Article

# Panium - Number Two

Panium — Tus Naj Npawb Ob

The Rise and Fall of the King of the South

Kev Sawv thiab Kev Poob ntawm Tus Vajntxwv Sab Qab Teb

Author

Jeff Pippenger

Published

February 27, 2025

Formats

PDF Unavailable
Word Unavailable
Song MP3

We left off the last article by writing, “Verses 10–15 represent three proxy wars accomplished by the king of the north, the papal power, from 1989 to the Sunday law.” These three proxy wars begin with the identification of the United States in verse 40 as “chariots, ships, and horsemen.”

Peb xaus zaj lus kawg los ntawm kev sau tias, “Nqe 10–15 sawv cev rau peb txoj kev ua tsov rog sawv cev uas raug ua tiav los ntawm tus vajntxwv sab qaum teb, uas yog lub hwjchim papal, txij xyoo 1989 mus txog rau txoj cai hnub Sunday.” Peb txoj kev ua tsov rog sawv cev no pib nrog kev txheeb xyuas Tebchaws Meskas hauv nqe 40 ua “tsheb nees ua rog, nkoj, thiab cov caij nees.”

The next proxy war, represented by verse 11 and its historical fulfillment at the Battle of Raphia in 217 BC, was between Ptolemy IV Philopator, the southern king of Egypt, and Antiochus the Great, also called Antiochus Magnus, of the Seleucid Empire. Antiochus had fulfilled verse 10 when he retaliated against Egypt for his northern kingdom’s defeat and loss of possessions, retaking all the geography the southern kingdom had previously seized from his kingdom. He did so but stopped at the border of Egypt, thus fulfilling verse 10 and typifying 1989.

Tsov rog sawv cev tom ntej, uas sawv cev los ntawm nqe 11 thiab nws qhov kev ua tiav hauv keeb kwm ntawm Tsov Rog Raphia xyoo 217 BC, yog nyob nruab nrab ntawm Ptolemy IV Philopator, tus vajntxwv qab teb ntawm tim Ejiptus, thiab Antiochus tus Loj, uas kuj hu ua Antiochus Magnus, ntawm lub tebchaws Seleucid. Antiochus tau ua tiav nqe 10 thaum nws tau pauj tim Ejiptus vim nws lub nceeg vaj qaum teb raug swb thiab poob nws tej cuab tam, rov qab txeeb tau tag nrho thaj chaw uas lub nceeg vaj qab teb tau txeeb yav tas los ntawm nws lub nceeg vaj. Nws tau ua li ntawd tiamsis nres ntawm ciam teb tim Ejiptus, yog li ua tiav nqe 10 thiab ua tus qauv cev faj lem rau xyoo 1989.

> But his sons shall be stirred up, and shall assemble a multitude of great forces: and one shall certainly come, and overflow, and pass through: then shall he return, and be stirred up, even to his fortress. Daniel 11:10.

> Tiamsis nws cov tub yuav raug tsa kom sawv, thiab yuav sau ib pab tub rog loj heev los ua ke; thiab ib tug yuav los tiag, thiab yuav hla tuaj nyab lug, thiab hla dhau mus; ces nws yuav rov qab los, thiab raug tsa kom sawv dua, txawm mus txog rau nws lub chaw ruaj khov. Daniel 11:10.

The second proxy war was the Battle of Raphia. Raphia means the borderland. That battleground marks the point where Antiochus had ceased his previous invasion of verse 10. The three proxy wars are governed by truth, in the sense that the first proxy war aligns with the last proxy war. All three wars—verses 10, 11, and then the third war of verses 13–15—are waged by the same historical figure in their initial fulfillment. Antiochus Magnus is present in each of the three battles, prophetically tying them together into one line. Antiochus wins the first and last battles, but not the middle one, where the king of the south prevails.

Tsov rog sawv cev zaum ob yog Tsov Rog ntawm Raphia. Raphia txhais tias thaj av ciam teb. Thaj chaw sib ntaus ntawd cim txog qhov chaw uas Antiochus tau tso tseg nws qhov kev txeeb chaw ua ntej uas muaj nyob hauv nqe 10. Peb tsov rog sawv cev no raug tswj hwm los ntawm qhov tseeb, hauv lub ntsiab tias tsov rog sawv cev thawj zaug sib haum nrog tsov rog sawv cev kawg. Tag nrho peb tsov rog—nqe 10, nqe 11, thiab tom qab ntawd tsov rog thib peb ntawm nqe 13–15—raug tawm tsam los ntawm tib tug neeg keeb kwm nkaus xwb hauv lawv qhov kev ua tiav thawj zaug. Antiochus Magnus nyob hauv txhua yam ntawm peb qhov kev sib ntaus ntawd, raws li lus faj lem khi lawv ua ke rau hauv ib txoj kab. Antiochus yeej qhov kev sib ntaus thawj zaug thiab qhov kawg, tiam sis tsis yog qhov nruab nrab, uas huab tais sab qab teb yog tus muaj yeej.

Just as Raphia means borderland, so does Ukraine. The second proxy war, first fulfilled by the Battle of Raphia, is now being fulfilled in the Ukrainian war. Vladimir Putin is the king of the south, the prophetic descendant of the first modern king of the south, Vladimir Lenin. Putin has repeatedly claimed that Russia’s response to Ukraine is based on a disputed agreement that, upon Germany’s reunification, NATO would not expand further into former USSR territory. Putin’s motivation mirrors Ptolemy’s in verses 5–9 and Napoleon’s in 1797. All three southern kings justify their actions against the northern king based on a broken treaty.

Ib yam li Raphia txhais tias thaj av ciam teb, Ukraine kuj txhais li ntawd thiab. Tsov rog sawv cev zaum ob, uas thawj zaug tau muaj tiav los ntawm Tsov Rog Raphia, tam sim no tab tom muaj tiav nyob rau hauv tsov rog Ukraine. Vladimir Putin yog tus vajntxwv qab teb, tus xeeb leej xeeb ntxwv yav tom ntej raws li lus faj lem ntawm thawj tus vajntxwv qab teb niaj hnub no, Vladimir Lenin. Putin tau rov hais ntau zaus tias Russia txoj kev teb rau Ukraine yog raws li ib daim ntawv cog lus uas muaj kev sib cav, uas hais tias thaum Yelemes rov sib koom ua ib lub tebchaws, NATO yuav tsis nthuav dav ntxiv mus rau thaj av qub ntawm USSR. Putin lub siab txhawb yog zoo ib yam li Ptolemy li hauv nqe 5–9 thiab Napoleon li hauv xyoo 1797. Peb tug vajntxwv qab teb no puav leej muab lawv tej kev ua tawm tsam tus vajntxwv qaum teb los ua ncaj ncees raws li ib daim ntawv cog lus uas raug rhuav lawm.

According to Isaiah 23, the whore of Tyre, representing the papal power, would be forgotten for seventy years, as the days of one king—a period repeatedly shown to be the time when the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, the earth beast of Revelation 13 (the United States), rules.

Raws li Yaxayas 23, tus niam ntiav ntawm Thailaub, uas sawv cev rau lub hwj chim papal, yuav raug hnov qab mus tau xya caum xyoo, zoo li lub caij nyoog ntawm ib tug vajntxwv—ib lub sijhawm uas tau raug qhia rov thiab rov dua tias yog lub sijhawm thaum lub nceeg vaj thib rau ntawm Vajlugkub txoj lus faj lem, yog tus tsiaj nyaum hauv av ntawm Tshwmsim 13 (Tebchaws Meskas), kav.

> And it shall come to pass in that day, that Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years, according to the days of one king: after the end of seventy years shall Tyre sing as an harlot. Take an harp, go about the city, thou harlot that hast been forgotten; make sweet melody, sing many songs, that thou mayest be remembered. And it shall come to pass after the end of seventy years, that the Lord will visit Tyre, and she shall turn to her hire, and shall commit fornication with all the kingdoms of the world upon the face of the earth. Isaiah 23:15–17.

> Thiab yuav muaj tseeb nyob rau hnub ntawd, tias lub nroog Tyre yuav raug hnov qab xya caum xyoo, raws li hnub nyoog ntawm ib tug vajntxwv; tom qab xaus xya caum xyoo lawm, Tyre yuav hu nkauj ib yam li ib tug pojniam luag pojniam. Cia li nqa ib rab nkauj ncas, mus ncig thoob lub nroog, koj tus pojniam luag pojniam uas raug hnov qab lawm; ua kom suab paj nruag qab zib, hu ntau zaj nkauj, kom koj thiaj raug nco txog. Thiab yuav muaj tseeb tias tom qab xaus xya caum xyoo lawm, tus Tswv yuav tuaj xyuas Tyre, thiab nws yuav rov qab mus cuag nws cov nqi zog, thiab yuav ua nkauj ua nraug nrog txhua lub tebchaws hauv lub ntiajteb saum npoo av. Yaxayas 23:15–17.

The symbolic seventy-year period spans from 1798 to the Sunday law, which is the history represented by verse 40. It is not until the ending of the seventy years, or the approach of the Sunday law, that the whore reappears. For this reason, the warfare of the three battles in verses 10–15 is carried out by a proxy of the papal power, for she is prophetically forgotten during this period.

Lub xya caum xyoo uas yog lub cim ncua txij xyoo 1798 mus txog rau txoj cai hnub Sunday, uas yog keeb kwm uas nqe 40 sawv cev rau. Tsis yog txog thaum xaus rau xya caum xyoo ntawd, los yog thaum txoj cai hnub Sunday tab tom los ze, mas tus niam ntiav thiaj rov tshwm sim dua. Vim li no, kev ua rog ntawm peb lub tshav rog hauv nqe 10–15 raug coj mus ua los ntawm ib tug sawv cev ntawm hwj chim papal, rau qhov yaj saub hais tias nws raug tsis nco qab lawm nyob rau lub sijhawm no.

In the first and last proxy battles, the king of the north prevails over the king of the south. In the middle battle, the king of the south prevails over the king of the north. The Battle of Raphia was the initial historical fulfillment of verse 11, and the verse and their historical fulfillment make up two witnesses that are to be combined with the parallel passages of papal Rome’s three and a half prophetic days of rule. Thus, two passages of Scripture within Daniel 11, accompanied by their historical fulfillments, set forth the prophetic characteristics of verse 11’s battle of the borderland, first fulfilled at the Battle of Raphia and then again at the time of the end in 1798.

Hauv thawj thiab thaum kawg ntawm ob qhov kev tsov rog sawv cev, tus vajntxwv sab qaum teb yeej tus vajntxwv sab qab teb. Hauv qhov kev tsov rog nruab nrab, tus vajntxwv sab qab teb yeej tus vajntxwv sab qaum teb. Kev Tsov Rog ntawm Raphia yog thawj zaug kev ua tiav hauv keeb kwm ntawm nqe 11, thiab nqe ntawd ua ke nrog lawv qhov kev ua tiav hauv keeb kwm tsim ua ob tug timkhawv uas yuav tsum raug muab sib xyaw nrog cov nqe Vajluskub uas sib txuam hais txog peb hnub ib nrab uas yog hnub yaj saub ntawm kev kav ntawm Loos papal. Yog li ntawd, ob nqe Vajluskub nyob hauv Daniyees 11, nrog rau lawv cov kev ua tiav hauv keeb kwm, nthuav tawm cov yam ntxwv yaj saub ntawm qhov kev tsov rog ntawm thaj av ciam teb hauv nqe 11, uas tau xub ua tiav thaum Kev Tsov Rog ntawm Raphia, thiab tom qab ntawd rov ua tiav dua thaum lub sijhawm kawg hauv xyoo 1798.

These lines of witness uphold that Vladimir Putin is the last Vladimir of the modern king of the south. “Vladimir” is often defined as meaning “ruler of the world,” but the word mir also correctly means “community.” Thus, Vladimir means “ruler of the community,” or “ruler of communism.” Putin identifies his involvement with Ukraine as based on a broken agreement addressing his concerns about NATO’s encroachment beyond the borders agreed upon after Germany’s unification. Putin’s direction is as much focused against NATO and the EU as it is against Zelenskyy and Ukraine. NATO and the EU’s encroachment upon territory Putin insists was to remain NATO-free parallels Ptolemy’s rage when the Seleucid king set the Egyptian princess bride aside for his former wife. That broken treaty pointed forward to the broken Treaty of Tolentino in 1797. In Daniel 11, when the southern king prevails over the northern king, it involves a broken treaty.

Cov lus tim khawv no txhawb tias Vladimir Putin yog Vladimir kawg ntawm tus vajntxwv niaj hnub no ntawm sab qab teb. “Vladimir” feem ntau txhais tias “tus kav lub ntiaj teb,” tiamsis lo lus mir kuj txhais tau raug tias “zej zog.” Yog li ntawd, Vladimir txhais tias “tus kav zej zog,” lossis “tus kav kev koom pheej ntseeg communist.” Putin qhia tias nws txoj kev koom tes hauv Ukraine yog raws li ib daim ntawv cog lus uas raug rhuav, uas hais txog nws tej kev txhawj xeeb txog NATO txoj kev txeeb nkag dhau ciam teb uas tau pom zoo tseg tom qab lub teb chaws Yelemes rov los ua ib lub teb chaws. Putin txoj kev coj qhia yog tsom rau NATO thiab EU ib yam li nws tsom rau Zelenskyy thiab Ukraine. NATO thiab EU txoj kev txeeb nkag rau thaj av uas Putin hais khov kho tias yuav tsum nyob tsis muaj NATO, yog ib qho sib xws nrog Ptolemy txoj kev npau taws thaum tus vajntxwv Seleucid muab tus ntxhais fuabtais Iyiv uas yuav los ua nyab tseg ib sab rau nws tus pojniam qub. Daim ntawv cog lus uas raug rhuav ntawd taw tes mus tom ntej rau Daim Ntawv Cog Lus Tolentino uas raug rhuav xyoo 1797. Hauv Daniyee 11, thaum tus vajntxwv sab qab teb kov yeej tus vajntxwv sab qaum teb, nws muaj feem nrog ib daim ntawv cog lus uas raug rhuav.

This broken treaty concerns the EU’s unwillingness to restrict NATO’s expansion beyond its borders when Germany was reunified. In this sense, Putin, the king of the south, is in a battle against the king of the north, represented by his proxy power. Just as the Nazis of World War II were a proxy for the Catholic Church, the Nazis of Ukraine become the symbol of the second proxy war of verses 10–15. Three world wars and three proxy wars—and in both lines, the Nazis are the proxy representative of the Catholic Church during the middle conflict.

Daim ntawv cog lus uas raug rhuav no hais txog EU txoj kev tsis kam txwv NATO txoj kev nthuav dav dhau nws tej ciam teb thaum Yelemees rov sib koom ua ib lub teb chaws. Hauv qhov kev txhais no, Putin, tus vajntxwv sab qab teb, tab tom nyob hauv kev sib ntaus tawm tsam tus vajntxwv sab qaum teb, uas raug sawv cev los ntawm nws lub hwjchim sawv cev. Ib yam li cov Nazis ntawm Tsov Rog Ntiaj Teb Zaum II tau ua tus sawv cev rau lub Koom Txoos Kas Tos Liv, cov Nazis ntawm Ukraine kuj dhau los ua lub cim ntawm tsov rog sawv cev zaum ob hauv nqe 10–15. Peb tsov rog ntiaj teb thiab peb tsov rog sawv cev—thiab hauv ob txoj kab, cov Nazis yog tus sawv cev ntawm lub Koom Txoos Kas Tos Liv thaum lub sij hawm kev tsis sib haum nruab nrab.

In the three original historical fulfillments of these proxy wars, Antiochus Magnus was in each battle. It has often been shown how the etymology of “Antiochus” and the symbolism associated with the Seleucid kingdom as the king of the north identify Antiochus as a symbol of the antichrist—the pope of Rome. But in the history of the three proxy wars, the whore of Tyre is forgotten, so the symbol of the “pope” represented in the name “Antiochus” stands for his proxy power. In the first and last battles, it is the United States openly doing the bidding for Rome. In verse 11, the proxy power is the Nazism of Ukraine, but it was and still is the ships and chariots of the United States that propped up Zelenskyy in the war. On the surface of the second proxy war, the United States is hidden, as is the pope during the seventy years of Isaiah 23. The United States is hidden in the very history where it develops all the characteristics of the beast, making it prophetically fitting that, once the second proxy war is underway, the United States is obscured by the proxy power of Nazism in Ukraine, though it remains the military and economic might of the earth beast that props up Ukraine until their demise.

Nyob rau hauv peb qhov kev ua tiav thawj zaug hauv keeb kwm ntawm cov kev tsov rog sawv cev no, Antiochus Magnus tau nyob hauv txhua qhov kev sib tua. Twb tau muaj kev qhia ntau zaus lawm tias keeb txhais lus ntawm “Antiochus” thiab lub ntsiab cim uas txuas nrog lub nceeg vaj Seleucid ua vajntxwv sab qaum teb qhia Antiochus tias yog ib lub cim ntawm tus antichrist—tus pope ntawm Loos. Tiamsis nyob rau hauv keeb kwm ntawm peb qhov kev tsov rog sawv cev no, tus pojniam luag pojniam ntawm Tyre raug hnov qab lawm, yog li ntawd lub cim ntawm tus “pope” uas sawv cev nyob hauv lub npe “Antiochus” sawv cev rau nws lub hwjchim sawv cev. Hauv thawj thiab qhov kawg ntawm cov kev sib tua, yog Tebchaws Meskas uas tab tom ua raws li Loos tej lus txib qhib lug. Hauv nqe 11, lub hwjchim sawv cev ntawd yog Nazism ntawm Ukraine, tiamsis nws yog thiab tseem yog cov nkoj thiab cov tsheb rog ntawm Tebchaws Meskas uas tau txhawb nqa Zelenskyy hauv kev tsov rog ntawd. Nyob rau saum npoo ntawm qhov kev tsov rog sawv cev thib ob, Tebchaws Meskas raug nkaum, ib yam li tus pope raug nkaum thaum xya caum xyoo ntawm Yaxayas 23. Tebchaws Meskas raug nkaum hauv zaj keeb kwm ntawd nws tus kheej, qhov chaw uas nws txhim tsa txhua yam cwj pwm ntawm tus tsiaj qus, ua rau nws haum rau txojkev yaj saub tias, thaum qhov kev tsov rog sawv cev thib ob twb tab tom pib mus lawm, Tebchaws Meskas raug npog los ntawm lub hwjchim sawv cev ntawm Nazism hauv Ukraine, txawm li ntawd los nws tseem yog lub zog tub rog thiab lub zog nyiaj txiag ntawm tus tsiaj qus hauv ntiajteb uas tseem txhawb nqa Ukraine mus txog rau lawv txojkev puastsuaj.

When the king of the south went to Babylon and took the king of the north captive, and also when General Berthier took the pope captive, he walked right into the Vatican suggesting that the Ukrainian war will end with Putin’s victory at a point when any resistance from the Ukraine has been removed. The kingdom Ptolemy captured was Babylon, and the kingdom Napoleon captured was spiritual Babylon. Thus, Zelenskyy’s kingdom is represented by those subjects which provide him support. Now that Trump has withdrawn the support of the earth beast’s chariots horsemen and ships, Ukraine’s support is the EU, the very group that has been unwilling to hear Putin’s claims of the broken treaty concerning the encroachment of NATO.

Thaum huab tais sab qab teb mus rau Npanpiloo thiab ntes huab tais sab qaum teb ua neeg raug kaw, thiab ib yam li thaum General Berthier ntes tus pope ua neeg raug kaw, nws tau taug kev ncaj qha mus rau hauv Vatican, qhia tias kev ua tsov rog hauv Ukraine yuav xaus nrog Putin txoj kev yeej rau lub sijhawm uas txhua yam kev tawm tsam ntawm Ukraine twb raug tshem tawm lawm. Lub nceeg vaj uas Ptolemy txeeb tau yog Npanpiloo, thiab lub nceeg vaj uas Napoleon txeeb tau yog Npanpiloo ntawm sab ntsuj plig. Yog li ntawd, Zelenskyy lub nceeg vaj raug sawv cev los ntawm cov pej xeem uas muab kev txhawb nqa rau nws. Nim no uas Trump twb rho tawm kev txhawb nqa ntawm cov tsheb nees, cov neeg caij nees, thiab cov nkoj ntawm tus tsiaj qus ntawm lub ntiaj teb lawm, Ukraine txoj kev txhawb nqa yog EU, yog pawg ntawd xwb uas tsis kam mloog Putin cov lus thov hais txog daim ntawv cog lus uas raug rhuav lawm concerning the encroachment of NATO.

The philosophy that guides the eurocrats of the EU is the Greenpeace movement. For this reason, Zelenskyy means, “green.” Zelenskyy is the symbolic head of the warmongers of the EU who are guided by the foolish global agenda of environmentalism. When the Ukraine war concludes Putin will celebrate not only a victory over Ukraine, but the entire EU and NATO.

Lub tswv yim uas coj cov eurocrats ntawm EU yog kev txav Greenpeace. Vim li no, Zelenskyy txhais tias, “ntsuab.” Zelenskyy yog tus thawj coj cim ntawm cov neeg nyiam ua tsov ua rog hauv EU uas raug coj los ntawm txoj txheej txheem ruam thoob ntiaj teb ntawm kev tiv thaiv ib puag ncig. Thaum tsov rog Ukraine xaus lawm, Putin yuav ua kev zoo siab tsis yog rau ib qho kev yeej Ukraine xwb, tab sis rau tag nrho EU thiab NATO.

The three proxy wars therefore possess the signature of truth. The first and last proxy war the king of the south is defeated through an alliance between the sea beast and earth beast of Revelation thirteen. In the beginning the victory for the king of the north was brought about by an alliance between a conservative, Vatican I pope, who in the context of the Fatima secrets of Catholicism lore is the white or good pope. The current pope, who as I write this is on his deathbed is a Vatican II, liberal pope, who in the context of the Fatima secrets is the black or bad pope.

Peb cov rog sawv cev peb zaug no yog li ntawd thiaj muaj lub cim qhia txog qhov tseeb. Hauv thawj zaug thiab zaug kawg ntawm tsov rog sawv cev, vajntxwv sab qab teb raug kov yeej los ntawm ib qho kev koom tes ntawm tus tsiaj nyaum hauv hiav txwv thiab tus tsiaj nyaum hauv ntiajteb ntawm Tshwm Sim kaum peb. Thaum pib, txoj kev yeej rau vajntxwv sab qaum teb tau raug coj los txog los ntawm ib qho kev koom tes nrog ib tug pope uas khaws txoj kev ntseeg qub, yog Vatican I, uas nyob hauv lub ntsiab lus ntawm cov lus zais Fatima hauv Catholicism tej lus dab neeg, yog tus pope dawb lossis tus pope zoo. Tus pope tam sim no, uas thaum kuv tab tom sau qhov no nws twb pw saum txaj tos kev tuag lawm, yog ib tug pope Vatican II, qhib siab tshiab, uas nyob hauv lub ntsiab lus ntawm cov lus zais Fatima yog tus pope dub lossis tus pope phem.

Verse fourteen identifies that when the “robbers of thy people” who exalt themselves and fall, enter into prophetic history the vision is established. In the fulfillment of verses thirteen through fifteen in the Battle of Panium in 200 BC pagan Rome inserted itself into the issues concerning that very battle. In the three verses which address the Battle of Panium, verse fourteen identifies that the vision is established by Rome.

Nqe kaum plaub qhia tias thaum cov “neeg tub sab ntawm koj haiv neeg” uas tsa lawv tus kheej siab thiab poob qis nkag mus rau hauv keeb kwm yaj saub, ces yog lub zeem muag raug tsa kom ruaj khov. Hauv qhov ua tiav ntawm nqe kaum peb mus txog kaum tsib hauv Tsov Rog Panium xyoo 200 BC, Loos pe hawm dab qhuas tau nkag los cuam tshuam rau tej xwm txheej hais txog tib qhov tsov rog ntawd. Hauv peb nqe uas hais txog Tsov Rog Panium, nqe kaum plaub qhia tias lub zeem muag raug tsa kom ruaj khov los ntawm Loos.

In the Battle of Panium history a conservative, Vatican I white pope will join forces with the last of the eight presidents that began in the period of Reagan, who previously formed an alliance with a conservative Vatican I pope. They did so in 1989 to bring down the former USSR, and at the end they do so to bring down the last ruler of that very kingdom.

Nyob hauv keeb kwm ntawm Tsov Rog Panium, ib tug pope dawb uas yog neeg txuag qub thiab sawv hauv Vatican I yuav koom tes nrog tus thawj tswj hwm kawg ntawm yim tus uas pib hauv tiam Reagan, tus uas yav tas los twb tau tsim ib txoj kev sib koom tes nrog ib tug pope txuag qub ntawm Vatican I lawm. Lawv tau ua li ntawd nyob rau xyoo 1989 kom rhuav tshem lub qub USSR, thiab thaum kawg lawv kuj ua li ntawd kom rhuav tshem tus kav kawg ntawm tib lub tebchaws ntawd.

In the Reagan years and with the alliance of pope John Paul II and the USA, John Paul II came to believe he was the good pope of the prophecies of Fatima. Motivated by that conviction he began to travel the world to promote what he understood to be a fulfillment of the predictions of Fatima. In doing so he became the most travelled pope in history, as well as the most recognized pope of all time as he fulfilled Revelation thirteen’s prediction that there would be a time when the whole world would wonder after the beast. Pope John Paul II’s public persona typifies the conservative Vatican I pope who comes into an alliance with the last president of the USA.

Nyob rau lub sijhawm Reagan thiab nrog kev sib koom tes ntawm Pope John Paul II thiab Tebchaws Meskas, John Paul II tau los ntseeg tias nws yog tus pope zoo uas tej yaj saub faj lem ntawm Fatima tau hais tseg. Vim raug tsav los ntawm txoj kev ntseeg ntawd, nws thiaj pib ncig mus thoob qab ntuj kom txhawb yam uas nws to taub tias yog kev ua tiav ntawm tej lus twv ua ntej ntawm Fatima. Thaum ua li ntawd, nws tau dhau los ua tus pope uas taug kev ntau tshaj plaws hauv keeb kwm, thiab tib lub sijhawm kuj yog tus pope uas neeg thoob plaws ntiaj teb paub tshaj plaws txhua tiam, raws li nws ua kom tiav qhov twv ua ntej hauv Tshwmsim tshooj kaum peb tias yuav muaj ib lub sijhawm uas tag nrho lub ntiaj teb yuav xav tsis thoob raws tus tsiaj qus qab. Pope John Paul II tus yam ntxwv uas tshwm sim rau pej xeem yog tus qauv meej ntawm tus pope uas khaws txoj kev ntseeg qub ntawm Vatican I uas nkag mus rau hauv kev sib koom tes nrog tus thawj tswj hwm kawg ntawm Tebchaws Meskas.

Therefore, one of the prophetic characteristics of the Reagan contemporary pope is that there is a point where his public image is marked as a waymark. That mark is in verse fourteen, when the robbers of thy people establish the vision. Pope John Paul II fulfills a prophetic characteristic of being the pope that the entire world wondered after, thus pointing forward to the conservative end time Vatican I pope who comes into an alliance with Trump. When that happens the vision is established, and what establishes the vision is the pope inserting himself into the history of Panium and the year 200 BC.

Vim li no, ib yam ntxwv cev Vajtswv lus ntawm tus pope niaj hnub nim no lub sijhawm Reagan yog tias muaj ib lub ntsiab chaw uas nws daim duab pej xeem raug cim tseg ua ib qho cim taw qhia. Qhov cim ntawd nyob hauv nqe kaum plaub, thaum cov tub sab ntawm koj haiv neeg tsa kom lub zeem muag ruaj khov. Pope John Paul II ua tiav ib yam ntxwv cev Vajtswv lus uas yog tus pope uas tag nrho lub ntiaj teb xav tsis thoob raws nws qab, yog li ntawd thiaj taw tes mus tom ntej rau tus conservative Vatican I pope ntawm lub sijhawm kawg uas los koom ib pab nrog Trump. Thaum qhov ntawd tshwm sim, lub zeem muag thiaj raug tsa kom ruaj khov, thiab yam uas tsa kom lub zeem muag ruaj khov yog tus pope nkag los tso nws tus kheej rau hauv keeb kwm ntawm Panium thiab xyoo 200 BC.

The beginning of the eight presidents illustrates the ending of the eight presidents and just before the Sunday law of verse sixteen the whore of Tyre who has been forgotten returns to open history as she forms an alliance with Reagan’s counterpart, Donald Trump. Together as represented by the alliance of Antiochus and Philip of Macedon they bring down the final generation of the southern kingdom as represented by the child king Ptolemy. A child in Bible prophecy is a symbol of the final generation, and after the Ukraine war Putin will repeat the history of the southern kings who are lifted up from military victories and lose their way in some type of church and state dilemma.

Qhov pib ntawm yim tus thawj tswj hwm yog ib qho piv txwv qhia txog qhov kawg ntawm yim tus thawj tswj hwm, thiab tam sim ua ntej txoj cai Sunday ntawm nqe kaum rau, tus niam ntiav ntawm Tyre uas twb raug hnov qab lawm rov qab los rau hauv keeb kwm qhib thaum nws tsim kev koom tes nrog Reagan tus txuam, Donald Trump. Nkawd ua ke, raws li tau sawv cev los ntawm kev sib koom tes ntawm Antiochus thiab Philip ntawm Macedon, coj kev poob ntawm tiam kawg ntawm lub tebchaws qab teb raws li tau sawv cev los ntawm tus vajntxwv me nyuam Ptolemy. Ib tug me nyuam hauv Vajlugkub tej lus faj lem yog ib lub cim ntawm tiam kawg, thiab tom qab tsov rog Ukraine, Putin yuav rov ua dua keeb kwm ntawm cov vajntxwv qab teb uas raug tsa siab los ntawm kev yeej hauv kev ua rog thiab plam lawv txojkev hauv ib hom teeb meem ntawm pawg ntseeg thiab lub xeev.

Thus, verse ten, representing 1989 and the first proxy war is the beginning, or the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet. The Battle of Raphia in verse eleven representing the Ukraine war is the thirteenth letter in the Hebrew alphabet. The number 13 is a symbol of rebellion, and the proxy army in the Ukrainian war are Nazi’s, the premier symbol of rebellion in the modern world. Panium is the last letter in the Hebrew alphabet, which is made up of twenty-two letters. Thus, the Hebrew word truth which is created by bringing the first, thirteenth and twenty-second letters of the alphabet together to form the Hebrew word “truth,” identifies the structure of these three proxy wars as truth. The twenty-second and last letter of the Hebrew alphabet is a symbol of divinity being combined with humanity, and the fulfillment of the Battle of Panium in the near future takes place during Trump’s presidency. Trump is the twenty-second president to have served two terms.

Yog li no, nqe kaum, uas sawv cev rau xyoo 1989 thiab thawj tsov rog sawv cev, yog qhov pib, los yog thawj tus ntawv ntawm cov ntawv Henplais. Tsov Rog Raphia hauv nqe kaum ib, uas sawv cev rau tsov rog Ukraine, yog tus ntawv thib kaum peb hauv cov ntawv Henplais. Tus naj npawb 13 yog ib lub cim ntawm kev ntxeev siab, thiab cov tub rog sawv cev hauv tsov rog Ukrainian yog cov Nazi, yog lub cim tseem ceeb tshaj plaws ntawm kev ntxeev siab hauv lub ntiaj teb niaj hnub no. Panium yog tus ntawv kawg hauv cov ntawv Henplais, uas muaj nees nkaum ob tus ntawv. Yog li no, lo lus Henplais uas txhais tias qhov tseeb, uas raug tsim los ntawm kev coj tus ntawv thawj, tus ntawv thib kaum peb, thiab tus ntawv thib nees nkaum ob ntawm cov ntawv los sib txuas ua ke los tsim lo lus Henplais “qhov tseeb,” qhia txog tus qauv ntawm peb tsov rog sawv cev no tias yog qhov tseeb. Tus ntawv thib nees nkaum ob thiab tus kawg hauv cov ntawv Henplais yog ib lub cim ntawm Vajtswv txoj kev muaj ntuj tsim los koom ua ke nrog tib neeg, thiab kev ua tiav ntawm Tsov Rog Panium nyob rau yav tom ntej uas nyob ze no yuav tshwm sim thaum lub sijhawm Trump ua thawj tswj hwm. Trump yog tus thawj tswj hwm thib nees nkaum ob uas tau ua haujlwm ob lub sij hawm.

Panium has a double witness to a twofold alliance and in both references the alliance represents an alliance identifying a hierarchical relationship between two parties. The alliance between Philip and Antiochus was strategic, aimed at countering Ptolemaic and Roman influence in the eastern Mediterranean. However, their collaboration was not focused on the Battle of Panium itself—Antiochus conducted this campaign independently, without Philip’s direct military involvement. Philip’s role was more indirect, providing political and strategic support by tying down Roman and Ptolemaic allies in Greece and the Aegean, allowing Antiochus to focus on Coele-Syria. The historians all identify that Antiochus was the more powerful in the alliance, and that it was only Antiochus who actually fought the battle. Their alliance was concerning the broader area associated with Alexander’s former kingdom. Thus, the alliance has a premier leader and a lesser subordinate as represented by the name Caesarea-Philippi, the name for Panium when Christ walked among men. Caesarea-Philippi therefore aligns with Antiochus and Philip, for Caesar was the more powerful in the alliance symbolized by both Caesar Augustus and Herod Philip the tetrarch.

Panium muaj ib zaj tim khawv ob npaug txog ib txoj kev koom tes ob chav, thiab nyob hauv ob qho kev hais ntawd txoj kev koom tes ntawd sawv cev rau ib txoj kev sib koom uas qhia txog ib txoj kev sib raug zoo raws qib txheej ntawm ob tog. Txoj kev koom tes ntawm Philip thiab Antiochus yog ib txoj kev npaj tswv yim, uas tsom rau kev tawm tsam Ptolemaic thiab Roman lub hwj chim nyob hauv sab hnub tuaj ntawm Hiavtxwv Mediterranean. Txawm li ntawd los, lawv txoj kev koom tes tsis tau tsom rau Tsov Rog ntawm Panium nws tus kheej—Antiochus tau ua txoj kev tawm tsam no ntawm nws tus kheej, tsis muaj Philip txoj kev koom tes tub rog ncaj qha. Philip lub luag hauj lwm yog ib yam uas tsis ncaj qha dua, muab kev txhawb nqa hauv nom tswv thiab hauv tswv yim los ntawm kev khaws Roman thiab Ptolemaic cov phooj ywg sib koom tes tseg nyob hauv tim Nkij teb chaws thiab Hiavtxwv Aegean, ua rau Antiochus muaj cuab kav tsom ntsoov rau Coele-Syria. Cov kws keeb kwm txhua tus puav leej qhia meej tias Antiochus yog tus muaj hwj chim loj dua hauv txoj kev koom tes ntawd, thiab tias tsuas yog Antiochus xwb thiaj yog tus uas tau tawm tsam hauv tsov rog ntawd tiag tiag. Lawv txoj kev koom tes muaj feem txog thaj av dav dua uas txuas nrog Alexander lub nceeg vaj yav tas los. Yog li ntawd, txoj kev koom tes no muaj ib tug thawj coj loj tshaj thiab muaj ib tug nyob qib qis dua uas nyob hauv qab mloog lus, raws li sawv cev los ntawm lub npe Caesarea-Philippi, uas yog lub npe hu rau Panium thaum Khetos taug kev nrog tib neeg. Vim li no Caesarea-Philippi thiaj sib haum nrog Antiochus thiab Philip, rau qhov Caesar yog tus muaj hwj chim loj dua hauv txoj kev koom tes uas raug cim los ntawm ob leeg Caesar Augustus thiab Herod Philip tus tetrarch.

The word “Tetrarch” means ruler over a fourth. Caesar ruled the entire kingdom, and Philip ruled over a fourth of a territory thus placing the symbol of Philip in a subjective relationship in the alliances of Panium and Caesarea-Philippi. With Herod Philip we see the symbol of two blood lines which are both symbols of a broken covenant relationship with God. We also see echoes of one fourth of the division of Alexander’s kingdom into four parts, or four tetrarchs. Philip means lover of horses.

Lo lus “Tetrarch” txhais hais tias tus kav tshaj ib feem plaub. Caesar kav tag nrho lub nceeg vaj, hos Philip kav ib feem plaub ntawm ib thaj chaw; yog li ntawd thiaj muab lub cim ntawm Philip tso rau hauv ib txoj kev sib raug zoo raws sab kev xav hauv cov kev koom tes ntawm Panium thiab Caesarea-Philippi. Hauv Herod Philip peb pom lub cim ntawm ob txoj kab ntshav, uas ob leeg tib si yog cov cim ntawm ib txoj kev sib raug zoo hauv lub tswv yim cog lus uas raug tawg nrog Vajtswv. Peb kuj pom tej suab ncha ntawm ib feem plaub ntawm qhov kev faib lub nceeg vaj ntawm Alexander ua plaub feem, los sis plaub tus tetrarch. Philip txhais hais tias tus uas nyiam nees.

At the Battle of Panium which is fulfilled at the conclusion of the Ukrainian war Antiochus Magnus, the United States will defeat Russia and will enter into an alliance with a lesser player represented by Philip. That lesser player will be involved but not directly in the battle. The battle will be between the USA and Putin, evidently directly connected with a religious controversy produced by Putin’s irritation and pride as illustrated by both Ptolemy IV Philopator after the Battle of Raphia, and by king Uzziah of Judah. Ptolemy and Uzziah were southern kings lifted up in pride by their military success who then desired to take up a sacred work which was only to be accomplished by the priests. Uzziah received leprosy for his efforts and Ptolemy in a rage slew 50,000 Jews in Alexandria.

Nyob rau hauv Tsov Rog Panium, uas yuav tiav raws li kev ua tiav thaum kawg ntawm tsov rog Ukraine, Antiochus Magnus, uas yog Tebchaws Meskas, yuav kov yeej Russia thiab yuav nkag mus rau hauv ib qho kev sib koom tes nrog ib tug neeg ua si me dua uas Philip sawv cev rau. Tus neeg ua si me ntawd yuav muaj feem koom nrog, tiamsis tsis yog ncaj qha hauv tsov rog ntawd. Tsov rog ntawd yuav yog nruab nrab ntawm Tebchaws Meskas thiab Putin, thiab zoo li pom tseeb tias muaj kev txuas ncaj qha nrog ib qho kev sib cav txog kev ntseeg uas raug tsim los ntawm Putin txoj kev chim siab thiab kev khav theeb, raws li tau ua piv txwv los ntawm ob leeg Ptolemy IV Philopator tom qab Tsov Rog Raphia, thiab los ntawm vajntxwv Uzziah ntawm Yudas. Ptolemy thiab Uzziah yog cov vajntxwv sab qab teb uas raug tsa siab hauv kev khav theeb los ntawm lawv txoj kev vam meej hauv kev ua rog, ces lawv thiaj ntshaw los tuav ib txoj hauj lwm dawb huv uas tsuas yog cov pov thawj thiaj yuav tsum ua tiav. Uzziah tau raug mob ruas vim nws txoj kev sim ntawd, hos Ptolemy, hauv kev npau taws heev, tau tua 50,000 tus Yudais hauv Alexandria.

Verse thirteen identifies the battle between the final generation of the modern king of the community, or communism, Vladimir Putin’s Russia and the USA. Trump prevails in the battle, but he does so with an ally from a fourth part of the kingdom, who is not actually at the battle. We are near the conclusion of verse eleven as testified to by the current events. Putin will be victorious over Ukraine, as represented by Raphia. He will then begin his progressive demise as represented by Uzziah being placed into a house until his death, due to leprosy. After his victory at Raphia in 217 BC, Ptolemy IV Philopator’s reign deteriorated due to corruption, extravagance, and reliance on unscrupulous advisors. He died in 204 BC, likely assassinated or poisoned by his ministers, Sosibius and Agathocles, as part of a conspiracy to secure power for his young son, Ptolemy V. This turbulent end reflects the instability and intrigue common in Hellenistic royal courts, marking a significant turning point in the decline of Ptolemaic Egypt.

Nqe kaum peb qhia txog kev sib ntaus sib tua ntawm tiam kawg ntawm tus vajntxwv niaj hnub ntawm zej zog, lossis kev koom tsim, yog Lavxias ntawm Vladimir Putin, thiab tebchaws Meskas. Trump yeej hauv kev sib ntaus ntawd, tiamsis nws ua li ntawd nrog ib tug phoojywg los ntawm ib feem plaub ntawm lub nceeg vaj, tus uas qhov tseeb tsis nyob rau hauv kev sib ntaus ntawd. Peb tab tom nyob ze rau qhov xaus ntawm nqe kaum ib raws li tej xwm txheej tam sim no ua timkhawv. Putin yuav kov yeej Ukraine, raws li sawv cev los ntawm Raphia. Tom qab ntawd nws yuav pib nws txoj kev puas tsuaj zuj zus, raws li sawv cev los ntawm Uxiya raug muab tso rau hauv ib lub tsev mus txog hnub nws tuag, vim mob ruas. Tom qab nws txoj kev yeej ntawm Raphia xyoo 217 BC, txoj kev kav ntawm Ptolemy IV Philopator pib poob qis vim kev coj tsis ncaj, kev siv neej khwv loj dhau, thiab kev vam khom rau cov neeg pab tswv yim tsis ncaj ncees. Nws tuag xyoo 204 BC, tej zaum raug tua lossis raug lom los ntawm nws cov thawj coj, Sosibius thiab Agathocles, raws li ib feem ntawm ib txoj kev ntxeev siab los txeeb hwjchim rau nws tus tub tseem hluas, Ptolemy V. Qhov xaus ntxhov no qhia txog kev tsis ruaj khov thiab kev dag ntxias uas muaj feem ntau hauv cov tsev hais plaub vajntxwv Hellenistic, thiab cim txog ib qho kev tig loj hauv txoj kev poob qis ntawm tim lyiv teb chaws Ptolemaic.

A characteristic of the spiritual fulfillment of the king of the south which was typified by the literal fulfillments which took place in the struggle for world domination following Alexander’s death is “revolution.” France becomes the spiritual king of the south in the French Revolution time period. The modern king of the south, Russia was born in the Russian Revolution. As the philosophy introduced into the French Revolution matured from the anarchy of the French Revolution unto the communism of the Soviet revolution is a characteristic of the king of the south. Communism spread through the world with revolutions.

Ib qho yam ntxwv ntawm kev ua tiav sab ntsuj plig ntawm vajntxwv sab qab teb, uas tau raug piv txwv los ntawm cov kev ua tiav raws cev nqaij daim tawv uas tau muaj tshwm sim hauv txoj kev tawm tsam kom kav lub ntiaj teb tom qab Aleksandaw tuag, yog “kev hloov kiv puag ncig.” Fabkis los ua vajntxwv sab qab teb sab ntsuj plig nyob rau lub sijhawm ntawm Fabkis Kev Hloov Kiv Puag Ncig. Vajntxwv sab qab teb niaj hnub no, yog Russia, tau yug los hauv Russia Kev Hloov Kiv Puag Ncig. Raws li txoj kev xav uas tau raug qhia los rau hauv Fabkis Kev Hloov Kiv Puag Ncig loj hlob tiav ntawm kev tsis muaj cai tsis muaj txiav txim ntawm Fabkis Kev Hloov Kiv Puag Ncig mus txog rau kev koom xeem ntawm Soviet kev hloov kiv puag ncig, qhov no yog ib yam ntxwv ntawm vajntxwv sab qab teb. Kev koom xeem tau nthuav mus thoob plaws lub ntiaj teb nrog kev hloov kiv puag ncig.

In modern times the CIA through the use of Non-Governmental Agencies has worked to overthrow nations around the globe, and the step-by-step plan which they have repeatedly employed is what is called color revolutions. The king of the south is a dragon power, and globalists are also the dragon power and the color revolutions of the CIA are markers of a dragon power. The history of France as the spiritual king of the south possesses a unique history that marks a conclusion of that particular line of prophecy.

Hauv lub caij nyoog niaj hnub no, CIA tau siv cov koom haum uas tsis yog tsoom fwv los ua hauj lwm rhuav tshem tej teb chaws thoob plaws lub ntiaj teb, thiab txoj kev npaj ib theem zuj zus uas lawv tau siv dua ntau zaus ntawd yog yam uas hu ua kev tawm tsam hloov xim. Vajntxwv sab qab teb yog ib lub hwj chim zaj, thiab cov neeg thoob ntiaj teb no kuj yog lub hwj chim zaj thiab tej kev tawm tsam hloov xim ntawm CIA yog tej cim qhia txog ib lub hwj chim zaj. Keeb kwm ntawm Fabkis raws li vajntxwv sab qab teb ntawm sab ntsuj plig muaj ib zaj keeb kwm tshwj xeeb uas cim tseg txog qhov xaus ntawm txoj kab lus faj lem ntawd.

That conclusion is represented by Napoleon. The French Revolution marks the beginning of France as the king of the south and Napoleon marks its end. Historians identify a series a steps which led Napoleon to his Waterloo, thus identifying a progressive ending to the first spiritual king of the south, as opposed to Babylon and Belshazzar being taken in one night. The first Vladimir of the modern king of the south, Vladimir Lenin died over a two-year period from a series of strokes. Some speculate Joseph Stalin poisoned him, just as some speculate the Ptolemy IV was poisoned by his counselors. The end of the modern king of the south as represented with the Soviet Union was also accomplished by a revolution.

Qhov xaus ntawd yog sawv cev los ntawm Napoleon. Kev Tawm Tsam Fabkis cim txog qhov pib ntawm Fabkis ua vajntxwv qab teb, thiab Napoleon cim txog nws qhov kawg. Cov kws keeb kwm qhia txog ib kab ke ntawm ntau theem uas coj Napoleon mus txog nws Waterloo, yog li ntawd qhia txog ib qho kev xaus zuj zus ntawm thawj tus vajntxwv sab ntsuj plig ntawm qab teb, tsis zoo li Npanpiloo thiab Belshazzar raug txeeb hauv ib hmos. Thawj Vladimir ntawm tus vajntxwv qab teb niaj hnub no, Vladimir Lenin, tau tuag nyob rau ib ncua sij hawm ob xyoos vim muaj ib kab kev hlab ntsha tawg. Muaj qee leej kwv yees tias Joseph Stalin tau muab tshuaj lom rau nws, ib yam li muaj qee leej kwv yees tias Ptolemy IV raug nws cov kws pab tswv yim muab tshuaj lom. Qhov kawg ntawm tus vajntxwv qab teb niaj hnub no raws li sawv cev los ntawm Soviet Union kuj tau ua tiav los ntawm ib qho kev tawm tsam.

The protest in Moscow that contributed to the demise of the USSR was the massive public resistance during the August 1991 Coup (August 19–21, 1991). This event, centered around the defense of the White House and Boris Yeltsin’s leadership, directly undermined the Soviet hardliners, exposed the regime’s fragility, and accelerated the USSR’s collapse. While earlier protests in Moscow (e.g., 1987–1990) and the Baltic Way (1989) built momentum, the August 1991 protests were the critical tipping point in Moscow, leading to the Soviet Union’s dissolution by the end of 1991. The beginning of Russia as the king of the south begins and ends in revolution. The ending of the USSR was a progressive disintegration of the kingdom, as was Ptolemy, Uzziah, Napoleon and even Vladimir Lenin. The ending of Putin is a progressive fall, which begins as soon as the Ukraine war is finished. His end is brought about at the Battle of Panium, when the USA takes control of the kingdom, while receiving support from an ally who is not actually at the battle.

Qhov kev tawm tsam hauv Moscow uas tau pab coj los rau qhov kev ploj tuag ntawm USSR yog qhov kev tawm tsam loj heev ntawm pej xeem thaum lub Sijhawm Tawm Tsam Hwj Chim thaum Lub Yim Hli 1991 (August 19–21, 1991). Qhov xwm txheej no, uas tsom rau kev tiv thaiv White House thiab Boris Yeltsin txoj kev coj noj coj ua, tau ua kom cov neeg tawv ncauj hauv Soviet poob hwj chim ncaj qha, qhia tawm txog qhov tsis ruaj khov ntawm lub xeev tswj hwm, thiab ua kom USSR txoj kev vau ceev dua. Txawm hais tias cov kev tawm tsam yav dhau los hauv Moscow (xws li, 1987–1990) thiab Baltic Way (1989) tau tsim kom muaj zog ntxiv, cov kev tawm tsam thaum Lub Yim Hli 1991 yog lub ntsiab turning point tseem ceeb hauv Moscow, uas coj mus rau kev yaj ntawm Soviet Union thaum xaus xyoo 1991. Qhov pib ntawm Russia raws li huab tais ntawm sab qab teb pib thiab xaus hauv kev kiv puag ncig. Qhov xaus ntawm USSR yog ib qho kev tawg zuj zus ntawm lub nceeg vaj, ib yam li Ptolemy, Uzziah, Napoleon thiab txawm yog Vladimir Lenin. Qhov xaus ntawm Putin yog ib qho kev poob zuj zus, uas pib tam sim ntawd thaum kev ua tsov rog Ukraine xaus lawm. Nws qhov kawg raug coj los txog ntawm Tsov Rog Panium, thaum USA txeeb tau txoj kev tswj hwm ntawm lub nceeg vaj, thaum tseem tau txais kev txhawb los ntawm ib tug phooj ywg koom tes uas tsis nyob tiag tiag hauv qhov tsov rog ntawd.

We will continue these lines in the next article.

Peb yuav txuas ntxiv cov ntsiab lus no hauv zaj lus tom ntej.

Back to Articles