All the prophets identify the end of the world.
Tout pwofèt yo idantifye fen mond lan.
“Each of the ancient prophets spoke less for their own time than for ours, so that their prophesying is in force for us. ‘Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.’ 1 Corinthians 10:11. ‘Not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven; which things the angels desire to look into.’ 1 Peter 1:12. . . .
“Chak nan ansyen pwofèt yo te pale mwens pou pwòp epòk pa yo pase pou pa nou an, konsa pwofesi yo gen fòs pou nou. ‘Koulye a, tout bagay sa yo te rive yo kòm egzanp; epi yo ekri yo pou avètisman nou, nou menm sou ki fen mond lan rive a.’ 1 Corinthians 10:11. ‘Se pa t pou tèt pa yo, men se te pou nou yo t ap sèvi bagay sa yo, bagay yo rapòte nou kounye a pa moun ki te preche levanjil la ban nou pa Sentespri ki te voye desann soti nan syèl la; bagay sa yo menm zanj yo ta renmen gade byen fon ladan yo.’ 1 Peter 1:12....”
“The Bible has accumulated and bound up together its treasures for this last generation. All the great events and solemn transactions of Old Testament history have been, and are, repeating themselves in the church in these last days.” Selected Messages, book 3, 338, 339.
“Bib la te rasanble epi mare ansanm trezò li yo pou dènye jenerasyon sa a. Tout gwo evènman yo ak tout tranzaksyon solanèl istwa Ansyen Testaman an te deja ap repete tèt yo, e y ap repete tèt yo, nan legliz la nan dènye jou sa yo.” Selected Messages, liv 3, 338, 339.
All the books of the Bible conclude in the book of Revelation.
Tout liv ki nan Bib la rive nan konklizyon yo nan liv Revelasyon an.
“In the Revelation all the books of the Bible meet and end.” Acts of the Apostles, 585.
“Nan Revelasyon an, tout liv Bib la rankontre epi yo fini.” Travay Apot yo, 585.
The final warning message for planet earth’s inhabitants is identified in Revelation eighteen.
Dènye mesaj avètisman pou moun k ap viv sou planèt latè a idantifye nan Revelasyon dizwit.
And after these things I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was lightened with his glory. And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. Revelation 18:1–3.
Apre bagay sa yo, mwen wè yon lòt zanj desann soti nan syèl la, li te gen gwo pouvwa; e tè a te klere avèk glwa li. E li rele avèk fòs, ak yon vwa pwisan, li t ap di: Babilòn, gwo lavil la, tonbe, li tonbe; li tounen kay demon yo, repè tout move lespri, ak kaj tout zwazo ki pa pwòp e ki rayisab. Paske tout nasyon yo bwè nan diven kòlè fònikasyon li a, e wa latè yo fè fònikasyon avèk li, e machann latè yo vin rich grasa abondans delis li yo. Revelasyon 18:1–3.
The phrase “Babylon the great” represents the Roman Catholic church and in Isaiah chapter twenty-three “Babylon the great” is represented as Tyre.
Fraz “Gwo Babilòn nan” reprezante Legliz Katolik Women an, epi nan Ezayi chapit venn-twa, “Gwo Babilòn nan” reprezante kòm Tir.
The burden of Tyre. Howl, ye ships of Tarshish; for it is laid waste, so that there is no house, no entering in: from the land of Chittim it is revealed to them. Be still, ye inhabitants of the isle; thou whom the merchants of Zidon, that pass over the sea, have replenished. And by great waters the seed of Sihor, the harvest of the river, is her revenue; and she is a mart of nations. Be thou ashamed, O Zidon: for the sea hath spoken, even the strength of the sea, saying, I travail not, nor bring forth children, neither do I nourish up young men, nor bring up virgins. As at the report concerning Egypt, so shall they be sorely pained at the report of Tyre. Pass ye over to Tarshish; howl, ye inhabitants of the isle. Is this your joyous city, whose antiquity is of ancient days? her own feet shall carry her afar off to sojourn. Who hath taken this counsel against Tyre, the crowning city, whose merchants are princes, whose traffickers are the honourable of the earth? The Lord of hosts hath purposed it, to stain the pride of all glory, and to bring into contempt all the honourable of the earth. Pass through thy land as a river, O daughter of Tarshish: there is no more strength. He stretched out his hand over the sea, he shook the kingdoms: the Lord hath given a commandment against the merchant city, to destroy the strong holds thereof. And he said, Thou shalt no more rejoice, O thou oppressed virgin, daughter of Zidon: arise, pass over to Chittim; there also shalt thou have no rest. Behold the land of the Chaldeans; this people was not, till the Assyrian founded it for them that dwell in the wilderness: they set up the towers thereof, they raised up the palaces thereof; and he brought it to ruin. Howl, ye ships of Tarshish: for your strength is laid waste. And it shall come to pass in that day, that Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years, according to the days of one king: after the end of seventy years shall Tyre sing as an harlot. Take an harp, go about the city, thou harlot that hast been forgotten; make sweet melody, sing many songs, that thou mayest be remembered. And it shall come to pass after the end of seventy years, that the Lord will visit Tyre, and she shall turn to her hire, and shall commit fornication with all the kingdoms of the world upon the face of the earth. And her merchandise and her hire shall be holiness to the Lord: it shall not be treasured nor laid up; for her merchandise shall be for them that dwell before the Lord, to eat sufficiently, and for durable clothing. Isaiah 23:1–18.
Chay ki sou Tir. Nou menm bato Tasis yo, rele byen fò; paske li detwi nèt, pa gen kay ankò, pa gen kote pou antre: se depi nan peyi Kitim yo fè yo konnen sa. Rete an silans, nou menm moun k ap viv sou zile a; ou menm komèsan Sidon yo, ki travèse lanmè a, te fè vin rich. Sou gwo dlo yo, grenn Siyor la, rekòt rivyè a, se te revni li; e li te yon mache pou nasyon yo. Wont pou ou, O Sidon; paske lanmè a pale, wi, fòs lanmè a, li di: Mwen pa janm gen doulè pou m akouche, ni mwen pa fè pitit, ni mwen pa nouri jenn gason, ni mwen pa leve jenn fi. Menm jan ak nouvèl sou Ejip la, konsa y ap soufri anpil lè nouvèl sou Tir la rive. Travèse al Tasis; rele byen fò, nou menm moun zile a. Èske se sa lavil kè kontan nou an ye, li menm ki te la depi tan lontan, depi jou ansyen yo? Pwòp pye pa li yo pral pote l byen lwen pou l al viv kòm etranje. Kilès ki pran desizyon sa a kont Tir, lavil ki t ap kouwone lòt yo, li menm ki gen komèsan li yo tankou chèf, machann li yo tankou moun onorab sou tè a? Se Senyè ki gen tout lame yo ki fè lide sa a, pou l tache ògèy tout glwa, epi pou l fè tout moun onorab sou tè a tonbe nan mepri. Pase nan peyi ou tankou yon rivyè, O pitit fi Tasis; pa gen fòs ankò. Li lonje men li sou lanmè a, li souke wayòm yo: Senyè a bay lòd kont lavil komès la, pou detwi fòtrès li yo. Epi li di: Ou p ap rejwi ankò, O ou menm vyèj oprime a, pitit fi Sidon; leve, travèse al Kitim; menm la tou, ou p ap jwenn repo. Gade peyi Kaldeyen yo; pèp sa a pa t egziste, jiskaske Asiryen an te tabli li pou moun ki rete nan dezè a: yo leve gwo fò won li yo, yo bati palè li yo; epi li mennen l nan destriksyon. Nou menm bato Tasis yo, rele byen fò; paske fòs nou an detwi nèt. Epi, nan jou sa a, sa pral rive konsa: yo pral bliye Tir pandan swasanndis ane, dapre dire yon sèl wa; apre swasanndis ane yo fini, Tir pral chante tankou yon fanm jennès. Pran yon ap, fè wonn lavil la, ou menm fanm jennès yo te bliye a; fè bèl mizik, chante anpil chante, pou yo ka sonje ou. Epi, apre swasanndis ane yo fini, sa pral rive konsa: Senyè a pral vizite Tir, e li pral tounen nan salè li, e li pral fè fònikasyon ak tout wayòm latè yo sou tout fas tè a. Men machandiz li yo ak salè li yo pral sen pou Senyè a: yo p ap sere yo ni anpile yo; paske machandiz li yo pral pou moun ki rete devan Senyè a, pou yo manje ase, epi pou yo gen rad ki dire lontan. Ezayi 23:1–18.
Sister White writes: “All the great events and solemn transactions of Old Testament history have been, and are, repeating themselves in the church in these last days.”
Sè White ekri: “Tout gwo evènman yo ak tout tranzaksyon solanèl istwa Ansyen Testaman an te repete, e yo ap repete ankò, nan legliz la nan dènye jou sa yo.”
Isaiah twenty-three addresses the prophetic relationships of the United Nations, the Papacy, the United States and Islam. In order to recognize these truths certain symbols in the chapter must be defined by Inspiration. Once the symbols are defined, the sequence of events is fairly straightforward. The symbols in the chapter that need to be defined are:
Ezayi venntwa pale sou relasyon pwofetik Nasyonzini, Papote a, Etazini ak Islam. Pou nou ka rekonèt verite sa yo, sèten senbòl ki nan chapit la dwe defini pa Enspirasyon an. Yon fwa senbòl yo fin defini, sekans evènman yo vin byen klè. Senbòl ki nan chapit la ki bezwen defini yo se:
The Burden, Tyre, The harlot, The Assyrian, The land of the Chaldeans, Towers and Palaces, Tarshish, The Seed of Sihor, The Land of Chittim, Zidon, The Merchants City, The report of Egypt and the report of Tyre, The Howling, A Daughter, Seventy Years, The Days of One King, Forgetting, and Remembering
Chay la, Tir, Fanm movèz vi a, Asiryen an, peyi Kaldeyen yo, Tou ak Palè yo, Tasis, Semans Siyor la, Peyi Kitim nan, Sidon, Vil Machann yo, nouvèl peyi Lejip la ak nouvèl Tir la, Rèl lamantasyon an, Yon Pitit fi, Swasanndizan, Jou yon sèl Wa, Bliye, ak Sonje
The word “burden” in verse one identifies a prophecy of doom against the kingdom of Tyre.
Mo “chay” nan vèsè premye a idantifye yon pwofesi destriksyon kont wayòm Tir la.
Burden: H4853—From H5375; a burden; specifically tribute, or (abstractly) porterage; figuratively an utterance, chiefly a doom, especially singing; mental, desire: – burden, carry away, prophecy, X they set, song, tribute.
Fado: H4853—Ki soti nan H5375; yon chay; espesyalman lajan taks, oswa (nan sans abstrè) transpò pa potè; nan sans figire yon pawòl pwoklame, sitou yon jijman, espesyalman yon chante; nan lespri, yon dezi: – fado, pote ale, pwofesi, X yo mete, chante, lajan taks.
The burden of Tyre is one of many passages in the Bible where the final judgment of the Roman Catholic church is identified. A “burden” by use and definition is a prophecy, and primarily a prophecy of doom. There are eleven “burdens” in Isaiah and eight times the word is used to describe a burden carried on the shoulders. The eleven times the word “burden” is represented as prophecy of doom are Isaiah 13:1; 15:1; 17:1; 19:1; 21:1, 11, 13; 22:1; 30:6 and of course chapter twenty-three where we find the burden of Tyre. It is worthwhile to place all of Isaiah’s prophecies of doom together in order to evaluate which power is being represented in the last days. Eleven prophecies of doom are difficult to cover at one time, so I will give a brief definition of each doom prophecy to set the context for chapter twenty-three.
Chay Tayi a se youn nan anpil pasaj nan Bib la kote jijman final Legliz Katolik Wòm nan idantifye. Yon “chay,” dapre itilizasyon ak definisyon li, se yon pwofesi, e an premye yon pwofesi kondanasyon. Gen onz “chay” nan Ezayi, epi uit fwa mo a itilize pou dekri yon chay yo pote sou zepòl. Onz fwa kote mo “chay” la prezante kòm yon pwofesi kondanasyon yo se Ezayi 13:1; 15:1; 17:1; 19:1; 21:1, 11, 13; 22:1; 30:6, epi natirèlman chapit venn-twa kote nou jwenn chay Tayi a. Li itil pou mete ansanm tout pwofesi kondanasyon Ezayi yo, pou nou ka evalye ki pouvwa y ap reprezante nan dènye jou yo. Onz pwofesi kondanasyon yo difisil pou kouvri an menm tan, kidonk m ap bay yon definisyon brèf sou chak pwofesi kondanasyon pou tabli kontèks chapit venn-twa a.
In chapter thirteen the prophecy of doom against Babylon is modern Babylon at the end of the world, which is the whore of Rome that is also illustrated in chapter seventeen of the book of Revelation.
Nan chapit trèz la, pwofesi kondanasyon kont Babilòn nan se Babilòn modèn nan fen mond lan, ki se pwostitye Wòm nan, jan sa montre tou nan chapit disèt nan liv Revelasyon an.
And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will show unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication. So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. Revelation 17:1–5.
Epi youn nan sèt zanj ki te gen sèt gode yo vini, li pale avè m, li di m: Vini isit la; m ap montre w jijman gwo pwostitiye a ki chita sou anpil dlo yo; se avèk li wa latè yo te fè fònikasyon, e moun ki rete sou latè yo te sou ak diven fònikasyon li a. Konsa li pote m ale nan Lespri a nan dezè a; epi mwen wè yon fanm chita sou yon bèt ki te koulè wouj violèt, plen ak non blasfèm, ki te gen sèt tèt ak dis kòn. E fanm nan te abiye ak koulè wouj violèt ak wouj, li te dekore ak lò, ak pyè presyez, ak pèl, li te gen nan men li yon gode an lò ki te plen ak abominasyon ak salte fònikasyon li a. E sou fwon li te gen yon non ki te ekri: MISTÈ, GRAN BABILÒN, MANMAN PWOSTITIYE YO AK ABOMINASYON LATÈ YO. Revelasyon 17:1–5.
I need to digress a little. The purpose of the study of the prophecy of Tyre is ultimately to align the prophetic history of the United States with that of the Seventh-day Adventist church. We will show that the government of the United States is one horn on the lamb-like beast of Revelation thirteen and that Protestantism that came out of the Dark Ages was the other horn. The horn of Protestantism became Millerite Adventism at the point the Protestants of the United States rejected the first angel’s message. When we have that in place, we will show that the history of the Protestant horn and the history of the Republican horn run parallel to one another and possess parallel prophetic characteristics. After all they are on the same beast representing that both horns are contemporary to one another. I will illustrate one example of this parallel of the horns of church and state in the United States. They both ‘forget’ in their own way.
Mwen bezwen fè yon ti devyasyon. Objektif etid sou pwofesi Tir la, an dènye analiz, se mete istwa pwofetik Etazini an ann amoni ak pa Legliz Advantis Setyèm Jou a. Nou pral montre ke gouvènman Etazini an se youn nan kòn ki sou bèt ki sanble ak yon ti mouton an nan Revelasyon trèz, e ke Pwotestantis ki te sòti nan Mwayennaj Fènwa yo se te lòt kòn nan. Kòn Pwotestantis la te vin tounen Advantis Milerit nan moman Pwotestan Etazini yo te rejte mesaj premye zanj lan. Lè nou fin tabli sa, nou pral montre ke istwa kòn pwotestan an ak istwa kòn repibliken an mache paralèl youn ak lòt e yo posede karakteristik pwofetik ki paralèl. Dayè, yo sou menm bèt la, sa ki reprezante ke toude kòn yo egziste nan menm epòk la. Mwen pral ilistre yon egzanp sou paralèl sa a ant kòn legliz la ak kòn leta a nan Etazini. Toude “bliye” nan fason pa yo.
Isaiah twenty-three marks the prophetic point that the papal power is forgotten for seventy years, and in those seventy symbolic years men forget the papacy and why the Dark Ages are called the Dark Ages. The Protestant horn’s motto when they separated from the Catholic church was the Bible and the Bible alone. They forgot that the Bible informs us who the papacy really is. They forgot the message enshrined in the sacred document they were entrusted with, and professed to be the champion defenders of.
Ezayi venntwa make pwen pwofetik kote yo bliye pouvwa papal la pandan swasanndis ane; e pandan swasanndis ane senbolik sa yo, lèzòm bliye papasi a ak poukisa yo rele Mwayennaj yo Epòk Fènwa a. Deviz kòn Pwotestan an lè yo te separe ak legliz Katolik la, se te: Bib la, e Bib la sèlman. Yo te bliye ke se Bib la ki fè nou konnen kiyès papasi a vrèman ye. Yo te bliye mesaj ki konsakre nan dokiman sakre yo te resevwa an depo, e yo te deklare tèt yo kòm defansè chanpyon li yo.
“Those who become confused in their understanding of the word, who fail to see the meaning of antichrist, will surely place themselves on the side of antichrist. There is no time now for us to assimilate with the world. Daniel is standing in his lot and in his place. The prophecies of Daniel and of John are to be understood. They interpret each other. They give to the world truths which everyone should understand. These prophecies are to be witness in the world. By their fulfillment in these last days, they will explain themselves.” Kress Collection, 105.
“Moun ki vin konfonn nan konpreyansyon yo sou pawòl la, ki pa rive wè siyifikasyon antikris la, sètènman ap mete tèt yo bò kote antikris la. Kounye a pa gen tan pou nou melanje tèt nou ak mond lan. Danyèl kanpe nan pòsyon pa l ak nan plas pa l. Pwofesi Danyèl ak Jan yo dwe konprann. Yo esplike youn lòt. Yo bay mond lan verite tout moun ta dwe konprann. Pwofesi sa yo dwe sèvi kòm temwayaj nan mond lan. Pa akonplisman yo nan dènye jou sa yo, yo pral esplike tèt yo.” Kress Collection, 105.
Likewise, the Republican horn representing the government of the United States was to be by the people and for the people, but the citizens of the United States have also forgotten the sacred document that they were entrusted with. That sacred document is the Constitution of the United States and the motto of the government that was designed to be for the people was the separation of church and state. They have forgotten the message of the Constitution they were entrusted with, and professed defenders of.
Menm jan an tou, kòn repibliken an ki reprezante gouvènman Etazini an te dwe soti nan pèp la epi pou pèp la; men sitwayen Etazini yo tou bliye dokiman sakre yo te konfye yo a. Dokiman sakre sa a se Konstitisyon Etazini an, e deviz gouvènman ki te fèt pou pèp la se te separasyon legliz ak leta. Yo bliye mesaj Konstitisyon yo te konfye yo a, e yo te fè pwofesyon pou yo te defansè li.
“And let it be remembered, it is the boast of Rome that she never changes. The principles of Gregory VII and Innocent III are still the principles of the Roman Catholic Church. And had she but the power, she would put them in practice with as much vigor now as in past centuries. Protestants little know what they are doing when they propose to accept the aid of Rome in the work of Sunday exaltation. While they are bent upon the accomplishment of their purpose, Rome is aiming to re-establish her power, to recover her lost supremacy. Let the principle once be established in the United States that the church may employ or control the power of the state; that religious observances may be enforced by secular laws; in short, that the authority of church and state is to dominate the conscience, and the triumph of Rome in this country is assured.
“Epi se pou yo sonje sa byen, se gwo lwanj Wòm fè pou tèt li lè li di li pa janm chanje. Prensip Grégoire VII ak Innocent III yo toujou rete prensip Legliz Katolik Wòm nan. E si sèlman li te gen pouvwa a, li ta mete yo an pratik kounye a ak menm fòs ak nan syèk ki pase yo. Pwotestan yo pa konnen vrèman sa y ap fè lè yo pwopoze pou aksepte èd Wòm nan zèv egzaltasyon dimanch lan. Pandan yo fikse sou akonplisman objektif pa yo, Wòm ap chèche retabli pouvwa pa li, pou l reprann sipremasi li te pèdi a. Se pou prensip la yon fwa tabli Ozetazini ke legliz la ka sèvi ak oswa kontwole pouvwa leta a; ke lwa sivil yo ka fè respekte obsèvans relijye yo; an brèf, ke otorite legliz ak leta dwe domine konsyans lan, epi viktwa Wòm nan peyi sa a asire.”
“God’s word has given warning of the impending danger; let this be unheeded, and the Protestant world will learn what the purposes of Rome really are, only when it is too late to escape the snare. She is silently growing into power. Her doctrines are exerting their influence in legislative halls, in the churches, and in the hearts of men. She is piling up her lofty and massive structures in the secret recesses of which her former persecutions will be repeated. Stealthily and unsuspectedly she is strengthening her forces to further her own ends when the time shall come for her to strike. All that she desires is vantage ground, and this is already being given her. We shall soon see and shall feel what the purpose of the Roman element is. Whoever shall believe and obey the word of God will thereby incur reproach and persecution.” The Great Controversy, 581.
“Pawòl Bondye a te bay avètisman konsènan danje k ap pwoche a; si yo pa koute l, mond pwotestan an va aprann ki sa objektif Wòm yo vrèman ye, sèlman lè li twò ta pou chape anba pyèj la. Li ap grandi an silans pou l vin gen pouvwa. Doktrin li yo ap egzèse enfliyans yo nan sal lejislatif yo, nan legliz yo, ak nan kè lèzòm. Li ap anpile estrikti li yo ki wo e solid, nan retrè sekrè kote ansyen pèsekisyon li yo va repete. An kachèt, san moun pa sispèk sa, li ap ranfòse fòs li yo pou l fè pwòp objektif pa li yo vanse lè lè a va rive pou li frape. Tout sa li anvi se yon pozisyon avantaj, e yo deja ap ba li sa. Byento nou va wè epi nou va santi ki sa objektif eleman women an ye. Nenpòt moun ki va kwè epi obeyi pawòl Bondye a, se poutèt sa menm li va sibi repwòch ak pèsekisyon.” The Great Controversy, 581.
If you can locate any dictionary that was published before 1950, and look up “scarlet colored woman” or some variation of that phrase from Revelation seventeen, every one of those pre-1950 dictionaries identifies that the Roman Catholic church is the whore of Revelation seventeen. The United States, Revelation thirteen’s two-horned earth-beast forgets its past, whether it be the horn of Protestantism or the horn of Republicanism. Both of these institutions came about from the protest against the religious tyranny of the papacy and the political tyranny of the kings that supported her, or as the Bible says, the kings that “committed fornication” with her. Before we take up Isaiah twenty-three, we will briefly give an overview of the other ten times Isaiah identifies a ‘prophecy of doom,’ for all of the eleven “burdens” are just that.
Si vous pouvez trouver quelque dictionnaire publié avant 1950, et y chercher « femme vêtue d’écarlate » ou quelque variante de cette expression tirée d’Apocalypse dix-sept, chacun de ces dictionnaires d’avant 1950 identifie l’Église catholique romaine comme étant la prostituée d’Apocalypse dix-sept. Les États-Unis, la bête de la terre à deux cornes d’Apocalypse treize, oublient leur passé, qu’il s’agisse de la corne du protestantisme ou de la corne du républicanisme. Ces deux institutions sont nées de la protestation contre la tyrannie religieuse de la papauté et la tyrannie politique des rois qui la soutenaient, ou, comme le dit la Bible, des rois qui ont « commis fornication » avec elle. Avant d’aborder Ésaïe vingt-trois, nous donnerons brièvement un aperçu des dix autres fois où Ésaïe désigne une « prophétie de malheur », car les onze « fardeaux » ne sont rien d’autre que cela.
Isaiah thirteen is the burden of Babylon in the “last days.” Babylon, though controlled and directed by the Catholic church in the last days is made up of three powers that lead the world to Armageddon in chapter sixteen of Revelation. In chapter thirteen’s prophecy of doom against modern Babylon there are three powers represented; Babylon, Lucifer and Assyria representing the beast (Assyria), the dragon (Lucifer) and the false prophet (Babylon). Assyria and Babylon are the two desolating powers God employed to punish ancient Israel and Assyria came first taking the northern ten tribes into captivity and thereafter Babylon took the southern two tribes of Judah.
Ezayi trèz se mesaj jijman kont Babilòn nan “dènye jou” yo. Babilòn, byenke Legliz Katolik la kontwole l e dirije l nan dènye jou yo, fòme ak twa pisans ki mennen mond lan rive Amagedòn nan chapit sèz Liv Revelasyon an. Nan pwofesi chapit trèz la sou kondanasyon Babilòn modèn nan, gen twa pisans ki reprezante la a: Babilòn, Lisifè ak Lasiri, ki reprezante bèt la (Lasiri), dragon an (Lisifè), ak fo pwofèt la (Babilòn). Lasiri ak Babilòn se de pisans devastatè Bondye te sèvi avè yo pou pini Izrayèl tan lontan an; Lasiri te vini an premye, li te mennen dis tribi nò yo an kaptivite, epi apre sa Babilòn te pran de tribi sid Jida yo.
Israel is a scattered sheep; the lions have driven him away: first the king of Assyria hath devoured him; and last this Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon hath broken his bones. Therefore thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will punish the king of Babylon and his land, as I have punished the king of Assyria. Jeremiah 50:17, 18.
Izrayèl se yon mouton ki gaye; lyon yo te kouri dèyè l: premye, wa Lasiri a te devore l; epi anfen, Nebikadneza, wa Babilòn nan, te kraze zo li yo. Se poutèt sa, men sa Seyè ki gen tout pouvwa yo, Bondye Izrayèl la, di: Gade, m pral pini wa Babilòn nan ak peyi li a, menm jan mwen te pini wa Lasiri a. Jeremi 50:17, 18.
First Assyria took the northern ten tribes of Israel into captivity and thereafter Babylon took the southern two tribes of Judah into captivity. Both of these captivities were fulfillment of Leviticus twenty-six’s “seven times.” The “seven times” of Leviticus was the very first “time prophecy” William Miller discovered, and it identifies that when Assyria captured the northern tribe it marked the beginning of a scattering that continued for twenty-five hundred and twenty years. That period began at their captivity in 723BC and ended at the “time of the end” in 1798. The southern tribes were taken by Babylon in 677BC, beginning the “seven times” against Judah which ended at the same point as the 2300-year prophecy of Daniel eight verse fourteen, on October 22, 1844. Assyria and Babylon fulfilled the same purpose of punishment against the rebellion of God’s people, but the punishment was first carried out by Assyria and then by Babylon.
Dabor, Asiri te mennen dis tribi pèp Izrayèl ki te nan nò yo ale an kaptivite, epi apre sa Babilòn te mennen de tribi Jida ki te nan sid yo ale an kaptivite. Toude kaptivite sa yo te yon akonplisman “sèt fwa” ki nan Levitik ventsis. “Sèt fwa” Levitik la se te premye “pwofesi tan” William Miller te dekouvri, e li montre ke lè Asiri te pran tribi nò a, sa te make kòmansman yon dispèsyon ki te kontinye pandan de mil senksan ven ane. Peryòd sa a te kòmanse ak kaptivite yo an 723 av. J.-K., epi li te fini nan “tan lafen an” an 1798. Babilòn te mennen tribi sid yo ale an 677 av. J.-K., konsa li te kòmanse “sèt fwa” ki te kont Jida a, ki te fini nan menm pwen ak pwofesi 2300 ane ki nan Danyèl uit vèsè katòz la, nan dat 22 oktòb 1844. Asiri ak Babilòn te akonpli menm bi pinisyon kont rebelyon pèp Bondye a, men pinisyon an te premye egzekite pa Asiri epi apre sa pa Babilòn.
In the prophetic relationship of the three powers in chapter thirteen Babylon is the image of Assyria, for she came after but did the same work against God’s people.
Nan relasyon pwofetik twa pouvwa yo nan chapit trèz la, Babilòn se imaj Lasiri, paske li te vini apre, men li te fè menm travay la kont pèp Bondye a.
In chapter fifteen, the burden against Moab is against the Protestant churches.
Nan chapit kenz la, mesaj jijman kont Moab la se kont legliz Pwotestan yo.
“This description of Moab represents the churches that have become like Moab. They have not stood at their post of duty as faithful sentinels. They have not cooperated with the heavenly intelligences by exercising their God-given ability to do the will of God, pressing back the powers of darkness, and using every power God has given them to advance truth and righteousness in our world. They have a knowledge of the truth, but they have not practiced what they know.” Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, volume 4, 1159.
“Deskripsyon sa a sou Moab reprezante legliz ki vin tankou Moab. Yo pa t rete kanpe nan pòs devwa yo kòm santinèl fidèl. Yo pa t kolabore avèk entèlijans selès yo lè yo te egzèse kapasite Bondye te ba yo pou fè volonte Bondye, pou repouse pouvwa fènwa yo, epi pou sèvi ak tout kapasite Bondye te ba yo pou fè laverite ak jistis avanse nan mond nou an. Yo gen konesans laverite a, men yo pa t mete an pratik sa yo konnen an.” Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, volume 4, 1159.
The Protestant church that has fallen is the church that continued to walk with the Lord when the rest of Protestantism fled at the second angel’s message. Moab is Adventism, the fallen Protestant horn.
Legliz pwotestan ki tonbe a se legliz ki te kontinye mache avèk Senyè a lè rès pwotestantis la te kouri ale devan mesaj dezyèm zanj lan. Moab se Advantis la, kòn pwotestan ki tonbe a.
Chapter seventeen is about Damascus, and it is identified as a city that is taken away. A city is a symbol of a kingdom and the kingdom that is taken away in the “last days” is the United States.
Chapit disèt la pale de Damas, e li idantifye kòm yon vil yo wete. Yon vil se yon senbòl yon wayòm, e wayòm yo wete nan “dènye jou yo” se Etazini.
Chapter nineteen is the prophecy of doom against Egypt, representing the United Nations and the whole world.
Chapit diznèf la se pwofesi kondanasyon kont Lejip, ki reprezante Nasyonzini ak lemonn antye.
The next three prophecies of doom in chapter twenty-one are against the terrible desert land of the south, Dumah and Arabia. These three prophecies of doom identify Islam, in agreement with the three woes of Revelation 8:13.
Pwochen twa pwofesi malè yo nan chapit venneyen an se kont tè dezè terib ki nan sid la, Duma ak Arabi. Twa pwofesi malè sa yo idantifye Islam, an akò avèk twa malè ki nan Revelasyon 8:13.
The prophecy of doom in chapter twenty-two portrays the separation of the Laodicean Adventists from the Philadelphian Adventists at the Sunday law.
Pwofesi kondanasyon ki nan chapit vennnde a dekri separasyon Advantis Lawodise yo ak Advantis Filadèlfi yo nan moman lwa dimanch la.
And then in chapter thirty we find the burden of the beasts of the south, which is a second illustration of the rebellion of Laodicean Adventists. Bringing all the burdens of Isaiah together virtually addresses every prophetic player in the “last days.” I am selecting Isaiah twenty-three in order to demonstrate that the history of the United States, as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, reigns from 1798 to the Sunday law.
Epi answit nan chapit trant, nou jwenn chay bèt nan sid la, ki se yon dezyèm ilistrasyon sou rebelyon Advantis Lawodise yo. Lè yo rasanble tout chay Ezayi yo ansanm, sa prèske adrese tout aktè pwofetik yo nan “dènye jou” yo. Mwen ap chwazi Ezayi venn-twa pou m demontre ke istwa Etazini, kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi biblik la, ap renye soti nan 1798 jouk rive nan lwa dimanch la.
Because “each of the ancient prophets spoke less for their own time than for ours, so that their prophesying is in force for us,” every prophetic utterance is addressing the events at the end of the world. This truth combined with the fact that “all the books of the Bible meet and end” in the book of Revelation, establishes the book of Revelation as the point of reference for aligning the prophetic testimony about the events at the end of the world.
Paske «chak nan ansyen pwofèt yo te pale mwens pou pwòp epòk pa yo pase pou pa nou an, konsa pwofetizasyon yo an vigè pou nou», chak deklarasyon pwofetik ap pale de evènman ki nan fen mond lan. Verite sa a, ansanm ak lefèt ke «tout liv Bib la rankontre epi fini» nan liv Revelasyon an, tabli liv Revelasyon an kòm pwen referans pou aliyen temwayaj pwofetik la konsènan evènman ki nan fen mond lan.
In the seventeenth chapter of Revelation, we see the great whore that commits fornication with the kings of the earth and her final judgment.
Nan dizwityèm chapit Liv Revelasyon an, nou wè gwo pwostitiye a k ap fè fònikasyon ak wa latè yo, ansanm ak jijman final li.
And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will show unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication. Revelation 17:1, 2.
Apre sa, youn nan sèt zanj ki te gen sèt bòl yo vini, li pale avè m, li di m konsa: Vini isit la; m ap montre w jijman gwo pwostitiye a ki chita sou anpil dlo yo; se avèk li wa latè yo te fè fònikasyon, e moun ki rete sou latè yo te sou ak diven fònikasyon li a. Revelasyon 17:1, 2.
The prophets never contradict one another.
Pwofèt yo pa janm kontredi youn lòt.
And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets. For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. 1 Corinthians 14:32, 33.
Les esprits des prophètes sont soumis aux prophètes. Car Dieu n’est pas un Dieu de désordre, mais de paix, comme dans toutes les Églises des saints. 1 Corinthiens 14:32, 33.
At the end of the world “the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters,” the great whore with “whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication,” the great whore that has made “the inhabitants of the earth” drunk “with the wine of her fornication;” is represented by Isaiah as the “harlot” who is forgotten for “the days of one king,” or seventy prophetic years. When the seventy years conclude Tyre “shall commit fornication with all the kingdoms of the world.” Isaiah’s harlot is John’s great whore. Isaiah’s harlot and John’s whore represent the Roman Catholic church, for a woman is a symbol of a church in God’s Word.
Nan fen mond lan, “jijman gwo pwostitiye a ki chita sou anpil dlo yo,” gwo pwostitiye sa a “wa latè yo te fè fònikasyon avèk li,” gwo pwostitiye ki fè “moun ki rete sou latè a” sou “ak diven fònikasyon li a;” Ezayi prezante l kòm “pwostitiye” yo bliye pandan “jou yon sèl wa,” oswa swasanndis ane pwofetik. Lè swasanndis ane yo fini, Tir “va fè fònikasyon ak tout wayòm lemonn yo.” Pwostitiye Ezayi a se gwo pwostitiye Jan an. Pwostitiye Ezayi a ak pwostitiye Jan an reprezante legliz Katolik women an, paske yon fanm se yon senbòl yon legliz nan Pawòl Bondye a.
Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church: For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church. Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband. Ephesians 5:22–33.
Madanm yo, soumèt nou bay pwòp mari nou, tankou bay Seyè a. Paske mari a se chèf madanm nan, menm jan Kris la se chèf Legliz la; e li se Sovè kò a. Se poutèt sa, menm jan Legliz la soumèt devan Kris la, konsa tou madanm yo dwe soumèt bay pwòp mari yo nan tout bagay. Mari yo, renmen madanm nou, menm jan Kris la tou te renmen Legliz la, epi li te bay tèt li pou li; pou li te ka sanktifye l epi pirifye l ak lavman dlo pa mwayen pawòl la, pou li te ka prezante l bay tèt li kòm yon Legliz gloriye, ki pa gen tach, ni rid, ni okenn bagay konsa; men pou li ta sen e san defo. Konsa tou, gason yo dwe renmen madanm yo tankou pwòp kò pa yo. Moun ki renmen madanm li renmen tèt li. Paske pa janm gen pèsonn ki rayi pwòp chè li; men li nouri l epi pran swen li avèk tandrès, menm jan Seyè a fè pou Legliz la. Paske nou se manm kò li, soti nan chè li, e nan zo li. Se poutèt sa, yon nonm va kite papa l ak manman l, epi l ap mete tèt li kole ak madanm li, e yo toude va fè yon sèl chè. Sa a se yon gwo mistè; men mwen pale konsènan Kris la ak Legliz la. Men kanmenm, se pou chak moun pami nou renmen madanm li tankou tèt pa li; epi se pou madanm nan gen reverans pou mari li. Efezyen 5:22–33.
The apostle Paul identifies that the church of Christ is prophetically represented as a woman. Therefore, a woman in prophecy is a church, but Christ’s church is “holy and without blemish.” An unholy church is represented as an unholy woman, thus Isaiah identifies a harlot and John a whore. They represent the papacy as a whore and God’s church is a virgin.
Apot Pòl la fè konnen Legliz Kris la reprezante pwofetikman kòm yon fanm. Se poutèt sa, nan pwofesi, yon fanm se yon legliz; men Legliz Kris la se “sen e san tach.” Yon legliz ki pa sen reprezante kòm yon fanm ki pa sen; konsa Ezayi idantifye yon jennès, epi Jan idantifye yon pwostitiye. Yo reprezante papote a kòm yon pwostitiye, epi Legliz Bondye a se yon vyèj.
For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. 2 Corinthians 11:2.
Paske mwen jalou pou nou ak yon jalouzi ki soti nan Bondye; paske mwen fiyanse nou ak yon sèl mari, pou m ka prezante nou bay Kris kòm yon vyèj ki pwòp. 2 Korentyen 11:2.
Not only is God’s church represented as a virgin, but she is espoused to only one husband. Tyre and John’s great whore commit fornication with the kings of the earth. The Catholic church has relations with several men, not one. Daniel informs us the kings are kingdoms.
Non sèlman legliz Bondye a reprezante kòm yon vyèj, men li fiyanse ak yon sèl mari. Tir ak gwo pwostiti Jan an fè fònikasyon ak wa latè yo. Legliz katolik la gen relasyon ak plizyè gason, pa ak yon sèl. Danyèl fè nou konnen wa yo se wayòm yo.
This is the dream; and we will tell the interpretation thereof before the king. Thou, O king, art a king of kings: for the God of heaven hath given thee a kingdom, power, and strength, and glory. And wheresoever the children of men dwell, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the heaven hath he given into thine hand, and hath made thee ruler over them all. Thou art this head of gold. And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth. And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iron that breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise. Daniel 2:36–40.
Men rèv la; epi n ap bay wa a entèpretasyon li. Ou menm, o wa, ou se yon wa sou wa yo; paske Bondye syèl la ba ou yon wayòm, pouvwa, fòs, ak glwa. Epi nenpòt kote pitit lèzòm yo rete, bèt nan chan yo ak zwazo nan syèl la, li lage yo nan men ou, e li fè ou chèf sou yo tout. Ou se tèt an lò sa a. E apre ou, yon lòt wayòm pral leve, ki enferyè pase pa ou a; epi yon twazyèm wayòm an kwiv, ki pral domine sou tout tè a. E katriyèm wayòm nan pral fò tankou fè; paske menm jan fè kraze an miyèt moso e li soumèt tout bagay, konsa li menm tou, tankou fè ki kraze tout bagay sa yo, l ap kraze yo an miyèt moso e l ap pilonnen yo. Danyèl 2:36–40.
In Daniel two, the kingdoms of Bible prophecy are identified and explained. As Daniel explains the dream to Nebuchadnezzar, he informs Nebuchadnezzar that he is the head of gold. The head of gold is a king, but a king represents a kingdom. The Roman Catholic church is the great harlot that commits fornication with all the kings of the earth at the end of seventy prophetic years. The kings are symbolic of men, and Tyre is an impure woman. A woman is a church, a whore is an unholy church; a man is a king and a king is a kingdom. A woman is a church and a king is a state. The unlawful relationship of these two entities represents spiritual fornication.
Nan Danyèl de, yo idantifye e yo esplike wayòm pwofesi Bib la. Pandan Danyèl ap esplike rèv la bay Nebikadneza, li fè Nebikadneza konnen se li menm ki tèt lò a. Tèt lò a se yon wa, men yon wa reprezante yon wayòm. Legliz Katolik Wòm nan se gwo jennès la ki fè fònikasyon ak tout wa latè yo nan fen swasanndis ane pwofetik yo. Wa yo se senbòl gason, epi Tir se yon fanm ki pa pwòp. Yon fanm se yon legliz, yon jennès se yon legliz ki pa sen; yon gason se yon wa epi yon wa se yon wayòm. Yon fanm se yon legliz epi yon wa se yon leta. Relasyon ilegal ant de antite sa yo reprezante fònikasyon espirityèl.
The Constitution of the United States is a divine document that enshrines the necessity of keeping these two entities separate. Though we are not yet finished with identifying Tyre as the Roman Catholic church, it seems appropriate at this point to address another symbol in Isaiah twenty-three that explains the symbolism of man and woman—church and state.
Konstitisyon Etazini an se yon dokiman diven ki tabli nesesite pou kenbe de antite sa yo separe. Byenke nou poko fini idantifye Tir kòm legliz Katolik women an, li sanble apwopriye nan pwen sa a pou nou abòde yon lòt senbòl nan Ezayi venntwa ki eksplike senbolis gason ak fanm nan—legliz ak leta.
Behold the land of the Chaldeans; this people was not, till the Assyrian founded it for them that dwell in the wilderness: they set up the towers thereof, they raised up the palaces thereof; and he brought it to ruin. Isaiah 23:13.
Gade peyi Kaldeyen yo; pèp sa a pa t egziste, jouk lè Asiryen an te fonde l pou moun k ap viv nan dezè a: yo leve gwo fò tou won li yo, yo bati palè li yo; epi li mennen l nan kraze. Ezayi 23:13.
In the verse, the Assyrian founded the land of the Chaldeans and set up both “towers” and “palaces.” The Assyrian is a symbol of Nimrod, and the Chaldeans represent the religious leaders of Babylon’s mystery religions. A “tower” is a symbol of a church. When Jesus set forth the parable of the vineyard, Sister White comments on the parable as follows:
Nan vèsè a, Asiryen an te fonde peyi Kaldeyen yo epi li te mete sou pye ni “tou” ni “palè.” Asiryen an se yon senbòl Nimwòd, epi Kaldeyen yo reprezante chèf relijye relijyon mistè Babilòn yo. Yon “tou” se yon senbòl yon legliz. Lè Jezi te prezante parabòl jaden rezen an, Sè White fè kòmantè sou parabòl la konsa:
“In the parable the householder represented God, the vineyard the Jewish nation, and the hedge the divine law which was their protection. The tower was a symbol of the temple.” Desire of Ages, 596.
“Nan parabòl la, mèt kay la te reprezante Bondye, jaden rezen an te reprezante nasyon jwif la, epi kloti a te reprezante lalwa diven an ki te pwoteksyon yo. Tou a te yon senbòl tanp lan.” Desire of Ages, 596.
The Assyrian founded the land of the Chaldeans who set up a church (tower) and a “palace.” A “palace’ represents a “king” which in turn represents a kingdom. A kingdom is also represented as a city.
Moun Lasiri an te fonde peyi Kaldeyen yo, ki te leve yon legliz (touwon) ak yon “palè.” Yon “palè” reprezante yon “wa”, e “wa” a, nan vire pa li, reprezante yon wayòm. Yon wayòm reprezante tou kòm yon vil.
And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. Genesis 11:4.
Epi yo di: Ann alò, ann bati pou nou yon vil ak yon fò won, ki tèt li ka rive jis nan syèl la; epi ann fè nou yon non, pou nou pa gaye toupatou sou fas tout tè a. Jenèz 11:4.
The “tower” and “palace” that the Assyrian founded are the “city” and “tower” which Nimrod built.
“Tour” ak “palè” Asiryen an te fonde yo se “vil” ak “tour” Nimwòd te bati yo.
And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified. Revelation 11:8.
Epi kadav yo va rete kouche nan lari gran vil la, ki, nan sans espirityèl, yo rele Sodòm ak Lejip, kote tou Seyè nou an te kloure sou kwa a. Revelasyon 11:8.
Inspiration informs us the “great city” in Revelation eleven represents the kingdom of France during the period of the French Revolution.
Enspirasyon fè nou konnen “gwo vil” ki nan Revelasyon onz la reprezante wayòm Lafrans pandan peryòd Revolisyon fransè a.
“‘The great city’ in whose streets the witnesses are slain, and where their dead bodies lie, is ‘spiritually’ Egypt. Of all nations presented in Bible history, Egypt most boldly denied the existence of the living God and resisted His commands. No monarch ever ventured upon more open and highhanded rebellion against the authority of Heaven than did the king of Egypt. When the message was brought him by Moses, in the name of the Lord, Pharaoh proudly answered: ‘Who is Jehovah, that I should hearken unto His voice to let Israel go? I know not Jehovah, and moreover I will not let Israel go.’ Exodus 5:2, A.R.V. This is atheism, and the nation represented by Egypt would give voice to a similar denial of the claims of the living God and would manifest a like spirit of unbelief and defiance. ‘The great city’ is also compared, ‘spiritually,’ to Sodom. The corruption of Sodom in breaking the law of God was especially manifested in licentiousness. And this sin was also to be a pre-eminent characteristic of the nation that should fulfill the specifications of this scripture.
“‘Gran vil la’ kote yo touye temwen yo nan lari li yo, epi kote kadav yo rete kouche, se ‘espirityèlman’ Ejip. Pami tout nasyon yo prezante nan istwa Bib la, Ejip se li menm ki te pi odasyezman nye egzistans Bondye vivan an epi ki te reziste kòmandman Li yo. Pa t janm gen okenn monak ki te oze antre nan yon rebelyon ki pi ouvè e pi awogan kont otorite Syèl la pase wa Ejip la. Lè Moyiz te pote mesaj la ba li nan non Senyè a, Farawon te reponn avèk ògèy: ‘Ki moun Jewova ye, pou m ta koute vwa Li pou m kite Izrayèl ale? Mwen pa konnen Jewova, e anplis mwen p ap kite Izrayèl ale.’ Egzòd 5:2, A.R.V. Sa a se ateyis, e nasyon Ejip la reprezante a t ap fè tande yon denegasyon menm jan an konsènan dwa Bondye vivan an genyen pou Li reklame obeyisans, e li t ap manifeste yon lespri enkredilite ak defi ki sanble avè l. Yo konpare ‘gran vil la’ tou, ‘espirityèlman,’ ak Sodòm. Koripsyon Sodòm nan vyolasyon lalwa Bondye a te parèt espesyalman nan debòch. E peche sa a tou te dwe yon karakteristik dominan nan nasyon ki t ap akonpli deskripsyon ekriti sa a.”
“According to the words of the prophet, then, a little before the year 1798 some power of satanic origin and character would rise to make war upon the Bible. And in the land where the testimony of God’s two witnesses should thus be silenced, there would be manifest the atheism of the Pharaoh and the licentiousness of Sodom.
“Dapre pawòl pwofèt la, donk, yon ti tan anvan ane 1798 la, yon pouvwa ki soti nan Satan e ki pote karaktè li t ap leve pou fè lagè kont Bib la. E nan peyi kote temwayaj de temwen Bondye yo t ap vin redwi konsa nan silans, ateyis Farawon an ak depravasyon Sodòm nan t ap parèt aklè.
“This prophecy has received a most exact and striking fulfillment in the history of France. During the Revolution, in 1793, ‘the world for the first time heard an assembly of men, born and educated in civilization, and assuming the right to govern one of the finest of the European nations, uplift their united voice to deny the most solemn truth which man’s soul receives, and renounce unanimously the belief and worship of a Deity.’—Sir Walter Scott, Life of Napoleon, vol. 1, ch. 17. ‘France is the only nation in the world concerning which the authentic record survives, that as a nation she lifted her hand in open rebellion against the Author of the universe. Plenty of blasphemers, plenty of infidels, there have been, and still continue to be, in England, Germany, Spain, and elsewhere; but France stands apart in the world’s history as the single state which, by the decree of her Legislative Assembly, pronounced that there was no God, and of which the entire population of the capital, and a vast majority elsewhere, women as well as men, danced and sang with joy in accepting the announcement.’—Blackwood’s Magazine, November, 1870.” The Great Controversy, 269.
“Pwofesi sa a te resevwa yon akonplisman ki pi egzak e ki pi frapan nan istwa Lafrans. Pandan Revolisyon an, an 1793, ‘lemonn, pou premye fwa, tande yon asanble moun, ki te fèt e ki te resevwa edikasyon nan sivilizasyon, epi ki t ap pran sou yo dwa pou gouvène youn nan pi bèl nasyon Ewòp yo, leve vwa ini yo pou nye verite ki pi solanèl nanm moun resevwa, epi renonse ak inanimite a kwayans ak adorasyon yon Divinite.’—Sir Walter Scott, Life of Napoleon, vol. 1, ch. 17. ‘Lafrans se sèl nasyon nan lemonn konsènan ki dosye otantik la toujou egziste, ki montre ke kòm yon nasyon li te leve men li nan rebelyon ouvè kont Otè linivè a. Te gen anpil moun k ap blasfème, anpil moun san lafwa, e toujou genyen yo, ann Angletè, Almay, Espay, ak lòt kote; men Lafrans rete apa nan istwa lemonn kòm sèl eta ki, pa dekrè Lasanble Lejislatif li a, te pwoklame ke pa t gen Bondye, epi kote tout popilasyon kapital la, ansanm ak yon gran majorite lòt kote, fanm menm jan ak gason, te danse e te chante ak lajwa pandan yo t ap akeyi anons sa a.’—Blackwood’s Magazine, Novanm, 1870.” The Great Controversy, 269.
The “great city” in Revelation eleven was the nation of France that passed a “decree of her Legislative Assembly” pronouncing that there was no God. The decree was an expression of atheism as represented by the rebellion of Pharaoh. A great city is a kingdom, or a “nation” or a “state.” In Revelation eleven France consists of two symbols—Egypt and Sodom.
“gwo vil” ki nan Revelasyon onz la se te nasyon Lafrans, ki te pase yon “dekrè Asanble Lejislatif li” ki te pwoklame pa t gen Bondye. Dekrè a te yon ekspresyon ateyis, jan rebelyon Farawon an te reprezante l. Yon gwo vil se yon wayòm, oswa yon “nasyon” oubyen yon “leta.” Nan Revelasyon onz, Lafrans konpoze de de senbòl—Lejip ak Sodòm.
We are informed, “This is atheism, and the nation represented by Egypt would give voice to a similar denial of the claims of the living God and would manifest a like spirit of unbelief and defiance. ‘The great city’ is also compared, ‘spiritually,’ to Sodom. The corruption of Sodom in breaking the law of God was especially manifested in licentiousness.”
Nou jwenn enfòmasyon sa a: “Sa a se ateyis, e nasyon ki reprezante pa Lejip la t ap fè tande yon menm kalite demanti kont dwa Bondye vivan an, e li t ap manifeste yon menm lespri enkredilite ak defi. ‘Gwo vil la’ tou konpare, ‘nan sans espirityèl,’ ak Sodòm. Koripsyon Sodòm nan vyole lalwa Bondye te manifeste sitou nan debòch.”
The great city or nation of France is symbolically represented by a nation (Egypt) and a city (Sodom.) Egypt “would give voice,” and the speaking of a nation represents statecraft, not churchcraft. Egypt was the state and Sodom was the church is the representation found in chapter eleven of Revelation
Gwo vil la oswa nasyon Lafrans lan reprezante senbolikman pa yon nasyon (Ejip) ak yon vil (Sodòm). Ejip “ta bay vwa,” e pale yon nasyon reprezante zafè Leta, pa zafè legliz. Ejip te Leta a, epi Sodòm te legliz la; se reprezantasyon sa a nou jwenn nan chapit onz nan Liv Revelasyon an.
“The ‘speaking’ of the nation is the action of its legislative and judicial authorities.” The Great Controversy, 442.
« Le fait que la nation “parle” est l’action de ses autorités législatives et judiciaires. » The Great Controversy, 442.
In Revelation eleven John sets forth the events of the French Revolution in prophetic symbolism. The actual Revolution provided ample historical evidence of the validity of John’s predictions in the chapter. John predicted, then the French Revolution fulfilled the prediction, and then in turn—both the prediction and the historical fulfillment of the prediction identify and parallel events at the end of the world, when once again a corrupt state is combined with a corrupt church. Of course, a bloodbath follows that unholy marriage. The kingdom of God is also a great city.
Nan Revelasyon onz, Jan prezante evènman Revolisyon fransè a nan senbolis pwofetik. Revolisyon an menm te bay anpil prèv istorik sou validite prediksyon Jan yo nan chapit la. Jan te predi, apre sa Revolisyon fransè a te akonpli prediksyon an, epi ansuit—ni prediksyon an ni akonplisman istorik prediksyon an idantifye epi mete an paralèl evènman ki pral rive nan fen mond lan, lè ankò yon eta koripsyon mete tèt li ansanm ak yon legliz koripsyon. Byen antandi, yon beny san swiv maryaj pwofan sa a. Wayòm Bondye a tou se yon gwo vil.
And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and showed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God. Revelation 21:10.
Epi li mennen m ale nan Lespri a sou yon gwo mòn ki wo anpil, epi li montre m gwo vil sa a, Jerizalèm ki sen an, k ap desann soti nan syèl la, kote Bondye ye a. Revelasyon 21:10.
“The coming of the bridegroom, here brought to view, takes place before the marriage. The marriage represents the reception by Christ of His kingdom. The Holy City, the New Jerusalem, which is the capital and representative of the kingdom, is called ‘the bride, the Lamb’s wife.’ Said the angel to John: ‘Come hither, I will show thee the bride, the Lamb’s wife.’ ‘He carried me away in the spirit,’ says the prophet, ‘and showed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God.’ Revelation 21:9, 10.” The Great Controversy, 426.
« Vini marye a, jan sa prezante isit la, fèt anvan maryaj la. Maryaj la reprezante moman kote Kris resevwa wayòm li a. Vil Sen an, Nouvo Jerizalèm nan, ki se kapital la epi ki reprezante wayòm nan, rele “lamarye a, madanm Ti Mouton an.” Zanj lan di Jan konsa: “Vini isit la, m ap montre w lamarye a, madanm Ti Mouton an.” “Li pote m ale nan Lespri a,” pwofèt la di, “epi li montre m gwo vil sa a, Jerizalèm ki sen an, k ap desann soti nan syèl la, bò kote Bondye.” Revelasyon 21:9, 10. » The Great Controversy, 426.
Nimrod’s rebellion is represented by his building a tower and a city, which typifies the combination of church and state at the end of the world, for all the prophets spoke of the end of the world. Nimrod’s rebellion was also a continuation of the rebellion of Lucifer whose desire was to take control of both God’s church and God’s state.
Rebelyon Nimwòd la reprezante pa lefèt li te bati yon gwo fò won ak yon vil, sa ki senbolize inyon legliz ak leta nan fen mond lan, paske tout pwofèt yo te pale konsènan fen mond lan. Rebelyon Nimwòd la te tou yon kontinyasyon rebelyon Lisifè a, li menm ki te gen dezi pran kontwòl ni legliz Bondye a ni leta Bondye a.
How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Isaiah 14:12–14.
Ala jan ou tonbe sot nan syèl la, o Lisi fè, pitit gason granmaten an! Ala jan yo rache ou desann atè, ou menm ki te fè nasyon yo febli! Paske ou te di nan kè ou: M ap monte nan syèl la, m ap leve twòn mwen pi wo pase zetwal Bondye yo; m ap chita tou sou mòn asanble a, nan pwent nò yo; m ap monte pi wo pase wotè nwaj yo; m ap vin tankou Trèwo a. Ezayi 14:12–14.
As Isaiah reveals Lucifer’s secret heart-desires to be “like the most High,” he points out that Lucifer is seeking to be seated in two distinctly different chairs. He wishes to “exalt” his “throne above the stars of God” and to “sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north.”
Jan Ezayi revele dezi sekrè ki te nan kè Lisifè pou l vin “tankou Trèwo a,” li fè remake Lisifè ap chèche chita sou de chèz ki klèman diferan. Li vle “leve” “twòn” pa l “anwo zetwal Bondye yo” epi tou “chita sou mòn asanble a, bò nò a.”
The throne is a symbol of the king’s authority—or state authority and “the sides of the north” is God’s church.
Twòn nan se yon senbòl otorite wa a—oswa otorite leta a—epi “kote ki nan nò yo” se legliz Bondye a.
A Song and Psalm for the sons of Korah. Great is the Lord, and greatly to be praised in the city of our God, in the mountain of his holiness. Beautiful for situation, the joy of the whole earth, is mount Zion, on the sides of the north, the city of the great King. God is known in her palaces for a refuge. Psalm 48:1–3.
Yon kantik ak Sòm pou pitit gason Kore yo. Gran se SENYÈ a, e li merite gwo louwanj nan vil Bondye nou an, sou mòn sentete li a. Bèl nan pozisyon li, lajwa tout latè a, se mòn Siyon, sou bò nò a, vil gran Wa a. Bondye fè konnen tèt li nan palè li yo tankou yon refij. Sòm 48:1–3.
Jerusalem is “the city of the great King,” thus marking the political throne of God, and Jerusalem is also “the mountain of his holiness,” “on the sides of the north,” thus marking the religious throne of God. From the beginning Satan’s rebellion and warfare are portrayed within the context of his desire to rule over both God’s church and God’s state. Satan thereafter led in the rebellion of Nimrod and the land that he founded for the Chaldeans is represented as a land where Nimrod built both a tower and a city—church and state.
Jerizalèm se “vil gran Wa a,” konsa li make twòn politik Bondye a; epi Jerizalèm se tou “mòn sentete li a,” “sou bò nò yo,” konsa li make twòn relijye Bondye a. Depi nan kòmansman an, rebelyon ak lagè Satan an prezante nan kontèks dezi li pou l dirije sou ni legliz Bondye a ni leta Bondye a. Apre sa, Satan te mennen nan rebelyon Nimwòd la, epi peyi li te fonde pou Kaldeyen yo reprezante kòm yon peyi kote Nimwòd te bati ni yon gwo kay won ni yon vil—legliz ak leta.
Therefore, when Isaiah’s harlot and John’s great whore commit fornication with the kings of the earth, prophecy is marking that an unholy relationship takes place between the Roman Catholic church and the kings of the earth at the end of seventy prophetic years.
Se poutèt sa, lè jennès Ezayi a ak gwo pwostitye Jan an fè fònikasyon ak wa latè yo, pwofesi a ap make ke yon relasyon ki pa sen ap pran plas ant legliz Katolik Wòm nan ak wa latè yo nan fen swasanndis ane pwofetik yo.
Isaiah’s line of prophecy describes the judgment of the harlot Tyre in chapter twenty-three and John describes the same judgment with the symbol of a scarlet-colored woman who is identified as “Babylon the great.” A third witness to the same judgment of the same whore is as follows:
Liy pwofesi Ezayi a dekri jijman pwostitye Tir la nan chapit venn-twa, epi Jan dekri menm jijman sa a avèk senbòl yon fanm koulè wouj violèt ki idantifye kòm “Babilòn gran an.” Yon twazyèm temwen sou menm jijman sa a, sou menm jennès la, se jan sa a:
“The woman (Babylon) of Revelation 17 is described as ‘arrayed in purple and scarlet color, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness: . . . and upon her forehead was a name written, Mystery, Babylon the Great, the mother of harlots.’ Says the prophet: ‘I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus.’ Babylon is further declared to be ‘that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.’ Revelation 17:4–6, 18. The power that for so many centuries maintained despotic sway over the monarchs of Christendom is Rome.” The Great Controversy, 382.
“Fanm nan (Babilòn) nan Revelasyon 17 dekri kòm ‘abiye ak koulè vyolèt ak wouj violèt, dekore ak lò, pyè presye ak pèl, li te gen nan men li yon gode an lò ki te plen ak abominasyon ak salte: ... epi sou fwon li te ekri yon non, Mistè, Babilòn Gran an, manman pwostitiye yo.’ Pwofèt la di: ‘Mwen te wè fanm nan sou ak san sen yo, ak san mati Jezi yo.’ Yo deklare ankò konsènan Babilòn ke li se ‘gwo vil sa a, ki ap gouvène sou wa latè yo.’ Revelasyon 17:4–6, 18. Pwisans ki, pandan anpil syèk, te kenbe yon dominasyon despotik sou monak lakretyente yo se Wòm.” The Great Controversy, 382.
Tyre is the Roman Catholic church in the “last days.” At that time the papacy will go forth and sing her seductive songs to the kings of the earth, thus leading the kings into the act of fornication, which is prophetically the combination of church and state.
Tir se Legliz Katolik Women nan “dènye jou” yo. Lè sa a, papote a pral sòti pou l chante chante sediktè li yo bay wa latè yo, konsa li pral mennen wa yo nan zak fònikasyon an, ki, nan sans pwofetik, se inyon ant legliz ak leta.
And it shall come to pass in that day, that Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years, according to the days of one king: after the end of seventy years shall Tyre sing as an harlot. Isaiah 23:15.
Epi sa pral rive nan jou sa a, Tir pral tonbe nan oubli pandan swasanndizan, dapre jou yon wa; apre fen swasanndizan yo, Tir pral chante tankou yon fanm movèz vi. Ezayi 23:15.
A king is a kingdom in Bible prophecy, so Tyre shall be forgotten during the time when a prophetic kingdom rules for seventy years.
Yon wa se yon wayòm nan pwofesi biblik, konsa Tir pral tonbe nan bliye pandan tan kote yon wayòm pwofetik ap gouvène pandan swasanndis ane.
And it shall come to pass in that day, that Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years, according to the days of one king: after the end of seventy years shall Tyre sing as an harlot. Take an harp, go about the city, thou harlot that hast been forgotten; make sweet melody, sing many songs, that thou mayest be remembered. And it shall come to pass after the end of seventy years, that the Lord will visit Tyre, and she shall turn to her hire, and shall commit fornication with all the kingdoms of the world upon the face of the earth. Isaiah 23:15–17.
Epi sa pral rive nan jou sa a, Tir pral tonbe nan oubli pandan swasanndis an, dapre dire yon sèl wa; apre fen swasanndis an yo, Tir pral chante tankou yon jennès. Pran yon gita, mache toupatou nan vil la, ou menm jennès yo te bliye a; fè bèl melodi, chante anpil chante, pou yo ka sonje ou. Epi sa pral rive apre fen swasanndis an yo, Senyè a pral vizite Tir, epi li pral tounen nan salè li, epi li pral fè fònikasyon ak tout wayòm sou latè, sou tout fas tè a. Ezayi 23:15–17.
During the days of one kingdom that rules for seventy prophetic years the Roman Catholic church will be forgotten. At the end of the seventy years, the papal power will “make sweet melody, sing many songs.” Prophetically a “song” represents “experience.”
Pandan jou youn wayòm k ap dirije pandan swasanndis ane pwofetik yo, legliz Katolik Women an pral tonbe nan bliye. Nan fen swasanndis ane yo, pouvwa papal la pral “fè bèl melodi, chante anpil chan.” Nan sans pwofetik, yon “chan” reprezante “eksperyans.”
“Upon the crystal sea before the throne, that sea of glass as it were mingled with fire,—so resplendent is it with the glory of God,—are gathered the company that have ‘gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name.’ With the Lamb upon Mount Zion, ‘having the harps of God,’ they stand, the hundred and forty and four thousand that were redeemed from among men; and there is heard, as the sound of many waters, and as the sound of a great thunder, ‘the voice of harpers harping with their harps.’ And they sing ‘a new Song’ before the throne, a song which no man can learn save the hundred and forty and four thousand. It is the song of Moses and the Lamb—a song of deliverance. None but the hundred and forty-four thousand can learn that song; for it is the song of their experience—an experience such as no other company have ever had. ‘These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever He goeth.’ These, having been translated from the earth, from among the living, are counted as ‘the first fruits unto God and to the Lamb.’ Revelation 15:2, 3; 14:1-5. ‘These are they which came out of great tribulation;’ they have passed through the time of trouble such as never was since there was a nation; they have endured the anguish of the time of Jacob’s trouble; they have stood without an intercessor through the final outpouring of God’s judgments. But they have been delivered, for they have ‘washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.’ ‘In their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault’ before God. ‘Therefore are they before the throne of God, and serve Him day and night in His temple: and He that sitteth on the throne shall dwell among them.’ They have seen the earth wasted with famine and pestilence, the sun having power to scorch men with great heat, and they themselves have endured suffering, hunger, and thirst. But ‘they shall hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall the sun light on them, nor any heat. For the Lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall feed them, and shall lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes.’ Revelation 7:14-17.” The Great Controversy, 648.
“Sou lanmè kristal la devan twòn nan, lanmè an vè sa a tankou melanje ak dife,—tèlman li klere ak laglwa Bondye,—la rasanble gwoup sila yo ki ‘te genyen laviktwa sou bèt la, sou imaj li, sou mak li, ak sou nimewo non li.’ Avèk Ti Mouton an sou Mòn Siyon, ‘yo gen gita Bondye yo,’ yo kanpe la, san karannkatmil yo ki te rachte pami lèzòm; epi yo tande, tankou bri anpil dlo, ak tankou bri yon gwo loraj, ‘vwa moun k ap jwe gita yo pandan y ap jwe sou gita yo.’ Epi yo chante ‘yon nouvo kantik’ devan twòn nan, yon kantik pèsonn pa ka aprann eksepte san karannkatmil yo. Se kantik Moyiz ak Ti Mouton an—yon kantik delivrans. Pèsonn lòt, eksepte san karannkatmil yo, pa ka aprann kantik sa a; paske se kantik eksperyans pa yo—yon eksperyans okenn lòt gwoup pa janm genyen. ‘Se sila yo ki swiv Ti Mouton an nenpòt kote Li ale.’ Sila yo, ki te transfòme soti sou tè a, pami vivan yo, yo konsidere yo kòm ‘premye fwi pou Bondye ak pou Ti Mouton an.’ Revelasyon 15:2, 3; 14:1-5. ‘Se sila yo ki sòti nan gwo tribilasyon an;’ yo te pase atravè tan detrès tankou pa t janm genyen depi lè te gen yon nasyon; yo te sipòte angwas tan detrès Jakòb la; yo te kanpe san yon entèsesè pandan dènye vide jijman Bondye yo. Men yo te delivre, paske yo te ‘lave rad yo, e yo te blanchi yo nan san Ti Mouton an.’ ‘Nan bouch yo pa t jwenn okenn manti: paske yo san fot’ devan Bondye. ‘Se poutèt sa yo devan twòn Bondye a, e yo sèvi Li lajounen kou lannwit nan tanp Li a: epi Sila a ki chita sou twòn nan ap rete nan mitan yo.’ Yo te wè tè a devaste ak grangou ak epidemi, solèy la te gen pouvwa pou boule moun ak yon gwo chalè, e yo menm tou yo te andire soufrans, grangou, ak swaf. Men, ‘yo p ap grangou ankò, ni yo p ap swaf ankò; ni solèy la p ap frape yo, ni okenn chalè. Paske Ti Mouton an ki nan mitan twòn nan ap nouri yo, epi L ap mennen yo nan sous dlo vivan yo: e Bondye ap siye tout dlo nan je yo.’ Revelasyon 7:14-17.” The Great Controversy, 648.
“‘In His temple doth everyone speak of His glory’ (Psalm 29:9), and the song which the ransomed ones will sing—the song of their experience—will declare the glory of God: ‘Great and marvelous are Thy works, O Lord God, the Almighty; righteous and true are Thy ways, Thou King of the ages. Who shall not fear, O Lord, and glorify Thy name? for Thou only art holy.’ Revelation 15:3, 4, R.V.” Education, 308.
“‘Nan tanp Li a, tout moun ap pale sou laglwa Li’ (Sòm 29:9), epi chan sa a ke sila yo ki delivre yo pral chante a—chan eksperyans pa yo a—pral deklare laglwa Bondye: ‘Gran e mèvèye se zèv Ou yo, O Senyè Bondye, Toupisan an; jis e veritab se chemen Ou yo, Ou menm Wa tout syèk yo. Kilès ki p ap gen lakrent pou Ou, O Senyè, e ki p ap bay non Ou glwa? paske se Ou menm sèl ki sen.’ Revelasyon 15:3, 4, R.V.” Education, 308.
At the end of seventy prophetic years the papacy will “make sweet melody, sing many songs, that” she “mayest be remembered.” At the end of the kingdom that rules for seventy prophetic years the Roman Catholic church will remind the world of the experience of her past history. In that history she ruled as the moral authority in a relationship between her and the kings of Europe. That history is rightly identified as the Dark Ages, and all the darkness that might in any way be associated with the history where the Papacy ruled over the kings of Europe can be attributed to the very foundational action that produced all the following darkness. That action was the combination of church and state, the combination of the kings of Europe and the Catholic church. In a biblical marriage the man is to rule over the woman, but the fornication that took place in that history was upside down from the true order of the relationship of man and woman.
Nan fen swasanndis ane pwofetik yo, pap la va “jwe mizik dous, chante anpil chante, pou” yo “ka sonje” li. Nan fen wayòm ki ap dirije pandan swasanndis ane pwofetik yo, Legliz Katolik Wòm nan va raple mond lan eksperyans istwa pase li. Nan istwa sa a, li te dirije kòm otorite moral la nan yon relasyon ant li menm ak wa Ewòp yo. Se avèk rezon yo idantifye istwa sa a kòm Mwayennaj Fènwa yo, e tout fènwa ki ta kapab, nan nenpòt fason, asosye ak istwa kote Pap la te dirije sou wa Ewòp yo, ka atribiye a aksyon fondamantal menm ki te pwodui tout fènwa ki te vin apre yo. Aksyon sa a se te konbinezon legliz ak leta, konbinezon wa Ewòp yo ak Legliz Katolik la. Nan yon maryaj biblik, gason an dwe dirije sou fanm lan; men fònikasyon ki te fèt nan istwa sa a te tèt anba parapò ak vrè lòd relasyon ant gason ak fanm.
At the end of seventy years there will be a great crisis when the kingdom of Bible prophecy that rules the world during the period of time when the Papacy is prophetically forgotten comes to a conclusion. The worldwide crisis produced by the collapse of that kingdom opens the door for the Catholic church to begin to inform the world that in order to navigate the troublous times produced by the collapse of that kingdom, the world must submit to the moral authority of the Roman Catholic church, as illustrated in the history of the Dark Ages.
Nan fen swasantdisan, pral gen yon gwo kriz lè wayòm pwofesi Bib la ki gouvène mond lan pandan peryòd tan kote Papote a pwofetikman bliye rive nan bout li. Kriz mondyal ki pwodui pa efondreman wayòm sa a louvri pòt la pou Legliz Katolik la kòmanse fè mond lan konnen ke, pou travèse tan twoub efondreman wayòm sa a pwodui yo, mond lan dwe soumèt li anba otorite moral Legliz Katolik Wòm nan, jan sa montre nan istwa Mwayennaj Fènwa yo.
When the kingdom ends and the papacy sings the song of her past experience, an experience that historians label as darkness; so how could that dark history possibly be a message for the papacy to share with the kings of the earth that would convince them to commit fornication with her? In a great crisis why would the experience of the past ages, (her song) her experience before she was forgotten prophetically, provide the logic for the kings of the earth to accept the experience of darkness as the solution for their great crisis?
Lè wayòm nan rive nan bout li, e papasi a chante chante eksperyans pase li a, yon eksperyans istoryen yo make kòm tenèb; konsa, kijan listwa tenèb sa a ta kapab yon mesaj pou papasi a pataje ak wa latè yo ki ta konvenk yo fè fònikasyon avè l? Nan yon gwo kriz, poukisa eksperyans syèk pase yo, (chante pa li a) eksperyans li anvan yo te bliye li nan sans pwofetik, ta bay lojik pou wa latè yo aksepte eksperyans tenèb la kòm solisyon pou gwo kriz pa yo a?
“A large class, even of those who look upon Romanism with no favor, apprehend little danger from her power and influence. Many urge that the intellectual and moral darkness prevailing during the Middle Ages favored the spread of her dogmas, superstitions, and oppression, and that the greater intelligence of modern times, the general diffusion of knowledge, and the increasing liberality in matters of religion forbid a revival of intolerance and tyranny. The very thought that such a state of things will exist in this enlightened age is ridiculed. It is true that great light, intellectual, moral, and religious, is shining upon this generation. In the open pages of God’s Holy Word, light from heaven has been shed upon the world. But it should be remembered that the greater the light bestowed, the greater the darkness of those who pervert and reject it.
“Yon gwo kategori moun, menm pami sila yo ki pa wè Romanis la avèk okenn favè, pa rann yo kont anpil danje ki genyen nan pouvwa ak enfliyans li. Anpil moun soutni ke fènwa entelektyèl ak moral ki te domine pandan Mwayennaj yo te favorize pwopagasyon dogm li yo, sipèstisyon li yo, ak opresyon li yo, e ke pi gwo entèlijans tan modèn yo, difizyon jeneral konesans, ak liberalis k ap ogmante nan kestyon relijyon yo, anpeche yon retou entolerans ak tirani. Yo pase menm lide ke yon eta de bagay konsa ta egziste nan epòk eklere sa a nan rizib. Se vre ke yon gran limyè, sou plan entelektyèl, moral, ak relijye, ap klere sou jenerasyon sa a. Nan paj ouvè Pawòl Sen Bondye a, limyè ki soti nan syèl la gaye sou lemonn. Men, fòk nou sonje, plis limyè yo bay la gwo, se plis fènwa sila yo ki tòde sans li epi ki rejte li a gwo.”
“A prayerful study of the Bible would show Protestants the real character of the papacy and would cause them to abhor and to shun it; but many are so wise in their own conceit that they feel no need of humbly seeking God that they may be led into the truth. Although priding themselves on their enlightenment, they are ignorant both of the Scriptures and of the power of God. They must have some means of quieting their consciences, and they seek that which is least spiritual and humiliating. What they desire is a method of forgetting God which shall pass as a method of remembering Him. The papacy is well adapted to meet the wants of all these. It is prepared for two classes of mankind, embracing nearly the whole world—those who would be saved by their merits, and those who would be saved in their sins. Here is the secret of its power.
Yon etid Bib la ak lapriyè ta montre Pwotestan yo vrè karaktè papis la e li ta fè yo gen l an degoutans epi evite l; men anpil ladan yo tèlman saj nan pwòp je pa yo, yo santi yo pa bezwen chèche Bondye avèk imilite pou yo ka jwenn direksyon nan laverite. Malgre yo ap vante tèt yo pou limyè yo resevwa, yo pa konnen ni Ekriti yo ni pisans Bondye. Yo dwe jwenn yon mwayen pou kalme konsyans yo, epi yo chèche sa ki pi piti espirityèl e ki pi piti imilyan an. Sa yo anvi a, se yon metòd pou bliye Bondye ki ta pase kòm yon metòd pou sonje Li. Papis la byen adapte pou satisfè bezwen tout moun sa yo. Li pare pou de kategori limanite, ki prèske kouvri tout lemonn nan—sa yo ki ta vle sove pa merit pa yo, ak sa yo ki ta vle sove nan peche yo. Men se la sekrè pouvwa li ye.
“A day of great intellectual darkness has been shown to be favorable to the success of the papacy. It will yet be demonstrated that a day of great intellectual light is equally favorable for its success. In past ages, when men were without God’s word and without the knowledge of the truth, their eyes were blindfolded, and thousands were ensnared, not seeing the net spread for their feet. In this generation there are many whose eyes become dazzled by the glare of human speculations, ‘science falsely so called;’ they discern not the net, and walk into it as readily as if blindfolded. God designed that man’s intellectual powers should be held as a gift from his Maker and should be employed in the service of truth and righteousness; but when pride and ambition are cherished, and men exalt their own theories above the word of God, then intelligence can accomplish greater harm than ignorance. Thus the false science of the present day, which undermines faith in the Bible, will prove as successful in preparing the way for the acceptance of the papacy, with its pleasing forms, as did the withholding of knowledge in opening the way for its aggrandizement in the Dark Ages.” The Great Controversy, 572.
“Yon jou gwo fènwa entelektyèl te montre favorab pou siksè papote a. Li pral ankò demontre ke yon jou gwo limyè entelektyèl egalman favorab pou siksè li. Nan tan pase yo, lè lèzòm te san Pawòl Bondye a epi san konesans verite a, je yo te kouvri, e dè milye te pran nan pyèj, san yo pa wè filè ki te louvri devan pye yo. Nan jenerasyon sa a gen anpil moun ki gen je yo avèg akòz eklat espekilasyon imen yo, ‘sa yo rele syans manti a;’ yo pa distenge filè a, epi yo mache antre ladan l osi fasil tankou si yo te gen je yo kouvri. Bondye te fè lide lèzòm yo pou yo konsidere yo kòm yon kado ki soti nan men Kreyatè yo, e pou yo sèvi avè l nan sèvis verite ak jistis; men lè ògèy ak anbisyon ap nouri, e lè lèzòm leve pwòp teyori pa yo pi wo pase Pawòl Bondye a, lè sa a entèlijans kapab fè plis mal pase inyorans. Konsa, fo syans tan prezan an, ki mine lafwa nan Bib la, pral pwouve li gen menm siksè nan prepare chemen an pou akseptasyon papote a, ak tout fòm sediktè li yo, menm jan ak retni konesans te genyen nan louvri chemen an pou grandisman li nan Mwayennaj fènwa yo.” The Great Controversy, 572.
“Roman Catholics acknowledge that the change in the Sabbath was made by their church, and they cite this very change as evidence of the supreme authority of the church. They declare that by observing the first day of the week as the Sabbath, Protestants are recognizing her power to legislate in divine things. The Roman church has not relinquished her claim to infallibility; and when the world and the Protestant churches accept a spurious Sabbath of her creating, while they reject the Sabbath of Jehovah, they virtually acknowledge this claim. They may cite the authority for this change, but the fallacy of their reasoning is easily discerned. The papist is sharp enough to see that Protestants are deceiving themselves, willingly closing their eyes to the facts in the case. As the Sunday institution gains favor, he rejoices, feeling assured that it will eventually bring the whole Protestant world under the banner of Rome.
“Katolik Women yo rekonèt ke se legliz pa yo menm ki te fè chanjman jou repo a, epi yo site menm chanjman sa a kòm prèv otorite siprèm legliz la. Yo deklare ke, lè Pwotestan yo ap obsève premye jou semèn nan kòm jou repo a, yo ap rekonèt pouvwa li pou tabli lwa nan bagay diven yo. Legliz Wòm nan pa t renonse a pretansyon li pou li enfayib; epi lè mond lan ansanm ak legliz Pwotestan yo aksepte yon fo jou repo li menm te kreye, pandan y ap rejte jou repo Jewova a, an reyalite yo rekonèt pretansyon sa a. Yo ka site otorite pou chanjman sa a, men fasil pou moun wè fot ki nan rezònman yo. Papis la ase file pou li wè ke Pwotestan yo ap twonpe tèt yo, antan yo volontèman fèmen je yo sou reyalite yo nan zafè a. Pandan enstitisyon dimanch lan ap pran plis favè, li rejwi, avèk asirans ke finalman sa pral mennen tout mond Pwotestan an anba banyè Wòm.”
“The change of the Sabbath is the sign or mark of the authority of the Roman church. Those who, understanding the claims of the fourth commandment, choose to observe the false Sabbath in the place of the true, are thereby paying homage to that power by which alone it is commanded. The mark of the beast is the papal Sabbath, which has been accepted by the world in the place of the day of God’s appointment.
“Chanjman jou repo a se siy oswa mak otorite Legliz women an. Moun ki, pandan yo konprann egzijans katriyèm kòmandman an, chwazi obsève fo jou repo a nan plas vrè a, se konsa y ap rann omaj a pouvwa sa a ki sèl bay lòd pou sa fèt. Mak bèt la se jou repo papal la, ke mond lan te aksepte nan plas jou Bondye te fikse a.
“But the time to receive the mark of the beast, as designated in prophecy, has not yet come. The testing time has not yet come. There are true Christians in every church, not excepting the Roman Catholic communion. None are condemned until they have had the light and have seen the obligation of the fourth commandment. But when the decree shall go forth enforcing the counterfeit Sabbath, and when the loud cry of the third angel shall warn men against the worship of the beast and his image, the line will be clearly drawn between the false and the true. Then those who still continue in transgression will receive the mark of the beast in their foreheads or in their hands.
“Men, tan pou moun resevwa mak bèt la, jan sa deziyen nan pwofesi a, poko rive. Tan eprèv la poko vini. Gen vrè kretyen nan chak legliz, san pa menm eksepte kominote katolik women an. Pèsonn pa kondane jiskaske yo fin resevwa limyè a epi yo wè obligasyon katriyèm kòmandman an. Men, lè dekrè a va pibliye pou fè respekte fo saba a, epi lè gwo rèl twazyèm zanj lan va avèti moun kont adorasyon bèt la ak imaj li a, liy lan va trase aklè ant sa ki fo ak sa ki vrè. Lè sa a, sila yo ki ap kontinye toujou nan transgresyon an va resevwa mak bèt la sou fwon yo oswa nan men yo.”
“With rapid steps we are approaching this period. When Protestant churches shall unite with the secular power to sustain a false religion, for opposing which their ancestors endured the fiercest persecution, then will the papal Sabbath be enforced by the combined authority of church and state. There will be a national apostasy, which will end only in national ruin.” Bible Training School, February 2, 1913.
“Avèk pa rapid, n ap pwoche peryòd sa a. Lè legliz Pwotestan yo pral ini ak pouvwa sivil la pou soutni yon fo relijyon, paske zansèt yo te sibi pèsekisyon ki pi sevè poutèt yo te opoze l, lè sa a yo pral fè saba papal la respekte pa otorite legliz ak leta ki mete fòs yo ansanm. Va gen yon apostazi nasyonal, ki pral fini sèlman nan destriksyon nasyonal.” Bible Training School, 2 fevriye 1913.
We have now touched upon five of the symbols we are seeking to identify before we fully address the chapter itself. A city is a kingdom in Bible prophecy and in Isaiah twenty-three there are two kingdoms that are closely related, but distinctly different. The first is the “crowning city” and the other is the “merchant city.” In the last days the power who is in control of the three-fold union of the dragon, beast and false prophet is the papacy. It is the kingdom that has the crown.
Koulye a, nou deja touche senk nan senbòl n ap chèche idantifye yo anvan nou abòde chapit la menm nèt. Nan pwofesi biblik, yon vil se yon wayòm; e nan Ezayi venntwa, gen de wayòm ki gen yon lyen sere youn ak lòt, men ki klèman diferan. Premye a se “vil ki kouwone a”, epi lòt la se “vil machann nan”. Nan dènye jou yo, pouvwa ki kenbe kontwòl inyon an twa pati ant dragon an, bèt la, ak fo pwofèt la, se papote a. Se wayòm ki pote kouwòn nan.
“As we approach the last crisis, it is of vital moment that harmony and unity exist among the Lord’s instrumentalities. The world is filled with storm and war and variance. Yet under one head—the papal power—the people will unite to oppose God in the person of His witnesses. This union is cemented by the great apostate. While he seeks to unite his agents in warring against the truth he will work to divide and scatter its advocates. Jealousy, evil surmising, evilspeaking, are instigated by him to produce discord and dissension.” Testimonies, volume 7, 182.
“Pandan n ap pwoche dènye kriz la, li gen yon enpòtans kapital pou amoni ak inite egziste pami enstrimantalite Senyè a. Mond lan ranpli ak tanpèt, lagè, ak dezakò. Men, anba yon sèl chèf—pouvwa papal la—moun yo pral ini pou yo opoze Bondye nan pèsonaj temwen Li yo. Inyon sa a sele pa gwo aposta a. Pandan li ap chèche ini ajan pa li yo nan lagè kont verite a, li pral travay pou divize ak gaye moun k ap defann li yo. Jalouzi, move sispisyon, move pale, se li ki ankouraje yo pou pwodui diskòd ak divizyon.” Testimonies, volim 7, 182.
The kingdom with the crown is Tyre, which means, “a rock.” In this chapter Tyre represents the papacy that works to counterfeit Christ, for the papacy is antichrist. The word “anti” in antichrist means “in place of.” The papacy seeks to counterfeit Christ at every level, and the name Tyre means rock, for the papacy is a counterfeit of the “Rock of Ages.”
Peyi Wa ki gen kouwòn lan se Tir, ki vle di, “yon wòch.” Nan chapit sa a, Tir reprezante papisite a k ap travay pou kontrefè Kris la, paske papisite a se antikris la. Mo “anti” nan antikris vle di “nan plas de.” Papisite a chache kontrefè Kris la nan tout nivo, epi non Tir la vle di wòch, paske papisite a se yon kontrefaksyon “Wòch ki la pou tout tan.”
Who hath taken this counsel against Tyre, the crowning city, whose merchants are princes, whose traffickers are the honourable of the earth? The Lord of hosts hath purposed it, to stain the pride of all glory, and to bring into contempt all the honourable of the earth. Pass through thy land as a river, O daughter of Tarshish: there is no more strength. He stretched out his hand over the sea, he shook the kingdoms: the Lord hath given a commandment against the merchant city, to destroy the strong holds thereof. Isaiah 23:8–11.
Kiyès ki pran konsèy sa a kont Tir, vil ki mete kouwòn nan, vil kote machann li yo se chèf, kote moun k ap fè komès li yo se moun ki gen onè sou latè? Se Senyè ki chèf lame yo ki fè plan sa a, pou l sal ògèy tout glwa, epi pou l fè tout moun ki gen onè sou latè tonbe nan mepri. Travèse peyi ou tankou yon larivyè, ou menm, pitit fi Tasis: pa gen fòs ankò. Li lonje men l sou lanmè a, li souke wayòm yo: Senyè a bay yon lòd kont vil machann nan, pou detwi fòtrès li yo. Ezayi 23:8–11.
We intend to show upon many witnesses that “the shaking of the kingdoms” is accomplished by God, through Islam. Islam is the power that angers the nations and is used to shake the nations. At this point we are identifying that the Lord has determined to bring into contempt “all the honorable of earth,” who are the “merchants” and “traffickers” whose “strong holds” are to be destroyed. The merchant city and the crowning city “have provoked the displeasure of heaven” and the Lord has purposed to destroy their “strong holds” and that represents the economy. The collapse of the economy occurs before the Sunday law in the United States, for before the Sunday law the citizens of the United States are demanding to be returned “to divine favor and temporal prosperity.” Their argument is that the judgments of God will not end until Sunday is “strictly enforced.” Several Bible witnesses agree that we are on the verge of a tremendous crash in the economy of the world. That crash occurs before the Sunday law, just as the crash of 1837, occurred before October 22, 1844.
Nou gen entansyon montre, sou baz anpil temwen, ke “souke wayòm yo” se Bondye ki akonpli li, atravè Islam. Islam se pouvwa ki fè nasyon yo fache e yo sèvi avè l pou souke nasyon yo. Nan pwen sa a n ap idantifye ke Seyè a deside fè “tout moun onorab sou latè” tonbe nan mepri; yo menm ki se “machann” ak “trafikan” yo, e se “fòtrès” pa yo ki dwe detwi. Vil machann nan ak vil k ap bay kouwòn lan “pwovoke mekontantman syèl la,” e Seyè a gen entansyon detwi “fòtrès” pa yo, e sa reprezante ekonomi an. Efondreman ekonomi an rive anvan lwa dimanch lan Ozetazini, paske anvan lwa dimanch lan sitwayen Etazini yo ap mande pou yo retounen “nan favè Bondye ak pwosperite tanporèl.” Agiman yo se ke jijman Bondye yo pap fini toutotan dimanch pa “sevèman aplike.” Plizyè temwen biblik dakò ke nou sou bò yon efondreman ekstraòdinè nan ekonomi lemonn. Efondreman sa a rive anvan lwa dimanch lan, menm jan efondreman ane 1837 la te rive anvan 22 oktòb 1844.
“And then the great deceiver will persuade men that those who serve God are causing these evils. The class that have provoked the displeasure of Heaven will charge all their troubles upon those whose obedience to God’s commandments is a perpetual reproof to transgressors. It will be declared that men are offending God by the violation of the Sunday sabbath; that this sin has brought calamities which will not cease until Sunday observance shall be strictly enforced; and that those who present the claims of the fourth commandment, thus destroying reverence for Sunday, are troublers of the people, preventing their restoration to divine favor and temporal prosperity. Thus the accusation urged of old against the servant of God will be repeated and upon grounds equally well established: ‘And it came to pass, when Ahab saw Elijah, that Ahab said unto him, Art thou he that troubleth Israel? And he answered, I have not troubled Israel; but thou, and thy father’s house, in that ye have forsaken the commandments of the Lord, and thou hast followed Baalim.’ 1 Kings 18:17, 18. As the wrath of the people shall be excited by false charges, they will pursue a course toward God’s ambassadors very similar to that which apostate Israel pursued toward Elijah.” The Great Controversy, 590.
“Epi lè sa a, gwo twonpè a pral konvenk lèzòm ke se moun k ap sèvi Bondye yo ki lakòz move malè sa yo. Klas moun ki te pwovoke mekontantman Syèl la pral fè tout traka yo tonbe sou moun sa yo ki, pa obeyisans yo anvè kòmandman Bondye yo, sèvi kòm yon repwòch san rete pou moun k ap transgrese yo. Y ap deklare ke lèzòm ap ofanse Bondye lè yo vyole saba dimanch lan; ke peche sa a lakòz kalamite ki pap sispann jiskaske obsèvans dimanch lan vin enpoze avèk sevèsite; epi ke sila yo ki prezante egzijans katriyèm kòmandman an, konsa yo detwi respè pou dimanch, se yo menm ki twouble pèp la, ki anpeche retablisman li nan favè Bondye ak pwosperite tanporèl. Konsa, akizasyon yo te fè lontan kont sèvitè Bondye a pral repete, e sou baz ki egalman byen tabli: ‘Epi, lè Akab wè Eli, Akab di li konsa: Eske se ou menm k ap twouble Izrayèl la? Epi li reponn: Se pa mwen ki twouble Izrayèl la; men se ou menm, ansanm ak kay papa ou, paske nou abandone kòmandman Senyè a, epi ou swiv Baal yo.’ 1 Wa 18:17, 18. Jan kòlè pèp la pral eksite pa fo akizasyon, yo pral aji anvè anbasadè Bondye yo nan yon fason ki sanble anpil ak sa Izrayèl aposta a te fè anvè Eli.” The Great Controversy, 590.
Elijah confronting the prophets of Baal and the priests of the grove on Mount Carmel represents the Sunday law. The message for the church was “choose this day whom you will serve.” When this history is repeated at the Sunday law the question is “which day are you going to choose, for the day you pick indicates whom you serve.” Before Mount Carmel was three and a half years of severe drought. Before the Sunday law there is a series of Sunday laws, but they have not been “strictly enforced.” The principle associated with a Sunday law is that national apostacy is followed by national ruin. The example of that is Constantine in the year 321 passed a Sunday law and shortly thereafter the first four trumpets of Revelation chapter eight began to bring Western Rome to its conclusion by the year 476. The story of Constantine is important for it included a progressive exalting of Sunday, and simultaneous progressive restrictions on the seventh-day Sabbath. The progressive history reached its conclusion when the citizens were forced to observe Sunday or be persecuted for keeping the Sabbath. That is also the conclusion of the escalating Sunday legislation in the United States. One principle associated with Sunday worship enforcement is “national apostasy is followed by national ruin.” This principle means escalating Sunday law enforcements, produces an escalation of God’s judgments, before the actual Sunday law of Revelation thirteen verse eleven. Every enactment will bring a corresponding ruin. The judgments the citizens are accusing the Sabbath-keepers of producing are actually produced by the escalating enforcement of Sunday legislation. We have included a passage from The Great Controversy, which I titled Sunday Progression. I would recommend that you read that once again. It is in the category entitled The Spirit of Prophecy.
Eli k ap fè fas ak pwofèt Baal yo ak prèt Achera yo sou mòn Kamèl la reprezante lwa dimanch lan. Mesaj la pou legliz la te: “chwazi jodi a kiyès n ap sèvi.” Lè istwa sa a repete nan lwa dimanch lan, kesyon an se: “ki jou nou pral chwazi, paske jou nou chwazi a montre kiyès n ap sèvi.” Anvan mòn Kamèl la, te gen twa zan edmi gwo sechrès. Anvan lwa dimanch lan, gen yon seri lwa dimanch, men yo poko “aplike avèk sevèrite.” Prensip ki asosye ak yon lwa dimanch se ke apostazi nasyonal swiv pa destriksyon nasyonal. Egzanp sa a se Konstanten ki, nan ane 321, te pase yon lwa dimanch, epi tousuit apre sa kat premye twonpèt yo nan Revelasyon chapit uit te kòmanse mennen Wòm oksidantal nan fen li rive nan ane 476. Istwa Konstanten an enpòtan, paske li te gen ladan l yon pwogresyon nan egzaltasyon dimanch lan, ansanm ak restriksyon pwogresif sou Saba setyèm jou a. Istwa pwogresif sa a te rive nan konklizyon li lè sitwayen yo te fòse obsève dimanch oswa yo te pèsekite paske yo t ap kenbe Saba a. Sa se tou konklizyon lejislasyon dimanch k ap vin pi sevè Ozetazini. Youn nan prensip ki asosye ak aplikasyon adorasyon dimanch lan se: “apostazi nasyonal swiv pa destriksyon nasyonal.” Prensip sa a vle di aplikasyon lwa dimanch yo k ap ogmante an severite pwodui yon ogmantasyon nan jijman Bondye yo, anvan vrè lwa dimanch Revelasyon trèz, vèsè onz la. Chak promulgasyon ap pote yon destriksyon ki koresponn avè l. Jijman sitwayen yo ap akize moun k ap kenbe Saba a kòm kòz yo, an reyalite se aplikasyon lejislasyon dimanch k ap vin pi sevè a ki pwodui yo. Nou te mete yon pasaj ki soti nan The Great Controversy, ke mwen te bay tit Sunday Progression. Mwen ta rekòmande pou nou li sa yon lòt fwa ankò. Li nan kategori ki rele The Spirit of Prophecy.
“God has revealed what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath. Those who have been warned of the events before them are not to sit in calm expectation of the coming storm, comforting themselves that the Lord will shelter His faithful ones in the day of trouble. We are to be as men waiting for their Lord, not in idle expectancy, but in earnest work, with unwavering faith. It is no time now to allow our minds to be engrossed with things of minor importance. While men are sleeping, Satan is actively arranging matters so that the Lord’s people may not have mercy or justice. The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending. Its professions are mild and apparently Christian, but when it shall speak it will reveal the spirit of the dragon. It is our duty to do all in our power to avert the threatened danger. We should endeavor to disarm prejudice by placing ourselves in a proper light before the people. We should bring before them the real question at issue, thus interposing the most effectual protest against measures to restrict liberty of conscience. We should search the Scriptures and be able to give the reason for our faith. Says the prophet: ‘The wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.’” Testimonies, volume 5, 452.
Bondye fè konnen sa ki gen pou rive nan dènye jou yo, pou pèp Li a ka pare pou kanpe kont tanpèt opozisyon ak kòlè a. Moun ki te resevwa avètisman sou evènman ki devan yo pa dwe chita nan yon atant trankil pou tanpèt k ap vini an, ap konsole tèt yo avèk lide ke Senyè a ap pwoteje fidèl Li yo nan jou detrès la. Nou dwe tankou moun k ap tann Seyè yo, pa nan yon atant parese, men nan travay serye, avèk yon lafwa ki pa brannen. Kounye a se pa tan pou nou kite lespri nou plonje nan bagay ki gen ti enpòtans. Pandan lèzòm ap dòmi, Satan ap travay avèk aktivite pou òganize bagay yo pou pèp Senyè a pa jwenn ni mizèrikòd ni jistis. Mouvman dimanch la kounye a ap fè chemen li nan fènwa. Dirijan yo ap kache vrè kestyon an, e anpil nan moun ki mete tèt yo ansanm ak mouvman an pa menm wè kote kouran kache a ap mennen. Deklarasyon li yo dous e yo parèt kretyen, men lè li va pale, li va revele lespri dragon an. Se devwa nou pou nou fè tout sa ki nan pouvwa nou pou detounen danje ki menase a. Nou dwe fè efò pou dezame prejije lè nou mete tèt nou nan bon limyè devan pèp la. Nou dwe prezante devan yo vrè kestyon ki an diskisyon an, konsa nou va poze pwotestasyon ki pi efikas kont mezi yo pou limite libète konsyans. Nou dwe fouye Ekriti yo e nou dwe kapab bay rezon pou lafwa nou. Pwofèt la di: “Mechan yo va fè mechanste; epi pèsonn nan mechan yo p ap konprann; men moun saj yo va konprann.” Testimonies, volume 5, 452.
It is difficult to recognize the movement for Sunday legislation, for it is making its way in “darkness” and the papacy is “stealthily and unsuspectedly” “strengthening her forces to further her own ends.” It is a fact that the work to pass Sunday legislation in darkness is a central issue in the testing process of the one hundred and forty-four thousand. “None of the wicked shall understand” according to Daniel and Sister White. The “wicked” in Daniel are Matthew’s “foolish virgins,” who Sister White identifies as Laodiceans. The wise will understand the events that are now taking place, even if the history around us appears to contradict God’s word. Do we believe God’s word or what is happening around us? Yet we have been forewarned that the end would be as the days of Noah.
Li difisil pou rekonèt mouvman an favè lejislasyon dimanch lan, paske li ap fè chemen li nan “fènwa,” epi papote a ap “an kachèt e san moun pa sispèk li” “ap ranfòse fòs li yo pou l avanse pwòp objektif pa li.” Se yon reyalite ke travay pou fè pase lejislasyon dimanch lan nan fènwa se yon kestyon santral nan pwosesis tès san karant-kat mil yo. “Pèsonn nan mechan yo p ap konprann,” dapre Danyèl ak Sè White. “Mechan” yo nan Danyèl se “vyèj sòt” Matye yo, ke Sè White idantifye kòm Laodiseyen yo. Moun saj yo pral konprann evènman k ap fèt kounye a, menm si istwa ki antoure nou an sanble kontredi pawòl Bondye a. Èske nou kwè pawòl Bondye a, oswa sa k ap pase bò kote nou? Men, yo te deja avèti nou davans ke lafen an t ap tankou nan jou Noe yo.
“The world, full of rioting, full of godless pleasure, is asleep, asleep in carnal security. Men are putting afar off the coming of the Lord. They laugh at warnings. The proud boast is made, ‘All things continue as they were from the beginning.’ ‘Tomorrow shall be as this day, and much more abundant.’ 2 Peter 3:4; Isaiah 56:12. We will go deeper into pleasure loving. But Christ says, ‘Behold, I come as a thief.’ Revelation 16:15. At the very time when the world is asking in scorn, ‘Where is the promise of His coming?’ the signs are fulfilling. While they cry, ‘Peace and safety,’ sudden destruction is coming. When the scorner, the rejecter of truth, has become presumptuous; when the routine of work in the various money-making lines is carried on without regard to principle; when the student is eagerly seeking knowledge of everything but his Bible, Christ comes as a thief.
“Lemonn nan, plen ak dezòd, plen ak plezi san Bondye, ap dòmi, ap dòmi nan yon sekirite lachè. Lèzòm ap pouse vini Senyè a byen lwen. Yo ap ri avètisman yo. Fyète a fè gwo deklarasyon sa a: ‘Tout bagay rete jan yo te ye depi nan kòmansman an.’ ‘Demen ap tankou jodi a, e anpil plis an abondans.’ 2 Pierre 3:4; Ésaïe 56:12. Nou pral antre pi fon nan renmen plezi. Men Kris di: ‘Men, m ap vini tankou yon vòlè.’ Apokalips 16:15. Nan menm moman mond lan ap mande ak deden: ‘Kote pwomès vini li a?’ siy yo ap akonpli. Pandan yo ap rele: ‘Lapè ak sekirite,’ yon destriksyon toudenkou ap vini. Lè moun kap pase nan betiz la, moun ki rejte laverite a, vin gen pretansyon; lè woutin travay la nan divès branch kote y ap fè lajan ap kontinye san okenn konsiderasyon pou prensip; lè etidyan an ap chèche avèk anvi konesans sou tout bagay eksepte sou Bib li, Kris vini tankou yon vòlè.”
“Everything in the world is in agitation. The signs of the times are ominous. Coming events cast their shadows before. The Spirit of God is withdrawing from the earth, and calamity follows calamity by sea and by land. There are tempests, earthquakes, fires, floods, murders of every grade. Who can read the future? Where is security? There is assurance in nothing that is human or earthly. Rapidly are men ranging themselves under the banner they have chosen. Restlessly are they waiting and watching the movements of their leaders. There are those who are waiting and watching and working for our Lord’s appearing. Another class are falling into line under the generalship of the first great apostate. Few believe with heart and soul that we have a hell to shun and a heaven to win.
“Tout bagay nan mond lan ap souke tèt li. Siy tan yo menasan. Evènman k ap vini yo voye lonbraj yo devan yo. Lespri Bondye ap retire kò li sou tè a, epi malè ap swiv malè sou lanmè ak sou tè. Gen tanpèt, tranblemanntè, dife, inondasyon, asasina tout kalite. Kilès ki ka li lavni an? Kote sekirite ye? Pa gen okenn asirans nan anyen ki soti nan lòm oswa ki sou tè a. Avèk vitès, moun ap ranje tèt yo anba drapo yo chwazi a. San repo, yo ap tann epi yo ap veye mouvman chèf yo. Gen moun k ap tann, k ap veye, epi k ap travay pou parèt Senyè nou an. Yon lòt gwoup ap mete tèt yo an ran anba kòmandman premye gran aposta a. Pa anpil moun ki kwè ak tout kè ak tout nanm yo ke gen yon lanfè pou nou evite ak yon syèl pou nou genyen.”
“The crisis is stealing gradually upon us. The sun shines in the heavens, passing over its usual round, and the heavens still declare the glory of God. Men are still eating and drinking, planting and building, marrying, and giving in marriage. Merchants are still buying and selling. Men are jostling one against another, contending for the highest place. Pleasure lovers are still crowding to theaters, horse races, gambling hells. The highest excitement prevails, yet probation’s hour is fast closing, and every case is about to be eternally decided. Satan sees that his time is short. He has set all his agencies at work that men may be deceived, deluded, occupied and entranced, until the day of probation shall be ended, and the door of mercy be forever shut.
“Kriz la ap pwoche sou nou piti piti. Solèy la ap klere nan syèl la, l ap suiv wout òdinè li, e syèl la toujou ap fè konnen glwa Bondye. Moun yo toujou ap manje ak bwè, plante ak bati, marye, epi bay an maryaj. Machann yo toujou ap achte ak vann. Moun yo ap pouse yonn kont lòt, y ap goumen pou pi gwo plas la. Moun ki renmen plezi yo toujou ap kouri an foul nan teyat, nan kous chwal, nan kay jwèt aza. Pi gwo eksitasyon an ap domine tout kote, men lè pwobasyon an ap fèmen byen vit, e chak ka pral byento deside pou letènite. Satan wè tan li kout. Li mete tout ajan li yo o travay pou moun kapab twonpe, egare, okipe, ak anchante, jouk jou pwobasyon an fini, epi pòt mizèrikòd la fèmen pou tout tan.”
“Solemnly there come to us down through the centuries the warning words of our Lord from the Mount of Olives: ‘Take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come upon you unawares.’ ‘Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man.’” Desire of Ages, 635, 636.
“Ak tout solanite, pawòl avètisman Seyè nou an soti sou Mòn Oliv la rive jwenn nou atravè syèk yo: ‘Veye sou tèt nou, pou kè nou pa janm vin lou ak eksè manje, ak sou, ak sousi lavi sa a, pou jou sa a pa tonbe sou nou san nou pa atann li.’ ‘Se poutèt sa, veye epi priye san rete, pou nou kapab jwenn nou diy pou chape anba tout bagay sa yo ki pral rive, epi pou nou kanpe devan Pitit lòm nan.’” Desire of Ages, 635, 636.
In chapter twenty-three of Isaiah Zidon is the United States and Tyre is the papacy. Tyre and Zidon were ancient contemporary Phoenician cities located on the Mediterranean coast. They were known for their maritime trade, wealth, and influence in the ancient world. Zidon and its “merchants” replenished Tarshish in the passage. Zidon’s merchants trafficked the “seed of Sihor,” which is “the harvest of a river,” and is the fruit “of the river,” and it is “her revenue,” for she is the “mart of nations.” All the prophets speak of the end of the world, so who is the mart of nations at the end of the world? It’s the USA.
Nan chapit venntrwa Ezayi a, Zidon se Etazini, epi Tir se papote a. Tir ak Zidon te de ansyen vil Fenisyen ki te egziste an menm tan, sou kòt Lanmè Mediterane a. Yo te konnen yo poutèt komès maritim yo, richès yo, ak enfliyans yo nan monn ansyen an. Nan pasaj la, Zidon ak “machann” li yo te ranpli Tachich ankò. Machann Zidon yo te fè komès ak “grenn Siyor,” ki se “rekòt yon rivyè,” epi ki se fwi “larivyè a,” e se “revni li,” paske li se “mache nasyon yo.” Tout pwofèt yo pale konsènan fen mond lan; kidonk, kiyès ki mache nasyon yo nan fen mond lan? Se Etazini.
Sihor is a river in Egypt (likely the Nile delta) and is used to represent the wealth of the world, for Egypt is the world. Zidon’s “virgin daughter” represents the last generation of the USA, and she is oppressed from the martial law that accompanies the Sunday law and the national ruin that immediately follows. Those virgins of Zidon are rebuked by the question concerning Tyre saying, “is this your joyous city” (kingdom) that the USA rejoiced in? Is “this the kingdom “whose antiquity is of ancient days,” when according to the passage it was founded by Nimrod, just after the flood?
Sihor se yon rivyè ann Ejip (petèt nan delta Nil la), epi yo sèvi avè l pou reprezante richès mond lan, paske Ejip se mond lan. “Pitit fi vyèj” Sidon an reprezante dènye jenerasyon Etazini an, epi yo peze l anba lwa masyal ki akonpaye lwa dimanch lan ansanm ak destriksyon nasyonal ki vin tousuit apre. Yo repwoche vyèj Sidon sa yo avèk kesyon konsènan Tir la ki di: “èske se sa a vil kè kontan nou an” (wayòm nan) Etazini te rejwi ladan l? Èske “se sa a wayòm nan “ki gen orijin li depi nan tan ansyen yo,” lè, dapre pasaj la, se Nimwòd ki te fonde l, jis apre delij la?
God has determined and “purposed” for “Tyre, the crowning city,” to punish her. The papacy’s punishment includes the collapse of the financial structure of the world, for “the Lord hath given” “a commandment against” “Zidon” “the merchant city,” (the United States.) His commandment “to destroy the strong holds,” or the economy of the United States is the Sabbath commandment, for national apostasy is followed by national ruin.
Bondye detèmine e li “fè plan” kont “Tir, vil ki bay kouwòn yo,” pou pini li. Pinisyon papote a gen ladan efondreman estrikti finansye mond lan, paske “Seyè a bay” “yon lòd kont” “Sidon” “vil machann nan,” (Etazini.) Lòd li a “pou detwi fò yo,” oswa ekonomi Etazini an, se kòmandman Saba a, paske apostazi nasyonal swiv pa rwin nasyonal.
The punishment of the papacy begins with the economic collapse of the entire world in response to the economy of the United States being destroyed. Zidon has a “house” associated with its economy, thus representing a financial structure that is destroyed, for you can no longer enter in. No more investments or profits from that “house,” for it is destroyed. The destruction takes place at the Sunday law, even though prior to the Sunday law there are already escalating judgments. When the collapse hits, the papacy, the USA with its merchant princes and honorable traffickers and the ships of Tarshish are going to “howl.”
Pinisyon papasi a kòmanse ak efondreman ekonomik tout lemonn kòm repons a destriksyon ekonomi Etazini. Zidon gen yon “kay” ki asosye ak ekonomi li, konsa li reprezante yon estrikti finansye ki detwi, paske nou pa ka antre ladan l ankò. Pa gen ankò envestisman ni pwofi ki soti nan “kay” sa a, paske li detwi. Destriksyon an fèt nan moman lwa dimanch lan, menm si anvan lwa dimanch lan deja gen jijman k ap vin pi sevè. Lè efondreman an frape, papasi a, Etazini avèk prens machann li yo ak trafikè onorab li yo, ansanm ak bato Tasis yo, pral “ranni.”
The location of “Tarshish” in the passage is associated with wealth in antiquity, and the ships of Tarshish in the Bible are the premier symbol of economic strength.
Kote “Tarsis” la nan pasaj la asosye ak richès nan tan lontan, epi nan Bib la bato Tarsis yo se senbòl prensipal fòs ekonomik.
For the king’s ships went to Tarshish with the servants of Huram: every three years once came the ships of Tarshish bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes, and peacocks. And king Solomon passed all the kings of the earth in riches and wisdom. 2 Chronicles 9:21, 22.
Paske bato wa a t ap ale Tasis ansanm ak sèvitè Ouram yo; chak twa zan, bato Tasis yo te konn rive yon fwa, pote lò, ajan, ivwa, makak, ak payon. E wa Salomon te depase tout wa latè yo nan richès ak sajès. 2 Kwonik 9:21, 22.
Ships represent economic strength, and Tarshish is the leading economic ship in Bible prophecy. The final generation of Tarshish, represented by the “daughter” of Tarshish is told to “pass through thy land as a river,” and what she finds is that her land has “no more strength,” and can no longer “rejoice” over the kingdom of Tyre. The strength they were looking for was the former economic strength of Zidon, but it was gone for the sea had spoken “saying, I travail not, nor bring forth children, neither do I nourish up young men, nor bring up virgins,” thus identifying the final generation of the sea, which is the peoples of the world lamenting the destruction of the economy of the world and at which point the people of the world wake up to the reality that they are the last generation of earth’s history, and its too late to prepare for eternal life.
Bato yo reprezante fòs ekonomik, e Tasis se bato ekonomik ki mennen nan pwofesi biblik. Dènye jenerasyon Tasis la, ki reprezante pa “pitit fi” Tasis la, resevwa lòd pou l “travèse peyi ou tankou yon rivyè,” epi sa li dekouvri se ke peyi li a “pa gen fòs ankò,” e li pa kapab “rejwi” ankò poutèt wayòm Tir la. Fòs yo t ap chèche a se te ansyen fòs ekonomik Sidon an, men li te disparèt, paske lanmè a te pale “li di: Mwen pa nan tranche, mwen pa fè pitit, mwen pa elve jenn gason, ni mwen pa leve vyèj,” konsa li idantifye dènye jenerasyon lanmè a, ki se pèp lemonn yo k ap plenn destriksyon ekonomi lemonn nan; se nan moman sa a pèp lemonn nan reveye devan reyalite ke yo se dènye jenerasyon nan istwa tè a, e li twò ta pou yo prepare pou lavi etènèl.
“Money will soon depreciate in value very suddenly when the reality of eternal scenes opens to the senses of man.” Evangelism, 62.
« Lajan pral byento pèdi valè li byen vit, lè reyalite sèn etènèl yo va ouvri devan sans lòm. » Evangelism, 62.
There are two “reports” or messages that cause pain to everyone in the passage. The first “report” concerns Egypt and the second “report” is Tyre. The report of Egypt is in the past tense for Isaiah says, “as at the report concerning Egypt,” thus showing that God had done something with Egypt prior to His destruction of Zidon (the USA.) What God did to Egypt, that also represents the “report” of Egypt, is that He destroyed Egypt in connection with the first time God entered into covenant with a chosen people. The two reports are the same “report.” The report of Egypt is the beginning and the report of Tyre is the ending. The Alpha and Omega has illustrated the covenant with the one hundred and forty-four thousand in the last days with the beginning history of that subject. The “report” concerning Egypt is the Red Sea deliverance when Pharaoh and his host were destroyed, which typifies the final deliverance of God’s people as represented by the “report” which is the “burden of Tyre.”
Gen de “rapò” oswa mesaj ki lakòz doulè pou tout moun nan pasaj la. Premye “rapò” a konsène Lejip, epi dezyèm “rapò” a se Tir. Rapò sou Lejip la nan tan pase, paske Ezayi di: “tankou lè rapò sou Lejip la te rive”; konsa li montre Bondye te deja fè yon bagay ak Lejip anvan Li te detwi Sidon (Etazini). Sa Bondye te fè ak Lejip la, e sa ki reprezante tou “rapò” sou Lejip la, se ke Li te detwi Lejip an rapò ak premye fwa Bondye te antre nan alyans ak yon pèp chwazi. De rapò yo se menm “rapò” a. Rapò sou Lejip la se kòmansman an, epi rapò sou Tir la se fen an. Alfa ak Omega a te ilistre alyans ak san karantkat mil yo nan dènye jou yo pa mwayen istwa kòmansman sijè sa a. “Rapò” konsènan Lejip la se delivrans Lanmè Wouj la, lè Farawon ak lame li a te detwi, sa ki sèvi kòm tip delivrans final pèp Bondye a jan sa reprezante pa “rapò” ki se “chay Tir la.”
The power represented in the Bible that destroys the ships of Tarshish is Islam. The subject of Islam will be taken up later, so we will address the subject more fully at a later time. It is represented in the passage as “Chittim” an ancient word for Cyprus, and the passage says that the destruction of Zidon and Tyre is revealed from “Chittim.” The symbol of Islam includes a very specific illustration of the destruction of the United States in Bible prophecy.
Pouvwa Bib la reprezante ki detwi bato Tasis yo, se Islam. Sijè Islam lan va trete pi ta; se poutèt sa, n ap egzamine sijè a pi an detay nan yon lòt moman. Nan pasaj la, li reprezante kòm “Chittim,” yon ansyen mo pou lil Chip, epi pasaj la di ke destriksyon Zidon ak Tir la revele depi “Chittim.” Senbòl Islam lan gen ladan l yon ilistrasyon trè presi sou destriksyon Etazini nan pwofesi biblik.
It is important to follow the days and years referenced in the book of Isaiah for they often identify the prophetic time of the passage that follows. Isaiah twenty-three follows the “burden” of the valley of vision in chapter twenty-two, that is preceded by chapter twenty-one that has three burdens,” and all three identify Islam. Before that chapter, in verse one of chapter twenty the setting of the prophetic history where the following prophecies of doom are identified in the following chapters.
Li enpòtan pou suiv jou ak ane yo mansyone nan liv Ezayi a, paske souvan yo idantifye tan pwofetik pasaj ki vin apre a. Ezayi venntwa vini apre “chay” fon vizyon an nan chapit vennde, e chapit sa a te vin anvan pa chapit venntyèn nan, ki genyen twa “chay”, epi tout twa yo idantifye Islam. Anvan chapit sa a, nan vèsè youn nan chapit ven an, yo bay kad istwa pwofetik la kote pwofesi malè ki swiv yo idantifye nan chapit ki vin apre yo.
In the year that Tartan came unto Ashdod (when Sargon the king of Assyria sent him,) and fought against Ashdod, and took it. Isaiah 20:1.
Nan ane kote Tatan rive Asdod (lè Sagon, wa Asiri a, te voye li), li te goumen kont Asdod, epi li te pran li. Ezayi 20:1.
The word “Tartan” may be a name or it is most likely a title of a military leader. Tartan came to Ashdod, a city in Egypt and took it in the period of history when the Assyrians were progressively taking control of the world. Assyria typified Babylon. Both Assyria and Babylon were kingdoms that came from the north, kingdoms identified as “lions” that “scattered” God’s sheep and both receive the same punishment. Assyria was first Babylon was last.
Mo “Tartan” an ka yon non, oswa, sa ki pi sanble, se yon tit yon chèf militè. Tartan te vini Asdòd, yon vil nan peyi Lejip, epi li te pran l pandan peryòd istwa kote Asiryen yo t ap pran kontwòl lemonn piti piti. Asiri te prefigire Babilòn. Toude, Asiri ak Babilòn, te wayòm ki te soti nan nò a, wayòm yo idantifye kòm “lyon” ki te “gaye” mouton Bondye yo, epi toude resevwa menm pinisyon an. Asiri te premye a; Babilòn te dènye a.
Israel is a scattered sheep; the lions have driven him away: first the king of Assyria hath devoured him; and last this Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon hath broken his bones. Therefore thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will punish the king of Babylon and his land, as I have punished the king of Assyria. Jeremiah 50:17, 18.
Izrayèl se yon mouton ki gaye; lyon yo te chase l ale: anvan, wa Lasiri a te devore l; epi an dènye, Nebikadneza sa a, wa Babilòn nan, te kraze zo li yo. Se poutèt sa, men sa Senyè dèzame yo, Bondye Izrayèl la, di: Gade, m ap pini wa Babilòn nan ak peyi li a, menm jan mwen te pini wa Lasiri a. Jeremi 50:17, 18.
Prophetically they are both the “haughty Assyrian.”
Pwofetikman, yo toulède se “Asiryen awogan” an.
“When Sennacherib, the haughty Assyrian, reproached and blasphemed God, and threatened Israel with destruction, ‘it came to pass that night, that the angel of the Lord went out, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians an hundred fourscore and five thousand.’ There were ‘cut off all the mighty men of valor, and the leaders and captains,’ from the army of Sennacherib. ‘So he returned with shame of face to his own land.’ [2 Kings 19:35; 2 Chronicles 32:21.]” The Great Controversy, 512.
“Lè Sennakerib, Asiryen ògeye a, te repwoche epi blasfeme Bondye, epi li te menase Izrayèl ak destriksyon, ‘sa te rive nan menm nuit sa a, zanj Seyè a soti, li frape nan kan Asiryen yo san katrevensenk mil.’ Yo te ‘detwi tout vanyan sòlda yo, chèf yo ak kòmandan yo,’ nan lame Sennakerib la. ‘Se konsa li te retounen nan pwòp peyi pa l ak figi li wont.’ [2 Kings 19:35; 2 Chronicles 32:21.]” The Great Controversy, 512.
The year that “Tartan came unto Ashdod” and “took it,” represents the progressive conquering of the world by the papal power as illustrated in the last six verses of Daniel eleven. The history of the Sunday law crisis, which is the “last days” of the investigative judgment, and which leads directly into the executive judgment, (the seven last plagues) is the historical setting represented by the “year” that Tartan came to Ashdod. With the context of that history in place Isaiah then gives three prophecies of doom concerning Islam, one concerning Laodicean Adventism and then the burden of Tyre. Chapter twenty-four is one of the classic examples of the seven last plagues that is followed by chapter twenty-five representing the final deliverance of God’s people, where we find God’s people expressing one of the most well-known statements during the great time of trouble.
Ane kote “Tatan te vini Asdòd” epi li “te pran li a,” reprezante konkèt pwogresif mond lan pa pouvwa papal la, jan sa ilistre nan sis dènye vèsè Danyèl onz la. Istwa kriz lwa dimanch lan, ki se “dènye jou” jijman ankèt la, e ki mennen dirèkteman nan jijman egzekitif la, (sèt dènye flewo yo) se kontèks istorik “ane” kote Tatan te vini Asdòd la reprezante. Avèk kontèks istwa sa a byen tabli, Ezayi bay twa pwofesi kondanasyon konsènan Islam, youn konsènan Advantis Laodise a, epi apre sa chay Tir la. Chapit vennkat se youn nan egzanp klasik sèt dènye flewo yo, e li swiv pa chapit vennsenk ki reprezante delivrans final pèp Bondye a, kote nou jwenn pèp Bondye a ap eksprime youn nan deklarasyon ki pi byen koni yo pandan gran tan detrès la.
And it shall be said in that day, Lo, this is our God; we have waited for him, and he will save us: this is the Lord; we have waited for him, we will be glad and rejoice in his salvation. Isaiah 25:9.
Lè sa a, y ap di nan jou sa a: Men Bondye nou an; nou te tann li, e li pral sove nou. Men Seyè a; nou te tann li, n ap fè kè nou kontan e n ap rejwi nan delivrans li. Ezayi 25:9.
The one hundred and forty-four thousand are the wise virgins that waited for their Lord to come to the wedding, though He tarried in agreement with the parable of the ten virgins. They are not Laodiceans, they are Philadelphians. Up to this point this article has been setting the context.
San karannkat kat mil yo se vyèj saj yo ki t ap tann Seyè yo vini nan nòs la, byenke Li te pran reta, dapre parabòl dis vyèj yo. Yo pa Laodiseyen; yo se Filadèlfyen. Jiska pwen sa a, atik sa a te ap tabli kontèks la.
In 1798, Napoleon took the pope captive delivering the prophetic deadly wound that is healed at the end of the world according to Revelation thirteen. At that point the United States took its place as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy according to Daniel two, seven, eight and eleven and Revelation twelve, thirteen, sixteen, seventeen and eighteen. From that point on both the Republican horn of the United States and the Protestant horn (Adventism) have forgotten who the papacy is. 1798 is the first year that the nations of the rest of the world acknowledged the United States as a sovereign nation, and it is also the year the first angel’s message arrived in history.
An 1798, Napoléon te fè pap la prizonye, li bay blesi lanmò pwofetik la ki geri nan fen mond lan selon Revelasyon trèz. Nan moman sa a, Etazini te pran plas li kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la selon Danyèl de, sèt, uit ak onz, ansanm ak Revelasyon douz, trèz, sèz, disèt ak dizuit. Depi lè sa a, ni kòn Repibliken Etazini an ni kòn Pwotestan an (Adventis la) bliye kiyès papote a ye. 1798 se premye ane kote nasyon rès mond lan te rekonèt Etazini kòm yon nasyon souvren, epi se ane tou kote mesaj premye zanj lan te rive nan listwa.
The “motto” of a Protestant at that time was, “the Bible and the Bible only.” Protestants identify themselves as defenders of the Bible alone, and when Adventism took their mantel at the arrival of the second angel, they accepted that “motto,” and were afterward labelled the “people of the book.” They had been given, through the ministry of William Miller a set of rules that would, if properly employed open the Bible to the minds of all who wished to hear. Miller’s Rules of Prophetic Interpretation are what inspiration says we must study if we are to give the third angel’s message.
“Deviz” yon Pwotestan nan epòk sa a te: “Bib la, e Bib la sèlman.” Pwotestan yo idantifye tèt yo kòm defansè Bib la sèlman; e lè Advantis la te pran manto yo lè dezyèm zanj lan te rive, yo te aksepte “deviz” sa a, epi apre sa yo te rele yo “pèp liv la.” Yo te resevwa, atravè ministè William Miller, yon seri règ ki t ap, si yo te itilize yo kòrèkteman, louvri Bib la devan lespri tout moun ki te vle tande. Règ Entèpretasyon Pwofetik Miller yo se sa enspirasyon an di nou dwe etidye si nou dwe bay mesaj twazyèm zanj lan.
“Said Christ, ‘If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.’ Again he said, ‘I am the light of the world; he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness.’ The light of truth is going forth like a burning lamp, and those who love the light will not walk in darkness. They will study the Scriptures, that they may know of a surety that they are listening to the voice of the true Shepherd, and not that of a stranger.
“Kris la te di: ‘Si yon moun vle vini dèyè mwen, se pou li renonse tèt li, pran kwa li, epi swiv mwen.’ Ankò li te di: ‘Mwen se limyè lemonn; moun ki swiv mwen p ap mache nan fènwa.’ Limyè verite a ap avanse tankou yon lanp k ap boule, e moun ki renmen limyè a p ap mache nan fènwa. Yo pral etidye Ekriti yo, pou yo ka konnen avèk sètitid yo ap koute vwa vrè Bèje a, epi non pa vwa yon etranje.”
“Those who are engaged in proclaiming the third angel’s message are searching the Scriptures upon the same plan that Father Miller adopted. In the little book entitled Views of the Prophecies and Prophetic Chronology, Father Miller gives the following simple but intelligent and important rules for Bible study and interpretation:
“Moun ki angaje nan pwoklamasyon mesaj twazyèm zanj lan ap fouye Ekriti yo dapre menm plan Papa Miller te adopte a. Nan ti liv ki pote tit Views of the Prophecies and Prophetic Chronology, Papa Miller bay règ sa yo, ki senp men entèlijan e enpòtan, pou etid ak entèpretasyon Bib la:
“‘1. Every word must have its proper bearing on the subject presented in the Bible; 2. All Scripture is necessary, and may be understood by diligent application and study; 3. Nothing revealed in Scripture can or will be hid from those who ask in faith, not wavering; 4. To understand doctrine, bring all the scriptures together on the subject you wish to know, then let every word have its proper influence; and if you can form your theory without a contradiction, you cannot be in error; 5. Scripture must be its own expositor, since it is a rule of itself. If I depend on a teacher to expound to me, and he should guess at its meaning, or desire to have it so on account of his sectarian creed, or to be thought wise, then his guessing, desire, creed, or wisdom is my rule, and not the Bible.’
“‘1. Tout mo bizin ena so aplikasyon apropriye lor size ki prezante dan Labib; 2. Tou Lekritir neseser, ek kapav konpran li atraver enn laplikasion serye ek letid; 3. Nanye ki finn revele dan Lekritir pa kapav ni pa pou reste kasiet pou bann ki demann avek lafwa, san ezitasion; 4. Pou konpran doktrinn, rasanble tou bann lekritir ansam lor size ki ou anvi kone, apre les sak mo ena so lenflians apropriye; ek si ou kapav form ou teori san okenn kontradiksion, ou pa kapav dan lerer; 5. Lekritir bizin so prop entèrpret, parski li enn reg pou limem. Si mo depan lor enn ansenan pou explik mwa li, ek li ti pou devinn so sans, ouswa swete ki li koumsa akoz so krwar sektèr, ouswa pou krwar li saz, alor so devinasion, so dezir, so krwar, ouswa so lasazes se mo reg, ek non pa Labib.’”
“The above is a portion of these rules; and in our study of the Bible we shall all do well to heed the principles set forth.
“Sa ki anlè a se yon pati nan règ sa yo; e nan etid nou fè sou Bib la, nou tout ap fè byen pou nou pran prekosyon pou nou suiv prensip yo tabli yo.
“Genuine faith is founded on the Scriptures; but Satan uses so many devices to wrest the Scriptures and bring in error, that great care is needed if one would know what they really do teach. It is one of the great delusions of this time to dwell much upon feeling, and to claim honesty while ignoring the plain utterances of the word of God because that word does not coincide with feeling. Many have no foundation for their faith but emotion. Their religion consists in excitement; when that ceases, their faith is gone. Feeling may be chaff, but the word of God is the wheat. And ‘what,’ says the prophet, ‘is the chaff to the wheat?’
“Vrè lafwa a fonde sou Ekriti yo; men Satan sèvi ak anpil mwayen pou tòde Ekriti yo epi fè erè antre, kidonk gwo prekosyon nesesè si yon moun vle konnen sa yo anseye toutbonvre. Youn nan gwo ilizyon tan sa a se rete anpil sou santiman, epi reklame onètete pandan y ap neglije pawòl klè nan Pawòl Bondye a, paske pawòl sa a pa dakò ak santiman yo. Anpil moun pa gen okenn fondman pou lafwa yo eksepte emosyon. Relijyon yo chita nan eksitasyon; lè sa sispann, lafwa yo disparèt. Santiman ka pay, men Pawòl Bondye a se ble a. Epi ‘ki sa,’ pwofèt la di, ‘pay la ye pou ble a?’”
“None will be condemned for not heeding light and knowledge that they never had, and they could not obtain. But many refuse to obey the truth that is presented to them by Christ’s ambassadors, because they wish to conform to the world’s standard; and the truth that has reached their understanding, the light that has shone in the soul, will condemn them in the Judgment. In these last days we have the accumulated light that has been shining through all the ages, and we shall be held correspondingly responsible. The path of holiness is not on a level with the world; it is a way cast up. If we walk in this way, if we run in the way of the Lord’s commandments, we shall find that the ‘path of the just is as the shining light, that shineth more and more unto the perfect day.’” Review and Herald, November 25, 1884.
“Pa gen pèsonn k ap kondannen paske yo pa t obeyi limyè ak konesans yo pa t janm genyen, e yo pa t kapab jwenn. Men, anpil moun refize obeyi verite ki prezante devan yo pa anbasadè Kris yo, paske yo vle konfòme yo ak mezi monn nan; epi verite ki rive jouk nan konpreyansyon yo a, limyè ki klere nan nanm nan, va kondannen yo nan Jijman an. Nan dènye jou sa yo, nou gen limyè akimile ki te klere atravè tout syèk yo, e y ap rann nou responsab selon mezi sa a. Chemen sentete a pa menm nivo ak monn nan; se yon gran wout yo leve wo. Si nou mache nan chemen sa a, si nou kouri nan chemen kòmandman Seyè a, n ap jwenn ke ‘chemen moun jis yo tankou limyè k ap klere, ki klere pi plis toujou jouk rive nan gran jou pafè a.’” Review and Herald, 25 Novanm 1884.
You can read in more detail about William Miller’s rules in the Article entitled William Miller under the Prophetic Keys category.
Ou ka li avèk plis detay sou règ William Miller yo nan Atik ki rele William Miller anba kategori Kle Pwofetik la.
In “our study of the Bible we shall all do well to heed the principles set forth” within “Father Miller’s” rules of prophetic interpretation. The horn of Protestantism was given the sacred document we call the Bible, and also given the responsibility to defend and promote the principles contained therein, and the Protestant horn was also given a set of rules to rightly divide the sacred documents’ meaning and intent.
Nan “etid nou sou Bib la, nou tout ap fè byen pou nou pran an konsiderasyon prensip yo mete devan” nan règ “Pè Miller” yo sou entèpretasyon pwofetik. Kòn Pwotestantis la te resevwa dokiman sakre nou rele Bib la, epi yo te ba li tou responsablite pou defann ak ankouraje prensip ki ladan l yo; epi yo te bay kòn Pwotestan an tou yon ansanm règ pou li byen separe siyifikasyon ak entansyon dokiman sakre yo.
The horn of Republicanism was given a sacred document we call the Constitution, and also given the responsibility to defend and promote the principles contained therein. The Republican horn was also given a set of rules to rightly divide the sacred documents’ meaning and intent. The rules given to rightly divide the Constitution is the Bill of Rights and it enshrines the most important purpose of the Constitution in the first rules of the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment listed in the Bill of Rights is the freedom of religion, expression, speech, and the press.
Kòn Repiblikenis la te resevwa yon dokiman sakre nou rele Konstitisyon an, epi yo te ba li tou responsablite pou defann ak fè pwomosyon prensip ki ladan l yo. Yo te bay kòn Repibliken an tou yon seri règ pou byen divize sans ak entansyon dokiman sakre a. Règ yo te bay pou byen divize Konstitisyon an se Deklarasyon Dwa yo, e li konsakre objektif ki pi enpòtan Konstitisyon an nan premye règ Deklarasyon Dwa yo. Premye Amannman ki nan Deklarasyon Dwa yo se libète relijyon, ekspresyon, lapawòl, ak laprès.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” U.S. Constitution, amend. I
«Le Congrès ne fera aucune loi touchant l’établissement d’une religion, ou en interdisant le libre exercice ; ni restreignant la liberté de parole, ou de la presse ; ni le droit du peuple de s’assembler paisiblement et d’adresser au Gouvernement des pétitions pour le redressement de ses griefs.» Constitution des États-Unis, amend. I
The Sunday law is an open attack against the first issue of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion, which is eliminated at the Sunday law, thus marking the end of the Constitution, the end of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy and the beginning of the persecution against those who are then proclaiming the third angel’s message in a loud cry. Those who are proclaiming the loud cry of the third angel and protesting against the destruction of the first Amendment and the Constitution are persecuted by those who were supposed to be upholding and applying the sacred rules, which defend the sacred document they were ordained to defend. This is an illustration of understanding and applying the parallel histories of the two horns of the lamb-like earth beast. The founding Fathers of the Constitution parallel Father Miller. The term Father used for Miller is used to designate a leader, not a popish priest. The Bible forbids calling men father who are professing to be spiritual guides. The Millerites are named after their father, as is often the case. To miss this distinction is to miss some of what the Elijah message means, when it turns the hearts of the fathers unto the children and vice-versa.
Lwa dimanch lan se yon atak ouvè kont premye dispozisyon Konstitisyon an, ki garanti libète relijyon, yon garanti yo elimine lè yo enpoze lwa dimanch lan; konsa sa make fen Konstitisyon an, fen Etazini kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi biblik la, epi kòmansman pèsekisyon kont sila yo ki, nan moman sa a, ap pwoklame mesaj twazyèm zanj lan ak yon gwo rèl. Sila yo k ap pwoklame gwo rèl twazyèm zanj lan epi k ap pwoteste kont destriksyon Premye Amannman an ak Konstitisyon an, se moun sa yo menm yo pèsekite pa men moun ki te sipoze soutni epi aplike règ sakre yo, ki defann dokiman sakre yo te òdone pou yo defann lan. Sa se yon ilistrasyon sou fason pou konprann epi aplike listwa paralèl de kòn bèt tè a ki sanble ak yon ti mouton an. Papa fondatè Konstitisyon an koresponn ak Papa Miller. Tèm Papa a, jan yo itilize l pou Miller, sèvi pou deziyen yon dirijan, non pa yon prèt papis. Labib entèdi rele moun papa lè yo fè pwofesyon yo se gid espirityèl. Yo rele Millerit yo dapre papa yo, jan sa rive souvan. Pa wè distenksyon sa a, se pa wè yon pati nan siyifikasyon mesaj Eli a, lè li vire kè papa yo bay pitit yo, epi kè pitit yo bay papa yo.
The United States in Isaiah twenty-three is the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy and it remains so until it overturns its Constitution at the rapidly approaching Sunday law. The sixth kingdom rules for seventy prophetic years, which are the days of one king. The kingdom (a king is a kingdom) that ruled for seventy years was Babylon. During the seventy years the horn of the state was the government of Babylon and the horn of the church was the Chaldeans. Daniel, Shadrach, Meshack and Abednego represent the one hundred and forty-four thousand. Both horns and God’s people are represented in Daniel’s testimony. The seventy years of captivity in Babylon was the days of one king that Isaiah employs to identify that the prophetic history of the United States and the history of Adventism as 1798 until the Sunday law.
Etazini nan Ezayi venntwa se sizyèm wayòm pwofesi biblik la, epi li rete konsa jiskaske li ranvèse Konstitisyon li nan lwa dimanch ki ap pwoche avèk vitès. Sizyèm wayòm nan gouvène pandan swasanndis ane pwofetik, ki se jou yon sèl wa. Wayòm nan (yon wa se yon wayòm) ki te gouvène pandan swasanndis ane se te Babilòn. Pandan swasanndis ane yo, kòn leta a te gouvènman Babilòn nan, epi kòn legliz la te Kaldeyen yo. Danyèl, Chadrak, Mechak ak Abèdnego reprezante san karannkat mil yo. Toude kòn yo ansanm ak pèp Bondye a reprezante nan temwayaj Danyèl la. Swasanndis ane kaptivite nan Babilòn nan te jou yon sèl wa Ezayi itilize pou idantifye istwa pwofetik Etazini ak istwa Advantis la kòm 1798 jiska lwa dimanch la.
Identifying that the line of prophetic history for both horns of the United States allows us to consider the ending and beginning, with the two horn witnesses to identify the characteristic of the other horn. After all the horns were the same. In Daniel there were horns, some broken, with horns that grew out of the broken horn. Some horns in Daniel were not the same size as each other, coming up later than the other. Not so, with the two horns of the United States. Those two horns parallel each other through the same history and produce the same waymarks, though different from one another in terms of their purpose. There are caveats within the history that are also important to understand.
Idantifye lefètke liy istwa pwofetik la pou toude kòn Etazini yo pèmèt nou konsidere fen an ak kòmansman an, avèk de temwen kòn yo pou idantifye karakteristik lòt kòn nan. Apre tou, tout kòn yo te menm jan. Nan Danyèl te gen kòn, kèk te kraze, avèk kòn ki te pouse soti nan kòn ki te kraze a. Kèk kòn nan Danyèl pa t menm gwosè youn ak lòt, paske yo te leve pi ta pase lòt la. Men sa pa konsa pou de kòn Etazini yo. De kòn sa yo mache an paralèl youn ak lòt atravè menm istwa a epi yo pwodui menm repè yo, byenke yo diferan youn ak lòt an tèm de objektif yo. Gen rezèv nan istwa a tou ki enpòtan pou konprann.
In the beginning of Adventism there was a change from the prophetic history represented by the church of Philadelphia unto the church of Laodicea. There must be therefore at the end a change from the prophetic history of Laodicea. The Revelation of Jesus Christ includes the light of this understanding and it is part of what is being unsealed at this time.
Nan kòmansman Adventis la, te gen yon chanjman soti nan istwa pwofetik legliz Filadèlfi a pou rive nan legliz Lawodise a. Konsa, nan fen an, dwe genyen tou yon chanjman soti nan istwa pwofetik Lawodise a. Revelasyon Jezikri a gen ladan limyè konpreyansyon sa a, e li fè pati sa k ap desele nan tan sa a.
And “after the end of seventy years” the pope will “sing” and the “forgotten” “harlot” will be remembered. She is “remembered” at the Sunday law, where the issue is between the worship of the sun, or the worship of the day that God’s law informed mankind to “remember.”
Epi “apre fen swasanndizan yo” pap la va “chante” epi “pwostitiye” ki te “bliye” a va sonje ankò. Yo “sonje” li nan lwa dimanch lan, kote kestyon an se ant adorasyon solèy la, oswa adorasyon jou lalwa Bondye te fè limanite konnen pou “sonje.”
In this article we have identified that the history of Babylon’s seventy-year rule typifies the history of the United States from 1798 until the Sunday law. In a previous article and often in Habakkuk’s Tables we identify that the captivity in and deliverance from Egypt, also typifies the history of the United States and God’s people. Those four histories of Babylon, Egypt, Adventism and the United States are not the only lines to bring upon these lines, but when we apply the rule of first mention to those four lines—it is absolutely amazing. I will close this article with one simple and partial illustration of what I mean, and what I intend to continue with when we further address the history of Isaiah twenty-three at a later time.
Nan atik sa a, nou idantifye ke istwa dominasyon swasanndizan Babilòn lan se yon tip istwa Etazini depi 1798 rive jouk lwa dimanch lan. Nan yon atik anvan, epi souvan nan Tablo Abakik yo, nou idantifye ke kaptivite ann Ejip ak delivrans soti ann Ejip la tou se yon tip istwa Etazini ak pèp Bondye a. Kat istwa sa yo—Babilòn, Ejip, Adantis la, ak Etazini—pa sèl liy yo ka mete sou liy sa yo; men lè nou aplike règ premye mansyon an sou kat liy sa yo, sa se yon bagay ki vrèman etonan. M ap fèmen atik sa a avèk yon sèl ilistrasyon senp e pasyèl sou sa m vle di a, ak sa m gen entansyon kontinye prezante lè n ap trete pi plis istwa Ezayi venntwa a nan yon lòt lè.
The history of Babylon has a converted king at the beginning and a wicked king at the end. Doesn’t matter if it were Biden or Trump, for the book of Daniel teaches that it is God who sets up rulers and takes them down. What can be sure about either a Democrat or Republican leader at the time of the Sunday law is that they are a wicked leader. Nebuchadnezzar was Babylon, he was the tyrant of Babylon, willing to throw three good men into the fire. But he was eventually converted to Daniel’s God. Not so with the last leader Belshazzar. He was a wicked king. The United States in prophecy begins as a lamb, a symbol of Christ and His sacrifice for mankind. At the end the United States will speak as a dragon. The change from Christ to Satan in this line of history is represented by the difference of Nebuchadnezzar and Belshazzar.
Istwa Babilòn nan kòmanse avèk yon wa ki te konvèti, epi li fini avèk yon wa mechan. Pa enpòtan si se te Biden oswa Trump, paske liv Danyèl la anseye se Bondye ki leve chèf yo e ki desann yo. Sa yon moun ka sèten konsènan swa yon dirijan Demokrat oswa Repibliken nan moman lwa dimanch lan, se ke li se yon dirijan mechan. Nebikadneza te Babilòn; li te tiran Babilòn nan, dispoze jete twa bon gason nan dife a. Men, alafen li te konvèti bay Bondye Danyèl la. Sa pa t konsa pou dènye chèf la, Belchaza. Li te yon wa mechan. Lèzetazini, nan pwofesi, kòmanse tankou yon ti mouton, yon senbòl Kris la ak sakrifis Li pou limanite. Nan fen an, Lèzetazini pral pale tankou yon dragon. Chanjman soti nan Kris pou rive nan Satan nan liy istwa sa a reprezante pa diferans ki genyen ant Nebikadneza ak Belchaza.
“Belshazzar had been given many opportunities for knowing and doing the will of God. He had seen his grandfather Nebuchadnezzar banished from the society of men. He had seen the intellect in which the proud monarch gloried taken away by the One who gave it. He had seen the king driven from his kingdom, and made the companion of the beasts of the field. But Belshazzar’s love of amusement and self-glorification effaced the lessons he should never have forgotten; and he committed sins similar to those that brought signal judgments on Nebuchadnezzar. He wasted the opportunities graciously granted him, neglecting to use the opportunities within his reach for becoming acquainted with truth. ‘What must I do to be saved?’ was a question that the great but foolish king passed by indifferently.” Bible Echo, April 25, 1898.
“Bèlchaza te resevwa anpil okazyon pou l konnen epi fè volonte Bondye. Li te wè granpapa li, Nèbikadneza, yo te mete l deyò nan sosyete lèzòm. Li te wè Entèlijans sa a, kote wa ògeye a te fè grandizè a, Moun ki te bay li a te retire l nan men li. Li te wè wa a chasse soti nan wayòm li, epi yo te fè l vin konpayon bèt nan chan yo. Men, lanmou Bèlchaza pou amizman ak pou fè lwanj tèt pa l te efase leson li pa t dwe janm bliye yo; epi li te komèt peche ki sanble ak sa yo ki te fè gwo jijman yo tonbe sou Nèbikadneza. Li te gaspiye okazyon yo te ba li avèk gras, li te neglije sèvi ak okazyon ki te a dimanch li pou l te vin konnen verite a. ‘Kisa mwen dwe fè pou m sove?’ se te yon kestyon gran wa a, ki te gran men sòt, te pase sou li avèk endiferans.” Bible Echo, 25 avril 1898.
Notice that the wicked Belshazzar was the foolish king. He suffered the same judgment as his father Nebuchadnezzar, for both judgments were represented as the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six. Nebuchadnezzar was in the fields living like a beast for twenty-five hundred and twenty days, which is seven biblical years and his son Belshazzar’s judgment which written on the wall represents twenty-five hundred and twenty as well. The difference was the judgment against Nebuchadnezzar converted him and made him a wise king, whereas Belshazzar’s judgment was upon the foolish king.
Remake byen ke mechan Bèlchaza se te wa sòt la. Li te sibi menm jijman ak papa l, Nebikadneza, paske toude jijman yo te reprezante kòm “sèt tan” nan Levitik vennsis. Nebikadneza te nan jaden yo, li t ap viv tankou yon bèt pandan de mil senksan venn jou, sa ki se sèt ane biblik; epi jijman pitit gason l lan, Bèlchaza, ki te ekri sou miray la, reprezante de mil senksan venn tou. Diferans lan se ke jijman kont Nebikadneza te konvèti l epi te fè l tounen yon wa saj, tandiske jijman Bèlchaza a te tonbe sou wa sòt la.
“To the last ruler of Babylon, as in type to its first, had come the sentence of the divine Watcher: ‘O king, . . . to thee it is spoken; The kingdom is departed from thee.’ Daniel 4:31.” Prophets and Kings, 533.
“Pou dènye chèf Babilòn nan, menm jan an tipolojik pou premye a, te vini santans Gadyen diven an: ‘O wa, ... se ak ou yo pale; wayòm nan wete nan men ou.’ Danyèl 4:31.” Prophets and Kings, 533.
The handwriting on the wall for the last president is the first amendment which identifies the “wall” of separation of church and state, which the final foolish king does not understand. The “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six represents a “scattering of the people” that is accomplished by the king of the north at the Sunday law. That scattering is the national ruin that follows the Sunday law. The sixth nation forgot the lessons of their founding fathers who penned the Constitution to protect not only from a corrupt church, but also from the tyrannical European kings that the corrupt woman slept with. The founding fathers represent those who rejected the papacy and the kings of Europe for they knew from their own experience after coming out of a scattering of twelve hundred and sixty years of papal darkness, that protections against that type of tyranny must be the center piece of their new Constitution. They were wise fathers, they were lamb-like, but not so with the last father, for he will speak as a dragon. The Fathers came out of a scattering and the son goes back into a scattering. The tyrant in both instances is the first papacy and the last papacy.
Ekriti ki sou miray la pou dènye prezidan an se Premye Amannman an, ki idantifye “miray” separasyon ant legliz ak leta a, yon bagay dènye wa sòt la pa konprann. “Sèt fwa” yo nan Levitik vennsis la reprezante yon “gaye pèp la” wa nò a reyalize lè lwa dimanch lan vini. Gaye sa a se destriksyon nasyonal ki swiv lwa dimanch lan. Sizyèm nasyon an te bliye leson zansèt fondatè li yo, ki te ekri Konstitisyon an pou pwoteje non sèlman kont yon legliz kòripsyon, men tou kont wa tiranik Ewòp yo, ak ki fanm kòripsyon an te kouche. Zansèt fondatè yo reprezante sila yo ki te rejte papote a ak wa Ewòp yo, paske yo te konnen, dapre pwòp eksperyans pa yo apre yo te sòti nan yon gaye douz san swasant ane fènwa papal, ke pwoteksyon kont kalite tirani sa a dwe poto mitan nouvo Konstitisyon yo a. Yo te papa saj, yo te tankou ti mouton; men se pa konsa ak dènye papa a, paske li pral pale tankou yon dragon. Papa yo te sòti nan yon gaye, epi pitit gason an retounen nan yon gaye. Tiran an, nan toude ka yo, se premye papote a ak dènye papote a.
The symbol of the judgment upon Nebuchadnezzar, the first king and the last king Belshazzar was the “seven times” scattering of Leviticus twenty-six. Nebuchadnezzar lived it, and Belshazzar had it written upon the wall as his epitaph the very night he died. The symbol of the Republican horn in the beginning was its escape from the king of the north’s bondage and the symbol of the Republican horn at its end is captivity brought about from the king of the north. The Sunday law is the “very night” that it dies as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. In all four illustrations, Belshazzar, Nebuchadnezzar, and the beginning and ending of the Republican horn the twenty-five twenty of Leviticus twenty-six, is the symbol represented at the beginning and the ending. That represents the signature of Alpha and Omega.
Senbòl jijman sou Nebikadneza, premye wa a, ak dènye wa a, Belchaza, se te dispèsyon “sèt tan” Levitik vennsis la. Nebikadneza te viv li, epi Belchaza te wè l ekri sou miray la kòm epitaf li menm nan lannuit li te mouri a. Senbòl kòn Repibliken an nan kòmansman li se te chape li anba esklavaj wa nò a, epi senbòl kòn Repibliken an nan fen li se kaptivite wa nò a pote sou li. Lwa dimanch lan se “menm lannuit” li mouri a antanke sizyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la. Nan kat ilistrasyon yo, Belchaza, Nebikadneza, ak kòmansman ak fen kòn Repibliken an, vennsenk-venn Levitik vennsis la se senbòl ki reprezante nan kòmansman an ak nan fen an. Sa reprezante siyati Alfa ak Omega.
The first “time prophecy” William Miller discovered was the twenty-five twenty of Leviticus twenty-six. It was the first stone in the foundation that Jesus laid through the work of Miller. It was also the first foundational truth that was set aside by Adventism in 1863. When all of Miller’s stones of truth were put into the foundation, those truths were represented on the two tables of Habakkuk, which are the 1843 and 1850 pioneer charts. Those two tables represent the covenant relationship between God and His denominated people just as the two tables of the Ten Commandments represented the covenant with ancient Israel.
Premye “pwofesi tan” William Miller te dekouvri a se vennsenk sanven Levitik ventsis la. Se te premye wòch nan fondasyon Jezi te poze atravè travay Miller. Se te tou premye verite fondamantal Advantis la te mete sou kote an 1863. Lè tout wòch verite Miller yo te mete nan fondasyon an, verite sa yo te reprezante sou de tabak Habakouk yo, ki se tablo pyonye 1843 ak 1850 yo. De tabak sa yo reprezante relasyon alyans ki genyen ant Bondye ak pèp Li ki gen yon denominasyon, menm jan de tabak Dis Kòmandman yo te reprezante alyans lan ak Izrayèl lontan.
At the end of Laodicean Adventism, when it is spewed out of the mouth of the Lord at the Sunday law, the handwriting on the wall is those two sacred pioneer charts. Charts which they are unable to read, for they refused to be benefitted by the warning message in their beginning of their history….
Nan fen Advantis Laodiseyen an, lè l ap vomi soti nan bouch Senyè a nan lwa dimanch lan, ekriti ki sou miray la se de tablo sakre pyonye sa yo. Tablo yo, yo pa kapab li yo, paske yo te refize resevwa benefis nan mesaj avètisman an nan kòmansman istwa yo….
The financial crisis of 1837 in the United States was a complex event triggered by a combination of economic factors, policies, and speculative activities.
Kriz finansye 1837 la Ozetazini te yon evènman konplèks ki te deklanche pa yon konbinezon faktè ekonomik, politik, ak aktivite espekilatif.
Speculative Bubble: In the years leading up to 1837, there was a speculative boom in land and investments, driven in part by the westward expansion of the country. Land speculation, particularly in the western frontier, led to inflated land prices and excessive borrowing.
Bul espekilatif: Nan ane ki te mennen rive an 1837, te gen yon gwo peryòd espekilasyon nan tè ak nan envestisman, sa ki te pouse an pati pa ekspansyon peyi a vè lwès. Espekilasyon sou tè, sitou sou fwontyè lwès la, te lakòz pri tè yo monte depase valè reyèl yo epi li te mennen nan twòp prete.
Easy Credit and Speculative Lending: Banks and financial institutions were issuing large amounts of credit and loans, often without adequate collateral. This easy access to credit contributed to the speculative frenzy and increased the risks of financial instability.
Kredi fasil ak prè espekilatif: Bank yo ak enstitisyon finansye yo t ap bay gwo kantite kredi ak prè, souvan san ase garanti. Aksè fasil sa a a kredi te kontribye nan foli espekilatif la epi li te ogmante risk enstabilite finansyè.
Overexpansion of Banks: Banks were expanding their operations rapidly, often issuing more paper money (banknotes) than they had specie (gold and silver) to back it up. This practice, known as “wildcat banking,” resulted in an overabundance of unregulated and unreliable currency in circulation.
Twòp ekspansyon bank yo: Bank yo t ap elaji operasyon yo avèk anpil vitès, souvan yo t ap emèt plis lajan papye (bil bank) pase kantite espès (lò ak ajan) yo te genyen pou garanti li. Pratik sa a, yo rele li “wildcat banking,” te lakòz yon twòp abondans lajan k ap sikile ki pa t reglemante e ki pa t fyab.
Jackson’s Economic Policies: President Andrew Jackson’s policies played a role in exacerbating the crisis. He issued the Specie Circular in 1836, which required that public lands be purchased with hard currency (gold and silver) rather than paper money. This led to a rush to convert banknotes into specie, causing financial strains and bank failures.
Politik ekonomik Jackson yo: Politik Prezidan Andrew Jackson yo te jwe yon wòl nan agrave kriz la. Li te pibliye Specie Circular la an 1836, ki te egzije pou yo achte tè piblik yo avèk lajan di (lò ak ajan) olye de lajan papye. Sa te lakòz yon kous pou konvèti biyè labank yo an lajan espès, sa ki te pwovoke tansyon finansye ak fayit labank.
International Factors: The crisis in the United States was also influenced by international economic conditions. A slump in the British economy, a major trading partner of the United States, led to a reduction in demand for American goods and exports. This, in turn, affected American businesses and contributed to economic distress.
Faktè entènasyonal yo: Kriz Ozetazini an te enfliyanse tou pa kondisyon ekonomik entènasyonal yo. Yon bès nan ekonomi Britanik la, ki se yon gwo patnè komèsyal Ozetazini, te mennen nan yon diminisyon nan demann pou machandiz ak ekspòtasyon ameriken yo. Sa, an retou, te afekte biznis ameriken yo epi te kontribye nan detrès ekonomik la.
Panic and Bank Runs: In May 1837, a series of financial shocks, including bank failures and credit contractions, led to a panic among investors and depositors. This panic triggered a wave of bank runs and a severe contraction of credit.
Panik ak Kous sou Bank yo: Nan mwa me 1837, yon seri chòk finansye, ki te gen ladan fayit bank yo ak restriksyon sou kredi, te lakòz yon panik pami envestisè yo ak depozan yo. Panik sa a te deklanche yon vag kous sou bank yo ak yon kontraksyon grav nan kredi.
Contraction of Money Supply: As banks failed and credit tightened, the overall money supply in the economy contracted significantly. This contraction of money aggravated economic difficulties and deepened the recession. The combination of these factors led to a severe economic downturn, characterized by bank failures, unemployment, reduced consumer spending, and a general economic depression.
Kontraksyon kantite lajan an nan sikilasyon: Pandan bank yo t ap fè fayit e kredi t ap vin pi sere, kantite total lajan ki te nan ekonomi an te diminye anpil. Kontraksyon sa a nan kantite lajan an te agrave difikilte ekonomik yo e li te fè resesyon an vin pi pwofon. Konbinezon faktè sa yo te mennen nan yon gwo bès ekonomik, ki te make pa fayit bank yo, chomaj, rediksyon nan depans konsomatè yo, ak yon depresyon ekonomik jeneral.
“We have nothing to fear for the future, except as we shall forget the way the Lord has led us, and His teaching in our past history.” Life Sketches, 196.
“Nou pa gen anyen pou nou pè konsènan lavni, eksepte si nou ta bliye chemen Senyè a mennen nou, ak ansèyman Li nan istwa pase nou an.” Life Sketches, 196.