Habakkuk's Two Tables 4 of 95
Mokõi Mesa Habacuc rehegua 4/95
For me it is pretty difficult to get through eight pages of notes in an hour's presentation, roughly. And if you will notice, we have 20 pages; so, I am just letting you know that I do not intend to read these notes. I intend to read some of these passages in here for those who are watching on LiveStream that can download the notes; and for those that ultimately watch this on DVD that they have this in the record for themselves, if they do not already have these articles available to them. What we are dealing with is Habakkuk's Two Tables, and at this point all we are doing is trying to demonstrate that Ellen White was in agreement with the truths represented on this 1843 Chart.
Chéve g̃uarã hasy porãiterei ahasávo ocho kuatiarogue nota peteĩ aravopeg̃uarã, ha upéicha rupi. Ha pehechakuaáramo, ñande jaguereko 20 kuatiarogue; upévare, aikuaaukánte peẽme ndaipotaiha amoñe’ẽ koʼã nota. Aime che rembiapópe amoñe’ẽvo koʼã pasáhe oĩva koʼápe umi ohechávape LiveStream rupive ikatúva oguejy hag̃ua koʼã nota; ha umi ipahápe ohechátava kóva DVD-pe g̃uarã, toguereko hag̃ua hikuái kóva jehaipyre ramo ijehegui kuérape, ndoguerekóimáramo koʼã artíkulo ipópe. Pe mbaʼe jahesareko hína hese haʼe Habakkuk Mokõi Tabla, ha ko’ag̃a peve jajapóva añoite hína jahechauka hag̃ua Ellen White oñemoĩ hague peteĩ ñeʼẽme umi añetegua ojehechaukáva ko Tabla 1843-pe.
The first three presentations we concluded yesterday were showing that Ellen White clearly and specifically endorses the 2520 time prophecy as valid in Early Writings, page 236.
Mbohapy jehechaukarã ñamohu’ã va’ekue kuehe ohechauka kuri Ellen White omoneĩha hesakã porã ha hekoitépe pe profesía ára rehegua 2520-pegua oiko porãha Early Writings, página 236-pe.
When speaking of the first disappointment in March of 1844, she says that after the disappointment the Millerites continued to study the Bible, and they discovered that the same evidence that had led them to predict 1843 for the 2520, the 2300, and the 1335, that same evidence was then recognized in 1844, to prove that these prophetic periods ended in 1844. And we discussed how the only prophetic periods that she could be speaking of are these two [referring to the 2520 and the 2300 on the 1843 Chart], not the 1335. The 1335 started in the AD time period; it ended in 1843. Therefore, she is putting her endorsement upon the understanding of the 2520 and the 2300-year prophecy.
Oñe’ẽvo pe peteĩha ñembyasy rehe marzo de 1844-pe, ha’e he’i pe ñembyasy rire umi Millerita osegi hague ostudia la Biblia, ha ohechakuaa hikuái pe evidencia peteĩchaguaite ogueraha vaʼekue chupekuéra opredisi hag̃ua 1843-pe pe 2520, pe 2300 ha pe 1335, upe evidencia peteĩchaguaite upéi ojehechakuaa hague 1844-pe, ojehechauka hag̃ua koʼã período profético opa hague 1844-pe. Ha ñañomongeta kuri mbaʼéichapa umi añoʼỹ periodo profético ikatúva haʼe oñeʼẽ hína hese haʼe koʼã mokõi añoite [oñeʼẽvo pe 2520 ha pe 2300 rehe pe Tabla de 1843-pe], ndahaʼéi pe 1335. Pe 1335 oñepyrũ arakaʼe AD-pe; opa 1843-pe. Upévare, haʼe omoĩ ijehegui mborayhu ha moneĩ hag̃ua pe entendimiento rehegua pe 2520 ha pe profecía 2300 ary rehegua.
And then she went on further to say that during that time period, as they began to prove that three time prophecies ended in 1844, this is what caused the persecution that drove the Millerites out of the church. So, it is not a coincidence that here at the end of the world men and women are being persecuted in the Adventist Church for presenting the information for why the 2520 ended in 1844.
Ha upéi, haʼe osegi heʼívo pe upe tiémpope, oñepyrũvo ojehechauka hag̃ua mbohapy profecía aravopegua opa hague ary 1844-pe, kóva hína pe omoñepyrũvaʼekue pe jehasa asy omosẽvaʼekue umi Milleríta-kuérape tupaógui. Upévare, ndahaʼéi peteĩ mbaʼe oikóva rei koʼápe, ko mundo paha gotyo, kuimbaʼe ha kuña-kuéra ojehasa asyha Iglesia Adventista-pe ogueru hag̃ua pe marandu omyesakãva mbaʼérepa pe 2520 opa ary 1844-pe.
Directed by the Hand of the Lord
Mbo po Yvága Rembiporu reheve hag̃ua Ñandejára po rupive
So, now we are moving to another subject, this one right here [referring to AD508 on the 1843 Chart]. You will find, if you have not looked at these Charts, Sister White says of this 1843 Chart, "I saw that the Lord directed in this Chart," and she says of this 1850 Chart that God was in the publishment of this Chart. So, she has told us that God was involved in the production of both of these Charts, and how they are structured was humanly purposeful. The Millerites did it on purpose, but it was by God's design.
Upévare, koʼág̃a jaháma ambue mbaʼére, kóva oĩva koʼápe [oñeʼẽvo AD508 rehe pe 1843 Chart-pe]. Pejuhúta, peneʼẽrenduʼỹramo guare koʼã Chart rehe, Sister White heʼi ko 1843 Chart rehe: “Ahecha kuri Ñandejára oisãmbyhy hague ko Chart-pe”, ha heʼi ko 1850 Chart rehe Tupã oĩ hague ko Chart ñemoherakuãme. Upéicharõ, haʼe ñandeʼapytépe heʼíma Tupã oike hague mokõivéva koʼã Chart jejapope, ha mbaʼéichapa oñemohenda hikuái, upéva yvypóra rembipotápe ojejapo. Umi Millerita ojapo upéva oipotágui upéicha, ha katu upéva oiko Tupã rembiapo rape rupi.
Up here, from 677BC down to what they believed, AD1843, this is the column [referring to the second column right the left on the 1843 Chart] that defines the 2520, that begins in 677BC and they thought ended in AD1843.
Ko’ápe, 677 a.C. guive peve pe ha’ekuéra ogueroviáva, 1843 d.C., kóva hína pe columna [ohechaukávo pe mokõiha columna oĩva asu gotyo pe Tabla 1843-pe] omyesakãva pe 2520, oñepyrũva 677 a.C.-pe ha ha’ekuéra oguerovia va’ekue opa hague 1843 d.C.-pe.
And they retained this graphic illustration on the 1850 Chart, from here [referring to the third column from the left] 677BC to here, AD1844. This is the column of the 2520 that exists on both Charts.
Ha ha’e kuéra omantene ko ta’ãnga hesakã porãva pe Cuadro 1850-pe, ko’águi [ohechaukáva mbohapyha columna asúigui] 677 a.C. guive ko’ápe peve, 1844 d.C. Kóva hína pe columna 2520 rehegua oĩva mokõivéva Cuadro-pe.
And right in the middle of these columns is the cross, in both instances.
Ha katu ko’ã columna mbyteitépe oĩ pe kurusu, mokõivéva caso-pe.
And right below the cross is the reference to the Daily. And the symbol of the Daily, Paganism, the root of the Pagan religion, is self-exaltation; and, this is where you can see the Lord's hand in it, not necessarily the human hand on both of these charts.
Ha upe kurusu guýpe oĩ pe ñe’ẽmondo pe Diario rehegua. Ha pe Diario ra’ãnga, paganoísmo, pe affonsa pe religión pagana rehegua, ha’e pe jejeguerohory yvate hag̃ua; ha, ko’ápe ikatu rehecha Ñandejára po ipype, ndaha’éi tekotevẽ hag̃uáicha yvypóra po oĩ hag̃ua mokõivéva ko’ã ta’anga’atýpe.
For you and me, or anyone, to have our self-exaltation removed from us, we must come to the foot of the cross, reflected on both of these Charts. That lesson is illustrated.
Nde ha chévape g̃uarã, térã oimeraẽva g̃uarã, ñandejehe ñamombaʼeguasu hag̃ua oñembogue hag̃ua ñandehegui, tekotevẽ jaheguahẽ pe kurusu py gotyo, ojehechauka hag̃uáicha mokõivéva koʼã Gráficope. Upe mboʼepy ojehechauka hag̃ua.
And, of course, when we talk about the columns of the 2520 with the cross in the middle, we know that in fulfillment of Daniel 9, when Christ came to confirm the covenant with many for one week, that one week equates to 2520 days, and in the midst of that week He was crucified. So, in the middle of these columns on each of these Charts we see the cross, and these are inferring the 2520 days that Christ confirmed the covenant with many.
Ha, añetehápe, ñañeʼẽ jave umi columna 2520 rehegua rehe, kurusu oĩva mbytépe, jaikuaa Daniel 9 ñemyenyhẽme, Cristo ou rire omombarete hag̃ua pe pacto heta tapichápe guarã peteĩ semana pukukue, upe peteĩ semana ojoja 2520 ára rehe, ha upe semana mbyte rupi haʼe ojekrusifika. Upévare, koʼã columna mbytépe peteĩteĩ koʼã Cuadro-pe jahecha pe kurusu, ha koʼãva ohechauka 2520 ára Cristo omombarete hague pe pacto heta tapichápe.
So, now we are going to take up the Daily and Ellen White's endorsement of it.
Upévare, ko'ág̃a ñañepyrũta jahecha hag̃ua pe “Daily” ha Ellen White omoneĩhague upéva.
"September 23, the Lord showed me that He had stretched out His hand the second time to recover the remnant of His people, and that efforts must be redoubled in this gathering time. In the scattering, Israel was smitten and torn, but now in the gathering time God will heal and bind up His people. In the scattering, efforts made to spread the truth had but little effect, accomplished but little or nothing; but in the gathering, when God has set His hand to gather His people, efforts to spread the truth will have their designed effect. All should be united and zealous in the work. I saw that it was wrong for any to refer to the scattering for examples to govern us now in the gathering; for if God should do no more for us now than He did then, Israel would never be gathered. I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until His hand was removed.
“23 jasyporundy, Ñandejára ohechauka chéve ha’e omyasãi jey hague Ipo mokõiha jey ojapo hag̃uáicha pe hembyre Itavayguakuéragui, ha tekotevẽha oñemombareteve umi ñeha’ã ko aty mbya’u ára jave. Pe sarambi aja, Israel oñenupã ha oñembyai; ágã katu, ko aty mbya’u ára jave, Tupã omongueráta ha ojokuaíta Itavayguápe. Pe sarambi aja, umi ñeha’ã ojejapóva oñemyasãi hag̃ua pe añetegua ndorekói va’ekue guasu efecto, omohu’ã sa’imi térã mba’eve; ha pe aty mbya’u aja, Tupã omoĩ vove Ipo ombyaty hag̃ua Itavayguápe, umi ñeha’ã oñemyasãi hag̃ua pe añetegua oguerekóta pe efecto oñembosako’i hague. Opavave tekotevẽ joaju ha kyre’ỹ tembiapópe. Ahecha vaiha oimeraẽva oñe’ẽ hag̃ua pe sarambíre techapyrãramo ñanemoakã hag̃ua ko’ág̃a pe aty mbya’u aja; Tupã ndojapóiramo niko ñanderehe ko’ág̃a hetave mba’e upe ramo ojapo haguéicha, Israel araka’eve noñembyatymo’ãi. Ahecha pe cuadro 1843-gua oñembohape hague Ñandejára po rupive, ha ndova’erãi oñemoambue; umi papapy oĩ hague Ha’e oipotaháicha; ha Ipo oĩ hague hi’ári ha omokañy peteĩ jejavy umi papapy apytépe, avave ndaikatúi hag̃uáicha ohecha upéva, pe Ipo oñemboyke peve.”
"Then I saw in relation to the —daily' (Daniel 8:12) that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text, and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —daily'; but in the confusion since 1844, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion have followed. Time has not been a test since 1844, and it will never again be a test.
Upéi ahecha pe — ára ha ára rehegua' (Daniel 8:12) rehe, pe ñe'ẽ —sacrificio' omoinge hague yvypóra arandu rupive, ha ndaha'éiha pe texto rehegua, ha Ñandejára ome'ẽ hague pe hechapyre añeteguáva umi ome'ẽ va'ekuépe pe huísio aravo sapukái. Oĩrõ guare joaju, 1844 mboyve, haimete opa umi oĩ va'ekue peteĩ ñe'ẽme oĩ va'ekue pe hechapyre añeteguáre pe — ára ha ára rehegua' rehe; ha pe ñemondýi ha javorái oúva 1844 guive, ambue hechapyrekuéra oñemoneĩ, ha pytũ ha javorái oúvo hapykuéri. Aravo ndaha'éi va'ekue peteĩ prueba 1844 guive, ha araka'eve noĩmo'ãvéi prueba ramo.
"The Lord has shown me that the message of the third angel must go, and be proclaimed to the scattered children of the Lord, but it must not be hung on time. I saw that some were getting a false excitement, arising from preaching time; but the third angel's message is stronger than time can be. I saw that this message can stand on its own foundation and needs not time to strengthen it; and that it will go in mighty power, and do its work, and will be cut short in righteousness.
Pe Ñandejára ohechauka chéve pe mbo’e oúva mbohapyha ánhel gui oho va’erãha ha oñemomarandu va’erãha Ñandejára ra’ykuéra isarambipávape, ha katu ndaha’éi va’erã oñemboja hag̃ua ára rehe. Ahecha oĩha oĩva oikeva peteĩ vy’aguasu japu hag̃uápe, osẽva ára rehe oñemoĩva predikasión-gui; ha pe mbohapyha ánhel rembiasa ipokatuve ára ikatúvagui ome’ẽ hag̃ua chupe mbarete. Ahecha ko marandu ikatuha opyta ijeheguiete imopyenda ári ha noikotevẽiha ára omombarete hag̃ua ichupe; ha ohoha mbarete tuichaitépe, ha ojapóta hembiapo, ha oñemohu’ãta tekojoja reheve.
"Then I was pointed to some who are in the great error of believing that it is their duty to go to Old Jerusalem, and think they have a work to do there before the Lord comes. Such a view is calculated to take the mind and interest from the present work of the Lord, under the message of the third angel; for those who think that they are yet to go to Jerusalem will have their minds there, and their means will be withheld from the cause of present truth to get themselves and others there. I saw that such a mission would accomplish no real good, that it would take a long while to make a very few of the Jews believe even in the first advent of Christ, much more to believe in His second advent. I saw that Satan had greatly deceived some in this thing and that souls all around them in this land could be helped by them and led to keep the commandments of God, but they were leaving them to perish. I also saw that Old Jerusalem never would be built up; and that Satan was doing his utmost to lead the minds of the children of the Lord into these things now, in the gathering time, to keep them from throwing their whole interest into the present work of the Lord, and to cause them to neglect the necessary preparation for the day of the Lord." Early Writings, 74–76.
Upéi che aime’ẽ oĩha algunos oĩva peteĩ jejavy guasúpe, ogueroviáva ha’eha iñembiapo oho hag̃ua Jerusalén Ymaguápe, ha oimo’ãva orekoha peteĩ tembiapo ojapova’erã upépe Ñandejára ou mboyve. Peichagua jehecha ikatu ogueraha akã ha py’apy Ñandejára rembiapo ko’ág̃aguáre, pe mbohapyha ánhel marandu guýpe; umi oimo’ãva gueteri oho va’erãha Jerusalén-pe ningo omoĩta iñakã upépe, ha ojokoíta imba’erepy añetegua ko’ág̃aguápe g̃uarã, ikatu hag̃uáicha ogueraha ijehe ha ambuépe upépe. Ahecha peichagua misión ndoguerumo’ãiha mba’eve porã añetéva, ha areterei oikotevẽtaha ikatu hag̃uáicha mbovymi judío oguerovia jepe Cristo peteĩha ou hague, ha hetave gueteri hag̃ua oguerovia Hembiapo mokõiha jeju. Ahecha Satanás tuichaiterei ombotavy hague algunos ko mba’épe ha umi angirũ oĩva ijerére ko tetãme ikatútante oipytyvõ chupekuéra ha ogueraha hag̃ua ojapo hag̃ua Tupã mandamiénto, ha katu ha’ekuéra oheja hína chupekuéra oñehundi hag̃uáicha. Ahecha avei Jerusalén Ymagua araka’eve ndojejapojeymo’ãiha; ha Satanás ojapoha opa ikatúva ogueraha hag̃ua Ñandejára ra’y kuéra akã ko’ã mba’épe ko’ág̃a, pe ñembyaty ára jave, ani hag̃ua omoĩ hikuái opaite ipy’apy Ñandejára rembiapo ko’ág̃aguápe, ha ojapo hag̃uáicha oheja rei pe ñembosako’i tekotevẽva Ñandejára ára peguarã." Early Writings, 74–76.
A few things that we are going to show is we have a passage from Early Writings, page 74. We have dealt with this before. Many of these things we will be dealing with in this presentation, we have dealt with before; but, most of us do not understand that this passage in Early Writings went through an evolution. As it exists in the book Early Writings, men will use what is in Early Writings to misrepresent the truth. But, if you go back to the original source documents, the logic for their misrepresenting the truth is removed.
Mokõi mbaʼe rohechaukátava hína haʼe ñande jaguerekoha peteĩ pasáhe Early Writings-gui, kuatiarogue 74-pe. Kóva rehe ñambaʼapo vaʼekue yma. Heta koʼã mbaʼe jahechátava ko presentación-pe ñambaʼapo vaʼekue hese yma; upéicharõ jepe, hetave ñande apytégui ndoikuaái ko pasáhe oĩva Early Writings-pe ohasa hague peteĩ evolución rehe. Oĩháicha pe aranduka Early Writings-pe, kuimbaʼekuéra oipurúta upe oĩva Early Writings-pe añetegua rehegua ombojeheʼa hag̃ua. Péro, reho jeýramo umi kuatia ypykue fuente-kuérape, ojeipeʼa pe lógica haʼekuéra oipurúva oñemboheko hag̃ua pe añetegua rehegua.
So, there is much that can be said about this. I am only going to identify a couple of points, because we are dealing with the Daily here. But, in this passage from Early Writings, I would have you take note of the very first two thoughts, September 23rd.
Upéicha, heta mba’e ikatu oñeñe’ẽ ko mba’ére. Che ahechaukáta mante mokõi punto, ñañembohoryháguinte ko’ápe pe Diario rehe. Péro, ko pasáhepe Early Writings-gui, aipota peñatendemi umi mokõi pensamiento tenonderãite rehe, 23 de septiembre.
Okay. September 23rd, if you are not familiar with it, you can put 1850 there; September 23, 1850. This has an impact on correctly understanding the Daily.
Oĩ. 23 jasyporundy, ndaikuaáiramo hese, ikatu remoĩ upépe 1850; 23 jasyporundy, 1850. Kóva oguereko peteĩ impacto ikatu hag̃uáicha oñentende hekopete pe ára ha ára.
The end of the first paragraph is a statement that we have dealt with here already for the past few days, "I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it until His hand was removed."
Pe párrafo peteĩha paha ha’e peteĩ ñe’ẽmondo ñande roñangarekóma hese ko’ápe umi ára ohasava’ekuépe, “Ahecha hague pe kuatia’atã 1843-pegua oñembohape hague Ñandejára po rupive, ha ndaikatuiha oñemoambue; pe umi papapy oĩ hague Ha’e oipotaháicha; pe Ipo oĩ hague hi’ári ha omokañy peteĩ jejavy umi papapy apytépe, upéicha avave ndaikatúi hag̃uáicha ohecha pe jejavy pe Ipo oñemboyke peve.”
The second paragraph says, "Then I saw in relation to the —daily' (Daniel 8:12) . . . ." Now, I want you to just put in your memory bank—we will deal with this no doubt later, the Lord willing—when the Daily is represented on the 1843 Chart, right here, it says, "taking away the daily"; it says, "Daniel 12: 11 and 12." On the 1850 Chart, when it is dealing with the Daily, it says, "pagan dominion or when the daily taken away, Daniel 11:31." So, on these two Charts, the emphasis that they are identifying from Daniel 11:31 and Daniel 12:11 is the taking away of the Daily. All right?
Pe mokõiha párrafo he’i: “Upéi ahecha pe —‘sáse jepivegua’ rehegua (Daniel 8:12) . . . .” Ko’ág̃a, aipota peñongatu pende mandu’apýpe—kóva rehe ñañe’ẽta, katuete, upe rire, Ñandejára oipotáramo—pe Sáse Jepivegua ojehechaukárõ pe Ta’anga 1843-pe, ko’ápe voi, he’i: “ojeipe’a pe sáse jepivegua”; he’i avei: “Daniel 12:11 ha 12.” Pe Ta’anga 1850-pe, oñeñe’ẽ jave pe Sáse Jepiveguáre, he’i: “paganokuéra poguýpe ñesãmbyhy térã pe sáse jepivegua ojeipe’a ramo, Daniel 11:31.” Upévare, ko’ã mokõi Ta’angápe, pe énfasis ojehechakuaáva Daniel 11:31 ha Daniel 12:11-gui ha’e pe jeipe’a pe Sáse Jepiveguágui. Añete piko?
And in Daniel 11:31 and Daniel 12:11, the Hebrew word that is translated as "take away" is sur, and it means "to take away"; it means "to remove."
Ha Daniel 11:31 ha Daniel 12:11-pe, pe ñe'ẽ hebreo oñembohasáva “ojeipe'a hag̃ua” ha'e sur, ha he'ise “ojeipe'a hag̃uáicha”; he'ise “ñemboguete” térã “jeipe'a”.
But, in Daniel 8, in verse 11, where it says the Daily is taken away, it is a different Hebrew word. It is rum, and it means "to lift up and to exalt."
Péro, Daniel 8-pe, versíkulo 11-pe, he’ihápe he’iha pe ára ha ára pegua ojeipe’aha, upépe ojepuru ambue ñe’ẽ hebreo. Ha’e hína rum, ha he’ise “oñemopu’ã ha oñemomba’eguasu hag̃ua.”
So, William Miller used the Cruden's Concordance, and the Cruden's Concordance does not give you any insight on the Hebrew or the Greek. So, the Lord was directing the Millerites; because, of the three places where the Daily is referenced in the Book of Daniel, Daniel chapter 8, Daniel chapter 11, and Daniel chapter 12, in chapters 11 and 12 the Hebrew that is translated "take away" means "take away." And that is what they are emphasizing on these Charts, is when Paganism was taken away the 1290 and the 1335 prophecies would begin.
Upévare, William Miller oiporu vaʼekue Cruden’s Concordance, ha Cruden’s Concordance nomeʼẽi ndéve mbaʼeveichagua hesakã hag̃ua hebreo térã griego rehe. Upévare, Ñandejára oguereko vaʼekue dirección umi Millerita-kuérape; pórke, umi mbohapy hendágui pe “Daily” oñemombeʼuhápe Daniel kuatiañeʼẽme, Daniel kapítulo 8, Daniel kapítulo 11 ha Daniel kapítulo 12-pe, kapítulo 11 ha 12-pe pe hebreo oñembohasáva “take away” ramo heʼise “take away.” Ha upéva hína haʼekuéra omombaʼeguasúva koʼã Gráfico-pe, arakaʼépa Paganismo ojeipeʼáramo pe profesía 1290 ha 1335 oñepyrũta hag̃ua.
But, in Daniel 8, when the Daily is taken away, it is not talking about being removed; it is talking about the religion of Paganism being lifted up and exalted. So, the Millerites got it right. They referenced the two chapters in Daniel that are about the Daily being taken away.
Ha, Daniel 8-pe, ára oñemboykévo pe Tapiaitegua, ndaha’éi oñeñe’ẽva oñemboguete hag̃ua; oñeñe’ẽ hína pe paganis mo’ã rehe, ojegueropu’akáva ha oñemomba’eguasúva. Upévare, umi Millerita oikuaa porãkuri. Ha’ekuéra ohechaukákuri umi mokõi kapítulo Daniel-pe oñe’ẽva pe Tapiaitegua oñemboykévare.
But here in Early Writings and as we go back through the original source documents you are going to see in this chapter that originally this reference of Daniel 8:12 is not there. I do not know that Ellen White told them to include that in there in 1882 when they printed Early Writings, or if one of the editors put it in. I am not threatened by it, because it is not talking about the taking away here.
Péro ko'ápe Primeros Escritos-pe ha jahasávo jey umi kuatia ypykue tee rupive, pehecháta ko capítulo-pe ypykuete ko ñe'ẽjoaju Daniel 8:12-gua ndaiporiha upépe. Che ndaikuaái Ellen White he'ípapa chupekuéra omoinge hag̃ua upéva upépe ary 1882-pe, omboysyrõrõ guare Primeros Escritos, térã peteĩva umi editor-kuéra omboikepa upéva. Ndachemondýi upéva, pórke ndaha'éi oñe'ẽva ko'ápe pe jeipe'águi.
It says in the second paragraph, "Then I saw in relation to the —daily' (Daniel 8:12) that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text, and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry."
He’i pe mokõiha párrafope: “Upéi ahecha pe —daily’ (Daniel 8:12) rehegua, pe ñe’ẽ —sacrifice’ oñemoĩhague yvypóra arandu rupive, ha ndaha’éiha pe téxtopegua, ha Ñandejára ome’ẽhague hesegua pe hechapy porã umi ome’ẽ vaʼekuépe pe huísio ára sapukái.”
Now, we had a meeting with some of the prominent pastors in Germany and some of the seminary teachers from Germany several years ago, in Germany, where I presented and they threw their stones at this message.
Koʼág̃a roguereko peteĩ aty heta ary mboyve Alemania-pe, umi mburuvicha guasu pastor kuéra ndive ha Alemania-gua seminario mboʼehára kuéra ndive, upépe che apreserta ha haʼekuéra omombo ita ko marandu rehe.
And there was a pastor there from Italy, and he expressed one of the foolish arguments about this verse. And what he said was—and there are several foolish arguments about the Daily, so you find this foolish argument used often and we will put it in the record here. It says, "Then I saw in relation to the —daily' (Daniel 8:12) that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text, and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry." Here is the foolish argument: They say Ellen White is not endorsing the Daily here; she is endorsing the Pioneer understanding that the word sacrifice was added by human wisdom and does not belong to the text. Okay? So, this Italian pastor is making this argument.
Ha oĩ kuri peteĩ pastor Italia-gua, ha ha’e omombe’u peteĩ umi argumento vyrorei rehegua ko versíkulo rehe. Ha he’i va’ekue kóicha —ha oĩ heta argumento vyrorei pe “Diario” rehegua, upévare rejuhu jepi ko argumento vyrorei ojeporúva, ha romoĩta ko’ápe peteĩ testímonio ramo. He’i kóicha: “Upéi ahecha pe —diario’ (Daniel 8:12) rehegua, pe ñe’ẽ —sacrificio’ oñemoĩ hague yvypóra arandu rupive, ha ndaha’éiha pe téysto pegua, ha Ñandejára ome’ẽ hague pe hesakã porãva hese umi omyasãi va’ekuépe pe huicio aravo sapukái.” Ko’ápe oĩ pe argumento vyrorei: Ha’ekuéra he’i Ellen White ndohechauka mo’ãiha ko’ápe pe “Diario”; ha’e ohechauka pe entendimiento umi Pionero-kuéra rehegua, pe ñe’ẽ sacrificio oñemoĩ hague yvypóra arandu rupive ha ndaha’éiha pe téysto pegua. Añetehápe? Upéicha, ko pastor Italia-gua ojapo hína ko argumento.
And I said, "Well, explain the next sentence to me, Pastor."
Ha che, “Upéicharõ, emyesakãna chéve pe ambue ñe’ẽjoaju, Pastor.”
The next sentence says, "When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —daily'; . . . ." This is not about the correct view of the word sacrifice being added by human wisdom. Ellen White here—and this is a hard one, this is a hard one for these people that are refusing to hear and are refusing to see in Adventism today. This paragraph, there are probably more theologians have lost their salvation over this paragraph than any other paragraph in the Spirit of Prophecy. I am not exaggerating; I think that is probably accurate.
Pe ñe’ẽjoaju oúva he’i: “Oĩ jave joaju, 1844 mboyve, hetave opavavégui oĩ joajúpe pe ñe’ẽporã rehegua pe —daily’; . . . .” Kóva ndaha’éi pe hechapy porã rehegua pe ñe’ẽ sacrifice oñemoĩhague yvypóra arandu rupive. Ellen White ko’ápe—ha kóva ijetu’ueterei, kóva ijetu’ueterei umi tapichápe g̃uarã ko’ág̃a peve Adventismo-pe nohenduséiva ha ndohesaséiiva. Ko párrafo rehe, ikatu hag̃uáicha oĩ hetave teólogo operde va’ekue isalvasión ko párrafo rupive oimeraẽ ambue párrafo-gui Espíritu de Profecía-pe. Ndaha’éi añemomba’eguasu hag̃uáicha; che aime hag̃ua peteĩcha, upéva ikatu hag̃uáicha ha’e añete.
In the early part of the 20th Century when the false view of the Daily is being introduced into Adventism, everyone that was fighting about it on both sides of the issue knew that they were fighting about this paragraph. When Stephen Haskell came to the defense of the Pioneer view that the Daily was Paganism, what did he do? He reprinted this 1843 Chart, and he put this paragraph on the bottom. So this paragraph is the focus of controversy, and it is here where many, many men have fallen on their swords and died.
Ñepyrũrã siglo 20-pe, pe “Daily” rehegua jehecha japu oñemoinge ramo guare adventísmo-pe, enterovéva oñorairõva hese mokõive lado-gui oikuaa porã kuri hikuái oñorairõha ko párrafo rehe. Stephen Haskell ou jave oñedefende hag̃ua Pionero-kuéra remiandu, he’íva “Daily” ha’eha Paganismo, mba’épa ojapo? Oñembokuatiajey ko Cuadro 1843 guare, ha omoĩ ko párrafo ipy gotyo. Upévare, ko párrafo ha’e pe ñemoñe’ẽjoavy mbytépe oĩva, ha ko’ápe heta-iterei, heta-iterei kuimba’e ho’a ikyse ári ha omanóva.
So, at a minimum level of what I want you to see here, because you have men like recently, Steve Wohlberg of White Horse Ministries, he has been opposing this message. And one of his arguments is, "Well, Ellen White never had a position on the Daily, so I don't have to have one," which was just an absolutely foolish position. But, even if we grant him the possibility that Ellen White did not have a position on it, what does she say in this quote? She says that the Pioneers had the correct view of it. Even if she did not know what it was, here she is saying that there is a correct view, which means there are a wrong view, maybe several wrong views.
Upévare, michĩmínte jepe pe nivelpe aipotávarã pehecha ko’ápe, pórke oĩ kuimba’e kuéra, Steve Wohlberg, White Horse Ministries-gua, ko’ã ára ramo, ha’e oĩ hína oñemoĩ hag̃ua ko marandu rehe. Ha peteĩva umi argumento oguerekóva ha’e: “Ellen White araka’eve ndoguerekói peteĩ postura pe Daily rehe, upévare che ndarekói hag̃ua peteĩ,” ha upéva ningo peteĩ postura itavývaite. Péro, jepe ñame’ẽ chupe pe posibilidad Ellen White ndoguerekóiva’ekue peteĩ postura hese, mba’épa he’i ko cita-pe? Ha’e he’i umi Pionero-kuéra oguereko hague pe visión hekopeteva’ekue hese. Jepe ha’e ndoikuaái rire mba’épa upéva, ko’ápe ha’e he’i oĩha peteĩ visión hekopeteva, upéva he’ise avei oĩha peteĩ visión vai, ikatu hag̃uáicha heta visión vai.
You have men like Vance Ferrell. Vance Ferrell; people have confidence in Vance Ferrell's prophetic interpretations, and I do not know why. Vance Ferrell is not the only one but he is one of the men that says that the Daily represents both Paganism and Christ's Sanctuary ministry. Okay? He is saying that this symbol represents Satan and Christ.
Peẽ peguereko kuimba’e kuéra Vance Ferrell-icha. Vance Ferrell; tapicha kuéra ojerovia Vance Ferrell maranduhára ñehesa’ỹijo-kuéra rehe, ha che ndaikuaái mba’érepa. Vance Ferrell ndaha’éi pe añoite, péro ha’e peteĩva umi kuimba’e apytégui he’íva pe “Daily” ohechauka mokõivéva, paganismo ha Cristo rembiapo pe Santuariope. Añetehápe? Ha’e he’i ko símbolo ohechaukaha Satanás ha Cristo.
What kind of discernment is being employed with that kind of reasoning?
Mba’eichagua discernimiento piko ojeipuru upeichagua razonamiento reheve?
Okay, Sister White, no matter what the Daily represents here, she says there is a correct view. So, we can at least agree with that premise here, right?
Mávapa, Hermana White, taha’e mba’épa he’ise pe “Diario” ko’ápe, ha’e he’i oĩha peteĩ visión correcta. Upévare, ikatu por lo menos ñaime de acuerdo ko premisa rehe ko’ápe, añetehápe?
"Then I saw in relation to the —daily' (Daniel 8:12) that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text, and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry. When union exited, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —daily'; but in the confusion since 1844, other views have been embraced,"—
Upéi ahecha pe —sápa ára guáre' (Daniel 8:12) rehegua, pe ñe'ẽ —sacrificio' oñemoĩhague yvypóra arandu rupive, ha noĩriha pe jehaipyteépe, ha Ñandejára ome'ẽ hague hese pe hechapyre hekopete umi ome'ẽva'ekuépe pe juicio aravo sapukái. Ohasávo pe joaju, 1844 mboyve, haimete maymáva oĩ va'ekue joajúpe pe hechapyre hekopete rehe pe —sápa ára guáre'; ha pe sarambi oiko va'ekue 1844 guive, ambue hechapyrekuéra oñemoneĩ,
This is what I told the Italian pastor. I said, "Okay. Can you give me any historical references where after 1844 there were other views about the word sacrifice that have been embraced?
Kóva hína pe ha’éva’ekue pe pastor italiano-pe. Ha’e chupe: “Iporã. Ikatúpa reme’ẽ chéve mba’eveichagua referencia histórica ohechaukáva, 1844 rire, oĩ hague ambue punto de vista ñe’ẽ sacrificio rehegua ojeguerovia hag̃uáicha?”
And he kind of backed out of that at this point.
Haʼe ku osẽ porãʼỹvaicha upévagui ko momentope.
Since 1844 other views of the Daily have been embraced, and what have they produced? Darkness and confusion.
1844 guive oñemoneĩ ambue ñe’ẽme’ẽnguéra “Diario”-re, ha mba’e piko ogueru hikuái? Pytũ ha apañuãi.
Underline "darkness and confusion," because when Sister White further talks about the Daily, she talks about darkness and confusion, and we are going to show you some of those this morning.
Emoi guýpe “pytũ ha ñemyakãrapu’ã”, Sister White oñe’ẽvévo upe Diario rehe, oñe’ẽhína pytũ ha ñemyakãrapu’ã rehe, ha ko pyhareve rohechaukáta peẽme umíva apytégui mbovymi.
Take the wrong view of the Daily and it produces darkness and confusion.
Eguereko peteĩ jehecha vai pe Tapiagua rehe, ha upéva ogueru pytũ ha ñembyavy.
"Time has not been a test since 1844, and it will never again be a test."
“Aravo ndaha’éi peteĩ prueba 1844 guive, ha araka’eve ndoikovéimo’ãi jey peteĩ prueba ramo.”
So, in connection with the Daily you see here, here is the argument. Here is the argument today; here is the argument that was introduced by Ellen White's son. It was introduced by others, but he is the one that put it into the historical record of Adventism. It is that when you read this passage, the context of time setting is what you need to understand.
Upéicha, pe “Diario” rehegua ndive, pehecha ko’ápe, ko’ápe oĩ pe argumento. Kóva hína pe argumento ko árape; kóva hína pe argumento omoingekuéva Ellen White ra’y. Ambuéva avei omoingekuri, ha’e katu pe omoĩva’ekue Adventismo rembiasakue ypykuépe. Ha’e hína kóva: remoñe’ẽ jave ko pasaje, pe aranduka’i ára ñemohendáva contexto hína pe tekotevẽva reikũmby.
—"other views have been embraced,"—in concerning the Daily—"and darkness and confusion have followed. Time has not been a test since 1844, and it will never again be a test.
—«ambue jehecha pyahukuéra oñemoneĩ vaʼekue»,— pe Diario rehegua —«ha pytũmby ha ñembyasyʼi oúma hapykuéri. Aravo ndahaʼéi vaʼekue peteĩ prueba guive 1844, ha arakaʼeve ndohasamoʼãi jey peteĩ prueba ramo.
"The Lord has shown me that the message of the third angel must go, and be proclaimed to the scattered children of the Lord, but it must not be hung on time."
“Pe Ñandejára ohechauka chéve pe tembiapo marandu ángel mbohapyha rehegua oho va’erãha, ha oñemomarandu va’erãha Ñandejára ra’ykuéra isarambípavape; ha katu ndojejokói va’erã ára rehe.”
Do you see why Willy White is saying that we need to see the context of time-setting?
¿Rehechápa mbaʼérepa Willy White heʼi ñande tekotevẽha jahecha pe contexto ojejapóhague ára ñemohendapy rehe?
It talks about the confusion that the wrong views of the Daily produced, time has not been a test; and then there is a paragraph about time setting.
Oñeñe'ẽ pe ñembyaty vai rehe, umi temimo'ã vai “ha'e va'ekue ára ha ára ojejapóva” rehegua oguenohẽ va'ekue; aravo noikoiva'ekue peteĩ prueba ramo; ha upéi oĩ peteĩ párrafo oñe'ẽva aravo ñemohenda rehe.
Okay, this is what you have to understand: This paragraph about time setting, it was not in the original source document; and, the statement about time has not been a test, that sentence has been altered. It misrepresents Ellen White's original thought. She did not connect anything about time setting with the Daily. This is what we want to look at this morning.
Oĩ, kóva hína peẽ peikuaava’erã: ko párrafo oñe’ẽva tiempo ñemohendágui, ndaipóri va’ekue pe kuatia ypykuepe; ha, pe ñe’ẽjoaju he’íva pe tiempo rehegua ndaha’ei hague peteĩ prueba, upe ñe’ẽjoaju oñemoambue. Upéva omombe’u vai Ellen White remiandu ypykue. Ha’e nombojoajúi mba’eve pe tiempo ñemohenda rehegua pe Diario ndive. Kóva hína pe jahechaséva ko’ẽrõ ko pyhareve.
So, as I said, we are not going to read all these pages. I am just going to make sure that you have them in your possession so you can test what I am saying; because, as a human being, there is a possibility that I am misleading you.
Upévare, ha’é haguéicha, ndajajemoĩmo’ãi jahecha hag̃ua opa ko’ã kuatiarogue. Aseguráta mante peẽ perekóma hag̃ua pende pópe, ikatu hag̃uáicha peẽ pemoa’ã hag̃ua ajéva; yvypóra ramo guáicha, ikatu ningo ajapo hag̃ua che pendejavy hag̃ua.
Arthur White—"The Context of Time Setting"
Arthur White—“Aravo ñemohenda rehegua contexto”
"The advocates of the old view maintained that the wording of this statement [Early Writings, 74–75.] placed Heaven's endorsement on the view of the daily held by Miller and eventually repeated by Uriah Smith.
“Pe jecha yma guarã oikovéva pe tesa ypykue rehe ohekaukáva ko ñe’ẽmby [Early Writings, 74–75.] omoĩha Yvágagui ojehechakuaáva pe jehecha pe ára ha ára rehegua Miller oguerekovaʼekuépe, ha upéi Uriah Smith omombeʼujeyvaʼekuépe.”
Arthur White, the son of Willy White, in his six-volume set about the history of Ellen White, speaking of his father's position rejecting the correct view of the Daily, he says, in EGW, volume 6, on page 252,
Arthur White, Willy White ra’y, ijaty seis volúmen-pe omombe’úva Ellen White rembiasakue, oñe’ẽvo itúva posición rehe, omboykéva pe añetegua jehecha pe “Daily” rehegua, he’i, EGW, volúmen 6-pe, página 252-pe,
"The advocates of the old view"—that the Daily represented Paganism—"maintained that the wording of this statement [Early Writings, 74–75.] placed Heaven's endorsement on the view of the daily held by Miller and eventually repeated by Uriah Smith."—
“Pe ñemoĩ yma guare rehegua ñemombaretehára”—pe Diario ohechauka hague Paganísmo—“omantene vaʼekue ko ñeʼẽjoaju [Early Writings, 74–75.] omoĩha Yvága ñeʼẽme’ẽ pe ñehesaʼỹijo rehe pe diario rehegua oguerekovaʼekue Miller ha upéi oñeʼẽjeyvaʼekue Uriah Smith rupive.”
If Arthur White was going to be a genuine, accurate historian, do you know what he would have said there? He would have just put one word in there; but, Arthur White, he missed the boat here. He would have said, "The advocates of the old view maintained [correctly] that the wording of this statement, —maintained that the wording of this statement [Early Writings, 74-75.],' placed Heaven's endorsement on the view of the daily held by Miller and eventually repeated by Uriah Smith."
Arthur White oikóta vaʼerãmoʼã peteĩ historiadór añetegua ha hekopete hag̃ua, peikuaa piko mbaʼépa heʼi vaʼerãmoʼã upépe? Omoĩnte vaʼerãmoʼã upépe peteĩ ñeʼẽ; ha Arthur White, koʼápe ojeavyete. Haʼe heʼi vaʼerãmoʼã: “Pe kuéra odefendéva pe ñemañakuaa yma guaréva omantene [hekopete] ko ñeʼẽjoaju ko declaración-pe, —omantene ko declaración-pe ko ñeʼẽjoaju [Early Writings, 74-75.],’ omoĩhague Yvágagui pe ñeʼẽmoneĩ pe ñemañakuaa rehegua pe ‘daily’ rehe, Miller oguerekovaʼekue ha upéi Uriah Smith ojepysojey vaʼekue.”
But he does not put correctly in there. He is just saying what they maintain, like there is the possibility that they were maintaining a wrong position. But they were not; they had the right position.
Ha’e ndoikemo’ãi upépe hekopete. Ha’e he’i mante hína umi mba’e ha’ekuéra omantene va’ekue, ku oĩvaicha pe ikatu hag̃uáicha omantene hikuái peteĩ postura vai. Péro ndaha’éi upéicha; ha’ekuéra oguereko kuri pe postura hekopete.
—"The new-view advocates"—his father, Willy, A. G. Daniells, W. W. Prescott, and I will not go there right now—"The new-view advocates held that the statement must be taken in its context—the context of time setting."—
—«Umi oñemoirũva pe “nueva visión”»—itúva, Willy, A. G. Daniells, W. W. Prescott, ha che ndahamo’ãi upépe ko’ág̃a—«umi oñemoirũva pe “nueva visión” ohechakuaa vaʼekue pe ñeʼẽvaʼekuevaʼerãha ojegueraha hag̃ua ijeheguiete ijere ykére—pe ijere yke, aravo ñemohenda rehegua.»
We just told you their argument in Early Writings, page 74.
Roikémaite peẽme iñe’ẽjoavy Early Writings, página 74-pe.
—"The new-view advocates held that the statement must be taken in its context—the context of time setting. Ellen White's repeated statements that I have no light on the point' (Letter 226, 1908) and I am unable to define clearly the points that are questioned' (Letter 250, 1908), and her inability to make a definite statement when the question was urged upon her, seemed to give support to their conclusion. They were confident also that the messages given through Ellen White would not conflict with the clearly established events of history." Arthur White, EGW, volume 6, 252.
—“Umi odefendéva pe jehecha pyahúpe oñesostene vaʼekue pe ñeʼẽvaʼerã ojehupyty vaʼerãha ijykére — arakaʼe oñemohenda hag̃ua rehegua ykére. Ellen White heʼi jey jey vaʼekue: ‘ndarekói tesape ko punto rehe’ (Letter 226, 1908) ha ‘ndaikatúi amyesakã porã umi punto oñeporandúva’ (Letter 250, 1908), ha ikatuʼỹha omeʼẽ peteĩ jeʼe porã ha añeteguáva pe porandu oñemyañáte jave hese, ojekuaa hag̃uáicha omeʼẽha pytyvõ ijoparávaʼekue hag̃ua upe conclusiónme. Haʼekuéra avei ojerovia mbaretépe umi marandu oñemeʼẽva Ellen White rupive ndoguerohorymoʼãiha ni ndojokupytýiha umi mbaʼe oiko hag̃ua tembiasakuepe oñemopyenda porãmava ndive.” Arthur White, EGW, volúmen 6, 252.
The Original Version—Review and Herald, November 1, 1850
Pe Versión Ypykue — Review and Herald, 1 de noviembre de 1850
And Early Writings, page 74, when was it printed? 1882; the book Early Writings was printed in 1882.
Ha *Early Writings*, página 74, araka’e ojejapo hag̃ua? 1882-pe; pe aranduka *Early Writings* ojejapo 1882-pe.
But where in the passage of Early Writings that we are considering is originally found is in the Review and Herald, November 1, 1850, and you have that in your notes. And it is several paragraphs, and as I have said, we are not going to read them all.
Ha katu pe pasáhe ñahesa’ỹijohína *Early Writings* pe ojejuhu ypyhaguépe hína *Review and Herald*pe, 1 de noviembre de 1850-pe, ha peẽ perekóma upéva pene kuatiahaipyrépe. Ha upéva oguereko heta párrafo, ha che ha’éma haguéicha, ndajaikomo’ãi readipaite hag̃ua umíva opavave.
We see four paragraphs on page 2, then four paragraphs on page 3:
Jahecha irundy párrafo kuatia rogue 2-pe, upéi irundy párrafo kuatia rogue 3-pe:
"Dear Brethren and Sisters I wish to give you a short sketch of what the Lord has recently shown to me in vision. I was shown the loveliness of Jesus, and the love that the angels have for one another. Said the angel—Can ye not behold their love?—follow it. Just so God's people must love one another. Rather let blame fall on thyself than on a brother. I saw that the message —sell that ye have and give alms' had not been given, by some, in its clear light; that the true object of the words of our Saviour had not been clearly presented. I saw that the object of selling was not to give to those who are able to labor and support themselves; but to spread the truth. It is a sin to support and indulge those who are able to labor, in idleness. Some have been zealous to attend all the meetings; not to glorify God, but for the —loaves and fishes.' Such had much better been at home laboring with their hands, —the thing that is good,' to supply the wants of their families, and to have something to give to sustain the precious cause of present truth.
“Che ryvy ha che reindy-kuéry, aipota ame’ẽ peẽme peteĩ ta’anga mbykymi umi mba’e Ñandejára ramoite ohechauka va’ekue chéve visión-pe. Ojehechauka chéve Jesús porãiteha, ha mborayhu umi ánhel-kuéra oguerekóva ojuehe. He’i pe ánhel: —Ndaikatúi piko pehecha imborayhu?— pehapo upéva. Péichaite avei Tupã retãygua-kuéra ojoayhu va’erã ojuehe. Iporãve to’a jeiko hag̃ua nde ári, peteĩ ermáno ári rangue. Ahecha pe marandu —pevende pene mba’e ha peiporu upéva pene poriahurãme’ hag̃ua— ndaikatúi hague, oĩ hag̃ua, hesakã porã hag̃uáicha, peteĩva kuéra rupive; ñande Salvador ñe’ẽ añeteguáva remimo’ã noñemoĩporãi porãi hague. Ahecha pe mba’e ojejapóva pe vende hag̃ua ndaha’éi ome’ẽ hag̃uáicha umi ikatúvape omba’apo ha oñemongakuaa ijehegui; síno oñemyasãi hag̃uáicha pe añetegua. Pekádo hína oñemombarete ha oñemokunu’ũ hag̃ua tekorei rupi umi ikatúva omba’apo. Oĩ va’ekue kyre’ỹ opaite atyhápe hag̃ua; ndaha’éi omomba’eguasu hag̃uáicha Tupãme, síno —mbuja ha pira rehe’ỹ. Ko’ãva oĩ porãve va’erã hógape omba’apóvo ipo-kuéra reheve, —pe mba’e iporãva,’ omyenyhẽ hag̃uáicha hóga ñemoikotevẽ, ha oguereko hag̃uáicha mba’e ome’ẽ hag̃ua oñemombarete hag̃ua pe tekombo’e hepyetereíva ko’ág̃agua añetegua rehegua.”
"Some, I saw, had erred in praying for the sick to be healed before unbelievers. If any among us are sick, and call for the elders of the church to pray over them, according to James 5:14, 15, we should follow the example of Jesus. He put unbelievers out of the room, then healed the sick; so we should seek to be separated from the unbelief of those who have not faith, when we pray for the sick among us.
Che ahecha, oĩva’ekue ojavy vaekue oñembo’évo umi hasývare ojekuera hag̃ua umi ndogueroviáiva renondépe. Oĩramo ñande apytépe hasýva, ha ohenóiramo tupao myakãhárakuérape oñembo’e hag̃ua hese, Santiago 5:14, 15 he’iháicha, tekotevẽ jajapo Jesús techapyrã. Ha’e omosẽ umi ndogueroviáivape kotýgui, upéi omonguera umi hasývape; upévare ñande avei tekotevẽ jaheka jañemboja’o hag̃ua pe ndogueroviái rehegua umi ijerovia’ỹvagui, ñañembo’évo umi ñande apytépe hasývare.
"Then I was pointed back to the time that Jesus took his disciples away alone, into an upper room, and first washed their feet, and then gave them to eat of the broken bread, to represent his broken body, and juice of the vine to represent his spilled blood. I saw that all should move understandingly, and follow the example of Jesus in these things, and when attending to these ordinances, should be as separate from unbelievers as possible.
Upéi che aime techaukajevy upe ára Jesús ogueraha hague ha’eñoite idiscípulo-kuérape peteĩ koty yvatehápe, ha tenonderã ohepy jepýi hag̃ua ipykuéra, ha upéi ome’ẽ chupekuéra ho’u hag̃ua mbujape oñembyaíva, ta’anga hag̃ua hete oñembyaíva, ha parral rykuere oñeñohẽva ta’anga hag̃ua huguy oñeñohẽva. Ahecha maymáva oiko vaerã arandu reheve, ha osegi Jesús ehémplo ko’ã mba’épe, ha oñangarekóvo ko’ã tembiapoukapýre, oĩ vaerã ijeheguiete hag̃ua umi ndogueroviáivagui pe ikatúva hag̃uáicha.
"Then I was shown that the seven last plagues will be poured out, after Jesus leaves the Sanctuary. Said the angel—It is the wrath of God and the Lamb that causes the destruction or death of the wicked. At the voice of God the saints will be mighty and terrible as an army with banners; but they will not then execute the judgment written. The execution of the judgment will be at the close of the 1000 years.
Upéi ahecha hag̃ua chéve pe umi siete plaga pahague oñehẽtaha, Jesús osẽ rire pe Santuario-gui. He’i vaʼekue pe ánhel: —Tupã ha pe Cordero pochykue hína upéva oguerúva ñehundi térã mano umi aña arigua ári. Tupã ñeʼẽ rupive umi santo-kuéra imbaretéta ha ñemongyhyjéta peteĩ ehérsito bandéra reheve guáicha; ha katu upe jave ndohupytymoʼãi gueteri hikuái pe huísio ojehaíva. Pe huísio jejapo añetéva oikóta pe 1000 áño pahaite jave.
"After the saints are changed to immortality, and are caught up together, and receive their harps, crowns, &c., and enter the Holy City, Jesus and the saints set in judgment. The books are opened, the book of life and the book of death; the book of life contains the good deeds of the saints, and the book of death contains the evil deeds of the wicked. These books were compared with the Statute book, the Bible, and according to that they were judged. The saints in unison with Jesus pass their judgment upon the wicked dead. Behold ye! said the angel, the saints sit in judgment, in unison with Jesus, and mete out to each of the wicked, according to the deeds done in the body, and it is set off against their names what they must receive, at the execution of the judgment. This, I saw, was the work of the saints with Jesus, in the Holy City before it descends to the earth, through the 1000 years. Then at the close of the 1000 years, Jesus, and the angels, and all the saints with him, leaves the Holy City, and while he is descending to the earth with them, the wicked dead are raised, and then the very men that —pierced him,' being raised, will see him afar off in all his glory, the angels and saints with him, and will wail because of him. They will see the prints of the nails in his hands, and in his feet, and where they thrust the spear into his side. The prints of the nails and the spear will then be his glory. It is at the close of the 1000 years that Jesus stands upon the Mount of Olives, and the Mount parts asunder, and it becomes a mighty plain, and those who flee at that time are the wicked, that have just been raised. Then the Holy City comes down and settles on the plain.
Umi marangatúpe oñemoambue rire tekove opave’ỹvape, ha oñehupi oñondivepa, ha ohupyty rire iárpa, ikoróna, hamba’e, ha oike pe Táva Marangatúpe, Jesús ha umi marangatúva oguapy oporohusgávo. Ojepe’a umi kuatiañe’ẽryru, pe kuatiañe’ẽryru tekove rehegua ha pe kuatiañe’ẽryru mano rehegua; pe kuatiañe’ẽryru tekove rehegua oguereko umi marangatúva rembiapo porã, ha pe kuatiañe’ẽryru mano rehegua oguereko umi iñañáva rembiapo vai. Ko’ã kuatiañe’ẽryru oñembojoja pe Léi Kuatia rehe, hínava la Biblia, ha upeichaite he’iháicha oñehusga chupekuéra. Umi marangatúva, Jesús ndive peteĩ ñe’ême, omoĩ ihusgapyre umi omanóva iñañáva ári. ¡Pema’ẽ! he’i pe ánhel; umi marangatúva oguapy oporohusgávo, Jesús ndive peteĩ ñe’ême, ha ome’ẽ peteĩteĩ umi iñañávape hembiapo kuéra he’iháicha ojapova’ekue hetepe oikove aja, ha héra ykére oñemboguapy mba’épa ohupytyva’erã hikuái, pe husgakatu oñemboguata jave. Kóva, ahecha, ha’e kuri umi marangatúva rembiapo Jesús ndive, pe Táva Marangatúpe, oguejy mboyve yvy ári, umi 1000 ary pukukue. Upéi umi 1000 ary pahápe, Jesús, umi ánhel, ha opaite umi marangatúva hendive, osẽ pe Távagui Marangatúgui, ha oguejy aja hikuái yvy ári, umi omanóva iñañáva oñemoingove jey; ha upérõ umi kuimba’eete “ojutava’ekue chupe” oñemoingove jeývo, ohechata chupe mombyry guive opavave hekomimbipa reheve, umi ánhel ha umi marangatúva hendive, ha hasẽ joáta hese. Ohecháta umi clavo rape ipope ha ipýpe, ha pe ikostádope oike hague pe kyse puku. Umi clavo rape ha pe kyse puku rape upérõ ha’éta iglória. Umi 1000 ary pahápe Jesús opyta Olivoty Yvyty ári, ha pe Yvyty oñemboja’o mokõime, ha oiko chugui peteĩ ñu tuichaitereíva, ha umi odiparava upérõ ha’e umi iñañáva, oñemoingove jeýva ramoite. Upéi pe Táva Marangatúva oguejy ha oguapy pe ñu ári.
"Then Satan imbues the wicked, that have been raised, with his spirit. He flatters them that the army in the City is small, and that his army is large, and that they can overcome the saints and take the City. While Satan was rallying his army, the saints were in the City, beholding the beauty and glory of the Paradise of God. Jesus was at their head, leading them. All at once the lovely Saviour was gone from our company; but soon we heard his lovely voice, saying, —Come ye blessed of my Father inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.' We gathered about Jesus, and just as he closed the gates of the City, the curse was pronounced upon the wicked. The gates were shut. Then the saints used their wings and mounted to the top of the wall of the City. Jesus was also with them; his crown looked brilliant and glorious. It was a crown within a crown, seven in number. The crowns of the saints were of the most pure gold, decked with stars. Their faces shone with glory, for they were in the express image of Jesus; and as they arose, and moved all together to the top of the City, I was enraptured with the sight.
Upéi Satanás omyenyhẽ umi ñaña, oikove jey vaʼekuépe, ijespíriture. Ombohovái chupekuéra pe táva pegua ehérsito michĩha, ha ijehérsito katu tuichaha, ha ikatuha ogana umi santo-kuérape ha oguereko pe Táva. Satanás ombyaty aja ijehérsito, umi santo-kuéra oĩ pe Táva ryepýpe, omaña hag̃ua Tupã Paraíso porãite ha hekomimbipa rehe. Jesús oĩ kuri iñakãme, oisãmbyhývo chupekuéra. Sapyʼaitépe pe Salvador iporãva ndaipóri véima ore apytépe; péro pyaʼeete rohendu ijayvu porãva, heʼívo: —Peju, che Ru ojehovasa vaʼekue, pehupyty pe rréino oñembosakoʼi vaʼekue peẽme g̃uarã yvy oñemopyenda mboyve guive. Ore aty Jesús jerére, ha upe javeite haʼe ombotyvo pe Táva rokẽnguéra, oñemoĩ pe maldisión umi ñaña ári. Oñemboty umi rokẽ. Upéi umi santo-kuéra oiporu ipepo ha ojupi pe murálla ári, pe Táva yvate gotyo. Jesús avei oĩ hendivekuéra; ikoróna ojajái ha hechapyrãva. Haʼe vaʼekue peteĩ koróna ambue koróna ryepýpe, siete papaha. Umi santo-kuéra koróna hína óro ipotĩvévagui, oñembojegua mbyjakuéra reheve. Hova kuéra omimbi gloria reheve, haʼekuéra oĩgui Jesús raʼangaetepe; ha ojupívo hikuái, ha oñemonguʼe joja maymáva pe Táva ruʼã gotyo, che añandu che pyʼa rory eterei upe ahecháva rehe.
"Then the wicked saw what they had lost; and fire was breathed from God upon them, and consumed them. This was the Execution of the Judgment. The wicked then received according as the saints in unison with Jesus had meted out to them during the 1000 years. The same fire from God that consumed the wicked, purified the whole earth. The broken ragged mountains melted with fervent heat, the atmosphere, also, and all the stubble was consumed. Then our inheritance opened before us, glorious and beautiful, and we inherited the whole earth made new. We all shouted with a loud voice, Glory, Alleluia.
Upérõ umi iñañáva ohecha mbaʼepa operdevaʼekue; ha tata osẽ Tupãgui hiʼári, ha omokõmba chupekuéra. Kóva vaʼekue pe Huísio Jejapo. Upérõ umi iñañáva ohupyty hekoitépe umi mbaʼe umi marangatúkuéra, Jesús ndive peteĩ ñeʼẽme, ombojojávaʼekue chupekuéra rehe pe 1000 áño aja. Pe misma tata osẽva Tupãgui ha omokõmbava umi iñañávape, omopotĩmba opa yvy. Umi yvyty oñembyaíva ha opẽmbáva oñehundi tata haku etereívape; pe ára jerére oĩva ave, ha opa umi ka’avo piru oñekõmba. Upéi ore renonderãme ojepeʼa ore herénsia, mimbipa ha porãite; ha rohupyty opa yvy oñembopyahúva. Maymáva rosapukái hatã peteĩ ñeʼẽme: ¡Glória, Aleluya!
"I also saw that the shepherds should consult those in whom they have reason to have confidence, those who have been in all the messages, and are firm in all the present truth, before they advocate any new point of importance, which they may think the Bible sustains. Then the shepherds will be perfectly united, and the union of the shepherds will be felt by the church. Such a course I saw would prevent unhappy divisions, and then there would be no danger of the precious flock being divided, and the sheep scattered, without a shepherd."—
“Ahecha avei che ahecha umi pastor-kuéra oikotevẽha oñemongeta umi tapicha ndive ikatúva ojerovia hese kuéra rehe, umi oĩva’ekue opaite marandupe, ha imbareteva opaite añetegua ko’ág̃aguápe, oipytyvõ mboyve oimeraẽ punto pyahu iñimportánteva, ha’éva hikuái ikatuha oñemopyenda Biblia rehe. Upéicharõ umi pastor-kuéra oĩta peteĩ ñe’ẽme añetehápe, ha pe joaju umi pastor-kuéra rehegua ojehechakuaáta tupao rupive. Peichagua tape che ahecha ojokotáha ja’o vai ñembyasyha, ha upéi ndaiporimo’ãi peligro pe aty porãite oñemboja’o hag̃ua, ha umi ovecha oñemosarambi hag̃ua, pastor’ỹre.”—
And then it concludes with five more paragraphs which I have in a box for you, because these five paragraphs out of the article are the ones that are going to end up in Early Writings. That is why these final five paragraphs have the box around them.
Ha upéi oñemohu’ã ambue po párrafo reheve, amoĩva peteĩ káha ryepýpe pene hag̃ua, ko’ã po párrafo osẽva pe artíkulogui ha’e rupi umi opytátava Early Writings-pe. Upévare ko’ã pahápegua po párrafo oguereko pe káha ijerére.
"September 23d, the Lord showed me that he had stretched out his hand the second time to recover the remnant of his people, and that efforts must be redoubled in this gathering time. In the scattering time Israel was smitten and torn; but now in the gathering time God will heal and bind up his people. In the scattering, efforts made to spread the truth had but little effect, accomplished but little or nothing; but in the gathering when God has set his hand to gather his people, efforts to spread the truth will have their designed effect. All should be united and zealous in the work. I saw that it was a shame for any to refer to the scattering for examples to govern us now in the gathering; for if God does no more for us now than he did then, Israel would never be gathered. It is as necessary that the truth should be published in a paper, as preached.
23 jasyporundy, Ñandejára ohechauka chéve haʼe omyasãi jey hague ipo mokõihápe oguenohẽ hag̃ua umi hembýva ipuévlogui, ha tekotevẽha oñembohetave umi ñehaʼã ko aty-ruʼã ára jave. Pe ñemosarambi ára jave Israel oñenupã ha oñembyai; ha koʼág̃a pe ñembyaty ára jave Tupã omongueráta ha oñapytĩta ipuévlo. Pe ñemosarambi aja, umi ñehaʼã ojejapóva oñemyasãi hag̃ua pe añetegua oreko vaʼekue saʼieterei mbaʼeporã, oikuaa hag̃ua saʼieterei térã mbaʼeve; ha pe ñembyaty aja, Tupã omoĩ vove ipo ombyaty hag̃ua ipuévlo, umi ñehaʼã oñemyasãi hag̃ua pe añetegua oguerekóta pe tembiaporã oñemoĩ hag̃uáicha. Maymáva tojoaju ha tokyreʼỹ pe tembiapópe. Ahecha hague peteĩ mbaʼe ñemotĩ hag̃uáicha oĩramo oimeraẽva ojapo hag̃ua pe ñemosarambígui techapyrã ñandereko hag̃ua koʼág̃a pe ñembyaty aja; ndaipóriramo guare Tupã ojapove ñanderehe koʼág̃a upe ramo ojapo haguéicha upérõ, Israel arakaʼeve noñembyaty moʼãi. Haʼe avei tekotevẽháicha pe añetegua oñemoherakuã peteĩ kuatiahaipyrépe, oñemombeʼuháicha avei.
"The Lord showed me that the 1843 chart was directed by his hand, and that no part of it should be altered; that the figures were as he wanted them. That his hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until his hand was removed.
“Pe Ñandejára ohechauka chéve pe kuatiahaipyre 1843 guare ojegueraha hague ipópe, ha ni peteĩ hendápe ndojemoambuéiva’erãha; umi papapy oĩ hague ha’e oipotaháicha. Ha ipóre oĩ hague ári ha omokañy peteĩ jejavy umi papapy apytépe, avave ndaikatúi hag̃uáicha ohecha upéva, ipó oñemboyke peve.
"Then I saw in relation to the —Daily,' that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text; and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —Daily;' but since 1844, in the confusion, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion has followed.
Upéi ahecha pe —Diario” rehegua, pe ñe’ẽ —sacrificio” yvypóra arandúgui oñemoĩ hague, ha ndaha’éiha pe texto pegua; ha Ñandejára ome’ẽ hague pe hesakã porãva hese umi omosarambíva’ekuépe pe huicio aravo sapukái. Oĩ jave joaju, ary 1844 mboyve, hetave opavave ojoajúkuri pe jehecha añetévare pe —Diario” rehe; ha 1844 guive, pe jepy’apy ha ñembyatyrõ’ỹ mbytépe, ambue jehecha oñemoneĩ, ha pytũ ha ñemyangekói osegi hapykuéri.
"The Lord showed me that Time had not been a test since 1844, and that time will never again be a test.
“Pe Ñandejára ohechauka chéve ára ndaha’eiha peteĩ prueba guive 1844, ha ára araka’eve ndohasamo’ãvéima peteĩ prueba.”
"Then I was pointed to some who are in the great error, that the saints are yet to go to Old Jerusalem, &c., before the Lord comes. Such a view is calculated to take the mind and interest from the present work of God, under the message of the third angel; for if we are to go to Jerusalem, then our minds will naturally be there, and our means will be withheld from other uses, to get the saints to Jerusalem. I saw that the reason why they were left to go into this great error, is because they have not confessed and forsaken their errors, that they have been in for a number of years past." Review and Herald, November 1, 1850."
Upéi che ahecha hag̃ua chéve ambuekuéra oĩva pe jejavy tuichaitévape, he'íva umi santo gueteri ohotaha Jerusalén Ymaguarépe, h.a.é., Ñandejára ou mboyve. Koichagua jehecha oñembosako'i hag̃ua ogueraha hag̃ua pe apytu'ũ ha pe interes pe tembiapo ko'ágã guare Tupã rehegua gui, pe mbohapyha ánhel marandu guýpe; peteĩcha, jaikóramo jahótaha Jerusalén-pe, upéicharõ ñane apytu'ũ naturally oĩta upépe, ha ñane mba'e porã oñeñongatúta ambue jeporu hag̃uáicha'ỹ, ikatu hag̃uáicha ogueraha umi santo-kuérape Jerusalén-pe. Ahecha avei pe mba'érepa ojeheja chupekuéra oike hag̃ua ko jejavy tuichaitéva ryepýpe, ha'eha ndoikuaaukái ha ndohejáigui ijejavykuéra, umi oikohaguépe heta ary pukukue yma guive. Review and Herald, 1 de noviembre de 1850.
Do you see them? Do you know what I am talking about?
¿Rehecha piko chupekuéra? ¿Reikuaa piko mba'épa ha'e hína?
Okay. If we go into these five final paragraphs, you will see some things that are different in the original than you will find in Early Writings, page 74.
Oĩ. Jaha ko’ã po párrafo paha-pe, pehecháta mba’e heta iñambuéva pe texto original-pe pe rejuhútavagui *Early Writings*, página 74-pe.
FROM THE AUDIENCE: So, you are saying these in the box are the originals?
PÚBLICO APYTÉGUI: Upéicharõ, ere he'ípa ko'ãva oĩva pe káhape ha'eha umi ypykue?
These in the box, these are the last five paragraphs in this original article, and this box is around them. These five paragraphs are what ultimately end up in Early Writings, page 74.
Ko’ãva ryru ryepýpe, ko’ãva hína pe po párrafo paha ko artíkulo ypykuepegua, ha ko ryru ojere ijerérekuéra. Ko’ã po párrafo hína umi ipahápe oikeva’ekue Early Writings, páhina 74-pe.
But, when was this printed, when was this written? November 1850.
Péro, araka’e piko oñeimprimi ko’ãva, araka’e piko ojehai? Noviembre de 1850.
So, I have in bold-faced the things that are going to be changed from these five paragraphs. There is going to be a metamorphosis with this; because, in the very near future in 1851 the book A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White is going to be printed and they are going to take these paragraphs and put them in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and View of Ellen G. White. And from here [article in Review and Herald, November 1850] to A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White there are some minor editorial changes that happened to these five paragraphs. And then from A Sketch of the Christian Experience and View of Ellen G. White in 1851 to Early Writings in 1882, there are some more editorial changes, and those editorial changes are what make Early Writings, page 74, convoluted.
Upévare, aiporavóma taiakuãme umi mba’e oñemoambuetátava ko’ã cinco párrafo-gui. Oĩta peteĩ metamorfosis ko’ã mba’épe; pórke, sapy’aitépe, ary 1851-pe, pe aranduka A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White oñemboguátata ha ko’ã párrafo ojegueraháta oñemoĩ hag̃ua A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White-pe. Ha ko’águi [artíkulo Review and Herald, noviembre 1850-pe] peve A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White-pe, oiko algunos michĩva ñembosako’i editorial ko’ã cinco párrafo rehe. Ha upéi, A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White guive ary 1851-pe peve Early Writings ary 1882-pe, oiko hetave ñembosako’i editorial, ha umi ñembosako’i editorial hína umi ojapóva Early Writings, página 74, ipy’aguapy’ỹ ha ijehe’a hag̃ua.
So, in these five paragraphs that conclude in the original manuscript, in the first paragraph, "September 23d, the Lord showed me . . . ," that is going to be changed.
Upévare, ko’ã po párrafo omohu’ãva pe manuscrito ypykuepe, pe párrafo peteĩhápe, “23 jasyporundy, Ñandejára ohechauka chéve . . . ,” upéva oñemoambuéta.
In the next paragraphs: "Then I saw . . ."; "Then I saw . . ."; The Lord showed me . . . "; and, "Then I was pointed to . . ."; these things get some minor adjustments.
Umi párrafo oúvape he'ívape: “Upéi ahecha . . .”; “Upéi ahecha . . .”; “Ñandejára ohechauka chéve . . .”; ha, “Upéi chemboguata hag̃ua . . .”; ko'ã mba'e oikotevẽ sapy'ami ñemyatyrõ michĩ hag̃uáicha.
Shown Ten Primary Truths in Thirteen Paragraphs
Ojehechauka Pa Añetegua Tenondetéva Mbohapy Pa Térãry Párrafo-pe
But, what I want you to see in these thirteen paragraphs from the original article, she has shown ten primary things.
Péro, pehechase hag̃ua ko’ẽrã mbohapyha párrafo original pegua, ha’e ohechauka kuri pa mba’e tenondegua.
And now I remember why I have these things bold-faced. It is not because those are going to get changed. I am emphasizing something for you, if you will see, that in these thirteen paragraphs she was shown this . . . , she was shown this . . . , she was shown this . . . , she was shown this. And when she was shown one thing, after she tells us about it, then she is shown something that is not necessarily connected to what she was just shown: "I was shown this . . . ; I was shown this . . . ; I was shown this . . . .
Ha koʼág̃a che manduʼa mbaʼérepa areko koʼã mbaʼe peteĩ letra hũme. Ndahaʼéi umi mbaʼe oñemoambuetaha rehe. Aime amombaretévo peteĩ mbaʼe pende rehehápe, pehecháramo, koʼã mbohapyha párrafope chupe ojehechauka kuri kóva . . . , chupe ojehechauka kuri kóva . . . , chupe ojehechauka kuri kóva . . . , chupe ojehechauka kuri kóva. Ha oñehechaukáramo chupe peteĩ mbaʼe, ha upéi haʼe ñandéve omombeʼu rire upéva, upérõ chupe ojehechauka ambue mbaʼe ndahaʼéiva katuete ojoaju vaʼerã pe mbaʼe ojehechauka vaʼekue chupe raẽ rehe: “Cheve ojehechauka kuri kóva . . . ; cheve ojehechauka kuri kóva . . . ; cheve ojehechauka kuri kóva . . . .”
You can check me out and read it for yourself, but she was shown ten primary truths in these thirteen paragraphs.
Ikatu rehecha che rehegua ha relee ndejehegui voi, ha upéicha jepe ojehechauka chupepa diez añetegua tenondegua ko’ã mbohapyha párrafope.
Here is what she was shown. She was shown about God's love, about offerings, about prayer for the sick, about the communion service, about the Seven Last Plagues connected with the Millennium, about new light, about the gathering after 1844, about the publishing work, about the 1843 Chart, about the "Daily," about "time" as a test, and about pilgrimages to Jerusalem. And if you read it carefully, this is not a flow of thought. This is a very, "I was shown this," and she records what she was shown; and, she was shown something that is not necessarily connected. You have to see that; because, as they begin to pull these paragraphs together, they begin to create the thought that she saying something that she really did not say.
Kóva ha’e pe ojehechaukáva’ekue chupe. Ojehechauka chupe Tupã mborayhu rehe, mymbajerurekuéra rehe, ñembo’e hasývape g̃uarã rehe, pe komunión rembiapo rehe, umi Pochy Pahápe Pa’ũ rehe ojoajúva pe Milénio ndive, tesape pyahu rehe, pe aty guasu 1844 rire rehe, pe tembiapo jehaikuaauka rehe, pe Kuatia’aty 1843 rehe, pe “Ára ha Ára Pukukue” rehe, “aravo” rehe peteĩ jehechaha ramo, ha Jerusalénpe peregrinasión rehe. Ha remoñe’ẽ porãramo kóva, ndaha’éi peteĩ ñemyesakã rape oho hag̃uáicha. Kóva katueteete ha’e peteĩ, “oñehechauka chéve kóva,” ha ha’e ohai pe ojehechaukáva’ekue chupe; ha, ojehechauka chupe peteĩ mba’e ndaha’éiva tekotevẽ hag̃uáicha ojoaju ambue ndive. Tekotevẽ rehesa’ỹijo upéva; pórke, oñepyrũvo ombojoaju hag̃ua ko’ã párrafo, oñepyrũ omoheñói pe ñemimo’ã ha’eha kuña he’íva peteĩ mba’e ha’e añetetehápe ndo’éiva’ekue.
Review and Herald, November 1, 1850
Review and Herald, 1 de noviembre de 1850
Okay. Notice the first paragraph of the five paragraphs that we are dealing with from November 1850.
Oĩ porã. Peikuaa hag̃ua pe párrafo peteĩha umi po párrafo ñamba’apohína hese kuéragui noviembre 1850-gua.
"September 23d, the Lord showed me that he had stretched out his hand the second time to recover the remnant of his people, and that efforts must be redoubled in this gathering time. In the scattering time Israel was smitten and torn; but now in the gathering time God will heal and bind up his people. In the scattering, efforts made to spread the truth had but little effect, accomplished but little or nothing; but in the gathering when God has set his hand to gather his people, efforts to spread the truth will have their designed effect. All should be united and zealous in the work. I saw that it was a shame for any to refer to the scattering for examples to govern us now in the gathering; for if God does no more for us now than he did then, Israel would never be gathered. It is as necessary that the truth should be published in a paper, as preached."—
23 jasypakõi, pe Ñandejára ohechauka chéve ha’e omyasãi hague ipo mokõiháicha oguerujey hag̃ua iñembyremby hetãgua, ha umi ñeha’ã tekotevẽha oñemboheta jey ko atyhárape. Pe omosarambipa jave, Israel ojejapi ha oñembyaipa; ha ko’ág̃a pe ombyaty jave, Tupã omongueráta ha oñapytĩta hetãguápe. Pe omosarambi aja, umi ñeha’ã ojejapóva oñemyasãi hag̃ua pe añetegua ningo sa’i rei oipytyvõva’ekue, michĩ rei térã mba’eve ndojapói va’ekue; ha pe ombyaty jave, Tupã omoĩmbáma vove ipo ombyaty hag̃ua hetãguápe, umi ñeha’ã oñemyasãi hag̃ua pe añetegua oguerekóta pe tembiaporã oñembosako’íva guive. Opavave tekotevẽ oñondivepa ha kyre’ỹme pe tembiapópe. Ahecha ha’eha peteĩ tĩrõguasu oimeraẽva ogueraha hag̃ua pe omosarambipa guive techapyrã ñande reko hag̃ua ko’ág̃a pe ombyatyhárape; Tupã ndajajapói hag̃ua ñanderehe ko’ág̃a hetave mba’e upe jave ojapo va’ekuégui, Israel araka’eve ndoñembyatymo’ãi. Ha’e tekotevẽháicha pe añetegua oñemoherakuã peteĩ kuatiaroguépe, avei oñemombe’u hag̃uáicha.”—
The last sentence from that paragraph, it says, "It is as necessary that the truth should be published in a paper, as preached." Okay. This thought is going to be dropped.
Pe párrafo paha rembeʼýpe, heʼi: «Tekotevẽiterei pe añetegua oñemoherakuã peteĩ kuatiahápe, oñemombeʼuháicha avei». Oĩ porã. Ko apytuʼũ oñemboykéta.
The second paragraph of the five that we are considering, where it says, "The Lord showed me," you see I have it underlined.
Pe mokõiha párrafo umi po apytégui jahechahína, he’ihápe: “Pe Ñandejára ohechauka chéve”, pehecha, aguereko subrayado.
—"The Lord showed me that the 1843 chart was directed by his hand, and that no part of it should be altered; that the figures were as he wanted them. That his hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until his hand was removed."—
—“Ñandejára ohechauka chéve pe kuatia’anga 1843-pegua oñemboguataha Ipo rupive, ha avave ndikatuiha omoambue mba’eve ipype; pe papapykuéra oĩhague Ha’e oipotaháicha. Ha’e Ipo oĩhague hi’ári ha omo’ãhague peteĩ jejavy umi papapy apytépe, upéicha avave ndaikatúi hag̃uáicha ohecha, pe Ipo oñemboyke peve.”—
The reason I have anything underlined in these four paragraphs at the top of the page is that those are going to have editorial changes when it gets reprinted in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White in 1851.
Pe mba’érepa aikuaauka hag̃ua mba’eve guýpe ñeha’ãrã ko’ã irundy párrafo kuatiarogue yvate gotyo, ha’e hína umi oguerekótava ñemoambue editorial oñeimprimi jey vove A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White-pe ary 1851-pe.
Okay. "The Lord showed me," is going to be changed; "by his hand" is going to be changed, "that no part of it should be altered" is going to be changed.
Oĩ. “Ñandejára ohechauka chéve” oñemoambue vaʼerã; “ipo rupive” oñemoambue vaʼerã; “ani hag̃ua iñambue ni peteĩ hendápe” oñemoambue vaʼerã.
Then in the next bold-faced paragraph [fourth paragraph] on the page says,
Upéi, pe páhina oúvape, pe párrafo mbarete jehaipýpe oĩvape [irundyha párrafo] he’i,
—"The Lord showed me that Time had not been a test since 1844, and that time will never again be a test."—
—“Ñandejára ohechauka chéve araka’e ndoikovéi hague ára peteĩ prueba ramo guive 1844, ha araka’eve ndaikovéimo’ãi jey ára peteĩ prueba ramo.”—
"The Lord showed me," that is going to be changed. What they are going to do the next year in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, they are going to take that one-sentence paragraph and they are going to combine it with the previous paragraph. They are going to turn it into one paragraph.
“Pe Ñandejára ohechauka chéve”, upéva oñemoambue vaʼerã. Pe ojejapótava ary oúvape A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White-pe haʼe hína ojegueraha hag̃ua pe párrafo peteĩ ñeʼẽjoajúnteva ha oñembojoaju hag̃ua pe párrafo mboyveguándi. Ojejapóta chugui peteĩ párrafo año.
But, also, if a word or words are bold-faced, there is going to be some other types of changes; and, I will give you an example of what I mean.
Ha avei, peteĩ ñe’ẽ térã ñe’ẽnguéra oĩramo taikuéra hũme, oĩta ambue ñemoambue tapichakue rehegua avei; ha ame’ẽta peẽme peteĩ techapyrã amyesakã hag̃ua mba’épa he’ise che.
And in the third paragraph it says,
Ha pe mbohapyha párrafope he’i,
—"Then I saw in relation to the —Daily,' that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text; and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —Daily;' but since 1844, in the confusion, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion has followed."—
—«Upéi ahecha pe —Daily” rehegua, pe ñe’ẽ —sacrifice” niko yvypóra arandu rupive oñemoĩva’ekue, ha ndaha’éi pe texto pegua; ha Ñandejára ome’ẽ hague hese pe jehecha añeteguáva umi ome’ẽ va’ekuépe pe huísio aravo sapukái. Oĩrõ guare joaju, 1844 mboyve, haimete opavave oĩ peteĩ ñe’ême pe jehecha añeteguápe pe —Daily” rehe; ha 1844 guive, pe ñembyai ha jepy’apy apytépe, oñemoguahẽ ambue jehechapy, ha ipyahẽ ndive ou pytũmby ha jepy’apy.»—
Then in the next bold-faced paragraph [fourth paragraph] on the page says,
Upéi, pe páhina rehegua párrafo oúva, letra hũ mbaretepývape ojehaihápe [irundyha párrafo], he’i,
"The Lord showed me that Time had not been a test since 1844, and that time will never again be a test."—
“Pe Ñandejára ohechauka chéve aravo ndoikói hague peteĩ jehechapyrãramo 1844 guive, ha aravo araka’eve ndohasamo’ãi jey peteĩ jehechapyrãramo.”—
"The Lord showed me," that is going to be changed.
“Pe Ñandejára ohechauka chéve”, upéva oñemoambue hag̃uáicha.
What they are going to do the next year in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, they are going to take that one-sentence paragraph and they are going to combine it with the previous paragraph. They are going to turn it into one paragraph.
Pe ambue ary oikótavape *A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White*-pe, haʼekuéra ojapyhýta upe párrafo peteĩ ñeʼẽjoapy reheguánte ha ombojoajúta pe párrafo mboyveguándi. Omoambuéta chupe peteĩ párrafo añónte hag̃ua.
And they are going to change "The Lord showed me" to "I was also shown." Okay? They are going to make those two paragraphs one paragraph, and they are going to change it to, "I was also shown," in 1851.
Haʼekuéra omoambuéta “The Lord showed me” ha omoĩta “I was also shown” rendaguépe. Oĩ porãpa? Haʼekuéra ojapóta umi mokõi párrafo peteĩ párrafo año hag̃ua, ha omoambuéta hikuái “I was also shown” hag̃ua, ary 1851-pe.
—"Then I was pointed to some who are in the great error, that the saints are yet to go to Old Jerusalem, &c., before the Lord comes. Such a view is calculated to take the mind and interest from the present work of God, under the message of the third angel; for if we are to go to Jerusalem, then our minds will naturally be there, and our means will be withheld from other uses, to get the saints to Jerusalem. I saw that the reason why they were left to go into this great error, is because they have not confessed and forsaken their errors, that they have been in for a number of years past." Review and Herald, November 1, 1850.
—«Upéi ojehechauka chéve oĩha unos oĩva peteĩ jejavýpe guasúpe, pe marangatukuéra gueteri oho vaʼerãha Jerusalén Ymaguarépe, ha ambue mbaʼe, Ñandejára ou mboyve. Koichagua jehecha ojejapo hag̃uáicha omomombyry hag̃ua apytuʼũ ha interes pe tembiapo koʼag̃agua Tupã rembiapógui, pe mbohapyha ánhel ñeʼẽmondo guýpe; pórke jaʼeramo jaʼoho vaʼerãha Jerusalénpe, upéicharõ ñane apytuʼũ naturally upépe oĩta, ha ñane mbaʼerepy ojokóta ambue jeporu hag̃ua, ikatu hag̃uáicha ojegueraha marangatukuérape Jerusalénpe. Ahecha pe mbaʼérepa ojeheja chupekuéra oike hag̃ua ko jejavy guasúpe, ndoconfesaíri ha ndohejái rupi ijejavykuéra, upekuéra oĩ hague pype heta ary rire.» Review and Herald, 1 de noviembre de 1850.
But, when you get to Early Writings, do you know what they do? They drop the "I was also shown," where in Early Writings this one paragraph, it is going to say, "When union existed before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —Daily,' but since 1844, in the confusion, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion has followed." They dropped the "I was also shown," and the next sentence is, "time had not been a test since 1844." Suddenly you do not know that this thought about time not being a test is one of things that she was specifically shown. You believe that this was part of her light on the Daily in the false view producing confusion.
Ha, peguahẽvo Primeros Escritos-pe, peikuaa piko mbaʼépa ojapo hikuái? Oheja rei hikuái pe “Avei ojehechauka chéve”, upépe, Primeros Escritos-pe, ko peteĩ párrafo heʼíta: “Oĩrõ guare joaju 1844 mboyve, haimete opavave ojoajuvaʼekue pe visión hekopete hag̃ua pe —‘Diario’ rehe; ha 1844 guive, pe ñembotavy apytépe, oñemoneĩ ambue visiónkuéra, ha upévagui ou pytũ ha ñembotavy.” Oheja rei hikuái pe “Avei ojehechauka chéve”, ha pe ñeʼẽjoaju oúva upe rire heʼi: “aravo ndahaʼéi vaʼekue peteĩ prueba 1844 guive.” Péicha, sapyʼaitépe ndereikuaavéi ko pensamiento aravo ndahaʼeiha prueba peteĩva umi mbaʼe ojehechaukavaʼekue chupe hekopete. Reguerovia upéva haʼe hague peteĩ parte iñarandu rehegua pe Diario rehe, pe visión japu omoheñóiva ñembotavy.
That is not the original. You have the original. Check it out.
Upéva ndaha’éi pe ypykue. Nde reguereko pe ypykue. Ehecha porã.
The Next Step (Step Two)—1851 A Sketch of the Christian Experience and View of Ellen G. White
Pe Paso Oúva (Mokõiha Paso)—1851 Peteĩ bosquejo pe experiencia cristiana ha pe visión rehegua Ellen G. White hag̃assistant to=final
Then underneath this, you have, A Sketch of the Christian Experience and View of Ellen G. White, printed in 1851; and, you have the breakdowns of the changes that took place, and there is a very, very significant change.
Upéi ko guýpe, peẽme pehupyty *A Sketch of the Christian Experience and View of Ellen G. White*, oñemboguejyva’ekue 1851-pe; ha pehupyty avei umi ñemyesakã mba’éichapa oñemoambue umi mba’e oikova’ekue, ha oĩ peteĩ ñemoambue tuicha, tuicha mba’e hag̃uáva.
"September 23d, the Lord shewed [formerly—"showed"] me that he had stretched out his hand the second time to recover the remnant of his people, and that efforts must be redoubled in this gathering time. In the scattering, Israel was smitten and torn; but now in the gathering time God will heal and bind up his people. In the scattering, efforts made to spread the truth had but little effect, accomplished but little or nothing; but in the gathering, when God has set his hand to gather his people, efforts to spread the truth will have their designed effect. All should be united and zealous in the work. I saw that it was wrong for any to refer to the scattering for examples to govern us now in the gathering; for if God does no more for us now than he did then, Israel would never be gathered. [Removed: It is as necessary that the truth should be published in a paper, as preached.] [Paragraphs Combined] I have seen [formerly—"the Lord showed me] that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, [formerly—"by His hand"] and that it should not be altered; [formerly—"no part of it should be altered"] that the figures were as he wanted them. That his hand was over, and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until his hand was removed.
“23 jasypoteĩme, Ñandejára ohechauka chéve ha’e ojepyso hague ipo mokõihápe oguerujey hag̃ua hembýva ipuévlogui, ha ko aty ñembyatýpe tekotevẽha oñembohetave umi ñeha’ã. Ñemosarambípe, Israel oñenupã ha oñembyai; ha ko’ág̃a, ñembyaty ára jave, Tupã omongueráta ha ombojoaju jeýta ipuévlope. Ñemosarambípe, umi ñeha’ã oñemoasãi hag̃ua añetegua oguereko kuri michĩeterei jepe iporãva, ojapo kuri michĩ térã mba’eve; ha ñembyatýpe, Tupã omoĩ vove ipo ombyaty hag̃ua ipuévlope, umi ñeha’ã oñemoasãi hag̃ua añetegua oguerekóta pe tembiaporã ojejapoukávarã. Opavave toñemojoaju ha tokyre’ỹ’ỹ tembiapópe. Ahecha va’ekue ndovaléiha avavépe ojehechauka hag̃ua ñemosarambi rehe techapyrãramo ñande mboguata hag̃ua ko’ág̃a ñembyatýpe; Tupã ndojapóiramo nendive ko’ág̃a hetave mba’e upe ojapo va’ekuégui upérõ, Israel araka’eve noñembyatymo’ãi. [Oñembogue: Tekotevẽiterei añetegua oñemoherakuã peteĩ kuatiaroguépe, oñemombe’uháicha.] [Párrafo-kuéra oñembojoaju] Ahecha va’ekue [ymave—“Ñandejára ohechauka chéve”] pe 1843 ary rechaukaha oñemboguata hague Ñandejára po rupive, [ymave—“Ipo rupive”] ha ndoñemoambuéiva’erãha; [ymave—“ni peteĩ hendáicha ndoñemoambuéi va’erã”] umi papapy oĩ hague ha’e oipotaháicha. Ipo oĩ hague hi’ári, ha omokañy peteĩ jejavy umi papapy apytépe, upéicha avave ndaikatúi hag̃uáicha ohecha, peve ipo oñembogue peve.”
"Then I saw in relation to the —Daily,' that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text; and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —Daily;' but since 1844, in the confusion, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion have followed. [Paragraphs Combined] I have also seen [Formerly—"the Lord showed me"] that time had not been a test since 1844, and that time will never again be a test.]" A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, ExV 61–62.
Upéi ahecha pe —“Diario” rehegua, pe ñe’ẽ —“sacrifício” oñemoĩ hague yvypóra arandu rupi, ha ndaha’éiha pe texto pegua; ha Ñandejára ome’ẽ hague hesa ypykue añetéva hese umi ome’ẽ vaʼekuépe pe ára juicio sapukái. Oĩ jave joaju, 1844 mboyve, haimete opavave oĩ vaʼekue peteĩ ñe’ẽme pe —“Diario” rehegua hesa ypykue porãre; ha 1844 guive, pe ñembotavýpe, ambue jehecha oñemoguahẽ, ha pytũ ha ñembotavy ou hapykuéri. [Párrafo-kuéra oñembojoaju] Avei ahecha [Yma—“Ñandejára ohechauka chéve”] ára ndahaʼeiha peteĩ prueba 1844 guive, ha ára arakaʼeve ndojehechamoʼãi jeyha peteĩ prueba ramo.]" A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, ExV 61–62.
Time not Connected with the Message of the Third Angel
Ára ndohupytýiva Mbohapyha Ángel Marandu rehe hag̃ua
Ellen White had a different vision than the vision that she had that ultimately ends up in Early Writings. She had several visions; but, she had a vision where she was told something; she was told one paragraph, and she wrote it down.
Ellen White oguereko vaʼekue peteĩ visión iñambuéva pe visión-gui oguerekóva ipahápe oĩ hag̃ua Early Writings-pe. Haʼe oguereko vaʼekue heta visión; ha katu, oguereko vaʼekue peteĩ visión ojeʼehápe chupe peteĩ mbaʼe; ojeʼe chupe peteĩ párrafo, ha haʼe ohaivaʼekue upéva.
"The Lord has shown me that the message of the third angel must go, and be proclaimed to the scattered children of the Lord, and that it should not be hung on time; for time never will be a test again. I saw that some were getting a false excitement arising from preaching time; that the third angel's message was stronger than time can be. I saw that this message can stand on its own foundation, and that it needs not time to strengthen it, and that it will go in mighty power, and do its work, and will be cut short in righteousness." A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, ExV 48.
“Pe Ñandejára ohechauka chéve mbohapyha ánhel marandu oho vaʼerãha, ha oñemomarandu vaʼerãha Ñandejára raʼykuéra isarambívape, ha ndojejokói vaʼerãiha ára rehe; ára ningo arakaʼeve ndahaʼemoʼãi peteĩ prueba jey. Ahecha oĩha umi oguerekóva peteĩ vyʼa japu osẽva ára rehe oñemoñeʼẽgui; mbohapyha ánhel marandu ningo imbaretevéva ára ikatúvagui. Ahecha ko marandu ikatuha oñemboʼy ijeheguiete ifundamento ári, ha noikotevẽiha ára omombarete hag̃ua chupe, ha oho vaʼerãha puʼaka guasúpe, ha ojapóta hembiapo, ha oñemohuʼãta tekojoja reheve.” A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, ExV 48.
What is she speaking about there? That we should never connect the Third Angel's Message with time again, right?
¿Mba’érepa he’i hína upépe? Ñande ndajajuhéiva araka’eve Mbohapyha Ángel Marandu rehe “tiempo” ndive jey, añetépa?
Amen? Are you with me?
Amén? Peñime?
Where do you find this? Where is it located?
Moõpa rejuhu ko mba’épe? Moõpa opyta?
FROM THE AUDIENCE: (No response.)
TAPICHÁGUI OĨVA'EKUE GUI: (Ndojejokóiri mba'eve.)
FROM THE AUDIENCE: A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views.
TAVYATY RENDÁGUI: Peteĩ ta’anga mbyky pe jeikove ha umi ñemo’ã cristiano rehegua.
A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, page 48, page 48.
Peteĩ ta’anga mbyky pe experiencia cristiana ha Ellen G. White remiandu rehegua, página 48, página 48.
Okay. Where do we find the passage that we are discussing that is derived from Review and Herald, November 1850; where is that located in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White? Well, it is located, if you back up in your notes, it is located in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, page 61 and page 62.
Oĩ. Moõpa jajuhu pe pasáhe ñamyesakãva, oúva Review and Herald, noviembre de 1850-gui; moõpa oĩ upéva A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White-pe? Porã, oĩ, pejevy ramo pende kuatiakuéra rehe, oĩ A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, página 61 ha página 62-pe.
You have a vision in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White that is recorded on page 48; then you have the vision that ultimately is going to end up in Early Writings, on pages 61 and 62. They are separated by 13 or 14 pages, right?
Peẽ peguereko peteĩ visión A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White-pe, oñeñongatúva kuatiarogue 48-pe; upéi peguereko pe visión ipahápe opytátava Early Writings-pe, kuatiaroguekuéra 61 ha 62-pe. Ojepe’a ojuehegui 13 térã 14 kuatiarogue rupi, añetehápe?
And what are they going to do when it comes to Early Writings? They are going to take this paragraph from page 48 and they are going to insert it right after her statement that time is no longer a test. They are going to put two visions together.
Ha mba’épa ojapóta og̃uahẽvo *Primeros Escritos* rehe? Oipe’áta ko párrafo kuatia rogue 48-gui ha omoingéta chupe peteĩchaite voi upe he’íva rire araka’eve noñemoĩvéimaha tiempo prueba ramo. Omojoajúta mokõi visión peteĩme.
Are you following what I mean?
¿Reikuaápa mba’épa he’ise che?
MAN IN THE AUDIENCE: Yes.
KUIMBA'E OĨVA TAPERENDÁPE: Héẽ.
Are you following what I mean?
¿Reikuaápa mba’épa he’iséva che?
INDIVIDUAL ADDRESSED IN THE AUDIENCE: (Affirmation.)
TAPICHA OÑEÑEʼẼVA PE HENDUHÁRA APYTÉPE: (Moneĩmby.)
Okay, because you are the one that I am seeing less confirmation with.
Oĩ, nde niko pe aikuaa sa’ive hag̃ua mba’éicha oñemohesakã.
The Last Step (Step Three)—1882 Early Writings
Pe Paha Ipaháva (Paha Mbohapy)—1882 Jehaipy Ñepyrũgua
Okay. Now, I am back to page 6 of your notes; and, now you have Early Writings again.
Mba’e porã. Ko’ág̃a, ajeyma nde kuatiañe’ẽnguérape rogue 6-pe; ha, ko’ág̃a, reguereko jey Early Writings.
"September 23, . . . I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until His hand was removed.
“23 de septiembre, . . . Ahecha kuri pe kuatia’atã 1843 gua oisãmbyhy hague Ñandejára po, ha ndova’erãi oñemoambue; umi papapy oĩ hague Ha’e oipota haguéicha; Ipo oĩ hague hi’ári ha omokañy peteĩ jejavy umi papapy apytépe, avave ndaikatúi hag̃uáicha ohecha, pe Ipo oñemboyke peve.
"Then I saw in relation to the —daily' (Daniel 8:12) that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text, and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —daily'; but in the confusion since 1844, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion have followed. Time has not been a test since 1844, and it will never again be a test.
Upéi ahechakuaa pe “ha’e jepi” rehegua (Daniel 8:12) pe ñe’ẽ “sacrificio” yvypóra arandu rupive oñemoĩ hague, ha ndaha’éiha pe texto pegua, ha Ñandejára ome’ẽ hague hesegua hechapyre añetéva umi ome’ẽ vaʼekuépe pe juicio aravo sapukái. Oĩ jave joaju, 1844 mboyve, haimete opaite oĩ joajúpe pe hechapyre añetévare pe “ha’e jepi” rehegua; ha pe jepy’apy ha ñembyai oúva 1844 guive, ambue hechapyrekuéra ojeguerovia, ha pytũ ha ñembotavy oúma hapykuéri. Aravo ndoikovéima prueba ramo 1844 guive, ha araka’eve ndoikovéimo’ã jey prueba ramo.
"The Lord has shown me that the message of the third angel must go, and be proclaimed to the scattered children of the Lord, but it must not be hung on time. I saw that some were getting a false excitement, arising from preaching time; but the third angel's message is stronger than time can be. I saw that this message can stand on its own foundation and needs not time to strengthen it; and that it will go in mighty power, and do its work, and will be cut short in righteousness.
“Pe Ñandejára ohechauka chéve pe mbohapyha ánhel rembiapoukapy oho vaerãha, ha oñemomarandu vaerãha Ñandejára ra’ykuéra isarambívape, ha katu ndohasaivaerãi ára rehe. Ahecha oĩha umi oguerekóva peteĩ kyre’ỹ japu, osẽva ára rehe oñemoñe’ẽgui; ha pe mbohapyha ánhel rembiapoukapy imbareteve ára ikatúvagui ome’ẽ hag̃ua chupe mbarete. Ahecha ko marandu ikatuha opyta ijeheguiete, ipyenda tee ári, ha noikotevẽi ára omombarete hag̃ua chupe; ha oho hag̃ua mbarete tuichápe, ha ojapo hag̃ua hembiapo, ha oñemohu’ã hag̃ua pya’e tekojoja reheve.”
"Then I was pointed to some who are in the great error of believing that it is their duty to go to Old Jerusalem . . ." Early Writings, 74-76.
“Upéi ojehechauka chéve umi oĩva peteĩ jejavy tuichaitereívape ogueroviágui ha’eha hembiaporãho hag̃ua Jerusalén Ymaguarépe . . .” Early Writings, 74-76.
And the reason that this is bold-faced, this is the paragraph here where it says, ". . . When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —daily'; but in the confusion since 1844, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion have followed. Time has not been a test since 1844, and it will never again be a test." you need to remember that originally in her first record of this vision, she said, "I was shown that time has not been a test since 1844," and it was a different paragraph. She had made sure that there was a distinction in what she was shown about the Daily and what was shown her about time being a test; and that the next paragraph, which is talking about no connecting time with the Third Angel's Message, it was not in the original vision. It was on page 48 of Life Sketches, not pages 61 and 62.
Ha pe mba’érepa ko ñembokuatia ojehai hũmbaitépe, ha’e ko párrafo he’ihápe: “. . . Oĩrõ guare joaju, ary 1844 mboyve, haimete opavave oĩ joajúpe pe “áragui ára” rehegua jehecha porãre; ha pe ñemondýi guasúpe ary 1844 guive, ambue jehechapyre ojehupyty, ha pytũ ha ñemyakãraku oñemoirũ. Aravo ndaha’éikuri peteĩ prueba ary 1844 guive, ha araka’eve ndoikovéimo upéicha.” reñemomandu’ava’erã iñepyrũrãme, pe jehechakuaa peteĩha ko visión rehegua he’ihaguére: “Ojehechauka chéve aravo ndaha’eiha peteĩ prueba ary 1844 guive,” ha upéva oĩkuri peteĩ párrafo iñambuévape. Ha’e ohechakuaaukakuri porã oĩha peteĩ joavy umi mba’e ojehechaukáva chupe pe “Áragui ára” rehegua ha umi mba’e ojehechaukáva chupe aravo rehegua, taha’eha peteĩ prueba; ha pe párrafo oúva upe rire, oñe’ẽva ndaiporiha aravo oñembojoajúva pe Tercer Ángel Marandu ndive, ndaha’éikuri pe visión ypykuepe. Upéva oĩkuri página 48-pe Life Sketches-pe, ndaha’éi página 61 ha 62-pe.
But, when you come to Early Writings in 1882, they put them together; and, therefore, when you get to the 1930s and you are going off into deep darkness in Adventism, and Willie White says that when you are studying the Daily you must study it in the context of time—"Sorry, Willie, your responsibility was to be the one that gave the accurate historical record of the Spirit of Prophecy. You were to be the one that defeated the Spirit of Prophecy. And in your presentation of Early Writings, page 75, you disregarded the original sources, and those original sources say that when you lifted the argument that the Daily has to be considered in the context of time in Early Writings, 74, that is absolutely untrue."—It is untrue! It cannot be sustained by the record in the Spirit of Prophecy. It cannot be sustained by the history of that time period.
Ha, rejuhu hag̃ua *Early Writings*pe ary 1882-pe, ombojoaju hag̃ua hikuái umi mba’e; ha, upévare, rejuhu jave nde juapy hag̃ua umi ary 1930-kuérape ha rehóvo pytũ pypukúpe Adventismo ryepýpe, ha Willie White he’i ramo araka’eve pe *Daily* rehe restudia jave reñemoarandu va’erãha hese aravo rehegua contexto ryepýpe—“Che ñyrõ, Willie, nde rembiapo va’ekue niko va’erã kuri pe nde ha’e hag̃ua upe ome’ẽva pe registro histórico hekopete pe Espíritu de Profecía rehegua. Nde va’erã kuri pe reity hag̃ua pe Espíritu de Profecía. Ha nde remombe’úvo *Early Writings*, página 75-pe, nde remboyke umi ypykue fuente; ha umi fuente ypykue he’i porã, nde rerahávo pe argumento pe *Daily* ojehechava’erãha aravo rehegua contexto ryepýpe *Early Writings*, 74-pe, upéva ndaha’éi añeteite.” —Ndaha’éi añete! Ndaikatúi oñemopu’ã pe registro oĩvare pe Espíritu de Profecía-pe. Ndaikatúi avei oñemopu’ã upe aravo periodo rembiasakue rehe.
Okay. Point 1, Sister White says that there is a correct view of the Daily, in Early Writings, 74. The primary argument that is foisted later on in history is that when you study that passage in Early Writings, 74, you have to place it in the context of time setting. That argument is bogus; it is not valid!
Oĩ. Kytĩ 1-pe, Hermana White he’i oĩha peteĩ jehecha hekopeteva pe “Daily” rehegua, Early Writings, 74-pe. Pe ñe’ẽmondo tenondegua oñemoĩva upe rire tembiasápe ha’e kóicha: reestudiávo upe pasaje oĩva Early Writings, 74-pe, tekotevẽ remoĩ pe tiempo ñemohenda ryepýpe. Upe ñe’ẽmondo natekotevẽi; ndovaléi!
So, now we are stuck with just the position that there is a correct view of the Daily. Okay? But, we are going to take up one more thought out of this paragraph.
Upéicha, koʼág̃a ñande japyta añoite pe ñemohenda rehe oĩha peteĩ jehecha hekopete pe Daily rehegua. Añetehápe? Péro, jahupíta gueteri peteĩve pensamiento ko párrafo-gui.
It says, "September 23d, the Lord showed me . . . ." September 23d, when? 1850: "September 23d, 1850, the Lord showed me."
He’i: “23 jasyporundy, Ñandejára ohechauka chéve . . . .” 23 jasyporundy, araka’e piko? 1850-pe: “23 jasyporundy 1850-pe, Ñandejára ohechauka chéve.”
What did He show her?
Mbaʼépa ohechauka chupe?
Well one of the things that He showed her was that since 1844, other views of the Daily have been embraced.
Peteĩva umi mba’e Ha’e ohechauka va’ekue chupe ha’e kóva: ary 1844 guive, ambue ñemo’ãnguéra “the Daily” rehegua oñemoneĩ.
"September 23, 1850 the Lord showed me . . . . When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —Daily;' but since 1844, in the confusion, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion has followed. The Review and Herald, November 1850."
“23 jasyporundy, 1850-pe, Ñandejára ohechauka chéve . . . . Oĩ jave joaju, 1844 mboyve, haimete opavave peteĩ ñe’ẽme oĩkuri pe jehecha hekopete rehegua ‘—Daily’ rehe; ha 1844 guive, pe ñemondýipe, ambue jehechakuaa oñemoneĩ, ha upéi hapykuéri ou pytũ ha ñemondýi. The Review and Herald, noviembre 1850.”
March 1850 The "Daily" is the Earthly Sanctuary
Marzo 1850 Pe “Meme’ẽ ára ha ára” ha’e pe Tupaóga Yvy arigua
So, on the bottom of page 6 you have a paragraph that comes from the Review and Herald of March 1850, and it is an article by David Arnold.
Upéicha, kuatia rogue 6 yvýpe peguerekóva peteĩ párrafo osẽva pe *Review and Herald* marzo ary 1850-gui, ha upéva hína peteĩ artículo David Arnold mba’e.
"He [Daniel] also sees the same oppressive power —standing up against the Prince of princes;' thus putting an end to the legality of all the daily sacrifices instituted at Sinai to be daily observed until the Seed should come. Here Christ, the substance, or great antitypical sacrifice was slain by the Roman soldiers. Thus by Rome —the daily sacrifice was taken away,' and the place of his sanctuary was cast down by Titus, a Roman general, when he destroyed the city of Jerusalem, and the temple of God, which contained —the sanctuary.' Here commenced the fulfillment of Christ's prophetic declaration. And they shall fall by the edge of the sword and shall be led away captive into all nations, and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, UNTIL THE TIMES OF THE GENTILES BE FULFILLED.' Luke 21:24." David Arnold, Review and Herald, March 1850, Volume 1, Number 8.
“Ha’e [Daniel] ohecha avei upe mbarete oporojopyha peteĩchagua —opu’ãvo mburuvicha kuéra Ruvicha rehe;’ péicha omoĩ opa hag̃ua pe legalidad opa umi sacrificio ára ha ára guáva oñemoĩ va’ekue Sinaípe ojejapo hag̃ua ára ha ára pe Ñemoñare ou peve. Ko’ápe Cristo, pe añetegua, térã pe gran sacrificio antitípico, ojejuka va’ekue umi soldádo romano rupive. Péicha Roma rupi —pe sacrificio ára ha ára guáva ojeipe’a va’ekue,’ ha isantuario renda oñembotyryry va’ekue Tito, peteĩ general romano, ombyaírõ guare táva Jerusalén, ha Tupã templo, oguerekóva —pe santuario.’ Ko’ápe oñepyrũ Cristo ñe’ẽmarandu profético ñekumpli. Ha ho’áta hikuái kyse rembe’y rupi ha ogueraháta chupekuéra prisionéroramo opa tetãnguérape, ha Jerusalén ojejapyréta gentil kuéra py rehe, PEVE UMI TIEMPO GENTIL KUÉRA MBA’E OÑEKUMPLI.’ Lucas 21:24.” David Arnold, Review and Herald, marzo de 1850, Volumen 1, Número 8.
In this article David Arnold teaches that the Daily in the Book of Daniel represents the Jewish sanctuary in Jerusalem that was removed by Pagan Rome in AD70.
Ko artíkulope David Arnold ombo’e pe “Diario” oĩva Daniel Arandukápe ohechaukaha pe santuario judío Jerusalénpe, oñemboykéva Roma pagana rupive ary 70 d.C.-pe.
September 1850 The "Daily" is Christ's Sanctuary Ministry
Setiembre de 1850 Pe “Meme” ha’e Cristo rembipota pe Santuario-pe
Then in September 1850, the same year—and by the way, who is the editor of the Review and Herald in 1850? His name is James White.
Upéi, jasyporundy 1850-pe, upe áño etépe —ha, añetehápe, máva piko hína pe Review and Herald mohendahára 1850-pe? Héra hína James White.
James White, then, in September of 1850, he prints an article by Crosier which teaches that the Daily represents Christ's Sanctuary ministry.
Upévare, James White, jasyporundy ary 1850-pe, omoherakuã peteĩ artíkulo Crosier mba’éva, ohekombo’éva pe “Daily” ohechauka Cristo rembiapo pe Santuariope.
Now, James White does not teach it directly, but people take the inference there and say that is what he is teaching. And why am I saying this? I am saying this for his reason: In September of 1850, Sister White says that since 1844 other views of the Daily have been embraced in darkness and confusion has followed.
Koʼág̃a, James White nomboʼéi upéva hekopete hag̃ua; ha katu tapicha kuéra oguenohẽ upégui peteĩ mbaʼe heʼiséva ha heʼi upéva hína la haʼe omboʼéva. Ha mbaʼérepa che haʼe kóva? Haʼe hag̃ua hese ko mbaʼe: 1850 ary septiembre-pe, Hermana White heʼi guive, 1844 guive, ambue jesareko “Daily” rehegua oñemoneĩ pytũmbýpe, ha upe rire osẽ vai hag̃ua ñemondýi ha sarambi.
These two views [Arnold and Crosier] are not the Pioneer view that the Daily is Paganism.
Ko’ã mokõi jehecha [Arnold ha Crosier] ndaha’éi umi Pionero-kuéra remiandu pe ára ha arakuaa rehegua ha’éva Paganismo.
And on page 7 you have the two paragraphs from Crosier's article, where he is inferring that the Daily is Christ's Sanctuary ministry.
Ha kuatia rogue 7-pe reguereko umi mokõi párrafo Crosier artículo-gui, upépe ha’e oikuaaukávo pe “Daily” ha’eha Cristo rembiapo pe Santuario-pe.
"—And the place of His Sanctuary was cast down;' Daniel 8:11. This casting down was in the days and by the means of the Roman power; therefore, the Sanctuary of this text was not the Earth, nor Palestine, because the former was cast down at the fall, more than 4,000 years, and the latter at the captivity, more than 700 years previous to the event of this passage, and neither by Roman agency.
“—ha pe tenda marangatuhápe oĩháme oñemombo yvýre;” Daniel 8:11. Ko ñemombo yvýre oiko Roma puʼaka ára ha ijeheguívoi; upévare, ko texto pegua Tenda Marangatu ndahaʼéi yvy, ni Palestina, pórke peteĩha oñemombo yvýre jeʼárõ guare, hetave 4.000 ary mboyve, ha mokõiha jejapyhy aja, hetave 700 ary ko pasáhe rembiapo mboyve, ha mokõivéva ndahaʼéi Roma rembiapokue rupive.
"The Sanctuary cast down is His against whom Rome magnified himself, which was the Prince of the host, Jesus Christ; and Paul teaches that His Sanctuary is in heaven. Again, Daniel 11:30–31, —For the ships of Chittim shall come against him; therefore, shall he be grieved and return, and have indignation (the staff to chastise) against the holy covenant (Christianity), so shall he do; he shall even return and have intelligence with them (priests and bishops) that forsake the holy covenant. And arms (civil and religious) shall stand on his part, and they (Rome and those that forsake the holy covenant) shall pollute the Sanctuary of strength.' What was this that Rome and the apostles of Christianity should joint pollute? This combination was formed against the —holy covenant', and it was the Sanctuary of that covenant they polluted; which they could do as well as to pollute the name of God; Jeremiah 34:16; Ezekiel 20; Malachi 1:7. This was the same as profaning or blaspheming His name. In this sense this —politico-religious' beast polluted the Sanctuary, (Revelation 13:6), and cast it down from its place in heaven, (Psalm 102:19; Jeremiah 17:12; Hebrews 8:1–2) when they called Rome the holy city, (Revelation 21:2) and installed the Pope there with the titles, —Lord God the Pope', —Holy Father', —Head of the Church', etc., and there, in the counterfeit, —temple of God', he professes to do what Jesus actually does in His Sanctuary; 2 Thessalonians 2:1–8. The Sanctuary has been trodden under foot (Daniel 8:13), the same as the Son of God has. (Hebrews 10:29.)" O. R. L. Crosier, —The Sanctuary', Review and Herald, September, 1850.
“Pe Santuario ojejapóva yvýre ha’e upe Imba’éva, avavépe Roma ombotuichavéva ijehe, ha’éva ehérsito Ruvicha, Jesucristo; ha Pablo ombo’e Hembiapo Renda Marangatu oĩha yvágape. Avei, Daniel 11:30–31-pe, —Pe umi Chittim rupi oúva umi várko ou va’erã hese; upévare oñembyasýta ha ojevýta, ha ipochýta (pe yvyra ojehupyty hag̃ua ñembohasa asy) pe ñemoĩmbyre marangatu rehe (Cristianismo), upéicha ojapóta; ojevýta jevy ha oñemoarandúta hendivekuéra (pa’i ha obispo-kuéra) ohejáva pe ñemoĩmbyre marangatu. Ha umi pochy (civil ha religioso) oñembo’ýta ijykére, ha ha’ekuéra (Roma ha umi ohejáva pe ñemoĩmbyre marangatu) omongy’áta pe mbarete Santuario.’ Mba’épa raka’e upe Roma ha cristianismo apóstol-kuéra omongy’áva oñondive? Ko joaju oñemoheñói pe —ñemoĩmbyre marangatu’ rehe, ha pe ñemoĩmbyre pegua Santuario voi hikuái omongy’a; upéva ikatu ojapo hikuái péicha avei omongy’áramo Tupã réra; Jeremías 34:16; Ezequiel 20; Malaquías 1:7. Kóva peteĩcha va’ekue oñemongy’ávo térã oñe’ẽvaíva Héra rehe. Ko sentido-pe ko mymba —político-religioso’ omongy’a pe Santuario, (Apocalipsis 13:6), ha omboguejy yvýre ipype guive yvágagui, (Salmo 102:19; Jeremías 17:12; Hebreos 8:1–2) ohenóivo Rómape táva marangatu, (Apocalipsis 21:2) ha omoĩvo upépe Papa-pe ko’ã téra reheve, —Karai Tupã Papa’, —Túva Marangatu’, —Tupao Akã’, h.a., ha upépe, pe —Tupã templo’ japúvape, ha’e he’i ojapoha upe Jesús añetehápe ojapóva I-Santuario-pe; 2 Tesalonicenses 2:1–8. Pe Santuario ojejopy guýpe py reheve (Daniel 8:13), peteĩcha Tupã Ra’y rehe ojejapoháicha. (Hebreos 10:29.)” O. R. L. Crosier, —The Sanctuary’, Review and Herald, septiembre, 1850.
The Logic of James White
La Lógica de James White
Why would James White print this article if he knew better? The reason for it is "The Logic of James White" in your notes.
Mba'érepa James White omoherakuãta ko artíkulo oikuaáramo porãve? Upévare oĩ “The Logic of James White” nde kuatiahaipyre mbytépe.
The first thing that was printed after the Disappointment is called A Word to the Little Flock, and the three people who were authors in that publication were James and Ellen White and Joseph Bates. The first thing that was printed after October 22, 1844, by those people that were following on the path was this article; and, in this article Sister White endorses Crosier's view, not his view of the Daily but his view of Christ moving from the Holy Place to the Most Holy Place.
Pe mba’e peteĩha oñemboguapýva kuatiareípe pe Ñembotavy guasu rire héra A Word to the Little Flock, ha umi mbohapy tapicha ohai va’ekue upe ñembokuatiápe ha’e James ha Ellen White ha Joseph Bates. Pe mba’e peteĩha oñembokuatia va’ekue 22 jasypa, 1844, rire umi tapicha osegíva pe tape rehe, ha’e ko artículo; ha ko artículope, Hermana White omoneĩ Crosier remiandu, ndaha’éi hembiapo pe Daily rehegua, síno hembiapo Cristo oñemonguévo pe Tenda Marangatúgui pe Tenda Marangatuetépe.
Notice, this is Sister White. This is why James White would be willing to print Crosier's article, it says,
Péina ko’ẽva, kóva hína Hermana White. Kóva rehe James White oĩva’erãkuri dispuesto omboguata hag̃ua imprenta rupive Crosier artículo, he’i:
"I believe the Sanctuary, to be cleansed at the end of the 2300 days, is the New Jerusalem Temple, of which Christ is a minister."—this is Ellen White—"The Lord shew me in vision, more than one year ago, that Brother Crosier had the true light, on the cleansing of the Sanctuary, &c; and that it was his will, that Brother C. should write out the view which he gave us in the Day-Star, Extra, February 7, 1846. I feel fully authorized by the Lord, to recommend that Extra, to every saint.
"Che arovia pe Santuario, oñemopotĩ va’erãva opa rire umi 2300 ára, ha’eha pe Templo Jerusalén Pyahupegua, upépe Cristo oserviha ministro ramo."—kóva ha’e Ellen White—"Ñandejára ohechauka chéve peteĩ visiónpe, ohasáma rire peteĩ áño rasami, pe Hermano Crosier oguerekoha pe tesape añetetéva pe Santuario ñemopotĩ rehegua, ha ambue mba’e; ha upéva ha’eha ivoluntad, pe Hermano C. ohai hag̃ua pe hechapyre ome’ẽ va’ekue oréve pe Day-Star, Extra, 7 de febrero de 1846-pe. Añandu chejupe plenamente autorizado Ñandejára rupive, ahekomenda hag̃ua pe Extra opaite umi santope."
"I pray that these lines may prove a blessing to you, and all the dear children who may read them." A Word to the Little Flock, May 12, 1847.
Añembo’e ko’ã líña toiko hag̃ua jehovasa ndéve g̃uarã, ha opa umi mitãnguéra ahayhuetéva olee vaʼerãva koʼãva. “A Word to the Little Flock”, 12 de mayo de 1847.
So, people even to this day, some of the modern historians in Adventism say, "Look at there. Ellen White is giving her blanket endorsement on Crosier's article; and, therefore, what Crosier said about the Daily being Christ's Sanctuary ministry that has to be true." And when they say that, they are misrepresenting history; because, Crosier's article had eight sections in it and, from the very beginning, the Adventists understood that four of those sections were total darkness and they have never, ever, ever been reprinted in Adventism.
Upéicha, umi tapicha ko ára peve, oĩva historiadór moderno Adventismo-pe he’i: “Pema’ẽ upépe. Ellen White ome’ẽ hína imoneĩmbyre tuichakue Crosier artículo rehe; ha upévare, pe Crosier he’íva pe Aryvére Cristo pegua Tupaópe hembiapoha rehe, upéva añete va’erã”. Ha oje’e jave upéicha, ombohasa vai hikuái tembiasakue; péicha rupi, Crosier artículo oguereko va’ekue ocho pehẽngue, ha iñepyrũmby guive, umi Adventista ontende va’ekue irundy umi pehẽngue apytégui ha’eha pytũmbaiterei ha araka’eve, araka’eve, araka’eve ndojeimprimivei Adventismo-pe.
As an example, one of his positions in that article was that when Jesus returns there is going to be a thousand years of peace. Adventists do not believe that and they never did. That understanding is an understanding that William Miller rejected that actually puts William Miller in the right path for understanding truth. That teaching is one of the teachings that is directly opposite to Millerite understanding.
Techapyrã ramo, peteĩva umi he’iva’ekue upe artíkulope ha’e va’ekue kóva: Jesús ojevy vove oĩta mil ary py’aguapy rehegua. Adventista-kuéra ndogueroviái upéva ha araka’eve ndogueroviaiva’ekue. Pe entendimiento William Miller omboykéva ha’e peteî entendimiento añetehápe omoĩva William Miller-pe tape porãme oñentende hag̃ua pe añetegua. Upe ñembo’e peteĩva umi ñembo’e apytégui oĩva directamente oñemoĩva Millerita-kuéra entendimiento rehe.
So, when Crosier comes out with this eight-part article, they know right off the bat that four of these parts are not reprintable.
Upévare, Crosier osẽvo ko artículo poapyhendýpe, haʼekuéra oikuaa voi pyaʼe hag̃ua, koʼã poapy pehẽngue apytégui irundy ndaikatuiha oñemboguejyjey.
But, James White prints the part where Crosier does infer that the Daily is Christ's Sanctuary ministry; but, he is only going to reprint those four parts. He is not going to reprint the other four. But, in order for James White to reprint Crosier's four parts, he has to print it in two issues. He had to print it twice in September 1850.
Ha katu, James White omoherakuã Crosier oñanduha pe “Daily” ha’eha Cristo rembiapo pe Santuario-pe; ha katu, ha’e omoherakuã jeýta umi irundy pehẽnte. Ndaha’éi omoherakuã jeýta ambue irundy. Péro, ikatu hag̃uáicha James White omoherakuã jey Crosier rembiasa umi irundy pehẽ, tekotevẽ omoĩ mokõi kuatia osẽvape. Tekotevẽ kuri omoherakuã mokõiháicha septiembre de 1850-pe.
There was not enough room in his Review and Herald in September 1850, so he printed two Review and Heralds in September 1850 so he could get all of Crosier's article on Christ moving from the Holy Place to the Most Holy Place.
Ndaipóri ipy guasúiva haʼe hag̃ua ikatúva omoinge ijehehápe Review and Herald-pe jasyporundy 1850-pe; upévare omboguata mokõi Review and Herald jasyporundy 1850-pe ikatu hag̃uáicha omoĩmba Crosier kuatiañe’ẽ rehegua Cristo ohasávo Tupaóga Marangatúgui Tupaóga Marangatuvévape.
Now, you will notice from Gerard Damsteegt that he is giving the historical evaluation that Adventists always knew that there were parts of Crosier's articles that were incorrect and that they could not be reprinted.
Koʼág̃a, rehecháta Gerard Damsteegt rupive haʼe omeʼẽha pe jehechakuaa histórico umi Adventista akóinte oikuaaha oĩhague Crosier artíkulo-kuérape peteĩteĩ hendakuéra ndovaléiva ha ndaikatúiha oñemoinge jey kuatiañeʼẽme.
"She [Ellen Harmon] said: —The Lord showed me in vision, more than one year ago, that Brother Crosier had the true light, on the cleansing of the Sanctuary, &c; and that it was His will that Brother C. should write out the view which he gave us in the Day Star Extra, February 7, 1846. I feel fully authorized by the Lord, to recommend that Extra, to every saint' (Letter. E. G. White to Curtis, Word to the Little Flock, 12). Seventh-day Adventists have usually interpreted this statement to mean that Crosier's presentations were not without mistakes, but that his major typological argumentation was correct. Reprints of the article omitted the aspects which they felt to be inaccurate." P. Gerard Damsteegt, Foundations of the Seventh-day Adventist Message and Mission, 125.
“Ha’e [Ellen Harmon] he’i: —Ñandejára ohechauka chéve peteĩ visión-pe, peteĩ áño rasami mboyve, pe hermano Crosier oguereko hague pe tesape añetéva pe Santuario ñemopotĩ rehegua, h.a.; ha upéva ha’e hague Ivoluntad pe hermano C. ohaikuaa hag̃ua pe jehecha ome’ẽ va’ekue oréve pe Day Star Extra-pe, febrero 7, 1846-pe. Añandu chejehegui añetehápe Ñandejára rupive añemoneĩha arekomenda hag̃ua upe Extra, opa santo-pe guarã” (Kuatiañe’ẽ. E. G. White to Curtis, Word to the Little Flock, 12). Umi Adventista ára pokõiha oguerekóva jepi ko ñe’ẽmondo ñehesa’ỹijo hag̃ua he’iséva Crosier ñemombe’u ndaha’éi hague jejavy’ỹre, ha katu iñe’ẽmbohape tuichavéva, tipología rehegua, añete hague. Umi jehaijey pe artículo-gui omboyke umi mba’e oimo’ã va’ekue ndoikoporãiha. P. Gerard Damsteegt, Foundations of the Seventh-day Adventist Message and Mission, 125.
Never Could Reprint His Complete Document
Araka’e ikatujevy mokõive oñemboguapy hag̃ua iñekuatiakuéra kompletoite.
Now, on the next page you have W. A. Spicer giving testimony to the same thing: They always knew that Crosier's articles had error in them, and they never reprinted those four sections.
Ko’ág̃a, pe páhina oúva-pe, perekóta W. A. Spicer ome’ẽha testimónio upe mba’e rehe avei: haʼekuéra akóinte oikuaa vaʼekue Crosier artículos-kuérape oĩ hague jejavy, ha araka’eve noñemoingejeyri umi irundy pehẽngue.
"Sad to say, young Crosier walked in the light of the Sabbath truth but a very little time. He later repudiated the sanctuary teaching that he had helped to establish. Our pioneer brethren reprinted his exposition on the sanctuary several times in their early papers, but they never could reprint his complete document. In it he had added to the sanctuary exposition some ideas on the age to come a temporal millennium, with a glorious age on this earth at the Second Advent. These things our brethren always omitted. These teachings of the age to come were all abroad in those days. The doctrine never fitted in with the definite advent message; and doubtless this leaven of error helped to lead the younger men away from the Sabbath and the sanctuary truths. He soon turned to bitter opposition to our early movement." W. A. Spicer, Review and Herald, December 14, 1939
“Ñambyasy hag̃uáicha ja’e hag̃ua, mitãrusu Crosier oguata pe ára resapepe pe sábado añetegua rehe peteĩ sapy’aite año. Upe rire omboyke pe ñemoarandu pe santuario rehegua ha’e voi oipytyvõ va’ekue oñemopyendávo. Ore hermanokuéra tenonderãgua ombojevyjey heta jey ijehechauka pe santuario rehegua umi ikuatiakuéra yma guarépe, ha katu araka’eve ndaikatúi ombojevyjey hikuái idokuménto kompletoite. Ipype ha’e ombojoapy pe jehechauka santuario rehegua rehe amombe’upykuéra pe ára oútavare, peteĩ milenio arapy rehegua, peteĩ ára mimbipáva ko yvy ári pe Jejuvy Mokõiha aja. Ko’ã mba’e ore hermanokuéra tapiaite omboyke. Ko’ã ñemoarandu pe ára oútavare rehegua isarambi va’ekue opárupi umi ára-pe. Pe doctrina araka’eve ndojoajúi porãikuri pe marandu adventista añetetéva rehe; ha ikatu hag̃uáichaete, ko levadura jejavy rehegua oipytyvõ ogueraha hag̃ua umi kuimba’e imitãvévape mombyry pe sábado ha pe santuario añeteguakuéragui. Pya’e voi ojere hag̃ua peteĩ ñemoĩ vai ha hakuáva ore ñepyrũrã mymbahápe.” W. A. Spicer, Review and Herald, 14 de diciembre de 1939
The point is, there are those people today that take Sister White's endorsement of Crosier's article in A Word to the Little Flock, people like Heidi Heikes, Heidi Heikes with his foolish book about the Daily being Christ's Sanctuary ministry. This is one of his arguments.
Pe mba’e oĩhápe ko’ã árape umi tapicha ojapyhýva Hermana White remoneĩrã Crosier artículo rehegua A Word to the Little Flock-pe, tapicha kuéra Heidi Heikes-icha, Heidi Heikes, iñarandu’ỹva aranduka reheve omombe’úva pe Diario ha’eha Cristo ministerio Santuario-pegua. Kóva ha’e peteĩva ijeporu hag̃ua argumento-kuéra apytégui.
People that do this are disregarding the historical facts. They never could reprint all of Crosier's articles. And to insist that Ellen White's endorsement in A Word to the Little Flock is a blanket endorsement of Crosier's position is to insist that Adventists believe that there is going to be a thousand years of peace. It is a foolish argument.
Umi ojapóva péicha ndohechagéi umi mba’e oikova’ekue añetehápe. Araka’eve ndaikatúi kuri omoingejey opaite Crosier artículos. Ha oñemyañete hag̃ua Ellen White ohechauka hag̃ua ipytyvõ *A Word to the Little Flock*pe ha upéva ha’e hag̃ua peteĩ moneĩ guasu ojepysóva Crosier rembiapo pytyvõrã, ha’e avei oñemyañete hag̃ua umi Adventista ogueroviaha oĩtaha mil ary py’aguapy. Upéva ha’e peteĩ ñe’ẽmondo vyrorei.
It is a misrepresentation of history, and it is done to deceive people and to produce confusion and darkness.
Ko’ẽva ha’e tembiasakue rehegua jejapo vai, ha ojejapo tavayguápe ombotavy hag̃ua ha omoheñói hag̃ua ñemondýi ha pytũmby.
So, you have two historians, Spicer who is deceased and Damsteegt who is still alive; but, I guarantee you, Spicer or Damsteegt, neither one of them, would agree with me with what I present. Okay, they would not. So, you have two antagonistic historians that are in agreement with what I am telling you. There is no justification whatsoever for taking Ellen White's endorsement of Crosier's article to mean that everything in it was perfect.
Upéicha, reguereko mokõi historiadór: Spicer, omanóva, ha Damsteegt, oikovéva gueteri; hákatu, asségurante ndéve, ni Spicer ni Damsteegt, peteĩve ndogueroviamo’ãi chéve ajeruréva ndive. Upéva ndojapomo’ãi. Upéicha rupi, reguereko mokõi historiadór oñemoĩva che kóntrape, ha upéicharõ jepe oĩ peteĩ ñe’ẽme umi mba’e ha’éva ndéve. Ndaipóri mba’eveichagua justifikasión ogueraha hag̃ua Ellen White remoneĩ Crosier artículo rehegua he’iséva pe ipype oĩva opa mba’e iperfékto hague.
The Advent Review—Volume 1, Auburn NY, Number 3
The Advent Review—Volumen 1, Auburn NY, Número 3
The Advent Review—Volume 1, Auburn NY, Number 4
Pe Advent Review—Volumen 1, Auburn NY, Número 4
The Advent Review—Volume 1, Auburn NY, Number Special
The Advent Review—Volumen 1, Auburn NY, Número Especial
When James White began to print Crosier's article in September of 1850, of The Review and Herald, that was Volume 1, Number 3
Tiago White oñepyrũrõ guare omboguapy hag̃ua kuatiápe Crosier artíkulo, setiémbre ary 1850-pe, *The Review and Herald*-pe, upéva ha’eva’ekue Volumen 1, Número 3.
But, he could not get it all in Volume 1, Number 3; so, he finished off the article in Volume 1 of The Review and Herald,, Number 4. And when did he do this? In September of 1850.
Ha ndaikatúi oikepaite Kuatiañe'ẽ 1, Papapy 3-pe; upévare, omohu'ã pe artíkulo Kuatiañe'ẽ 1-pe The Review and Herald, Papapy 4-pe. Ha araka'épa ojapo kóva? Jasyporundy ary 1850-pe.
Well, what happened in September of 1850? Sister White had a vision that says, "September 23, 1850 the Lord showed me . . . . When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —Daily;' but since 1844, in the confusion, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion has followed. The Review and Herald, November 1850."
Mba’épa oiko vaʼekue jasypoteĩ ary 1850-pe? Hermana White oguereko peteĩ visión heʼíva: “23 jasyporundy 1850-pe Ñandejára ohechauka chéve . . . . Oĩrõ guare joaju, 1844 mboyve, haimete opaite oĩ peteĩ ñeʼẽme pe hechapyre añeteguáre —‘Ára Ha Ára’— rehe; ha 1844 guive, pe apañuãime, ambue hechapyrekuéra oñemoneĩ, ha pytũ ha apañuãi oúva hapykuéri. The Review and Herald, noviembre 1850.”
Who was her husband? He was the editor of The Review and Herald.
Mávapa raka’e iména? Ha’e va’ekue The Review and Herald mboguataha.
So, what did he do when his wife said, "Do you know what I just was told by the Lord, James? I was told that we were not supposed to be introducing the views of the Daily that contradict the Pioneer understanding that the Daily is Paganism, because it is bringing darkness and confusion."
Upévare, mbaʼépa ojapo hembireko heʼírõ guare chupe: “Reikuaápa mbaʼépa cheve heʼi ramoite Ñandejára, Santiago? Heʼi cheve ndajajapovaʼerãiha roikévo ñemyasãi hag̃ua umi Daily rehegua oĩva oñemoĩ hag̃uáicha pe entendimiento de los Pioneros rehe, haʼéva pe Daily haʼeha Paganismo, pórke upéva ogueru pytũ ha confusión.”
So, what did James White do? In September of 1850 he printed another Review and Herald, three in one month. It is called Volume 1, Special Edition.
Upéicharõ, mbaʼépa ojapo James White? Jasyporundy ary 1850-pe ojapo hag̃ua peteĩ ambue Review and Herald mboguapypyre, mbohapy peteĩ jasy pukukuepe. Kóva héra Volumen 1, Edición Especial.
And what did he do? He reprinted Crosier's article and removed what Crosier said about the Daily!
Ha mbaʼe ojapo raʼe? Omoñe’ẽjey Crosier artíkulo ha omboyke pe Crosier heʼíva pe “Diario” rehegua!
Brothers and Sisters, this is historical proof that James and Ellen White understood that Crosier's view about the Daily was wrong and that it brought darkness and confusion.
Peẽ kuéra, koʼãva haʼe peteĩ prueba histórica ohechaukáva Santiago ha Elena White oikuaa hague Crosier remiandu pe Diario rehegua vaiha, ha ogueru hague pytũ ha sarambi.
And what was Crosier's view about the Daily? That it was Christ's Sanctuary ministry.
Ha mba’épa vaʼekue Crosier remiandu pe “Diario” rehegua? Haʼe vaʼekue Cristo rembiapo Santuario-pe.
So, in Early Writings, 74, when she says, "September 23rd, the Lord showed me that the Millerites had the correct view of the Daily," the historical evidence is that the Millerites understood—
Upévare, *Early Writings*, 74-pe, ha’e he’i jave: “23 jasyporundype, Ñandejára ohechauka chéve umi Millerita-kuérape oguereko hague pe entendimiento hekopete pe *Daily* rehegua”, pe evidencia histórica ohechauka umi Millerita-kuéra oikuaa hague—
Now, Brothers and Sisters, Brothers and Sisters, do not miss this fact: What is this: September 1850 Sister White is shown that since 1844 other views of the Daily had been embraced; May 1850, Arnold presents the Daily as the Jewish sanctuary; September 1850, part 1 of 2 of Crosier's article is published, inclusive of his presentation of the Daily as Christ's Sanctuary ministry; September 1850, part 2 of 2 of Crosier's article is published; September 1850, Crosier's article is reprinted, but his view on the Daily has been removed? What is taking place?
Koʼág̃a, che ryvy ha che reindykuéra, che ryvy ha che reindykuéra, ani peheja ohasa pendehegui ko mbaʼe añetegua: Mbaʼépa kóva: septiembre de 1850-pe, hermana White ohechauka hag̃ua ichupe guive 1844 rire oñemopyendaha ambue jehecha-kuéra pe “Diario” rehe; mayo de 1850-pe, Arnold opresenta pe “Diario” judío-kuéra santuario ramo; septiembre de 1850-pe, oñemoherakuã Crosier artículo pehẽngue 1 2-gui, oikehápe ipresentación pe “Diario” rehe Cristo rembiapo santuariope; septiembre de 1850-pe, oñemoherakuã pehẽngue 2 2-gui Crosier artículo-gui; septiembre de 1850-pe, Crosier artículo oñeimprime jey, péro ojeipeʼa chugui ijehecha pe “Diario” rehe? Mbaʼépa oiko hína?
We see the same year that this 1850 Chart is produced, and what does this Chart say about the Daily? "Pagan Dominion or The DAILY taken away. Dan. 11:31 508."
Jahecha pe año-pe ojejapoha ko Cuadro 1850 gua, ha mba’épa he’i ko Cuadro pe Diario rehe? “Dominio pagano térã pe DIARIO ojeipe’a va’ekue. Dan. 11:31 508.”
Ellen White knew what those who gave the Judgment Hour's cry position of the Daily was. When she says they had the correct view, she knew that the correct view was that it represented the Pagan Dominion being taken; the Daily represented Paganism.
Ellen White oikuaa mba’épa pe “sapy’aitépe pe juicio” sãsoha ombohýiva kuéra oimo’ãkuri pe Diario rehegua. Ha’e he’ívo hikuái oreko hague pe jehecha hekopete, oikuaa porãkuri pe jehecha hekopeteha hína pe ohechaukáva pe mburuvicha paganokuéra rehegua oñemboykeha; pe Diario ohechauka paganismo.
And in this year, 1850, the historical record proves that she rejected and her husband rejected the teaching that the Daily represents Christ Sanctuary ministry, which is the teaching that the Biblical Research Institute of the Seventh-day Adventist Church upholds. It is the teaching that the self-supporting ministries, such as Heartland and Steps to Life support. It is the teaching that brings darkness and confusion.
Ha ko áñope, 1850-pe, pe registro histórico ohechauka ha’e omboyke hague ha iména omboyke hague avei pe mbo’epy he’íva pe Daily ohechauka Cristo rembiapo Santuario-pe, upéva hína pe mbo’epy omombaretéva pe Biblical Research Institute pe Iglesia Adventista del Séptimo Día rehegua. Upéva hína pe mbo’epy omoirũva umi ministerio ojejokoséva ijehegui, ha’eháicha Heartland ha Steps to Life. Upéva hína pe mbo’epy oguerúva pytũ ha ñemyangekói.
Now, notice this concerning the 1850 Chart. This is in November of 1850. This is the same month that she has the vision that she records that ultimately goes through the evolution in 1851, and then in 1882 ends up in Early Writing, in this very month, in this very month, in November of 1850. It says,
Koʼág̃a, peñatende kóva rehe peteĩcha hag̃ua 1850-pegua Kuádro rehe. Kóva niko noviembre de 1850-pe. Kóva hína upe jasyete voi haʼe orekohápe pe visión haʼe ombokuatiaháicha, upéva ipahápe ohasa pe evolución rupive 1851-pe, ha upéi 1882-pe oĩ hag̃uáicha Early Writing-pe, ko jasyetépe voi, ko jasyetépe voi, noviembre de 1850-pe. He’i,
"Monday we returned to Dorchester where our dear Brother Nichols and family live."—
“Arakõi rovy’ápe rojevy Dorchester-pe, oikoha ñande pehẽngue pohayhuetéva, pe Hermano Nichols, ha hogaygua ndive.”
Right up here [referring to the 1850 Chart, upper right-hand corner], "Published by Otis Nichols, Dorchester, Massachusetts." Okay? She is talking about this, right? Do you see it, this Chart?
Ko’ápe voi [oñe’ẽhína pe Cuádro 1850 rehe, yvate gotyo akatúa koty], “Oñemoherakuã Otis Nichols rupive, Dorchester, Massachusetts-pe.” Añete piko? Ha’e oñe’ẽ hína ko mba’e rehe, añetehápe? Rehechápa, ko Cuádro?
—"There in the night God gave me a very interesting vision, the most of which you will see in the paper. God shewed me the necessity of getting out a chart. I saw it was needed and that the truth made plain upon tables would effect much and would cause souls to come to the knowledge of the truth." Manuscript Releases, number 15, 210 November, 1850.
—“Upépe pyhare jave Tupã ome’ẽ chéve peteĩ visión iporãiterei ha iñinteresánteva, hetave mba’e upévagui pehechátava kuatiañe’ẽme. Tupã ohechauka chéve tekotevẽha oñemosarambi peteĩ cuadro. Ahecha tekotevẽha upéva ha pe añetegua ojehechaukáva hesakã hag̃uáicha umi tabla ári ojapótaha heta mba’e ha omoaguĩtaha umi ánga pe añetegua reikuaápe.” Manuscript Releases, número 15, 210 noviembre, 1850.
She had a vision at Nichols's house in Dorchester—that is all on this Chart—saying, "You need to make a chart."
Haʼe oguereko peteĩ visión Nichols róga Dorchester-pe—opa mbaʼe upéva oĩ ko Kuatiarechaukahápe—heʼívo: “Tekotevẽ pejapo peteĩ kuatiarechaukaha.”
And what does she say about the chart? How does she describe it?
Ha mba’épa he’i pe kuña pe ta’angáre? Mba’éichapa omombe’u upéva?
Go to Habakkuk 2, "I saw the need of getting out a chart," and what would it do? It was needed, "that the truth made plain upon tables." Habakkuk 2, verse 2, says, "And the Lord answered me and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, . . . ." She is saying that this Otis Nichols 1850 Chart, printed in Dorchester, Massachusetts, is a fulfillment of Habakkuk, just like she says in The Great Controversy that the 1843 Chart is a fulfillment of Habakkuk.
Tereho Habacuc 2-pe: “Ahechakuaa tekotevẽha ojejapo hag̃ua peteĩ ta’anga’aty,” ha mba’épa ojapóta upéva? Tekotevẽ kuri, “añetegua ojehechauka hag̃ua hesakã hag̃uáicha kuatiarogue ári.” Habacuc 2, versíkulo 2, he’i: “Upérõ Ñandejára chembohovái ha he’i chéve: Ehai pe visión, ha ejapo hesakã hag̃uáicha kuatiarogue ári, . . . .” Ha’e he’i ko Otis Nichols 1850 arýpe guare ta’anga’aty, oñemboguapýva Dorchester, Massachusetts-pe, ha’eha peteĩ ñembyaty Habacuc ñe’ẽ rehegua ojehupytyva’ekue, peteĩchaite umi ha’e he’iháicha The Great Controversy-pe pe 1843 guare ta’anga’aty rehe, ha’éva peteĩ ñembyaty Habacuc rehegua ojehupytyva’ekue.
Okay, do you see that? Do you see when she got this vision? In the same time that this was going on: "September 23d, the Lord showed me . . . . that the teaching of the Daily as Christ's Sanctuary ministry brings darkness and confusion," and her husband immediately reprinted the article and removed those two paragraphs. It was never reprinted again in Adventism until 1931 when Willie White reprinted it; and, when he did so, he had some false witness in the very tract that he printed. It can be demonstrated.
Upéicha, ¿rehechápa upéva? ¿Rehechápa araka’épepa ha’e oñeme’ẽ chupe ko visión? Pe mismo tiempo-pe ko mba’e oiko aja: “23 de septiembre, Ñandejára ohechauka chéve . . . . pe enseñanza pe Diario rehegua Cristo pegua Santuario ministerio ramo ogueruha pytũmby ha confusión”, ha iména pya’e omyeñepyrũ jey pe artículo ha oipe’a umi mokõi párrafo. Araka’eve noñemyasãi jeyvéi Adventismo-pe pe año 1931 peve, Willie White omyasãi jey ramo guare; ha, upérõ ojapo jave upéva, oguereko testimonio japu pe tracto voi ha’e omyasãi va’ekuépe. Ikatu ojehechauka.
Now, I want to read something here to you, a longer quote, about this same time period. This is from November 27, 1850.
Koʼág̃a aikóta amoñeʼẽse peẽme koʼápe mbaʼe, peteĩ ñeʼẽngatuve, ko tiempo pukukue rehegua. Kóva niko 27 de noviembre de 1850-gua.
"I have neglected writing you for some time. I will now give my reasons. First, I had no time to write for weeks after I received Sister Arabella's kind and welcome letter, or I should have complied with her request to have answered it within two weeks. I liked the letter very much. We were all interested in the letter and hope my delay will not prevent you from answering this as soon as you read it, and I will not wait so long next time.
Areko ara peteĩ tiempo ndahai ndeve. Ko’ág̃a ame’ẽta che mba’érepa. Peteĩha, ndarekói vaʼekue tiempo ahai hag̃ua heta semána aja, chepyhy rire Hermana Arabella rembiapokue porã ha ovyʼapavẽ hag̃uagua; upévare ndaikatúi akumpli hembijerure hag̃ua ambohovái hag̃ua mokõi semána ryepýpe. Aguerohoryeterei pe kuatia. Orepa roñeinteresa pe kuatia rehe ha roha’arõ che mbotapykue ndojokomo’ãi hag̃ua nde rembohovái ko kuatia pya’e pe’óta remoñe’ẽ vove, ha che ndaha’arõmo’ãi pukuete péicha ambue jey.
"James' and my health is quite good now. Our home is in Paris, at Brother Andrews', within a few steps of the post office and printing office. We shall stay here some little time. This is a very kind family, yet quite poor. Everything here is free as far as they have. We do not think it right to be any expense to them while here. I want to see you all very much and dear Sister Gorham.
Ore ha che ha’e porãiterei ko’ág̃a. Ore róga oĩ París-pe, pe ermáno Andrews rógape, opávo mbovymi pytu’úpe correo rógagui ha imprenta rógagui. Roikóta ko’ápe sapy’ami. Kóva ha’e peteĩ familia ipy’aporãiterei va’ekue, jepe hasy mboriahu. Opa mba’e ko’ápe ñandéve guarã reiete, pe kuéra oguerekoháicha. Ndoroguerekói hekojojaha roiko hag̃ua chupekuéra peteĩ jepe gasto ñaĩ aja ko’ápe. Ahechaseiterei peẽme peẽme ha pe ermána ahayhuetéva Gorham.
"Our conference at Topsham was one of deep interest. Twenty-eight were present; all took part in the meeting.
“Ore aty atyguasu Topsham-pe niko tuicha iporã ha omombarete ore py’aguapy. Mokõi pa poapy tapicha oĩkuri upépe; maymáva oike ha oipytyvõ pe atyhápe.”
"Sunday the power of God came upon us like a mighty rushing wind. All arose upon their feet and praised God with a loud voice; it was something as it was when the foundation of the house of God was laid. The voice of weeping could not be told from the voice of shouting. It was a triumphant time; all were strengthened and refreshed. I never witnessed such a powerful time before.
Domíngope Ñandejára pu’aka ou orerehe yvytu mbarete pya’e oúvaicha. Opavave opu’ã ipy rehe ha omomba’e guasu Ñandejárape ñe’ẽ hatãme; upéva ha’eva’ekue peteĩ mba’e ojoguáva upe oikova’ekuépe oñemoĩ ramo guare Ñandejára róga ypykue. Hasẽ ñe’ẽ ndaikatúi oñembojoavy sapukái ñe’ẽgui. Ha’eva’ekue peteĩ ára jehovasa guasu rehegua; opavave oñemombarete ha oñembopyahu. Araka’eve ndahechái upeichagua ára ipu’akapáva mboyve.
"Our next conference was in Fairhaven. Brother Bates and wife were present. It was quite a good meeting. On our return to Brother Nichols', the Lord gave me a vision and showed me that the truth must be made plain upon tables, and it would cause many to decide for the truth by the three angels' messages, with the two former being made plain upon tables."—
Ore konferénsia oúva oiko Fairhaven-pe. Pe ermáno Bates ha hembireko oĩkuri upépe. Pe aty iporãiterei kuri. Rojevývo ermáno Nichols rógape, Ñandejára ome'ẽ chéve peteĩ visión ha ohechauka chéve pe añetegua ojehechaukava'erãha mesakuéra ári hesakã hag̃uáicha, ha upéva ombohetáta heta tapichápe ojedesidi hag̃ua pe añetegua rehe umi mbohapy ánhel marandu rupive, umi mokõi tenondegua ojehechaukávo hesakã hag̃uáicha mesakuéra ári.
That is right down here, [indicating the lower left corner of the 1850 Chart]. Okay? They are on this Chart, what she is talking about.
Upéva oĩ ko’ápe voi, [ohechaukávo 1850 Chart pe akatúa asu gotyo guýpe oĩvape]. Oĩ porãpa? Ha’ekuéra oĩ ko Chart-pe, upe ha’e omombe’úva.
—"I also saw it was as necessary for the paper to be published as for the messengers to go, for the messengers need a paper to carry with them, containing present truth, to put in the hands of those that hear, and then the truth would not fade from the mind, and that the paper would go where the messengers could not go. Other things I saw which will appear in the paper.
—“Che avei ahecha kuatiahaipyre osẽva’erãha ikatu hag̃uáicha, peteĩchaite tekotevẽháicha umi mensahéro osẽ hag̃ua; umi mensahéro niko oikotevẽ peteĩ kuatiahaipyre ogueraha hag̃ua hendivekuéra, oguerekóva pe añetegua ko’ag̃agua, omoĩ hag̃uáicha umi ohendúvape pópe, ha upéicha pe añetegua ndogueimo’ãi iñakãgui; ha pe kuatiahaipyre ohóta umi mensahéro ndaikatúihápe oho. Ambue mba’e avei ahecha, umíva osẽtaha pe kuatiahaipýpe.
"How do you all get along? Are you all striving for eternal life? I want to see you very, very much and think I shall before long. Now is the preparation time and I hope we shall all make sure work for eternity. Time looks very short and what we do we must do quickly.
—Mba’éichapa peiko peẽme? ¿Peẽpa peñeha’ã hína peikove hag̃ua tekove opave’ỹvape g̃uarã? Aipotaeterei, aipotaeterei rohecha, ha che aimo’ã ndahi’aréi ajuhutaha upéva. Ko’ág̃a niko ñembosako’i ára, ha che aha’arõ ñande maymáva ñamombarete hag̃ua tembiapo añetéva opa’ỹ hag̃uarã. Aravo ojehecha mbykypaitetéma, ha pe jajapóva va’erã ñañeha’ã jajapo pya’e.
"November 20, one week ago, Brother Henry Nichols and self went to Topsham. We had just risen from the dinner table Thursday [Nov. 21], when one of Brother Foey's children came in and said their mother was insensible. We hastened over the river one mile and found our dear Sister Foey dying. My distress was great as I found she did not know me. She continued long in great distress until between three and four o'clock and then breathed her last. She has left a husband and three children to mourn their loss.
“20 de noviembre, peteĩ arapokõindy ohasávape, Hermano Henry Nichols ha che roho Topsham-pe. Rojepu’ãmbotahápe karurã mesa-gui juevespe [Nov. 21], peteĩ Hermano Foey ra’ykuéra apytégui oike ha he’i isy oĩha akã’ỹ hag̃uáicha. Pya’e rojasa pe ysyrýi peteĩ milla pukukue ha rojuhu ñande hermana ahayhuetéva, Hermana Foey, omanombotaitéma. Tuicha che py’apy, ajuhúvo ha’e ndoikuaáiha che. Ha’e opyta areterei tuicha jehasa asýpe mbohapy ha irundy aravo mbytépe peve, ha upéi omosẽ ipytu paha. Oheja iména ha mbohapy ita’ýra hag̃ua oñembyasy hag̃ua okañy haguére chupekuéra.”
"Friday morning [Nov. 22], Brother Henry came to Paris for James to shave him to attend the funeral. We had a very solemn, interesting time. The Lord did not leave us but let His Spirit rest upon us. Sister Foey's last days were decidedly her most spiritual and best days. Brother Foey has this to console him, that she died a Christian. He bears up well. God gives him grace to endure the affliction. Oh, how good it is to have a hope in God that will sustain in all scenes of trial and affliction. Praise God for a hope, a good hope. What would you, any of you, give for your hope?
Pyhare pyhareve [22 nov.], pe ermáno Henry ou Paríspe ani hag̃ua chupe James oñeikytĩ hag̃ua hague hag̃ua oho hag̃ua ñotỹhápe. Ore rohasa peteĩ aravo iporãitereíva ha marangatúva. Ñandejára ndorehejaíri, ha oheja Ipy'aguasu opytu'u ore ári. Hermána Foey ára pahakuépe ojehechauka porãiterei va'ekue ha'eha umi ára ipy'aguasuvéva ha iporãvéva chupe g̃uarã. Hermáno Foey oguereko ko mba'e oñembopy'aguasuhápe, ha'e omano hague peteĩ kristiáno ramo. Ha'e ogueropu'aka porã. Tupã ome'ẽ chupe gracia ogueropu'aka hag̃ua pe jehasa asy. ¡Ajépa iporãite jaikóramo ñaha'arõ hag̃ua Tupãre, peteĩ ñaha'arõ ikatúva ñanemboguata mbarete opaichagua jeporekove asy ha jehasa asýpe! Toñemomba'e guasu Tupã peteĩ ñaha'arõ rehe, peteĩ ñaha'arõ porã rehe. Mba'épa peẽ, peteĩteĩva pendehegui, peme'ẽta pende ñaha'arõ rehehápe?
"Hold fast the faith. Be strong in God and lean upon His everlasting arm. It will never fail you but will bear you up under every affliction. I hope you will all grow stronger and stronger in the truth. Do not falter but press your way to the kingdom."—
Pejoko pende jerovia rehe. Peñemombarete Tupãme ha pejerovia Hembijy apopyrã opa’ỹvare. Upéva araka’eve ndofallamo’ãi pendehegui, ha penepu’ãta opaichagua jehasa asýpe. Aipota peẽ peñemombareteve ha peñemombareteve añeteguápe. Ani pepyta kyhyjépe ni pekangy, síno pesegíkena pene rape peho hag̃ua pe rréinope.
Here we go. Here is what I want you to see.
Jaháke ñañepyrũ. Kóva hína aipota recha hag̃ua.
—"One week ago, last Sabbath, we had a very interesting meeting. Brother Hewit from Dead River was there. He came with a message to the effect that the destruction of the wicked and the sleep of the dead was an abomination within a shut door that a woman Jezebel, a prophetess had brought in and he believed that I was that woman, Jezebel."—
—“Peteĩ arapokõindy ohasávape, sábado pahápe, roguereko peteĩ aty iporãitereíva. Pe hermano Hewit, Dead River-gua, oĩkuri upépe. Haʼe ou peteĩ marandu reheve heʼiséva umi iñañáva ñehundi ha umi omanóva okeha haʼeha peteĩ mbaʼe jeguaru peteĩ okẽ mbotypýpe, peteĩ kuña Jezabel, profetisa, ogueru vaʼekue; haʼe oguerovia cheha hague upe kuña, Jezabel.”—
Okay? Brother Hewit is saying that Ellen White is Jezebel and she has introduced three errors.
Upéicha piko? Pe ermáno Hewit he’i Ellen White ha’eha Jezabel ha’e omoinge hague mbohapy jejavy.
"—We told him of some of his errors in the past, that the 1335 days were ended and numerous errors of his. It had but little effect. His darkness was felt upon the meeting and it dragged."—
—Romombeʼu chupe umi ivaikue ojejapovaʼekue chugui yma, pe 1335 ára opa hague ha heta ambue jejavy orekóva. Upéva saʼiete añoite oguereko vaʼekue efecto. Ipyharégui oñeñandu pe aty ári ha upéva omboyke ha ipukuvévaicha oho.
Now, I want you to see this. I have something to say about this paragraph that I want you to follow, if you can.
Koʼág̃a aipota pehecha kóva. Che areko peteĩ mbaʼe haʼéva ko párrafo rehegua, ha aipota pesegíri upéva, ikatúrõ.
If you have ever dealt with those in Adventism that reapply the time prophecies at the end of the world, they only have three quotes that they use—they use lots of quotes, but they have three primary quotes that they use. This is one of them; because, they will go there and say, "We told him of some of his errors in the past," and they will claim that when she says "that the 1335 days were ended" that that was one of his errors. Do you see how you can kind of twist that grammar a little bit: "We told him of some of his errors in the past? We also told him that the 1335 days were ended; but the time setters say we told him some of his errors in the past and one of those errors was that you are teaching the 1335 days is ended and that is an error." So, you can twist it either way.
Mbovyramo ramo peñe’ẽmava umi oĩvandi Adventismo ryepýpe omoĩjey hag̃ua umi profesía ára rehegua mundo pahaitepe, haʼekuéra oreko mante mbohapy cita oiporúva—oiporu heta cita, péro oreko mbohapy cita principal oiporúva. Kóva haʼe peteĩva umívagui; pórke haʼekuéra ohóta upépe ha heʼíta: “Roikuaauka chupe peteĩva umi ijejavykuégui yma guare”, ha heʼíta hikuái koʼág̃a heʼívo “pe 1335 ára opa hague”, upéva haʼe hague peteĩva umi ijejavykuégui. Rehechápa mbaʼéichapa ikatu sapyʼami rembojere michĩmi upe gramática: “Roikuaauka chupe peteĩva umi ijejavykuégui yma guare”? “Avei roikuaauka chupe pe 1335 ára opa hague”; péro umi omoĩva ára katu heʼi ore roikuaauka hague chupe peteĩva umi ijejavykuégui yma guare ha peteĩva umi jejavyva haʼeha nde remboʼeha pe 1335 ára opa hague ha upéva peteĩ jejavy. Upéicharõ, ikatu rembojere mokõive hendáicha.
The first time I had a face-to-face confrontation with Eugene Prewitt was in Oklahoma, and he is arguing that the Millerite History does not repeat at the end of the world, and I give him a couple of quotes in the Spirit of Prophecy.
Peteĩha jey che rojovake roñorairõ Eugene Prewitt ndive vaʼekue oiko Oklahoma-pe, haʼe katu oñemoĩ oñeʼẽvo pe Historia Millerita ndojejapovejóiha ko mundo paha gotyo, ha che ameʼẽ chupe mokõi cita Espíritu de Profecía-gui.
And he says, "Jeff, you know that Ellen White was a careless writer."
Ha he'i: “Jeff, nde reikuaa Ellen White ha'e hague peteĩ haihára oñangarekóiva'ỹva.”
And I said, "What do you mean?"
Ha ha’e: “Mba’érepa ere upéva?”
And he went to this quote. He says that this quote proves that she is a careless writer; because she knows that I know that the time setters can twist this quote, if they wish to.
Ha'e oho ko ñemombe'úpe. He'i ko ñemombe'u ohechauka porãha ha'eha peteĩ haihára iñangarekó'ỹva; pórke ha'e oikuaa che aikuaaha umi omoĩva ára ikatuha ombohape vai ko ñemombe'u, oipotáramo.
Now, the fact that someplace like Washita has the influence that teaches its students that Ellen White is a careless writer is one thing; but, is she a careless writer here?
Koʼág̃a, peteĩ tenda Washita-icha oguerekóramo pe influencia omboʼéva hemimboʼépekuéra Ellen White haʼeha peteĩ haihára iñangarekoʼỹva, upéva peteĩ mbaʼe; péro, ¿haʼe piko iñangarekoʼỹva koʼápe?
—"I felt that I must say a few words. In the name of Jesus, I got up and in about five minutes the meeting changed. Everyone felt it at the same instant. Every countenance was lighted up. The presence of God filled the place. Brother Hewit dropped upon his knees and began to cry and pray. I was taken off in vision and saw much that I cannot write. It had a great effect upon Brother Hewit. He confessed it was of God and was humbled in the dust. He has been writing ever since that meeting, and is now writing from the same table renouncing all his errors that he has advanced. I believe God is bringing him up and he is calculated to do good, if God moves through him.
—«Añandu aikotevẽha ha’e mbovymi ñe’ẽ. Jesús rérape apu’ã, ha cinco minuto rupi pe aty oñemoambue. Opavave oñandu upéva peteĩ jave. Maymáva rova hendy. Tupã renondete omyenyhẽ pe tenda. Pe hermano Hewit ho’a hag̃ua ipy’a guýpe ha oñepyrũ hasẽ ha oñembo’e. Che ajegueraha jehechaýpe ha ahecha heta mba’e ndaikatúiva ahai. Upéva oguereko va’ekue peteĩ tuicha efecto hermano Hewit ári. Ha’e omombe’u va’ekue upéva ouha Tupãgui ha oñemomirĩ yvýpe. Upéi guive pe aty guive, ha’e ohai meme hína, ha ko’ág̃a ohaína pe mesa peteĩhágui voi omboykévo opa jejavy ha’e omyasãiva’ekue. Aguerovia Tupã oguerahaha chupe yvateve, ha ikatu ojapo porã, Tupã omba’apóramo hese.»
"Much love to dear Sister Gorham. Tell her to be strong. God is with her and He will not leave her. Much love to you all. I hope the children will not get sleepy, but will be interested in the truth and be diligent to make their calling and election sure. Write, be sure and write, and do not do as I have done. I love you, all of you. Write." Manuscript Releases, volume 16, 206–209. Written from Paris, Maine, November 27, 1850.
Mborayhu eterei pe ermána ahayhuetéva Gorham-pe guarã. Ere chupe taimbarete hag̃ua. Tupã oĩ hendive ha ndohejamo’ãi chupe. Mborayhu eterei peẽme peẽme guarã. Aha’arõ mitãnguéra ndokeiseymo’ãiha, síno oikóta hag̃ua iñinteresado pe añeteguáre ha oñeha’ãmbaitéta hag̃ua omoañete hag̃ua hembiayhu ha iporavo. Ehai, aníkena nderesarái rehai hag̃ua, ha ani pejapo che ajapo haguéicha. Rohayhu peẽme, opavave peẽme. Ehai. Manuscript Releases, volúmen 16, 206–209. Ojehai va’ekue París, Maine guive, 27 de noviembre de 1850.
Brothers and Sisters, what is the historical context of this; where is she writing this at? She is writing this in 1850, in Brother Nichols's house.
Hermanos ha hermanakuéra, mba’épa ko mba’e rehegua contexto histórico; moõpa ha’e ohai hína kóva? Ha’e ohai hína kóva ary 1850-pe, hermano Nichols rógape.
In this time period, what is the Lord doing? He is showing that the Pioneers have the correct view of the Daily, and she is dealing with that. She is saying that Christ's Sanctuary ministry is the false view of the Daily.
Ko tiémpope, ¿mbaʼépa ojapo Ñandejára? Haʼe ohechauka umi Pionéro oguerekoha pe jehecha hekopete pe Diario rehegua, ha haʼe ombaʼapo hína upéva rehe. Haʼe heʼi Cristo Ministerio pe Santuario-peha haʼeha pe jehecha japu pe Diario rehegua.
In this history, this very history—not this very history and not just the very year, but the very month of the year she is getting visions and she is clarifying this truth about the Pioneer position of the Daily, saying those that gave the Judgment Hour Cry had the correct view of the Daily; and, in the same paragraph, she says, "I saw that the 1843 Chart was directed by the hand of the Lord and it should not be altered and that those that gave the Judgment Hour Cry had the correct view of the Daily."
Ko tembiasakuepe, ko tembiasakue añeteguápe—ndaha’éi añónte ko tembiasakue añetegua ha ndaha’éi avei añónte pe aryete, síno pe jasyete voi upe arýpe ha’e ohupyty visión-kuéra ha omyesakã ko añetegua rehegua pe posición pionera pe Diario rehe, he’ívo umi ome’ẽ va’ekue pe Juicio Aravo Sapukái oguereko hague pe techakuaa hekopete pe Diario rehe; ha, upe párrafo-pe voi, ha’e he’i: “Che ahecha pe Carta 1843-gua ojejapo hague Ñandejára po rupive ha ndovaléi oñemoambue, ha umi ome’ẽ va’ekue pe Juicio Aravo Sapukái oguereko hague pe techakuaa hekopete pe Diario rehe.”
And what does it say about the Daily on this 1843 Chart? Well, it says that it was taken away in AD508; and, at 1335 years later brings you to 1843 and that the 1335 is in the past.
¿Ha mbaʼépa heʼi pe Diario rehe ko Kárta 1843-pegua? Heẽ, heʼi oñemombytai hague Cristo rire 508-pe; ha, 1335 ary upe rire, ogueraha ndeve 1843-pe ha pe 1335 oĩma pe ohasavaʼekuépe.
Can you imagine, in the very month, in the very year, that she would tell Brother Hewit from Dead River that it was still future?
¿Ikatúpa reimo’ã, upe jasyetepe, upe áñoetépe, ha’e he’itaha Hermáno Hewit-pe Dead River-gua, upéva gueteriha oútava?
Okay, these time setters, these time setters, and these people that believe that Sister White is a careless writer. History does not uphold this.
Oĩ, koʼã omoĩva ára, koʼã omoĩva ára, ha koʼã tapicha ogueroviáva Hermana White haʼeha peteĩ haihára ojapoʼỹ hag̃uáicha mbaʼe. Tembiasakue ndojokupytýi ko mbaʼére.
So, I want you to see, in connection with the Daily, Ellen White even understood the 1335.
Upévare, aipota pehecha hag̃ua, pe “Ára Pukukue” rehegua joaju hag̃ua, Ellen White jepe oikuaa hag̃ua pe 1335.
Ellen White just did not put her seal of approval on the Daily being Paganism; she understood that it started the 1335-year prophecy, which ended in 1843, and she defended that position in public against Brother Hewit from Dead River. Do you see that?
Ellen White ndaha’éi añoite ome’ẽi imbyajerovia pe “Daily” ha’eha paganismo; ha’e ontende porã kuri upéva omoñepyrũ hague pe profesía 1335 ary pegua, opa va’ekue 1843-pe, ha ha’e omo’ã kuri upe posición opavave renondépe pe hermano Hewit-gui Dead River-gua rovake. Rehechápa upéva?
And in the same month, where she is saying that Christ's Sanctuary ministry as the Daily only brings darkness and confusion; and, her husband, in response to that vision, removes that teaching from the Review and Herald.
Ha upe jasyte, ha’e he’íva Cristo pegua Teko Marangatu-pe hembiapo pe ára ha ára añoite ogueruha pytũ ha ñembyasy; ha iména, upe visión-pe ombohováivo, oipe’a upe mbo’epy Review and Herald-gui.
Up here in your notes, where it says "1850 Chart," this is what it says right here [referring to the third column from the left on the 1850 Chart, the text following Jesus on the cross in AD31]. I wanted you to be able to have it in your notes.
Ko’ápe yvate pende kuatiañe’ẽmbytépe, he’ihápe “1850 Chart”, kóva ha’e pe he’íva ko’ápe voi [ohechaukávo mbohapyha columna asúgotyo pe 1850 Chart-pe, pe jehaipy oúva Jesús rire kurusúre AD31-pe]. Aipota va’ekue ikatu hag̃uáicha peguereko pende kuatiañe’ẽmbytépe.
Away Daniel 11:31 508
Mombyry Daniel 11:31 508
And then on the 1843 Chart over here [referring to the center column, underneath Jesus on the cross in AD31]:
Ha upéi, pe Kuatiañe’ẽ 1843-gua ko’ápe [ohechaukávo pe columna mbytépe, Jesús kurusúre guýpe, 31 d.C.-pe]:
Taking away of the daily sacrifice. Dan. 12:11, 12
Jeipe’a pe sacrificio ára ha ára guáva. Dan. 12:11, 12
Okay, these are these two Charts.
Mávapa, ko’ãva hína umi mokõi ta’anga.
Sister White understood that these men had the correct view, and she understood that it initiated the 1335-year prophecy that ended in 1843; and, she understood that it represented the Pagan Dominion being taken away in 508.
Hermana White ontende vaʼekue koʼã kuimbaʼe oguerekoha pe tesaʼỹijo hekopeteva, ha ontende avei upéva omoñepyrũ hague pe profesía 1335 ary rehegua, opa vaʼekue 1843-pe; ha, ontende avei upéva ohechauka hague pe Pagano Mburuvicha Rekomimbipa ojeipeʼa hague 508-pe.
Under these two references to the Charts you have another quote in the time period of Brother Nichols, and she is rebuking people from making other charts because their artwork is satanic; whereas, she says that the artwork upon these two Charts is heavenly. She says,
Ko’ã mokõi ñe’ẽmondo umi Ta’ãngamýire guýpe reguereko ambue ñe’ẽ ojeporavo va’ekue Hermano Nichols tiémpope, ha ha’e oñemoñe’ẽ mbarete tapichápe ani hag̃ua ojapo ambue ta’ãngamýi, pórke umi ta’ãnga oĩva ipype ha’e satánico; upe aja, ha’e he’i ko’ã mokõi Ta’ãngamýi ári oĩva ta’ãnga ha’e yvágagui. Ha’e he’i,
"I saw the chart-making business was all wrong. It originated with Brother Rhodes and was followed out by Brother Case. Means has been spent in making charts and forming uncouth disgusting images to represent angels and the glorious Jesus. Such things I saw were displeasing to God. I saw that God was in the publishment of the chart by Brother Nichols."—
“Ahecha umi ta’anga’aty apo rembiapo oĩha vaieterei. Upéva oñepyrũ va’ekue Hermano Rhodes reheve ha upéi Hermano Case omotenonde. Oñegasta hague tembiporu ta’anga’aty apo hag̃ua ha oñemoheñói hag̃ua ta’angakuéra ivaíva ha ñanembojeguarúva, ojeporu hag̃uáicha ojerepresenta hag̃ua umi ánhel ha Jesús glorioso. Ahecha ko’ã mba’e ndojeguerohoryiha Tupãgui. Ahecha avei Tupã oĩ hague pe ta’anga’aty oñemoherakuã va’ekuépe Hermano Nichols rupive.”
Who was in the publishment of this 1850 Chart? God!
Mávapa oĩ vaʼekue ko Kárta 1850 guápe oñemoherakuãramo? Tupã!
—"I saw that there was"—what?—"a prophecy of this chart in the Bible, and if this chart is designed for God's people, if it [is] sufficient for one it is for another, and if one needed a new chart painted on a larger scale, all need it just as much.
—«Ahecha oĩha»—mba’e?—«peteĩ profesía ko ta’anga rehegua la Bíblia-pe, ha ko ta’anga ojejapóramo Ñandejára tavayguakuérape g̃uarã, ha’e [ramo] suficiente peteĩme g̃uarã, upéicharõ ambuépe g̃uarã avei; ha peteĩ oikotevẽrire oñepinta jey hag̃ua peteĩ ta’anga pyahu tuichavéva, opavave oikotevẽ upéva upeichaite avei.
"I saw that it was a restless, uneasy, unsatisfied, ungrateful feeling in Brother Case that desired another chart. I saw that these painted charts had a bad effect upon the congregation. It caused a light, chaffy spirit of ridicule to be in the meeting."—
“Ahechakuaa pe mba’e ha’eha peteĩ ñandu py’aguapy’ỹva, py’apekue’ỹva, ndovy’áiva ha aguyje’ỹva ermáno Case-pe, oipotáva ambue cuadro. Ahechakuaa avei ko’ã cuadro oñepinta vaekue oreko hague peteĩ vaiete mbyaty rehe. Ojapo haguére pe atyhápe oĩ hag̃ua peteĩ espíritu vevúi, tavyra’ỹ ha puka ñembohory rehegua.” —
Now, this is the one that I want you to think through.
Koʼág̃a, kóva hína pe che aipota peẽ pejepyʼamongeta hese.
—"I saw that the charts ordered by God struck the mind favorably, even without an explanation."—
—«Ahecha Ñandejára omanda vaʼekue umi kuatia taʼãngakuéra opoko porãha akãme, jepe noñemyesakãiramo.»—
"I saw that the charts," plural, "ordered by God . . . ." What charts, in the plural, were ordered by God? These two Charts [the 1843 and 1850 Charts] were ordered by God."
“Ahecha umi cuadro-kuéra”, hetaitépe, “oñemoĩva’ekue Ñandejára rupive . . . .” Mba’e cuadro-pa, hetaitépe, oñemoĩva’ekue Ñandejára rupive? Ko’ã mokõi Cuadro [1843 ha 1850 Cuadro-kuéra] oñemoĩva’ekue Ñandejára rupive.
These two Charts are a fulfillment of Habakkuk 2.
Ko’ã mokõi Ta’anga Ojekuaaukaha niko peteĩ ñemyanyhẽ Habacuc 2-peguáicha.
—"There is something light, lovely, and heavenly in the representation of the angels on the charts. The mind is almost imperceptibly led to God and heaven. But the other charts that have been gotten up disgust the mind, and cause the mind to dwell more on earth than heaven. Images representing angels look more like fiends than beings of heaven. I saw that the charts had for days and weeks occupied Brother Case's mind when he should have been seeking heavenly wisdom from God, and should have been growing in graces of the Spirit and the knowledge of the truth.
—“Oĩ mba’e tesakã, porã ha yvagagua umi ánhel oñerrepresentáva umi kuatia’atãme. Akã py’apy’ỹ hag̃uáicha ogueraha mbeguekatu hag̃uáicha Tupã ha yvága gotyo. Péro ambue kuatia’atã oñembosako’íva ombojeguaru akãme, ha ojapo akã opyta hag̃uave yvy rehe rangue yvága rehe. Ta’ãnga ohechaukáva ánhelpe ojoguave aña hag̃ua umi yvagagua rekovekuérape rangue. Ahecha umi kuatia’atã ára ha arapokõindy pukukue omyenyhẽ hague Hermano Case akã, ha’e ohekava’erãmo’ã arandu yvagagua Tupãgui, ha okakuaava’erãmo’ã pe Espíritu grásiakuérape ha añeteguáva kuaápe.
"I saw that if the means that has been wasted in getting out charts had been spent in getting out the truth clear before the brethren in publishing tracts, etc., it would have done much good and saved souls. I saw that the chart-making business has spread like the fever." Manuscript Releases, number 13, 359; 1853.
“Ahechakuaa pe tembiporu oñembyai vaekue ojejapo hag̃ua ta’anga aty guasu hag̃ua, ojeiporu rire ojekuaauka hag̃ua pe añetegua hesakã porã hag̃ua pehẽngue kuérape, oñemoherakuãvo tratádo kuéra, hamba’e rupi, ojapóta va’ekue heta porã ha osalváta va’ekue ánga kuérape. Ahechakuaa pe negocio ojejapóva ta’anga rehegua oñemyasãi hague tatarendy rasyicha.” Manuscript Releases, número 13, 359; 1853.
The 1290 and 1335 Days
Umi 1290 ha 1335 Ára
I have following an article from the Review and Herald, January 28, 1858. The reason I have it in your notes is because you can see that in 1858 they are still teaching that the Daily is Paganism. You have it in your reference, eight years after 1850 they still understand the Daily is Paganism.
Cheguereko peteĩ artículo osẽva Review and Herald-pe, 28 jasypateĩ 1858-pe. Mba’érepa areko pende kuatiahaipe ha’e hag̃ua ikatu hag̃uáicha pehecha 1858-pe gueteri ombo’e hikuái pe “Daily” ha’eha paganismo. Peguereko upéva pene referénciape; 1850 rire ocho ary haguépe gueteri ontende hikuái pe “Daily” ha’eha paganismo.
"ANOTHER important prophetic period upon which the Advent doctrine is based, is the 1335 days of Daniel 12, with which the 1290 days are so intimately connected. These two periods are introduced to us as follows:
“Ambue profético iñimportantetéva hi’ári oñemopyenda pe doctrina Adventista, ha’e hína pe 1335 ára Daniel 12-pe guare, ndive umi 1290 ára ojoajúva hendive peteĩchaite. Ko’ã mokõi período oñemombe’u ñandéve kóicha:”
"—And from the time that the daily (sacrifice) shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. Blessed is he that waiteth and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days. But go thou thy way till the end be; for thou shalt rest and stand in thy lot at the end of the days.' Daniel 12:11–13.
“—Ha umi ára oñemboguejýta guive pe sacrificio ára ha ára gua, ha oñemoĩta guive pe mba’e vai oporomongu’i hag̃uáicha, ohasáta mil mokõi cien noventa ára. Ojehovasa pe oha’arõva ha oguahẽva mil mbohapy cien treinta y cinco árape. Ha nde, tereho nde rape pe paha peve; reñeno hag̃uáicha ha repu’ãta nde rréndape umi ára paha gotyópe.” Daniel 12:11–13.
"The questions at once arise, Can we tell what the events are, from which these periods are to be dated; and if so, can we tell when they took place? We first enquire. What is the—'daily' (sacrifice) and the —abomination that maketh desolate'? It will be noticed that the word, sacrifice, is in italics: denoting that it is a supplied word. The same will be noticed in the other instances of its occurrence in the book of Daniel, viz., chapter 11:31 and 8:11–13. Let us briefly refer to this latter chapter. In verse 13 it will be observed that two desolations are brought to view; the daily (desolation,) and the transgression of desolation. This fact is made so plain by Josiah Litch that we cannot do better than quote his language:*
“Umi porandu py’aguasu voi ko’ãva: Ikatúpa jaikuaa mba’éichapa umi tembiapo ojehechakuaa hag̃ua ko’ã ára yvýpe; ha upéicha ramo, ikatúpa jaikuaa araka’épa oiko raka’e? Ñepyrũrã ñaporandu: Mba’épa pe —‘tapiaitegua’ (sacrificio) ha pe —‘mba’e vai omoñembyahýiva’? Ojehechakuaáta pe ñe’ẽ, sacrificio, oĩha letra cursívape: upéva he’iseha peteĩ ñe’ẽ oñemoĩva’ekue omoañete hag̃ua pe frase. Upéicha avei ojehechakuaáta ambue hendápe osẽ jave pe kuatia Daniel-pe, he’iséva, capítulo 11:31 ha 8:11–13-pe. Ñañemoĩmi ko capítulo pahápe. Versículo 13-pe ojehecháta mokõi ñemombyahy ojehechaukaha; pe tapiaitegua (ñemombyahy), ha pe tembiapovai ñemombyahygua. Ko añetegua Josiah Litch omyesakã porãiterei, upévare ndaikatúi jajapo mba’e iporãvéva oñe’ẽ hag̃ua hese, síno ñacita hag̃ua iñe’ẽtee:*”
"—The daily sacrifice is the present reading of the text; but no such thing as sacrifice is found in the original. This is acknowledged on all hands. It is a gloss or construction put upon it by the translators. The true reading is, "the daily and the transgression of desolation;" daily and transgression being connected together by "and" the daily desolation and the transgression of desolation. They are two desolating powers which were to desolate the Sanctuary and the host.'
"—Pe sacrificio ára ha’e pe jeporavo ko’ãgagua pe jehaipyre rehegua; ha katu mba’eveichagua sacrificio ndojejuhúi pe ypykue guive. Kóva oñemoneĩ opa hendáicha. Ha’e peteĩ glosa térã peteĩ ñemohenda omoĩva hese umi traduktór. Pe jehecha añetéva ha’e: “pe ára ha pe tembiapo vai ñehundi rehegua”; ára ha tembiapo vai ojoaju oñondive “ha” rupive, pe ñehundi ára ha pe tembiapo vai ñehundi rehegua. Mokõi pokatu ohundíva hína umi va’ekue ohundi hag̃ua pe Santuario ha pe ehérsito."
"From this it is evident that the —daily,' can have no reference to the Jewish worship to which it has been applied by the older and more prevalent opinion; and this is further evident from the consideration that if these periods, taken either literally or figuratively, be dated from any taking away of this worship, they do not bring us to any event whatever worthy of note.
Kóva risã porã porã ha’e hag̃ua pe “—diaria” ndaikatuiha oguereko mba’eveichagua referencia pe jerureha judía rehe, upe mba’épe oñemoĩva’ekue pe opinión ymavegua ha hetaitevéva rupi; ha kóva ojekuaa porãve avei ñañeconsiderávo ko’ã período, taha’e literalmente térã figurativamente, oñemboykéramo oimeraẽ jepe upe jerureha ñemboipe’a guive, noñeguerahaiha ñandéve mba’eveichagua acontecimiento ojehechakuaáva hag̃ua.
"The daily and the abomination then, are two desolating powers which were to oppress the church: can we ascertain what these powers are? We have only to adopt William Miller's method of reasoning on this point to arrive at the same conclusion with him. He says:
“Upéicharõ, pe ára ha ára rehegua ha pe ñembyai ñembojeguarúva ha’e mokõi pu’aka ombyai hag̃uáva, ojejopýva’erã pe tupão rehe: ikatúpa jaikuaa mba’épa ko’ã pu’aka? Tekotevẽnte ñamoneĩ William Miller remiandu rape ko punto-pe, jahupyty hag̃ua hendive peteĩchagua ñe’ẽmbyky. He’i:
"—I read on, and could find no other case in which if [the daily] was found but in Daniel. I then [by the aid of a concordance] took those words which stood in connection with it, —take away;' —he shall take away the daily'; —from the time that the daily shall be taken away'; &c. I read on and thought I should find no light on the text. Finally I came to 2 Thessalonians 2:7, 8, —For the mystery of iniquity doth already work; only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way, and then shall that wicked be revealed.'&c. And when I had come to that text, O, how clear and glorious the truth appeared! There it is! That is —the daily!' Well, now, what does Paul mean by —he who now letteth' or hindereth? By —the Man of Sin,' and the —wicked,' Popery is meant. Well what is it which hinders Popery from being revealed? Why it is Paganism. Well, then, —the daily' must mean Paganism.'+
“—Amoñe’ẽve ha ndaikatúi ajuhu ambue kásope ojejuhuhápe [pe ára ha ára] ndaha’éiramo Daniel-pe año. Upéi [peteĩ concordancia pytyvõ rupive] aipyhýi umi ñe’ẽ oĩva hendive joajúpe, —tojepe’a; —ha’e oipe’áta pe ára ha ára; —pe ára guive pe ára ha ára ojepe’áva; &c. Amoñe’ẽve ha apensa ndajuhumo’ãiha mba’eve tesape’ẽva pe texto rehe. Ipahápe ajuhu 2 Tesalonicenses 2:7, 8, —Pe teko añáme’ẽ ñemimby niko omba’apóma; peteĩnte oĩ ko’ág̃a ojoko hag̃uáicha, ojeipe’a pe tapegui peve, ha upérõta ojehechauka pe ivaíva.’ &c. Ha og̃uahẽvo upe texto-pe, ¡ajépa hesakã ha hechapyrãite pe añetegua! ¡Upépe oĩ! ¡Upéva hína —pe ára ha ára!’ Ko’ág̃a, mba’épa he’ise Pablo —pe ko’ág̃a ojokóva’ térã omo’ãva? —Pe Kuimba’e Angaipa reheve, ha pe —ivaíva,’ oje’éva hína pe Papado. Mba’épa, upéicharõ, pe ojokóva pe Papado ani hag̃ua ojehechauka? Mba’ére, upéva hína pe Paganismo. Upéicharõ, —pe ára ha ára’ he’iseva’erã pe Paganismo.’+”
"We see from Daniel 8, that it is the little horn, which succeeded the goat, or Grecian empire, that takes away the —daily;' and it is the only power brought to view after the division of Alexander's kingdom down to the time when the Sanctuary should be cleansed at the end of the 2300 days. This little horn we have in its proper place showed to be Rome taken as a unit, corresponding with the fourth kingdom of Daniel's other visions. Now it is a fact that a change did take place in the Roman power from Paganism to Papacy. Paganism from the days of the Assyrian kings down to the time of its modification into Popery, had been the daily, or as Professor Whiting renders it, —the continual' desolation, by which Satan had stood up against the cause of Jehovah. In its priests, its altars and its sacrifices, it bore resemblance to the Levitical form of Jehovah's worship; but when the Levitical gave place to the Christian form of worship, Satan, in order to successfully oppose the work, must change also his form of opposition; hence the temples, altars and statues of Paganism are baptized into the blasphemies of Popery.
“Jahecha Daniel 8-gui, pe mimbipa michĩva, omyengovi va'ekue kavara térã Grécia retã guasu rire, ha'e pe omboykéva pe — ára ha ára guare; ha ha'eñoite pe pu'aka ojehechaukáva Alejandro rréino oñemboja'o rire guive pe ára peve oñemopotĩ va'erã pe Tupaópe 2300 ára paha gotyo. Kóva mimbipa michĩva rohechauka va'ekue hendápe porãha Roma, peteĩ joaju ramo jepe, oñembojojáva Daniel rembiporu ambuépe pe irundyha rréino rehe. Ko'ág̃a añetehápe oiko hague peteĩ ñemoambue pe pu'aka romano-pe, paganis mógui papado peve. Paganismo, umi mburuvicha guasu Asiria-pegua ára guive pe ára peve oñemoambuehague Popery-pe, ha'e va'ekue pe ára ha ára guare, térã, Profesor Whiting ombohasaháicha, — pe tapiaitegua' ñehundi, upéva rupive Satanás oñembo'y va'ekue Jehová rembipota rehe. Ipa'ikuéra, i'altar-kuéra ha isakrifísio-kuérape, oguereko va'ekue peteĩ joguaha pe Jehová ñemomba'e Leví rembiapokue rehegua ndive; ha katu pe forma levítica ome'ẽ jave hendaguépe pe forma cristiana ñemomba'e rehegua, Satanás, ikatu hag̃uáicha oñemoĩ porã pe tembiapo rovái, tekotevẽkuri avei omoambue iñemoĩrã; upévare umi tupao, altar ha ta'anga paganismo-pegua oñemongarai pe Popery ñe'ẽvaiete kuérape.”
"But the daily, Paganism, is said in the prophecy, to have a sanctuary, and the place of its sanctuary was to be cast down. That a sanctuary is frequently connected with idolatry and heathenism, as the place of its devotion and worship, is evident from the following scriptures: Isaiah 16:12; Amos 7:9, 13, margin. Ezekiel 28:18. Concerning the sanctuary of the daily of Daniel 8, we offer the following from Apollos Hale:*
“Pe ára, pe ára pegua, paganismo, he’iháicha pe profesíape, oguereko hag̃ua peteĩ santuario, ha pe tenda isantuario rehegua oñemombo hag̃ua yvýpe. Pe santuario heta jey oñembojoajuha idolatría ha gentilismo ndive, ha’e hag̃ua pe tenda oñeme’ẽhague chupekuéra devoción ha adoración, ojehechauka porã ko’ã Escritura rupi: Isaías 16:12; Amós 7:9, 13, margen. Ezequiel 28:18. Daniel 8 pe ára pegua santuario rehegua, rome’ẽ ko’ãva Apollos Hale-gui:*”
"—What can be meant by the —sanctuary' of Paganism? Paganism, and error of every kind, have their sanctuaries, as well as truth. These are the temples or asylums consecrated to their service. Some particular and renowned temple of Paganism may, then, be supposed to be here spoken of. Which of its numerous distinguished temples may it be? One of the most magnificent specimens of classic architecture is called the Pantheon. Its name signifies the —temple or asylum of all the gods.' The place of its location is Rome.+ The idols of the nations conquered by the Romans were sacredly deposited in some niche or department of this temple, and in many cases became objects of worship by the Romans themselves. Could we find a temple of Paganism that was more strikingly —his sanctuary.'"
—Mbaʼépa heʼise ikatúva pe —santuario' paganis-mo rehegua? Paganismo, ha opaichagua jejavy, oguereko avei isantuario-kuéra, añeteguáicha pe añetegua. Umíva hína umi témpolo térã tenda ñemoʼã oñembosakraméva iservísio-pe g̃uarã. Ikatu, upéicharõ, oñeñeʼẽ koʼápe peteĩ témpolo pagano rehe, ijojahaʼỹva ha herakuãetéva. Mávapa ikatu oime umi heta témpolo porãitéva apytépe? Peteĩva umi techapyrã ijeguasuvéva arquitectura clásica rehegua hérava Pantheon. Héra heʼise —opa umi tupãnguéra róga térã tenda ñemoʼã.' Oĩhápe hína Roma.+ Umi tetãnguéra romano-kuéra ogana vaʼekue taʼanga tupãnguéra oñeñongatu marangatúpe peteĩteĩva peteĩ niche térã peteĩ departamento ko témpolo-pe, ha heta kásope oiko avei hikuái mbaʼejerureha romano-kuéra jehegui. Ikatúne piko jajuhu peteĩ témpolo pagano rehegua ikatúva oñemombeʼu hesakãvévo ha mbaretevévo —isantuario' ramo?
"Having now ascertained that the daily is Paganism, and the transgression of desolation, or —the abomination that maketh desolate,' is the Papacy, and that the especial sanctuary of Paganism was the Pantheon, and that the —place' of its location was Rome, we inquire further.
Koʼág̃a ñamombeʼúma porã porã rire pe ára ha ára haʼehague paganismo, ha pe jejavy ñehundi rehegua, térã —pe mbaʼe jeguaru ombyaíva opa mbaʼeʼỹ hag̃uáicha,— haʼehague Papado, ha avei pe santuario poravopyre paganis-mo rehegua hague Pantheon, ha pe —tenda— oĩhagueha Roma, ñaporanduve.
"1. Was Paganism —taken away' by the Roman civil power? The following statement of an important and well-known fact in the history of the church and world, we think answers to the prophecy. It refers to Constantine the first Christian emperor, and says:
“1. ¿Paganismo-pa —ojeipe’a va’ekue— mburuvicha guasu romano poguýpe? Ko’ẽ va’e ñe’ẽmondo peteĩ mba’e añetegua tuicha ha ojekuaáva porã tupaópe ha yvy ape ári rembiasakuepe, ore roimo’ã ombohováiha upe profesía. Oñe’ẽ Constantino rehe, pe emperador cristiano peteĩha, ha he’i péicha:”
"—His first act of government was the dispatch of an edict throughout the empire, exhorting his subjects to embrace Christianity.'++
—Ha tembiapo tenondegua mburuvicharã ramo vaʼekue hína peteĩ decreto omyasãiva opa rupi pe império pukukue javeve, omokyreʼỹ hag̃ua hemimboyguápe oguerovia hag̃ua pe cristianismo.
"2. Was Rome the city or place of his sanctuary, (the Pantheon,) cast down by the authority of the State? The following extract answers:
“2. ¿Róma piko ra’e táva térã lugar iñembyahýiha guare, (el Panteón,) oñemombo yvýre Estado pokatu rupi? Pe ñeguenohẽ oúva ombohovái:”
"—The death of the last rival of Constantine had sealed the peace of the empire. Rome was once more the undisputed queen of nations. But, in that hour of elevation and splendor, she had been raised to the edge of a precipice. Her next step was to be downward and irrecoverable. The change of the government to Constantinople still perplexes the historian. It was an act in direct repugnance to the whole course of the ancient and honorable prejudices of the Roman mind. It was the work of no luxurious Asiatic, devoted to the indulgences of eastern customs and climates, but an iron conqueror, born in the west, and contemptuous, like all Romans, of the habits of the orientals; it was the work of a keen politician, yet it was impolitic in the most palpable degree. Yet Constantine abandoned Rome, the great citadel and throne of the Caesars, for an obscure corner of Thrace, and expended the remainder of his vigorous and ambitious life in the double toil of raising a colony into the capital of his empire, and degrading the capital into the feeble honors and humiliated strength of a colony.'*
—Pe último rival de Constantino ñemano ombotyva’ekue mburuvichaguasu py’aguapy. Roma oiko jey va’ekue tetãnguéra rréina ojehecharamóva’ỹ hag̃uáicha. Péro upe yvate ha jeguerohory aravópe, oñemoĩmava’ekue yvyra’ã apýra rembe’ýpe. Ipyhyrã ambuéva oho va’erã va’ekue yvýguo gotyo ha ndaikatumo’ãvéima ojere jey. Tekove ñeisãmbyhy ñemoambue Constantinópe peve gueteri ombohory hag̃ua tembiasakuaahárape. Upéva ha’e va’ekue peteĩ tembiapo oĩva mbarete hag̃uáicha peteĩchaite opu’ãvo opaite yma guare Roma arandu ha jerovia porãitéva rehe. Ndaha’éi va’ekue peteĩ asiático heko porãvagui, oñeme’ẽmbáva kuarahyresẽ gotyo jepokuaa ha yvytu rekohápe gua’u hag̃ua, síno peteĩ ñorairõhára akãratã, heñóiva kuarahyreike gotyo, ha oporombohory’ỹva, opaite romano-kuéraicha, orientál-kuéra jepokuaakuére; ha’e va’ekue peteĩ polítiko hesakã porãva rembiapo, upéicharõ jepe, ndaiporãi hag̃ua oñeporandu hag̃uáicha hesakã porãvéva rupi. Upéicharõ jepe, Constantino ohejareí Roma, pe táva guasu hatã ha César-kuéra guapyha, ha oiporu hekovia hekovére hembipota ha imbarete guive opa peve mokõi tembiapo pohýi rehe: omoingove jey hag̃ua peteĩ kolónia pe tetã guasu itavusu ramo, ha omboguejy hag̃ua pe tavusu iñemomba’e michĩ ha ipokatu ñemomirĩmbyme peteĩ kolónia rekópe.'*
"This record from the pen of the historian is too plain to need comment. The place of his sanctuary was cast down, says the prophecy; and after a statement of facts like the above, the most fastidious in prophetic interpretation must be satisfied of its application.
Ko jehaipyre tembiasakue rembiapógui hesakãiterei ha natekotevẽi ñe’ẽmondo. Iñembo’ehao renda oñemombo yvýpe, he’i pe profesía; ha upeichagua mba’e oikóva je’e rire, umi oikekatupyrývéva jepe profesía ñemyesakãme oĩva’erã ovy’ápe pe jejeporúre.
"From the time that the daily shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. Blessed is he that waiteth and cometh to the thousand three hundred five and thirty days. With the facts before us that the daily is Paganism, that the abomination that maketh desolate is the Papacy, that there was a change from the former to the latter in the Roman power, and by the authority of State we have but to inquire further when this took place in a manner to fulfill the prophecy; for if we can ascertain this, we have the starting point from which the prophetic periods in the text before us are to be dated. Therefore,
“Pe ára pe sacrificio ára haʼéva ojeipeʼárõ guive, ha oñemopuʼã hag̃ua pe mbaʼe jeguaru oporomondoro hag̃uáva, oikóta mil mokõi ciento noventa ára. Ojehovasáva hína pe ohaʼarõva ha oguahẽva mil trescientos treinta y cinco árape. Umi mbaʼe añetegua ñande renondépe oĩva reheve, pe sacrificio ára haʼéha pe Paganismo, pe mbaʼe jeguaru oporomondoro hag̃uáva haʼéha pe Papado, oĩhague peteĩ ñemoambue peteĩva guive ambuépe pe mbarete romano ryepýpe, ha Estado pokatu rupive, tekotevẽnte ñaporandu hag̃ua arakaʼépa ko mbaʼe oiko peteĩ hendáicha omoañetévo pe profesía; péicha, ikatúramo jaikuaa upéva, jarekóta pe ñepyrũmby oñemoĩ hag̃uápe umi período profesiagua ojeʼéva ko texto ñande renondépe. Upévare,”
"3. When did the event referred to in the prophecy take place? Let it be observed, the question is not, when were the saints given into the hands of the Papacy, but when had the change of religion from Paganism to Papacy been so far effected as to make the latter the national religion, and place it in a condition to start upon its career. This, like all other great revolutions, was not the work of a moment. Its incipient workings were manifest long before. Paul said that even in his day the mystery of iniquity, the Man of Sin, the —abomination that maketh desolate,' was already at work. And it is in the light of this scripture that we must understand our Lord's words in Mathew 24:15, concerning the abomination of desolation, where he makes evident reference to Daniel 9:27. For although Paganism had not given place to the Papacy in the year 70 when Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans we do understand that the power which then appeared modified somewhat in name and form, was the very power that should, as the abomination of desolation, wear out the saints and desolate the church of the Most High.
“3. Araka’e oiko pe mba’e oje’éva profesíape? Tojehechakuaa porãke, pe porandu ndaha’éi: araka’epa umi santo oñeme’ẽ va’ekue Papado pópe, síno araka’épa pe ñeambue tupãrégui paganisímo guive Papado peve oñemohu’ã kuri peichaháicha, upéicha hag̃ua pe ipahague oiko tetã rembijerovia ramo, ha oñemoĩ peteĩ tekotevẽme oñepyrũ hag̃uáicha hembiapo rape. Kóva, opa ambue revolución tuichávaicha, ndaha’éi va’ekue peteĩ sapy’ánte oikóva rembiapo. Iñepyrũmby rembiapo ojehechauka va’ekue ymaite guive. Pablo he’i va’ekue voi hi’árape pe mba’eñemimby aña rehegua, pe Kuimba’e Pekadogua, pe —mba’e jeguaru oporomombyrýva’—, ojapoha hína hembiapo. Ha ko Escritura rehegua hesakãme jahupytyva’erã ñande Ruvicha ñe’ẽ Mateo 24:15-pe, pe mba’e jeguaru oporomombyrýva rehegua, upépe ha’e ohechauka porã Daniel 9:27 rehegua. Pórke jepe paganisímo ndohejái gueteri hendaguápe Papadope áño 70-pe, Jerusalén oñehundi ramo guare umi romano-kuéra rupive, roikuaa porã pe pu’aka upérõ ojehechaukáva, michĩmi oñemoambuéva téra ha forma-pe, ha’ehaite pe pu’aka va’erã, pe mba’e jeguaru oporomombyrýva ramo, ombopy’arasy umi santo-pe ha omombyry pe Tupã Yvatetegua iglesia.”
"Up to the time of the conversion of Clovis, king of France, which took place in 496, the French and other nations of western Rome were Pagan; but subsequent to that event the efforts to convert idolaters to Christ were crowned with great success. It is said that the conversion of Clovis gave rise to the custom of addressing the French monarch with the titles of Most Christian Majesty and Eldest Son of the Church.+ Between that time and A.D. 508 by "alliances," "capitulations" and conquests, "the Avborici," the "Roman garrisons in the west," Brittany, the Burgundians and the Visigoths, were brought into subjection.'++
Pe época peñemoñepyrũ Clovis, Francia ruvicha guasu, oikova’ekue ary 496-pe, umi francés ha ambue tetãnguéra Roma kuarahyreike gotyopegua ha’e va’ekue pagano; péro upe mba’e rire, umi ñeha’ã ombojerovia hag̃ua umi ta’ãnga rehegua Cristo-pe oñemohu’ã heta jehupyty porã reheve. He’íje Clovis ñemoambue ome’ẽ hague ñepyrũ jepokuaápe oñehenói hag̃ua mburuvicha guasu francés-pe ko’ã téra reheve: Most Christian Majesty ha Eldest Son of the Church.+ Upe ára guive ha A.D. 508 peve, “joaju rupive”, “capitulación rupive” ha ñorairõ jeity rupive, “umi Avborici”, “umi guarnición romana kuarahyreike gotyopegua”, Bretaña, umi burgundio ha umi visigodo, oñemoĩ hag̃ua ipoguýpe.'++
"—Paganism in the western Roman Empire, though it doubtless retarded the progress of the Christian faith, especially in those nations which were molested, as in the case of England, by the inroads of the barbarous clans, who continued idolaters, henceforth had not the power, if it had the disposition to suppress the Catholic faith, or to hinder the encroachments of the Roman Pontiff.
—Paganismo pe Império Romano kuarahyreikegua gotyo, ikatúramo jepe oñembotapykuerẽ pe jerovia cristiana rembiapo ñemotenonde, koʼýte umi tetãnguéra oñemolestavaʼekuépe, Inglaterra-peicha, umi atykuéra bárbara oikéva mbaretépe rupi, opytavaʼekue gueteri taʼangamýi ñemombaʼeguasúpe, koʼág̃a guive ndorekovéima pe puʼaka, oguerekóramo jepe pe pyʼaro, omboyke hag̃ua pe jerovia Católica, térã ojoko hag̃ua pe Papa Romano ñemombaʼeguasu oikejoavývape.
"From that time, the Papal abomination was triumphant, so far as Paganism was concerned. Its future contests were with the other Christian sects, who were always treated as heretics; and with princes who were always treated as rebels or dividers of the body of Christ. The prominent powers of Europe gave up their attachment to Paganism only to perpetuate its abominations in another form; for Paganism needed only to be baptized to become Christian in the Catholic sense; and when the interests or vengeance of its presiding minister made the demand, their possessions and thrones,—perhaps their lives,—must be laid on the altar. SS
Upérõ guive, pe abominasión papal osẽ porãite vaʼekue, pe paganísmo rehegua ramo. Iñorairõrã tenonderã guive haʼe vaʼekue ambue sektakuéra cristiana ndive, umi oñeñangarekóva tapiaite heréhe herético ramo; ha mburuvichakuéra ndive, umi oñeñetratáva tapiaite opuʼãva térã ombojaʼóva Cristo rete ramo. Umi mbarete guasu Europa rehegua oheja ijaso paganísmo rehe, ani hag̃ua peteĩchante hag̃ua, síno ombojoaju hag̃ua iñabominasiónkuéra ambue formape; paganísmo ningo oikotevẽnte vaʼekue oñemongarai hag̃ua ikatu hag̃uáicha oiko cristiano sentido católico-pe; ha ijapytepekuéra pe ministro oguapýva tenonde gotyo remikotevẽ térã ipyahẽ hag̃ua ojeporu vove, ijáravaʼekue ha iguapyhára guasu,—ikatu hag̃uáicha hekove voi,—oñemoĩvaʼerã pe altár ári. SS
"* Prophetic Exposition, Volume 1, 127.
* Ñemyesakã Maranduhára, Volumen 1, 127.
"+ Goodrich's Universal Hist. and Gutherie's Geog.'
"+ Hist. Universal de Goodrich ha Geog. de Gutherie."
"+ Mosheim Christian History, Volume 1, 132, 133.
+ Mosheim Historia Cristiana, Volumen 1, 132, 133.
"In England, Arthur, the first Christian king, founded the Christian worship on the ruins of the Pagan.* Rapin, who claims to be more exact in the chronology of events in his history, states that he was elected monarch of Britain in 508. Book 2, 129.
Inglatérrape, Artur, mburuvicha guasu kristiáno peteĩha, omoheñói pe ñemomba’e guasu kristiáno pe pagáno rembyaikuére.* Rapin, he’íva ijehegui oikoha hag̃ua hendaitépeve umi mba’e oikóva cronología rehegua hembiasakuepe, he’i hese ojeporavo hague chupe Britania mburuvicha guasúrõ ary 508-pe. Aranduka 2, 129.
"What was the condition of the See of Rome at this time? —Symmachus was Pope from 498 or 9 to 514. His pontificate was distinguished by these remarkable circumstances and events:
“Mba’éichapa oĩkuri upe jave Roma Renda Apostólica rekotee? —Symmachus ha’e va’ekue Papa ary 498 térã 499 guive 514 peve. Ipapado oñembyesakã porã ko’ã tekove ojehecharamóva ha mba’e oikova’ekue rehe:”
"1. He —left Paganism' when he entered the —church of Rome.'
"1. Ha’e —ohejáva va’ekue paganísmo' oike jave —iglesia de Roma'-pe."
"2. He found his way to the Papal chair by striving with his competitor even unto blood. Du Pin.
“2. Oguahẽ kuri pe tenda papálpe oñorãirõvo icompetidór ndive huguy peve. Du Pin.”
"3. By the adulation paid to him as the successor of St. Peter.
“3. Ojehecharamo chupe San Pedro rembiekovia ramo.”
"4. By the excommunication of the Emperor Anastasius.+
“4. Mburuvicha Guasu Anastasio oñemosẽ haguére tupãóguigui.+”
"—How much,' says Mosheim, —the opinions of some were favorable to the lordly demands of the Roman Pontiffs, may be easily imagined from an expression of Ennodius, that infamous and extravagant flatterer of Symmachus, who was a prelate of ambiguous fame. This parasitical panegyrist, among other impertinent assertions maintained that the Pontiff was constituted judge in the place of God, which he filled as the Vicegerent of the Most High.'++
“—Mboypaite peve, —he’i Mosheim, —ikatu hag̃uáicha oñeimo’ã umi temiandu oĩva apytépe oipytyvõha umi jerure mburuvichagua umi Pontífice Romano-kuéra rehegua, ikatu hag̃uáicha ojehechakuaa pya’e peteĩ ñe’ẽjoavy Ennodius rehegua rupi, upe adulador vai ha ijapýra Symmachus rehegua, peteĩ prelado héra mokõive hendáicha oñeñe’ẽva. Ko panegirista parasítico, ambue he’íva ndaikatúiva hag̃uáicha, omantene va’ekue avei Pontífice oñemoĩ hague juez ramo Tupã rendaguépe, upe omyenyhẽva’ekue Yvatevéva Rembigueroviaha ramo.”++
"By the strength secured to the Catholic cause in the west, by these successes, and the agency of the vicars, and other agents of the See of Rome, the Papal party in Constantinople were —placed' in a position to justify open hostilities in behalf of their master at Rome. In 508 the whirlwind of fanaticism and civil war swept in fire and blood through the streets of the eastern capital.'
“Katolikokuéra rembipotápe oguerekóva mbarete ojehupytýva Kuarahyreike gotyo, ko’ã jehupytyrã rupive, ha umi vikário ha ambue agente-kuéra Róma Rendy guigua rembiapo rupive, pe aty papal Constantinopla-pe oĩkuri —moĩmbyre’ peteĩ tenda ojehechakuaa hag̃uáicha ñorairõ jehechaukáva hesakã hag̃uáicha hóga jararã Róma-pe oĩvape rehehápe. Ary 508-pe pe yvytu atã fanatismo ha ñorairõ civil rehegua ohasákuri tata ha tuguy reheve tetã tenda guasu kuarahyresẽgua tape rupi.”
"Gibbon, under the years 508–514, speaking of the commotions in Constantinople, says —The statues of the emperor were broken, and his person was concealed in a suburb, till, at the end of three days, he dared to implore the mercy of his subjects. [Popery is triumphant.] Without his diadem, and in the posture of a suppliant, Anastasius appeared on the throne of the circus. The Catholics, before his face, rehearsed the genuine Trisagion; they exulted in the offer which he proclaimed by the voice of a herald, of abdicating the purple; they listened to the admonition, that, since all could not reign, they should previously agree in the choice of a sovereign; and they accepted the blood of two unpopular ministers, whom their master, without hesitation, condemned to the lions. These furious but transient seditions were encouraged by the success of Vitalian, who with his army of Huns and Bulgarians, for the most part idolaters, declared himself the champion of the Catholic faith. In this pious rebellion he depopulated Thrace, besieged Constantinople, exterminated sixty-five thousand of his fellow Christians, till he obtained the recall of the bishops, the satisfaction of the Pope, and the establishment of the council of Chalcedon, an orthodox treaty, reluctantly signed by the dying Anastasius, and more faithfully performed by the uncle of Justinian. And such was the event of the first of the religious wars which have been waged in the name, and by the disciples, of the God of Peace." SS
Gibbon, ary 508–514-pe, oñeʼẽvo umi sarambi rehe Constantinopla-pe, heʼi — Mburuvicha guasu raʼangakue oñembyai, ha haʼe voi okañy peteĩ táva jerére, mbohapy ára paha peve, upérõ ramo añoite osẽ hag̃ua ojerure hag̃ua poriahuvereko hembiguáikuérape. [Papismo ipuʼakaite.] Iñakãrãngaʼỹre, ha peteĩ ojerure asy hag̃uáicha oĩvo, Anastasio ojehechauka tróno ári, círco-pe. Umi católico, hova renondépe, omombeʼu jevy pe Trisagion añeteguáva; ovyʼa hikuái pe marandu rehe, peteĩ maranduha ñeʼẽ rupive haʼe omoherakuãva, ohejáta hag̃ua pe pytã saʼy mburuvicharã; ohendu hikuái pe momarandu, ikatuʼỹgui maymáva ogoverna, oĩvaʼerãha peteĩ ñeʼẽme hag̃ua peteĩ mburuvicha jeporavorã rehe; ha omoneĩ hikuái mokõi ministro ndogustáiva tuguy, umívape ijára, mbaʼeve hag̃ua ndojepyʼapýi, omondo vaʼekue umi león kuérape. Koʼã puʼaka vai pyaʼe hag̃uáva, jepe sapyʼagua, oñemokyreʼỹ Vitaliano ñembotavy rehe, haʼe iñehérsito húngaro ha búlgaro ndive, hetavéva taʼanga rehe ojeroviáva, omoherakuãva ijehe pe jerovia católica ñorairõhára ramo. Ko marangatúva heʼíva guýpe opuʼãvo, omondaipa Tracia, omongoraʼe Constantinopla, ojuka peteĩchagua cristianokuérape sesenta y cinco mil, peve ohupyty jey hag̃ua umi obispo jegueru, Papa satisfacción, ha concilio de Calcedonia ñemopyenda, peteĩ ñeʼẽmeʼẽ ortodoxa, Anastasio omanombotýva pyʼa mokõi hag̃uáicha ohaíva, ha Justiniano túvaʼy rupive iporãve hag̃uáicha oñemboguata vaʼekue. Ha péicha oiko pe ñorairõ religioso peteĩha apytégui, umi oñorairõ vaʼekue Tekojoja Jára rérape ha umi hapykuéri omoirũva rupive. SS
"With the following extract from Appollos Hale, we close the testimony on this point: —We now invite our modern Gamaliels to take a position with us in the place of the sanctuary of Paganism (since claimed as the "patrimony of St. Peter") in 508. We look a few years into the past, and the rude Paganism of the northern barbarians is pouring down upon the nominally Christian empire of Western Rome—triumphing everywhere—and its triumphs everywhere distinguished by the most savage cruelty. . . . The empire falls and is broken into fragments. One by one the lords and rulers of these fragments, abandon their Paganism and profess the Christian faith. In religion the conquerors are yielding to the conquered. But still Paganism is triumphant. Among its supporters there is one stern and successful conqueror. (Clovis.) But soon he also bows before the power of the new faith and becomes its champion. He is still triumphant, but, as a hero and conqueror, reaches the zenith at the point we occupy, A.D. 508.
Ko ñe’ẽmondo oúva Appollos Hale-gui rupive, romohu’ã ko témare pe testimónio: —Ko’ág̃a roinvita ñane Gamaliel-kuéra ko’ẽrõguápe tojagarra peteĩ tenda ore ndive paganísmo santuario rendápe (upéi oñe’ẽva hese “San Pedro tembiapoukapy teéramo”) ary 508-pe. Ma’ẽmi rojevy mbovymi ary rapykuévo, ha pe paganísmo vai ha ñarõva umi bárbaro yvate gotyogua rehegua oñemboguejy hína pe império Romagua Kuarahyreikévo gotyo, hérava cristiano añetetépe’ỹ—ipu’aka opa hendápe—ha ijehupytykue opa hendápe ojehechauka pe tekorasy ha ñañaite hag̃ua. . . . Pe império ho’a ha oñembyaipa peteĩchagua pehẽnguépe. Peteĩteĩ umi mburuvicha ha sãmbyhyhára ko’ã pehẽnguepegua, oheja hikuái ipaganísmo ha omombe’u hikuái ogueroviaha pe jerovia cristiana. Tupãrayhúpe umi ipu’akáva oñeme’ẽ hína umi oñemomba’éva pópe. Péro paganísmo gueteri ipu’aka. Umi omombaretéva apytépe oĩ peteĩ ñorairõhára hatã ha osẽporãva. (Clovis.) Péro pya’e avei ha’e oñesũ pe jerovia pyahu pu’aka renondépe ha oiko chugui pe ñemoherakuãhára. Ha’e gueteri ipu’aka, péro, peteĩ kuimba’e py’aguasu ha ñorairõhára ramo, og̃uahẽ ijyvatevévape pe punto jahupytyhápe, A.D. 508.
"—In or near the same year, the last important subdivision of the fallen empire is publicly, and by the coronation of its triumphant —monarch' Christianized.
—Pe ary mboyve upe arýpe, pe ñemboja’o paha iñimportánteva pe mburuvicha guasu ho’áva rehegua oñemoingoveha cristianorã tetãygua renondépe, ha pe ikarãi pu’akapáva —“mburuvicha guasu”— oñemongoronágui.
"—The pontiff for the period on which we stand is a recently converted Pagan. The bloody contest which placed him in the chair was decided by the interposition of an Arian king. He is bowed to and saluted as filling —the place of God on earth.' The senate is so far under his power, that, on suspicion that the interests of the See of Rome demand it, they excommunicate the emperor. . . . In 508 the mine is sprung beneath the throne of the Eastern Empire. The result of the confusion and strife it occasions is the humiliation of its rightful lord. Now the question is, at what time was Paganism so far suppressed, as to make room for its substitute and successor, the Papal abomination? When was this abomination placed in a position to start on its career of blasphemy and blood? Is there any other date for its being "placed," or "set up" in the room of Paganism, but 508? If the mysterious enchantress has not now brought all her victims within her power, she has taken her position, and some have yielded to the fascination.
"—Pe pontífice pe ára ñande jajepy’amondehápe ha’e peteĩ pagano ramoite oñekonvertíva’ekue. Pe ñorairõ huguy ryepýpe omoĩva’ekue chupe pe tenda guasúpe oñemboheko hag̃ua, ojedesidi peteĩ mburuvicha guasu arriano oikévo ipype. Hese oñesũ ha oñemomaitei chupe ku omyenyhẽ hag̃uáicha —‘Tupã renda ko yvy ári’. Pe senado oĩ upéichaite ipoguýpe, ha pe Santa Sede Romagua rembiapo ojeruréva ramo, sospecha rupive jepe, omosẽ Tupã atygui pe mburuvicha guasu. . . . Áño 508-pe pe mina oñemboguejy pe Imperio Oriental guapyha guýpe. Pe sarambi ha ñorairõ upéva omoheñóiva rembiapokue ha’e pe ijára tee ñemomirĩ. Ko’ág̃a pe porandu ha’e: araka’e pe paganismo oñemboguejy ha oñembogue porãkuri hag̃uáicha ome’ẽ hag̃ua tenda hekoviarã ha hekovia hag̃uápe, pe mba’e jeguaru papalpeguápe? Araka’epa ko mba’e jeguaru oñemoĩkuri peteĩ tenda hag̃uápe ikatu hag̃uáicha oñepyrũ heko rape ñe’ẽrei ha tuguy rehegua? Oĩ piko ambue ára ikatúva ñamoĩ hag̃ua hese oñemoĩhague térã oñemboykehague paganismo rendaguépe, ndaha’éiramo 508? Pe kuña paje ñemimbyrã rehegua ndaikatúiramo gueteri ogueru opa umi hembiguái va’erãme ipoguýpe, upéicharamo jepe ha’e oñemoĩma hekopegua tenda rehe, ha oĩma umi ojeityva’ekue upe iporãva ñemohenda poguýpe."
"The others are at length subdued, —and kings, and peoples and multitudes, and nations, and tongues,' are brought under the spell which prepares them, even while —drunken with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus,' to —think they are doing God service,' and to fancy themselves the exclusive favorites of heaven, while becoming an easier and richer prey for the damnation of hell'*
“Ambuekuéra ipahápe oñemoĩ jejopy guýpe, —ha mburuvicha guasu, ha tavayguakuéra, ha aty guasu, ha tetãnguéra, ha ñe’ẽnguéra,’ oñemoĩ upe mba’e pohýi poguýpe ombosako’íva chupekuéra, jepe —oka’u hag̃ua Jesús mártir-kuéra ruguy rehe,’ —oimo’ã hag̃ua ojapoha Tupã rembiapo,’ ha oguerovia hag̃ua ha’eha yvága ñemoĩ porã peteĩete oguerekóva; aja upéicha hikuái oiko hag̃ua peteĩ mbotavyve ha ipirúva heta hag̃ua añaretã ñehundi hag̃ua guarã”*
"We have the date. The —daily' was taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up in 508. Dating from this point the 1290 days or years terminate in 1798 where, as has already been shown, the civil power was stricken from the Pope by the arm of Buonaparte. The 1335 days bring us 45 full years this side of that event.
“Oreko pe ára. Pe —árakatuete’ỹ’ henyhẽ hague ojeipe’a, ha pe mba’e ojeguaraha hag̃ua oporomondýi hag̃ua oñemopu’ã 508-pe. Ojeipapávo ko punto guive, umi 1290 ára térã ary opa 1798-pe, upépe, ojehechaukaháicha voi yma, pe Pope-gui ojeipe’a pe mbarete tetãygua Buonaparte jyva rupive. Umi 1335 ára ogueru ñandéve 45 ary kompletoite upe mba’e oiko va’ekue rire.”
"But some may say, How is it that you make the periods terminate in the past? Does it not read that Daniel should rest and stand in his lot at the end of the days? Certainly; and we believe it. But what is it for Daniel to stand in his lot? This point will come under consideration when we come to an explanation of the passing of the time, and an examination of the events that did take place at the end of the days. Meanwhile we here cast anchor till another week." Review and Herald, January 28, 1858.
“Péro oĩ ikatúva he’i: Mba’éicha piko peẽ pejapo pe umi ára térã arange opa hag̃ua yma guarépe? Ndépa he’i Daniel opytu’úva ha oñembo’yva’erãha ilótepe ára paha opávo? Añetehápe; ha rojerovia upévare. Péro mba’épa he’ise Daniel oñembo’y hag̃ua ilótepe? Ko punto ojehecháta ñamyasãivo pe tiempo hasáva rehegua ñemyesakã, ha ñahesa’ỹijóvo umi mba’e oikova’ekue añetehápe ára paha opávo. Upe aja, ko’ápe roñapytĩ ñande ánkla ambue arapokõindy peve.” Review and Herald, January 28, 1858.
Errors and Dangers of Prescott and Daniells; The Cities to Be Worked
Jejavy ha Peligrokuéra Prescott ha Daniells rehegua; Táva kuéra oñemba’apova’erã hag̃ua hag̃ua hag̃ua hag̃ua Káda pyhare asy porãme, aikuaa va’ekue mba’éichapa che py’ápe oikuaaite hag̃ua pe marandu Ñandejára ome’ẽva chéve pe ñane tavayguakuéra yvypóra guasu rehegua, ha umi oĩva ñembyaty guasúpe jerére. Umi marandu oñeme’ẽ chéve ijetu’u haguére ojehecha hag̃ua umi mba’e vai oikóva umi oĩva apytépe, ha umi ojehupyty va’erã ojehupi hag̃ua umi yvypóra yvate gotyo. Oĩ heta oĩva oikotevẽva peteĩ ñemoambue atyguasu ijyképekuéra ha ipy’apykuérape. Ko’ãga ñande tavaguasu kuéra oñepyrũ ojepe’a hag̃ua Ñandejára renondégui, ha ñane retãme umi marandu oúva opáichagua hendágui ohechauka hína peteĩ ánga py’ahatã ha ndaijojaháiva peteĩme. Ñandejára ára guasu hi’aguĩ. Hi’ãnteva’erã ñandéve ñandepu’ã hag̃ua ñaneporã hag̃ua hag̃ua ko mba’e rehegua. Umi mba’e ojehecháva California-pe oñemoĩva’erã tenonderã rupi umi tavaguasu opáichaguápe. Jahecha heta ñañeha’ã guasu, jepe katu mbovymínte oĩ umi mba’e ojejapóva oikuaa porã ha ojeikuaa hag̃ua pe añetegua ko’ã táva guasúpe. Tekotevẽ oñemoĩ peteĩ tembiapo hatã, oñemboyke’ỹre, hekojoja porãme oñemboguata hag̃ua. Ahecha mbeguekatúpe peteĩ jerovia’ỹ, peteĩ py’a rasy, peteĩ py’ahatã ha peteĩ mba’e ndojekuaaséi ha ndojepotaaséi opoko hína ñane tavayguápe. Umi mba’e avei peẽme peneakãhatã hag̃ua, pejerure’ỹ hag̃ua consejo ha pejerovia umi pende akãgui año rehe. Pe tembiapo oikehápe umi táva guasu noñemotenondéi pe jerovia hatã, pe py’a guasu, ha pe jerovia pya’e va’erãme. Ñandejára naiporandúi ñandéve jajapo hag̃ua oimeraẽ mba’e ndaikatúiva jajapo hag̃ua. Ojerure añónte ñane rembiapo ikatúva hag̃ua jajapo, ha upéi omoĩta ijespíritu marangatúpe ha ipu’aka oiko hag̃ua ñane rembiapo ndive. Yvypóra apytu’ũ ndoikói hag̃ua ñandegueraha. Ñandejára oĩta ñandive ñambohovái hag̃ua umi mba’e ijetu’úva. Che kyhyje hína umi ñane irũnguéra, oñemoĩvo umi tenda ñangarekohápe, ndoikuaáiha pe ñemomba’eguasu oñeikotevẽva ojehupyty hag̃ua yvypóra rekove yvate gotyo. Iporãva ha hekojojáva año noikememe’ẽi pe oikotevẽva’erã. Ikatúva’ẽ umi kuimba’e oreko hag̃ua peteĩ tekove morotĩ ha, upéicharõ jepe, ndikatúi hag̃ua omboja pe tembiapo natekotevẽiva peteĩ mba’eveichagua. Oikotevẽ umi kuimba’e ikatúva ohechauka hag̃ua pe mba’e ra’anga porãva umi oñehundisévape. Ñandejára oipota iñe’ẽ ojehupyty hag̃ua py’aguasúpe, pu’akápe, ha pe Espíritu Santo poguýpe. Satanás oma’ẽ porã hína ohecha hag̃ua mávapa ikatúva oikekuaa hag̃ua iñuhãme, ha upéi oipurúta chupekuéra hembipotápe hag̃ua. Ñañeha’ãva’erã jepive hag̃ua ani hag̃ua ñande py’a guasu ñane mbotavy, térã ñande py’ahatã ñane mboyke Ñandejáragui ha iñañeteguágui. Jajagarra porãva’erã umi tekove nde’iséiva oñemomichĩme’ẽ, ha oĩva dispuesto oikuaauka hag̃uáicha mbeguekatu ha mborayhúpe umi oñeikotevẽvape. Ñane ánga oĩva’erã henyhẽ hag̃ua pe py’a porãgui ouva’ekue pe yvágagui. Upéicharõ añoite ikatúta ñame’ẽ hag̃ua peteĩ testimonio hekopete hag̃ua pe añetegua rehe. Che syke’y Prescott ha che syke’y Daniells oikotevẽ oikuaa hag̃ua ikangyha pe ijurupy’a ndive oku’e hag̃ua tembiapópe ha iporandu ha iñembojoavy haguére pe marandu Ñandejára ome’ẽva’ekue. Napeñemoĩporãiva’erãi pene remiandu ha pene aporandu rehe umi marandu ombouva’erãmoguáicha penekatupyrýgui. Ndapejeroviái porãi va’ekue pe testimonio rehe. Pende rekove mombaretépe pejerovia hag̃ua pene komité rehe ha pende rapicha kuéra rehe, penderejávo umi mba’e iporãvéva oúva yvágagui. Ñandejára oikotevẽ tembiguái ikangatuvéva pe jeroviápe, ndaikatúiva oñemongu’e yvypóra remiandúgui. Pe tembiapo ndohováiri tenonderã gotyo oho hag̃uáicha, oñemoĩ aja yvypóra remiandu tenondépe ha ndojajehejáiramo Ñandejára Espíritu tombohape. Pe jerovia’ẽ, pe marandu ojehecharamóva, ha umi py’a oñembotyva’ekue pe mba’e yvágagui, ojoko hína pe pu’aka ojeikotevẽva. Añe’ẽ ndéve, che syke’y Prescott ha che syke’y Daniells. Penendive oĩkuri peteĩ mba’e vai. Pene retãme oikékuri peteĩ espíritu ndaha’éiva pe oñeme’ẽva yvágagui. Penepytyvõ hag̃uáicha, pe yvágagui omboukuri marandu ñemoñe’ẽ ha ñemboguejy. Péro pe py’ahatã ha pe mba’e ndojepotaaséiva peheja hag̃ua pe yvágagui oñangareko pende rehe, ombopy’aju hag̃ua pende apytu’ũ. Che syke’y kuéra, penemandu’áke pene ndive oñeñe’ẽ hague. Ñandejára imba’e porãme pene renói penembojevývo pe jerovia ha pe py’a guasu rehe. Umi ñe’ẽ peẽme oñeme’ẽva ndaha’éi kuri oñemoĩ hag̃uánte pene akãme, síno peteĩ ñemoambue hag̃ua pene rekove ryepýpe ha pene remiandúpe. Ko’ã táva guasu oñemotenondeva’erã. Pe porandu ndaha’éi mba’éichapa ikatúta jahechakuaa pe tembiapo ikatu hag̃uáicha oñembohape hendaitépe, síno mba’éichapa ikatúta ojepuru ñane mba’e, ñane kuimba’e ha kuña, ñane py’aguasu ha ñane katupyry tuichakue ojejapo hag̃ua pe mba’e hekojojáva. Ñandejára ohenói tembiguái oñemoañetéva rehe, oñembokatupyryva rehe, ohechakuaáva umi mba’e guasu hi’aguĩva. Oĩva’erã peteĩ pu’aka oguata hag̃ua pe añetegua rendive, peteĩ pu’aka ndaiporivéimava umi yvypóra rembiapo rehe añónte.
(A. G. Daniells was elected president of the General Conference in 1901. This suggests that this document was written in 1910, a time when Mrs. White was very concerned about Daniells' neglect of the cities and his involvement in the controversy over the "Daily.")
(A. G. Daniells ojeporavo Conferencia General mburuvicháramo ary 1901-pe. Kóva ohechauka ko kuatia ojehai hague 1910-pe, peteĩ ára kuñakarai White oĩhaguépe tuicha jepy’apýpe Daniells oheja rei haguére umi táva guasu ha oike haguére pe ñorairõme pe “Daily” rehegua.)
Now, recently Steve Wohlberg was saying that he does not have to take a position on the Daily because Ellen White never had a position on the Daily, and if it is good enough for the prophetess to take that position, it is good enough for him.
Koʼág̃a ramoite Steve Wohlberg heʼi vaʼekue ndotekotevẽiha oguereko peteĩ posición pe “Daily” rehe, Ellen White arakaʼeve ndoguerekói rupi peteĩ posición pe “Daily” rehe; ha iporãramo pe profetísape g̃uarã ojagarra hag̃ua upe posición, upéicha avei iporã chupe hag̃ua.
Well, Ellen White did have a position on the Daily. She said the Millerites had the correct view of it, and she understood it was Paganism. She understood that when Paganism was taken away, the 1335 began; and, she understood that other views than that only produced darkness and confusion.
Añete, Ellen White ningo oguereko kuri peteĩ postura pe Daily rehegua. Ha’e he’i vaekue umi Millerita-kuéra oguereko hague pe jehecha hekopeteva’ekue hese, ha ha’e oikuaa porã vaekue upéva hague Paganismo. Ha’e oikuaa porã vaekue, oñemboykévo Paganismo, oñepyrũ hague pe 1335; ha oikuaa avei vaekue ambue jehecha ndaha’éiva upéva, ogueru hag̃uánte pytũ ha ñembotavy.
And the one that you can demonstrate from the history of 1850 that was really isolated as bringing darkness and confusion is Crosier's view that the Daily represented Christ's Sanctuary ministry; so, I think she had an understanding what the Daily was, not only what it was but what it represented because, if you left that position, you go into darkness and confusion.
Ha pe ojehechaukáva 1850 rembiasakuegui, añetehápe oñemombyrýva ogueru hag̃ua pytũmby ha tavyrai, haʼe hína Crosier remiandu pe “Diario” rehe, haʼeha Cristo rembiapo pe Santuariope; upévare, che aime hag̃ua che manduʼápe haʼe oguereko hague peteĩ entendimiento mbaʼépa pe “Diario”, ndahaʼéi añónte mbaʼépa upéva, síno avei mbaʼépa upéva orrepresenta, pórke reheja ramo upe postura, reike pytũmbýpe ha tavyraípe.
But, in 1910 Ellen White also rebuked the General Conference President and W. W. Prescott for pushing this same view as Crosier's.
Ha, ary 1910-pe, Ellen White oikuaauka vai vaʼekue avei Conferencia General mburuvicha ha W. W. Prescott-pe, oisãso haguére ko jehecha peteĩchagua Crosier rembipota ndive.
And no historian is going to argue that Prescott and Willie White and A. G. Daniells, that when they were pushing the Daily, they were pushing the idea that the Daily represented Christ's Sanctuary ministry. Everyone knows that.
Ha avave oĩva tembiasakue rehegua ndohasamo’ãi Prescott ha Willie White ha A. G. Daniells, pe “Daily” omotenondévo, omotenonde hague pe ñe’ẽme’ẽ oje’éva pe “Daily” orrepresentaha Cristo rembiapo pe Santuario-pe. Opavave oikuaa upéva.
But, you have got the entire article here from Manuscript Releases, volume 20.
Péro, reiporukuéma ko artículo pukukue ko’ápe, Manuscript Releases, volumen 20-gui.
When was this released? Well, it was released in 1988; so, it is available for students of Adventism to consider in 1988.
Araka’e piko kóva oñeguenohẽ? Añetehápe, oñeguenohẽ kuri 1988-pe; upévare, oĩma disponible umi temimbo’épe g̃uarã omyesakã hag̃ua Adventismo rehegua 1988-pe.
When did Willie White and Prescott and Daniells establish the false view of the Daily in Adventism? From 1919 to 1931 is when they accomplished their work. By 1931, forget about it!! Adventism is going to teach that the Daily represents Christ's Sanctuary ministry because they have accepted the interpretation of the Scriptures that comes from apostate Protestantism and Catholicism. And from this point on, the Daily is identified as Christ's Sanctuary ministry.
¿Araka’e piko Willie White ha Prescott ha Daniells omopyenda Adventísmo-pe pe visión japu “Daily” rehegua? Ary 1919 guive 1931 peve ojapo hikuái hembiapo. Ary 1931 peve, hesaráima chugui!! Adventísmo ombo’éta “Daily” ohechauka hag̃ua Cristo rembiapo pe Santuario-pe, oguerovia haguére hikuái pe interpretación Escritura-kuéra rehegua oúva protestantismo apóstata ha catolicismo-gui. Ha ko’ág̃a guive, “Daily” oñemomba’e Cristo rembiapo Santuario-pe hag̃ua.
Awe, there are some voices that are opposing this that know better, but the tide has totally turned from that point on.
Aipo, oĩ sapy’ánte ñe’ẽnguéra oñemoĩva ko kóva rehe, ha oikuaa porãve, péro upe guive pe ysyry guasu ojerepaite.
And then in 1988, the Ellen White Estate releases for us this statement from 1910 at the very time the Daily was being agitated by Prescott, Daniells, and Willie White.
Ha upéi, ary 1988-pe, pe Ellen White Estate oguenohẽ ñandéve g̃uarã ko ñe’ẽkuaa 1910-gua, upe javeite pe Daily oñembopy’arory ha oñemyakãratĩrõ guare Prescott, Daniells ha Willie White rupive.
"At this stage of our experience we are not to have our minds drawn away from the special light given [us] to consider at the important gathering of our conference. And there was Brother Daniells, whose mind the enemy was working;"
Ko etapa ore rekove rehegua-pe ndajahejavéima va’erã ñande apytu’ũ oñemomombyry hag̃ua pe tesakã poravopyre oñeme’ẽ va’ekue [ñandéve] jahecha hag̃ua ñane konferénsia aty guasúpe iñimportánteva. Ha upépe oĩkuri pe hermano Daniells, pe enemigo omba’apo hague iñapytu’ũ rehe;
What does that mean? What does it mean that the enemy is working your mind? It means the Holy Spirit is not working your mind.
Mba’épa he’ise upéva? Mba’épa he’ise pe enemigo omba’apoha nde apytu’ũme? He’ise pe Espíritu Santo ndoikóiha omba’apo nde apytu’ũme.
"...and your mind and Elder Prescott's mind were being worked by the angels that were expelled from heaven..."
“…ha pene apytuʼũ ha Elder Prescott apytuʼũ ojepuru hag̃uáicha umi ánhel rehe oñemosẽvaʼekue yvágagui…”
"Satan's work was to divert your minds that jots and tittles should be brought in which the Lord did not inspire you to bring in. They were not essential. But this meant much to the cause of truth. And the ideas of your minds, if you could be drawn away to jots or tittles, is a work of Satan's devising. To correct little things in the books written, you suppose would be doing a great work. But I am charged, Silence is eloquence."
Satanás rembiapo vaʼekue ningo peẽme pende apytuʼũ omboguevívo, ikatu hag̃uáicha oike umi mbaʼe michĩvéva jepe, pe Ñandejára ndoporahéiʼỹva peẽme pemboinge hag̃ua. Umíva ndahaʼéi vaʼekue tekotevẽva. Péro kóva heʼise heta mbaʼe añetegua rehehápe. Ha pende apytuʼũ remiandu, peẽ ikatúramo peguerahaukapa umi mbaʼe michĩvéva rehe, upéva hína Satanás rembiapokue. Peimoʼã ningo pemyatyrõvo umi mbaʼe michĩva umi aranduka jehaipyrepe, pejapótaha peteĩ tembiapo tuicha. Péro che ajerurepyre kóicha: Kirirĩha hína ñeʼẽ porã.
They wanted to go into Uriah Smith's book, Thoughts on Daniel and Revelation, and remove what he said about the Daily being Paganism. That is why in this time period one of the men that is fighting against Willie White and Prescott and Daniells is a man named Larry Smith.
Ha’ekuéra oipota oike Uriah Smith kuatiañe’ẽme, Thoughts on Daniel and Revelation, ha omboguejy hag̃ua upe ha’e he’iva’ekue pe Tapiaite rehe, ha’éva Paganismo. Upévare ko aravope peteĩ kuimba’e oñorairõva Willie White, Prescott ha Daniells rehe ha’e peteĩ kuimba’e hérava Larry Smith.
Who is Larry Smith? That is Uriah's son, and he knows what they want to do and he is standing with his dad: the Daily is Paganism.
Máva piko Larry Smith? Upéva Urías ra’y, ha ha’e oikuaa mba’épa ha’ekuéra ojapose, ha opyta hína itúva ykére: pe ára ha áragua ha’e paganísmo.
"I am to say, Stop your picking flaws. If this purpose of the devil could only be carried out, then [it] appears to you [that] your work would be considered as most wonderful in conception. It was the enemy's plan to get all the supposed objectionable features where all classes of minds did not agree.
“Ava’erã va’erã pejejopy hag̃ua pene mba’e vai rehe. Ko propósito añágui ojejapóramoite, upéicharõ peẽme g̃uarã peẽicha ojehechaukáta pende rembiapoha iporãitereiha iñemoheñóipe. Kóva ha’eva’ekue pe enemigo rembiapokue ogueru hag̃ua opa umi mba’e ojehecháva ivaíva, umi opáichagua apytu’ũndy ndojoajuihápe peteĩ ñe’ême.”
"And what then? The very work that pleases the devil would come to pass. There would be a representation given to the outsiders not of our faith just what would suit them, that would develop traits of character which would"
“¿Mba’épa upéi? Oikóta upe tembiapoite ombovy’áva Aniápe. Ojejapóta peteĩ ta’ãnga umi okapegua rovake ndaha’éiva ñande jeroviágui, ha katu pe ha’ekuéra oipotávaite, omongakuaátava umi tekokatu rehegua rasgo kuéra ha omboguatátava”
do what? "cause great confusion."
ojapo mbaʼe? “omoheñói tuicha jepy’apy.”
Other views of the Daily have been adopted that bring confusion and darkness.
Oĩ ambue ñe’ẽme’ẽ “Mba’e Oikóva Ára ha Ára” rehegua oñemoneĩ vaʼekue, ha umíva ogueru hag̃ua jepyʼapy ha pytũmby.
"and occupy the golden moments which should be used zealously to bring the great message before the people. The presentations upon any subject we have worked upon could not all harmonize, and the results would be to confuse the minds of believers and unbelievers. This is the very thing that Satan had planned that should take place—anything that could be magnified as a disagreement.
ha peiporu umi ára yvytimbo itajuicha ombojegua va’erã, oiporu hag̃ua kyre’ỹme ojegueraha hag̃ua tavayguakuérape pe marandu guasu. Umi ñemombe’u oimeraẽva peteĩ mba’e reheguáva ñamba’apóma hese ndaikatumo’ãi opaite ojoaju peteĩcha, ha pe resultado ha’éta omyangekóita umi jeroviáva ha umi ndogueroviáivape. Kóva voi hína pe mba’e Satanás oplanéava oiko hag̃ua—oimeraẽ mba’e ikatúva oñemomba’eguasu hag̃ua peteĩ ñemoĩ joavyramo.
Lord willing, when we begin to prove these doctrines from our Bible study, we will look at Ezekiel 28; because, Ezekiel 28 is where the very root of the Daily is identified. Ezekiel 28 is about the exaltation of Lucifer, and she is marking it; because, as they are trying to say that the Daily represents Christ's Sanctuary ministry, not only were they rejecting the true view of the Daily, a symbol of self-exaltation, but they were manifesting that very self-exaltation in their own experience. She emphasizes they would bring confusion into our ranks.
Ñandejára oipotáramo, ñañepyrũ vove jahechauka hag̃ua koʼã doctrina ñande estudio bíblico-gui, jahecháta Ezequiel 28; pórke Ezequiel 28-pe ojehechauka pe raízete pe Diario rehegua. Ezequiel 28 oñeʼẽ Lucifer jehechaukáre yvate hag̃ua, ha haʼe omarka upéva; pórke, haʼekuéra oñehaʼã aja heʼi pe Diario orepresentaha Cristo ministerio pe Santuario-pe, ndahaʼéi añónte oikuaaukáva hikuái pe visión añetegua pe Diario rehegua, peteĩ símbolo jehechaukáva yvate hag̃ua ijehe, síno avei ohechaukáva hikuái upe jehechauka hag̃ua yvate ijehekuéra rehegua haʼekuéra experiencia teepe. Haʼe omombaʼeguasu hikuái omoingetaha ñande apytépe pyʼajere.
"Now, here is a grand work, where strange spirits can figure. But the Lord has a work to [be] done to save perishing souls; and the places which Satan, disguised, could fill in, bringing confusion into our ranks, he will do to perfection, and all those little differences will become enlarged, prominent.
Ko’ág̃a ápe oĩ peteĩ tembiapo tuichaitereíva, upépe umi espíritu extraño ikatu ojapo hikuái ijehechauka. Péro Ñandejára oguereko peteĩ tembiapo ojejapova’erã osalva hag̃ua umi ánga ohóvape ñehundípe; ha umi tenda Satanás, ojoguaháramo ambueichagua, ikatúva omyenyhẽ, oguerúva ñembyasy ha sarambi ñande aty apytépe, upéva ha’e ojapóta porãiterei, ha opa umi michĩmi joavy ojehechaukavéta, oñemomba’eguasuvéta.
And what does it mean, "And I was shown"? God specifically told her this.
Ha mba’épa he’ise “Ha ojehechauka chéve”? Tupã voi he’i porã kuri chupe kóva.
"And I was shown from the first that the Lord had given neither Elders Daniells nor Prescott the burden of this work. Should Satan's wiles be brought in, should this "Daily" be such a great matter as to be brought in to confuse minds and hinder the advancement of the work at this important period of time? It should not, whatever may be. This subject should not be introduced,"
“Ha ojehechauka chéve iñepyrũmby guive Tupãme’ẽha'ỹ hague, ni karai kuéra Daniells ni Prescott-pe, ko tembiapo pohýi. Ojeikeva’erã piko Satanás rembiguái ñuhã kuéra; ha ko “Diario” oiko hag̃ua peteĩ mba’e tuichaitereíva, oñemoingéva hag̃ua oñembotavy hag̃ua apytu’ũnguéra ha ojoko hag̃ua tembiapo ñemotenonde ko ára iñimportánteva jave? Ndoikói va’erã upéicha, taha’e ha’éva. Ko mba’e noñemoingéiva’erã.”
Sister White understood the Daily, and she understood that teaching the Daily was Christ's Sanctuary ministry is something that came from angels that were expelled from Heaven and that it only brings confusion and darkness; and, she knew the Pioneer position that the Daily represented Paganism, and that when the Daily was taken away, the 1335-year time prophecy began. She knew that. She knew the difference, no matter what these guys want to say.
Hermana White oikũmby porã vaʼekue pe Tapiaiteguáre, ha oikũmby avei vaʼekue pe mboʼepy heʼíva pe Tapiaitegua haʼeha Cristo rembiapo pe Santuariope ouha umi ánhelgui oñemosẽ vaʼekue Yvágagui, ha upéva añoite ogueruha ñembyavy ha pytũmby; haʼe oikuaa vaʼekue avei umi Pionero ñemoĩmby rehegua, pe Tapiaitegua orrepresentaha pe Paganísmo, ha pe Tapiaitegua oñemboykévo, oñepyrũ hague pe profesía ára 1335 ary pukukue rehegua. Haʼe oikuaa vaʼekue upéva. Haʼe oikuaa vaʼekue pe joavy, tahaʼe haʼeháicha koʼã kuimbaʼe oipota heʼi.
"It should not, whatever may be. This subject should not be introduced, for the spirit that would be brought in would be forbidding, and Lucifer is watching every movement. Satanic agencies would commence his work and there would be confusion brought into our ranks. You have no call to hunt up the difference of opinion that is not a testing question; but your silence is eloquence. I have the matter all plainly before me. If the devil could involve any one of our own people on these subjects, as he has proposed to do, Satan's cause would triumph. Now the work without delay is to be taken up and not a [difference] of opinion expressed.
“Aníke, mba’éichapa oikóramo jepe. Ko mba’e ndoikéiva’erã, pórke pe espíritu ojeikéva’erã vaʼekue ojokóva ha ombotovéva, ha Lucifer omaña hína opaichagua ñemonguʼe rehe. Umi mba’eapo satánico oñepyrũta hembiapo, ha ñembyaty vai oike ñande atykuérape. Ndereguerekói pe ñehenói reheka hag̃uáicha umi joavy opinión rehegua ndaha’éiva peteĩ porandu ombojegueroviávarã; ha nde kirirĩ reñeʼẽ porã. Che aikuaa porãite ko asunto tuichakue. Pe aña ikatúrire omoinge ñande rapichakuéra apytépe peteĩva jepe koʼã mba’e rehe, heʼi hag̃uáicha ojapótaha, Satanás rembiapo osẽ porãta. Koʼág̃a tembiapo oñeñepyrũva’erã pyaʼeʼỹreʼỹ, ha ani oñemyasãi mba’eveichagua opinión [joavy].”
"Satan would inspire those men who have gone out from us to unite with evil angels and retard our work on unimportant questions, and what rejoicing [there] would be in the camp of the enemy. Press together, press together. Let every difference be buried. Our work now is to devote all our physical and brain-nerve power to put these differences out of the way, and all harmonize. If Satan could with his great unsanctified wisdom be permitted to get the least hold, [he would rejoice].
“Satanás omongu’e umi kuimba’épe osẽ va’ekuépe orehegui oñondive hag̃ua umi ánhel vai ndive ha ombotapykue hag̃ua ñane rembiapo porandu mba’e’ỹvare, ha mba’eichaitépa oĩta vy’a pe enemigo táva ñorãirõhárakuéra apytépe. Peñembyaty, peñembyaty. Toñeñotỹ opaichagua joavy. Ko’ág̃a ñane rembiapo hína ñame’ẽ hag̃ua opa ñane mbarete tete rehegua ha ñane akã ha nervio mbarete hag̃ua ñamoĩ umi joavy tape ykére, ha opa maymáva tojoaju. Satanáspe, iñarandu tuicha ha ndojemongaraívape, oñeme’ẽrire jepe pe michĩvéva jejoko’ỹ hag̃ua, [ovy’aitéta].”
"Now, when I saw how you were working, my mind took in the whole situation and the results if you should go forward and give the parties that have left us the least chance to bring confusion into our ranks. Your lack of wisdom would be just what Satan would have it. Your loud proclamation was not under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. I was instructed to say to you that your picking flaws in the writings of men that have been led of God is not inspired of God. And if this is the wisdom that Elder Daniells would give to the people, by no means give him an official position, for he cannot reason from cause to effect. Your silence on this subject is your wisdom. Now, everything like picking flaws in the publications of men who are not alive is not the work God has given any of you to do. For if these men—Elders Daniells and Prescott—had followed the directions given in working the cities, there would have been many, very many, convinced of the truth and converted, able men that [now] are in positions where they never will be reached.
Koʼág̃a, ahecháta aikuaa ramo mbaʼéichapa rembaʼapo hína, che akã oguereko pe situación tuichakue ha umi resultado, reho hag̃ua tenonderã ha remboja hag̃ua umi oheja vaʼekuépe ñandéhegui michĩmínte jepe pe oportunidad ogueru hag̃ua confusión ñande aty ryepýpe. Nde aranduʼỹ haʼéta vaʼerã upeichaite voi Satanás oipotaháicha. Nde proclamación hatãva ndahaʼéi kuri Espíritu Santo inspiración guýpe. Che amongetapa hag̃uáicha ndéve, ne remboavyvy rehe umi kuatiajehaipyre kuimbaʼekuéra oñemboguata vaʼekue Tupã rupive, ndahaʼéi Tupãgui oúva. Ha ko arandu ramo Elder Daniells omeʼẽtava tetãygua kuérape, aniete hag̃uáicha peẽme peikuaa, ani hag̃uáicha ojeheja chupe peteĩ tembiapo oficial, ndoikuaái rupi ombojoaju hag̃ua causa ha efecto. Nde kirirĩ ko asunto rehegua hína nde arandu. Koʼág̃a, opa mbaʼe ojoguáva remboavyvy hag̃ua umi kuatiañemoherakuã kuimbaʼe oikovémaʼỹva rehegua ndahaʼéi pe tembiapo Tupã omeʼẽva pene peteĩteĩme pejapo hag̃ua. Pórke koʼã kuimbaʼe—Elders Daniells ha Prescott—omoañete rire umi instrucción oñemeʼẽva táva kuérape oñembaʼapo hag̃ua, heta, hetaiterei vaʼerãmoʼã oñekonvense pe añeteguáre ha oñekonverti, kuimbaʼe ikatupyrýva [koʼág̃a] oĩva umi tenda ndojehupytýmoʼãvéimahápe arakaʼeve.
"All the world is to be regarded as one great family. And when you have such a fountain of knowledge to draw from, why have you left the world to perish for years with the testimonies given by our Lord Jesus Christ? True religion teaches us to regard every man and woman as a person to whom we can do good.
“Ko múndo tuichakue ojehechava’erã peteĩ familia guasu ramo. Ha pende pópe oĩramo péichaite peteĩ yvu kuaapy rehegua pendehegui oñeguenohẽ hag̃uáicha, mba’ére piko peheja pe múndo operece hag̃ua heta áño pukukue umi testimonio ñande Ruvicha Jesucristo ome’ẽ vaekue reheve? Pe religión añetegua ñanembo’e jahecha hag̃ua opa kuimba’e ha kuña peteĩ tapicha ramo ikatuhápe jajapo hese iporãva.”
"This has been in print many years: —A Balanced Mind,' testimony to Elder Andrews. The mind may be cultivated to become a power to know when to speak and what burdens to take up and to bear, for Christ is your teacher. And I feared greatly for you [when I saw you] exalting your wisdom and pursuing a course to bring in differences of opinion. The Lord calls for wise men who can hold their peace when it [is] wisdom for them to do so. If you would be a whole man, you need sanctification through Jesus Christ. Now there is a work just started, and let wisdom be seen in every minister, in every president of [a] conference. But here was a work for you to take hold of years ago where you were needed to lift your voice for this very work. Christ gave all His people special directions what they shall do and the things they shall not do. And there is a little time left us to work out the righteousness of the Lord. You can understand the way of the Lord. I saw your purpose of carrying things after your own devising after you were placed as president. You had thought you would do wonderful things, which would be a work God had not placed in your hands to do. Now, your work is not to oppress but to release every necessity possible if the Lord has accepted you to serve. But you have very early given evidence that wisdom and sanctified judgment have not been manifested by you. You blazed out matters that would not be received unless the Lord should give light.
Kóva oĩma heta áño oñembokuatia hag̃uáicha: —“Peteĩ Akã Py’aguapyre,” testimonio anciano Andrews-pe guarã. Pe akã ikatu oñemongakuaa hag̃ua oiko hag̃ua chugui peteĩ pu’aka oikuaa hag̃ua araka’épa oñeñe’ẽ va’erã ha mba’e pohýi-pa ojegueraha va’erã ha ojeporavo hag̃ua ogueropu’aka, pórke Cristo ha’e nde Mbo’ehára. Ha che akyhyje eterei nderehe [ahechávo ndéve] remomba’eguasu ne arandu tee ha resẽvo peteĩ tape omoingéva juavy opáichagua apytépe. Ñandejára ohenói kuimba’e arandúpe, ikatúva okirirĩ araka’épa upéva ha’e arandu hag̃ua ichupekuéra ojapo upéicha. Reikuaaséramo ne completo hag̃ua kuimba’éicha, reikotevẽ ñemomarangatu Jesucristo rupive. Ko’ág̃a oñepyrũma peteĩ tembiapo, ha tojehecha arandu opa ministro-pe, opa conferencia mburuvichápe. Péro ko’ápe oĩkuri peteĩ tembiapo ndéve guarã rejapyhy va’erã va’ekue heta áño yma, upépe reikotevẽkuri rehupi ne ñe’ẽ ko tembiapo mismo rehehápe. Cristo ome’ẽ va’ekue opa Itavayguakuérape mbo’epyrã especial mba’épa ojapo va’erã ha mba’épa ndojapói va’erã. Ha sa’imi tiempo opytáma ñandéve ñamba’apo hag̃ua ñamoheñói hag̃ua Ñandejára rekojojápe. Nde ikatu reikuaa Ñandejára rape. Ahecha ne propósito regueraha hag̃uáicha umi mba’e nde jeguerovia tee rupi, rire remoĩ rire ndéve mburuvicháramo. Reimo’ãkuri rejapotaha mba’e hechapyrãva, ha upéva ha’e va’erãmo’ã peteĩ tembiapo Tupã ndohejaiva’ekue nde pópe rejapo hag̃ua. Ko’ág̃a, nde rembiapo ndaha’éi rejopy hag̃ua, síno remosãsóvo opa tekotevẽ ikatuháicha, Ñandejára ndererovia ramo reservi hag̃ua. Péro pyharevete guive remohechauka va’ekue arandu ha juicio oñemomarangatúva ndojehechaukái hague nde pype. Remombe’u hatã umi mba’e ndojeguerohorymo’ãi va’ekue, ndaha’éiramo Ñandejára ome’ẽ tesape.
"I have been instructed that such hasty movements should not have [been] made [such] as selecting you as president of the conference even another year. But the Lord forbids any more such hasty transactions until the matter is brought before the Lord in prayer; and as you have had the message come to you that the work of the Lord resting upon the president is a most solemn responsibility, you had no moral right to blaze out as you did upon the subject of the —Daily' and suppose your influence would decide the question. There was Elder Haskell, who has carried the heavy responsibilities, and there is Elder Irwin and several men I might mention who have the heavy responsibilities.
Aime jehekombo’e ndéve ko’ã mba’e pya’eterei ndojejapói va’erãmo’ãri, ha’e kuéra ndeporavóramo jepe neñemoĩ hag̃ua pe aty guasu mburuvicháramo ambue ary pukukue. Péro Ñandejára ombotove ojejapo hag̃ua hetave ko’ãichagua mba’e pya’e pe asunto ndoguahẽmboyve Ñandejára renondépe ñembo’épe; ha nde, reguereko haguére pe marandu oguahẽva ndéve, pe tembiapo Ñandejára rehegua oĩva pe aty guasu mburuvicha áriha peteĩ tembiapo tuichaite ha kyhyjepyrãva, ndereguerekói va’ekue derécho tekopotĩgua reñepyrũ hag̃uáicha pe “—Daily” rehe, ha reimo’ã nde influencia rupive ojedesidíta pe porandu. Oĩ kuri anciano Haskell, ogueraháva’ekue umi trácho pohýi, ha oĩ anciano Irwin ha heta kuimba’e ikatúva amombe’u, oguerekóva umi trácho pohýi.
"Where was your respect for the men of age? What authority could you exercise without taking all the responsible men to weigh the matter? But let us now investigate the matter. We must now reconsider whether it is the Lord's judgment, in the face of the work that has been neglected, of showing your zeal to carry the work even another year. If you should carry the work another year with the help that shall unite with you, there should be a change take place in you and Elder Prescott. And humble your own hearts before God. The Lord will have to see in you a showing of a different experience, for if ever men needed to be reconverted at this present [time], it [is] Elder Daniells and Elder Prescott.
—Moõpa peẽ peñemomba’e’ỹkuri umi karai hi’árape? Mba’e autorida piko ikatúva peẽ peiporu, ndapeguerahái hag̃ua opaite umi kuimba’e orekóva tráchta ohecha ha oheja hag̃ua ko mba’e? Péro ko’ág̃a tañahesa’ỹijo ko mba’e. Ko’ág̃a tekotevẽ jajepy’amongeta jey taha’épa kóva pe Ñandejára huísio, tembiapo oñemboyke hag̃uére, peẽ pehechauka hag̃ua pene kyre’ỹ pemotenondévo pe tembiapo ambue áño jepe. Peẽ peraha ramo pe tembiapo ambue áño, umi pytyvõ oĩtava oñondive pene ndive reheve, tekotevẽta oiko peteĩ ñemoambue pende pype ha karai Prescott pype. Ha peñemomirĩ pende py’a tee Tupã renondépe. Ñandejára ohechava’erã pende pype peteĩ jeikove rehegua ambuéva jehechauka, pórke oĩrõ araka’eve kuimba’e oikotevẽva oñekonverti jey ko árape, ha’e karai Daniells ha karai Prescott.
"Seven men should be chosen that are men of wisdom and through the working of the grace of God [give] evidence [of] a reconversion. For any men who are so blinded that they cannot reason from cause to effect, that they would ignore the men who have borne the responsibilities of the work and these presidents of conferences, [that] men [who] carry the work for over two years should be disregarded and such an impulsive consequence take place that men would neglect the very work kept before them for years—work the cities—and no, or but very little, attention [be] given to the old men for counsel, but proclaim the things they choose to give the people, bears its own testimony of the unsafety of the men to be entrusted with such a grand and wonderful work.
Tojeporavo umi siete kuimbaʼe haʼe hag̃ua kuimbaʼe arandu ha Tupã gracia rembiapo rupive [omeʼẽ] hag̃ua peteĩ jevyjey rehegua [rechaukaha]. Oimeraẽ kuimbaʼe oñembotavyetereíva ikatu hag̃uáicha ndoikuaái mbaʼégui mbaʼe osẽva, ha ohejarei hag̃ua umi kuimbaʼe oguerahavaʼekue ko tembiapo rembiaporã ha koʼã conferencia moakãhára, [ha] umi kuimbaʼe [o]guerojepytasóva tembiapópe mokõi ary ári hag̃ua ojehecharamoʼỹre, ha upéi oiko hag̃ua peteĩ consecuencia pyaʼe ha jejopyʼỹvaicha, umi kuimbaʼe oheja hag̃uáicha pe tembiapoete oĩva hendápe hesakuéra renondépe heta ary pukukue—pe tembiapo táva guasúpe—ha ndaipóri térã michĩeterei atención oñemeʼẽva umi kuimbaʼe tujavévape consejo rehe, ha katu oikuaauka umi mbaʼe haʼekuéra voi oiporavóva omeʼẽ hag̃ua tavayguakuérape, upéva voi ogueru hekopete iñemombeʼu tee mbaʼeichaitépa ndahaʼéi seguro umi kuimbaʼe ojeroviapy hag̃ua hese kuéra peteĩ tembiapo tuichaite ha hechapyrãva koichagua rehe.
"Christ is not dead. He will never suffer His work to be carried on in this strange way. Let the books alone. If any change is essential, God will have the harmony in that change consistent, but when a message has been entrusted to men with the large responsibilities involved, [God] demands faithfulness that will work by love and purify the soul. Elders Daniells and Prescott both need reconversion. A strange work has come in, and it is not in harmony with the work Christ came to our world to do; and all who are truly converted will work the works of Christ.
“Cristo ndojejái. Araka’eve ndohejamo’ãi Ijapopyrã ojegueraha ko’ẽichagua tape extraño rupive. Peheja umi kuatiañe’ẽ oĩ hag̃uáicha. Oĩramo tekotevẽ peteĩ ñemoambue, Tupã omoĩta pe joaju porã upe ñemoambuépe hag̃ua opyta oñembojoajúva hekópe; ha peteĩ marandu oñeme’ẽ rire kuñakarai ha kuimba’épe umi tuicha hag̃ua responsabilidad oguerekóva ndive, [Tupã] ojerure jerovia hag̃ua, pe mborayhu rupive omba’apóva ha omopotĩva pe ánga. Umi anciano Daniells ha Prescott mokõivéva oikotevẽ ojevyjey hag̃ua pe conversión-pe. Oike peteĩ tembiapo extraño, ha ndaha’éi ojoajúva pe tembiapo Cristo ou va’ekue ko yvy ape ári ojapo hag̃ua; ha opa umi añetehápe ojeconvertíva ojapóta umi tembiapo Cristo rembiapo.”
"We are everyone [to] work out the work which shall glorify the Father. We have come to the crisis—either to conform to the character of Jesus Christ right in this preparatory time or not attempt [it]. Elder Daniells, [you are not] to feel at liberty to let your voice be heard on high as you have done under similar circumstances. And understand, the president of a conference is not a ruler. He works in connection with the wise men who occupy the position as presidents whom God has accepted. He has not liberty to meddle with the writings in printed books from the pens that God has accepted. They are no longer to bear sway unless they show less of the ruling, dominating power. The crisis has come, for God will be dishonored.
“Maymávapa opavave hag̃ua tembiapo ombojeglorifikátava Túvape. Jaike pe apañuãi guasúpe—tajaiko hag̃ua Jesucristo rekokápe ko ára ñembosako’ípe térã ani hag̃ua ñañeha’ã hese. Karai Daniells, ndereñeñanduva’erãi reikuaa hag̃uáicha nde py’aguasu rehenduka hag̃ua nde ñe’ẽ yvatehápe, rejapohaguéicha ambue mba’e oikóva upéicha jave. Ha peikuaa hag̃ua, peteĩ conferencia ruvicha ndaha’éi peteĩ mburuvicha guasu. Omba’apo va’erã umi kuimba’e arandu ndive oguapýva mburuvicha-kuéra ramo, ha Tupã omoneĩ va’ekue chupekuéra. Ndojejokói chupe oñemoingove hag̃ua umi jehaipyre kuatiápe oñemboguapývape umi aranduhára kuéra rembiapópe, Tupã omoneĩ va’ekue. Ndohupytyvéima hikuái pu’aka hag̃ua ndouhechaukáiramo michĩve pe pu’aka oguerekóva omanda ha oisãmbyhyse hag̃ua. Pe apañuãi og̃uahẽma, Tupã niko oñemotĩta hag̃uére.”
"How does the Lord look upon the unworked cities? Christ is in heaven. Now its acknowledgment is to be, —There is no kingly rule. And now is the crisis of this world. Now I am the Power to save or to destroy. Now is the time when the destiny of all is in My hands. I have given My life to save the world. And "I, if I be lifted up," the saving grace I shall impart will prove that all who will be fashioned after the divine similitude and will be one with Me shall work as I work with My power of redeeming grace.' Whoever will, [let him] take hold with his brethren to do the work given them to do when in responsible places under the counsel the Lord gives, and seek most earnestly to work in complete harmony with Him who so loved the world He gave His life a full sacrifice for the saving of the world. I speak to our ministers, that as they enter upon the work in our cities let there be a calm sacredness attending the ministry of the Word. We cannot make the proper impression upon the minds of the people if we . . . [Lower third of this page left blank.]
“Mba’éichapa Ñandejára oma’ẽ umi táva ndojejapóivare? Cristo oĩ yvágape. Koʼág̃a pe jehechakuaa vaʼerã hína kóicha: —Ndaipóri mburuvicha guasu rembiapokue. Ha koʼág̃a hína ko yvy arigua apañuãi guasu. Koʼág̃a che hína pe Pokatu osalva térã ohundi hag̃ua. Koʼág̃a hína pe ára opaite mbaʼe rape paha oĩha Che pópe. Ameʼẽ che rekove asálva hag̃uáicha ko múndo. Ha: “Che, ajerupi rire yvate,” pe poriahuvereko salvadora ameʼẽtava ohechaukáta opa umi oñemoheñóitavape Tupã joguaháramo ha oĩtavape peteĩ hag̃ua chendive, ombaʼapotaha che ambaʼapoháicha che pokatu poriahuvereko ñepyrũrã rupive.” Oimeraẽ oipotáva, tojapyhy ijoykeʼykuéra ndive ojapo hag̃ua pe tembiapo oñemeʼẽvaʼekue chupekuéra ojapo hag̃ua, oĩ jave hikuái tenda tekotevẽhápe, pe ñemoñeʼẽrã Ñandejára omeʼẽva guýpe, ha toheka kyreʼỹme ombaʼapo hag̃ua peteĩchaite ñeñondive Hendive, pe ohayhu etereíva ko múndope ha omeʼẽvaʼekue hekove peteĩ mymbajuka guasu ramo ko múndo ñesalvárã. Añeʼẽ ore ministrokuérape, ha oike jave hikuái pe tembiapópe ore távape, toguata pe Ñeʼẽ rembiapo ndive pyʼaguapy marangatu. Ndikatúi jajapo pe mbaʼe ombohapéva tekotevẽháicha tavayguakuéra akãme ñane . . . [Ko kuatiarogue mbytéguio yvýpe opyta nandi.]”
"I copy from my Diary. The truth as it is in Jesus—talk it, pray it, believe every word in its simplicity. What would you gain if mistakes are brought before the men who have departed from the faith and given heed to seducing spirits, men who were not long ago with us in the faith? Will you stand on the devil's side? Give your attention to the unworked fields. A world-wide work is before us. I was given representations of John Kellogg.
Akopia che Diáriogui. Pe añetegua oĩháicha Jesúspe—eñe’ẽ hese, eñembo’e hese, eguerovia opa ñe’ẽ hekopete. Mba’épa reganátamo jejavykuéra oñemoĩramo umi kuimba’e renondépe ojehekýiva’ekue jeroviágui ha oñatende vaíva angaipa rerahávare, kuimba’e ndahi’aréi oĩ va’ekue ñanendive jeroviápe? Reñemoĩtapa Aña ladope? Emoĩ ne atención umi kokue oñemba’apó’ỹvape. Peteĩ tembiapo opavave yvy ape ári ñande renondépe oĩ. Che ame’ẽ chéve ta’ãngamýi John Kellogg rehegua.
"A very attractive personage was representing the ideas of the specious arguments that he was presenting, sentiments different from the genuine Bible truth. And those who are hungering and thirsting after something new were advancing ideas [so specious] that Elder Prescott was in great danger. Elder Daniells was in great danger [of] becoming wrapped in a delusion that if these sentiments could be spoken everywhere it would be as a new world.
Peteĩ ava ojeguerohoryetereíva ohechaukaína umi idea oguerúva umi argumento ikatupyrýva ha ojogua porãva rupive, apytuʼũ ha ñemimoʼã iñambuéva pe añetehápe oĩva Biblia rembiapokuegui. Ha umi ohechávo pyahu hag̃uáicha, ha oipota asy hag̃ua mbaʼe pyahu, omotenonde vaʼekue umi idea [ojoguaite ha hekopeguárõ guáicha] upéicha rupi Elder Prescott oĩkuri peteĩ tuicha peligro-pe. Elder Daniells avei oĩkuri peteĩ tuicha peligro-pe [oikóvo] oñembojere hag̃ua peteĩ ñembotavy rehe, oñeimoʼãvo koʼã ñemimoʼã ikatúrõ oñemombeʼu opa hendápe, upéva haʼetéva peteĩ yvy pyahu hag̃uáicha.
"Yes, it would, but while their minds were thus absorbed I was shown that Brother Daniells and Brother Prescott were weaving into their experience sentiments of a spiritual[istic] appearance and drawing our people to beautiful sentiments that would deceive, if possible, the very elect."
“Upéicha, añetehápe oikóta; ha upe aja iñakãnguéra oñemotenondévo péicha, ojehechauka chéve hermano Daniells ha hermano Prescott omoingehague ijehasápekuéra ñeñandu peteĩ aspecto espiritual[ística] rehegua, ha oguerahahague ñande retãyguápe ñeñandu porãite hag̃ua, ikatu hag̃uáicha ombotavy, ikatúrõ, umi poravo pyre jepe.”
The very elect is not going to be deceived, but there are going to be people who are standing with the very elect that are going to get deceived. The very elect are the wise virgins. The foolish virgins are going to get deceived, right?
Umi poravopyreiteeteguaite ndohovamo’ãi, ha katu oĩta tapicha umi poravopyreiteetéva ykére oĩva oñembotavýtava. Umi poravopyreiteetegua ha’e umi kuñataĩ arandu. Umi kuñataĩ tavy ha katu oñembotavýta, añetépa?
And as the wise virgins in this time period, when the temptation is there to deceive the very elect, as the wise virgins are receiving the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, what are the foolish virgins receiving? The strong delusion of 2 Thessalonians. We will deal with that, too, in connection with the Daily.
Ha péicha umi kuñataĩ arandu ko ára pegua, jepéramo pe jejopyrã oĩ hag̃ua ombotavývo umi poravopyre voi, ha umi kuñataĩ arandu ohupytývo pe ñehẽmboyku pe Espíritu Santo rehegua, mbaʼe piko ohupyty umi kuñataĩ itavyva? Pe mbotavy guasu 2 Tesalonicenses pegua. Upeva avei jahechaukáta pe Diario rehegua ndive joaju hag̃uáicha.
—"were weaving into their experience sentiments of a spiritual[istic] appearance and drawing our people to beautiful sentiments that would deceive, if possible, the very elect."
—«Oñemonde hikuái ijeheguiete oikovévape temimoĩmby espiritual[ista] joguáva, ha ogueraha ñane retãyguárape ñeñandurã porãva gotyo ikatúva ombotavy, ikatúramo, umi poravopyre jepe.»
What is the very bottom line of spiritualism?
Mba’épa pe ipahápe añetete pe espiritismo?
When it comes to the story of King Saul, what did Samuel say? "Rebellion is as witchcraft." Rebellion is witchcraft.
Oñeñe’ẽvo Mburuvicha guasu Saúl rembiasáre, ¿mba’épa he’i va’ekue Samuel? “Ñemoĩ hag̃ua iñe’ẽ rehe hína paje mba’evai ojapóva paje pyharegua reheguaicha.” Pe ñemoĩ iñe’ẽ rehe hína paje pyharegua rehegua.
Where does Saul end up?
Moõpa ojehupyty Saúl?
FROM THE AUDIENCE: With the witch of Endor.
PE TAVAYGUAKUÉGUI: Endor paje ndive.
With the witch of Endor.
Pe kuña pajehára Endor pegua ndive.
What was it that King Sault did to produce this train of events that leads him to the witch of Endor? He set his word above God's Word. He had been told what to do, but he went ahead and he did what he wanted to do.
Mba’épa ojapo ruvicha guasu Saúl omoñepyrũ hag̃ua ko joaju mba’e oikóva ogueraháva chupe Endor pajehárape? Ha’e omoĩ ikuéntape iñe’ẽ Tupã Ñe’ẽ ári. Oje’e kuri chupe mba’épa ojapova’erã, ha upéicharõ jepe tenonde gotyo oho ha ojapo pe ha’e oipotáva ojapo.
The very bottom line of spiritualism is placing your word above God's Word. That is where it all starts. That is witchcraft.
Pe espiritismo rehegua pyenda ipahaitépe hína ñamoĩ hag̃ua nde ñe’ẽ Tupã Ñe’ẽ ári. Upépepa oñepyrũ opa mba’e. Upéva hína paje.
Witchcraft is identifying how Satan brings you under his influence. How he entrances you it is a magical term dealing with magical deception.
Paje rehechakuaa mba’éichapa Satanás ndereraha iñemopu’ã guýpe. Mba’éichapa nderembotavy ha nderereko ipoguýpe, upéva ha’e peteĩ ñe’ẽ ojeporúva mba’e paje rehegua gotyo, oñe’ẽva ñembotavy pajepegua rehe.
When you are bewitched, who is the first to become bewitched? The witch. It all starts when I place my word above God's Word. That is witchcraft, that is rebellion, and I am the one that has become bewitched. And that is what happened to Daniells and Prescott.
Reñemoĩmbávo pende rehe paje, máva piko raẽve oñemoĩmbáta? Pe pajehára voi. Opa mba’e oñepyrũ ahejávo che ñe’ẽ Tupã Ñe’ẽ ári. Upéva hína paje, upéva hína pu’aka’ẽ, ha che voi hína upe oñemoĩmbáva. Ha upévaite la ojehúva’ekue Daniells ha Prescott rehe.
And what sentiments were Daniells and Prescott trying to bring in when this was happening? A wrong view of the Daily.
Ha mbaʼe remimoʼãpa Daniells ha Prescott oikuaaukase rakaʼe ko mbaʼe oikóramo guare upéva? Peteĩ jehecha vai pe Árere rehegua.
And what is the true view of the Daily? Is that it is Paganism, and Paganism is the religion of self-exaltation. It is a religion that began in the courts of Heaven when Satan, when Satan, set his word above God's Word and introduced into the history of mankind the mystery of iniquity.
Ha mba’épa pe visión añetegua pe “Daily” rehegua? Ha’eha paganisimo, ha pe paganisimo ha’e pe religión oñemomba’eguasu hag̃uáicha ijehe. Ha’e peteĩ religión oñepyrũva’ekue Yvágape, táva ruvicha kuérape, Satanás, Satanás, omoĩrõ guare iñe’ẽ Ñandejára Ñe’ẽ ári ha omoinge yvypóra rembiasakuepe pe angaipa ñemimby.
The mystery of iniquity is Satan's work in bewitching us. It is Satan's work in getting us to place our word or his word above God's Word.
Pe mbaʼe ñemimby vai rehegua ha’e Satanás rembiapo ñanepohano hag̃ua. Ha’e Satanás rembiapo ñanemokyreʼỹ hag̃ua ñamoĩ hag̃ua ñane ñeʼẽ térã haʼe ñeʼẽ Yma Ñandejára Ñeʼẽ ári.
Do you follow my thought?
¿Reikuaápa che remiandu?
Look up iniquity. It will define iniquity in Strong's Concordance. And when you take it down to the root word, what is the root word for iniquity? Alpha, alpha. That is the Alpha Apostasy.
Eheka mba’evaípe. Upépe oñemyesakãta mba’épa he’ise iniquidad Strong’s Concordance-pe. Ha reguerúramo pe ñe’ẽ rapópe, mba’épa pe ñe’ẽ rapoite iniquidad-pe g̃uarã? Alfa, alfa. Upéva hína pe Alfa Apostasía.
When were Daniells and Prescott pushing this foolish view? In the time period of the Alpha Apostasy.
Arakaʼe piko Daniells ha Prescott omoakã hína kuri ko jehecha vyrorei? Pe Álpapegua apostasía tiémpope.
So, do not miss what Sister White is saying here about deceiving the very elect and about reading Ezekiel 28. She knew what was going on. She knew that this Daily thing is something that is not only wrong doctrinally but it requires those who are going to preach the wrong view of the Daily to place their word above God's Word and puts them in the position where they are bewitched; and, therefore, they are a tool in the hand of Satan to bewitch others with their rebellion.
Upévare, ani peheja rei mbaʼe heʼíva koʼápe Hermana White umi ojapovaʼerã rehe umi poravopyre jepe oñembotavýva ha pe moñeʼẽ rehe Ezequiel 28-pe. Haʼe oikuaa porã mbaʼe-pa oiko hína kuri. Oikuaa porã kuri ko mbaʼe “Daily” rehegua ndahaʼeiha añónte peteĩ jejavy doctrinal, síno ojerureha umi opredikátavape pe jehechapyre vai “Daily” rehegua omoĩ hag̃ua iñeʼẽ Ñandejára Ñeʼẽ ári, ha upéicha omoĩ chupekuéra peteĩ tenda-pe oĩháme oñepysangáva; ha upévare, haʼekuéra haʼe peteĩ tembipuru Satanás pópe ombojehechaukáva ambuépekuéra avei iñemoĩ vai rupive.
"I have to trace with my pen [the fact] that these brethren would see defects in their delusive ideas that would place the truth in an uncertainty; and [yet] they [would] stand out as [if they had] great spiritual discernment. Now I am to tell them [that] when I was shown this matter,"
“Che ahai hag̃ua che kuatiahai rupive [ko añetegua] koʼã joykeʼykuéra ohechataha jejavy hembiapo apañuãihaíme, ha umíva omoĩta pe añetegua peteĩ ndaikatúivape ojekuaa porã; ha [upéicharõ jepe] haʼekuéra oñemboʼýta [ku oguerekóvaicha] tuicha kuaapy espiritual. Koʼág̃a aikotevẽ amombeʼu chupekuéra [mbaʼe] ahechaukárõ guare chéve ko mbaʼe,”
People say, "Oh, Ellen White, she doesn't have a position on the Daily."
Tapicha he’i: “¡Oh, Ellen White, ha’e ndorekói peteĩ postura pe Diario rehe!”
"when I was shown this matter when Elder Daniells was lifting up his voice like a trumpet in advocating his ideas of the —Daily,' the after results were presented. Our people were becoming confused. I saw the result, and then there were given me cautions that if Elder Daniells without respect to the outcome should thus be impressed and let himself believe he was under the inspiration of God,"—
“chejehechauka ramo ko mba’ére, karai Daniells omopu’ãrõ guare iñe’ẽ peteĩ turuichaicha, omosarambívo hembiapo arandu rehegua pe —‘Daily,’ rehe, upe rire oikótava ojechauka chéve. Ñande tavayguakuéra ojepy’apy ha oñembotavyhína. Ahecha mba’éichapa opa hag̃ua, ha upéi oñeme’ẽ chéve ñe’ẽmondo kyhyjéva, karai Daniells ndojepy’apýiramo jepe upe osẽtavare, upéicha oñembopy’arã ha ohejávo ojeroviaha ha’e oĩha Tupã ñepytyvõ ha inspiración guýpe,”
This is spiritualism. He has placed his word above God's Word. He is believing that he is being inspired by God.
Kóva hína espirituálismo. Haʼe omoĩ heʼínte ijayvu Ñandejára Ñeʼẽ ári. Ojerovia hína oñeinspira hag̃ua chupe Ñandejára.
"that if Elder Daniells without respect to the outcome should thus be impressed and let himself believe he was under the inspiration of God, skepticism would be sown among our ranks everywhere, and we should be where Satan would carry his messages. Set unbelief and skepticism would be sown in human minds, and strangecrops of evil would take the place of truth. Ms 67, 1910, 1–8. Manuscript Release, volume 20, 17–22.
“ha Elder Daniells, oñemomba’eguasu’ỹre upe osẽtavére, upéicha oñandu mbarete ha oheja ijehe ogueroviaha oĩha Tupã inspiración guýpe, mokõihũ ha py’a mokõi oñeñotỹta opa hendáicha ñande atykuéra apytépe, ha ñande jaikóta pe tenda Satanás oguerahahápe imarandu. Ndogueroviái ha mokõihũ oñeñotỹta yvypóra apytu’ũme, ha mba’evai ñemitỹ pyahu ha iñambueetéva omyengoviáta añetegua. Ms 67, 1910, 1–8. Manuscript Release, volume 20, 17–22.”
The strange crops of evil are growing all over Adventism today.
Ñañoty iva mba’e vai rehegua okakuaa hína opa rupi ko árape Adventismo ryepýpe.
Ellen White places her endorsement on the Pioneer understanding of the 2520.
Ellen White omoĩ imoneĩrũha umiãngypyra-kuéra oikuaaháicha pe 2520 rehe.
Ellen White places her endorsement on the Pioneer understanding that the Daily in the Book of Daniel represents Paganism.
Ellen White omoĩ hera oipytyvõ hag̃ua pe entendimiento umi Pionero oguerekóva, pe “Diario” oĩva kuatia Daniel-pe orrepresentaha Paganismo.