The four abominations of Ezekiel chapter eight, lead to the leadership of God’s last day Laodicean church bowing down to the sun, and thus receiving the mark of the beast. The next chapter, which is the same vision, illustrates those in God’s last day church who receive the seal of God. Sister White informs us the sealing of Ezekiel chapter nine, is the same as the sealing represented in Revelation chapter seven. God judges a nation in its third and fourth generation, and the four abominations of Ezekiel identify the four generations of rebellion that began in 1863, when Laodicean Adventism introduced a counterfeit of the two tables of Habakkuk which had been given as a symbol of the covenant relationship between God and His people, just as the two tables of the Ten Commandments had been given at the beginning of ancient Israel.
Ñaari ñent yu bonk yi ci Ezekiel saar 8, di yóbbu njiiti kërkëru Yàlla gu Laodisé bu fan yu mujj yi, ba ñuy sujjóot ci jant bi, te noonu di jot màndarga rab wa. Saar wi ci topp, moom itam mooy benn peeñ mi, te dafa wone ñi nekk ci kërkëru Yàlla gu fan yu mujj yi ñi jot sëllu Yàlla. Sister White xamal na nu ne tëjjin bi ci Ezekiel saar 9, mooy benn ak tëjjin bi ñu tektal ci Revelation saar 7. Yàlla di àtte xeet ci seeni ñatteelu ak ñeenteelu maas, te ñaari ñent yu bonk yi ci Ezekiel dañuy wone ñaari ñent maas yu ñàkk dégg-dëgg ya tàmbalee woon ci 1863, ba bi Adventisme bu Laodisé indi woon lu dëppul ak ñaari wet yi ci Habakkuk, yi ñu joxe woon muy màndarga diggante kóllëre gi nekk diggante Yàlla ak xeeti askanam, ni ñaari wet yi ci Fukk i Santaane yi joxe woon nañu leen ci ndoorteelu Israayil gu yàgg.
Aaron’s golden calf, was a counterfeit image, the symbol of rebellion that was manifested just as God was producing the two tables that represent a genuine image of jealousy. Aaron’s golden calf typified the counterfeit 1863 chart, which had removed the “seven times,” of Leviticus twenty-six from the message along with other time-prophecies. Thus, Laodicean Adventism set up an image of jealousy in the very beginning of its history, as Aaron had done in the beginning history of ancient Israel, and as Jeroboam had done in the beginning history of the northern kingdom of Ephraim.
Nag wuusóobu Aaróŋ, moo doon nataal bu neenal, te mu nekk misaalu bunt, bi feeñoon ci jamono jooju sax ba Yàlla di sos ñaari tabale yi, yi di tektal nataal bu dëgg bu wuutu. Wuusóobu Aaróŋ gu wurus gi dafa misaalaloon chart bu neenal bu 1863, bi dindiwoon “juróom-ñaari waxtu yi,” ci Leviticus ñaar-fukk ak juróom-benn, ci yégle bi, ak yeneen yëgley waxtu itam. Noonu nag, Adventisme bu Laodicea taxawaloon nataal bu wuutu ca njëlbéenu jaar-jaaram, ni Aaróŋ defee ko ca njëlbéenu jaar-jaaru Israayil ju yàgg ja, te ni Yerobowam defee ko ca njëlbéenu jaar-jaaru nguurug bëj-gànnaar gu Efrayim.
The “seven times,” of Leviticus twenty-six was the first prophecy of time which Miller was led to understand, and it was the first jewel of prophetic time set aside in the rebellion of 1863. 1863 marked the beginning of the covering up of the jewels of Miller’s dream and the introduction of counterfeit jewels and coins. The “seven times,” was the cornerstone that the builders rejected. In 1863 it was those who had been the builders of the Millerite temple that set aside the cornerstone of the “seven times,” but in the last days that stone is now the head of the corner. That stone represented the Rock of Ages, and it also was represented by the day which the Lord had made, for it was a symbol of the sabbath rest for the land. In 1844, Millerite Adventism rebuked Jeroboam’s false system of worship, and separated from “the assembly of mockers” who had “rejoiced” over the first disappointment.
“Juróom ñaari waxtu yi,” yu nekk ci Levitikus ñaar-fukk ak juróom-benn, moo doon njëkk yoon ci kàddug yégle gu jëm ci jamono, gi Miller ñu ko indi ba mu xam ko; te mooyaroon itam njëkk perl bu jamono yu yégle, bi ñu denc ci wetu gaaw ga ci atum 1863. Atum 1863 màndargaal na tàmbaliwaayu suturóo perl yi ci géntu Miller ak duggali perl yu fen ak xaalis yu fen. “Juróom ñaari waxtu yi” moo doon doj wu njëkka wàll wi tabaxkat yi bañ. Ci 1863, ñi nekkoon tabaxkati kër-gu-neex gu Millerite lañu denc doj wu njëkka wàll wi, mooy “juróom ñaari waxtu yi”; waaye ci fan yu mujj yi, doj woowu mooy léegi boppu xonq bi. Doj woowu dafa doon tekki Doju Mànduteef gi, te dafa doon itam màndargaalees ak bés bi Boroom bi def, ndaxte dafa doon màndargau noflaay sabbaat bi ngir suuf si. Ci 1844, Adventism bu Millerite yedd na sistemu jaamu ju fen ju Jeroboam, te mu soree ak “mbooloom ñiy ñaawal” ñi “bég” woon ci kaw nàkkamte gu njëkk ga.
The builders were instructed to never return to “the assembly of mockers,” as the Judean prophet had been instructed to return to Jerusalem by a different path than what had led him to 1844. The path that had led him to 1844, was the path he had come out of, which was Protestantism, and in that history Protestantism had become apostate Protestantism. The builders were commanded to never return to “the assembly of mockers,” and they were instructed to not eat their food or drink their water. The builders had eaten the little book that was in the angel’s hand in 1840, and that food was sweet in their mouths.
Ñi tabaxkat yi, dañu leen santoon bu baax ne duñu délsi mukk ci “mbooloom ñiy yéjj,” ni ko yonent bu Yudee bi santoon woon, mu dellu Yerusalem jaar yeneen yoon wu wuute ak wi ko indoon ba ci 1844. Yoon wi ko indoon ba ci 1844, mooyoon yoon wi mu génne woon, te mooy Protestantaas; te ci waxtuwoowu Protestantaas doon na ba noppi, nekk apostat Protestantaas. Ñi tabaxkat yi, dañu leen diglewoon ne duñu délsi mukk ci “mbooloom ñiy yéjj,” te itam dañu leen sant ne buñu lekk seen lekk walla naan seen ndox. Ñi tabaxkat yi, dañu woon lekk téere bu tuuti bi nekkoon ci loxob malaaka mi ci 1840, te lekk boobu neexoon ci seen gémmiñ.
The eating and drinking of prophecy represents the methodology used to study the Bible. The Millerites were given a specific way to study God’s Word, and those rules produced a totally different biblical message than the theologians of apostate Protestantism and Catholicism produced with their corrupted methodology. The builders, who are also the Judean prophet, were not to return and eat or drink of the methodology of either apostate Protestantism or Catholicism. The Judean prophet did that very thing, thus identifying that Laodicean Adventism would do that very thing in 1863, for in 1863, they employed the theological arguments of apostate Protestantism to reject Miller’s application of the “seven times,” and thus set up Aaron’s and Jeroboam’s images of jealousy. The first generation of Laodicean Adventism had then begun.
Lekki ak naan ci waxu yoon wi dafay tegtal taxawaayu yoonu njàng mi ñuy jëfandikoo ngir gëstu Biibël bi. Ñu joxoon Millerites yi benn yoon wu matale ngir gëstu Kàddu Yàlla, te yoon yooyu jur nañu benn bataaxal bu Biibël bi bu wuutook yàgg ak bu ñu teologiyen yu Protestan gu dëddu ak Katolisism génne ak seen yoonu njàng wu yàqu. Tabaxkat yi, ñoom itam mooy yonent buy Juda, waruñu woon dellusi ngir lekk mbaa naan ci yoonu njàngu Protestan gu dëddu walla Katolisism. Yonentu Juda jëfoon na loolu sax, te noonu moo xamle ne Adventism bu Laodise moo di def loolu sax ci atum 1863, ndaxte ci 1863 dañu jëfandikoo werantey teologii yu Protestan gu dëddu ngir bañ a nangu njëfandikoo Miller bu “juróom-ñaar yi yoon,” te noonu dañu taxawal nataali kañaan yi Aaróon ak Jeroboam. Noonu la njëlbéen gi sëriñu Adventism bu Laodise tàmbalee.
After the prophet from Judea interacted with Jeroboam he started on his journey back to Judea, but he never made it. The prophet represents Laodicean Adventism, which, according to inspiration, arrived into the Millerite movement in 1856. Sister White never backed away from identifying Adventism as Laodicea, and there is no biblical evidence that Laodicea ever changes. There are individuals that leave their own personal Laodicean experience, but as a church Laodicea is to be spewed out of the mouth of the Lord, for Laodicea means “a people judged.” Adventism uses the definition to claim it represents the church that exists during the period of the judgment in the heavenly sanctuary. In their blindness they acknowledge the Investigative Judgment element of the meaning of Laodicea, but cannot see the Executive Judgment that is clearly represented in their name.
Gannaawkat bi jóge Yudee bi gisoon na Yerobowam, te mu tàmbaliwaat yoonam ngir dellu Yudee, waaye mënu ko jot. Gannaawkat boobu dafay tegu ci Adfantis bi di Lawdise, mi waxin bu ñu jaaral ci xel mu sell bi feeñal ne duggoon na ci yëngu-yëngu Millerite bi atum 1856. Rakku jigéen White duñu gis fenn fu mu gënoon a bañ a tudde Adfantis ne mooy Lawdise, te amul benn firnde bu Bibil bi jox ne Lawdise soppeeku mbaa soppiku. Am na nit ñu génn ci seen bopp ci seeni jëfandikoo yu Lawdise, waaye ni mbooloom mbooloo, Lawdise war nañu ko wacc ci gémmiñu Boroom bi, ndaxte Lawdise tekki na “xeet bu ñu àtte.” Adfantis dafay jëfandikoo tekki gi ngir wax ne mooy kanamug mbooloom mbooloo mi nekk ci jamono ji ñuy àtte ci kër gu sell gi nekk asamaan. Ci seen gumba, dañuy nangu ne tekki Lawdise dafa ëmb mbirum Àtteb Seetkat bi, waaye mënuñu gis Àtteb Jëfandikukat bi, mi feeñ bu leer ci seen tur.
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God; I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot. So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth. Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked. Revelation 3:14–17.
Bindal ci malaaka ju mbooloom ñi gëm yaa ci Laodise ne: Li Amen bi wax, Seede bu takku te dëgg, ki di tàmbali mbind mi Yàlla sàkk; Xam naa say jëf, ne danga neexul te tangul: bëgg naa nga neex mbaa nga tang. Kon nag ndaxte danga tang-neex, te neexul te tangul, dinaa la tudd ci sama gémmiñ. Ndaxte yaw yaa ne: Bare naa alal, am naa yëngu-yëngu, te soxlaatu ma dara; te xamoo ne yaw yaa metti, yaa yërëm, yaa néew alal, yaa gumb, te rafetuloo dara. Peeñu 3:14–17.
The Judean prophet ends up buried with the false prophet who deceived him into eating his food and drinking his drink. They both end up in the same grave, and the lying prophet of Bethel (the counterfeit church), calls him brother when he dies.
Yonent Yudaa baa mujj a suuloo ak yonent fenkat bi ko nax ba mu lekk ay lekkam te naan ay naanam. Ñoom ñaar ñépp dañuy mujj a nekk ci benn bàmmeel, te yonent juy fen ci Betel (jàngale bu dëggul bi), dafa koy wax “mbokk” bi mu dee.
Now there dwelt an old prophet in Bethel; and his sons came and told him all the works that the man of God had done that day in Bethel: the words which he had spoken unto the king, them they told also to their father. And their father said unto them, What way went he? For his sons had seen what way the man of God went, which came from Judah. And he said unto his sons, Saddle me the ass. So they saddled him the ass: and he rode thereon, And went after the man of God, and found him sitting under an oak: and he said unto him, Art thou the man of God that camest from Judah? And he said, I am. Then he said unto him, Come home with me, and eat bread. And he said, I may not return with thee, nor go in with thee: neither will I eat bread nor drink water with thee in this place: For it was said to me by the word of the Lord, Thou shalt eat no bread nor drink water there, nor turn again to go by the way that thou camest. He said unto him, I am a prophet also as thou art; and an angel spake unto me by the word of the Lord, saying, Bring him back with thee into thine house, that he may eat bread and drink water. But he lied unto him. So he went back with him, and did eat bread in his house, and drank water. And it came to pass, as they sat at the table, that the word of the Lord came unto the prophet that brought him back: And he cried unto the man of God that came from Judah, saying, Thus saith the Lord, Forasmuch as thou hast disobeyed the mouth of the Lord, and hast not kept the commandment which the Lord thy God commanded thee, But camest back, and hast eaten bread and drunk water in the place, of the which the Lord did say to thee, Eat no bread, and drink no water; thy carcase shall not come unto the sepulchre of thy fathers. 1 Kings 13:11–22.
Léegi ab yonent buy mag nekkoon ca Betel; doomam yu góor ñëw wax ko lépp lu nit ki Yàlla defoon bés booba ca Betel; wax yi mu waxoon buur bi, ñoom itam wax nañu ko seen baay. Noonu seen baay ne leen: “Ban yoon la jëm?” Ndaxte doomam yu góor gisoon nañu ban yoon la nit ki Yàlla, mi jóge Yuda, jëm. Mu ne doomam yu góor: “Sammal-leen ma mbaam mi.” Noonu ñu sammalal ko mbaam mi, mu war ci, dem topp nit ki Yàlla, fekk ko mu toog ci suufu garab gu mag; mu ne ko: “Yaw nga di nit ki Yàlla, bi jóge Yuda?” Mu tontu ne: “Man laa.” Noonu mu ne ko: “Kaay ak man sama kër, nga lekk mburu.” Mu ne ko: “Manuma dellu ak yaw, walla dugg ak yaw; du maa lekk mburu te du maa naan ndox ak yaw fii. Ndaxte Kàddug Aji Sax ji waxoon na ma ne: ‘Bul fa lekk mburu, bul fa naan ndox, te bul dellu jaar ci yoon wi nga jaaroon ngir ñëw.’ ” Mu ne ko: “Yonent laa itam ni yaw; te malaaka wax na ma ci Kàddug Aji Sax ji ne: ‘Dellool ko ak yaw sa kër, ngir mu lekk mburu te naan ndox.’ ” Waaye fen la ko woon. Noonu mu dellu ak moom, lekk mburu ci këram, naan ndox. Bi ñu toogee ca lekkukaay ba, Kàddug Aji Sax ji dikk ci yonent bi ko dellooon. Mu woo nit ki Yàlla, mi jóge Yuda, ne: “Nii la Aji Sax ji waxe: ‘Gannaaw dangaa weddi ndigal Aji Sax ji, te sàmmuloo santaane bi Aji Sax ji, sa Yàlla, sant la; waaye danga dellu, lekk mburu te naan ndox fa, ba tax Aji Sax ji wax la ne: “Bul fa lekk mburu te bul fa naan ndox”; sa néewu yaram du agg ca bàmmeelu say maam.’ ” 1 Buur Ya 13:11–22.
The second angel’s message in the summer of 1844, consisted of identifying that the Protestant churches had fallen and become the daughters of Catholicism. Millerite Adventism had called men and women to leave those denominations for to stay in them meant spiritual and eternal death. The lying prophet of Bethel represents the religious system instituted in Bethel by Jeroboam. It was a system that set up an image to the beast, and the beast that was copied is the beast of Catholicism. The Protestants continued to identify themselves as Protestants, but they also continued to observe the day of the sun as the day of worship which is the mark of Catholicism’s authority.
Bataaxalu malaaka ñaareel bi ci nooru 1844 mooyoon wone ne kërce yi diiwaan yu Protestaaŋ yi daanu nañu te nekk doom yu Katolisism. Aduunaat Adventist yu Millerite woo nañu góor ak jigéen ñu génn ci mbooloo yooyu, ndaxte des ci seen bi mooy dee ci ruu ak dee ba fàww. Yonent bi fenkat bu Betel dafay tegtal sistemu diine bi Yerobowam sampoon ci Betel. Dafa doon sistem bu taxawaloon nataalu rab wi, te rab wi ñu roy mooy rab wu Katolisism. Protestaaŋ yi saxoon ci jox seen bopp turu Protestaaŋ, waaye saxoon it ci sàmm bésu jant bi ni bésu jaamu, te loolu mooy marka bu sañ-sañu Katolisism.
The Protestants claim to be Protestants, though the only definition of Protestant is to protest Rome, and in so doing their profession is an image of the Roman church, for she professes to be a Christian institution, though she has no biblical justification for the claim. Her claim is based upon the empty authority of tradition and custom, which is the same false authority Protestantism employs as they claim to be Protestants. It is the same logic that had blinded Seventh-day Adventists to believe that as Laodiceans, they are still in a secure covenant relationship. It is the same false authority that ancient Israel proclaimed when they stated, “The temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord are we.”
Protestaŋ yi di wax ne ñoom ay Protestaŋ lañu, te lii rekk moo di ni ñu far Rome, te ci def loolu seeni waxu ngëm dañuy mel ni misaalu kër Yàlla bu Room, ndax moom it di wax ne mbooloom Kristaan la, fekk amul benn ànd ak Biibël buy sàkku kooku. Li muy dogale ci ay waxam dafa sampu ci kàttanu cosaan ak aada yu neen, te loolu mooy benn autorite bu fen boobu Protestaŋ yi it di jëfandikoo bi ñuy wax ne ñoom ay Protestaŋ lañu. Mooy benn xalaat boobu it a gumbël Waa Adventist yu fanweer ba tax ñu gëm ne, ci seen nekkinu Laodise, ñu ngi sax ci jàmm ci diggante kóllëre gu wóor. Mooy benn autorite bu fen boobu it ngir Israayil gu yàgg yégle ba wax ne: “Tempulu Boroom bi, tempulu Boroom bi, nun lanu.”
“The warning was not heeded by the Jewish people. They forgot God, and lost sight of their high privilege as His representatives. The blessings they had received brought no blessing to the world. All their advantages were appropriated for their own glorification. They robbed God of the service He required of them, and they robbed their fellow men of religious guidance and a holy example. Like the inhabitants of the antediluvian world, they followed out every imagination of their evil hearts. Thus they made sacred things appear a farce, saying, ‘The temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord, are these’ (Jeremiah 7:4), while at the same time they were misrepresenting God’s character, dishonoring His name, and polluting His sanctuary.
“Waare gi kennul woonul Yew yi déggul. Ñoom fàtte nañu Yàlla, te ñàkk gis sañ-sañu kawe ga ñu amoon ngir doon ay tegtalëm. Barke yi ñu jotoon indiwul benn barke ci àddina si. Lépp lu ñu amoon ngir yokk seen bopp lañu ko jëfandikoo. Ñu sàcc Yàlla liggéey bi mu leen laajoon, te sàcc seen moroom ñi it yoonu diine ak misaal bu sell. Ni waa àddina ba paree ndox ma, ñu topp lépp lu seen xol yu bon xeex di xalaat. Noonu lañu def ba yékkati yeneen yu sell mel ni ñaawal, di wax: ‘Kër Yàlla bi, kër Yàlla bi, mooy yii’ (Jeremiah 7:4), fekk ci jamono jooju sax da ñuy wone nit ñi jikkoo Yàlla ci lu jubul, toroxal turam, tey tilimal ay bérabam bu sell.”
“The husbandmen who had been placed in charge of the Lord’s vineyard were untrue to their trust. The priests and teachers were not faithful instructors of the people. They did not keep before them the goodness and mercy of God and His claim to their love and service. These husbandmen sought their own glory. They desired to appropriate the fruits of the vineyard. It was their study to attract attention and homage to themselves.” Christ’s Object Lessons, 292.
“Boroom tool yi ñu teg woon ci kaw reseñu Boroom bi, ñoom waxoonu dëgg ci li ñu dénk ci seen loxo. Saraxalekat ya ak jàngalekat ya nekkul woon way-jàngale yu takku ci nit ñi. Duñu woon di dëpp ci seen kanam ngor ak yërmëndey Yàlla ak sañ-sañam ci seen mbëggeel ak seen liggéeyal ko. Toolkat yooyu dañoo wutoon seen bopp màggaay. Ñoom bëggoon nañu jël seen bopp meññeefi reseñ bi. Li ñuy sax ci di ko gëstu mooy jéem a yóbbu xel ak màggal ci seen bopp.” Christ’s Object Lessons, 292.
In 1863 the movement of the Millerites ended, but it had ceased to be a movement of Philadelphians in 1856. The rejection of the message of Moses (the “seven times”), that was presented by Elijah (William Miller) was rejected, and the rejection was based upon the methodology of the lying prophet of Bethel. 1863 was the end of sixty-five years that had began in 1798, and was the end of the prophecy of Isaiah chapter seven.
Ci atum 1863, yëngu Millerites bi jeex na, waaye dafa noppoonoon nekk yëngu Philadelphians ci atum 1856. Ñàkk nangu ndigal Musaa bi (“juróom-ñaari yoon”), mi Eliyaas (William Miller) jébbaloon, dañu ko bañ, te bañ gi dafa sukkandikuwoon ci metodu yonent bu dëggul bi dëkk Betel. Atum 1863 moo doon jeexital juróom-benn-fukk ak juróom at yi tambalee ci 1798, te mooyoon itam jeexital yonentukaay Esayi sarax 7.
And it came to pass in the days of Ahaz the son of Jotham, the son of Uzziah, king of Judah, that Rezin the king of Syria, and Pekah the son of Remaliah, king of Israel, went up toward Jerusalem to war against it, but could not prevail against it. And it was told the house of David, saying, Syria is confederate with Ephraim. And his heart was moved, and the heart of his people, as the trees of the wood are moved with the wind. Then said the Lord unto Isaiah, Go forth now to meet Ahaz, thou, and Shearjashub thy son, at the end of the conduit of the upper pool in the highway of the fuller’s field; And say unto him, Take heed, and be quiet; fear not, neither be fainthearted for the two tails of these smoking firebrands, for the fierce anger of Rezin with Syria, and of the son of Remaliah. Because Syria, Ephraim, and the son of Remaliah, have taken evil counsel against thee, saying, Let us go up against Judah, and vex it, and let us make a breach therein for us, and set a king in the midst of it, even the son of Tabeal: Thus saith the Lord God, It shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass. For the head of Syria is Damascus, and the head of Damascus is Rezin; and within threescore and five years shall Ephraim be broken, that it be not a people. And the head of Ephraim is Samaria, and the head of Samaria is Remaliah’s son. If ye will not believe, surely ye shall not be established. Isaiah 7:1–9.
Te mu amooni ci fan yi Ahaz doomu Jotam, sët Uziya, buur Yuda, ba Resin buur Siri ak Pekah doomu Remalya, buur Israyil, yéeg ca Yerusalem ngir xeex ak moom; waaye mënuñu ko not. Te ñu yëgle kër Daawuda ne: “Siri bokk na ak Efrayim.” Noonu xolam yengu, ak xolu askanam, ni garabi àll yi di yengu ndax ngelaw li. Noonu Aji Sax ji wax Yàllaay: “Génn léegi, nga daje ak Ahaz, yow ak Shear-yashub sa doom, ca njeexital tuxu dënd bu kaw ba, ci yoonu toolu ràbbikat bëñ-safara bi; te nga wax ko ne: ‘Moytul te dal; bu ragal, te bul dégg xol ngir ñaari jéexiti yëf yu tàkk tey sàcciku yii, ngir mer mu tar mu Resin ak Siri ak doomu Remalya. Ndaxte Siri, Efrayim ak doomu Remalya, fexe nañu lu bon ci sa kaw, naan: “Na nu yéeg ci Yuda, nu sonal ko, te nu ubbi ci biiram ngir sunu bopp, te tabax buur ci diggam, mooy doomu Tabeel.” ’ Nii la Boroom bi Yàlla wax: ‘Loolu du taxaw, te du am. Ndaxte boppu Siri mooy Damaas, te boppu Damaas mooy Resin; te ci biir juróom-benn-fukk ak juróom-ñent at, dees na dagg Efrayim ba mu baña ne nit ñu bokk benn askan. Te boppu Efrayim mooy Samariya, te boppu Samariya mooy doomu Remalya. Su ngeen gëmul, dungeen sax.’ ” Yàllaay 7:1–9.
The sixty-five-year prophecy of verse eight, identifies that “within” the period of sixty-five years the northern kingdom of the ten tribes would be taken into captivity. The vision was recorded in the year 742 BC, and nineteen years later in 723 BC, Ephraim was scattered and taken into captivity by the Assyrians. In 677 BC, at the end of the sixty-five years king Manasseh was captured and carried into Babylon. The starting point in 742 BC, marks a civil war between the northern kingdom and the southern kingdoms of Israel, just as 1863, marks the very center of the Civil War in the United States between the North and South. The prophecy was proclaimed by Isaiah in the literal glorious land (Judah), and the prophecy of 1863 was fulfilled in the spiritual glorious land (the United States).
Kàddu gi ci sarax 8 bi buy wax ci ñaari-fukk ak juróom-ñaari at yi, day wone ne “ci biir” jamono ju tollu ci ñaari-fukk ak juróom-ñaari at, nguurug bëj-gànnaaw gu ñaari-fukk giir yi dinañu ko jël ci ngàpp. Tegginu gis-gis boobu amoon na ci atum 742 BC, te fukk ak juróom-ñent at gannaaw ga, ci 723 BC, Efrayim tasaaroo na te Asiryeen ya yóbbu ko ci ngàpp. Ci 677 BC, bi ñaari-fukk ak juróom-ñaari at ya matée, buur Manase dañu ko jàpp te yóbbu ko Babilon. Taxawaayu tàmbalee bi ci 742 BC, dafay màndargaal xare bu askan wiiru diggante nguurug bëj-gànnaaw ak nguurug bëj-saalum yi ci Israyil, ni itam 1863 di màndargaal diggu-diggu Xarey Réew mi ci États-Unis diggante Bëj-gànnaaw ak Bëj-saalum. Yàlla waxoon waxu kàddug yonent bi jaarale ko ci Esayi ci réew mi tedd te màgg, maanaam Yuda, te waxu yonent bu 1863 bi mat na ci réew mi tedd te màgg ci xel, maanaam États-Unis.
There are three waymarks within the sixty-five-year prophecy. The civil war of 742 BC, is followed in nineteen years by the scattering of the northern kingdom, in 723 BC. At the end of the sixty-five years the southern kingdom was scattered. The prophecy, including its beginning and ending, represents both “indignations” of God against the northern and southern kingdoms, and those two indignations are preceded by nineteen years at their starting points, and then followed by another nineteen years that follow their fulfillments.
Am na ñetti màndarga yu nekk ci biir waxu yonent bu juróom-benni-fukk ak juróom-ñaar at. Xareb réew mi amoon ci atum 742 BC, te gannaaw fukk ak juróom-ñent at, ñu tas nguur gu bëj-gànnaar gi ci atum 723 BC. Ci mujjug juróom-benni-fukk ak juróom-ñaar at yi, ñu tas nguur gu bëj-saalum gi. Waxu yonent wi, booleek tambaliam ak mujjeem, dafay tegtal ñaari “mer” yi Yàlla am ci kaw nguur gu bëj-gànnaar gi ak gu bëj-saalum gi, te mer yooyu ñaar ñu jiitu leen ak fukk ak juróom-ñent at ci seen pexe yu tàmbali, ba noppi ñu toppaat ak beneen fukk ak juróom-ñent at gannaaw seen matug amal.
The entire chiastic structure identifies a period of civil war between north and south that marks the beginning and ending. In the midst of the beginning and ending the two antagonists of the civil war were both carried into slavery, and in the sixty-five years that they are gathered out of their mutually scattered condition of slavery into one nation, they arrive at 1863, which is the date of the Emancipation Proclamation that freed the slaves. The prophecy of a civil war in literal Judah concludes at the civil war in spiritual Judah, for Jesus always illustrates the end of a thing, with the beginning of a thing, for He is Alpha and Omega.
Tabbital gi ciis bi yépp di jàngal ab waxtu xareb réew diggante bëj-gànnaar ak bëj-saalum, te mooy tëral njàlbéen ak mujjam. Ci biir njàlbéen ak mujjam, ñaari noon yi ci xareb réew bi ñoom ñaar ñépp yóbbu nañu leen ca jaamono; te ci juróom-benn fukki ak juróomi at yi, bi ñu leen dajale jële leen ci seen xaalis guuy tasaaroo ci jaamono, ba def leen benn xeet, dañuy agsi ci 1863, moo di bésub yégle bi ñu waxe Emancipation Proclamation, bi goree jaam yi. Kàddug wax ji ci mbirum xareb réew ci Yuda gu dëgg gi dafay jeex ci xareb réew ci Yuda gu ruu, ndaxte Yeesu dafa sax di melokaanal mujju mbir ak njàlbéenu mbir, ndax Moo di Alfa ak Omega.
The history of 1863 was represented by the history of 742 BC, when the prophet Isaiah, along with his son, delivered a message to the wicked king of Judah (Ahaz). 742 BC in the passage is represented by the testimony of king Ahaz, who was king of Judah and who had shut down God’s sanctuary service and had his high priest erect a model of a Syrian temple in the very precincts of God’s earthly sanctuary.
Jëfandikoo atum 1863 dafa mel ni jëfandikoo atum 742 B.C., ba yonent Yàlla Esayi, ànd ak doomam, yéglee benn ndigël ci buur bu bon bu Yuda (Akas). 742 B.C. ci xel mi, dafa mel ni seede bu buur Akas, mi doon buur Yuda te moo taxawoon liggéeyu kër Yàlla ga, te sant sarxalkatam bu mag mu yékkati benn misaalu kër-kàddu Siri ci biir saxal yu kër Yàlla ci suuf.
In the history of wicked king Ahaz (marked as 742 BC by the prophecy of Isaiah), the leader of Jerusalem introduced the worship of paganism (Catholicism) into God’s church, just as Laodicean Adventism returned to the methodology of apostate Protestantism to discard the message of Moses that had been delivered by Elijah. In 742 BC, Isaiah confronted the wicked king of Judah at the end of the conduit of the upper pool, by the fuller’s field, and he brought his son with him when he did. His son’s name was a sign, and when the prophet from Judah confronted king Jeroboam, he also gave him a sign.
Ci jamono buur bu bon Ahaz, buur buy Yerusalem dafa dugal yëngu paganism (Katolisism) ci mbooloom Yàlla, ni Laodisean Adventism delloo ci yoonu Protestantism buy réer ngir sànni yégleb Musaa mi Eliya joxoon. Ci atum 742 baataay Yàlla, Isaya daje ak buur buy bon bu Yuda ca njeexital xàllub ndox mu kawe mi, ca wetu toolu fuller bi, te indiwoon na doomam bi ak moom bi mu ko defee. Turu doomam boobu doon na màndarga, te ba yonent bi jóge Yuda dajee ak buur Yeroboam, moo ko itam jox màndarga.
Behold, I and the children whom the Lord hath given me are for signs and for wonders in Israel from the Lord of hosts, which dwelleth in mount Zion. Isaiah 8:18.
Xooluleen, man ak xale yi ma Aji Boroom bi may, nu ngi nekk ay màndarga ak ay kéemaan ci biir Israyel, yu jóge ci Boroom mbooloom yi, mi dëkk ci tund Siyon. Esayi 8:18.
The name of Isaiah’s son “Shearjashub,” means “a remnant shall return.” Those that “return” who make up the remnant, are those who wait for the Lord during the tarrying time.
Turu doom Isaayi mi, “Shearjashub,” tekki na ne: “des ndaw dinañu dellusi.” Ñi “dellusi,” ñi di des ndaw bi, mooy ñi xaar Boroom bi ci waxtu yéexóol ba.
And I will wait upon the Lord, that hideth his face from the house of Jacob, and I will look for him. Behold, I and the children whom the Lord hath given me are for signs and for wonders in Israel from the Lord of hosts, which dwelleth in mount Zion. Isaiah 8:17, 18.
Te dina xaar Boroom bi, mi nëbb ay kanamam ci kërgóorug Yàqub, te dinaa yaakaar ci moom. Xool-leen, man ak xale yi ma Boroom bi jox, nu ngi nekk tegtal ak kéemaan ci Israyil, jële ci Boroom gàngoor yi, mi dëkk ci tundu Siyon. Esayi 8:17, 18.
When Isaiah interacts with wicked king Ahaz in 742 BC, he represents those who have “waited,” for all the prophets are speaking of the last days, and those who “wait” in the last days are those who have suffered the first disappointment. Jeremiah thought God had lied, and withheld the rain, and Isaiah thinks God has hidden “his face from the house of Jacob,” but Isaiah determines that he will wait, and look for the Lord, which represents the “wise” during the tarrying time of the vision. Those that did return and separate the precious from the vile, who were to become God’s mouthpiece were sealed, and therefore contrasted with those who receive the mark of the beast.
Ba Isayi doon ak buur buur Aas bu bon ci atum 742 BC, mu ngi tegtal ñi “xaar,” ndax yonent yi yépp dañuy wax ci fan yu mujj yi, te ñi “xaar” ci fan yu mujj yi mooy ñi jànkoonte ak njël bu njëkk ba. Yeremi dafa foog ne Yàlla fen na, te tere na taw bi, te Isayi itam dafa foog ne Yàlla nëbb na “kanamam ci kërug Yàqoob,” waaye Isayi dogal na ne dina xaar te seet Boroom bi, loolu di tegtal ñi “xam-xam” ci jamono yu vision bi yàgg. Ñi délsi woon te tàq lu tedd ak lu bon, ñoom ñi waroon nekk Yàlla ay waxkat, dafañu leen tëj ci màndarga, te moo tax ñu juuyoo ak ñi jot màrk bu rab wi.
And many among them shall stumble, and fall, and be broken, and be snared, and be taken. Bind up the testimony, seal the law among my disciples. And I will wait upon the Lord, that hideth his face from the house of Jacob, and I will look for him. Behold, I and the children whom the Lord hath given me are for signs and for wonders in Israel from the Lord of hosts, which dwelleth in mount Zion. And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead? To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them. Isaiah 8:16–20.
Te ñu bare ci seen biir dinañu tëdd, dinañu daanu, dinañu yàqu, dinañu jàpp ci fiir, te dinañu nekk ay jaam. Dëjël seede si, tëj yoonu Yàlla bi ci samay taalibe. Man nag dinaa xaar Boroom bi, mi nëbb jëmam ci kër Yàqub, te dinaa yaakaar ci moom. Xoolleen, man ak xale yi ma Boroom bi may, nunu ay màndarga ak ay kéemaan lañu ci biir Israayil, yu jóge ci Boroom mboolem mbooloo yi, mi dëkk ci tundu Siyon. Bu ñu leen waxee ne: “Seetleen ca ñiy wax ak rab yi, ak ca ñiy njumte te di julli ndank ndank”; ndax du yoon ngir xeet wut seen Yàlla? Ndax nit ñi dul dee dañuy laaj ñi dee? Demleen ca yoon wa ak ca seede si; su ñu waxul ni kàddu gii waxe, mooy ndax amuñu leer ci seen biir. Isaaya 8:16–20.
We will continue this study in the next article.
Dina ñu wéyal njàngum bii ci mbind mi ci topp.
“These are not the words of Sister White, but the words of the Lord, and His messenger has given them to me to give to you. God calls upon you to no longer work at cross purposes with Him. Much instruction was given in regard to men claiming to be Christian when they are revealing the attributes of Satan, counteracting in spirit, word, and action the advancement of truth, and are surely following the path where Satan is leading them. In their hardness of heart they have grasped authority which in no way belongs to them, and which they should not exercise. Saith the great Teacher, ‘I will overturn, overturn, overturn.’ Men say in Battle Creek, ‘The temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord are we’ but they are using common fire. Their hearts are not softened and subdued by the grace of God.” Manuscript Releases, volume 13, 222.
“Yii du waxi Soeur White la, waaye waxi Boroom bi la, te ndawam moo ko jox ma ngir ma jox leen ko. Yàlla di leen woote ngir dungeen doxaat ak moom ci yeneen pexe yu juuyoo ak yiitam. Jàngale yu bare lañu joxe ci mbirum nit ñiy wax ne ay Kiristaan lañu, waaye seen melokaan di feeñal melokaani Seytaane, di weddi ci xel, ci wax ak ci jëf yokkute dëgg gi, te ci lu wóor dañuy topp yoon wi Seytaane di leen jiite ci. Ci seen dëgër xol, dañu jàppale sañ-sañ yu kenn joxu leen ko, te yu ñu warul a jëfandikoo. Jàngalekat bu màgg bi nee: ‘Dinaa ko wërngal, wërngal, wërngal.’ Nit ñi wax ci Battle Creek ne: ‘Naka kër Yàlla ji, kër Yàlla ji, nun lañu,’ waaye dañuy jëfandikoo safara su yomb. Seeni xol noppaluñu, te suufeeluñu ci yiwug Yàlla.” Manuscript Releases, volume 13, 222.