The key to rightly dividing verses ten through sixteen of Daniel eleven is found in the basic prophetic applications that were employed over thirty years ago, in 1996, when The Time of the End magazine was published. Thirty years later, the Lord has revealed that another prophetic message is to be formalized as was the Millerite message formalized in 1831. In the omega history of these thirty years the message to be formalized is represented as a correction of a previous message of Islam, as represented by Josiah Litch and also a corrected message of the closed door, as represented by Samuel Snow, which is the symbol of the parable of the ten virgins. A message of Islam, accompanied with a warning of the progressive closing doors of probation as Christ finishes His work of judgment will be proclaimed. The message is twofold, possessing and internal and external line, which in turn represent the first two steps of the three-step testing process that always occurs when a prophecy is unsealed, as was the revelation of Jesus Christ on December 31, 2023.
Mabudin fahimtar ayoyi goma zuwa goma sha shida na Daniyel goma sha ɗaya yadda ya kamata ana samunta ne cikin ainihin amfani na annabci da aka yi amfani da su fiye da shekaru talatin da suka wuce, a shekara ta 1996, lokacin da aka wallafa mujallar The Time of the End. Bayan shekaru talatin, Ubangiji ya bayyana cewa wani saƙon annabci kuma za a tsarantar da shi kamar yadda aka tsarantar da saƙon Millerite a shekara ta 1831. A cikin tarihin omega na waɗannan shekaru talatin, saƙon da za a tsarantar ana wakilta shi a matsayin gyaran wani saƙo na baya game da Musulunci, kamar yadda Josiah Litch yake wakilta, haka kuma a matsayin gyararren saƙon ƙofar da aka rufe, kamar yadda Samuel Snow yake wakilta, wanda shi ne alamar misalin budurwai goma. Za a shelanta saƙo game da Musulunci, tare da gargadi game da ƙofofin rufe-lokacin-gwaji masu ci gaba da rufewa yayin da Almasihu yake kammala aikinsa na shari’a. Saƙon ɗin na ninki biyu ne, yana ɗauke da layi na ciki da na waje, waɗanda kuma a nasu juyin suke wakiltar matakai biyu na farko cikin tsarin gwaji mai matakai uku wanda kullum yake faruwa sa’ad da aka buɗe hatimin wani annabci, kamar yadda ya kasance da wahayin Yesu Almasihu a ranar 31 ga Disamba, 2023.
The Time of the End magazine contains the basic overview of the future for America as represented in the last six verses of Daniel eleven which were unsealed at the time of the end in 1989. The magazine has been in the public record for thirty years and no one saw that a main theme of the magazine was the religious struggle between communism and the churches under the influence of Catholicism, especially in the Ukraine. That religious battle from the period of 1989, explains the context of the religious demise of Putin as represented by Ptolemy and Uzziah in the rebellion they both manifested at the temple in Jerusalem. The temple in Jerusalem was Uzziah’s temple, not Ptolemy’s temple. Both Putin and Zelenskyy desecrate the same temple in two different ways; one as an Egyptian and one as a Jew.
Mujallar Lokacin Ƙarshe tana ƙunshe da ainihin taƙaitaccen bayani game da makomar Amurka kamar yadda aka wakilta a cikin ayoyi shida na ƙarshe na Daniyel sura ta goma sha ɗaya, waɗanda aka buɗe a lokacin ƙarshe a shekarar 1989. Mujallar ta kasance cikin bayanan jama’a har tsawon shekara talatin, amma babu wanda ya lura cewa wani babban jigon mujallar shi ne gwagwarmayar addini tsakanin kwaminisanci da ikilisiyoyi da suke ƙarƙashin rinjayin Katolika, musamman a ƙasar Yukren. Wannan yaƙin addini daga zamanin 1989 yana bayyana mahallin rugujewar addinin Putin kamar yadda aka wakilta ta wurin Ptolemy da Uzziah a cikin tawaye da su duka suka nuna a haikalin Urushalima. Haikalin Urushalima haikalin Uzziah ne, ba haikalin Ptolemy ba ne. Duka Putin da Zelenskyy suna ƙazantar da wannan haikali guda ɗaya ta hanyoyi biyu dabam; ɗaya a matsayin Ba-misirce, ɗaya kuma a matsayin Bayahude.
The church that was struggling against the king of the south in 1989 was the Catholic church. And why not? Atheism of France delivered the deadly wound to the king of the north in 1798, so why wouldn’t the papacy retaliate against atheism’s long-drawn-out persecution of the Catholic church, especially in the Ukraine? More significant is that this clear testimony about the Ukraine came from a publication in 1996, that was citing the secular historians about the history of 1989. Now that the Lord is unsealing the hidden history of verse forty, He has pointed to the struggle between two orthodox churches to provide the prophetic and historical context of the battle of Raphia and its aftermath, and He had already included the necessary insights in The Time of the End magazine that was published thirty years ago.
Ikilisiyar da take fama da gwagwarmaya da sarkin kudu a shekara ta 1989 ita ce Ikilisiyar Katolika. Kuma me ya sa ba haka ba? Rashin yarda da Allah na Faransa ne ya jikkata sarkin arewa da rauni mai kisa a 1798, to, me ya sa ba za a ce papanci ya rama dogon zaluncin da rashin yarda da Allah ya yi wa Ikilisiyar Katolika ba, musamman a Yukiren? Abin da ya fi muhimmanci shi ne, wannan bayyananniyar shaida game da Yukiren ta fito ne daga wata wallafa a 1996, wadda take ambaton masana tarihin duniya game da tarihin 1989. Yanzu da Ubangiji yake kwance hatimin ɓoyayyen tarihin aya ta arba’in, Ya nuna zuwa ga gwagwarmayar da ke tsakanin ikilisiyoyi biyu na Orthodox domin Ya ba da mahallin annabci da na tarihi na yaƙin Raphia da abin da ya biyo bayansa, kuma tun tuni Ya riga Ya haɗa muhimman fahimtohin da ake bukata a cikin mujallar The Time of the End wadda aka buga shekaru talatin da suka wuce.
The demise of Napoleon aligns with the progressive demise of Lenin, Stalin and the system of the Soviet Union. When the prophetic southern kingdom moved its capital to Russia there were two major revolutions in 1917. The first is what is called the Russian revolution when the Czar was overthrown, and then in the same year the Bolshevik Revolution followed, which led to the civil war of 1917 unto 1922. In 1922 the Soviet Union was formed.
Rushewar Napoleon ya yi daidai da rushewar Lenin, Stalin da tsarin Tarayyar Soviet a hankali. Sa’ad da masarautar kudu ta annabci ta mayar da babban birninta zuwa Rasha, an sami manyan juyin juya hali guda biyu a shekara ta 1917. Na fari shi ne abin da ake kira Juyin Juya Halin Rasha sa’ad da aka hambarar da Czar, sa’an nan kuma a cikin wannan shekarar ne Juyin Juya Halin Bolshevik ya biyo baya, wanda ya kai ga yaƙin basasa daga 1917 har zuwa 1922. A shekara ta 1922 aka kafa Tarayyar Soviet.
The beginning of Russia as the spiritual king of the south represented a two-step revolution that led to civil war, then the formation of a confederacy of countries. The collapse of the Soviet Union was also two steps, beginning with the tearing down of the Berlin wall on November 9, 1989, which then led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union on December 31, 1991. As the last ruler of Russia, the king of the south, Vladimir Putin was typified by the first Russian ruler—Vladimir Lenin.
Farkon Rasha a matsayin sarkin kudu na ruhaniya ya wakilci juyin juya hali mai matakai biyu wanda ya kai ga yaƙin basasa, sa’an nan kuma samuwar ƙungiyar haɗin ƙasashe. Rushewar Tarayyar Soviet ita ma ta kasance mai matakai biyu, tana farawa da rushewar katangar Berlin a ranar 9 ga Nuwamba, 1989, wanda daga nan ya kai ga watsewar Tarayyar Soviet a ranar 31 ga Disamba, 1991. A matsayin mai mulki na ƙarshe na Rasha, sarkin kudu, an wakilci Vladimir Putin ta misalin mai mulkin Rasha na farko—Vladimir Lenin.
Vladimir means “a great leader” and Putin means “the path.” Lenin means “a great river,” but Vladimir Lenin chose the name of Lenin to hide his real name, which was Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov. Ilyich means “son of Elijah,” and Ulyanov means “youthful son of Elijah.”
Vladimir na nufin “babban shugaba,” kuma Putin na nufin “hanya.” Lenin na nufin “babban kogi,” amma Vladimir Lenin ya zaɓi sunan Lenin ne domin ya ɓoye ainihin sunansa, wanda shi ne Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov. Ilyich na nufin “ɗan Iliya,” kuma Ulyanov na nufin “matashin ɗan Iliya.”
The great Russian leader on the path, in the history represented by the battle of Raphia in 217 BC, was typified by the first leader of Russia, who as Vladimir Lenin was the great leader of the mighty river, but who hid his name. A name is a symbol of character, and for Vladimir to hide his two names represents a character that chose a great river of political thought, over a character represented by Elijah, which means “God is Jehovah.” The root of atheism is the denial of God, and atheism is a prime characteristic of the king of the south. The second and third given name of Lenin emphasize Elijah and his son, and the end of Russia as the king of the south is represented by Ptolemy IV, who was victorious at the battle of Raphia, but when Antiochus returned in 200 BC at the battle of Panium Ptolemy’s five-year-old son was then ruling. Lenin’s two original names identify Elijah and his son, and align with Ptolemy and his son. Elijah and the message to his children occurs in the latter days, just before “the great and dreadful day of the Lord;” which is where the battles of Raphia and Panium are also located.
Babban shugaban Rasha a wannan hanya, a cikin tarihin da ya sami wakilci ta wurin yaƙin Raphia a shekara ta 217 K.H., an siffanta shi ta wurin shugaban farko na Rasha, wanda a matsayinsa na Vladimir Lenin shi ne babban shugaban babban kogi, amma ya ɓoye sunansa. Suna alama ce ta hali, kuma ga Vladimir ya ɓoye sunayensa biyu yana wakiltar wani hali da ya zaɓi babban kogin tunanin siyasa a kan halin da Iliya yake wakilta, wanda ma’anarsa ita ce “Allah shi ne Jehobah.” Tushen rashin yarda da Allah shi ne musun Allah, kuma rashin yarda da Allah babban sifa ce ta sarkin kudu. Suna na biyu da na uku da aka ba Lenin suna jaddada Iliya da ɗansa, kuma ƙarshen Rasha a matsayin sarkin kudu yana samun wakilci ta wurin Ptolemy IV, wanda ya yi nasara a yaƙin Raphia, amma sa’ad da Antiochus ya dawo a shekara ta 200 K.H. a yaƙin Panium, ɗan Ptolemy mai shekara biyar ne yake mulki a lokacin. Sunayen Lenin biyu na asali suna bayyana Iliya da ɗansa, kuma suna daidaita da Ptolemy da ɗansa. Iliya da saƙon zuwa ga ’ya’yansa yana faruwa a kwanaki na ƙarshe, gab da “babbar kuma mai ban tsoro ranar Ubangiji;” wanda a nan ne kuma aka ajiye yaƙe-yaƙen Raphia da Panium.
Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord: And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse. Malachi 4:5, 6.
Ga shi, zan aiko muku da Iliya annabi kafin zuwan babbar ranar Ubangiji mai ban tsoro; kuma shi zai mai da zuciyar iyaye ga ’ya’ya, da zuciyar ’ya’ya ga iyayensu, kada in zo in bugi duniya da la’ana. Malachi 4:5, 6.
The testimony of Uzziah and Ptolemy align in verse eleven of Daniel eleven, and Uzziah lived for eleven years after his rebellion and leprosy; whereas, Ptolemy ruled for a total of seventeen years, which is the same number of years between the battles of verse eleven and verse fifteen. The 250-year prophecy that began in 457 BC, ended in 207 BC in the middle of those two battles; ten years after Raphia and seven before Panium. Ptolemy IV’s reign began in 221 BC, and he died in 204 BC, so the seventeen years of Ptolemy are not the same line as the seventeen years from Raphia to Panium. Nor are they the same seventeen years that are represented by the conclusion of the 250-year prophecy beginning with Nero in 64 and ending in 313. From 313 to the first Sunday law in 321 is eight years, and nine years later in 330 Constantine divided the kingdom into east and west.
Shaidar Uzziah da na Ptolemy sun yi daidai a aya ta goma sha ɗaya ta Daniyel goma sha ɗaya, kuma Uzziah ya rayu na tsawon shekara goma sha ɗaya bayan tawayensa da kuturtarsa; alhali kuwa, Ptolemy ya yi mulki na jimillar shekara goma sha bakwai, wanda shi ne adadin shekarun da ke tsakanin yaƙe-yaƙen aya ta goma sha ɗaya da aya ta goma sha biyar. Annabcin shekara 250 da ya fara a 457 BC, ya ƙare a 207 BC a tsakiyar waɗannan yaƙe-yaƙe biyu; shekara goma bayan Raphia kuma shekara bakwai kafin Panium. Mulkin Ptolemy IV ya fara a 221 BC, kuma ya mutu a 204 BC, saboda haka shekaru goma sha bakwai na Ptolemy ba su ne layi ɗaya da shekaru goma sha bakwai daga Raphia zuwa Panium ba. Haka kuma ba su ne waɗannan shekaru goma sha bakwai ɗin guda ɗaya da ƙarshen annabcin shekara 250 yake wakilta ba, wanda ya fara da Nero a 64 ya kuma ƙare a 313. Daga 313 zuwa dokar Lahadi ta farko a 321 akwai shekara takwas, kuma bayan shekara tara, a 330 Constantine ya raba mulkin zuwa gabas da yamma.
In the very near future Putin and Russia will defeat Ukraine and the footsteps of Ptolemy and Uzziah will begin to repeat in the history represented by verse twelve. The two biblical witnesses place the final crisis for Putin in a church and state crisis. Their rebellion was manifested at the temple in Jerusalem, thus identifying Uzziah’s temple and religion as the point of prophetic reference.
A nan gaba kaɗan sosai, Putin da Rasha za su ci Ukraine da yaƙi, kuma sawun Ptolemy da Uzziah za su fara maimaituwa a cikin tarihin da aya ta goma sha biyu ke wakilta. Shaidu biyu na Littafi Mai Tsarki sun sanya rikici na ƙarshe ga Putin a cikin rikicin coci da ƙasa. An bayyana tawayensu a haikali a Urushalima, ta haka ana gane haikalin Uzziah da addininsa a matsayin wurin nuni na annabci.
Zelenskyy, which means “green,” is the puppet of the globalist bureaucrats of the European Union and the United Nations, whose globalist agenda is aptly represented by the green political movement that worships mother earth. It is fitting that Zelenskyy was an actor, for he is clearly a proxy of other powers, and his name meaning “green” identifies the political philosophy that guides his movements on the chess board of human history. Checkmate is right around the corner for Zelenskyy.
Zelenskyy, wanda ke nufin “kore,” ɗan tsana ne na masu mulkin burokrasi na masu kishin dunƙulewar duniya na Tarayyar Turai da Majalisar Ɗinkin Duniya, waɗanda manufarsu ta dunƙulewar duniya take samun cikakkiyar wakilci a cikin motsin siyasar kore da ke bautar uwa duniya. Ya dace cewa Zelenskyy ya kasance ɗan wasan kwaikwayo, domin a fili yake cewa wakilin wasu ikoki ne, kuma ma’anar sunansa, wato “kore,” tana bayyana falsafar siyasar da ke jagorantar motsinsa a kan allon wasan dara na tarihin bil’adama. Shah-mat yana gab da riske Zelenskyy.
In this final history the rebellion of Uzziah and Ptolemy will once again be acted out, but Ptolemy (Putin) died four years before the battle of Panium, and the last ruler of the king of the south is represented by a five-year-old child who is being handled by a series of corrupt and incompetent regents.
A cikin wannan tarihin ƙarshe, tawāyen Uzziah da Ptolemy za a sake aiwatar da shi, amma Ptolemy (Putin) ya mutu shekaru huɗu kafin yaƙin Panium, kuma mai mulki na ƙarshe na sarkin kudu ana wakilta shi da wani yaro mai shekara biyar, wanda jerin wakilai marasa gaskiya kuma marasa ƙwarewa suke tafiyar da shi.
Ptolemy V was only about 5–6 years old when he ascended the throne in 204 BC (after his father’s mysterious death), and the Ptolemaic kingdom was paralyzed by a series of incompetent or corrupt regencies during his reign. The initial regency was from 204–202 BC, after Ptolemy IV’s death was concealed and his mother Arsinoe III murdered. The court favorites Sosibius, a longtime minister under Ptolemy IV, and Agathocles the brother of Ptolemy IV’s mistress Agathoclea, declared themselves regents. They forged or presented a will making them guardians, placed the young king under the care of Agathoclea and her family, and purged potential rivals. Sosibius handled much of the early administration.
Ptolemy V yana ɗan kimanin shekara 5–6 ne kawai sa’ad da ya hau gadon sarauta a shekara ta 204 K.H. (bayan mutuwar mahaifinsa mai cike da asiri), kuma masarautar Ptolemy ta shiga wani irin gurguncewa saboda jerin mulkokin riƙon ƙwarya marasa ƙwarewa ko masu cin hanci a lokacin mulkinsa. Mulkin riƙon ƙwaryar farko ya kasance daga 204–202 K.H., bayan an ɓoye mutuwar Ptolemy IV kuma aka kashe mahaifiyarsa Arsinoe III. Waɗanda suka yi fice a fadar sarki, Sosibius, wani tsohon minista mai daɗaɗɗen hidima a ƙarƙashin Ptolemy IV, da Agathocles, ɗan’uwan Agathoclea ƙwarƙwarar Ptolemy IV, sun ayyana kansu a matsayin masu riƙon mulki. Sun ƙirƙira ko suka gabatar da wasiyya da ta naɗa su a matsayin masu kula, suka sanya matashin sarkin ƙarƙashin kulawar Agathoclea da iyalinta, kuma suka kawar da masu yiwuwa su zama abokan hamayya. Sosibius ne ya gudanar da mafi yawan harkokin mulki na farkon lokaci.
A shift occurred around 202 BC, when Agathocles became the dominant regent, but was widely hated for debauchery and mismanagement. A popular uprising in Alexandria led to his brutal lynching by a mob, with the boy-king nominally approving. Subsequent regents were Tlepolemus the governor of Pelusium, and then Aristomenes. By the time of the battle of Panium in 200 BC, the kingdom was under this rotating series of regents and court advisors.
Wani sauyi ya faru a wajen shekara ta 202 K.H., sa’ad da Agathocles ya zama babban wakili mai mulki, amma mutane da yawa sun ƙi shi saboda lalaci da ɓarnar ɗabi’a da kuma rashin iya tafiyar da mulki. Wani bore na jama’a a Alexandria ya kai ga muguwar kashe shi ta hannun taron jama’a, tare da yaron sarki yana amincewa da hakan a bisa suna kawai. Wakilan mulki na gaba sun kasance Tlepolemus gwamnan Pelusium, sannan kuma Aristomenes. A lokacin yaƙin Panium a shekara ta 200 K.H., masarautar tana ƙarƙashin wannan jere mai juyawa na wakilan mulki da masu ba da shawara na fadar sarauta.
At the battle of Panium the Ptolemaic forces were led in the field by the general Scopas of Aetolia, a mercenary commander appointed under the regency, not by Ptolemy V himself. The young king had no real control—the decisions, military strategy, and kingdom’s overall weakness stemmed from the regents’ paralysis, internal revolts (like the native Egyptian uprisings), and court intrigue. This instability allowed Antiochus III the Great to decisively defeat Scopas at Panium, seizing Coele-Syria, including Judea permanently from Ptolemaic control.
A yaƙin Panium, rundunonin Ptolemaiyawa sun kasance ƙarƙashin jagorancin babban kwamanda Scopas na Aetolia a filin fama, wanda shi ne kwamandan haya da aka naɗa a ƙarƙashin mulkin wakilci, ba kuwa Ptolemy V da kansa ba. Matashin sarkin ba shi da wani iko na ainihi—shawarwari, dabarun yaƙi, da kuma raunin masarautar gaba ɗaya sun samo asali ne daga gazawar masu riƙon mulki, tawaye na cikin gida (kamar tashe-tashen hankulan Masarawa na ƙasar), da makircin fada. Wannan rashin daidaituwa ya ba Antiochus III Mai Girma damar doke Scopas a Panium da ƙarfi ƙwarai, ya kuma ƙwace Coele-Syria, har da Yahudiya, har abada daga ikon Ptolemaiyawa.
Historians discuss the probability that Ptolemy IV’s death was by poisoning, which is also part of the historical speculation concerning Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, as well as the queen of the south, Cleopatra. Putin prevails in the Ukrainian War, but then his demise begins with his desire to implement the controlling relationship that the Soviet Union formerly had with the Ukrainian church, which when removed in 1989, was the symbol of the victory of the king of the north over the king of the south.
Masana tarihi suna tattauna yiwuwar mutuwar Ptolemy IV ta kasance ta hanyar guba, abin da kuma yake cikin hasashen tarihi game da Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, da kuma sarauniyar kudu, Cleopatra. Putin yana yin nasara a Yaƙin Ukrainiya, amma daga nan halakarsa tana farawa da burinsa na aiwatar da dangantakar iko da rinjaye da Tarayyar Soviet ta taɓa yi da cocin Ukrainiya, wadda, sa’ad da aka kawar da ita a 1989, ta kasance alamar nasarar sarkin arewa a kan sarkin kudu.
The Ukraine is the cradle of Eastern Slavic Orthodoxy. The baptism of Vladimir the Great took place in 988 in Kyiv. Moscow later claimed the title “Third Rome” after Constantinople fell, positioning itself as the rightful heir and spiritual guardian of all Russian lands, including the Ukraine as its “canonical territory”.
Ukraine ita ce cibiyar haifar da Orthodoxiya ta Slav na Gabas. Baftismar Vladimir Mai Girma ta faru a shekara ta 988 a Kyiv. Daga baya Moscow ta yi iƙirarin lakabin “Roma ta Uku” bayan fāɗuwar Constantinople, tana mai ɗora kanta a matsayin halastacciyar magājiya kuma mai tsaron ruhaniya na dukan ƙasashen Rasha, har da Ukraine a matsayin “yankinta na canon”.
The Moscow Patriarchate has always viewed Ukraine as spiritually inseparable from Russia with the motto of “One people, one faith,” which is a phrase Putin himself has repeatedly used. Ukraine, especially since 2014/2022, increasingly sees Moscow’s oversight as colonial and imperial domination rather than true spiritual motherhood. As of February 2026, there are two competing Orthodox structures. One is the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, which since 2019 has been independent from Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople. In Kyiv the Orthodox Church of Ukraine is considered as the truly national church.
Patriarchate na Moscow a koyaushe yana kallon Ukraine a matsayin wadda ba za a iya raba ta da Rasha ta fuskar ruhaniya ba, da taken nan na “Mutum ɗaya, bangaskiya ɗaya,” wanda shi kansa Putin ya sha maimaitawa. Ukraine kuma, musamman tun daga 2014/2022, tana ƙara kallon kulawar Moscow a matsayin mulkin mallaka da mamayar daula, maimakon uwa ta ruhaniya ta gaskiya. Zuwa watan Fabrairu 2026, akwai tsare-tsaren Orthodox guda biyu da suke fafatawa da juna. Ɗaya daga cikinsu shi ne Cocin Orthodox na Ukraine, wanda tun 2019 ya kasance mai cin gashin kansa daga Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew na Constantinople. A Kyiv ana ɗaukar Cocin Orthodox na Ukraine a matsayin cocin ƙasa na gaskiya.
Reader beware: the Orthodox Church of Ukraine is a different church than the Ukrainian Orthodox church. The Ukrainian Orthodox church is connected with Russia’s orthodox church, and for this reason Zelenskyy has been attacking it. The Vatican opposes the attacks of Zelenskyy that are already underway, but Putin’s rebellion of verse twelve follows his victory at Raphia, and is yet future.
Mai karatu, ka yi hattara: Cocin Orthodox na Ukraine coci ne dabam da Cocin Orthodox na Yukiren. Cocin Orthodox na Yukiren yana da alaƙa da Cocin Orthodox na Rasha, kuma saboda wannan dalili ne Zelenskyy yake kai masa hari. Fadar Vatican tana adawa da hare-haren Zelenskyy waɗanda tuni suka fara, amma tawayen Putin na aya ta goma sha biyu yana biye da nasararsa a Raphia, kuma har yanzu yana nan a gaba.
The Ukrainian Orthodox Church was historically linked to the Moscow body. In the aftermath of the invasion of 2022, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church declared full autonomy in May 2022, but Ukrainian state investigations (DESS) have repeatedly argued it remains canonically and legally affiliated with Moscow. Ukraine passed a law in August 2024 (signed by Zelenskyy) banning any religious body tied to the Russian Orthodox Church (the “aggressor state”). The Ukrainian Orthodox Church has been ordered to fully sever ties or face court-ordered dissolution of its Kyiv Metropolis. As of late 2025 and early 2026, there are ongoing raids, parish transfers to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (over 1,300 since 2022), court cases, and UN experts warning of religious-freedom concerns regarding the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
Cocin Orthodox ta Yukren a tarihi tana da alaƙa da ƙungiyar Moscow. A bayan mamayar shekara ta 2022, Cocin Orthodox ta Yukren ta ayyana cikakkiyar cin gashin kai a watan Mayu 2022, amma binciken gwamnatin Yukren (DESS) ya yi ta nanata cewa har yanzu tana da alaƙa da Moscow ta fuskar canon da kuma ta doka. Yukren ta zartar da wata doka a watan Agusta 2024 (wadda Zelenskyy ya sanya wa hannu) da ke haramta duk wata ƙungiyar addini da ke da alaƙa da Cocin Orthodox ta Rasha (“ƙasar mai kai hari”). An umarci Cocin Orthodox ta Yukren da ta yanke duk wata alaƙa gaba ɗaya, in ba haka ba kuma ta fuskanci rushewar Metropolis ɗinta na Kyiv bisa umarnin kotu. Ya zuwa ƙarshen 2025 da farkon 2026, ana ci gaba da kai samame, ana sauya Ikklesiyoyin parishi zuwa Cocin Orthodox ta Yukren (fiye da 1,300 tun daga 2022), ana gudanar da shari’o’in kotu, kuma masana Majalisar Ɗinkin Duniya suna gargadi game da damuwar da ta shafi ’yancin addini dangane da Cocin Orthodox ta Yukren.
The Vatican has publicly opposed any forced dissolution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Russia and Putin frame this as outright persecution of canonical Orthodoxy and have made protection of the “Russian Orthodox churches” an explicit demand in any peace negotiations. Russian propaganda consistently ties the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and the Ukrainian state attacks upon it as “Nazism” and as part of their “denazification” justification.
Fadar Vatican ta fito fili ta yi adawa da duk wani tilastaccen rushewar Cocin Orthodox ta Ukraine. Rasha da Putin suna bayyana wannan a matsayin tsanantawa sarai ga Orthodox na ka’ida, kuma sun mai da kare “coci-cocin Orthodox na Rasha” wata buƙata bayyananna a cikin kowace tattaunawar zaman lafiya. Farfagandar Rasha a kai a kai tana danganta Cocin Orthodox ta Ukraine da hare-haren da gwamnatin Ukraine ke kai mata da “Nazism” kuma a matsayin wani ɓangare na hujjar su ta “denazification.”
Putin will presumptuously “enter the temple” and claim full spiritual dominion over Ukrainian Orthodoxy in attempt to re-subordinate the entire Ukrainian church structure under Moscow, demanding recognition as the rightful spiritual head of the Russian orthodox world.
Putin zai kutsa kai cikin “haikali” da gangan, ya kuma yi iƙirarin cikakken mulkin ruhaniya a kan Ortodoksiyar Yukirenia, a ƙoƙarinsa na sake mayar da dukan tsarin cocin Yukirenia ƙarƙashin Moscow, yana neman a amince da shi a matsayin shugaban ruhaniya na gaskiya na duniyar Ortodoks ta Rasha.
This is the exact parallel to Ptolemy entering the Most Holy Place, while Uzziah is Zelenskyy seeking to burn incense. Ptolemy’s rebellion was in the Most Holy Place and Uzziah’s was in the holy place. A southern king, flushed with the victory of the “borderline,” ending the proxy-power of Nazism, and then overstepping into the place that belongs only to the realm of religion. Then will come a sudden providential humbling, and Putin will disappear from the scene (as Ptolemy IV died in 204 BC). After the power vacuum of a ‘weak-successors phase,’ the northern king returns with greater force and prevails at the modern battle of Panium in verse 15.
Wannan shi ne daidai da Ptolemy yana shiga Wuri Mafi Tsarki, alhali kuwa Uzziah shi ne Zelenskyy yana neman ƙona turare. Tawāyen Ptolemy ya kasance a cikin Wuri Mafi Tsarki, amma na Uzziah ya kasance a cikin wuri mai tsarki. Wani sarkin kudu, cike da farin cikin nasarar “iyakace,” yana kawo ƙarshen ikon wakilci na Nazism, sa’an nan kuma yana ƙetare iyaka ya shiga wurin da yake na fagen addini kaɗai. Sa’an nan kuma za a zo da wani ƙasƙantarwa na gaggawa ta tanadin Allah, kuma Putin zai ɓace daga fagen (kamar yadda Ptolemy IV ya mutu a shekara ta 204 K.H.). Bayan gibi na iko na wani ‘matakin magada masu rauni,’ sarkin arewa zai dawo da ƙarfi mafi girma kuma ya yi nasara a yaƙin Panium na zamani a aya ta 15.
Seventeen
Sha Bakwai
Seventeen years occurs three times in the history where the battles of Raphia and Panium merge together, line upon line. The seventeen years from the edict of Milan where the eastern and western thrones of the empire were brought together through marriage, until the kingdom was divided and divorced in 330. The seventeen years beginning and ending are waymarks of two other related prophetic periods. Beginning with Nero in the year 64 a period of persecution is marked that ended in the history of Constantine the Great. The transition from Nero’s period of persecution unto the compromise represented by Constantine identifies the transition from the church of Smyrna unto the church of Pergamos. 313 and the edict of Milan identify the end of the church of Smyrna, and the end of the seventeen-year period is the year 330, which was the fulfillment of the three-hundred-and-sixty-year prophecy of Daniel 11:24.
Shekaru goma sha bakwai sun bayyana sau uku a cikin tarihi inda yaƙe-yaƙen Raphia da Panium suke haɗuwa wuri guda, layi bisa layi. Shekaru goma sha bakwai daga dokar Milan, inda aka haɗa kursiyin gabas da na yamma na daular ta wurin aure, har zuwa lokacin da aka raba mulkin kuma aka sake shi a shekara ta 330. Shekaru goma sha bakwai, farkonsu da ƙarshensu, alamu ne na hanya na wasu lokutan annabci guda biyu masu alaƙa da juna. Da farawa da Nero a shekara ta 64, an nuna wani zamani na tsanantawa wanda ya ƙare a tarihin Constantine Mai Girma. Sauyin daga zamanin tsanantawar Nero zuwa ga sulhun da Constantine ya wakilta yana nuna sauyin daga ikkilisiyar Smyrna zuwa ga ikkilisiyar Pergamos. 313 da dokar Milan suna nuna ƙarshen ikkilisiyar Smyrna, kuma ƙarshen wannan zamani na shekaru goma sha bakwai shi ne shekara ta 330, wadda ita ce cikar annabcin shekaru ɗari uku da sittin na Daniyel 11:24.
He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers’ fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time. Daniel 11:24.
Zai shiga cikin salama har zuwa mafi albarkar wurare na lardin; zai kuma aikata abin da ubanninsa ba su taɓa yi ba, ko kakanninsa na uba; zai rarraba musu ganima, da kwasar ganima, da dukiya: i, zai kuma shirya dabarunsa gāba da kagara masu ƙarfi, har na ɗan lokaci. Daniyel 11:24.
The seventeen years from 313 and the edict of Milan, begins with a fulfillment of prophecy and ends at the fulfillment of another prophecy. The first prophetic fulfillment which marks the beginning, identifies the transition from the church of Smyrna unto the church of Pergamos, and the prophecy that marks the end of those seventeen years, identifies the division of Rome into eastern and western Rome. The seventeen years is identified by prophetic history, not by any specific seventeen-year proclamation. The alpha of the division of the second church from the third church aligned with the division of the empire into east and west at the fulfillment of the time prophecy of 360 years. Those two prophecies establish a period of seventeen years, and they need to be established as a legitimate prophetic period based upon the witness of two or three; if seventeen is a valid prophetic symbol.
Shekaru goma sha bakwai daga 313 da dokar Milan, sun fara da cikar wani annabci kuma suna ƙarewa da cikar wani annabci dabam. Cikar annabci ta farko wadda take nuna farkon, tana bayyana sauyawa daga ikilisiyar Smyrna zuwa ikilisiyar Pergamos, kuma annabcin da yake nuna ƙarshen waɗannan shekaru goma sha bakwai, yana bayyana rarrabuwar Roma zuwa Roma ta gabas da Roma ta yamma. An gano waɗannan shekaru goma sha bakwai ta tarihin annabci, ba ta kowace sanarwa ta musamman ta shekaru goma sha bakwai ba. Alfa na rarrabuwar ikilisiya ta biyu daga ikilisiya ta uku ya yi daidai da rarrabuwar daular zuwa gabas da yamma a lokacin cikar annabcin lokaci na shekaru 360. Waɗannan annabce-annabce guda biyu suna kafa wani zamani na shekaru goma sha bakwai, kuma wajibi ne a kafa su a matsayin halastaccen zamani na annabci bisa ga shaidar mutum biyu ko uku; idan goma sha bakwai alama ce ingantacciya ta annabci.
Those witnesses exist in another 250-year period which began in 457 BC. On that date the 2,300-year prophecy of Daniel 8:14 began. 457 BC is a prophetic starting point, and an established prophetic waymark. Extending 250 years into the future brings you to 207 BC, which is the history between the battles of Raphia and Panium. The battle of Raphia and Panium cannot be separated, for they are both engaged in by Antiochus the Great. From the battle of Raphia in 217 BC unto the battle of Panium in 200 BC is seventeen years. The 2,300-year prophecy identifies a change of dispensation at the beginning, when the third decree restored Judah’s national sovereignty and then at the ending there was a change of dispensation when Christ moved from the holy place to the Most Holy Place. 207 BC represents the change of dispensation of Egyptian rule over Judea, unto the Seleucid dispensation of rule over the glorious land. The dispensation of Seleucid control over the glorious land produced the revolt of the Maccabees in 167 BC.
Waɗannan shaidu suna nan a cikin wani zangon shekaru 250 dabam wanda ya fara a 457 BC. A wannan lokaci ne annabcin shekaru 2,300 na Daniyel 8:14 ya fara. 457 BC mafari ne na annabci, kuma tabbatacciyar alama ce ta annabci. Idan aka ƙara shekaru 250 zuwa gaba, za a kai ga 207 BC, wanda shi ne tarihin da yake tsakanin yaƙe-yaƙen Raphia da Panium. Ba za a iya raba yaƙin Raphia da na Panium ba, gama Antiochus Mai Girma ne ya shiga duka biyun. Daga yaƙin Raphia a 217 BC har zuwa yaƙin Panium a 200 BC akwai shekaru goma sha bakwai. Annabcin shekaru 2,300 yana nuna sauyin zamani na gudanarwar Allah a farkonsa, sa’ad da umarni na uku ya maido da ikon mulkin ƙasa na Yahuda, sannan kuma a ƙarshe aka yi sauyin zamani na gudanarwar Allah sa’ad da Almasihu ya tashi daga Wuri Mai Tsarki zuwa Wuri Mafi Tsarki. 207 BC yana wakiltar sauyin zamanin mulkin Masar a bisa Yahudiya zuwa zamanin mulkin Seleucid a kan ƙasa mai daraja. Zamanin iko na Seleucid a kan ƙasa mai daraja ya haifar da tawayen Maccabees a 167 BC.
The Nero period of 250 years ends with the history of Constantine the GREAT and the 250 years that conclude between the two battles is the history of Antiochus the GREAT. At the battle of Raphia, Ptolemy IV defeated Antiochus the Great and Ptolemy reigned for seventeen years. Both 250-year periods contain a distinct seventeen-year period. Both end in the history of a ruler who is known as the GREAT. Both 250-year periods begin at an established prophetic waymark and they both end at an established prophetic waymark.
Zamanin Nero na shekaru 250 ya ƙare da tarihin Constantine MAI GIRMA, kuma shekaru 250 da suka cika tsakanin yaƙe-yaƙen biyu su ne tarihin Antiochus MAI GIRMA. A yaƙin Raphia, Ptolemy IV ya ci Antiochus Mai Girma da yaƙi, kuma Ptolemy ya yi mulki na shekaru goma sha bakwai. Dukkan lokutan shekaru 250 ɗin suna ɗauke da wani kebantaccen lokaci na shekaru goma sha bakwai. Dukkaninsu suna ƙarewa a cikin tarihin wani mai mulki da aka sani da MAI GIRMA. Dukkan lokutan shekaru 250 ɗin suna farawa ne a wata tabbatacciyar alamar annabci, kuma dukkansu suna ƙarewa a wata tabbatacciyar alamar annabci.
The United States began on July 4, 1776 and 250 years later brings you to July 4, 2026 when Donald Trump, who is known as the one seeking to make America “great,” is going to celebrate those 250 years. 2026, like unto the 250 years from 457 BC concludes in the middle of the history of the modern battles of Raphia and Panium, known as the Ukrainian and Third World War. The reign of a southern king, the period of the first Sunday law and the period from the battle of Raphia to Panium provide three periods of seventeen years that are all connected with the same prophetic history. Three 250-year periods all arrive together in the same prophetic histories. The three periods of 250 years establish three lines of prophetic truth with history associated with Donald Trump, represented as either Constantine the Great, or Antiochus the Great.
Ƙasar Amurka ta fara ne a ranar 4 ga Yuli, 1776, kuma shekaru 250 bayan haka su kai ka zuwa ranar 4 ga Yuli, 2026, lokacin da Donald Trump, wanda aka san shi da mai neman ya mai da Amurka “babba,” zai yi bikin waɗannan shekaru 250. Shekarar 2026, kamar yadda shekaru 250 tun daga 457 BC suke ƙarewa, tana ƙarewa ne a tsakiyar tarihin yaƙe-yaƙen zamani na Raphia da Panium, waɗanda aka sani da Yaƙin Ukraine da Yaƙin Duniya na Uku. Mulkin wani sarkin kudu, zamanin dokar Lahadi ta farko, da kuma zamanin daga yaƙin Raphia zuwa Panium suna ba da lokaci uku na shekaru goma sha bakwai, waɗanda dukkansu suna da alaƙa da wannan tarihin annabci ɗaya. Lokuta uku na shekaru 250 dukkansu suna iso tare a cikin tarihohin annabci iri ɗaya. Waɗannan lokuta uku na shekaru 250 suna kafa layuka uku na gaskiyar annabci tare da tarihi mai alaƙa da Donald Trump, wanda aka wakilta ko dai a matsayin Constantine the Great, ko kuma Antiochus the Great.
The three lines of 250 years provide three different, but complementary illustrations of the latter days. Nero’s line identifies the seventeen-year history of compromise that perfectly speaks to the prophetic characteristics of the formation of the image of the beast.
Layin uku na shekaru 250 suna ba da misalai uku dabam-dabam, amma masu cike juna, game da kwanaki na ƙarshe. Layin Nero yana bayyana tarihin shekaru goma sha bakwai na yin sulhu daidai, wanda yake magana sarai game da siffofin annabci na kafuwar siffar dabbar.
“The Lord has shown me clearly that the image of the beast will be formed before probation closes; for it is to be the great test for the people of God, by which their eternal destiny will be decided. Your position is such a jumble of inconsistencies that but few will be deceived.
“Ubangiji ya nuna mini sarai cewa za a kafa siffar dabbar nan kafin lokacin gwaji ya ƙare; gama ita ce za ta zama babban gwaji ga mutanen Allah, wanda ta wurinsa za a yanke makomarsu ta har abada. Matsayinka irin wannan ruɗani ne na saɓani da rashin daidaito, har kaɗan ne kawai za a ruɗe.”
“In Revelation 13 this subject is plainly presented; [Revelation 13:11–17, quoted].
“A cikin Ru’ya ta Yohanna 13 an gabatar da wannan batu a sarari; [Ru’ya ta Yohanna 13:11–17, an nakalto].”
“This is the test that the people of God must have before they are sealed. All who proved their loyalty to God by observing His law, and refusing to accept a spurious sabbath, will rank under the banner of the Lord God Jehovah, and will receive the seal of the living God. Those who yield the truth of heavenly origin and accept the Sunday sabbath, will receive the mark of the beast.” Manuscript Releases, volume 15, 15.
“Wannan ita ce gwajin da mutanen Allah dole ne su fuskanta kafin a sa musu hatimi. Dukan waɗanda suka tabbatar da amincinsu ga Allah ta wurin kiyaye dokarsa, kuma suka ƙi karɓar Asabar ta ƙarya, za su shiga ƙarƙashin tutar Ubangiji Allah Jehobah, kuma za su karɓi hatimin Allah mai rai. Waɗanda kuwa suka yi watsi da gaskiyar da ta fito daga sama suka kuma karɓi Asabar ta Lahadi, za su karɓi alamar dabbar.” Manuscript Releases, juzu’i na 15, 15.
The image of the beast is the combination of church and state, with the church in control of the relationship. The compromise of Constantine in attempting to bring paganism together with Christianity is the classic example of the compromise of the latter days.
Siffar dabbar kuwa ita ce haɗuwar coci da gwamnati, inda coci ke riƙe da iko a cikin wannan dangantaka. Sulhun da Constantine ya yi, a ƙoƙarinsa na haɗa arna da Kiristanci wuri guda, shi ne fitaccen misali na sulhun kwanaki na ƙarshe.
“In the movements now in progress in the United States to secure for the institutions and usages of the church the support of the state, Protestants are following in the steps of papists. Nay, more, they are opening the door for the papacy to regain in Protestant America the supremacy which she has lost in the Old World. And that which gives greater significance to this movement is the fact that the principal object contemplated is the enforcement of Sunday observance—a custom which originated with Rome, and which she claims as the sign of her authority. It is the spirit of the papacy—the spirit of conformity to worldly customs, the veneration for human traditions above the commandments of God—that is permeating the Protestant churches and leading them on to do the same work of Sunday exaltation which the papacy has done before them.
“A cikin matakan da ake aiwatarwa yanzu a Amurka domin tabbatar wa cibiyoyi da al’adun ikilisiya goyon bayan gwamnati, Furotestoci suna bin sawun mabiya papanci. A’a, fiye da haka, suna buɗe ƙofa ga papanci ya sāke samun rinjaye a Amurkan Furotesta irin wanda ta rasa a Tsohuwar Duniya. Kuma abin da yake ba wannan motsi muhimmanci mafi girma shi ne gaskiyar cewa babban abin da ake nufi da shi shi ne tilasta kiyaye Lahadi—al’adar da ta samo asali daga Roma, wadda kuma take iƙirarin ita ce alamar ikon ta. Ruhun papanci ne—ruhun daidaituwa da al’adun duniya, girmama al’adun mutane fiye da umarnan Allah—wanda yake ratsawa cikin ikilisiyoyin Furotesta yana kuma jagorantarsu su aikata irin wannan aikin ɗaukaka Lahadi da papanci ta riga ta aikata a gabansu.”
“If the reader would understand the agencies to be employed in the soon-coming contest, he has but to trace the record of the means which Rome employed for the same object in ages past. If he would know how papists and Protestants united will deal with those who reject their dogmas, let him see the spirit which Rome manifested toward the Sabbath and its defenders.
“In mai karatu yana so ya fahimci hanyoyin da za a yi amfani da su a rikicin da ke gabatowa nan ba da jimawa ba, abin da ya wajaba gare shi shi ne ya bi diddigin tarihin hanyoyin da Roma ta yi amfani da su domin wannan manufa a zamanin da suka shuɗe. In yana so ya san yadda Katolika da Furotesta, idan suka haɗu, za su yi da waɗanda suka ƙi koyarwarsu, to, bari ya dubi ruhun da Roma ta nuna game da Asabar da kuma masu kāre ta.”
“Royal edicts, general councils, and church ordinances sustained by secular power were the steps by which the pagan festival attained its position of honor in the Christian world. The first public measure enforcing Sunday observance was the law enacted by Constantine. (A.D. 321) This edict required townspeople to rest on ‘the venerable day of the sun,’ but permitted countrymen to continue their agricultural pursuits. Though virtually a heathen statute, it was enforced by the emperor after his nominal acceptance of Christianity.” The Great Controversy, 574.
“Dokokin sarauta, manyan majalisun ƙoli, da ƙa’idodin coci da ikon duniya ya goya musu baya su ne matakan da wannan bikin arna ya bi har ya kai ga matsayinsa na daraja a cikin duniyar Kirista. Mataki na farko na jama’a da ya tilasta kiyaye Lahadi shi ne dokar da Constantine ya kafa. (A.D. 321) Wannan umarni ya bukaci mazauna birane su huta a ‘ranar girmamammiyar rana,’ amma ya ba mazauna karkara izinin ci gaba da ayyukansu na noma. Ko da yake a zahiri doka ce ta arna, sarki ya tilasta aiwatar da ita bayan karɓarsa ta Kiristanci a suna kawai.” The Great Controversy, 574.
The progression of compromise that led to, and will again lead to the Sunday law is represented with the seventeen-year period from 313 to 330, with the first Sunday law of 321 as the midpoint of the history. At the beginning was a marriage of east and west, and at the end was the divorce of east and west. The first Sunday law is the middle waymark representing rebellion, just as the thirteenth letter of the Hebrew alphabet, when preceded by the first letter and followed by the twenty-second and last letter of the alphabet makes up the Hebrew word truth. Marriage at the beginning and divorce at the end identifies the alpha letter in agreement with the omega letter. The period of 250-years that began with Nero has the signature of Christ, and it speaks to a subject of present truth in the latter days.
Ci gaban sasanci wanda ya kai ga dokar Lahadi, kuma wanda zai sake kaiwa ga dokar Lahadi, an wakilta shi da tsawon shekaru goma sha bakwai daga 313 zuwa 330, tare da dokar Lahadi ta farko ta 321 a matsayin alamar tsakiya ta wannan tarihi. A farkon akwai aure tsakanin gabas da yamma, kuma a ƙarshe akwai saki tsakanin gabas da yamma. Dokar Lahadi ta farko ita ce alamar tsakiyar hanya wadda ke wakiltar tawaye, kamar yadda harafi na goma sha uku na baƙaƙen Ibrananci, sa’ad da aka gabatar da shi da harafi na farko kuma aka biyo shi da harafi na ashirin da biyu, wato na ƙarshe a cikin baƙaƙen, yake zama kalmar Ibrananci ta gaskiya. Aure a farkon da saki a ƙarshe yana bayyana harafin alpha cikin daidaito da harafin omega. Tsawon shekaru 250 da ya fara da Nero yana ɗauke da sa hannun Almasihu, kuma yana magana ne game da batun gaskiyar yanzu a kwanaki na ƙarshe.
The 250-year period that begins with 457 BC is emphasizing the statecraft represented by Antiochus the Great as he stands within the seventeen-year period from Raphia to Panium. We understand it as statecraft, for in 457 BC a prophecy of 2,300 years also began. The 2,300 years is the internal line of prophecy that speaks to God’s work of redemption, which aligns with a symbol of churchcraft. Unlike the 250-year period that began with Nero, the period that begins in 457 BC is addressing the political role of the last American president who is seeking to make America and then the world great, as he promotes the erroneous Catholic concept of a golden age of a thousand years of peace.
Lokacin shekaru 250 da ya fara daga 457 BC yana jaddada dabarun mulki da Antiochus the Great ya wakilta yayin da yake tsaye a cikin lokacin shekaru goma sha bakwai daga Raphia zuwa Panium. Mun fahimce shi a matsayin dabarun mulki, domin a cikin 457 BC wani annabcin shekaru 2,300 shi ma ya fara. Shekaru 2,300 ɗin su ne layin annabci na ciki da ke magana game da aikin fansa na Allah, wanda ya dace da alamar ikon ikilisiya. Ba kamar lokacin shekaru 250 da ya fara da Nero ba, lokacin da ya fara a 457 BC yana magana ne game da rawar siyasa ta shugaban Amurka na ƙarshe wanda yake neman ya mai da Amurka, sa’an nan kuma duniya, mai girma, yayin da yake inganta kuskuren ra’ayin Katolika na zamanin zinariya na shekaru dubu na salama.
The 250 years of the United States, who is the earth beast of Revelation thirteen identifies the conclusion of the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, that ends where it began, in the midst of war. The victors of history, define the record of history that is preserved. The globalist dragon powered Democrats, view the current anarchy as a revolution, and the all-talk and no action Republicans view this current history as a civil war. The Democrats are representatives of the dragon of Bible prophecy, and the Republicans are represented as apostate Protestants, or in the terms of John in Revelation sixteen, they are the false prophet. The United States began in a war of revolution and it ends with a war of revolution. The Republican party began in a civil war and they end in a civil war. Republicans see the civil war that Democrats call a revolution.
Shekaru 250 na {asar Amurka, wadda ita ce dabbar ƙasa ta Wahayi sura ta goma sha uku, suna nuna ƙarshen mulki na shida na annabcin Littafi Mai Tsarki, wanda yake ƙarewa a inda ya fara, a tsakiyar yaƙi. Masu nasarar tarihi su ne ke ƙayyade tarihin da ake adanawa. ‘Yan Democrat, waɗanda dodon mai goyon bayan tsarin duniya ya ba iko, suna kallon rikicin rashin tsari na yanzu a matsayin juyin juya hali, kuma ‘yan Republican, masu yawan magana ba tare da aiki ba, suna kallon tarihin yanzu a matsayin yaƙin basasa. ‘Yan Democrat wakilai ne na dodon annabcin Littafi Mai Tsarki, kuma ‘yan Republican ana wakiltarsu a matsayin murtaddun Furotesta, ko kuma a cikin kalmomin Yohanna a Wahayi sura ta goma sha shida, su ne annabin ƙarya. {asar Amurka ta fara ne da yaƙin juyin juya hali kuma tana ƙarewa da yaƙin juyin juya hali. Jam’iyyar Republican ta fara ne a yaƙin basasa kuma tana ƙarewa a yaƙin basasa. ‘Yan Republican suna ganin yaƙin basasar da ‘yan Democrat suke kira juyin juya hali.
Trump, as the last Republican president possesses the prophetic attributes of the first Republican president, who arrived in the external history of the Civil War. Lincoln’s external Civil War was also the internal history of Isaiah’s prophecy of chapter seven, verse eight that ended in 1863, the very year of the Emancipation Proclamation. The distinction between the two parties is a primary and foundational prophetic principle. It began with Cain and Abel, who in the time of Christ were represented by the Sadducees and the Pharisees, two classes of Cain who were to murder one Abel.
Trump, a matsayinsa na shugaban ƙasa na jam’iyyar Republican na ƙarshe, yana da siffofin annabci irin na shugaban ƙasa na farko na jam’iyyar Republican, wanda ya bayyana a cikin tarihin waje na Yaƙin Basasa. Yaƙin Basasa na waje na Lincoln kuma shi ne tarihin cikin gida na annabcin Ishaya sura ta bakwai, aya ta takwas, wanda ya ƙare a 1863, wato ainihin shekarar da aka fitar da Sanarwar ’Yantarwa. Bambancin da ke tsakanin jam’iyyun biyu babban ƙa’ida ce ta annabci kuma ginshiƙi ne na asali. Ya fara da Kayinu da Habila, waɗanda a zamanin Almasihu Sadukiyawa da Farisiyawa suka wakilta, rukuni biyu na Kayinu waɗanda za su kashe Habila ɗaya.
The Pharisees and Sadducees represent those who agreed to crucify their Messiah, for different reasons, but agreement—just the same. The Pharisees professed to uphold the law, but didn’t, as with Republicans. The Pharisees professed to uphold the original divine law, but interpreted the law through their own bigoted logic. The original Law for the Pharisees is the Constitution for the Republicans, the very Constitution they claim to support, but don’t. The Sadducees rejected the power of God, and though a smaller sect than the Pharisees, the Sadducees controlled the religious and political landscape of Judea in the time of Christ. The Democrats are a smaller sect than the Republicans, so small they must cheat to stay in power, but stay in power they do, for their opponents who profess to uphold equal justice for all, do nothing to enforce the principles of the law they profess to uphold.
Farasiyawa da Sadukiyawa suna wakiltar waɗanda suka yarda a gicciye Almasihunsu, saboda dalilai dabam-dabam, amma dai yarda ce—haka nan. Farasiyawa sun yi iƙirarin tsayawa ga doka, amma ba su yi haka ba, kamar yadda yake ga ’yan Republican. Farasiyawa sun yi iƙirarin tsayawa ga asalin dokar Allah, amma sun fassara dokar ta hanyar son zuciyarsu mai cike da wariya. Asalin Dokar ga Farasiyawa ita ce Tsarin Mulki ga ’yan Republican, wato wannan Tsarin Mulki ɗin da kansa da suke da’awar suna goyon baya, amma ba sa yi. Sadukiyawa kuwa sun ƙi ikon Allah, kuma ko da yake su ƙungiya ce mafi ƙanƙanta fiye da Farasiyawa, Sadukiyawa ne suka mamaye yanayin addini da siyasa na Yahudiya a zamanin Almasihu. ’Yan Democrat kuwa ƙungiya ce mafi ƙanƙanta fiye da ’yan Republican, har ƙanƙantarsu ta kai ga dole su yi magudi domin su ci gaba da riƙe iko, kuma iko ɗin kuwa suna ci gaba da riƙewa, gama masu hamayya da su waɗanda suke da’awar tsayawa ga adalci iri ɗaya ga kowa, ba sa yin kome domin aiwatar da ƙa’idodin dokar da suke da’awar suna tsayawa a kanta.
There is nothing new under the sun, and the two political parties in the United States are as much a part of the prophetic landscape as were the Pharisees and Sadducees. There are of course many other parallels along this prophetic line, but it is only when you see the prophetic relationship of the two unholy powers, who though adversaries, become united against holiness, that you then see Ptolemy and Uzziah in the proper light. Both southern kings attempted to sacrifice at the same temple, but Ptolemy, from Egypt represents a dragon power—the Democrats. Uzziah, as king of Judea is the leader of the glorious land, who is apostate Protestantism, or the false prophet—the Republicans.
Babu wani sabon abu a ƙarƙashin rana, kuma jam’iyyun siyasa biyu na Amurka suna cikin shimfiɗar annabci kamar yadda Farisiyawa da Sadukiyawa suka kasance. Tabbatacce ne akwai wasu kamanceceniya masu yawa a wannan layin annabci, amma sai kawai lokacin da ka ga dangantakar annabci ta waɗannan iko biyu marasa tsarki—waɗanda, ko da yake maƙiya ne ga juna, sukan haɗa kai gāba da tsarki—sa’an nan ne zaka ga Ptolemy da Uzziah cikin hasken da ya dace. Dukansu sarakunan kudu sun yi ƙoƙarin miƙa hadaya a cikin haikali ɗaya, amma Ptolemy, daga Masar, yana wakiltar ikon maciji—jam’iyyar Democrats. Uzziah kuwa, a matsayin sarkin Yahudiya, shi ne jagoran ƙasa mai daraja, wanda shi ne Furotestantism mai ridda, ko annabin ƙarya—jam’iyyar Republicans.
The relationship of the dragon and false prophet is classically represented at Mount Carmel. At the mount, Ahab represented the dragon and Jezebel’s prophets of Baal and Ashtaroth represented the false prophets who stood against Elijah. The beast that is Jezebel was still behind the scenes in Samaria. The dragon united with the false prophet was also represented by pagan Rome and the Jews unification at the cross, as will be the unification of the Democrats and the Republicans at the Sunday law. The elements of a united power are represented by the Democrats and Republicans within the Republican horn of the earth beast. Those two unholy political powers are represented by Cain, and the line of Abel also possesses a twofold division.
Dangantakar da ke tsakanin macijin da annabin ƙarya an wakilta ta a sarari a Dutsen Karmel. A kan dutsen, Ahab ya wakilci macijin, kuma annabawan Ba’al da Ashtarot na Jezebel suka wakilci annabawan ƙarya da suka tsaya gāba da Iliya. Dabbar nan wadda ita ce Jezebel har yanzu tana a bayan fage a Samariya. Macijin da ya haɗu da annabin ƙarya an kuma wakilta su ta wurin haɗuwar Roma ta arna da Yahudawa a kan gicciye, kamar yadda kuma za a yi haɗuwar Democrats da Republicans a dokar Lahadi. Abubuwan da suka ƙunshi iko guda ɗaya a haɗe ana wakilta su ta wurin Democrats da Republicans a cikin ƙahon Republican na dabbar ƙasa. Waɗannan iko biyu na siyasa marasa tsarki Kayinu ne ya wakilta, kuma layin Habila ma yana da rarrabuwar kashi biyu.
Abel’s line, which in relation to Cain’s external line is the internal line, and is represented by two classes of virgins. The progression of the Protestant horn of the earth beast that is the United States is represented by a series of religious purging’s beginning with the church of Sardis in 1798, when the United States became the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Sardis was a church who had a name claiming that it lived, but it was dead. By 1798 the Protestant sects that had broken away from the papal church were already returning to Rome. Christians were first named Christians in Antioch.
Tsatson Habila, wanda dangane da tsatson waje na Kayinu shi ne tsatson ciki, kuma azuzuwa biyu na budurwai ne suke wakiltarsa. Ci gaban ƙahon Furotesta na dabbar ƙasa, wadda ita ce Amurka, ana wakiltarsa da jerin tsarkakewa na addini da suka fara da ikkilisiyar Sardis a shekara ta 1798, sa’ad da Amurka ta zama masarauta ta shida ta annabcin Littafi Mai Tsarki. Sardis ikkilisiya ce da take da suna tana iƙirarin cewa tana da rai, amma matacciya ce. Zuwa shekara ta 1798 ƙungiyoyin Furotesta waɗanda suka balle daga cocin papanci sun riga sun fara komawa Roma. A Antakiya ne aka fara kiran Kiristoci da suna Kiristoci.
“It was in Antioch that the disciples were first called Christians. The name was given them because Christ was the main theme of their preaching, their teaching, and their conversation. Continually they were recounting the incidents that had occurred during the days of His earthly ministry, when His disciples were blessed with His personal presence. Untiringly they dwelt upon His teachings and His miracles of healing. With quivering lips and tearful eyes they spoke of His agony in the garden, His betrayal, trial, and execution, the forbearance and humility with which He had endured the contumely and torture imposed upon Him by His enemies, and the Godlike pity with which He had prayed for those who persecuted Him. His resurrection and ascension, and His work in heaven as the Mediator for fallen man, were topics on which they rejoiced to dwell. Well might the heathen call them Christians, since they preached Christ and addressed their prayers to God through Him.
A Antakiya ne aka fara kiran almajirai da suna Kiristoci. An ba su wannan suna ne domin Almasihu shi ne babban jigon wa’azinsu, koyarwarsu, da tattaunawarsu. A kai a kai suna ba da labarin abubuwan da suka faru a kwanakin hidimarsa ta duniya, lokacin da almajiransa suka sami albarka da kasancewarsa tare da su a zahiri. Ba tare da gajiyawa ba suna zurfafawa a kan koyarwarsa da mu’ujizojin warkewarsa. Da leɓuna masu rawa da idanu masu cike da hawaye suka yi magana game da azabarsa a lambu, cin amanar da aka yi masa, shari’arsa, da kashe shi, da haƙuri da tawali’un da ya jure zagi da azabar da maƙiyansa suka ɗora masa, da tausayi irin na Allah wanda da shi ya yi addu’a domin masu tsananta masa. Tashinsa daga matattu da hawansa zuwa sama, da aikinsa a sama a matsayin Mai shiga tsakani domin mutum faɗaɗɗe, su ne batutuwan da suka yi murna su tsaya a kansu. Daidai ne ƙwarai arna su kira su Kiristoci, domin suna wa’azin Almasihu ne kuma suna miƙa addu’o’insu ga Allah ta wurinsa.
“It was God who gave to them the name of Christian. This is a royal name, given to all who join themselves to Christ. It was of this name that James wrote later, ‘Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats? Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called?’ James 2:6, 7. And Peter declared, ‘If any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf.’ ‘If ye be reproached for the name of Christ, happy are ye; for the spirit of glory and of God resteth upon you.’ 1 Peter 4:16, 14.” Acts of the Apostles, 157.
“Allah ne ya ba su sunan Kirista. Wannan suna ne na sarauta, wanda aka ba dukan waɗanda suka haɗa kansu da Almasihu. Wannan ne sunan da Yaƙub ya rubuta game da shi daga baya, ‘Ashe, ba mawadata ba ne suke zaluntar ku, su kuma jawo ku gaban kujerun shari’a? Ashe, ba su ne suke saɓo ga wannan sunan mai daraja da aka kira ku da shi ba?’ Yaƙub 2:6, 7. Kuma Bitrus ya bayyana, ‘In kuwa wani yana shan wahala a matsayin Kirista, kada ya ji kunya; sai dai ya ɗaukaka Allah a wannan al’amari.’ ‘Idan ana zaginku saboda sunan Almasihu, masu albarka ne ku; gama Ruhun ɗaukaka da na Allah yana zaune a kanku.’ 1 Bitrus 4:16, 14.” Ayyukan Manzanni, 157.
The church of Ephesus was given the name of Christian which led to the persecuted church of Smyrna, that was followed by the church of compromise in the history of Pergamos. When the papacy took the throne, a separation identified God’s true church as the church in the wilderness. The Roman church was Thyatira. At the ending of the wilderness of twelve hundred and sixty years, the church of Protestantism arose, and from that point onward the Protestant horn is represented by a divine series of tests and purges.
An ba cocin Afisa sunan Kirista, wanda ya kai ga cocin Simirna mai shan tsanantawa; bayan wannan sai cocin sassauci da sulhu a tarihin Pergamos. Sa’ad da papanci ya hau karagar mulki, wani rarrabewa ya bayyana cocin Allah na gaskiya a matsayin cocin da take cikin jeji. Cocin Roma ita ce Tiyatira. A ƙarshen zaman jeji na shekaru dubu ɗaya da ɗari biyu da sittin, cocin Furotesta ta bayyana, kuma daga wannan lokaci zuwa gaba ana wakiltar ƙahon Furotesta ta hanyar jerin gwaje-gwaje da tsarkake-tsarkake na Allah.
Protestantism began when Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses upon the door in 1517, and “23” years later in 1540 the Jesuit order began. In 2013 the 95th and final presentation of Habakkuk’s Tables was nailed to the door, and on March 13, 2013¸ the first Jesuit pope was inaugurated. Martin Luther was excommunicated in that very history by pope Leo. Go figure…
Furotesta ya fara ne sa’ad da Martin Luther ya ƙusance theses nasa 95 a kan ƙofa a shekara ta 1517, kuma bayan shekara “23” a 1540 ƙungiyar Jesuit ta fara. A shekara ta 2013 an ƙusance gabatarwa ta 95 kuma ta ƙarshe ta Teburorin Habakkuk a kan ƙofa, kuma a ranar 13 ga Maris, 2013, an naɗa Fafaroma na farko ɗan ƙungiyar Jesuit. An kori Martin Luther daga tarayya da coci a cikin wannan tarihin ta hannun Fafaroma Leo. Ka yi tunani…
In 1798 the church of Sardis claimed to hold to the name of “Protestant,” but by returning to Rome they were already failing to uphold their name. When Millerite Adventism took the torch of Protestantism in 1844, they represented a rebuke against Jeroboam the first king of Israel, a nation who were blood relatives of the tribe in Judah, where God had placed His temple. Jeroboam set up a counterfeit, based upon the religion that represented his nation’s former bondage. He repeated Aaron’s foundational rebellion of erecting an image of a beast with all the prophetic significance associated with the story. But at his dedication service Millerite Adventism rebuked his unwillingness to continue to direct true worship to the sanctuary where God lives. Jeroboam, wanted the focus of worship to be in Bethel and Dan, representing those from Sardis in 1844 who refused to follow Christ into the Most Holy Place.
A shekara ta 1798 cocin Sardis ta yi iƙirarin riƙe suna na “Furotesta,” amma da komawarsu zuwa Roma sun riga sun fara kasa tsayawa kan sunansu. Sa’ad da Adventism na Millerite ya karɓi fitilar Furotesta a shekara ta 1844, sun wakilci tsawatawa ga Yerobowam, sarkin Isra’ila na fari—al’ummar da suke ’yan’uwa ta jini da kabilar da take a Yahuda, inda Allah ya sa Haikalinsa. Yerobowam ya kafa abin jabu, bisa ga addinin da yake wakiltar tsohuwar bautar da al’ummarsa ta taɓa kasancewa a ƙarƙashinta. Ya maimaita fitinar tushe ta Haruna ta kafa siffar dabba, tare da dukan muhimmancin annabci da ke da alaƙa da wannan labari. Amma a wajen hidimar keɓewarsu Millerite Adventism ya tsawata masa saboda ƙin ci gaba da karkatar da ibada ta gaskiya zuwa Wuri Mai Tsarki inda Allah yake zaune. Yerobowam yana so a mayar da hankalin ibada zuwa Betel da Dan, waɗanda suke wakiltar waɗanda suka fito daga Sardis a shekara ta 1844, waɗanda suka ƙi bin Almasihu zuwa Wuri Mafi Tsarki.
Millerite Adventism chose to return to the religion of Rome, and took up the very doctrinal arguments of those who had just been exposed as false prophets through their rejection of Miller’s message; as their theological masters in order to justify their rejection of the prophetic message of the seven times. Millerite Adventism, as with the disobedient prophet chose their own path, instead of following God’s direction. The path that is chosen by the foolish in all the tests and purges of the wise and foolish virgins from the Protestant reformation onward in prophetic history is the path which returns to the worship of the land that you were delivered from, and as they say, “all roads lead to Rome.” All roads except Jeremiah’s old paths.
Adventism na Millerawa ta zaɓi komawa ga addinin Roma, ta kuma rungumi ainihin hujjojin koyarwa na waɗanda aka riga aka tona a matsayin annabawan ƙarya ta wurin ƙin karɓar saƙon Miller; a matsayin malamansu na tauhidi domin su ba da hujjar ƙin karɓarsu ga saƙon annabci na lokatai bakwai. Adventism na Millerawa, kamar annabin marar biyayya, ta zaɓi nata hanya maimakon bin ja-gorar Allah. Hanyar da wawaye suke zaɓa a cikin dukan gwaje-gwaje da tsarkake-tsarkaken masu hikima da wawaye cikin tarihin annabci tun daga gyaran Furotesta zuwa gaba ita ce hanyar da take komawa ga bautar ƙasar da aka cece ku daga gare ta, kuma kamar yadda suke cewa, “duk hanyoyi suna kaiwa Roma.” Dukan hanyoyi ban da tsoffin hanyoyin Irmiya.
The Protestant reformation had been typified by Moses’ return to Egypt in order to lead God’s people into the Promised Land. Once out of the land of captivity God purposed to give His chosen people His law. In the line of Moses and the Protestant reformation rebellion was manifested immediately after the deliverance. God tested Sardis, a people who claimed to have a living name, but were dead by the time of the message of William Miller. Two purging’s took place in 1844; the first was the purge of the church of Sardis, who had claimed to be Protestants, but were proven to be dead; and then the Millerite’s were purged in the same year, in fulfillment of the parable of the ten virgins.
An yi wa Gyaran Furotesta kwatanci da komowar Musa zuwa Masar domin ya fitar da mutanen Allah zuwa Ƙasar Alkawari. Da zarar sun fito daga ƙasar bautar talala, Allah ya yi nufin ya ba zaɓaɓɓun mutanensa shari’arsa. A cikin layin Musa da Gyaran Furotesta, tawaye ya bayyana nan da nan bayan ceto. Allah ya gwada Sardis, mutanen da suka yi iƙirarin suna da suna mai rai, amma sun kasance matattu a lokacin saƙon William Miller. Tsarkakewa biyu suka faru a shekara ta 1844; na fari shi ne tsarkakewar cocin Sardis, wadda ta yi iƙirarin cewa ita Furotesta ce, amma aka tabbatar matacciya ce; sa’an nan kuma aka tsarkake Milleriyawa a wannan shekarar, cikin cikar misalin budurwai goma.
The Democrats and Republicans represent two political classes that together make up the Republican horn on the earth beast of Revelation thirteen. The wise and foolish virgins are two religious classes that together make up the Protestant horn on the earth beast. The wise virgins possess the first name given at Antioch. The wise virgins are Christians, but they are also Philadelphians who have the promise of receiving a name.
’Yan Democrat da ’yan Republican suna wakiltar azuzuwan siyasa guda biyu waɗanda tare suke kafa ƙahon Republican a kan dabbar ƙasa ta Ru’ya ta Yohanna sura ta goma sha uku. Budurwai masu hikima da marasa hikima kuma su ne azuzuwan addini guda biyu waɗanda tare suke kafa ƙahon Protestant a kan dabbar ƙasa. Budurwai masu hikima suna da suna na fari da aka ba da shi a Antakiya. Budurwai masu hikima Kiristoci ne, amma su ma Filadelfiyawa ne waɗanda suke da alkawarin karɓar suna.
Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name. Revelation 3:12.
Wanda ya yi nasara zan mai da shi ginshiƙi a cikin haikalin Allahna, kuma ba zai ƙara fita waje ba har abada; kuma zan rubuta a kansa sunan Allahna, da sunan birnin Allahna, wato sabuwar Urushalima, wadda take saukowa daga sama daga wurin Allahna: kuma zan rubuta a kansa sabon sunana. Ru’ya ta Yohanna 3:12.
The first time God named His people Christian was at Antioch, and the history where the Laodicean movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand changes unto the Philadelphian movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand is also the history of Antiochus the Great, who the city of Antioch is named after, and who is represented at the end of a 250-year period between the battles of Raphia and Panium.
A karo na farko da Allah ya ba mutanensa suna Kirista shi ne a Antakiya, kuma tarihin da motsin Laodikiya na dubu ɗari da arba’in da huɗu yake sauyawa zuwa motsin Filadelfiya na dubu ɗari da arba’in da huɗu shi ma tarihin Antiochus Mai Girma ne, wanda aka sa wa birnin Antakiya suna ne a kansa, kuma wanda ake wakilta a ƙarshen wani zamani na shekaru dari biyu da hamsin tsakanin yaƙe-yaƙen Raphia da Panium.
We will continue these things in the next article.
Za mu ci gaba da waɗannan abubuwa a talifi na gaba.