Article

# The Hidden History of Verse Forty - Number Two

Qirqinchi Oyatning Yashirin Tarixi — Ikkinchi Qism

The United States, the Patriot Act, and the Path to Prophetic Fulfillment

Qo‘shma Shtatlar, Patriot Akti va Bashoratning Bajo Bo‘lishiga Olib Boruvchi Yo‘l

Author

Jeff Pippenger

Published

September 19, 2024

Formats

PDF
Word
Song MP3

We ended the last article with the sentence that stated, “In 2001 the government of the United States spoke the Patriot Act into law.”

Oldingi maqolani quyidagi jumla bilan yakunlagan edik: “2001 yilda Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlari hukumati Patriot Actni qonun kuchiga kiritdi.”

> “There are many, even of those engaged in this movement for Sunday enforcement, who are blinded to the results which will follow this action. They do not see that they are striking directly against religious liberty. There are many who have never understood the claims of the Bible Sabbath and the false foundation upon which the Sunday institution rests. Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.

> “Yakshanba kunini majburan joriy etish harakatida ishtirok etayotganlarning ham ko‘plari ushbu chora ortidan qanday oqibatlar kelib chiqishini ko‘rmay, ko‘r bo‘lib qolganlar. Ular diniy erkinlikka to‘g‘ridan-to‘g‘ri zarba berayotganlarini anglamaydilar. Muqaddas Kitobdagi shanbaning da’volarini va yakshanba institutining tayanadigan soxta poydevorini hech qachon tushunmaganlar ko‘pdir. Diniy qonunchilik foydasiga qilingan har qanday harakat, aslida, ko‘p asrlar davomida vijdon erkinligiga izchil urush olib borgan papalikka yon berish amalidir. Yakshanbaga rioya qilish o‘z mavjudligi uchun go‘yoki nasroniy institut sifatida “gunoh siriga” qarzdordir; va uni majburan joriy etish Romanizmning tamal toshi bo‘lgan prinsiplarning amaldagi e’tirofi bo‘ladi. Qachonki xalqimiz yakshanba qonunini qabul qilish orqali o‘z hukumatining prinsiplaridan shu qadar yuz o‘girsa, Protestantizm bu ishda papachilik bilan qo‘l birlashtirgan bo‘ladi; bu esa uzoq vaqtdan beri yana faol istibdodga otilib chiqish fursatini ishtiyoq bilan poylab kelgan zulmga hayot baxsh etishdan boshqa narsa bo‘lmaydi.” Testimonies, 5-jild, 711.

1888 typified 2001, and it was then that the Blair Bill was introduced, though its failure to be passed, prevented it from prophetically speaking. It became the sign of 66 AD, a siege that was initiated and then mysteriously withdrawn. When it is understood that there are two image of the beast testing periods, and that the second period begins with the Sunday law in the United States, typified by the year 321, and that the period ends when the world Sunday law, typified by 538, is fully enforced; then it demands prophetically that the beginning of the first image of the beast testing period also begins with some type of typification of a Sunday law being spoken. In 1888, the Blair Bill was an attempt to enforce a National Sunday law, and 1888 identifies when the angel of Revelation eighteen descends and lightens the earth with his glory.

1888 yil 2001 yilni timsolladi, va aynan o‘sha paytda Bler Bill taqdim etildi; biroq uning qabul qilinmay qolishi uning bashoratli tarzda gapirishiga to‘sqinlik qildi. U milodiy 66 yilning belgisi bo‘ldi — boshlangan, so‘ng esa sirli ravishda qaytarib olingan qamal. Agar hayvon suratining sinov davrlari ikki ekanligi, ikkinchi davr esa 321 yil bilan timsollangan Qo‘shma Shtatlardagi yakshanba qonuni bilan boshlanishi va 538 yil bilan timsollangan butunjahon yakshanba qonuni to‘liq kuchga kiritilganda tugashi tushunilsa; unda bashorat nuqtayi nazaridan birinchi hayvon surati sinov davrining boshlanishi ham yakshanba qonunining qandaydir timsoli tilga olinishi bilan boshlanishi talab etiladi. 1888 yilda Bler Bill milliy yakshanba qonunini majburan joriy etishga urinish edi, va 1888 yil Vahiy kitobining o‘n sakkizinchi bobi farishtasi tushib, yerni o‘zining ulug‘vorligi bilan yoritadigan vaqtni ko‘rsatadi.

The Patriot Act is the typification of a Sunday law that begins the image of the beast testing time in the United States. The United States speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven when it enforces the Sunday law. When it enforces that law it will speak as a dragon, and that Sunday law identifies that the image of the beast is fully formed in the United States. At that point the United States has filled up its cup of probationary time, and national apostasy is followed by national ruin. At that point the United States ceases to be the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy as the threefold union is established.

Patriot Act — bu Qo‘shma Shtatlarda hayvonning suratiga oid sinov vaqtini boshlab beradigan Yakshanba qonunining timsolidir. Qo‘shma Shtatlar Yakshanba qonunini ijro etganida, Vahiy kitobining o‘n uchinchi bob, o‘n birinchi oyatining amalga oshishi sifatida ajdaho kabi gapiradi. U o‘sha qonunni ijro etganida ajdaho kabi gapiradi, va o‘sha Yakshanba qonuni Qo‘shma Shtatlarda hayvonning surati to‘la shakllanganini ko‘rsatadi. O‘sha paytda Qo‘shma Shtatlar o‘zining sinov muddati kosasini to‘ldirgan bo‘ladi, va milliy murtadlikdan keyin milliy halokat keladi. O‘sha paytda uch tomonlama ittifoq o‘rnatilgach, Qo‘shma Shtatlar Muqaddas Kitob bashoratidagi oltinchi shohlik bo‘lishdan to‘xtaydi.

Alpha and Omega always portrays the end with the beginning and at the beginning of the United States there were three times the United States prophetically spoke that marked the beginning of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. The Declaration of Independence in 1776, followed by the Constitution of 1789 and then the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 identify the first three times the United States prophetically spoke. Each of those three publications represented the speaking of the United States. Those three steps led to 1798, the beginning of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Those same three waymarks in the beginning of the United States, represent three waymarks that lead to the ending of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy.

Alpha va Omega har doim oxirni boshlanish bilan tasvirlaydi, va Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining boshida Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlari bashoratli ma’noda uch marta gapirdi; bu uch voqea Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining Muqaddas Kitob bashoratidagi oltinchi shohlik sifatidagi boshlanishini belgiladi. 1776-yildagi Mustaqillik Deklaratsiyasi, undan keyin 1789-yildagi Konstitutsiya va so‘ng 1798-yildagi Chet elliklar va Tuhmat to‘g‘risidagi Qonunlar Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining bashoratli ma’noda ilk uch bor gapirganini ko‘rsatadi. Ana shu uch nashrning har biri Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining gapirishini ifodalagan. Bu uch bosqich 1798-yilga, ya’ni Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining Muqaddas Kitob bashoratidagi oltinchi shohlik sifatida hukmronlik qila boshlashiga olib keldi. Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining boshidagi xuddi shu uch belgi, Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining Muqaddas Kitob bashoratidagi oltinchi shohlik sifatidagi hukmronligining yakuniga olib boradigan uch belgini ham ifodalaydi.

The Patriot Act is the first of three times the United States speaks as it comes to its conclusion as the sixth kingdom. The third speaking, that identifies the end of the sixth kingdom is the Sunday law. In the middle of that history the Pelosi Trials of January 6, which began in 2022 were initiated. The trials were a direct rejection of the rights enshrined in the Constitution because the trials were political in nature, and the lawfare was not simply a fabrication of facts, but it was actually a direct attack upon “procedural” and “substantive” law as identified within the Constitution.

Patriot Act — Qo‘shma Shtatlar oltinchi shohlik sifatida o‘z yakuniga yaqinlashar ekan, uning so‘zlashining uch marotabasidan birinchisidir. Oltinchi shohlikning oxirini belgilab beradigan uchinchi so‘zlashish — yakshanba qonunidir. O‘sha tarixning o‘rtasida, 2022 yilda boshlangan 6-yanvar Pelosi sud jarayonlari yo‘lga qo‘yildi. Bu sud jarayonlari siyosiy xususiyatga ega bo‘lgani sababli, Konstitutsiyada mustahkamlab qo‘yilgan huquqlarning bevosita rad etilishi edi; va bu huquqiy kurash shunchaki dalillarni to‘qib chiqarish emas, balki aslida Konstitutsiya doirasida belgilangan “protsessual” va “moddiy” huquqqa qaratilgan to‘g‘ridan-to‘g‘ri hujum edi.

The Patriot Act in 2001 was a direct attack upon the “Due Process Clause” which appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. That was 2001, and in 2022 the attack against the Constitution was focused upon both “procedural due process” and “substantive due process.” The word “repudiate” means to deny, and Sister White identifies that at the Sunday law in the United States every principle of the Constitution will be repudiated.

2001-yildagi Patriot Act AQSh Konstitutsiyasining Beshinchi tuzatishi va O‘n to‘rtinchi tuzatishida uchraydigan “Tegishli huquqiy jarayon bandi”ga bevosita hujum edi. Ular shuni belgilaydiki, hech kim qonunning tegishli huquqiy jarayonisiz hayotidan, erkinligidan yoki mulkidan mahrum etilishi mumkin emas. Bu 2001-yil edi, 2022-yilda esa Konstitutsiyaga qarshi hujum ham “protsessual tegishli huquqiy jarayon”, ham “moddiy tegishli huquqiy jarayon”ga qaratildi. “Repudiate” so‘zi inkor etmoq degan ma’noni anglatadi, va Sister White Qo‘shma Shtatlardagi yakshanba qonuni paytida Konstitutsiyaning har bir tamoyili inkor etilishini ta’kidlaydi.

> “By the decree enforcing the institution of the papacy in violation of the law of God, our nation will disconnect herself fully from righteousness. When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near.

> “Papalik muassasasini Xudoning qonunini buzgan holda majburan joriy etuvchi farmon bilan xalqimiz o‘zini solihlikdan butunlay uzib qo‘yadi. Protestantizm jarlik uzra qo‘lini cho‘zib, Rim hokimiyatining qo‘lini ushlaganida; tubsiz chuqurlik uzra qo‘l uzatib, spiritizm bilan qo‘l biriktirganida; shu uch karra ittifoq ta’siri ostida mamlakatimiz o‘z Konstitutsiyasining protestant va respublikachi boshqaruv sifatidagi har bir tamoyilini rad etganida hamda papalikning yolg‘onlari va aldovlarini yoyish uchun sharoit yaratganida, ana shunda biz Shaytonning ajoyib faoliyati uchun vaqt kelganini va nihoya yaqin ekanini bilishimiz mumkin.”

> “As the approach of the Roman armies was a sign to the disciples of the impending destruction of Jerusalem, so may this apostasy be a sign to us that the limit of God’s forbearance is reached, that the measure of our nation’s iniquity is full, and that the angel of mercy is about to take her flight, never to return. The people of God will then be plunged into those scenes of affliction and distress which prophets have described as the time of Jacob’s trouble. The cries of the faithful, persecuted ones ascend to heaven. And as the blood of Abel cried from the ground, there are voices also crying to God from martyrs’ graves, from the sepulchers of the sea, from mountain caverns, from convent vaults: ‘How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost Thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?’

> “Rim qo‘shinlarining yaqinlashib kelishi shogirdlar uchun Quddusning yaqinlashib kelayotgan vayron bo‘lishining alomati bo‘lganidek, bu murtadlik ham biz uchun Xudoning sabr-toqatining chegarasiga yetilganining, xalqimiz gunohining o‘lchovi to‘lganining va rahm-shafqat farishtasi endi ortga hech qachon qaytmaslik uchun uchib ketish arafasida ekanining alomati bo‘lishi mumkin. Shunda Xudoning xalqi payg‘ambarlar Yoqubning kulfat vaqti deb tasvirlagan o‘sha azob-uqubat va musibat manzaralariga g‘arq bo‘ladi. Sodiq, quvg‘in qilinganlarning faryodlari osmonga ko‘tariladi. Va Hobilning qoni yerdan faryod qilganidek, shahidlar qabrlaridan, dengiz qa’ridagi qabrlardan, tog‘ g‘orlaridan, monastir sag‘analaridan ham Xudoga nola qilayotgan ovozlar bor: ‘Qachongacha, ey Rabbiy, muqaddas va haqiqiy Zot, Sen yer yuzida yashovchilar ustidan hukm chiqarmay va qonimiz uchun qasos olmay turasan?’”

> “The Lord is doing His work. All heaven is astir. The Judge of all the earth is soon to arise and vindicate His insulted authority. The mark of deliverance will be set upon the men who keep God’s commandments, who revere His law, and who refuse the mark of the beast or of his image.

> “Egamiz O‘z ishini qilmoqda. Butun osmon harakatdadir. Butun yerning Hakamı tez orada qo‘zg‘alib, tahqirlangan hokimiyatini oqlaydi. Najot belgisi Xudoning amrlarini tutadigan, Uning qonunini e’zozlaydigan hamda yirtqichning yoki uning tasvirining tamg‘asini rad etadigan kishilar ustiga qo‘yiladi.

> “God has revealed what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath. Those who have been warned of the events before them are not to sit in calm expectation of the coming storm, comforting themselves that the Lord will shelter His faithful ones in the day of trouble. We are to be as men waiting for their Lord, not in idle expectancy, but in earnest work, with unwavering faith. It is no time now to allow our minds to be engrossed with things of minor importance. While men are sleeping, Satan is actively arranging matters so that the Lord’s people may not have mercy or justice. The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending. Its professions are mild and apparently Christian, but when it shall speak it will reveal the spirit of the dragon. It is our duty to do all in our power to avert the threatened danger. We should endeavor to disarm prejudice by placing ourselves in a proper light before the people. We should bring before them the real question at issue, thus interposing the most effectual protest against measures to restrict liberty of conscience. We should search the Scriptures and be able to give the reason for our faith. Says the prophet: ‘The wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.’” Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.

> “Xudo O‘z xalqini qarshilik va g‘azab bo‘roniga qarshi turishga tayyorlash uchun oxirgi kunlarda nima sodir bo‘lishini ochib bergan. Oldilaridagi voqealar haqida ogohlantirilganlar kelayotgan bo‘ronni xotirjam kutib o‘tirmasliklari, Rabbiy musibat kunida O‘zining sodiq bandalarini panohida asraydi, deb o‘zlarini ovutmasliklari kerak. Biz Rabbimizni kutayotgan kishilar kabi bo‘lishimiz lozim — bekorchilikdagi kutishda emas, balki qat’iy ishlashda, sobit imon bilan. Hozir aqlimizni ahamiyati kichik narsalar bilan band etishga mutlaqo vaqt emas. Odamlar uxlayotgan bir paytda, Shayton Rabbimiz xalqiga rahm-shafqat ham, adolat ham ko‘rsatilmasligi uchun ishlarni faol ravishda yo‘lga qo‘ymoqda. Yakshanba harakati hozir zulmat ichida o‘z yo‘lini topmoqda. Yetakchilar haqiqiy masalani yashirmoqdalar, va bu harakatga qo‘shilayotganlarning ko‘plari ham ichki oqim qayoqqa intilayotganini o‘zlari ko‘rmaydilar. Uning da’volari muloyim va tashqi ko‘rinishda masihiyona, ammo u so‘zlaganida ajdahoning ruhini namoyon qiladi. Tahdid solayotgan xavfni daf etish uchun qo‘limizdan kelgan barcha ishni qilish burchimizdir. Odamlar oldida o‘zimizni to‘g‘ri tarzda namoyon etib, xurofotni qurolsizlantirishga intilishimiz kerak. Vijdon erkinligini cheklovchi choralariga qarshi eng samarali e’tirozni shu tariqa qo‘yib, bahs markazidagi haqiqiy masalani ularning oldiga olib chiqishimiz kerak. Biz Muqaddas Yozuvlarni tadqiq etishimiz va e’tiqodimizning sababini bayon eta olishimiz kerak. Payg‘ambar shunday deydi: ‘Fosiqlar fosiqlik qiladilar; fosiqlardan hech biri tushunmaydi; ammo donolar tushunadilar.’” Testimonies, 5-jild, 451, 452.

Sister White aligns the Sunday law with several last-day waymarks, and in so doing her words reveal “what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath.” Therefore, the waymarks that she aligns in this passage are to be carefully examined. I am suggesting that the point of reference is the line of prophecy that focuses upon the Constitution of the United States, along with the “speaking” of the nation as an interrelated symbol.

Opa Uayt yakshanba qonunini so‘nggi kunlarning bir necha yo‘lko‘rsatkichlari bilan uyg‘unlashtiradi va shu tariqa uning so‘zlari “Uning xalqi qarshilik va g‘azab bo‘roniga qarshi turishga tayyor bo‘lishi uchun, oxirgi kunlarda nima sodir bo‘lishini” ochib beradi. Shuning uchun, u ushbu parchada o‘zaro bog‘lagan yo‘lko‘rsatkichlar diqqat bilan tekshirilishi lozim. Men nazarda tutilayotgan tayanch nuqta Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlari Konstitutsiyasiga qaratilgan bashorat chizig‘i, shu bilan birga millatning “gapirishi” o‘zaro bog‘liq timsol sifatida ekanini ta’kidlamoqdaman.

By that, I mean, that the Blair Bill in 1888, the Patriot Act in 2001, and the political prosecutions that were carried out by the Democrats and globalist Republicans beginning in 2022 were each a direct denial of two essential elements of the Constitution. 1888 represents enforcement of Sunday worship, and then in 2001, the change from English law to Roman law. In 2022 “substantive” and “procedural” law was attacked.

Buning bilan shuni nazarda tutamanki, 1888-yildagi Bler qonun loyihasi, 2001-yildagi Patriot Act va 2022-yildan boshlab demokratlar hamda globalist respublikachilar tomonidan amalga oshirilgan siyosiy ta’qiblar har biri Konstitutsiyaning ikki muhim unsurini bevosita inkor etish edi. 1888-yil yakshanba ibodatini majburan joriy etishni anglatadi, 2001-yilda esa ingliz huquqidan rim huquqiga o‘tish yuz berdi. 2022-yilda “moddiy” va “protsessual” huquqqa hujum qilindi.

Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations. The law defines legal or illegal behavior and sets out the punishments for it. Substantive law covers many legal areas, including criminal, civil, and contract law.

Moddiy huquq jismoniy shaxslar va tashkilotlarning huquq hamda majburiyatlarini belgilaydi, protsessual huquq esa nizolarni hal etish va jismoniy shaxslar hamda tashkilotlarning huquq va majburiyatlarini amalga oshirish jarayonini bayon qiladi. Huquqiy normalar qaysi xatti-harakat qonuniy yoki noqonuniy ekanini belgilaydi va buning uchun nazarda tutilgan jazolarni ko‘rsatadi. Moddiy huquq ko‘plab huquq sohalarini, jumladan jinoyat, fuqarolik va shartnoma huquqini qamrab oladi.

Criminal law is an excellent example of substantive law. Criminal law defines what actions are considered criminal and the penalties for those crimes. Civil law, however, governs disputes between individuals and organizations, such as breach of contract, personal injury, or property disputes.

Jinoyat huquqi moddiy huquqning ajoyib namunasidir. Jinoyat huquqi qaysi xatti-harakatlar jinoiy deb hisoblanishini va bunday jinoyatlar uchun qanday jazolar belgilanishini aniqlaydi. Biroq fuqarolik huquqi shaxslar va tashkilotlar o‘rtasidagi nizolarni, masalan, shartnomaning buzilishi, shaxsga yetkazilgan zarar yoki mulk nizolarini tartibga soladi.

Substantive law is typically written in statutes, regulations, and case law. Statutes are laws passed by legislative bodies, such as national parliaments or state legislature, and regulations are rules and procedures created by administrative agencies. Case law is the law that judges create through their interpretation of statutes, regulations, and the Constitution.

Moddiy huquq odatda statutlar, normativ qoidalar va sud pretsedentlari shaklida yozib qo‘yiladi. Statutlar — milliy parlamentlar yoki shtat qonun chiqaruvchi organlari kabi qonun chiqaruvchi tuzilmalar tomonidan qabul qilinadigan qonunlardir, normativ qoidalar esa ma’muriy idoralar tomonidan yaratiladigan qoidalar va tartib-taomillardir. Sud pretsedentlari esa sudyalar tomonidan statutlar, normativ qoidalar va Konstitutsiyani sharhlash orqali shakllantiriladigan huquqdir.

Procedural law refers to the rules governing the legal process. It outlines how cases move through the legal system, from the initial filing of a complaint to the final resolution. Procedural law covers various legal areas, including civil, criminal, and administrative procedures. The purpose of procedural law is to ensure that the legal process is fair and efficient. It provides a framework for resolving disputes and ensures that everyone involved in the legal process, including judges, lawyers, and litigants, knows what is expected of them.

Protsessual huquq sud-huquq jarayonini tartibga soluvchi qoidalarga ishora qiladi. U ishlarning huquq tizimi orqali qanday harakatlanishini, da’voni dastlabki kiritishdan tortib yakuniy hal etilishigacha belgilab beradi. Protsessual huquq fuqarolik, jinoyat va ma’muriy protseduralarni o‘z ichiga olgan turli huquq sohalarini qamrab oladi. Protsessual huquqning maqsadi huquqiy jarayonning adolatli va samarali bo‘lishini ta’minlashdir. U nizolarni hal etish uchun asos yaratadi hamda huquqiy jarayonda ishtirok etuvchi barcha shaxslar, jumladan sudyalar, advokatlar va taraflar, ulardan nima kutilishini bilishini ta’minlaydi.

Substantive and procedural law are intended to work together to ensure justice is served. Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing those rights and obligations. In other words, substantive law defines legal or illegal behavior and the consequences of illegal behavior, while procedural law outlines how those legal issues are resolved.

Moddiy va protsessual huquq adolat qaror topishini ta’minlash uchun o‘zaro hamkorlikda amal qilishi ko‘zda tutilgan. Moddiy huquq jismoniy shaxslar va tashkilotlarning huquq hamda majburiyatlarini belgilaydi, protsessual huquq esa nizolarni hal etish va ana shu huquq hamda majburiyatlarni amalga oshirish jarayonini bayon qiladi. Boshqacha aytganda, moddiy huquq qaysi xatti-harakat qonuniy yoki g‘ayriqonuniy ekanini va g‘ayriqonuniy xatti-harakatning oqibatlarini belgilaydi, protsessual huquq esa shu huquqiy masalalar qanday hal etilishini ko‘rsatib beradi.

In 2001, the Patriot Act removed the right of habeas corpus. “Habeas corpus” is a Latin term that translates to “you shall have the body.” It refers to a legal principle that protects individuals from unlawful detention by requiring a court to examine the lawfulness of a person’s imprisonment. Habeas corpus is a fundamental right in many legal systems, especially those influenced by English common law. It ensures that a person cannot be held in custody without just cause and allows them to challenge the legality of their detention before a judge.

2001 yilda Patriot Act habeas corpus huquqini bekor qildi. “Habeas corpus” — lotincha atama bo‘lib, “tanaga ega bo‘lasiz” deb tarjima qilinadi. Bu shaxsning qamoqda saqlanishi qonuniy ekanini sud tekshirishini talab qilish orqali odamlarni noqonuniy hibsda saqlashdan himoya qiladigan huquqiy tamoyilni anglatadi. Habeas corpus ko‘plab huquqiy tizimlarda, ayniqsa ingliz umumiy huquqi ta’sirida shakllangan tizimlarda, asosiy huquq hisoblanadi. U shuni ta’minlaydiki, biror shaxs asosli sabab bo‘lmasdan qamoqda saqlanishi mumkin emas va unga o‘zining hibsda saqlanishi qonuniyligini sudya oldida e’tiroz qilish huquqini beradi.

A “Due Process Clause” appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Courts have developed two branches of due process doctrine: procedural due process and substantive due process. In 2001, with the Patriot Act habeas corpus was removed as a right, and English law was replaced by Roman law. English law defines that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty, and Roman law identifies that a person is considered guilty until proven innocent. In the Pelosi Trials of 2022, both procedural and substantive due process was trampled upon. Both substantive law and procedural law were applied in the Pelosi Trials in the exact opposite of their intended constitutional purpose.

“Qonuniy tartib-taomil bandi” AQSH Konstitutsiyasining ham Beshinchi tuzatishida, ham O‘n to‘rtinchi tuzatishida uchraydi. Ular shuni nazarda tutadiki, hech kim qonunda belgilangan tegishli tartib-taomilsiz hayotdan, erkinlikdan yoki mulkdan mahrum etilishi mumkin emas. Sudlar qonuniy tartib-taomil doktrinasining ikki tarmog‘ini rivojlantirdilar: protsessual qonuniy tartib-taomil va moddiy-huquqiy qonuniy tartib-taomil. 2001 yilda Patriot Act bilan habeas corpus huquq sifatida bekor qilindi va ingliz huquqi o‘rniga Rim huquqi joriy etildi. Ingliz huquqi shuni belgilaydiki, shaxs aybi isbotlangunga qadar aybsiz deb hisoblanadi, Rim huquqi esa shaxs aybsizligi isbotlangunga qadar aybdor deb hisoblanishini ta’kidlaydi. 2022 yilgi Pelosi sud jarayonlarida ham protsessual, ham moddiy-huquqiy qonuniy tartib-taomil oyoqosti qilindi. Pelosi sud jarayonlarida ham moddiy huquq, ham protsessual huquq ularning konstitutsiyaviy maqsadiga mutlaqo zid tarzda qo‘llanildi.

The distinction between substantive due process and procedural due process lies in the different aspects of law and rights that each concept protects within the framework of the U.S. Constitution, particularly under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Mohiyatan tegishli huquqiy jarayon va protsessual tegishli huquqiy jarayon o‘rtasidagi farq shundaki, bu ikki tushuncha AQSh Konstitutsiyasi doirasida, xususan Beshinchi va O‘n to‘rtinchi tuzatishlardagi Tegishli huquqiy jarayon bandlari asosida, qonun va huquqlarning har biri himoya qiladigan turli jihatlariga taalluqlidir.

Substantive due process is concerned with the fundamental rights and liberties that the government cannot infringe upon, regardless of the procedure used. It protects certain rights from government interference even if the proper procedures are followed. Substantive due process involves rights that are deemed fundamental, such as the right to privacy, the right to marry, and the right to raise one’s children. These rights are protected from government intrusion unless there is a compelling state interest. It serves as a check on the government’s power, ensuring that laws and regulations do not violate fundamental liberties.

Moddiy adolatli huquqiy jarayon hukumat, qanday tartib-taomil qo‘llanilishidan qat’i nazar, buzishi mumkin bo‘lmagan asosiy huquq va erkinliklar bilan bog‘liqdir. U tegishli tartib-taomillarga rioya qilingan taqdirda ham ayrim huquqlarni hukumat aralashuvidan himoya qiladi. Moddiy adolatli huquqiy jarayon shaxsiy daxlsizlik huquqi, nikohdan o‘tish huquqi va o‘z farzandlarini tarbiyalash huquqi kabi asosiy deb e’tirof etiladigan huquqlarni o‘z ichiga oladi. Bunday huquqlar, agar davlatning nihoyatda muhim manfaatdorligi mavjud bo‘lmasa, hukumat tajovuzidan himoya qilinadi. U hukumat hokimiyati ustidan nazorat vositasi bo‘lib xizmat qiladi hamda qonunlar va me’yoriy qoidalar asosiy erkinliklarni buzmasligini ta’minlaydi.

Procedural due process is concerned with the procedures that the government must follow before it deprives an individual of life, liberty, or property. It ensures that individuals receive fair and impartial treatment through proper legal processes. Procedural due process requires the government to follow certain steps or procedures, such as providing notice, a fair hearing, and an opportunity to be heard, before depriving someone of their rights. It emphasizes the methods by which laws are enforced, ensuring that the government acts in a just and fair manner.

Protsessual tegishli huquqiy tartib hukumat bir shaxsni hayot, erkinlik yoki mulkdan mahrum etishidan oldin rioya qilishi lozim bo‘lgan tartib-taomillarga taalluqlidir. U shaxslarning tegishli yuridik jarayonlar orqali adolatli va xolis muomalaga ega bo‘lishini ta’minlaydi. Protsessual tegishli huquqiy tartib hukumatdan, birovni uning huquqlaridan mahrum etishdan oldin, xabardor qilish, adolatli sudlov eshituvi va tinglanish imkoniyatini berish kabi muayyan bosqichlar yoki tartib-taomillarga rioya etishni talab qiladi. U qonunlar qanday usullar bilan ijro etilishiga urg‘u berib, hukumatning adolatli va xolis tarzda harakat qilishini ta’minlaydi.

The lawfare that has been manifested since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a denial of both substantive and procedural due process. The fundamental rights of American citizens were openly and successfully denied. The false flag operations and the open corruption of the alphabet agencies of the United States has been regularly exposed since even before the Pelosi Trials began, but the legal procedures that have been employed by the globalists of both parties since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a clear illustration of the destruction of procedural due process.

Pelosi sudlari boshlanganidan beri namoyon bo‘layotgan huquqiy ta’qib ham moddiy, ham protsessual tegishli huquqiy jarayonning inkorini ifodalaydi. Amerika fuqarolarining asosiy huquqlari oshkora va muvaffaqiyatli ravishda inkor etildi. Soxta bayroq amaliyotlari hamda Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining harfli agentliklaridagi ochiq korrupsiya, hatto Pelosi sudlari boshlanishidan ham avval muntazam ravishda fosh etib kelindi, biroq Pelosi sudlari boshlanganidan beri har ikki partiyadagi globalistlar tomonidan qo‘llanilgan huquqiy tartib-taomillar protsessual tegishli huquqiy jarayonning vayron qilinishini yaqqol namoyish etadi.

Earlier in the article we read, “Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.”

Maqolaning avvalgi qismida biz shunday o‘qigan edik: “Diniy qonunchilikni yoqlovchi har qanday harakat, aslida, ko‘p asrlar davomida vijdon erkinligiga izchil ravishda qarshi urush olib borgan papalikka yon berish harakatidir. Yakshanbaga rioya qilish o‘z mavjudligini go‘yoki xristian muassasasi sifatida ‘gunoh siridan’ oladi; va uni majburan joriy etish Rimchilikning tamal toshi bo‘lgan prinsiplarning amalda e’tirof etilishi bo‘ladi. Mamlakatimiz o‘z boshqaruvining prinsiplaridan shu qadar voz kechib, yakshanba to‘g‘risidagi qonunni qabul qilganida, protestantizm bu ishda papachilik bilan qo‘l ushlashgan bo‘ladi; bu esa uzoq vaqtdan beri yana faol istibdod sifatida otilib chiqish imkoniyatini intiqlik bilan kutib turgan zulmga hayot bag‘ishlashdan boshqa narsa bo‘lmaydi.”

In the line of history that can be represented with the Constitution of the United States there are three specific waymarks representing some element of the Constitution in both the beginning and the ending of the United States. Each of those three waymarks are political actions, and therefore symbolize the speaking of the United States. The third of those three waymarks in the beginning, that marked 1798, was the Alien and Sedition Acts and the third of those waymarks at the ending is when the United States enforces a Sunday law, and speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven.

Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlari Konstitutsiyasi bilan ifodalanishi mumkin bo‘lgan tarix chizig‘ida Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining ham boshlanishida, ham oxirida Konstitutsiyaning ayrim unsurini ifodalovchi uchta muayyan belgi mavjud. Bu uch belgining har biri siyosiy harakatlardir, shuning uchun ular Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining gapirishini ramziy tarzda ifodalaydi. Boshlanishdagi ana shu uch belgining uchinchisi — 1798-yilni belgilagan “Chet elliklar va fitna to‘g‘risidagi qonunlar” edi; oxirdagi o‘sha belgilar ichidagi uchinchisi esa Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlari yakshanba qonunini majburan joriy etib, Vahiy kitobining o‘n uchinchi bobi, o‘n birinchi oyati bajo bo‘lishi tariqasida ajdaho kabi gapiradigan paytdir.

The prophetic history of the United States begins when, as represented by the earth, it opened its mouth and swallowed up the flood of the dragon’s persecution.

Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining bashoratli tarixi shundan boshlanadiki, yer timsolida ifodalanganidek, u o‘z og‘zini ochib, ajdahoning quvg‘in-sitamlari to‘fonini yutib yubordi.

> And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. Revelation 12:15, 16.

> Va ilon ayolning ortidan uni oqim bilan oqizib ketkazish uchun og‘zidan toshqinday suv otdi. Ammo yer ayolga yordam berdi, yer o‘z og‘zini ochib, ajdaho o‘z og‘zidan otgan toshqinni yutib yubordi. Vahiy 12:15, 16.

In 1776, the beast that was to arise from the earth, and ultimately become the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy in 1798, swallowed up the flood of persecution against God’s people by establishing a nation with a Constitution that protested against the tyrants of European royalty and the tyrants of the papal church.

1776-yilda yerdan chiqishi kerak bo‘lgan va oxir-oqibat 1798-yilda Muqaddas Kitob bashoratining oltinchi shohligiga aylangan mahluq, Yevropa qirolligining zolimlariga va papalik cherkovining zolimlariga qarshi norozilik bildirgan Konstitutsiyaga ega bir xalqni barpo etish orqali Xudoning xalqiga qarshi qilingan ta’qib selini yutib yubordi.

The Declaration of Independence in 1776 typified the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 typified the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 typified the Sunday law in the United States.

1776-yildagi Mustaqillik Deklaratsiyasi 2001-yildagi Patriot Aktining timsoli edi. 1789-yildagi Konstitutsiya 2022-yilda boshlangan Pelosi sud jarayonlarining timsoli edi. 1798-yildagi Chet elliklar va Ig‘vogarlik to‘g‘risidagi aktlar Qo‘shma Shtatlardagi yakshanba qonunining timsoli edi.

The pronouncement of independence by the American patriots in 1776 represented the announcement of the loss of independence with the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 represented the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts represents the Sunday law. The history of the repudiation of every principle of the Constitution represents a progressive overturning of the Constitution that ends at the Sunday law.

1776-yilda amerikalik vatanparvarlar tomonidan mustaqillikning e’lon qilinishi 2001-yildagi Patriot Act bilan mustaqillikning yo‘qotilishi e’lon qilinganini ifoda etdi. 1789-yildagi Konstitutsiya 2022-yilda boshlangan Pelosi Trials’ni ifoda etdi. Alien and Sedition Acts yakshanba qonunini ifoda etadi. Konstitutsiyaning har bir tamoyilidan voz kechish tarixi Konstitutsiyaning yakshanba qonuni bilan nihoyasiga yetadigan izchil ag‘darilishini ifoda etadi.

These lines all align in the hidden history of verse forty of Daniel chapter eleven. In this article we quoted four paragraphs from Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.

Bu satrlarning barchasi Doniyor kitobining o‘n birinchi bobidagi qirqinchi oyatning yashirin tarixida bir-biriga muvofiq keladi. Ushbu maqolada biz Testimonies, 5-jild, 451, 452-betlardan to‘rtta paragraf keltirdik.

We will look closer at those paragraphs in the next article.

Keyingi maqolada o‘sha paragraflarni batafsilroq ko‘rib chiqamiz.

Back to Articles