Article

# The Hidden History of Verse Forty - Number Two

Lipale Tse Patiloeng tsa Temana ea Mashome a Mane — Nomoro ea Bobeli

The United States, the Patriot Act, and the Path to Prophetic Fulfillment

امريكا Syarikat, Akta Patriot, dan Jalan Menuju Penggenapan Nubuatan

Author

Jeff Pippenger

Published

September 19, 2024

Formats

PDF Unavailable
Word Unavailable
Song MP3

We ended the last article with the sentence that stated, “In 2001 the government of the United States spoke the Patriot Act into law.”

Kami telah mengakhiri artikel yang lalu dengan ayat yang menyatakan, “Pada tahun 2001 kerajaan Amerika Syarikat telah mengisytiharkan Akta Patriot menjadi undang-undang.”

> “There are many, even of those engaged in this movement for Sunday enforcement, who are blinded to the results which will follow this action. They do not see that they are striking directly against religious liberty. There are many who have never understood the claims of the Bible Sabbath and the false foundation upon which the Sunday institution rests. Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.

> “Ku ni vanyingi, hambi exikarhi ka lava katsekaka eka mphalalo lowu wa ku sindzisa Sonto, lava nga dlayiwaka mahlo hi leswi swi nga ta landzela xiendlo lexi. A va swi voni leswaku va ba hi ku kongoma ku lwisana ni ntshunxeko wa vukhongeri. Ku ni vanyingi lava nga si tshama va twisisa swivilelo swa Savata ya Bibele ni masungulo ya mavunwa lawa nhlengeletano ya Sonto yi akeke ehenhla ka wona. Mupfhumba wihi na wihi lowu seketeleke nawu wa vukhongeri hi ntiyiso i xiendlo xa ku pfumelela vapapa, lava ku ringana malembe yo tala swinene va tshameke va lwa hi ku ya emahlweni ni ntshunxeko wa ripfalo. Ku hlayisa Sonto ku kolota ku va kona ka kona tanihi nhlengeletano leyi vuriwaka ya Vukriste eka ‘xihundla xa vubihi;’ naswona ku sindzisiwa ka kona ku ta va ku amukeriwa hi ndlela ya xiviri ka milawu leyi hi yona ribye ra yinhla swinene ra Varhoma. Loko tiko ra hina ri ta landzula hi ndlela yoleyo milawu ya mfumo wa rona ku fikela laha ri endlaka nawu wa Sonto, Vuprotestente eka xiendlo lexi byi ta khoma mavoko ni vupapa; a ku nge vi nchumu wun’wana handle ka ku nyika vutomi eka tihanyi leti khale ti tshameke ti rindzele hi ku navela swinene nkarhi wa tona leswaku ti tlhela ti tlulela eka vuhosi bya vudespoti lebyi tirhaka.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.

1888 typified 2001, and it was then that the Blair Bill was introduced, though its failure to be passed, prevented it from prophetically speaking. It became the sign of 66 AD, a siege that was initiated and then mysteriously withdrawn. When it is understood that there are two image of the beast testing periods, and that the second period begins with the Sunday law in the United States, typified by the year 321, and that the period ends when the world Sunday law, typified by 538, is fully enforced; then it demands prophetically that the beginning of the first image of the beast testing period also begins with some type of typification of a Sunday law being spoken. In 1888, the Blair Bill was an attempt to enforce a National Sunday law, and 1888 identifies when the angel of Revelation eighteen descends and lightens the earth with his glory.

1888 li typifia 2001, e li te lè sa a menm yo te prezante Blair Bill la, men paske li pa t pase, sa te anpeche li pale pwofetikman. Li te vin tounen siy ane 66 ap. J.-K. la, yon syèj ki te kòmanse epi apre sa yo te retire l nan yon fason mistik. Lè yo konprann gen de peryòd tès pou imaj bèt la, epi dezyèm peryòd la kòmanse avèk lwa dimanch Ozetazini, ki tipifye pa ane 321, epi peryòd la fini lè lwa dimanch mondyal la, ki tipifye pa 538, vin aplike nèt; alò sa egzije pwofetikman pou kòmansman premye peryòd tès imaj bèt la kòmanse tou avèk yon kalite tipifikasyon kote yo pwoklame yon lwa dimanch. An 1888, Blair Bill la te yon tantativ pou fè respekte yon lwa dimanch nasyonal, epi 1888 idantifye moman zanj Revelasyon dizwit la desann epi klere tè a avèk glwa li.

The Patriot Act is the typification of a Sunday law that begins the image of the beast testing time in the United States. The United States speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven when it enforces the Sunday law. When it enforces that law it will speak as a dragon, and that Sunday law identifies that the image of the beast is fully formed in the United States. At that point the United States has filled up its cup of probationary time, and national apostasy is followed by national ruin. At that point the United States ceases to be the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy as the threefold union is established.

Akta Patriot merupakan tipifikasi bagi hukum Ahad yang memulakan masa ujian bagi patung binatang itu di Amerika Syarikat. Amerika Syarikat berbicara seperti seekor naga sebagai penggenapan Wahyu fasal tiga belas, ayat sebelas, apabila ia menguatkuasakan hukum Ahad. Apabila ia menguatkuasakan hukum itu, ia akan berbicara seperti seekor naga, dan hukum Ahad itu menandakan bahawa patung binatang itu telah terbentuk sepenuhnya di Amerika Syarikat. Pada ketika itu Amerika Syarikat telah menggenapkan cawan masa percubaannya, dan kemurtadan nasional diikuti oleh kebinasaan nasional. Pada ketika itu Amerika Syarikat tidak lagi menjadi kerajaan yang keenam dalam nubuatan Alkitab apabila kesatuan rangkap tiga ditegakkan.

Alpha and Omega always portrays the end with the beginning and at the beginning of the United States there were three times the United States prophetically spoke that marked the beginning of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. The Declaration of Independence in 1776, followed by the Constitution of 1789 and then the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 identify the first three times the United States prophetically spoke. Each of those three publications represented the speaking of the United States. Those three steps led to 1798, the beginning of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Those same three waymarks in the beginning of the United States, represent three waymarks that lead to the ending of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy.

អាល់ផា និង អូមេហ្គា តែងតែបង្ហាញ​ចុងបញ្ចប់​ជាមួយ​នឹង​ការចាប់ផ្ដើម ហើយ​នៅ​ដើមកំណើត​នៃ​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក មាន​បីដង​ដែល​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក​បាន​និយាយ​ក្នុង​ន័យ​ព្យាករណ៍ ដែល​បាន​សម្គាល់​ការចាប់ផ្ដើម​នៃ​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក​ជា​នគរ​ទីប្រាំមួយ​នៃ​ព្យាករណ៍​ព្រះគម្ពីរ។ សេចក្ដីប្រកាសឯករាជ្យ ឆ្នាំ 1776 បន្ទាប់មក​ដោយ​រដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញ ឆ្នាំ 1789 ហើយ​បន្ទាប់មក​ទៀត​ដោយ​ច្បាប់​អេលៀន និង​សេឌីសិន ឆ្នាំ 1798 បញ្ជាក់​អំពី​បីដង​ដំបូង​ដែល​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក​បាន​និយាយ​ក្នុង​ន័យ​ព្យាករណ៍។ ឯកសារ​បោះពុម្ព​ទាំងបី​នោះ នីមួយៗ​តំណាង​ឲ្យ​ការ​និយាយ​របស់​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក។ ជំហាន​ទាំងបី​នោះ​បាន​នាំ​ទៅ​ដល់​ឆ្នាំ 1798 ដែល​ជា​ការចាប់ផ្ដើម​នៃ​ការសោយរាជ្យ​របស់​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក​ជា​នគរ​ទីប្រាំមួយ​នៃ​ព្យាករណ៍​ព្រះគម្ពីរ។ សញ្ញាសម្គាល់​ទាំងបី​ដដែល​នោះ​នៅ​ក្នុង​ការចាប់ផ្ដើម​នៃ​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក ក៏​តំណាង​ឲ្យ​សញ្ញាសម្គាល់​បី​ដែល​នាំ​ទៅ​កាន់​ចុងបញ្ចប់​នៃ​ការសោយរាជ្យ​របស់​សហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក​ជា​នគរ​ទីប្រាំមួយ​នៃ​ព្យាករណ៍​ព្រះគម្ពីរ។

The Patriot Act is the first of three times the United States speaks as it comes to its conclusion as the sixth kingdom. The third speaking, that identifies the end of the sixth kingdom is the Sunday law. In the middle of that history the Pelosi Trials of January 6, which began in 2022 were initiated. The trials were a direct rejection of the rights enshrined in the Constitution because the trials were political in nature, and the lawfare was not simply a fabrication of facts, but it was actually a direct attack upon “procedural” and “substantive” law as identified within the Constitution.

Akta Patriot merupakan yang pertama daripada tiga kali Amerika Syarikat bersuara ketika ia menuju kepada penamatnya sebagai kerajaan yang keenam. Pertuturan yang ketiga, yang menandai akhir kerajaan yang keenam itu, ialah undang-undang Ahad. Di tengah-tengah sejarah itu, Perbicaraan Pelosi pada 6 Januari, yang bermula pada tahun 2022, telah dimulakan. Perbicaraan tersebut merupakan penolakan langsung terhadap hak-hak yang termaktub dalam Perlembagaan kerana perbicaraan itu bersifat politik, dan penggunaan undang-undang sebagai senjata itu bukan sekadar pemalsuan fakta, melainkan sesungguhnya suatu serangan langsung terhadap undang-undang “prosedural” dan “substantif” sebagaimana dikenal pasti dalam Perlembagaan.

The Patriot Act in 2001 was a direct attack upon the “Due Process Clause” which appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. That was 2001, and in 2022 the attack against the Constitution was focused upon both “procedural due process” and “substantive due process.” The word “repudiate” means to deny, and Sister White identifies that at the Sunday law in the United States every principle of the Constitution will be repudiated.

ព្រះរាជក្រឹត្យ Patriot Act ក្នុងឆ្នាំ 2001 គឺជាការវាយប្រហារដោយផ្ទាល់លើ “Due Process Clause” ដែលមាននៅទាំងក្នុងវិសោធនកម្មទីប្រាំ និងវិសោធនកម្មទីដប់បួន នៃរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញសហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក។ បទបញ្ញត្តិទាំងនេះកំណត់ថា គ្មាននរណាម្នាក់អាចត្រូវបានដកហូតជីវិត សេរីភាព ឬទ្រព្យសម្បត្តិ ដោយគ្មាននីតិវិធីត្រឹមត្រូវតាមច្បាប់ឡើយ។ នោះគឺនៅឆ្នាំ 2001 ហើយនៅឆ្នាំ 2022 ការវាយប្រហារប្រឆាំងនឹងរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញបានផ្តោតលើទាំង “procedural due process” និង “substantive due process”។ ពាក្យ “repudiate” មានន័យថា បដិសេធ ហើយ Sister White កំណត់អត្តសញ្ញាណថា នៅពេលច្បាប់ថ្ងៃអាទិត្យនៅសហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក កើតមានឡើង គ្រប់គោលការណ៍ទាំងអស់នៃរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញនឹងត្រូវបានបដិសេធ។

> “By the decree enforcing the institution of the papacy in violation of the law of God, our nation will disconnect herself fully from righteousness. When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near.

> “Ka ho thunya taelo e qobellang ho thehoa ha bopapa ka ho tlōla molao oa Molimo, sechaba sa rōna se tla ikarola ka botlalo ho lokeng. Ha Boprotestanta bo tla otlolla letsoho la bona ka mose ho lekhalo ho tšoara letsoho la matla a Roma, ha bo tla nanabela ka mose ho mohohlo ho tšoarana ka matsoho le bomoea, ha, tlas’a tšusumetso ea kopano ena e meraro, naha ea rōna e tla latola molao-motheo o mong le o mong oa Molaotheo oa eona e le puso ea Boprotestanta le ea repaboliki, ’me e tla etsa tokisetso bakeng sa ho hasana ha mashano le lithetso tsa bopapa, joale re ka tseba hore nako e fihlile bakeng sa tšebetso e hlollang ea Satane le hore bofelo bo haufi.”

> “As the approach of the Roman armies was a sign to the disciples of the impending destruction of Jerusalem, so may this apostasy be a sign to us that the limit of God’s forbearance is reached, that the measure of our nation’s iniquity is full, and that the angel of mercy is about to take her flight, never to return. The people of God will then be plunged into those scenes of affliction and distress which prophets have described as the time of Jacob’s trouble. The cries of the faithful, persecuted ones ascend to heaven. And as the blood of Abel cried from the ground, there are voices also crying to God from martyrs’ graves, from the sepulchers of the sea, from mountain caverns, from convent vaults: ‘How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost Thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?’

> “រៀង​ដូច​ជា​ការ​ចូល​មក​ជិត​របស់​កង​ទ័ព​រ៉ូម​ជា​សញ្ញា​ដល់​ពួក​សិស្ស​អំពី​ការ​បំផ្លាញ​ក្រុង​យេរូសាឡិម​ដែល​ជិត​មក​ដល់ ដូច្នោះ​ដែរ ការ​ក្បត់​ជំនឿ​នេះ​ក៏​អាច​ជា​សញ្ញា​ដល់​យើង​ថា ព្រំ​កំណត់​នៃ​ការ​អត់​ធ្មត់​របស់​ព្រះ​បាន​មក​ដល់​ហើយ ថា មាត្រា​នៃ​អំពើ​ទុច្ចរិត​របស់​ជាតិ​យើង​បាន​ពេញ​បរិបូរណ៍​ហើយ ហើយ​ថា ទេវតា​នៃ​ព្រះ​គុណ​កំពុង​តែ​ហោះ​ចេញ​ទៅ ដោយ​មិន​ត្រឡប់​មក​វិញ​ឡើយ។ ពេល​នោះ ប្រជា​ជន​របស់​ព្រះ​នឹង​ត្រូវ​បាន​បោះ​ទម្លាក់​ចូល​ទៅ​ក្នុង​ទិដ្ឋភាព​ទាំង​នោះ​នៃ​ទុក្ខ​វេទនា និង​សេចក្ដី​អាសន្ន ដែល​ពួក​ហោរា​បាន​ពិពណ៌នា​ថា​ជា​គ្រា​លំបាក​របស់​យ៉ាកុប។ សម្រែក​របស់​ពួក​ស្មោះត្រង់​ដែល​ត្រូវ​បាន​បៀតបៀន ឡើង​ទៅ​ដល់​ស្ថាន​សួគ៌។ ហើយ​ដូច​ជា​ឈាម​របស់​អេបិល​បាន​ស្រែក​ពី​ដី នោះ​ក៏​មាន​សំឡេង​ដែល​ស្រែក​ទៅ​កាន់​ព្រះ​ផង​ដែរ ពី​ផ្នូរ​របស់​ពួក​សាក្សី​ដែល​បាន​ស្លាប់ ពី​ផ្នូរ​សព​នៅ​សមុទ្រ ពី​ល្អាង​ភ្នំ ពី​បន្ទប់​បញ្ចុះ​សព​នៃ​វត្ត​អារាម​ថា៖ ‘ឱ​ព្រះ​អម្ចាស់​បរិសុទ្ធ និង​ពិត​ត្រង់​អើយ ដល់​ពេល​ណា​ទៀត ទ្រង់​មិន​ជំនុំ​ជម្រះ និង​សងសឹក​ឈាម​របស់​យើង​លើ​ពួក​អ្នក​ដែល​រស់​នៅ​លើ​ផែនដី?’”

> “The Lord is doing His work. All heaven is astir. The Judge of all the earth is soon to arise and vindicate His insulted authority. The mark of deliverance will be set upon the men who keep God’s commandments, who revere His law, and who refuse the mark of the beast or of his image.

> “ခရစ်တော်သည် မိမိအမှုတော်ကို ဆောင်ရွက်နေတော်မူ၏။ ကောင်းကင်လောကတစ်ရပ်လုံးသည် လှုပ်ရှားလျက်ရှိ၏။ မြေကြီးတစ်ခွင်လုံး၏ တရားသူကြီးသည် မကြာမီ ထ၍ မိမိ၏ အလွန်အမင်း စော်ကားခံရသော အာဏာကို တရားဝင် ထင်ရှားစေတော်မူလိမ့်မည်။ ကယ်တင်ခြင်း၏ အမှတ်အသားကို ဘုရားသခင်၏ ပညတ်တော်များကို စောင့်ထိန်းသူများ၊ ကိုယ်တော်၏ ပညတ်တရားကို ရိုသေလေးမြတ်သူများ၊ သားရဲ၏ အမှတ်တံဆိပ်ကိုဖြစ်စေ ၎င်း၏ ရုပ်တု၏ အမှတ်တံဆိပ်ကိုဖြစ်စေ လက်မခံဘဲ ငြင်းပယ်သူများ၏ အပေါ်၌ ချမှတ်ပေးလိမ့်မည်။”

> “God has revealed what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath. Those who have been warned of the events before them are not to sit in calm expectation of the coming storm, comforting themselves that the Lord will shelter His faithful ones in the day of trouble. We are to be as men waiting for their Lord, not in idle expectancy, but in earnest work, with unwavering faith. It is no time now to allow our minds to be engrossed with things of minor importance. While men are sleeping, Satan is actively arranging matters so that the Lord’s people may not have mercy or justice. The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending. Its professions are mild and apparently Christian, but when it shall speak it will reveal the spirit of the dragon. It is our duty to do all in our power to avert the threatened danger. We should endeavor to disarm prejudice by placing ourselves in a proper light before the people. We should bring before them the real question at issue, thus interposing the most effectual protest against measures to restrict liberty of conscience. We should search the Scriptures and be able to give the reason for our faith. Says the prophet: ‘The wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.’” Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.

> “देवानि अन्तिम-दिनहरिमां की हूनेवाला छि, से प्रकट कयलनि, जाहिसँ हुनकर प्रजा विरोध आ क्रोधक आँधीमे ठाढ़ रहबाक लेल तैयार रहथि। जाहि लोकसभकेँ अपनासँ आगाँ होएबाला घटनाक चेतावनी देल गेल अछि, हुनका सभकेँ एहन शान्त प्रतीक्षामे बैसल नहि रहबाक चाही जे आबएबाला आँधीकेँ देखितो अपनाकेँ ई कहि सान्त्वना दियौ कि संकट-दिनमे प्रभु अपन विश्वासयोग्य लोकसभकेँ आश्रय देताह। हमरा सभकेँ अपन प्रभुक प्रतीक्षा करैत लोकसभ जकाँ रहबाक अछि—निष्क्रिय प्रतीक्षामे नहि, बल्कि गम्भीर परिश्रममे, अटल विश्वासक संग। एखन एहन समय नहि अछि कि हम अपन मनकेँ गौण महत्वक बातसभमे डुबा दी। जहिना मनुष्य सुतल अछि, तहिना शैतान सक्रिय रूपसँ व्यवस्था क’ रहल अछि, जाहिसँ प्रभुक प्रजाकेँ दया वा न्याय नहि भेटए। रविवासर आन्दोलन एखन अन्धकारमे अपन बाट बना रहल अछि। नेतृत्वकर्ता सभ वास्तविक प्रश्नकेँ छिपा रहल छथि, आ आन्दोलनमे जुड़निहार बहुतो लोक स्वयं नहि देखैत छथि जे ई भीतरक धारा कतय दिस जा रहल अछि। ओकर घोषणासभ कोमल आ प्रत्यक्षतः मसीही प्रतीत होइत अछि, मुदा जखन ई बाजत, तखन ई अजगरक आत्माकेँ प्रकट करत। हमर कर्तव्य अछि जे हम अपन सम्पूर्ण सामर्थ्यसँ एहि आशंकित संकटकेँ टारबाक लेल सभ किछु करी। लोकसभक समक्ष अपनाकेँ उचित रूपमे प्रस्तुत क’ क’ हम पूर्वाग्रहकेँ निःशस्त्र करबाक प्रयास करबाक चाही। हमरा सभकेँ हुनक समक्ष वास्तविक विवादक प्रश्न प्रस्तुत करबाक चाही, एहि प्रकारेँ अंतःकरणक स्वतन्त्रताकेँ सीमित करबाक उपायसभक विरुद्ध सर्वाधिक प्रभावकारी प्रतिवाद उपस्थित करैत। हमरा सभकेँ पवित्रशास्त्रक खोज करबाक चाही आ अपन विश्वासक कारण देबाक योग्य होयबाक चाही। भविष्यवक्ता कहैत छथि: ‘दुष्ट दुष्टतापूर्वक कर्म करत; आ दुष्टसभमे सँ केओ नहि बुझत; मुदा बुद्धिमान बुझत।’” Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.

Sister White aligns the Sunday law with several last-day waymarks, and in so doing her words reveal “what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath.” Therefore, the waymarks that she aligns in this passage are to be carefully examined. I am suggesting that the point of reference is the line of prophecy that focuses upon the Constitution of the United States, along with the “speaking” of the nation as an interrelated symbol.

Sister White in tûk ni thupêk Sunday nênkhat chu ni hnuhnung hun atâna hriatna hmun pawimawhte nêna a thlun a; chu ti tûra, a thu-te chuan “ni hnuhnungte-ah engte nge a lo thleng dâwn tih a puang a, chutichuan A mite chu dodâlna leh thinrimna thlipui an hmachhawn theih nân an inbuatsaih theih ang” tih an lantîr a ni. Chuvângin, he lâi thu-ah a thlun hriatna hmun pawimawhte chu fimkhur takin zir chian tûr a ni. Ka sawi tum chu, hriatna hmunin a kawhchuahna ber chu United States Constitution chungchâng hrilhlâwkna line, tin, hnam chuan a “sawi” tih pawh entîrna inlaichîn tlat anga ngaih tûr a ni tih hi a ni.

By that, I mean, that the Blair Bill in 1888, the Patriot Act in 2001, and the political prosecutions that were carried out by the Democrats and globalist Republicans beginning in 2022 were each a direct denial of two essential elements of the Constitution. 1888 represents enforcement of Sunday worship, and then in 2001, the change from English law to Roman law. In 2022 “substantive” and “procedural” law was attacked.

Dengan itu, yang saya maksudkan ialah bahawa Blair Bill pada tahun 1888, Patriot Act pada tahun 2001, dan pendakwaan politik yang dijalankan oleh pihak Demokrat dan Republikan globalis bermula pada tahun 2022, masing-masing merupakan penafian langsung terhadap dua unsur penting dalam Perlembagaan. Tahun 1888 melambangkan penguatkuasaan ibadat hari Ahad, dan kemudian pada tahun 2001, perubahan daripada undang-undang Inggeris kepada undang-undang Rom. Pada tahun 2022, undang-undang “substantif” dan “prosedural” telah diserang.

Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations. The law defines legal or illegal behavior and sets out the punishments for it. Substantive law covers many legal areas, including criminal, civil, and contract law.

Melayo ya motheo e hlalosa ditokelo le boitlamo jwa batho ka bongwe le jwa mekgatlho, fa melayo ya tsamaiso ya tsheko e baya ka fa pele tsela ya go rarabolola dikganetsano le go dira gore ditokelo le boitlamo jwa batho ka bongwe le jwa mekgatlho di diragadiwe. Molao o tlhalosa maitsholo a a mo molaong kgotsa a a seng mo molaong, mme o baya dikotlhao tse di a amang. Melayo ya motheo e akaretsa mafelo a le mantsi a molao, go akaretsa molao wa bosenyi, wa selegae, le wa dikonteraka.

Criminal law is an excellent example of substantive law. Criminal law defines what actions are considered criminal and the penalties for those crimes. Civil law, however, governs disputes between individuals and organizations, such as breach of contract, personal injury, or property disputes.

法典 sꞌloꞌ law piah thil nih hmuhtheih piaknak tha bik a si. Criminal law cun zeidang thilriantu pawl kha sualnak ah rel an si ti le cu sualnak pawl hrang i phu peknak pawl kha a fiangter. Asinain, civil law cun mi mal le bu pawl karlak i buainak pawl a uk, tahchunghnak ah contract buarnak, pumhmuatnak, asilole neihnak buainak pawl.

Substantive law is typically written in statutes, regulations, and case law. Statutes are laws passed by legislative bodies, such as national parliaments or state legislature, and regulations are rules and procedures created by administrative agencies. Case law is the law that judges create through their interpretation of statutes, regulations, and the Constitution.

Umthetho wezinto ezisemqoka uvame ukubhalwa emithethweni ebekiwe, emithethwenelandelweni, nasemthethweni wamacala. Imithetho ebekiwe iyimithetho ephasiswa yizigungu zomthetho, njengamaphalamende kazwelonke noma izishayamthetho zezifundazwe, kanti imithetwonqubo iyimithetho nezinqubo ezakhiwa izinhlaka zokuphatha. Umthetho wamacala ungumthetho amajaji awudalayo ngokuhumusha kwawo imithetho ebekiwe, imithetwonqubo, kanye noMthethosisekelo.

Procedural law refers to the rules governing the legal process. It outlines how cases move through the legal system, from the initial filing of a complaint to the final resolution. Procedural law covers various legal areas, including civil, criminal, and administrative procedures. The purpose of procedural law is to ensure that the legal process is fair and efficient. It provides a framework for resolving disputes and ensures that everyone involved in the legal process, including judges, lawyers, and litigants, knows what is expected of them.

Molao wa ditsamaiso o raya melawana e laolang tshebetso ya semolao. O hlalosa kamoo dinyewe di tsamayang ka teng hara tsamaiso ya molao, ho tloha ho kengweng ha pelaelo kapa tletlebo qalong ho isa tharollong ya ho qetela. Molao wa ditsamaiso o akaretsa mafapha a fapaneng a molao, ho kenyeletswa ditsamaiso tsa setjhaba, tsa botlokotsebe, le tsa tsamaiso. Morero wa molao wa ditsamaiso ke ho netefatsa hore tshebetso ya semolao e lokile ebile e sebetsa ka katleho. O fana ka moralo wa ho rarolla dikgang, mme o netefatsa hore bohle ba amehang tshebetsong ya semolao, ho kenyeletswa baahlodi, babuelli ba molao, le mahlakore a qosang kapa a qoswang, ba tseba se lebeletsweng ho bona.

Substantive and procedural law are intended to work together to ensure justice is served. Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing those rights and obligations. In other words, substantive law defines legal or illegal behavior and the consequences of illegal behavior, while procedural law outlines how those legal issues are resolved.

Hukum substantif dan hukum prosedural dimaksudkan untuk bekerja bersama-sama bagi memastikan keadilan ditegakkan. Hukum substantif mentakrifkan hak dan kewajipan individu serta organisasi, manakala hukum prosedural menggariskan proses untuk menyelesaikan pertikaian dan menguatkuasakan hak serta kewajipan tersebut. Dengan kata lain, hukum substantif mentakrifkan tingkah laku yang sah atau menyalahi undang-undang serta akibat daripada tingkah laku yang menyalahi undang-undang, manakala hukum prosedural menggariskan bagaimana isu-isu perundangan tersebut diselesaikan.

In 2001, the Patriot Act removed the right of habeas corpus. “Habeas corpus” is a Latin term that translates to “you shall have the body.” It refers to a legal principle that protects individuals from unlawful detention by requiring a court to examine the lawfulness of a person’s imprisonment. Habeas corpus is a fundamental right in many legal systems, especially those influenced by English common law. It ensures that a person cannot be held in custody without just cause and allows them to challenge the legality of their detention before a judge.

Pada tahun 2001, Patriot Act menghapuskan hak habeas corpus. “Habeas corpus” ialah istilah Latin yang diterjemahkan sebagai “engkau hendaklah mempunyai tubuh itu.” Istilah ini merujuk kepada suatu prinsip perundangan yang melindungi individu daripada penahanan yang menyalahi undang-undang dengan mensyaratkan mahkamah meneliti kesahihan pemenjaraan seseorang. Habeas corpus ialah suatu hak asasi dalam banyak sistem perundangan, khususnya yang dipengaruhi oleh common law Inggeris. Hak ini memastikan bahawa seseorang tidak boleh ditahan tanpa sebab yang adil serta membolehkannya mencabar kesahan penahanannya di hadapan seorang hakim.

A “Due Process Clause” appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Courts have developed two branches of due process doctrine: procedural due process and substantive due process. In 2001, with the Patriot Act habeas corpus was removed as a right, and English law was replaced by Roman law. English law defines that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty, and Roman law identifies that a person is considered guilty until proven innocent. In the Pelosi Trials of 2022, both procedural and substantive due process was trampled upon. Both substantive law and procedural law were applied in the Pelosi Trials in the exact opposite of their intended constitutional purpose.

Dalam Perlembagaan Amerika Syarikat, suatu “Klausa Proses Wajar” terdapat dalam kedua-dua Pindaan Kelima dan Pindaan Keempat Belas. Klausa-klausa ini memperuntukkan bahawa tiada seorang pun boleh dilucutkan nyawa, kebebasan, atau harta benda tanpa proses wajar menurut undang-undang. Mahkamah telah mengembangkan dua cabang doktrin proses wajar: proses wajar prosedural dan proses wajar substantif. Pada tahun 2001, melalui Patriot Act, habeas corpus telah disingkirkan sebagai suatu hak, dan undang-undang Inggeris telah digantikan dengan undang-undang Rom. Undang-undang Inggeris menetapkan bahawa seseorang dianggap tidak bersalah sehingga dibuktikan bersalah, manakala undang-undang Rom menetapkan bahawa seseorang dianggap bersalah sehingga dibuktikan tidak bersalah. Dalam Perbicaraan Pelosi tahun 2022, kedua-dua proses wajar prosedural dan proses wajar substantif telah diinjak-injak. Kedua-dua undang-undang substantif dan undang-undang prosedural telah diterapkan dalam Perbicaraan Pelosi dengan cara yang tepat bertentangan dengan tujuan perlembagaan yang dimaksudkan.

The distinction between substantive due process and procedural due process lies in the different aspects of law and rights that each concept protects within the framework of the U.S. Constitution, particularly under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

ការបែងចែករវាង «substantive due process» និង «procedural due process» ស្ថិតនៅលើទិដ្ឋភាពខុសគ្នានៃច្បាប់ និងសិទ្ធិ ដែលគោលគំនិតនីមួយៗការពារនៅក្នុងក្របខ័ណ្ឌនៃរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញសហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក ជាពិសេសក្រោមបទប្បញ្ញត្តិអំពីនីតិវិធីត្រឹមត្រូវ (Due Process Clauses) នៃវិសោធនកម្មទី៥ និងទី១៤។

Substantive due process is concerned with the fundamental rights and liberties that the government cannot infringe upon, regardless of the procedure used. It protects certain rights from government interference even if the proper procedures are followed. Substantive due process involves rights that are deemed fundamental, such as the right to privacy, the right to marry, and the right to raise one’s children. These rights are protected from government intrusion unless there is a compelling state interest. It serves as a check on the government’s power, ensuring that laws and regulations do not violate fundamental liberties.

Proses wajar substantif berkaitan dengan hak-hak dan kebebasan-kebebasan asasi yang tidak boleh dicabuli oleh kerajaan, tanpa mengira prosedur yang digunakan. Ia melindungi hak-hak tertentu daripada campur tangan kerajaan walaupun prosedur yang sewajarnya telah dipatuhi. Proses wajar substantif melibatkan hak-hak yang dianggap asasi, seperti hak terhadap privasi, hak untuk berkahwin, dan hak untuk membesarkan anak-anak sendiri. Hak-hak ini dilindungi daripada pencerobohan kerajaan melainkan terdapat kepentingan negara yang mendesak. Ia berfungsi sebagai suatu kawalan terhadap kuasa kerajaan, dengan memastikan bahawa undang-undang dan peraturan tidak melanggar kebebasan-kebebasan asasi.

Procedural due process is concerned with the procedures that the government must follow before it deprives an individual of life, liberty, or property. It ensures that individuals receive fair and impartial treatment through proper legal processes. Procedural due process requires the government to follow certain steps or procedures, such as providing notice, a fair hearing, and an opportunity to be heard, before depriving someone of their rights. It emphasizes the methods by which laws are enforced, ensuring that the government acts in a just and fair manner.

ꞌNnɛ kwan so atɛntrenee ho nsɛm fa akwan a aban no wɔ sɛ ɛdi so ansa na agye obi nkwa, ne fahofadi, anaa ne agyapade fi ne nsam ho. Ɛhwɛ ma nnipa nya apae mu ne nyiyim a ɛnni mu ayɛ wɔ mmara kwan pa so. ꞌNnɛ kwan so atɛntrenee hwehwɛ sɛ aban no di anammɔn anaa akwan pɔtee bi so, te sɛ sɛ wɔma obi amanneɛ, wɔma no atie a ɛyɛ pɛ, na wɔma no hokwan sɛ ɔka ne ho asɛm, ansa na wɔagye obi ne hokwan ahorow afi ne nsam. Ɛsi dua wɔ akwan a wɔfa so de mmara yɛ adwuma no so, na ɛma wohu sɛ aban no yɛ ade wɔ ɔtrenee ne pɛyɛ mu.

The lawfare that has been manifested since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a denial of both substantive and procedural due process. The fundamental rights of American citizens were openly and successfully denied. The false flag operations and the open corruption of the alphabet agencies of the United States has been regularly exposed since even before the Pelosi Trials began, but the legal procedures that have been employed by the globalists of both parties since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a clear illustration of the destruction of procedural due process.

Pe keriasengnaba wehna a taretwi kakataik dahto nanan pa aitaysa Pelosi Trials, ia kakairi ba denial ba substantive due process kah procedural due process baku. Ra rights fundamentales sawehki American citizens rehn kan pahnyokada kan kah mehn pahn aleman laleh. Mehn false flag operations o mehn corruption aleman en agencies “alphabet” ko en United States pahn pwaratahla sang ni regular sang mehn mwomwensaud, pil sang mwahu mehn ketin me Pelosi Trials pahn tepida, ah legal procedures me globalists en parties riau ko usikihda sang ni kaimwail me Pelosi Trials pahn tepida, iei mehn illustration aleman en destruction en procedural due process.

Earlier in the article we read, “Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.”

ပိုမိုအစောပိုင်းက ဆောင်းပါး၌ ကျွန်ုပ်တို့ ဖတ်ခဲ့ရသည်မှာ၊ “ဘာသာရေးဥပဒေပြုခြင်းကို ထောက်ခံသော မည်သည့်လှုပ်ရှားမှုမဆို အမှန်တကယ်အားဖြင့် ပုပ်ရဟန်းမင်းစနစ်အား အလျှော့ပေးအပ်ခြင်း ဖြစ်သည်။ ထိုပုပ်ရဟန်းမင်းစနစ်သည် နှစ်ပေါင်းများစွာ တစ်လျှောက်လုံး စိတ်သဘောထားလွတ်လပ်ခွင့်ကို မလျော့မပေါ့ ဆန့်ကျင်တိုက်ခိုက်လာခဲ့သည်။ တနင်္ဂနွေနေ့ကို စောင့်ထိန်းခြင်းသည် ‘ဒုစရိုက်၏ လျှို့ဝှက်နက်နဲမှု’ ကြောင့်သာ မိမိ၏ တည်ရှိမှုကို ရရှိထားသော၊ ခရစ်ယာန်အဖွဲ့အစည်းဟု ခေါ်ဆိုကြသည့် အဖွဲ့အစည်းတစ်ရပ် ဖြစ်သည်။ ထိုသို့ စောင့်ထိန်းခြင်းကို အာဏာဖြင့် အတည်ပြုအကောင်အထည်ဖော်ခြင်းသည် ရိုးမဘုရားကျောင်းစနစ်၏ အခြေခံထောင့်ကျောက်ပင် ဖြစ်သော အခြေခံသဘောတရားများကို အမှန်တကယ် အသိအမှတ်ပြုခြင်းပင် ဖြစ်လိမ့်မည်။ ကျွန်ုပ်တို့၏ နိုင်ငံသည် တနင်္ဂနွေနေ့ဥပဒေတစ်ရပ် ပြဋ္ဌာန်းရန်အလို့ငှာ မိမိအစိုးရ၏ အခြေခံမူဝါဒများကို ထိုသို့ စွန့်လွှတ်ငြင်းပယ်သည့်အခါ၊ ပရိုတက်စတင့်ဘာသာသည် ဤအမှု၌ ပုပ်ရဟန်းမင်းစနစ်နှင့် လက်ချင်းချိတ်မည်ဖြစ်သည်။ ထိုသို့ပြုခြင်းသည် အချိန်အတော်ကြာကတည်းက မိမိ၏ အခွင့်အရေးကို စောင့်ကြည့်လျက် တစ်ဖန် အာဏာရှင်ဆန်သော အုပ်စိုးမှုအဖြစ် တက်ကြွစွာ ပြန်လည်ပေါ်ပေါက်လာရန် အလွန်စိတ်အားထက်သန်နေခဲ့သော ဖိနှိပ်အာဏာစနစ်အား အသက်သွင်းပေးခြင်းမှတပါး အခြားအရာမဟုတ်ပေ။”

In the line of history that can be represented with the Constitution of the United States there are three specific waymarks representing some element of the Constitution in both the beginning and the ending of the United States. Each of those three waymarks are political actions, and therefore symbolize the speaking of the United States. The third of those three waymarks in the beginning, that marked 1798, was the Alien and Sedition Acts and the third of those waymarks at the ending is when the United States enforces a Sunday law, and speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven.

Dalam garis sejarah yang dapat diwakili oleh Perlembagaan Amerika Syarikat, terdapat tiga penanda khusus yang mewakili suatu unsur Perlembagaan itu, baik pada permulaan mahupun pada pengakhiran Amerika Syarikat. Setiap satu daripada tiga penanda itu merupakan tindakan politik, dan oleh itu melambangkan pertuturan Amerika Syarikat. Penanda yang ketiga daripada tiga penanda itu pada permulaan, yang menandai tahun 1798, ialah Akta Orang Asing dan Hasutan, dan penanda yang ketiga daripada penanda-penanda itu pada pengakhiran ialah ketika Amerika Syarikat menguatkuasakan suatu undang-undang Ahad, lalu berkata-kata seperti seekor naga sebagai penggenapan Wahyu fasal tiga belas, ayat sebelas.

The prophetic history of the United States begins when, as represented by the earth, it opened its mouth and swallowed up the flood of the dragon’s persecution.

Boporofeti jwa hisetori ya United States bo simologa fa, jaaka e tshwantshediwa ke lefatshe, le bula molomo wa lone mme la metsa morwalela wa pogiso ya kgogela.

> And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. Revelation 12:15, 16.

> Monyoka a ntšha mo molomong wa gagwe meetse a le morwalela morago ga mosadi, gore a mo gogole ka morwalela. Mme lefatshe la thusa mosadi, mme lefatshe la ahlamisa molomo wa lone, mme la kometsa morwalela o noga e kgolo e neng ya o ntsha mo molomong wa yone. Tshenolo 12:15, 16.

In 1776, the beast that was to arise from the earth, and ultimately become the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy in 1798, swallowed up the flood of persecution against God’s people by establishing a nation with a Constitution that protested against the tyrants of European royalty and the tyrants of the papal church.

Pada tahun 1776, binatang yang akan muncul dari bumi, dan yang akhirnya menjadi kerajaan keenam dalam nubuat Alkitab pada tahun 1798, menelan banjir penganiayaan terhadap umat Allah dengan mendirikan suatu bangsa yang berlandaskan Konstitusi yang memprotes para tiran dari kerajaan-kerajaan Eropa dan para tiran dari gereja kepausan.

The Declaration of Independence in 1776 typified the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 typified the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 typified the Sunday law in the United States.

Pernyataan Kemerdekaan pada tahun 1776 melambangkan Akta Patriot tahun 2001. Perlembagaan tahun 1789 melambangkan Perbicaraan Pelosi yang bermula pada tahun 2022. Akta Orang Asing dan Hasutan tahun 1798 melambangkan undang-undang Ahad di Amerika Syarikat.

The pronouncement of independence by the American patriots in 1776 represented the announcement of the loss of independence with the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 represented the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts represents the Sunday law. The history of the repudiation of every principle of the Constitution represents a progressive overturning of the Constitution that ends at the Sunday law.

ఫ్రీమేసన్‌గా. అమెరికా పితృదేశభక్తులు 1776లో చేసిన స్వాతంత్ర్య ప్రకటన, 2001లోని పేట్రియట్ చట్టంతో స్వాతంత్ర్య నష్టపు ప్రకటనను సూచించింది. 1789 రాజ్యాంగం, 2022లో ఆరంభమైన పెలోసి విచారణలను సూచించింది. ఎలియన్ మరియు సెడిషన్ చట్టాలు ఆదివారపు చట్టాన్ని సూచిస్తాయి. రాజ్యాంగంలోని ప్రతి సూత్రాన్నియు తిరస్కరించిన చరిత్ర, ఆదివారపు చట్టంతో ముగిసే రాజ్యాంగం యొక్క క్రమేపీ పల్టీ కొట్టింపును సూచిస్తుంది.

These lines all align in the hidden history of verse forty of Daniel chapter eleven. In this article we quoted four paragraphs from Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.

Garis-garis ini semuanya selaras dalam sejarah tersembunyi ayat empat puluh dari Daniel pasal sebelas. Dalam artikel ini kami telah memetik empat perenggan daripada Testimonies, jilid 5, 451, 452.

We will look closer at those paragraphs in the next article.

Noko tyɛkyerɛ saa nkyekyɛm no mu yiye kɛse wɔ asɛm a edi hɔ no mu.

Back to Articles