Elijah’s witness begins when he identifies that there would be no rain, except at his word for three and a half years.

Temwayaj Eli a kòmanse lè li fè konnen pa t ap gen lapli, eksepte sou pawòl li, pandan twa zan e demi.

And Elijah the Tishbite, who was of the inhabitants of Gilead, said unto Ahab, As the Lord God of Israel liveth, before whom I stand, there shall not be dew nor rain these years, but according to my word. 1 Kings 17:1.

Eli, Tichbit la, ki te soti nan mitan moun Galaad yo, di Akab: Menm jan Seyè a, Bondye pèp Izrayèl la, vivan, li menm devan ki mwen kanpe a, pa pral gen ni lawouze ni lapli pandan ane sa yo, eksepte selon pawòl mwen. 1 Wa 17:1.

Those three and a half years represent the history of Thyatira from 538 until 1798. In 1798, at the end of the period of drought Elijah summons Ahab to Carmel. The first angels’ message announced the hour of God’s judgment on October 22, 1844. The first angel’s message was the command to Ahab to call all of Israel to Carmel.

Twa zan edmi sa yo reprezante istwa Tiyatir depi 538 rive 1798. An 1798, nan fen peryòd sechrès la, Eli rele Akab sou mòn Kamèl. Mesaj premye zanj lan te anonse lè jijman Bondye a nan 22 oktòb 1844. Mesaj premye zanj lan te kòmandman Akab te resevwa pou rele tout pèp Izrayèl la sou mòn Kamèl.

And it came to pass, when Ahab saw Elijah, that Ahab said unto him, Art thou he that troubleth Israel? And he answered, I have not troubled Israel; but thou, and thy father’s house, in that ye have forsaken the commandments of the Lord, and thou hast followed Baalim. Now therefore send, and gather to me all Israel unto mount Carmel, and the prophets of Baal four hundred and fifty, and the prophets of the groves four hundred, which eat at Jezebel’s table. So Ahab sent unto all the children of Israel, and gathered the prophets together unto mount Carmel. And Elijah came unto all the people, and said, How long halt ye between two opinions? if the Lord be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word. 1 Kings 18:17–21.

Epi sa, lè Akab wè Eli, Akab di li: Èske se ou menm k ap twouble Izrayèl la? Li reponn: Se pa mwen ki twouble Izrayèl la; men se ou menm ak kay papa ou, paske nou te abandone kòmandman Senyè a, epi ou te swiv Baal yo. Koulye a, voye fè rasanble tout Izrayèl vin jwenn mwen sou mòn Kamèl, ansanm ak katsansenkant pwofèt Baal yo, ak katsan pwofèt Achera yo, ki manje sou tab Jezabèl la. Se konsa Akab voye chèche tout pitit Izrayèl yo, epi li rasanble pwofèt yo sou mòn Kamèl. Eli pwoche bò kote tout pèp la, li di: Jiska ki lè n ap ezite ant de opinyon? Si Senyè a se Bondye, swiv li; men si se Baal, swiv li. E pèp la pa t reponn li yon sèl mo. 1 Wa 18:17–21.

All Israel was gathered to Carmel in the time of Elijah, which in turn represented William Miller’s history when the three churches of Revelation chapter three were gathered together. The church that had initially fled into the wilderness in 538 to escape the persecution of Jezebel, as represented by the church of Thyatira, came out of the wilderness as the generation that was to be confronted with the message of Elijah, represented by William Miller. The earth beast then opened its mouth and swallowed up the flood of persecution that had been sent against her for twelve hundred and sixty years.

Tout Israël fut rassemblé au Carmel au temps d’Élie, ce qui, à son tour, représentait l’histoire de William Miller, lorsque les trois Églises du chapitre trois de l’Apocalypse furent réunies ensemble. L’Église qui, au commencement, s’était enfuie au désert en 538 pour échapper à la persécution de Jézabel, telle qu’elle est représentée par l’Église de Thyatire, sortit du désert comme la génération qui devait être mise en présence du message d’Élie, représenté par William Miller. La bête de la terre ouvrit alors sa bouche et engloutit le flot de persécution qui avait été envoyé contre elle pendant mille deux cent soixante ans.

And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. Revelation 12:16.

Epi tè a te ede fanm nan; tè a louvri bouch li, epi li vale desann gwo dlo dragon an te voye soti nan bouch li. Revelasyon 12:16.

In prophecy the “speaking of a nation” is the action of its legislative and judicial authorities, and in 1789 the United States established the divine document that is the Constitution of the United States, thus protecting the rights and freedom necessary to provide protection from the persecution of both the kings of Europe and the apostate Catholic church.

Nan pwofesi, “pawòl yon nasyon” se aksyon otorite lejislatif ak jidisyè li yo; e an 1789 Etazini te etabli dokiman diven ki se Konstitisyon Etazini an, konsa li te pwoteje dwa ak libète ki te nesesè pou bay pwoteksyon kont pèsekisyon ni wa Ewòp yo ni legliz Katolik aposta a.

The speaking of the nation is the action of its legislative and judicial authorities.” The Great Controversy, 443.

«Lè nasyon an pale, se aksyon otorite lejislatif ak jidisyè li yo.» The Great Controversy, 443.

In 1789, just before the beginning of the United States’ prophetic role as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy began, it spake as a Lamb, but at the Sunday law it will speak as a dragon.

An 1789, jis anvan kòmansman wòl pwofetik Etazini kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la te kòmanse, li te pale tankou yon Ti Mouton; men, nan lwa dimanch lan, li pral pale tankou yon dragon.

And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. Revelation 13:11.

Epi m te wè yon lòt bèt k ap monte soti nan tè a; li te gen de kòn tankou yon ti mouton, epi li te pale tankou yon dragon. Revelasyon 13:11.

The beginning and ending of the earth beast are marked by its speaking. In 1798, Ahab calls all of Israel to Mount Carmel where Elijah is going to set forth a test to prove to those watching whether the God of the Hebrews or the god of Jezebel is the true God. Jezebel had four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal and four hundred prophets of the grove. The false god Baal was a male deity and the false god Ashtaroth was a female deity.

Kòmansman ak finisman bèt ki soti sou tè a make pa fason li pale. An 1798, Akab rele tout pèp Izrayèl la sou mòn Kamèl, kote Eli pral prezante yon tès pou pwouve devan tout moun k ap gade si Bondye Ebre yo oswa bondye Jezabèl la se vrè Bondye a. Jezabèl te gen katsan senkant pwofèt Baal ak katsan pwofèt Achera yo. Fo bondye Baal la te yon divinite gason, epi fo bondye Astarté a te yon divinite fi.

Those two classes of false prophets represent the combination of church and state, for in prophecy when a man and woman are represented together, the woman represents a church and the man the state. Elijah was outnumbered eight hundred and fifty to one as he confronted the unholy combination of church and state, as represented by the female and male false deities and also by the marriage of Ahab and Jezebel. Ahab and Jezebel’s illustration of church and state represent the corruption of the horn of Republicanism and Baal and Ashtaroth represent the corruption of the Protestant horn.

De fo pwofèt sa yo reprezante konbinezon legliz ak leta, paske nan pwofesi, lè yo prezante yon gason ak yon fanm ansanm, fanm nan reprezante yon legliz epi gason an reprezante leta. Eli te an minorite, uit san senkant kont youn, lè li te konfwonte konbinezon enpi legliz ak leta a, jan sa te reprezante pa fo divinite fi ak gason yo, epi tou pa maryaj Akab ak Jezabèl la. Ilistrasyon Akab ak Jezabèl sou legliz ak leta a reprezante koripsyon kòn Repiblikanis la, epi Baal ak Ashtaròt yo reprezante koripsyon kòn Pwotestan an.

The issue was Elijah’s protest against the corrupt religion represented by Thyatira in Revelation chapter two. Elijah represented a Protestant, for the only definition of Protestant is someone who protests against Rome. Elijah’s protest represents a protest against the combination of church and state that is accomplished by the unholy alliance between a corrupted state with a corrupted church.

Pwoblèm nan se te pwotestasyon Eli te leve kont relijyon kòwonpi ki reprezante pa Tiyatir nan chapit de liv Revelasyon an. Eli te reprezante yon Pwotestan, paske sèl definisyon yon Pwotestan se yon moun ki pwoteste kont Wòm. Pwotestasyon Eli a reprezante yon pwotestasyon kont konbinezon legliz ak leta, ki reyalize pa alyans enpi ki fèt ant yon leta kòwonpi ak yon legliz kòwonpi.

Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols. And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not. Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds. Revelation 2:20–22.

Sepandan, mwen gen kèk bagay kont ou, paske ou kite fanm sa a, Jezabèl, ki rele tèt li yon pwofètès, anseye epi sedui sèvitè m yo pou yo fè fònikasyon, epi pou yo manje bagay yo te ofri bay zidòl. E mwen te ba li tan pou l repanti de fònikasyon li; men li pa t repanti. Gade, m ap jete li sou yon kabann, epi moun k ap fè adiltè avè l yo nan yon gwo tribilasyon, si yo pa repanti de zèv yo. Revelasyon 2:20–22.

Eating represents the message you accept, and a message that is sacrificed to idols represents the doctrines of Catholicism, the very symbol of the abominable worship of idols. God’s people in the Dark Ages had come to accept many of the pagan doctrines of Catholicism, and especially the worship of the sun.

Manje reprezante mesaj ou aksepte a, epi yon mesaj yo ofri bay zidòl yo reprezante doktrin Katolisism lan, senbòl menm adorasyon zidòl ki abominab la. Pèp Bondye a nan Mwayennaj Fènwa yo te rive aksepte anpil nan doktrin payen Katolisism lan, e sitou adorasyon solèy la.

Fornication is an unlawful relationship and prophetically represents the very essence of what the Constitution prohibits; the combination of church and state. Ahab was in an unlawful relationship with Jezebel, for as a king of Israel he was not to marry a heathen princess. Jesus identified John the Baptist as Elijah, and John also confronted the same unholy relationship when he rebuked Herod for marrying Herodias, his brother’s wife.

Fònikasyon se yon relasyon ki pa legal e, nan sans pwofetik, li reprezante menm esans sa Konstitisyon an entèdi a: konbinezon legliz ak leta. Akab te nan yon relasyon ki pa legal ak Jezabèl, paske antanke wa Izrayèl li pa t dwe marye ak yon prensès payèn. Jezi te idantifye Jan Batis kòm Eli, e Jan tou te konfwonte menm relasyon ki pa sen sa a lè li te reprimande Ewòd poutèt li te marye ak Ewodyas, madanm frè li.

For Herod had laid hold on John, and bound him, and put him in prison for Herodias’ sake, his brother Philip’s wife. For John said unto him, It is not lawful for thee to have her. Matthew 14:3, 4.

Paske Ewòd te fè arete Jan, li te mare l, epi li te mete l nan prizon poutèt Ewodyas, madanm Filip, frè li. Paske Jan te di li: Li pa legal pou ou genyen li. Matye 14:3, 4.

Elijah’s confrontation with Ahab and Jezebel prefigured John’s confrontation with Herod and Herodias for both relationships represented an unlawful relationship of church and state. Together they represent the Elijah message of the one hundred and forty-four thousand who confronts the papacy (Jezebel & Herodias), the ten kings that represent the United Nations (Ahab & Herod) and the United States that represents the false prophet (the false prophets of Carmel and Salome, Herodias’ daughter).

Konfwontasyon Eli ak Akab ak Jezabèl la te prefigire konfwontasyon Jan ak Ewòd ak Ewodyad, paske toude relasyon sa yo te reprezante yon relasyon ilegal ant legliz ak leta. Ansanm yo reprezante mesaj Eli a nan san karannkat mil yo, ki ap konfwonte papote a (Jezabèl ak Ewodyad), dis wa yo ki reprezante Nasyonzini an (Akab ak Ewòd), ak Etazini ki reprezante fo pwofèt la (fo pwofèt Kamel yo ak Salome, pitit fi Ewodyad la).

The prophetic setting at Carmel includes the defense by Elijah of the Constitution of the United States, which enshrines the principle of the separation of church and state.

Kad pwofetik ki sou Kamèl la gen ladan l defans Eli fè pou Konstitisyon Etazini yo, ki tabli kòm prensip separasyon ant legliz ak Leta.

And it came to pass, when Ahab saw Elijah, that Ahab said unto him, Art thou he that troubleth Israel? And he answered, I have not troubled Israel; but thou, and thy father’s house, in that ye have forsaken the commandments of the Lord, and thou hast followed Baalim. 1 Kings 18:17, 18.

Epi sa, lè Akab wè Eli, Akab di li: Èske se ou menm k ap twouble Izrayèl? E li reponn: Se pa mwen ki twouble Izrayèl; men se ou menm ak kay papa ou, paske nou vire do bay kòmandman Seyè a, epi ou te swiv Baalim yo. 1 Wa 18:17, 18.

The Constitution established that the two horns of Republicanism and Protestantism would always stay separate from each other. But Revelation identifies that when the United States ultimately speaks as a dragon, it will do so when the apostate churches of the United States take control and combine with the apostate government.

Konstitisyon an te etabli ke de kòn Repiblikanis ak Pwotestantis yo t ap toujou rete separe youn ak lòt. Men, Revelasyon an idantifye ke lè Etazini, finalman, pale tankou yon dragon, li pral fè sa lè legliz aposta Etazini yo pran kontwòl epi mete tèt yo ansanm ak gouvènman aposta a.

“But what is the ‘image to the beast’? and how is it to be formed? The image is made by the two-horned beast, and is an image to the beast. It is also called an image of the beast. Then to learn what the image is like and how it is to be formed we must study the characteristics of the beast itself—the papacy.

“Men, ki sa ki ‘imaj bèt la’? epi kijan li dwe fòme? Se bèt ki gen de kòn nan ki fè imaj la, e li se yon imaj pou bèt la. Yo rele li tou yon imaj bèt la. Donk, pou nou konnen kijan imaj la ye ak kijan li dwe fòme, nou dwe etidye karakteristik bèt la menm nan—papote a.

“When the early church became corrupted by departing from the simplicity of the gospel and accepting heathen rites and customs, she lost the Spirit and power of God; and in order to control the consciences of the people, she sought the support of the secular power. The result was the papacy, a church that controlled the power of the state and employed it to further her own ends, especially for the punishment of ‘heresy.’ In order for the United States to form an image of the beast, the religious power must so control the civil government that the authority of the state will also be employed by the church to accomplish her own ends.” The Great Controversy, 443.

«Lè legliz premye tan an te vin kòwonpi paske li te vire do bay senplisite levanjil la epi li te aksepte rit ak koutim payen yo, li te pèdi Lespri ak pouvwa Bondye; epi, pou l te ka kontwole konsyans pèp la, li te chèche sipò pouvwa sivil la. Rezilta a se te papote a, yon legliz ki te kontwole pouvwa leta a epi ki te sèvi avè l pou avanse pwòp objektif pa li, espesyalman pou pini “erezi.” Pou Etazini fòme yon imaj bèt la, fòk pouvwa relijye a kontwole gouvènman sivil la nan yon tèl mezi, otorite leta a tou va sèvi pa legliz la pou reyalize pwòp objektif pa li yo.» The Great Controversy, 443.

Elijah at Mount Carmel represented the work of the Millerites, and the Millerites were established as the true prophet in contrast with those that had recently come out from under the influence of Catholicism, but chose through their rejection of the light of the first angel to return to Rome. Thus, the second angel’s message in the spring of 1844 consisted of identifying the Protestant denominations as daughters of Babylon, and the Millerites as the genuine Protestant horn.

Eli sou mòn Kamèl te reprezante travay Milerit yo, e Milerit yo te etabli kòm vrè pwofèt la an kontrast ak sila yo ki te fèk sòti anba enfliyans Katolik la, men ki, atravè rejè yo te fè limyè premye zanj lan, te chwazi retounen Wòm. Konsa, mesaj dezyèm zanj lan nan prentan 1844 la te genyen ladan l idantifikasyon denominasyon pwotestan yo kòm pitit fi Babilòn yo, epi Milerit yo kòm vrè kòn pwotestan an.

When God brought ancient Israel out of the slavery of Egypt and through the waters of the Red Sea, He initiated a progressive testing process that began with the test of the heavenly manna.

Lè Bondye te fè ansyen Izrayèl soti anba esklavaj peyi Lejip epi pase yo nan dlo Lanmè Wouj la, Li te kòmanse yon pwosesis eprèv pwogresif ki te kòmanse ak eprèv laman selès la.

“Upon us is shining the accumulated light of past ages. The record of Israel’s forgetfulness has been preserved for our enlightenment. In this age God has set His hand to gather unto Himself a people from every nation, kindred, and tongue. In the advent movement He has wrought for His heritage, even as He wrought for the Israelites in leading them from Egypt. In the great disappointment of 1844 the faith of His people was tested as was that of the Hebrews at the Red Sea.” Testimonies, volume 8, 115, 116.

“Se limyè akimile tan pase yo k ap klere sou nou. Dosye sou bliye pèp Izrayèl la te konsève pou enstriksyon nou. Nan epòk sa a, Bondye lonje men Li pou rasanble bò kote Li yon pèp ki soti nan tout nasyon, fanmi, ak lang. Nan mouvman avènman an, Li te aji pou eritaj Li, menm jan Li te aji pou Izrayelit yo lè Li t ap mennen yo soti Lejip. Nan gwo desepsyon ane 1844 la, lafwa pèp Li a te pase anba eprèv menm jan ak lafwa Ebre yo bò Lanmè Wouj la.” Testimonies, volim 8, 115, 116.

The disappointment of October 22, 1844, led to the understanding of the heavenly sanctuary, which then presented the test of the Sabbath just as the test of the manna became the first of a series of ten tests for ancient Israel.

Desepsyon 22 Oktòb 1844 la mennen nan konpreyansyon tanp sen ki nan syèl la, ki ansuit te prezante tès Saba a menm jan tès laman nan te vin premye a nan yon seri dis tès pou Izrayèl tan lontan an.

“The Lord gave me the following view in 1847, while the brethren were assembled on the Sabbath, at Topsham, Maine.

“Seyè a te ban m vizyon sa a ann 1847, pandan frè yo te reyini jou Saba a, nan Topsham, Maine.

“We felt an unusual spirit of prayer. And as we prayed the Holy Ghost fell upon us. We were very happy. Soon I was lost to earthly things and was wrapped in a vision of God’s glory. I saw an angel flying swiftly to me. He quickly carried me from the earth to the Holy City. In the city I saw a temple, which I entered. I passed through a door before I came to the first veil. This veil was raised, and I passed into the holy place. Here I saw the altar of incense, the candlestick with seven lamps, and the table on which was the shewbread. After viewing the glory of the holy, Jesus raised the second veil and I passed into the holy of holies.

“Nou te santi yon lespri lapriyè ki pa t òdinè. Epi pandan nou t ap priye, Sentespri a desann sou nou. Nou te ranpli ak anpil kè kontan. Talè konsa, mwen te pèdi tout sans bagay tè sa yo, e mwen te anvlope nan yon vizyon glwa Bondye. Mwen wè yon zanj k ap vole byen vit vin jwenn mwen. Li prese pote mwen soti sou tè a pou mennen m nan Vil Sen an. Nan vil la mwen wè yon tanp, kote mwen antre. Mwen pase pa yon pòt anvan mwen rive devan premye rido a. Yo leve rido sa a, epi mwen antre nan kote ki apa a. La a mwen wè lotèl lansan an, gwo chandelye ki gen sèt lanp yo, ak tab kote pen pwopozisyon an te ye a. Apre mwen fin gade glwa kote ki apa a, Jezi leve dezyèm rido a, epi mwen antre nan Sen Sen yo.”

“In the holiest I saw an ark; on the top and sides of it was purest gold. On each end of the ark was a lovely cherub, with its wings spread out over it. Their faces were turned toward each other, and they looked downward. Between the angels was a golden censer. Above the ark, where the angels stood, was an exceeding bright glory, that appeared like a throne where God dwelt. Jesus stood by the ark, and as the saints’ prayers came up to Him, the incense in the censer would smoke, and He would offer up their prayers with the smoke of the incense to His Father. In the ark was the golden pot of manna, Aaron’s rod that budded, and the tables of stone which folded together like a book. Jesus opened them, and I saw the Ten Commandments written on them with the finger of God. On one table were four, and on the other six. The four on the first table shone brighter than the other six. But the fourth, the Sabbath commandment, shone above them all; for the Sabbath was set apart to be kept in honor of God’s holy name. The holy Sabbath looked glorious—a halo of glory was all around it. I saw that the Sabbath commandment was not nailed to the cross. If it was, the other nine commandments were; and we are at liberty to break them all, as well as to break the fourth. I saw that God had not changed the Sabbath, for He never changes. But the pope had changed it from the seventh to the first day of the week; for he was to change times and laws.” Early Writings, 32.

“ក្នុងទីបរិសុទ្ធបំផុត ខ្ញុំបានឃើញហិបមួយ; លើកំពូល និងជ្រុងទាំងសងខាងរបស់វា គឺជាមាសសុទ្ធបំផុត។ នៅចុងនីមួយៗនៃហិប មានកេរូបដ៏ស្រស់ស្អាតមួយ ដោយបកស្លាបរបស់វាគ្របលើហិប។ មុខរបស់វាបែរមករកគ្នាទៅវិញទៅមក ហើយវាសម្លឹងចុះក្រោម។ នៅចន្លោះទេវតាទាំងនោះ មានកំញានមាសមួយ។ នៅលើហិប ត្រង់កន្លែងដែលទេវតាទាំងនោះឈរ មានសិរីរុងរឿងភ្លឺចែងចាំងលើសលប់មួយ ដែលមើលទៅដូចជាបល្ល័ង្កដែលព្រះទ្រង់គង់នៅ។ ព្រះយេស៊ូវទ្រង់ឈរនៅក្បែរហិប ហើយកាលណាសេចក្តីអធិស្ឋានរបស់ពួកបរិសុទ្ធឡើងមកដល់ទ្រង់ ធូបនៅក្នុងកំញានក៏ហុយផ្សែងឡើង ហើយទ្រង់ថ្វាយសេចក្តីអធិស្ឋានរបស់ពួកគេឡើងទៅព្រះវរបិតារបស់ទ្រង់ ជាមួយនឹងផ្សែងធូបនោះ។ នៅក្នុងហិប មានក្អមមាសដែលផ្ទុកម៉ាណា ដំបងរបស់អារ៉ុនដែលបានចេញពន្លក ហើយនិងផ្ទាំងថ្មទាំងពីរ ដែលបត់បិទជាមួយគ្នាដូចជាសៀវភៅមួយ។ ព្រះយេស៊ូវបានបើកវា ហើយខ្ញុំបានឃើញបញ្ញត្តិដប់ប្រការសរសេរនៅលើវា ដោយម្រាមព្រះហស្តរបស់ព្រះ។ លើផ្ទាំងមួយ មានបួនប្រការ ហើយលើផ្ទាំងមួយទៀត មានប្រាំមួយប្រការ។ បួនប្រការនៅលើផ្ទាំងទីមួយភ្លឺរលោងជាងប្រាំមួយប្រការផ្សេងទៀត។ ប៉ុន្តែប្រការទីបួន គឺបញ្ញត្តិអំពីថ្ងៃសប្ប័ទ បានភ្លឺលេចធ្លោលើសទាំងអស់; ដ្បិតថ្ងៃសប្ប័ទត្រូវបានញែកទុកឲ្យរក្សាទុក ដើម្បីលើកកិត្តិយសដល់ព្រះនាមបរិសុទ្ធរបស់ព្រះ។ ថ្ងៃសប្ប័ទបរិសុទ្ធមើលទៅពោរពេញដោយសិរីល្អ—រង្វង់សិរីរុងរឿងមួយព័ទ្ធជុំវិញវាទាំងស្រុង។ ខ្ញុំបានឃើញថា បញ្ញត្តិអំពីថ្ងៃសប្ប័ទ មិនត្រូវបានឆ្កាងជាប់នៅលើឈើឆ្កាងទេ។ ប្រសិនបើវាត្រូវបានឆ្កាងជាប់ នោះបញ្ញត្តិទាំងប្រាំបួនផ្សេងទៀតក៏ដូចគ្នាដែរ; ហើយយើងក៏មានសេរីភាពនឹងរំលងបញ្ញត្តិទាំងអស់នោះ ដូចគ្នានឹងរំលងប្រការទីបួនផងដែរ។ ខ្ញុំបានឃើញថា ព្រះមិនបានផ្លាស់ប្តូរថ្ងៃសប្ប័ទទេ ដ្បិតព្រះមិនដែលផ្លាស់ប្តូរឡើយ។ ប៉ុន្តែសម្តេចប៉ាបបានផ្លាស់ប្តូរវាពីថ្ងៃទីប្រាំពីរ ទៅជាថ្ងៃទីមួយនៃសប្តាហ៍; ដ្បិតគាត់ត្រូវបានកំណត់ឲ្យផ្លាស់ប្តូរពេលវេលា និងក្រឹត្យវិន័យទាំងឡាយ។” Early Writings, 32.

When the Protestants came out of the Dark Ages in 1798 and the book of Daniel was unsealed, the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, the two-horned earth beast of Revelation thirteen began its march through prophetic history. Protestantism was founded upon the sacred document called the Holy Bible and Republicanism was founded upon the sacred document called the Constitution. God had brought His church in the wilderness out of the Dark Ages, but just as with ancient Israel during the Egyptian period of slavery the Sabbath commandment had been forgotten. As Israel crossed the Red Sea on its way to the giving of the law at Sinai, modern Israel crossed the Atlantic on its way to October 22, 1844, where the law would once again be revealed. The Lord was once again raising up a people who would be the depositaries of His law, the depositaries of His prophetic revelations and who would carry the mantle of Protestantism. Ancient Israel was given the two tables of the Ten Commandments as the symbol of their work to be the depositaries of His law, and modern Israel was given the two tables of Habakkuk as the symbol of their work as depositaries of His prophetic Word.

Lè Pwotestan yo te sòti nan Mwayennaj Fènwa yo an 1798 e liv Danyèl la te desele, sizyèm wayòm pwofesi biblik la, bèt tè ki gen de kòn nan nan Revelasyon trèz la, te kòmanse mach li atravè listwa pwofetik. Pwotestantis te fonde sou dokiman sakre yo rele Bib Sen an, e Repiblikanis te fonde sou dokiman sakre yo rele Konstitisyon an. Bondye te fè legliz Li a nan dezè a soti nan Mwayennaj Fènwa yo, men menm jan sa te ye ak ansyen Izrayèl pandan peryòd esklavaj peyi Lejip la, kòmandman jou Saba a te bliye. Menm jan Izrayèl te travèse Lanmè Wouj la sou wout li pou al resevwa lalwa a nan Sinayi, Izrayèl modèn nan te travèse Atlantik la sou wout li pou rive 22 oktòb 1844, kote lalwa a t ap revele yon lòt fwa ankò. Senyè a te yon lòt fwa ankò ap leve yon pèp ki t ap vin depozitè lalwa Li a, depozitè revelasyon pwofetik Li yo, e ki t ap pote manto Pwotestantis la. Yo te bay ansyen Izrayèl de tab Dis Kòmandman yo kòm senbòl travay yo pou yo te depozitè lalwa Li a, e yo te bay Izrayèl modèn nan de tab Abakik yo kòm senbòl travay li antanke depozitè Pawòl pwofetik Li a.

Modern Israel was to carry both sets of two tables as it presented the third angel’s message to the world, which is the message proclaimed by those who carry the mantle of Protestantism. The Protestantism that came out of the Dark Ages was then incomplete as was ancient Israel as they crossed through the Red Sea. Protestantism had professed the motto of the Bible and the Bible alone, but had an incomplete understanding of God’s Word through centuries of eating the pagan doctrines of Roman Catholicism (things sacrificed unto idols). God designed that a true Protestant would represent the entire Word of God as symbolized by the “law and the prophets,” the two sets of two tables that represent both the work of God’s people and God’s character. The work of the first angel was to produce a genuine Protestant people that would be both the depositaries of His law and of his prophetic Word.

Izrayèl modèn te dwe pote toude seri de tablèt yo, pandan li t ap prezante twazyèm mesaj zanj lan bay mond lan, ki se mesaj sa a ke moun ki pote manto Pwotestantis la ap pwoklame. Pwotestantis ki te sòti nan Mwayennaj Fènwa yo te lè sa a enkonplè, menm jan ak ansyen Izrayèl lè yo t ap travèse Lanmè Wouj la. Pwotestantis te deklare deviz la: Labib e Labib sèlman, men li te gen yon konpreyansyon enkonplè de Pawòl Bondye a, akoz plizyè syèk kote li te manje doktrin payen Legliz Katolik Women an (bagay yo te ofri bay zidòl). Bondye te tabli pou yon vrè Pwotestan ta reprezante tout Pawòl Bondye a, jan sa senbolize pa “lalwa ak pwofèt yo,” de seri de tablèt yo ki reprezante ni travay pèp Bondye a ni karaktè Bondye. Travay premye zanj lan te pou pwodui yon pèp vrèman Pwotestan ki t ap alafwa depozitè lalwa Li a ak Pawòl pwofetik Li a.

“God has called His church in this day, as He called ancient Israel, to stand as a light in the earth. By the mighty cleaver of truth, the messages of the first, second, and third angels, He has separated them from the churches and from the world to bring them into a sacred nearness to Himself. He has made them the depositaries of His law and has committed to them the great truths of prophecy for this time. Like the holy oracles committed to ancient Israel, these are a sacred trust to be communicated to the world. The three angels of Revelation 14 represent the people who accept the light of God’s messages and go forth as His agents to sound the warning throughout the length and breadth of the earth.” Testimonies, volume 5, 455.

“Bondye rele legliz Li a nan tan sa a, menm jan Li te rele Izrayèl tan lontan an, pou l kanpe kòm yon limyè sou tè a. Pa mwayen gwo lam pwisan verite a, mesaj premye, dezyèm, ak twazyèm zanj yo, Li separe yo ak legliz yo ansanm ak mond lan, pou mennen yo nan yon pwoksimite sakre avèk Li menm. Li fè yo tounen depozitè lwa Li a, e Li konfye yo gwo verite pwofesi yo pou tan sa a. Menm jan ak pawòl sakre yo ki te konfye Izrayèl tan lontan an, sa yo se yon depo sakre ki dwe kominike bay mond lan. Twa zanj nan Revelasyon 14 yo reprezante pèp ki aksepte limyè mesaj Bondye yo epi ki soti kòm ajan Li pou fè avètisman an sonnen toupatou sou tout latè.” Testimonies, volim 5, 455.

The warning that is to be proclaimed by those who have been identified as the depositaries of the two sets of two tables is against receiving the mark of Catholicism. That protest is against the unlawful relationship of Ahab and Jezebel and was represented by Elijah on Mount Carmel. The giving of the two tables of stone at Mount Sinai typified the giving of Habakkuk’s two tables of cloth in the history of 1842 through 1849. Habakkuk’s two tables are the symbol of the covenant relationship between God and His Protestant people. To reject those tables would be the same as ancient Israel rejecting God’s law.

Avètisman sa a, ke moun yo ki idantifye kòm depozitè de seri de tab yo dwe pwoklame, se kont resevwa mak Katolis la. Pwotestasyon sa a se kont relasyon ilegal ant Akab ak Jezabèl la, e li te reprezante pa Eli sou Mòn Kamèl. Don de tab wòch yo sou Mòn Sinayi te prefigire don de tab twal Abakik yo nan istwa 1842 rive 1849. De tab Abakik yo se senbòl relasyon alyans ki genyen ant Bondye ak pèp Pwotestan Li a. Rejte tab sa yo ta menm bagay ak ansyen Izrayèl ki te rejte lalwa Bondye a.

The Millerites entered into the Most Holy Place and received the light of the Sabbath, but the testing process was yet unfinished. Simultaneously the horn of Republicanism was proceeding through the very same history. And both horns would reach a milestone in their march together in 1863.

Millerit yo te antre nan Kote ki Pi Sen an e yo te resevwa limyè sou Saba a, men pwosesis eprèv la pa t ankò fini. An menm tan an, kòn Repiblikenis la t ap pwogrese atravè menm istwa sa a. E toude kòn yo t ap rive nan yon etap enpòtan nan mach yo ansanm an 1863.

Miller’s Elijah message produced a progressive purification process with the intended purpose of establishing the Protestant horn and in the identical history the Republican horn was involved with a progressive process of political development. Both horns are on the same earth beast, so they must travel in unison through the entire history of the earth beast.

Mesaj Eli Miller la te pwodui yon pwosesis pirifikasyon pwogresif ak objektif entansyonèl pou etabli kòn Pwotestan an, epi nan menm istwa sa a, kòn Repibliken an te angaje nan yon pwosesis pwogresif devlopman politik. Toude kòn yo sou menm bèt ki soti sou tè a; kidonk, yo dwe avanse annamoni atravè tout istwa bèt ki soti sou tè a.

The first prophetic characteristic of the Republican horn of the earth beast was the action of speaking the Constitution into effect in 1789. In 1798, (the time of the end when the book of Daniel was unsealed), the earth beast would speak for the first time as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. 1798 was the beginning of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, and the speaking that occurred at the beginning of the earth beast’s history in 1798 would typify the last time the sixth kingdom would speak, and that time is represented as the voice of the dragon. When we consider the laws passed by the Republican horn in the United States in 1798, we should expect to see a typification of the laws that will be passed in conjunction with the Sunday law when the United States speaks as a dragon. As we consider the following four laws, ask yourself if the four laws passed in 1798 have the prophetic signature of Alpha and Omega?

Premye karakteristik pwofetik kòn Repibliken an nan bèt tè a se te aksyon pou mete Konstitisyon an an aplikasyon pa mwayen pawòl an 1789. An 1798, (tan lafen an lè liv Danyèl la te desegele), bèt tè a t ap pale pou premye fwa kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi biblik la. Ane 1798 la te kòmansman Etazini kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi biblik la, epi pawòl ki te pwononse nan kòmansman istwa bèt tè a an 1798 la t ap sèvi kòm tip dènye fwa sizyèm wayòm nan t ap pale, e tan sa a reprezante kòm vwa dragon an. Lè nou konsidere lwa kòn Repibliken an te pase Ozetazini an 1798, nou ta dwe atann nou wè yon tipifikasyon lwa yo pral pase an koneksyon avèk lwa dimanch lan lè Etazini pral pale tankou yon dragon. Pandan n ap konsidere kat lwa sa yo ki vin apre yo, mande tèt ou si kat lwa ki te pase an 1798 yo pote siyati pwofetik Alfa ak Omega.

In 1798, the United States passed several significant laws known as the Alien and Sedition Acts. These acts were a series of four laws passed by the Federalist-controlled Congress and signed into law by President John Adams, the second president of the United States and former vice president of George Washington.

An 1798, Etazini te adopte plizyè lwa enpòtan yo te konnen sou non Alien and Sedition Acts. Lwa sa yo te fòme yon seri kat lwa Kongrè a, ki te anba kontwòl Federalists yo, te vote, epi Prezidan John Adams, dezyèm prezidan Etazini an e ansyen vis-prezidan George Washington, te siyen pou yo vin lwa.

The Naturalization Act: This law extended the residency requirement for immigrants to become U.S. citizens from 5 to 14 years. It was aimed primarily at curbing the influence of recent immigrants, who were often aligned with the opposition party, the Democratic-Republicans.

Lwa Natiralizasyon an: Lwa sa a te pwolonje kondisyon rezidans pou imigran yo vin sitwayen Etazini soti nan 5 ane pou rive 14 ane. Li te vize sitou limite enfliyans imigran ki te fèk rive yo, ki souvan te aliyen ak pati opozisyon an, Demokratik-Repibliken yo.

The Alien Friends Act: This act authorized the president to deport non-citizens deemed to be a threat to the security of the United States during peacetime. It allowed the president to detain and deport any non-citizen he considered dangerous.

Lwa sou Zanmi Etranje yo: Lwa sa a te bay prezidan an otorizasyon pou depòte moun ki pa sitwayen yo, si yo te konsidere yo kòm yon menas pou sekirite Etazini pandan tan lapè. Li te pèmèt prezidan an arete epi depòte nenpòt moun ki pa sitwayen li te konsidere kòm danjere.

The Alien Enemies Act: This law provided for the apprehension, restraint, and deportation of citizens from countries at war with the United States. It was enacted as a precaution during the tense atmosphere of the late 1790s.

Lwa sou Lènmi Etranje yo: Lwa sa a te prevwa arestasyon, detansyon, ak depòtasyon sitwayen ki soti nan peyi ki te an lagè ak Etazini. Li te adopte kòm yon mezi prekosyon nan klima tansyon ki te make fen ane 1790 yo.

The Sedition Act: This is the most controversial of the Alien and Sedition Acts. It made it a criminal offense to publish “false, scandalous, and malicious” writings against the government or its officials, with the intent to defame them or bring them into disrepute. Critics saw this as a direct attack on freedom of speech and the press.

Lwa sou Sedisyon an: Sa a se lwa ki plis bay kontwovès nan mitan Lwa sou Etranje yo ak sou Sedisyon an. Li te fè li tounen yon zak kriminèl pou pibliye ekriti ki “fo, eskandalè, ak mechan” kont gouvènman an oswa kont otorite li yo, avèk entansyon pou difame yo oswa fè yo tonbe nan mepri piblik. Moun ki t ap kritike lwa sa a te wè ladan l yon atak dirèk kont libète lapawòl ak libète laprès.

The Alien and Sedition Acts were highly controversial and led to significant opposition from Democratic-Republicans, who believed these laws violated fundamental Constitutional rights and targeted their political party. They argued that the laws were an infringement on the First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech and the press. Eventually, these laws played a role in the election of 1800, when Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans won the presidency and Congress, leading to the repeal of the Sedition Act.

Lwa sou Etranje ak Sedisyon yo te trè kontwovèsyal e yo te lakòz yon opozisyon enpòtan nan men Demokratik-Repibliken yo, ki te kwè lwa sa yo vyole dwa fondamantal Konstitisyonèl yo epi yo te vize pati politik pa yo a. Yo te plede ke lwa sa yo te yon vyolasyon Premye Amannman an, ki pwoteje libète lapawòl ak laprès. Finalman, lwa sa yo te jwe yon wòl nan eleksyon 1800 la, lè Thomas Jefferson ak Demokratik-Repibliken yo te genyen prezidans lan ak Kongrè a, sa ki te mennen nan anilasyon Lwa sou Sedisyon an.

The Democratic-Republican party believed these laws violated the fundamental rights upheld by the Constitution, and they also believed the laws were targeting the opposing political party. It matters not that these laws were repealed or later expired, the Alpha and Omega illustrates the end with the beginning. In the history where these laws were enacted or “spoke” into law the Federalist party was opposed by a party called Democrat-Republicans. The evolution of the Democrat-Republican party ultimately produces the Republican party. A political party primarily coalesced together based upon an anti-slavery position.

Pati Demokratik-Repibliken an te kwè ke lwa sa yo te vyole dwa fondamantal Konstitisyon an garanti, epi yo te kwè tou ke lwa sa yo t ap vize pati politik opozisyon an. Sa pa gen enpòtans si lwa sa yo te anile oswa si yo te vin ekspire pita; Alfa ak Omega a montre fen an pa mwayen kòmansman an. Nan istwa kote lwa sa yo te adopte oswa te “pale” yo vin tounen lwa, Pati Federalis la te jwenn opozisyon nan men yon pati yo te rele Demokrat-Repibliken. Evolisyon Pati Demokrat-Repibliken an, finalman, pwodui Pati Repibliken an. Yon pati politik ki te sitou rasanble sou baz yon pozisyon kont esklavaj.

The historians identify 1863 as the very center point of the civil war, a war which was premised upon the issue of slavery. 1863 is also a waymark for the new standard bearers of the Protestant horn, who then rejected the first time-prophecy given to Miller by angels (the prophecy of “seven times” from Leviticus twenty-six). Could it be a simple coincidence that the prophecy of the seven times just happens to be based upon the laws of slavery set forth in the previous chapter of Leviticus? The “curse” identified by the “seven times” was the promise that if the covenant laws of chapter twenty-five were to be disobeyed, Israel would then end its history by returning into the slavery it was taken out of when it began its journey at the Red Sea.

Istoryen yo idantifye lane 1863 kòm pwen santral menm lagè sivil la, yon lagè ki te chita sou kestyon esklavaj la. Ane 1863 se tou yon makè pwofetik pou nouvo potdrapo kòn Pwotestan an, ki lè sa a te rejte premye pwofesi tan zanj yo te bay Miller la (pwofesi “sèt fwa” ki soti nan Levitik ventisiz). Èske sa ta ka yon senp konyensidans dèske pwofesi sèt fwa yo jis rive baze sou lwa esklavaj yo ki tabli nan chapit anvan an nan Levitik? “Madichon” ki idantifye pa “sèt fwa” yo se te pwomès ke si lwa alyans ki nan chapit vennsenk la ta dezobeyi, pèp Izrayèl la t ap fini istwa li lè li ta retounen nan esklavaj kote yo te sòti a lè li te kòmanse vwayaj li nan Lanmè Wouj la.

From 1798 to 1863 the political party that was the Democratic–Republican party went through a series of purges or shakings. From 1798 onward, and especially from August 11, 1840 onward through 1863 the Millerite movement went through a series of purges and shakings.

Depi 1798 rive 1863, pati politik ki te rele Pati Demokratik-Repibliken an te pase nan yon seri pirifikasyon oswa soukous. Depi 1798 pou pi devan, epi sitou depi 11 dawout 1840 pou rive nan 1863, mouvman Millerit la te pase nan yon seri pirifikasyon ak soukous.

The Democratic-Republican Party, which was one of the early political parties in the United States, did not directly transform into the modern Republican Party as it exists today. Instead, it underwent a series of changes and splits over time, ultimately leading to the formation of several different political parties before the emergence of the Republican Party.

Pati Demokratik-Repibliken an, ki te youn nan premye pati politik Ozetazini, pa t transfòme dirèkteman nan Pati Repibliken modèn nan jan li egziste jodi a. Olye de sa, li te pase atravè yon seri chanjman ak divizyon sou tan, e finalman sa te mennen nan fòmasyon plizyè pati politik diferan anvan aparisyon Pati Repibliken an.

The Democratic-Republican Party, often associated with Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, was founded in the late 18th century as a response to the Federalist Party. The Democratic-Republicans favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution, states’ rights, and agrarian interests.

Pati Demokratik-Repibliken an, ki souvan asosye ak Thomas Jefferson ak James Madison, te fonde nan fen 18yèm syèk la kòm yon repons kont Pati Federalis la. Demokratik-Repibliken yo te favorize yon entèpretasyon estrik Konstitisyon an, dwa eta yo, ak enterè agrè yo.

However, by the 1820s, the Democratic-Republican Party began to fracture along regional and ideological lines. The primary split occurred during the Era of Good Feelings (1817–1825), when there was a lack of strong opposition to James Monroe’s presidency. This period of political tranquility contributed to the decline of the Democratic-Republican Party. The party eventually split into several factions and evolved into the following political groups:

Sepandan, rive nan ane 1820 yo, Pati Demokratik-Repibliken an te kòmanse fann dapre liy rejyonal ak ideyolojik. Prensipal separasyon an te fèt pandan Era of Good Feelings (1817–1825), lè te gen yon mank opozisyon solid kont prezidans James Monroe. Peryòd trankilite politik sa a te kontribye nan deklin Pati Demokratik-Repibliken an. Finalman, pati a te divize an plizyè faksyon epi li te evolye pou vin gwoup politik sa yo:

Democratic Party: The followers of Andrew Jackson, who became the seventh president in 1829, formed the Democratic Party. Jacksonian Democrats supported a strong executive branch, westward expansion, and a broader suffrage for white males.

Pati Demokratik: Disip Andrew Jackson yo, ki te vin setyèm prezidan an an 1829, te fòme Pati Demokratik la. Demokrat Jacksonyen yo te sipòte yon branch egzekitif ki fò, ekspansyon vè lwès, ak yon dwa pou vote ki pi laj pou gason blan yo.

National Republican Party: This party emerged as a response to Andrew Jackson’s presidency and later merged with other anti-Jackson factions to become the Whig Party. The National Republicans were generally more supportive of a strong federal government and economic development.

Pati Repibliken Nasyonal la: Pati sa a te parèt kòm yon repons fas ak prezidans Andrew Jackson, epi pita li te fusionnen ak lòt faksyon anti-Jackson pou vin tounen Pati Whig la. An jeneral, Repibliken Nasyonal yo te plis favorab anvè yon gouvènman federal ki fò ak devlopman ekonomik.

Anti-Masonic Party: This was a short-lived political party that emerged in the 1820s, primarily in response to concerns about the influence of the secretive Masonic fraternity. It absorbed some former Democratic-Republicans.

Pati Anti-Masonryen an: Se te yon pati politik ki te dire yon ti tan, ki te parèt nan ane 1820 yo, sitou kòm repons a enkyetid konsènan enfliyans fratènite Masonik la ki t ap aji an sekrè. Li te absòbe kèk ansyen Demokrat-Repibliken.

The Whig Party: Formed in the 1830s, the Whigs included former National Republicans, Anti-Masons, and other opposition groups. They were characterized by their opposition to Jacksonian policies, support for a strong federal government, and promotion of industrial and economic development.

Pati Whig la: Fòme nan ane 1830 yo, Whig yo te gen ladan ansyen Repibliken Nasyonal yo, Anti-Mason yo, ak lòt gwoup opozisyon. Yo te karakterize pa opozisyon yo anvè politik Jacksonyen yo, sipò yo pou yon gouvènman federal solid, ak pwomosyon devlopman endistriyèl ak ekonomik.

The modern Republican Party was founded in the 1850s as a direct response to the growing sectional tensions over slavery. It attracted former Whigs, anti-slavery Democrats, Free Soilers, and others who opposed the expansion of slavery into new territories. The first Republican presidential candidate, John C. Fremont, ran in the 1856 election, and the party’s first successful candidate, Abraham Lincoln, was elected in 1860. So, the Republican Party emerged separately from the Democratic-Republican tradition and had a distinct trajectory in American political history.

Pati Repibliken modèn nan te fonde nan ane 1850 yo kòm yon repons dirèk ak tansyon seksyonèl k ap ogmante sou kestyon esklavaj la. Li te atire ansyen manm pati Whig la, Demokrat ki te kont esklavaj, manm mouvman Free Soil la, ansanm ak lòt moun ki te opoze ak ekspansyon esklavaj nan nouvo teritwa yo. Premye kandida prezidansyèl Repibliken an, John C. Fremont, te patisipe nan eleksyon 1856 la, epi premye kandida pati a ki te reyisi, Abraham Lincoln, te eli an 1860. Konsa, Pati Repibliken an te parèt apa de tradisyon Demokratik-Repibliken an epi li te suiv yon trajektwa distenk nan istwa politik ameriken an.

By 1860, the Republican party elected its first president. It was based upon a coalition of political parties that were opposed to slavery. In 1863 the Emancipation Proclamation “spoke” slavery out of existence. In 1863 the Republican horn, then represented by the Republican party “spoke” slavery out of existence, while the Protestant horn ceased to be a movement and became the Seventh-day Adventist church. The movement of the Millerites legally and officially ended in May of 1863, and in that year Moses’ oath, the prophecy of slavery was rejected. He that has an ear, let him hear.

Rive nan ane 1860, pati Repibliken an te eli premye prezidan li. Li te baze sou yon kowalisyon pati politik ki te opoze ak esklavaj. An 1863, Pwoklamasyon Emansipasyon an te “pale” esklavaj pou fè l disparèt. An 1863, kòn repibliken an, ki nan epòk sa a te reprezante pa pati Repibliken an, te “pale” esklavaj pou fè l disparèt, pandan kòn pwotestan an te sispann yon mouvman epi li te vin Legliz Advantis Setyèm Jou a. Mouvman Milerit yo te fini legalman e ofisyèlman nan mwa me 1863, epi nan ane sa a, sèman Moyiz la, pwofesi esklavaj la, te rejte. Moun ki gen zòrèy, se pou l tande.

At this point it might be informative to provide a brief overview of the “oath of Moses” as labelled by the prophet Daniel.

Nan pwen sa a, li ta ka itil pou bay yon kout apèsi sou “sèman Moyiz la” jan pwofèt Danyèl rele l la.

Yea, all Israel have transgressed thy law, even by departing, that they might not obey thy voice; therefore the curse is poured upon us, and the oath that is written in the law of Moses the servant of God, because we have sinned against him. Daniel 9:11.

Wi, tout Izrayèl te vyole lalwa ou a, menm lè yo te detounen yo pou yo pa t obeyi vwa ou; se poutèt sa madichon an vide sou nou, ansanm ak sèman ki ekri nan lalwa Moyiz, sèvitè Bondye a, paske nou te peche kont li. Danyèl 9:11.

William Miller who was guided by Gabriel and other angels as he studied the Word of God, was first led to the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six. Miller’s testimony is that in his study of the Bible, he began in the book of Genesis and therefore he obviously came to Leviticus well before he reached the twenty-three hundred years of Daniel chapter eight and verse fourteen. He exclusively used the Bible and a Cruden’s concordance.

William Miller, ki te jwenn direksyon nan men Gabriel ak lòt zanj pandan l t ap etidye Pawòl Bondye a, te premye mennen sou “sèt tan yo” nan Levitik vennsis. Temwayaj Miller la se ke, nan etid li te fè sou Labib la, li te kòmanse nan liv Jenèz; se poutèt sa li klèman te rive nan Levitik lontan anvan li te rive sou de mil twasan ane yo nan Danyèl chapit uit, vèsè katòz. Li te sèvi sèlman ak Labib la ak yon konkòdans Cruden.

Cruden’s concordance has no references to the Hebrew or Greek words that were thereafter translated into the English of the King James Bible. Miller considered the “context” of the passage he was studying to guide his understanding of a word or passage of Scripture. When it came to his understanding of the “seven times” it is very simple to see the context for the “seven times” of chapter twenty-six of Leviticus is chapter twenty-five.

Konkòdans Cruden an pa gen okenn referans ak mo ebre oswa grèk yo ki te apre sa tradui nan anglè Bib Wa Jak la. Miller te konsidere “kontèks” pasaj li t ap etidye a pou gide konpreyansyon li sou yon mo oswa yon pasaj nan Ekriti yo. Lè li rive nan konpreyansyon li sou “sèt tan yo”, li trè senp pou wè ke kontèks “sèt tan yo” nan chapit vennsis Levitik la se chapit vennsenk.

Chapter twenty-five outlines the resting of the land, the Jubilee and the rules of slavery. The rules of chapter twenty-five are part of “the law of Moses the servant of God” that produces a blessing if obeyed and a “curse” if disobeyed. In chapter twenty-six the curse of the “seven times” equates to twenty-five hundred and twenty years and is set forth in the obvious context of the rules of the land resting and the principles of slavery. In chapter twenty-six the punishment is called the “quarrel of my covenant.”

Chapit vennsenk lan esplike repo tè a, Jibile a, ak règ sou esklavaj. Règ ki nan chapit vennsenk yo fè pati “lalwa Moyiz, sèvitè Bondye a”, ki pwodui yon benediksyon si yo obeyi li, epi yon “madichon” si yo dezobeyi li. Nan chapit vennsis la, madichon “sèt fwa” a egal ak de mil senksan ven ane, epi li prezante nan kontèks ki klè sou règ konsènan repo tè a ak prensip esklavaj yo. Nan chapit vennsis la, pinisyon an rele “kontestasyon alyans mwen an.”

Then will I also walk contrary unto you, and will punish you yet seven times for your sins. And I will bring a sword upon you, that shall avenge the quarrel of my covenant: and when ye are gathered together within your cities, I will send the pestilence among you; and ye shall be delivered into the hand of the enemy. Leviticus 26:24, 25.

Lè sa a, m ap mache kont nou menm tou, e m ap pini nou sèt fwa ankò poutèt peche nou yo. E m ap fè yon nepe vini sou nou, ki va tire vanjans pou kont akò mwen an; epi lè nou rasanble anndan vil nou yo, m ap voye epidemi nan mitan nou; e y ap lage nou nan men lènmi an. Levitik 26:24, 25.

In context the “covenant” that God has a “quarrel” over would be the covenant previously cited in chapter twenty-five. The punishment of the seven times is called the “quarrel of” God’s “covenant” and the “curse” attached to it is that Israel would be “delivered into the hand of their” enemies, and once in the enemies’ land, (as Daniel was) Israel would become the slaves of their enemies.

Nan kontèks la, “alyans” Bondye gen yon “kont” pou li a se ta alyans ki te deja site nan chapit vennsenk la. Pinisyon “sèt fwa” a rele “kont” “alyans” Bondye a, epi “madichon” ki tache avè l la se ke Izrayèl t ap “lage nan men lènmi yo”; epi yon fwa yo rive nan peyi lènmi yo, (jan sa te rive Danyèl), Izrayèl t ap vin esklav lènmi yo.

When Moses recorded Leviticus twenty-six ancient Israel had just been delivered from the slavery of Egypt and the principles of slavery represented in chapter twenty-five would bring either a blessing or a curse. Ancient Israel never practiced the rules of the Jubilee and ultimately both the northern and southern kingdoms were scattered for “seven times” in fulfillment of what Daniel called the “curse of Moses.”

Lè Moyiz te ekri Levitik vennsis, ansyen Izrayèl te fèk delivre anba esklavaj peyi Lejip, e prensip esklavaj ki reprezante nan chapit vennsenk la t ap pote swa yon benediksyon swa yon madichon. Ansyen Izrayèl pa t janm pratike règ Jibile a, e finalman ni wayòm nò a ni wayòm sid la te gaye pou “sèt fwa,” an akonplisman sa Danyèl te rele “madichon Moyiz la.”

The covenant relationship between God and Israel which had begun with their slavery in Egypt, ended with their slavery to Assyria and Babylon. The “seven times” against the northern kingdom ended in 1798, and “seven times” against the southern kingdom ended in 1844. The starting point for the two periods of seven times is marked in Isaiah chapter seven with a prophecy of sixty-five years that was proclaimed by Isaiah to king Ahaz of Judah in 742 BC.

Relasyon alyans ki te egziste ant Bondye ak Izrayèl la, ki te kòmanse ak esklavaj yo ann Ejip, te fini ak esklavaj yo anba Lasiri ak Babilòn. “Sèt fwa” kont wayòm nò a te fini an 1798, epi “sèt fwa” kont wayòm sid la te fini an 1844. Pwen depa pou de peryòd sèt fwa sa yo make nan Ezayi chapit sèt, avèk yon pwofesi sou swasantsenk ane Ezayi te pwoklame bay wa Akaz nan Jida an 742 av. J.-K.

For the head of Syria is Damascus, and the head of Damascus is Rezin; and within threescore and five years shall Ephraim be broken, that it be not a people. And the head of Ephraim is Samaria, and the head of Samaria is Remaliah’s son. If ye will not believe, surely ye shall not be established. Isaiah 7:8, 9.

Paske tèt peyi Siri se Damas, e tèt Damas se Rezen; epi anndan swasantsenk ane, Efrayim ap kraze pou l pa tounen yon pèp ankò. E tèt Efrayim se Samari, e tèt Samari se pitit gason Remalya. Si nou pa kwè, se sèten nou p ap rete fèm. Ezayi 7:8, 9.

Isaiah had identified that “within” sixty-five years from the time when the prophecy was set forth in 742 BC, the northern kingdom would be broken. Nineteen years later in 723 BC the northern kingdom of Israel was taken into slavery by the king of Assyria and forty-six years later the king of Babylon took the southern kingdom of Judah into slavery in 677 BC. The prophecy of sixty-five years produces six historical waymarks. The first is 742 BC when the prediction is set forth. Nineteen years later in 723 BC, the northern kingdom was taken into slavery by the Assyrians. Forty-six years later in 677 BC the southern kingdom was taken into slavery by the Babylonians. The first twenty-five hundred and twenty years that began in 723 BC then ended in 1798. Then is 1844 the twenty-five hundred and twenty years that began in 677 BC concluded. From 1844, the prediction extended nineteen years to 1863 in order to complete the entire prophetic structure, for when the Alpha and Omega marked nineteen years to begin the prophetic structure there must be nineteen years to reach its end.

Ésaïe avait indiqué que « d’ici » soixante-cinq ans à partir du moment où la prophétie fut énoncée en 742 av. J.-C., le royaume du nord serait brisé. Dix-neuf ans plus tard, en 723 av. J.-C., le royaume du nord d’Israël fut emmené en captivité par le roi d’Assyrie, et quarante-six ans plus tard, le roi de Babylone emmena le royaume du sud de Juda en captivité en 677 av. J.-C. La prophétie des soixante-cinq ans produit six jalons historiques. Le premier est 742 av. J.-C., lorsque la prédiction est énoncée. Dix-neuf ans plus tard, en 723 av. J.-C., le royaume du nord fut emmené en captivité par les Assyriens. Quarante-six ans plus tard, en 677 av. J.-C., le royaume du sud fut emmené en captivité par les Babyloniens. Les premiers deux mille cinq cent vingt ans, qui commencèrent en 723 av. J.-C., s’achevèrent ensuite en 1798. Puis, en 1844, les deux mille cinq cent vingt ans qui commencèrent en 677 av. J.-C. arrivèrent à leur terme. À partir de 1844, la prédiction se prolongea de dix-neuf ans jusqu’en 1863 afin d’achever toute la structure prophétique, car lorsque l’Alpha et l’Oméga marquèrent dix-neuf ans pour commencer la structure prophétique, il devait y avoir dix-neuf ans pour en atteindre la fin.

Ancient Israel was delivered from the slavery of Egypt and through disobedience both the northern and southern kingdoms were returned to slavery. The prophecies transcend from the prophetic history of ancient literal Israel to modern spiritual Israel and in so doing the theme of all the prophetic waymarks is slavery.

Ansyen Izrayèl te delivre anba esklavaj Ejip, e poutèt dezobeyisans, ni wayòm nò a ni wayòm sid la te retounen nan esklavaj. Pwofesi yo depase istwa pwofetik ansyen Izrayèl literal la pou rive sou Izrayèl espirityèl modèn nan, e konsa, tèm tout repè pwofetik yo se esklavaj.

The prophecy in Isaiah seven was presented to the wicked king Ahaz by Isaiah in 742BC when an impending civil war between the north and south was being identified. The southern kingdom of Ahaz was the literal glorious land of ancient Israel. In 1798, the spiritual glorious land of Bible prophecy began to rule as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. When the seven times against the literal glorious land ended in 1844, there was, as in the history of king Ahaz an impending civil war. By 1844, the turmoil of political parties breaking apart and forming alliances had almost fully settled into two classes of political persuasions. In terms of slavery the Democrats were pro-slavery and the Republicans were anti-slavery. From 1798 to the beginning of the civil war in 1860 the process of developing two classes of political parties had been settled.

Pwofesi ki nan Ezayi sèt la te prezante bay wa mechan Akaz pa Ezayi an 742 av. J.-K., lè yo t ap idantifye yon lagè sivil ki t apral pete ant nò a ak sid la. Wayòm sid Akaz la te peyi bèl pouvwa literal ansyen Izrayèl la. An 1798, peyi bèl pouvwa espirityèl la nan pwofesi Bib la te kòmanse dirije kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la. Lè sèt tan yo kont peyi bèl pouvwa literal la te fini an 1844, te gen, menm jan sa te ye nan listwa wa Akaz la, yon lagè sivil ki t apral pete. Rive an 1844, boulvèsman pati politik yo ki t ap kraze epi fòme alyans te prèske fin tabli nèt an de klas tandans politik. Konsènan esklavaj, Demokrat yo te an favè esklavaj epi Repibliken yo te kont esklavaj. Soti 1798 rive nan kòmansman lagè sivil la an 1860, pwosesis devlopman de klas pati politik yo te fin tabli.

Ahaz represented the literal glorious land and therefore typified the spiritual glorious land. The history of Ahaz typifies the prophetic history where the prophecy was proclaimed in 742 BC therefore typifies the history where the prophecy ended. In the beginning history the northern kingdom consisting of ten tribes had broken away from the other two tribes in protest against the divinely established government of the southern two tribes. The ten northern tribes had formed a confederacy with Syria, typifying the alliance between the southern confederacy and a power represented symbolically by Syria.

Akaz te reprezante peyi glwa literal la, e poutèt sa li te yon tip peyi glwa espirityèl la. Istwa Akaz la se yon tip istwa pwofetik kote pwofesi a te pwoklame an 742 av. J.-K., e konsa li tipifye istwa kote pwofesi a te fini. Nan istwa kòmansman an, wayòm nò a, ki te gen dis branch fanmi, te separe ak de lòt branch fanmi yo kòm yon pwotestasyon kont gouvènman divinman etabli de branch fanmi sid yo. Dis branch fanmi nò yo te fòme yon konfederasyon avèk Siri, sa ki tipifye alyans ant konfederasyon sid la ak yon pouvwa ki reprezante senbolikman pa Siri.

This brief summary is identifying that the seven times of Leviticus twenty-six is a covenant promise that sets forth either a blessing for obedience or the “curse” of slavery for disobedience. The northern and southern kingdoms started together as one nation that was delivered out of slavery, only to be delivered back into slavery at their respective endings.

Rezime sa a ap montre ke sèt tan yo nan Levitik vennsizyèm chapit la se yon pwomès alyans ki tabli swa yon benediksyon pou obeyisans, swa “madichon” esklavaj la pou dezobeyisans. Wayòm nò a ak wayòm sid la te kòmanse ansanm kòm yon sèl nasyon ki te delivre soti nan esklavaj, sèlman pou yo te delivre tounen nan esklavaj nan fen pa yo chak.

The sixty-five years at the ending of those prophecies of slavery concluded with spiritual Israel in the spiritual glorious land, at the very dead center of a civil war of the north against the south. The antagonists in the civil war was a kingdom that formed a confederacy and broke away from the divinely established government that was located in the opposing kingdom.

Swasannsenk senk ane swasannsenk lannen bann profesi lesklavaj sa yo te rive nan bout yo avèk Izrayèl espirityèl la nan peyi espirityèl gloriye a, egzakteman nan mitan menm yon lagè sivil ant nò a ak sid la. Advèsè yo nan lagè sivil la se te yon wayòm ki te fòme yon konfederasyon epi ki te separe tèt li ak gouvènman Bondye te tabli a, ki te chita nan wayòm opoze a.

From 1798 onward to the civil war, the horn of Republicanism was put through a process which produced two classes of political antagonists that represent two sides of the issues of slavery. The proslavery antagonists that sought to continue the practice of slavery lost the battle.

Depi 1798 pou rive jouk lagè sivil la, yo te fè kòn Repiblikanis la pase nan yon pwosesis ki te pwodui de klas advèsè politik ki reprezante de bò kesyon esklavaj la. Advèsè ki te pou esklavaj yo, ki t ap chèche kontinye pratik esklavaj la, te pèdi batay la.

From 1798 onward to the civil war, the horn of Protestantism was put through a process which produced two classes of religious antagonists that represent two sides of the issues of slavery. The proslavery antagonists that sought to continue the original understanding of the prophecy of slavery lost the battle.

Depi 1798 rive jouk nan lagè sivil la, kòn Pwotestantis la te pase atravè yon pwosesis ki te pwodui de klas advèsè relijye ki reprezante de bò kestyon esklavaj la. Advèsè ki te an favè esklavaj yo, ki t ap chèche kontinye konpreyansyon orijinal pwofesi sou esklavaj la, te pèdi batay la.

In 1863 the horn of Republicanism succeeded in rejecting the practice of slavery.

An 1863, kòn Repiblikenis la te reyisi rejte pratik esklavaj la.

In 1863 the horn of Protestantism succeeded in rejecting the prophecy of slavery.

An 1863, kòn Pwotestantis la te reyisi rejte pwofesi esklavaj la.

In doing so they rejected the work of Miller, the Elijah for his time. In so doing they also rejected “the oath of Moses,” the foundation stone for their time. Moses and Elijah were then rejected, only to return on September 11, 2001.

En agissant ainsi, ils ont rejeté l’œuvre de Miller, l’Élie pour son temps. Ce faisant, ils ont aussi rejeté « le serment de Moïse », la pierre de fondation pour leur temps. Moïse et Élie furent alors rejetés, pour ne revenir que le 11 septembre 2001.

Alpha and Omega, the wonderful linguist recorded His divine signature throughout the time prophecy of the “oath of Moses” that He himself proclaimed as Palmoni, the Wonderful Numberer. If ye will not believe, surely ye shall not be established.

Alfa ak Omega, bèl lengwis la, te anrejistre siyati diven Li atravè tout pwofesi tan an nan “sèman Moyiz la” ke Li menm te pwoklame antanke Palmoni, Mèveye Moun ki Konte a. Si nou pa kwè, sètènman nou p ap tabli.