Article

# Panium - Number Two

Panium – Nọmba Abụọ

The Rise and Fall of the King of the South

Mbili na Ọdịda nke Eze nke Ndịda

Author

Jeff Pippenger

Published

February 27, 2025

Formats

PDF
Word
Song MP3

We left off the last article by writing, “Verses 10–15 represent three proxy wars accomplished by the king of the north, the papal power, from 1989 to the Sunday law.” These three proxy wars begin with the identification of the United States in verse 40 as “chariots, ships, and horsemen.”

Anyị kwụsịrị isiokwu ikpeazụ site n’ide, “Amaokwu 10–15 na-anọchi anya agha nnọchi anya atọ nke eze ugwu, ike ndị poopu, rụrụ site n’afọ 1989 ruo n’iwu Sọnde.” Agha nnọchi anya atọ ndị a na-amalite site n’ịmata United States n’amaokwu 40 dị ka “ụgbọ ịnyịnya agha, ụgbọ mmiri, na ndị na-agba ịnyịnya.”

The next proxy war, represented by verse 11 and its historical fulfillment at the Battle of Raphia in 217 BC, was between Ptolemy IV Philopator, the southern king of Egypt, and Antiochus the Great, also called Antiochus Magnus, of the Seleucid Empire. Antiochus had fulfilled verse 10 when he retaliated against Egypt for his northern kingdom’s defeat and loss of possessions, retaking all the geography the southern kingdom had previously seized from his kingdom. He did so but stopped at the border of Egypt, thus fulfilling verse 10 and typifying 1989.

Agha nnọchi anya nke sochirinụ, nke amaokwu nke 11 nọchiri anya ya na mmezu ya n’akụkọ ihe mere eme n’Agha Raphia n’afọ 217 T.K., bụ n’etiti Ptolemy IV Philopator, eze ndịda nke Ijipt, na Antiochus the Great, nke a na-akpọkwa Antiochus Magnus, nke Alaeze Seleucid. Antiochus emezuworị amaokwu nke 10 mgbe o weghachiri ihe megide Ijipt n’ihi mmeri e meriri alaeze ugwu ya na ọnwụnwa ihe onwunwe ya, wereghachite akụkụ ala niile nke alaeze ndịda nara na mbụ n’aka alaeze ya. O mere otú a, ma kwụsị n’ókè ala Ijipt, wee si otú a mezuo amaokwu nke 10 ma bụrụkwa ụdị nke 1989.

> But his sons shall be stirred up, and shall assemble a multitude of great forces: and one shall certainly come, and overflow, and pass through: then shall he return, and be stirred up, even to his fortress. Daniel 11:10.

> Ma ụmụ-ya ndị ikom ka a ga-akpali, ha ga-achịkọtakwa ìgwè ndị agha dị ukwuu: otu n’ime ha ga-abịa n’ezie, juputa dịka idei mmiri, gafekwa: mgbe ahụ ọ ga-alaghachi, a ga-akpalikwa ya, ruo ọbụna n’ebe ewusiri ike ya. Daniel 11:10.

The second proxy war was the Battle of Raphia. Raphia means the borderland. That battleground marks the point where Antiochus had ceased his previous invasion of verse 10. The three proxy wars are governed by truth, in the sense that the first proxy war aligns with the last proxy war. All three wars—verses 10, 11, and then the third war of verses 13–15—are waged by the same historical figure in their initial fulfillment. Antiochus Magnus is present in each of the three battles, prophetically tying them together into one line. Antiochus wins the first and last battles, but not the middle one, where the king of the south prevails.

Agha nnọchi anya nke abụọ bụ Agha Raphia. Raphia pụtara ala ókè. Ebe agha ahụ na-akara isi ebe Antiọkọs kwụsịrị mbuso agha ya gara aga nke amaokwu nke 10. Agha nnọchi anya atọ ahụ bụ eziokwu na-achịkwa ha, n’echiche na agha nnọchi anya mbụ kwekọrọ na agha nnọchi anya ikpeazụ. Agha atọ ahụ nile—amaokwu nke 10, nke 11, ma emesịa agha nke atọ nke amaokwu 13–15—otu onye akụkọ ihe mere eme ahụ ka na-alụ ha na mmezu mbụ ha. Antiọkọs Magnus nọ n’ime agha atọ ahụ nke ọ bụla, na-ejikọta ha ọnụ n’amụma n’otu ahịrị. Antiọkọs meriri agha mbụ na nke ikpeazụ, ma ọ bụghị nke dị n’etiti, ebe eze nke ndịda meriri.

Just as Raphia means borderland, so does Ukraine. The second proxy war, first fulfilled by the Battle of Raphia, is now being fulfilled in the Ukrainian war. Vladimir Putin is the king of the south, the prophetic descendant of the first modern king of the south, Vladimir Lenin. Putin has repeatedly claimed that Russia’s response to Ukraine is based on a disputed agreement that, upon Germany’s reunification, NATO would not expand further into former USSR territory. Putin’s motivation mirrors Ptolemy’s in verses 5–9 and Napoleon’s in 1797. All three southern kings justify their actions against the northern king based on a broken treaty.

Dịka Rafịa pụtara ala ókè, otu a ka Ukraine pụtakwara. Agha nnọchi nke abụọ, nke agha Rafịa buru ụzọ mezuo, ka a na-emezu ugbu a n’agha Ukraine. Vladimir Putin bụ eze ndịda, nwa n’usoro amụma nke eze ndịda mbụ nke oge a, Vladimir Lenin. Putin ekwuola ugboro ugboro na nzaghachi Russia nye Ukraine dabeere n’otu nkwekọrịta a na-arụ ụka banyere ya, nke kwuru na, mgbe Germany jikọtara ọzọ, NATO agaghị agbasawanye ọzọ n’ime ókèala mbụ nke USSR. Ebumnobi Putin yiri nke Ptolemy n’amaokwu nke 5–9 na nke Napoleon n’afọ 1797. Ndị eze ndịda atọ a niile na-eme ka omume ha megide eze ugwu bụrụ ihe ziri ezi dabere n’elu nkwekọrịta e mebiri emebi.

According to Isaiah 23, the whore of Tyre, representing the papal power, would be forgotten for seventy years, as the days of one king—a period repeatedly shown to be the time when the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, the earth beast of Revelation 13 (the United States), rules.

Dịka Aịzaya 23 si kwuo, akwụna Taịa, nke na-anọchi anya ike papal, a ga-echefu ya ruo afọ iri asaa, dịka ụbọchị nke otu eze—oge e gosipụtara ugboro ugboro na ọ bụ oge mgbe alaeze nke isii nke amụma Baịbụl, anụ ọhịa nke ụwa nke Mkpughe 13 (United States), na-achị.

> And it shall come to pass in that day, that Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years, according to the days of one king: after the end of seventy years shall Tyre sing as an harlot. Take an harp, go about the city, thou harlot that hast been forgotten; make sweet melody, sing many songs, that thou mayest be remembered. And it shall come to pass after the end of seventy years, that the Lord will visit Tyre, and she shall turn to her hire, and shall commit fornication with all the kingdoms of the world upon the face of the earth. Isaiah 23:15–17.

> Ọ gēme kwa n’ụbọchị ahụ na a ga-echefu Taịa afọ iri asaa, dịka ụbọchị nke otu eze siri dị: mgbe ngwụcha afọ iri asaa gasịrị, Taịa ga-abụku abụ dịka nwanyị akwụna. Were ụbọ akwara, gagharịa gburugburu obodo, gị nwanyị akwụna e chefuru echefu; kpọọ ụda dị ụtọ, bụrụọ ọtụtụ abụ, ka e wee cheta gị. Ọ gēme kwa mgbe ngwụcha afọ iri asaa gasịrị, na Onyenwe anyị ga-eleta Taịa, ọ ga-alaghachikwute ụgwọ akwụna ya, ọ ga-akwa iko ya na alaeze niile nke ụwa n’elu ụwa dum. Aịzaịa 23:15–17.

The symbolic seventy-year period spans from 1798 to the Sunday law, which is the history represented by verse 40. It is not until the ending of the seventy years, or the approach of the Sunday law, that the whore reappears. For this reason, the warfare of the three battles in verses 10–15 is carried out by a proxy of the papal power, for she is prophetically forgotten during this period.

Oge ihe nnọchianya nke afọ iri asaa ahụ na-agbatị site n’afọ 1798 ruo n’iwu Sọnde, nke bụ akụkọ ihe mere eme nke amaokwu nke 40 na-anọchi anya ya. Ọ bụghị ruo n’ọgwụgwụ nke afọ iri asaa ahụ, ma ọ bụ nsochi nke iwu Sọnde, ka nwanyị akwụna ahụ pụtara ọzọ. N’ihi nke a, agha nke ọgụ atọ ahụ dị n’amaokwu 10–15 ka a na-eme site n’aka onye nnọchi anya ike ndị popu, n’ihi na n’amụma a chefuru ya n’oge a.

In the first and last proxy battles, the king of the north prevails over the king of the south. In the middle battle, the king of the south prevails over the king of the north. The Battle of Raphia was the initial historical fulfillment of verse 11, and the verse and their historical fulfillment make up two witnesses that are to be combined with the parallel passages of papal Rome’s three and a half prophetic days of rule. Thus, two passages of Scripture within Daniel 11, accompanied by their historical fulfillments, set forth the prophetic characteristics of verse 11’s battle of the borderland, first fulfilled at the Battle of Raphia and then again at the time of the end in 1798.

N’agha nnọchi anya nke mbụ na nke ikpeazụ, eze nke ugwu na-emeri eze nke ndịda. N’agha nke dị n’etiti, eze nke ndịda na-emeri eze nke ugwu. Agha Raphia bụ mmezu akụkọ ihe mere eme mbụ nke amaokwu nke 11, ma amaokwu ahụ na mmezu ya n’akụkọ ihe mere eme mejupụtara ndị àmà abụọ a ga-ejikọta na akụkụ Akwụkwọ Nsọ ndị yiri ya gbasara ụbọchị amụma atọ na ọkara nke ọchịchị Rome nke ndị pope. Ya mere, akụkụ Akwụkwọ Nsọ abụọ dị n’ime Daniel 11, tinyere mmezu ha n’akụkọ ihe mere eme, na-egosipụta àgwà amụma nke agha mpaghara ókèala nke amaokwu nke 11, nke mbụ mezuru n’Agha Raphia, ma emesịa ọzọ n’oge ọgwụgwụ na 1798.

These lines of witness uphold that Vladimir Putin is the last Vladimir of the modern king of the south. “Vladimir” is often defined as meaning “ruler of the world,” but the word mir also correctly means “community.” Thus, Vladimir means “ruler of the community,” or “ruler of communism.” Putin identifies his involvement with Ukraine as based on a broken agreement addressing his concerns about NATO’s encroachment beyond the borders agreed upon after Germany’s unification. Putin’s direction is as much focused against NATO and the EU as it is against Zelenskyy and Ukraine. NATO and the EU’s encroachment upon territory Putin insists was to remain NATO-free parallels Ptolemy’s rage when the Seleucid king set the Egyptian princess bride aside for his former wife. That broken treaty pointed forward to the broken Treaty of Tolentino in 1797. In Daniel 11, when the southern king prevails over the northern king, it involves a broken treaty.

Ahịrị ndị a nke àmà na-akwado na Vladimir Putin bụ Vladimir ikpeazụ nke eze ndịda nke oge a. A na-akọwakarị “Vladimir” dịka nke pụtara “onye na-achị ụwa,” ma okwu mir pụtakwara n’ezie “ọgbakọ.” Ya mere, Vladimir pụtara “onye na-achị ọgbakọ,” ma ọ bụ “onye na-achị komunizim.” Putin na-akọwa itinye aka ya n’ihe gbasara Ukraine dịka ihe dabere n’usoro nkwekọrịta e mebiri emebi nke na-elebara nchegbu ya anya banyere mgbasa NATO gafee ókè e kwetara mgbe e jikọtara Germany ọnụ ọzọ. Nduzi Putin lekwasịrị anya megide NATO na EU n’otu aka ahụ ọ dịkwa megide Zelenskyy na Ukraine. Mbata NATO na EU n’ime ókèala Putin na-ekwusi ike na ọ ga-anọgide bụrụ nke na-enweghị NATO na-adakọ na iwe Ptolemy mgbe eze Seleucid wepụrụ ada-eze nwanyị Ijipt n’ọnọdụ ya n’ihi nwunye mbụ ya. Nkwekọrịta ahụ e mebiri emebi tụrụ aka n’ihu na Nkwekọrịta Tolentino e mebiri emebi n’afọ 1797. N’ime Daniel 11, mgbe eze ndịda meriri eze ugwu, ọ gụnyere nkwekọrịta e mebiri emebi.

This broken treaty concerns the EU’s unwillingness to restrict NATO’s expansion beyond its borders when Germany was reunified. In this sense, Putin, the king of the south, is in a battle against the king of the north, represented by his proxy power. Just as the Nazis of World War II were a proxy for the Catholic Church, the Nazis of Ukraine become the symbol of the second proxy war of verses 10–15. Three world wars and three proxy wars—and in both lines, the Nazis are the proxy representative of the Catholic Church during the middle conflict.

Nkwekọrịta a e mebiri emebi metụtara enweghị ọchịchọ nke EU igbochi mgbasawanye NATO gafee ókèala ya mgbe e jikọgharịrị Germany ọzọ. N’echiche a, Putin, eze nke ndịda, nọ n’agha megide eze nke ugwu, onye a na-anọchi anya site n’ike nnọchi anya ya. Dị nnọọ ka ndị Nazi nke Agha Ụwa nke Abụọ bụ ndị nnọchi anya Chọọchị Katọlik, ndị Nazi nke Ukraine ghọọ akara nke agha nnọchi anya nke abụọ nke amaokwu 10–15. Agha ụwa atọ na agha nnọchi anya atọ—na n’akara abụọ ahụ, ndị Nazi bụ ndị nnọchi anya Chọọchị Katọlik n’oge esemokwu etiti ahụ.

In the three original historical fulfillments of these proxy wars, Antiochus Magnus was in each battle. It has often been shown how the etymology of “Antiochus” and the symbolism associated with the Seleucid kingdom as the king of the north identify Antiochus as a symbol of the antichrist—the pope of Rome. But in the history of the three proxy wars, the whore of Tyre is forgotten, so the symbol of the “pope” represented in the name “Antiochus” stands for his proxy power. In the first and last battles, it is the United States openly doing the bidding for Rome. In verse 11, the proxy power is the Nazism of Ukraine, but it was and still is the ships and chariots of the United States that propped up Zelenskyy in the war. On the surface of the second proxy war, the United States is hidden, as is the pope during the seventy years of Isaiah 23. The United States is hidden in the very history where it develops all the characteristics of the beast, making it prophetically fitting that, once the second proxy war is underway, the United States is obscured by the proxy power of Nazism in Ukraine, though it remains the military and economic might of the earth beast that props up Ukraine until their demise.

N’ime mmezu atọ mbụ ndị a nke agha nnọchi anya ndị a n’akụkọ ihe mere eme, Antiochus Magnus nọ n’agha ọ bụla. A na-egosipụtakarị otú mmalite-asụsụ nke “Antiochus” na ihe nnọchianya jikọtara ya na alaeze Seleucid dịka eze nke ugwu si akọwa Antiochus dịka ihe nnọchianya nke onye-emegide-Kraịst—pọọpụ Rom. Ma n’akụkọ ihe mere eme nke agha nnọchi anya atọ ahụ, akwụna Taịa echefuola, ya mere ihe nnọchianya nke “pọọpụ” e gosiri n’aha “Antiochus” na-anọchi anya ike nnọchi anya ya. N’agha mbụ na nke ikpeazụ, ọ bụ United States n’ihu ọha na-eme ihe Rome nyere ya iwu ime. N’amaokwu 11, ike nnọchi anya ahụ bụ Nazizim nke Ukraine, ma ọ bụ ụgbọ mmiri na ịnyịnya-agha nke United States ka bụbu ma ka bụkwa ndị kwadoro Zelenskyy n’agha ahụ. N’elu elu nke agha nnọchi anya nke abụọ, United States zoro ezo, dịka pọọpụ si zoro ezo n’ime afọ iri asaa nke Aịzaịa 23. United States zoro ezo n’ime kpọmkwem akụkọ ihe mere eme ahụ ebe ọ na-etolite njirimara niile nke anụ ọhịa ahụ, nke na-eme ka o kwekọọ n’amụma na, ozugbo agha nnọchi anya nke abụọ malitere ịga n’ihu, Nazizim nke Ukraine na-ekpuchi United States dịka ike nnọchi anya, ọ bụ ezie na ike agha na ike akụ na ụba nke anụ ọhịa nke ụwa ka na-akwado Ukraine ruo mgbe mbibi ha bịara.

When the king of the south went to Babylon and took the king of the north captive, and also when General Berthier took the pope captive, he walked right into the Vatican suggesting that the Ukrainian war will end with Putin’s victory at a point when any resistance from the Ukraine has been removed. The kingdom Ptolemy captured was Babylon, and the kingdom Napoleon captured was spiritual Babylon. Thus, Zelenskyy’s kingdom is represented by those subjects which provide him support. Now that Trump has withdrawn the support of the earth beast’s chariots horsemen and ships, Ukraine’s support is the EU, the very group that has been unwilling to hear Putin’s claims of the broken treaty concerning the encroachment of NATO.

Mgbe eze nke ndịda gara Babilọn ma dọta eze nke ugwu n’agha, nakwa kwa mgbe Jeneraal Berthier dọtara pope n’agha, ọ gara ozugbo n’ime Vatican, na-egosi na agha Ukraine ga-akwụsị site na mmeri Putin n’oge a ga-ewepụla nguzogide ọ bụla sitere n’aka Ukraine. Alaeze Ptolemy jidere bụ Babilọn, alaeze Napoleon jidere bụkwa Babilọn nke mmụọ. N’ihi ya, a na-anọchi anya alaeze Zelenskyy site n’aka ndị isiokwu ahụ na-enye ya nkwado. Ugbu a ebe Trump ewepụla nkwado nke ụgbọ ịnyịnya, ndị na-agba ịnyịnya, na ụgbọ mmiri nke anụ ọhịa nke ụwa, nkwado Ukraine bụ EU, otu ahụ kpọmkwem nke na-achọghị ịnụ nkwupụta Putin banyere ọgbụgba ndụ e mebiri emebi gbasara mbata NATO.

The philosophy that guides the eurocrats of the EU is the Greenpeace movement. For this reason, Zelenskyy means, “green.” Zelenskyy is the symbolic head of the warmongers of the EU who are guided by the foolish global agenda of environmentalism. When the Ukraine war concludes Putin will celebrate not only a victory over Ukraine, but the entire EU and NATO.

Nkà ihe ọmụma nke na-edu ndị eurokrat nke EU bụ mmegharị Greenpeace. N’ihi nke a, Zelenskyy pụtara, “akwụkwọ ndụ akwụkwọ ndụ.” Zelenskyy bụ isi nnọchianya nke ndị na-akpali agha nke EU, ndị a na-edu site n’agenda nzuzu zuru ụwa ọnụ nke nchedo gburugburu ebe obibi. Mgbe agha Ukraine ga-eru ọgwụgwụ, Putin agaghị eme emume naanị maka mmeri o meriri Ukraine, kama maka EU na NATO dum.

The three proxy wars therefore possess the signature of truth. The first and last proxy war the king of the south is defeated through an alliance between the sea beast and earth beast of Revelation thirteen. In the beginning the victory for the king of the north was brought about by an alliance between a conservative, Vatican I pope, who in the context of the Fatima secrets of Catholicism lore is the white or good pope. The current pope, who as I write this is on his deathbed is a Vatican II, liberal pope, who in the context of the Fatima secrets is the black or bad pope.

Ya mere, agha nnọchi anya atọ ahụ nwere akara nke eziokwu. N’agha nnọchi anya mbụ na nke ikpeazụ, a na-emeri eze ndịda site na njikọ aka dị n’etiti anụ ọhịa nke si n’oké osimiri pụta na anụ ọhịa nke si n’ụwa pụta nke Mkpughe iri na atọ. Na mmalite, e mere ka mmeri eze ugwu pụta site na njikọ aka dị n’etiti poopu Vatican Mbụ nke na-agbaso ọdịnala, onye, n’ọdịnala Katọlik gbasara ihe nzuzo Fatima, bụ poopu ọcha ma ọ bụ poopu ọma. Poopu dị ugbu a, onye, ka m na-ede nke a, nọ n’ọnwụ ọnwụ ya, bụ poopu Vatican nke Abụọ, nke na-emesapụ aka, onye, n’ihe gbara ihe nzuzo Fatima gburugburu, bụ poopu ojii ma ọ bụ poopu ọjọọ.

Verse fourteen identifies that when the “robbers of thy people” who exalt themselves and fall, enter into prophetic history the vision is established. In the fulfillment of verses thirteen through fifteen in the Battle of Panium in 200 BC pagan Rome inserted itself into the issues concerning that very battle. In the three verses which address the Battle of Panium, verse fourteen identifies that the vision is established by Rome.

Amaokwu nke iri na anọ na-eme ka a mata na mgbe “ndi na-apụnara ndi nke gi ihe,” bụ ndị na-ebuli onwe ha elu ma daa, batara n’ime akụkọ amụma, ka e mere ka ọhụụ ahụ guzosie ike. N’ime mmezu nke amaokwu iri na atọ ruo iri na ise n’Agha Panium n’afọ 200 BC, Rome ndị na-ekpere arụsị tinyere onwe ya n’ihe gbasara agha ahụ kpọmkwem. N’ime amaokwu atọ ndị na-ekwu banyere Agha Panium, amaokwu nke iri na anọ na-akọwa na ọ bụ site na Rome ka e mere ka ọhụụ ahụ guzosie ike.

In the Battle of Panium history a conservative, Vatican I white pope will join forces with the last of the eight presidents that began in the period of Reagan, who previously formed an alliance with a conservative Vatican I pope. They did so in 1989 to bring down the former USSR, and at the end they do so to bring down the last ruler of that very kingdom.

N’agha Panium nke akụkọ ihe mere eme, otu poopu ọcha nke Vatican I, onye na-agbaso ọdịnala, ga-esonyere onye ikpeazụ n’ime ndị isi ala asatọ ahụ malitere n’oge Reagan, onye bụbu onye guzoburu njikọ aka na otu poopu nke Vatican I na-agbaso ọdịnala. Ha mere nke a n’afọ 1989 iji kwatuo USSR mbụ ahụ, ma n’ọgwụgwụ ha ga-emekwa ya iji kwatuo onye ọchịchị ikpeazụ nke alaeze ahụ kpọmkwem.

In the Reagan years and with the alliance of pope John Paul II and the USA, John Paul II came to believe he was the good pope of the prophecies of Fatima. Motivated by that conviction he began to travel the world to promote what he understood to be a fulfillment of the predictions of Fatima. In doing so he became the most travelled pope in history, as well as the most recognized pope of all time as he fulfilled Revelation thirteen’s prediction that there would be a time when the whole world would wonder after the beast. Pope John Paul II’s public persona typifies the conservative Vatican I pope who comes into an alliance with the last president of the USA.

N’oge Reagan na n’ime njikọ nke Pope John Paul II na USA, John Paul II bịara ikwere na ya bụ pope ọma ahụ nke amụma Fatima kwuru banyere ya. N’ịkpali site n’ime nkwenye ahụ, ọ malitere ịgagharị ụwa iji kwalite ihe ọ ghọtara ịbụ mmezu nke amụma Fatima kwuru. N’ime ime nke a, ọ ghọrọ pope kacha gagharịa n’akụkọ ihe mere eme, yana pope a kacha mara amara n’oge niile, ka ọ na-emezu amụma nke Mkpughe isi nke iri na atọ nke kwuru na oge ga-abịa mgbe ụwa niile ga-eju anya soro anụ ọhịa ahụ. Àgwà ọha Pope John Paul II na-anọchi anya n’ezie pope Vatican I onye mgbanwe ọdịnala na-abata n’ime njikọ ya na onye isi ala ikpeazụ nke USA.

Therefore, one of the prophetic characteristics of the Reagan contemporary pope is that there is a point where his public image is marked as a waymark. That mark is in verse fourteen, when the robbers of thy people establish the vision. Pope John Paul II fulfills a prophetic characteristic of being the pope that the entire world wondered after, thus pointing forward to the conservative end time Vatican I pope who comes into an alliance with Trump. When that happens the vision is established, and what establishes the vision is the pope inserting himself into the history of Panium and the year 200 BC.

Ya mere, otu n’ime njirimara amụma nke pope nke oge a nke Reagan bụ na e nwere otu ebe a na-akara oyiyi ya n’ihu ọha dịka ihe-akara-ụzọ. Akara ahụ dị n’amaokwu nke iri na anọ, mgbe ndị ohi nke ndị gị ga-eme ka ọhụụ ahụ guzosie ike. Pope John Paul II na-emezu otu njirimara amụma nke ịbụ pope ahụ nke ụwa dum tụrụ n’anya soro, si otú a na-atụ aka n’ihu n’ebe pope Vatican I nke oge ikpeazụ, nke na-agbaso ụzọ mgbanwe-ọchịchị aka nri, nọ, onye na-abanye n’ọgbụgba ndụ na Trump. Mgbe nke ahụ mere, ọhụụ ahụ eguzobewo; ihe na-eme ka ọhụụ ahụ guzosie ike bụ pope ahụ itinye onwe ya n’akụkọ ihe mere eme nke Panium na afọ 200 BC.

The beginning of the eight presidents illustrates the ending of the eight presidents and just before the Sunday law of verse sixteen the whore of Tyre who has been forgotten returns to open history as she forms an alliance with Reagan’s counterpart, Donald Trump. Together as represented by the alliance of Antiochus and Philip of Macedon they bring down the final generation of the southern kingdom as represented by the child king Ptolemy. A child in Bible prophecy is a symbol of the final generation, and after the Ukraine war Putin will repeat the history of the southern kings who are lifted up from military victories and lose their way in some type of church and state dilemma.

Mbido nke ndị isi ala asatọ ahụ na-egosi njedebe nke ndị isi ala asatọ ahụ, ma tupu Iwu Ụka nke ụbọchị Sọnde nke amaokwu nke iri na isii, akwụna Taịa nke echefuola echefu na-alaghachi n’ime akụkọ ihe mere eme mepere emepe ka ọ na-etolite njikọ ya na onye hà Reagan, bụ Donald Trump. Ha abụọ, dị ka e si anọchi anya ha site na njikọ nke Antiochus na Filip nke Masedonia, na-ebutu ọdịda nke ọgbọ ikpeazụ nke alaeze ndịda, dịka e si anọchi anya ya site n’eze nwata Ptolemy. Nwata, n’amụma Baịbụl, bụ akara nke ọgbọ ikpeazụ; ma mgbe agha Ukraine gachara, Putin ga-emegharị akụkọ ndị eze ndịda, ndị a na-ebuli elu site n’imeri n’agha ma na-apụ n’ụzọ ha n’ụdị ụfọdụ nke nsogbu dị n’etiti ụka na ọchịchị.

Thus, verse ten, representing 1989 and the first proxy war is the beginning, or the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet. The Battle of Raphia in verse eleven representing the Ukraine war is the thirteenth letter in the Hebrew alphabet. The number 13 is a symbol of rebellion, and the proxy army in the Ukrainian war are Nazi’s, the premier symbol of rebellion in the modern world. Panium is the last letter in the Hebrew alphabet, which is made up of twenty-two letters. Thus, the Hebrew word truth which is created by bringing the first, thirteenth and twenty-second letters of the alphabet together to form the Hebrew word “truth,” identifies the structure of these three proxy wars as truth. The twenty-second and last letter of the Hebrew alphabet is a symbol of divinity being combined with humanity, and the fulfillment of the Battle of Panium in the near future takes place during Trump’s presidency. Trump is the twenty-second president to have served two terms.

Ya mere, amaokwu nke iri, nke na-anọchi anya afọ 1989 na agha nnọchi anya mbụ, bụ mmalite, ma ọ bụ mkpụrụedemede mbụ nke mkpụrụedemede Hibru. Agha Raphia dị n’amaokwu nke iri na otu, nke na-anọchi anya agha Ukraine, bụ mkpụrụedemede nke iri na atọ n’ime mkpụrụedemede Hibru. Ọnụọgụ 13 bụ akara nke nnupụisi, ma ndị agha nnọchi anya nọ n’agha Ukraine bụ ndị Nazi, bụ akara kachasị elu nke nnupụisi n’ụwa nke oge a. Panium bụ mkpụrụedemede ikpeazụ n’ime mkpụrụedemede Hibru, nke mejupụtara mkpụrụedemede iri abụọ na abụọ. Ya mere, okwu Hibru ahụ bụ eziokwu, nke e si n’ịjikọta mkpụrụedemede mbụ, nke iri na atọ, na nke iri abụọ na abụọ nke mkpụrụedemede ọnụ wee mepụta okwu Hibru ahụ “eziokwu,” na-akọwapụta nhazi nke agha nnọchi anya atọ ndị a dịka eziokwu. Mkpụrụedemede nke iri abụọ na abụọ, nke bụkwa nke ikpeazụ n’ime mkpụrụedemede Hibru, bụ akara nke ịdị nsọ Chineke a jikọtara na mmadụ, ma mmezu nke Agha Panium n’oge na-adịghị anya na-eme n’oge ọchịchị Trump. Trump bụ onye isi ala nke iri abụọ na abụọ nke jere ozi n’oge ọchịchị abụọ.

Panium has a double witness to a twofold alliance and in both references the alliance represents an alliance identifying a hierarchical relationship between two parties. The alliance between Philip and Antiochus was strategic, aimed at countering Ptolemaic and Roman influence in the eastern Mediterranean. However, their collaboration was not focused on the Battle of Panium itself—Antiochus conducted this campaign independently, without Philip’s direct military involvement. Philip’s role was more indirect, providing political and strategic support by tying down Roman and Ptolemaic allies in Greece and the Aegean, allowing Antiochus to focus on Coele-Syria. The historians all identify that Antiochus was the more powerful in the alliance, and that it was only Antiochus who actually fought the battle. Their alliance was concerning the broader area associated with Alexander’s former kingdom. Thus, the alliance has a premier leader and a lesser subordinate as represented by the name Caesarea-Philippi, the name for Panium when Christ walked among men. Caesarea-Philippi therefore aligns with Antiochus and Philip, for Caesar was the more powerful in the alliance symbolized by both Caesar Augustus and Herod Philip the tetrarch.

Panium nwere àmà abụọ gbasara njikọ aka okpukpu abụọ, ma n’ihe atụ abụọ ahụ, njikọ aka ahụ na-anọchi anya njikọ nke na-akọwa mmekọrịta n’usoro ọchịchị dị n’etiti akụkụ abụọ. Njikọ aka dị n’etiti Philip na Antiochus bụ nke atụmatụ agha na ndọrọ ndọrọ ọchịchị, e lekwasịrị ya anya iguzogide mmetụta Ptolemaic na nke Rome n’ebe ọwụwa anyanwụ nke Oké Osimiri Mediterenian. Otú ọ dị, imekọ ihe ọnụ ha elekwasịghị anya n’Agha Panium n’onwe ya—Antiochus duru ọgụ a n’onwe ya, na-enweghị itinye aka agha ozugbo sitere n’aka Philip. Ọrụ Philip bụ nke na-apụtachaghị ìhè, nke bụ inye nkwado ndọrọ ndọrọ ọchịchị na nke atụmatụ agha site n’ijide ndị mmekọ Rome na Ptolemaic n’ala Gris na n’Oké Osimiri Aegean n’ọrụ, si otú a kwe ka Antiochus lekwasị anya na Coele-Syria. Ndị odeakụkọ ihe mere eme niile na-akọwa na Antiochus bụ onye nwere ike karị n’ime njikọ aka ahụ, nakwa na ọ bụ naanị Antiochus n’onwe ya lụrụ agha ahụ n’eziokwu. Njikọ aka ha metụtara mpaghara sara mbara nke e jikọtara na alaeze mbụ Alexander. Ya mere, njikọ aka ahụ nwere onye ndu kachasị elu na onye nọ n’okpuru ya nke pere mpe, dịka e gosiri ya site n’aha Caesarea-Philippi, nke bụ aha Panium mgbe Kraịst jere ije n’etiti mmadụ. N’ihi ya, Caesarea-Philippi kwekọrọ na Antiochus na Philip, n’ihi na Caesar bụ onye nwere ike karị n’ime njikọ aka ahụ nke Caesar Augustus na Herod Philip onye tetrarch nọchiri anya ya.

The word “Tetrarch” means ruler over a fourth. Caesar ruled the entire kingdom, and Philip ruled over a fourth of a territory thus placing the symbol of Philip in a subjective relationship in the alliances of Panium and Caesarea-Philippi. With Herod Philip we see the symbol of two blood lines which are both symbols of a broken covenant relationship with God. We also see echoes of one fourth of the division of Alexander’s kingdom into four parts, or four tetrarchs. Philip means lover of horses.

Okwu a bụ́ “Tetrarch” pụtara onye na-achị otu ụzọ n’ime anọ. Siza na-achị alaeze ahụ dum, Filip kwa na-achị otu ụzọ n’ime anọ nke mpaghara, si otú a na-etinye ihe nnọchianya Filip n’ọnọdụ mmekọrịta nkeonwe n’ime njikọ aka nke Panium na Caesarea-Philippi. N’aka Herod Filip, anyị na-ahụ ihe nnọchianya nke ahịrị ọbara abụọ, nke ha abụọ bụ ihe nnọchianya nke mmekọrịta ọgbụgba ndụ mebiri emebi na Chineke. Anyị na-ahụkwa nkwughachi nke otu ụzọ n’ime anọ nke nkewa alaeze Alexander n’ime akụkụ anọ, ma ọ bụ tetrarch anọ. Filip pụtara onye hụrụ ịnyịnya n’anya.

At the Battle of Panium which is fulfilled at the conclusion of the Ukrainian war Antiochus Magnus, the United States will defeat Russia and will enter into an alliance with a lesser player represented by Philip. That lesser player will be involved but not directly in the battle. The battle will be between the USA and Putin, evidently directly connected with a religious controversy produced by Putin’s irritation and pride as illustrated by both Ptolemy IV Philopator after the Battle of Raphia, and by king Uzziah of Judah. Ptolemy and Uzziah were southern kings lifted up in pride by their military success who then desired to take up a sacred work which was only to be accomplished by the priests. Uzziah received leprosy for his efforts and Ptolemy in a rage slew 50,000 Jews in Alexandria.

N’Agha Panium nke a na-emezu na njedebe nke agha Ukraine, Antiochus Magnus, ya bụ United States, ga-emeri Russia ma banye n’ọgbụgba-ndụ ya na onye ọkpụkpọ dị nta nke Philip na-anọchi anya ya. Onye ọkpụkpọ ahụ dị nta ga-etinye aka, ma ọ bụghị ozugbo n’agha ahụ. Agha ahụ ga-adị n’etiti USA na Putin, o doro anya na o jikọtara ozugbo na esemokwu okpukpe nke iwe na mpako Putin mụrụ, dịka e gosiri ya n’aka Ptolemy IV Philopator mgbe Agha Raphia gasịrị, nakwa n’aka eze Uzziah nke Juda. Ptolemy na Uzziah bụ ndị eze ndịda ndị mmeri ha n’agha buliri elu n’mpako, bụ́ ndị mesịrị chọọ iburu ọrụ dị nsọ nke ọ bụ naanị ndị nchụàjà ka e nyere imezu ya. Uzziah natara ekpenta n’ihi mbọ ya, Ptolemy kwa, n’iwe, gburu ndị Juu 50,000 na Alexandria.

Verse thirteen identifies the battle between the final generation of the modern king of the community, or communism, Vladimir Putin’s Russia and the USA. Trump prevails in the battle, but he does so with an ally from a fourth part of the kingdom, who is not actually at the battle. We are near the conclusion of verse eleven as testified to by the current events. Putin will be victorious over Ukraine, as represented by Raphia. He will then begin his progressive demise as represented by Uzziah being placed into a house until his death, due to leprosy. After his victory at Raphia in 217 BC, Ptolemy IV Philopator’s reign deteriorated due to corruption, extravagance, and reliance on unscrupulous advisors. He died in 204 BC, likely assassinated or poisoned by his ministers, Sosibius and Agathocles, as part of a conspiracy to secure power for his young son, Ptolemy V. This turbulent end reflects the instability and intrigue common in Hellenistic royal courts, marking a significant turning point in the decline of Ptolemaic Egypt.

Amaokwu nke iri na atọ na-akọwa ọgụ dị n’etiti ọgbọ ikpeazụ nke eze nke obodo nke oge a, ma ọ bụ komunizim, ya bụ Rọshịa Vladimir Putin, na USA. Trump na-emeri n’agha ahụ, ma ọ na-eme nke a ya na onye mmekọ sitere n’otu ụzọ anọ nke alaeze ahụ, onye na-adịghịkwa n’eziokwu n’agha ahụ. Anyị nọ nso na mmechi nke amaokwu nke iri na otu dịka ihe omume ndị dị ugbu a na-agba àmà. Putin ga-enwe mmeri megide Ukraine, dịka Raphia na-anọchi anya ya. O mesịa, ọ ga-amalite mbibi ya na-aga n’ihu, dịka Uzaya e tinyere n’ụlọ ruo ọnwụ ya n’ihi ekpenta. Mgbe mmeri ya gasịrị na Raphia n’afọ 217 BC, ọchịchị Ptolemy IV Philopator malitere ịdaba n’ihi nrụrụ aka, ibi ndụ n’ọtụ, na ịdabere n’aka ndị ndụmọdụ na-enweghị omume ọma. Ọ nwụrụ n’afọ 204 BC, o yikarịrị ka e gburu ya ma ọ bụ nye ya nsị site n’aka ndị ozi ya, Sosibius na Agathocles, dịka akụkụ nke izu ọjọọ iji nweta ike maka nwa ya nwoke ka dị obere, Ptolemy V. Ọgwụgwụ a jupụtara n’ọgba aghara na-egosipụta enweghị nkwụsi ike na aghụghọ ndị a na-ahụkarị n’ụlọikpe eze ndị Hellenistic, na-akara ntụgharị dị mkpa n’ịda mba nke Ijipt Ptolemaic.

A characteristic of the spiritual fulfillment of the king of the south which was typified by the literal fulfillments which took place in the struggle for world domination following Alexander’s death is “revolution.” France becomes the spiritual king of the south in the French Revolution time period. The modern king of the south, Russia was born in the Russian Revolution. As the philosophy introduced into the French Revolution matured from the anarchy of the French Revolution unto the communism of the Soviet revolution is a characteristic of the king of the south. Communism spread through the world with revolutions.

Otu njirimara nke mmezu ime mmụọ nke eze nke ndịda, nke e gosipụtara n’ụdị site na mmezu nkịtị ndị mere n’ọgụ maka ịchị ụwa sochiri ọnwụ Alexander, bụ “mgbanwe ọchịchị.” France ghọrọ eze ime mmụọ nke ndịda n’oge Mgbanwe Ọchịchị France. Eze nke ndịda nke oge a, Russia, mụrụ na Mgbanwe Ọchịchị Russia. Dị ka nkà ihe ọmụma e webatara n’ime Mgbanwe Ọchịchị France siri too site n’ọgba aghara nke Mgbanwe Ọchịchị France ruo n’ọchịchị komunizim nke mgbanwe ọchịchị Soviet, otu a bụ njirimara nke eze nke ndịda. Komunizim gbasara n’ụwa nile site na mgbanwe ọchịchị.

In modern times the CIA through the use of Non-Governmental Agencies has worked to overthrow nations around the globe, and the step-by-step plan which they have repeatedly employed is what is called color revolutions. The king of the south is a dragon power, and globalists are also the dragon power and the color revolutions of the CIA are markers of a dragon power. The history of France as the spiritual king of the south possesses a unique history that marks a conclusion of that particular line of prophecy.

N’oge a, CIA, site n’iji Ụlọọrụ Ndị Na-abụghị nke Gọọmenti, arụwo ọrụ ịkwatu mba dị iche iche gburugburu ụwa, ma atụmatụ nke nzọụkwụ-nzọụkwụ ha ejirila ugboro ugboro eme ihe bụ nke a na-akpọ mgbanwe agba. Eze nke ndịda bụ ike dragọn, ma ndị ọchịchị ụwa ọnụ bụkwa ike dragọn, mgbanwe agba nke CIA bụkwa akara ngosi nke ike dragọn. Akụkọ ihe mere eme nke France dịka eze ime mmụọ nke ndịda nwere akụkọ pụrụ iche nke na-akara njedebe nke ahịrị amụma ahụ kpọmkwem.

That conclusion is represented by Napoleon. The French Revolution marks the beginning of France as the king of the south and Napoleon marks its end. Historians identify a series a steps which led Napoleon to his Waterloo, thus identifying a progressive ending to the first spiritual king of the south, as opposed to Babylon and Belshazzar being taken in one night. The first Vladimir of the modern king of the south, Vladimir Lenin died over a two-year period from a series of strokes. Some speculate Joseph Stalin poisoned him, just as some speculate the Ptolemy IV was poisoned by his counselors. The end of the modern king of the south as represented with the Soviet Union was also accomplished by a revolution.

Mmechi ahụ ka Napoleon nọchiri anya ya. Mgbanwe Ọchịchị nke France na-akara mmalite France dị ka eze nke ndịda, Napoleon kwa na-akara njedebe ya. Ndị ọkọ akụkọ ihe mere eme na-achọpụta usoro nzọụkwụ dị iche iche nke dugara Napoleon na Waterloo ya, si otu a na-egosi njedebe na-aga n’ihu nke eze ime mmụọ mbụ nke ndịda, n’adịghị ka Babilọn na Belshaza e jidere n’otu abalị. Vladimir mbụ nke eze nke ndịda nke oge a, Vladimir Lenin, nwụrụ n’ime oge afọ abụọ site n’usoro ọrịa mkpọnwụ dị iche iche. Ụfọdụ na-eche na Joseph Stalin tinyere ya nsị, dịka ụfọdụ na-echekwa na ndị ndụmọdụ ya tinyere Ptolemy IV nsị. Njedebe nke eze nke ndịda nke oge a dịka e siri gosi ya na Soviet Union mezukwara site n’ime mgbanwe ọchịchị.

The protest in Moscow that contributed to the demise of the USSR was the massive public resistance during the August 1991 Coup (August 19–21, 1991). This event, centered around the defense of the White House and Boris Yeltsin’s leadership, directly undermined the Soviet hardliners, exposed the regime’s fragility, and accelerated the USSR’s collapse. While earlier protests in Moscow (e.g., 1987–1990) and the Baltic Way (1989) built momentum, the August 1991 protests were the critical tipping point in Moscow, leading to the Soviet Union’s dissolution by the end of 1991. The beginning of Russia as the king of the south begins and ends in revolution. The ending of the USSR was a progressive disintegration of the kingdom, as was Ptolemy, Uzziah, Napoleon and even Vladimir Lenin. The ending of Putin is a progressive fall, which begins as soon as the Ukraine war is finished. His end is brought about at the Battle of Panium, when the USA takes control of the kingdom, while receiving support from an ally who is not actually at the battle.

Mkpọtụ isi n’obodo Moscow nke nyere aka n’ịla n’iyi nke USSR bụ nnukwu nguzogide ọha n’oge Mgbalị Ọchịchị August 1991 (August 19–21, 1991). Ihe omume a, nke gbadoro gburugburu nchebe nke White House na ndu Boris Yeltsin, mebiri ike ndị isi ike Soviet ozugbo, kpughere adịghị ike ọchịchị ahụ, ma mee ka ọdịda nke USSR dị ngwa. Ọ bụ ezie na mkpokọta isi ndị gara aga na Moscow (dịka ọmụmaatụ, 1987–1990) na Baltic Way (1989) wuru mkpali ahụ, mkpokọta isi August 1991 bụ isi mgbanwe dị oke mkpa na Moscow, nke dugara n’ịkwatu Soviet Union ruo na njedebe nke 1991. Mmalite nke Russia dịka eze nke ndịda na-amalite ma na-ejedebe n’ime mgbanwe ọchịchị. Njedebe nke USSR bụ ịgbasasị nke alaeze ahụ nwayọọ nwayọọ, dịka ọ dịkwa na Ptolemy, Uzziah, Napoleon na ọbụna Vladimir Lenin. Njedebe nke Putin bụ ọdịda na-aga n’ihu nwayọọ nwayọọ, nke na-amalite ozugbo agha Ukraine kwụsịrị. A na-eweta njedebe ya n’Agha Panium, mgbe USA na-achịkwa alaeze ahụ, ebe ọ na-anata nkwado site n’aka onye mmekọ nke na-anọghị n’agha ahụ n’eziokwu.

We will continue these lines in the next article.

Anyị ga-aga n’ihu na ahịrị ndị a n’isiokwu na-esote.

Back to Articles