Article

# The Book of Daniel - Number One-Hundred and Seventy-Three

Kitaaba Daani’el — Lakkoofsa Dhibba Tokko fi Torbaatamii Sadii

The Papal Shadows: Unveiling the Influence and Intentions Behind “Hitler’s Pope”

ପାପୀୟ ଛାୟାମାନ: “ହିଟଲରଙ୍କ ପୋପ” ପଛରେ ଥିବା ପ୍ରଭାବ ଏବଂ ଉଦ୍ଦେଶ୍ୟମାନଙ୍କର ଉନ୍ମୋଚନ

Author

Jeff Pippenger

Published

April 3, 2024

Formats

PDF
Word
Song MP3

In the book titled, Hitler’s Pope, the author John Cornwell starts the story of the future pope who reigned when Hitler ruled Germany, with his grandfather and Pope Pius IX, who were driven out of the City of Rome. When Pius IX fled from the city of Rome, disguised as a nun, the only man he took with him was the future pope’s grandfather. Cornwall addresses the close relationship of the two men, and thereafter identifies how the future pope’s father also was connected with the power center of the Catholic Church. In doing so he identifies the social, political and religious environment of the history from the time of Pius IX, through World War II. The overview of history is tremendously informative.

Macaafni mata duree *Hitler’s Pope* jedhu keessatti, barreessaan John Cornwell seenaa phaaphaasii gara fuulduraatti ta’ee yeroo Hitler Jarmanii bulchaa turetti mootummaa isaa geggeesse sanaa, akaakayyuu isaa fi Phaaphaasii Pius IX, kanneen Magaalaa Roomaa keessaa ari’amanii turan irraa jalqaba. Yommuu Pius IX uffata dubartii waaqeffattuu fakkaatuun of dhoksee Magaalaa Roomaa keessaa baqate, namni inni of wajjin geesse tokko qofa akaakayyuu phaaphaasii gara fuulduraatti ta’u sana ture. Cornwell hariiroo dhiigaa miti garuu baay’ee dhihoo ta’e namoota lamaan sanaa ilaala, achiis abbaan phaaphaasii gara fuulduraatti ta’u sunis akkamitti giddugala aangoo Waldaa Katoolikaa wajjin walitti hidhata akka qabu ibsa. Akkas gochuudhaan, yeroo Pius IX irraa jalqabee hanga Lola Addunyaa Lammaffaatti seenaa keessatti haala hawaasummaa, siyaasaa fi amantii ture adda baasa. Ilaalchi waliigalaa seenaa kanaa odeeffannoo baay’ee guddaa of keessaa qaba.

> “Another step in papal assumption was taken, when, in the eleventh century, Pope Gregory VII proclaimed the perfection of the Roman Church. Among the propositions which he put forth was one declaring that the church had never erred, nor would it ever err, according to the Scriptures. But the Scripture proofs did not accompany the assertion. The proud pontiff also claimed the power to depose emperors, and declared that no sentence which he pronounced could be reversed by anyone, but that it was his prerogative to reverse the decisions of all others.

> “Tarkaanfatamni mootummaa paaphaasummaa keessatti tarkaanfiin biraan kan fudhatame, yeroo jaarraa kudha tokkaffaatti, Phaaphaasiin Gireegoorii VII guutummaa Waldaa Roomaa labsutti ture. Ibsaalee inni dhiheesse keessaa tokko, akka Macaafa Qulqulluutti waldaan sun matumaa dogoggoree hin beekne, gara fuulduraattis matumaa hin dogoggortu kan jedhu ture. Garuu ragaan Macaafa Qulqulluu ibsa sana deeggaru himaticha wajjin hin dhihaanne. Phaaphaasiin oftuulaan sun mootummaa mootota mootummaa irraa buusuuf aangoo qaba jechuunis ofii isaa himate; murtiin inni labse kamiyyuu eenyuun iyyuu diigamuu hin danda’u, garuu murtii warra kaanii hundumaa diiguun mirga isaa addaa ta’uu isaa labse.”

> “A striking illustration of the tyrannical character of this advocate of infallibility was given in his treatment of the German emperor, Henry IV. For presuming to disregard the pope’s authority, this monarch was declared to be excommunicated and dethroned. Terrified by the desertion and threats of his own princes, who were encouraged in rebellion against him by the papal mandate, Henry felt the necessity of making his peace with Rome. In company with his wife and a faithful servant he crossed the Alps in midwinter, that he might humble himself before the pope. Upon reaching the castle whither Gregory had withdrawn, he was conducted, without his guards, into an outer court, and there, in the severe cold of winter, with uncovered head and naked feet, and in a miserable dress, he awaited the pope’s permission to come into his presence. Not until he had continued three days fasting and making confession, did the pontiff condescend to grant him pardon. Even then it was only upon condition that the emperor should await the sanction of the pope before resuming the insignia or exercising the power of royalty. And Gregory, elated with his triumph, boasted that it was his duty to pull down the pride of kings.” The Great Controversy, 57.

> “Fakkeenyi nama cunqursaa kan nama dogoggora hin qabne jedhamee of waamsu kanaa keessaa fakkeenyi ifaan mul’isu tokko akka inni mootummaa Jarmanii, Henrii IV, ittiin qabe keessatti kennameera. Sababii aangoo paappaasii tuffachuuf of eeggannoo malee ija jabinaan ka’eef, mootichi kun waldaa irraa ariʼatamee fi mootummaa irraa buqqaʼe jedhamee labsame. Henriin, sababii ajajni paappaasii isaan isa irratti fincilsiisuun jajjabeesseef, abbootiin mootummaa isaa of irraa fagaatanii fi isa doorsisaa turanitti sodaatee, Roomaa wajjin araara buusuun isaaf barbaachisaa akka taʼe ni hubate. Innis haadha manaa isaa fi tajaajilaa amanamaa tokko wajjin taʼee, of paappaa duratti gad of deebisuuf jecha, yeroo gannaa giddugaleessaa keessatti Alpoota ceʼe. Yommuu inni masaraa Gregorii itti of qubate gaʼetti, eegdotasaarra adda baafamee gara dallaa alaa tokkootti geeffame; achittis, qorra cimaa yeroo gannaa keessatti, mataa qullaa fi miila qullaa, uffata gadadoodhaan uffatee, eeyyama paappaan gara fuula isaa akka dhufuuf kennu eeggachaa ture. Hanga guyyaa sadii soomanaa fi cubbuu isaa himachaa itti fufetti, bulchaan olaanaan sun isaaf araara kennuuf gad of hin qabne. Yeroo sanattis, araarri sun haala tokko qofaan kenname; jechuunis, mootichi mallattoolee mootummaa irra deebiʼee uffachuu yookaan aangoo mootummaa hojjetuudhaaf dura hayyama paappaasii akka eeggatu irratti. Gregoriinis, moʼicha isaa kanaan ol kaʼee gammadee, of tuulummaan mootota gadi buusuun hojii isaa akka taʼe ni boone.” The Great Controversy, 57.

Gregory VII was an “advocate of infallibility,” but the ridiculous claim was not made an official doctrine (dogma), until Pius IX, who made the foolish claim an established doctrine at the first Vatican Council. The doctrine was passed July 18, 1870, one hundred and fifty years to the day before the first disappointment of the one hundred and forty-four thousand.

Gregory VII “deggertuu dogoggoraa kan hin dogoggorre jedhuuf falmaa kan ture” ture; garuu himanni qoosaa sun hanga Pius IXtti, isa himannaa gowwummaa sana Walga’ii Vaatikaanii Tokkoffaatti barsiisa mootummaa amantii (dogmaa) dhaabate taasiseetti, akka dogmaa mootummaa amantiitti hin taasifamne. Barsiisni sun Adoolessa 18, 1870 irratti darbe; kun guyyaa sanatti waggaa dhibba tokkoo fi shantama dura abdii kutannaa jalqabaa namoota kuma dhibba afurtamii afur ta’aniif ta’e ture.

What is informative about the history is that when Pius IX organized the first Vatican Council, and implemented his doctrine of infallibility, his motivation was brought about by his hatred of what was called “modernism.” It was not rooted in the idea that a pope could make no errors when defining biblical doctrines, it was a defense of the papal opposition to the influence that had been produced by the French Revolution. It was directed against what would ultimately be known as Communism.

Wanti seenaa kanaa ifa taasisu keessaa tokko, yeroo Piyus IX Gumii Vaatikaanii Isa Duraa qindeessee, barsiisa isaa kan dogoggora irraa bilisa ta’uu hojii irra oolchetti, kaka’umsi isaa jibba inni “moodarnizimii” jedhamuun waamamu irratti qabu irraa madde. Inni yaada paappasiin tokko yeroo barsiisa macaafa qulqulluu hiiku dogoggora tokko illee gochuu hin danda’u jedhu irratti hundaa’ee hin turre; kun ittisa mormii aangoo paappaasummaa dhiibbaa Warraaqsa Faransaayiin uume irratti qabu ture. Innis waan dhuma irratti Koomunizimii jedhamee beekamu irratti qajeelfame ture.

The French Revolution brought about an upheaval in the ruling structure of European nations, with a particular hatred for the monarchy that is the papacy. It was an Italian Republican revolt that had temporarily driven Pius IX, and his right-hand man out of Rome. The “modernism,” that was represented by the various philosophies that were produced by the French Revolution was Pius IX’s, arch enemy, and his doctrine of infallibility was designed to sustain every claim that the pope made against the modernists ideas that were produced by the French Revolution.

Warri Faransaayii sirna mootummaa biyyoota Awurooppaa keessatti jeequmsa guddaa fide; keessumaa immoo mootummaa abbaa-irree kan papasummaa irratti jibba addaa agarsiise. Fincilli Republiikaanota Xaaliyaanii tokko Piyus IX fi nama harka mirgaa isaa taʼe yeroo muraasaaf Roomaa keessaa ariʼee ture. “Mooḍarniizimiin” jechuun falsafawwan adda addaa Kacaasa Faransaayiin oomishaman kanneen bakka buʼan sun diina isaa isa guddaa Piyus IX ture; barsiifanni isaa waaʼee dogoggorri hin jirre jedhu immoo yaada mooḍarniistotaa Kacaasa Faransaayiin oomishaman irratti mormii phaaphaasiin dhiyeessu kamiyyuu jabeessee dhaabuuf qophaaʼee ture.

Daniel chapter eleven, verse forty identifies that in 1798, the king of the south (atheistic France), delivered the deadly wound to the king of the north (the papacy).

Daani'el boqonnaa kudha tokko, lakkoofsa afurtama keessatti bara 1798tti mootichi kibbaa (Faransaayiin amantii Waaqayyoo hin qabne) mooticha kaabaa (Phaaphaasummaa) madeessuu du'aa fide san itti kenne jedhee ibsa.

Pius IX’s doctrine of infallibility was connected with the war represented by verse forty of Daniel eleven, and from the latter part of 1869 to the following year Pius IX called together the first Vatican Council, known as Vatican 1, for the purpose of confirming that the pope was the head of Catholicism, and that Catholicism was the head of all the churches, as had been proclaimed by Justinian’s decree in the year 533.

Barsiis dogma Pius IX waa waraana lakkoofsa afurtama keessatti Daaniyael boqonnaa kudha tokkoon bakka buufame waliin walqabatee ture; akkasumas dhuma bara 1869 irraa jalqabee hanga bara itti aanuutti Pius IX Gumii Vaatiikaanii Tokkoffaa, kan Vatican 1 jedhamuun beekamu, walitti waame; kaayyoon isaas paappaan mataa Kaatolikiitti akka taʼe, Kaatolikiinis akkuma labsii Justinian bara 533 keessatti labsameen waldoota kiristaanaa hundumaa irratti mataa akka taʼe mirkaneessuu ture.

The Second Vatican Council, also known as Vatican II, was held from 1962 to 1965. It was a landmark event in the history of the Catholic Church, and one of the most significant ecumenical councils in modern times. The council convened under the leadership of Pope John XXIII and continued during the pontificate of Pope Paul VI after John XXIII’s death in 1963. It is important to recognize the distinct difference between these two councils.

Manni Walgahii Vaatikaan lammaffaan, kan Vaatikaan II jedhamuunis beekamu, bara 1962 irraa kaasee hanga 1965tti gaggeeffame. Inni seenaa Waldaa Kaatolikii keessatti taatee guddaa mallattoo ta’e, akkasumas yeroo ammayyaa keessatti maddiiwwan waldaa waliigalaa isa keessaa baay’ee barbaachisoo ta’an keessaa tokko ture. Manni Walgahichaa hoggansa Phaaphaasii Yohaannis XXIII jalatti walitti qabamee, erga Yohaannis XXIII bara 1963 keessatti du’ee booddee mootummaa phaaphaasummaa Phaaphaasii Phaawulos VI jalattis itti fufe. Garaagarummaa adda ta’e kan maddiiwwan lamaan kana gidduu jiru beekuun barbaachisaa dha.

The first council was to establish what is called the “primacy,” of the pope, meaning that the pope is the supreme ruler, teacher and shepherd of the Church, responsible for preserving and interpreting the doctrines of faith. His authority consisted in defining dogmas, issuing doctrinal decrees, and making authoritative pronouncements on matters of faith and morals, known as papal infallibility. It includes the pope’s jurisdictional authority over the universal church, including the power to appoint bishops, regulate the sacraments, and govern the church’s administration.

Golgiin duraad khaltmaa ulamjlaltai “dood erh” gej nerlegddeg zuiliig тогтоох зорилготой baiv. Ene ni, pap khun bol Itgeliin surgaaliig хадгалж, tailbarlan togtooh uuregtei, Chuulganiin deed zakhiragch, bagsh, malchin mun gesen utgatai. Tüünii erh medel ni dogm togtooh, surgaaliin zarlig gargah, itgel ba yos surtahuunii asuudlaar erkh medeltei medegdel hiih yavdald orshij baidag bögööd üüniig papiin endeshgüi baidal гэж нэрлэдэг. Ene ni niitiin Chuulgan deer papiin харьяалах эрх мэдлийг, tüünchlen бишopuudyg tomiloh, sakramentuudiig zohitsuulah, Chuulganiin захиргааг удирдах эрхийг багтаadag.

The second council was to redirect the church into an ecumenical entity. The councils were directly opposite propositions. The conservative first council was contradicted by the liberal second council. Those two factions were as different as night and day, and the prophecy that is attributed to the three secrets of Fatima identify an internal war fitly represented by these two councils.

Manni lammaffaan lammaffaa waldaa amantootaa qaama ekumeenikaalawaa ta’e keessa deebisuuf ture. Lammileen sun yaada isaanii keessatti kallattiidhaan walfaallaa turan. Lammanni jalqabaa kan sirna eegsisaa ture, lammataadhaan kan bilisa ba’ummaa deeggaru sanaan mormame. Gareewwan lamaan sun akkuma halkanii fi guyyaa adda adda turan; raajii iccitiiwwan Fatimaa sadanitti ramadame immoo waraana keessaa kan lammilee lamaan kanaan sirriitti bakka buufame adda baasa.

The prophecy identifies a class who uphold the primacy represented by Pius IX as being represented by what is either called the “white pope,” the “good pope,” or the “good bishop”, and the other class, associated with Vatican II, are represented by the “black pope,” or the “bad pope,” or the “bad bishop.” The controversy of the two political concepts is represented when you visit the shrine of the miracle of Fatima, in Fatima, Portugal. When entering, the walkway is set between a statue of a black pope on one side, and a white pope on the other side.

Raajii kun garee angafummaa Phaawus IX’n bakka buʼame ol kaasu, isa “phaaphaasii adii,” yookaan “phaaphaasii gaarii,” yookaan “episkooppii gaarii” jedhamee waamamuun bakka buʼame akka taʼe adda baasa; gareen biraa immoo, kan Vaatican II wajjin walqabatu, “phaaphaasii gurraachaa,” yookaan “phaaphaasii hamaa,” yookaan “episkooppii hamaa” jechuun bakka buʼama. Falmiin yaad-rimeewwan mootummaa lamaanii yeroo ati gara iddoo qulqulluu dinqii Faatimaa, Faatimaa, Poorchugaal daawwattu keessatti bakka buʼamee mulʼata. Yeroo seentu, karaa miilaan itti seename sun gama tokkoon siidaa phaaphaasii gurraachaa, gama biraatiin immoo phaaphaasii adii gidduutti qophaaʼeera.

It therefore becomes part of the heritage of the man that would ultimately become what the book identifies as Hitler’s pope, that his roots are entwined in the struggle between modernism (the king of the south), and papal primacy (the king of the north).

Kanaaf, inni kun dhaala nama dhuma irratti kitaabichi “phaaphaasii Hitiler” jedhee ibsu ta’uuf deemu keessaa tokko ta’a; jechuunis, bu’uurri isaa walitti hidhamuun qabsoo ammayyummaa (mooticha kibbaa) fi ol’aantummaa phaaphaasii (mooticha kaabaa) gidduutti geggeeffamu keessa jira.

It is to be understood that the author of the book we are considering was a Catholic of good standing, and his stated purpose for writing the book was to shed light upon the claim that the pope that reigned during World War 2 had supported Hitler, the Nazi’s or had any culpability in the holocaust against the Jews, and others. When Cornwell addresses Pius XII’s grandfather, who was the right-hand man that ordained the Vatican 1 council, the history of the struggle between the kings of the south and north is being acted out in that very history. When the “Republicanism” revolution reached Italy, for about a year, the Italians drove Pius IX out of the city of Rome, and from then on, even after he returned, all the papacy has ever owned was the one hundred and ten acres, known as Vatican City.

Barreeffamni kita ilaalu, barreessaan kitaaba nuti ilaallu kun Katoolikii maqaa gaarii qabu ture; kaayyoon isaa inni ifatti ibses immoo, paappaasii yeroo Waraana Addunyaa 2ffaa bulchaa ture Hitleriin, Naazotaatiin deggarameera, yookaan xureeffamuu guddaa Yihudootaa fi kanneen biroo irratti raawwatame keessatti yakka itti gaafatamummaa kamiyyuu qaba jechuun dhiyaate irratti ifa kaa’uuf ture. Yommuu Cornwell abbaa akaakayyuu Pius XII, namicha harka mirgaa ta’ee Gumii Vaatican 1ffaa hundeesse sana ilaallatutti dubbatu, seenaa wal’aansoo mootota kibbaa fi kaabaa gidduu jiru sun keessatti seenaa sana keessatti hojii irra oolaa jira. Yommuu warri “Republicanism” jedhamu fincila isaanii Xaaliyaan ga’aniitti, waggaa tokkoo yeroo ta’eef, Xaaliyaanonni Pius IX magaalaa Roomaa keessaa ari’an; yeroo sanaa jalqabee immoo, inni deebi’ee boodallee, wanti paappaasonni yeroo hunda qabatan lafa ekaara dhibba tokkoo fi kudhan qofa, kan Vatican City jedhamuun beekamu ture.

The only way he was even able to return to the Vatican is with the help of French troops, and a loan from the Rothschilds, the infamous Jewish bankers. To intelligently understand the papal complicity in the holocaust during World War II, requires some basic understanding of Europe’s attitude towards the Jews since the crucifixion of Christ. The book suggests that antisemitism and racism are two different attitudes, claiming Hitler’s hatred of the Jews was racist, for Hitler viewed the Jews as a lesser category of human beings, whereas antisemitism was the hatred of the Jews because they killed God. Whether they are one and the same, or there is actually a distinction between the two, the reality of the plight of the Jews is worth understanding.

Karaan inni gara Vaatiiqaanitti deebiʼuu dandaʼe tokkicha illee gargaarsa loltoota Faransaayii fi liqii Rothschildoota irraa argameen, baankota Yihudootaa maqaa hamaa qaban sanaan ture. Yeroo waraana addunyaa lammaffaa keessa hirmaannaa Phaaphaasummaa keessatti Holokaastii sirriitti hubachuuf, erga Kiristoos fannifamee booddee ilaalchi Awurooppaan Yihudoota irratti qabdu buʼuuraa tokko tokko hubachuun barbaachisaa dha. Kitaabni kun mormii Yihudootaa fi sanyii irratti jibbiinsi ilaalcha lama adda taʼan akka taʼan ni ibsa; jibbiinsi Hitilaar Yihudoota irratti qabus kan sanyummaa irratti hundaaʼe ture, sababiin isaas Hitilaar Yihudoota akka garee namaa gadi aanaa taʼetti ilaala ture; yeroo mormiin Yihudootaa immoo Yihudoonni Waaqayyoon ajjeesan jedhuun isaan jibbuudha. Isaan tokkoo fi isuma tokko taʼan iyyuu taʼan, yookaan dhuguma isaanii lamaan gidduutti garaagarummaan jiraatu iyyuu jiraatu, dhugaan haala rakkina Yihudootaa hubatamuu malu dha.

For instance, in America today if the word “ghetto,” is used most think it is the definition of the poor, run down side of town. But the term “ghetto,” originally referred to a section of a city, especially in Venice, Italy, where Jews were compelled to live during the Middle Ages. The first ghetto was established in Venice in 1516, when the Venetian Republic confined Jews to a designated area of the city known as the “geto nuovo” (new foundry), which eventually became known as the ghetto.

Fakkeenyaaf, Ameerikaa keessatti yeroo ammaatti yoo jedhuun “ghetto” fayyadaman, namoonni baay’een hiika isaa akka kutaa magaalaa hiyyeessaa fi diigamaa ta’etti yaadu. Garuu jechi “ghetto” jedhu jalqabatti kutaa magaalaa tokkoo, addumaanis Venice, Xaaliyaanii keessatti, bakka Yihuudoonni bara Giddugaleessaa keessa akka jiraatan dirqisiifaman agarsiisa ture. Ghettoon jalqabaa Venice keessatti bara 1516 hundeeffame; yeroo mootummaa Veeneeshiyaan Yihuudoota kutaa magaalichaa addaan murtaa’e tokko keessatti, kan “geto nuovo” (warshaa haaraa) jedhamuun beekamu keessatti qubachiise; kunis dhuma irratti ghetto jedhamuun beekame.

In Europe through the Middle Ages, Jews were restricted as to where they could live, and also the professions they were allowed to practice. The restrictions were based upon the old definition of antisemitism, which referred to the belief that the Jews had killed God, and that all of their subsequent problems had been brought upon themselves through their own actions.

Awurooppaa keessatti yeroo Giddugaleessa keessa, Yihudoonni bakka isaan jiraachuu dandaʼan irratti daangeffamoo turan; akkasumas hojiiwwan ogummaa isaan hojjechuu dandeessan irrattis daangeffamni irra ture. Daangeffamoonni sun hiika durii anti-Semitisimii irratti hundaaʼanii turan; innis amantii Yihudoonni Waaqayyoon ajjeesan jedhu, akkasumas rakkooleen isaanii itti aansuun dhufan hundinuu hojii ofii isaanii irraa akka isaanitti dhufan jedhu agarsiisa.

In the Middle Ages, it was an established tradition that Christians could not lend money or accept interest for a loan. The Jews were exempt from that restriction, and lending money became one of the professions that Jews were allowed to perform. The Jewish bankers, such as the Rothschild family, were the money changers in response to legal restrictions against what professions they were allowed to perform. When Pius IX needed funds to return to the Vatican, the frustration of no longer ruling the city of Rome was magnified by his need to reach out to the Jews for money.

Yeroo Giddugaleessaa keessatti, Kiristaanonni maallaqa liqeessuu yookaan liqii irratti dhalaa fudhachuu hin dandeenye jechuun duudhaan dhaabbataa ture. Yihudoonni uggura sana irraa bilisa turan; kanaafis maallaqa liqeessuun hojiiwwan Yihudoonni hojjechuu akka danda’an keessaa tokko taʼe. Baankiiwwan Yihudootaa, akka maatii Rothschild fakkaatan, daangeffamoota seeraa hojiiwwan isaan raawwachuu akka danda’an irratti kaaʼaman irraa kan kaʼe, warra maallaqa jijjiiran taʼan. Pius IX gara Vaatikaanitti deebiʼuuf yeroo maallaqa barbaade, aariin isaa magaalaa Roomaa irratti mootummaa gochuu dadhabuu isaatiin kaʼe guddate; kunis maallaqa argachuuf gara Yihudootaatti harka diriirsuu isaatiin daran hammaate.

Prior to his being driven out of Rome Pius IX had appeared to be in one of two camps concerning the Jews and the church’s relation to the Jews. The two camps consisted of those who believed the Jews, no matter what happens to them, are simply getting what they deserve, and the other tended to show a little mercy towards the Jews. When Pius IX returned to the Vatican, after being driven out, the mercy he had sometimes manifested prior to his exile was never manifested again. Before his exile he had shut down the ghetto in the city of Rome, and after his return he re-established the ghetto, and began a taxation upon the Jews in order to regroup his financial losses.

Pius IX Roomaa keessaa ariʼamuu isaa dura, Yihudootaa fi walitti dhufeenya waldaa kiristaanaa Yihudoota wajjin qabdu ilaalchisee, gareewwan lama keessaa tokko keessatti argamu fakkaata ture. Gareewwan lamaan keessaa tokko warra, Yihudoonni wanti isaan irra gaʼu kam iyyuu yoo taʼe, salphaatti waan isaan malu argachaa jiru jedhan ture; inni kaan immoo Yihudootaaf gara-laafina xiqqoo agarsiisuu irratti janjeessa ture. Pius IX erga ariʼamee booda gara Vaaticaanitti yeroo deebiʼe, gara-laafinni inni yeroo tokko tokko mootummaa ariʼamuu isaa dura agarsiisaa ture sana deebiʼee matumaa hin mulʼanne. Ariʼamuu isaa dura, magaalaa Roomaa keessatti geettoo cufee ture; erga deebiʼee booddee immoo geettoo sana irra deebiʼee hundeesse, akkasumas kasaaraa maallaqaa isaa walitti deebisuu fi gurmeessuuf Yihudoota irratti gibira kaaʼuu jalqabe.

Pope Pius IX’s right-hand man was Marcantonio Pacelli, the grandfather of Hitler’s pope. He was an attorney that belonged to a special class of attorneys that supported the papacy. His son became part of that same elite class of attorneys, as did his grandson, who would ultimately become Hitler’s pope. After the book runs through the history of Eugenio Pacelli’s grandfather, his father, and his youth and education, it addresses the position that Pacelli took up as he began his work for the papacy. As an attorney, descending from the elite papal attorneys, he was picked to head up a department that specialized in contracts, which are called concords. In 1901 Pacelli was brought into the office of the Papal Secretariat of State.

ପୋପ ପାଇଉସ୍ IXଙ୍କର ଡାହାଣହାତ ମଣିଷ ଥିଲେ ମାର୍କଆଣ୍ଟୋନିଓ ପାଚେଲ୍ଲି, ଯିଏ ହିଟ୍ଲରଙ୍କ ପୋପଙ୍କର ପିତାମହ ଥିଲେ। ସେ ଏକ ଅଧିବକ୍ତା ଥିଲେ, ଯିଏ ପୋପତନ୍ତ୍ରକୁ ସମର୍ଥନ କରୁଥିବା ଅଧିବକ୍ତାମାନଙ୍କ ଏକ ବିଶେଷ ଶ୍ରେଣୀର ସଦସ୍ୟ ଥିଲେ। ତାଙ୍କର ପୁତ୍ର ମଧ୍ୟ ସେହି ଏକେ ଉଚ୍ଚବର୍ଗୀୟ ଅଧିବକ୍ତା-ଶ୍ରେଣୀର ଅଂଶ ହେଲେ, ଏବଂ ତାଙ୍କର ପୌତ୍ର ମଧ୍ୟ ସେପରି ହେଲେ, ଯିଏ ଶେଷରେ ହିଟ୍ଲରଙ୍କ ପୋପ ହେବେ। ପୁସ୍ତକଟି ଯେତେବେଳେ ଇଉଜେନିଓ ପାଚେଲ୍ଲିଙ୍କର ପିତାମହ, ତାଙ୍କର ପିତା, ଏବଂ ତାଙ୍କର ଯୁବକାଳ ଓ ଶିକ୍ଷାର ଇତିହାସକୁ ବର୍ଣ୍ଣନା କରି ସମାପ୍ତ କରେ, ସେତେବେଳେ ଏହା ସେହି ପଦବୀକୁ ଆଲୋଚନା କରେ, ଯାହା ପାଚେଲ୍ଲି ପୋପତନ୍ତ୍ର ପାଇଁ ନିଜ କାର୍ଯ୍ୟ ଆରମ୍ଭ କଲାବେଳେ ଗ୍ରହଣ କରିଥିଲେ। ଉଚ୍ଚବର୍ଗୀୟ ପାପାଳ ଅଧିବକ୍ତାମାନଙ୍କର ବଂଶଧର ଭାବେ, ଏକ ଅଧିବକ୍ତା ଥିବାରୁ, ତାଙ୍କୁ ଏମିତି ଗୋଟିଏ ବିଭାଗର ମୁଖ୍ୟ କରାଯାଇଥିଲା, ଯାହା ଚୁକ୍ତିପତ୍ରରେ ବିଶେଷଜ୍ଞ ଥିଲା, ଯେଗୁଡ଼ିକୁ “କନ୍କର୍ଡସ୍” ବୋଲି କୁହାଯାଏ। 1901 ମସିହାରେ ପାଚେଲ୍ଲିଙ୍କୁ ପାପାଳ ସେକ୍ରେଟାରିଏଟ୍ ଅଫ୍ ଷ୍ଟେଟ୍‌ର କାର୍ଯ୍ୟାଳୟରେ ନିୟୋଜିତ କରାଯାଇଥିଲା।

Pacelli became the envoy to the nations. Prophetically Pacelli became the legal point of contact that consummated the fornication of the kings of the earth with the papacy. In 1903, Pius X was coronated as pope. Immediately he began to attack the “intellectual poison” that produced “relativism and skepticism.” The man who ran Pius X’s effort to eradicate “modernism” was Umberto Benigni, who worked in the same office as Pacelli. Benigni once stated of a group of world-class historians, that they were men for whom, “history is nothing but a continual desperate attempt to vomit. For this sort of human being there is only one remedy: the inquisition!” To Benigni, a historian that expressed any sympathy with the ideas that came from the French Revolution were to be executed.

Paasheliin ergamaa sabootaaf taʼe. Raajii keessatti Paasheliin qabxii quunnamtii seeraa taʼee, ejja mootota lafaa fi paaphaasummaa gidduutti raawwatame guutummaatti xumure. Bara 1903 keessa, Phaayus X paaphaasii taʼee gonfame. Battalumatti inni “summii sammuu” kan “walitti dhufeenya dhugaa dhabuu fi shakkii” uumu irratti weerara jalqabe. Namni tattaaffii Phaayus X “ammayyummaa” balleessuuf godhe hogganaa ture Umberto Beniignii ture; inni waajjira tokko keessatti Paashelii wajjin hojjetaa ture. Beniigniin yeroo tokko garee seenaa-beektota sadarkaa addunyaa ilaalchisee akkana jedhe: isaan namoota, “warraaf seenaa wanta tokko illee hin taane, garuu tattaaffii itti fufiinsa qabu, abdii kutannaan guutame, haqqisuuf godhamu qofa.” “Nama gosa kanaaf qoricha tokko qofa jira: mana murtii amantii!” jedhe. Akka ilaalcha Beniigniitti, seenaa-beekaan yaada Kacaasa Faransaay irraa dhufe kamiyyuu irratti gara laafina tokko yoo mulʼise, ni ajjeefamuu qaba ture.

Officially, Benigni ran the propaganda ministry for the papacy, but unofficially he also ran a clandestine spy network, designed to identify any Catholics that had any sympathy for the “modernism,” that had originated with the king of the south. Ultimately in 1910, his work produced a directive that obliged employees of the papacy to swear an oath, called the Antimodernist Oath. It is still in force. To be employed by the Vatican you must swear to a hatred of modernist ideas, which today we would call communistic ideas.

Benigni’n sirnaan, tajaajila paappaasummaa keessatti ministeera piroopaagaandaa geggeessaa ture; garuu iccitidhaan immoo, neetwoorkii basaasaa dhokataa tokko illee hoogganaa ture; kunis Kaatoilota “ammayyummaa” jedhamee waamamuuf gara-laafina ykn deggersa kam iyyuu qaban adda baasuuf kan qophaa’e ture; “ammayyummaan” kunis mootii kibbaatiin kan madde ture. Dhuma irratti, bara 1910 keessatti, hojii isaa irraa qajeelfamni tokko ba’e; innis hojjettoonni paappaasummaa kakuu tokko akka seenan dirqisiise; kakuun sunis Kakuu Farra-Ammayyummaa jedhama. Inni amma iyyuu hojiirra jira. Vaatiikaan keessatti hojjetamuu yoo barbaadde, yaadota ammayyummaa irratti jibba qabaachuu kee kakachuun siif dirqama; yaadota kana har’a nuti yaadota koomunizimii jechuun waamna.

In the summary of Cronwell’s book, on the flyleaf it states, “In the first decade of the century, as a brilliant young Vatican lawyer, Pacelli helped shape an ideology of unprecedented papal power; during the 1920’s he employed cunning and blackmail to impose power in Germany. In 1933, Hitler became his perfect negotiating partner and a concordant was established that granted religious and educational advantages to the Catholic Church in exchange for Catholic withdrawal from social and political action. This ‘voluntary’ abdication of political Catholicism imposed from Rome facilitated the rise of Nazism.

Cuunfaa kitaaba Cronwell irratti, fuula duraatti akkana jechuun ibsameera: “Waggaa kudhan jalqabaa jaarraa sana keessatti, Paachalii akka abukaatoo Vaatikaanii dargaggoo ifaa ta’etti, yaada aangoo paaphaasii yeroo kamiyyuu hin argamne bocuuf gargaare; bara 1920moota keessatti immoo, Jarmanii keessatti aangoo fe’uuf haxxummaa fi doorsisa itti fayyadame. Bara 1933tti, Hitlariin michuu marii isaa isa guutuu ta’e, waliigalteenis hundeeffame; inni kunis, Kaatolikoonni hojii hawaasummaa fi siyaasaa irraa akka of qusatan jechuun, Waldaa Kaatolikii keessatti faayidaalee amantii fi barnootaa kenne. ‘Fedhii isaaniitiin’ jechuun dhiifamuu siyaasa Kaatolikummaa kana Rooma irraa dirqiin fe’ame kun, ka’umsa Naazisummaa haala mijeesse.”

At a cabinet meeting on July 14, 1933, Adolph Hitler expressed his opinion that very month that the concordance manufactured by Pacelli with the Nazi’s gave Germany created “an area of trust…. In the developing struggle against international Jewry.”

Yeroo walga’ii kaabineetaa Adoolessa 14, 1933 geggeeffametti, Adoolf Hitlar yaada isaa ibsee, waliigalteen Pacelliin Naaziiwwan waliin qopheesse, kan Jarmaniif kenne, “naannoo amantaa… qabsoo guddachaa jiruu Yihudoota addunyaa maraa irratti geggeeffamu keessatti” uume jedhe.

Cornwell’s book was not well received by Catholics who refused to accept the evidence that Pacelli was the primary reason that Hitler was able to rise to power, for Germany was a majority of Catholics. Pacelli had struck an agreement that prevented the Catholic publishing house, Catholic news agencies and Catholic schools from saying anything about the direction of Hitler from 1933 onward. The book traces the obvious anti-Semitic bent of Pacelli, who thereafter became the pope during World War II. At least three items can be established on very reliable historical sources from the book.

Kitaabni Cornwell katolikoota biratti sirriitti fudhatama hin arganne; isaanis ragaa agarsiisu kan Pacelli sababaa guddaa Hitler aangoo irratti ol-baʼuu dandaʼe taʼuu isaa fudhachuu didan, sababiin isaas Jarmaniin biyya baayʼinaan katolikoota qabdu turte. Pacelli waliigaltee tokko raawwatee ture; kunis manneen maxxansaa Katolikaa, dhaabbilee oduu Katolikaa fi manneen barumsaa Katolikaa bara 1933 irraa eegalee waaʼee kallattii Hitler homaa akka hin dubbanne dhowwe. Kitaabichi ilaalcha ifatti Yihudoota irratti jibbaa qabu kan Pacelli hordofa; inni sana booddee yeroo Lola Addunyaa Lammaffaa keessa phaaphaasii taʼe. Yoo xiqqaate wantoonni sadii maddoota seenaa amanamoo baayʼee taʼan irraa kitaabicha keessatti hundeeffamanii mirkanaaʼuu dandaʼu.

The first is the warfare of the king of the north and the king of the south, as represented in Daniel chapter eleven. In that warfare the enemies are Catholicism against atheism, the pope against Communism. The other point is that the pope employed Nazism as his proxy army against atheism during World War II, just as the pope employed apostate Protestantism in 1989, as its proxy army against the atheism of the USSR. The book also identifies the internal and external prophetic structure represented by the satanic messages that came forth from the miracle at Fatima.

Inni jalqabaa mootota kaabaa fi mootota kibbaa ti; akka Daani’el boqonnaa kudha tokko keessatti ibsameetti. Loltuu sana keessatti diinonni isaanii Kaatooleekummaa fi ateesimii walitti dhaabbatan, jechuunis paappaasii fi Komiyuunizimii walitti dhaabbatan. Qabxiin inni biraan immoo yeroo Lola Addunyaa Lammaffaa keessatti paappaan ateesimii irratti akka waraana bakka isaa ta’utti Naazizimii fayyadame; akkuma bara 1989 immoo ateesimii USSR irratti akka waraana bakka isaa ta’utti Pirootestaantizimii gantuu fayyadame sanaa dha. Kitaabichi akkasumas caasaa raajii keessaa fi alaa kan ergaawwan seexana irraa, dinqii Faatimaa irraa ba’an keessatti mul’ate ni adda baasa.

The borderline war of Raphia, represented in verses eleven and twelve of Daniel eleven, represent the war of the borderline currently playing out in the Ukraine. The ancient war was a hot war, the second is the second proxy war, with the proxy armies involved in mortal interaction. Raphia identifies the borderline war as being between the king of the north and the king of the south, but prophecy teaches that until the soon coming Sunday law, the whore of Tyre is forgotten, Jezebel is in Samaria, and Herodias skipped Herod’s birthday party. Those three witnesses of the role of the king of the north in this current history, is that she is behind the scenes pulling the strings. The hot wars, proxy wars and cold wars that happen while she is forgotten are accomplished by her proxy armies.

Lolni daangaa Raafiyaa, isa Daani’el boqonnaa kudha tokko lakkoobsa kudha tokkoo fi kudha lama keessatti bakka buufame, lolicha daangaa yeroo ammaa Yuukireen keessatti adeemsifamaa jiru bakka bu’a. Lolni durii sun lola ho’aa ture; inni lammaffaan immoo lola ergamaa lammaffaa dha, kan keessatti loltoonni ergamanii hirmaatan walitti bu’iinsa du’aaf nama saaxilu keessa jiran. Raafiyaan lola daangaa akka isa mootii kaabaa fi mootii kibbaa gidduu jiru adda baasti; garuu raajiiwwan, hamma seerri Dilbataa dhiheenyatti dhufu sanatti, sagaagaltuun Xiiroos ni irraanfatamti, Iizaabel Samaariyaa keessa jirti, Herodiyaas immoo ayyaana dhaloota mootummaa Heroodis ni darbite jechuun barsiisu. Dhugaa-baatonni sadan kun waa’ee gahee mootii kaabaa seenaa yeroo ammaa keessatti qaban ni mul’isu; jechuun ishee duubbee keessaa hidhatawwan harkisaa jirti. Lolawwan ho’aan adeemsifaman, lolawwan ergamaan geggeeffaman, fi lolawwan qabbanaan raawwataman, yeroo isheen irraanfatamte sanatti, loltoota isheen ergiteen raawwatamu.

Russia is the king of the south, and it is now involved in a borderline war that is being financed by the globalists of the Western world, primarily the progressive Democrats and RINO (Republican In Name Only) Republicans in the United States. When the United States is represented as the king of the north’s proxy army in verse forty of Daniel eleven, its two prophetic characteristics are military might and financial power. The United States is accomplishing the same work in Ukraine that it did in 1989, helping the Pope against Russia, and the proxy army on the ground, defending Ukraine, is so full of Nazi supporters that even the mainstream media cannot deny it. Rome is now using the same proxy armies that she used in the hot war that was World War II, and in 1989, to war against Russia. Read the book: Hitler’s Pope, the Secret History of Pius XII.

Raashiyaan mootii kibbaa ti; yeroo ammaa immoo waraana daangaa irratti adeemsifamu keessatti hirmaachaa jirti; waraanni kunis addunyaa Dhihaa keessatti warra addunyaawotaatiin, keessumaa Ameerikaa keessatti Demokratoota fooyya’oo fi RINO (maqaa qofaatiin Republikaanota ta’an) Republikaanotaatiin maallaqaan deggaramaa jira. Yeroo Ameerikaan Daani’el boqonnaa kudha tokko lakkoofsa afurtama keessatti akka raayyaa bakka-bu’aa mootii kaabaa keessaa bakka buufamtu, amala ishee lamaan raajii keessatti mul’atan humna waraanaa fi humna maallaqaa dha. Ameerikaan hojiiuma walfakkaataa kan bara 1989 hojjette Yukireen keessatti raawwachaa jirti; jechuunis Raashiyaa irratti Phaaphaasii gargaaraa jirti; raayyaan bakka-bu’aa lafa irratti Yukireen ittisaa jirus deeggartoota Naazii keessaa hamma guutamee waan ta’eef, miidiyaan idilee illee isa mormuu hin danda’u. Roomiin amma raayyoota bakka-bu’aa isheen waraana hoo’aa kan Waraana Addunyaa Lammaffaa ta’e keessatti, akkasumas bara 1989tti itti fayyadamte sanaanuma, Raashiyaa irratti waraanuuf fayyadamaa jirti. Kitaaba kana dubbisaa: Hitler’s Pope, the Secret History of Pius XII.

We will continue this study in the next article.

Nuti itti aanu keessatti qorannoo kana itti fufna.

> “In like manner, when God was about to open to the beloved John the history of the church for future ages, He gave him an assurance of the Saviour’s interest and care for His people by revealing to him ‘One like unto the Son of man,’ walking among the candlesticks, which symbolized the seven churches. While John was shown the last great struggles of the church with earthly powers, he was also permitted to behold the final victory and deliverance of the faithful. He saw the church brought into deadly conflict with the beast and his image, and the worship of that beast enforced on pain of death. But looking beyond the smoke and din of the battle, he beheld a company upon Mount Zion with the Lamb, having, instead of the mark of the beast, the ‘Father’s name written in their foreheads.’ And again he saw ‘them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name, stand on the sea of glass, having the harps of God’ and singing the song of Moses and the Lamb.

> “Akka kanumaatti, yeroo Waaqayyo seenaa waldaa dhaloota fuulduraatiif Yohaannis isa jaallatamaa tureef ifa godhuuf jedhu, ‘Isa Ilma namaa fakkaatu’ jechuun, ibiddoowwan ibsaa gidduu keessa deddeebi’aa jiru isa mul’isuudhaan, kanneen waldoota torban agarsiisan sana gidduutti, Fayyisaa ummata Isaa irratti fedhii fi kunuunsa qabuuf isaaf mirkaneessa kenne. Utuu Yohaannis waldaa humnoota lafaa wajjin qabsoo guguddaa isa dhumaa keessa jirtu argisiifamuufii, injifannoo fi bilisummaa warra amanamoo isa dhumaa ilaaluufis hayyamameef. Inni waldaan bineensaa fi fakkeenya isaa wajjin walitti bu’iinsa du’a fide keessa galfamtee, waaqeffannaan bineensichaas adabbii du’aatiin dirqama taasifamee akka jiru arge. Garuu inni aaraa fi hollacha lola sanaa bira darbee yeroo ilaalu, Tulluu Xiyoon irratti Hoolicha wajjin tuuta tokko arge; isaan mallattoo bineensichaa iddoo qabaatanitti, ‘maqaa Abbaa isaanii adda isaanii irratti barreeffame’ qabaniiru. Ammas inni ‘warra bineensicha irratti, fakkeenya isaa irratti, mallattoo isaa irratti, lakkoobsa maqaa isaa irrattis injifannoo argatan’ galaana geejjibaa irra dhaabatanii, ‘sibila muuziqaa Waaqayyoo qabatanii’ faarfannaa Musee fi Hoolichaa faarfachaa jiran arge.”

> “These lessons are for our benefit. We need to stay our faith upon God, for there is just before us a time that will try men’s souls. Christ, upon the Mount of Olives, rehearsed the fearful judgments that were to precede His second coming: ‘Ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars.’ ‘Nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. All these are the beginning of sorrows.’ While these prophecies received a partial fulfillment at the destruction of Jerusalem, they have a more direct application to the last days.

> “Barnoonni kun buʼaa keenyaatiif dha. Nuyi amantii keenya Waaqa irratti jabeessinee dhaabuu qabna; yeroo lubbuu namaa qoru tokko nu dura dhiʼoo jira. Kiristoos, Tulluu Ejersaa irratti, murtiiwwan sodaachisoo dhufaatii isaa lammaffaa dura dhufan irra deebiʼee dubbate: ‘Waraanaa fi oduu waraanaa ni dhageessu.’ ‘Sabni saba irratti ni kaʼa, mootummaa immoo mootummaa irratti; beelli, dhaʼichi, fi kirkirri lafaas iddoowwan garaagaraatti ni taʼa. Kun hundinuu jalqaba gaddaa ti.’ Raajiiwwan kun yeroo Yerusaalem diigametti guutamuu gartokkee argatan iyyuu, guyyoota dhumaa irratti hojii irra oolmaa isaanii caalaatti kallattiidhaan qabu.”

> “We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecy is fast fulfilling. The Lord is at the door. There is soon to open before us a period of overwhelming interest to all living. The controversies of the past are to be revived; new controversies will arise. The scenes to be enacted in our world are not yet even dreamed of. Satan is at work through human agencies. Those who are making an effort to change the Constitution and secure a law enforcing Sunday observance little realize what will be the result. A crisis is just upon us.

> “Nuyi taateewwan gurguddaa fi ulfaatoo ta’anitti seenuuf balbala irra dhaabanneerra. Raajii saffisaan raawwatamaa jira. Gooftaan balbala irra jira. Yeroon dhiyoo keessatti kan warra jiraatan hundumaaf fedhii guddaa fi nama liqimsu nu dura banamu tokko ni jira. Falmiiwwan yeroo darban keessaa deebi’anii ni kaafamu; falmiiwwan haaraanis ni ka’u. Haalli addunyaa keenya keessatti raawwatamuuf jiru ammallee illee hin abjootamne. Seexanni karaa ergamtoota namootaatiin hojjechaa jira. Warri mootummaa heera jijjiiruufii seera kabaja Dilbataa dirqisiisu mirkaneessuuf tattaafatan bu’aan isaa maal akka ta’u baay’ee hin hubatan. Qormaanni guddaan amma iyyuu nutti dhihaateera.

> “But God’s servants are not to trust to themselves in this great emergency. In the visions given to Isaiah, to Ezekiel, and to John we see how closely heaven is connected with the events taking place upon the earth and how great is the care of God for those who are loyal to Him. The world is not without a ruler. The program of coming events is in the hands of the Lord. The Majesty of heaven has the destiny of nations, as well as the concerns of His church, in His own charge.” Testimonies, volume 5, 752, 753.

> “Garboonni Waaqayyoo garuu yeroo rakkoo guddaa kanaatti of irratti amanachuu hin qaban. Mul’ata Isaayaasiif, Hisqi’eeliif, fi Yohannisitti kenname keessatti, samiin hojiiwwan lafa irratti raawwatamaa jiran wajjin hammam walitti dhiyeenyaan wal qabate akka jiru, akkasumas warra Isaaf amanamoo ta’an irratti kunuunsi Waaqayyoo hammam guddaa akka ta’e ni argina. Addunyaan bulchaa malee miti. Sirni wantoota dhufuuf jiran harka Gooftaa keessa jira. Ulfinni samii qooda biyyoota lafaa, akkasumas dhimmawwan waldaa Isaa, ofii Isaatiin eegumsa jalatti qaba.” Testimonies, volume 5, 752, 753.

Back to Articles