Article

# Panium - Number Nineteen

પાનિયમ - ક્રમાંક ઉગણીસ

The Greats: Antiochus, Constantine, and the Last President

Томчууд: Антиох, Константин, ба Сүүлчийн Ерөнхийлөгч

Author

Jeff Pippenger

Published

March 1, 2026

Formats

PDF Unavailable
Word Unavailable
Song MP3

The key to rightly dividing verses ten through sixteen of Daniel eleven is found in the basic prophetic applications that were employed over thirty years ago, in 1996, when The Time of the End magazine was published. Thirty years later, the Lord has revealed that another prophetic message is to be formalized as was the Millerite message formalized in 1831. In the omega history of these thirty years the message to be formalized is represented as a correction of a previous message of Islam, as represented by Josiah Litch and also a corrected message of the closed door, as represented by Samuel Snow, which is the symbol of the parable of the ten virgins. A message of Islam, accompanied with a warning of the progressive closing doors of probation as Christ finishes His work of judgment will be proclaimed. The message is twofold, possessing and internal and external line, which in turn represent the first two steps of the three-step testing process that always occurs when a prophecy is unsealed, as was the revelation of Jesus Christ on December 31, 2023.

កូនសោសម្រាប់ការបែងចែកយ៉ាងត្រឹមត្រូវនៃខទីដប់ដល់ខទីដប់ប្រាំមួយ នៃដានីយ៉ែលជំពូក ១១ ត្រូវបានរកឃើញនៅក្នុងការអនុវត្តទំនាយមូលដ្ឋានដែលត្រូវបានប្រើប្រាស់កាលពីជាងសាមសិបឆ្នាំមុន គឺនៅឆ្នាំ ១៩៩៦ នៅពេលដែលទស្សនាវដ្តី The Time of the End ត្រូវបានបោះពុម្ពផ្សាយ។ សាមសិបឆ្នាំក្រោយមក ព្រះអម្ចាស់បានបើកសម្ដែងថា សារទំនាយមួយទៀតត្រូវតែត្រូវបានរៀបចំឲ្យមានទម្រង់ជាផ្លូវការ ដូចដែលសាររបស់ពួក Millerites ត្រូវបានរៀបចំឲ្យមានទម្រង់ជាផ្លូវការនៅឆ្នាំ ១៨៣១។ នៅក្នុងប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រ omega នៃរយៈពេលសាមសិបឆ្នាំនេះ សារដែលត្រូវរៀបចំឲ្យមានទម្រង់ជាផ្លូវការ ត្រូវបានតំណាងថាជាការកែតម្រូវសារមុនមួយស្តីអំពីសាសនាឥស្លាម ដូចដែលត្រូវបានតំណាងដោយ Josiah Litch ហើយក៏ជាសារកែតម្រូវអំពីទ្វារបិទផងដែរ ដូចដែលត្រូវបានតំណាងដោយ Samuel Snow ដែលជានិមិត្តសញ្ញានៃប្រៀបប្រដូចអំពីព្រហ្មចារីទាំងដប់។ សារមួយអំពីសាសនាឥស្លាម ដែលភ្ជាប់មកជាមួយនឹងការព្រមានអំពីការបិទជាបន្តបន្ទាប់នៃទ្វារនៃពេលសាកល្បង ខណៈដែលព្រះគ្រីស្ទបញ្ចប់ព្រះរាជកិច្ចវិនិច្ឆ័យរបស់ទ្រង់ នឹងត្រូវបានប្រកាស។ សារនោះមានពីរផ្នែក ដោយមានទាំងខ្សែខាងក្នុង និងខ្សែខាងក្រៅ ដែលជាវេនតំណាងឲ្យជំហានពីរដំបូងនៃដំណើរការសាកល្បងបីជំហាន ដែលតែងតែកើតឡើងនៅពេលទំនាយមួយត្រូវបានបើកត្រា ដូចជាការបើកសម្ដែងអំពីព្រះយេស៊ូវគ្រីស្ទនៅថ្ងៃទី ៣១ ខែធ្នូ ឆ្នាំ ២០២៣។

The Time of the End magazine contains the basic overview of the future for America as represented in the last six verses of Daniel eleven which were unsealed at the time of the end in 1989. The magazine has been in the public record for thirty years and no one saw that a main theme of the magazine was the religious struggle between communism and the churches under the influence of Catholicism, especially in the Ukraine. That religious battle from the period of 1989, explains the context of the religious demise of Putin as represented by Ptolemy and Uzziah in the rebellion they both manifested at the temple in Jerusalem. The temple in Jerusalem was Uzziah’s temple, not Ptolemy’s temple. Both Putin and Zelenskyy desecrate the same temple in two different ways; one as an Egyptian and one as a Jew.

Majalah Time of the End memuat gambaran dasar tentang masa depan bagi Amerika sebagaimana dilambangkan dalam enam ayat terakhir Daniel sebelas, yang dimeteraikan itu dibuka pada waktu akhir pada tahun 1989. Majalah itu telah tercatat dalam ranah publik selama tiga puluh tahun, namun tidak seorang pun melihat bahwa salah satu tema utamanya ialah pergumulan keagamaan antara komunisme dan gereja-gereja di bawah pengaruh Katolik, khususnya di Ukraina. Pertempuran keagamaan dari periode 1989 itu menjelaskan konteks kemerosotan keagamaan Putin sebagaimana dilambangkan oleh Ptolemeus dan Uzia dalam pemberontakan yang keduanya nyatakan di Bait Suci di Yerusalem. Bait Suci di Yerusalem itu adalah Bait Suci Uzia, bukan Bait Suci Ptolemeus. Baik Putin maupun Zelenskyy menajiskan Bait Suci yang sama dengan dua cara yang berbeda; yang satu sebagai orang Mesir dan yang satu sebagai orang Yahudi.

The church that was struggling against the king of the south in 1989 was the Catholic church. And why not? Atheism of France delivered the deadly wound to the king of the north in 1798, so why wouldn’t the papacy retaliate against atheism’s long-drawn-out persecution of the Catholic church, especially in the Ukraine? More significant is that this clear testimony about the Ukraine came from a publication in 1996, that was citing the secular historians about the history of 1989. Now that the Lord is unsealing the hidden history of verse forty, He has pointed to the struggle between two orthodox churches to provide the prophetic and historical context of the battle of Raphia and its aftermath, and He had already included the necessary insights in The Time of the End magazine that was published thirty years ago.

Kereke e neng e lwantšana le kgoši ya borwa ka 1989 e be e le Kereke ya K’hatholike. Gomme ke ka baka la’ng go se be bjalo? Go se dumele go Modimo ga Fora go neile kgoši ya leboa ntho e gobatšago ya go bolaya ka 1798, ka gona ke ka baka la’ng bopapa bo ka se itefeletše go se dumele go Modimo ka tlaišo ya bjona ya nako e telele kgahlanong le Kereke ya K’hatholike, kudukudu ka Ukraine? Seo se bohlokwa le go feta ke gore bohlatse bjo bo lego pepeneneng mabapi le Ukraine bo tšwile kgatišong ya 1996, yeo e bego e tsopola borahistori ba lefase mabapi le histori ya 1989. Bjale ge Morena a dutše a phetla histori ye e utilwego ya temana ya masomenne, o šupile ntwa magareng ga dikereke tše pedi tša orthodox go fana ka seemo sa boporofeta le sa histori sa ntwa ya Raphia le ditlamorago tša yona, gomme o be a šetše a akaretša ditemogo tše di nyakegago ka makasineng wa The Time of the End wo o phatlaladitšwego nywaga ye masometharo e fetilego.

The demise of Napoleon aligns with the progressive demise of Lenin, Stalin and the system of the Soviet Union. When the prophetic southern kingdom moved its capital to Russia there were two major revolutions in 1917. The first is what is called the Russian revolution when the Czar was overthrown, and then in the same year the Bolshevik Revolution followed, which led to the civil war of 1917 unto 1922. In 1922 the Soviet Union was formed.

ការរលត់ទៅនៃណាប៉ូឡេអុង ស្របគ្នានឹងការរលត់ទៅជាបន្តបន្ទាប់នៃលេនីន ស្តាលីន និងប្រព័ន្ធនៃសហភាពសូវៀត។ នៅពេលដែលនគរខាងត្បូងតាមទំនាយបានផ្លាស់ទីរាជធានីរបស់ខ្លួនទៅកាន់រុស្ស៊ី មានបដិវត្តន៍ធំពីរនៅឆ្នាំ 1917។ បដិវត្តន៍ទីមួយគឺអ្វីដែលគេហៅថា បដិវត្តន៍រុស្ស៊ី នៅពេលដែលព្រះចៅអធិរាជត្សារ ត្រូវបានផ្តួលរំលំ ហើយបន្ទាប់មកនៅក្នុងឆ្នាំដដែល បដិវត្តន៍បុលសេវិកក៏បានកើតឡើងតាមមក ដែលនាំទៅដល់សង្គ្រាមស៊ីវិលចាប់ពីឆ្នាំ 1917 រហូតដល់ឆ្នាំ 1922។ នៅឆ្នាំ 1922 សហភាពសូវៀតត្រូវបានបង្កើតឡើង។

The beginning of Russia as the spiritual king of the south represented a two-step revolution that led to civil war, then the formation of a confederacy of countries. The collapse of the Soviet Union was also two steps, beginning with the tearing down of the Berlin wall on November 9, 1989, which then led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union on December 31, 1991. As the last ruler of Russia, the king of the south, Vladimir Putin was typified by the first Russian ruler—Vladimir Lenin.

Pemia Rusia kama mfalme wa kusini wa kiroho kuliwakilisha mapinduzi ya hatua mbili yaliyopelekea vita vya wenyewe kwa wenyewe, kisha kuundwa kwa shirikisho la nchi mbalimbali. Kuanguka kwa Umoja wa Kisovieti nako kulikuwa kwa hatua mbili, kuanzia kwa kubomolewa kwa Ukuta wa Berlin mnamo Novemba 9, 1989, jambo lililopelekea baadaye kuvunjika kwa Umoja wa Kisovieti mnamo Desemba 31, 1991. Kama mtawala wa mwisho wa Urusi, mfalme wa kusini, Vladimir Putin alifananishwa kwa mfano na mtawala wa kwanza wa Urusi—Vladimir Lenin.

Vladimir means “a great leader” and Putin means “the path.” Lenin means “a great river,” but Vladimir Lenin chose the name of Lenin to hide his real name, which was Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov. Ilyich means “son of Elijah,” and Ulyanov means “youthful son of Elijah.”

Владимир значи „голем водач“, а Путин значи „патот“. Ленин значи „голема река“, но Владимир Ленин го избрал името Ленин за да го сокрие своето вистинско име, кое било Владимир Илич Уљанов. Илич значи „син на Илија“, а Уљанов значи „млад син на Илија“.

The great Russian leader on the path, in the history represented by the battle of Raphia in 217 BC, was typified by the first leader of Russia, who as Vladimir Lenin was the great leader of the mighty river, but who hid his name. A name is a symbol of character, and for Vladimir to hide his two names represents a character that chose a great river of political thought, over a character represented by Elijah, which means “God is Jehovah.” The root of atheism is the denial of God, and atheism is a prime characteristic of the king of the south. The second and third given name of Lenin emphasize Elijah and his son, and the end of Russia as the king of the south is represented by Ptolemy IV, who was victorious at the battle of Raphia, but when Antiochus returned in 200 BC at the battle of Panium Ptolemy’s five-year-old son was then ruling. Lenin’s two original names identify Elijah and his son, and align with Ptolemy and his son. Elijah and the message to his children occurs in the latter days, just before “the great and dreadful day of the Lord;” which is where the battles of Raphia and Panium are also located.

ឧត្តមមេដឹកនាំរុស្ស៊ីដ៏ធំនៅលើផ្លូវនោះ ក្នុងប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រដែលត្រូវបានតំណាងដោយសង្គ្រាមរ៉ាហ្វៀនៅឆ្នាំ 217 មុន គ.ស. ត្រូវបានជាប្រភេទតាមរយៈមេដឹកនាំដំបូងនៃរុស្ស៊ី ដែលក្នុងនាមជា Vladimir Lenin គឺជាមេដឹកនាំដ៏ធំនៃទន្លេដ៏ខ្លាំងក្លា ប៉ុន្តែអ្នកនោះបានលាក់ឈ្មោះរបស់ខ្លួន។ ឈ្មោះគឺជានិមិត្តសញ្ញានៃអត្តចរិត ហើយការដែល Vladimir លាក់ឈ្មោះទាំងពីររបស់ខ្លួន បង្ហាញពីអត្តចរិតមួយដែលបានជ្រើសរើសទន្លេដ៏ធំនៃគំនិតនយោបាយ មុនអត្តចរិតដែលត្រូវបានតំណាងដោយ Elijah ដែលមានន័យថា «ព្រះគឺយេហូវ៉ា»។ ឫសគល់នៃអធិទេពនិយមគឺការបដិសេធព្រះ ហើយអធិទេពនិយមគឺជាលក្ខណៈសំខាន់មួយនៃស្តេចខាងត្បូង។ ឈ្មោះកំណើតទីពីរ និងទីបីរបស់ Lenin សង្កត់ធ្ងន់ទៅលើ Elijah និងកូនប្រុសរបស់គាត់ ហើយទីបញ្ចប់នៃរុស្ស៊ីក្នុងនាមជាស្តេចខាងត្បូង ត្រូវបានតំណាងដោយ Ptolemy IV ដែលបានឈ្នះក្នុងសង្គ្រាមរ៉ាហ្វៀ ប៉ុន្តែ នៅពេល Antiochus បានត្រឡប់មកវិញនៅឆ្នាំ 200 មុន គ.ស. ក្នុងសង្គ្រាមប៉ានីយ៉ូម នោះកូនប្រុសអាយុប្រាំឆ្នាំរបស់ Ptolemy កំពុងសោយរាជ្យ។ ឈ្មោះដើមទាំងពីររបស់ Lenin កំណត់អត្តសញ្ញាណ Elijah និងកូនប្រុសរបស់គាត់ ហើយស្របគ្នាជាមួយ Ptolemy និងកូនប្រុសរបស់គាត់។ Elijah និងសារទៅកាន់កូនចៅរបស់គាត់ កើតមាននៅថ្ងៃចុងក្រោយ មុន «ថ្ងៃដ៏អស្ចារ្យ និងគួរឱ្យស្ញែងខ្លាចរបស់ព្រះអម្ចាស់» បន្តិច; ដែលជាកន្លែងដែលសង្គ្រាមរ៉ាហ្វៀ និងប៉ានីយ៉ូមក៏ស្ថិតនៅផងដែរ។

> Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord: And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse. Malachi 4:5, 6.

> Lwa ungania, Ndzi ta mi rhumela Eliya muprofeta emahlweni ka ku ta ka siku lerikulu ni leri chavisaka ra Yehovha; kutani u ta tlherisela mbilu ya vatata eka vana, ni mbilu ya vana eka vatata wa vona, leswaku ndzi nga ti ndzi ba misava hi ndzhukano. Malaki 4:5, 6.

The testimony of Uzziah and Ptolemy align in verse eleven of Daniel eleven, and Uzziah lived for eleven years after his rebellion and leprosy; whereas, Ptolemy ruled for a total of seventeen years, which is the same number of years between the battles of verse eleven and verse fifteen. The 250-year prophecy that began in 457 BC, ended in 207 BC in the middle of those two battles; ten years after Raphia and seven before Panium. Ptolemy IV’s reign began in 221 BC, and he died in 204 BC, so the seventeen years of Ptolemy are not the same line as the seventeen years from Raphia to Panium. Nor are they the same seventeen years that are represented by the conclusion of the 250-year prophecy beginning with Nero in 64 and ending in 313. From 313 to the first Sunday law in 321 is eight years, and nine years later in 330 Constantine divided the kingdom into east and west.

Бу Уzzия белән Птолемей турындагы шаһитлекләр Даниял унбернең унберенче аятендә туры килә, һәм Уzzия үзенең фетнәсе белән махаулыктан соң тагын унбер ел яшәде; ә Птолемей барлыгы унҗиде ел идарә итте, бу исә унберенче аять белән унбишенче аятьтәге сугышлар арасындагы еллар санына тәңгәл. Б. э. к. 457 елда башланган 250 еллык пәйгамбәрлек, шул ике сугышның уртасында, б. э. к. 207 елда тәмамланды; Рафиядән ун ел соң һәм Паниумнан җиде ел элек. Птолемей IVнең идарәсе б. э. к. 221 елда башланды, һәм ул б. э. к. 204 елда үлде, шуңа күрә Птолемейнең унҗиде елы Рафиядән Паниумга кадәрге унҗиде ел белән бер үк сызык түгел. Шулай ук алар 64 елда Нерон белән башланып, 313 елда тәмамланган 250 еллык пәйгамбәрлекнең ахыры белән күрсәтелгән шул ук унҗиде ел да түгел. 313 елдан 321 елдагы беренче якшәмбе канунына кадәр сигез ел, һәм тагын тугыз елдан соң, 330 елда, Константин патшалыкны көнчыгышка һәм көнбатышка бүлде.

In the very near future Putin and Russia will defeat Ukraine and the footsteps of Ptolemy and Uzziah will begin to repeat in the history represented by verse twelve. The two biblical witnesses place the final crisis for Putin in a church and state crisis. Their rebellion was manifested at the temple in Jerusalem, thus identifying Uzziah’s temple and religion as the point of prophetic reference.

Dalam masa yang sangat dekat, Putin dan Rusia akan mengalahkan Ukraine, dan jejak langkah Ptolemy dan Uzziah akan mulai terulang dalam sejarah yang digambarkan oleh ayat dua belas. Kedua saksi alkitabiah itu menempatkan krisis terakhir bagi Putin dalam suatu krisis antara gereja dan negara. Pemberontakan mereka dinyatakan di bait suci di Yerusalem, dengan demikian menandai bait suci dan agama Uzziah sebagai titik rujukan kenabian.

Zelenskyy, which means “green,” is the puppet of the globalist bureaucrats of the European Union and the United Nations, whose globalist agenda is aptly represented by the green political movement that worships mother earth. It is fitting that Zelenskyy was an actor, for he is clearly a proxy of other powers, and his name meaning “green” identifies the political philosophy that guides his movements on the chess board of human history. Checkmate is right around the corner for Zelenskyy.

Zelenskyy, a ɔkyerɛ sɛ “ahabammono,” yɛ Europa Nkabom (European Union) ne Amanaman Nkabom (United Nations) mu amanaman nyinaa so tumidi pɛ atitiriw no aboa a wɔde di agoru, wɔn amanaman nyinaa so tumidi pɛ nhyehyɛe a amanyɔsɛm mu ahabammono kuw a ɛsom asaase maame no gyina hɔ ma no yiye pa ara. Ɛfata sɛ na Zelenskyy yɛ ɔyɛkyerɛni, efisɛ ɛda adi pefee sɛ ɔyɛ tumi foforo bi ahyɛmufo, na ne din a ɛkyerɛ “ahabammono” no da amanyɔsɛm mu nyansapɛ a ɛkyerɛ ne nantew wɔ nnipa abakɔsɛm agodibea no so adi. Agoru no awiei a obi rentumi nnyina ano bio no rebɛn Zelenskyy ntɛm ara.

In this final history the rebellion of Uzziah and Ptolemy will once again be acted out, but Ptolemy (Putin) died four years before the battle of Panium, and the last ruler of the king of the south is represented by a five-year-old child who is being handled by a series of corrupt and incompetent regents.

Dalam sejarah akhir ini, pemberontakan Uzia dan Ptolemy akan sekali lagi diperagakan, tetapi Ptolemy (Putin) telah mati empat tahun sebelum pertempuran Panium, dan penguasa terakhir raja selatan dilambangkan oleh seorang kanak-kanak berusia lima tahun yang sedang dikendalikan oleh serangkaian pemangku raja yang korup dan tidak cakap.

Ptolemy V was only about 5–6 years old when he ascended the throne in 204 BC (after his father’s mysterious death), and the Ptolemaic kingdom was paralyzed by a series of incompetent or corrupt regencies during his reign. The initial regency was from 204–202 BC, after Ptolemy IV’s death was concealed and his mother Arsinoe III murdered. The court favorites Sosibius, a longtime minister under Ptolemy IV, and Agathocles the brother of Ptolemy IV’s mistress Agathoclea, declared themselves regents. They forged or presented a will making them guardians, placed the young king under the care of Agathoclea and her family, and purged potential rivals. Sosibius handled much of the early administration.

Ptolemy V waa qiyaastii 5–6 sano jir oo keliya markii uu carshiga fuulay sannadkii 204 BC (ka dib dhimashadii dahsoonaa ee aabbihii), boqortooyadii Ptolemaic-na waxay ku dhacday curyaannimo ay keeneen taxane maamulladii ku-meelgaarka ahaa ee aan kartida lahayn ama musuqmaasuqa ku sifoobay intii uu xukunka hayay. Maamulkii ku-meelgaarka ahaa ee bilowga ahaa wuxuu jiray 204–202 BC, ka dib markii dhimashadii Ptolemy IV la qariyey, hooyadiis Arsinoe III-na la dilay. Kuwa maxkamadda ku lahaa saameynta, Sosibius oo ahaa wasiir muddo dheer soo hoos shaqaynayay Ptolemy IV, iyo Agathocles oo ahaa walaalka Agathoclea, oo ahayd sayidadii Ptolemy IV, waxay isku dhawaaqeen maamuleyaal ku-meelgaar ah. Waxay sameeyeen ama soo bandhigeen dardaaran ka dhigaya iyaga masuuliyiinta ilaalinta, waxayna boqorka yar geliyeen daryeelka Agathoclea iyo qoyskeeda, iyagoo sifayn ku sameeyay cid kasta oo noqon kartay loollan. Sosibius ayaa maamulkii hore intiisa badan gacanta ku hayay.

A shift occurred around 202 BC, when Agathocles became the dominant regent, but was widely hated for debauchery and mismanagement. A popular uprising in Alexandria led to his brutal lynching by a mob, with the boy-king nominally approving. Subsequent regents were Tlepolemus the governor of Pelusium, and then Aristomenes. By the time of the battle of Panium in 200 BC, the kingdom was under this rotating series of regents and court advisors.

Б.з.д. шамамен 202 жылы Агафокл үстем регентке айналған кезде бір өзгеріс болды, бірақ ол азғындығы мен басқарудағы жөнсіздігі үшін жұртшылықтың кеңінен жек көруіне ұшырады. Александриядағы халық көтерілісі оның тобырдың қолынан қатыгездікпен линчке ұшырауына әкелді, бұған бала-патша атаулы түрде келісімін берген еді. Бұдан кейінгі регенттер Пелусийдің әміршісі Тлеполем және содан соң Аристомен болды. Б.з.д. 200 жылғы Паний шайқасы кезіне қарай патшалық осындай ауыспалы регенттер мен сарай кеңесшілерінің билігіне қараған еді.

At the battle of Panium the Ptolemaic forces were led in the field by the general Scopas of Aetolia, a mercenary commander appointed under the regency, not by Ptolemy V himself. The young king had no real control—the decisions, military strategy, and kingdom’s overall weakness stemmed from the regents’ paralysis, internal revolts (like the native Egyptian uprisings), and court intrigue. This instability allowed Antiochus III the Great to decisively defeat Scopas at Panium, seizing Coele-Syria, including Judea permanently from Ptolemaic control.

ဟၤပၲုိန်စစ်ပွဲ၌ ပ္တိုလမိဘက်၏ တပ်များကို တိုက်ကွင်း၌ ဦးဆောင်ခဲ့သူမှာ ပ္တိုလမိ V ကိုယ်တိုင် မဟုတ်ဘဲ၊ အုပ်ချုပ်ရေးအပ်နှင်းထားသော အစောင့်အရှောက်အစိုးရလက်အောက်တွင် ခန့်အပ်ခံထားရသော အက်တိုလီးယားမှ အငှားစစ်ခေါင်းဆောင် ဗိုလ်ချုပ် စ္ကောပပ် ဖြစ်သည်။ ထိုလူငယ်ဘုရင်၌ အမှန်တကယ်သော အာဏာထိန်းချုပ်မှု မရှိခဲ့ချေ—ဆုံးဖြတ်ချက်များ၊ စစ်မဟာဗျူဟာ၊ ထို့ပြင် နိုင်ငံတော်တစ်ရပ်လုံး၏ အားနည်းချက်တို့သည် အုပ်ချုပ်ရေးအပ်နှင်းခံ ရေဂျင့်များ၏ လှုပ်ရှားနိုင်စွမ်းပျက်ကွက်မှု၊ အတွင်းရေးပုန်ကန်မှုများ (အီဂျစ်မူလဇာတိသားတို့၏ အရေးတော်ပုံများကဲ့သို့သော) နှင့် နန်းတွင်းအကြံအစည်ယှက်ယှက်များမှ ပေါ်ပေါက်လာခဲ့သည်။ ဤမတည်ငြိမ်မှုကြောင့် အန်တီအိုခတ်စ် III မဟာသည် ဟၤပၲုိန်၌ စ္ကောပပ်ကို ပြတ်ပြတ်သားသား အနိုင်ယူနိုင်ခဲ့ပြီး၊ ယုဒေယာကို အပါအဝင် ကိုအီလ်-ဆီးရီးယားကို ပ္တိုလမိအုပ်ချုပ်မှုမှ အမြဲတမ်း သိမ်းယူခဲ့သည်။

Historians discuss the probability that Ptolemy IV’s death was by poisoning, which is also part of the historical speculation concerning Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, as well as the queen of the south, Cleopatra. Putin prevails in the Ukrainian War, but then his demise begins with his desire to implement the controlling relationship that the Soviet Union formerly had with the Ukrainian church, which when removed in 1989, was the symbol of the victory of the king of the north over the king of the south.

Para ahli sejarah membincangkan kemungkinan bahawa kematian Ptolemy IV berpunca daripada racun, yang juga merupakan sebahagian daripada spekulasi sejarah berkenaan Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, serta ratu dari selatan, Cleopatra. Putin menang dalam Perang Ukraine, tetapi kemudian kebinasaannya bermula dengan keinginannya untuk melaksanakan hubungan penguasaan yang dahulunya dimiliki oleh Kesatuan Soviet terhadap gereja Ukraine, yang apabila dihapuskan pada tahun 1989, merupakan lambang kemenangan raja utara atas raja selatan.

The Ukraine is the cradle of Eastern Slavic Orthodoxy. The baptism of Vladimir the Great took place in 988 in Kyiv. Moscow later claimed the title “Third Rome” after Constantinople fell, positioning itself as the rightful heir and spiritual guardian of all Russian lands, including the Ukraine as its “canonical territory”.

Украина е колевката на источнословенското православие. Крштението на Владимир Велики се случило во 988 година во Киев. Подоцна Москва го присвоила називот „Трет Рим“ по падот на Константинопол, поставувајќи се себеси како законски наследник и духовен чувар на сите руски земји, вклучително и Украина како нејзина „канонска територија“.

The Moscow Patriarchate has always viewed Ukraine as spiritually inseparable from Russia with the motto of “One people, one faith,” which is a phrase Putin himself has repeatedly used. Ukraine, especially since 2014/2022, increasingly sees Moscow’s oversight as colonial and imperial domination rather than true spiritual motherhood. As of February 2026, there are two competing Orthodox structures. One is the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, which since 2019 has been independent from Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople. In Kyiv the Orthodox Church of Ukraine is considered as the truly national church.

Patriarkat Moscow sentiasa memandang Ukraine sebagai tidak terpisahkan secara rohani daripada Rusia dengan cogan kata “Satu bangsa, satu iman,” suatu ungkapan yang berulang kali digunakan oleh Putin sendiri. Ukraine, khususnya sejak 2014/2022, semakin memandang pengawasan Moscow sebagai penaklukan kolonial dan imperial, bukannya keibuan rohani yang sejati. Sehingga Februari 2026, terdapat dua struktur Ortodoks yang saling bersaing. Salah satunya ialah Gereja Ortodoks Ukraine, yang sejak 2019 telah merdeka daripada Patriark Ekumenikal Bartholomew dari Konstantinopel. Di Kyiv, Gereja Ortodoks Ukraine dianggap sebagai gereja nasional yang benar-benar mewakili bangsa itu.

Reader beware: the Orthodox Church of Ukraine is a different church than the Ukrainian Orthodox church. The Ukrainian Orthodox church is connected with Russia’s orthodox church, and for this reason Zelenskyy has been attacking it. The Vatican opposes the attacks of Zelenskyy that are already underway, but Putin’s rebellion of verse twelve follows his victory at Raphia, and is yet future.

Pembaca hendaklah berhati-hati: Gereja Ortodoks Ukraina adalah gereja yang berbeda dari Gereja Ortodoks Ukraina. Gereja Ortodoks Ukraina terhubung dengan gereja ortodoks Rusia, dan karena alasan ini Zelenskyy telah menyerangnya. Vatikan menentang serangan-serangan Zelenskyy yang sudah sedang berlangsung, tetapi pemberontakan Putin dalam ayat dua belas mengikuti kemenangannya di Raphia, dan masih akan terjadi pada masa depan.

The Ukrainian Orthodox Church was historically linked to the Moscow body. In the aftermath of the invasion of 2022, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church declared full autonomy in May 2022, but Ukrainian state investigations (DESS) have repeatedly argued it remains canonically and legally affiliated with Moscow. Ukraine passed a law in August 2024 (signed by Zelenskyy) banning any religious body tied to the Russian Orthodox Church (the “aggressor state”). The Ukrainian Orthodox Church has been ordered to fully sever ties or face court-ordered dissolution of its Kyiv Metropolis. As of late 2025 and early 2026, there are ongoing raids, parish transfers to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (over 1,300 since 2022), court cases, and UN experts warning of religious-freedom concerns regarding the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.

Ukphandle LweSonto Lwama-Orthodox lwase-Ukraine ngokomlando lwaluxhumene nenhlangano yaseMoscow. Ngemva kokuhlasela kwango-2022, iSonto Lwama-Orthodox lwase-Ukraine lamemezela ukuzimela okuphelele ngoMeyi 2022, kodwa uphenyo lukahulumeni wase-Ukraine (DESS) seluphindaphinde lwaphikisa ngokuthi lusahlobene neMoscow ngokohlelo lwecanon nangokomthetho. I-Ukraine yaphasisa umthetho ngo-Agasti 2024 (owasayinwa nguZelenskyy) ovimbela noma iyiphi inhlangano yenkolo exhunywe neSonto Lwama-Orthodox laseRussia (“izwe elihlaselayo”). ISonto Lwama-Orthodox lwase-Ukraine seliyaliwe ukuba linqamule ngokuphelele ubudlelwane noma libhekane nokuchithwa kweKyiv Metropolis yalo okuyalelwe yinkantolo. Kusukela ngasekupheleni kuka-2025 nasekuqaleni kuka-2026, kusaqhubeka ukuhlasela nokuseshwa, ukudluliselwa kwamaparishi eSontweni Lwama-Orthodox lwase-Ukraine (angaphezu kuka-1,300 kusukela ngo-2022), amacala ezinkantolo, kanye nochwepheshe be-UN abaxwayisa ngezinkinga zenkululeko yenkolo eziphathelene neSonto Lwama-Orthodox lwase-Ukraine.

The Vatican has publicly opposed any forced dissolution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Russia and Putin frame this as outright persecution of canonical Orthodoxy and have made protection of the “Russian Orthodox churches” an explicit demand in any peace negotiations. Russian propaganda consistently ties the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and the Ukrainian state attacks upon it as “Nazism” and as part of their “denazification” justification.

Ta Vatikan ia phat pawl in mihring taka hman a tawh loh chuan Ukrainian Orthodox Church chu tihral ral tura tihbuai dan pawh a hrilh chhuak a ni. Russia leh Putin chuan hei hi canonical Orthodoxy chunga tihduhdahna tak tak niin an sawi a, “Russian Orthodox churches” humhimna pawh remna thuthlungna zawng zawngah an ngenna chiang takah an dah bawk. Russian propaganda chuan Ukrainian Orthodox Church leh Ukrainian ram in a chungah hma lakna pawl chu “Nazism” niin a sawi reng a, chu chu an “denazification” tihchhanah pawh a tel vek tihin an zawm tlat reng a ni.

Putin will presumptuously “enter the temple” and claim full spiritual dominion over Ukrainian Orthodoxy in attempt to re-subordinate the entire Ukrainian church structure under Moscow, demanding recognition as the rightful spiritual head of the Russian orthodox world.

Putin akan dengan lancangnya “memasuki bait suci” dan menuntut kekuasaan rohani sepenuhnya atas Ortodoksi Ukraina dalam upaya untuk menaklukkan kembali seluruh struktur gereja Ukraina di bawah Moskow, seraya menuntut pengakuan sebagai kepala rohani yang sah atas dunia Ortodoks Rusia.

This is the exact parallel to Ptolemy entering the Most Holy Place, while Uzziah is Zelenskyy seeking to burn incense. Ptolemy’s rebellion was in the Most Holy Place and Uzziah’s was in the holy place. A southern king, flushed with the victory of the “borderline,” ending the proxy-power of Nazism, and then overstepping into the place that belongs only to the realm of religion. Then will come a sudden providential humbling, and Putin will disappear from the scene (as Ptolemy IV died in 204 BC). After the power vacuum of a ‘weak-successors phase,’ the northern king returns with greater force and prevails at the modern battle of Panium in verse 15.

Eyi ne Ptolemy a wɔkɔhyɛɛ Kronkron Mu Kronkron no mu no ho pɛpɛɛpɛ sɛso, bere a Uzziah yɛ Zelenskyy a ɔpɛ sɛ ɔhyew aduhuam no. Ptolemy atuatew no sii Kronkron Mu Kronkron no mu, na Uzziah de ne de no sii kronkronbea no mu. Anafo fam hene bi a ɔde “hye so pɛɛ” no nkonimdi ahomaso ahorow, de proxy tumi a Nazism kura no ba awiei, na afei ɔtra kɔfa baabi a ɛyɛ nyamesom ahenni no nko ara de. Afei na ahobrɛase a Onyankopɔn de ba mpofirim bɛba, na Putin befi asɛnka no so ayera (sɛnea Ptolemy IV wui wɔ afe 204 ansa na Kristo reba no). Bere a tumi mu hwehwe mu ba wɔ “adifoɔ a wɔyɛ mmerɛw” bere bi akyi no, atifi fam hene no san ba a ɔwɔ ahoɔden kɛse mu, na odi nkonim wɔ Panium ko a ɛwɔ nnɛyi bere mu no mu wɔ nkyekyem 15 mu.

## Seventeen

Tujuh Belas

Seventeen years occurs three times in the history where the battles of Raphia and Panium merge together, line upon line. The seventeen years from the edict of Milan where the eastern and western thrones of the empire were brought together through marriage, until the kingdom was divided and divorced in 330. The seventeen years beginning and ending are waymarks of two other related prophetic periods. Beginning with Nero in the year 64 a period of persecution is marked that ended in the history of Constantine the Great. The transition from Nero’s period of persecution unto the compromise represented by Constantine identifies the transition from the church of Smyrna unto the church of Pergamos. 313 and the edict of Milan identify the end of the church of Smyrna, and the end of the seventeen-year period is the year 330, which was the fulfillment of the three-hundred-and-sixty-year prophecy of Daniel 11:24.

Miaka kumi na saba hutokea mara tatu katika historia ambapo vita vya Raphia na Panium vinaungana pamoja, mstari juu ya mstari. Miaka kumi na saba tangu amri ya Milan, ambapo viti vya enzi vya mashariki na magharibi vya dola vililetwa pamoja kwa njia ya ndoa, hadi ufalme ulipogawanywa na kupewa talaka mwaka 330. Miaka kumi na saba, katika mwanzo na mwisho wake, ni alama za njia za vipindi viwili vingine vya kinabii vinavyohusiana. Kuanzia na Nero katika mwaka 64, kipindi cha mateso kinawekwa alama, nacho kilifikia mwisho katika historia ya Constantine Mkuu. Mpito kutoka kipindi cha mateso cha Nero hadi mapatano ya maelewano yanayowakilishwa na Constantine unaonyesha mpito kutoka kanisa la Smirna hadi kanisa la Pergamo. 313 na amri ya Milan vinaonyesha mwisho wa kanisa la Smirna, na mwisho wa kipindi cha miaka kumi na saba ni mwaka 330, ambao ulikuwa utimilifu wa unabii wa miaka mia tatu na sitini wa Danieli 11:24.

> He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers’ fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time. Daniel 11:24.

> Ol i go insait long pis, yes long ol ples bilong provins i gat planti gris tru; na em bai mekim samting em ol papa bilong em i no bin mekim, na ol tumbuna papa bilong em tu i no bin mekim; em bai tilim namel long ol dispela ol samting ol i kisim long pait, na ol planda, na ol gutpela samting i dia tumas: yes, em bai tingting paslain long ol plan bilong em long pait long ol strongpela banis, tasol inap long wanpela taim. Daniel 11:24.

The seventeen years from 313 and the edict of Milan, begins with a fulfillment of prophecy and ends at the fulfillment of another prophecy. The first prophetic fulfillment which marks the beginning, identifies the transition from the church of Smyrna unto the church of Pergamos, and the prophecy that marks the end of those seventeen years, identifies the division of Rome into eastern and western Rome. The seventeen years is identified by prophetic history, not by any specific seventeen-year proclamation. The alpha of the division of the second church from the third church aligned with the division of the empire into east and west at the fulfillment of the time prophecy of 360 years. Those two prophecies establish a period of seventeen years, and they need to be established as a legitimate prophetic period based upon the witness of two or three; if seventeen is a valid prophetic symbol.

Le min pi mriat snam khih na u snem 313 bad ka hukum jong ka Milan, ka sdang da ka jingpyndep ïa ka jingïathuhlypa bad ka kut ha ka jingpyndep ïa sa kawei pat ka jingïathuhlypa. Ka jingpyndep jingïathuhlypa kaba nyngkong, kaba dak ïa ka jingsdang, ka pynithuh ïa ka jingkylla na ka balang Smyrna sha ka balang Pergamos, bad ka jingïathuhlypa kaba dak ïa ka jingkut jong kito ki khih na u snem, ka pynithuh ïa ka jingpynkhaïi ïa ka Rom sha ka Rom ba mihngi bad ka Rom ba sepngi. Ia kine ki khih na u snem la pynithuh da ka histori jingïathuhlypa, ym da kano-kano ka jingpynbna kaba kyrpang jong ki khih na u snem. Ka alpha jong ka jingpynïakhlad ïa ka balang kaba ar na ka balang kaba lai ka ïahap bad ka jingpynkhaïi ïa ka hima sha mihngi bad sepngi ha ka jingpyndep ïa ka jingïathuhlypa por jong 360 snem. Kine ar tylli ki jingïathuhlypa ki pynskhem ïa ka por jong ki khih na u snem, bad ki dei ban pynskhem ïa kata kum ka por jingïathuhlypa kaba hok katkum ka jingïasakhi jong ar ne lai ngut; lada khatsan snem ka long ka dak jingïathuhlypa kaba shonghok.

Those witnesses exist in another 250-year period which began in 457 BC. On that date the 2,300-year prophecy of Daniel 8:14 began. 457 BC is a prophetic starting point, and an established prophetic waymark. Extending 250 years into the future brings you to 207 BC, which is the history between the battles of Raphia and Panium. The battle of Raphia and Panium cannot be separated, for they are both engaged in by Antiochus the Great. From the battle of Raphia in 217 BC unto the battle of Panium in 200 BC is seventeen years. The 2,300-year prophecy identifies a change of dispensation at the beginning, when the third decree restored Judah’s national sovereignty and then at the ending there was a change of dispensation when Christ moved from the holy place to the Most Holy Place. 207 BC represents the change of dispensation of Egyptian rule over Judea, unto the Seleucid dispensation of rule over the glorious land. The dispensation of Seleucid control over the glorious land produced the revolt of the Maccabees in 167 BC.

Bonna basupi bo teng mo nakong e nngwe ya dingwaga di le 250 e e simolotseng ka 457 BC. Mo letlheng leo boporofeti jwa Daniele 8:14 jwa dingwaga di le 2,300 bo ne jwa simologa. 457 BC ke ntlha ya tshimologo ya boporofeti, e bile ke sesupo sa boporofeti se se tlhomameng. Go oketsa dingwaga di le 250 go ya pele go go isa kwa 207 BC, e leng hisetori e e leng fa gare ga dintwa tsa Raphia le Panium. Ntwa ya Raphia le ya Panium ga di kgaoganngwe, gonne tsotlhe tse pedi di ne tsa lwelwa ke Antiochus yo Mogolo. Go simologa ka ntwa ya Raphia ka 217 BC go fitlha kwa ntweng ya Panium ka 200 BC ke dingwaga di le lesome le bosupa. Boporofeti jwa dingwaga di le 2,300 bo supa phetogo ya paka ya tsamaiso kwa tshimologong, fa taelo ya boraro e ne e busetsa Juda boipuso jwa yone jwa setšhaba, mme gape kwa bokhutlong ga nna le phetogo ya paka ya tsamaiso fa Keresete a ne a tswa mo felong fa boitshepo a ya kwa Felong ga Maitshepo. 207 BC e emela phetogo ya paka ya puso ya Egepeto mo Judea, go ya kwa pakeng ya puso ya Seleucid mo lefatsheng le le galalelang. Paka ya taolo ya Seleucid mo lefatsheng le le galalelang e ne ya tlhagisa botsuolodi jwa Maccabees ka 167 BC.

The Nero period of 250 years ends with the history of Constantine the GREAT and the 250 years that conclude between the two battles is the history of Antiochus the GREAT. At the battle of Raphia, Ptolemy IV defeated Antiochus the Great and Ptolemy reigned for seventeen years. Both 250-year periods contain a distinct seventeen-year period. Both end in the history of a ruler who is known as the GREAT. Both 250-year periods begin at an established prophetic waymark and they both end at an established prophetic waymark.

Nako ya Nero ya myaka 250 esukaka na lisolo ya Constantine Monene, mpe miaka 250 oyo esukaka kati na bitumba mibale ezali lisolo ya Antiochus Monene. Na etumba ya Raphia, Ptolemy IV alongaki Antiochus Monene, mpe Ptolemy ayangelaki mbula zomi na nsambo. Bileko nyonso mibale ya miaka 250 ezali na eleko moko ya polele ya mbula zomi na nsambo. Yango nyonso mibale esukaka na lisolo ya mokonzi oyo ayebani lokola Monene. Bileko nyonso mibale ya miaka 250 ebandaka na elembo ya nzela ya esakweli oyo etiamaki, mpe nyonso mibale esukaka na elembo ya nzela ya esakweli oyo etiamaki.

The United States began on July 4, 1776 and 250 years later brings you to July 4, 2026 when Donald Trump, who is known as the one seeking to make America “great,” is going to celebrate those 250 years. 2026, like unto the 250 years from 457 BC concludes in the middle of the history of the modern battles of Raphia and Panium, known as the Ukrainian and Third World War. The reign of a southern king, the period of the first Sunday law and the period from the battle of Raphia to Panium provide three periods of seventeen years that are all connected with the same prophetic history. Three 250-year periods all arrive together in the same prophetic histories. The three periods of 250 years establish three lines of prophetic truth with history associated with Donald Trump, represented as either Constantine the Great, or Antiochus the Great.

United States dia natomboka tamin’ny 4 Jolay 1776, ary 250 taona tatỳ aoriana dia mitondra anao ho amin’ny 4 Jolay 2026, izay hankalazan’i Donald Trump, izay fantatra ho ilay mikatsaka ny hanao an’i Amerika ho “lehibe,” izany 250 taona izany. Ny taona 2026, tahaka ny 250 taona manomboka amin’ny 457 TK, dia mifarana eo afovoan’ny tantaran’ny ady maoderina ao Raphia sy Panium, izay fantatra amin’ny hoe ny ady Okrainiana sy ny Ady Lehibe Fahatelo. Ny fanapahan’ny mpanjaka atsimo, ny vanim-potoanan’ny lalàna alahady voalohany, ary ny vanim-potoana manomboka amin’ny adin’i Raphia ka hatramin’i Panium dia manome fe-potoana telo samy fito ambin’ny folo taona, izay mifamatotra avokoa amin’ilay tantara ara-paminaniana iray ihany. Fe-potoana telo samy 250 taona no tonga miaraka ao anatin’ireo tantara ara-paminaniana ireo ihany. Ireo fe-potoana telo misy 250 taona ireo dia mametraka tsipika telo amin’ny fahamarinana ara-paminaniana, miaraka amin’ny tantara mifandray amin’i Donald Trump, izay aseho ho toy i Constantin Lehibe, na Antiokosy Lehibe.

The three lines of 250 years provide three different, but complementary illustrations of the latter days. Nero’s line identifies the seventeen-year history of compromise that perfectly speaks to the prophetic characteristics of the formation of the image of the beast.

Melayu standard translation: Tiga garis sepanjang 250 tahun itu memberikan tiga gambaran yang berbeza, namun saling melengkapi, tentang hari-hari terakhir. Garis Nero mengenal pasti sejarah kompromi selama tujuh belas tahun yang dengan sempurna mencerminkan ciri-ciri nubuatan pembentukan patung binatang itu.

> “The Lord has shown me clearly that the image of the beast will be formed before probation closes; for it is to be the great test for the people of God, by which their eternal destiny will be decided. Your position is such a jumble of inconsistencies that but few will be deceived.

> “Tuhan telah menunjukkan kepada saya dengan jelas bahawa patung binatang itu akan dibentuk sebelum pintu kasihan ditutup; kerana itulah yang akan menjadi ujian besar bagi umat Tuhan, yang melaluinya nasib kekal mereka akan ditentukan. Kedudukan anda merupakan suatu kekusutan pertentangan yang sedemikian rupa sehingga hanya sedikit orang akan diperdayakan.

> “In Revelation 13 this subject is plainly presented; [Revelation 13:11–17, quoted].

> “Dalama Ufunuo 13 somo hili limewasilishwa waziwazi; [Ufunuo 13:11–17, imenukuliwa].”

> “This is the test that the people of God must have before they are sealed. All who proved their loyalty to God by observing His law, and refusing to accept a spurious sabbath, will rank under the banner of the Lord God Jehovah, and will receive the seal of the living God. Those who yield the truth of heavenly origin and accept the Sunday sabbath, will receive the mark of the beast.” Manuscript Releases, volume 15, 15.

> “Le ke teko yeo batho ba Modimo ba swanetšego go e lebana nayo pele ba bewa leswao. Bohle bao ba bontšhitšego potego ya bona go Modimo ka go boloka molao wa Gagwe, le ka go gana go amogela sabatha ya bofora, ba tla ema ka tlase ga sefoka sa Morena Modimo Jehofa, gomme ba tla amogela leswao la Modimo yo a phelago. Bao ba neelago therešo ya tšwago legodimong gomme ba amogela sabatha ya Lamorena, ba tla amogela leswao la sebata.” Manuscript Releases, volume 15, 15.

The image of the beast is the combination of church and state, with the church in control of the relationship. The compromise of Constantine in attempting to bring paganism together with Christianity is the classic example of the compromise of the latter days.

Setšoantšo sa sebata ke kopano ea kereke le ’muso, moo kereke e laolang kamano eo. Ho sekisetsa ha Constantine, ka ho leka ho kopanya bohetene le Bokreste, ke mohlala o tloaelehileng oa ho sekisetsa ha matsatsi a ho qetela.

> “In the movements now in progress in the United States to secure for the institutions and usages of the church the support of the state, Protestants are following in the steps of papists. Nay, more, they are opening the door for the papacy to regain in Protestant America the supremacy which she has lost in the Old World. And that which gives greater significance to this movement is the fact that the principal object contemplated is the enforcement of Sunday observance—a custom which originated with Rome, and which she claims as the sign of her authority. It is the spirit of the papacy—the spirit of conformity to worldly customs, the veneration for human traditions above the commandments of God—that is permeating the Protestant churches and leading them on to do the same work of Sunday exaltation which the papacy has done before them.

> “Dalam gerakan-gerakan yang kini sedang berlangsung di Amerika Serikat untuk memperoleh bagi lembaga-lembaga dan tata-guna gereja dukungan negara, orang-orang Protestan sedang mengikuti jejak kaum papis. Bahkan lebih daripada itu, mereka sedang membuka pintu bagi kepausan untuk memperoleh kembali di Amerika Protestan supremasi yang telah hilang daripadanya di Dunia Lama. Dan yang memberi arti lebih besar kepada gerakan ini ialah kenyataan bahwa tujuan utama yang dipikirkan adalah penegakan pemeliharaan hari Minggu—suatu kebiasaan yang berasal dari Roma, dan yang diklaimnya sebagai tanda otoritasnya. Roh kepausan itu—roh penyesuaian diri kepada adat-istiadat duniawi, penghormatan terhadap tradisi-tradisi manusia di atas perintah-perintah Allah—sedang meresapi gereja-gereja Protestan dan menuntun mereka untuk melakukan pekerjaan pengagungan hari Minggu yang sama seperti yang telah dilakukan kepausan sebelum mereka.

> “If the reader would understand the agencies to be employed in the soon-coming contest, he has but to trace the record of the means which Rome employed for the same object in ages past. If he would know how papists and Protestants united will deal with those who reject their dogmas, let him see the spirit which Rome manifested toward the Sabbath and its defenders.

> “පෙරළි අනාගතයේ ඉක්මනින් පැමිණෙන සටනේදී යොදාගනු ලබන ක්‍රියාකාරක බලයන් පාඨකයා අවබෝධ කරගැනීමට කැමති නම්, අතීත යුගවල එම අරමුණම ඉටු කිරීම සඳහා රෝමය යොදාගත් ක්‍රමවල වාර්තාව ඔහු සොයාබැලිය යුතුය. පාපවාදීන් හා ප්‍රොටෙස්ටන්තුන් එක්ව, ඔවුන්ගේ ධර්මමත ප්‍රතික්ෂේප කරන්නන් සමඟ කෙසේ ක්‍රියාකරනු ඇත්දැයි ඔහු දැනගැනීමට කැමති නම්, සබත් දිනය සහ එහි ආරක්ෂකයන් පිළිබඳව රෝමය ප්‍රකාශ කළ ආත්මභාවය ඔහු දැකගත යුතුය.”

> “Royal edicts, general councils, and church ordinances sustained by secular power were the steps by which the pagan festival attained its position of honor in the Christian world. The first public measure enforcing Sunday observance was the law enacted by Constantine. (A.D. 321) This edict required townspeople to rest on ‘the venerable day of the sun,’ but permitted countrymen to continue their agricultural pursuits. Though virtually a heathen statute, it was enforced by the emperor after his nominal acceptance of Christianity.” The Great Controversy, 574.

> “Патшалық жарлықтар, жалпы кеңестер және зайырлы биліктің қолдауына сүйенген шіркеулік қаулылар — осының бәрі арқылы пұтқа табынушылық мейрамы христиан әлемінде құрметті орынға ие болды. Жексенбіні сақтауды міндеттеген алғашқы жария шара — Константин шығарған заң болды. (A.D. 321) Бұл жарлық қала тұрғындарына ‘күннің қастерлі күні’ демалуды міндеттеді, бірақ ауыл адамдарына егіншілік істерін жалғастыруға рұқсат берді. Шын мәнінде, бұл пұтқа табынушылық сипаттағы заң болғанымен, Константин христиандықты сырттай қабылдағаннан кейін император ретінде оны күшіне енгізді.” The Great Controversy, 574.

The progression of compromise that led to, and will again lead to the Sunday law is represented with the seventeen-year period from 313 to 330, with the first Sunday law of 321 as the midpoint of the history. At the beginning was a marriage of east and west, and at the end was the divorce of east and west. The first Sunday law is the middle waymark representing rebellion, just as the thirteenth letter of the Hebrew alphabet, when preceded by the first letter and followed by the twenty-second and last letter of the alphabet makes up the Hebrew word truth. Marriage at the beginning and divorce at the end identifies the alpha letter in agreement with the omega letter. The period of 250-years that began with Nero has the signature of Christ, and it speaks to a subject of present truth in the latter days.

Kemaslahatan kompromi yang menuntun kepada, dan yang sekali lagi akan menuntun kepada undang-undang Hari Minggu dilambangkan oleh jangka waktu tujuh belas tahun dari 313 hingga 330, dengan undang-undang Hari Minggu yang pertama pada tahun 321 sebagai titik tengah sejarah itu. Pada permulaannya terdapat suatu perkawinan antara timur dan barat, dan pada akhirnya terjadi perceraian antara timur dan barat. Undang-undang Hari Minggu yang pertama adalah tanda jalan di tengah yang melambangkan pemberontakan, sama seperti huruf ketiga belas dari abjad Ibrani, yang apabila didahului oleh huruf pertama dan diikuti oleh huruf kedua puluh dua dan yang terakhir dari abjad itu, membentuk kata Ibrani bagi “kebenaran.” Perkawinan pada permulaan dan perceraian pada akhir menandai huruf alfa dalam kesesuaian dengan huruf omega. Jangka waktu 250 tahun yang dimulai dengan Nero memiliki tanda tangan Kristus, dan hal itu berbicara tentang suatu pokok kebenaran masa kini pada hari-hari terakhir.

The 250-year period that begins with 457 BC is emphasizing the statecraft represented by Antiochus the Great as he stands within the seventeen-year period from Raphia to Panium. We understand it as statecraft, for in 457 BC a prophecy of 2,300 years also began. The 2,300 years is the internal line of prophecy that speaks to God’s work of redemption, which aligns with a symbol of churchcraft. Unlike the 250-year period that began with Nero, the period that begins in 457 BC is addressing the political role of the last American president who is seeking to make America and then the world great, as he promotes the erroneous Catholic concept of a golden age of a thousand years of peace.

꯵꯲꯰-ꯆꯍꯤꯒꯤ ꯃꯇꯝ ꯑꯁꯤ, ꯌꯦꯁꯨꯁ ꯃꯃꯥꯡ 457 ꯗꯥ ꯍꯧꯒꯠꯄꯥ, ꯔꯥꯐꯤꯌꯥ ꯗꯒꯤ ꯄꯥꯅꯤꯌꯝ ꯐꯥꯎꯕꯒꯤ ꯆꯍꯤ ꯇꯔꯥ-ꯇꯔꯦꯠꯀꯤ ꯃꯇꯨꯡ ꯏꯟ ꯑꯟꯇꯤꯑꯣꯀꯁ ꯗ ꯒ꯭ꯔꯦꯠ ꯑꯁꯤꯅ ꯃꯉꯥꯡꯗ ꯂꯦꯟꯈꯠꯂꯤꯕꯥ ꯂꯩꯕꯥ ꯂꯩꯌꯦꯡ-ꯂꯦꯟꯁꯤꯟꯒꯤ ꯃꯆꯥꯁꯤꯡ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯑꯇꯣꯞꯄꯥꯔꯦ। 457 ꯌꯦꯁꯨꯁ ꯃꯃꯥꯡ ꯗꯥꯒꯤ ꯆꯍꯤ 2,300 ꯒꯤ ꯃꯇꯝ-ꯄꯥꯟꯈ꯭ꯔꯝ ꯑꯃꯁꯨ ꯍꯧꯒꯠꯄꯥ ꯑꯃ ꯂꯩꯔꯦ ꯍꯥꯏꯕꯁꯤ, ꯑꯩꯈꯣꯏꯅ ꯃꯁꯤꯒꯤ ꯋꯥꯔꯣꯜ ꯂꯩꯌꯦꯡ-ꯂꯦꯟꯁꯤꯟ ꯑꯃꯅꯤ ꯍꯥꯏꯅ ꯈꯪꯏ। ꯆꯍꯤ 2,300 ꯑꯁꯤ ꯃꯇꯝ-ꯄꯥꯟꯈ꯭ꯔꯝꯒꯤ ꯃꯅꯨꯡꯒꯤ ꯂꯝꯗꯃ ꯑꯗꯨꯅꯤ, ꯑꯗꯨꯒꯤ ꯋꯥꯔꯣꯜ ꯂꯩꯔꯤꯕꯁꯤ ꯑꯇꯣꯟꯕꯥ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯁꯤꯡ ꯈꯨꯗꯣꯡꯆꯥꯕꯒꯤ ꯇꯧꯔꯤꯕꯥ ꯂꯩꯄꯥꯛ ꯑꯃꯗꯨ ꯈꯨꯠꯌꯥꯝꯅ, ꯑꯗꯨ ꯆꯥꯔꯆꯀ꯭ꯔꯥꯐꯇ꯭ꯒꯤ ꯈꯨꯖꯤꯛ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯆꯥꯟꯅꯔꯤ। ꯅꯤꯔꯣꯗꯒꯤ ꯍꯧꯒꯠꯄꯥ ꯆꯍꯤ ꯵꯲꯰-ꯒꯤ ꯃꯇꯝ ꯑꯗꯨꯒ ꯆꯥꯡꯗꯅ, 457 ꯌꯦꯁꯨꯁ ꯃꯃꯥꯡ ꯗꯥ ꯍꯧꯒꯠꯄꯥ ꯃꯇꯝ ꯑꯁꯤꯅ ꯑꯃꯦꯔꯤꯀꯥꯒꯤ ꯑꯔꯣꯏꯕꯥ ꯄ꯭ꯔꯦꯖꯤꯗꯦꯟꯠ ꯑꯁꯤꯒꯤ ꯂꯩꯌꯦꯡꯒꯤ ꯐꯤꯕꯝ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯋꯥꯔꯣꯜ ꯂꯩꯔꯤ, ꯃꯁꯤꯅ ꯑꯃꯦꯔꯤꯀꯥꯕꯨ ꯑꯁꯨꯝꯅ ꯑꯗꯨꯒ ꯃꯇꯨꯡꯗ ꯃꯥꯂꯦꯝꯕꯨ ꯑꯆꯧꯕꯥ ꯑꯃ ꯑꯣꯏꯍꯜꯂꯤꯕꯥꯅ ꯍꯧꯖꯤꯛꯄꯤ, ꯃꯗꯨꯗꯒꯤ ꯃꯁꯤꯅ ꯑꯁꯨꯃ꯭ꯅꯥ ꯑꯁꯣꯏꯕꯥ ꯀꯦꯊꯣꯂꯤꯛꯀꯤ ꯍꯥꯏ-ꯇꯧꯅꯕꯥ ꯑꯃ, ꯁꯥꯟꯇꯤꯒꯤ ꯆꯍꯤ ꯂꯤꯁꯤꯡ ꯑꯃꯒꯤ ꯁꯣꯅꯥꯒꯤ ꯃꯇꯝ ꯑꯁꯤ ꯄꯣꯛꯍꯟꯂꯤ।

The 250 years of the United States, who is the earth beast of Revelation thirteen identifies the conclusion of the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, that ends where it began, in the midst of war. The victors of history, define the record of history that is preserved. The globalist dragon powered Democrats, view the current anarchy as a revolution, and the all-talk and no action Republicans view this current history as a civil war. The Democrats are representatives of the dragon of Bible prophecy, and the Republicans are represented as apostate Protestants, or in the terms of John in Revelation sixteen, they are the false prophet. The United States began in a war of revolution and it ends with a war of revolution. The Republican party began in a civil war and they end in a civil war. Republicans see the civil war that Democrats call a revolution.

Tahun 250 Amerika Serikat, yang merupakan binatang dari bumi dalam Wahyu pasal tiga belas, menandai penutupan kerajaan keenam dari nubuatan Alkitab, yang berakhir di tempat ia bermula, di tengah peperangan. Para pemenang sejarah menentukan catatan sejarah yang dilestarikan. Partai Demokrat yang digerakkan oleh naga globalis memandang anarki saat ini sebagai suatu revolusi, dan Partai Republik yang banyak bicara tetapi tanpa tindakan memandang sejarah masa kini ini sebagai perang saudara. Partai Demokrat adalah wakil-wakil naga dari nubuatan Alkitab, dan Partai Republik digambarkan sebagai Protestan yang murtad, atau dalam istilah Yohanes dalam Wahyu pasal enam belas, mereka adalah nabi palsu. Amerika Serikat dimulai dalam perang revolusi dan berakhir dengan perang revolusi. Partai Republik dimulai dalam perang saudara dan mereka berakhir dalam perang saudara. Kaum Republik melihat perang saudara yang oleh kaum Demokrat disebut revolusi.

Trump, as the last Republican president possesses the prophetic attributes of the first Republican president, who arrived in the external history of the Civil War. Lincoln’s external Civil War was also the internal history of Isaiah’s prophecy of chapter seven, verse eight that ended in 1863, the very year of the Emancipation Proclamation. The distinction between the two parties is a primary and foundational prophetic principle. It began with Cain and Abel, who in the time of Christ were represented by the Sadducees and the Pharisees, two classes of Cain who were to murder one Abel.

Trump, sebagai presiden Republikan yang terakhir, memiliki ciri-ciri nubuat dari presiden Republikan yang pertama, yang muncul dalam sejarah lahiriah Perang Saudara. Perang Saudara lahiriah Lincoln juga merupakan sejarah batiniah dari nubuat Yesaya pasal tujuh, ayat delapan, yang berakhir pada tahun 1863, tepat pada tahun Proklamasi Emansipasi. Perbedaan antara kedua partai itu merupakan suatu prinsip nubuat yang utama dan mendasar. Hal itu bermula dengan Kain dan Habel, yang pada zaman Kristus diwakili oleh orang-orang Saduki dan orang-orang Farisi, dua golongan Kain yang akan membunuh satu Habel.

The Pharisees and Sadducees represent those who agreed to crucify their Messiah, for different reasons, but agreement—just the same. The Pharisees professed to uphold the law, but didn’t, as with Republicans. The Pharisees professed to uphold the original divine law, but interpreted the law through their own bigoted logic. The original Law for the Pharisees is the Constitution for the Republicans, the very Constitution they claim to support, but don’t. The Sadducees rejected the power of God, and though a smaller sect than the Pharisees, the Sadducees controlled the religious and political landscape of Judea in the time of Christ. The Democrats are a smaller sect than the Republicans, so small they must cheat to stay in power, but stay in power they do, for their opponents who profess to uphold equal justice for all, do nothing to enforce the principles of the law they profess to uphold.

Bafarisayo na Basadukayo bagereranya abemeye kubamba Mesiya wabo, ku mpamvu zitandukanye, ariko ari ukwemeranya—uko byagenda kose. Bafarisayo bavugaga ko bashyigikiye amategeko, ariko ntibayakurikize, nk’uko bimeze ku ba-Repubulikani. Bafarisayo bavugaga ko bashyigikiye itegeko ry’umwimerere ry’Imana, ariko bagasobanura iryo tegeko banyuze mu mitekerereze yabo bwite irangwa n’ivangura. Itegeko ry’umwimerere ku Bafarisayo ni ryo Itegeko Nshinga ku ba-Repubulikani, ari ryo Tegeko Nshinga nyir’izina bavuga ko bashyigikiye, nyamara ntibarishyigikire. Basadukayo banze imbaraga z’Imana, kandi nubwo bari itsinda rito kurusha Bafarisayo, Basadukayo ni bo bagenzuraga imiterere y’idini n’iya politiki bya Yudaya mu gihe cya Kristo. Abademokarate ni itsinda rito kurusha aba-Repubulikani, rito cyane ku buryo bagomba kunyereza amatora kugira ngo bakomeze kuguma ku butegetsi, kandi koko baguma ku butegetsi, kuko abo bahanganye na bo bavuga ko bashyigikiye ubutabera bungana kuri bose, ariko ntibagire icyo bakora ngo bashyire mu bikorwa amahame y’amategeko bavuga ko bashyigikiye.

There is nothing new under the sun, and the two political parties in the United States are as much a part of the prophetic landscape as were the Pharisees and Sadducees. There are of course many other parallels along this prophetic line, but it is only when you see the prophetic relationship of the two unholy powers, who though adversaries, become united against holiness, that you then see Ptolemy and Uzziah in the proper light. Both southern kings attempted to sacrifice at the same temple, but Ptolemy, from Egypt represents a dragon power—the Democrats. Uzziah, as king of Judea is the leader of the glorious land, who is apostate Protestantism, or the false prophet—the Republicans.

Ga nangna adgipa dongja, aro United States-o donggipa gni politika dal’gipa dolrang Farisee aro Sadduceerang gita katchinikgipa drakani bak ong’aha. Bebeko agangenchimode, ia katchinikgipa line-o bang’a gipin melgrikanirangba donga, indiba chongmotan, nang·ni nikna man’aniara ia gni rongtalgijagipa bilrangni katchinikgipa nangrimaniko—chongmotan, uamang bobil ong’oba, rongtalani kosako manderang gita apsan dake saksa ong’ahaon—ong’ani somoion, nang·a Ptolemy aro Uzziah-ko kakket ong’gipa seng·ani gimin nikna man’a. South-ni gni rajarang apsan torom nok-o boli on·na jotton ka·aha, indiba Egypt-oni ong’gipa Ptolemy drakon bil-ko mesokgipa ong’a—Democrats. Judea-ni raja ong’gipa Uzziah rasong gnanggipa a·songni dilgipa ong’a, jean bortol ong’gipa Protestantism, maiba gualgipa katchinikgipa—Republicans ong’a.

The relationship of the dragon and false prophet is classically represented at Mount Carmel. At the mount, Ahab represented the dragon and Jezebel’s prophets of Baal and Ashtaroth represented the false prophets who stood against Elijah. The beast that is Jezebel was still behind the scenes in Samaria. The dragon united with the false prophet was also represented by pagan Rome and the Jews unification at the cross, as will be the unification of the Democrats and the Republicans at the Sunday law. The elements of a united power are represented by the Democrats and Republicans within the Republican horn of the earth beast. Those two unholy political powers are represented by Cain, and the line of Abel also possesses a twofold division.

Kamqhemanuka phakathi kukadrako nomprofethi wamanga kumelwe ngendlela evamile eNtabeni yaseKarmeli. Entabeni, u-Ahabi wayemele udrako, kanti abaprofethi bakaBhali no-Ashtaroti bakaJezebeli babemele abaprofethi bamanga abema ngokumelene no-Eliya. Isilo esinguJezebeli sasisesezinsizeni ezingemuva eSamariya. Udrako ehlanganiswe nomprofethi wamanga waphinde wamela ubuRoma bobuqaba kanye nokuhlangana kwamaJuda esiphambanweni, njengoba kuyakuba njalo ekuhlanganeni kwamaDemocrats namaRepublicans emthethweni weSonto. Izingxenye zamandla ahlangene zimelwe ngamaDemocrats namaRepublicans ngaphakathi kophondo lweRepublican lwesilo somhlaba. Lawo mandla amabili ezombusazwe angcwele amelelwa nguKhayini, kanti nomugqa ka-Abela nawo unokwehlukaniswa okuphindwe kabili.

Abel’s line, which in relation to Cain’s external line is the internal line, and is represented by two classes of virgins. The progression of the Protestant horn of the earth beast that is the United States is represented by a series of religious purging’s beginning with the church of Sardis in 1798, when the United States became the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Sardis was a church who had a name claiming that it lived, but it was dead. By 1798 the Protestant sects that had broken away from the papal church were already returning to Rome. Christians were first named Christians in Antioch.

Abeli dakota, si Kainda i tadota bawlpuia mi chungchangin dakota a ni a, numei thianghlim pawl pahnihin an entir. United States-a ni Protestant ki sang sakiwa, lei sahrang ki siangtho dan a, sakhaw tihfai khawng hrang hrang hmangin a kal chhoh danin entirin a ni; chu chu 1798-a Sardis kohhran atanga tan a ni, chutih lai chuan United States chu Bible hrilhlawkna rama ram pakhatna rukna a lo ni tawh a. Sardis chu nung nia inti hming nei mah se, thi tawh kohhran a ni. 1798 thleng hian pope kohhran ata an inthen tawh Protestant sect hrang hrangte chu Rom lam pan kir leh tawh an ni. Kristian tih hming chu a hmasa berin Antioch khuaah an koh a ni.

> “It was in Antioch that the disciples were first called Christians. The name was given them because Christ was the main theme of their preaching, their teaching, and their conversation. Continually they were recounting the incidents that had occurred during the days of His earthly ministry, when His disciples were blessed with His personal presence. Untiringly they dwelt upon His teachings and His miracles of healing. With quivering lips and tearful eyes they spoke of His agony in the garden, His betrayal, trial, and execution, the forbearance and humility with which He had endured the contumely and torture imposed upon Him by His enemies, and the Godlike pity with which He had prayed for those who persecuted Him. His resurrection and ascension, and His work in heaven as the Mediator for fallen man, were topics on which they rejoiced to dwell. Well might the heathen call them Christians, since they preached Christ and addressed their prayers to God through Him.

> “Di Antiokhialah murid-murid itu mula-mula disebut orang Kristian. Nama itu diberikan kepada mereka kerana Kristus merupakan tema utama pemberitaan, pengajaran, dan percakapan mereka. Tanpa henti mereka menceritakan kembali peristiwa-peristiwa yang telah berlaku pada zaman pelayanan-Nya di bumi, ketika murid-murid-Nya diberkati dengan kehadiran-Nya secara peribadi. Dengan tidak mengenal jemu mereka mengulas ajaran-ajaran-Nya dan mukjizat-mukjizat penyembuhan-Nya. Dengan bibir yang menggigil dan mata yang berlinang air mata, mereka berbicara tentang penderitaan-Nya di taman, pengkhianatan terhadap-Nya, perbicaraan dan penyaliban-Nya, kesabaran dan kerendahan hati yang dengannya Dia menanggung penghinaan dan penyeksaan yang dikenakan ke atas-Nya oleh musuh-musuh-Nya, serta belas kasihan yang ilahi yang dengannya Dia telah berdoa bagi mereka yang menganiaya-Nya. Kebangkitan dan kenaikan-Nya, serta pekerjaan-Nya di syurga sebagai Pengantara bagi manusia yang telah jatuh, merupakan pokok-pokok pembicaraan yang dengan sukacita mereka perkatakan. Patutlah orang-orang kafir menyebut mereka orang Kristian, kerana mereka memberitakan Kristus dan memanjatkan doa mereka kepada Tuhan melalui Dia.”

> “It was God who gave to them the name of Christian. This is a royal name, given to all who join themselves to Christ. It was of this name that James wrote later, ‘Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats? Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called?’ James 2:6, 7. And Peter declared, ‘If any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf.’ ‘If ye be reproached for the name of Christ, happy are ye; for the spirit of glory and of God resteth upon you.’ 1 Peter 4:16, 14.” Acts of the Apostles, 157.

> “ꯑꯁꯤ ꯀꯔꯤꯒꯤꯅꯣ ꯑꯩꯍꯥꯛꯀꯤ ꯃꯤꯡ ‘ꯈ꯭ꯔꯤꯁꯆꯤꯌꯟ’ ꯄꯤꯕ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯑꯌꯥꯝꯕ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯑꯗꯣꯝꯒꯤ ꯃꯤꯡ ꯑꯅꯤꯡꯕ ꯑꯃꯅꯤ। ꯃꯤꯡ ꯑꯁꯤ ꯔꯥꯖꯥꯒꯤ ꯃꯤꯡ ꯑꯃꯅꯤ, ꯈ꯭ꯔꯤꯁꯠꯇꯒꯤ ꯃꯃꯥꯡꯗ ꯑꯄꯨꯟꯕ ꯃꯤ ꯄꯨꯝꯅꯃꯛꯇ ꯄꯤꯕ ꯑꯃꯅꯤ। ꯖꯦꯝꯁꯅ ꯃꯇꯝ ꯃꯇꯨꯡꯗ ꯃꯤꯡ ꯑꯁꯤꯒꯤ ꯃꯇꯨꯡꯗ ꯑꯁꯨꯝꯅ ꯏꯕꯤ, ‘ꯃꯄꯣꯠ ꯑꯃꯒꯤ ꯃꯤꯁꯤꯡꯅ ꯑꯗꯣꯝꯕꯨ ꯅꯣꯡꯉꯧꯕ ꯇꯧꯕ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯍꯟꯗꯣꯛꯂꯒ ꯑꯗꯣꯝꯕꯨ ꯅ꯭ꯌꯥꯌꯒꯤ ꯐꯝꯁꯪꯒꯤ ꯃꯃꯥꯡꯗ ꯄꯨꯔꯛꯂꯤ ꯍꯥꯏꯅ ꯅꯠꯇꯕꯔꯥ? ꯑꯅꯤꯡꯕ ꯑꯗꯣꯝꯅ ꯀꯧꯕ ꯑꯔꯥꯟꯕ ꯃꯤꯡ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯃꯥꯡꯍꯜꯂꯤ ꯍꯥꯏꯅ ꯅꯠꯇꯕꯔꯥ?’ James 2:6, 7. ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯄꯤꯇꯔꯅ ꯑꯁꯨꯝꯅ ꯍꯥꯏꯈꯤ, ‘ꯀꯅꯥꯒꯨꯝꯕ ꯃꯤ ꯈ꯭ꯔꯤꯁꯆꯤꯌꯟ ꯑꯃ ꯑꯣꯏꯅ ꯑꯥꯔꯨꯕ ꯐꯪꯂꯕꯗꯤ, ꯃꯍꯥꯛ ꯌꯥꯔꯣꯏꯗꯕꯅꯤ; ꯑꯗꯨꯕꯨ ꯃꯍꯥꯛꯅ ꯃꯇꯝ ꯑꯁꯤꯒꯤ ꯃꯇꯨꯡꯗ ꯏꯁ꯭ꯋꯔꯕꯨ ꯃꯄꯨꯡ ꯐꯥꯎꯕ ꯇꯧꯒꯅꯤ।’ ‘ꯑꯗꯣꯝ ꯈ꯭ꯔꯤꯁꯠꯀꯤ ꯃꯤꯡꯒꯤ ꯃꯇꯨꯡꯗ ꯔꯥꯛꯂꯕ ꯇꯧꯔꯕꯗꯤ, ꯑꯗꯣꯝ ꯑꯣꯏꯕ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯕꯅꯤ; ꯃꯔꯝꯗꯤ ꯃꯄꯨꯡ ꯐꯥꯎꯕꯒꯤ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯏꯁ꯭ꯋꯔꯒꯤ ꯊꯧꯋꯥꯏ ꯑꯗꯣꯝꯒꯤ ꯃꯊꯛꯇ ꯂꯩꯔꯤ।’ 1 Peter 4:16, 14.” Acts of the Apostles, 157.

The church of Ephesus was given the name of Christian which led to the persecuted church of Smyrna, that was followed by the church of compromise in the history of Pergamos. When the papacy took the throne, a separation identified God’s true church as the church in the wilderness. The Roman church was Thyatira. At the ending of the wilderness of twelve hundred and sixty years, the church of Protestantism arose, and from that point onward the Protestant horn is represented by a divine series of tests and purges.

Baroi Ephesus la a pe adin Kristianih, a thinlung in kohhran tihduhdahna nei Smyrna kohhran lo awm a; chu chu Pergamos chanchina inremna kohhran lo zui ta. Pope lalṭhutphah a chang khan, thenkhatna pakhatin Pathian kohhran dik chu ramthlaléra kohhran anga a hriat chhuah a. Rome kohhran chu Thyatira a ni. Ramthlaléra kum sang khat leh za ruk sawmruk chhung a tawpah, Protestantism kohhran chu a lo ding chhuak a; chu hnuah chuan Protestant ki chu fiahna leh tihthianghlima Pathian ruahman inthlâna a entîr ta a ni.

Protestantism began when Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses upon the door in 1517, and “23” years later in 1540 the Jesuit order began. In 2013 the 95th and final presentation of Habakkuk’s Tables was nailed to the door, and on March 13, 2013¸ the first Jesuit pope was inaugurated. Martin Luther was excommunicated in that very history by pope Leo. Go figure…

Protestantisme bèrèngan semasa Martin Luther memaku 95 tesisnya pada pintu pada tahun 1517, dan “23” tahun kemudian pada tahun 1540, ordo Jesuit pun bermula. Pada tahun 2013, pembentangan ke-95 dan yang terakhir bagi Jadual-jadual Habakuk telah dipakukan pada pintu, dan pada 13 Mac 2013, paus Jesuit yang pertama telah ditabalkan. Martin Luther telah dikucilkan dalam sejarah yang sama itu oleh Paus Leo. Fikirkanlah sendiri…

In 1798 the church of Sardis claimed to hold to the name of “Protestant,” but by returning to Rome they were already failing to uphold their name. When Millerite Adventism took the torch of Protestantism in 1844, they represented a rebuke against Jeroboam the first king of Israel, a nation who were blood relatives of the tribe in Judah, where God had placed His temple. Jeroboam set up a counterfeit, based upon the religion that represented his nation’s former bondage. He repeated Aaron’s foundational rebellion of erecting an image of a beast with all the prophetic significance associated with the story. But at his dedication service Millerite Adventism rebuked his unwillingness to continue to direct true worship to the sanctuary where God lives. Jeroboam, wanted the focus of worship to be in Bethel and Dan, representing those from Sardis in 1844 who refused to follow Christ into the Most Holy Place.

Ndzi lembe ra 1798 kereke ya Sarda yi vule leswaku yi khomile vito ra “Protestant,” kambe hi ku tlhelela eRoma a se yi sungula ku tsandzeka ku seketela vito ra yona. Loko Adventism ya vaMillerite yi teka rivoni ra Protestantism hi 1844, yi yimelerile ku tshinya Yerobuwama hosi yo sungula ya Israele, tiko leri a ri ri maxaka ya ngati ya nyimba ya Yuda, laha Xikwembu a xi vekeke tempele ya xona. Yerobuwama u simeke nchumu wa vuxisi, lowu a wu sekeriwe eka vukhongeri lebyi a byi yimela vuhlonga bya khale bya tiko ra yena. U phindhile vukanganyisi bya masungulo bya Aroni byo aka xifaniso xa xivandzana, lebyi a byi rhwale nkoka hinkwawo wa vuprofeta lowu fambelanaka ni mhaka yoleyo. Kambe enkarhini wa nkhuvo wa yena wa ku nyiketeriwa, Adventism ya vaMillerite yi n’wi tshinyile hikwalaho ka ku ala ka yena ku ya emahlweni a kongomisa vukhongeri bya ntiyiso eswikwameni laha Xikwembu xi tshamaka kona. Yerobuwama a lava leswaku nkoka wa vukhongeri wu va eBethele na le Dani, leswi a swi yimela lava humaka eSarda hi 1844 lava aleke ku landzela Kreste ku nghena eNdhawini yo Kwetsima swinene.

Millerite Adventism chose to return to the religion of Rome, and took up the very doctrinal arguments of those who had just been exposed as false prophets through their rejection of Miller’s message; as their theological masters in order to justify their rejection of the prophetic message of the seven times. Millerite Adventism, as with the disobedient prophet chose their own path, instead of following God’s direction. The path that is chosen by the foolish in all the tests and purges of the wise and foolish virgins from the Protestant reformation onward in prophetic history is the path which returns to the worship of the land that you were delivered from, and as they say, “all roads lead to Rome.” All roads except Jeremiah’s old paths.

បានជ្រើសរើសត្រឡប់ទៅកាន់សាសនានៃរ៉ូម ហើយទទួលយកយ៉ាងពិតប្រាកដនូវអំណះអំណាងខាងគោលលទ្ធិរបស់អ្នកទាំងឡាយដែលទើបត្រូវបានបង្ហាញថាជាព្យាការីក្លែងក្លាយ ដោយសារការបដិសេធសាររបស់ Miller ជាគ្រូខាងទេវវិទ្យារបស់ខ្លួន ដើម្បីបង្ហាញថាការបដិសេធសារព្យាករណ៍អំពី «ប្រាំពីរដង» របស់ពួកគេមានមូលហេតុត្រឹមត្រូវ។ Millerite Adventism ដូចជាព្យាការីមិនស្តាប់បង្គាប់ បានជ្រើសរើសផ្លូវរបស់ខ្លួនឯង ជំនួសឲ្យការដើរតាមការណែនាំរបស់ព្រះ។ ផ្លូវដែលមនុស្សល្ងង់ជ្រើសរើស នៅក្នុងគ្រប់ការសាកល្បង និងការបន្សុទ្ធសម្អាតនៃព្រហ្មចារីមានប្រាជ្ញា និងព្រហ្មចារីល្ងង់ ចាប់តាំងពីការកែទម្រង់ប្រូតេស្តង់តទៅក្នុងប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រព្យាករណ៍ គឺជាផ្លូវដែលត្រឡប់ទៅកាន់ការថ្វាយបង្គំដល់ដែនដីដែលអ្នកត្រូវបានរំដោះចេញពីវា ហើយដូចដែលគេនិយាយថា «ផ្លូវទាំងអស់នាំទៅរ៉ូម»។ លើកលែងតែផ្លូវបុរាណរបស់ Jeremiah។

The Protestant reformation had been typified by Moses’ return to Egypt in order to lead God’s people into the Promised Land. Once out of the land of captivity God purposed to give His chosen people His law. In the line of Moses and the Protestant reformation rebellion was manifested immediately after the deliverance. God tested Sardis, a people who claimed to have a living name, but were dead by the time of the message of William Miller. Two purging’s took place in 1844; the first was the purge of the church of Sardis, who had claimed to be Protestants, but were proven to be dead; and then the Millerite’s were purged in the same year, in fulfillment of the parable of the ten virgins.

Tị́ Ọ̀túnṣe Pírótẹ́sítáǹtì ni a ti fi àpẹẹrẹ hàn nínú ìpadà Mósè sí Íjíbítì láti mú àwọn ènìyàn Ọlọ́run jáde lọ sí Ilẹ̀ Ìlérí. Nígbà tí wọ́n jáde kúrò ní ilẹ̀ ìgbèkùn, Ọlọ́run pinnu láti fi òfin Rẹ̀ fún àwọn ènìyàn àyànfẹ́ tirẹ̀. Nínú ìtòlẹ́sẹẹsẹ Mósè àti Ọ̀túnṣe Pírótẹ́sítáǹtì, ìṣọ̀tẹ̀ hàn gbangba lẹ́sẹ̀kẹsẹ̀ lẹ́yìn ìdásílẹ̀ náà. Ọlọ́run dán Sádísì wò, àwọn ènìyàn tí wọ́n sọ pé wọ́n ní orúkọ alààyè, ṣùgbọ́n tí wọ́n ti kú ní àsìkò ìránṣẹ́ William Miller. Ìwẹ̀nùmọ́ méjì ṣẹlẹ̀ ní 1844; èkínní ni ìwẹ̀nùmọ́ ìjọ Sádísì, tí wọ́n ti pe ara wọn ní Pírótẹ́sítáǹtì, ṣùgbọ́n tí a fi hàn pé wọ́n ti kú; lẹ́yìn náà ni a sì tún wẹ̀nùmọ́ àwọn Míléráítì ní ọdún kan náà, gẹ́gẹ́ bí ìmúṣẹ àpèjúwe àwọn wúńdíá mẹ́wàá.

The Democrats and Republicans represent two political classes that together make up the Republican horn on the earth beast of Revelation thirteen. The wise and foolish virgins are two religious classes that together make up the Protestant horn on the earth beast. The wise virgins possess the first name given at Antioch. The wise virgins are Christians, but they are also Philadelphians who have the promise of receiving a name.

Demokrat engga Republicanrang minggipin skanggni political classrang ong·a, jeanrang together ong·e Para. 13-o sea beast-ni a·ao beast-o donggipa Republican horn-ko dakaha. Wise virgins aro foolish virgins minggiparang minggipin religious classrang ong·a, jeanrang together ong·e earth beast-o donggipa Protestant horn-ko dakaha. Wise virgins-rang Antioch-o skanggipa on·gimin bimungko man·gipa ong·a. Wise virgins-rang Christians ong·a, indiba uamang Philadelphians-aba ong·a, jeanrang bimung man·na ku·rachakgiminrang ong·a.

> Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name. Revelation 3:12.

> Ea fenyang hlwang chuak mi cu ka Pathian biakinn ah an tung a si ding i, cui ah cun a chuak cang lai lo ding: cun amah cungah ka Pathian hmin le ka Pathian khua hmin, a thar Jerusalem, ka Pathian hnen ih van ihsin a rung tum mi, le ka hmin thar ka ngan ding. Thuphuan 3:12.

The first time God named His people Christian was at Antioch, and the history where the Laodicean movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand changes unto the Philadelphian movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand is also the history of Antiochus the Great, who the city of Antioch is named after, and who is represented at the end of a 250-year period between the battles of Raphia and Panium.

Kali pertama Allah menamai umat-Nya sebagai Kristian adalah di Antiokhia, dan sejarah ketika pergerakan Laodikia bagi seratus empat puluh empat ribu berubah menjadi pergerakan Filadelfia bagi seratus empat puluh empat ribu juga merupakan sejarah Antiokhus Agung, yang daripadanya kota Antiokhia dinamakan, dan yang digambarkan pada penghujung suatu tempoh 250 tahun antara peperangan Rafia dan Panium.

We will continue these things in the next article.

Дараагийн өгүүлэлд бид эдгээрийг үргэлжлүүлэн авч үзнэ.

Back to Articles