Article

# Rome Establishes the Vision - Number Five

IRoma Iseka Umbono — Inani lesiHlanu

Unveiling the Repeated Prophetic Controversies in Adventism: Understanding the Robbers of Thy People

Ukuveza Iingxabano Zesiprofeto Eziphindaphindwayo Kwi-Adventism: Ukuqonda Abaphangi Babantu Bakho

Author

Jeff Pippenger

Published

August 9, 2024

Formats

PDF
Word
Song MP3

In the last article we identified six prophetic lines of controversy which have occurred in the history of Adventism from the Millerite time period until the present day. I contend the first and the last controversy over the “robbers of thy people” in verse fourteen of Daniel chapter eleven are prophetically identical. The Millerites understood the “robbers” to be Rome, and the Protestants taught the “robbers” were a Syrian king named Antiochus Epiphanes.

Kwinqaku lokugqibela sichonge imigca emithandathu yesiprofeto yempikiswano ethe yavela kwimbali yoBhadventi ukususela kwixesha lamaMillerite kude kube ngumhla wanamhlanje. Ndiyagxininisa ukuba impikiswano yokuqala neyokugqibela emalunga “nabaphangi babantu bakowenu” kwivesi yeshumi elinesine yesahluko seshumi elinanye sikaDaniyeli, ziyafana ngokwesiprofeto. AmaMillerite ayebaqonda “abaphangi” njengeRoma, yaye amaProtestanti ayefundisa ukuba “abaphangi” yayingukumkani waseSiriya ogama linguAntiochus Epiphanes.

> And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south: also the robbers of thy people shall exalt themselves to establish the vision; but they shall fall. Daniel 11:14.

> Yaye ngaloo maxesha kuya kusukuma abaninzi bemelene nokumkani wasezantsi; kwanabaphangi babantu bakowenu baya kuzinyusa ukuze bamise umbono; kodwa baya kuwa. Daniyeli 11:14.

Beginning in verse ten, and continuing through verse fifteen a warfare between the kingdoms of Egypt and Syria is represented. Egypt is the king of the south in the passage, and the Syrian king is represented as the king of the north. Verse ten identifies what the historians call the beginning of the Fourth Syrian war in 219 BC, verses eleven and twelve represent the battle of Raphia in 217 BC, and its aftermath. Then verses thirteen through fifteen identify the battle of Panium in 200 BC. In verses ten through fifteen the Syrian king is Antiochus Magnus, ruler of the Seleucid Empire.

Ukuqala kwivesi yeshumi, kuqhubeke kude kube kwivesi yeshumi elinesihlanu, kumelwa imfazwe phakathi kwezikumkani zaseYiputa nezaseSiriya. Kule ndawo, iYiputa ingukumkani wasemzantsi, aze ukumkani waseSiriya amelwe njengokumkani wasemantla. Ivesi yeshumi ichaza oko ababhali-mbali bakubiza ngokuba kukuqala kweMfazwe yesine yaseSiriya ngowama-219 BC; iivesi zeshumi elinanye neshumi elinesibini zimela idabi laseRafiya ngowama-217 BC, kunye nemiphumo yalo. Emva koko iivesi zeshumi elinesithathu ukuya kweleshumi elinesihlanu zichaza idabi lasePanium ngowama-200 BC. Kwiivesi zeshumi ukuya kweleshumi elinesihlanu, ukumkani waseSiriya nguAntiochus Magnus, umlawuli woBukhosi lwamaSeleucid.

Verse ten represents the history when Antiochus Magnus begins a war to regain territory that was taken from the Seleucid kingdom years before. In the verse he regains the lost territory in 219 BC, but he temporarily ceases his aggressions, and seeks to regroup his military strength. He had regained control of the lost territory, and made it all the way to the border of Egypt, the southern kingdom ruled by the Ptolemy dynasty. Between 219 BC and 217 BC, both the king of the south and the king of the north made plans for the approaching battle of Raphia.

Ivesi yeshumi imela imbali xa uAntiochus Magnus eqalisa imfazwe yokuphinda afumane ummandla owathatyathwa kubukumkani bamaSeleucid kwiminyaka engaphambili. Kule vesi uwuphinda afumane loo mmandla ulahlekileyo ngowama-219 BC, kodwa uyayeka okwethutyana imikhuba yakhe yohlaselo, aze afune ukuhlanganisa kwakhona amandla omkhosi wakhe. Wayesele ebuyise ulawulo lommandla owawulahlekile, waza wafikelela kanye kumda waseYiputa, ubukumkani basemazantsi obabuphantsi kolawulo lobukhosi bukaPtolemy. Phakathi kowama-219 BC nowama-217 BC, kokubini ukumkani wasemzantsi nokumkani wasemantla benza amalungiselelo edabi elalisondela laseRaphia.

The battle of Raphia took place in 217 BC, and the southern kingdom of Egypt, ruled by Ptolemy prevailed over the Syrian king Antiochus Magnus, king of the north in the prophetic passage. Then in verses thirteen through fifteen, seventeen years later in 200 BC, Antiochus Magnus, who had then formed an alliance with Philip of Macedon engaged Egypt in the battle of Panium. The southern kingdom of Egypt then had a child king of five or six years old, and Antiochus Magnis and Philip could not resist taking advantage of the child king of Egypt, and Antiochus Magnus prevailed in the battle of Panium. The three verses that represent the battle of Panium contain verse fourteen, where a new power is introduced into the prophetic narrative.

Idabi laseRaphia lenzeka ngowama-217 BC, yaye ubukumkani basemzantsi baseYiputa, obabulawulwa nguPtolemy, boyisa ukumkani waseSiriya uAntiochus Magnus, ukumkani wasemantla kwesi siqendu sesiprofeto. Emva koko, kwiivesi zeshumi elinesithathu ukuya kweshumi elinesihlanu, kwiminyaka elishumi elinesixhenxe kamva ngowama-200 BC, uAntiochus Magnus, owayesele enze umanyano noPhilip waseMakedoni, wajongana neYiputa kwidabi lasePanium. Ubukumkani basemzantsi baseYiputa ngelo xesha babunokumkani ongumntwana oneminyaka emihlanu okanye emithandathu ubudala, yaye uAntiochus Magnus noPhilip abazange bakwazi ukumelana nokusebenzisa elo thuba likakumkani ongumntwana waseYiputa, yaye uAntiochus Magnus waphumelela kwidabi lasePanium. Ezi vesi zintathu zimele idabi lasePanium ziqulethe ivesi yeshumi elinesine, apho amandla amatsha aziswa khona kwibali lesiprofeto.

The robbers of thy people are a different power than the Egyptian king of the south, or the Seleucid king of the north, or Philip the Macedonian ruler. The Millerites recognized that Rome is the robbers of thy people. One of the Hebrew root words that is translated as “robbers,” means breaker. Pagan Rome is represented in prophecy as the power who would break in pieces.

Abaphangi babantu bakowenu ngamandla ahlukileyo kunokumkani wasezantsi waseYiputa, okanye ukumkani wasemantla wakwaSeleucid, okanye uFilipu umlawuli waseMakedoni. AmaMillerite aqonda ukuba iRoma ngabaphangi babantu bakowenu. Elinye lamagama engcambu yesiHebhere eliguqulelwa ngokuba “ngabaphangi,” lithetha umqhekezi. IRoma yobuhedeni imelwe esiprofetweni njengamandla awayeya kuqhekeza abe ziingceba.

> After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns. Daniel 7:7.

> Emva koku ndabona emibonweni yasebusuku, nanko ke irhamncwa lesine, eloyikekayo nelimangalisayo, linamandla ngokugqithiseleyo; yaye lalinamazinyo amakhulu entsimbi: ladla, laza laqhekeza lakhawulahlula, layinyathela intsalela ngeenyawo zalo; yaye lalahlukile kuwo onke amarhamncwa ayengaphambi kwalo; yaye lalinempondo ezilishumi. Daniyeli 7:7.

When Uriah Smith comments on the robbers, he quotes a historian who points out that robbers represent breakers.

Xa u-Uriah Smith enika amagqabaza ngamasela, ucaphula imbali-mlando ebonisa ukuba amasela amela abaqhekezi.

> “A new power is now introduced,—‘the robbers of thy people;’ literally, says Bishop Newton, ‘the breakers of thy people.’ Far away on the banks of the Tiber, a kingdom had been nourishing itself with ambitious projects and dark designs. Small and weak at first, it grew with marvelous rapidity in strength and vigor, reaching out cautiously here and there to try its prowess, and test the vigor of its warlike arm, till, conscious of its power, it boldly reared its head among the nations of the earth, and seized with invincible hand the helm of their affairs. Henceforth the name of Rome stands upon the historic page, destined for long ages to control the affairs of the world, and exert a mighty influence among the nations even to the end of time.

> “Ngoku kuziswa igunya elitsha,—‘abaphangi babantu bakho;’ ngokwenene, utsho uBhishophu uNewton, ‘abaphuli babantu bakho.’ Kude lee ngasemanxwemeni oMlambo iTiber, ubukumkani babuzondla ngamacebo amabhongo nangeenjongo ezimnyama. Ekuqaleni buncinane, bubuthathaka, bukhule ngesantya esimangalisayo ngamandla nangokomelela, busolula ngononophelo apha naphaya ukuzama ubukroti balo, nokuvavanya ukomelela kwengalo yalo yemfazwe, de, buqonda amandla abo, baphakamisa intloko yabo ngokukhalipha phakathi kweentlanga zehlabathi, baza babamba ngesandla esingenakoyiswa isixhobo sokulawula imicimbi yazo. Ukususela ngoko igama laseRoma limi ephepheni lembali, limiselwe ukuba kangangeenkulungwane ezininzi lilawule imicimbi yehlabathi, kwaye lisebenzise impembelelo enkulu phakathi kweentlanga kude kube sekupheleni kwexesha.

> “Rome spoke; and Syria and Macedonia soon found a change coming over the aspect of their dream. The Romans interfered in behalf of the young king of Egypt, determined that he should be protected from the ruin devised by Antiochus and Philip. This was BC 200, and was one of the first important interferences of the Romans in the affairs of Syria and Egypt.” Uriah Smith, Daniel and Revelation, 257.

> “IRoma yathetha; yaye iSiriya neMakedoniya kungekudala zafumanisa utshintsho lusiza phezu kwenkangeleko yephupha lazo. AmaRoma angenelela ngenxa yokuxhasa ukumkani omncinane waseYiputa, ezimisele ukuba makakhuselwe ekutshatyalalisweni okwalucebiswe nguAntiyokwe noFilipu. Oku kwakungo-200 BC, yaye kwakungomnye wongenelelo lokuqala olubalulekileyo lwamaRoma kwimicimbi yeSiriya neYiputa.” Uriah Smith, Daniel and Revelation, 257.

The prediction set forth in the verses was fulfilled in roughly twenty years from 219 BC unto 200 BC, but the prophets speak more about the last days than the days in which they lived.

Isiprofeto esibekwe kwezi ndinyana sazaliseka phantse kwiminyaka engamashumi amabini, ukusuka kowe-219 BC ukuya kowe-200 BC; kodwa abaprofeti bathetha ngakumbi ngemihla yokugqibela kunemihla ababephila kuyo.

> “Each of the ancient prophets spoke less for their own time than for ours, so that their prophesying is in force for us. ‘Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.’ 1 Corinthians 10:11. ‘Not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven; which things the angels desire to look into.’ 1 Peter 1:12. . . .

> “Ngamnye kubaprofeti bamandulo akazange athethe kangako ngexesha lakhe njengokuba wathethela elethu, ukuze ke ukuprofeta kwabo kusebenze kuthi. ‘Ke kaloku zonke ezi zinto zabehlela bona zibe yimizekelo; zaza zabhalelwa ukulumkisa kwethu thina, esifikelwe ziziphelo zamaxesha ehlabathi.’ 1 Korinte 10:11. ‘Babonakaliselwa ukuba babengazilungiseleli bona ngokwabo, koko babelungiselela thina ngezo zinto ngoku ezixelwe kuni ngabo banishumayeze iindaba ezilungileyo ngoMoya oyiNgcwele othunywe evela ezulwini; izinto ezo ezinqwenelwa nangazingelosi ukuzikhangela.’ 1 Petros 1:12....”

> “The Bible has accumulated and bound up together its treasures for this last generation. All the great events and solemn transactions of Old Testament history have been, and are, repeating themselves in the church in these last days.” Selected Messages, book 3, 338, 339.

> “IBhayibhile iye yaqokelela yaza yabopha ndawonye ubuncwane bayo ngenxa yesi sizukulwana sokugqibela. Zonke iziganeko ezikhulu nezenzo ezinzulu zembali yeTestamente eNdala bezikade ziphindaphindwa, yaye zisaqhubeka ziphindaphindwa, ebandleni kule mihla yokugqibela.” Selected Messages, incwadi 3, 338, 339.

Although Daniel did not live in the twenty-year time period we are considering, inspiration through the writings of Sister White informs is that much of the history recorded in Daniel eleven is to be repeated in the final fulfillment of Daniel eleven.

Nangona uDaniyeli engazange aphile kulo mmandla wexesha weminyaka engamashumi amabini esiwuqwalaselayo, imphefumlelo ngeembhalo zikaDade White isazisa ukuba inxalenye enkulu yembali ebhalwe kuDaniyeli ishumi elinanye iya kuphindwa ekuzalisekeni kokugqibela kukaDaniyeli ishumi elinanye.

> “We have no time to lose. Troublous times are before us. The world is stirred with the spirit of war. Soon the scenes of trouble spoken of in the prophecies will take place. The prophecy in the eleventh of Daniel has nearly reached its complete fulfillment. Much of the history that has taken place in fulfillment of this prophecy will be repeated.” Manuscript Releases, number 13, 394.

> “Asinalo xesha lokulilahla. Amaxesha enzima asiphambi kwethu. Ihlabathi liyashukunyiswa ngumoya wemfazwe. Kungekudala iziganeko zembandezelo ezathethwayo eziprofetweni ziya kwenzeka. Isiprofeto esikwisahluko seshumi elinanye sikaDaniyeli sele siphantse safikelela ekuzalisekeni kwaso okupheleleyo. Inxalenye enkulu yembali eyenzekileyo ekuzalisekisweni kwesi siprofeto iya kuphindwa.” Manuscript Releases, number 13, 394.

Verses ten through fifteen of Daniel eleven represent the history of the last days which leads up to the soon-coming Sunday law, for verse sixteen identifies when Rome, for the first time, conquered the “glorious land.”

Iindima zeshumi ukuya kweyeshumi elinesihlanu zikaDaniyeli ishumi elinanye zimela imbali yemihla yokugqibela ekhokelela kumthetho weCawa oza kufika kungekudala, kuba indima yeshumi elinesithandathu ichaza ixesha apho iRoma, okokuqala ngqa, yoyisa “ilizwe elizukileyo.”

> But he that cometh against him shall do according to his own will, and none shall stand before him: and he shall stand in the glorious land, which by his hand shall be consumed. Daniel 11:16.

> Kodwa lowo uzayo ukumchasa uya kwenza ngokokuthanda kwakhe, yaye akukho namnye uya kumelana naye; yaye uya kuma ezweni elizukileyo, lona liya kutshatyalaliswa sisandla sakhe. Daniyeli 11:16.

Daniel employs the expression “glorious land” twice in his writings. The first is verse sixteen, when literal pagan Rome conquered the literal glorious land of Judah.

UDaniyeli usebenzisa ibinzana elithi “ilizwe elizukileyo” kabini kwimibhalo yakhe. Okokuqala kukwivesi yeshumi elinesithandathu, xa iRoma yobuhedeni yokoqobo yoyisa ilizwe elizukileyo lokwenyani lakwaYuda.

> “Although Egypt could not stand before Antiochus, the king of the north, Antiochus could not stand before the Romans, who now came against him. No kingdoms were longer able to resist this rising power. Syria was conquered, and added to the Roman empire, when Pompey, BC 65, deprived Antiochus Asiaticus of his possessions, and reduced Syria to a Roman province.

> “Nangona iYiputa yayingakwazi ukuma phambi kuka-Antiochus, ukumkani wasemantla, noAntiochus wayengenakukwazi ukuma phambi kwamaRoma, awayeseze amchase ngelo xesha. Akukho bukumkani baphinda bakwazi ukumelana nala mandla ayephakama. ISiriya yoyiswa, yaza yongezwa kubukhosi baseRoma, xa uPompey, BC 65, wamhlutha uAntiochus Asiaticus izinto zakhe, wayinciphisa iSiriya yaba liphondo laseRoma.”

> “The same power was also to stand in the Holy Land, and consume it. Rome became connected with the people of God, the Jews, by alliance, BC 162, from which date it holds a prominent place in the prophetic calendar. It did not, however, acquire jurisdiction over Judea by actual conquest till BC 63; and then in the following manner.” Uriah Smith, Daniel and Revelation, 259.

> “Loo mandla mnye wayemiselwe nokuma eLizwe eliNgcwele, aze aligqibe. IRoma yadibana nabantu bakaThixo, amaYuda, ngomnqophiso, ngo-162 BC, ukususela kulo mhla yaba nendawo ebalulekileyo kwikhalenda yesiprofeto. Noko ke, ayizange ifumane ulawulo phezu kwelakwaYuda ngokuloyisa ngokwenene de kube ngu-63 BC; yaye ke ngoko ngendlela elandelayo.” Uriah Smith, Daniel and Revelation, 259.

The other verse where Daniel employs the “glorious land” is in verse forty-one.

Enye indinyana apho uDaniyeli asebenzisa khona “ilizwe elizukileyo” ikwivesi yamashumi amane ananye.

> He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon. Daniel 11:41.

> Kananjalo uya kungena ezweni elizukileyo, aze amazwe amaninzi abhukuqwe; kodwa aba baya kusinda esandleni sakhe, uEdom, noMowabhi, nentloko yabantwana baka-Amon. Daniyeli 11:41.

Verse forty-one of course follows verse forty, and verse forty begins with the words “and at the time of the end.” In The Great Controversy, Sister White identifies 1798 as the “time of the end,” so verse forty-one is identifying history that follows after the time of the end in 1798.

Indima yamashumi amane ananye ngokwendalo ilandela indima yamashumi amane, yaye indima yamashumi amane iqala ngamazwi athi “yaye ngexesha lesiphelo.” Kwi-The Great Controversy, uDade White uchaza u-1798 njenge “xesha lesiphelo,” ngoko ke indima yamashumi amane ananye ichaza imbali elandela emva kwexesha lesiphelo ngo-1798.

> “But at the time of the end, says the prophet, “Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.’ Daniel 12:4. . . . Since 1798 the book of Daniel has been unsealed, knowledge of the prophecies has increased, and many have proclaimed the solemn message of the judgment near.” The Great Controversy, 356.

> “Kodwa ngexesha lokuphela, utsho umprofeti, ‘Baninzi abaya kuhambahamba, nolwazi luya kwandiswa.’ Daniyeli 12:4.... Ukususela ngowe-1798 incwadi kaDaniyeli ityhiliwe, ulwazi lweziprofeto luye lwandiswa, yaye baninzi abaye bavakalisa umyalezo onzulu womgwebo osondelileyo.” Imbambano Enkulu, 356.

The glorious land of verse forty-one is not literal ancient Judah of old, but spiritual modern Judah. The United States is spiritual modern Judah, and verse forty-one is identifying the soon-coming Sunday law in the United States.

Ilizwe elizukileyo lendinyana yamashumi amane ananye asililo elakwaYuda lasemandulo ngokwentsingiselo yokoqobo, koko linguYuda langoku ngokwasemoyeni. IUnited States yiYuda langoku ngokwasemoyeni, yaye indinyana yamashumi amane ananye ichaza umthetho weCawe oza kufika kungekudala eUnited States.

> Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual. 1 Corinthians 15:46.

> Noko ke, akuzange kuqale oko kungokwasemoyeni, koko kwaqala oko kungokwemvelo; kwaza emva koko kwalandela oko kungokwasemoyeni. 1 Korinte 15:46.

That Sunday law is typified by verse sixteen, for “much of the history that has taken place” in the fulfillment of Daniel eleven is to be repeated. Verses ten through fifteen in the last days, represents the history preceding and leading up to the Sunday law.

Loo mthetho weCawa uchazwa ngokomfuziselo yivesi yeshumi elinesithandathu, kuba “ininzi yembali eyenzekileyo” ekuzalisekeni kukaDaniyeli ishumi elinanye iya kuphindwa. Iivesi zeshumi ukuya kweleshumi elinesihlanu kwimihla yokugqibela zimele imbali eyandulela, yaza yakhokelela kumthetho weCawa.

The king of the north in those five verses, as well as the king of the south who were fulfilled by the Seleucid king Antiochus Magnus and the Egyptian kings of the Ptolemaic kingdom, typify powers that are the focus of the history that leads to the soon-coming Sunday law. These verses identify the history of the movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand, for verse ten identifies the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989, and verse sixteen the soon-coming Sunday law.

Ukumkani wasentla kwezo ndinyana zintlanu, kwanokumkani wasemazantsi, ezazalisekiswa ngukumkani wakwaSeleucid uAntiochus Magnus nangookumkani baseYiputa bobukumkani bakwaPtolemy, bafanekisela amagunya ayingqwalasela yembali ekhokelela kumthetho weCawa osondeleyo ukuza. Ezi ndinyana zichaza imbali yentshukumo yabangamawaka alikhulu anamashumi amane anesine, kuba indinyana yeshumi ichaza ukuwa kweSoviet Union ngowe-1989, yaye indinyana yeshumi elinesithandathu ichaza umthetho weCawa osondeleyo ukuza.

Christ emphasizes these verses by aligning verse ten with verse forty and verse sixteen with verse forty-one. The direct reference to the literal glorious land which typifies the spiritual glorious land of verse forty-one is the end of the six verses, and verse ten is the beginning.

UKristu ugxininisa ezi ndinyana ngokumatanisa indinyana yeshumi nendinyana yamashumi amane, kwanokumatanisa indinyana yeshumi elinesithandathu nendinyana yamashumi amane ananye. Isalathiso esithe ngqo kwilizwe elizukileyo lokwenene, elimele ngokomfuziselo ilizwe elizukileyo lasemoyeni lendinyana yamashumi amane ananye, sisiphelo sezi ndinyana zintandathu, yaye indinyana yeshumi sisiqalo.

Just as Christ made sure verse sixteen has a direct connection with verse forty-one, and so too, verse ten has a direct connection with verse forty. The expression in verse ten “overflow, and pass through,” is the identical Hebrew phrase that is translated as “overflow and pass over,” in verse forty. The phrase is only found one other place in the Scriptures, but it is translated a little differently than verse ten and verse forty. Still, it is the same Hebrew phrase.

Kanye njengoko uKristu waqinisekisa ukuba ivesi yeshumi elinesithandathu inonxibelelwano oluthe ngqo nevesi yamashumi amane ananye, kwangokunjalo, ivesi yeshumi inonxibelelwano oluthe ngqo nevesi yamashumi amane. Intetho ekwivesi yeshumi ethi “phuphuma, udlule phakathi,” yeyona ntetho kanye yesiHebhere eguqulelwe ngokuthi “phuphuma uze ugqithe ngapha,” kwivesi yamashumi amane. Le ntetho ifumaneka kwenye indawo enye kuphela eZibhalweni, kodwa iguqulelwe ngokwahlukileyo kancinane kunendlela ekwivesi yeshumi nakwivesi yamashumi amane. Sekunjalo, yiyo kanye loo ntetho yesiHebhere.

> And he shall pass through Judah; he shall overflow and go over, he shall reach even to the neck; and the stretching out of his wings shall fill the breadth of thy land, O Immanuel. Isaiah 8:8.

> Yaye kuya kudlula kwaYuda; kuya kukhukulisa kugalele, kufike kude kuse entanyeni; nokunwenwa kwamaphiko akhe kuya kuwuzalisa ububanzi belizwe lakho, wena Imanuweli. Isaya 8:8.

Isaiah’s “overflow and go over,” is the same as verse ten’s “overflow, and pass through,” and verse forty’s “overflow and pass over.” More than this, each of the three verses are describing an attack from the king of the north upon the king of the south. In Isaiah, the northern king of Assyria, Sennacherib, was attacking Judah, the southern kingdom of Israel. In verse ten Antiochus Magnus, the northern king of the Seleucid Empire was attacking the southern kingdom of Egypt. In verse forty, the king of the north, the papal power, who had received a deadly wound at the beginning of verse forty, was attacking the southern atheistic power of the Soviet Union. Each verse represents the same prophetic structure of a conflict between the kings of the north and south, and in each verse the northern king “overflows and passes over.”

“Ukuphuphuma kugqithe” kukaIsaya kuyafana nokuthi “uphuphume, adlule” kwivesi yeshumi, kwanokuthi “uphuphume, agqithe” kwivesi yamashumi amane. Ngaphezu koko, nganye kwezi vesi zintathu ichaza uhlaselo olwenziwa ngukumkani wasentla phezu kukumkani wasemzantsi. KuIsaya, ukumkani wasemantla waseAsiriya, uSenakeribhe, wayehlasela uYuda, ubukumkani basemzantsi bakwaSirayeli. Kwivesi yeshumi uAntiochus Magnus, ukumkani wasemantla wobuKumkani bamaSeleucid, wayehlasela ubukumkani basemzantsi baseYiputa. Kwivesi yamashumi amane, ukumkani wasentla, amandla obupopu, awayefumene inxeba elibulalayo ekuqaleni kwevesi yamashumi amane, wayehlasela amandla asemzantsi angakholelwayo kuThixo eSoviet Union. Ivesi nganye imele ulwakhiwo olufanayo lwesiprofeto lwengxabano phakathi kookumkani basentla nabasemzantsi, yaye kwivesi nganye ukumkani wasentla “uyaphuphuma agqithe.”

Isaiah’s testimony and verse ten both identify that when the northern king attacks he ceases before entering into the capital of the southern kingdom. Sennacherib brought his warfare to the walls of Jerusalem, and no further. In 219 BC, Antiochus Magnus came to the border of Egypt and stopped. Then he lost the battle of Raphia that occurred two years later in 217 BC. Sennacherib came to the walls of Jerusalem and lost the battle as God intervened.

Ubungqina bukaIsaya nendima yeshumi zombini zibonisa ukuba xa ukumkani wasemantla ehlasela, uyema engakangeni kwisixeko esiyintloko sobukumkani basemzantsi. USenakeribhi wazisa imfazwe yakhe de yafikelela kwiindonga zaseYerusalem, kodwa akaphindanga waqhubela phambili. Ngo-219 BC, uAntiyokosi Omkhulu wafika emdeni waseYiputa waza wema. Emva koko woyiswa emfazweni waseRafiya owenzeka kwiminyaka emibini kamva ngo-217 BC. USenakeribhi wafika kwiindonga zaseYerusalem waza woyiswa emfazweni njengoko uThixo wangenelela.

> Therefore thus saith the Lord concerning the king of Assyria, He shall not come into this city, nor shoot an arrow there, nor come before it with shield, nor cast a bank against it. By the way that he came, by the same shall he return, and shall not come into this city, saith the Lord. For I will defend this city, to save it, for mine own sake, and for my servant David’s sake. And it came to pass that night, that the angel of the Lord went out, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians an hundred fourscore and five thousand: and when they arose early in the morning, behold, they were all dead corpses. So Sennacherib king of Assyria departed, and went and returned, and dwelt at Nineveh. And it came to pass, as he was worshipping in the house of Nisroch his god, that Adrammelech and Sharezer his sons smote him with the sword: and they escaped into the land of Armenia. And Esarhaddon his son reigned in his stead. 2 Kings 19:32–37.

> Ngako oko utsho uYehova ngokusingisele kukumkani waseAsiriya ukuthi, Akayi kungena kulo mzi, angadubuli nalitolo khona, angasondeli kuwo ephethe ikhaka, angawakhi nongqameko lokuwungqinga. Ngendlela awafika ngayo, uya kubuya ngayo kwangolo hlobo; akayi kungena kulo mzi, utsho uYehova. Kuba ndiya kuwukhusela lo mzi, ndiwusindise ngenxa yam ngokwam, nangenxa kaDavide, umkhonzi wam. Kwathi ngobo busuku isithunywa sikaYehova saphuma, sabulala eminqubeni yama-Asiriya ikhulu elinamashumi asibhozo anesihlanu amawaka; kwathi bakuvuka kusasa, nanko bengamizimba efileyo bonke. Waza uSenakeribhi ukumkani waseAsiriya wemka, wahamba wabuyela, wahlala eNineve. Kwathi, esanqula endlwini kaNisroki uthixo wakhe, oonyana bakhe uAdrameleki noSharetseri bambulala ngekrele; baza basabela ezweni laseArmeniya. Waza uEsar-hadon unyana wakhe walawula esikhundleni sakhe. 2 Kumkani 19:32–37.

In 1989, the king of the north swept away the Soviet Union, but he did not overcome the capital of the Soviet Union. Russia was left standing. The next battle, typified in verses eleven and twelve, was the battle of Raphia, which was also typified by the overthrow of Sennacherib’s army and his subsequent death which identifies a victory for the southern king, which was Judah in the testimony of Sennacherib, and Raphia in the testimony of Antiochus Magnus.

Ngowe-1989, ukumkani wasemntla wayitshayela wayisusa iSoviet Union, kodwa akazange ayoyise ikomkhulu leSoviet Union. IRashiya yasala imile. Idabi elilandelayo, elifanekiswe kwiindima zeshumi elinanye neshumi elinesibini, laliyiDabi laseRafiya, elakwafanekiswa kukubhukuqwa komkhosi kaSennakeribhi nokufa kwakhe okwalandelayo, nto leyo ebonakalisa uloyiso lokumkani wasemzantsi, owayenguYuda kubungqina bukaSennakeribhi, neRafiya kubungqina bukaAntiochus Magnus.

Verse ten provides a direct connection to verse forty and verse sixteen provides a direct connection with verse forty-one. Verses ten through sixteen represent the history of 1989 unto the Sunday law. The verse represents a hidden history in verse forty that begins with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989 and continues unto the Sunday law. Verse ten also directly connects the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six to the hidden history, but that line of truth is outside what we are here setting forth.

Ivesi yeshumi inika unxulumano oluthe ngqo nevesi yamashumi amane, yaye ivesi yeshumi elinesithandathu inika unxulumano oluthe ngqo nevesi yamashumi amane ananye. Iivesi zeshumi ukuya kweshumi elinesithandathu zimele imbali ka-1989 kude kuse kumthetho weCawa. Le vesi imele imbali efihlakeleyo kwivesi yamashumi amane eqala ngokuwa kweSoviet Union ngo-1989 ize iqhube kude kuse kumthetho weCawa. Ivesi yeshumi ikwadibanisa ngokuthe ngqo “amaxesha asixhenxe” kaLevitikus amashumi amabini anesithandathu nale mbali ifihlakeleyo, kodwa loo mgca wenyaniso ungaphandle koko sikumisela apha.

In Millerite history the first of six primary controversies within Adventism concerning the correct identification of Rome occurred, and it was over who the robbers of verse fourteen represented. The Protestants held they represented Antiochus Epiphanes, and the Millerites identified them as Rome. In the last controversy of Adventism concerning the correct identification of Rome it is also over the robbers of verse fourteen. One class, represented by the Millerites, is upholding the foundational understanding of the Millerites, which was endorsed by the Spirit of Prophecy.

Kwimbali yamaMillerite kwaqala impikiswano yokuqala kwezisithandathu eziphambili ngaphakathi kobu-Adventism ngokuphathelele ukuchongwa ngokuchanekileyo kweRoma, yaye yayimalunga nokuba abaphangi bendima yeshumi elinesine babemele bani. AmaProtestanti ayegcina ukuba babemele uAntiochus Epiphanes, kanti amaMillerite abachonga njengeRoma. Kwimpikiswano yokugqibela yobu-Adventism ngokuphathelele ukuchongwa ngokuchanekileyo kweRoma, nayo ikwangalabo baphangi bendima yeshumi elinesine. Elinye iqela, elimelwe ngamaMillerite, limi liqinile ekuxhaseni ukuqonda okusisiseko kwamaMillerite, okwasiqinisekiswa nguMoya wesiProfeto.

> “I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until His hand was removed.” Early Writings, 74.

> “Ndibonile ukuba itshathi ka-1843 yayikhokelwa sisandla seNkosi, nokuba yayingamele iguqulwe; ukuba amanani ayenjalo njengoko Yona yayifuna; ukuba isandla saYo sasiphezu kwawo saza safihla impazamo kwezinye zezo zibalo, ukuze kungabikho namnye unokuyibona, de kwasuswa isandla saYo.” Early Writings, 74.

That sacred chart identifies the controversy with the notation of 164 BC.

Loo tshathi ingcwele ichaza impikiswano ngophawu luka-164 BC.

> “164 Death of Antiochus Epiphanes, who of course, stood not up against the Prince of Princes, as he had been 164 yrs. dead before the Prince of Princes was born.”

> “164 Ukufa kuka-Antiochus Epiphanes, owathi kambe, akazange avukele iNkosana yeenkosana, njengoko wayesele efile iminyaka eli-164 ngaphambi kokuba iNkosana yeenkosana izalwe.”

The reference of that controversy upon the sacred chart represents the only truth represented upon the sacred chart that is not based upon a prophetic passage from God’s Word. In doing so it identifies a waymark, not of biblical history, but of Advent history, and “it should not be altered,” for the controversy identifies how the prophetic vision is established. To reject that foundational truth is to simultaneously reject the authority of the Spirit of Prophecy’s endorsement of the sacred chart.

Isalathiso saloo mpikiswano esikwitshathi engcwele simela inyaniso ekuphela kwayo emelwe kwitshathi engcwele engasekelwanga kwisicatshulwa sesiprofeto esivela eLizwini likaThixo. Ngokwenjenjalo sichonga uphawu lwendlela, kungekhona lwembali yeBhayibhile, kodwa lwembali yeAdvent, yaye “asifanele sitshintshwe,” kuba loo mpikiswano ichaza indlela umbono wesiprofeto omiselwa ngayo. Ukuyilahla loo nyaniso esisiseko kukuthi ngaxeshanye ulahle igunya lokuqinisekiswa yiMoya weSiprofeto kwetshathi engcwele.

> “The very last deception of Satan will be to make of none effect the testimony of the Spirit of God. ‘Where there is no vision, the people perish’ (Proverbs 29:18). Satan will work ingeniously, in different ways and through different agencies, to unsettle the confidence of God’s remnant people in the true testimony. He will bring in spurious visions to mislead, and will mingle the false with the true, and so disgust people that they will regard everything that bears the name of visions as a species of fanaticism; but honest souls, by contrasting false and true, will be enabled to distinguish between them.” Selected Messages, book 2, 78.

> “Eyona nkohliso yokugqibela kaSathana iya kuba kukwenza ubungqina boMoya kaThixo bungabi namandla. ‘Apho kungekho mbono, abantu bayatshabalala’ (Imizekeliso 29:18). USathana uya kusebenza ngobuqhophololo obukhulu, ngeendlela ezahlukeneyo nangamacebo ahlukeneyo, ukuze axokozelise ukuzithemba kwabantu abaseleyo bakaThixo kubungqina benyaniso. Uya kuzisa imibono eyinkohliso ukuze akhohlise, aze axube ubuxoki nenyaniso, aze ngaloo ndlela abantu bacaphuke kangangokuba baya kuthabatha yonke into ethwala igama lemibono njengohlobo oluthile lwenzondelelo egqithisileyo; kodwa imiphefumlo enyanisekileyo, ngokuthelekisa ubuxoki nenyaniso, iya kwenziwa ikwazi ukwahlula phakathi kwako.” Selected Messages, incwadi 2, 78.

The last controversy of “the robbers of thy people”, is the same as the first, and without an understanding of the symbol which establishes the vision, “the people perish.” They “perish” because they “make of none effect the testimony of the Spirit of God.”

Impikiswano yokugqibela “yabaphangi babantu bakho” iyafana neyaqala, yaye ngaphandle kokuqondwa komfuziselo omisela umbono, “abantu bayatshabalala.” “Bayatshabalala” ngenxa yokuba “balenza ilize ubungqina boMoya kaThixo.”

The other class claims that the United States is represented as the robbers of verse fourteen. That class is unable or unwilling to see that Antiochus Magnus in verses ten through fifteen represents the United States. Just as the Protestants of Millerite history claimed the robbers were Antiochus, the class who is unwilling to see identifies the robbers as the power (the United States) that is typified by Antiochus.

Elinye iqela lithi i-United States imelwe njengabaphangi bendima yeshumi elinesine. Elo qela alinakho okanye alifuni ukubona ukuba uAntiochus Magnus, kwiindima zeshumi ukuya kweleshumi elinesihlanu, umele i-United States. Kanye njengokuba amaProtestanti embalini yamaMillerite athi abaphangi babengoAntiochus, iqela elingafuni ukubona lichaza abaphangi njengamandla (i-United States) afuziselwa nguAntiochus.

Sennacherib’s attack upon Judah that reached to the capital, Jerusalem, and that failed, was led by Sennacherib’s general, the Rabshakeh.

Uhlaselo lukaSenarike phezu kukaYuda, olwafikelela kwikomkhulu, iYerusalem, lwaza lwaphumelela, lwalukhokelwa ngumphathi-mkhosi kaSenarike, uRabshakeh.

> Now therefore, I pray thee, give pledges to my lord the king of Assyria, and I will deliver thee two thousand horses, if thou be able on thy part to set riders upon them. How then wilt thou turn away the face of one captain of the least of my master’s servants, and put thy trust on Egypt for chariots and for horsemen? Am I now come up without the Lord against this place to destroy it? The Lord said to me, Go up against this land, and destroy it. Then said Eliakim the son of Hilkiah, and Shebna, and Joah, unto Rabshakeh, Speak, I pray thee, to thy servants in the Syrian language; for we understand it: and talk not with us in the Jews’ language in the ears of the people that are on the wall. But Rabshakeh said unto them, Hath my master sent me to thy master, and to thee, to speak these words? hath he not sent me to the men which sit on the wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss with you? Then Rabshakeh stood and cried with a loud voice in the Jews’ language, and spake, saying, Hear the word of the great king, the king of Assyria. 2 Kings 18:23–28.

> Ngoko ke ngoku, ndiyakucela, yenza isivumelwano nenkosi yam, ukumkani waseAsiriya, yaye ndiya kukunika amahashe angamawaka amabini, ukuba wena unakho ngakwicala lakho ukubeka abakhweli kuwo. Uya kuthi ngoko uwubuyise njani na ubuso bomthetheli omnye kwabona bakhonzi bancinane benkosi yam, uze uthembele kwiYiputa ngenxa yeenqwelo zokulwa nangenxa yabakhweli bamahashe? Ndinyuke na ngoku ngaphandle kukaYehova nxamnye nale ndawo ukuze ndiyitshabalalise? UYehova wathi kum, Nyuka uye nxamnye nalo mhlaba, uwutshabalalise. Wandula ke uEliyakim unyana kaHilekiya, noShebhena, noYowa, bathi kuRabshake, Thetha, siyakucela, kubakhonzi bakho ngolwimi lwaseSiriya; kuba siyaluva; ungathethi nathi ngolwimi lwamaYuda ezindlebeni zabantu abaseludongeni. Kodwa uRabshake wathi kubo, Inkosi yam indithume na enkosini yakho, nakuwe, ukuba ndithethe la mazwi? ayindithumanga na kumadoda ahleli eludongeni, ukuze adle ilindle lawo, asele nomchamo wawo kunye nani? Wema ke uRabshake, wadanduluka ngezwi elikhulu ngolwimi lwamaYuda, wathetha esithi, Liveni ilizwi lokumkani omkhulu, ukumkani waseAsiriya. 2 Kumkani 18:23–28.

The Rabshakeh was presenting not his words, but the words of Sennacherib, king of Assyria. In Daniel eleven verse forty the king of the north is the papal power who at the time of the end in 1798 received a deadly wound at the hands of atheistic France, the southern king. In the verse the king of the north ultimately retaliates and overflows the southern kingdom (the USSR) in 1989. When the king of the north accomplished that work, he brought with him “chariots, and with horsemen, and many ships.” “Chariots and horsemen” represent military might and “ships” represent economic power. Those symbols identify the United States as papal Rome’s proxy army in the victory of 1989, as typified by Rabshakeh. Antiochus Magnus in verse ten through fifteen represents the United States, and as William Miller correctly identified that the word “also” in verse fourteen establishes a new power entering the prophetic narrative, the “robbers” must represent a power distinct from either the Ptolemaic kings of the south, or Antiochus the king of the north or Philip of Macedon.

URabshakeh wayengavezi awakhe amazwi, koko wayeveza amazwi kaSenakeribhe, ukumkani waseAsiriya. KuDaniyeli ishumi elinanye indinyana yamashumi amane ukumkani wasemntla ligunya lobupopu elathi ngexesha lesiphelo ngo-1798 lafumana inxeba elibulalayo ezandleni zeFransi engakholelwayo kubukho bukaThixo, ukumkani wasemzantsi. Kule ndinyana ukumkani wasemntla ekugqibeleni uyaziphindezela aze aphuphume ebukumkanini basemzantsi (i-USSR) ngo-1989. Xa ukumkani wasemntla wawufeza loo msebenzi, weza “neenqwelo zokulwa, nabakhweli bamahashe, neenqanawa ezininzi.” “Iinqwelo zokulwa nabakhweli bamahashe” zimele amandla emfazwe, yaye “iinqanawa” zimele amandla ezoqoqosho. Ezo mpawu zichaza i-United States njengomkhosi obambele iRoma yobupopu kuloyiso luka-1989, njengoko kuchazwe ngohlobo olungumfuziselo kuRabshakeh. UAntiochus Magnus kwiindinyana zeshumi ukuya kweleshumi elinesihlanu umele i-United States, yaye njengoko uWilliam Miller wachaza ngokuchanekileyo ukuba igama elithi “kananjalo” kwindinyana yeshumi elinesine lisungula igunya elitsha elingena kwimbali yesiprofeto, “abaphangi” kufuneka bamele igunya elahlukileyo nokuba kukookumkani basemazantsi boPtolemy, okanye nguAntiochus ukumkani wasemntla, okanye nguFilipu waseMakedoni.

> “The king of the south, in this verse, without any doubt, means king of Egypt; but what the robbers of thy people means remains yet a doubt perhaps to some. That it cannot mean Antiochus, or any king of Syria, it is plain; for the angel had been talking about that nation for a number of verses previous, and now says, ‘also the robbers of thy people,’ etc., evidently implying some other nation. I will admit that Antiochus did perhaps rob the Jews; but how could this ‘establish the vision,’ as Antiochus is not spoken of anywhere in the vision as performing any act of that kind; for he belonged to what is called the Grecian kingdom in the vision. Again, ‘to establish the vision,’ must mean to make sure, complete, or fulfill the same.” William Miller, Miller’s Works, Lecture 6, 89.

> “Ukumkani wasemzantsi, kule ndinyana, ngaphandle kwamathandabuzo, uthetha ukumkani waseYiputa; kodwa into ethethwa ngabaphangi babantu bakho isahleli iyinto ethandabuzekayo mhlawumbi kwabanye. Ukuba ayinakuthetha uAntiochus, okanye nawuphi na ukumkani waseSiriya, kuyacaca; kuba ingelosi yayithetha ngolo hlanga kwiindinyana ezininzi ezandulelayo, yaza ngoku ithi, ‘kananjalo nabaphangi babantu bakho,’ njl., ngokucacileyo ibonisa olunye uhlanga. Ndiya kuvuma ukuba mhlawumbi uAntiochus wabaphanga amaYuda; kodwa oko kwakunokulimisela njani ‘umbono,’ ekubeni uAntiochus engakhankanywa ndawo embonweni njengowenza nasiphi na isenzo esinjalo; kuba wayengowoko kubizwa ngokuba bubukumkani bamaGrike embonweni. Kwakhona, ‘ukumisela umbono,’ kufuneka kuthethe ukuwuqinisekisa, ukuwugqibezela, okanye ukuwuzalisekisa.” William Miller, Miller’s Works, Lecture 6, 89.

“Antiochus” was a name selected by many of the kings of the Syrian Seleucid Empire. The founder of that empire was Seleucid Nicator, and somewhere between twenty-six to thirty kings made up the entire list of Seleucid kings. Many of those kings chose the name “Antiochus”, just as the many popes choose throne-names when they are selected as popes. The popes are all “antichrist,” which means “against Christ”. The word “anti” meaning “against”. As antichrists they have taken the name of their spiritual forefather, who is Satan. Satan and the popes are both identified as the antichrist in inspiration.

“Antiochus” yayiligama elalikhethwa ngabaninzi bookumkani boBukhosi bamaSeleucid baseSiriya. Umsunguli baloo bukhosi wayenguSeleucid Nicator, yaye ndaweni ithile phakathi kookumkani abangamashumi amabini anesithandathu ukuya kumashumi amathathu benza uluhlu olupheleleyo lookumkani bamaSeleucid. Abaninzi kwabo kumkani bakhetha igama elithi “Antiochus”, kanye njengokuba oopopu abaninzi bekhetha amagama obupopu xa bekhethwa ukuba babe ngoopopu. Oopopu bonke bangabo “antichrist,” okuthetha ukuthi “ngokuchasene noKristu”. Igama elithi “anti” lithetha “ngokuchasene”. Njengabachasi bakaKristu bathabathe igama likayise wabo wokomoya, onguSathana. USathana noopopu bobabini bachazwa njengomchasi kaKristu kwimpefumlelo.

> “The determination of antichrist to carry out the rebellion he began in heaven will continue to work in the children of disobedience.” Testimonies, volume 9, 230.

> “Ukuzimisela komchasi kaKristu ukuqhuba imvukelo awayiqalayo ezulwini kuya kuqhubeka kusebenza ebantwaneni bokungathobeli.” Testimonies, volume 9, 230.

A pope is a representative of Satan, and thus they are both against Christ, and therefore are the “antichrist.” They choose a name when they take the position as pope, and become Satan’s earthly representative.

Upopu ngummeli kaSathana, yaye ngoko bobabini bachasene noKristu, yaye ngenxa yoko bangulo “mchasi-Kristu.” Bakhetha igama xa bethabatha isikhundla njengopopu, baze babe ngummeli kaSathana wasemhlabeni.

> “To secure worldly gains and honors, the church was led to seek the favor and support of the great men of earth; and having thus rejected Christ, she was induced to yield allegiance to the representative of Satan—the bishop of Rome.” The Great Controversy, 50.

> “Ukuze kufunyanwe iingenelo nembeko zehlabathi, ibandla lakhokelwa ekubeni lifune ukuthandwa nenkxaso ngamadoda amakhulu omhlaba; yaye ke, lakuba limlahlile ngaloo ndlela uKristu, lakhuthazelwa ekubeni linikele ukunyaniseka kummeli kaSathana—ubhishophu waseRoma.” The Great Controversy, 50.

By their works you shall know them, and the popes carry on the same work as Satan.

Niya kubazi ngemisebenzi yabo, yaye oopopu baqhuba kwa loo msebenzi mnye kaSathana.

> “Through the pope of Rome the same work has been carried on here on earth as was carried on in the courts of heaven before the expulsion of the prince of darkness. Satan sought to correct the law of God in heaven, and to supply an amendment of his own. He exalted his own judgment above that of his Creator, and placed his will above the will of Jehovah, and in this way virtually declared God to be fallible. The pope also takes the same course and, claiming infallibility for himself, seeks to adjust the law of God to meet his own ideas, thinking himself able to correct the mistakes he thinks he sees in the statutes and commands of the Lord of heaven and earth. He virtually says to the world, I will give you better laws than those of Jehovah. What an insult is this to the God of heaven!” Signs of the Times, November 19, 1894.

> “Ngopopu waseRoma kwaqhutywa kwalapha emhlabeni kwa loo msebenzi mnye wawuqhutywa ezinkundleni zasezulwini ngaphambi kokugxothwa komthetheli wobumnyama. USathana wafuna ukulungisa umthetho kaThixo ezulwini, aze anikele ngolungiso olusuka kuye ngokwakhe. Waphakamisa esakhe isigqibo ngaphezu kwesesoMdali wakhe, wabeka intando yakhe ngaphezu kwentando kaYehova, yaye ngaloo ndlela wavakalisa ngokwenene ukuba uThixo unokuphosisa. Nopopu naye uthabatha ikhondo elo linye, yaye, ezibanga ukuba akanakusilela, ufuna ukuwulungisa umthetho kaThixo ukuze uhambelane nezimvo zakhe, ezicinga ukuba uyakwazi ukulungisa iimpazamo acinga ukuba uyazibona kwimimiselo nasemiyalelweni yeNkosi yezulu nomhlaba. Ngokwenene uthi ehlabathini, Ndiya kuninika imithetho engcono kunekaYehova. Esi sisithuko esinjani na kuThixo wezulu!” Signs of the Times, November 19, 1894.

Though Seleucus Nicator established the Seleucid Empire, many of the following kings chose the name “Antiochus,” in honor, not of Seleucus, but of his father. Seleucus’ father, Antiochus, was a nobleman and a general in the service of King Philip II of Macedon, who was the father of Alexander the Great. This noble status and military background helped establish the foundation for Seleucus’s own prominent role and subsequent rise to power after the death of Alexander the Great.

Nangona uSeleucus Nicator waseka uBukhosi bamaSeleucus, abaninzi kookumkani abalandelayo bakhetha igama elithi “Antiochus,” ngembeko, kungekhona kuSeleucus, kodwa kuyise. Uyise kaSeleucus, uAntiochus, wayengumnumzana obekekileyo nomphathi-mkhosi kwinkonzo kaKumkani uPhilip II waseMakedoni, owayenguyise ka-Alexander Omkhulu. Esi sidima sobunobukhosi nemvelaphi yomkhosi sanceda ekusekweni kwesiseko sendima kaSeleucus ebalulekileyo ngokwakhe, kwanokunyukela kwakhe emandleni emva kokufa kuka-Alexander Omkhulu.

Seleucus’ kingdom was established when he took control of three of the four areas of Alexander’s kingdom. Rome also conquers three geographical powers in order to take control and become the king of the north. When Seleucus had secured the east, the west and the north he became the king of the north in the historical narrative, and his capital was the city of Babylon. Many of the following kings chose the name “Antiochus” when they took the northern throne in order to honor their political forefather. The parallel is easy to see, if you choose to see. If you don’t, you don’t.

Ubukumkani bukaSeleucus bamiselwa xa wathabatha ulawulo lweendawo ezintathu kwezo zone zobukumkani buka-Alesandire. NeRoma ngokunjalo yoyisa amagunya amathathu eendawo ukuze ithabathe ulawulo ize ibe ngukumkani wasentla. Xa uSeleucus wayeseqinisile impuma, intshona, nomntla, waba ngukumkani wasentla kwimbali ebaliswayo, yaye ikomkhulu lakhe lalingumzi waseBhabheli. Uninzi lookumkani abalandelayo bakhetha igama elithi “Antiochus” xa babethabatha itrone yasentla ukuze bazukise uyisemkhulu wabo kwezopolitiko. Ukufana kuyabonakala lula, ukuba ukhetha ukukubona. Ukuba awukhethi, akukuboni.

The name “Antiochus” (Ἀντίοχος in Greek) comes from the Greek elements’ “anti” (meaning “against” or “opposite”) and “ocheo” (meaning “to hold fast” or “to maintain”). The northern kings chose the name to maintain their political heritage with the father, just as the antichrist (popes) choose names when they begin to rule. Just as the popes are representatives of their father, the devil, so too the Antiochus’ of the Syrian Empire typify representatives of their father. In this application Antiochus represents a proxy of their father. The proxy of the papal power in 1989 was the United States, and the secular testimony upholds the relationship between the antichrist, Pope John Paul II, and Ronald Reagan in their work to bring down the former Soviet Union.

Igama elithi “Antiochus” (Ἀντίοχος ngesiGrike) livela kwizakhi zesiGrike ezithi “anti” (elithetha “ukuchasana” okanye “ukuba ngokuchasene”) kunye no-“ocheo” (elithetha “ukubambelela ngokuqinileyo” okanye “ukugcina”). Ookumkani basemantla bakhetha eli gama ukuze bagcine ilifa labo lezopolitiko kunye noyise, kanye njengoko umchasi-Kristu (oopopu) bekhetha amagama xa beqalisa ukulawula. Njengoko oopopu bengabameli boyise, uMtyholi, ngokunjalo no-Antiochus boBukhosi baseSiriya bafuzisela abameli boyise. Kolu setyenziso uAntiochus umele ummeli osebenzela egameni loyise. Ummeli wamandla obupopu ngowe-1989 yayiyi-United States, yaye ubungqina behlabathi buxhasa ubudlelwane phakathi komchasi-Kristu, uPopu John Paul II, noRonald Reagan emsebenzini wabo wokuwisa iSoviet Union yangaphambili.

In verses ten through sixteen, the first and last verse possess direct references to verses forty and forty-one. Verse ten directly represents verse forty. Verse sixteen directly represents verse forty-one. The verses represent the portion of the prophecy of Daniel that relates to the last days.

Kwizibhalo zeshumi ukuya kweleshumi elinesithandathu, ivesi yokuqala neyokugqibela zineembekiselo ezithe ngqo kwizibhalo zamashumi amane namashumi amane ananye. Ivesi yeshumi imela ngokuthe ngqo ivesi yamashumi amane. Ivesi yeshumi elinesithandathu imela ngokuthe ngqo ivesi yamashumi amane ananye. Ezi zibhalo zimele inxalenye yesiprofeto sikaDaniyeli enxulumene nemihla yokugqibela.

> “The book that was sealed was not the book of Revelation, but that portion of the prophecy of Daniel which related to the last days. The Scripture says, ‘But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased’ (Daniel 12:4). When the book was opened, the proclamation was made, ‘Time shall be no longer.’ (See Revelation 10:6.) The book of Daniel is now unsealed, and the revelation made by Christ to John is to come to all the inhabitants of the earth. By the increase of knowledge a people is to be prepared to stand in the latter days. . . .

> “Incwadi eyayitywiniwe yayingeyiyo incwadi yeSityhilelo, kodwa yayilelo candelo lesiprofeto sikaDaniyeli elalibhekisele kwimihla yokugqibela. ISibhalo sithi, ‘Kodwa wena, Daniyeli, wavale la mazwi, uyitywine incwadi kude kube lixesha lesiphelo; baninzi abaya kujikeleza apho naphaya, lwande ulwazi’ (Daniyeli 12:4). Xa incwadi yavulwayo, kwenziwa isibhengezo esithi, ‘Akusayi kuba sabakho ixesha.’ (Bona ISityhilelo 10:6.) Incwadi kaDaniyeli ngoku ayisatywiniwanga, kwaye isityhilelo esenziwa nguKristu kuYohane siza kufikelela kubo bonke abemi bomhlaba. Ngokwanda kolwazi, abantu baya kulungiselelwa ukuma ngemihla yokugqibela....”

> “In the first angel’s message men are called upon to worship God, our Creator, who made the world and all things that are therein. They have paid homage to an institution of the Papacy, making of no effect the law of Jehovah, but there is to be an increase of knowledge on this subject.” Selected Messages, book 2, 105, 106.

> “Esigidini sengelosi yokuqala abantu bayabizelwa ukuba banqule uThixo, uMdali wethu, owadala ihlabathi nazo zonke izinto ezikulo. Banike uzuko kwiziko lobuPapa, besenza umthetho kaYehova ungabi nampembelelo, kodwa kuya kubakho ukwanda kolwazi ngalo mba.” Selected Messages, incwadi 2, 105, 106.

At the time of the end in 1989 the last six verses of Daniel chapter eleven represent the “portion of the prophecy of Daniel which related to the last days.” It was recognized when it was then unsealed, and that unsealing produced an increase of knowledge on the “institution of the Papacy, making of no effect the law of Jehovah.” The Alpha and Omega always illustrates the end with the beginning, and the testing process that began in 1989, was designed to produce two classes of worshippers.

Ngexesha lesiphelo ngo-1989 iindinyana ezintandathu zokugqibela zesahluko seshumi elinanye sikaDaniyeli zimele “inxalenye yesiprofeto sikaDaniyeli eyayinxulumene nemihla yokugqibela.” Yaqondwa xa ngelo xesha yatyhilwayo, yaye oko kutyhilwa kwavelisa ukwanda kolwazi ngokuphathelele “ukumiselwa kobuPapa, ukwenziwa ize umthetho kaYehova.” UAlfa no-Omega usoloko ebonakalisa isiphelo ngesiqalo, yaye inkqubo yokuvavanywa eyaqalayo ngo-1989, yayiyilelwe ukuvelisa iindidi ezimbini zabakhonzi.

> And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand. Daniel 12:9, 10.

> Wathi yena, Hamba ngendlela yakho, Daniyeli; ngokuba la mazwi avalelwe, atywiniwe, kude kube lixesha lesiphelo. Abaninzi baya kuhlanjululwa, benziwe mhlophe, bavavanywe; kodwa abangendawo baya kwenza ubungendawo; yaye akukho namnye kwabangendawo oya kuqonda; kodwa izilumko ziya kuqonda. Daniyeli 12:9, 10.

We are now in the final period of that testing process, for the controversy of the robbers at the beginning of Adventism is now being repeated. To identify the robbers as the United States is to identify Antiochus as the robbers. It is the identical controversy of the Millerites and Protestants.

Ngoku sikwelona xesha lokugqibela lwaloo nkqubo yokuvavanywa, kuba impikiswano ngabaphangi ekuqaleni kobu-Adventist ngoku iyaphindwa. Ukuchonga abaphangi njengeUnited States kukuchonga uAntiochus njengabaphangi. Yimpikiswano efanayo kanye neyamaMillerite namaProtestanti.

At the end of the testing process, just as in the beginning of the testing process, which began in 1989, the Lion of the tribe of Judah unseals “that portion of the prophecy of Daniel which related to the last days.” In 1989 it was the last six verses of Daniel eleven, and at the ending it is the hidden history of verse forty, that is typified by verses ten through sixteen.

Ekupheleni kwenkqubo yokuvavanywa, kanye njengasekuqaleni kwenkqubo yokuvavanywa, eyaqala ngo-1989, iNgonyama yesizwe sakwaYuda ityhila itywina “laloo nxalenye yesiprofeto sikaDaniyeli eyayiphathelele kwimihla yokugqibela.” Ngo-1989 yayizizibhalo ezithandathu zokugqibela zikaDaniyeli ishumi elinanye, yaye ekupheleni yimbali efihlakeleyo yendinyana yamashumi amane, efaniswa ziindinyana zeshumi ukuya kweleshumi elinesithandathu.

We will continue our consideration of the six lines of controversies within the history of Adventism in the following articles. The first of those six controversies illustrates the last of those six controversies. We will use the first and last controversies to overlay the other four controversies as we unfold the elements involved with the efforts of the enemy of righteousness to prevent God’s people from rightly dividing “the vision”, which is established with the symbol of Rome.

Siya kuqhubeka nokuqwalasela kwethu imigca emithandathu yeempikiswano ngaphakathi kwimbali yoBuwadventisti kumanqaku alandelayo. Eyokuqala kwezo mpikiswano zintandathu ibonakalisa eyokugqibela kwezo mpikiswano zintandathu. Siya kusebenzisa impikiswano yokuqala neyokugqibela ukugqumelela ezinye ezine ezo mpikiswano njengoko sityhila izinto ezibandakanyekileyo kwimizamo yotshaba lobulungisa yokuthintela abantu bakaThixo ekwahluleni ngokufanelekileyo “umbono”, omiswe ngophawu lweRoma.

> “Unless we understand the importance of the moments that are swiftly passing into eternity, and make ready to stand in the great day of God, we shall be unfaithful stewards. The watchman is to know the time of night. Everything is now clothed with a solemnity that all who believe the truth for this time should realize. They should act in reference to the day of God. The judgments of God are about to fall upon the world, and we need to be preparing for that great day.

> “Ngaphandle kokuba sikuqonde ukubaluleka kwamaxesha adlula ngokukhawuleza engena kunaphakade, size silungele ukuma ngomhla omkhulu kaThixo, siya kuba ngabagcini abangathembekanga. Umlindi umele alazi ixesha lobusuku. Yonke into ngoku yambathiswe sisidima esinzulu ekufuneka bonke abakholwayo enyanisweni yale mihla basiqonde. Bamele benze ngokubhekiselele kumhla kaThixo. Izigwebo zikaThixo sele ziza kuwela phezu kwehlabathi, yaye kufuneka silungiselele loo mini inkulu.”

> “Our time is precious. We have but few, very few days of probation in which to make ready for the future, immortal life. We have no time to spend in haphazard movements. We should fear to skim the surface of the word of God.” Testimonies, volume 6, 407.

> “Ixesha lethu lixabisekile. Sineentsuku ezimbalwa kuphela, ewe zimbalwa kakhulu, zovavanyo esinazo zokuzilungiselela ubomi obuzayo, obungafiyo. Asinaxesha lokulichitha kwiintshukumo ezingenacwangco. Simele soyike ukuchukumisa nje umphezulu welizwi likaThixo.” Testimonies, volume 6, 407.

Back to Articles