We ended the last article with the sentence that stated, “In 2001 the government of the United States spoke the Patriot Act into law.”
Qayna qillqaska tukuysichirqanchik qhipa qillqapi kay simiwan: “2001 watapi Estados Unidos suyupa gobiernon Patriot Act nisqa kamachiyta leyman tukuchirqan.”
“There are many, even of those engaged in this movement for Sunday enforcement, who are blinded to the results which will follow this action. They do not see that they are striking directly against religious liberty. There are many who have never understood the claims of the Bible Sabbath and the false foundation upon which the Sunday institution rests. Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.
“యిది ఆదివార ఆచరణను బలవంతపరచు ఈ ఉద్యమములో నిమగ్నులైయున్న వారిలోను అనేకులు, ఈ చర్యచేత అనుసరించబోవు ఫలితముల విషయములో అంధులై యున్నారు. తాము మతస్వాతంత్ర్యమునకు నేరుగా దెబ్బకొడుచున్నారనే విషయమును వారు గ్రహింపరు. బైబిలు విశ్రాంతిదినమునకు సంబంధించిన హక్కులను, అలాగే ఆదివార వ్యవస్థ ఆధారపడిన తప్పుడు పునాదిని ఎన్నడును గ్రహింపనివారును అనేకులున్నారు. మత సంబంధమైన శాసనమునకు అనుకూలమైన ఏ ఉద్యమమైనను, అనేక యుగములుగా మనస్సాక్షి స్వాతంత్ర్యమునకు నిరంతరముగా యుద్ధము చేసిన పాపసంస్థానమునకు చేయు ఒక రాయితీ కార్యమే. ఆదివార ఆచరణ ‘అధర్మమనే రహస్యము’నుండి ఉద్భవించినదై, క్రైస్తవ సంస్థ అని పిలువబడుచున్నదానికి తన ఉనికిని దానికే అప్పగించియున్నది; దానిని బలవంతపరచుటయే రోమనీయత్వమునకు మూలస్తంభమైయున్న సూత్రములను వాస్తవముగా అంగీకరించుట అవుతుంది. మన దేశము, ఆదివార శాసనమును అమలులోనికి తెచ్చుటద్వారా, తన ప్రభుత్వ సూత్రములను ఈ విధముగా త్యజించినప్పుడు, ఈ కార్యములో ప్రొటెస్టాంటిజము పోపత్వముతో చేతులు కలుపును; అది మరేమియు కాక, చాలాకాలముగా మళ్లీ చురుకైన నిరంకుశ అధికారములోకి ఎగబాకుటకై అవకాశమును ఆత్రుతతో కాచియున్న ఆ దౌర్జన్యానికి ప్రాణము పోయుటయే అవుతుంది.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.
1888 typified 2001, and it was then that the Blair Bill was introduced, though its failure to be passed, prevented it from prophetically speaking. It became the sign of 66 AD, a siege that was initiated and then mysteriously withdrawn. When it is understood that there are two image of the beast testing periods, and that the second period begins with the Sunday law in the United States, typified by the year 321, and that the period ends when the world Sunday law, typified by 538, is fully enforced; then it demands prophetically that the beginning of the first image of the beast testing period also begins with some type of typification of a Sunday law being spoken. In 1888, the Blair Bill was an attempt to enforce a National Sunday law, and 1888 identifies when the angel of Revelation eighteen descends and lightens the earth with his glory.
1888 ဗျူဟာဖြင့် 2001 ကို ပုံဆောင်ထားခဲ့ပြီး၊ ထိုအချိန်တွင်ပင် Blair Bill ကို တင်သွင်းခဲ့သည်။ သို့ရာတွင် ၎င်းသည် အတည်မပြုနိုင်ခဲ့သဖြင့် ပရောဖက်ပြုဆိုင်ရာ အနက်အဓိပ္ပာယ်ဖြင့် မပြောဆိုနိုင်အောင် ဖြစ်စေခဲ့သည်။ ထိုအရာသည် အေဒီ 66 ကို ညွှန်ပြသော လက္ခဏာတစ်ရပ် ဖြစ်လာခဲ့သည်၊ အစပြုခဲ့သော်လည်း နက်နဲစွာ မရှင်းလင်းနိုင်သည့် အကြောင်းကြောင့် ပြန်လည် ဆုတ်ခွာသွားသော ဝိုင်းရံမှုတစ်ခု ဖြစ်သည်။ သားရဲ၏ ရုပ်တုနှင့်ဆိုင်သော စမ်းသပ်ကာလ နှစ်ရပ်ရှိသည်ကိုလည်းကောင်း၊ ဒုတိယကာလသည် အမေရိကန်ပြည်ထောင်စုရှိ တနင်္ဂနွေဥပဒေမှ စတင်ပြီး၊ 321 ခုနှစ်ဖြင့် ပုံဆောင်ထားကာ၊ ထိုကာလသည် ကမ္ဘာလုံးဆိုင်ရာ တနင်္ဂနွေဥပဒေကို 538 ခုနှစ်ဖြင့် ပုံဆောင်ထားသကဲ့သို့ အပြည့်အဝ အာဏာတည်သည့်အခါ၌ အဆုံးသတ်သည်ကိုလည်းကောင်း နားလည်သည့်အခါ၊ ထိုအခါ ပရောဖက်ပြုဆိုင်ရာအားဖြင့် ပထမ သားရဲ၏ ရုပ်တုနှင့်ဆိုင်သော စမ်းသပ်ကာလ၏ အစတည်ရာသည်လည်း တနင်္ဂနွေဥပဒေတစ်မျိုးမျိုးကို ကြေညာပြောဆိုခြင်းအား ပုံဆောင်သော အရာတစ်ခုဖြင့် စတင်ရမည်ဟု လိုအပ်စေသည်။ 1888 ခုနှစ်တွင် Blair Bill သည် အမျိုးသားအဆင့် တနင်္ဂနွေဥပဒေကို အတည်ပြု အာဏာသက်ဝင်စေရန် ကြိုးပမ်းမှုတစ်ရပ် ဖြစ်ခဲ့ပြီး၊ 1888 သည် ဗျာဒိတ်ကျမ်း 18 ရှိ ကောင်းကင်တမန် ဆင်းသက်လာ၍ မိမိ၏ ဘုန်းတော်ဖြင့် မြေကြီးကို အလင်းပေးသောအချိန်ကို ဖော်ညွှန်းသည်။
The Patriot Act is the typification of a Sunday law that begins the image of the beast testing time in the United States. The United States speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven when it enforces the Sunday law. When it enforces that law it will speak as a dragon, and that Sunday law identifies that the image of the beast is fully formed in the United States. At that point the United States has filled up its cup of probationary time, and national apostasy is followed by national ruin. At that point the United States ceases to be the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy as the threefold union is established.
قانونُ پاتریۆت، تیپسازیِ یکشنبهقانونی است که آغازِ زمانِ آزمونِ تصویرِ وحش را در ایالات متحده رقم میزند. ایالات متحده، در تحققِ مکاشفه باب سیزدهم، آیه یازدهم، هنگامی که یکشنبهقانون را به اجرا میگذارد، همچون اژدها سخن میگوید. هنگامی که آن قانون را به اجرا گذارد، همچون اژدها سخن خواهد گفت، و آن یکشنبهقانون نشان میدهد که تصویرِ وحش در ایالات متحده بهطور کامل شکل گرفته است. در آن نقطه، ایالات متحده پیمانهٔ زمانِ آزمایشیِ خود را پر کرده است، و ارتدادِ ملی در پیِ ویرانیِ ملی میآید. در آن نقطه، با استقرارِ اتحادِ سهگانه، ایالات متحده دیگر ششمین پادشاهیِ نبوتِ کتابمقدس نخواهد بود.
Alpha and Omega always portrays the end with the beginning and at the beginning of the United States there were three times the United States prophetically spoke that marked the beginning of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. The Declaration of Independence in 1776, followed by the Constitution of 1789 and then the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 identify the first three times the United States prophetically spoke. Each of those three publications represented the speaking of the United States. Those three steps led to 1798, the beginning of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Those same three waymarks in the beginning of the United States, represent three waymarks that lead to the ending of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy.
ئادەمە و ئۆمەگا هەمووکات کۆتایییەکە لەگەڵ سەرەتاکە پیشان دەدات، و لە سەرەتای ویلایەتە یەکگرتووەکاندا سێ جار هەبوو کە ویلایەتە یەکگرتووەکان بە شێوەی پێغەمبەرانە قسەیان کرد و ئەوە سەرەتای ویلایەتە یەکگرتووەکان وەک شەشەم پاشایەتی پێشبینیی کتێبی پیرۆز نیشاندا. ڕاگەیاندنی سەربەخۆیی لە ساڵی 1776، کە دوای ئەوە دەستوور لە 1789 هات، و پاشان یاساکانی بیانی و ناپاکگوتن لە 1798، یەکەم سێ جارەکانی ناساند کە ویلایەتە یەکگرتووەکان بە شێوەی پێغەمبەرانە قسەیان کرد. هەر یەکێک لەو سێ بڵاوکراوەیە نوێنەرایەتی قسەکردنی ویلایەتە یەکگرتووەکان دەکرد. ئەو سێ هەنگاوە گەیاندنە 1798، سەرەتای فەرمانڕەوایی ویلایەتە یەکگرتووەکان وەک شەشەم پاشایەتی پێشبینیی کتێبی پیرۆز. هەمان ئەو سێ نیشانە-ڕێگەیە لە سەرەتای ویلایەتە یەکگرتووەکاندا، نوێنەرایەتی سێ نیشانە-ڕێگە دەکەن کە بەرەو کۆتایی فەرمانڕەوایی ویلایەتە یەکگرتووەکان وەک شەشەم پاشایەتی پێشبینیی کتێبی پیرۆز دەبن.
The Patriot Act is the first of three times the United States speaks as it comes to its conclusion as the sixth kingdom. The third speaking, that identifies the end of the sixth kingdom is the Sunday law. In the middle of that history the Pelosi Trials of January 6, which began in 2022 were initiated. The trials were a direct rejection of the rights enshrined in the Constitution because the trials were political in nature, and the lawfare was not simply a fabrication of facts, but it was actually a direct attack upon “procedural” and “substantive” law as identified within the Constitution.
Patriot Act-उ संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका छैठौँ राज्यको रूपमा आफ्नो निष्कर्षतर्फ आइपुग्दा बोल्ने तीन अवसरहरूमध्ये पहिलो हो। छैठौँ राज्यको अन्त्यलाई चिन्हित गर्ने तेस्रो बोलाइ आइतबारको व्यवस्था हो। त्यस इतिहासको मध्यभागमा, २०२२ मा आरम्भ भएका जनवरी ६ का Pelosi Trials प्रारम्भ गरिए। ती मुद्दाहरू संविधानमा सुनिश्चित गरिएका अधिकारहरूको प्रत्यक्ष अस्वीकृति थिए, किनकि ती मुद्दाहरू स्वभावतः राजनीतिक थिए, र lawfare तथ्यहरूको केवल बनावट मात्र नभई, वास्तवमै संविधानभित्र चिन्हित “procedural” र “substantive” कानुनमाथिको प्रत्यक्ष आक्रमण थियो।
The Patriot Act in 2001 was a direct attack upon the “Due Process Clause” which appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. That was 2001, and in 2022 the attack against the Constitution was focused upon both “procedural due process” and “substantive due process.” The word “repudiate” means to deny, and Sister White identifies that at the Sunday law in the United States every principle of the Constitution will be repudiated.
قانون الوطنية لعام 2001 كان هجومًا مباشرًا على «بند الإجراءات القانونية الواجبة» الوارد في كلٍّ من التعديل الخامس والتعديل الرابع عشر لدستور الولايات المتحدة. وهذان ينصّان على أنه لا يجوز حرمان أحد من الحياة أو الحرية أو الملكية دون الإجراءات القانونية الواجبة. كان ذلك في عام 2001، وفي عام 2022 انصبّ الهجوم على الدستور على كلٍّ من «الإجراءات القانونية الواجبة الإجرائية» و«الإجراءات القانونية الواجبة الموضوعية». وكلمة «يتنكّر» تعني ينكر، وتُبيّن الأخت وايت أنه عند صدور قانون الأحد في الولايات المتحدة سوف يُتَنكَّر لكل مبدأ من مبادئ الدستور.
“By the decree enforcing the institution of the papacy in violation of the law of God, our nation will disconnect herself fully from righteousness. When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near.
«Atiur apapáchiq kamachiyta churarichispa, Diospa kamachinanta p’anqaspa, suyunchikqa llapanpiqmi chiqap kaymanta t’aqakunqa. Protestantisimuq makinta chay hatun t’uqu patamanta mast’arichispa Romanapa atiyninpa makinta jap’inan pacha, uku muyumanta mast’arichispa espiritismowan makimakichakunan pacha, kay kimsa kuti huñunakuypa kamachiynin uranpi suyunchikqa Protestantawan republikanu gobiernomanta kasqanman hina Constitucionninpa sapa prinsipionta ñak’arichispa qichunqa, hinaspa papal llaullakuykunata, pantachikuyninkunata mirachinapaq kamachiyta ruwaspa, chayqa yachayta atisunña Satanaspa musphay atiywan rurasqanpaq pacha chayamushanta, tukukuyqa qayllamantaña kasqanta.»
“As the approach of the Roman armies was a sign to the disciples of the impending destruction of Jerusalem, so may this apostasy be a sign to us that the limit of God’s forbearance is reached, that the measure of our nation’s iniquity is full, and that the angel of mercy is about to take her flight, never to return. The people of God will then be plunged into those scenes of affliction and distress which prophets have described as the time of Jacob’s trouble. The cries of the faithful, persecuted ones ascend to heaven. And as the blood of Abel cried from the ground, there are voices also crying to God from martyrs’ graves, from the sepulchers of the sea, from mountain caverns, from convent vaults: ‘How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost Thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?’
“جیسا کہ رومی لشکروں کا نزدیک آنا شاگردوں کے لیے یروشلیم کی قریب الوقوع ہلاکت کی ایک نشانی تھا، ویسا ہی یہ ارتداد ہمارے لیے بھی اس بات کی نشانی ہو سکتا ہے کہ خدا کی درگزر کی حد کو پہنچا جا چکا ہے، کہ ہماری قوم کی بدکرداری کا پیمانہ بھر چکا ہے، اور کہ رحمت کا فرشتہ اپنی پرواز کے لیے آمادہ ہے، تاکہ پھر کبھی واپس نہ آئے۔ تب خدا کے لوگ اُن مصیبت اور تنگی کے مناظر میں ڈال دیے جائیں گے جنہیں انبیا نے یعقوب کی مصیبت کے وقت کے طور پر بیان کیا ہے۔ وفادار اور ستائے ہوئے لوگوں کی فریادیں آسمان تک پہنچتی ہیں۔ اور جس طرح ہابیل کا خون زمین سے پکار اٹھا تھا، اسی طرح شہیدوں کی قبروں سے، سمندر کے مدفنوں سے، پہاڑی غاروں سے، اور خانقاہی تہہ خانوں سے بھی ایسی آوازیں خدا سے فریاد کرتی ہیں: ‘اَے خداوند، قدوس اور برحق، تُو کب تک اُن سے جو زمین پر بسنے والے ہیں، ہمارا خون انصاف کے ساتھ طلب نہ کرے گا اور اُس کا بدلہ نہ لے گا؟’”
“The Lord is doing His work. All heaven is astir. The Judge of all the earth is soon to arise and vindicate His insulted authority. The mark of deliverance will be set upon the men who keep God’s commandments, who revere His law, and who refuse the mark of the beast or of his image.
“ᎤᏬᏚᎯ ᎤᏚᎵᏍᎬ ᎤᏛᏁᎭ. ᎾᏂᎥ ᎦᎸᎶᎢ ᎤᏴᏛᎢ ᎤᏪᏯ. ᏂᎬᎾᏛ ᎡᎶᎯ ᏗᎫᎪᏓᏁᎯ ᎤᏍᏆᎸᎯᏳ ᎤᎴᏅᎯᏍᏗ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏙᎴᎰᏒᎯ ᎤᏤᎵ ᎤᎵᏂᎩᏛ ᎤᏙᎯᏳᏒ ᎤᏓᎦᏘᏓᏍᏔᏂ. ᎠᏓᏗᏱ ᎤᏙᎯᏳᎯ ᎤᏰᎸᏛ ᏓᏰᎸᏔᏂ Ꮎ ᏗᏂᏍᏆᏂᎪᏗᏳ ᎠᎴ Ꮎ ᎠᏂᎾᏰᏍᎩ ᎤᏤᎵ ᏗᎧᎿᎭᏩᏛᎢ, ᎠᎴ Ꮎ ᎬᏩᎾᏟᎶᏍᏗ Ꮎ ᏅᏩᏍᏛ ᎤᏙᎯᏳᎯ ᏗᎦᎸᎶᏗ Ꮭ ᎤᎾᏓᏂᎸᏨᎢ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏟᏍᏗ ᎠᏟᎶᏍᏙᏗ Ꮭ ᎤᎾᏓᏂᎸᏨᎢ.”
“God has revealed what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath. Those who have been warned of the events before them are not to sit in calm expectation of the coming storm, comforting themselves that the Lord will shelter His faithful ones in the day of trouble. We are to be as men waiting for their Lord, not in idle expectancy, but in earnest work, with unwavering faith. It is no time now to allow our minds to be engrossed with things of minor importance. While men are sleeping, Satan is actively arranging matters so that the Lord’s people may not have mercy or justice. The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending. Its professions are mild and apparently Christian, but when it shall speak it will reveal the spirit of the dragon. It is our duty to do all in our power to avert the threatened danger. We should endeavor to disarm prejudice by placing ourselves in a proper light before the people. We should bring before them the real question at issue, thus interposing the most effectual protest against measures to restrict liberty of conscience. We should search the Scriptures and be able to give the reason for our faith. Says the prophet: ‘The wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.’” Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.
«Աստուած յայտնած է, թէ ինչ պիտի կատարուի վերջին օրերուն, որպէսզի Իր ժողովուրդը պատրաստ ըլլայ ընդդիմութեան եւ բարկութեան մրրիկին դէմ կանգնելու։ Անոնք, որոնք նախօրօք զգուշացուած են իրենց առջեւ եղող դէպքերուն մասին, պէտք չէ հանդարտ ակնկալութեամբ նստին գալիք փոթորիկին սպասելով՝ իրենց մխիթարելով, թէ Տէրը նեղութեան օրը պիտի պատսպարէ Իր հաւատարիմները։ Մենք պէտք է ըլլանք որպէս իրենց Տիրոջը սպասող մարդիկ՝ ոչ թէ պարապ ակնկալութեամբ, այլ՝ լուրջ աշխատանքի մէջ, անսասան հաւատքով։ Այժմ ժամանակը չէ, որ մեր միտքերը կլանուին երկրորդական կարեւորութիւն ունեցող բաներով։ Մինչ մարդիկ կը ննջեն, Սատանան գործօնապէս կ’ըմբռնէ իր կարգադրութիւնները, որպէսզի Տիրոջ ժողովուրդը ո՛չ ողորմութիւն գտնէ, ո՛չ ալ արդարութիւն։ Կիրակիի շարժումը այժմ իր ճամբան կը բանայ խաւարի մէջ։ Առաջնորդները կը ծածկեն ճշմարիտ հարցը, եւ շարժումին միացողներէն շատեր իրենք իսկ չեն տեսներ, թէ այդ թաքուն հոսանքը ո՛ւր կը տանի։ Անոր դաւանութիւնները մեղմ են եւ արտաքուստ՝ քրիստոնէական, բայց երբ ան խօսի, վիշապին հոգին պիտի յայտնէ։ Մեր պարտականութիւնն է ընել ամէն ինչ, որ մեր կարողութեան սահմաններուն մէջ է, սպառնացող վտանգը կասեցնելու համար։ Մենք պէտք է ջանանք զինաթափել նախապաշարումը՝ ժողովուրդին առջեւ մեզ պատշաճ լոյսի մէջ ներկայացնելով։ Մենք պէտք է անոնց առջեւ դնենք վէճի իսկական հարցը, այսպէսով ներկայացնելով խղճի ազատութիւնը սահմանափակող միջոցառումներուն դէմ ամենաազդու բողոքը։ Մենք պէտք է Սուրբ Գրութիւնները քննենք եւ կարող ըլլանք տալ մեր հաւատքին պատճառը։ Մարգարէն կ’ըսէ. “Չարերը չարութիւն պիտի ընեն, եւ չարերէն ո՛չ մէկը պիտի հասկնայ. բայց իմաստունները պիտի հասկնան”»։ Վկայութիւններ, հատոր 5, 451, 452։
Sister White aligns the Sunday law with several last-day waymarks, and in so doing her words reveal “what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath.” Therefore, the waymarks that she aligns in this passage are to be carefully examined. I am suggesting that the point of reference is the line of prophecy that focuses upon the Constitution of the United States, along with the “speaking” of the nation as an interrelated symbol.
ह्वाइट बहिनीले आइतबारको व्यवस्था अन्तिम दिनका धेरै मार्गचिन्हहरूसँग समरेखित गर्नुहुन्छ, र यसो गर्दा उहाँका वचनहरूले “अन्तिम दिनहरूमा के हुन जाँदैछ, ताकि उहाँका मानिसहरू विरोध र क्रोधको आँधीको सामना गर्न तयार हुन सकून्” भन्ने कुरा प्रकट गर्छन्। त्यसकारण, उहाँले यस खण्डमा समरेखित गर्नुभएका मार्गचिन्हहरूलाई सावधानीपूर्वक जाँचिनुपर्छ। म यो सुझाव दिँदैछु कि सन्दर्भबिन्दु त्यो भविष्यवाणीको रेखा हो, जो संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिकाको संविधानमाथि केन्द्रित छ, साथै राष्ट्रको “बोलाइ”लाई परस्पर सम्बन्धित प्रतीकको रूपमा पनि समेट्छ।
By that, I mean, that the Blair Bill in 1888, the Patriot Act in 2001, and the political prosecutions that were carried out by the Democrats and globalist Republicans beginning in 2022 were each a direct denial of two essential elements of the Constitution. 1888 represents enforcement of Sunday worship, and then in 2001, the change from English law to Roman law. In 2022 “substantive” and “procedural” law was attacked.
Санаан би юуг хэлж байна вэ гэвэл, 1888 онд гарсан Блэрийн хууль, 2001 онд батлагдсан Патриотын хууль, мөн 2022 оноос эхлэн Ардчилсан нам болон даяаршлыг дэмжигч Бүгд Найрамдахчуудын явуулсан улс төрийн яллан хавчилтууд нь тус бүрдээ Үндсэн хуулийн хоёр үндсэн бүрэлдэхүүнийг шууд үгүйсгэсэн явдал байсан. 1888 он нь Ням гаргийн мөргөлийг албадан хэрэгжүүлэхийг илэрхийлдэг бөгөөд 2001 онд Английн хуулиас Ромын хуульд шилжсэн өөрчлөлт гарсан. 2022 онд “материаллаг” болон “процессын” хуулинд халдсан.
Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations. The law defines legal or illegal behavior and sets out the punishments for it. Substantive law covers many legal areas, including criminal, civil, and contract law.
Ukrainian: Матеріальне право визначає права та обов’язки фізичних осіб і організацій, тоді як процесуальне право окреслює порядок вирішення спорів і забезпечення прав та обов’язків фізичних осіб і організацій. Закон визначає, яка поведінка є правомірною або неправомірною, і встановлює покарання за неї. Матеріальне право охоплює багато галузей права, зокрема кримінальне, цивільне та договірне право.
Criminal law is an excellent example of substantive law. Criminal law defines what actions are considered criminal and the penalties for those crimes. Civil law, however, governs disputes between individuals and organizations, such as breach of contract, personal injury, or property disputes.
Jingimmal qānūn ukax mä suma uñacht’äwiwa qhanpach qānūnitaki. Jingim qānūnux qhanañchi kunanakas juchañchata amuyatäni ukat uka juchanakapatakix kuna mutuyäwinakas utji ukxa. Civil qānūnusti, mayja tuqitxa, jaqinakampi ukhamarak tantachäwinakamp ch’axwäwinak apnaqi, sañäni, aruskipäwi p’akintawi, sapa mayniru usuchjawi, jan ukax yänakat ch’axwäwi.
Substantive law is typically written in statutes, regulations, and case law. Statutes are laws passed by legislative bodies, such as national parliaments or state legislature, and regulations are rules and procedures created by administrative agencies. Case law is the law that judges create through their interpretation of statutes, regulations, and the Constitution.
Qanunnaa maddaa irra caalaan seerota tumaman, dambiiwwan, fi seera murtii keessatti barreeffama. Seerotni tumaman seerota qaamolee seera tumanii, akka paarlaamaawwan biyyaalessaa yookaan mana maree seera tumtuu mootummaa naannoo, raggaasisaniidha; dambiiwwan immoo seerotaa fi adeemsa qaamolee bulchiinsaatiin uumamaniidha. Seerri murtii seera abbootiin murtii hiikkaa isaanii seerota tumaman, dambiiwwan, fi Heera irratti kennaniin uumanidha.
Procedural law refers to the rules governing the legal process. It outlines how cases move through the legal system, from the initial filing of a complaint to the final resolution. Procedural law covers various legal areas, including civil, criminal, and administrative procedures. The purpose of procedural law is to ensure that the legal process is fair and efficient. It provides a framework for resolving disputes and ensures that everyone involved in the legal process, including judges, lawyers, and litigants, knows what is expected of them.
Зандық рәсімдік құқық заң процесін реттейтін қағидаларға жатады. Ол істің құқықтық жүйе арқылы қалай қозғалатынын, шағымды бастапқы беруден бастап түпкілікті шешім шығарылғанға дейін айқындайды. Рәсімдік құқық азаматтық, қылмыстық және әкімшілік іс жүргізуді қоса алғанда, құқықтың түрлі салаларын қамтиды. Рәсімдік құқықтың мақсаты — заң процесінің әділ әрі тиімді болуын қамтамасыз ету. Ол дауларды шешудің негіздемелік құрылымын белгілейді және құқықтық процеске қатысатындардың бәрі, соның ішінде судьялар, адвокаттар және тараптар, өздерінен не күтілетінін білуін қамтамасыз етеді.
Substantive and procedural law are intended to work together to ensure justice is served. Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing those rights and obligations. In other words, substantive law defines legal or illegal behavior and the consequences of illegal behavior, while procedural law outlines how those legal issues are resolved.
Мазмұндық және іс жүргізу құқығы әділеттің жүзеге асырылуын қамтамасыз ету үшін өзара үйлесімді қызмет етуге арналған. Мазмұндық құқық жеке адамдар мен ұйымдардың құқықтары мен міндеттерін айқындайды, ал іс жүргізу құқығы дауларды шешу және сол құқықтар мен міндеттерді жүзеге асыру процесін белгілейді. Басқаша айтқанда, мазмұндық құқық заңды немесе заңсыз мінез-құлықты және заңсыз мінез-құлықтың салдарын айқындайды, ал іс жүргізу құқығы сол құқықтық мәселелердің қалай шешілетінін белгілейді.
In 2001, the Patriot Act removed the right of habeas corpus. “Habeas corpus” is a Latin term that translates to “you shall have the body.” It refers to a legal principle that protects individuals from unlawful detention by requiring a court to examine the lawfulness of a person’s imprisonment. Habeas corpus is a fundamental right in many legal systems, especially those influenced by English common law. It ensures that a person cannot be held in custody without just cause and allows them to challenge the legality of their detention before a judge.
Yn 2001, fe ddiddymodd y Patriot Act hawl habeas corpus. Mae “habeas corpus” yn derm Lladin a gyfieithir yn “byddi’n cael y corff.” Cyfeiria at egwyddor gyfreithiol sy’n amddiffyn unigolion rhag cadw anghyfreithlon drwy fynnu bod llys yn archwilio cyfreithlondeb carchariad person. Mae habeas corpus yn hawl sylfaenol mewn llawer o systemau cyfreithiol, yn enwedig y rhai a ddylanwadwyd gan gyfraith gwlad Lloegr. Sicrha ei bod yn amhosibl dal person yn y ddalfa heb achos cyfiawn, ac y caniateir iddo herio cyfreithlondeb ei gadw gerbron barnwr.
A “Due Process Clause” appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Courts have developed two branches of due process doctrine: procedural due process and substantive due process. In 2001, with the Patriot Act habeas corpus was removed as a right, and English law was replaced by Roman law. English law defines that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty, and Roman law identifies that a person is considered guilty until proven innocent. In the Pelosi Trials of 2022, both procedural and substantive due process was trampled upon. Both substantive law and procedural law were applied in the Pelosi Trials in the exact opposite of their intended constitutional purpose.
“Due Process Clause” macaafa seeraa mootummaa Ameerikaa keessatti Fooyya’insa Shanaffaa fi Fooyya’insa Kudha Afraffaa lamaan keessatti ni argama. Kanneen kunis eenyu iyyuu adeemsa seeraa sirrii malee jireenya, bilisummaa, yookaan qabeenya irraa mulqamuu akka hin dandeenye ni tumu. Manni murtii dameewwan lama barsiisa due process jedhamuu kanaa guddiseera: procedural due process fi substantive due process. Bara 2001 keessatti, Patriot Act wajjin habeas corpus akka mirgaatti irraa kaafame, seerri Ingilizii immoo seeraan Roomaa bakka buufame. Seerri Ingilizii namni tokko yakka irraa bilisa akka taʼetti ilaalamu hanga balleessaa isaa mirkanaaʼutti ni ibsa; seerri Roomaa immoo namni tokko hanga qulqullinni isaa mirkanaaʼutti balleessaa qabu akka taʼetti ilaalamu ni addeessa. Murtiilee Pelosi bara 2022 keessatti, procedural due process fi substantive due process lamaan irratti sarbama guddaan raawwatameera. Seerri substantive fi seerri procedural lamaanis Murtiilee Pelosi keessatti kaayyoo isaanii mootummaa heeraa keessatti yaadame sana irraa guutumaan guutuutti faallaa taʼeen hojii irra oolfaman.
The distinction between substantive due process and procedural due process lies in the different aspects of law and rights that each concept protects within the framework of the U.S. Constitution, particularly under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
تفاوت میان دادرسی ماهویِ منصفانه و دادرسی شکلیِ منصفانه در جنبههای متفاوت قانون و حقوقی نهفته است که هر یک از این دو مفهوم در چارچوب قانون اساسی ایالات متحده، بهویژه ذیل بندهای دادرسی منصفانه در متممهای پنجم و چهاردهم، از آنها حمایت میکنند.
Substantive due process is concerned with the fundamental rights and liberties that the government cannot infringe upon, regardless of the procedure used. It protects certain rights from government interference even if the proper procedures are followed. Substantive due process involves rights that are deemed fundamental, such as the right to privacy, the right to marry, and the right to raise one’s children. These rights are protected from government intrusion unless there is a compelling state interest. It serves as a check on the government’s power, ensuring that laws and regulations do not violate fundamental liberties.
サブスタンティブ・デュー・プロセスは、いかなる手続が用いられたかにかかわらず、政府が侵害することのできない基本的な権利および自由に関わるものである。これは、適正な手続が踏まれている場合であっても、一定の権利を政府の干渉から保護する。サブスタンティブ・デュー・プロセスには、プライバシーの権利、婚姻する権利、および自己の子を養育する権利のように、基本的であるとみなされる権利が含まれる。これらの権利は、州にやむを得ない利益が認められる場合を除き、政府による介入から保護される。これは政府権力に対する抑制として機能し、法律および規制が基本的自由を侵害しないことを確保する。
Procedural due process is concerned with the procedures that the government must follow before it deprives an individual of life, liberty, or property. It ensures that individuals receive fair and impartial treatment through proper legal processes. Procedural due process requires the government to follow certain steps or procedures, such as providing notice, a fair hearing, and an opportunity to be heard, before depriving someone of their rights. It emphasizes the methods by which laws are enforced, ensuring that the government acts in a just and fair manner.
Ныҳалҭатә ҳәҟьаԥышьа, аҳәынҭқарра ауаҩы ҳаҭа, ихақәиҭра, ма ихыԥсахыртә мал-мүлик аҟынтә ималхра аԥхьа, иахьӡарыз еиҿкаамҭақәа рыла ашьаҭа рымоуп. Уи иаанагоит, ауаа зегьы ишахәҭоу еиԥш, аихамгыларада, закәантә ԥҟарақәа рылеиҿкаау апроцессқәа арқылы рныҟәгара. Ныҳалҭатә ҳәҟьаԥышьа иаҭахуп, ауаҩы иақәиҭрақәа рҟынтә ималхра аԥхьа, аҳәынҭқарра шьапыларақәа ма апроцедурақәа жәпакы ирықәныҟәазарц, иаҳҳәап, алырхарҭа аҟаҵара, ииашоу азыӡырҩра, насгьы ихшыҩзы арҳәара алшара иоурц. Уи азгәеиҭеитуеит азакәанқәа рымчхра мҩасла ишымҩаԥгоу, иагьынаҭоит, аҳәынҭқарра ииашаны, насгьы аԥҟарала иҭышәынтәаланы аус ауазарц.
The lawfare that has been manifested since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a denial of both substantive and procedural due process. The fundamental rights of American citizens were openly and successfully denied. The false flag operations and the open corruption of the alphabet agencies of the United States has been regularly exposed since even before the Pelosi Trials began, but the legal procedures that have been employed by the globalists of both parties since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a clear illustration of the destruction of procedural due process.
꧋ꦭꦺꦴꦮ꧀ꦥꦫ꧀ ꦲꦤꦸꦭꦶꦃꦲꦏꦺ ꦏꦁ ꦏꦠꦿꦶꦭꦏ꧀ꦱꦤꦏꦺ ꦱꦶꦤ꧀ꦢꦺꦤ꧀ ꦥꦼꦭꦺꦴꦱꦶ ꦠꦿꦶꦪꦭ꧀ꦱ꧀ ꦩꦸꦭꦻ, ꦲꦶꦏꦸ ꦤꦺꦩ꧀ꦧꦁꦏꦺ ꦥꦼꦤꦁꦏꦭꦤ꧀ ꦲꦠꦱ꧀ ꦢꦸꦪꦺ ꦥꦿꦺꦴꦱꦺꦱ꧀ ꦲꦸꦏꦸꦩ꧀ ꦏꦁ ꦲꦢꦶꦭ꧀, ꦧꦻꦏ꧀ ꦏꦁ ꦧꦂꦱꦶꦥꦠ꧀ ꦱꦸꦧ꧀ꦱ꧀ꦠꦤ꧀ꦱꦶꦥ꧀ ꦩꦸꦥꦸꦤ꧀ ꦏꦁ ꦧꦂꦱꦶꦥꦠ꧀ ꦥꦿꦺꦴꦱꦺꦢꦸꦫꦭ꧀. ꦲꦏ꧀-ꦲꦏ꧀ ꦢꦱꦂ ꦥꦫ ꦮꦂꦒ ꦤꦼꦒꦫ ꦲꦩꦼꦫꦶꦏ ꦏꦠꦿꦶꦭꦏ꧀ ꦢꦶꦥꦸꦤ꧀ꦥꦼꦤꦁꦏꦭ꧀ ꦱꦼꦕꦫ ꦠꦼꦫꦁ-ꦠꦼꦫꦁ ꦭꦤ꧀ ꦏꦼꦭꦩ꧀ꦥꦲꦤ꧀. ꦲꦺꦴꦥꦼꦫꦱꦶ ꦥꦤ꧀ꦗꦶ ꦥꦭ꧀ꦱꦸ ꦭꦤ꧀ ꦏꦫꦸꦱꦏꦤ꧀ ꦏꦁ ꦏꦠꦿꦶꦭꦏ꧀ ꦏꦁ ꦧꦺꦴꦏꦃ ꦥꦢꦁ ꦢꦫꦶ ꦲꦒꦼꦤ꧀ꦱꦶ-ꦲꦒꦼꦤ꧀ꦱꦶ “alphabet” ꦩꦶꦭꦶꦏ꧀ ꦱꦼꦫꦶꦏꦠ꧀ ꦩꦶꦩ꧀ꦥꦶꦏ꧀ ꦱꦼꦫꦶꦏꦠ꧀ ꦲꦩꦼꦫꦶꦏ ꦏꦠꦿꦶꦭꦏ꧀ ꦏꦶꦥꦿꦏꦱꦏꦺ ꦱꦼꦕꦫ ꦫꦸꦠꦶꦤ꧀ ꦱꦶꦤ꧀ꦢꦺꦤ꧀ ꦱꦼꦢꦸꦫꦸꦁ ꦥꦼꦭꦺꦴꦱꦶ ꦠꦿꦶꦪꦭ꧀ꦱ꧀ ꦩꦸꦭꦻ, ꦤꦩꦸꦁ ꦥꦿꦺꦴꦱꦺꦢꦸꦂ-ꦥꦿꦺꦴꦱꦺꦢꦸꦂ ꦲꦸꦏꦸꦩ꧀ ꦏꦁ ꦏꦠꦿꦶꦭꦏ꧀ ꦢꦶꦒꦸꦤꦏꦏꦺ ꦺꦴꦭꦺꦃ ꦥꦫ ꦒ꧀ꦭꦺꦴꦧꦭꦶꦱ꧀ ꦢꦫꦶ ꦏꦭꦶꦩ꧀ꦥꦤ꧀ ꦫꦺꦴ ꦥꦫ꧀ꦠꦻ ꦱꦶꦤ꧀ꦢꦺꦤ꧀ ꦥꦼꦭꦺꦴꦱꦶ ꦠꦿꦶꦪꦭ꧀ꦱ꧀ ꦩꦸꦭꦻ, ꦲꦶꦏꦸ ꦤꦺꦩ꧀ꦧꦁꦏꦺ ꦒꦩ꧀ꦧꦂ ꦏꦁ ꦕꦼꦛ ꦏꦠꦿꦶꦭꦏ꧀ ꦠ꼋ꦁ ꦥꦿꦸꦱꦏꦤ꧀ꦤꦺ ꦥꦿꦺꦴꦱꦺꦱ꧀ ꦲꦸꦏꦸꦩ꧀ ꦏꦁ ꦧꦂꦱꦶꦥꦠ꧀ ꦥꦿꦺꦴꦱꦺꦢꦸꦫꦭ꧀.
Earlier in the article we read, “Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.”
Meara en artículope leímos: “Kuaʼẽte oimeraẽ mbaʼe ñemonguʼe jeroviapy rehegua léi rehehápe haʼe añetehápe peteĩ ñemeʼẽ rupi pe papadope, upéva heta ára pukukue oñorairõ meme vaʼekue conciencia sãso rehe. Arapokõindy ñemboaje oguereko iñexistencia peteĩ institución oñehenóiva cristiana ramo ‘tekovaí ñemimby’ rupi; ha iñemoañete hag̃ua oikóta peteĩ jehechakuaa añetetéva umi principio rehegua haʼéva voi romanismo itakuapy guasu. Ñane retã oheja vove upéicha igobierno principiokuéra, omoĩ hag̃uáicha peteĩ léi arapokõindy rehegua, protestantismo ko tembiapópe ojopóta ipo popería ndive; ndahaʼemoʼãi ambue mbaʼe ndahaʼéiramo omeʼẽvo tekove pe tiranía-pe ymaite guive haku hag̃uáicha omaña hag̃uáicha ijatyvyrojeývo despotismo activo-pe.”
In the line of history that can be represented with the Constitution of the United States there are three specific waymarks representing some element of the Constitution in both the beginning and the ending of the United States. Each of those three waymarks are political actions, and therefore symbolize the speaking of the United States. The third of those three waymarks in the beginning, that marked 1798, was the Alien and Sedition Acts and the third of those waymarks at the ending is when the United States enforces a Sunday law, and speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven.
Америки Нэгдсэн Улсын Үндсэн хуулиар төлөөлүүлэн үзүүлж болох түүхийн шугамд, Америкийн Нэгдсэн Улсын эхлэл болон төгсгөлийн аль алинд нь Үндсэн хуулийн ямар нэгэн элементийг төлөөлөх гурван тодорхой тэмдэглэгээ байдаг. Тэдгээр гурван тэмдэглэгээ тус бүр нь улс төрийн үйлдлүүд бөгөөд тиймээс Америкийн Нэгдсэн Улсын ярихыг бэлгэддэг. Эхлэлийн тал дахь тэрхүү гурван тэмдэглэгээний гурав дахь нь 1798 оныг тэмдэглэсэн Харь иргэд ба Үймүүлэн доромжлох тухай хуулиуд байсан бол, төгсгөлийн тал дахь тэрхүү тэмдэглэгээнүүдийн гурав дахь нь Америкийн Нэгдсэн Улс Ням гаргийн хуулийг хэрэгжүүлж, Илчлэлт номын арван гуравдугаар бүлгийн арван нэгдүгээр эшлэлийн биелэл болгон луу мэт ярих үе юм.
The prophetic history of the United States begins when, as represented by the earth, it opened its mouth and swallowed up the flood of the dragon’s persecution.
پیغمبرانهٔ تاریچەی ویلایەتە یەکگرتووەکان دەست پێ دەکات کاتێک، وەک لەلایەن زەویەوە نیشان دراوە، دەمی خۆی کردەوە و لاڤای ستەمکاریی ئەژدیها قووت دایەوە.
And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. Revelation 12:15, 16.
وار مار زلہٕ پننہٕ مَنٛزٕ نِش آب پٲٹھۍ سیلاب زنہٕ پَتہٕ، تاکہ سُہ تَمِس سیلابس منز بہاونہٕ۔ تہٕ زٔمیٖنہٕ دِژ مدد زنہٕ، تہٕ زٔمیٖنہٕ آو پنُن واتھ ژھٲلِتھ، تہٕ نگلٲو سُہ سیلاب یُس اژدہٕ پننہٕ مَنٛزٕ نِش کاس۔ مکاشفہ 12:15، 16۔
In 1776, the beast that was to arise from the earth, and ultimately become the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy in 1798, swallowed up the flood of persecution against God’s people by establishing a nation with a Constitution that protested against the tyrants of European royalty and the tyrants of the papal church.
Iti 1776, ti animal a mti umtubong ket daga, ken iti ud-udina agbalin nga maikanem a pagarian ti padto ti Biblia idi 1798, inung-una na ti layus ti pannakaparigat a maibusor kadagiti tattao ti Dios babaen iti pannakaipasdek ti maysa a nacion nga addaan iti maysa a Konstitusion a nagballigi a nangtukiad kadagiti mannakabalin a tirano ti pagkakari ti Europa ken kadagiti tirano ti papal nga iglesia.
The Declaration of Independence in 1776 typified the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 typified the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 typified the Sunday law in the United States.
ᎠᏰᎵ 1776 ᎤᏓᏅᏘᏍᎬ ᎤᏬᏚᎯᏍᏗ ᎤᏛᏁᎸᎯ ᎤᏤᎵᎬᎢ 2001 ᎤᏍᏆᏂᎪᏗ Patriot Act ᎤᏯᏟᎶᏍᏔᏁᎢ። 1789 ᎤᎵᏍᏓᏴᏗ Constitution 2022 ᎤᏓᎴᏅᎯ ᎤᏍᏆᏂᎪᏗ Pelosi Trials ᎤᏯᏟᎶᏍᏔᏁᎢ። 1798 ᎠᏂᏐᏴ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏂᏐᏢᏗ ᎤᎾᏛᏁᎸ Alien and Sedition Acts ᎠᎹᏰᎢ ᎤᏍᏆᏂᎪᏗ ᏍᏆᏂᎦᎵ ᎤᎾᏁᎳᏅᎯ ᏧᎵᏍᏆᎸ Sunday law ᏉᎯᎢ ᎠᎹᏰᎢ ᎤᏍᏗ ᎠᎹᏰᏟᏗ United States ᎤᏯᏟᎶᏍᏔᏁᎢ።
The pronouncement of independence by the American patriots in 1776 represented the announcement of the loss of independence with the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 represented the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts represents the Sunday law. The history of the repudiation of every principle of the Constitution represents a progressive overturning of the Constitution that ends at the Sunday law.
1776-тәи ашықәсին ამერიკელი პატრიოტების მიერ გამოცხადებული დამოუკიდებლობა წარმოადგენდა 2001 წლის Patriot Act-ით დამოუკიდებლობის დაკარგვის გამოცხადებას. 1789 წლის კონსტიტუცია წარმოადგენდა 2022 წელს დაწყებულ Pelosi Trials-ს. Alien and Sedition Acts წარმოადგენს საკვირაო კანონს. კონსტიტუციის ყოველი პრინციპის უარყოფის ისტორია წარმოადგენს კონსტიტუციის თანდათანობით დამხობას, რომელიც სრულდება საკვირაო კანონით.
These lines all align in the hidden history of verse forty of Daniel chapter eleven. In this article we quoted four paragraphs from Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.
Эти линии все согласуются в сокрытой истории сорокового стиха одиннадцатой главы Даниила. В этой статье мы процитировали четыре абзаца из Testimonies, том 5, 451, 452.
We will look closer at those paragraphs in the next article.
Yaqinda kelgusi maqolada ana shu bandlarni yanada yaqindan ko‘rib chiqamiz.