge joj bijahu kao u medvjeda, a usta njezina kao usta lava; i zmaj joj dade svoju silu, i svoje prijestolje, i veliku vlast. Otkrivenje 13,2.

The dragon, who is pagan Rome provided three things for the papacy, i.e. “his power, and his seat, and great authority.” In verse twelve the USA, the earth beast is represented as exercising all the “power” of the beast before him. Yet the word “power” in verse two is a different Greek word than the word translated as “power” in verse twelve. In verse two “power” is G1722: meaning in the face of (literally or figuratively): in the presence (sight) of.

Zmaj, koji je poganski Rim, osigurao je papinstvu tri stvari, to jest „silu svoju, i prijestolje svoje, i vlast veliku”. U dvanaestom retku Sjedinjene Američke Države, zvijer iz zemlje, prikazane su kako vrše svu „vlast” zvijeri pred njom. Ipak, riječ „vlast” u drugom retku druga je grčka riječ od one koja je u dvanaestom retku prevedena kao „vlast”. U drugom retku „vlast” je G1722: što znači pred licem (doslovno ili preneseno): u prisutnosti (naočigled) od.

The word “power” in verse twelve is a different Greek word.

Riječ „moć” u dvanaestom retku druga je grčka riječ.

> And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. Revelation 13:12.

> I on vrši svu vlast prve Zvijeri pred njom te čini da se zemlja i oni koji na njoj prebivaju klanjaju prvoj Zvijeri, kojoj bijaše iscijeljena smrtna rana. Otkrivenje 13,12.

The word “power” G1832 here means, (in the sense of ability); privilege, that is, delegated influence: authority, jurisdiction, liberty, power, right, strength. The word “power” in verse twelve is identifying that the earth beast is the sea beast’s delegated authority—the USA is the proxy representative of the sea beast. The USA exercises all the delegated authority of the first beast. In verse two pagan Rome gave three things to the papacy. Clovis gave his military and economic might to the papacy in 496 at the Battle of Tolbiac. Constantine gave the “seat” of the empire away in 330 and Justinian identified the pope as the corrector of heretics and the head of the churches by a decree in 533. Clovis in 496 typifies Reagan in 1989. Reagan typifies Trump.

Riječ „vlast” G1832 ovdje znači (u smislu sposobnosti); povlastica, to jest preneseni utjecaj: vlast, jurisdikcija, sloboda, moć, pravo, snaga. Riječ „vlast” u dvanaestom retku označuje da je zvijer iz zemlje prenesena vlast zvijeri iz mora — SAD je opunomoćeni predstavnik zvijeri iz mora. SAD izvršava svu prenesenu vlast prve zvijeri. U drugom retku poganski je Rim dao papinstvu tri stvari. Klodvig je dao svoju vojnu i gospodarsku moć papinstvu 496. godine u Bitci kod Tolbiaca. Konstantin je 330. predao „sjedište” Carstva, a Justinijan je dekretom 533. godine označio papu kao ispravitelja heretika i poglavara crkava. Klodvig 496. godine predstavlja tip Reagana 1989. Reagan je tip Trumpa.

According to Gregory of Tours (writing nearly a century later), Clovis was losing the battle and, in desperation, called upon the Catholic god for aid. His wife, Clotilde, was a Catholic Burgundian princess who had been urging him to convert from paganism. Clovis vowed that if he won, he would adopt Catholicism. The tide turned—whether by divine intervention or military strategy—and Clovis defeated the Alemanni, killing their king and scattering their forces. True to his vow, he converted to Catholicism and was baptized, traditionally dated to Christmas Day 496 in Reims by Bishop Remigius (St. Remi).

Prema Grguru Tourskom (koji je pisao gotovo stoljeće kasnije), Klodvig je gubio bitku te je, u očaju, zazvao u pomoć katoličkoga Boga. Njegova supruga Klotilda bila je katolička burgundska princeza koja ga je poticala da se obrati s poganstva. Klodvig se zavjetovao da će, ako pobijedi, prihvatiti katoličanstvo. Tijek bitke preokrenuo se — bilo božanskom intervencijom bilo vojnom strategijom — te je Klodvig porazio Alamanne, ubivši njihova kralja i raspršivši njihove snage. Vjeran svojemu zavjetu, obratio se na katoličanstvo i bio kršten, prema predaji na Božić 496. godine u Reimsu od biskupa Remigija (sv. Remi).

His conversion marked a turning point, making Clovis the first Catholic king among the Germanic rulers (unlike the Arian Christian Visigoths or Ostrogoths). This aligned the Franks with the Roman Church, gaining him support from the Gallo-Roman population and the papacy. Clovis’ baptism is often seen as the symbolic “birth of France” as a Catholic nation, distinguishing it from other barbarian kingdoms that adhered to Arianism or paganism. For this reason, Catholicism refers to France as “the firstborn of the Catholic church,” and also “the eldest daughter of the Catholic church.”

Njegovo obraćenje označilo je prekretnicu, učinivši Klodviga prvim katoličkim kraljem među germanskim vladarima (za razliku od arijanskih kršćanskih Vizigota ili Ostrogota). Time su se Franci uskladili s Rimskom Crkvom, čime je stekao potporu galsko-rimskog stanovništva i papinstva. Klodvigovo krštenje često se smatra simboličkim „rođenjem Francuske” kao katoličkog naroda, čime se ona razlikovala od drugih barbarskih kraljevstava koja su prianjala uz arijanstvo ili poganstvo. Zbog toga katolicizam Francusku naziva „prvorođencem Katoličke crkve”, a također i „najstarijom kćeri Katoličke crkve”.

When Clovis became the first proxy power of the papacy in 496, he typified Reagan who became the proxy power in 1989. In the history of Reagan and pope John Paul II a secret alliance was formed for the purpose of bringing down the king of the south. From 1798 unto the Sunday law the whore of Tyre is hidden, and she is the very same whore who traces her roots back to Macedon the northern most kingdom. She is the king of the north, hidden prophetically, but still professing to be infallible.

Kada je Klodvig 496. godine postao prvom opunomoćenom silom papinstva, predoznačio je Reagana, koji je 1989. postao opunomoćena sila. U povijesti Reagana i pape Ivana Pavla II. sklopljen je tajni savez sa svrhom obaranja kralja juga. Od 1798. pa sve do nedjeljnoga zakona bludnica iz Tira skrivena je, i ona je ista ona bludnica koja svoje korijene vuče iz Makedonije, najsjevernijega kraljevstva. Ona je kralj sjevera, proročki skrivena, ali i dalje tvrdi da je nepogrešiva.

The pope also represents “them that forsake the covenant,” who though prophetically hidden throughout the three proxy wars; will ultimately come into view in the history of the Battle of Panium. In the transition from Imperial Rome to papal Rome Daniel identifies when pagan Rome was reaching the end of its time as the fourth kingdom of Bible prophecy.

Papa također predstavlja „one koji ostavljaju savez“, koji su, premda proročki skriveni tijekom triju posredničkih ratova, naposljetku došli u vidokrug u povijesti bitke kod Panija. U prijelazu iz Carskoga Rima u papinski Rim Daniel utvrđuje trenutak kada je poganski Rim dosezao kraj svojega vremena kao četvrto kraljevstvo biblijskoga proroštva.

> For the ships of Chittim shall come against him: therefore he shall be grieved, and return, and have indignation against the holy covenant: so shall he do; he shall even return, and have intelligence with them that forsake the holy covenant. Daniel 11:30.

> Jer će lađe kitimske doći protiv njega; zato će se ražalostiti, vratiti se i gnjeviti se na sveti savez; tako će i učiniti: vratit će se te stupiti u sporazum s onima koji napuštaju sveti savez. Daniel 11,30.

In the verse “them that forsake the holy covenant” is the Catholic church. Those who forsake the holy covenant are John the Revelator’s compromising church of Pergamos, that according to Paul would fall away before the man of sin would be revealed. Catholicism is those who have forsaken the covenant as represented by the attack that was brought against the Word of God, and also the seventh-day Sabbath which were both brought under progressive attacks from the time of Constantine onward. Earlier in chapter eleven the “covenant” is also referenced.

U retku „one koji ostavljaju sveti savez” jest Katolička crkva. Oni koji ostavljaju sveti savez jesu popustljiva crkva Pergam Ivana Objavitelja, koja bi, prema Pavlu, otpala prije nego što bi se otkrio čovjek grijeha. Katolicizam su oni koji su napustili savez, kako je to predočeno napadom podignutim protiv Riječi Božje, a također i protiv subote sedmoga dana, koje su obje od vremena Konstantina nadalje bile izložene postupnim napadima. Ranije u jedanaestom poglavlju također se spominje „savez”.

> And both these kings’ hearts shall be to do mischief, and they shall speak lies at one table; but it shall not prosper: for yet the end shall be at the time appointed. Then shall he return into his land with great riches; and his heart shall be against the holy covenant; and he shall do exploits, and return to his own land. At the time appointed he shall return, and come toward the south; but it shall not be as the former, or as the latter. Daniel 11:27–29.

> I srca obaju tih kraljeva bit će upravljena na zlo, i za jednim će stolom govoriti laži; ali to neće uspjeti, jer će kraj još biti u određeno vrijeme. Tada će se vratiti u svoju zemlju s velikim bogatstvom; i srce će mu biti protiv svetoga saveza; i on će izvršiti velika djela te se vratiti u svoju zemlju. U određeno vrijeme opet će se vratiti i poći prema jugu; ali neće biti kao prije ni kao poslije. Daniel 11:27–29.

In these verses “he” returns to his own land, then later he returns to his own land again. The two returning’s represent two victories that were then followed by a triumphal “return” to the city of Rome. The first was the Battle of Actium in 31 BC against Antony and Cleopatra, and the second was after the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The “time appointed” in the verses is the year 330, which identified the conclusion of the prophetic “time” of verse twenty-four that equates to three hundred and sixty years.

U tim se recima „on” se vraća u svoju zemlju, a zatim se poslije ponovno vraća u svoju zemlju. Ta dva povratka predstavljaju dvije pobjede, nakon kojih je uslijedio trijumfalni „povratak” u grad Rim. Prva je bila Bitka kod Akcija 31. pr. Kr. protiv Antonija i Kleopatre, a druga nakon razorenja Jeruzalema 70. godine po Kr. „Određeno vrijeme” u tim recima jest godina 330., koja označava završetak proročkoga „vremena” iz dvadeset i četvrtoga retka, koje odgovara razdoblju od tristo šezdeset godina.

The two kings who speak lies at one table do so before the “time appointed,” “for yet the end shall be at the time appointed.” A question which should be considered is what does the verse mean when it states, “Then shall he return into his land with great riches?” Does it mean at the time appointed, then shall he return; or does it mean once the two tell lies at the table, then shall he return, and therefore the return is before the time appointed.

Dva kralja koji govore laži za jednim stolom čine to prije „određenoga vremena“, „jer će svršetak još biti u određeno vrijeme“. Pitanje koje valja razmotriti jest što redak znači kada kaže: „Tada će se vratiti u svoju zemlju s velikim bogatstvom?“ Znači li to da će se u određeno vrijeme tada vratiti; ili znači da će se, nakon što ona dvojica budu govorila laži za stolom, tada vratiti, i stoga je povratak prije određenoga vremena.

Uriah Smith identifies the two returns as 31 BC and 70 AD, which represents a history before the year 330, which is the time appointed. Smith also points out that the “return” of verse twenty-nine is post 330, and that it is not successful as were the returns following the battles of Actium and Jerusalem. What this means is that before the time appointed there is a meeting where lies are told, that is followed by one of the two kings who had been telling lies returning with great riches, who then opposes the holy covenant, does exploits and returns at the year 330, which is the time appointed.

Uriah Smith poistovjećuje dva povratka s 31. pr. Kr. i 70. po. Kr., što predstavlja povijest prije godine 330., koja je određeno vrijeme. Smith također ističe da je „povratak” iz dvadeset i devetog retka nakon 330. godine te da nije uspješan kao što su bili povratci nakon bitaka kod Akcija i Jeruzalema. To znači da se prije određenog vremena događa sastanak na kojemu se govore laži, nakon čega se jedan od dvojice kraljeva koji su govorili laži vraća s velikim bogatstvom, potom ustaje protiv svetoga saveza, izvršava pothvate i vraća se u godini 330., koja je određeno vrijeme.

He then attacks the south, but it will be unlike the Battle of Actium or the destruction of Jerusalem. The history of 70 AD in the verses portrays the end of God’s chosen covenant people as represented by “the holy covenant” in the passage. In verse thirty pagan Rome has intelligence with those who forsake the holy covenant. 70 AD was the very end of ancient literal Israel as God’s covenant people, and verse thirty is identifying the history four centuries after 70 AD. Those who forsake the covenant in the history represented in verse thirty, are those who have forsaken the covenant entered into by God and His Christian people. Papal Rome is the church represented as those who forsake the holy covenant in verse thirty.

Zatim napada jug, ali to će biti drukčije od Bitke kod Akcija ili razorenja Jeruzalema. Povijest 70. godine po Kr. u tim redcima prikazuje kraj Božjega izabranog savezničkog naroda, kako je predstavljen izrazom „sveti savez” u tom odlomku. U tridesetom retku poganski Rim ima sporazumijevanje s onima koji napuštaju sveti savez. Godina 70. po Kr. bila je sam kraj drevnoga doslovnog Izraela kao Božjega savezničkog naroda, a trideseti redak označuje povijest četiri stoljeća nakon 70. godine po Kr. Oni koji napuštaju savez u povijesti prikazanoj u tridesetom retku jesu oni koji su napustili savez što su ga sklopili Bog i Njegov kršćanski narod. Papinski Rim je crkva predstavljena kao oni koji napuštaju sveti savez u tridesetom retku.

> For the ships of Chittim shall come against him: therefore he shall be grieved, and return, and have indignation against the holy covenant: so shall he do; he shall even return, and have intelligence with them that forsake the holy covenant. Daniel 11:30.

> Jer će lađe kitimske doći protiv njega; stoga će se ožalostiti, vratiti se i gnjeviti se na sveti savez; tako će i učiniti: vratit će se i sporazumjeti se s onima koji napuštaju sveti savez. Daniel 11:30.

Verse twenty-nine brings us to the year 330, which was the time appointed as fulfilled by Constantine moving the capital city to Constantinople. At that waymark pagan Rome would be drawn into a southern war that would not be successful as had been Actium and Jerusalem. Then in verse thirty pagan Rome is attacked by Genseric who launched his naval warfare from Chittim, which is known today as Carthage. This warfare against pagan Rome was also represented as the second trumpet of the seven trumpets in the book of Revelation. The first four of those trumpet powers brought Western Rome to a conclusion by 476. Of those first four trumpets, the second trumpet, which is the ships of Chittim was the most severe, for Genseric took control of the seas and the wealth of the Empire dried up.

Dvadeset i deveti redak dovodi nas do godine 330., što je bilo određeno vrijeme ispunjeno time što je Konstantin premjestio glavni grad u Konstantinopol. Na toj vremenskoj oznaci poganski je Rim bio uvučen u južni rat koji ne bi bio uspješan kao što su bili Akcij i Jeruzalem. Zatim je u tridesetom retku poganski Rim napadnut od Genzerika, koji je pokrenuo svoje pomorsko ratovanje iz Kitima, koji je danas poznat kao Kartaga. To ratovanje protiv poganskoga Rima također je bilo prikazano kao druga truba od sedam truba u knjizi Otkrivenja. Prve četiri od tih trubnih sila dovele su Zapadni Rim do njegova završetka do 476. godine. Od te prve četiri trube, druga truba, to jest lađe kitimske, bila je najteža, jer je Genzerik preuzeo nadzor nad morima i bogatstvo Carstva presušilo.

Confronted and grieved by the ships of Chittim he returns and has indignation against the holy covenant. This was fulfilled in the history leading up to the empowerment of the papacy in 538, through a warfare against God’s Word. After that he returns and has “intelligence with them that forsake the holy covenant.” That interaction between pagan and papal Rome was fulfilled in 533 with the decree of Justinian. The next verse, verse thirty-one then continues with how pagan Rome was “grieved.” In 2 Thessalonians, Paul teaches that pagan Rome “restrained” the papacy from taking control in 538. After he is grieved by an attack from the seas which wreck the economics of the kingdom, he has indignation against the holy covenant, then intelligence with those who forsake the covenant. In the next verses, “arms” which represents the power given to the papacy in 496 by Clovis, stand up and they pollute the sanctuary of strength, which in history represented the city of Rome, and then pagan Rome would remove the religion of paganism (the daily) from the realm and replace it with Catholicism and then they place the papacy on the throne in 538.

Suočen i ojađen lađama Kitima, vraća se i gnjevi se na sveti savez. To se ispunilo u povijesti koja je vodila do osnaženja papinstva 538. godine, kroz ratovanje protiv Božje Riječi. Nakon toga vraća se i ima „sporazum s onima koji napuštaju sveti savez”. Ta međusobna povezanost između poganskog i papinskog Rima ispunila se 533. godine Justinijanovim dekretom. Sljedeći redak, trideset i prvi, zatim nastavlja prikazivati kako je poganski Rim bio „ojađen”. U 2. Solunjanima Pavao uči da je poganski Rim „zadržavao” papinstvo da ne preuzme vlast 538. godine. Nakon što je ojađen napadom s mora koji razara gospodarstvo kraljevstva, on se gnjevi na sveti savez, a zatim stupa u sporazum s onima koji napuštaju savez. U sljedećim redcima „mišice”, koje predstavljaju silu danu papinstvu 496. godine po Klodvigu, podižu se i one oskvrnjuju svetište sile, koje je u povijesti predstavljalo grad Rim, a zatim će poganski Rim ukloniti religiju poganstva (svagdašnju službu) iz područja i zamijeniti je katolicizmom, a potom će 538. godine postaviti papinstvo na prijestolje.

When the papacy was empowered in 538 it provided both a prophetic witness, and also a historical witness that are represented in the verses we are considering. The year 538 is typified by 31 BC and the Battle of Actium. In Daniel chapter eight, verse nine pagan Rome would conquer three geographical obstacles to take the throne of the earth. The first was Syria to the east, then Judah and Jerusalem followed by Egypt at the Battle of Actium. Papal Rome would also have three horns removed, the third of which was the Goths who were driven from the city of Rome in 538. Pagan Rome and papal Rome provide two witnesses that identify that the Battle of Actium aligns with 538, and 538 illustrates the Sunday law in the USA, when modern Rome rules supremely until probation closes.

Kad je papinstvo bilo osnaženo 538. godine, pružilo je i proročki svjedok i povijesni svjedok, koji su prikazani u redcima koje razmatramo. Godina 538. tipološki je predočena 31. pr. Kr. i Bitkom kod Akcija. U Danielu, osmo poglavlje, deveti redak, poganski bi Rim svladao tri zemljopisne prepreke kako bi preuzeo prijestolje zemlje. Prva je bila Sirija na istoku, zatim Juda i Jeruzalem, a potom Egipat u Bitki kod Akcija. Papinski bi Rim također imao uklonjena tri roga, od kojih su treći bili Goti, koji su 538. godine bili istjerani iz grada Rima. Poganski Rim i papinski Rim pružaju dva svjedoka koja potvrđuju da se Bitka kod Akcija podudara s 538. godinom, a 538. godina predočava zakon o nedjelji u SAD-u, kada moderni Rim vrhovno vlada sve do zaključenja vremena kušnje.

We have concluded an overview of verses twenty-seven to thirty-one.

Zaključili smo pregled stihova dvadeset sedam do trideset jedan.

In the next article, we will focus on these verses and begin the work of aligning the passage with the history of verses eleven through fifteen.

U sljedećem ćemo se članku usredotočiti na ove retke i započeti rad na usklađivanju ovoga odlomka s poviješću redaka jedanaestoga do petnaestoga.

Back to Articles