I intend to demonstrate how the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six is “hidden in plain sight” in the book of Daniel, while also identifying that it was hidden through the human instruments which God employed in presenting “the stone” that is stumbled over in the book of Daniel. To follow the light of this presentation requires “integrity.” The definition of integrity that I am suggesting, would be defined as consistency in one’s actions, values, methods, and principles. It would demand that we adhere to what is revealed within God’s Word, even when it does not agree with human ideas that contradict God’s Word.
Je me propose de démontrer comment les « sept temps » de Lévitique vingt-six sont « cachés à la vue de tous » dans le livre de Daniel, tout en montrant aussi qu’ils furent dissimulés par le moyen des instruments humains que Dieu employa pour présenter « la pierre » sur laquelle on trébuche dans le livre de Daniel. Pour suivre la lumière de cette présentation, il faut de l’« intégrité ». La définition de l’intégrité que je propose serait celle-ci : la constance dans les actions, les valeurs, les méthodes et les principes. Elle exigerait que nous nous attachions à ce qui est révélé dans la Parole de Dieu, même lorsque cela ne s’accorde pas avec des idées humaines qui contredisent la Parole de Dieu.
“Strict integrity should be cherished by every student. Every mind should turn with reverent attention to the revealed word of God. Light and grace will be given to those who thus obey God. They will behold wondrous things out of His law. Great truths that have lain unheeded and unseen since the day of Pentecost, are to shine from God’s word in their native purity. To those who truly love God the Holy Spirit will reveal truths that have faded from the mind, and will also reveal truths that are entirely new. Those who eat the flesh and drink the blood of the Son of God will bring from the books of Daniel and Revelation truth that is inspired by the Holy Spirit. They will start into action forces that cannot be repressed. The lips of children will be opened to proclaim the mysteries that have been hidden from the minds of men. The Lord has chosen the foolish things of this world to confound the wise, and the weak things of the world to confound the mighty.” The Fundamentals of Christian Education, 474.
« L’intégrité rigoureuse devrait être chérie par chaque étudiant. Chaque esprit devrait se tourner, avec une attention révérencieuse, vers la parole révélée de Dieu. La lumière et la grâce seront données à ceux qui obéissent ainsi à Dieu. Ils contempleront des choses merveilleuses dans Sa loi. De grandes vérités, demeurées négligées et invisibles depuis le jour de la Pentecôte, doivent resplendir de la parole de Dieu dans leur pureté originelle. À ceux qui aiment véritablement Dieu, le Saint-Esprit révélera des vérités qui se sont effacées de l’esprit, et Il révélera aussi des vérités entièrement nouvelles. Ceux qui mangent la chair et boivent le sang du Fils de Dieu tireront des livres de Daniel et de l’Apocalypse une vérité inspirée par le Saint-Esprit. Ils mettront en mouvement des forces qui ne pourront être réprimées. Les lèvres des enfants seront ouvertes pour proclamer les mystères qui ont été cachés à l’esprit des hommes. Le Seigneur a choisi les choses folles de ce monde pour confondre les sages, et les choses faibles du monde pour confondre les fortes. » The Fundamentals of Christian Education, 474.
An easy example of both the human error that is found in the book of Daniel, and the unwillingness to adhere to God’s Word, can be found in the word translated as “daily” in Daniel chapter eight. Integrity would demand that if Ellen White commented on that word, as she does, that as Seventh-day Adventists that profess to uphold the Spirit of Prophecy, we would automatically use her commentary on the word to direct our understanding.
Un exemple simple à la fois de l’erreur humaine que l’on trouve dans le livre de Daniel et du refus de s’attacher à la Parole de Dieu se trouve dans le mot traduit par « continuel » au chapitre huit de Daniel. L’intégrité exigerait que, si Ellen White a commenté ce mot, comme elle le fait, nous, en tant qu’adventistes du septième jour qui professons soutenir l’Esprit de prophétie, utilisions automatiquement son commentaire sur ce mot pour orienter notre compréhension.
“Then I saw in relation to the ‘Daily,’ that the word ‘sacrifice’ was supplied by man’s wisdom, and does not belong to the text; and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the ‘Daily;’ but since 1844, in the confusion, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion has followed.” Review and Herald, November 1, 1850.
“Ensuite, je vis, au sujet du « perpétuel », que le mot « sacrifice » avait été ajouté par la sagesse humaine et n’appartient pas au texte ; et que le Seigneur en donna la juste compréhension à ceux qui proclamèrent le cri de l’heure du jugement. Lorsqu’il y avait unité, avant 1844, presque tous étaient unis sur la juste compréhension du « perpétuel » ; mais depuis 1844, dans la confusion, d’autres vues ont été adoptées, et les ténèbres et la confusion ont suivi.” Review and Herald, 1er novembre 1850.
We could spend a great deal of time on these two sentences, for when they finally get placed in the book Early Writings, the human editors have placed a misguided definition of what is stated, but that is another story. For our purposes we simply wish to point out two relevant points. The first point is that Sister White says “the word “sacrifice” was supplied by man’s wisdom, and does not belong to the text.”
Nous pourrions consacrer beaucoup de temps à ces deux phrases, car lorsqu’elles furent finalement insérées dans le livre Early Writings, les éditeurs humains y ont attaché une définition erronée de ce qui est déclaré, mais c’est là une autre question. Pour notre propos, nous voulons simplement relever deux points pertinents. Le premier point est que Sister White déclare que « le mot “sacrifice” a été ajouté par la sagesse humaine, et n’appartient pas au texte. »
Then I heard one saint speaking, and another saint said unto that certain saint which spake, How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot? Daniel 8:13.
แล้วข้าพเจ้าได้ยินผู้บริสุทธิ์องค์หนึ่งกำลังพูดอยู่ และผู้บริสุทธิ์อีกองค์หนึ่งได้กล่าวแก่ผู้บริสุทธิ์องค์นั้นผู้ซึ่งกำลังพูดอยู่ว่า นิมิตเรื่องเครื่องบูชาประจำวัน และเรื่องการล่วงละเมิดอันก่อให้เกิดความรกร้าง ซึ่งมอบทั้งสถานนมัสการและกองทัพให้ถูกเหยียบย่ำอยู่ใต้เท้า จะยืดไปนานเพียงใด? ดาเนียล 8:13
The previous verse is the question that elicits the answer of verse fourteen, and that answer represents the central pillar and foundation of Adventism. And in the very question that produces that great light represented as the central pillar of Adventism, we are informed that human wisdom has made an error by placing an added word into the translation of the verse.
দ্বাদশ পদে উত্থাপিত প্রশ্নই চতুর্দশ পদের উত্তরের উদ্রেক করে, এবং সেই উত্তরই অ্যাডভেন্টবাদের কেন্দ্রীয় স্তম্ভ ও ভিত্তিকে উপস্থাপন করে। আর যে প্রশ্ন থেকে সেই মহৎ আলো উদ্ভূত হয়, যা অ্যাডভেন্টবাদের কেন্দ্রীয় স্তম্ভরূপে চিত্রিত, সেই প্রশ্নের মধ্যেই আমাদের জানানো হয়েছে যে মানবীয় প্রজ্ঞা পদটির অনুবাদে একটি অতিরিক্ত শব্দ সংযোজন করে ভুল করেছে।
There are literally hundreds of added words in the translation of the 1611 KJV Bible, but there is only one time that God identifies any of those hundreds of added words as erroneous. And it is clear it was an error that was produced by the human side of the combination of humanity and divinity which produced the Word of God. More significant is that there would be no need for any inspired commentary on the added word “sacrifice” if it were not something that produced an incorrect understanding of the verse. It is clear that it does, for the inspired commentary not only identifies that the word should not be there, but also identifies that “those who gave the judgment hour cry,” were given “the correct view” of the “daily” by the Lord. Integrity demands that we use those two sentences just as they read.
Il y a littéralement des centaines de mots ajoutés dans la traduction de la Bible KJV de 1611, mais il n’y a qu’une seule occasion où Dieu identifie l’un quelconque de ces centaines de mots ajoutés comme erroné. Et il est clair qu’il s’agissait d’une erreur produite par le côté humain de la combinaison de l’humanité et de la divinité qui a produit la Parole de Dieu. Plus significatif encore, il n’y aurait nul besoin d’aucun commentaire inspiré au sujet du mot ajouté « sacrifice » si celui-ci ne produisait pas une compréhension incorrecte du verset. Il est clair qu’il en produit une, car le commentaire inspiré non seulement indique que ce mot ne devrait pas s’y trouver, mais il précise aussi que « ceux qui donnèrent le cri de l’heure du jugement » reçurent du Seigneur « la juste compréhension » du « continuel ». L’intégrité exige que nous employions ces deux phrases exactement telles qu’elles sont écrites.
Those who gave the judgment hour cry identified “the daily” as a symbol representing paganism or pagan Rome, depending on the context where it is located. The word translated as “daily” occurs five times in the book of Daniel. All five occurrences are as a noun. The word occurs one hundred and four times in God’s Word, and ninety-nine times it is used as an adjective, but in the book of Daniel alone, it is used as a noun. The men who translated the King James Bible saw the word ninety-nine times as an adjective, so when it came to the book of Daniel, they attempted to make it an adjective in order to agree with all the other times it occurred as an adjective. In order to do that, they added the word “sacrifice.” But God, through Ellen White, said that “sacrifice” should be omitted, which would mean that “the daily” is to be understood as a noun.
Waɗanda suka ba da kukan sa’ar shari’a sun bayyana “na kullum” a matsayin alama mai wakiltar arna ko Roma ta arna, gwargwadon yanayin da yake a cikinsa. Kalmar da aka fassara da “na kullum” ta bayyana sau biyar a cikin littafin Daniyel. Dukkan bayyanawar nan biyar suna a matsayin suna. Kalmar tana bayyana sau ɗari da huɗu a cikin Maganar Allah, kuma sau casa’in da tara ana amfani da ita a matsayin sifa, amma a cikin littafin Daniyel kaɗai ake amfani da ita a matsayin suna. Mutanen da suka fassara Littafi Mai Tsarki na King James sun ga kalmar sau casa’in da tara a matsayin sifa, saboda haka, sa’ad da suka zo ga littafin Daniyel, suka yi ƙoƙarin mai da ita sifa domin ta yi daidai da dukan sauran lokutan da ta bayyana a matsayin sifa. Domin su yi haka, sai suka ƙara kalmar “hadaya.” Amma Allah, ta wurin Ellen White, ya ce ya kamata a cire “hadaya,” wanda hakan ke nufin cewa “na kullum” ya kamata a fahimce ta a matsayin suna.
Those who stand opposed to God’s counsel on this word within Adventism define the word as a symbol of Christ’s heavenly sanctuary ministry, but those who gave the judgment hour cry correctly defined it as paganism. Adventism today uses a symbol of a satanic power to represent Christ!
Mkati mwa Uadventista, wale wanaopinga shauri la Mungu kuhusu neno hili hulifafanua neno hilo kuwa ni ishara ya huduma ya Kristo katika patakatifu pa mbinguni, lakini wale waliotoa kilio cha saa ya hukumu walilifafanua kwa usahihi kuwa ni upagani. Uadventista leo hutumia ishara ya mamlaka ya kishetani kumwakilisha Kristo!
Through erroneous human logic, the true understanding of the word translated as “the daily” has been hidden from Adventism. Adventists that base their prophetic study on subjects that occur randomly through the years in their Sabbath School quarterlies lazily drink the Kool-Aid that is dished out through those quarterlies, and which are confirmed by pastors who themselves have not the integrity necessary to allow any input from the comments on the subject by Sister White.
Ni inyurabwenge bw’abantu buyobye ni ho gusobanukirwa nyakuri kw’ijambo ryahinduwemo “ibya buri munsi” kwahishwe Adventisime. Abadiventisti bashinga inyigisho yabo y’ubuhanuzi ku ngingo zigaragara mu buryo butunguranye mu myaka inyuranye mu bitabo by’igihembwe by’Ishuri ryo ku Isabato, banywa mu bunebwe iyo nyigisho bahawe muri ibyo bitabo by’igihembwe nk’aho banywa Kool-Aid, kandi igashyigikirwa n’abapasitori ubwabo badafite ubunyangamugayo bukenewe ngo bemere icyo ari cyo cyose gituruka ku bitekerezo bya Mushiki wa Wite ku byerekeye iyo ngingo.
The history of the controversy of “the daily” reached the turning point around 1911, where Sister White directly stated that those who had rejected the pioneer understanding of “the daily” as paganism, and who were teaching that “the daily” represented Christ’s sanctuary ministry, had received their understanding from “angels that were expelled from heaven” (20 MR 17).
İhtilafın “mütemadi” meselesine dair tarihi, yaklaşık 1911 yılı civarında dönüm noktasına ulaştı; o sırada Kardeş White, “mütemadi”nin putperestlik olduğuna dair öncü anlayışı reddeden ve “mütemadi”nin Mesih’in kutsal mekândaki hizmetini temsil ettiğini öğreten kimselerin, bu anlayışı “gökten kovulmuş melekler”den aldıklarını açıkça ifade etti (20 MR 17).
The truth of “the daily” has been identified clearly by Sister White, and she teaches that “holy angels” guided the mind of William Miller and that “angels expelled from heaven” guide the minds of those who teach that “the daily” represents Christ’s heavenly sanctuary ministry. The truth of “the daily”, as presented by those who gave the judgment hour cry, was discovered by William Miller.
Ba tabbas Sister White du « quotidien » dinden ni sool na bu leer, te moo jàngale ne « malaaka yu sell yi » gindi nañu xel u William Miller, te ne « malaaka yiñ leen génne asamaan » moo gindi xel yi ñiy jàngale ne « le quotidien » dafay tektal liggéeyu Krist ci barkeelu asamaan. Dëggu « quotidien » bi, ni ko ñi joxe waxu waxtu atte bi prezenté woon, William Miller moo ko gis.
“I read on, and could find no other case in which it [the daily] was found, but in Daniel. I then [by the aid of a concordance] took those words which stood in connection with it, ‘take away;’ he shall take away the daily; ‘from the time the daily shall be taken away,’ &c. I read on, and thought I should find no light on the text; finally I came to 2 Thess. ii, 7, 8. ‘For the mystery of iniquity doth already work; only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way, and then shall that wicked be revealed,’ &c. And when I had come to that text, O, how clear and glorious the truth appeared! There it is! That is the daily! Well, now, what does Paul mean by ‘he who now letteth,’ or hindereth? By ‘the man of sin,’ and the ‘wicked,’ Popery is meant. Well, what is it which hinders Popery from being revealed? Why, it is Paganism; well, then, ‘the daily’ must mean Paganism.” Second Advent Manual, 66.
“Nilisoma mbele, wala sikuweza kupata mahali pengine popote ambapo [dhabihu ya] daima ilipatikana, ila katika Danieli. Ndipo [kwa msaada wa konkodansi] nikachukua maneno yale yaliyosimama katika uhusiano nayo, ‘kuondoa;’ ataiondoa dhabihu ya daima; ‘tangu wakati ambao dhabihu ya daima itaondolewa,’ n.k. Nilisoma mbele, nikidhani kwamba singepata nuru yoyote juu ya andiko hilo; hatimaye nikafika katika 2 Wathesalonike ii, 7, 8. ‘Kwa maana ile siri ya kuasi yatenda kazi hivi sasa; lakini yeye azuiaye sasa ataendelea kuzuia, hata atakapoondolewa njiani, ndipo yule mwovu atakapofunuliwa,’ n.k. Na nilipofika katika andiko hilo, loo, jinsi kweli ilivyoonekana wazi na yenye utukufu! Hapo ndipo ilipo! Hiyo ndiyo dhabihu ya daima! Basi sasa, Paulo anamaanisha nini kwa ‘yeye azuiaye sasa,’ au azuiaye? Kwa ‘mtu wa dhambi,’ na ‘yule mwovu,’ humaanishwa Upapa. Basi, ni nini kinachozuia Upapa usifunuliwe? Kwa nini, ni Upagani; basi, ‘dhabihu ya daima’ lazima imaanishe Upagani.” Second Advent Manual, 66.
What is really sobering about Miller’s discovery that “the daily” represented paganism, is where he found the truth. He found it in the passage of the apostle Paul’s writings where Paul not only defines “the daily” as paganism, but it is the passage identifying that those who received not the love of the truth, receive strong delusion. The acceptance of “the daily” as a symbol of Christ’s sanctuary ministry, the definition that came from angels that were expelled from heaven, is the symbol of those in Adventism who have not the integrity necessary to rightly divide the word of truth, and therefore are already destined to receive strong delusion.
Ce qui est véritablement solennel dans la découverte de Miller selon laquelle « le perpétuel » représentait le paganisme, c’est l’endroit où il a trouvé cette vérité. Il l’a trouvée dans le passage des écrits de l’apôtre Paul où Paul non seulement définit « le perpétuel » comme étant le paganisme, mais où se trouve aussi le passage identifiant que ceux qui n’ont pas reçu l’amour de la vérité reçoivent une puissance d’égarement. L’acceptation de « le perpétuel » comme symbole du ministère de Christ dans le sanctuaire, définition qui provenait d’anges qui furent chassés du ciel, est le symbole de ceux, dans l’adventisme, qui n’ont pas l’intégrité nécessaire pour dispenser droitement la parole de vérité et qui, par conséquent, sont déjà destinés à recevoir une puissante séduction.
I do not want to sidetrack the point we are seeking to identify. That point is that the “seven times” that is identified in the same vision where “the daily” is located has been hidden by human hands, though it remains in plain sight. This was simply an easy example of how a human translation error made long centuries ago, that is thereafter manipulated in human minds by angels that were expelled from heaven, is used today at this crucial time just before the final crisis at the end of the world, to blind minds to truth that is actually in plain sight.
Je ne veux pas détourner l’attention du point que nous cherchons à discerner. Ce point est que les « sept temps » qui sont désignés dans la même vision où se trouve « le continuel » ont été cachés par des mains humaines, bien qu’ils demeurent à la vue de tous. Ceci n’était qu’un exemple simple de la manière dont une erreur humaine de traduction commise il y a de longs siècles, puis manipulée dans les esprits humains par des anges qui furent expulsés du ciel, est utilisée aujourd’hui en ce moment crucial, juste avant la crise finale à la fin du monde, pour aveugler les esprits à une vérité qui se trouve en réalité à la vue de tous.
In the 1910 time period the rebellion of “the daily” was just getting under way, W. W. Prescott and A. G. Daniells were spearheading the satanic work of rejecting the foundational understanding of “the daily.” The following article is a letter from that very time, where Sister White addresses the satanic view that “the daily” in the book of Daniel represents Christ’s sanctuary work. At that time the two men were pushing the idea of going into the old pioneer books and changing the pioneer understanding to their new satanic definition. It is my hope that we can exercise integrity as we read the article.
فِي حُقْبَةِ عَامِ 1910، كَانَ تَمَرُّدُ «الْمُحْرَقَةِ الدَّائِمَةِ» فِي بَدَايَاتِهِ، وَكَانَ W. W. Prescott وَ A. G. Daniells يَتَزَعَّمَانِ الْعَمَلَ الشَّيْطَانِيَّ الْمُتَمَثِّلَ فِي رَفْضِ الْفَهْمِ التَّأْسِيسِيِّ لِـ «الْمُحْرَقَةِ الدَّائِمَةِ». وَالْمَقَالُ التَّالِي هُوَ رِسَالَةٌ مِنْ ذَلِكَ الزَّمَنِ بِعَيْنِهِ، تُخَاطِبُ فِيهَا الأُخْتُ وَايْتِ النَّظْرَةَ الشَّيْطَانِيَّةَ الْقَائِلَةَ إِنَّ «الْمُحْرَقَةَ الدَّائِمَةَ» فِي سِفْرِ دَانِيآلَ تُمَثِّلُ خِدْمَةَ الْمَسِيحِ فِي الْمَقْدِسِ. وَفِي ذَلِكَ الْوَقْتِ، كَانَ الرَّجُلَانِ يَدْفَعَانِ بِفِكْرَةِ الرُّجُوعِ إِلَى كُتُبِ الرَّوَّادِ الْأُولَى وَتَغْيِيرِ فَهْمِ الرَّوَّادِ إِلَى تَعْرِيفِهِمَا الشَّيْطَانِيِّ الْجَدِيدِ. وَأَمَلِي أَنْ نُمَارِسَ النَّزَاهَةَ وَنَحْنُ نَقْرَأُ هَذَا الْمَقَالَ.
“At this stage of our experience we are not to have our minds drawn away from the special light given [us] to consider at the important gathering of our conference. And there was Brother Daniells, whose mind the enemy was working; and your mind and Elder Prescott’s mind were being worked by the angels that were expelled from heaven. Satan’s work was to divert your minds that jots and tittles should be brought in which the Lord did not inspire you to bring in. They were not essential. But this meant much to the cause of truth. And the ideas of your minds, if you could be drawn away to jots or tittles, is a work of Satan’s devising. To correct little things in the books written, you suppose would be doing a great work. But I am charged, Silence is eloquence.
“Ena na ni gauna oqo ni noda bula ena sega ni vakayavalati tani kina na noda vakasama mai na rarama digitaki ka soli [vei keda] me vakasamataki ena soqoni bibi ni noda koniferedi. Ka sa tiko kina o Taciqu o Daniells, ka sa cakacaka tiko kina na meca ena nona vakasama; ka sa vakayagataki talega na nomu vakasama kei na vakasama nei Qase o Prescott mai vei ira na agilosi era a cemuri tani mai lomalagi. Na cakacaka i Setani me vuki tani kina na nomuni vakasama me ra kau mai kina na tikina lalai kei na mataitini lalai ka sega ni uqeta na Turaga mo dou kauta mai. E sega ni ka bibi sara. Ia sa levu na kena ibalebale ena vuku ni cakacaka ni dina. Kei na vakanananu ni nomuni vakasama, kevaka e rawa ni dreti tani ki na tikina lalai se na mataitini lalai, sa dua na cakacaka e vakasamataka o Setani. Mo ni vakadodonutaka na veika lalai ena ivola sa volai oti, dou nanuma ni dou sa cakava tiko e dua na cakacaka levu. Ia au sa vakaroti, Na galu sa vosa vakaitalatala.”
“I am to say, Stop your picking flaws. If this purpose of the devil could only be carried out, then [it] appears to you [that] your work would be considered as most wonderful in conception. It was the enemy’s plan to get all the supposed objectionable features where all classes of minds did not agree.
« Je dois dire : Cessez de relever les défauts. Si ce dessein du diable pouvait seulement être mené à bien, alors il vous semblerait que votre œuvre serait considérée comme tout à fait remarquable dans sa conception. C’était le plan de l’ennemi de faire ressortir toutes les caractéristiques prétendument répréhensibles là où toutes les catégories d’esprits n’étaient pas d’accord. »
“And what then? The very work that pleases the devil would come to pass. There would be a representation given to the outsiders not of our faith just what would suit them, that would develop traits of character which would cause great confusion and occupy the golden moments which should be used zealously to bring the great message before the people. The presentations upon any subject we have worked upon could not all harmonize, and the results would be to confuse the minds of believers and unbelievers. This is the very thing that Satan had planned that should take place—anything that could be magnified as a disagreement.
«Եվ ապա ի՞նչ։ Կկատարվեր հենց այն գործը, որ հաճելի է սատանային։ Դրսինների առաջ մեր հավատքի մասին կտրվեր մի այնպիսի ներկայացում, որն ուղիղ կհամապատասխաներ նրանց, կզարգացներ բնավորության այնպիսի գծեր, որոնք մեծ շփոթություն կառաջացնեին և կզբաղեցնեին այն ոսկեղեն պահերը, որոնք պետք է եռանդով գործադրվեին՝ մեծ լուրը ժողովրդի առաջ բերելու համար։ Մեր կողմից որևէ թեմայի վերաբերյալ մշակված ներկայացումները չէին կարող բոլորը համահունչ լինել, և դրա հետևանքը կլիներ հավատացյալների ու անհավատների մտքերը շփոթեցնելը։ Հենց սա էր այն բանը, որ սատանան ծրագրել էր, որ տեղի ունենա՝ ամեն ինչ, ինչ կարելի էր մեծացնել իբրև անհամաձայնություն»։
“Read Ezekiel, chapter 28. Now, here is a grand work, where strange spirits can figure. But the Lord has a work to [be] done to save perishing souls; and the places which Satan, disguised, could fill in, bringing confusion into our ranks, he will do to perfection, and all those little differences will become enlarged, prominent.
«Lisez Ézéchiel, chapitre 28. Or, voici une grande œuvre, où des esprits étranges peuvent intervenir. Mais le Seigneur a une œuvre à accomplir pour sauver les âmes qui périssent ; et les places que Satan, déguisé, pourrait occuper, en semant la confusion dans nos rangs, il le fera à la perfection, et toutes ces petites divergences deviendront amplifiées, saillantes. »
“And I was shown from the first that the Lord had given neither Elders Daniells nor Prescott the burden of this work. Should Satan’s wiles be brought in, should this “Daily” be such a great matter as to be brought in to confuse minds and hinder the advancement of the work at this important period of time? It should not, whatever may be. This subject should not be introduced, for the spirit that would be brought in would be forbidding, and Lucifer is watching every movement. Satanic agencies would commence his work and there would be confusion brought into our ranks. You have no call to hunt up the difference of opinion that is not a testing question; but your silence is eloquence. I have the matter all plainly before me. If the devil could involve any one of our own people on these subjects, as he has proposed to do, Satan’s cause would triumph. Now the work without delay is to be taken up and not a [difference] of opinion expressed.
«Եվ ինձ հենց սկզբից ցույց տրվեց, որ Տերը ո՛չ երեցներ Դանիելսին, ո՛չ էլ Պրեսկոտին չէր տվել այս գործի բեռը։ Մի՞թե Սատանայի խորամանկությունները պիտի ներմուծվեն, մի՞թե այս «Ամենօրյա»-ն պիտի այնպիսի մեծ հարց դառնա, որ ներմուծվի՝ մտքերը շփոթեցնելու և այս կարևոր ժամանակահատվածում գործի առաջխաղացումը խոչընդոտելու համար։ Դա չպետք է լինի, ինչ էլ որ լինի։ Այս թեման չպետք է ներկայացվի, որովհետև այն ոգին, որ պիտի ներմուծվեր, արգելիչ կլիներ, և Լյուցիֆերը հետևում է ամեն շարժման։ Սատանայական գործակալությունները պիտի սկսեին նրա գործը, և խառնաշփոթ պիտի բերվեր մեր շարքերը։ Դուք կոչված չեք փնտրելու այն կարծիքների տարբերությունը, որը փորձության հարց չէ. բայց ձեր լռությունը պերճախոսություն է։ Ես այս ամբողջ հարցը պարզորեն իմ առաջ ունեմ։ Եթե սատանան կարողանար մեր սեփական ժողովրդից որևէ մեկին ներքաշել այս հարցերի մեջ, ինչպես նա մտադրվել է անել, Սատանայի գործը կհաղթեր։ Այժմ գործը, առանց ուշացման, պետք է ձեռնարկվի, և ոչ մի [կարծիքների] տարբերություն չպետք է արտահայտվի»։
“Satan would inspire those men who have gone out from us to unite with evil angels and retard our work on unimportant questions, and what rejoicing [there] would be in the camp of the enemy. Press together, press together. Let every difference be buried. Our work now is to devote all our physical and brain-nerve power to put these differences out of the way, and all harmonize. If Satan could with his great unsanctified wisdom be permitted to get the least hold, [he would rejoice].
「サタンは、わたしたちの中から出て行った者たちをそそのかして悪しき天使らと結び合わせ、些細な問題によってわたしたちの働きを妨げさせるであろう。そして、そのとき敵の陣営には何という歓喜があることであろう。互いに固く結び合いなさい、固く結び合いなさい。あらゆる相違を葬り去りなさい。今、わたしたちのなすべき働きは、これらの相違を取り除くために、わたしたちの身体の力と脳神経の力のすべてを傾け、すべての者が調和することである。もしサタンが、その大いなる聖別されていない知恵によって、わずかでも足場を得ることを許されるなら、［彼は歓喜するであろう］。」
“Now, when I saw how you were working, my mind took in the whole situation and the results if you should go forward and give the parties that have left us the least chance to bring confusion into our ranks. Your lack of wisdom would be just what Satan would have it. Your loud proclamation was not under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. I was instructed to say to you that your picking flaws in the writings of men that have been led of God is not inspired of God. And if this is the wisdom that Elder Daniells would give to the people, by no means give him an official position, for he cannot reason from cause to effect. Your silence on this subject is your wisdom. Now, everything like picking flaws in the publications of men who are not alive is not the work God has given any of you to do. For if these men—Elders Daniells and Prescott—had followed the directions given in working the cities, there would have been many, very many, convinced of the truth and converted, able men that [now] are in positions where they never will be reached.
«បច្ចុប្បន្ននេះ ពេលដែលខ្ញុំបានឃើញពីរបៀបដែលអ្នកកំពុងធ្វើការ គំនិតរបស់ខ្ញុំបានយល់ច្បាស់អំពីស្ថានការណ៍ទាំងមូល និងអំពីលទ្ធផលដែលនឹងកើតមាន ប្រសិនបើអ្នកបន្តទៅមុខ ហើយផ្តល់ឱកាសសូម្បីតែបន្តិចបន្តួចដល់ភាគីទាំងឡាយដែលបានចាកចេញពីយើង ឲ្យនាំការភាន់ច្រឡំចូលមកក្នុងជួររបស់យើង។ ការខ្វះប្រាជ្ញារបស់អ្នកនឹងជាអ្វីដែលសាតាំងចង់បានយ៉ាងពិតប្រាកដ។ ការប្រកាសដោយសំឡេងខ្លាំងរបស់អ្នក មិនបានស្ថិតក្រោមការបំផុសគំនិតរបស់ព្រះវិញ្ញាណបរិសុទ្ធឡើយ។ ខ្ញុំបានទទួលការណែនាំឲ្យប្រាប់អ្នកថា ការដែលអ្នករើសកំហុសនៅក្នុងសំណេររបស់បុរសដែលត្រូវបានព្រះដឹកនាំ នោះមិនមែនជាការបំផុសគំនិតពីព្រះទេ។ ហើយប្រសិនបើនេះជាប្រាជ្ញាដែលអែលឌើរ Daniells នឹងផ្ដល់ឲ្យប្រជាជន នោះកុំឲ្យគាត់កាន់តំណែងផ្លូវការដាច់ខាត ពីព្រោះគាត់មិនអាចវែកញែកពីហេតុទៅផលបានឡើយ។ ការស្ងៀមរបស់អ្នកលើប្រធានបទនេះ គឺជាប្រាជ្ញារបស់អ្នក។ ឥឡូវនេះ អ្វីៗទាំងអស់ដែលមានលក្ខណៈដូចជាការរើសកំហុសនៅក្នុងសៀវភៅបោះពុម្ពផ្សាយរបស់បុរសដែលមិនមានជីវិតរស់នៅទៀតហើយ នោះមិនមែនជាកិច្ចការដែលព្រះបានប្រទានឲ្យអ្នកណាម្នាក់ក្នុងចំណោមអ្នកធ្វើឡើយ។ ដ្បិត ប្រសិនបើបុរសទាំងនេះ—អែលឌើរ Daniells និង Prescott—បានអនុវត្តតាមការណែនាំដែលបានផ្ដល់ឲ្យក្នុងការធ្វើការនៅតាមទីក្រុង នោះនឹងមានមនុស្សជាច្រើន មែនទែនជាច្រើន ត្រូវបានបញ្ចុះបញ្ចូលអំពីសេចក្តីពិត ហើយត្រូវបានបម្លែងចិត្ត ជាមនុស្សមានសមត្ថភាព ដែល [ឥឡូវនេះ] ស្ថិតនៅក្នុងមុខតំណែងដែលគេនឹងមិនអាចទៅដល់បានឡើយ។»
“All the world is to be regarded as one great family. And when you have such a fountain of knowledge to draw from, why have you left the world to perish for years with the testimonies given by our Lord Jesus Christ? True religion teaches us to regard every man and woman as a person to whom we can do good.
« Le monde entier doit être considéré comme une seule grande famille. Et lorsque vous avez une telle source de connaissance où puiser, pourquoi avez-vous laissé le monde périr pendant des années, malgré les témoignages donnés par notre Seigneur Jésus-Christ ? La vraie religion nous enseigne à considérer chaque homme et chaque femme comme une personne à qui nous pouvons faire du bien. »
“This has been in print many years: ‘A Balanced Mind,’ testimony to Elder Andrews. The mind may be cultivated to become a power to know when to speak and what burdens to take up and to bear, for Christ is your teacher. And I feared greatly for you [when I saw you] exalting your wisdom and pursuing a course to bring in differences of opinion. The Lord calls for wise men who can hold their peace when it [is] wisdom for them to do so. If you would be a whole man, you need sanctification through Jesus Christ. Now there is a work just started, and let wisdom be seen in every minister, in every president of [a] conference. But here was a work for you to take hold of years ago where you were needed to lift your voice for this very work. Christ gave all His people special directions what they shall do and the things they shall not do. And there is a little time left us to work out the righteousness of the Lord. You can understand the way of the Lord. I saw your purpose of carrying things after your own devising after you were placed as president. You had thought you would do wonderful things, which would be a work God had not placed in your hands to do. Now, your work is not to oppress but to release every necessity possible if the Lord has accepted you to serve. But you have very early given evidence that wisdom and sanctified judgment have not been manifested by you. You blazed out matters that would not be received unless the Lord should give light.
‘전인격적 건전성’ 곧 앤드루스 장로에게 보낸 증언은 여러 해 동안 인쇄되어 왔다. 마음은, 언제 말해야 하며 어떤 짐을 맡아 지고 감당해야 하는지를 아는 능력이 되도록 계발될 수 있다. 이는 그리스도께서 그대의 교사이시기 때문이다. 그리고 나는 그대가 자신의 지혜를 높이며 의견 차이를 들여오는 길을 추구하는 것을 보았을 때, 그대를 크게 두려워하였다. 주께서는, 잠잠히 있는 것이 그들에게 지혜인 때에 잠잠할 수 있는 지혜로운 사람들을 부르신다. 그대가 온전한 사람이 되려면 예수 그리스도를 통한 성화가 필요하다. 이제 막 시작된 한 일이 있으니, 모든 목회자와 모든 합회의 회장에게서 지혜가 드러나게 하라. 그러나 바로 이 일에 관하여, 여러 해 전에 그대가 붙들어야 할 일이 있었고, 그곳에서 그대는 이 바로 그 일을 위하여 목소리를 높일 필요가 있었다. 그리스도께서는 당신의 모든 백성에게 그들이 무엇을 해야 하는지와 무엇을 해서는 안 되는지를 특별히 지시하셨다. 그리고 우리에게는 주의 의를 이루기 위하여 일할 시간이 얼마 남지 않았다. 그대는 주의 길을 이해할 수 있다. 나는 그대가 회장으로 세워진 후에, 그대 자신의 고안대로 일을 이끌어 가려는 목적을 보았다. 그대는 하나님께서 그대의 손에 맡기시지 않은 어떤 일을 하여 놀라운 일들을 이루리라고 생각하였다. 이제 그대의 일은 압박하는 것이 아니라, 주께서 그대를 섬기도록 받아들이셨다면 가능한 모든 필요를 풀어 주는 것이다. 그러나 그대는 아주 일찍부터 지혜와 성별된 판단이 그대에게서 나타나지 않았다는 증거를 보여 주었다. 그대는 주께서 빛을 주시지 않으시면 받아들여지지 않을 문제들을 성급히 터뜨려 놓았다.
“I have been instructed that such hasty movements should not have [been] made [such] as selecting you as president of the conference even another year. But the Lord forbids any more such hasty transactions until the matter is brought before the Lord in prayer; and as you have had the message come to you that the work of the Lord resting upon the president is a most solemn responsibility, you had no moral right to blaze out as you did upon the subject of the ‘Daily’ and suppose your influence would decide the question. There was Elder Haskell, who has carried the heavy responsibilities, and there is Elder Irwin and several men I might mention who have the heavy responsibilities.
«ចំពោះខ្ញុំ បានទទួលការណែនាំថា មិនគួរបានធ្វើចលនាដ៏ប្រញាប់ប្រញាល់បែបនោះឡើយ ដូចជាការជ្រើសតាំងអ្នកជាប្រធានសន្និសីទ សូម្បីតែសម្រាប់មួយឆ្នាំទៀតក៏ដោយ។ ប៉ុន្តែ ព្រះអម្ចាស់ហាមឃាត់មិនឲ្យមានប្រតិបត្តិការដ៏ប្រញាប់ប្រញាល់បែបនេះតទៅទៀតឡើយ រហូតទាល់តែបញ្ហានោះត្រូវបាននាំមកនៅចំពោះព្រះអម្ចាស់ក្នុងការអធិស្ឋាន; ហើយដោយសារអ្នកបានទទួលសារមកកាន់អ្នកថា កិច្ចការរបស់ព្រះអម្ចាស់ដែលស្ថិតលើប្រធាននោះ ជាការទទួលខុសត្រូវដ៏ឧឡារិកបំផុត អ្នកគ្មានសិទ្ធិខាងសីលធម៌ណាមួយឡើយ ក្នុងការផ្ទុះឡើងដូចដែលអ្នកបានធ្វើលើប្រធានបទអំពី “Daily” ហើយសន្មតថា ឥទ្ធិពលរបស់អ្នកនឹងសម្រេចបញ្ហានោះបាន។ នៅទីនោះមានអែលឌើរ ហាស់ខែល ដែលបានទទួលរ៉ាប់រងការទទួលខុសត្រូវដ៏ធ្ងន់ធ្ងរ ហើយក៏មានអែលឌើរ អ៊ីរវិន និងបុរសជាច្រើនទៀតដែលខ្ញុំអាចលើកឈ្មោះបាន ដែលកំពុងទទួលរ៉ាប់រងការទទួលខុសត្រូវដ៏ធ្ងន់ធ្ងរ។»
“Where was your respect for the men of age? What authority could you exercise without taking all the responsible men to weigh the matter? But let us now investigate the matter. We must now reconsider whether it is the Lord’s judgment, in the face of the work that has been neglected, of showing your zeal to carry the work even another year. If you should carry the work another year with the help that shall unite with you, there should be a change take place in you and Elder Prescott. And humble your own hearts before God. The Lord will have to see in you a showing of a different experience, for if ever men needed to be reconverted at this present [time], it [is] Elder Daniells and Elder Prescott.
«Шумо ба мардони солхӯрда чӣ гуна эҳтиром зоҳир кардед? Бе он ки ҳамаи мардони масъулро барои баррасии ин масъала гирд оваред, чӣ ихтиёре метавонистед ба кор баред? Аммо акнун биёед худи ин масъаларо таҳқиқ кунем. Акнун мо бояд аз нав бияндешем, ки оё ин доварии Худованд нест, ки дар рӯ ба рӯи кори мавриди беэътиноӣ қароргирифта, ғайрати худро барои пеш бурдани кор ҳатто як соли дигар нишон диҳед. Агар шумо бо ёрии онҳое ки бо шумо муттаҳид хоҳанд шуд, корро як соли дигар пеш баред, бояд дар шумо ва Пир Прескотт тағйироте ба амал ояд. Ва дилҳои худро дар ҳузури Худо фурӯтан созед. Худованд бояд дар шумо зуҳури таҷрибаи дигаргунеро бубинад, зеро агар ҳаргиз мардоне дар ҳамин замони ҳозира ба навтабдилёбӣ ниёз дошта бошанд, онҳо Пир Дэниэлс ва Пир Прескотт мебошанд.»
“Seven men should be chosen that are men of wisdom and through the working of the grace of God [give] evidence [of] a reconversion. For any men who are so blinded that they cannot reason from cause to effect, that they would ignore the men who have borne the responsibilities of the work and these presidents of conferences, [that] men [who] carry the work for over two years should be disregarded and such an impulsive consequence take place that men would neglect the very work kept before them for years—work the cities—and no, or but very little, attention [be] given to the old men for counsel, but proclaim the things they choose to give the people, bears its own testimony of the unsafety of the men to be entrusted with such a grand and wonderful work.
“Ku nga hlawh ar sawmruk a tak anei, kiba dei jong ka jingstad bad kiba pyni da ka jingtrei jong ka jingïsynei U Blei ïa ka jingkylla biang. Namar kino-kino ki briew kiba la matlah haduh katta-katta ba kim lah shuh ban pyrkhat na ka daw sha ka jingmih, ba kin leh mynthi ïa kita ki briew kiba la kit ïa ki jingkitkhlieh jong ka kam bad ïa kine ki presidents jong ki conferences, ba ïa ki briew kiba la rah ïa ka kam palat ar snem yn ñiewbeiñ, bad ka jingïarapram kaba kum kata kan jia haduh ba ki briew kin iehnoh ïa kata hi ka kam kaba la buh hakhmat jong ki la bun snem—ka kam ha ki nongbah—bad ym don satia, lane tang khyndiat eh, ka jingïarap jingmut na ki tymmen ki san jong ka jingai jingïasyllok, hynrei kin pynbna ïa kiei-kiei kiba ki jied ban ai ha u paidbah, ka kit hi ïa la ka jong ka jingsakhi shaphang ka jingbym shngain jong kita ki briew ban aiti ha ki ïa kum kane ka kam bakhraw bad kaba phylla.”
“Christ is not dead. He will never suffer His work to be carried on in this strange way. Let the books alone. If any change is essential, God will have the harmony in that change consistent, but when a message has been entrusted to men with the large responsibilities involved, [God] demands faithfulness that will work by love and purify the soul. Elders Daniells and Prescott both need reconversion. A strange work has come in, and it is not in harmony with the work Christ came to our world to do; and all who are truly converted will work the works of Christ.
“Christus ist nicht tot. Er wird niemals zulassen, dass Sein Werk auf diese befremdliche Weise weitergeführt wird. Lasst die Bücher unangetastet. Wenn irgendeine Änderung unerlässlich ist, wird Gott dafür sorgen, dass in dieser Änderung die Übereinstimmung gewahrt bleibt; wenn aber eine Botschaft Menschen mit den damit verbundenen großen Verantwortlichkeiten anvertraut worden ist, fordert [Gott] Treue, die durch Liebe wirksam ist und die Seele reinigt. Die Ältesten Daniells und Prescott bedürfen beide einer erneuten Bekehrung. Ein fremdartiges Werk ist eingedrungen, und es steht nicht im Einklang mit dem Werk, das Christus in unsere Welt zu tun kam; und alle, die wahrhaft bekehrt sind, werden die Werke Christi wirken.”
“We are everyone [to] work out the work which shall glorify the Father. We have come to the crisis—either to conform to the character of Jesus Christ right in this preparatory time or not attempt [it]. Elder Daniells, [you are not] to feel at liberty to let your voice be heard on high as you have done under similar circumstances. And understand, the president of a conference is not a ruler. He works in connection with the wise men who occupy the position as presidents whom God has accepted. He has not liberty to meddle with the writings in printed books from the pens that God has accepted. They are no longer to bear sway unless they show less of the ruling, dominating power. The crisis has come, for God will be dishonored.
“Bám maŋa ŋuní [ka] baara la kɛ min bɛ Fa la tɔgɔ bonya. An nana kɔlɔsi la ma—walima ka bɛn Yesu Kirisa kɛra la cɛsira ma kɔfɛli waati in na, walima ka tɛ se ka [o] kɛ. Kɔrɔ Daniells, i [ma] ka i yɛrɛ dɛmɛ ka i kuma bon kosɛbɛ i ka a kɛ i ka kɛ cogoya ɲɔgɔn na. Ani ka faamu ko, konfɛransi dɔ kuntigi tɛ kɛ masa ye. A bɛ baara kɛ ni cɛkɛɲumanw ye minnu bɛ kuntigiya sigiyɔrɔ la i n’a fɔ kuntigiw minnu Ala y’a minɛ. A tɛ sira sɔrɔ ka a bolo don sɛbɛnniw la minnu bɛ sɛbɛnni kɛra kitapuw la, kalanw minnu bɔra kalamɛnnu la minnu Ala y’a minɛ. U tɛna ka se ka fanga ta dɔrɔn bila fo ni u bɛ jira ko u ma kɛ ni fanga ɲɛmɔgɔya, fanga bolojanbaliya ye. Kɔlɔsi ye na, bawo Ala bɛna bonya tɛ.”
“How does the Lord look upon the unworked cities? Christ is in heaven. Now its acknowledgment is to be, ‘There is no kingly rule. And now is the crisis of this world. Now I am the Power to save or to destroy. Now is the time when the destiny of all is in My hands. I have given My life to save the world. And “I, if I be lifted up,” the saving grace I shall impart will prove that all who will be fashioned after the divine similitude and will be one with Me shall work as I work with My power of redeeming grace.’ Whoever will, [let him] take hold with his brethren to do the work given them to do when in responsible places under the counsel the Lord gives, and seek most earnestly to work in complete harmony with Him who so loved the world He gave His life a full sacrifice for the saving of the world. I speak to our ministers, that as they enter upon the work in our cities let there be a calm sacredness attending the ministry of the Word. We cannot make the proper impression upon the minds of the people if we . . . [Lower third of this page left blank.]
“ဘုရင်ရှင်သည် မလုပ်ဆောင်ရသေးသော မြို့များကို မည်သို့ မြင်တော်မူသနည်း။ ခရစ်တော်သည် ကောင်းကင်ဘုံ၌ ရှိတော်မူ၏။ ယခု ထိုအရာကို ဤသို့ အသိအမှတ်ပြုရမည်— ‘ဘုရင့်အာဏာစိုးမိုးမှု မရှိ။ ယခုသည် ဤလောက၏ အကျပ်အတည်းကာလဖြစ်၏။ ယခု ငါသည် ကယ်တင်ရန်သော်လည်းကောင်း ဖျက်ဆီးရန်သော်လည်းကောင်း အာဏာတန်ခိုးတော် ဖြစ်၏။ ယခုသည် လူအပေါင်းတို့၏ ကြမ္မာကံတရားသည် ငါ့လက်တော်၌ ရှိနေသော အချိန်ဖြစ်၏။ ငါသည် လောကကို ကယ်တင်ရန် ငါ့အသက်ကို ပေးပြီးပြီ။ ထို့ပြင် “I, if I be lifted up,” ဟူသောအတိုင်း၊ ငါပေးအပ်မည့် ကယ်တင်ခြင်းကျေးဇူးတော်သည် ဘုရားသခင်၏ ပုံသဏ္ဍာန်တူအောင် ပုံဖော်ခံလိုသူ အပေါင်းတို့နှင့် ငါနှင့် တစ်လုံးတစ်ဝတည်း ဖြစ်လိုသူ အပေါင်းတို့သည် ငါ၏ ရွေးနုတ်ကယ်တင်သော ကျေးဇူးတော်၏ တန်ခိုးဖြင့် ငါလုပ်သကဲ့သို့ လုပ်ကြမည်ဖြစ်ကြောင်း သက်သေပြလိမ့်မည်။’ အလိုရှိသောသူ မည်သူမဆို မိမိညီအစ်ကိုတို့နှင့်အတူ ချိတ်ဆက်၍၊ မိမိတို့အား ပေးအပ်ထားသော အလုပ်ကို၊ တာဝန်ရှိရာနေရာများ၌ သခင်ဘုရားပေးတော်မူသော အကြံပေးညွှန်ကြားချက်အောက်တွင် လုပ်ဆောင်ကြကုန်လော့။ ထို့ပြင် လောကကို ထိုမျှချစ်တော်မူသဖြင့် လောက၏ ကယ်တင်ခြင်းအတွက် မိမိအသက်ကို ပြည့်စုံသော ယဇ်ပူဇော်ခြင်းအဖြစ် ပေးတော်မူသော သူနှင့် အပြည့်အဝ သဟဇာတဖြစ်စွာ အလုပ်လုပ်နိုင်ရန် အလွန်အမင်း အားထုတ်ရှာဖွေကြကုန်လော့။ ငါသည် ငါတို့၏ ဓမ္မအမှုထမ်းများအား ပြောကြားသည်မှာ၊ ငါတို့၏ မြို့များတွင် အလုပ်သို့ ဝင်ရောက်ကြသောအခါ နှုတ်ကပတ်တော် အမှုတော်ကို ဆောင်ရွက်ရာ၌ ငြိမ်သက်သော သန့်ရှင်းမြင့်မြတ်မှုတစ်ရပ် လိုက်ပါစေရန် ဖြစ်၏။ ငါတို့သည် လူတို့၏ စိတ်နှလုံးများပေါ်တွင် သင့်လျော်မှန်ကန်သော သက်ရောက်မှုကို မဖြစ်စေနိုင်ကြ၊ အကယ်၍ ငါတို့သည်... [ဤစာမျက်နှာ၏ အောက်ပိုင်း တစ်သုံးပုံကို ဗလာထားသည်။]
“I copy from my Diary. The truth as it is in Jesus—talk it, pray it, believe every word in its simplicity. What would you gain if mistakes are brought before the men who have departed from the faith and given heed to seducing spirits, men who were not long ago with us in the faith? Will you stand on the devil’s side? Give your attention to the unworked fields. A world-wide work is before us. I was given representations of John Kellogg.
« Je recopie de mon Journal. La vérité telle qu’elle est en Jésus — parlez-en, priez-la, croyez-en chaque parole dans sa simplicité. Que gagneriez-vous si des erreurs étaient portées devant les hommes qui se sont éloignés de la foi et ont prêté l’oreille à des esprits séducteurs, des hommes qui, il n’y a pas longtemps encore, étaient avec nous dans la foi ? Vous tiendrez-vous du côté du diable ? Portez votre attention sur les champs encore inexplorés. Une œuvre d’envergure mondiale est devant nous. Des représentations concernant John Kellogg m’ont été données. »
“A very attractive personage was representing the ideas of the specious arguments that he was presenting, sentiments different from the genuine Bible truth. And those who are hungering and thirsting after something new were advancing ideas [so specious] that Elder Prescott was in great danger. Elder Daniells was in great danger [of] becoming wrapped in a delusion that if these sentiments could be spoken everywhere it would be as a new world.
“Un personnage très séduisant exposait, dans les raisonnements spécieux qu’il présentait, des sentiments différents de la véritable vérité biblique. Et ceux qui avaient faim et soif de quelque chose de nouveau faisaient avancer des idées [si spécieuses] qu’Elder Prescott courait un grand danger. Elder Daniells courait un très grand danger [de] s’envelopper dans une illusion, pensant que, si ces sentiments pouvaient être proclamés partout, ce serait comme un monde nouveau.
“Yes, it would, but while their minds were thus absorbed I was shown that Brother Daniells and Brother Prescott were weaving into their experience sentiments of a spiritual[istic] appearance and drawing our people to beautiful sentiments that would deceive, if possible, the very elect. I have to trace with my pen [the fact] that these brethren would see defects in their delusive ideas that would place the truth in an uncertainty; and [yet] they [would] stand out as [if they had] great spiritual discernment. Now I am to tell them [that] when I was shown this matter, when Elder Daniells was lifting up his voice like a trumpet in advocating his ideas of the ‘Daily,’ the after results were presented. Our people were becoming confused. I saw the result, and then there were given me cautions that if Elder Daniells without respect to the outcome should thus be impressed and let himself believe he was under the inspiration of God, skepticism would be sown among our ranks everywhere, and we should be where Satan would carry his messages. Set unbelief and skepticism would be sown in human minds, and strange crops of evil would take the place of truth.—Ms 67, 1910, 1–8. Manuscript Release, volume 20, 17–22.
“Ee, way taʼa ture, garuu yeroo yaadni isaanii akkasitti liqimfamee turetti obboleessi Daniells fi obboleessi Prescott yaada fakkaattii hafuuraa [spiritualistic] qabu muuxannoo isaanii keessatti walitti fidaa akka turan, akkasumas uummata keenya gara yaadota bareedoo, kan yoo dandaʼame warra filatamoo iyyuu gowwoomsanitti harkisaa akka turan natti mulʼifame. Ani qalamakootiin [dhugaa kana] barreessuutu natti jira, jechuunis obboloonni kun yaadota isaanii gowwoomsaa taʼan keessatti hirʼina arguu isaanii, kan dhugaa shakkii keessa galchu; garuu [taʼus] isaan [akka waan] hubannaa hafuuraa guddaa qabanitti of mulʼisu. Amma ani isaanitti himuun qaba [akka] yeroo wanti kun natti mulʼifametti, yeroo Jaarsi Daniells yaadota isaa waaʼee ‘Daily’ jabeessee sagalee isaa akka malakataa ol kaasaa turetti, buʼaan isaa inni boodaa natti dhiyaate. Uummanni keenya burjaajaʼaa ture. Ani buʼaa isaa arge, achiis akeekkachiisonni natti kennaman; isaanis akka jechuun, yoo Jaarsi Daniells buʼaa isaa utuu hin ilaalin akkasitti kakaʼee, ofiis isaa akka inni geggeessaa Waaqayyootiin jira jedhee amane, shakkiin amantii dhabuu safuu keenya keessatti bakka hundatti facaafama, nus iddoo Seexanni ergaa isaa baatutti geenya. Amantii dhabuun jabaa fi shakkiin yaada namootaa keessatti facaafama, midhaan hamaa ajaaʼibsiisoonnis bakka dhugaa ni buʼu.—Ms 67, 1910, 1–8. Manuscript Release, volume 20, 17–22.”
Those that gave the judgment hour cry were given the correct view of “the daily” in the book of Daniel. Through the human hands which translated the book of Daniel, and thereafter by human beings that were being directed by angels that were expelled from heaven, the correct understanding of “the daily” has become hidden, though it is in plain sight. In Daniel when the word translated as “the daily” occurs, it is not to include the added human word “sacrifice.” In verse thirteen of Daniel eight we find one of the five times where this occurs in the book of Daniel. In that very verse, the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six is also identified, but through the same type of humanistic manipulation it has been hidden in plain sight.
Wale waliotoa kilio cha saa ya hukumu walipewa uelewa sahihi wa “ya daima” katika kitabu cha Danieli. Kupitia mikono ya kibinadamu iliyokitafsiri kitabu cha Danieli, na baadaye kupitia wanadamu waliokuwa wakiongozwa na malaika waliofukuzwa kutoka mbinguni, uelewa sahihi wa “ya daima” umefichika, ijapokuwa uko wazi machoni. Katika Danieli, neno lililotafsiriwa kuwa “ya daima” halipaswi kujumuisha neno la kibinadamu lililoongezwa “dhabihu.” Katika aya ya kumi na tatu ya Danieli nane tunaona mojawapo ya mara tano ambamo jambo hili hutokea katika kitabu cha Danieli. Katika aya hiyo yenyewe, “nyakati saba” za Mambo ya Walawi ishirini na sita pia zinatambulishwa, lakini kwa namna iyo hiyo ya upotoshaji wa kibinadamu zimefichwa waziwazi machoni.
We will look at this fact in the next article.
Nous examinerons ce fait dans le prochain article.