Article

# Rome Establishes the Vision - Number Eleven

Rim Vahiyni Mustahkamlaydi — O‘n Birinchi Raqam

Understanding the Triple Application of Prophecy: September 11, 2001, and the Final Testing Process for Laodicean Adventism

Bashoratning uch karra tatbiqini anglash: 2001-yil 11-sentyabr va Laodikiyalik Adventizm uchun yakuniy sinov jarayoni

Author

Jeff Pippenger

Published

August 30, 2024

Formats

PDF
Word
Song MP3

Just as August 11, 1840, confirmed the rules adopted by Miller, after September 11, 2001 it was seen by those willing to see, that the prophetic principles adopted by Future for America were the true biblical methodology of the latter rain, as set forth in Isaiah chapter twenty-eight. The application of reform line upon reform line as set forth in sacred history established that September 11, 2001, was a repetition of August 11, 1840.

Xuddi 1840-yil 11-avgust Miller tomonidan qabul qilingan qoidalarni tasdiqlaganidek, 2001-yil 11-sentabrdan keyin ko‘rishga tayyor bo‘lganlar uchun Future for America tomonidan qabul qilingan bashoratli tamoyillar Ishayo kitobining yigirma sakkizinchi bobida bayon etilgan kech yomg‘irning haqiqiy Muqaddas Kitobiy metodologiyasi ekani ayon bo‘ldi. Muqaddas tarixda bayon etilganidek, islohot chizig‘i ustiga islohot chizig‘ini qo‘llash 2001-yil 11-sentabr 1840-yil 11-avgustning takrori bo‘lganini tasdiqladi.

It was seen that as the mighty angel of Revelation ten descended in 1840, He typified His descent in 2001. Both angels descended as a prophecy of Islam was fulfilled. The movement then grew as men and women responded to the effectiveness of the methodology. The leadership of Laodicean Seventh-day Adventism was passed by at the time of the end in 1989, and now that church entered into its final testing process, as the Lord began to select the movement of the third angel to be His last-day spokesmen.

Vahiy 10-bobdagi qudratli Farishta 1840 yilda pastga tushganida, U 2001 yildagi O‘z tushishini timsol qilgani ko‘rildi. Har ikkala farishta ham Islom haqidagi bashorat bajo bo‘lgan paytda pastga tushdi. So‘ng, erkaklar va ayollar ushbu uslubiyatning samaradorligiga javob berganlari sari, harakat o‘sib bordi. Laodikiya ruhidagi Yettinchi kun Adventizmi rahbariyati oxirzamon davrida, 1989 yilda, chetlab o‘tildi, va endi Rabbiy uchinchi farishta harakatini O‘zining oxirgi kunlardagi vakillari sifatida tanlay boshlagan bir paytda, o‘sha jamoat o‘zining yakuniy sinov jarayoniga kirdi.

A premier rule of the rules given for the last days was the triple application of prophecy. Especially so at that time was the triple application of the three woes, which so clearly upheld the event of September 11, 2001. When that truth was honestly investigated, those who were then being led to Jeremiah’s “old paths,” by hearts seeking for the truth, the prophetic fulfillment, along with the validity of the rules of prophetic interpretation adopted by the movement of the third angel was recognized as valid.

Oxirgi kunlar uchun berilgan qoidalarning eng bosh qoidasidan biri bashoratning uch karra tatbiqi edi. Ayniqsa o‘sha paytda uchta voy-holning uch karra tatbiqi shunday ravshan namoyon bo‘ldiki, u 2001-yil 11-sentabr voqeasini yaqqol tasdiqlab turardi. Bu haqiqat halollik bilan tekshirilganida, o‘sha kezlarda haqiqatni izlayotgan qalblar orqali Yeremiyoning “qadimiy yo‘llari”ga yetaklanayotganlar, bashoratning bajo kelishini, shuningdek uchinchi farishta harakati tomonidan qabul qilingan bashoratni talqin qilish qoidalarining haqiqiyligini asosli deb tan oldilar.

It was seen that the correct pioneer understanding of the history of the first woe of Revelation chapter nine represented Islam. The false prophet Mohammed was seen to be the king of that history. In that history Islam would attack the Roman Empire, and their mode of warfare was specifically identified as striking suddenly and unexpectedly. In that regard it was understood that the very mode of warfare of Islam provided the etymological roots of the word “assassin.” In that history Islam would hurt the armies of Rome, and the period concluded under the line of a one-hundred-and-fifty-year time prophecy. When that time prophecy ended on July 27, 1449, the time prophecy and history of the second woe began.

Vahiy kitobining to‘qqizinchi bobidagi birinchi voy tarixiga doir to‘g‘ri kashshofona tushuncha Islomni ifodalashi ko‘rildi. Soxta payg‘ambar Muhammad ushbu tarixning shohi ekani ko‘rildi. O‘sha tarixda Islom Rim imperiyasiga hujum qilishi, va ularning urush olib borish usuli ayniqsa to‘satdan hamda kutilmaganda zarba berish sifatida aniq belgilab qo‘yilgani ko‘rildi. Shu munosabat bilan, aynan Islomning urush usulining o‘zi “assassin” so‘zining etimologik ildizlarini ta’minlashi tushunildi. O‘sha tarixda Islom Rim lashkarlariga ozor yetkazishi, va bu davr yuz ellik yillik vaqt bashorati chizig‘i ostida yakun topishi ko‘rildi. Bu vaqt bashorati 1449-yil 27-iyulda tugaganida, ikkinchi voyning vaqt bashorati va tarixi boshlandi.

It began another time-prophecy of three hundred and ninety-one years and fifteen days, that ended on August 11, 1840. In that history the ruler that represented the prophetic work of Islam was Ottman, who had been typified by Mohammed in the history of the first woe. Chapter nine says that in the history of the second woe, Islam would kill the armies of Rome. They would still exercise the mode of warfare, attacking suddenly and unexpectedly, but in that history gunpowder was first invented and employed, so the second woe represented a mode of warfare represented by the assassin’s sudden attack, plus it included explosives.

Bu uch yuz to‘qson bir yil va o‘n besh kundan iborat yana bir vaqt-payg‘ambarligini boshladi; u 1840-yil 11-avgustda nihoyasiga yetdi. O‘sha tarixda Islomning payg‘ambarlik ishini ifoda etgan hukmdor Ottman edi; u birinchi voy tarixida Muhammad tomonidan timsollashtirilgan edi. To‘qqizinchi bob shuni aytadiki, ikkinchi voy tarixida Islom Rim lashkarlarini o‘ldiradi. Ular hanuz urush olib borishning o‘sha usulini, ya’ni to‘satdan va kutilmaganda hujum qilishni qo‘llar edilar, biroq o‘sha tarixda porox ilk bor ixtiro qilinib ishga solindi; shu bois ikkinchi voy qotilning to‘satdan hujumida ifodalangan urush usulini anglatar edi, bundan tashqari, u portlovchi moddalarni ham o‘z ichiga olardi.

On September 11, 2001 the third woe of Islam suddenly struck the spiritual armies of Rome with explosives. That event marked the beginning of several lines of prophetic truth, but it had clearly been established upon the two previous witnesses of the first and second woe. The event clearly demonstrated that just as the empowerment of the Millerite history of August 11, 1840, when the prophecy of Islam of the second woe was fulfilled and the angel of Revelation ten descended, that when the prophecy of Islam of the third woe arrived, it marked the descent of the angel of Revelation eighteen on that date.

2001-yil 11-sentabrda Islomning uchinchi voyi to‘satdan portlovchi moddalar bilan Rimning ruhiy lashkarlariga zarba berdi. O‘sha voqea bashoratli haqiqatning bir necha yo‘nalishlarining boshlanishini belgiladi, biroq u, shubhasiz, birinchi va ikkinchi voyning avvalgi ikki guvohi ustiga asoslangan edi. Bu voqea shuni ravshan namoyon qildiki, xuddi 1840-yil 11-avgustdagi Millerchilar tarixining quvvatlantirilishi singari — ya’ni Islomning ikkinchi voy haqidagi bashorati amalga oshib, Vahiy kitobining o‘ninchi bobidagi farishta pastga tushgan paytda — Islomning uchinchi voy haqidagi bashorati yetib kelganida, bu o‘sha sanada Vahiy kitobining o‘n sakkizinchi bobidagi farishtaning tushishini belgilagan edi.

> “Now comes the word that I have declared that New York is to be swept away by a tidal wave? This I have never said. I have said, as I looked at the great buildings going up there, story after story, ‘What terrible scenes will take place when the Lord shall arise to shake terribly the earth! Then the words of Revelation 18:1–3 will be fulfilled.’ The whole of the eighteenth chapter of Revelation is a warning of what is coming on the earth. But I have no light in particular in regard to what is coming on New York, only that I know that one day the great buildings there will be thrown down by the turning and overturning of God’s power. From the light given me, I know that destruction is in the world. One word from the Lord, one touch of his mighty power, and these massive structures will fall. Scenes will take place the fearfulness of which we cannot imagine.” Review and Herald, July 5, 1906.

> “Endi men Nyu-Yorkni suv to‘lqini supurib ketishi kerak, deb e’lon qilganman, degan gap kelib chiqyaptimi? Men buni hech qachon aytmaganman. Men u yerda qavatma-qavat qad ko‘tarayotgan ulkan binolarga qarab shunday deganman: ‘Yer yuzini qattiq larzaga solish uchun Rabbiy o‘rnidan turganida, naqadar dahshatli manzaralar yuz beradi! Shunda Vahiy 18:1–3 dagi so‘zlar bajo bo‘ladi.’ Vahiyning o‘n sakkizinchi bobining butuni yer yuziga kelayotgan narsalar haqida ogohlantirishdir. Ammo Nyu-York ustiga aynan nima kelishi borasida menga alohida nur berilmagan; faqat shuni bilamanki, bir kun kelib u yerdagi ulkan binolar Xudoning qudrati burib-ag‘darishi va ostin-ustin qilishi orqali qulatiladi. Menga berilgan nurga ko‘ra, men halokat dunyoda ekanini bilaman. Rabbiydan chiqqan bir so‘z, Uning qudratli quvvatining bir tegishi — va bu ulkan inshootlar qulab tushadi. Biz tasavvur ham qila olmaydigan darajada dahshatli manzaralar yuz beradi.” Review and Herald, 1906-yil 5-iyul.

The movement of Future for America was then seen, by those willing to see, as the parallel of the Millerite movement. Islam of the third woe became a primary element of the message from that point onward. Inspiration plainly taught that when the angel of Revelation descended the latter rain would arrive.

Shundan so‘ng, ko‘rishga tayyor bo‘lganlar tomonidan Future for America harakati Milleriylar harakatining parallelidir, deb ko‘rildi. Uchinchi voyadagi Islom o‘sha nuqtadan boshlab xabarning asosiy unsurlaridan biriga aylandi. Ilhom Vahiy kitobidagi farishta pastga tushganida keyingi yomg‘ir kelishini ravshan tarzda o‘rgatgan edi.

> “The latter rain is to fall upon the people of God. A mighty angel is to come down from heaven, and the whole earth is to be lighted with his glory.” Review and Herald, April 21, 1891.

> “Keyingi yomg‘ir Xudoning xalqi ustiga yog‘ilishi kerak. Qudratli bir farishta osmondan tushib keladi, va butun yer yuzi uning ulug‘vorligi bilan yoritiladi.” Review and Herald, 1891-yil 21-aprel.

As the Lion of the tribe of Judah began to open the broader understanding of the latter rain, He led His people to the book of Joel, which is a primary point of reference of the latter rain. At that point some of those men who had joined the movement post September 11, 2001, determined that the insects of Joel that destroy God’s vine, leading up to the awakening of the Midnight Cry, represented Islam. They could not or would not see that the insects represented Rome.

Yahudo qabilasining Arsloni keyingi yomg‘ir haqidagi kengroq tushunchani ochishni boshlaganida, U O‘z xalqini Yoel kitobiga yetakladi; bu kitob keyingi yomg‘irga oid asosiy murojaat nuqtalaridan biridir. O‘sha paytda 2001-yil 11-sentabrdan keyin bu harakatga qo‘shilgan o‘sha kishilarning ayrimlari, Yoelda Xudoning tokini vayron qiladigan va Yarim Tun Faryodining uyg‘onishiga olib boradigan hasharotlar Islomni ifodalaydi, degan xulosaga keldilar. Ular hasharotlar Rimni ifodalashini ko‘ra olmadilar yoki ko‘rishni istamadilar.

The powerful light that had been brought about by recognizing the triple application of prophecy in regards to the three woes added an unsanctified logical support to their claim that the insects represented Islam. As is always the case, once a private interpretation is entertained a wresting of the Scriptures takes place in an attempt to uphold the false premise. In their work to uphold their view they demonstrated that they did not understand the principle of type and antitype.

Uchta kulfatga doir bashoratning uch karra qo‘llanishini anglash natijasida yuzaga kelgan qudratli nur, hasharotlar Islomni ifodalaydi, degan ularning da’vosiga muqaddaslanmagan mantiqiy tayanch qo‘shdi. Har doimgidek, bir marta shaxsiy talqin qabul qilinsa, soxta asosni saqlab qolishga urinishda Muqaddas Yozuvlarni buzib talqin qilish yuz beradi. O‘z qarashlarini himoya qilish borasidagi ishlarida ular timsol va antitimsol tamoyilini tushunmaganliklarini namoyon etdilar.

In theological and biblical studies, the terms “type” and “antitype” are used to describe a relationship between two elements, where one prefigures or foreshadows the other. This concept often falls under the broader categories of “shadow” and “substance.”

Ilohiyot va Muqaddas Kitob tadqiqotlarida “tip” va “antitip” atamalari bir-biri bilan bog‘liq ikki unsur o‘rtasidagi munosabatni ifodalash uchun qo‘llanadi; bunda ulardan biri boshqasini oldindan tasvirlaydi yoki uning soyasini tashlaydi. Bu tushuncha ko‘pincha “soya” va “mohiyat” kabi kengroq toifalar doirasiga kiradi.

A type is an event, person, or institution in the Old Testament that prefigures or foreshadows a corresponding event, person, or institution in the New Testament. It serves as a symbolic precursor. The antitype is the fulfillment or actualization of the type. It is the reality that was foreshadowed by the type. The concept of “shadow” and “substance” parallels the relationship between type and antitype. The “shadow” represents the (type), whereas the “substance” represents the (antitype).

Tip — Eski Ahddagi bir voqea, shaxs yoki muassasa bo‘lib, Yangi Ahddagi unga muvofiq voqea, shaxs yoki muassasani oldindan bildiradi yoki bashoratli tarzda soyasini tashlaydi. U ramziy bir muqaddima vazifasini bajaradi. Antitip esa tipning bajo keltirilishi yoki voqelikka aylanishidir. U tip tomonidan oldindan soyasi tashlangan voqelikdir. “Soya” va “mohiyat” tushunchasi tip bilan antitip o‘rtasidagi munosabatga muvoziy keladi. “Soya” (tip)ni, “mohiyat” esa (antitip)ni ifodalaydi.

> Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ. Colossians 2:16, 17.

> Shunday ekan, hech kim sizlarni yegulik yoki ichimlik haqida, yoxud bayram kuni, yangi oy yoki shanba kunlari xususida hukm qilmasin; bular kelajakdagi narsalarning soyasidir; ammo jism Masihnikidir. Kolosaliklarga 2:16, 17.

> For the law having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image of the things, can never with those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually make the comers thereunto perfect. Hebrews 10:1.

> Zero Qonun kelajakdagi yaxshi narsalarning soyasiga ega bo‘lib, narsalarning ayni qiyofasining o‘zi emas ekan, ular yildan-yilga doimiy ravishda keltirib turgan o‘sha qurbonliklar bilan u yerga keluvchilarni hech qachon komil qila olmaydi. Ibroniylarga 10:1.

In the post September 11, 2001 controversy over Joel, and the correct identification of papal Rome as symbolized by four insects, thus outlining the progressive destruction of Laodicean Adventism, those arguing that the insects were Islam, not only placed an unsanctified emphasis upon the triple application of the three woes, but they also pointed to types which pointed to the antitype of Rome, and claimed those types actually identified Islam. In doing so, they gave evidence that they either did not truly understand the principle of type and antitype, or they believed misrepresenting the types was a worthy means to justify the end.

2001-yil 11-sentabrdan keyingi davrda Yoel kitobi yuzasidan, hamda to‘rtta hasharot orqali ramziy tarzda ifodalangan papalik Rimini to‘g‘ri aniqlash va shu tariqa Laodikiyadagi adventizmning bosqichma-bosqich vayron qilinishini bayon etish borasidagi bahs-munozarada, hasharotlar Rim emas, balki Islom edi, deb da’vo qilganlar, uch baloning uch karra tatbiq etilishiga muqaddaslanmagan bir urg‘u berish bilan cheklanib qolmay, balki Rimning antitipiga ishora qiluvchi tiplarga ham murojaat qilib, aynan o‘sha tiplar aslida Islomni aniqlab beradi, deb da’vo qildilar. Shunday qilish orqali ular yo tip va antitip tamoyilini chinakamiga tushunmaganliklariga, yoki maqsadni oqlash uchun tiplarni noto‘g‘ri talqin etishni munosib vosita deb bilganliklariga dalil berdilar.

In the current controversy over Rome, there is once again evidence that those holding to the flawed idea that the “robbers” of Daniel chapter eleven, verse fourteen is the United States do not correctly understand both the triple application of prophecy, or the principle of type and antitype.

Rim haqidagi hozirgi bahs-munozarada, Doniyor kitobining o‘n birinchi bob, o‘n to‘rtinchi oyatidagi “qaroqchilar” Qo‘shma Shtatlar deb hisoblaydigan nuqsonli g‘oyaga yopishib olganlar bashoratning uch karra tatbiqini ham, tip va antitip tamoyilini ham to‘g‘ri tushunmasliklari yana bir bor ayon bo‘lmoqda.

When those who hold the view that the “robbers” are the United States seek to uphold their position they employ an application of a triple application of the three Rome’s, to supposedly prove that modern Rome, the third manifestation of Rome is the United States. Trusting that they are not purposely bearing false witness, and that they are only manifesting a blind ignorance of the rules of a triple application of prophecy, they employ a prophetic characteristic of the first two Rome’s and argue that a characteristic of Rome’s history identifies modern Rome.

“qaroqchilar” Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlari, degan qarashni tutganlar o‘z mavqelarini himoya qilishga uringanlarida, ular uchta Rimning uch karra tatbiqiga doir bir qo‘llanishdan foydalanadilar; go‘yoki shu bilan zamonaviy Rim, ya’ni Rimning uchinchi namoyoni, Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlari ekanini isbotlamoqchi bo‘ladilar. Ular ataylab soxta guvohlik bermayotganiga, balki faqat bashoratning uch karra tatbiqi qoidalariga nisbatan ko‘r nodonlikni namoyon etayotganiga ishonib, ular dastlabki ikki Rimga xos bo‘lgan bashoratli bir xususiyatdan foydalanadilar va Rim tarixining bir xususiyati zamonaviy Rimni aniqlab beradi, deb da’vo qiladilar.

Pagan Rome is the first of three prophetic fulfillments of Rome. In Daniel chapter eight pagan Rome is the masculine little horn. In chapter two pagan Rome is statecraft. In Daniel seven pagan Rome divides into a ten-fold kingdom.

Butparast Rim — Rim haqidagi uch bashoratiy ro‘yobning birinchisidir. Doniyor kitobining sakkizinchi bobida butparast Rim erkak jinsidagi kichik shoxdir. Ikkinchi bobda butparast Rim davlatchilikdir. Doniyor kitobining yettinchi bobida butparast Rim o‘n bo‘lakli saltanatga bo‘linadi.

The second manifestation of Rome is papal Rome, who in chapter eight is the feminine little horn, and who is churchcraft in chapter two, and who is the horn speaking blasphemies and plucks up three horns in chapter seven. Pagan Rome is a singular power, but papal Rome is a twofold power, representing the papal church as ruling over the statecraft of the previous political structures of pagan Rome. In 1798, the papal power received its deadly wound, but it did not cease to be a church, it only ceased to be a beast of Bible prophecy for the civil power it had previously controlled was removed.

Rimning ikkinchi namoyoni — papalik Rimi bo‘lib, u sakkizinchi bobda ayol jinsidagi kichik shoxdir, ikkinchi bobda esa cherkovchilikdir, yettinchi bobda esa kufr so‘zlarini gapiradigan va uchta shoxni yulib tashlaydigan shoxdir. Butparast Rim yagona hokimiyatdir, ammo papalik Rimi ikki qirrali hokimiyat bo‘lib, papalik cherkovining butparast Rimning avvalgi siyosiy tuzilmalariga mansub davlatchilik ustidan hukmronlik qilishini ifodalaydi. 1798 yilda papalik hokimiyati o‘limli yarasini oldi, ammo u cherkov bo‘lishdan to‘xtamadi; u faqat Muqaddas Kitob bashoratidagi mahluq bo‘lishdan to‘xtadi, chunki ilgari o‘zi nazorat qilgan fuqaroviy hokimiyat undan olib tashlangan edi.

The second Rome is papal Rome and it only functioned as a power (beast) of Bible prophecy when it had the ability to control the power of the state to carry out its blasphemous plans. The first Rome was a singular power, the second Rome was a twofold power and the third Rome is a threefold power. The three manifestations of Rome are governed by the same principles as every triple application of prophecy. Prophetically there are three woes, three Babylon’s, three Rome’s and three Elijah’s. In terms of type and antitype the first two manifestation of any of the triple applications are types which provide the shadow of the third fulfillment, which is the antitype and substance of the triple application of prophecy.

Ikkinchi Rim — papalik Rimi bo‘lib, u faqat o‘zining kufrona rejalarini amalga oshirish uchun davlat hokimiyatini boshqarish qudratiga ega bo‘lganida Muqaddas Kitob bashoratidagi bir qudrat (mahluq) sifatida faoliyat ko‘rsatgan. Birinchi Rim yakka bir qudrat edi, ikkinchi Rim ikki qirrali qudrat edi, uchinchi Rim esa uch qirrali qudratdir. Rimning ushbu uch ko‘rinishi bashoratning har bir uch karra tatbiqidagi kabi ayni tamoyillar bilan boshqariladi. Bashoriy ma’noda uchta voy, uchta Bobil, uchta Rim va uchta Ilyos bor. Tip va antitip nuqtai nazaridan, uch karra tatbiqlarning har biridagi dastlabki ikki ko‘rinish tiplar bo‘lib, ular uchinchi bajo kelishning soyasini beradi; uchinchi bajo kelish esa bashoratning uch karra tatbiqidagi antitip va mohiyatdir.

With Rome the characteristics of the first two Rome’s identify that both pagan and papal Rome gave the title of Pontifex Maximus to their ruler. Therefore, the title of the ruler of modern Rome would be Pontifex Maximus, a title never attributed to any president of the United States. The first two Rome’s would overcome three geographical obstacles in order to establish the authority upon the throne of their specific period of history. There is no evidence of the United States overcoming three geographical obstacles leading up to 1798.

Rim bilan bog‘liq holda, birinchi ikki Rimning xususiyatlari shuni ko‘rsatadiki, ham butparast Rim, ham papalik Rimi o‘z hukmdoriga Pontifex Maximus unvonini bergan. Shuning uchun zamonaviy Rim hukmdorining unvoni Pontifex Maximus bo‘lar edi; bu unvon esa hech qachon Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining biror prezidentiga nisbat berilmagan. Birinchi ikki Rim o‘z tarixiy davrining taxti ustida hokimiyatni o‘rnatish uchun uchta geografik to‘siqni yengib o‘tgan bo‘lar edi. 1798-yilgacha bo‘lgan davrda Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarining uchta geografik to‘siqni yengib o‘tganiga oid hech qanday dalil yo‘q.

The first two Rome’s had a specific period of time identified when they would rule supremely. In verse twenty-four of Daniel eleven pagan Rome is identified ruling for a “time,” or three hundred and sixty years, which it did from the Battle of Actium in 31 BC, until the year 330 AD. Repeatedly papal Rome is identified as ruling for twelve hundred and sixty years after the three horns were removed, from 538 until 1798. In Isaiah chapter twenty-three the United States is identified as reigning for seventy symbolic years, as the days of one king, but it never removed three geographical obstacles in advance of its ruling for seventy symbolic years.

Dastlabki ikki Rimning qachon mutlaq hukmronlik qilishi aniq bir vaqt davri bilan belgilangan edi. Daniel kitobining o‘n birinchi bob yigirma to‘rtinchi oyatida butparast Rim “bir vaqt”, ya’ni uch yuz oltmish yil davomida hukmronlik qilishi bilan ko‘rsatilgan bo‘lib, u miloddan avvalgi 31-yildagi Aktsiy jangi paytidan to milodiy 330-yilgacha shunday qildi. Papa Rimi esa, uchta shox olib tashlangandan keyin, 538-yildan 1798-yilgacha bo‘lgan ming ikki yuz oltmish yil davomida hukmronlik qilgani qayta-qayta ko‘rsatilgan. Ishayo kitobining yigirma uchinchi bobida Qo‘shma Shtatlar bir podshohning kunlari kabi ramziy yetmish yil davomida hukmronlik qilishi bilan ko‘rsatilgan, biroq u ramziy yetmish yil davomida hukmronlik qilishidan avval hech qachon uchta jug‘rofiy to‘siqni olib tashlamagan.

Modern Rome is represented as overcoming the three geographical obstacles of the king of the south, the glorious land and Egypt in Daniel chapter eleven, verses forty to forty-two, and when those three obstacles are defeated and brought into the submission of Rome they then form the threefold union of the dragon, the beast and false prophet. John also informs us that the papal beast’s deadly wound is healed and that it then rules for forty-two symbolic months.

Zamonaviy Rim Doniyor kitobining o‘n birinchi bobida, qirqinchi oyatdan qirq ikkinchi oyatgacha, janub podshohi, ulug‘vor yurt va Misrning uchta geografik to‘sig‘ini yengib o‘tayotgani sifatida tasvirlanadi; va bu uch to‘siq mag‘lub etilib, Rimga bo‘ysundirilgach, ular ajdarho, maxluq va soxta payg‘ambardan iborat uch karra ittifoqni tashkil etadi. Yuhanno ham bizga papalik maxluqining halokatli yarasi tuzatilganini va shundan so‘ng uning qirq ikki ramziy oy davomida hukmronlik qilishini ma’lum qiladi.

> And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. Revelation 13:3–5.

> Va men uning boshlaridan birini xuddi o‘lim darajasida yaralangandek ko‘rdim; va uning halokatli yarasi tuzaldi: va butun dunyo hayvonga hayrat bilan ergashdi. Va ular hayvonga hokimiyat bergan ajdahoga sajda qildilar; va hayvonga ham sajda qilib, shunday dedilar: Hayvonga kim o‘xshar? U bilan urush qilishga kim qodirdir? Va unga buyuk so‘zlar va kufrlar so‘zlovchi bir og‘iz berildi; va unga qirq ikki oy davom etish uchun hokimiyat berildi. Vahiy 13:3–5.

The beast that rules for forty-two symbolic months after its deadly wound is healed is the Roman power.

O‘limga olib keluvchi yarasi tuzalganidan keyin qirq ikki ramziy oy davomida hukmronlik qiladigan mahluq — Rim hokimiyatidir.

> The prophecy of Revelation 13 declares that the power represented by the beast with lamblike horns shall cause ‘the earth and them which dwell therein’ to worship the papacy—there symbolized by the beast ‘like unto a leopard.’ . .. In both the Old and the New World, the papacy will receive homage in the honor paid to the Sunday institution, that rests solely upon the authority of the Roman Church.” The Great Controversy, 578.

> Vahiy 13 dagi bashorat qoʻzichoqsimon shoxlarga ega boʻlgan mahluq bilan ifodalangan hokimiyat “yer yuzini va unda yashovchilarni” papalikka sajda qildirishini e’lon qiladi; bu yerda papalik “qoplonga oʻxshash” mahluq orqali ramziy ifodalangan.... Eski hamda Yangi Dunyoda papalik yakshanba institutiga koʻrsatiladigan ehtirom orqali ta’zim qabul qiladi; bu institut esa butunlay Rim cherkovining hokimiyatiga tayanadi.” The Great Controversy, 578.

Pagan, the first Rome, ruled supremely for three hundred and sixty years in fulfillment of Daniel chapter eleven, verse twenty-four, and it did so after it removed three geographical obstacles in fulfillment of Daniel chapter eight, verse nine.

Butparast, birinchi Rim, Doniyor kitobining o‘n birinchi bobi, yigirma to‘rtinchi oyatining bajo bo‘lishida uch yuz oltmish yil davomida mutlaq hukmronlik qildi, va bu ishni Doniyor kitobining sakkizinchi bobi, to‘qqizinchi oyatining bajo bo‘lishida uchta geografik to‘siqni olib tashlaganidan keyin amalga oshirdi.

Papal, the second Rome ruled supremely for twelve hundred and sixty years in fulfillment of several passages of Scripture, and it did so after it removed three geographical obstacles in fulfillment of Daniel chapter seven, verses eight and twenty.

Papalik — ikkinchi Rim — Muqaddas Yozuvning bir necha oyatlarining amalga oshishi sifatida ming ikki yuz oltmish yil davomida oliy hukmronlik qildi; va buni Doniyor kitobining yettinchi bobi, sakkizinchi va yigirmanchi oyatlarining amalga oshishi sifatida uchta geografik to‘siqni bartaraf etganidan keyin qildi.

Modern Rome overcomes the king of the south in verse forty of Daniel eleven, and then in verse forty-one it overcomes the glorious land and in verse forty-two it overcomes Egypt. Modern Rome is the king of the north of Daniel chapter eleven.

Zamonaviy Rim Doniyor kitobining o‘n birinchi bobidagi qirqinchi oyatda janub podshohi ustidan g‘alaba qozonadi, so‘ng qirq birinchi oyatda ulug‘vor yurtni yengadi va qirq ikkinchi oyatda Misrni zabt etadi. Zamonaviy Rim Doniyor kitobining o‘n birinchi bobidagi shimol podshohidir.

Pagan, the first Rome, was a persecuting power, and papal, the second Rome, was a persecuting power and therefore modern Rome will be a persecuting power.

Butparast, birinchi Rim, ta’qib qiluvchi hokimiyat edi, va papalik, ikkinchi Rim, ta’qib qiluvchi hokimiyat edi; demak, zamonaviy Rim ham ta’qib qiluvchi hokimiyat bo‘ladi.

The United States will participate in the third persecution accomplished by modern Rome, but this doesn’t identify the United States as the papal power, it simply identifies a characteristic of the United States’ relationship to the papal power in the last days.

Qo‘shma Shtatlar zamonaviy Rim amalga oshiradigan uchinchi quvg‘inda ishtirok etadi, biroq bu Qo‘shma Shtatlarni papalik hokimiyati deb belgilamaydi; bu shunchaki oxirgi kunlarda Qo‘shma Shtatlarning papalik hokimiyati bilan bo‘lgan munosabatining bir xususiyatini ko‘rsatadi.

Those who wish to argue that the United States is the “robbers of thy people” in the last days employ the triple application of the three Rome’s to incorrectly identify the United States. The flawed method they employ in the context of a triple application is based upon identifying a characteristic of the first two Rome’s, and insisting that a prophetic characteristic of Rome, and not Rome itself, is the third Rome.

Oxirgi kunlarda Qo‘shma Shtatlar “sening xalqingning talonchilari” ekanini da’vo qilmoqchi bo‘lganlar, Qo‘shma Shtatlarni noto‘g‘ri aniqlash uchun uchta Rimning uch karra tatbiqini qo‘llaydilar. Ular uch karra tatbiq doirasida qo‘llaydigan nuqsonli usul shundan iboratki, birinchi ikki Rimning bir xususiyatini aniqlab olib, so‘ngra Rimning o‘zi emas, balki Rimga oid bashoratli bir xususiyat uchinchi Rimdir, deb qat’iy turib oladilar.

They identify Constantine’s first historical Sunday law in 321 AD, and then papal Rome’s Sunday law in 538 AD, to claim the soon-coming Sunday law in the United States defines the United States as modern Rome, and they also mix their flawed application by associating Jesus’ warning to flee when the “abominations of desolation” spoken of by Daniel, as the Sunday law. The “abomination of desolation” Jesus spoke of, points to two Sunday laws in the last days, but it is a very different symbolism in that it is a warning to flee, not the warning to shun the mark of the beast. Their flawed idea doesn’t even address that there are two specific Sunday laws in the last days.

Ular milodiy 321-yildagi Konstantinning tarixdagi ilk Yakshanba qonunini va milodiy 538-yildagi papalik Rimining Yakshanba qonunini ko‘rsatib, yaqinda Qo‘shma Shtatlarda joriy etiladigan Yakshanba qonuni Qo‘shma Shtatlarni zamonaviy Rim sifatida belgilaydi, deb da’vo qiladilar; shuningdek, Doniyor orqali aytilgan “xarob qiluvchi jirkanchliklar” ko‘ringanda qochish haqidagi Iso ogohlantirishini Yakshanba qonuni bilan bog‘lash orqali o‘zlarining nuqsonli tatbiqlarini ham aralashtiradilar. Iso tilga olgan “xarob qiluvchi jirkanchlik” oxirgi kunlarda ikkita Yakshanba qonuniga ishora qiladi, biroq bu juda boshqacha ramziydir, chunki u qochish haqidagi ogohlantirishdir, mahluqning belgisidan saqlanish haqidagi ogohlantirish emas. Ularning nuqsonli g‘oyasi oxirgi kunlarda aynan ikkita muayyan Yakshanba qonuni borligini hatto hisobga ham olmaydi.

> When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains: Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house: Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes. And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day. Matthew 24:15–20.

> Shunday ekan, qachonki sizlar muqaddas joyda Doniyor payg‘ambar tomonidan aytilgan vayron qiluvchi jirkanchlikning turganini ko‘rsangiz, (o‘quvchi anglasin:) u holda Yahudiyada bo‘lganlar tog‘larga qochsinlar; tomning ustida bo‘lgan kishi uyidan biror narsa olish uchun pastga tushmasin; dalada bo‘lgan kishi ham kiyimini olish uchun orqaga qaytmasin. O‘sha kunlarda homilador bo‘lganlarga va emizikli bolasi borlarga hol bo‘lsin! Ibodat qilinglarki, qochishingiz qishda ham, shanba kunida ham bo‘lmasin. Matto 24:15–20.

“The abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet,” was a sign which Jesus gave to His people that identified when they should flee from the coming destruction of Jerusalem as pagan Rome besieged and thereafter destroyed the sanctuary and city from the year 66 to the year 70 AD.

“Doniyor payg‘ambar tomonidan aytilgan vayronagarchilik jirkanchligi” Iso O‘z xalqiga bergan bir alomat edi; bu alomat butparast Rim Quddusni qamal qilib, keyin milodiy 66-yildan 70-yilgacha muqaddas maskan va shaharni vayron qilayotgan paytda, ular yaqinlashib kelayotgan Quddus halokatidan qachon qochishlari kerakligini ko‘rsatib berardi.

> “Jesus declared to the listening disciples the judgments that were to fall upon apostate Israel, and especially the retributive vengeance that would come upon them for their rejection and crucifixion of the Messiah. Unmistakable signs would precede the awful climax. The dreaded hour would come suddenly and swiftly. And the Saviour warned His followers: ‘When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) then let them which be in Judea flee into the mountains.’ Matthew 24:15, 16; Luke 21:20, 21. When the idolatrous standards of the Romans should be set up in the holy ground, which extended some furlongs outside the city walls, then the followers of Christ were to find safety in flight. When the warning sign should be seen, those who would escape must make no delay. . ..

> “Iso apostat bo‘lgan Isroil ustiga tushajak hukmlarni, ayniqsa Masihni rad etib, xochga mixlaganlari uchun ularga kelajak qasoskor intiqomni tinglab turgan shogirdlariga bayon qildi. O‘sha dahshatli avj nuqtasidan oldin shubhasiz alomatlar namoyon bo‘lar edi. Qo‘rqinchli soat to‘satdan va shiddat bilan yetib kelardi. Va Najotkor O‘z izdoshlarini ogohlantirdi: ‘Shunday ekan, qachonki sizlar Doniyor payg‘ambar orqali aytilgan vayronagarchilik makruhligi muqaddas joyda turganini ko‘rsangiz, (o‘qigan anglasin:) unda Yahudiyada bo‘lganlar tog‘larga qochsinlar.’ Matto 24:15, 16; Luqo 21:20, 21. Rimliklarning butparast bayroqlari shahar devorlaridan bir necha furlong tashqariga cho‘zilgan muqaddas yerga o‘rnatilgach, Masihning izdoshlariga qochish orqali najot topish lozim edi. Ogohlantiruvchi alomat ko‘ringanda, qutulib qolmoqchi bo‘lganlar hech qanday kechikish qilmasliklari kerak edi....”

> “Not one Christian perished in the destruction of Jerusalem. Christ had given His disciples warning, and all who believed His words watched for the promised sign. . . . Without delay they fled to a place of safety—the city of Pella, in the land of Perea, beyond Jordan.” The Great Controversy, 25, 30.

> “Quddusning vayron qilinishida birorta ham masihiy halok bo‘lmadi. Masih O‘z shogirdlarini ogohlantirgan edi, va Uning so‘zlariga ishonganlarning hammasi va’da qilingan alomatni kutib kuzatib turdilar.... Ular zudlik bilan xavfsiz joyga — Iordandan naridagi Pereya yurtidagi Pella shahriga qochib ketdilar.” The Great Controversy, 25, 30.

As the year 538 approached, the Christians of that era recognized that the church had been corrupted by a compromise with the religion of paganism, and based upon the warning of Christ, and in conjunction with the light given through the apostle Paul’s testimony in 2 Thessalonians chapter two, they fled into the prophetic wilderness of the twelve hundred and sixty years.

538-yil yaqinlashar ekan, o‘sha davr nasroniylari jamoat butparastlik dini bilan murosaga kelish oqibatida buzilganini angladilar va Masihning ogohlantirishiga, shuningdek, havoriy Pavlusning 2 Salonikaliklarga maktubining ikkinchi bobidagi guvohligi orqali berilgan nurga asoslanib, o‘n ikki yuz oltmish yillik bashoratli sahroga qochib ketdilar.

> “But before the coming of Christ, important developments in the religious world, foretold in prophecy, were to take place. The apostle declared: ‘Be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the day of Christ is at hand. Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.’

> “Ammo Masihning kelishidan oldin, bashoratlarda oldindan aytilganidek, diniy dunyoda muhim voqealar yuz berishi kerak edi. Havoriy shunday degan: ‘Tezda fikringizdan chalg‘imanglar va na ruh, na so‘z, na go‘yo bizdan chiqqan maktub orqali vahimaga tushmanglar; go‘yo Masihning kuni yaqinlashib qolgandek. Hech kim sizlarni hech qanday yo‘l bilan aldab qo‘ymasin; chunki avvalo yuz o‘girish kelmaguncha va halokat o‘g‘li bo‘lgan o‘sha gunoh odami oshkor bo‘lmaguncha, o‘sha kun kelmaydi; u Xudo deb atalgan yoki sajda qilinadigan har narsaga qarshi turadi va o‘zini ulardan yuqori ko‘taradi; shunday qilib, u Xudodek Xudoning ma’badida o‘tirib, o‘zini Xudo ekanini ko‘rsatadi.’”

> “Paul’s words were not to be misinterpreted. It was not to be taught that he, by special revelation, had warned the Thessalonians of the immediate coming of Christ. Such a position would cause confusion of faith; for disappointment often leads to unbelief. The apostle therefore cautioned the brethren to receive no such message as coming from him, and he proceeded to emphasize the fact that the papal power, so clearly described by the prophet Daniel, was yet to rise and wage war against God’s people. Until this power should have performed its deadly and blasphemous work, it would be in vain for the church to look for the coming of their Lord. ‘Remember ye not,’ Paul inquired, ‘that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?’

> “Pavlusning so‘zlari noto‘g‘ri talqin qilinmasligi kerak edi. U maxsus vahiy orqali Salonikaliklarni Masihning darhol kelishi haqida ogohlantirgan, deb ta’lim berilmasligi lozim edi. Bunday qarash imon borasida chalkashlikni keltirib chiqarar edi; chunki ko‘pincha ko‘ngil qolishi imonsizlikka olib boradi. Shuning uchun havoriy birodarlarni undan kelayotgandek bo‘lgan bunday xabarni qabul qilmaslikka ogohlantirdi va payg‘ambar Doniyor tomonidan shu qadar aniq tasvirlangan papalik hokimiyati hali ko‘tarilib chiqib, Xudoning xalqiga qarshi urush olib borishi kerakligini ta’kidlashda davom etdi. Bu hokimiyat o‘zining o‘lim keltiruvchi va kufrona ishini ado etmagunicha, jamoat uchun o‘z Rabbining kelishini kutish behuda bo‘lar edi. Pavlus: ‘Esingizda yo‘qmi, men hali sizlar bilan bo‘lganimda bularni sizlarga aytgan edim-ku?’ deb so‘radi.”

> “Terrible were the trials that were to beset the true church. Even at the time when the apostle was writing, the ‘mystery of iniquity’ had already begun to work. The developments that were to take place in the future were to be ‘after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, and with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish.’

> “Haqiqiy jamoat boshiga tushishi kerak bo‘lgan sinovlar dahshatli edi. Havoriy bu so‘zlarni yozayotgan paytning o‘zidayoq, «qonunsizlik siri» allaqachon amal qila boshlagan edi. Kelajakda yuz berishi kerak bo‘lgan voqealar esa «shaytonning faoliyatiga ko‘ra, har xil qudrat, alomatlar va yolg‘on mo‘jizalar bilan, hamda halok bo‘layotganlarda nohaqlikning har xil aldovlari bilan» sodir bo‘lishi kerak edi.”

> “Especially solemn is the apostle’s statement regarding those who should refuse to receive ‘the love of the truth.’ ‘For this cause,’ he declared of all who should deliberately reject the messages of truth, ‘God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: that they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.’ Men cannot with impunity reject the warnings that God in mercy sends them. From those who persist in turning from these warnings, God withdraws His Spirit, leaving them to the deceptions that they love.” Acts of the Apostles, 265, 266.

> “Haqiqatga bo‘lgan muhabbat”ni qabul qilishdan bosh tortadiganlar haqidagi havoriyning bayonoti ayniqsa tantanalidir. U haqiqat xabarlarini ataylab rad etadigan barcha kishilar to‘g‘risida shunday degan edi: “Shu sababdan Xudo ularga kuchli adashishni yuboradi, toki ular yolg‘onga ishonsinlar: toki haqiqatga ishonmagan, balki nohaqlikdan zavq olganlarning barchasi hukm qilinsin.” Insonlar Xudo O‘z rahm-shafqati bilan ularga yuboradigan ogohlantirishlarni jazosiz rad eta olmaydilar. Bu ogohlantirishlardan yuz o‘girishda davom etadiganlardan Xudo O‘z Ruhini qaytarib oladi va ularni o‘zlari sevgan aldovlarga tashlab qo‘yadi.” Havoriylarning faoliyati, 265, 266.

The compromise between paganism and the church was the warning sign that led the Christians of that era to separate from papal Rome, but it should be noted that the light that Paul contributed to Jesus’ warning to flee, is the same passage that William Miller came to understand that “the daily” of the book of Daniel represented pagan Rome. The prophetic relationship between pagan Rome restraining, and then falling away in order for papal Rome to ascend to the throne was a truth that must be understood, for the consequences of not recognizing the prophetic relationship would bring strong delusion upon those who did not love that truth. Sister White addresses the same history:

Butparastlik bilan cherkov o‘rtasidagi murosa o‘sha davr masihiylarini papalik Rimidan ajralishga olib borgan ogohlantiruvchi belgi edi, biroq shuni ta’kidlash lozimki, Pavlus Iso bergan qochish haqidagi ogohlantirishga qo‘shgan nur aynan Uilyam Miller Doniyor kitobidagi “kundalik” butparast Rimni anglatishini tushunib yetgan o‘sha parchadir. Butparast Rimning to‘sib turishi, so‘ngra esa papalik Rim taxtga ko‘tarilishi uchun chekinib tushib ketishi o‘rtasidagi bashoratli munosabat anglanishi zarur bo‘lgan haqiqat edi, chunki bu bashoratli munosabatni tan olmaslik oqibatlari o‘sha haqiqatni sevmaganlar ustiga kuchli adashishni keltirar edi. Opa Uayt ayni shu tarixga murojaat qiladi:

> “It required a desperate struggle for those who would be faithful to stand firm against the deceptions and abominations which were disguised in sacerdotal garments and introduced into the church. The Bible was not accepted as the standard of faith. The doctrine of religious freedom was termed heresy, and its upholders were hated and proscribed.

> “Ruhoniy liboslariga burkangan va jamoat ichiga kiritilgan aldovlar hamda jirkanchliklarga qarshi, sodiq qolishni istaganlar qat’iy turib olishlari uchun shiddatli kurash talab etilar edi. Muqaddas Kitob imonning mezoni sifatida qabul qilinmas edi. Diniy erkinlik ta’limoti bid’at deb atalardi, va uni qo‘llab-quvvatlaganlar nafrat qilinib, ta’qib ostiga olinardi.

> “After a long and severe conflict, the faithful few decided to dissolve all union with the apostate church if she still refused to free herself from falsehood and idolatry. They saw that separation was an absolute necessity if they would obey the word of God. They dared not tolerate errors fatal to their own souls, and set an example which would imperil the faith of their children and children’s children. To secure peace and unity they were ready to make any concession consistent with fidelity to God; but they felt that even peace would be too dearly purchased at the sacrifice of principle. If unity could be secured only by the compromise of truth and righteousness, then let there be difference, and even war.” The Great Controversy, 45, 46.

> “Uzoq va shiddatli kurashdan so‘ng, sodiq bo‘lgan ozchilik, agar murtad jamoat hanuzgacha o‘zini yolg‘on va butparastlikdan xalos etishni rad etsa, u bilan bo‘lgan har qanday ittifoqni bekor qilishga qaror qildi. Ular Xudoning kalomiga itoat etishlari uchun ajralish mutlaq zarurat ekanini angladilar. Ular o‘z jonlari uchun halokatli bo‘lgan xatolarga toqat qila olmas edilar, shuningdek farzandlari va farzandlarining farzandlari imonini xatarga qo‘yadigan namuna ko‘rsatishga ham jur’at eta olmas edilar. Tinchlik va birlikni ta’minlash uchun ular Xudoga sadoqatga muvofiq bo‘lgan har qanday yon berishga tayyor edilar; biroq ular tinchlikning o‘zi ham tamoyilni qurbon qilish evaziga haddan tashqari qimmatga tushishini his qildilar. Agar birlikka faqat haqiqat va solihlikdan voz kechish orqali erishish mumkin bo‘lsa, unda tafovut bo‘lsin, hatto urush ham bo‘lsin.” The Great Controversy, 45, 46.

The prophetic relationship between the United States and the papacy in the last days has been typified, and emphasized, by Paul’s identification of the relationship between pagan and papal Rome leading up to 538 AD. In the triple application of Rome, pagan Rome fulfilled Jesus words identifying the abomination of desolation as a sign to flee, and papal Rome also fulfilled Jesus’ words. Sister White identifies another fulfillment of Christ’s words.

Oxirgi kunlarda Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlari bilan papalik o‘rtasidagi bashoratli munosabat 538-yilgacha bo‘lgan davrda butparast Rim bilan papalik Rim o‘rtasidagi munosabatni Pavlus aniqlab bergani orqali timsollashtirilgan va ta’kidlangan. Rimning uch karra qo‘llanishida, butparast Rim vayronagarchilik qabihligi qochish uchun belgi ekanini bildirgan Isoning so‘zlarini bajo keltirdi, va papalik Rim ham Isoning so‘zlarini bajo keltirdi. Opa Uayt Masihning so‘zlarining yana bir bajo kelishini ko‘rsatadi.

> “It is no time now for God’s people to be fixing their affections or laying up their treasure in the world. The time is not far distant, when, like the early disciples, we shall be forced to seek a refuge in desolate and solitary places. As the siege of Jerusalem by the Roman armies was the signal for flight to the Judean Christians, so the assumption of power on the part of our nation in the decree enforcing the papal sabbath will be a warning to us. It will then be time to leave the large cities, preparatory to leaving the smaller ones for retired homes in secluded places among the mountains.” Testimonies, volume 5, 464.

> “Endi Xudoning xalqi uchun o‘z mehr-muhabbatini bu dunyoga bog‘laydigan yoki o‘z xazinasini unda to‘playdigan vaqt emas. Ilk shogirdlar singari, biz ham vayron va yolg‘iz joylardan panoh izlashga majbur bo‘ladigan vaqt uzoq emas. Quddusning Rim qo‘shinlari tomonidan qamal qilinishi Yahudiyadagi masihiylar uchun qochish ishorasi bo‘lganidek, papalik shanbasini majburan joriy etuvchi farmonda xalqimizning hokimiyatni o‘z qo‘liga olishi ham biz uchun ogohlantirish bo‘ladi. O‘shanda yirik shaharlardan chiqib ketishning, so‘ngra esa tog‘lar orasidagi xilvat joylardagi tanho maskanlarga ko‘chib borish uchun kichik shaharlardan ham ketishga hozirlik ko‘rishning vaqti keladi.” Testimonies, 5-jild, 464.

For the Christians of Christ’s time period the warning identified when to flee Jerusalem. In the fifth and sixth century the warning for the Christians led them to flee into the wilderness.

Masihning davridagi masihiylar uchun bu ogohlantirish Quddusdan qachon qochish kerakligini ko‘rsatdi. Beshinchi va oltinchi asrlarda esa bu ogohlantirish masihiylarni sahroga qochishga undadi.

> And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. . .. And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent. And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. Revelation 12:6, 15–17.

> Va xotin sahroga qochib ketdi; u yerda uning uchun Xudo tomonidan tayyorlangan bir joy bor edi, toki u yerda uni ming ikki yuz oltmish kun boqsinlar.... Va xotinga buyuk burgutning ikki qanoti berildi, toki u ilonning yuzidan sahroga, o‘z joyiga uchib borsin; u yerda bir zamon, zamonlar va yarim zamon davomida oziqlantiriladi. Va ilon o‘z og‘zidan xotinning ortidan daryodek suv otdi, toki uni oqim bilan oqizib yuborsin. Ammo yer xotinga yordam berdi, va yer o‘z og‘zini ochib, ajdaho o‘z og‘zidan otib chiqargan daryoni yutib yubordi. Va ajdaho xotindan g‘azablandi va uning zurriyotining qolgani bilan urush qilgani ketdi; ular Xudoning amrlarini saqlaydilar va Iso Masihning shahodatiga egadirlar. Vahiy 12:6, 15–17.

Jesus always illustrates the end of a thing with the beginning of the thing, for He is Alpha and Omega. The warning of the abomination of desolation in the history of papal Rome was recognized when the papal power was recognized as standing in the holy place.

Iso har doim bir narsaning nihoyasini o‘sha narsaning boshlanishi bilan tasvirlaydi, chunki U Alfa va Omegadir. Papalik Rimining tarixidagi xarobalik keltiruvchi jirkanchlik haqidagi ogohlantirish papalik hokimiyati muqaddas joyda turgan deb tan olingan paytda anglab yetildi.

The warning is recorded by Matthew, Mark and Luke, and each reference has a slight variation of words. Matthew states, “When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place,” and Mark states, “when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not.” Luke states, “when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains.”

Bu ogohlantirish Matto, Mark va Luqo tomonidan qayd etilgan bo‘lib, har bir iqtibosda so‘zlarning ozgina farqi mavjud. Matto shunday deydi: “Shunday ekan, sizlar Doniyor payg‘ambar orqali aytilgan vayronagarchilik jirkanchini muqaddas joyda turganini ko‘rganingizda”, Mark esa shunday deydi: “sizlar Doniyor payg‘ambar orqali aytilgan vayronagarchilik jirkanchini turmasligi kerak bo‘lgan joyda turganini ko‘rganingizda.” Luqo shunday deydi: “sizlar Quddusning qo‘shinlar bilan o‘rab olinganini ko‘rganingizda, bilinglarki, uning vayron bo‘lishi yaqinlashgan. Shunda Yahudiyada bo‘lganlar tog‘larga qochsinlar.”

All three testimonies apply together. In a more specific application, Luke’s reference of Jerusalem being compassed with armies identifies the warning that when pagan Rome began its siege against Jerusalem in the year 66 AD, that Christians still in Jerusalem were to immediately flee. Matthew’s reference of “the holy place,” corresponds with Paul identifying the “man of sin” who “sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God,” thus representing the papal fulfillment of the “abomination of desolation.” Mark identifies the abomination of desolation standing where it ought not, and it corresponds to the warning to flee given to Adventism in the last days. Two of the warnings are associated with the command that whoever reads the warning should understand, and they all address a sign that was to inform the Christians of the era to flee.

Uchala guvohlikning barchasi birgalikda tatbiq etiladi. Yanada aniqroq tatbiqda, Luqoning Quddusning lashkarlar bilan qurshab olinishi haqidagi ishorasi, milodiy 66-yilda majusiy Rim Quddusga qarshi qamalni boshlaganida, Quddusda hali qolayotgan masihiylar darhol qochishlari kerakligi haqidagi ogohlantirishni belgilab beradi. Matto tilga olgan “muqaddas joy” Pavlus aniqlab bergan, “Xudoning ma’badida o‘tirib, o‘zini Xudo deb ko‘rsatuvchi” “gunoh odami”ga mos keladi; shu tariqa bu “xarob qiluvchi jirkanchlik”ning papalikdagi bajo bo‘lishini ifodalaydi. Mark esa xarob qiluvchi jirkanchlikning bo‘lishi kerak bo‘lmagan joyda turganini ko‘rsatadi va bu oxirgi kunlarda Adventizmga berilgan qochish haqidagi ogohlantirishga mos keladi. Ogohlantirishlarning ikkitasi, ogohlantirishni o‘qigan har kim uni tushunishi kerakligi haqidagi amr bilan bog‘langan bo‘lib, ularning barchasi o‘sha davrdagi masihiylarga qochish kerakligini bildirish uchun berilgan alomatga qaratilgandir.

The false application of a triple application that is misrepresented by those who claim the “robbers of thy people” are the United States, identifies that when the “abomination of desolation” is fulfilled at the Sunday law in the United States, that the Sunday law that then is enforced identifies the United States as Modern Rome, for pagan and papal Rome both previously enforced a Sunday law.

“Xalqingning qaroqchilari”ni Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlari deb da’vo qiluvchilar tomonidan noto‘g‘ri talqin qilingan uch karra tatbiqning soxta qo‘llanishi shuni ko‘rsatadiki, “xarob qiluvchi jirkanchlik” Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlaridagi yakshanba qonuni bilan amalga oshganda, o‘sha paytda majburan ijro etiladigan yakshanba qonuni Amerika Qo‘shma Shtatlarini Zamonaviy Rim sifatida belgilaydi, chunki butparast Rim ham, papalik Rimi ham ilgari yakshanba qonunini majburan ijro etgan.

The problem with that flawed application is that the Sunday law of pagan Rome took place in the year 321 AD, but pagan Rome’s fulfillment of the “abomination of desolation” was fulfilled in the year 66 AD, 255 years before the Sunday law of 321 AD. So too, the compromise that produced the “man of sin” was already occurring in the time of Paul, who said, “the mystery of iniquity doth already work,” yet the papal Sunday law came over four centuries later. The first two witnesses in a triple application of prophecy establish the characteristics of the third fulfillment of the last days. The “abomination of desolation” in the last days, upon two historical witnesses, and three biblical records of Christ’s words, represents a warning to flee, not the enforcement of a Sunday law.

O‘sha nuqsonli tatbiqning muammosi shundaki, butparast Rimning yakshanba qonuni milodiy 321-yilda joriy etilgan, holbuki butparast Rimning “xarob qiluvchi jirkanchlik”ni bajo keltirishi milodiy 66-yilda sodir bo‘lgan edi — ya’ni milodiy 321-yildagi yakshanba qonunidan 255 yil avval. Xuddi shuningdek, “gunoh odami”ni yuzaga keltirgan murosa allaqachon Pavlus davridayoq sodir bo‘layotgan edi; u: “qonunsizlik siri allaqachon amal qilmoqda”, degan, holbuki papalikning yakshanba qonuni undan to‘rt asrdan ham ko‘proq vaqt keyin paydo bo‘ldi. Bashoratning uch karra tatbiqidagi dastlabki ikki guvoh oxirgi kunlardagi uchinchi bajo kelishning xususiyatlarini belgilab beradi. Oxirgi kunlardagi “xarob qiluvchi jirkanchlik”, ikki tarixiy guvohlik va Masihning so‘zlari haqidagi Muqaddas Kitobdagi uch qaydga ko‘ra, yakshanba qonunining ijro etilishini emas, balki qochish haqidagi ogohlantirishni anglatadi.

In the next article we will break down why the application is flawed in the context of established rules associated with a triple application of prophecy, and why the identification of the Sunday law in the context of the warning given by Christ is a misrepresentation of prophetic history.

Keyingi maqolada biz bashoratning uch karra tatbiqi bilan bog‘liq o‘rnatilgan qoidalar nuqtayi nazaridan nega bu tatbiq nuqsonli ekanini, shuningdek, Masih bergan ogohlantirish kontekstida yakshanba qonunining identifikatsiya qilinishi nega bashorat tarixining noto‘g‘ri talqin etilishi ekanini tahlil qilamiz.

> “This compromise between paganism and Christianity resulted in the development of ‘the man of sin’ foretold in prophecy as opposing and exalting himself above God. That gigantic system of false religion is a masterpiece of Satan’s power—a monument of his efforts to seat himself upon the throne to rule the earth according to his will.” The Great Controversy, 50.

> “Butparastlik bilan xristianlik o‘rtasidagi bu murosa bashoratda Xudoga qarshi chiqib, o‘zini Xudodan yuqori ko‘taruvchi deb oldindan aytilgan ‘gunoh odami’ning shakllanishiga olib keldi. Soxta dinning o‘sha ulkan tizimi shayton qudratining bir durdonasidir — uning o‘z irodasiga ko‘ra yer yuzini boshqarish uchun taxtga o‘tirishga bo‘lgan urinishlarining bir yodgorligidir.” The Great Controversy, 50.

Back to Articles