The pioneer application of the history which fulfilled verses ten through sixteen identified that Rome, who established the vision arrived in the year 200 BC, the same year as the battle of Panium, and I am suggesting that in 2025 Rome arrived and established the vision with the inauguration of Trump and Pope Leo. 2025 represents the only time a pope and President were inaugurated in the same year. The beast and its image was lifted up for all who are willing to see in 2025. Unlike the pioneers, I am applying the sequence of the verses, instead of the history that initially fulfilled the verses. I agree with the history, but am drawing upon a sequence within the verses as the framework for the history, as opposed to using the history to define the framework of the verses. I contend that the two approaches are both accurate.

ঐতিহাসিক অগ্রদূতদের প্রয়োগ অনুসারে, যে ইতিহাস দশ থেকে ষোলো পদ পূর্ণ করেছিল, তা শনাক্ত করে যে রোম, যে দর্শন প্রতিষ্ঠা করেছিল, খ্রিস্টপূর্ব ২০০ সালে এসে উপস্থিত হয়েছিল—যে বছর প্যানিয়ামের যুদ্ধ সংঘটিত হয়েছিল—এবং আমি এই মর্মে প্রস্তাব করছি যে ২০২৫ সালে ট্রাম্প ও পোপ লিওর অভিষেকের মাধ্যমে রোম এসে উপস্থিত হয়েছে এবং দর্শন প্রতিষ্ঠা করেছে। ২০২৫ সেই একমাত্র সময়কে নির্দেশ করে যখন একজন পোপ ও একজন রাষ্ট্রপতির অভিষেক একই বছরে সংঘটিত হয়েছে। ২০২৫ সালে যে সকলের দেখিবার ইচ্ছা আছে, তাদের সকলের সম্মুখে সেই পশু ও তাহার প্রতিমূর্তি উত্তোলিত হয়েছিল। অগ্রদূতদের বিপরীতে, আমি পদগুলির যে ইতিহাস প্রথমে পূর্ণ করেছিল তা নয়, বরং পদগুলির ধারাবাহিকতাই প্রয়োগ করছি। আমি সেই ইতিহাসের সঙ্গে একমত; তবে পদগুলির কাঠামো নির্ধারণের জন্য ইতিহাসকে ব্যবহার করার পরিবর্তে, ইতিহাসের কাঠামো হিসেবে পদগুলির অন্তর্নিহিত ধারাবাহিকতাকেই অবলম্বন করছি। আমি দাবি করি যে উভয় পদ্ধতিই যথার্থ।

The Revolution of the Maccabees

ثورة المكابيين

I apply the line of the Maccabees in a similar fashion. The Maccabean revolt in 167 BC was well after the battle of Panium in 200 BC, and well before Pompey captured Jerusalem in 63 BC. The line which begins at verse sixteen with general Pompey’s conquering of Jerusalem in 63 BC, and continues through to Tiberias Caesar who reigned when Jesus was crucified. The cross and Tiberias is represented in verse twenty-two of chapter eleven.

Na pari ya Maccabees ko mpe na lolenge moko. Botomboki ya Maccabée na mobu 167 liboso ya Klisto ezalaki mingi sima ya etumba ya Panium na 200 liboso ya Klisto, mpe mingi liboso ya ntango oyo Pompée akangaki Yerusaleme na 63 liboso ya Klisto. Molɔngɔ́ oyo ebandi na vɛrsɛ ya zomi na motoba na kolɔngɔnɔ ya Yerusaleme na Généra Pompée na 63 liboso ya Klisto, mpe ekobi kino na César Tibère oyo ayangelaki na ntango oyo Yesu babakamisaki ye na ekulusu. Ekulusu mpe Tibère bazali komonisama na vɛrsɛ ya iri na mibale ya mokapo ya zomi na moko.

And with the arms of a flood shall they be overflown from before him, and shall be broken; yea, also the prince of the covenant. Daniel 11:22.

Na wa pɛlɛl kɛ ka bɔ ɔ nɛɛma kɛ pɛ, an ka kɔnɔni wɔn na kɛrɛ; ɛɛ, halaa layiri la masa fana. Daniel 11:22.

General Pompey conquering Jerusalem in 63 BC in verse sixteen, and then the cross in 31 AD in verse twenty-two, represents a line of prophecy that begins at a symbol of the Sunday law and ends with a symbol of the Sunday law. Verse twenty-three is a break in the passage, thus marking verse twenty-two as the end of the prophetic line that began in verse sixteen. Accompanied with the distinct ending of the line in verse twenty-two, is the fact that verse twenty-two is a symbol of the same waymark represented in verse sixteen, thus providing an alpha and omega witness that verses sixteen to twenty-two represents a distinct prophetic line.

ਪਦ ਸੋਲ੍ਹਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਈਸਾਪੂਰਵ 63 ਵਿੱਚ ਜਨਰਲ ਪੋਮਪੀ ਦੁਆਰਾ ਯਰੂਸ਼ਲਮ ਦੀ ਜਿੱਤ, ਅਤੇ ਫਿਰ ਪਦ ਬਾਈ ਵਿੱਚ ਈਸਵੀ 31 ਵਿੱਚ ਸਲੀਬ, ਭਵਿੱਖਬਾਣੀ ਦੀ ਇੱਕ ਐਸੀ ਰੇਖਾ ਨੂੰ ਦਰਸਾਉਂਦੇ ਹਨ ਜੋ ਐਤਵਾਰ ਦੇ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਦੇ ਇੱਕ ਪ੍ਰਤੀਕ ਨਾਲ ਸ਼ੁਰੂ ਹੁੰਦੀ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਐਤਵਾਰ ਦੇ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਦੇ ਹੀ ਇੱਕ ਪ੍ਰਤੀਕ ਨਾਲ ਸਮਾਪਤ ਹੁੰਦੀ ਹੈ। ਪਦ ਤੇਈਂ ਇਸ ਅੰਸ਼ ਵਿੱਚ ਇੱਕ ਵਿਛੋੜਾ ਹੈ; ਇਸ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਇਹ ਪਦ ਬਾਈ ਨੂੰ ਉਸ ਭਵਿੱਖਬਾਣੀ ਰੇਖਾ ਦੇ ਅੰਤ ਵਜੋਂ ਚਿੰਨ੍ਹਿਤ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ ਜੋ ਪਦ ਸੋਲ੍ਹਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਸ਼ੁਰੂ ਹੋਈ ਸੀ। ਪਦ ਬਾਈ ਵਿੱਚ ਇਸ ਰੇਖਾ ਦੇ ਸਪਸ਼ਟ ਅੰਤ ਨਾਲ ਇਹ ਤੱਥ ਵੀ ਜੁੜਿਆ ਹੋਇਆ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਪਦ ਬਾਈ ਉਸੇ ਹੀ ਨਿਸ਼ਾਨੀ ਦਾ ਪ੍ਰਤੀਕ ਹੈ ਜੋ ਪਦ ਸੋਲ੍ਹਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਦਰਸਾਈ ਗਈ ਹੈ; ਇਸ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ ਇਹ ਇੱਕ ਅਲਫਾ ਅਤੇ ਓਮੇਗਾ ਗਵਾਹੀ ਪ੍ਰਦਾਨ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਪਦ ਸੋਲ੍ਹਾਂ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਈ ਤੱਕ ਇੱਕ ਵਿਲੱਖਣ ਭਵਿੱਖਬਾਣੀ ਰੇਖਾ ਨੂੰ ਦਰਸਾਉਂਦੇ ਹਨ।

Add to this that verses fifteen and sixteen are marking the transition from the Seleucid kingdom to the Roman power, and you see a break in continuity from the Seleucids in verse fifteen unto the Romans in verse sixteen and the line of verse sixteen to twenty-two is clearly isolated as a singular prophetic line. Verse sixteen introduces the next power who will dominate Judea, thus marking a transition of prophetic history just as with verse twenty-three. The line begins and ends with a symbol of the Sunday law, and the line ends in the twenty-second verse of the eleventh chapter.

Bundan başga-da, on bäşinji we on altynjy aýatlaryň Selewkiler patyşalygyndan Rim häkimiýetine geçişi görkezýändigini nazara alsaňyz, on bäşinji aýatdaky Selewkilerden on altynjy aýatdaky Rimlilere çenli dowamlylykda bir üzülmäniň bardygyny görersiňiz; şeýlelikde, on altynjy aýatdan ýigrimi ikinji aýada çenli bolan hatar aç-açan ýeke-täk pygamberlik hatary hökmünde aýratynlaşdyrylýar. On altynjy aýat Ýahudany agalyk astyna aljak indiki güýji girizýär, şeýlelikde, edil ýigrimi üçünji aýatdaky ýaly, pygamberlik taryhynda bir geçişi belleýär. Bu hatar Ýekşenbe kanunynyň bir nyşany bilen başlanýar we tamamlanýar, we hatar on birinji babyň ýigrimi ikinji aýatynda tamam bolýar.

Smith—and Three Caesars

سمِتھ—اور تین قیصر

The fact that verse sixteen represents the Sunday law, as does verse twenty-two—demands that the two verses be aligned upon each other. Uriah Smith comments on verse twenty-three, and explains why it represents a history that began further back in the history of the previous verses, as opposed to representing a history that follows immediately after the cross of verse twenty-two.

Hakika kwamba aya ya kumi na sita inawakilisha sheria ya Jumapili, kama vile aya ya ishirini na mbili pia inavyofanya—linadai kwamba aya hizo mbili zilinganishwe juu ya kila moja. Uriah Smith atoa maoni juu ya aya ya ishirini na tatu, na aeleza kwa nini inawakilisha historia iliyoanza nyuma zaidi katika historia ya aya zilizotangulia, badala ya kuwakilisha historia inayofuatia mara baada ya msalaba wa aya ya ishirini na mbili.

“‘VERSE 23. And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.’

«އާޔަތް 23. އަދި އޭނާއާއެކު ކުރެވޭ އަހުދުގެ ފަހުން އޭނާ ހީލަތްތެރިކޮށް މަސައްކަތްކުރާނެ؛ ފަހެ، އޭނާ އުފުލިގެން އައިސް، މަދު ބަޔަކާއެކު ބާރުވެރިވާނެ.»

“The ‘him’ with whom the league here spoken of is made, must be the same power which has been the subject of the prophecy from the 14th verse; and that this is the Roman power is shown beyond controversy in the fulfilment of the prophecy in three individuals, as already noticed, who successively ruled over the Roman Empire; namely, Julius, Augustus, and Tiberius Caesar. The first, on returning to the fort of his own land in triumph, stumbled and fell, and was not found. Verse 19. The second was a raiser of taxes; and he reigned in the glory of the kingdom, and died neither in anger nor in battle, but peacefully in his own bed. Verse 20. The third was a dissembler, and one of the vilest of characters. He entered upon the kingdom peaceably, but both his reign and life were ended by violence. And in his reign the Prince of the covenant, Jesus of Nazareth, was put to death upon the cross. Verses 21. 22. Christ can never be broken or put to death again; hence in no other government, and at no other time, can we find a fulfilment of these events. Some attempt to apply these verses to Antiochus, and make one of the Jewish high priests the prince of the covenant, though they are never called such. This is the same kind of reasoning which endeavors to make the reign of Antiochus a fulfilment of the little horn of Daniel 8; and it is offered for the same purpose; namely, to break the great chain of evidence by which it is shown that the Advent doctrine is the doctrine of the Bible, and that Christ is now at the door. But the evidence cannot be overthrown; the chain cannot be broken.

«هغه “ده” چې دلته ورسره تړون شوی دی، باید هماغه ځواک وي چې له ۱۴م آيت څخه د نبوت موضوع پاتې شوې ده؛ او دا چې همدا رومي ځواک دی، د نبوت په پوره کېدو سره، چې لا مخکې ورته اشاره شوې، په درو اشخاصو کې له هر ډول شخړې او مناقشې پورته ثابتیږي، هغو کسانو کې چې په وار سره يې پر رومي امپراتورۍ حکومت وکړ؛ يعنې: جوليوس، اګوستوس، او تيبيريوس قيصر. لومړی، چې د خپلې خاورې کلا ته په بريا بېرته راستون شو، وښوېد او ولوېد، او بيا ونه موندل شو. آيت ۱۹. دوهم د مالياتو راټولوونکی و؛ او هغه د سلطنت په جلال کې پاچاهي وکړه، او نه په قهر او نه په جګړه کې ومړ، بلکې په خپل بستر کې په سوله ومړ. آيت ۲۰. درېيم يو منافق و، او له تر ټولو ناولو کرکټرونو څخه و. هغه په آرامۍ سره سلطنت ته داخل شو، خو هم يې پاچاهي او هم يې ژوند په زور او تاوتريخوالي پای ته ورسېدل. او د هغه د پاچاهۍ په زمانه کې د عهد رئيس، يعنې د ناصرت عيسی، پر صليب وواژه شو. آيتونه ۲۱، ۲۲. مسيح هيڅکله بيا ماتېدلی يا وژل کېدلی نه شي؛ نو ځکه په بل هېڅ حکومت کې، او په بل هېڅ وخت کې، موږ د دغو پېښو پوره کېدل نه شو موندلی. ځينې هڅه کوي چې دا آيتونه پر انطيوخس تطبيق کړي، او د يهودو له مشرانو کاهنانو څخه يو د عهد رئيس وبولي، حال دا چې هغوی هېڅکله په دې نوم نه دي بلل شوي. دا هماغه ډول استدلال دی چې هڅه کوي د انطيوخس پاچاهي د دانيال ۸ د واړه ښکر پوره کېدل وګرځوي؛ او دا د هماغه موخې لپاره وړاندې کېږي؛ يعنې، د هغو لويو شواهدو ځنځير مات کړي چې په وسيله يې ښودل کېږي چې د راتګ عقيده د مقدس کتاب عقيده ده، او دا چې مسيح اوس پر دروازه ولاړ دی. خو شواهد نه شي نسکورېدای؛ ځنځير نه شي ماتېدای.»

“Having taken us down through the secular events of the empire to the end of the seventy weeks, the prophet, in verse 23, takes us back to the time when the Romans became directly connected with the people of God by the Jewish league, BC 161: from which point we are then taken down in a direct line of events to the final triumph of the church, and the setting up of God’s everlasting kingdom. The Jews, being grievously oppressed by the Syrian kings, sent an embassy to Rome, to solicit the aid of the Romans, and to join themselves in ‘a league of amity and confederacy with them.’ 1 Mac.8; Prideaux, II, 234; Josephus’s Antiquities, book 12, chap.10, sec.6. The Romans listened to the request of the Jews, and granted them a decree, couched in these words:—

“ናይ መንግስቲ ዓለማዊ ፍጻሜታት ክሳዕ መወዳእታ እተን ሰብዓ ሱሙናት ኣውሪዱ ድሕሪ ምምጻኡ፡ ነቢዩ ብቕጽል 23 ናብ እቲ ሮማውያን ብሕብረት ኣይሁድ ብቐጥታ ምስ ህዝቢ ኣምላኽ ዝተኣሳሰሩሉ ጊዜ፡ ዓ.ቅ.ል. 161፡ ይመልሰና፤ ካብቲ ነጥቢ ድማ ንሕና ብቐጥታ መስመር ፍጻሜታት ክሳዕ ናይ መወዳእታ ዓወት ናይ ቤተ ክርስቲያንን ምቛም ዘለኣለማዊት መንግስቲ ኣምላኽን ንወርድ። ኣይሁድ፡ ብነገስታት ሶርያ ኣዝዮም ተጽኒዖም ስለ ዝነበሩ፡ ሓገዝ ሮማውያን ንምልማን፡ ምሳታቶም ድማ ‘ኪዳን ማሕበራዊ ሕውነትን ሓባራዊ ስምምዕነትን’ ንምእታው፡ ልኡኽ ናብ ሮሜ ለኣኹ። 1 Mac.8; Prideaux, II, 234; Josephus’s Antiquities, book 12, chap.10, sec.6. ሮማውያን ንልመና ኣይሁድ ሰሚዖም፣ በዚ ዝስዕብ ቃላት ዝተጻሕፈ ኣዋጅ ኣበርከቱሎም፦”

“‘The decree of the senate concerning a league of assistance and friendship with the nation of the Jews. It shall not be lawful for any that are subject to the Romans, to make war with the nation of the Jews, nor to assist those that do so, either by sending them corn, or ships, or money; and if any attack be made upon the Jews, the Romans shall assist them as far as they are able; and again, if any attack be made upon the Romans, the Jews shall assist them. And if the Jews have a mind to add to, or to take from, this league of assistance, that shall be done with the common consent of the Romans. And whatever addition shall thus be made, it shall be of force.’ ‘This decree,’ says Josephus, ‘was written by Eupolemus, the son of John, and by Jason, the son of Eleazer, when Judas was high priest of the nation, and Simon, his brother, was general of the army. And this was the first league that the Romans made with the Jews, and was managed after this manner.’

“‘ᎤᏍᏆᏂᎪᏗ ᎤᏂᎾᏝᎢ ᎤᎾᏓᏡᎬ ᎤᏍᏕᎸᏙᗗ ᎠᎴ ᎤᎾᎵᎢᎵᏍᏙᏗ ᏧᏂᏧᏏ ᎤᏂᏴᏫ ᎠᏰᎵ. ᎥᏝ ᏱᏚᎵᏍᎪᎸ ᎩᎶ ᏍᎩᏯ ᎶᎻ ᎤᎾᏤᎵ ᎤᎾᏓᏤᎵᎬᎢ, ᎠᏂᏍᎦᏯ ᏧᏂᏧᏏ ᎤᏂᏴᏫ ᎠᏰᎵ ᏗᎨᎫᏥᏍᎬᎢ, ᎠᎴ ᎥᏝ ᏱᏙᏓᏂᏍᏕᎸ ᎬᏩᏍᏕᎸᏗ ᎾᏍᎩ ᎢᏳᏃ ᎾᏍᎩ ᎢᏳᏅᏁᎸ, ᎠᏰᎵ ᎤᏂᏲᎯᏍᏗ ᎤᏂᏁᎬ, ᎠᎴ ᏥᏳ, ᎠᎴ ᎠᏕᎸ; ᎢᏳᏃ ᎩᎶ ᏱᏚᏂᎷᏤᎸ ᏧᏂᏧᏏ, ᎶᎻ ᎬᏩᏍᏕᎸᎯ ᎨᏎᏍᏗ ᎂᎯᏳ ᎤᏂᎬᎾᏛ ᎨᏒ ᎢᏳᏍᏗ; ᎠᎴ ᏔᎵᏁ ᎢᏳᏃ ᎩᎶ ᏱᏚᏂᎷᏤᎸ ᎶᎻ, ᏧᏂᏧᏏ ᎬᏩᏍᏕᎸᎯ ᎨᏎᏍᏗ. ᎢᏳᏃ ᏧᏂᏧᏏ ᎤᏅᏅ ᏱᎩ ᎤᏂᏁᏉᏗᏱ, ᎠᎴ ᏱᎩ ᎤᏂᎨᏒᎢ ᏧᎦᎵᎪᏁᎸ ᎤᏍᏕᎸᏙᏗ, ᎾᏍᎩ ᏄᏍᏗ ᏱᎨᏎᏍᏗ ᏂᎦᏛ ᎶᎻ ᎤᎾᏁᎵᏍᎬ ᎤᎾᏓᏟᏌᏅᎯ. ᎠᎴ ᎤᏂᏁᏉᎬ ᎢᏳᏃ ᎾᏍᎩ ᏱᎨᏎᎢ, ᎾᏍᎩ ᎤᎵᏂᎩᏛ ᎨᏎᏍᏗ.’ ‘ᎯᎴᏍᏫᏍ,’ ᎠᏗᎭ ᏦᏏᏈᏍ, ‘ᎯᎠ ᎤᏬᏪᎳᏅᎩ ᏳᏉᎵᎹᏍ ᏣᏂ ᎤᏪᏥ, ᎠᎴ ᏤᏏᏂ ᎢᎵᎡᏌ ᎤᏪᏥ, ᎿᏉ ᏧᏓᏏ ᎠᏥᎸ-ᎤᏪᏥ ᎤᏓᏠᏱ ᎨᏎ ᏴᏫᏱ, ᎠᎴ ᏌᏩᏂ, ᎤᏅᏟ, ᏓᏂᏡᬢᏍᎩ ᎨᏎ ᎠᏂᏯᏫᏍᎬᎢ. ᎠᎴ ᎯᎠ ᎢᎬᏱᏱ ᏗᎧᎿᎩ ᎨᏎ ᎶᎻ ᏧᏂᏧᏏ ᎠᏁᎳ ᎤᏂᏬᏂᏍᎬ, ᎠᎴ ᎯᎠ ᏄᏍᏗ ᎤᏂᎦᏛᏁᎢ.’”

“At this time the Romans were a small people, and began to work deceitfully, or with cunning, as the word signifies. And from this point they rose by a steady and rapid ascent to the height of power which they afterward attained.” Uriah Smith, Daniel and the Revelation, 270, 271.

«Во это же время римляне были малым народом и начали действовать коварно, или с хитростью, как и означает это слово. И с этого момента они стали неуклонно и быстро восходить к той вершине могущества, которой впоследствии достигли». Uriah Smith, Daniel and the Revelation, 270, 271.

Not only does the cross of verse twenty-two end a line with a symbol that is also at the beginning of the line, but the next verse drops back into the history which preceded the cross, to roughly thirty years after Panium and roughly one hundred years before Rome conquered Jerusalem. The waymark of the league of the Jews that Smith here identifies as 161 BC, is identified by other pioneers as 158 BC. The point I am focusing on here is not so much the date, but that verses sixteen to twenty-two represents a line of prophetic history that the Sunday law is both the alpha and omega of the line. Then once the line of verse sixteen unto twenty-two is set forth, verse twenty-three repeats and enlarges upon the history within the line of verses sixteen to twenty-two. The prophetic line of history represented by verse twenty-three is the history of the Maccabees, and the history of the Maccabees is a perfect parallel to the history of the United States.

Na xitʉ tsɨkua versículo veintidós kyʉ nixtja in xá línia tsɨ juan simbólu xíi ñá xá prinsipio de la misma línia, sino que el versículo que sigue vuelve a caer en la historia que precedió a la cruz, aproximadamente treinta años después de Panium y aproximadamente cien años antes de que Roma conquistara Jerusalén. El hito de la liga de los judíos que Smith aquí identifica como 161 a. C., es identificado por otros pioneros como 158 a. C. El punto en el cual me estoy enfocando aquí no es tanto la fecha, sino que los versículos dieciséis al veintidós representan una línea de historia profética de la cual la ley dominical es tanto el alfa como la omega de la línea. Entonces, una vez que la línea del versículo dieciséis hasta el veintidós ha sido expuesta, el versículo veintitrés repite y amplía la historia contenida dentro de la línea de los versículos dieciséis al veintidós. La línea profética de historia representada por el versículo veintitrés es la historia de los Macabeos, y la historia de los Macabeos es un paralelo perfecto de la historia de los Estados Unidos.

Two Dynasties

Ca Mìng Làih}

The Maccabees represent a rebellion against the Seleucid kingdom that began during the reign of Antiochus Epiphanes. The rebellion was against the northern Seleucid kingdom and it resulted in a victory that led to one of two Judean dynasties in the period that ultimately led to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The first dynasty was the Hasmonean and the second was the Herodian. The Herodian dynasty was the second Judean government after deliverance from the northern Seleucid kingdom. It was directly connected to the Roman system, whereas; the prior Hasmonean dynasty was essentially Jewish. The Hasmonean dynasty began in 141 BC and in 37 BC the Herodian dynasty began and lasted until 70 AD.

ئال مەككابيل كوانت رِيپْرِزِنتا ڤمبەرونتاقن مننتڠ كراجاءن سلوكيد يڠ برمولا سمسا پمرينتهن أنتيوكوس إڤيفانيس. ڤمبەرونتاقن ايت مننتڠ كراجاءن سلوكيد اوتارا، دان هاسيلڽ ايله سواتو كمناڠن يڠ ممباوا كڤد ساله ساتو دارڤد دوا دينستي يهوده دالم تمڤوه ايت، يڠ اخيرڽ ممباوا كڤد كهانچورن يروشليم پد تاهون 70 ماسيحي. دينستي يڠ ڤرتام ايله دينستي حسموني، دان يڠ كدوا ايله دينستي هيروديان. دينستي هيروديان ايله ڤمرينتهن يهوده يڠ كدوا سلڤس ڤمببسن دارڤد كراجاءن سلوكيد اوتارا. دينستي ايت برهوبوڠ سچارا لڠسوڠ دڠن سيستم روم، سدڠكن دينستي حسموني يڠ منداهولويڽ ڤد اسسڽ برسيفت يهودي. دينستي حسموني برمولا پد تاهون 141 سبلوم ماسيحي، دان پد تاهون 37 سبلوم ماسيحي برمولاڽ دينستي هيروديان، لالو برترسن هيڠݢ تاهون 70 ماسيحي.

The dynasties represent the government of Judea, the ancient and literal glorious land. The Maccabean revolt was from 167 to 160 BC. In 164 BC the Maccabees drove Antiochus Epiphanes out of Jerusalem and cleansed and rededicated the temple after Antiochus had desecrated it, but it was not until 141 BC that the northern Seleucid power was fully vanquished and the Hasmonean dynasty began.

Dynastyo no rerrepresenta i gu-byetno ni Judea, i dani y antiguo tan literal a makasiglat a daga. I revolta ni Maccabeo yan ginen 167 asta 160 antes de Cristo. Gi 164 antes de Cristo, i man-Maccabeo pinapå'go si Antiochus Epiphanes ginen Jerusalem ya linimpia yan tinanota fanu si templo dispues de para u fanesngaña gue' ni Antiochus, lao ti asta 141 antes de Cristo na i poder Seleucida gi norte ma completo na mapaglao, ya i dynastiya Hasmoneo tumutuhon.

The Herodian dynasty is a key to this line, for it was Herod the Great who called to execute the babies at the time of Jesus birth, and his son was ruling when Jesus died. Herod the Great was the father, and he was a king over Judea, but his son was only a tetrarch, meaning he was a ruler over a fourth of the kingdom, like a governor rather than a king. That is why he lacked the authority which required him to connect with Pilate to crucify Christ. Jesus’ birth was the prophetic “time of the end” in his line of prophecy, and His death represents the Sunday law. The first Herod represents 1989, and the last Herod is the Sunday law. Herod the father to Herod the son is the prophetic line of Christ.

سلسلةُ هيرودس هي مفتاحٌ لهذا الخط، لأن هيرودس الكبير هو الذي أمر بقتل الأطفال حين وُلِد يسوع، وكان ابنه هو الحاكم عندما مات يسوع. كان هيرودس الكبير هو الأب، وكان ملكًا على اليهودية، أمّا ابنه فلم يكن سوى رئيسِ ربع، أي حاكمًا على ربع المملكة، أشبهَ بوالٍ لا بملك. ولذلك كان يفتقر إلى السلطة التي أوجبت عليه أن يتصل ببيلاطس لكي يَصلب المسيح. كانت ولادةُ يسوع «وقتَ النهاية» النبوي في خطّ نبوّته، ويمثل موته قانونَ الأحد. فهيرودس الأول يمثّل سنة 1989، وهيرودس الأخير هو قانون الأحد. ومن هيرودس الأب إلى هيرودس الابن يمتدّ الخطّ النبوي للمسيح.

The line of the Maccabees begins with a victorious rebellion against a northern king who had enforced his Greek customs, culture as well as the Greek religion upon the Jews. The beginning of the Hasmonean dynasty represented 1798. Why so, you might ask? If one dynasty begins at a prophetic “time of the end,” as it was with the Herodian dynasty at Christ’s birth, then the other dynasty would of prophetic necessity have the same beginning. The two dynasties both begin with a time of the end, when we apply Christ birth as the “time of the end,” but the foolish never see the unsealed light associated with the time of the end.

मकाबीहरूको वंशावली एउटा उत्तरका राजाविरुद्धको विजयी विद्रोहबाट आरम्भ हुन्छ, जसले यहूदीहरूमाथि आफ्ना युनानी चालचलन, संस्कृति तथा युनानी धर्म बलपूर्वक थोपरेको थियो। हस्मोनी राजवंशको आरम्भले १७९८ को प्रतिनिधित्व गर्थ्यो। किन यस्तो हो, भनी तपाईंले सोध्न सक्नुहुन्छ। यदि एउटा राजवंश भविष्यसूचक “अन्तको समय”मा आरम्भ हुन्छ, जसरी ख्रीष्टको जन्मको बेला हेरोदियन राजवंशको सन्दर्भमा भएको थियो, भने अर्को राजवंश पनि भविष्यसूचक आवश्यकता अनुसार उही आरम्भ हुनुपर्थ्यो। जब हामी ख्रीष्टको जन्मलाई “अन्तको समय”को रूपमा लागू गर्छौँ, तब यी दुवै राजवंशहरू अन्तको समयसँगै आरम्भ हुन्छन्; तर मूर्खहरूले अन्तको समयसँग सम्बन्धित खोलिएको प्रकाश कहिल्यै देख्दैनन्।

“In ours, as in Christ’s day, there may be a misreading or misinterpreting of the Scriptures. If the Jews had studied the Scriptures with earnest, prayerful hearts, their searching would have been rewarded with a true knowledge of the time, and not only the time, but also the manner of Christ’s appearing. They would not have ascribed the glorious second appearing of Christ to his first advent. They had the testimony of Daniel; they had the testimony of Isaiah and the other prophets; they had the teaching of Moses; and here was Christ in their very midst, and still they were searching the Scriptures for evidence in regard to his coming. And they were doing unto Christ the very things that had been prophesied they would do. They were so blinded they knew not what they were doing.

«ဤကာလ၌လည်း၊ ခရစ်တော်၏ နေ့ရက်ကာလ၌ ဖြစ်သကဲ့သို့ပင်၊ သမ္မာကျမ်းစာကို မှားယွင်းဖတ်ရှုခြင်း သို့မဟုတ် မှားယွင်းအနက်ဖွင့်ဆိုခြင်း ရှိနိုင်သည်။ ယုဒလူတို့သည် သမ္မာကျမ်းစာကို earnest, prayerful hearts ဖြင့် လေးနက်စွာ လေ့လာဆန်းစစ်ခဲ့ကြလျှင်၊ သူတို့၏ ရှာဖွေမှုသည် ကာလအချိန်အကြောင်းကို မှန်ကန်စွာ သိရှိခြင်းဖြင့် ဆုချီးမြှင့်ခံရမည်သာမက၊ ခရစ်တော် ပေါ်ထွန်းလာမည့် နည်းလမ်းအကြောင်းကိုလည်း သိရှိကြလိမ့်မည်။ သူတို့သည် ခရစ်တော်၏ ဘုန်းတော်ကြီးမြတ်သော ဒုတိယအကြိမ် ကြွလာခြင်းကို သူ၏ ပထမအကြိမ် ကြွလာခြင်းနှင့် မစပ်ဆိုင်စေကြလိမ့်မည်။ သူတို့၌ ဒံယေလ၏ သက်သေခံချက် ရှိခဲ့သည်။ ဟေရှာယနှင့် အခြား ပရောဖက်တို့၏ သက်သေခံချက်လည်း ရှိခဲ့သည်။ မောရှေ၏ သွန်သင်ချက်လည်း ရှိခဲ့သည်။ ထိုအခါ ခရစ်တော်သည် သူတို့၏ အလယ်၌ တကယ်ရှိနေသော်လည်း၊ သူတို့သည် ကိုယ်တော်၏ ကြွလာခြင်းနှင့် စပ်လျဉ်းသော အထောက်အထားကို ရှာဖွေရန် သမ္မာကျမ်းစာကို ဆက်လက် လေ့လာရှာဖွေနေကြဆဲ ဖြစ်သည်။ ထိုမျှသာမက၊ သူတို့သည် မိမိတို့ ပြုကြမည်ဟု ကြိုတင် ပရောဖက်ပြုထားပြီးသော အရာများကိုပင် ခရစ်တော်အပေါ်၌ ပြုလုပ်နေကြသည်။ သူတို့သည် အလွန် မျက်စိကန်းသွားကြသောကြောင့် မိမိတို့ ဘာပြုနေကြသည်ကို မသိကြ။»

“And many are doing the same things today, in 1897, because they have not had experience in the testing messages comprehended in the first, second and third angels’ messages. There are those who are searching the Scriptures for proof that these messages are still in the future. They gather together the truthfulness of the messages, but they fail to give them their proper place in prophetic history. Therefore such are in danger of misleading the people in regard to locating the messages. They do not see and understand the time of the end, or when to locate the messages. The day of God is coming with stealthy tread; but the supposed wise and great men are prating about ‘Higher Education.’ They know not the signs of Christ’s coming, or of the end of the world.” Paulson Collection, 423, 424.

“अनि आज, १८९७ मा, धेरैले उही कामहरू गरिरहेका छन्, किनकि तिनीहरूले पहिलो, दोस्रो र तेस्रो स्वर्गदूतहरूको सन्देशमा समाविष्ट परख गर्ने सन्देशहरूको अनुभव पाएका छैनन्। त्यहाँ यस्ता मानिसहरू छन् जो यी सन्देशहरू अझै भविष्यकै हुन् भन्ने प्रमाण खोज्दै धर्मशास्त्रहरूको अनुसन्धान गरिरहेका छन्। तिनीहरूले सन्देशहरूको सत्यतालाई सङ्कलन त गर्छन्, तर तिनलाई भविष्यवाणीको इतिहासमा तिनको उचित स्थान दिन असफल हुन्छन्। त्यसैले, यस्ता मानिसहरू सन्देशहरू कहाँ स्थापित गर्ने भन्ने विषयमा जनतालाई भ्रममा पार्ने जोखिममा छन्। तिनीहरूले अन्तको समय, वा सन्देशहरू कहाँ स्थापित गर्ने, त्यो देख्दैनन् र बुझ्दैनन्। परमेश्वरको दिन दबे पाउमा आउँदैछ; तर कथित बुद्धिमान् र महान् मानिसहरू ‘उच्च शिक्षा’ को बारेमा फतफताइरहेका छन्। तिनीहरूलाई न ख्रीष्टको आगमनका चिन्हहरू थाहा छन्, न त संसारको अन्त्यका।” Paulson Collection, 423, 424.

Identifying Christ’s birth as the “time of the end,” and therefore as the key of bringing the line of the Maccabees into the present truth context of the latter days, is making Christ the very center of the passage, which is also evidence the application is valid.

Ang pagtukoy sa kapanganakan ni Cristo bilang ang “panahon ng kawakasan,” at samakatuwid ay bilang susi sa pagdadala ng linya ng mga Macabeo sa konteksto ng kasalukuyang katotohanan ng mga huling araw, ay ginagawa si Cristo na pinakasentro ng talata, na isa ring katibayan na wasto ang pagkakapit nito.

The line of the Maccabees illustrates the spiritual glorious land, and the illustration begins in a period where the citizens of the glorious land break away from the king of the north’s political and religious domination. The Maccabean revolt that led to the Hasmonean dynasty represents 1776, and the revolt against the king of the north that was accomplished by the Maccabees represented the Revolutionary War. The twenty-two years of 1776 unto 1798 represents the Maccabean rebellion that led to the Hasmonean dynasty at the time of the end in 1798, which continued until the Herodian dynasty began at the time of the end in 1989. The Herodian dynasty continued until the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD.

ខ្សែរត្រកូលម៉ាកាបេ បង្ហាញនូវទឹកដីដ៏រុងរឿងខាងវិញ្ញាណ ហើយការបង្ហាញនោះចាប់ផ្តើមនៅក្នុងសម័យមួយដែលប្រជាជននៃទឹកដីដ៏រុងរឿងបានផ្តាច់ខ្លួនចេញពីអធិបតេយ្យភាពនយោបាយ និងសាសនារបស់ស្តេចខាងជើង។ ការបះបោររបស់ម៉ាកាបេ ដែលនាំទៅដល់រាជវង្សហាស្មូនេ តំណាងឲ្យឆ្នាំ 1776 ហើយការបះបោរប្រឆាំងនឹងស្តេចខាងជើង ដែលត្រូវបានសម្រេចដោយពួកម៉ាកាបេ តំណាងឲ្យសង្គ្រាមបដិវត្តន៍។ រយៈពេលម្ភៃពីរឆ្នាំ ចាប់ពី 1776 ដល់ 1798 តំណាងឲ្យការបះបោររបស់ម៉ាកាបេ ដែលនាំទៅដល់រាជវង្សហាស្មូនេ នៅពេលចុងបញ្ចប់ក្នុងឆ្នាំ 1798 ដែលបានបន្តរហូតដល់រាជវង្សហេរ៉ូឌៀនបានចាប់ផ្តើមនៅពេលចុងបញ្ចប់ក្នុងឆ្នាំ 1989។ រាជវង្សហេរ៉ូឌៀនបានបន្តរហូតដល់ការបំផ្លាញក្រុងយេរូសាឡឹមនៅឆ្នាំ 70 គ.ស.

What is important to recognize in this line of history is twofold; it is an illustration of the ancient glorious land that typifies the modern glorious land, and it begins within a line of history that starts with verse sixteen, where Rome conquers the glorious land for the first time, thus identifying the primary theme of the line. The line of verse sixteen unto verse twenty-two represents the glorious land, and its context is the soon-coming Sunday law. The line also represents the two classes of worshippers that influence both dynastic governments. The Sadducees were less in numbers but generally controlled the Jewish religious and political systems in both dynastic periods. The religious system was managed by a priesthood, and that priesthood was also influenced by both Sadducees and Pharisees. The Hasmonean and Herodian governments were both influenced by the Pharisees and Sadducees, and the two dynasties represent the government of the United States from 1798 unto the Sunday law.

तुव अतीत रेखायाँ इ बात दुइ प्रकार सँ बुझब आवश्यक अछि; ई प्राचीन महिमामय देशक एक उदाहरण अछि, जे आधुनिक महिमामय देशक प्रतीक अछि, आ ई ओहि इतिहास-रेखाक भीतर आरम्भ होइत अछि जे पद सोरहम सँ शुरू होइत अछि, जतए रोम पहिल बेर महिमामय देश पर विजय प्राप्त करैत अछि, आ एही प्रकारेँ ई रेखाक प्रधान विषयक पहचान करबैत अछि। पद सोरहम सँ पद बाइस धरिक रेखा महिमामय देशक प्रतिनिधित्व करैत अछि, आ ओकर प्रसंग शीघ्र आव’ बला रविवारक व्यवस्था अछि। ई रेखा उपासकसभक ओहि दुइ वर्गक सेहो प्रतिनिधित्व करैत अछि जे दुनू राजवंशीय सरकारसभ पर प्रभाव डालैत अछि। सदूकी लोक संख्या मे कम छलाह, मुदा सामान्यतः दुनू राजवंशीय अवधिमे यहूदी धार्मिक आ राजनीतिक व्यवस्थासभ पर नियंत्रण रखने छलाह। धार्मिक व्यवस्थाक संचालन एक पुरोहिताई द्वारा होइत छल, आ ओ पुरोहिताई सदूकी आ फरीसी दुनूक प्रभावमे सेहो छल। हस्मोनी आ हेरोदियन सरकारसभ दुनू फरीसी आ सदूकीसभक प्रभावमे छल, आ ई दुइ राजवंश 1798 सँ रविवारक व्यवस्था धरि संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिकाक सरकारक प्रतिनिधित्व करैत अछि।

The Pharisees and Sadducees represent two parties of political persuasions that are distinguished by their stand upon the issue of slavery. The Democrats are pro-slavery and the Republicans are anti-slavery; and together they interact with the political apparatus of the constitutional government of the United States. That government is the earth beast of Revelation thirteen, and the external history of the earth beast is represented by its republican horn. The internal history is represented by the protestant horn. The horns are separated on the beast, for the beast is the Constitution that separates the state horn from the church horn, but they move through history together. The republican horn has two influences either for or against slavery. The protestant horn has two influences either for the seventh-day Sabbath or the first day of the sun.

Awọn Farisi ati awọn Sadusi ṣoju awọn ẹgbẹ́ méjì ti ìfẹ̀sí ọ̀ṣèlú tí a yà sọ́tọ̀ nípasẹ̀ ipò tí wọ́n gbà lórí ọ̀ràn ẹrú. Àwọn Democrat jẹ́ alátìlẹ́yìn fún ẹrú, àwọn Republican sì jẹ́ alátakò ẹrú; àti pé pọ̀ọ̀kan wọn ń bá ẹ̀rọ ọ̀ṣèlú ìjọba t’ó dá lórí òfin ìpìlẹ̀ ti United States ṣiṣẹ́ pọ̀. Ìjọba yẹn ni ẹranko ilẹ̀ ti Ìfihàn orí kẹtàlá, àti pé ìtàn òde ẹranko ilẹ̀ náà ni a ṣoju rẹ̀ nípasẹ̀ ìwo republican rẹ̀. Ìtàn inú rẹ̀ ni a ṣoju rẹ̀ nípasẹ̀ ìwo protestant rẹ̀. A yà àwọn ìwo náà sọ́tọ̀ lórí ẹranko náà, nítorí ẹranko náà ni Òfin Ìpìlẹ̀ tí ó ya ìwo ìpínlẹ̀ kúrò lọ́dọ̀ ìwo ìjọ, ṣùgbọ́n wọ́n ń rìn kiri nínú ìtàn pọ̀. Ìwo republican ní ipa méjì, bóyá fún ẹrú tàbí lòdì sí ẹrú. Ìwo protestant náà ní ipa méjì, bóyá fún Sábá ọjọ́ keje tàbí fún ọjọ́ kìn-ín-ní ti oòrùn.

Roughly thirty years after the battle of Panium the Maccabees mark the history of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Then roughly a century later, verse sixteen is fulfilled when Jerusalem is conquered, typifying the cross. Judea is the second of the three obstacles Rome subdues as it takes control of the world. General Pompey conquered Syria in 65 BC, and then Judah in 63 BC. Augustus Caesar would conquer the third obstacle at the battle of Actium in 31 BC. This history is represented in the line of verse sixteen to twenty-two.

Պանիումի ճակատամարտից մոտավորապես երեսուն տարի անց Մակաբայեցիները նշանավորում են Միացյալ Նահանգների պատմությունը՝ որպես աստվածաշնչյան մարգարեության վեցերորդ թագավորություն։ Այնուհետև մոտավորապես մեկ դար անց տասնվեցերորդ համարը կատարվում է, երբ Երուսաղեմը նվաճվում է՝ նախատիպելով խաչը։ Հրեաստանը երկրորդն է այն երեք խոչընդոտներից, որ Հռոմը հնազանդեցնում է՝ աշխարհը իր վերահսկողության տակ առնելու ընթացքում։ Զորավար Պոմպեոսը Սիրիան նվաճեց մ.թ.ա. 65 թվականին, իսկ ապա՝ Հուդան մ.թ.ա. 63 թվականին։ Օգոստոս Կեսարը երրորդ խոչընդոտը պիտի նվաճեր Ակտիումի ճակատամարտում՝ մ.թ.ա. 31 թվականին։ Այս պատմությունը ներկայացված է տասնվեցերորդից մինչև քսաներկուերորդ համարների շարքում։

By the time of the cross the Maccabean history has been running for almost two hundred years. Uriah Smith identifies that the history represented by the league with the Jews in verse twenty-three is to be aligned to a starting point in history that occurred almost two hundred years before the history of the cross in verse twenty-two. The history of the cross in verse twenty-two must be aligned with verse sixteen, for verse sixteen is also the Sunday law. This means the line of the Maccabees, which is the history of the glorious land of Judah, begins well before verse sixteen’s Sunday law.

A la ora de la cruz, la historia de los Macabeos lleva ya en curso casi doscientos años. Uriah Smith identifica que la historia representada por la liga con los judíos en el versículo veintitrés debe alinearse con un punto de partida en la historia que ocurrió casi doscientos años antes de la historia de la cruz en el versículo veintidós. La historia de la cruz en el versículo veintidós debe alinearse con el versículo dieciséis, porque el versículo dieciséis también es la ley dominical. Esto significa que la línea de los Macabeos, que es la historia de la tierra gloriosa de Judá, comienza mucho antes de la ley dominical del versículo dieciséis.

When we understand that the Millerite history illustrates the history of the one hundred and forty-four thousand, we can align the time of the end for the Millerites in 1798, with the time of the end for the one hundred and forty-four thousand in 1989. When we do this, we are overlaying the history of the first and second angels, with the history of the third angel. 1798 and 1989 are the alpha and omega waymark of the history of verse forty of Daniel eleven.

Millerite tarixinin yüz qırx dörd minin tarixini təsvir etdiyini anladığımızda, Milleritlər üçün sonun vaxtını 1798-ci ildə, yüz qırx dörd min üçün sonun vaxtı olan 1989-cu illə uyğunlaşdıra bilərik. Bunu etdiyimiz zaman, birinci və ikinci mələklərin tarixini üçüncü mələyin tarixi ilə üst-üstə qoymuş oluruq. 1798 və 1989 Daniel on birinci fəslin qırxıncı ayəsinin tarixinin alfa və omeqa nişanlarıdır.

Verse forty begins at the “time of the end,” which is easily proved to be 1798; and when correctly understood, the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989, fulfilled verse forty, and that fulfillment was also “the time of the end.” Two “time of the ends,” in one verse, that is in the same chapter as the line of the Maccabees. The Maccabean revolt that led to the Hasmonean dynasty represents the twenty-two years from 1776 unto 1798. In 1798 the Hasmonean dynasty began and the Herodian dynasty began in 1989.

چەلەمین ئایەت لە «کاتی کۆتایی» دەست پێ دەکات، کە بە ئاسانی دەسەلمێندرێت 1798 ـە؛ و کاتێک بە دروستی تێ بگەین، داڕمانی یەکێتیی سۆڤیەت لە 1989 دا، ئایەتی چەلەی پێ هاتە دی، و ئەو پێکهاتنەش هەمان «کاتی کۆتایی» بوو. دوو «کاتیی کۆتایی»، لە یەک ئایەتدا، لە هەمان بەشدا کە هێڵی ماکابییەکان تێدایە. شۆڕشی ماکابییەکان کە بووە هۆی دەرکەوتنی خێزانی هاشمۆنی، نوێنەرایەتیی ئەو بیست و دوو ساڵە دەکات لە 1776 تا 1798. لە 1798 دا خێزانی هاشمۆنی دەستی پێ کرد و خێزانی هێرۆدی لە 1989 دا دەستی پێ کرد.

Verse ten of Daniel eleven identifies 1989, and verse sixteen is the Sunday law. The line of history within those verses represent three battles, and a demise of a southern king and the entrance of Rome into prophetic history. It also contains the line of two dynasties that typify the change that occurs when the earth beast of Revelation thirteen who “had two horns like a lamb, and” “spake as a dragon.” Sequentially the first Jewish dynasty is the lamb and the second Roman dynasty is the dragon. The first dynasty was Jewish, the second was Roman. Whether Jewish or Roman the earth beast had two horns.

Daniel kin saṅhniḥ curi vəḥkī 1989, lə Daniel kin saṅhniḥ sətəruḥkī hri Sunday law. Pəsaṅhniḥ hri gaicaiḥ tamiḥkā mī pəcacrāh sā mūi, nŭng marnās saṅ rājā tisaṅhniḥ tbaṅ, nŭng kār cōl mok robah Rome tŏv knuṅ pravattisās prophēt. Vā kŏ mī pəsaṅhniḥ robah vaṃsānuvat piḍael tœrvəv jī rūpkāy dāl pdam pđūr dāl kaet mīnləṅkāl pṣəṅhniḥ pṛəptət knuṅ Revelation 13 dāl “mī sɑɛk pi dociə saet” haey “niyeay dociə nāk.” Tām lămṭāp vaṃsa dāmbūṅ nei cūnciət Yudae kŭ saet haey vaṃsa Roman ti pir kŭ nāk. Vaṃsa dāmbūṅ kŭ Yudae, vaṃsa ti pir kŭ Roman. Tōh bəy ciə Yudae rŭ Roman kŏ daoy sat pṛəptət nei dēy noh mī sɑɛk pi.

The Jewish dynasty represents the Protestant horn and the Roman dynasty represents the Republican horn. Both horns also possess a prophetic division of two. The Sadducees and Pharisees provide the framework of the pro-slavery Democrats as opposed to the anti-slavery Republicans; while also representing a twofold division of foolish virgins in contrast with the wise virgins. The Pharisees as foolish virgins are purged at the first disappointment and the Sadducees are purged at the second temple cleansing. The Pharisees, like unto the church of Sardis professed to have a name of life, but were dead, and are purged first, then the Sadducees who denied the power of God, denied the power and message of the Midnight Cry. The Sadducees are the covenant people who are being passed by, the Sadducees are those who are satisfied with the feelings of good emotions.

Yudío dinastía Protestant cuerno representati, ha Romanu dinastía Republicanu cuerno representati. Ambos cuernonan tambe tin un dividí profétiko di dos. Saduceonan i Fariseonan ta proveé e marco di e Demócratanan pro-esklavitut na kontraste ku e Republicanan anti-esklavitut; miéntras ku tambe nan ta representá un dividí doble di vírgenanan necio en kontraste ku e vírgenanan prudente. E Fariseonan komo vírgenanan necio ta ser purgá na e promé desengaño, i e Saduceonan ta ser purgá na e di dos limpiesa di e templo. E Fariseonan, semejante na e iglesia di Sardis, a profesá tin un nòmber di bida, pero tabata morto, i nan ta ser purgá promé; despues e Saduceonan, ku a nenga e poder di Dios, a nenga e poder i e mensahe di e Gritu di Medianoche. E Saduceonan ta e pueblo di pacto ku ta ser pasá di largo; e Saduceonan ta esunan ku ta satisfecho ku e sentimentunan di bon emoshon.

“The coming of Christ, as announced by the first angel’s message, was understood to be represented by the coming of the bridegroom. The widespread reformation under the proclamation of His soon coming, answered to the going forth of the virgins. In this parable, as in that of Matthew 24, two classes are represented. All had taken their lamps, the Bible, and by its light had gone forth to meet the Bridegroom. But while ‘they that were foolish took their lamps, and took no oil with them,’ ‘the wise took oil in their vessels with their lamps.’ The latter class had received the grace of God, the regenerating, enlightening power of the Holy Spirit, which renders His word a lamp to the feet and a light to the path. In the fear of God they had studied the Scriptures to learn the truth, and had earnestly sought for purity of heart and life. These had a personal experience, a faith in God and in His word, which could not be overthrown by disappointment and delay. Others ‘took their lamps, and took no oil with them.’ They had moved from impulse. Their fears had been excited by the solemn message, but they had depended upon the faith of their brethren, satisfied with the flickering light of good emotions, without a thorough understanding of the truth or a genuine work of grace in the heart. These had gone forth to meet the Lord, full of hope in the prospect of immediate reward; but they were not prepared for delay and disappointment. When trials came, their faith failed, and their lights burned dim.” The Great Controversy, 393.

«ክርስቶስ መምጣቱ፣ በመጀመሪያው መልአክ መልእክት እንደ ተገለጸው፣ በሙሽራው መምጣት እንደ ተወከለ ተረድቶ ነበር። በእርሱ በቅርቡ መምጣት ማወጅ ሥር የተስፋፋው ተሐድሶ፣ ድንግሎቹ ለመገናኘት በመውጣታቸው ጋር ይጣጣማ ነበር። በዚህ ምሳሌ፣ እንደ ማቴዎስ 24 ባለው ምሳሌ ሁሉ፣ ሁለት ዓይነት ክፍሎች ተወክለዋል። ሁሉም መብራታቸውን፣ መጽሐፍ ቅዱስን፣ ይዘው ነበር፤ በብርሃኑም ሙሽራውን ሊገናኙ ወጥተው ነበር። ነገር ግን ‘ሰነፎቹ መብራታቸውን ይዘው ዘይት ከእነርሱ ጋር አልወሰዱም’ ሲል፣ ‘ጠቢባኑ ግን ከመብራታቸው ጋር በዕቃቸው ዘይት ወሰዱ።’ የኋለኛው ክፍል የእግዚአብሔርን ጸጋ፣ የመንፈስ ቅዱስን እንደ አዲስ የሚወልድና የሚያበራ ኃይል ተቀብሎ ነበር፤ ይህም ቃሉን ለእግር መብራትና ለመንገድ ብርሃን ያደርገዋል። በእግዚአብሔር ፍርሃት እውነትን ለመማር መጽሐፍትን መርምረው ነበር፤ የልብና የሕይወት ንጽሕናንም በትጋት ፈልገው ነበር። እነዚህ የግል ልምድ ነበራቸው፤ በእግዚአብሔርና በቃሉ ላይ ያላቸው እምነት በተስፋ መቋረጥና በመዘግየት ሊፈርስ የማይችል ነበር። ሌሎች ግን ‘መብራታቸውን ይዘው ዘይት ከእነርሱ ጋር አልወሰዱም።’ ከግፊት የተነሣ ተንቀሳቅሰው ነበር። ፍርሃታቸው በዚያ ጥብቅ መልእክት ተነስቶ ነበር፤ ነገር ግን በወንድሞቻቸው እምነት ላይ ተመርከው ነበር፤ እውነትን በጥልቀት ሳያስተውሉ ወይም በልብ ውስጥ እውነተኛ የጸጋ ሥራ ሳይኖር፣ በመልካም ስሜቶች የሚንቀጠቀጠው ብርሃን ብቻ ረክተው ነበር። እነዚህ ወዲያውኑ ሽልማት ያገኛሉ በሚለው ተስፋ ተሞልተው ጌታን ሊገናኙ ወጥተው ነበር፤ ነገር ግን ለመዘግየትና ለተስፋ መቋረጥ ዝግጁ አልነበሩም። ፈተናዎች ሲመጡ እምነታቸው አልቆ መብራታቸውም ደብዝዞ ነበር።» The Great Controversy, 393.

Whether political or religious both classes unite against the wise at the crisis at midnight. This being said, we began the article by raising the point that I am applying verse fourteen based upon its placement in the flow of the verses, in contradiction with the historical sequence represented by the verses. I employ that logic in agreement with the placement of verse twenty-three. The placement of a waymark is to correspond to its historical fulfillment. The league that the Jews made with Rome during the Maccabean time period defined where the verse would be applied. The “robbers” of verse fourteen, who establish the vision did so in 200 BC, the very year of the battle of Panium, but the battle and the robbers are two different symbols.

Сәясий яки диний болсун, икки гуруппа йерим кечилик боһранда дана кишиләргә қарши бирлишиду. Буни дейиш билән, биз мақалини шу нуқтини көтүрүш билән башлиған едүкки, мән он төртинчи айәтни айәтләрниң еқими ичидики орниға асасән қоллинимән, айәтләр ипадиләйдиған тарихи изчиллиққа хилап һалда. Мән бу мәнтиқни йигирмә үчинчи айәтниң орниға мувапиқ һалда қоллинимән. Бир бәлгиниң орни униң тарихи әмәлгә ешишиға мувапиқ келиши керәк. Йәһудийларниң Маккавийлар дәвридә Рим билән түзгән иттипақи бу айәтниң қәйәргә қоллинилидиғанлиқини бәлгүләп бәрди. Көрүнүшни мустәһкәмләйдиған он төртинчи айәттики «бузғунчилар» миладтин авал 200-йилда, дәл Панийум уруши йүз бәргән йили шу ишни қилди, лекин уруш билән бузғунчилар икки хил рамздур.

The “robbers” become part of the narrative, not to establish a direct connection with the date of the battle of Panium, but to identify the relation they made with the weakened five-year-old ruler of Egypt that was about to be defeated by Antiochus. They did not want a disruption of the importation of Egyptian wheat to the Roman Empire. The prophetic relation of Rome with the vulnerable five-year-old Egyptian king is the subject of the verse. That intercession is identifying the aftermath of the fallout that follows Putin’s attempt to include the subjection of the Ukrainian church to the Russian church as it had formerly been, before 1989. That attempt starts the progressive demise of his southern kingdom, and when Putin dies as did Ptolemy, or is somehow exiled as was Uzziah and Napoleon, he is prophetically removed and his kingdom is then being handled by a series of less competent leaders. Then, in the time of the five-year old king, papal Rome intercedes to protect its interests, which is the Ukrainian church.

«Գողերը» դառնում են պատմության մի մասը՝ ոչ թե Պանիոնի ճակատամարտի թվականի հետ ուղիղ կապ հաստատելու համար, այլ ցույց տալու այն հարաբերությունը, որ նրանք հաստատեցին Եգիպտոսի թուլացած հինգ տարեկան տիրակալի հետ, որը շուտով պիտի պարտվեր Անտիոքոսի կողմից։ Նրանք չէին ցանկանում խափանում Հռոմեական կայսրություն եգիպտական ցորենի ներմուծման գործում։ Հռոմի մարգարեական հարաբերությունը խոցելի հինգ տարեկան եգիպտական թագավորի հետ է այս համարի նյութը։ Այդ միջամտությունը մատնանշում է այն հետևանքների հետագա ընթացքը, որ հաջորդում է Պուտինի փորձին՝ ուկրաինական եկեղեցու ենթարկեցումը ռուսական եկեղեցուն ներառելու, ինչպես նախկինում էր՝ 1989 թվականից առաջ։ Այդ փորձը սկիզբ է դնում նրա հարավային թագավորության աստիճանական կործանմանը, և երբ Պուտինը մահանում է, ինչպես Պտղոմեոսը, կամ որևէ կերպ աքսորվում է, ինչպես Օզիան և Նապոլեոնը, նա մարգարեապես հեռացվում է, և ապա նրա թագավորությունը վարվում է պակաս կարող առաջնորդների մի շարքի կողմից։ Այնուհետև, հինգ տարեկան թագավորի ժամանակ, պապական Հռոմը միջամտում է՝ պաշտպանելու իր շահերը, այսինքն՝ ուկրաինական եկեղեցին։

The papacy is not picking sides between Russian or Ukrainian orthodoxy; she is playing every side to bring all the religious bodies under her authority as represented in Isaiah four.

پاپیسی روسی یا یوکرینی آرتھوڈوکسی کے درمیان کسی ایک فریق کا ساتھ نہیں دے رہی؛ وہ ہر ایک جانب کھیل رہی ہے تاکہ تمام مذہبی جماعتوں کو اپنے اختیار کے تحت لے آئے، جیسا کہ یسعیاہ چار میں ظاہر کیا گیا ہے۔

And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach. In that day shall the branch of the Lord be beautiful and glorious, and the fruit of the earth shall be excellent and comely for them that are escaped of Israel. And it shall come to pass, that he that is left in Zion, and he that remaineth in Jerusalem, shall be called holy, even every one that is written among the living in Jerusalem. Isaiah 4:1–3.

Aka nasin da seeli nyɔnyɔrẽ ŋmɛi jũu mɔ pũrɔ lɛkɛ bo ŋmɔkuɛ̃ mɔ ba, je, Anya nyaa bo ba yi dĩi, nya bo ba katre i: pɛrɛ kɛ bo yeli ba n ɔlɛ hɛ̃, nɛ bo kɛ ba n jɛ̃n nĩi. Aka nasin da seeli, Gbehinɔ ŋmãlẽ lɔ bɛɛ yi nɛmi nɛ ŋgaŋga, nya tɛi n nyɛã lɔ bɛɛ yi kpakpa nɛ yĩyĩi nɔ nɛ Israel bi nɛi kɛ ba bɔ. Nya a bɛɛ kɛ, ɔ nɛ a tɔ Sion mɔ, nya ɔ nɛ a gbo Jerusalem mɔ, ba bɛɛ yeli e hewi; je, mɔmɔ nɛ ba sra e nɔ nɛi mɔ Jerusalem. Isaiah 4:1–3.

The papacy takes control of all the religious bodies, represented as seven women, meaning all the churches. Those seven churches wish to be called catholic, which means universal, and they are clearly not God’s people, for they intend to wear their own apparel. The unification of all the religious bodies who wish to wear their own human garments does so in the time when those in “Jerusalem shall be called holy,” which is when the branch of the Lord transforms from a Laodicean to Philadelphian people, which is where the papacy becomes the head of all the religious bodies in the very time she will also be made the head of the political bodies.

El papado toma el control de todos los cuerpos religiosos, representados como siete mujeres, es decir, todas las iglesias. Esas siete iglesias desean ser llamadas católicas, lo cual significa universales, y claramente no son el pueblo de Dios, porque tienen la intención de vestir su propia vestidura. La unificación de todos los cuerpos religiosos que desean vestir sus propias vestiduras humanas acontece en el tiempo cuando los que están en “Jerusalem shall be called holy”, que es cuando el renuevo del Señor se transforma de un pueblo laodicense en un pueblo filadelfiano, y es allí donde el papado llega a ser la cabeza de todos los cuerpos religiosos en el mismo tiempo en que también será hecho cabeza de los cuerpos políticos.

In 1989, the Ukrainian church was a symbol of the king of the north sweeping away the Soviet Union, and Putin will seek to restore the former relationship of submission, and receive leprosy on his forehead and begin a persecution against the religion that refused his demands. That persecution took place in Ptolemy’s own nation, in the city of Alexandria, so the churches within Russia that are influenced by Rome will become Putin’s target, and his ending. As Trump prepares for the battle of Panium his open relationship with the protector of the weakened Egyptian child king is identified in 2025. The Roman power that in 200 BC protected the Egyptian child-king, will not then protect the child-king. She will help to end the child king. Rome as Egypt’s protector in 200 BC, represents Rome as Egypt’s destroyer at the battle of Panium.

1989-шы жылы Украин чиркөө Советтер Союзун шыпырып салган түндүк падышасынын белгиси болгон, ал эми Путин мурдагы баш ийүү мамилесин калыбына келтирүүгө умтулат жана маңдайына пес оорусун кабыл алып, анын талаптарын четке каккан динге каршы куугунтук баштайт. Ал куугунтук Птолемейдин өз элинде, Александрия шаарында болгон, ошондуктан Римдин таасири астындагы Орусия ичиндеги чиркөөлөр Путиндин бутасына да, анын акырына да айланат. Трамп Паний согушуна даярданып жатканда, алсырап калган Мисирдин бала-падышасынын коргоочусу менен болгон анын ачык мамилеси 2025-жылы аныкталат. Б.з.ч. 200-жылы Мисирдин бала-падышасын коргогон Рим бийлиги анда бала-падышаны коргобойт. Ал бала-падышанын соңуна чыгууга жардам берет. Б.з.ч. 200-жылы Мисирдин коргоочусу катары Рим, Паний согушунда Мисирдин кыйратуучусу катары Римди билдирет.

Millerites

ميلريين

The Millerites did not see three Roman powers, they only saw two, but their truth was truth, just the same. The prophetic logic of Antiochus as a symbol allows us to apply verse fourteen in a history that precedes verse fifteen, even if the history which initially fulfilled the verses placed both verse fourteen and fifteen in the year 200 BC. I am claiming verse sixteen is the soon-coming Sunday law and that verse fourteen was 2025, and verse fifteen is the yet future battle of Panium. Antiochus proves the three battles are one prophetic line for he is at all three battles, but he also proves the claim I am asserting that the latter-day application of the verses, when rightly divided with line upon line methodology.

میلریتەکان سێ هێزی ڕۆمیان نەدیت؛ تەنها دوویان بینی، بەڵام ڕاستییەکەیان هەر ڕاستی بوو. لۆژیکی پێشبینیی ئەنتیوخۆس وەک هێما ڕێگا دەدات کە ئێمە ئایەتی چواردە پەیوەست بکەین بە مێژوویەک کە پێش ئایەتی پانزە دەکەوێت، هەرچەندە ئەو مێژووەی کە سەرەتا ئایەتەکانی بەجێهێنا، هەردووکی ئایەتی چواردە و پانزەی لە ساڵی 200 پ.ز. دانا. من بانگەشەی ئەوە دەکەم کە ئایەتی شازدە یاسای یەکشەممەی نزیکهاتووە، و ئایەتی چواردە ساڵی 2025 بوو، و ئایەتی پانزە شەڕی پانیۆمە کە هێشتا داهاتووە. ئەنتیوخۆس دەیسەلمێنێت کە ئەو سێ شەڕە یەک هێڵی پێشبینیین، چونکە لە هەموو ئەو سێ شەڕەدا ئامادەیە؛ بەڵام هەروەها ئەو بانگەشەیەش دەیسەلمێنێت کە من دەریدەبڕم، ئەویش ئەوەیە کە بەکارهێنانی کۆتایی زەمان بۆ ئەو ئایەتانە، کاتێک بە ڕێوەچوونی دروست و بە میتۆدی «هێڵ لەسەر هێڵ» دابەش بکرێت.

Antiochus was at all three battles and in the latter days he represents the papacies proxy power in 1989 (Reagan and the USA), 2014 (Zelenskyy and the Ukraine), and then at the battle of Panium it is the same proxy power as 1989, for Jesus always represents the end with the beginning. Ronald Reagan is dead and buried, so the historical witness of Antiochus is accurate to the Millerite understanding, but subject to the rules which govern a line upon line application. The last papal proxy power in the verses is Trump, even though historically Antiochus was at all three battles. In order to fulfill verse thirteen Trump had to lose the second election, for in verse thirteen he “returns,” stronger than ever, strong enough to take a bullet through the ear, which along with the right thumb and right big toe is what was to be anointed with blood, when the priests were anointed.

Антиох ба ҳар се ҷанг ҳозир буд, ва дар айёми охир ӯ қудрати вакилии папаро дар солҳои 1989 (Рейган ва Иёлоти Муттаҳидаи Амрико), 2014 (Зеленский ва Украина) намояндагӣ мекунад; ва сипас, дар ҷанги Панийум, ҳамон қудрати вакилист, ки дар соли 1989 буд, зеро Исо ҳамеша анҷомро бо ибтидо намояндагӣ мекунад. Роналд Рейган мурда ва дафн шудааст, бинобар ин шоҳидии таърихии Антиох барои фаҳмиши Миллерӣ дуруст аст, аммо мутобеи қоидаҳоест, ки татбиқи «хат бар хат»-ро идора мекунанд. Охирин қудрати вакилии папа дар ин оятҳо Трамп аст, ҳарчанд аз нигоҳи таърихӣ Антиох дар ҳар се ҷанг ҳозир буд. Барои он ки ояти сездаҳ иҷро шавад, Трамп бояд дар интихоботи дувум мағлуб мешуд, зеро дар ояти сездаҳ ӯ «бозмегардад», аз ҳарвақта қавитар, ончунон қавӣ, ки тире аз гӯшаш бигзарад; ва гӯши рост, ҳамроҳ бо ангушти калони дасти рост ва ангушти калони пои рост, ҳамонҳо буданд, ки ҳангоми тадҳини коҳинон бояд бо хун тадҳин карда мешуданд.

Reagan typified Trump, for Reagan is the first of the final eight presidents from the time of the end in 1989. Lincoln typified Trump, for he was the first Republican president. Lincoln was assassinated by proslavery Democrats in alliance with Rome, and both Ronald Reagan and his popish counterpart John Paul II survived assassination attempts. Trump was politically assassinated in 2020, with the stolen election in fulfillment of Revelation eleven, verse seven, and then in 2024 he was resurrected in fulfillment of verse eleven.

Ռեյգանը նախատիպում էր Թրամփին, որովհետև Ռեյգանը ժամանակի վերջից՝ 1989 թվականից սկսած, վերջին ութ նախագահներից առաջինն է։ Լինքոլնը նախատիպում էր Թրամփին, որովհետև նա առաջին Հանրապետական նախագահն էր։ Լինքոլնը սպանվեց ստրկամետ դեմոկրատների կողմից՝ Հռոմի հետ դաշինքի մեջ, իսկ Ռոնալդ Ռեյգանն ու նրա պապական համարժեքը՝ Հովհաննես Պողոս II-ը, երկուսն էլ վերապրեցին մահափորձերը։ Թրամփը քաղաքականապես սպանվեց 2020 թվականին՝ գողացված ընտրությամբ, Հայտնություն տասնմեկերորդ գլխի յոթերորդ համարի կատարման մեջ, ապա 2024 թվականին հարություն առավ՝ տասնմեկերորդ համարի կատարման մեջ։

And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them. … And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them. Revelation 11:7, 11.

ꦱꦪꦤ꧀ꦠꦼꦴꦤ꧀ ꦩꦿꦺꦏꦱꦏꦺ ꦲꦤ꧀ꦢꦫꦺꦏ꧀ꦲꦏꦺ ꦧꦼꦏ꧀ꦠꦶꦲꦺ, ꦱꦠ꧀ꦮ ꦲꦼꦮꦤ꧀ ꦪꦁ ꦩꦸꦤ꧀ꦕꦸꦭ꧀ ꦱꦏ ꦭꦸꦧꦁ ꦠꦤ꧀ꦥ ꦲꦶꦚ꧀ꦠꦺꦁ ꦲꦏꦤ꧀ ꦩꦼꦤꦒꦶꦱꦏꦤ꧀ ꦥꦼꦫꦁ ꦩꦼꦭꦮꦤ꧀ ꦩꦿꦺꦏꦱꦏꦺ, ꦢꦤ꧀ ꦲꦏꦤ꧀ ꦩꦼꦤꦒ꧀ꦏꦸꦭꦏꦤ꧀ ꦩꦿꦺꦏꦱꦏꦺ, ꦭꦤ꧀ ꦩꦼꦩꦸꦤꦸꦃ ꦩꦿꦺꦏꦱꦏꦺ. … ꦭꦤ꧀ ꦱꦼꦠꦼꦭꦃ ꦠꦼꦭꦸꦁ ꦲꦫꦶ ꦱꦼꦔꦃ, Roh kauripan saking Gusti Allah mlebet ing dhatengipun, sarta padha ngadeg ing inggiling sukunipun; lan wedi ageng tumiba dhateng para ingkang nyumurupi piyambakipun. Wahyu 11:7, 11.

Trump’s resurrection was his “return” of verse thirteen, and it also provided a parallel of a characteristic of Rome, for Rome is “the eighth that is of the seven,” and Trump is an image of Rome.

Kasanḥag Trump ket dufset nnes i d-yuɣalen n yisefra wis kraḍ d mraw, yerna yefka daɣen amgired n yiwet n tmerna n Ruma, acku Ruma d “atam n tisnatin i d-yeffɣen seg sa,” yerna Trump d tugna n Ruma.

And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. Revelation 17:11.

And la bestia que era, y no es, aun él es el octavo, y es de entre los siete, y va a perdición. Apocalipsis 17:11.

Trump’s second term makes him the eighth president since Reagan, and because he was also the sixth, Trump, in alignment with the papacy is “the eight, that is of the seven.” Eight is the symbol of resurrection, which emphasizes that he, as an image of the papacy needed to have a deadly wound that was healed in order to “return.”

تْرَمْب کا دوسرا دورِ صدارت اُسے ریگن کے بعد آٹھواں صدر بناتا ہے، اور چونکہ وہ چھٹا بھی تھا، اس لیے ٹرمپ، پاپائیت کے ساتھ مطابقت میں، “وہ آٹھواں ہے، جو سات میں سے ہے۔” آٹھ قیامت کی علامت ہے، جو اس امر پر زور دیتی ہے کہ اسے، پاپائیت کی ایک شبیہ ہونے کے ناطے، “واپس آنے” کے لیے ایک مہلک زخم کھانا اور پھر شفا پانا ضروری تھا۔

And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. Revelation 13:3.

“And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.” Revelation 13:3.

When the deadly wound is healed the world “wonders after the beast,” and when Trump was resurrected as the eighth that is of the seven in 2024, he “returned” and the whole world wondered after him.

Kan ñeñeskuéra omonguerávo upe herida omanókuaáva, ko yvy tuichakue “oñemondýi mymba guasu rapykuéri”; ha Trump oñemopu’ãjey ramo pe poapyha ramo, umi siete-gui, ary 2024-pe, ha’e “ojevy” ha ko yvy tuichakue oñemondýi hapykuéri.

And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them. And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them. Revelation 11:11, 12.

Y después de tres días y medio, el Espíritu de vida procedente de Dios entró en ellos, y se pusieron en pie; y cayó gran temor sobre los que los vieron. Y oyeron una gran voz del cielo que les decía: Subid acá. Y subieron al cielo en una nube; y sus enemigos los vieron. Apocalipsis 11:11, 12.

Trump “returned” in the election of 2024, and then in 2025 he and pope Leo were both inaugurated. Jesus gave a direct and fair warning, to any who wished to see.

Trump “tuqsiñaqtut” 2024-mi nirisuutiqarnikkut, taavalu 2025-mi ilagilugu papa Leo tamarmik ivertitaullutik. Jesusip toqqaannartumik nalunaiqsuillunilu naammagittartumik mianersoqqussut tunniuppaa, kinaluunniit takujumasaqartunut.

When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand.) Matthew 24:15.

Poro ende, kur të shihni neverinë e shkretimit, për të cilën foli profeti Daniel, duke qëndruar në vendin e shenjtë, (kush lexon, le të kuptojë.) Mateu 24:15.

Mark says it perhaps a little clearer.

Mark-sazqa sa kaq achka sut’ita niwa.

But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains. Mark 13:14.

A nga no makakita kamo han mangil-ad nga butang han pagkawarat, nga ginsiring ni Daniel nga propeta, nga natindog dida han diri niya angay katindogan, (pasabta an nagbabasa,) unya an mga aadto ha Judea kumalagiw ngadto ha kabukiran. Marcos 13:14.

The abomination of desolation is Rome in each of its three phases. Pagan, papal and modern Rome is each a symbol of warning for the people of God. The warning is to be recognized when Rome is in a “holy place” or where “it ought not” be. The glorious land is the holy land in Scripture, and the United States is the spiritual glorious land.

Вайраншудың жиркеніштігі — Рим оның үш кезеңінің әрқайсысында. Пұтқа табынушы, папалық және қазіргі Римнің әрқайсысы Құдай халқы үшін ескерту нышаны болып табылады. Ескерту Рим “қасиетті орында” болғанда немесе “болуға тиісті емес” жерде тұрған кезде танылуға тиіс. Даңқты жер — Жазбадағы қасиетті жер, ал Америка Құрама Штаттары — рухани мағынадағы даңқты жер.

And the Lord shall inherit Judah his portion in the holy land, and shall choose Jerusalem again. Be silent, O all flesh, before the Lord: for he is raised up out of his holy habitation. Zechariah 2:12, 13.

Chaytaqmi Señorqa Judá llaqtata herencianqa paypa rakisqan hina allin hallp’api, hinallataq Jerusalenta yapamanta akllanqa. Upallaychik, tukuy runakuna, Señorpa ñawpaqenpi; payqa hatarimusqa kachkan santo tiyananmanta. Zacarías 2:12, 13.

When you see Rome standing in the holy place the Lord is choosing Jerusalem as His covenant people for the final time. When Reagan, the first of eight presidents arranged a secret alliance with the antichrist of Bible prophecy, it represented an open alliance with Rome by the eighth and last president since the time of the end in 1989. Omega symbols often reverse attributes of the alpha symbol.

ئه‌گەر ڕۆم لە شوێنی پیرۆزدا ڕاوەستاو ببینیت، ئەوا یەزدان ئۆرشەلیم هەڵدەبژێرێت وەک گەلی پەیمانی خۆی بۆ دواجار. کاتێک ریگن، یەکەمین لە هەشت سەرۆکدا، هاوپەیمانییەکی نهێنی لەگەڵ دژە مەسیحی پێشبینییەکانی کتێبی پیرۆز ڕێکخست، ئەوە نوێنەرایەتیی هاوپەیمانییەکی ئاشکرا لەگەڵ ڕۆم دەکرد لەلایەن هەشتەمین و دوا سەرۆکەوە لە زمانەی کۆتاییەوە لە ساڵی 1989. نیشانەکانی ئۆمێگا زۆرجار خاسیەتەکانی نیشانەی ئالفا پێچەوانە دەکەن.

The inauguration of pope Leo and Trump in 2025 is identifying an open relationship between the sea beast and the earth beast of Revelation thirteen. The reversal to an open alliance of Trump and Leo that was typified by the secret alliance of Reagan and John Paul II, informs us that the support of the Egyptian child-king that fulfilled verse fourteen in 200 BC, represents a lack of support in the latter-days.

A kàmfọ̀ Papa Leo àti Trump ní ọdún 2025 ń fi ìbáṣepọ̀ tí ó ṣí síta hàn láàárín ẹranko òkun àti ẹranko ilẹ̀ nínú Ìfihàn orí kẹtàlá. Ìpadà sí ìṣọ̀kan gbangba ti Trump àti Leo, èyí tí a ti fi ìṣọ̀kan aṣínà ti Reagan àti John Paul Kejì ṣàpẹẹrẹ, ń jẹ́ kí a mọ̀ pé ìtìlẹ́yìn ọmọ ọba Íjíbítì tí ó mú ẹsẹ̀ kẹrìnlá ṣẹ ní ọdún 200 Ṣ.K., dúró fún àìsí ìtìlẹ́yìn ní àwọn ọjọ́ ìkẹyìn.

2025 establishes the external foundational vision or prophecy, for it lifts up Rome as the warning of Rome that is identified by Daniel with the symbolism of “the abomination of desolation.” The warning of the abomination of desolation takes place in advance of the destruction represented by “desolation.” In the siege of Jerusalem under Cestius the warning was represented by the banners of Rome’s authority being placed within the sacred precincts of the sanctuary. Those who saw, understood, obeyed and left the city and were protected when the siege was re-engaged. They saw the Roman warning sign. The Christians who separated from the compromised church of Pergamos and thereafter the church of Thyatira fled into the wilderness when they saw the man of sin setting in the temple of God. Those witnesses identify a warning of the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel in the latter days.

2025 እቲ ውጫዊ መሠረታዊ ራእይ ወይ ትንቢት ይመስርት፣ ምኽንያቱ ሮማ እቲ ብዳንኤል “እቲ ጽያፍ ዘጥፍእ” ብዝብል ምልክት ዝተለለየ መጠንቀቕታ ከም ዝኾነት ኣልዒሉ ያርእያ። መጠንቀቕታ ናይ እቲ ጽያፍ ዘጥፍእ ቅድሚ እቲ ብ“ጥፍኣት” ዝተወከለ ምጥፋእ ይፍጸም። ኣብ ከበባ የሩሳሌም ብቄስጥዮስ፣ እቲ መጠንቀቕታ ብዓላማታት ሥልጣን ሮማ ኣብ ውሽጢ ቅዱስ ክልል መቕደስ ብምቕማጥ ተወኪሉ ነበረ። እቶም ዝረኣዩ፣ ዝተረድኡ፣ ዝተኣዘዙ እሞ ካብታ ከተማ ዝወጹ፣ እቲ ከበባ ዳግም ምስ ተጀመረ ተሓልዮም ነበሩ። ንሳቶም እቲ ሮማዊ ምልክት መጠንቀቕታ ረኣዩ። እቶም ካብታ ዝተበላሸወት ቤተ ክርስቲያን ጴርጋሞን ዝተፈለዩ ክርስቲያናት፣ እናድሕርዚ ድማ እታ ቤተ ክርስቲያን ትያጥራ፣ እቲ ሰብ ሓጢኣት ኣብ ቤተ መቕደስ ኣምላኽ ክቕመጥ ምስ ረኣዩ ናብ በረኻ ሃደሙ። እቶም ምስክራት እቲ ብዳንኤል ኣብ ዳሕረዎት መዓልታት ዝተነግረ መጠንቀቕታ ናይ እቲ ጽያፍ ዘጥፍእ ይለልዩ።

We have repeatedly shown that 1888 was the siege of Cestius, and the conclusion of the Sunday law crisis is the siege of Titus. The Blair Sunday law bills of the 1880’s in accompaniment with the Sunday laws that were implemented in some southern states during the 1880’s was the warning of Cestius that also marked the dividing line on Sister White’s counsel on country living. Before the 1880’s her counsel was that in the future we would need to move to the country, but after the 1880’s country living was something that was to have already been accomplished. The warning sign of the Blair Bills, promoting the papal power’s mark of authority being discussed in 1880’s typified the Patriot Act at 9/11, for the angel of Revelation eighteen appeared in both those histories.

ꯑꯩꯈꯣꯏꯅ ꯃꯇꯝ ꯃꯇꯝꯗ ꯄꯨꯊꯣꯛꯈꯤꯕ ꯑꯗꯨꯒ 1888 ꯑꯗꯨ Cestius ꯀꯤ ꯄꯨꯟꯁꯤꯟꯕ ꯑꯣꯏ, ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ Sunday law crisis ꯀꯤ ꯂꯣꯏꯁꯤꯟꯕ ꯑꯗꯨ Titus ꯀꯤ ꯄꯨꯟꯁꯤꯟꯕ ꯑꯣꯏꯑꯦ꯫ 1880 ꯁꯤꯡꯒꯤ Blair Sunday law bills ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ 1880 ꯁꯤꯡꯗ ꯁꯥꯎꯊꯔꯟ ꯏꯁ꯭ꯇꯦꯠꯁꯤꯡ ꯈꯔꯗ ꯂꯥꯛꯈꯤꯕ Sunday laws ꯑꯗꯨ ꯂꯣꯏꯅ Cestius ꯀꯤ ꯆꯦꯠꯀꯤꯟꯕ ꯋꯥꯔꯣꯜ ꯑꯣꯏꯈꯤ, ꯃꯁꯤꯅ Sister White ꯀꯤ country living ꯒꯤ ꯃꯔꯝꯒꯤ ꯌꯥꯝꯅ ꯁꯦꯗꯣꯛꯄ ꯂꯤꯅꯤꯡ ꯑꯃꯥꯅꯤ ꯃꯥꯔꯛ ꯇꯧꯈꯤ꯫ 1880 ꯁꯤꯡꯒꯤ ꯃꯃꯥꯡꯗ ꯃꯍꯥꯛꯀꯤ ꯃꯔꯝꯒꯤ ꯋꯥꯔꯣꯜ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯃꯊꯪꯗ ꯑꯩꯈꯣꯏꯅ ꯂꯩꯔꯤꯕ ꯂꯝꯗꯥꯔꯛꯇ ꯆꯠꯀꯗꯕꯅꯤ ꯍꯥꯏꯕ ꯑꯣꯏꯈꯤ, ꯑꯩꯇꯧꯔꯁꯨ 1880 ꯁꯤꯡꯒꯤ ꯃꯇꯨꯡꯗ country living ꯑꯗꯨ ꯍꯥꯅꯅ ꯃꯄꯨꯡ ꯐꯥꯅ ꯑꯣꯏꯍꯜꯂꯕ ꯃꯇꯝ ꯑꯃꯥ ꯑꯣꯏꯈꯤ꯫ 1880 ꯁꯤꯡꯗ Blair Bills ꯀꯤ ꯆꯦꯠꯀꯤꯟꯕ ꯃꯔꯛꯇ, papal power ꯀꯤ mark of authority ꯑꯗꯨ ꯍꯥꯟꯅ ꯋꯥꯔꯤ ꯂꯩꯔꯤꯕ ꯑꯗꯨ 9/11 ꯗ Patriot Act ꯀꯤ ꯆꯦꯠꯀꯤꯟꯕ ꯑꯦꯛꯁꯥꯝꯄꯜ ꯑꯣꯏꯈꯤ, ꯃꯔꯝꯗꯤ Revelation eighteen ꯀꯤ ꯑꯦꯟꯖꯦꯜ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯍꯤꯁ꯭ꯇꯣꯔꯤ ꯑꯅꯤꯃꯛ ꯑꯗꯨꯗ ꯑꯄꯥꯏꯕ ꯑꯣꯏꯈꯤ꯫

9/11 was the warning of Cestius placing his authority in the holy place where it should not be, for at 9/11 Roman law replaced English law. In the Pelosi Trials of 2021 the due process clause was repudiated, and represents another footstep towards the siege of Titus, which ends at the soon-coming Sunday law in the United States. The siege is a period of time. 1888 speaks to the rebellion of the internal Protestant horn, and 9/11 speaks to the rebellion of the external Republican horn. The inauguration of the pope from the glorious land in the same year that the final president is also inaugurated represents the final warning of the abomination of desolation standing where it ought not, just before the battle of Panium. The battle of Panium leads directly into the Sunday law and the battle of Actium, which represented the third and final obstacle for pagan Rome, and then pagan Rome ruled supremely for 360 years in fulfillment of Daniel 11:24. At the Sunday law the sixth and seventh kingdoms are both conquered by Rome, and modern Rome then reigns for one symbolic hour, or forty-two symbolic months.

9/11 нь Cestius ариун газарт байх ёсгүй байсан эрх мэдлээ байрлуулсны анхааруулга байсан, учир нь 9/11-д Ромын хууль Английн хуулийг орлосон юм. 2021 оны Pelosi Trials-д зохих журмын заалт няцаагдсан бөгөөд энэ нь удахгүй АНУ-д ирэх Ням гаргийн хууль дээр төгсөх Titus-ын бүслэлт рүү чиглэсэн бас нэгэн алхмыг илэрхийлдэг. Бүслэлт нь тодорхой хугацааны үе юм. 1888 он нь дотоод Протестант эвэрний бослогын тухай өгүүлдэг, харин 9/11 нь гаднах Republican эвэрний бослогын тухай өгүүлдэг. Эцсийн ерөнхийлөгч мөн тангараг өргөх тэр л жилд сүр жавхлант газраас папыг өргөмжлөн залсан нь Panium-ы тулалдааны яг өмнө, сүйрлийн жигшүүрт зүйл байх ёсгүй газартаа зогсож буй эцсийн анхааруулгыг илэрхийлдэг. Panium-ы тулалдаан нь Ням гаргийн хууль болон Actium-ы тулалдаан руу шууд хөтөлдөг бөгөөд энэ нь харь Ромын хувьд гурав дахь бөгөөд эцсийн саадыг төлөөлсөн; үүний дараа харь Ром Daniel 11:24-ийн биеллээр 360 жилийн турш дээдлэн ноёрхсон. Ням гаргийн хуулийн үед зургаа дахь болон долоо дахь хаант улс хоёулаа Ромд эзлэгдэж, улмаар орчин үеийн Ром нэг бэлгэдлийн цаг, өөрөөр хэлбэл дөчин хоёр бэлгэдлийн сарын турш ноёрхоно.

In verse sixteen Pompey, who has just conquered pagan Rome’s first obstacles of Syria then conquers Jerusalem. Pompey takes down Rome’s first two obstacles and Augustus Caesar conquers the third at Actium. Modern Rome first conquers the king of the south in 1989 in fulfillment of verse forty, and as typified by verse ten. Then at the Sunday law modern Rome conquers its second and third obstacle with the United States and then the United Nations immediately agrees to give their kingdom to the papal power. Pagan Rome conquered two with Pompey and then one, and papal Rome conquered one in 1989, and then its next two in verse sixteen, which is where Pompey is marked with his second conquering.

In verse sixteen Pompey, who has just conquered pagan Rome’s first obstacles of Syria, then conquers Jerusalem. Pompey takes down Rome’s first two obstacles, and Augustus Caesar conquers the third at Actium. Modern Rome first conquers the king of the south in 1989 in fulfillment of verse forty, and as typified by verse ten. Then at the Sunday law modern Rome conquers its second and third obstacle with the United States, and then the United Nations immediately agrees to give their kingdom to the papal power. Pagan Rome conquered two with Pompey and then one, and papal Rome conquered one in 1989, and then its next two in verse sixteen, which is where Pompey is marked with his second conquering.

Whether it was the third obstacle at Actium for pagan Rome, or when the third obstacle, represented by the Goths being driven out of the city of Rome in 538, when Rome overcomes the third obstacle it rules supremely.

Wara càdday ñetteelu gàllankoor ga nekkon ca Actium ngir Room gu bokkoon ci jaamu tuur yi, mbaa ba ñetteelu gàllankoor ga, mi ñu teewal ci ne ñu dàqee Got yi ca dëkkub Room ca atum 538, bi Room daanee ñetteelu gàllankoor ga, mu nguur ak kàttan gu kawe.

Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets. Amos 3:7.

نيشّانكه خه‌ودای باڵادەست هیچ شتێك ناكات، مەگەر نهێنیی خۆی بۆ بەندەكانی، پێغەمبەران، ئاشكرا بكات. ئامۆس 3:7.

The Lord will surely give the final manifestation of the warning sign that is represented as the abomination of desolation in the book of Daniel, before the desolation arrives. That warning sign is the open alliance in contrast with Reagan’s secret alliance being represented in 2025. The Lord will not bring punishment, without first giving warning, and Amos is very direct about what the secret revelation to His servants is, and who it is directed at.

Imaqinip piqqissaartumik tunniutissavaa mianersoqqussutip nalunaaqutaa kingulleq, Danielip allagaani inoqajuitsunngortitsisumik maajunnartutut assersuunneqartoq, inoqajuitsunngortitsineq nalliutinnginnerani. Mianersoqqussutip nalunaaqutaa taanna tassaavoq suleqatigiiffik ammasoq, Reaganip isertuussaasumik suleqatigiiffianut akerliusumik, 2025-imi assersuunneqartoq. Naalagaq pillaatissamik eqqussissanngilaq, sioqqullugu mianersoqqussuteqanngikkuni, Amosilu erseqqissumik oqariartuuteqarpoq taassuma kiffaminut isertuussaasumik saqqummersitaa sunaasoq, kiisalu kimut sammitinneqarnersoq.

Hear this word that the Lord hath spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying, You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities. Amos 3:1, 2.

Uiw cħaŋél waŋ lé Tȟuŋkášila níyapi he, O Izráel kičhíčhiyapi owáŋka kiŋ, tȟokáta oyáte kiŋ étaŋhaŋ waúŋspe kte šni, kiŋháŋ waŋžíyaŋ waŋbláke hečha: “Niyé ité waŋží he oyáte kiŋ oyás’iŋ él waúŋ waŋbláke; lečhála héhaŋ niyé wowóuŋspeyapi owóuŋspe kiŋ héčhetu weló iyečheča kte.” Amos 3:1, 2

Amos is addressing the last generation of God’s chosen covenant people who are to be punished, in alignment with the 25 men who bow to the sun in Ezekiel eight. Amos is presenting the Laodicean message, which is the third angel’s message during the blotting out of sin in the time of the judgment of the living. Amos’s warning is based upon a unification of two parties.

Amos je adresing e las ultim generation de Deo su poplo del pacto e eligite, qui debe esser punit, in conformitate con le 25 homines qui se inclina al sol in Ezechiel capitulo 8. Amos presenta le message laodicee, que es le message del tertie angelo durante le elimination del peccato in le tempore del judicio del vivos. Le avertimento de Amos es fundate super un unification de duo partes.

Can two walk together, except they be agreed? Will a lion roar in the forest, when he hath no prey? will a young lion cry out of his den, if he have taken nothing? Can a bird fall in a snare upon the earth, where no gin is for him? shall one take up a snare from the earth, and have taken nothing at all? Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it? Amos 3:3–6.

¿Andi dega kañari pỹ’a peteĩcha’ỹre? ¿León osapukáita piko ka’aguy ryepýpe, ndoguerekóiramo mba’eve ojapyhýva? ¿León mitã osẽvo itakuágui osapukáita piko, noñemomba’éiramo mba’eve rehe? ¿Guyra ho’áta piko yvy ári ñuhãme, ndaipóriramo chupe ĝuarã ñuhã? ¿Ojehupípa ñuhã yvýgui, mba’eveite ndojejapyhýi hag̃uáicha? ¿Ojetocáta piko mbaraka guasu táva ryepýpe ha tavayguakuéra ndokyhyjemo’ãi? ¿Oikóta piko mba’evai táva ryepýpe, ha Ñandejára ndojapói rire upéva? Amós 3:3–6.

The warning of two walking together as one, is set within the context of a snare catching a bird from the earth. Birds are symbols of religious bodies, and the papacy is a cage of every unclean and hateful bird in Revelation.

Ɔkasa a ɛbɔ kɔkɔ sɛ baanu bɛnantew abom sɛ baako no, wɔde asi afidie a ɛkyere anomaa fi asase so no mu. Nnomaa yɛ nyamesomkuw ho nsɛnkyerɛnne, na papacy no yɛ adaka a nnomaa a wɔn ho ntew na wɔtan wɔn nyinaa wom wɔ Adiyisɛm mu.

And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. Revelation 18:2, 3.

ئەمیش بە دەنگێکی بەهێز بە هەراسانی بانگی کرد و وتی: «بابلی گەورە کەوتووە، کەوتووە، و بووە نیشتەجێی شەیتانان، و جێگای هەموو ڕۆحێکی پیس، و قەفەسی هەموو باڵندەیەکی گڵاو و قێزەون.» چونکە هەموو نەتەوەکان لە شەرابی تووڕەیی زیناکاریی ئەو خواردووە، و پاشاکانی زەوی لەگەڵی زینایان کردووە، و بازرگانانی زەوی بەهۆی زۆری ناز و نیعمەتییەکانی ئەوەوە دەوڵەمەند بوون. مکاشفە 18:2، 3.

A bird in a cage is a captured bird, and when a nation commits fornication with the whore of Rome it becomes a captured bird, and the bird that is lifted up above all the other prophetic birds is the power whose threefold house is built, is established at the Sunday law, in her place, which is Shinar, which is Babylon. It is the bird that received a deadly wound in 1798, or as Zechariah states, had a lead cover placed over its basket, but was thereafter lifted up by the birds of spiritualism and apostate Protestantism.

Pinjaradaki quş əsir alınmış quşdur, və bir millət Roma fahişəsi ilə zina etdikdə əsir alınmış quşa çevrilir; və bütün digər peyğəmbərlik quşlarının üzərində yuxarı qaldırılan quş, üçqat evi tikilən, Bazar günü qanunu zamanı öz yerində — Şinarda, yəni Babildə — bərqərar edilən hakimiyyətdir. O, 1798-ci ildə ölümcül yara almış quşdur, yaxud Zəkəriyyənin dediyi kimi, səbətinin üzərinə qurğuşun qapaq qoyulmuşdu; lakin bundan sonra spiritizmin və mürtəd Protestantlığın quşları tərəfindən yuxarı qaldırıldı.

Then the angel that talked with me went forth, and said unto me, Lift up now thine eyes, and see what is this that goeth forth. And I said, What is it? And he said, This is an ephah that goeth forth. He said moreover, This is their resemblance through all the earth. And, behold, there was lifted up a talent of lead: and this is a woman that sitteth in the midst of the ephah. And he said, This is wickedness. And he cast it into the midst of the ephah; and he cast the weight of lead upon the mouth thereof. Then lifted I up mine eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came out two women, and the wind was in their wings; for they had wings like the wings of a stork: and they lifted up the ephah between the earth and the heaven. Then said I to the angel that talked with me, Whither do these bear the ephah? And he said unto me, To build it an house in the land of Shinar: and it shall be established, and set there upon her own base. Zechariah 5:5–11.

Tsaawonati anjel a makisao kanyak, ket kinunana kaniak, “Itaam ta ita dagiti matam, ket kitaem no anya daytoy a rumuar.” Ket kinunak, “Ania dayta?” Ket kinunana, “Daytoy ti maysa nga epa a rumuar.” Kinunana pay, “Daytoy ti pannakailadawanda iti entero a daga.” Ket, adtoy, naitag-ay ti maysa a talento a tingga; ket daytoy ket maysa a babai a nakatugaw iti tengnga ti epa. Ket kinunana, “Daytoy ket kinadakes.” Ket impuyna dayta iti tengnga ti epa; ket impuyna ti pagatad ti tingga iti ngiwatna. Kalpasanna, intag-ayko manen dagiti matak, ket kinitak, ket, adtoy, addada dua a babbai a rumuar, ket ti angin adda kadagiti payakda; ta addaan ida kadagiti payak a kas kadagiti payak ti tagak: ket intag-ayda ti epa iti nagbaetan ti daga ken ti langit. Ket kinunak iti anjel a makisao kanyak, “Sadino ti pagyanan a pangipananda iti epa?” Ket kinunana kaniak, “Tapno maipatakderan dayta iti maysa a balay idiay daga ti Shinar: ket maipasdekto, ket maisaad sadiay iti bukodna a pamuon.” Zacarias 5:5–11.

Amos’s snare catches the bird from the earth, for it represents the alliance that precedes the soon-coming Sunday law where the earth-bird is captured, and according to Amos the alliance is a rebuke to Laodicean Seventh-day Adventism, for there will be a warning trumpet blown in the city, which they will refuse to hear.

Takat Amos tu ts’íib juntúul ch’íich’ ichil lu’um, tuméen u k’ajóoltik le alianzao’ tu yáanal u yúuchul le ley domingo ku taal chakbe’en, tu’ux le ch’íich’ ti’ lu’umo’ ku ch’úuyul; bey xan, tu yóolal Amos, le alianzao’ jump’éel p’áatal t’aan ti’ le Adventismo Séptimo Día laodiceano, tuméen yan u p’úutul juntúul trompeta ti’ le káajo’, ka leti’ob ma’ u yéeyik u yu’ubik.

Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it? Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets. The lion hath roared, who will not fear? the Lord God hath spoken, who can but prophesy? Amos 3:6–8.

Si ena naipatuki iti ili ti trumpeta, ket ti tattao saandanto aya nga agbuteng? Addanto aya ti dakes iti maysa nga ili, ket ti Apo saan nga Isuna ti nangaramid? Pudno unay, ti Apo a Dios awan ti aramidenna, no di ket iparangarangna ti palimedna kadagiti adipenna a profeta. Nagungongen ti leon, asinonto ti saan nga agbuteng? Nagsao ti Apo a Dios, asinonto ti di agipadto? Amos 3:6–8.

The Lion who roars is the Lion of the tribe of Judah, who represents Christ when He seals and unseals His prophetic Word. The open alliance of 2025 is the siege of Cestius and the symbol of the robbers of God’s people is established when you see two walking together that should never co-exist. Rome allied and aligned with Protestants is an oxymoron, for to be a Protestant means to protest against Rome.

𐑞 𐑤𐑲𐑩𐑯 𐑣𐑵 𐑮𐑷𐑮𐑟 𐑦𐑟 𐑞 𐑤𐑲𐑩𐑯 𐑝 𐑞 𐑑𐑮𐑲𐑚 𐑝 𐑡𐑵𐑛𐑩, 𐑣𐑵 𐑮𐑧𐑐𐑮𐑦𐑟𐑧𐑯𐑑𐑕 𐑒𐑮𐑲𐑕𐑑 𐑣𐑰𐑯 𐑣𐑰 𐑕𐑰𐑤𐑟 𐑯 𐑳𐑯𐑕𐑰𐑤𐑟 𐑣𐑦𐑟 𐑐𐑮𐑪𐑐𐑣𐑧𐑑𐑦𐑒 𐑢𐑻𐑛. 𐑞 𐑴𐑐𐑩𐑯 𐑩𐑤𐑲𐑩𐑯𐑕 𐑝 2025 𐑦𐑟 𐑞 𐑕𐑰𐑡 𐑝 𐑕𐑧𐑕𐑑𐑦𐑩𐑕, 𐑯 𐑞 𐑕𐑦𐑥𐑚𐑩𐑤 𐑝 𐑞 𐑮𐑪𐑚𐑼𐑟 𐑝 𐑜𐑪𐑛’𐑟 𐑐𐑰𐑐𐑩𐑤 𐑦𐑟 𐑦𐑕𐑑𐑨𐑚𐑤𐑦𐑖𐑑 𐑢𐑧𐑯 𐑿 𐑕𐑰 𐑑𐑵 𐑢𐑷𐑒𐑦𐑙 𐑑𐑫𐑜𐑧𐑞𐑼 𐑞𐑨𐑑 𐑖𐑫𐑛 𐑯𐑧𐑝𐑼 𐑒𐑴𐑦𐑜𐑟𐑦𐑕𐑑. 𐑮𐑴𐑥 𐑩𐑤𐑲𐑛 𐑯 𐑩𐑤𐑲𐑯𐑛 𐑢𐑦𐑞 𐑐𐑮𐑪𐑑𐑧𐑕𐑑𐑩𐑯𐑑𐑕 𐑦𐑟 𐑩𐑯 𐑪𐑒𐑕𐑦𐑥𐑹𐑪𐑯, 𐑓𐑹 𐑑 𐑚𐑰 𐑩 𐑐𐑮𐑪𐑑𐑧𐑕𐑑𐑩𐑯𐑑 𐑥𐑰𐑯𐑟 𐑑 𐑐𐑮𐑩𐑑𐑧𐑕𐑑 𐑩𐑜𐑱𐑯𐑕𐑑 𐑮𐑴𐑥.

We will continue these things in the next article.

Yabangi mambu yayi na lisolo oyo elandi.

Too Late to Escape the Snare

Jánai Éjfiṋaṙ Maałaḳin Aḳəŋ Tsaḳa ણ

“And let it be remembered, it is the boast of Rome that she never changes. The principles of Gregory VII and Innocent III are still the principles of the Roman Catholic Church. And had she but the power, she would put them in practice with as much vigor now as in past centuries. Protestants little know what they are doing when they propose to accept the aid of Rome in the work of Sunday exaltation. While they are bent upon the accomplishment of their purpose, Rome is aiming to re-establish her power, to recover her lost supremacy. Let the principle once be established in the United States that the church may employ or control the power of the state; that religious observances may be enforced by secular laws; in short, that the authority of church and state is to dominate the conscience, and the triumph of Rome in this country is assured.

“Ac tambayun yuyarisun, kay pagpasigarbu sang Roma nga indi guid sia nagabag-o. Ang mga prinsipio ni Gregoryo VII kag ni Inocencio III amo gihapon ang mga prinsipio sang Simbahan nga Romano Catolico. Kag kon yara lamang sa iya ang gahum, ipatuman niya ina subong man nga may kapintas kag kabaskug sang nangin pamaagi sini sa nagligad nga mga siglo. Gamay gid ang ihibalo sang mga Protestante sa ila ginahimo sa diha nga ginatanyag nila nga batonon ang bulig sang Roma sa buluhaton sang pagbayaw sang Domingo. Samtang determinado sila sa paghingyo nga matuman ang ila katuyoan, ang Roma nagatinguha nga mapatindog liwat ang iya gahum, nga mabawi ang iya nadula nga pagkahalangdon. Sa oras nga mapatukod na sa Estados Unidos ang prinsipio nga ang simbahan mahimo maggamit ukon magkabuot sang gahum sang estado; nga ang relihiyoso nga mga pag-obserbar mahimo ipatuman paagi sa sekular nga mga kasuguan; sa malip-ot, nga ang awtoridad sang simbahan kag estado amo ang magaduminar sa konsiensia, ang kadalag-an sang Roma sa sini nga pungsod sigurado na.

“God’s word has given warning of the impending danger; let this be unheeded, and the Protestant world will learn what the purposes of Rome really are, only when it is too late to escape the snare. She is silently growing into power. Her doctrines are exerting their influence in legislative halls, in the churches, and in the hearts of men. She is piling up her lofty and massive structures in the secret recesses of which her former persecutions will be repeated. Stealthily and unsuspectedly she is strengthening her forces to further her own ends when the time shall come for her to strike. All that she desires is vantage ground, and this is already being given her. We shall soon see and shall feel what the purpose of the Roman element is. Whoever shall believe and obey the word of God will thereby incur reproach and persecution.” The Great Controversy, 581.

“Кудайдын сөзү жакындап келе жаткан коркунуч жөнүндө эскертүү берген; эгер буга көңүл бурулбаса, анда протестант дүйнөсү Римдин максаттары чындыгында эмнеде экенин тузактан кутулууга кеч болуп калганда гана билет. Ал унчукпай эле күчкө толуп баратат. Анын окуулары мыйзам чыгаруу залдарында, чиркөөлөрдө жана адамдардын жүрөктөрүндө өз таасирин тийгизип жатат. Ал өзүнүн мурдагы куугунтуктары кайталана турган жашыруун терең жайларында бийик да зор курулуштарын тургузуп жатат. Жашыруун жана эч ким шектенбеген түрдө ал өз күчтөрүн, сокку уруучу убактысы келгенде, өз максаттарын илгерилетүү үчүн бекемдеп жатат. Анын каалаганы — пайдалуу таяныч орун гана, ал болсо ага азыртадан эле берилип жатат. Биз жакында Римчил элементтин максаты эмне экенин көрөбүз жана сезебиз. Ким Кудайдын сөзүнө ишенип, ага баш ийсе, ошол аркылуу жаманаттыга жана куугунтукка кабылат.” The Great Controversy, 581.

“There is a world lying in wickedness, in deception, and delusion, in the very shadow of death,—asleep, asleep. Who are feeling travail of soul to awaken them? What voice can reach them? My mind is carried to the future when the signal will be given, ‘Behold the Bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet Him.’ But some will have delayed to obtain the oil for replenishing their lamps, and too late they will find that character, which is represented by the oil, is not transferable. That oil is the righteousness of Christ. It represents character, and character is not transferable. No man can secure it for another. Each must obtain for himself a character purified from every stain of sin.” Bible Echo, May 4, 1896.

“Atiro a maysa a lubong a nakatutok iti kinadakes, iti panangallilaw ken iti pannakaallilaw, iti mismon a linong ti patay,—matmaturog, matmaturog. Asino ti makarikna iti panagpaspasnek ti kararua tapno riingen ida? Ania a timek ti makadanon kadakuada? Ti nakemko ket maipan iti masakbayan inton maited ti pakakitaan, ‘Adtoy, umay ti Novio; rumuar kayo tapno sabatenyo Isuna.’ Ngem dadduma ket inalliwda ti panangala iti lana a pangsupsupel kadagiti silawda, ket naladawdan unay inton madlawda a ti kababalin, a mairanta babaen ti lana, ket saan a maiyakar. Dayta a lana ket ti kinalinteg ni Cristo. Isimsimbolo na ti kababalin, ket ti kababalin ket saan a maiyakar. Awan ti tao a makagun-od dayta para iti sabali. Tunggal maysa ket masapul a maala na para iti bukodna ti maysa a kababalin a nadalus manipud iti tunggal mantsa ti basol.” Bible Echo, May 4, 1896.

“As I viewed poor souls dying for want of the present truth, and some who professed to believe the truth were letting them die by withholding the necessary means to carry forward the work of God, the sight was too painful, and I begged of the angel to remove it from me. I saw that when the cause of God called for some of their property, like the young man who came to Jesus (Matthew 19:16–22) they went away sorrowful, and that soon the overflowing scourge would pass over and sweep their possessions all away, and then it would be too late to sacrifice earthly goods, and lay up a treasure in heaven.” Early Writings, 49.

«Як я бачыла бедныя душы, што паміралі з-за недахопу цяперашняй праўды, і некаторыя, што вызнавалі веру ў праўду, дазвалялі ім паміраць, утрымліваючы неабходныя сродкі для прасоўвання Божай справы, гэтае відовішча было занадта балючым, і я прасіла анёла аддаліць яго ад мяне. Я бачыла, што, калі справа Божая патрабавала часткі іхняй маёмасці, яны, падобна юнаку, які прыйшоў да Ісуса (Matthew 19:16–22), адыходзілі засмучаныя, і што неўзабаве перапоўнены біч пройдзе над імі і змяце ўсю іхнюю маёмасць, і тады будзе ўжо занадта позна ахвяраваць зямныя даброты і збіраць сабе скарб на небе». Early Writings, 49.

“Judas saw that his entreaties were in vain, and he rushed from the hall exclaiming, It is too late! It is too late! He felt that he could not live to see Jesus crucified, and in despair went out and hanged himself.” The Desire of Ages, 722.

«Юда көрді, що його благання були марними, і він вибіг із залу, вигукуючи: Запізно! Запізно! Він відчув, що не може жити, щоб побачити розп’яття Ісуса, і в розпачі вийшов та повісився». The Desire of Ages, 722.