The Messianic fulfillment's in the book of Matthew include the waymark of the time of the end, the waymark of the message being formalized, two witnesses of the waymark of 9/11, one a witness of the internal message to Laodicea and the other the external message of Islam’s terrorism. It is fitting that the waymark of 9/11 is represented by two of the twelve Messianic fulfillment's in Matthew, for 9/11 includes the message of the second angel, where there is always a doubling. The death of July 18, 2020, was the fifth waymark we considered, and then the voice in the wilderness in July 2023, was the sixth and the resurrection of 2024 was number seven. The eighth Messianic fulfillment is the Midnight Cry.
Matiye téere bi nekk na ay matalinu Mesiya yi yu ëmb lëndëm yu taxaw ci jamonoy mujj gi, lëndëmu wax ji di tabaxoo ci yoon wu sedd, ak ñaari seede yu lëndëmu 9/11, kenn ci ñoom di seede wax ju biir bu jëm ci Laodise, te ki ci des di wax ju bitiwu terorismu Islaam. Yóomb na ba ànd ak yoon ne, lëndëmu 9/11 dafa feesaloo ci ñaari ci fukk ak ñaar yi ci matalinu Mesiya yi nekk ci Matiye, ndaxte 9/11 dafay ëmb ndigalu malaaka ñaareel bi, fa ñaareel gi sax di am. Deege bi amoon 18 Sulet 2020 mooyoon juróomeelu lëndëm bi nu xooloon, te ba noppi baat bi ci màndiŋ ma ci Sulet 2023 mooyoon juróomeelu ak benneel bi, te ndekkiteem 2024 mooy juróom ñaareel bi. Juróom ñetteelu matalinu Mesiya bi mooy Yuuxu Diggante Guddi.
The Eighth Messianic Waymark is the Midnight Cry
Tàkk yi juróom-ñetteel bu Mesiya bi mooy Xaacu Guddi gi
All this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, Tell ye the daughter of Sion, Behold, thy King cometh unto thee, meek, and sitting upon an ass, and a colt the foal of an ass. Matthew 21:4, 5.
Lépp li amoon na ngir amoon a matal li yonent bi waxoon ne: “Waxleen doom ju jigéen ju Siyon: xoolal, sa Buur ngi ñëw ci yaw, woyof te toog ci kaw mbaam, ci kaw ndawam, doom ju góor ju mbaam.” Macë 21:4, 5.
Prediction
Waxu ci ëllëg
Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass. Zechariah 9:9.
Bégal bu ba réy, yaw Siyon doom ju jigéen; xaacu, yaw Yerusalem doom ju jigéen: xoolal, sa Buur ngi ñëw ci yaw; moom ku jub la, te mu yor musal; suufeel na boppam, te mu war ab mbaam, di war nag ndawam, doomub mbaam. Sakariya 9:9.
“Five hundred years before, the Lord had declared by the prophet Zechariah, ‘Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem. Behold, thy King cometh unto thee. He is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass.’ [Zechariah 9:9.] Had the disciples realized that Christ was going to judgment and to death, they could not have fulfilled this prophecy.
“Juróom téeméeri at miin, Boroom bi waxoon jaarale ko ci yonent Sakariya ne: ‘Bëgg na nga bànneex lool, yaa doom Siiyon; xaacu, yaa doom Yerusalem. Xoolal, sa Buur di ñëw ci yaw. Moom ku jub la, te am ndamlu; suufeel na boppam, di war ab mbaam, ak xaleem, mbaam mu góorul bi sumb.’ [Sakariya 9:9.] Su fekkee ne taalibe yi xamoon nañu ne Almasi bi dafa dem cig àtte ak dee, duñu manoon a matal wax kàddu gu yàlla woon gi.”
“In like manner, Miller and his associates fulfilled prophecy, and gave a message which inspiration had foretold should be given to the world, but which they could not have given had they fully understood the prophecies pointing out their disappointment, and presenting another message to be preached to all nations before the Lord should come. The first and second angels’ messages were given at the right time, and accomplished the work which God designed to accomplish by them.” The Great Controversy, 405.
“Ni noonu boobu, Miller ak ay bokk nañoom itam matale nañu waxu yonent yi, te yégle nañu benn ndawtal gu xel mu Sell mi waxoon ne dees na ko jox addina si, waaye mënuñu woon koo jox su fekkee ne degg nañu ba baax waxu yonent yi di tegtal seen naqar ak di wone beneen ndawtal gu war a ñiir ci xeet yépp bala Boroom bi dikk. Ndawtal malaaka bu jëkk bi ak bu ñaareel bi, joxeef na leen ci waxtu wu jaar, te matale nañu liggéey bi Yàlla nammoon a matale jaarale ko ci ñoom.” The Great Controversy, 405.
The misunderstanding of God’s prophetic Word was involved with the history of Christ’s triumphal entry, and also with the parallel history of the proclamation of the Midnight Cry message in 1844. The one hundred and forty-four thousand are required to understand “the prophecies pointing out their disappointment.” John in Revelation ten is told in advance, that the message of the little book that was going to be sweet in his mouth, would turn bitter.
Njubte bu baaxul bu nit ñi amoon ci Kàddu Yàlla gu yonent, bokkoon na ci jaar-jaaru duggug Kirist ci ndam, te itam ci jaar-jaaru wu dëppooki ak moom, di yégle xibaaru Yuuxu Guddi gi ci atum 1844. Ñetti fukk ak ñeent ñaari junni ñi, war nañu xam “yonent yi tegtal seen niru yàqubte.” Yowaana ci Peeñu ma fukk, waxees na ko lu jiitu ne, xibaaru téere bu ndaw bi miy neex ci gémmiñam, dina wex ba metti.
“We have nothing to fear for the future, except as we shall forget the way the Lord has led us, and His teaching in our past history.” Life Sketches, 196.
«Amunu dara lu jëm ci ëllëg, xanaa nu fàtte yoon wi Boroom bi jiiteewoon nu, ak njàngaleem ci sunu jaar-jaaru mbind mu weesu.» Life Sketches, 196.
The “Lord’s leading” in the past is represented among other providential acts, as His hand covering a mistake in the figures, for it was not best for the Millerites to understand their disappointment in advance, any more than it was for the disciples to understand all the elements of their disappointment at the cross. But the history of the proclamation of the Midnight Cry is identified as the very light that leads to heaven, and this is noted in Ellen White’s very first vision. The one hundred and forty-four thousand must understand the disappointments of the disciples and the Millerites. To refuse that light is to fall off the path.
“Njëwri Yàlla bi” ca jamono yu weesu yi, feeñ na ci biir yeneen jëf yu Yàlla di yore ak i pexeem, ni loxoom mi muuru ab njuumte ci lim yi; ndaxte nekkul woon lu gën a baax ñeel waa Miller ñu xam seen naqaru yëngu yàggul lu jiitu, ni it nekkul woon lu gën a baax ñeel taalibe yi ñu xam bépp mbir mu mat seen naqar ca bant ba. Waaye taariixu yégle “Yuuxu Diggante Guddi” gi, déggal nañu ko ni leer gu sax di gindee asamaan, te loolu mooy liñu bind ci njël gu njëkk gu Ellen White. Ñetti fukki junni ak ñent fukki ñeent war nañu xam naqar yi taalibe yi ak waa Miller dajale. Bàyyi leer googu mooy daanu dëkku yoon wi.
“They had a bright light set up behind them at the beginning of the path, which an angel told me was the ‘midnight cry.’ This light shone all along the path, and gave light for their feet, so that they might not stumble.
“Ñu nekkoon ak leer gu xonq gu ñu taxawale woon ca ginnaawam, ci njàlbéenu yoon wi, te malaaka mi waxoon na ma ne mooy «yuuxu guddi ga digg». Leer googu dafa leer ci yoon wi bépp, te di leen may leer ngir seen tànk, ba ñu bañ a tàccu.
“If they kept their eyes fixed on Jesus, who was just before them, leading them to the city, they were safe. But soon some grew weary, and said the city was a great way off, and they expected to have entered it before. Then Jesus would encourage them by raising His glorious right arm, and from His arm came a light which waved over the advent band, and they shouted ‘Alleluia!’ Others rashly denied the light behind them, and said that it was not God that had led them out so far. The light behind them went out, leaving their feet in perfect darkness, and they stumbled and lost sight of the mark and of Jesus, and fell off the path down into the dark and wicked world below.” Christian Experience and Teachings of Ellen G. White, 57.
“Su ñu saxee seeni bët ci Yeesu, mi nekkoon ci seen kanam, di leen jiite jëm ca dëkk ba, ñu dafa wóor. Waaye gannaaw loolu, yenn ci ñoom sonn nañu, ne dëkk ba sore na lool, te yaakaaroon nañu ne dañu ko wara dugge woon ba noppi. Noonu Yeesu daan leen dëgërël ci yékkati ay ndijooram gu tedd giy leer, te ca ndijooram ga la leer gu nekk di jolli ci kaw mbooloom advent ba, te ñu yuuxu naan: “Alleluia!” Ñeneen it, ci ñaawte, weddi nañu leer ga nekkoon ca gannaaw, ne du Yàlla moo leen génne ba tollu fii. Leer ga nekkoon ca gannaaw dem na, ba bàyyi seen tànk ci lëndëm gu mat sëkk, te ñu daanu, réer mandarga ga ak Yeesu, te rot ca yoon wa ba tàbbi ci suuf, ca àddina gu lëndëm ak gu bon ga.” Christian Experience and Teachings of Ellen G. White, 57.
The eighth waymark is the Midnight Cry as typified by Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem.
Juróome juróom-ñetteel ba mooy Midnight Cry bi, ni ko denc ci dugub Kirist ci Yerusalem ak ndam.
“The midnight cry was not so much carried by argument, though the Scripture proof was clear and conclusive. There went with it an impelling power that moved the soul. There was no doubt, no questioning. Upon the occasion of Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem, the people who were assembled from all parts of the land to keep the feast, flocked to the Mount of Olives, and as they joined the throng that were escorting Jesus, they caught the inspiration of the hour, and helped to swell the shout, ‘Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord!’ [Matthew 21:9.] In like manner did unbelievers who flocked to the Adventist meetings—some from curiosity, some merely to ridicule—feel the convincing power attending the message, ‘Behold, the Bridegroom cometh!’” Spirit of Prophecy, volume 4, 250, 251.
“Xaacu guddi gi dafa yóbbu woonul lool ci waxtaani lay, doonte sax firnde yi Jóge ci Mbind mi leer na te mat na. Am na woon benn doole buy jéggi te dal ci moom, di yëngu xol. Amoonul benn sikki-sàkka, amoonul benn laaj. Bi Kirist duggee ak ndam ci Yerusalem, nit ñi dajale woon nañu jóge ci bépp xàjju réew mi ngir sàmm màggal gi; ñu daw jëm ca Tundu Oliw yi, te bi ñuy bokk ak mbooloo ma doon ànd ak Yeesu, ñu jàpp woon xel mu sell mi muccoon ci waxtu woowa, te ñu yokk xaacu bi ne: ‘Yaw miy ñëw ci turu Boroom bi, barkeel nga!’ [Matthew 21:9.] Noonu itam, ñi gëmul ñi daan dawsi ca ndaje yi Adventist—ñenn ci bànneex rekk, ñenn it ngir ree te ñaawal—dafa dal ci ñoom doole ju wóoruy xel, ji ànd ak yégle bi ne: ‘Xool-leen, Boroom céet bi ngi ñëw!’” Spirit of Prophecy, volume 4, 250, 251.
To be a wise virgin in the latter days, would of prophetic necessity require that those wise virgins suffer a disappointment, that in turn ushers in the tarrying time of the parable. Without the tarrying time experience you are not a wise or a foolish virgin.
Ngir doon janq ci fan yu mujj yi, ci soxlay gu yonent bi di laaj, dafay waral ne janq yooyu dañu di xamee benn naqar; te loolu mooy indi it waxtu yiir wi ci léebu bi. Su fekkee amoo xew-xewu waxtu yiir woowu, doo nekk janq ju xam-xam mbaa janq ju ñàkk xam-xam.
“The parable of the ten virgins of Matthew 25 also illustrates the experience of the Adventist people.” The Great Controversy, 393.
« Léebu fukki janq yi nekk ci Macë 25 itam day won xam-xamu askanu Awanis yi. » The Great Controversy, 393.
Either way, the wise virgins of the last days must experience a disappointment that paralleled April 19, 1844, for the experience of the parable is the experience of the one hundred and forty-four thousand, who John in the Revelation identifies as virgins.
Ci lu jublu yépp, fekk xale yu ñaawul yi ci mujjug jamono bi war nañu dund benn naqar gu mengook 19 Awril 1844, ndaxte xew-xewu léebu bi mooy xew-xewu ñaar fukk ak ñeent junni, ñi Yowaana sant ci Peeñ mi ne ay janq.
These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb. Revelation 14:4.
Ñooñu mooy ñi gàccul ak jigéen; ndaxte seeni njaboot lañu. Ñooñu mooy ñi topp Mbiir mi fu mu dem fépp. Ñooñu lañu jotalee ci biir nit ñi, ngir nekk ñoom ay màggal yu jëkk ngir Yàlla ak ngir Mbiir mi. Peeñu 14:4
How many parables of Christ are directly and specifically identified as being fulfilled to the very letter? Every parable will be fulfilled to the very letter, but the parable of the ten virgins is specifically set forth as being fulfilled in the past and the future “to the very letter.” It is compared to the third angel that is to remain present truth from 1844 onward until Michael stands up and human probation closes.
Ñaata léebu Kirist yi lañu wax bu leer te bu jëm ci benn yoon ne, dañu koy matal ci yeneen baat yi ak ci yeneen araf yi “ba ci benn araf”? Bépp léebu dina am matalugam “ba ci benn araf,” waaye léebu fukki janq yi, moom, dañu koy feesal bu leer ne matna ci jamono jëkk ak ne dina mat ci jamono ñëw “ba ci benn araf.” Dañu ko méngale ak ñetteelu malaaka mi, mi war a nekk dëgg gu nekk ci kanam nit ñi dale ci 1844 ba keraam bi Mikael di taxaw, te waxtu nattu nit ñi tëj.
“I am often referred to the parable of the ten virgins, five of whom were wise, and five foolish. This parable has been and will be fulfilled to the very letter, for it has a special application to this time, and, like the third angel’s message, has been fulfilled and will continue to be present truth till the close of time.” Review and Herald, August 19, 1890.
«Saa yu bare ci lépp ci léeb bu fukk janq yi, juróom ñu am xel te juróom ñu ñàkk xel. Léeb boobu amoon na te dina matale ba ci araf wu nekk, ndaxte am na jëfandikoo gu gaaw ci jamono jii, te, ni yégleb malaaka bu ñetteel bi, mat na te dina wéy di dëgg-gu-jamono ba kera mujjug jamono.» Review and Herald, 19 Ut 1890.
Until the close of time, the parable of the ten virgins is present truth, and the Midnight Cry will be fulfilled again to the very letter.
Ba àgg ba jamono jeexee, léebu fukki janq yi mooy dëggu jamonoy tey, te yuuxu guddi digg bi dina mataat ci mbind mu nekk.
“There is a world lying in wickedness, in deception and delusion, in the very shadow of death,—asleep, asleep. Who are feeling travail of soul to awaken them? What voice can reach them? My mind was carried to the future, when the signal will be given. ‘Behold, the Bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him.’ But some will have delayed to obtain the oil for replenishing their lamps, and too late they will find that character, which is represented by the oil, is not transferable.” Review and Herald, February 11, 1896.
«Am na àdduna bu nekk ci bon, ci naxteef ak réere, ci saxaaru dee ba ci boppam,—nelaw, nelaw. Kan ñoo ngi dëgër xol di metti ngir yeeleen? Ban baat moo leen man a jot? Sama xel yóbbu na ma ca ëllëg, ba ker gi dinañu joxe mandarga gi. “Xool-leen, Boroom sëy bi ngi ñëw; génnleen, ndajeekoom.” Waaye am na ñenn ñi delaye woon ngir am diwlin wi ñuy feyaatal seen lamp yi, te bu weesoo ba, dinañu gis ne jikko ji, ji diwlin ji di firi, du lu ñu man a joxante.» Review and Herald, February 11, 1896.
The Midnight Cry is the next waymark on the horizon in the movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand. That waymark is accompanied by the persecution that begins against the faithful in advance of the Sunday law. That persecution is external, and internal, and the internal persecution includes two distinct symbols. One of those symbols is Judas, the other the Sanhedrin.
Yuuxu Guddi gi mooy tektalu yoon bi ci bët-set bi ci doxalin ñetti téeméer ak ñeenti fukk ak ñeent junni. Tektal woowu and na ak fitna bi tambali ci kaw ñi sell yi lu jiitu yoonu Dibéer. Fitna boobu bokk na ci biti, te bokk it ci biir; te fitna bu biir boobu ëmb na ñaari misaal yu wuute. Benn ci misaal yooyu mooy Yudaa, beneen bi mooy Sañedreen.
The Ninth Messianic Waymark is the Betrayal for 30 Silver Pieces
Màndarga Yoonent bu Juróom-ñaari ci Yooni Mesiya bi mooy Wooral gi ngir 30 xaali xaalis.
Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value; And gave them for the potter’s field, as the Lord appointed me. Matthew 27:9, 10.
Noonu la amoon la wax jëkk ci yonent bi Yeremi, ba naan: «Ñu jël ñetti-fukki xalis yu xaalis, njëg la ko teg woon ki ñu njëgaale, moom mi askanu Israayil njëgaale woon; te ñu jox ko ngir toolu noppkat bi, ni Boroom bi digle ma ko.» Matye 27:9, 10.
Prediction
Yëglelu
And I said unto them, If ye think good, give me my price; and if not, forbear. So they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver. And the Lord said unto me, Cast it unto the potter: a goodly price that I was prised at of them. And I took the thirty pieces of silver, and cast them to the potter in the house of the Lord. Zechariah 11:12, 13.
Ma ne leen: Bu ngeen ko jàppee ni lu baax la, joxleen ma sama pey; waaye bu ko dul noonu, bàyyileen ko. Noonu ñu weesu sama pey, te mu tollu ci fanweer yu xaalis. Te Aji Sax ji ne ma: Sànnil ko ci ndabkat bi; ndax mooy pey bu màgg bi ñu ma nattalee. Kon ma jël fanweer yu xaalis yi, sànni leen ci ndabkat bi ci kër Aji Sax ji. Sakaraya 11:12, 13.
The betrayal of Judas represents the betrayal of the counterfeit priests, for the number 30 represents the age of the priests. The priests, who are also Levites are purified as gold and silver by the Messenger of the Covenant. Judas’s thirty pieces of silver represents the purging of the false priests at the Sunday law, though Judas died just before the cross, it was still the same day. Judas is not the symbol of the Sanhedrin; he is a symbol of one who was thought to be among the disciples of Christ.
Worug Yudaa mooy misaalu worug saraxalekat yu dëggul yi, ndaxte lim bi 30 dafa misaal atum saraxalekat yi. Saraxalekat yi, ñoom itam Lewi lañu, Ndaw liitu Kóllëre gi mooy leen sellal ni wurus ak xaalis. Ñetti-fukkiy xonq xaalisu Yudaa mooy misaalu setalug saraxalekat yu falso yi ci yoonu Dibeer bi; doonte Yudaa dee na tuuti lu jiitu bant ba, waaye benn bés la woon. Yudaa du misaalu Sanedreen bi; mooy misaalu kenn ku ñu yaakaar ne bokk na ci taalibey Kirist.
As a disciple of Christ, you were a disciple of the anointing of Jesus. The anointing at His baptism changed Jesus’ name unto Jesus Christ, for Christ means—the anointed one. His name then changed, for He was then to confirm the covenant with many for one week, and a premier symbol of covenant relationship is a changed name. Jesus was anointed with power at His baptism. To be a disciple of Christ, meant you were a disciple of His baptism. It was at His baptism that He was anointed with power. The statement by Peter in Matthew 16:18 is known in the Christian theological world as the “Christian Confession.” It is one of the great themes for discussion among theologians and scholars. Generally, a discussion of the theologians and scholars identifies something of no, or perhaps minor importance, but the point remains, that Christianity understands that when Jesus was anointed, He then became the Messiah.
Ndekkitub Kirist, yaa nekkoon taalibeb ngir ngóbbin gu Yeesu. Ngóbbin gi ci ay sóobam soppiwul turam ba muy Yeesu Kirist, ndaxte Kirist mooy—Ki ñu ngóbb. Kon turam soppi na, ndaxte booba dafa wara dëggal kóllëre gi ak ñu bare ci benn ayu-bés, te kenn ci màndarga yi gën a mag ci diggante kóllëre mooy tur wu ñu soppi. Yeesu dañoo ko ngóbb ak doole ci ay sóobam. Neek taalibeb Kirist, mooy ne yaa nekkoon taalibeb ay sóobam. Ci ay sóobam lañu ko ngóbb ak doole. Wax ji Piyeer wax ci Macë 16:18, xam nañu ko ci àddina teolojig Kiristaan yi ni “Nangu gu Kiristaan.” Moo bokk ci yeneen mbir yu mag yi teologian yi ak xëtu xam-xam yi di waxtaane. Lu ëpp, waxtaanu teologian yi ak xëtu xam-xam yi di wone lu amul solo, walla xéy lu ndaw a solo; waaye li ci des mooy ne, Kiristaanite xam na ne bi ñu ngóbb Yeesu, booba la nekk Masiya bi.
He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. Matthew 16:15, 16.
Mu ne leen: Waaye yéen, ku ngeen wax ne man maa di kan? Noonu Simóŋ Piyeer tontu ne ko: Yaw yaa di Almasi bi, Doomu Yàlla ju Dund ji. Matye 16:15, 16.
Peter’s original name conveyed that very truth, for Simon Barjona means “one who hears the message of the dove,” which was the message of His baptism. His baptism aligns with 9/11, and Judas represents those who at some point professed an understanding of 9/11, but lose their way along the path. Judas is not a symbol of the Sanhedrin, for they represent the Laodicean Seventh-day Adventist church. Judas provided a witness for the Sanhedrin, but the symbolism of the Sanhedrin’s rebellion is different than the rebellion of Judas. The Sanhedrin’s rebellion is expressed in the following dream.
Tur wu njëkk mooy woon njàngat boobu sax, ndaxte Simon Barjona tekki na “ki dégg ndëgëm pitax bi,” te loolu mooy ndëgëmu sóobam ci ndox mi. Sóobam ci ndox mi méngoo na ak 9/11, te Yuda mooy firndeel ñi waxoon benn waxtu ne dañu xam li 9/11 di wax, waaye dañuy réer ci yoon wi. Yuda du firndeelu Sanedren bi, ndaxte ñoom dañuy teewal mbooloom Laodise buy màndargaal kerk gu juróom-ñaareelu fan yi Adventiste. Yuda joxe na seede ci Sanedren bi, waaye firndeelu bàkkaaru Sanedren bi wuute na ak bàkkaaru Yuda. Bàkkaaru Sanedren bi feeñ na ci gént gi di topp.
“I gathered up my writings, and we started on our journey. On the way we held two meetings in Orange and had evidence that the church was profited and encouraged. We were ourselves refreshed by the Spirit of the Lord. That night I dreamed that I was in Battle Creek looking out from the side glass at the door and saw a company marching up to the house, two and two. They looked stern and determined. I knew them well and turned to open the parlor door to receive them, but thought I would look again. The scene was changed. The company now presented the appearance of a Catholic procession. One bore in his hand a cross, another a reed. And as they approached, the one carrying a reed made a circle around the house, saying three times: ‘This house is proscribed. The goods must be confiscated. They have spoken against our holy order.’ Terror seized me, and I ran through the house, out of the north door, and found myself in the midst of a company, some of whom I knew, but I dared not speak a word to them for fear of being betrayed. I tried to seek a retired spot where I might weep and pray without meeting eager, inquisitive eyes wherever I turned. I repeated frequently: ‘If I could only understand this! If they will tell me what I have said or what I have done!’
“Damaa dajale yi ma, te nu tambali sunu tukki. Ci yoon wi nu amee ñaari ndaje ci Orange, te nu gis ay firnde ne mbooloom gëm gi jariñoo na ci te ñu dëgërloo ko. Nun itam, Xelum Boroom bi yeesal na nu. Gudd googu ma génn ci gént ne maa ngi ci Battle Creek, di xool ci weñu ndëjukaay bi ci bunt bi, te gis ma ay nit yu doon ñëw kër ga, ñaar-ñaar. Seen kanam dafa metti, te da ñoo dogu. Xamoon naa leen bu baax, ba tax ma walbatiku ngir ubbi bunt-u sala ba ngir teg leen dalal, waaye ma xalaat ne dinaa xoolaat. Noonu mbir mi soppeeku. Léegi mbooloo ma mel ni doxalin buy Katolig. Kenn yoroon bant, keneen yoroon garab gu woyof. Bi ñuy jegesi, ka yoroon garab ga def ab daara wër kër ga, ne lu ñetti yoon: ‘Kër gii terees na ko. Alal ji war nañu koo nangu. Wax nañu lu juuyoo sunu santaane bu sell bi.’ Ragal jàpp ma, ma daw jaar ci biir kër ga, génn ci bunt bu bëj-gànnaar, te fekkee maa ngi ci biir mbooloo, am na ci ñoom ñenn ñu ma xam, waaye meewuma wax kenn benn baat ngir ragal ñu wor ma. Di naa wut bérab bu weesu, fu ma mana jooyee te ñaan, te bañ a daje ak bët yu bëgg xam lépp, di seetaan fu ma walbatikoo. Ma di faral di wax: ‘Sama bëgg-bëgg mooy xam lii rekk! Bu ñu ma waxoon li ma wax walla li ma def!’”
“I wept and prayed much as I saw our goods confiscated. I tried to read sympathy or pity for me in the looks of those around me, and marked the countenances of several whom I thought would speak to me and comfort me if they did not fear that they would be observed by others. I made one attempt to escape from the crowd, but seeing that I was watched, I concealed my intentions. I commenced weeping aloud, and saying: ‘If they would only tell me what I have done or what I have said!’ My husband, who was sleeping in a bed in the same room, heard me weeping aloud and awoke me. My pillow was wet with tears, and a sad depression of spirits was upon me.” Testimonies, volume 1, 577, 578.
«Damaa na lool te ñaan bu baax ba ma doon gis sunu alal di ñu nangu. Maa ngi jéem a jàng ci xool yu ma wër yërëm walla cofeel ci sama mbir, te ma seetaan kanam yu bare, ña ma foogoon ne dañuy wax ak man te di ma diimël su fekkee ne ragaluñu ne ñeneen yi seet leen. Benn yoon laa jéemoon a rëcc ci biir mbooloo ma, waaye bi ma gisee ne ñu ngi ma xool, ma nëbb sama yéene. Daldi tàmbali a jooy ak kàddu gu kawe, naan: “Bu ñu ma waxkoon rekk li ma def walla li ma wax!” Sama jëkkër, mi doon nelaw ci lal bu nekk ci benn néeg ak man, dégg naa ma di jooy ak kàddu gu kawe te mu yeew ma. Sama bantal dafa tooy ak rangoo yu jooy, te nak tiis bu metti daloon na sama xel.» Testimonies, volume 1, 577, 578.
Applying the principle that the prophets speak more about the latter days than the days in which they lived, raises a very solemn question for the leaders of the Seventh-day Adventist church. Sister White “gathered up” her “writings” and began a return journey to Battle Creek. Battle Creek was then the heart of the work, as is Tacoma Park today, or Jerusalem in the days of Christ. She gathered up her writings for the trip, after she set forth a struggle she had been having concerning her writings. The context of her dream is about her writings. The struggle took place in the town of Wright.
Jëfandikook njariñ bi ne yonnent yi di wax gën ci fan yu mujj yi gën a bare fan yi ñu dundoon, loolu dafa yékkati ab laaj bu tar lool ci njiiti mbooloom Église Adventiste du Septième Jour. Soeur White “dajale” ay “mbindam” te tàmbalee dellu jëm Battle Creek. Battle Creek mooyoon ba noppi xolub liggéey bi, ni Tacoma Park di ko tey, walla Yerusalem ca fan yi Kirist nekkee. Moo dajale ay mbindam ngir tukki bi, gannaaw bi mu wonee ñaxtu bu mu doon am ci ay mbindam. Wér-gu-yaramu géntam mi aju ci ay mbindam. Ñaxtu bi amoon na ca dëkkub Wright.
“While in Wright we had sent my manuscript for No. 11 to the office of publication, and I was improving almost every moment when out of meeting in writing out matter for No. 12. My energies, both physical and mental, had been severely taxed while laboring for the church in Wright. I felt that I should have rest, but could see no opportunity for relief. I was speaking to the people several times a week, and writing many pages of personal testimonies. The burden of souls was upon me, and the responsibilities I felt were so great that I could obtain but a few hours of sleep each night.
“Bi nu nekkoon Wright, yeboon naa sama mbind mi ngir lim wu 11 ci biroo publikasyon bi, te dama doon gëna wér lu matale nekk saa yu nekk bu ma génnee ndaje mi, di bind ay mbir ngir lim wu 12. Sama doole yi, ci yaram ak ci xel itam, dañu leen sonal lool ba metti bi may liggéeyal mbooloom gëmkat yi ci Wright. Dama doon feel ne war naa noppalu, waaye mënuloon gis benn fànn wu ma man a am ndimbalu. Dama doon wax ak nit ñi ay yoon yu bari ci ayi fan yu nekk, te di bind ay xët yu bari yu seede yu jëm ci nit ku nekk. Diisug bakkan yi dafa nekkon ci sama kaw, te trách yu mag yi ma doon yëgge ba tax ma mënuloon am ludul ay waxtu yu néew ngir nelaw bu guddi gu nekk.”
“While thus laboring in speaking and writing, I received letters of a discouraging character from Battle Creek. As I read them I felt an inexpressible depression of spirits, amounting to agony of mind, which seemed for a short period to palsy my vital energies. For three nights I scarcely slept at all. My thoughts were troubled and perplexed. I concealed my feelings as well as I could from my husband and the sympathizing family with whom we were. None knew my labor or burden of mind as I united with the family in morning and evening devotion, and sought to lay my burden upon the great Burden Bearer. But my petitions came from a heart wrung with anguish, and my prayers were broken and disconnected because of uncontrollable grief. The blood rushed to my brain, frequently causing me to reel and nearly fall. I had the nosebleed often, especially after making an effort to write. I was compelled to lay aside my writing, but could not throw off the burden of anxiety and responsibility upon me, as I realized that I had testimonies for others which I was unable to present to them.
“Bi loolu di am ci sama liggéey gu ci wax ak bind, jot naa ay bataaxal yu jóge Battle Creek yu am doxalin gu doyadi. Ba ma leen jàng, xam naa nak tiis bu mëna waxu ci sama xol, ba mu tollu ci metitug xel, te loolu mel ni dafa bëgg a dëj samay doole yu dund ngir ab diir bu gàtt. Ñetti guddi, bëgg-bëgg, nelawuma dara walla lu néew. Samay xalaat yépp dafa jaxasoo te jàq. Denc naa samay naqar ni ma ko manee ci sama jëkkër ak njaboot gi am yërmande gi nu nekkoon ak ñoom. Kenn xamuloon sama coono walla yëf bu metti bi nekk ci sama xel, ba ma boolee ak njaboot gi ci jaamu Yàlla bu suba ak bu ngoon, di wut a teg sama yëf ci Kaw Ku Yëkkati Yëf yi. Waaye samay ñaan jóge woon ci xol bu metit daldi ko wringé, te samay ñaan dañoo daggante te seen yoon wérul ndax naqar gu maneesul a téey. Deret dafa daan daw jëm ci sama bopp, lu bare yoon tax ma di wër, ba lu ci des ma daan bëgga daanu. Deret dafa daan génn ci sama bëñ saa yu bari, rawatina gannaaw bu ma defe woon jéego ngir bind. Mànn naa woon a bàyyi bind bi, waaye manuma woon a yiwi sama bopp ci yëfug tiit ak yëfug war wi nekk ci man, ndaxte xamoon naa ne am naa ay seede ngir ñeneen ñi te manuma leen a joxe.”
“I received still another letter, informing me that it was thought best to defer the publication of No. 11 until I could write out that which I had been shown in regard to the Health Institute, as those in charge of that enterprise stood in great want of means and needed the influence of my testimony to move the brethren. I then wrote out a portion of that which was shown me in regard to the Institute, but could not get out the entire subject because of pressure of blood to the brain. Had I thought that No. 12 would be so long delayed, I should not in any case have sent that portion of the matter contained in No. 11. I supposed that after resting a few days I could again resume my writing. But to my great grief I found that the condition of my brain made it impossible for me to write. The idea of writing testimonies, either general or personal, was given up, and I was in continual distress because I could not write them.
“Ma jotaat beneen bataaxal, di xamal ma ne dañoo gise woon ne gën nañu yàggal génne No. 11 ba kera may bind li ñu ma won ci lu jëm ci Health Institute, ndaxte ñi yoroon liggéey boobu dañoo nekkoon ci ñàkk gu réy gu means te soxla woon nañu lool sama seede ngir jëfandikoo ndikëlam ngir yëngu mbokk yi. Noonu ma bind ab cér ci li ñu ma won woon ci lu jëm ci Institute bi, waaye manoonuma génne mbir mi bépp ndax tawat deret ci bopp bi. Su ma xalaatoon ne No. 12 dina yàgg lool ci ñëw, duma woon ci benn anam yónnee cér boobu ci mbir mi nekk ci No. 11. Dama daan foog ne gannaaw noppalu ay fan, dinaa manaat tàmbali sama bind. Waaye ci sama naqari bu réy, gis naa ne tolluwaayu sama bopp def na ne manuma bind. Xel ma bind seede yi, muy yu ñépp walla yu nit ku nekk, bàyyikoo nañu ko, te dama nekkoon ci metit gu sax ndax manuma leen bind.”
“In this state of things it was decided that we would return to Battle Creek and there remain while the roads were in a muddy, broken-up condition, and that I would there complete No. 12. My husband was very anxious to see his brethren at Battle Creek and speak to them and rejoice with them in the work which God was doing for him. I gathered up my writings, and we started on our journey. …” Testimonies, volume 1, 576, 577.
«Ci kanam la, ñu dogaloon ne dinañu dellusi Battle Creek te des fa ba yoon yi nekk ci xaalis bu toy te yàqu; te ma matale fa No. 12. Sama jëkkër dafa bëggoon lool gis ay bokkam ci Battle Creek, wax ak ñoom, te bég ak ñoom ci liggéey bi Yàlla doon defal moom. Dama dajale sama mbind yi, te nu tàmbalee sunu tukki. …» Testimonies, volume 1, 576, 577.
In the latter days, the leadership of the Seventh-day Adventist church, represented as Battle Creek and those she “knew well,” changed into a Catholic procession. The leadership of the Seventh-day Adventist church changed into a Catholic procession. In the dream they came “two by two,” one with a reed, another with a cross. They drew a circle around the house and proclaimed three times, “This house is proscribed. The goods must be confiscated. They have spoken against our holy order.” What are the “goods” in the “house” which the Catholic leaders of Battle Creek “confiscated?” What “holy order” of the Catholic church was “spoken against?”
Ci jamono yu mujjooy, njiitu mbooloom kërcegu Fanweer-gi Ñeenti, miiruwoon ni Battle Creek ak ñi mu “xamoon bu baax,” soppeek nañu ba nekk doxalin Katolig. Njiitu mbooloom kërcegu Fanweer-gi Ñeenti soppeek nañu ba nekk doxalin Katolig. Ci gént bi dañuy ñëw “ñaari-ñaari,” kenn ak bët-u nattukaay, keneen ak bàkkar. Dañu wër kër ga ak ab daara, te yéglee ñetti yoon ne: “Kër gii terees na ko. War nañu jël alalam. Wax nañu lu juuyoo sunu santaane sell bi.” Lan mooy “alal” yi nekk ci “kër” gi, yi njiit yu Katolig yu Battle Creek “jële”? Ban “santaane sell” bu kërcegu Katolig lañu “waxoon lu juuyoo ci?”
More directly the question might be, “what order of Catholicism led out in the inquisition?” The inquisition began with the order of Dominicans, before the Jesuits arrived in history, but once involved they became the order that championed the cruelty and bloodshed.
Ci lu gën a leer ni laaj bi mooy: “ban ndigalug Katolig moo jiitu woon ci Inkizisiyoŋ bi?” Inkizisiyoŋ bi tambalee na ak ndigalug Dominikeŋ yi, bala Yezwit yi feeñ ci jaar-jaaru bindu; waaye bi ñu ca bokkee, ñoom lañu doon ndigal li gën a taxaw ci yërmëndeyadi, mbugal ak tuur deret.
“Throughout Christendom, Protestantism was menaced by formidable foes. The first triumphs of the Reformation past, Rome summoned new forces, hoping to accomplish its destruction. At this time the order of the Jesuits was created, the most cruel, unscrupulous, and powerful of all the champions of popery. Cut off from earthly ties and human interests, dead to the claims of natural affection, reason and conscience wholly silenced, they knew no rule, no tie, but that of their order, and no duty but to extend its power. The gospel of Christ had enabled its adherents to meet danger and endure suffering, undismayed by cold, hunger, toil, and poverty, to uphold the banner of truth in face of the rack, the dungeon, and the stake. To combat these forces, Jesuitism inspired its followers with a fanaticism that enabled them to endure like dangers, and to oppose to the power of truth all the weapons of deception. There was no crime too great for them to commit, no deception too base for them to practice, no disguise too difficult for them to assume. Vowed to perpetual poverty and humility, it was their studied aim to secure wealth and power, to be devoted to the overthrow of Protestantism, and the re-establishment of the papal supremacy.
“Ci biir Kiriisentaŋ gi yépp, Protestaŋtism dafa nekkoon ci loru ay noon yu réy te am doole. Bi ndam yu njëkk yi Réforme ba noppee, Room woote na ay doole yu bees, di yaakaar ne dina àgg ci yokk seen alag. Ci jamono jooju lañu sos ordru Jézuit yi, ñoom ñoo gën a metti, gën a amul xel mu jub, te gën a am doole ci bépp aji taxawal poperi. Goor-giiñu leen ci mbooleem lëkkaloo ak àddina ak yiw nit, dee ci laaj yi mbëggeelug natureel di sàkku, te xel ak xel mu set deñoo noppi bu baax, xamuñu woon benn yoon, benn lëkkaloo, lu dul yoonu seen ordru, te xamuñu woon benn warugar lu dul yaatal dooleem. Xibaar bu baax bu Kirist dafa mayoon ñi ko topp mën a daje ak fitna te muñ coono, te bañ a tiit ndax sedd, xiif, liggéey bu metti, ak ñàkk, ngir taxawal ràppug dëgg gi ci kanamu torture, kaso, ak ñaawteefu lakka. Ngir xeex ak doole yooyu, Jézuitism dafa dugal ci ay toppkatam ab saafara gu réy gu leen may ñu muñ ay lor yu mel ni yooyu, te jëfandikoo ci dooley dëgg gi bépp jumtukaay bu naxe. Amul woon tooñ bu leen gën a réy ba ñu bañ koo def, amul naxe bu leen gën a torox ba ñu bañ koo jëfandikoo, amul wonebopp bu leen gën a jafe ba ñu bañ koo sol. Naka ñu fas yéene ci ñàkk alal ak toroxlu gu dul jeex, waaye seen pexe mu xam-xamoon mooy am alal ak doole, di jébbalu ci daanel Protestaŋtism, ak sampaatu biñaat ci kaw nguurug paap bi.”
“When appearing as members of their order, they wore a garb of sanctity, visiting prisons and hospitals, ministering to the sick and the poor, professing to have renounced the world, and bearing the sacred name of Jesus, who went about doing good. But under this blameless exterior the most criminal and deadly purposes were often concealed. It was a fundamental principle of the order that the end justifies the means. By this code, lying, theft, perjury, assassination, were not only pardonable but commendable, when they served the interests of the church. Under various disguises the Jesuits worked their way into offices of state, climbing up to be the counselors of kings, and shaping the policy of nations. They became servants to act as spies upon their masters. They established colleges for the sons of princes and nobles, and schools for the common people; and the children of Protestant parents were drawn into an observance of popish rites. All the outward pomp and display of the Romish worship was brought to bear to confuse the mind and dazzle and captivate the imagination, and thus the liberty for which the fathers had toiled and bled was betrayed by the sons. The Jesuits rapidly spread themselves over Europe, and wherever they went, there followed a revival of popery.
«Bi ñuy feeñ ni ay nit ñu bokk ci seen kurél, ñuy sol yére yu sell, di seeti kaso yi ak hospitaal yi, di topptoo ñi feebar ak ñi néew doole, di wax ne dañoo bañ àddina, te di yóbbu turu Yesu bu sell, moom mi doon wër di def lu baax. Waaye ci suufu melokaan wu mel ni amul njubadi, lu ëpp ci bàkkaar te gàttal boppaloon ngir rey, ñoo fa doon nëbbiku. Benn pacc bu am solo ci seen kurél mooy ne mujj gi moo taxawal pexe yi. Ci sàrt boobu, fen, sàcc, seede ju dul dëgg, ak rey nit, duñu leen wax rekk ne ñu ñaakkul baal, waaye sax dañoo yékkati leen, bu fekkee ne ñoo di toppatoo njariñu kerk bi. Ci ay nattuwaay yu wuute, Jesuit yi duggoon ci kër yi nguuru, yéeg ba nekk ndaw ñu diggante ak buur yi, te di defar pëlisey réew yi. Ñu doon jaam yu ngir doon yëgkat ci seen sang yi. Ñu sos kolees yi ngir doomi buur ak boroom ngërëm yi, ak ekool yi ngir nit ñi ci askan wi; te doomi way-jur yu Protestan ñi, dañoo leen gàdd ci topp ay cérémóoni yu pap yi. Lépp lu mel ni teddunga ak wonebopp gu biti ci jamono jaamu Room, dañoo ko jëfandikoo ngir jaxase xel mi, ak ngir yëngal te jàpp xalaat, ba taxe gore gu baay yi liggéeyoon ba sonn, tuuru deret, ngir jot ci moom, doom yi wor ko. Jesuit yi law a law tasaaroo ci bépp Europa, te fu ñu dem, fa la dekki gu bees gu popis ga topp.»
“To give them greater power, a bull was issued re-establishing the inquisition. Notwithstanding the general abhorrence with which it was regarded, even in Catholic countries, this terrible tribunal was again set up by popish rulers, and atrocities too terrible to bear the light of day were repeated in its secret dungeons. In many countries, thousands upon thousands of the very flower of the nation, the purest and noblest, the most intellectual and highly educated, pious and devoted pastors, industrious and patriotic citizens, brilliant scholars, talented artists, skillful artisans, were slain or forced to flee to other lands.
“Ngir leen jox doole gu gën a réy, ñu génne benn buleet ngir delloo inkiisisoŋ bi. Doonte seenub ñaawtéef, ba ci réew yu Katolik yi sax, mbooloo mi yépp dafa ko bañoon lool, waaye at-kàttan bu tiit lii ñu sampaat naat ko ak boroom nguur yu pap yi, te ñaawtéef yu tiis ba duñu man a muñ leeru bés, ñu delloo ko ci ay kaso yu suturaam. Ci bari réew, junni junniy nit ci ñi gën a rafet ci xeetu réew mi, ñi gën a set te gën a tedd, ñi gën a am xel ak njàng mu kawe, sàmmkat yu ragal Yàlla te jébbalu, waa réew yu liggéeykat te bëgg réewam, xam-xamkat yu leer, artistes yu am kàttan, ay njiit yu am xel ci seen liggéey, ñu rey leen walla ñu gaaw a daw jëm ci yeneen réew.”
“Such were the means which Rome had invoked to quench the light of the Reformation, to withdraw from men the Bible, and to restore the ignorance and superstition of the Dark Ages. But under God’s blessing and the labors of those noble men whom He had raised up to succeed Luther, Protestantism was not overthrown. Not to the favor or arms of princes was it to owe its strength. The smallest countries, the humblest and least powerful nations, became its strongholds. It was little Geneva in the midst of mighty foes plotting her destruction; it was Holland on her sandbanks by the northern sea, wrestling against the tyranny of Spain, then the greatest and most opulent of kingdoms; it was bleak, sterile Sweden, that gained victories for the Reformation.” The Great Controversy, 234, 235.
“Loolu la woon ay yoonu yi Rooma woo woon ngir fey leeru Réformaasioŋ bi, te dindi Biibël bi ci nit ñi, ba delloo xamul ak gëm-gëm yu réer yu Jamono yu Lëndëm yi. Waaye ci barkeb Yàlla ak ci liggéeyu góor ñooñu yu tedd yi mu taxawaloon ngir ñu wuutu Luther, Prostantaŋis duñu ko daan. Doonul ci yiw walla ci mbëru buur yi la war a jële dooleem. Réew yi gën a tuuti, xeeti réew yi gën a suufe te gën a néew kàttan, ñoom la nekk ay tataam. Mu doon Genev bu tuuti bi nekk ci diggante noon yu am doole yuy fexe bañ a rey; mu doon Oland ci tefesam yu suufe ca géeju bëj-gànnaar ga, di xare ak nootug Espaañ, mi nekkoon booba bi ci gën a màgg te gën a bare alal ci nguur yi; mu doon Sëwed gu tàngoor, gu ñàkk meññeef, gi jël ndam ngir Réformaasioŋ bi.” The Great Controversy, 234, 235.
The Catholic church did all they could to hide the Bible from men, by claiming their pagan traditions and customs are above God’s Word. The leaders of Laodicean Adventism will not take dissenters to court over the writings of Ellen White, but Catholics professing to be the leaders of Battle Creek will. The very essence of the beast of Catholicism is employing secular power to accomplish religious purposes. When Adventism sought the legal secular power to manage its institutions, the fruits of their ”holy order” can be seen.
Kàttolik yi def nañu lépp lu ñu man ngir nëbb Biibël ci nit ñi, te ñuy wax ne seen cosaan yu pagan ak seen aaday a gën Kàddu Yàlla. Njiiti Adventism bu Laodicea duñu yóbbu ñi di weddi ci àttekat ngir mbind yi Ellen White, waaye Kàttolik yi di wax ne ñoom ñoo di njiiti Battle Creek dinañu ko def. Mbindeefug dëgg-dëgg gu mala bu Kàttolisim mooy jëfandikoo kàttanug àddina ngir matal njariñ yu diine. Bi Adventism seetee kàttanug yoon gu àddina ngir saytu ay kurumam, meññent yi seen “tegu yoon bu sell” feeñ nañu.
In the context of the Spanish Inquisitions auto-da-fé (act of faith) ceremonies, the reed and cross appear as symbolic elements tied to Christ’s crucifixion. The reed refers to the mock scepter placed in Jesus’ hand during his crowning with thorns, used by Roman soldiers to strike him, symbolizing mockery, suffering, and scorn.
Ci biir xew-xewu auto-da-fé (“jëfub ngëm”) yi ci Inquisition espagnol bi, garab gu sew gi ak bant bi feeñ nañu ne ay màndarga yu ñu lëkkal ci daajale Krist. Garab gu sew gi dafay tektal ngàngalem bu ñu tegon ci loxob Yeesu bi ñuy kaal ko ak degg yu xob, te xarekat Rom yi doon ko jëfandikoo ngir dóor ko, di màndargaal ñaawal, sonal ak toroxte.
The cross is prominently featured in auto-da-fé processions. A green cross (often veiled in black crepe) served as the emblem of the Inquisition, carried in a separate preparatory procession the day before and displayed during the event. It symbolized the tribunal’s authority.
Bant bu xàcc bi feeñ bu leer ci yooni auto-da-fé. Benn xàcc bu wert (yu bari ñu daan ko muur ak ñuul crepe) moo doon màndarga Inkiisisoŋ bi; ñu daan ko yóbbu ci benn yoonu waajal bu beru te wuutu, bés bi jiitu, te ñu wone ko itam diirub xew-xew bi. Moo doon nataalu sañ-sañu kuréelu àtte ba.
Proscribing of goods refers to the confiscation (sequestration or proscription) of a convicted person’s property, a common Inquisition penalty to fund the tribunal and punish heresy. This was publicly announced in the auto-da-fé sentences, emphasizing public humiliation and deterrence.
Mbilim alalu yi ci alal mooy jàppaleeku ci nangu alalu nit kuññaleku bañ a topp dëgg, walla tere ko (sequestration or proscription), te loolu nekkoon mbugal bu siiw ci Inquisition ngir dundal tribunal bi te mbugal heresy. Lii dafa ñu koy yégle woon ci kanam ñépp ci ay àtte auto-da-fé, ngir fésal toroxal bu askan wi di gis ak ngir tere ñeneen.
The writings of Ellen G. White clearly and conclusively condemn the leadership that will proscribe her writings in an attempt to silence the song of the vineyard being sung, but it is the last action of an unholy order, just before they manifest their characters openly at the Sunday law. A “Catholic procession,” aligns with 25 ancient men bowing to the sun. In the following four paragraphs, the first paragraph sets forth the “professed people of God,” in the “last days.” The passage clearly teaches that in the last days, Seventh-day Adventist ministers will in “churches and in large gatherings in the open air,” “urge upon the people the necessity of keeping the first day of the week.”
Mbind mi Ellen G. White dañu xamle bu leer te mat ne njiit yi dinañu tere bindam ngir jéema noppi woyug tool ba ñuy woy, waaye loolu mooy jëf ju mujj ju njëkkul ci yoonu sell, tuuti laata ñuy feeñal seen jikko yu ubbeek ci yoonu dibeer bi. Ab “toppandoo Katolik,” dafa méngook ñaar-fukk ak juróom ñaari mag yu jëfandikoo jëmbët ngir sujjóot jant bi. Ci ñeenti xët yu topp ci suuf, xët bu njëkk bi day wax ci “nit ñi di naan ne ñooy ñoñu Yàlla,” ci “bés yu mujj yi.” Wax jii day jàngale bu leer ne ci bés yu mujj yi, saraxalekat yu Seventh-day Adventist dinañu, ci “jàng yi ak ci mbooloo yu mag yi ci béti suuf,” “ñaan nit ñi ne war nañu sàmm bés bu njëkk bu ayubés bi.”
“The Lord has a controversy with his professed people in these last days. In this controversy men in responsible positions will take a course directly opposite to that pursued by Nehemiah. They will not only ignore and despise the Sabbath themselves, but they will try to keep it from others by burying it beneath the rubbish of custom and tradition. In churches and in large gatherings in the open air, ministers will urge upon the people the necessity of keeping the first day of the week. There are calamities on sea and land: and these calamities will increase, one disaster following close upon another; and the little band of conscientious Sabbath-keepers will be pointed out as the ones who are bringing the wrath of God upon the world by their disregard of Sunday.”
“Boroom bi am xuloo ak ñi wax ne ay nitam lañu ci bés yu mujj yii. Ci xuloo bii, góor ñi nekk ci yoon yu am kargo dinañu jël taxawaay bu jublu ci lu Neemiya defe woon. Duñu yem ci bañ mbaa xeeb Noflaay bi rekk ci seen bopp, waaye it dinañu jéem a tere ñeneen ñi ci, di ko suul ci suufas aaday ak cosaan. Ci kërgëm yi ak ci mbooloo yu mag yi ci bitti, ay jàngalekat dinañu di ñaax askan wi ne war nañu sàmm bés bu njëkk bu ayu-bés bi. Am na ay musiba ci géej ak ci suuf; te musiba yooyu dinañu yokku, benn njàmbaar di topp benn ci lu gaaw; te kurél gu ndaw giy sàmm Noflaay bi ak xel mu sell dinañu leen teeral ne ñoom lañuy indi merum Yàlla ci àddina, ndax seen bañ a jëfe bésu Dibéer.”
This is clearly identifying Seventh-day Adventists as the “professed people of God” who will encourage Sunday keeping, and that they will also point “out” “the little band of conscientious Sabbath-keepers.” The next paragraph she emphasizes that the persecution of past ages will be repeated. The previous paragraph ended with her identifying the professed people of God in contrast with those she says are conscientious Sabbath-keepers. She then introduces past histories, and warns those histories will be repeated in the latter days. She is very clear.
Lii mooy jox xamle bu leer ne Way-Adventis yu bésub juróom-ñaareel yi lañuy “nit ñi di wax ne ñooy askanu Yàlla,” ñiy yëngu ngir jëfandikoo dibeer, te itam ñooy tegtal “gannaaw” “tuuti mbootaayu ñi di sàmm Càbbar ak xel mu sell.” Ci xët wi ci topp, mu fésal ne bu baax ne fitna yi jamono yu weesu yi dinañu dellusi. Xët wi jiitu jeexoon na ci moom di raññee nit ñi di wax ne ñooy askanu Yàlla, juuy làqu ak ñi mu wax ne ñooy ñi di sàmm Càbbar ak xel mu sell. Gannaaw loolu mu tàmbalee wax ci jaar-jaari màndarga yu weesu yi, te mu artu ne jaar-jaari yooyu dinañu dellusi ci fan yu mujj yi. Lu leer la.
“Satan urges this falsehood that he may take the world captive. It is his plan to compel men to accept errors. He takes an active part in the promulgation of all false religions, and will stop at nothing in his efforts to enforce erroneous doctrines. Under a cloak of religious zeal, men, influenced by his spirit, have invented the most cruel tortures for their fellow-men, and have inflicted the most awful sufferings upon them. Satan and his agents have the same spirit still; and the history of the past will be repeated in our day.
«Seytaane di dëggadi bëgg ngir mu man a jàpp àddina jaam. Ay pexeem la ngir mu gaawloo nit ñi ba nangu njàngale yu jubul. Mu ngi bokk bu baax ci tasare diine yu dul dëgg yépp, te du taxaw ci dara ngir dëgërël njàngale yu wone. Ci yaramu fitna bu sàngu ci seen bëgg-bopp gu diine, nit ñi, ñi ruuhu Seytaane di jiite, sos nañu mbindu metit yu gëna bon ngir seen moroomi nit, te yóbbu nañu ci seen kow coono yu gëna tiis. Seytaane ak ay ndawam am nañu ba tey benn ruux boobu; te jaar-jaari jamono yu weesu dina dellusi ci sunu jamono.»
“There are men who have set their minds and will to accomplish evil; in the dark recesses of their hearts they have resolved what crimes they will commit. These men are self-deceived. They have rejected God’s great rule of right, and in its stead have erected a standard of their own, and comparing themselves with this standard they pronounce themselves holy. The Lord will permit them to reveal what is in their hearts, to act out the spirit of the master that controls them. He will let them show their hatred of his law in their treatment of those who are loyal to its requirements. They will be actuated by the same spirit of religious frenzy that goaded on the mob that crucified Christ; church and State will be united in the same corrupt harmony.
“Am na ñu xel ak seen coobare ngir def lu bon; ci biir seen xol yu nëbb yi dañu dogal ba noppi yan tooñ yu ñuy def. Nit ñii dafa leer ne dañuy nax seen bopp. Dañu bàyyi yoonu njub gu mag gu Yàlla, te fa mu nekk dañu taxawal seen pexe yu seen bopp, te di wërante ak pexe moomu, di wax ne ñoom ay sell lañu. Boroom bi dina leen may ñu feeñal li nekk ci seen xol, di jëfe noonu ruu maam mi leen moom. Dina leen bàyyi ñu won seen bañ yoonu moom ci ni ñuy doxale ak ñi takku ci laajam yi. Dañu leen di yëngu ak benn ruu mu ni melokaan bu dini buy doxal mbooloo mi daanuwoon ci rey Kirist; kër-gëm ak réew dinañu booloo ci benn déggoo gu yaxute.”
“The church of today has followed in the steps of the Jews of old, who set aside the commandments of God for their own traditions. She has changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant, and now, as then, pride, unbelief, and infidelity are the result. Her true condition is set forth in these words from the song of Moses: ‘They have corrupted themselves, their spot is not the spot of his children; they are a perverse and crooked generation. Do ye thus requite the Lord, O foolish people and unwise? is not he thy father that hath bought thee? hath he not made thee, and established thee?’” Review and Herald, March 18, 1884.
“Ekkaleesiyab tey jamono dafa topp yooni Yawut ya ca jamono yu yàgg ya, ñoom ñi waccoon ndigali Yàlla ngir seen coosan yu bopp. Moom soppi na sàrt bi, fecc na kóllëre gu sax ga, te léegi, ni ko nekkoon booba, réy-réylu, ñàkk gëm ak weddi ngëm moo ci jur. Dëgg-dëgg xaalisam dëgg dees na ko wax ci wax yii jógé ci woyub Muusaa: ‘Ñoom dajal nañu seen bopp, seeni màndarga du màndargay doomam yi; ñoom xeet lañu gu jubadi ak gu weng. Ndax noonu ngeen di fey Boroom bi, yéen nit ñu doyadi te ñàkk xel? Ndax du mooy sa Baay bi la jënd? Ndax du mooy ki la bind, te taxawalloow la?’” Review and Herald, March 18, 1884.
There is passage after passage in the Spirit of Prophecy identifying the latter-day persecution of God’s faithful, and the “church of today” which she is identifying is not Christianity in general, it is the church she repeatedly identifies as being typified by the Jewish church. Those clear passages in her writings are the motivation for the Seventh-day Adventist church to attempt to place restrictions upon the writings of Sister White, as her dream so aptly identifies. Their actions against her writings, which were the obvious goods of her house that are to be proscribed by the leaders of Battle Creek who changed into a holy order of Catholicism. Their attack upon her writings is also represented by the attack upon Jeremiah’s writings. Ellen White’s dream is a second witness to Jeremiah’s writings being burned.
Amna ayi wàll ci Xelum Yàlla yu bari yu bari di won fitna bu mujj bi ñuy teg ci kaw ñi Yàlla di wóolu; te “jàngoro ji tey” bi mu di jox tur fii, du kiriscaane gi ci yépp, waaye mooy mbooloo mi mu di faaral di wax ba noppi ne dañoo ko melale ak mbooloom Yawut ya. Wàll yooyu leer ci ay bindam mooy li tax mbooloom Adventiste du Besub Juróom-ñaareel bi di jéem a teg ay sàrt ci bind yi Sister White, ni gëntam ga ko xamle lu mat sëkk. Seeni jëf ci bindam, yi doon alal ju leer ju kërëm ji, te ji war a ñu tere ko ci ndigal yu njiit yi ca Battle Creek, ñi soppeeku ba nekk kurél gu sell gu Katolisim. Seeni song ci bindam itam dañoo ko melale ak song bi ñu teg ci bind yi Yeremi. Gëntu Ellen White mooy seede bu ñaareel bi ne bind yi Yeremi dañoo leen lakk.
In the third generation of Laodicean Adventism compromise was the predominant theme. The third generation is represented by the church of Pergamos. Beginning with the publication of W. W. Prescott’s book titled The Doctrine of Christ in 1919, through to the publication of Questions on Doctrine in 1957, marks a period of transition represented by an alpha publication and ending with an omega publication. The first book represented W. W. Prescott’s rejection of the Lion of the tribe of Judah, for the apostate Protestant view of Christ. Prescott’s book, aptly titled The Doctrine of Christ, gutted the Millerite prophetic message, leaving the empty definition of Jesus that is worshipped by Catholicism and apostate Protestantism. The last book in that generation defines a sanctification and justification that destroys God’s law, His justice and mercy. Ancient Israel was given the responsibility to be the depositaries of God’s law, and Adventism was to be the depositaries of not only God’s law, but also His prophetic Word. In 1919 a book that rejected the defense of God’s prophetic Word, marking the beginning of the third generation of Laodicean Adventism that ended with a book that rejects God’s law.
Ci ñetteelu maas gu ñetteel gi ci Adventisme Laodicée bi, jàppandikoo ak yàqante moo doon mbir mi gëna fés. Maas gu ñetteel gi dafañu ko teewloo ak jaamu Pergame. Li tambalee ak génne téereb W. W. Prescott bi tudd The Doctrine of Christ ci atum 1919, ba ci génne Questions on Doctrine ci atum 1957, moo mel ni jamono ju soppeeku, ju ñu teewloo ak benn téere bu alfa ji tàmbalee, ba noppi ak benn téere bu omega ji. Téere bu njëkk bi dafa teewloo bañug W. W. Prescott ci Ndambalu xeeti Yuda, ngir jël xalaatu Protestaŋ bu wattuwóon ci Kirist. Téereb Prescott bi, bu baax a tudd The Doctrine of Christ, dafa yàq sëriñu waxu yonent yi bu Millerite, ba des rekk tekkiin bu neenul ci Yeesu, bi Katolisism ak Protestaŋ bu wattuwóon di jamoo. Téere bu mujj bi ci maas googu dafay tekki benn sellal ak benn njubte gu yàq yoonu Yàlla, njubteem ak yërmandeem. Israeel gu yàgg ga, ñu ko joxoon sas ngir nekk ñiy wottu yoonu Yàlla, te Adventisme waroon a nekk ñiy wottu du yoonu Yàlla rekk waaye itam Kàdduy yonentam. Ci atum 1919, ab téere bu bañ défense Kàddug yonent bu Yàlla moo fésal tambali maas gu ñetteel gu Adventisme Laodicée, ga nga xam ne jeex na ak ab téere bu bañ yoonu Yàlla.
“If you indulge stubbornness of heart, and through pride and self-righteousness do not confess your faults, you will be left subject to Satan’s temptations. If when the Lord reveals your errors you do not repent or make confession, his providence will bring you over the ground again and again. You will be left to make mistakes of a similar character, you will continue to lack wisdom, and will call sin righteousness, and righteousness sin. The multitude of deceptions that will prevail in these last days will encircle you, and you will change leaders, and not know that you have done so.” Review and Herald, December 16, 1890.
“Su fekkee ngaa bàyyi xol bu dëgër, te ngaa bañ a wax sa ñàkk yaram ndax réy-réylu ak njub gu sa bopp, dees na la bàyyi nga nekk ci suuf nattu Seytaane yi. Su fekkee ne Boroom bi feeñal la say njuumte te doo tuub walla doo ko wax, sa yoon wu Yàlla dina la delloo ci suuf si ay yoon ak ay yoon. Dees na la bàyyi nga def njuumte yu mel noonu, dinga sax di ñàkk xel mu leer, te dinga wooye bàkkaar njub, ak njub bàkkaar. Mbooloom nax yi dinañu am ndam ci fan yu mujj yii dinañu la wër, te dinga soppi njiit, te doo xam ne def nga ko.” Review and Herald, December 16, 1890.
Pergamos, the third church led to Thyatira, the papal church, which is the fourth generation, when the 25 men bow to the symbol of Thyatira’s authority.
Pergame, ñetteelu mbooloom mi, jur na ca Tiyatir, mbooloom paapal bi, te mooy xeetu ma ñenteel, bi góor ñaar-fukk ak juróom ñent yi sujjóo ci misaalu sañ-sañu Tiyatir.
“The regulation adopted by the early colonists, of permitting only members of the church to vote or to hold office in the civil government, led to most pernicious results. This measure had been accepted as a means of preserving the purity of the state, but it resulted in the corruption of the church. A profession of religion being the condition of suffrage and officeholding, many, actuated solely by motives of worldly policy, united with the church without a change of heart. Thus the churches came to consist, to a considerable extent, of unconverted persons; and even in the ministry were those who not only held errors of doctrine, but who were ignorant of the renewing power of the Holy Spirit. Thus again was demonstrated the evil results, so often witnessed in the history of the church from the days of Constantine to the present, of attempting to build up the church by the aid of the state, of appealing to the secular power in support of the gospel of Him who declared: ‘My kingdom is not of this world.’ John 18:36. The union of the church with the state, be the degree never so slight, while it may appear to bring the world nearer to the church, does in reality but bring the church nearer to the world.” The Great Controversy, 297.
“Ndogal li kolonis yi njëkk yi jëlwoon, ci may ñi bokk rekk ci kërgëm gi ngir ñu man a vote walla jot yar ci nguurug réew mi, indi na ay meññeef yu bon lool. Jëf jooju nangu nañu ko woon ni ab yoon ngir aar sellug réew mi, waaye mu jur yàqute kërgëm gi. Gannaaw wax ne nit ku bëgg a am sañ-sañu vote ak yërmande ci liggéeyu nguur gi war na wone ne am na diine, ñu bare, te li leen doxal moom rekk mooy xeetu politig addina, booloo nañu ak kërgëm gi fekk seen xol soppiwul. Noonu kërgëm yi daldi mel ni ñu fees ak nit ñi ñu soppiwul, ba noppi sax ci ñi doon ñëwël xebaar bi amoon na ñu dul yore jëng yu jub, te xam xamulñu sax dooley Xel mu Sell mi di yeesalaat nit. Noonu dellu nañu seedeat ay meññeefu bon yu feeñ saa yu bare ci jaar-jaari kërgëm gi, dale ca fan yi Constantine ba léegi, ci jéem a yokk kërgëm gi jaarale ko ci ndimbalug nguur gi, di woote ci kàttanug àddina ngir taxawu xebaaru baax bi Ñoom mi waxoon ne: ‘Sama nguur bokkul ci àddina sii.’ John 18:36. Booloo gi nekk ci diggante kërgëm gi ak nguur gi, doonte sax tolluwaayam néew na lool, bu dee ni mu mel ni dafay yóbbul àddina gi gannaaw kërgëm gi, ci dëgg-dëgg du dara ludul yóbbu kërgëm gi gannaaw àddina gi.” The Great Controversy, 297.
The “union of the church with the state, be the degree never so slight, while it may appear to bring the world nearer to the church, does in reality but bring the church nearer to the world.” On May 18, 1977, Bert B. Beach (a director in the church’s Northern Europe-West Africa Division and involved in interchurch relations) presented a gold-covered medallion to the antichrist, Pope Paul VI during a group audience in Rome. It was part of a meeting of the Conference of Secretaries of World Confessional Families. The event was reported in the Adventist Review (August 11, 1977) and noted by Religious News Service as the first time an official SDA representative met a Pontiff.
“Bokkig mbooloom gëmkat yi ak nguur gi, bu dëgërul sax ci njàng mi gën a tuuti, doonte dafa mel ni muy yëgal àddina wi ci wetu mbooloom gëmkat yi, ci dëgg-dëgg du dara ludul yëgal mbooloom gëmkat yi ci wetu àddina wi.” Ci 18 Mee 1977, Bert B. Beach (ab njiitu ci division bi mbooloom gëmkat yi ci Tugal gu Bëj-gànnaar ak Afrig gu Sowu-jant, te bokk ci mbirum diggante mboolooy diine yi) jox na medaayo bu ñu muur xaalis wurus antikrist bi, Pàppa Paul VI, bi ñu doon daje ak mbooloo ci Room. Loolu dafa nekkoon cér ci ndaje mi tudd Conference of Secretaries of World Confessional Families. Xew-xew boobu, Adventist Review (11 Ut 1977) moo ko siiwal, te Religious News Service xamle ne loolu mooy yoon wu jëkk wi ab ndawlu SDA bu am ndigal daje ak ab Pontiff.
“The Lord has pronounced a curse upon those who take from or add to the Scriptures. The great I AM has decided what shall constitute the rule of faith and doctrine, and he has designed that the Bible shall be a household book. The church that holds to the word of God is irreconcilably separated from Rome. Protestants were once thus apart from this great church of apostasy, but they have approached more nearly to her, and are still in the path of reconciliation to the Church of Rome. Rome never changes. Her principles have not altered in the least. She has not lessened the breach between herself and Protestants; they have done all the advancing. But what does this argue for the Protestantism of this day? It is the rejection of Bible truth which makes men approach to infidelity. It is a backsliding church that lessens the distance between itself and the Papacy.
“Boroom bi yégle na rëcc ci kaw ñi jële dara ci Mbind mi walla yokk ci ko. Mag moomu maa ngi nekk, « MAN MIIY NEKK », mo sàkku na li war a doon sàrtu ngëm ak njàngale, te mu tëral na ne Biibël bi war na doon téereb kër gi. Mbooloom gëm gi tegu ci Kàddu Yàlla, dogoo gu dul jàppante la soreel ko ak Room. Benn yoon Protestaa yi nekkoon nañu noonu, séq ak réy mbooloom mbugal mii, waaye jege nañu ko gannaaw-gannaaw, te ba tey ñu ngi ci yoonu delloo ak Kërceenug Room. Room du soppiku mukk. Ay njubteem soppiwul benn tuuti sax. Waxul ba yàqu yawute bi nekk diggante moom ak Protestaa yi; ñoom ñoo def lépp lu jëm ci kanam. Waaye lan la loolu di firndeel ci Protestaanteem jamono jii? Mooy bañ dëggu Biibël bi tax nit ñi di jëma jegeeg wéetal. Mbooloom gëm gu delloo gannaaw mooy waññi sorewaayam ak Papasi bi.”
“It is souls like Luther, Cranmer, Ridley, Hooper, and the thousands of noble men who were martyrs for the truth’s sake, who are the true Protestants. They stood as faithful sentinels of truth, declaring that Protestantism is incapable of union with Romanism, but must be as far separated from the principles of the Papacy as is the east from the west. Such advocates of truth could no more harmonize with ‘the man of sin’ than could Christ and his apostles. In earlier ages the righteous felt that it was impossible to affiliate with Rome, and, though their antagonism to this system of error was maintained at risk of property and life, yet they had courage to maintain their separation, and manfully struggled for the truth. Bible truth was dearer to them than wealth, honor, or even life itself. They could not endure to see the truth buried under a mass of superstition and lying sophistry. They took the word of God in their hands, and raised the standard of truth before the people, boldly declaring that which God had revealed unto them through diligent searching of the Bible. They died the cruelest of deaths for their fidelity to God, but by their blood they purchased for us liberties and privileges that many who claim to be Protestants are easily yielding up to the power of evil. But shall we yield up these dearly bought privileges? Shall we offer insult to the God of heaven, and, after he has freed us from the Romish yoke, again place ourselves in bondage to this antichristian power? Shall we prove our degeneracy by signing away our religious liberty, our right to worship God according to the dictates of our own conscience?
“Xel yu mel ni melow Luther, Cranmer, Ridley, Hooper, ak junni nit ñu tedd ci dëgg, ñoo di wa Protestaŋ yu dëgg dëgg. Ñoom taxawoon ni ay wottukat yu takku ci dëgg, di yégle ne Protestantisme mënu ànd ak Romanisme, waaye war na weesu ak njariñi Papauté ba mel ni penku ak sowu. Ñu mel ni ñii di taxawkat yu dëgg mënuñu woon a juboo ak ‘ki bàkkaar bi’ noonu la Kirist ak ay ndawam itam mënuñu ko woon. Ci jamono yu jiitu ya, ñi jub daan nañu xam ne mënuñu boole seen bopp ak Room; te doonte seen xeex ak sistemu njuumte bii dafa taxawoon ci risku alal ak bakkan, moom lañu amee fit ngir sax ci seen weesu, te góor-góorlu nañu ci xeex ngir dëgg. Dëggu Biibël dafa gën a jafe ci ñoom lu dul alal, teraanga, walla sax bakkanu ñoom ci boppam. Mënuñu woon muñ a gis dëgg di suuloo ci suufu mboolem réere ak sophisme fenkat. Jële nañu kàddug Yàlla ci seen loxo, te yékkati nañu saxalu dëgg ci kanamu askan wi, di wax ak fit li Yàlla révèle woon ci ñoom jaarale ko ci seet bu góor-góorlu ci Biibël bi. Dee nañu dee yu gëna metti ngir seen takku ci Yàlla, waaye jaarale ko ci seen deret, jëndal nañu nu sañ-sañ ak yelleef yi ñu bare ñi di wax ne ñoom ay Protestaŋ di leen bàyyi yomb ci kàttanu lu bon. Waaye ndax danuy bàyyi yelleef yii ñu jënd ak njariñu yu jafe? Ndax danuy toroxal Yàllay asamaan, te gannaaw bi mu nu goree ci yokku Room, dellu yokk sunu bopp ci jaamug kàttan gii di antikiris? Ndax danuy firndeel sunu wàññiku by signing away sunu sañ-sañu diine, sunu sañ-sañu màggal Yàlla ni ko xelu sunu bopp di jox ndigal?”
“The voice of Luther, that echoed in mountains and valleys, that shook Europe as with an earthquake, summoned forth an army of noble apostles of Jesus, and the truth they advocated could not be silenced by fagots, by tortures, by dungeons, by death; and still the voices of the noble army of martyrs are telling us that the Roman power is the predicted apostasy of the last days, the mystery of iniquity which Paul saw beginning to work even in his day. Roman Catholicism is rapidly gaining ground. Popery is on the increase, and those who have turned their ears away from hearing the truth are listening to her delusive fables. Papal chapels, papal colleges, nunneries, and monasteries are on the increase, and the Protestant world seems to be asleep. Protestants are losing the mark of distinction that distinguished them from the world, and they are lessening the distance between themselves and the Roman power. They have turned away their ears from hearing the truth; they have been unwilling to accept light which God shed upon their pathway, and are therefore going into darkness. They speak with contempt of the idea that there will be a revival of the past cruel persecution on the part of Romanists and those who affiliate with them. They do not recognize the fact that the word of God fully predicts such a revival, and will not concede that the people of God in the last days shall suffer persecution, although the Bible says, ‘The dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.’
“Baati Luther, bi doon reewe ci tund ya ak xuru yi, bi yëngal Ëroop mel ni suuf yëngoo, woo na génne xeet bu mag bu ndaw ndaw ndawul ci yooni Yeesu, te dëgg bi ñuy taxawal manuñu ko noppi ak lakk, ak mbugal yu metti, ak kaso yi, ak dee; te ba léegi itam baat yi ci mbooloo bu tedd bu seede yi di nu wax ne kàttanu Room mooy ngëstu gi ñu waxoon ne dina am ci fan yu mujj yi, mooy kumpa gu ñaawteef gi Pool gisoon ne tàmbalee na liggéey ba ca jamonoom sax. Katolisismu Room di yokku gaaw gaaw. Poperi mi ngi gën a yaatu, te ñi dëddugloo dëgg bi, jublu seeni nopp ci ay léeb yu naxam. Kapel yu paap bi, ekool yu paap bi, kër yu jigéen ñi diine, ak monas yu ñiy dund ci bëgg-bopp, ñu ngi yokku; te àddina Protestaaŋ bi mel ni dafa nelaw. Protestaaŋ yi di sànk mandarga gu leen doon xàmmee, gu leen weesloo ak àddina, te ñu ngi waññi diggante bi doon nekk seen diggante ak kàttanu Room. Dëddoo nañu dégg dëgg bi; bëgguñu woon nangu leer gi Yàlla tasaare woon ci seen yoon, te moo tax ñu ngi dugg ci lëndëm. Ñu ngi wax ak xeebtu ci xalaat bi ne fitna ak bundxata gu bon gu jamono yu weesu yi dinaat dellusi ci wetu Roomaanis ak ñi bokk ak ñoom. Xamuñu ne Kàddug Yàlla wax na bu mat ne noonu dina dellusi, te bëgguñu nangu ne askanu Yàlla ci fan yu mujj yi dinañu sonn fitna, doonte Biibël bi wax ne, ‘Naga ba meroon na ci jigéen ji, dem xare ak desitu askanam, ñiy sàmm ndigali Yàlla, te yor seede Yeesu Kirist.’”
“Popery is the religion of human nature, and the mass of humanity love a doctrine that permits them to commit sin, and yet frees them from its consequences. People must have some form of religion, and this religion, formed by human device, and yet claiming divine authority, suits the carnal mind. Men who think themselves wise and intelligent turn away in pride from the standard of righteousness, the ten commandments, and do not think it is in harmony with their dignity to inquire into the ways of God. Therefore they go into false ways, into forbidden paths, become self-sufficient, self inflated, after the pattern of the pope, not after the pattern of Jesus Christ. They must have the form of religion that has the least requirement of spirituality and self-denial, and as unsanctified human wisdom will not lead them to loathe popery, they are naturally drawn toward its provisions and doctrines. They do not want to walk in the ways of the Lord. They are altogether too much enlightened to seek God prayerfully and humbly, with an intelligent knowledge of his word. Not caring to know the ways of the Lord, their minds are all open to delusions, all ready to accept and believe a lie. They are willing to have the most unreasonable, most inconsistent falsehoods palmed off upon them as truth.
“Pooperiye mooy diineg nit ki ci boppam, te mbooloom nit ñi bëgg nañu jàngale gu leen may ñu def bàkkaar, waaye te moom indi leen ci moomeelam. Nit ñépp war nañu am benn melow diine, te diine jii, ji nit sos ak xelam, waaye di laaj ndigal bu jóge Yàlla, moo dëppook xel mu bokk ci yaram. Góor ñi di jàpp seen bopp ni ñoo am xam-xam ak njàng mu leer dañuy dellu ak réy-réylu dëggal njub gi, maanaam fukk yoon yi, te duñu jàpp ne aada ak daraja seen bopp moo leen waral seet yoonu Yàlla yi. Moo tax ñuy dugg ci yoon yu jubadi, ci pexe yu ñu tere, di sukkandiku ci seen bopp, di yaawe ci seen bopp, topp royukaayu baab, waaye du royukaayu Yeesu Kirist. War nañu am melow diine gu gën a néew laaj ngëm gu xel mu sell ak weddi bopp, te ndax xam-xamu nit gu ñu sellalul du leen yóbbu ba ñu sib Pooperi, looloo tax seen dund gu tabe moo leen di jiital ci ay dogal ak ay jàngaleem. Bëgguñu dox ci yooni Boroom bi. Seen leer gu bare ba fees dafa tax ba duñu seet Yàlla ci ñaan ak toroxlu, ak xam-xam gu am solo ci Kàddug Yàlla. Ndegam sax duñu faale xam yooni Boroom bi, seen xel ubbeeku na bépp nax, te ñu ngi jekk ci nangu ak gëm fen. Bëgg nañu ñu di leen jox ay fen yu gën a ñàkk xelu, yu gën a weddi seen bopp, ni très, te ñu jàpp ko ne mooy dëgg.”
“Satan’s masterpiece of deception is popery; and while it has been demonstrated that a day of great intellectual darkness was favorable to Romanism, it will also be demonstrated that a day of great intellectual light is also favorable to its power; for the minds of men are concentrated on their own superiority, and do not like to retain God in their knowledge. Rome claims infallibility, and Protestants are following in the same line. They do not desire to search for truth and go on from light to a greater light. They wall themselves in with prejudice, and seem willing to be deceived and to deceive others.
“Liggéeyu naxar gu gën a magg bu Seytaane mooy papis; te niki ñu wonee ne jamono ju ñàkk xel bu réy neexoon Romanis, noonu itam dinañu wone ne jamono ju leer gu magg ci xel neex na itam dooleem; ndax xeli nit ñi dajalees na ci seen bopp ak seen njégu bopp, te bëgguñu a denc Yàlla ci seen xam-xam. Room dafa bëgg a wax ne moom du jéngxat, te Protestaa yi topp nañu benn yoon boobu. Bëgguñu a seet dëgg te jëfandikoo leer ngir dem ci leer gu gën a magg. Tàbb nañu seen bopp ci biir ñaawteefug njubadi, te mel ni dañuy nangu a naxariku ak a naxar nit ñeneen.”
“But though the attitude of the churches is discouraging, yet there is no need of being disheartened; for God has a people who will preserve their fidelity to his truth, who will make the Bible, and the Bible alone, their rule of faith and doctrine, who will elevate the standard, and hold aloft the banner on which is inscribed, “The commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.” They will value a pure gospel, and make the Bible the foundation of their faith and doctrine.
«Waaye doonte sax taxawaayu kilifa yi di lu yàq yaakaar, teewul kenn war naañu a xeeb xol; ndaxte Yàlla am na nit ñu bokk ci moom, ñi denc seen takku ci dëggam, ñi di def Biibël, te Biibël rekk, muy seen sàrtu ngëm ak jàngale, ñi di yékati ràññee, te téye ca kaw banniere bi ñu bind ne, “Santaane Yàlla yi ak ngëm Yeesu.” Dinañu jàpp xibaar bu baax bu sell ni lu am solo, te def Biibël muy fondamaŋu seen ngëm ak seen jàngale.»
“For such a time as this, when men are casting aside the law of the Lord of hosts, the prayer of David is applicable,—‘It is time for thee, Lord, to work; for they have made void thy law.’ We are coming to a time when almost universal scorn will be heaped upon the law of God, and God’s commandment-keeping people will be severely tried; but will they lose their respect for the law of Jehovah because others do not see and realize its binding claims? Let God’s commandment-keeping people, like David, reverence God’s law in proportion as men cast it aside and heap upon it disrespect and contempt.” Signs of the Times, February 19, 1894.
«Ngir yenn saa yu mel ni lii, bi nit ñi di sànni fu sore yoonu Boroom bu Kër gi, ñaanu Daawuda dafay jëm ci dëgg,—“Waxtu jot na ngir Yow, Boroom bi, nga jëfandikoo sa doole; ndaxte dañu yàq sa yoon.” Nungi jëm ci ab waxtu bu xasaw gu bari di daanu ci yoonu Yàlla ba mu nekk lu tollook ñépp, te nit ñi di sàmm ndigali Yàlla dinañu jaar ci nattu gu metti; waaye ndax dinañu ñàkk seen worma ci yoonu Yàlla ndax ñeneen duñu gis te xam lu mu leen teg? Na nit ñi di sàmm ndigali Yàlla, ni Daawuda, wormaal yoonu Yàlla ci ni nit ñi koy sànni fu sore te di koy teg ci kawam xeeb ak xeebal.» Signs of the Times, 19 Fewriye 1894.
Two years before the antichrist was given a golden medal by a leader of the Laodicean Seventh-day Adventist church, in 1975, a lawsuit was brought against the Seventh-day Adventist church; EEOC v. Pacific Press Publishing Association (Case No. C-74-2025 CBR in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California), where the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued the church’s publishing house on behalf of two female employees—Merikay Silver (a former editor who had left by the time of the suit) and Lorna Tobler—alleging gender-based discrimination in pay and benefits. The church defended its practices partly by invoking religious exemptions and discussing its governance structure.
Ñaari at ak antikiriis bi joxee medaay buur bu wurus ndax kilifab kërgaggu Ajjàngat yu Bés bu Juróom-Ñaareel yi ci Laodise, ci atum 1975, amoon na ab mbirum yoon ci lu jëm ci kërgaggu Ajjàngat yu Bés bu Juróom-Ñaareel yi; EEOC v. Pacific Press Publishing Association (Case No. C-74-2025 CBR in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California), fa Komisiyoŋu Yemaleg Ëmb yu Yemee ngir Liggéeykat yi (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) daanee kërgaggu giñ-kàddu kërgaggu gi ngir ñaari jigéen ñi doon liggéey ci foofu—Merikay Silver (ab soppekat bind yu jotoon a bàyyi ba keroog mbir mi duggee ci yoon) ak Lorna Tobler—dafa leen tuumaal ne dañoo leen di ñàkkal ci pey ak njariñ yi ndax seen jigéen-jàmm. Kërgaggu gi daan na aar ay jëfandikoom ci genn wàll, dafa woote woon ay sàmm yu diine ak itam waxtaan ci ni nguuram ak jaar-jaaram tëdde.
In a sworn statement dated February 6, 1976 (part of a defense brief submitted to the court), Neal C. Wilson (then president of the church’s North American Division, and later General Conference president from 1979–1990) addressed the church’s historical views on Roman Catholicism. The statement was made in the context of arguing against characterizations of the church as having a “hierarchy” similar to the papal system. The full relevant quote is: “Although it is true that there was a period in the life of the Seventh-day Adventist Church when the denomination took a distinctly anti-Roman Catholic viewpoint, and the term ‘hierarchy’ was used in a pejorative sense to refer to the papal form of church governance, that attitude on the Church’s part was nothing more than a manifestation of widespread anti-popery among conservative protestant denominations in the early part of this century and the latter part of the last, and which has now been consigned to the historical trash heap so far as the Seventh-day Adventist Church is concerned.”
Ci ab wax jàppale gu ñu waat ci fanweeri 6 Fewriye 1976 (bokk ci ab mbindum difaans bu ñu joxe àttekat yi), Neal C. Wilson (mi doon saa su boobaa njiitu Division bu Amerik gu Bëj-gànnaaru kàngiis gi, te gannaaw loolu mu nekk njiitu General Conference diggante 1979–1990) waxoon na ci gis-gisu màggat yi kàngiis gi amoon ci Roman Catholicism. Wax ji amoon na ci yoonu fexe bañ a nangu ni ñuy melale kàngiis gi ne am na “hierarchy” bu nirook ak sistemu baab. Kàddu gi yépp te jëm ci lii mooy: “Doonte dëgg la ne amoon na ab jamono ci dundug Kàngiisu Seventh-day Adventist bi, ba mbooloo mi daan taxawal gis-gis bu biral ci suufe Roman Catholicism, te baat bu ‘hierarchy’ daan nañu ko jëfandikoo ci anam wu xeebal ngir tudde melokaanu nguuru-kàngiis gu baab, xalaat woowu ci wetug Kàngiis gi nekkoonul dara ludul feeñug noonoo baab bu yaatu woon ci biir mboolooy protestant yu sàmm seen yoonu njàngale ci tàmbaliinu xarnu bii ak ci mujjug xarnu ma jiitu, te léegi dees na ko sàkk ci mbalitu yàggaay yi, bu ñu seetee ko ci lu jëm ci Kàngiisu Seventh-day Adventist bi.”
This reflects a shift away from the church’s traditional prophetic interpretation, which identified the papacy as the ‘beast’ or antichrist in Revelation. Critics within and outside the church have interpreted it as downplaying or abandoning that anti-Catholic stance to align with modern ecumenism or legal defenses. Wilson, in 1985 identified the Presidents of the various Divisions of the church as “cardinals,” when he stated, “… there is no ‘cardinal’ from all the countries of the Far East, while there will probably be two ‘cardinals’ from Africa.”
Lii dafay won nekk genn soppi gu sore ci tekki bu wax ju jigéen gu yëg-yëg gu mbootaay bi ci wàllu kàddu yu jëm ci jamono yi di ñëw, gi daan ràññee papas bi ni mooy “rab wi” walla antikrist bi ci Peeñ gu Xel mu Sell mi. Ñi koy bëggul ci biir ak bitiir mbootaay bi, tekki nañu ko ne day wàññi walla bàyyi taxawaay bu jëm ci Kaatolig yi, ngir ànd ak ekumenisam bu jamono jii walla lay yu ñuy defe ngir aar yoon. Wilson, ci atum 1985, ràññee na njiitu Desiwóŋ yu wuute yi ci mbootaay bi ni “kardinàl”, bi mu waxee ne: “… amul benn ‘kardinàl’ bu jóge ci réew yépp yu Penku Féeg bi, waaye amaana ñaar ‘kardinàl’ yu jóge Afrika.”
Sister White stated that it is a backslidden church that lessens the distance between itself and the pope! The compromise of the third generation is represented as weeping for Tammuz in Ezekiel eight, and by the compromise of Pergamos. The first generation from 1863 unto 1888 represented the church of Ephesus, a church that lost its first love, and the Millerite movements first love was the prophetic message, and the first chapter of that prophetic message was the “seven times” that were set aside in 1863.
Sërin White wax na nees na kere gu ñëw ginnaaw te yàgg ci yoonu dëgg mooy bu wàññe digganteem ak boppam ak papa bi! Jëfandikoo ak toppandoo bu ñetteelu maas gi dañu ko melale ci Ezekiel juróom-ñett, ni ñuy jooyal Tammuz, te itam ci toppandoo bu Pergamos. Maas bu njëkk bi, dale ci 1863 ba 1888, moo doon mbooloom Efes, moom di kanam gu réy gu yàqu woon mbëggeelam bu njëkk; te mbëggeel bu njëkk bu yëngu-yëngu Millerite bi moo doon yégleb kàddug yonent gi, te saraxalekat bu njëkk bu kàddug yonent googu moo doon “juróom-ñaari waxtu yi” yu ñu bàyyi woon ci wetu 1863.
From 1888 unto 1919, the second generation represented by Smyrna and Ezekiel’s secret chambers, witnessed the death of the Spirit of Prophecy, as Sister White was laid to rest in 1915. More details of the four generations are necessary to complete the testimony, but the progressive rebellion must be understood to fully appreciate how an apostate people could “proscribe” the writings of Ellen White, or how they could promote the first day of the week as acceptable. Judas works with the “drunkards of Ephraim” that “rule this people” in Jerusalem, and those that rule Jerusalem and bow to the sun, are represented by the Sanhedrin.
Bëm 1888 ba 1919, ñaareelu maas gi ñuy tegtale ci Smyrna ak néeg yu nëbb yi ci Esekiyel, gis nañu dee gu Xelum Kàddug Yàlla, ndaxte Sœur White dañu ko suuloon ci 1915. Fariñ yu gën a bari ci ñenti maas yi am nañu solo ngir matal seede si, waaye fàggu gu ñëw ndànk-ndànk gi war nañu ko xam bu baax ngir xam bu leer ni nit ñu dëddu Yàlla mën nañu “tere” mbind mi Ellen White, walla ni ñu mën a yékkati bés bu jëkk bu ayu-bis bi ni lu ñuy nangu. Yuda di liggéey ak “naan-kat yu Efraim” yi “nguur nit ñi” ci Yerusalem, te ñi nguur Yerusalem te sujjóot jant bi, Sanhedrin moo leen di tegtale.
We will continue this study in the next article.
Danuy yokk nañu ci ginnaaw ci jàngat bii ci beneen mbind mi.
“Among the professed children of God, how little patience has been manifested, how many bitter words have been spoken, how much denunciation has been uttered against those not of our faith. Many have looked upon those belonging to other churches as great sinners, when the Lord does not thus regard them. Those who look thus upon the members of other churches, have need to humble themselves under the mighty hand of God. Those whom they condemn may have had but little light, few opportunities and privileges. If they had had the light that many of the members of our churches have had, they might have advanced at a far greater rate, and have better represented their faith to the world. Of those who boast of their light, and yet fail to walk in it, Christ says, ‘But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you. And thou, Capernaum [Seventh-day Adventists, who have had great light], which art exalted unto heaven [in point of privilege], shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.’ At that time Jesus answered and said, ‘I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent [in their own estimation], and hast revealed them unto babes.’
«Ci biir yépp ñiy wax ne ñoom ay doomu Yàlla lañu, muñ gi ñu wone nekk na ndaw lool; baat yu metti yu baree waxees nañu; ñaari kàdduy daan ak yedd a ngi bari ci kaw ñi nekkul ci sunu ngëm. Ñu bare xool nañu ñi bokk ci yeneen mboolooy kërceen ni ñu doon ay bàkkaarkat yu réy, waaye Boroom bi du leen seet noonu. Ñiy xool noonu ci kaw membër yi ci yeneen mboolooy kërceen, war nañu toroxalu ci suufu loxo bu am doole bu Yàlla. Ñi ñuy daan, man nañu a amoon tuuti leer rekk, ak tuuti yoon ak njariñ. Su ñu amoon leer gi ñu bare ci sunuy mbooloo yi am, kon man nañu woon a jëm kanam ci anam gu gën a gaaw lool, te wone seen ngëm àddina si gën a baax. Ci ñi damayoo ci seen leer, te teewul dox ci moom, Almasi nee na: “Waaye maa ngi leen koy wax, bésub àtte ba, ñu dina muñal Tir ak Sidon gën a muñal yeen. Yow it, Kapernawum [Bés-bu-jjéx-Adventiste yi, ñi amoon leer gu réy], yaw mi yékkati ba asamaan [ci wetu njariñ yi], dinga suul ba safara: ndaxte su kéemaan yi am ci sa biir amoon nañu ci Sodom, kon dina des ba tey. Waaye maa ngi leen koy wax, bésub àtte ba, réewum Sodom dina am muñal gu gën a yomb ci sa kaw.” Ca waxtu woowu, Yeesu tontu ne: “Maa ngi la sant, Baay, Boroom asamaan ak suuf, ndax danga nëbb lii ci ñi am xam-xam ak xel [ci seen seeni gis-gis], te feeñal ko xale yi.”»
“‘And now, because ye have done all these works, saith the Lord, and I spake unto you, rising up early and speaking, but ye heard not; and I called you, but ye answered not; therefore will I do unto this house, which is called by my name, wherein ye trust, and unto the place which I gave to you and to your fathers, as I have done to Shiloh. And I will cast you out of my sight, as I have cast out all your brethren, even the whole seed of Ephraim.’
«Te léegi, ndax seen def nañu lëpp yii, wax na Boroom bi, te maa ngi wax ak yeen ci yàgg a jóg, di wax, waaye dégluwuleen; te woo naa leen, waaye tontuwuleen; moo tax dinaa def kër gii, gi ñuy woowe sama tur, gi ngeen wóolu, ak bérab bi ma joxoon yéen ak seen baay yu mag, ni ma defee Silo. Te dinaa leen sànni jële sama kanam, ni ma sànnee seen mbokk yépp, maanaam askanu Efrayim bépp.»
“The Lord has established among us institutions of great importance, and they are to be managed, not as worldly institutions are managed, but after God’s order. They are to be managed with an eye single to his glory, that by all means perishing souls may be saved. To the people of God the testimonies of the Spirit have come, and yet many have not taken heed to reproofs, warnings, and counsels.
«Boroom bi samp na ci sunu biir ay kuréel yu am solo lool, te war nañu leen di saytu, waxuma ni ñuy saytu kuréeli àddina yi, waaye ci topp ndigal Yàlla. War nañu leen di saytu ak xel mu jëm benn rekk ci ndamaram, ngir ci bépp anam ñi di sànku ñu mën a mucc. Ci nit ñi Yàlla moom la Seede yi jóge ci Xelum Yàlla dikk, teewul sax ñu bare jéggalul yégle yi, artu yi, ak tegtal yi.»
“‘Here now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not: fear ye not me saith the Lord: will ye not tremble at my presence, which have placed the sand for the bound of the sea by a perpetual degree, that it cannot pass it: and though the waves thereof toss themselves, yet can they not prevail; though they roar, yet can they not pass over it? but this people hath a revolting and a rebellious heart; they are revolted and gone. Neither say they in their heart, Let us now fear the Lord our God, that giveth rain, both the former and the latter, in his season: he reserveth unto us the appointed weeks of the harvest. Your iniquities have turned away these things, and your sins have withholden good things from you. . . . They judge not the cause, the cause of the fatherless, yet they prosper; and the right of the needy do they not judge. Shall I not visit for these things? saith the Lord; shall not my soul be revenged on such a nation as this?’
«“Dégluleen léegi lii, yéen xeet wu ñàkk xel te amul njàngat; yi am bët te gisul, yi am nopp te déggul: ndax dungeen ma ragal, wax na Boroom bi? ndax dungeen yëngu ci sama kanam, man mi teg suufus géej gi di suufuŋ suuf ngir muy digu géej gi, ci anam wu sax ba fàww, ba mu mënul ko jéggi? Te doonte ay mbeddam di xàccaat, teewul duñu man a daan; doonte ñuy riir, teewul duñu ko jéggi. Waaye xeet wii am na xol wu dëngante te fippu; dañu dëngante ba dem. Te it waxuñu ci seen xol: Na nuy ragal léegi Boroom bi sunu Yàlla, mi di jox taw, muy taw wu njëkk ak taw wu mujj ci jamonoam; mooy aaralal nu ay ayu-bés yu tànn ngir ngóob mi. Seeni tooñ dëddoo nañu yëf yii, te seeni bàkkaar tere nañu yiw yi ci yéen.... Dañuy àttewul mbir mi, mbiru jirim ji amul baay, teewul ñuy am njariñ; te dëggug ñàkk doole yi, duñu ko àtte. Ndax duma leen seetaan ndax yëf yii? wax na Boroom bi; ndax sama ruu du feyu ci xeet wu mel nii?”»
“Shall the Lord be compelled to say, ‘Pray not thou for this people, neither lift up cry nor prayer for them, neither make intercession to me: for I will not hear thee’? ‘Therefore the showers have been withholden, and there hath been no latter rain. . . . Wilt thou not from this time cry unto me, My father, thou art the guide of my youth?’” Review and Herald, August 1, 1893.
“Ndax Boroom bi dinañu ko ga, ne: ‘Bul ñaanal nit ñi; bul yékkati yuuxu walla ñaan ngir ñoom, te bul ma defal ñoom ràmmu: ndaxte duma la déglu’? ‘Moo tax taw yi dañoo jàppandikoo, te amagul taw wu mujj.... Ndax doo wax ma li dale tey ne: Sama Baay, yaa di kilifag sama ndaw?’” Review and Herald, 1 Awuut 1893.