Laodicea - Number Four

The aspect which I pointed out that Stephen Haskell probably did not see, though he upheld by his recognition of the truths which bring to light this fact, is that in the history at the end of ancient Israel, you simultaneously find the beginning of modern Israel overlapping the same historical period. When Christ was confirming the covenant with many for one week (twenty-five hundred and twenty days), ancient Israel was living out the experience of Laodicea, on the verge of being spewed out of the mouth of the Lord. Simultaneously modern Israel was living out the experience of Ephesus. Laodicea of ancient Israel was being scattered and Ephesus of modern Israel was being gathered in the very same history.

And “yes” if you are wondering, I am aware that the week that Christ confirmed the covenant in fulfillment of Daniel chapter nine, which began at His baptism and ended with the stoning of Stephen was not a literal twenty-five hundred and twenty days, but prophetically it most definitely was, for prophetically a year equals three hundred and sixty days. Three hundred and sixty days multiplied by seven is twenty-five hundred and twenty days, and “the dead center” of that prophetic week is the cross. Prophetically Christ placed the cross, dead center of the prophetic period of twenty-five hundred and twenty days, thus showing that the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six is established and upheld by the cross of Christ. It is not an accident that when Sister White teaches, as she does that both of Habakkuk’s sacred tables; the 1843 and 1850 chart have the twenty-five hundred and twenty year prophecy in the very center of the chart, and both charts have the cross dead center of that illustration.

Along with the principle that each of the seven churches are repeated in Millerite history and also our history is another important principle early Adventism acknowledged. That principle demonstrates that “internal and external” prophetic lines of the same history is employed by the Holy Spirit to convey truth. Miller recognized this and directly taught it. He correctly taught that the seven seals of Revelation represent a parallel history to the churches, but in that parallel illustration the seals represent an external and the churches an internal truth of the identical history. Uriah Smith also addresses this principle and employs the words “internal” and “external” which seems to me to be the best way to express the two parallel lines.

We will now begin our consideration of the seven churches. It is important to recognize that the first two churches and then again, the third and fourth church have a “cause and effect” relationship that demands that they be considered together. Smyrna is the church that represents those that are persecuted by Rome, and Ephesus was the church that carried the gospel to the entire world.

The Ephesus church represented the early church that lived “godly in Christ Jesus” which is a “cause” that always produces an “effect.”

The godliness of the Ephesian church brought about the persecution represented by the church of Smyrna. The two churches represent a cause and an effect relationship, and the effect demands to be preceded by a cause. The persecution of the Sunday law crisis is instigated by a manifestation of what Sister White calls “primitive godliness.” A godliness that has been illustrated in past, or primitive histories.

The Midnight Cry of the “last days” is the revival of “primitive godliness” identified in the passage. It’s a revival that occurs in a movement, not a church. The history Sister White employs to describe the revival is the history of “apostolic times,” which is represented by the church of Ephesus. That revival will produce “persecution.”

The “life of Christ on earth” in the next passage represents the beginning of the church of Ephesus, but it also typifies the history of Laodicean Adventism at the end of the world.

The experience represented by Ephesus takes place simultaneously to the experience of Laodicea. The quibbling Jews were the Laodiceans of ancient Israel and Christ and His disciples were Ephesians of modern Israel. John the Baptist introduced the church of Ephesus, and he represents the church in the “last days” which is opposed by Laodiceans, who call themselves Jews, but they are not.

Ephesus is the “cause” and Smyrna is the “effect.” Pergamos and Thyatira also represent a cause-and-effect relationship. Pergamos is the church of compromise that corrupted Christianity by combining it with paganism. The Christian church fell when it accepted the premise that it was possible for the idolatry of paganism to co-exist within its borders. The emperor Constantine is the symbol of that compromising history, and his prophetic role was to produce the falling away of true Christianity in advance of the papacy being revealed.

The Pergamos church was the “cause” and Thyatira was the “effect.” The prophet Daniel often presents the history of paganism giving way to papalism, and the falling away that preceded the establishment of the papacy that Paul identified is addressed in Daniel eleven.

The church of compromise that fell away before the papal power was revealed into history is represented by Daniel as “them that” forsook “the holy covenant.” After they forsook the covenant, then the papacy, represented by Daniel as the “abomination that maketh desolate,” was placed upon the throne of the earth. Sister White identifies the last six verses of Daniel eleven when she states, the “prophecy in the eleventh of Daniel has nearly reached its complete fulfillment.” The last six verses are the final fulfillment of Daniel eleven, and she teaches that the history represented by those final verses was typified by Daniel 11:30–36, which identifies the historical “cause and effect” represented by Pergamos and Thyatira.

The cause-and-effect relationship of Pergamos and Thyatira, as well as the cause-and-effect relationship of Ephesus and Smyrna are repeated in the “last days.” The Protestants of the United States will compromise with idolatry, as represented by Pergamos (the premier sign of idolatry is the worship of the sun), and when they fall away the way is prepared for the man of sin, to once again be prophetically revealed. While the falling away and placing of the papacy on the throne is repeated God will simultaneously be raising up a church typified by Ephesus to carry the message of Daniel and Revelation to the world and the persecution represented by Smyrna will be repeated.

I will address the last three churches after we consider the truth that the first four seals of Revelation are an external line of truth that runs parallel to the internal line of truth represented by the first four churches. As already noted, Uriah Smith states it this way:

We have shown that the first four churches represent two “cause and effect” relationships that are repeated in the “last days.” Based upon the pioneers of Adventism, but more importantly upon the authority of God’s Word, those four internal histories of the church should have a parallel external history represented by the first four seals. The first and second seals echo the same characteristics of Ephesus and Smyrna, but use a white horse to represent the work of carrying Christianity to the world. It represents the external work of the church, and the second seal represents the blood bath of Smyrna with a red horse.

Zechariah contains a few passages that directly identify the four horses represented in the first four seals of Revelation. In one of those passages in chapter ten, Zechariah identifies that when the latter rain is poured out “the flock of Judah” which is God’s “house” will be turned into “his goodly horse in the battle.”

Ellen White repeatedly identifies that the outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost typifies the latter rain that is now falling. The work done for the world at Pentecost is represented by the church of Ephesus, and Ephesus causes the persecution represented by Smyrna, which John represents as the “red horse” of the second seal. The first two seals run parallel to the first two churches and they illustrate the “last days,” when the latter rain is being poured out.

The Spirit of Prophecy also selects both the end of the third seal and beginning of the fourth seal thus tying them together (cause and effect), and in doing so she places the history represented as existing in her day and in the “last days.”

In Sister White’s personal history, (penned in 1898) the spirit of compromise that prepares the way for the papacy to once again be enthroned was already alive and well, for the falling away of Protestantism that began with the rejection of the first angel’s message in the spring of 1844, had already begun (in 1863) to encroach upon the horn of Protestant Adventism.

The compromise of Pergamos is represented as a “pair” of balances in the third seal. Two balances of measuring represent a dishonest measurement. The third seal leads to the fourth seal, represented by a “pale horse” of “death,” thus representing the murder of millions by the papacy during the Dark Ages. “Hell” is what follows the pale horse of the papacy. The history of the third and fourth seals parallel the history of the churches of Pergamos and Thyatira. The compromise of Constantine was a progressive work; thus, the spirit of compromise was already active in Sister White’s personal history, just as it was in the time of Paul when he said the “mystery of iniquity does already work.” The falling away that precedes the papacy’s enthronement is always a progressive history, and that “history is to be repeated. That which has been will be again.”

James White identified another prophetic anomaly in the seven churches, and seven seals. He identifies a purposeful distinction between the first four churches and the last three churches, and then again, the same phenomenon in the first four seals and the last three seals.

James White did not include the fact that the same pattern exists in the trumpets, but it does. The first four trumpets are trumpets, but the last three trumpets are three woes. The first four trumpets represent God’s judgment on pagan Rome for Constantine’s Sunday law in the year 321, and the three trumpet woes represent Islam. The first two trumpet woes were judgments against papal Rome for the Sunday law it enacted in 538, and the third trumpet woe is for the Sunday law crisis that is coming in the very near future.

Joseph Bates employs the pioneer understanding of the last three churches as a singular symbol to describe three contemporary churches in the Millerite time period. All the emphasis in the passage was supplied by Bates.

In the Millerite history Sardis, was the church that had a name that claimed to be alive, but it was dead.

God’s people always have a name. The name during the history of Ephesus through Pergamos was Christian. The name during the papal rule was the church in the wilderness. The name from the introduction of the morning star, John Wycliffe was Protestant. At the time of the end in 1798, the Protestants had already begun their return to the Roman communion. All that was needed then was a test that would manifest the fact that in spite of their professed name, they were no longer the chosen church. In the spring of 1844, they reached the test that would manifest that they were no longer the church that carried Christ’s covenant name. The story of Elijah provides a very detailed second witness of this fact. When they manifested their true character, it was difficult for the Millerites to initially identify that the Protestants had demonstrated that they had become the daughters of Babylon. But the Millerites eventually did that very thing, and began to call souls out of those fallen churches in fulfillment of the second angel’s message. Then there was a testing process that would cause the Millerites to manifest their own characters. Were they Philadelphians or Laodiceans?

The Philadelphians followed Christ into the Most Holy Place and those Millerites who refused to do so manifested the character of Laodiceans. Thus, we find the logic for Bates identification of the three churches as contemporaries of the same history. That history was fulfilled within the prophetic structure of the parable of the ten virgins, which inspiration informs us has been and will be fulfilled to the very letter.

The last three churches represent those outside of the Millerite movement as Sardis, and those within the movement represent either Philadelphia or Laodicea. Those three churches are identified in Revelation chapter three, and the first four churches are in chapter two. Therefore, when Sister White references the history of chapter three of Revelation, she is identifying the very same churches Joseph Bates just identified.

The three contemporary churches of Millerite history are repeated at the end of Adventism. Joseph Bates was identifying the dynamics of the Millerite period and identified Sardis as the daughters of Babylon, which was the target audience for the second angel’s message. He was addressing the struggle between the little flock that followed Christ into the Most Holy Place on October 22, 1844 and those who refused to move out of the holy place. He was attempting to call the Laodiceans out of the darkness they had received, and at least part of their Laodicean blindness was due to the fact that William Miller had taken a leading position in the Laodicean movement. This is the same struggle identified in the message to Philadelphia.

A religious crisis always produces two classes of worshippers as it did in the Great Disappointment. The mantle of Protestantism had just been taken from Sardis, as they returned to Rome and officially became Rome’s daughter. The mantle was then held by Millerite Adventism, but a test would soon after produce two classes professing to be the little flock. A true flock and a counterfeit flock. Bates represented the little flock that followed Christ into the Most Holy Place. His struggle was with Laodiceans who professed to be the little flock. As a Philadelphian, Bates’ struggle was with the synagogue of Satan, a group that professed to be God’s people, but did lie and were not Jews.

When the parable is fulfilled for the final time at the end of Adventism there will be a chosen covenant people that were passed by at the time of the end in 1989, the same as the Jewish leadership was passed by at Christ birth, which represents the time of the end in that prophetic history. When the history of Christ reached the triumphal entry into Jerusalem, the Midnight Cry history of the Millerite time was typified. Inspiration repeatedly aligns the waymark of the cross with the Great Disappointment of 1844. Judas represents the Laodiceans of Christ’s history, and the apostles were the Philadelphians. For three and a half years after the cross the Philadelphians, represented by Bates, attempted to call the Laodiceans out of a fallen church that was represented by the disciple Judas Iscariot.

In 1989 the former chosen covenant people rejected the light that was unsealed and were passed by. When the first disappointment of July 18, 2020 arrived the testing process began among those who formerly had appeared to be of the same movement. Yet one class are Laodicean and the other class Philadelphian. Just as Judas covenanted three times with the Sanhedrin to betray Christ before the cross, the Laodiceans of the history after September 11, 2001 will have failed three opportunities to repent. At the soon coming Sunday law it will be manifested as certainly as Judas hanging from a tree, that the Laodiceans are separate from the Philadelphians. It is at the harvest when the tares are separated from the wheat. We are rapidly approaching that harvest.

These truths are only recognized when and if we are willing to understand that the only biblical methodology that can uncover and establish ‘truth’ is “historicism.” The true methodology is not preterism, futurism, dispensationalism, woke-ism, grammatical or historical expertise or any variation of the many satanic counterfeits. There is a commonly known phrase that is attributed to a seventeenth century philosopher named Jean-Jacques Rousseau that has been restated many ways, but the essence of the thought is, “Error has many roots, but truth has only one.” “Truth” is Alpha and Omega who is as a root out of dry ground.

The truths we are currently sharing must be recognized in the context that the growth of truth is progressive throughout history, and more importantly our understanding of truth must be placed in the context of the Alpha and Omega, the context of Jesus identifying the end of a thing with the beginning of a thing.

The fourth church is Thyatira and it represents the period that the papacy ruled as the fifth kingdom of Bible prophecy, which is the period that the church in the wilderness was in captivity. The captivity of spiritual Israel by spiritual Babylon for twelve hundred and sixty years was typified by the captivity of literal Israel in literal Babylon for seventy years.

The seventy years of captivity in Babylon is represented by the church of Thyatira. The church of Thyatira is the effect that was produced by the cause, which is represented by Pergamos. Pergamos is symbolized by Constantine the emperor that combined idolatry with Christianity. The symbol of his idolatry was the worship of the sun. The biblical reason for ancient Israel being taken into captivity for the seventy years of Thyatira is that their kings formed relationships and alliances with the idolatrous nations around them in direct rebellion against God’s Word. God repeatedly warned Israel not to intermix with the heathen nations around them. The Ten Commandments, the very thing ancient Israel was to be the depositaries of straightly forbids worshipping idols. When the Lord passed by Moses at the cave of Horeb and revealed His character He twice included the very warning we are referring to.

Twice God warned ancient Israel in this passage alone, and there are many other biblical testimonies of the command to ancient Israel that they were to make no covenants with the idolatrous nations around them. Those compromises began with ancient Israel’s rejection of God and His theocracy. When they desired a king, God allowed them to have a king and from that point on the majority of all the kings, and most certainly every king of the northern ten tribes disregarded that very command. The principle that required that Israel was separate and peculiar from the idolatrous nations around them was rejected and illustrated by the compromise that Constantine would later become a symbol of. Pergamos and Constantine represent the rebellion of Israel’s kings who introduced idolatry into God’s church. The falling away that began with king Saul typified the falling away of the Christian church that led to the captivity in spiritual Babylon. The sacred history beginning with king Saul onward until the captivity in Babylon is symbolized by the church of Pergamos. The captivity of seventy years that followed was the church of Thyatira.

Ephesus, represents the church that goes forth to conquer the Promised Land. Ephesus represents the time of Moses and the deliverance of Israel from the bondage of Egypt.

The history represented by the deliverance from Egypt is repeated in the last days. It was therefore also repeated in the Millerite history. That is why Sister White repeatedly references that history to describe the Millerite history. She aligns the Great Disappointment of 1844 with the disappointment of the Hebrews as they stood before the Red Sea with Pharaoh’s army approaching them from behind. She also aligns the history of the deliverance from Egypt with the time of Christ, thus the disappointment of the disciples at the cross was typified by the disappointment at the Red Sea, which also typified the Great Disappointment of 1844. The disappointment of the cross represented the beginning of the church of Ephesus. The time of Moses at the beginning of ancient Israel represented by the church of Ephesus which also typified the beginning of modern Israel in the time of Christ. Both histories are represented by the church of Ephesus. The truths we are identifying here have often been publicly presented through the years by Future for America, so I am simply providing an overview.

In the history of Christ, we find the beginning of the new covenant people who are being raised up as the previous covenant chosen people are being passed by. The history of Christ is the end of ancient Israel, and in the history of the deliverance from Egypt at the beginning of ancient Israel there was a previously chosen covenant people that were passed by for a new covenant people.

In Christ’s history the former chosen people came to their final conclusion in the year 70 with the destruction of Jerusalem. At the beginning in the time of Moses the former chosen people died in the wilderness over a forty-year period, and Joshua and Caleb became the representatives of the new chosen people that were destined to carry the message to the Promised land as did the apostles of the Ephesian church time period carried the gospel to the world.

The beginning and ending of ancient and also the beginning of modern Israel all identify a transition of a former chosen people unto a new chosen people. Upon the testimony of two or three a thing is established; and each of these three lines of witnesses identify the divorce of the previous chosen people and these witnesses possess the signature of Alpha and Omega, the One who identifies the end from the beginning. There will be a former chosen people that is passed by when God enters into covenant with the one hundred and forty-four thousand. God is not the author of confusion; He never changes and His word never fails.

The deliverance from Egypt and the triumphs accomplished by God through Joshua are represented by the church of Ephesus, but Ephesus was destined to lose its first love. When Joshua was laid to rest another generation arose marking the period represented by Smyrna. Joshua’s wonderful work of clearing the Promised Land was never fully accomplished, for the people became satisfied with themselves and forsook the work given to Joshua. They lost their first love. That period continued until Israel rejected God and Samuel anointed king Saul, thus ushering in the church of Pergamos.

Though Smyrna is one of the two churches that receive no rebuke from the Lord, the history testifies that those who were martyred during that period of time represents some whose motivations were based upon human and not divine impulses. The book of Judges opens by identifying the death of Joshua, and there is a verse that is repeated twice in the book which defines the history of the judges. The second time that verse is cited is the final verse of the book. The first verse of the book marks the end of Joshua and the last verse summarizes the history.

As in the history of Smyrna “self” was a primary theme from the beginning to the end. Because they had no king, they determined to do whatever they chose to do. The lack of guidance was what Haskell identified in the history of Smyrna that was represented by no active Spirit of Prophecy. In both histories a lack of guidance opened the door for decisions to be made based upon a person’s own motivations. Ephesus represents the deliverance from Egypt. The history recorded in the book of Judges is represented by the church of Smyrna. From king Saul until the Babylonian captivity is represented by the church of Pergamos and the captivity in Babylon is represented by the church of Thyatira.

In agreement with the phenomenon identified by the pioneers there is a four and three division in the churches, seals and trumpets, and the first four churches in ancient Israel’s history begin with the Egyptian captivity and end with the Babylonian captivity, for the Alpha and Omega always identifies the end with the beginning. The first four churches in modern Israel’s history begin with the subjection of the Jews to Roman authority and the four churches end with the subjection of the spiritual Jews to spiritual Rome for twelve hundred and sixty years.

What followed Thyatira was Sardis, which began when they came out of the Babylonian captivity typified by Thyatira. Sardis is the church which had a name that it lived, but it did not live. Their profession of life was a lie. Interestingly enough, of all the seven churches it is the word Sardis that has no definition. Definitions have been assigned to Sardis based upon the context of the history and verses, but there is no etymological definition of the name. It has a name, but it doesn’t.

After the Babylonian captivity they rebuilt Jerusalem and the temple. They then had a name again, for God had promised to put His name in Jerusalem. But His name represents His character, and the lack of His personal presence identified that they had the name that represented life, but in reality, they no longer had the presence that produces life. All they really had was profession and pretense.

The last voice in Sardis promised of an Elijah who would come before the great and terrible day of the Lord. For ancient Israel the destruction of Jerusalem was the great and dreadful day of the Lord. For this reason, Sister White refers to Jerusalem’s destruction in 70AD as an illustration of the great and dreadful day of the Lord represented as the seven last plagues. The church of Philadelphia began with the voice of John the Baptist crying in the wilderness, thus typifying the voice of William Miller. The voices of John the Baptist and William Miller were presenting the Laodicean message to a people who believed everything was alright, when everything was all wrong. Both John the Baptist and William Miller laid the ax to the root of the tree. The message to Sardis was that there were “a few names even in Sardis which have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with me in white: for they are worthy.” John the Baptist and William Miller represent those who came out of the time period represented by Sardis and were worthy to walk with Christ.

The seven churches of Revelation represent the history of the apostles until the Second Coming of Christ, and the seven churches also represent the history of ancient Israel from the prophet Moses until the first coming of Christ.

The deliverance from Egypt is represented by the church of Ephesus, and the symbol of the church of Ephesus in that history was Joshua. After those who God brought out of Egypt failed ten successive tests, the Lord removed the covenant from the rebels and gave it to Joshua and Caleb.

Sister White identifies that Joshua and Caleb represent those “upon whom the ends of the world are come,” who “make a covenant with God by sacrifice.”

The covenant that is renewed, as represented by the covenant being renewed with Joshua and Caleb, is the covenant with the one hundred and forty-four thousand and the great multitude. It is renewed after the original covenant chosen people are divorced from God and assigned to die in the wilderness. The covenant with the hundred and forty-four thousand is accomplished in the very same history that a former chosen people is rejected.

Ephesus means desirable and the work accomplished by both Joshua and the early church was “desirable.” When Joshua led God’s people into the Promised Land, he went forth conquering. The first seal runs parallel with the church of Ephesus, and is represented by a white horse that goes forth conquering. This was true of Joshua and of the apostolic church. The first seal runs parallel to the church of Ephesus in both ancient and modern Israel.

Smyrna is derived from the word “myrrh” which is an oil that was used for embalming the dead. The second seal is represented by a red horse who was given “a great sword” and “power” to take “peace from the earth” which meant that men in that history would “kill one another.” The second seal runs parallel to the church of Smyrna and it represents the authority given to God’s enemies allowing them to overcome and kill God’s people. This was fulfilled in the period following the apostolic church and also in the history of the Judges. In both histories God allowed powers outside of God’s people to bring warfare and death upon His people. In the apostolic church that warfare was motivated by the rejection of the religion of Christ, which in the previous period of Ephesus had been invincible as it carried the gospel to the world. The motivation of the enemies of God’s people in the period of the Judges was based upon the previous period of Ephesus, where God demonstrated his power upon Egypt and the following nations that Joshua had been used to conquer. The second seal runs parallel to the church of Smyrna in both ancient and modern Israel.

Pergamos means a “fortified citadel,” thus representing a castle of a king. The third seal runs parallel to Pergamos and represents the history where human judgment is carried out by the kings of the land in opposition to God’s judgment. Thus, the measurement, or the judgment which is represented by the “two” scales that weigh the “wheat,” “barley,” “oil” and “wine;” identifies royal human authority, which is always flawed in relation to God’s judgment. Remember that an honest measuring or an honest weighing does not require two scales. Two scales represent unequal judgment.

The “barley” is a symbol of the Passover festival’s “first fruit” offering, the “wheat” is a symbol of the Pentecostal festival’s offering of the “two wave loaves.” The “oil” is a symbol of the Holy Spirit and the “wine” is a symbol of doctrine. Pergamos in the time of ancient Israel is the period of the compromising kings of Israel who brought judgment upon God’s system of worship represented by the Passover through Pentecostal season. The truths of God’s word are represented by the “wine” and “oil.” In both ancient and modern Israel, the church of Pergamos is the period when Satan attempts to accomplish what he could not do through the shedding of blood in the history represented by Smyrna. In Pergamos Satan attempted to destroy God’s people and God’s truth through compromise, not by the shedding of blood as represented in Smyrna. The compromise of the kings of ancient Israel typifies the compromise of Constantine in modern Israel.

Thyatira means “sacrifice of contrition” and speaks to the spirit of martyrdom that God provides to His people that are slain for His name. The sacrifice of contrition represents the willingness to serve Christ in severe circumstances as represented by Daniel, Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego during the captivity of the seventy years; and it also represents the sacrifice of the Waldensians, the Huguenots and others who were tortured, imprisoned, slandered and slain by the papal authority during the history of the twelve hundred and sixty years. The fourth seal runs parallel to the church of Thyatira and represents the persecution by ancient Babylon against ancient Israel and the persecution by modern Babylon against modern Israel. The history of both captivities first required a falling away from truth which Israel’s kings and the emperor Constantine accomplished. Both prepared the way for a period represented by Thyatira.

Sardis has no meaning in agreement with it professing a name, but the profession is a lie. The presence of the Shekinah never manifested in the second temple. The presence of Christ never manifested in the history of Sardis. The reformation of the Dark Ages was essentially a series of one step forward and two steps back. The work that the history of Sardis was supposed to accomplish in the Protestant Reformation was never finalized.

Philadelphia means brotherly love and it is impossible to love your brother if you do not first love God.

Philadelphia represents the church who loves God, and for this reason there is no condemnation or rebuke levelled against Philadelphia.

Philadelphia is given “the key of David,” and in the Philadelphian history of ancient Israel they were given the Son of David, which represents among other things the prophetic principle of Alpha and Omega, the first and the last. That key represents the methodology of “historicism.” In the period represented by the Philadelphian church at the end of ancient Israel the very Author of biblical prophecy was the key. In the period represented by the Philadelphian church in the Millerite history William Miller was given the key. In those two histories Christ dealt with Jews who thought they were the sons of Abraham, but they were not. Miller dealt with Protestants who thought they were spiritual Jews, but were not.

Laodicea means a people judged, and the Laodiceans, the Jews of Christ time period, were ultimately judged in 70AD at the destruction of Jerusalem. The ultimate judgment of apostate Protestantism takes place in the Sunday law crisis, but they met their judgment when they rejected the first angel’s message in the spring of 1844, and were then divinely pronounced as the daughters of Babylon. Those fallen Protestants typify Laodicean Adventism in the last days of the investigative judgment.

We have now essentially reviewed several various ways in which the seven churches of Revelation can be correctly understood as prophetic symbols and thereafter prophetically applied. But they must be understood and applied within the context of the prophetic rules “that have been given us by the highest authority.”

The message to the seven churches were messages given to the seven churches that were in existence when John recorded the messages. The messages to the seven churches provide instruction and warning for all churches throughout history. The messages to the seven churches provide instruction and warning for individual Christians throughout history. The seven churches represent the history of Christianity from the time of the apostles until the end of the world. The seven churches represent the history of ancient Israel from the time of Moses until the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The seven churches may be recognized and applied by identifying the distinction between the first four churches and the last three churches.

Of the six various prophetic applications we are identifying, the same applications are represented in the seven seals.

We will address these truths in the next article.