Elijah’s witness begins when he identifies that there would be no rain, except at his word for three and a half years.
Icyo Eliya yashinze intahe cye gitangira igihe yatangarizaga ko hatazagwa imvura, keretse ku ijambo rye, mu gihe cy’imyaka itatu n’igice.
And Elijah the Tishbite, who was of the inhabitants of Gilead, said unto Ahab, As the Lord God of Israel liveth, before whom I stand, there shall not be dew nor rain these years, but according to my word. 1 Kings 17:1.
Kae Ilaija, na kai Tisibaiti, e dua vei ira na lewenivanua mai Kiliati, a kaya vei Eapi, Me vaka sa bula Jiova na Kalou i Isireli, ena matana au sa tu kina, ena sega ni tau na tegu se na uca ena veiyabaki oqo, ia me vaka ga na noqu vosa. 1 Tui 17:1.
Those three and a half years represent the history of Thyatira from 538 until 1798. In 1798, at the end of the period of drought Elijah summons Ahab to Carmel. The first angels’ message announced the hour of God’s judgment on October 22, 1844. The first angel’s message was the command to Ahab to call all of Israel to Carmel.
Esos tres años y medio representan la historia de Tiatira desde 538 hasta 1798. En 1798, al final del período de sequía, Elías convoca a Acab al Carmelo. El mensaje del primer ángel anunció la hora del juicio de Dios el 22 de octubre de 1844. El mensaje del primer ángel fue la orden dada a Acab de convocar a todo Israel al Carmelo.
And it came to pass, when Ahab saw Elijah, that Ahab said unto him, Art thou he that troubleth Israel? And he answered, I have not troubled Israel; but thou, and thy father’s house, in that ye have forsaken the commandments of the Lord, and thou hast followed Baalim. Now therefore send, and gather to me all Israel unto mount Carmel, and the prophets of Baal four hundred and fifty, and the prophets of the groves four hundred, which eat at Jezebel’s table. So Ahab sent unto all the children of Israel, and gathered the prophets together unto mount Carmel. And Elijah came unto all the people, and said, How long halt ye between two opinions? if the Lord be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word. 1 Kings 18:17–21.
Ek hett gebeur toe Agab Elía sien, dat Agab vir hom sê: Is dit jy, jy wat Israel in die ongeluk stort? En hy antwoord: Ek het Israel nie in die ongeluk gestort nie; maar jy en jou vader se huis, omdat julle die gebooie van die Here verlaat het en jy die Baäls nagevolg het. Stuur dan nou en laat die hele Israel by my bymekaarkom op die berg Karmel, en die vierhonderd-en-vyftig profete van Baäl en die vierhonderd profete van die heilige boomstamme wat van Isébel se tafel eet. Daarop het Agab na al die kinders van Israel gestuur en die profete op die berg Karmel bymekaargeroep. Toe kom Elía na die hele volk en sê: Hoe lank hink julle op twee gedagtes? As die Here God is, volg Hom na; maar as Baäl dit is, volg hom na. Maar die volk het hom nie een woord geantwoord nie. 1 Konings 18:17–21.
All Israel was gathered to Carmel in the time of Elijah, which in turn represented William Miller’s history when the three churches of Revelation chapter three were gathered together. The church that had initially fled into the wilderness in 538 to escape the persecution of Jezebel, as represented by the church of Thyatira, came out of the wilderness as the generation that was to be confronted with the message of Elijah, represented by William Miller. The earth beast then opened its mouth and swallowed up the flood of persecution that had been sent against her for twelve hundred and sixty years.
ઈલિયાના સમયમાં સમગ્ર ઇઝરાયેલ કર્મેલ પર એકત્રિત કરવામાં આવ્યો હતો, જે તેના અનુસંધાને વિલિયમ મિલરની ઇતિહાસાવસ્થાનું પ્રતિનિધિત્વ કરતું હતું, જ્યારે પ્રકાશિતવાક્ય અધ્યાય ત્રણની ત્રણ કલીસિયાઓને એકસાથે ભેગી કરવામાં આવી હતી। કલીસિયા, જે શરૂઆતમાં ઈ.સ. ૫૩૮માં યેઝેબેલના અત્યાચારથી બચવા અરણ્યમાં ભાગી ગઈ હતી, અને જેનું પ્રતિનિધિત્વ થિયાતીરાની કલીસિયા દ્વારા કરવામાં આવે છે, તે અરણ્યમાંથી બહાર આવી એવી પેઢી તરીકે પ્રગટ થઈ જેને ઈલિયાના સંદેશનો સામનો કરાવાનો હતો, અને જેનું પ્રતિનિધિત્વ વિલિયમ મિલર દ્વારા થાય છે। ત્યારબાદ પૃથ્વીરૂપ પશુએ પોતાનું મોં ખોલ્યું અને તેના વિરુદ્ધ એક હજાર બેસો સાઠ વર્ષ સુધી મોકલવામાં આવેલ અત્યાચારના પૂર ને ગળી ગયું।
And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. Revelation 12:16.
Et la terre secourut la femme, et la terre ouvrit sa bouche, et engloutit le fleuve que le dragon avait lancé de sa bouche. Apocalypse 12:16.
In prophecy the “speaking of a nation” is the action of its legislative and judicial authorities, and in 1789 the United States established the divine document that is the Constitution of the United States, thus protecting the rights and freedom necessary to provide protection from the persecution of both the kings of Europe and the apostate Catholic church.
En prophétie, le « fait de parler d’une nation » désigne l’action de ses autorités législatives et judiciaires; et, en 1789, les États-Unis établirent le document divin qu’est la Constitution des États-Unis, protégeant ainsi les droits et la liberté nécessaires pour garantir une protection contre la persécution tant des rois d’Europe que de l’Église catholique apostate.
“The speaking of the nation is the action of its legislative and judicial authorities.” The Great Controversy, 443.
«Қавмнинг гапириши — унинг қонун чиқарувчи ва суд ҳокимиятларининг ҳаракатидир». The Great Controversy, 443.
In 1789, just before the beginning of the United States’ prophetic role as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy began, it spake as a Lamb, but at the Sunday law it will speak as a dragon.
1789 में, बाइबिलीय भविष्यद्वाणी के छठे राज्य के रूप में संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका की भविष्यद्वाणिक भूमिका के आरम्भ से ठीक पहले, उसने मेम्ने के समान बोला; परन्तु रविवार के विधि-नियम के समय वह अजगर के समान बोलेगा।
And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. Revelation 13:11.
“Minn tí sá eina aðra skepnu stíga upp úr jørðini; og hon hevði tvey horn lík einum lambi, og hon talaði sum ein dreki.” Opinberingin 13:11.
The beginning and ending of the earth beast are marked by its speaking. In 1798, Ahab calls all of Israel to Mount Carmel where Elijah is going to set forth a test to prove to those watching whether the God of the Hebrews or the god of Jezebel is the true God. Jezebel had four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal and four hundred prophets of the grove. The false god Baal was a male deity and the false god Ashtaroth was a female deity.
Le commencement et la fin de la bête de la terre sont marqués par sa parole. En 1798, Achab convoque tout Israël au mont Carmel, où Élie va proposer une épreuve afin de démontrer à ceux qui regardent si le Dieu des Hébreux ou le dieu de Jézabel est le vrai Dieu. Jézabel avait quatre cent cinquante prophètes de Baal et quatre cents prophètes des bosquets sacrés. Le faux dieu Baal était une divinité masculine, et la fausse déesse Astarté était une divinité féminine.
Those two classes of false prophets represent the combination of church and state, for in prophecy when a man and woman are represented together, the woman represents a church and the man the state. Elijah was outnumbered eight hundred and fifty to one as he confronted the unholy combination of church and state, as represented by the female and male false deities and also by the marriage of Ahab and Jezebel. Ahab and Jezebel’s illustration of church and state represent the corruption of the horn of Republicanism and Baal and Ashtaroth represent the corruption of the Protestant horn.
Ces deux catégories de faux prophètes représentent l’union de l’Église et de l’État; car, dans la prophétie, lorsqu’un homme et une femme sont présentés ensemble, la femme représente une Église et l’homme l’État. Élie se trouva seul contre huit cent cinquante lorsqu’il affronta l’alliance impie de l’Église et de l’État, telle qu’elle était représentée par les fausses divinités féminine et masculine, ainsi que par le mariage d’Achab et de Jézabel. La représentation de l’Église et de l’État par Achab et Jézabel figure la corruption de la corne du républicanisme, et Baal ainsi qu’Astarté représentent la corruption de la corne protestante.
The issue was Elijah’s protest against the corrupt religion represented by Thyatira in Revelation chapter two. Elijah represented a Protestant, for the only definition of Protestant is someone who protests against Rome. Elijah’s protest represents a protest against the combination of church and state that is accomplished by the unholy alliance between a corrupted state with a corrupted church.
L’enjeu était la protestation d’Élie contre la religion corrompue représentée par Thyatire au chapitre deux de l’Apocalypse. Élie représentait un protestant, car la seule définition d’un protestant est celle de quelqu’un qui proteste contre Rome. La protestation d’Élie représente une protestation contre l’union de l’Église et de l’État, réalisée par l’alliance impie entre un État corrompu et une Église corrompue.
Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols. And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not. Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds. Revelation 2:20–22.
Cependant, j’ai contre toi quelques griefs : c’est que tu laisses cette femme Jézabel, qui se dit prophétesse, enseigner et séduire mes serviteurs, pour les entraîner à se livrer à la fornication et à manger des viandes sacrifiées aux idoles. Je lui ai donné du temps afin qu’elle se repente de sa fornication ; mais elle ne s’est point repentie. Voici, je vais la jeter sur un lit, et ceux qui commettent adultère avec elle, dans une grande tribulation, à moins qu’ils ne se repentent de leurs œuvres. Apocalypse 2:20–22.
Eating represents the message you accept, and a message that is sacrificed to idols represents the doctrines of Catholicism, the very symbol of the abominable worship of idols. God’s people in the Dark Ages had come to accept many of the pagan doctrines of Catholicism, and especially the worship of the sun.
Manger représente le message que l’on accepte, et un message sacrifié aux idoles représente les doctrines du catholicisme, symbole même du culte abominable des idoles. Le peuple de Dieu, au Moyen Âge, en était venu à accepter nombre des doctrines païennes du catholicisme, et tout particulièrement l’adoration du soleil.
Fornication is an unlawful relationship and prophetically represents the very essence of what the Constitution prohibits; the combination of church and state. Ahab was in an unlawful relationship with Jezebel, for as a king of Israel he was not to marry a heathen princess. Jesus identified John the Baptist as Elijah, and John also confronted the same unholy relationship when he rebuked Herod for marrying Herodias, his brother’s wife.
La fornication est une relation illicite et représente prophétiquement l’essence même de ce que la Constitution interdit : l’union de l’Église et de l’État. Achab était dans une relation illicite avec Jézabel, car, en tant que roi d’Israël, il ne devait pas épouser une princesse païenne. Jésus a identifié Jean-Baptiste comme Élie, et Jean a lui aussi affronté cette même relation impie lorsqu’il reprit Hérode pour avoir épousé Hérodiade, la femme de son frère.
For Herod had laid hold on John, and bound him, and put him in prison for Herodias’ sake, his brother Philip’s wife. For John said unto him, It is not lawful for thee to have her. Matthew 14:3, 4.
कारण हेरोद ने यूहन्ना को पकड़कर बाँध दिया था और हेरोदियास के कारण, जो उसके भाई फिलिप्पुस की पत्नी थी, उसे बन्दीगृह में डाल दिया था। क्योंकि यूहन्ना ने उससे कहा था, “तेरे लिये उसका रखना विधिसम्मत नहीं है।” मत्ती 14:3, 4.
Elijah’s confrontation with Ahab and Jezebel prefigured John’s confrontation with Herod and Herodias for both relationships represented an unlawful relationship of church and state. Together they represent the Elijah message of the one hundred and forty-four thousand who confronts the papacy (Jezebel & Herodias), the ten kings that represent the United Nations (Ahab & Herod) and the United States that represents the false prophet (the false prophets of Carmel and Salome, Herodias’ daughter).
La confrontation d’Élie avec Achab et Jézabel préfigurait la confrontation de Jean avec Hérode et Hérodiade, car ces deux relations représentaient une union illicite de l’Église et de l’État. Ensemble, elles représentent le message d’Élie des cent quarante-quatre mille, qui confronte la papauté (Jézabel et Hérodiade), les dix rois qui représentent les Nations Unies (Achab et Hérode), et les États-Unis, qui représentent le faux prophète (les faux prophètes du Carmel et Salomé, fille d’Hérodiade).
The prophetic setting at Carmel includes the defense by Elijah of the Constitution of the United States, which enshrines the principle of the separation of church and state.
The prophetische setting at Carmel omvat de verdediging door Elia van de Grondwet van de Verenigde Staten, die het beginsel van de scheiding van kerk en staat verankert.
And it came to pass, when Ahab saw Elijah, that Ahab said unto him, Art thou he that troubleth Israel? And he answered, I have not troubled Israel; but thou, and thy father’s house, in that ye have forsaken the commandments of the Lord, and thou hast followed Baalim. 1 Kings 18:17, 18.
Et il arriva, lorsque Achab vit Élie, qu’Achab lui dit : Est-ce toi qui troubles Israël ? Et il répondit : Ce n’est pas moi qui trouble Israël ; c’est toi, au contraire, et la maison de ton père, parce que vous avez abandonné les commandements de l’Éternel, et que tu as suivi les Baals. 1 Rois 18:17, 18.
The Constitution established that the two horns of Republicanism and Protestantism would always stay separate from each other. But Revelation identifies that when the United States ultimately speaks as a dragon, it will do so when the apostate churches of the United States take control and combine with the apostate government.
Konstituutiolla vahvistettiin, että republikaanisuuden ja protestanttisuuden kaksi sarvea pysyisivät aina erillään toisistaan. Mutta Ilmestys osoittaa, että kun Yhdysvallat lopulta puhuu lohikäärmeen tavoin, se tekee niin silloin, kun Yhdysvaltojen luopuneet kirkot ottavat vallan ja yhtyvät luopuneeseen hallitukseen.
“But what is the ‘image to the beast’? and how is it to be formed? The image is made by the two-horned beast, and is an image to the beast. It is also called an image of the beast. Then to learn what the image is like and how it is to be formed we must study the characteristics of the beast itself—the papacy.
«А что такое “образ зверя”? и как он должен быть создан? Образ создаётся зверем с двумя рогами и является образом зверю. Он также называется образом зверя. Итак, чтобы узнать, каков этот образ и как он должен быть создан, нам необходимо исследовать свойства самого зверя — папства.
“When the early church became corrupted by departing from the simplicity of the gospel and accepting heathen rites and customs, she lost the Spirit and power of God; and in order to control the consciences of the people, she sought the support of the secular power. The result was the papacy, a church that controlled the power of the state and employed it to further her own ends, especially for the punishment of ‘heresy.’ In order for the United States to form an image of the beast, the religious power must so control the civil government that the authority of the state will also be employed by the church to accomplish her own ends.” The Great Controversy, 443.
“Първата църква, когато се поквари, като се отклони от простотата на евангелието и прие езически обреди и обичаи, изгуби Духа и силата на Бога; и за да владее над съвестта на народа, потърси подкрепата на светската власт. Резултатът беше папството — църква, която контролираше държавната власт и я използваше, за да прокарва своите собствени цели, особено за наказване на „ерес“. За да могат Съединените щати да създадат образ на звяра, религиозната власт трябва дотолкова да подчини гражданското управление, че и държавната власт да бъде използвана от църквата за постигане на нейните собствени цели.” Великата борба, 443.
Elijah at Mount Carmel represented the work of the Millerites, and the Millerites were established as the true prophet in contrast with those that had recently come out from under the influence of Catholicism, but chose through their rejection of the light of the first angel to return to Rome. Thus, the second angel’s message in the spring of 1844 consisted of identifying the Protestant denominations as daughters of Babylon, and the Millerites as the genuine Protestant horn.
Élie au mont Carmel représentait l’œuvre des millérites, et les millérites furent établis comme le véritable prophète, par contraste avec ceux qui étaient récemment sortis de l’influence du catholicisme, mais qui choisirent, par leur rejet de la lumière du premier ange, de retourner à Rome. Ainsi, le message du second ange, au printemps de 1844, consistait à identifier les dénominations protestantes comme les filles de Babylone, et les millérites comme la véritable corne protestante.
When God brought ancient Israel out of the slavery of Egypt and through the waters of the Red Sea, He initiated a progressive testing process that began with the test of the heavenly manna.
Da Dio anticaeleavitù d e fece passare attraverso le acque del Mar Rosso, Egli diede inizio a un processo progressivo di prova che cominciò con la prova della manna celeste.
“Upon us is shining the accumulated light of past ages. The record of Israel’s forgetfulness has been preserved for our enlightenment. In this age God has set His hand to gather unto Himself a people from every nation, kindred, and tongue. In the advent movement He has wrought for His heritage, even as He wrought for the Israelites in leading them from Egypt. In the great disappointment of 1844 the faith of His people was tested as was that of the Hebrews at the Red Sea.” Testimonies, volume 8, 115, 116.
«Sur nous resplendit la lumière accumulée des siècles passés. Le récit de l’oubli d’Israël a été conservé pour notre instruction. En cet âge, Dieu a mis la main à l’œuvre afin de se rassembler un peuple de toute nation, tribu et langue. Dans le mouvement adventiste, Il a agi en faveur de Son héritage, de même qu’Il agit pour les Israélites en les conduisant hors d’Égypte. Dans la grande déception de 1844, la foi de Son peuple fut mise à l’épreuve, comme le fut celle des Hébreux à la mer Rouge.» Testimonies, volume 8, 115, 116.
The disappointment of October 22, 1844, led to the understanding of the heavenly sanctuary, which then presented the test of the Sabbath just as the test of the manna became the first of a series of ten tests for ancient Israel.
La désillusion du 22 octobre 1844 conduisit à la compréhension du sanctuaire céleste, lequel présenta alors l’épreuve du sabbat, tout comme l’épreuve de la manne devint la première d’une série de dix épreuves pour l’ancien Israël.
“The Lord gave me the following view in 1847, while the brethren were assembled on the Sabbath, at Topsham, Maine.
«И Господь дал мне следующее видение в 1847 году, когда братья были собраны в субботу в Топшеме, штат Мэн. »
“We felt an unusual spirit of prayer. And as we prayed the Holy Ghost fell upon us. We were very happy. Soon I was lost to earthly things and was wrapped in a vision of God’s glory. I saw an angel flying swiftly to me. He quickly carried me from the earth to the Holy City. In the city I saw a temple, which I entered. I passed through a door before I came to the first veil. This veil was raised, and I passed into the holy place. Here I saw the altar of incense, the candlestick with seven lamps, and the table on which was the shewbread. After viewing the glory of the holy, Jesus raised the second veil and I passed into the holy of holies.
“ኣብ ጸሎት ዘይተለምደ መንፈስ ተሰሚዑና። እናጸለና ከለና ድማ መንፈስ ቅዱስ ኣብ ልዕሌና ወረደ። ብዙሕ ሕጉሳት ነበርና። ድሕሪ ሓጺር ጊዜ ካብ ምድራዊ ነገራት ጠፊአ ብራእይ ክብሪ ኣምላኽ ተሸፊነ ነበርኩ። መልኣኽ ብፍጥነት ናባይ እናነፈረ ረኣኹ። ንሱ ብቕልጡፍ ካብ ምድሪ ናብታ ቅድስቲ ከተማ ወሰደኒ። ኣብታ ከተማ ናብኡ ዝኣተኹዎ ቤተ መቕደስ ረኣኹ። ናብቲ ቀዳማይ መጋረጃ ከይበጻሕኩ ብኣፍ ደገ ሓለፍኩ። እቲ መጋረጃ ተልዒሉ ነበረ፣ ኣነ ድማ ናብቲ ቅዱስ ስፍራ ኣተኹ። ኣብኡ መሰውኢ ዕጣን፣ ሸውዓተ መብራህቲ ዘለዎ ቀንዴል፣ ከምኡውን እቲ ቅድሚ ገጽ እንጌራ ዘለዎ ሰደቓ ረኣኹ። ድሕሪ ክብሪ እቲ ቅዱስ ስፍራ ምርኣየይ፣ የሱስ ነቲ ካልኣይ መጋረጃ ኣልዒሉ፣ ኣነ ድማ ናብቲ ቅድስተ ቅዱሳን ኣተኹ።”
“In the holiest I saw an ark; on the top and sides of it was purest gold. On each end of the ark was a lovely cherub, with its wings spread out over it. Their faces were turned toward each other, and they looked downward. Between the angels was a golden censer. Above the ark, where the angels stood, was an exceeding bright glory, that appeared like a throne where God dwelt. Jesus stood by the ark, and as the saints’ prayers came up to Him, the incense in the censer would smoke, and He would offer up their prayers with the smoke of the incense to His Father. In the ark was the golden pot of manna, Aaron’s rod that budded, and the tables of stone which folded together like a book. Jesus opened them, and I saw the Ten Commandments written on them with the finger of God. On one table were four, and on the other six. The four on the first table shone brighter than the other six. But the fourth, the Sabbath commandment, shone above them all; for the Sabbath was set apart to be kept in honor of God’s holy name. The holy Sabbath looked glorious—a halo of glory was all around it. I saw that the Sabbath commandment was not nailed to the cross. If it was, the other nine commandments were; and we are at liberty to break them all, as well as to break the fourth. I saw that God had not changed the Sabbath, for He never changes. But the pope had changed it from the seventh to the first day of the week; for he was to change times and laws.” Early Writings, 32.
“सबसे पवित्र स्थान में मैंने एक सन्दूक देखा; उसके ऊपर और उसके पार्श्वों पर अति शुद्ध सोना मढ़ा हुआ था। सन्दूक के प्रत्येक सिरे पर एक सुन्दर करूब था, जिसके पंख उसके ऊपर फैले हुए थे। उनके मुख एक-दूसरे की ओर थे, और वे नीचे की ओर देख रहे थे। स्वर्गदूतों के बीच एक सोने की धूपदानी थी। सन्दूक के ऊपर, जहाँ स्वर्गदूत खड़े थे, एक अत्यन्त उज्ज्वल महिमा थी, जो ऐसे प्रकट होती थी मानो वह एक सिंहासन हो जहाँ परमेश्वर निवास करता है। यीशु सन्दूक के पास खड़े थे, और जब पवित्र जनों की प्रार्थनाएँ उनके पास ऊपर उठती थीं, तब धूपदानी की धूप उठती थी, और वे धूप के धुएँ के साथ उनकी प्रार्थनाओं को अपने पिता के पास अर्पित करते थे। सन्दूक के भीतर मन्ना का सोने का पात्र, हारून की वह छड़ी जिसमें कोपलें फूटी थीं, और पत्थर की वे पटियाएँ थीं जो पुस्तक के समान एक साथ बंद हो जाती थीं। यीशु ने उन्हें खोला, और मैंने उन पर परमेश्वर की उँगली से लिखी हुई दस आज्ञाएँ देखीं। एक पटिया पर चार थीं, और दूसरी पर छह। पहली पटिया की वे चार अन्य छह से अधिक चमकती थीं। परन्तु चौथी, अर्थात् सब्त की आज्ञा, उन सब से बढ़कर चमक रही थी; क्योंकि सब्त परमेश्वर के पवित्र नाम के आदर में मानने के लिए अलग ठहराया गया था। पवित्र सब्त महिमामय दिखाई देता था—उसके चारों ओर महिमा का एक प्रभामण्डल था। मैंने देखा कि सब्त की आज्ञा क्रूस पर नहीं ठोंकी गई थी। यदि वह ठोंकी गई होती, तो अन्य नौ आज्ञाएँ भी ठोंकी गई होतीं; और तब हमें उन्हें सबको तोड़ने की उतनी ही छूट होती जितनी चौथी को तोड़ने की। मैंने देखा कि परमेश्वर ने सब्त को नहीं बदला है, क्योंकि वह कभी नहीं बदलता। परन्तु पोप ने उसे सप्ताह के सातवें दिन से बदलकर पहले दिन कर दिया है; क्योंकि उसी को समयों और व्यवस्थाओं को बदलना था।” Early Writings, 32.
When the Protestants came out of the Dark Ages in 1798 and the book of Daniel was unsealed, the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, the two-horned earth beast of Revelation thirteen began its march through prophetic history. Protestantism was founded upon the sacred document called the Holy Bible and Republicanism was founded upon the sacred document called the Constitution. God had brought His church in the wilderness out of the Dark Ages, but just as with ancient Israel during the Egyptian period of slavery the Sabbath commandment had been forgotten. As Israel crossed the Red Sea on its way to the giving of the law at Sinai, modern Israel crossed the Atlantic on its way to October 22, 1844, where the law would once again be revealed. The Lord was once again raising up a people who would be the depositaries of His law, the depositaries of His prophetic revelations and who would carry the mantle of Protestantism. Ancient Israel was given the two tables of the Ten Commandments as the symbol of their work to be the depositaries of His law, and modern Israel was given the two tables of Habakkuk as the symbol of their work as depositaries of His prophetic Word.
Når protestantene trådte ut av mørketiden i 1798, og Daniels bok ble åpnet, begynte det sjette riket i Bibelens profeti, det tohornede jorddyret i Åpenbaringen tretten, sin fremmarsj gjennom den profetiske historie. Protestantismen var grunnlagt på det hellige dokument som kalles Den hellige bibel, og republikanismen var grunnlagt på det hellige dokument som kalles Konstitusjonen. Gud hadde ført sin menighet i ørkenen ut av mørketiden, men slik det også var med det gamle Israel under den egyptiske trelldomsperiode, var sabbatsbudet blitt glemt. Likesom Israel krysset Rødehavet på vei til lovgivningen ved Sinai, krysset det moderne Israel Atlanterhavet på vei til 22. oktober 1844, hvor loven igjen skulle bli åpenbart. Herren oppreiste på ny et folk som skulle være forvalterne av hans lov, forvalterne av hans profetiske åpenbaringer, og som skulle bære protestantismens kappe. Det gamle Israel fikk de to steintavlene med De ti bud som symbolet på sin gjerning som forvaltere av hans lov, og det moderne Israel fikk Habakkuks to tavler som symbolet på sin gjerning som forvaltere av hans profetiske ord.
Modern Israel was to carry both sets of two tables as it presented the third angel’s message to the world, which is the message proclaimed by those who carry the mantle of Protestantism. The Protestantism that came out of the Dark Ages was then incomplete as was ancient Israel as they crossed through the Red Sea. Protestantism had professed the motto of the Bible and the Bible alone, but had an incomplete understanding of God’s Word through centuries of eating the pagan doctrines of Roman Catholicism (things sacrificed unto idols). God designed that a true Protestant would represent the entire Word of God as symbolized by the “law and the prophets,” the two sets of two tables that represent both the work of God’s people and God’s character. The work of the first angel was to produce a genuine Protestant people that would be both the depositaries of His law and of his prophetic Word.
Israël moderne devait porter les deux ensembles de deux tables lorsqu’il présentait au monde le message du troisième ange, lequel est le message proclamé par ceux qui portent le manteau du protestantisme. Le protestantisme qui sortit des âges de ténèbres était alors incomplet, tout comme l’ancien Israël lorsqu’il traversa la mer Rouge. Le protestantisme avait professé la devise de la Bible et de la Bible seule, mais il possédait une compréhension incomplète de la Parole de Dieu après des siècles durant lesquels il s’était nourri des doctrines païennes du catholicisme romain (des choses sacrifiées aux idoles). Dieu avait voulu qu’un véritable protestant représente l’ensemble de la Parole de Dieu, comme le symbolisent « la loi et les prophètes », les deux ensembles de deux tables qui représentent à la fois l’œuvre du peuple de Dieu et le caractère de Dieu. L’œuvre du premier ange devait produire un peuple authentiquement protestant, qui serait à la fois le dépositaire de Sa loi et de Sa Parole prophétique.
“God has called His church in this day, as He called ancient Israel, to stand as a light in the earth. By the mighty cleaver of truth, the messages of the first, second, and third angels, He has separated them from the churches and from the world to bring them into a sacred nearness to Himself. He has made them the depositaries of His law and has committed to them the great truths of prophecy for this time. Like the holy oracles committed to ancient Israel, these are a sacred trust to be communicated to the world. The three angels of Revelation 14 represent the people who accept the light of God’s messages and go forth as His agents to sound the warning throughout the length and breadth of the earth.” Testimonies, volume 5, 455.
“Mungu ameliita kanisa Lake katika siku hizi, kama alivyowaita Israeli wa kale, kusimama kama nuru duniani. Kwa upanga mkuu wa ukweli, yaani ujumbe wa malaika wa kwanza, wa pili, na wa tatu, amewatenga na makanisa mengine na na ulimwengu ili awalete katika ukaribu mtakatifu na Yeye mwenyewe. Amewafanya kuwa wahifadhi wa sheria Yake na amewakabidhi kweli kuu za unabii kwa ajili ya wakati huu. Kama vile maneno matakatifu ya Mungu yalivyowekwa mikononi mwa Israeli wa kale, haya nayo ni amana takatifu ya kuwasilishwa kwa ulimwengu. Wale malaika watatu wa Ufunuo 14 wanawawakilisha watu wanaoupokea nuru ya jumbe za Mungu na kwenda mbele kama wajumbe Wake kuitangaza onyo katika urefu na upana wa dunia yote.” Testimonies, juzuu ya 5, 455.
The warning that is to be proclaimed by those who have been identified as the depositaries of the two sets of two tables is against receiving the mark of Catholicism. That protest is against the unlawful relationship of Ahab and Jezebel and was represented by Elijah on Mount Carmel. The giving of the two tables of stone at Mount Sinai typified the giving of Habakkuk’s two tables of cloth in the history of 1842 through 1849. Habakkuk’s two tables are the symbol of the covenant relationship between God and His Protestant people. To reject those tables would be the same as ancient Israel rejecting God’s law.
Le avertimento que debe esser proclamate per illes qui ha essite identificate como le depositarios del duo series de duo tabulas es contra le reception del marca del Catholicismo. Iste protesto es contra le relation illicite de Achab e Jezabel e esseva representate per Elia super le Monte Carmelo. Le donation del duo tabulas de petra al Monte Sinai typificava le donation del duo tabulas de panno de Habacuc in le historia de 1842 usque 1849. Le duo tabulas de Habacuc es le symbolo del relation de pacto inter Deo e Su populo protestante. Rejectar iste tabulas esserea le mesme como le antique Israel rejectar le lege de Deo.
The Millerites entered into the Most Holy Place and received the light of the Sabbath, but the testing process was yet unfinished. Simultaneously the horn of Republicanism was proceeding through the very same history. And both horns would reach a milestone in their march together in 1863.
Milleritehguo̍k tiến vào Nơi Chí Thánh và đã nhận lãnh ánh sáng về ngày Sa-bát, nhưng tiến trình thử luyện vẫn chưa hoàn tất. Đồng thời, chiếc sừng của chủ nghĩa Cộng hòa đang tiến bước qua chính cùng một lịch sử ấy. Và cả hai chiếc sừng sẽ cùng đạt đến một cột mốc trong cuộc tiến trình chung của mình vào năm 1863.
Miller’s Elijah message produced a progressive purification process with the intended purpose of establishing the Protestant horn and in the identical history the Republican horn was involved with a progressive process of political development. Both horns are on the same earth beast, so they must travel in unison through the entire history of the earth beast.
Ujumbe wa Eliya wa Miller ulizalisha mchakato wa utakaso wa hatua kwa hatua kwa kusudi lililokusudiwa la kuisimamisha pembe ya Kiprotestanti, na katika historia hiyohiyo pembe ya Kirepublican ilihusika katika mchakato wa maendeleo ya kisiasa wa hatua kwa hatua. Pembe zote mbili ziko juu ya mnyama yuleyule wa nchi, kwa hiyo ni lazima zisafiri kwa umoja katika historia yote ya mnyama wa nchi.
The first prophetic characteristic of the Republican horn of the earth beast was the action of speaking the Constitution into effect in 1789. In 1798, (the time of the end when the book of Daniel was unsealed), the earth beast would speak for the first time as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. 1798 was the beginning of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, and the speaking that occurred at the beginning of the earth beast’s history in 1798 would typify the last time the sixth kingdom would speak, and that time is represented as the voice of the dragon. When we consider the laws passed by the Republican horn in the United States in 1798, we should expect to see a typification of the laws that will be passed in conjunction with the Sunday law when the United States speaks as a dragon. As we consider the following four laws, ask yourself if the four laws passed in 1798 have the prophetic signature of Alpha and Omega?
Sifa ya kwanza ya kinabii ya pembe ya Kirepublikani ya mnyama wa nchi ilikuwa tendo la kuitamka Katiba ili ianze kutumika mwaka 1789. Mwaka 1798, (wakati wa mwisho ambapo kitabu cha Danieli kilifunuliwa), mnyama wa nchi angenena kwa mara ya kwanza kama ufalme wa sita wa unabii wa Biblia. Mwaka 1798 ulikuwa mwanzo wa Marekani kama ufalme wa sita wa unabii wa Biblia, na kunena kulikotokea mwanzoni mwa historia ya mnyama wa nchi mwaka 1798 kungekuwa kielelezo cha mara ya mwisho ambapo ufalme wa sita ungenenena, na wakati huo unawakilishwa kama sauti ya joka. Tunapozingatia sheria zilizopitishwa na pembe ya Kirepublikani nchini Marekani mwaka 1798, tunapaswa kutarajia kuona mfano wa sheria zitakazopitishwa kwa kushirikiana na sheria ya Jumapili wakati Marekani itakaponena kama joka. Tunapozingatia sheria nne zifuatazo, jiulize kama sheria nne zilizopitishwa mwaka 1798 zina alama ya kinabii ya Alfa na Omega?
In 1798, the United States passed several significant laws known as the Alien and Sedition Acts. These acts were a series of four laws passed by the Federalist-controlled Congress and signed into law by President John Adams, the second president of the United States and former vice president of George Washington.
Mwaka wa 1798, Merika ilipitisha sheria kadhaa muhimu zilizojulikana kama Sheria za Wageni na Uchochezi. Sheria hizi zilikuwa mfululizo wa sheria nne zilizopitishwa na Bunge lililodhibitiwa na Chama cha Federalist na kutiwa saini kuwa sheria na Rais John Adams, rais wa pili wa Merika na aliyekuwa makamu wa rais wa George Washington.
The Naturalization Act: This law extended the residency requirement for immigrants to become U.S. citizens from 5 to 14 years. It was aimed primarily at curbing the influence of recent immigrants, who were often aligned with the opposition party, the Democratic-Republicans.
قانون التجنيس: مدَّ هذا القانون مدةَ الإقامة المطلوبة للمهاجرين كي يصبحوا مواطنين في الولايات المتحدة من 5 إلى 14 سنة. وكان يهدف أساسًا إلى كبح نفوذ المهاجرين الوافدين حديثًا، الذين كانوا في الغالب متحالفين مع حزب المعارضة، الجمهوريين الديمقراطيين.
The Alien Friends Act: This act authorized the president to deport non-citizens deemed to be a threat to the security of the United States during peacetime. It allowed the president to detain and deport any non-citizen he considered dangerous.
Loi sur les étrangers amis : Cette loi autorisait le président à expulser, en temps de paix, les non-citoyens jugés constituer une menace pour la sécurité des États-Unis. Elle permettait au président de détenir et d’expulser tout non-citoyen qu’il estimait dangereux.
The Alien Enemies Act: This law provided for the apprehension, restraint, and deportation of citizens from countries at war with the United States. It was enacted as a precaution during the tense atmosphere of the late 1790s.
Safofin Makiya na Maƙiya na Ƙasashen Waje: Wannan doka ta tanadi kama, tsarewa, da kuma kora ’yan ƙasa na ƙasashen da suke cikin yaƙi da Amurka. An zartar da ita a matsayin matakin kariya a lokacin yanayin tsanani na ƙarshen shekarun 1790.
The Sedition Act: This is the most controversial of the Alien and Sedition Acts. It made it a criminal offense to publish “false, scandalous, and malicious” writings against the government or its officials, with the intent to defame them or bring them into disrepute. Critics saw this as a direct attack on freedom of speech and the press.
કુટિલતા વિરોધી અધિનિયમ: આ Alien and Sedition Acts પૈકી સૌથી વધુ વિવાદાસ્પદ હતો. તેણે સરકાર અથવા તેના અધિકારીઓ વિરુદ્ધ તેમને બદનામ કરવા અથવા તેમની પ્રતિષ્ઠા ખંડિત કરવા ના આશયથી “ખોટાં, કલંકજનક અને દુર્ભાવનાપૂર્ણ” લખાણો પ્રકાશિત કરવાનું દંડનીય ગુનો ઠરાવ્યો. વિવેચકોએ આને વાણી-સ્વાતંત્ર્ય અને પત્રકારિતા-સ્વાતંત્ર્ય પર સીધો પ્રહાર ગણાવ્યો.
The Alien and Sedition Acts were highly controversial and led to significant opposition from Democratic-Republicans, who believed these laws violated fundamental Constitutional rights and targeted their political party. They argued that the laws were an infringement on the First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech and the press. Eventually, these laws played a role in the election of 1800, when Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans won the presidency and Congress, leading to the repeal of the Sedition Act.
Loi ya Bapaya mpe ya Botomboki esalaki ntembe monene mpe ememaki botɛmɛli makasi uta epai ya ba Democratic-Republicans, oyo bandimaki ete mibeko yango ebukaki makoki ya ntina mingi ya Mobeko-Mokonzi mpe ezalaki kotya mokano na ekólo na bango ya politiki. Bango balobaki ete mibeko yango ezalaki kobebisa Bobongisi ya Liboso, oyo ebatelaka bonsomi ya koloba mpe ya bapanzi-sango. Na nsuka, mibeko yango esalaki eteni moko na maponami ya 1800, tango Thomas Jefferson mpe ba Democratic-Republicans balongaki bokonzi ya mokonzi mpe Congress, mpe yango ememaki na kolongolama ya Mobeko ya Botomboki.
The Democratic-Republican party believed these laws violated the fundamental rights upheld by the Constitution, and they also believed the laws were targeting the opposing political party. It matters not that these laws were repealed or later expired, the Alpha and Omega illustrates the end with the beginning. In the history where these laws were enacted or “spoke” into law the Federalist party was opposed by a party called Democrat-Republicans. The evolution of the Democrat-Republican party ultimately produces the Republican party. A political party primarily coalesced together based upon an anti-slavery position.
파푸아민주공화국 정당은 이 법들이 헌법이 보장하는 근본적 권리들을 침해한다고 믿었으며, 또한 그 법들이 반대 정당을 겨냥하고 있다고 여겼다. 이 법들이 폐지되었거나 혹은 후에 효력을 상실하였다는 사실은 중요하지 않다. 알파와 오메가는 시작으로 끝을 보여 준다. 이 법들이 제정되었거나 곧 법으로 “말해졌던” 역사에서, 연방당은 민주공화당이라 불린 한 정당의 반대를 받았다. 민주공화당의 발전은 마침내 공화당을 산출한다. 곧 주로 노예제 반대 입장에 기초하여 결집된 한 정당이다.
The historians identify 1863 as the very center point of the civil war, a war which was premised upon the issue of slavery. 1863 is also a waymark for the new standard bearers of the Protestant horn, who then rejected the first time-prophecy given to Miller by angels (the prophecy of “seven times” from Leviticus twenty-six). Could it be a simple coincidence that the prophecy of the seven times just happens to be based upon the laws of slavery set forth in the previous chapter of Leviticus? The “curse” identified by the “seven times” was the promise that if the covenant laws of chapter twenty-five were to be disobeyed, Israel would then end its history by returning into the slavery it was taken out of when it began its journey at the Red Sea.
Les historiens situent l’année 1863 au point central même de la guerre civile, une guerre fondée sur la question de l’esclavage. L’année 1863 constitue également un jalon pour les nouveaux porte-étendards de la corne protestante, qui rejetèrent alors la première prophétie de temps donnée à Miller par des anges (la prophétie des « sept temps » de Lévitique vingt-six). Se pourrait-il que ce soit une simple coïncidence si la prophétie des sept temps se trouve précisément fondée sur les lois relatives à l’esclavage énoncées dans le chapitre précédent du Lévitique ? La « malédiction » désignée par les « sept temps » était la promesse que, si les lois de l’alliance du chapitre vingt-cinq venaient à être désobéies, Israël achèverait alors son histoire en retournant à l’esclavage dont il avait été tiré lorsqu’il commença son voyage à la mer Rouge.
From 1798 to 1863 the political party that was the Democratic–Republican party went through a series of purges or shakings. From 1798 onward, and especially from August 11, 1840 onward through 1863 the Millerite movement went through a series of purges and shakings.
من 1798 إلى 1863 مرّ الحزب السياسي المعروف بالحزب الديمقراطي–الجمهوري بسلسلة من عمليات التطهير أو الهزّات. ومنذ عام 1798 فصاعدًا، وعلى وجه الخصوص منذ 11 أغسطس 1840 فصاعدًا حتى عام 1863، مرّت الحركة الميلرية بسلسلة من عمليات التطهير والهزّات.
The Democratic-Republican Party, which was one of the early political parties in the United States, did not directly transform into the modern Republican Party as it exists today. Instead, it underwent a series of changes and splits over time, ultimately leading to the formation of several different political parties before the emergence of the Republican Party.
Il Partito Democratico-Repubblicano, che fu uno dei primi partiti politici negli Stati Uniti, non si trasformò direttamente nel moderno Partito Repubblicano così come esiste oggi. Piuttosto, attraversò nel tempo una serie di cambiamenti e scissioni, che portarono infine alla formazione di diversi partiti politici, prima dell’emergere del Partito Repubblicano.
The Democratic-Republican Party, often associated with Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, was founded in the late 18th century as a response to the Federalist Party. The Democratic-Republicans favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution, states’ rights, and agrarian interests.
د ډيموکرات-جمهوري غوښتونکي ګوند، چې ډېری وخت له توماس جيفرسن او جېمز مېډيسن سره تړل کېږي، د اتلسمې پېړۍ په وروستیو کې د فدراليست ګوند په غبرګون کې بنسټ کېښودل شو. ډيموکرات-جمهوري غوښتونکو د اساسي قانون سخت تفسير، د ايالتونو حقوق، او کرنيزې ګټې پلويتوب کاوه.
However, by the 1820s, the Democratic-Republican Party began to fracture along regional and ideological lines. The primary split occurred during the Era of Good Feelings (1817–1825), when there was a lack of strong opposition to James Monroe’s presidency. This period of political tranquility contributed to the decline of the Democratic-Republican Party. The party eventually split into several factions and evolved into the following political groups:
Cependant, dans les années 1820, le Parti démocrate-républicain commença à se fracturer selon des lignes régionales et idéologiques. La principale scission se produisit durant l’Ère des bons sentiments (1817–1825), lorsqu’il y eut une absence d’opposition vigoureuse à la présidence de James Monroe. Cette période de tranquillité politique contribua au déclin du Parti démocrate-républicain. Le parti finit par se scinder en plusieurs factions et évolua pour donner naissance aux groupes politiques suivants :
Democratic Party: The followers of Andrew Jackson, who became the seventh president in 1829, formed the Democratic Party. Jacksonian Democrats supported a strong executive branch, westward expansion, and a broader suffrage for white males.
Πάρτι Δημοκρατικό: Οι οπαδοί του Άντριου Τζάκσον, ο οποίος έγινε ο έβδομος πρόεδρος το 1829, σχημάτισαν το Δημοκρατικό Κόμμα. Οι Τζακσονιανοί Δημοκρατικοί υποστήριζαν μια ισχυρή εκτελεστική εξουσία, την επέκταση προς τη Δύση και ένα ευρύτερο εκλογικό δικαίωμα για τους λευκούς άνδρες.
National Republican Party: This party emerged as a response to Andrew Jackson’s presidency and later merged with other anti-Jackson factions to become the Whig Party. The National Republicans were generally more supportive of a strong federal government and economic development.
ޤައުމީ ރިޕަބްލިކަން ޕާޓީ: މި ޕާޓީ އުފެދުނީ އެންޑްރޫ ޖެކްސަންގެ ރިޔާސަތަށް ދެކޮޅު ދިނުމެއްގެ މަންޒަރުގައެވެ، އަދި ފަހުން ޖެކްސަންއާ ދެކޮޅު އެހެން ފިރުޤާތަކާ އެކުވެ ވިގް ޕާޓީއަށް ބަދަލުވިއެވެ. ޤައުމީ ރިޕަބްލިކަނުން އާންމުކޮށް ގަދަ ފެޑަރަލް ސަރުކާރަކަށާއި އިޤްތިޞާދީ ތަރައްޤީއަށް އިތުރަށް ދެކޮޅުނުދޭ މީހުން ކަމަށް ބެލެވެއެވެ۔
Anti-Masonic Party: This was a short-lived political party that emerged in the 1820s, primarily in response to concerns about the influence of the secretive Masonic fraternity. It absorbed some former Democratic-Republicans.
Parti antimaçonnique : Il s’agissait d’un parti politique de courte durée qui apparut dans les années 1820, principalement en réaction aux inquiétudes suscitées par l’influence de la confrérie maçonnique secrète. Il absorba certains anciens démocrates-républicains.
The Whig Party: Formed in the 1830s, the Whigs included former National Republicans, Anti-Masons, and other opposition groups. They were characterized by their opposition to Jacksonian policies, support for a strong federal government, and promotion of industrial and economic development.
ffの対象言語が指定されていません。翻訳先の言語名をご指定ください。
The modern Republican Party was founded in the 1850s as a direct response to the growing sectional tensions over slavery. It attracted former Whigs, anti-slavery Democrats, Free Soilers, and others who opposed the expansion of slavery into new territories. The first Republican presidential candidate, John C. Fremont, ran in the 1856 election, and the party’s first successful candidate, Abraham Lincoln, was elected in 1860. So, the Republican Party emerged separately from the Democratic-Republican tradition and had a distinct trajectory in American political history.
May I confirm what language “ff” refers to?
By 1860, the Republican party elected its first president. It was based upon a coalition of political parties that were opposed to slavery. In 1863 the Emancipation Proclamation “spoke” slavery out of existence. In 1863 the Republican horn, then represented by the Republican party “spoke” slavery out of existence, while the Protestant horn ceased to be a movement and became the Seventh-day Adventist church. The movement of the Millerites legally and officially ended in May of 1863, and in that year Moses’ oath, the prophecy of slavery was rejected. He that has an ear, let him hear.
تا سال 1860، حزب جمهوریخواه نخستین رئیسجمهور خود را برگزید. این حزب بر پایهٔ ائتلافی از احزاب سیاسی بنا شده بود که با بردهداری مخالفت میورزیدند. در سال 1863، اعلامیهٔ آزادی بردگان، بردهداری را با «سخن گفتن» از میان برداشت. در سال 1863، شاخ جمهوریخواه، که در آن زمان بهوسیلهٔ حزب جمهوریخواه نمایندگی میشد، بردهداری را با «سخن گفتن» از میان برداشت، در حالی که شاخ پروتستان دیگر یک جنبش نبود و به کلیسای ادونتیست روز هفتم تبدیل شد. جنبش میلریها بهطور قانونی و رسمی در ماه مه 1863 پایان یافت، و در آن سال، سوگند موسی، یعنی نبوتِ بردهداری، رد شد. هر که گوش شنوا دارد، بشنود.
At this point it might be informative to provide a brief overview of the “oath of Moses” as labelled by the prophet Daniel.
Σε αυτό το σημείο, θα μπορούσε να είναι διαφωτιστικό να παρασχεθεί μια σύντομη επισκόπηση του «όρκου του Μωυσή», όπως ονομάζεται από τον προφήτη Δανιήλ.
Yea, all Israel have transgressed thy law, even by departing, that they might not obey thy voice; therefore the curse is poured upon us, and the oath that is written in the law of Moses the servant of God, because we have sinned against him. Daniel 9:11.
Oui, tout Israël a transgressé ta loi, en s’en détournant pour ne pas obéir à ta voix ; c’est pourquoi la malédiction s’est répandue sur nous, ainsi que le serment qui est écrit dans la loi de Moïse, serviteur de Dieu, parce que nous avons péché contre lui. Daniel 9:11.
William Miller who was guided by Gabriel and other angels as he studied the Word of God, was first led to the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six. Miller’s testimony is that in his study of the Bible, he began in the book of Genesis and therefore he obviously came to Leviticus well before he reached the twenty-three hundred years of Daniel chapter eight and verse fourteen. He exclusively used the Bible and a Cruden’s concordance.
William Miller, ambaye aliongozwa na Gabrieli na malaika wengine alipokuwa akijifunza Neno la Mungu, aliongozwa kwanza kwenye “nyakati saba” za Mambo ya Walawi ishirini na sita. Ushuhuda wa Miller ni kwamba katika kujifunza kwake Biblia, alianza katika kitabu cha Mwanzo, na kwa hiyo ni dhahiri kwamba alifika katika Mambo ya Walawi muda mrefu kabla hajafikia ile miaka elfu mbili na mia tatu ya Danieli sura ya nane na aya ya kumi na nne. Alitumia Biblia pekee na konkodansi ya Cruden.
Cruden’s concordance has no references to the Hebrew or Greek words that were thereafter translated into the English of the King James Bible. Miller considered the “context” of the passage he was studying to guide his understanding of a word or passage of Scripture. When it came to his understanding of the “seven times” it is very simple to see the context for the “seven times” of chapter twenty-six of Leviticus is chapter twenty-five.
Le concordancier de Cruden ne comporte aucune référence aux mots hébreux ou grecs qui furent ensuite traduits dans l’anglais de la Bible du roi Jacques. Miller considérait le « contexte » du passage qu’il étudiait comme le guide de sa compréhension d’un mot ou d’un passage de l’Écriture. Quant à sa compréhension des « sept temps », il est très simple de voir que le contexte des « sept temps » du chapitre vingt-six du Lévitique est le chapitre vingt-cinq.
Chapter twenty-five outlines the resting of the land, the Jubilee and the rules of slavery. The rules of chapter twenty-five are part of “the law of Moses the servant of God” that produces a blessing if obeyed and a “curse” if disobeyed. In chapter twenty-six the curse of the “seven times” equates to twenty-five hundred and twenty years and is set forth in the obvious context of the rules of the land resting and the principles of slavery. In chapter twenty-six the punishment is called the “quarrel of my covenant.”
Sura ishirin da biyar ta bayyana hutawar ƙasar, Shekarar Yubili, da ƙa’idodin bautar. Ƙa’idodin da ke cikin sura ta ishirin da biyar wani ɓangare ne na “shari’ar Musa bawan Allah” wadda ke haifar da albarka idan aka yi mata biyayya, da kuma “la’ana” idan aka ƙi ta. A sura ta ishirin da shida, la’anar “sau bakwai” tana daidai da shekaru dubu biyu da ɗari biyar da ashirin, kuma an gabatar da ita a cikin sararin ma’anar da ke a bayyane na ƙa’idodin hutawar ƙasar da ka’idojin bautar. A sura ta ishirin da shida, ana kiran hukuncin “rigimar alkawarina.”
Then will I also walk contrary unto you, and will punish you yet seven times for your sins. And I will bring a sword upon you, that shall avenge the quarrel of my covenant: and when ye are gathered together within your cities, I will send the pestilence among you; and ye shall be delivered into the hand of the enemy. Leviticus 26:24, 25.
Alors moi aussi je marcherai contre vous, et je vous châtierai encore sept fois pour vos péchés. Et je ferai venir sur vous l’épée, qui vengera la querelle de mon alliance; et lorsque vous serez rassemblés dans vos villes, j’enverrai la peste au milieu de vous; et vous serez livrés entre les mains de l’ennemi. Lévitique 26:24, 25.
In context the “covenant” that God has a “quarrel” over would be the covenant previously cited in chapter twenty-five. The punishment of the seven times is called the “quarrel of” God’s “covenant” and the “curse” attached to it is that Israel would be “delivered into the hand of their” enemies, and once in the enemies’ land, (as Daniel was) Israel would become the slaves of their enemies.
In de context is het “verbond” waarover God een “twist” heeft, het verbond dat eerder in hoofdstuk vijfentwintig werd aangehaald. De straf van de zeven tijden wordt de “twist van” Gods “verbond” genoemd, en de daaraan verbonden “vloek” is dat Israël “in de hand van hun” vijanden zou worden overgegeven; en eenmaal in het land van de vijanden, (zoals Daniël was) zou Israël de slaven van hun vijanden worden.
When Moses recorded Leviticus twenty-six ancient Israel had just been delivered from the slavery of Egypt and the principles of slavery represented in chapter twenty-five would bring either a blessing or a curse. Ancient Israel never practiced the rules of the Jubilee and ultimately both the northern and southern kingdoms were scattered for “seven times” in fulfillment of what Daniel called the “curse of Moses.”
Sa taala ni Moses ang Leviticus kapitulo baynte-sais, ang karaang Israel bag-o pa lamang naluwas gikan sa pagkaulipon sa Egipto, ug ang mga prinsipyo sa pagkaulipon nga girepresentar sa kapitulo baynte-singko magadala ug panalangin o tunglo. Ang karaang Israel wala gayud magbuhat sa mga lagda sa Jubileo, ug sa katapusan ang amihanang ug habagatang mga gingharian nangapatlaag sulod sa “pito ka pilo” sa katumanan sa gitawag ni Daniel nga “tunglo ni Moses.”
The covenant relationship between God and Israel which had begun with their slavery in Egypt, ended with their slavery to Assyria and Babylon. The “seven times” against the northern kingdom ended in 1798, and “seven times” against the southern kingdom ended in 1844. The starting point for the two periods of seven times is marked in Isaiah chapter seven with a prophecy of sixty-five years that was proclaimed by Isaiah to king Ahaz of Judah in 742 BC.
Ang kaugnayang tipan sa pagitan ng Diyos at ng Israel, na nagsimula sa kanilang pagkaalipin sa Egipto, ay nagtapos sa kanilang pagkaalipin sa Asiria at Babilonia. Ang “pitong panahon” laban sa hilagang kaharian ay nagtapos noong 1798, at ang “pitong panahon” laban sa timog na kaharian ay nagtapos noong 1844. Ang panimulang punto ng dalawang yugto ng pitong panahon ay minarkahan sa Isaias kabanata pito sa pamamagitan ng isang propesiya ng animnapu’t limang taon na ipinahayag ni Isaias kay haring Ahaz ng Juda noong 742 BC.
For the head of Syria is Damascus, and the head of Damascus is Rezin; and within threescore and five years shall Ephraim be broken, that it be not a people. And the head of Ephraim is Samaria, and the head of Samaria is Remaliah’s son. If ye will not believe, surely ye shall not be established. Isaiah 7:8, 9.
Потому что глава Сирии — Дамаск, и глава Дамаска — Рецин; и через шестьдесят пять лет Ефрем перестанет быть народом, ибо будет сокрушён. И глава Ефрема — Самария, и глава Самарии — сын Ремалии. Если вы не верите, то потому и не утвердитесь. Исаия 7:8, 9.
Isaiah had identified that “within” sixty-five years from the time when the prophecy was set forth in 742 BC, the northern kingdom would be broken. Nineteen years later in 723 BC the northern kingdom of Israel was taken into slavery by the king of Assyria and forty-six years later the king of Babylon took the southern kingdom of Judah into slavery in 677 BC. The prophecy of sixty-five years produces six historical waymarks. The first is 742 BC when the prediction is set forth. Nineteen years later in 723 BC, the northern kingdom was taken into slavery by the Assyrians. Forty-six years later in 677 BC the southern kingdom was taken into slavery by the Babylonians. The first twenty-five hundred and twenty years that began in 723 BC then ended in 1798. Then is 1844 the twenty-five hundred and twenty years that began in 677 BC concluded. From 1844, the prediction extended nineteen years to 1863 in order to complete the entire prophetic structure, for when the Alpha and Omega marked nineteen years to begin the prophetic structure there must be nineteen years to reach its end.
Isaïe avait indiqué que « dans » les soixante-cinq années à compter du moment où la prophétie fut proclamée en 742 av. J.-C., le royaume du nord serait brisé. Dix-neuf ans plus tard, en 723 av. J.-C., le royaume du nord d’Israël fut emmené en captivité par le roi d’Assyrie, et quarante-six ans plus tard, le roi de Babylone emmena en captivité le royaume du sud, Juda, en 677 av. J.-C. La prophétie des soixante-cinq années produit six balises historiques. La première est 742 av. J.-C., lorsque la prédiction est énoncée. Dix-neuf ans plus tard, en 723 av. J.-C., le royaume du nord fut emmené en captivité par les Assyriens. Quarante-six ans plus tard, en 677 av. J.-C., le royaume du sud fut emmené en captivité par les Babyloniens. Les premiers deux mille cinq cent vingt ans qui commencèrent en 723 av. J.-C. prirent ensuite fin en 1798. Puis, en 1844, les deux mille cinq cent vingt ans qui commencèrent en 677 av. J.-C. arrivèrent à leur terme. À partir de 1844, la prédiction se prolongea de dix-neuf ans jusqu’en 1863 afin d’achever l’ensemble de la structure prophétique, car lorsque l’Alpha et l’Oméga marquèrent dix-neuf ans pour commencer la structure prophétique, il devait y avoir dix-neuf ans pour en atteindre la fin.
Ancient Israel was delivered from the slavery of Egypt and through disobedience both the northern and southern kingdoms were returned to slavery. The prophecies transcend from the prophetic history of ancient literal Israel to modern spiritual Israel and in so doing the theme of all the prophetic waymarks is slavery.
Israël d’autrefois fut délivré de l’esclavage d’Égypte, et, par désobéissance, les royaumes du nord et du sud furent tous deux ramenés à l’esclavage. Les prophéties s’élèvent au-delà de l’histoire prophétique de l’ancien Israël littéral jusqu’à l’Israël spirituel moderne, et, ce faisant, le thème de tous les jalons prophétiques est l’esclavage.
The prophecy in Isaiah seven was presented to the wicked king Ahaz by Isaiah in 742BC when an impending civil war between the north and south was being identified. The southern kingdom of Ahaz was the literal glorious land of ancient Israel. In 1798, the spiritual glorious land of Bible prophecy began to rule as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. When the seven times against the literal glorious land ended in 1844, there was, as in the history of king Ahaz an impending civil war. By 1844, the turmoil of political parties breaking apart and forming alliances had almost fully settled into two classes of political persuasions. In terms of slavery the Democrats were pro-slavery and the Republicans were anti-slavery. From 1798 to the beginning of the civil war in 1860 the process of developing two classes of political parties had been settled.
ساتویں بابِ یسعیاہ کی نبوت 742 قبل مسیح میں یسعیاہ نے شریر بادشاہ اخز کے سامنے پیش کی، جب شمال اور جنوب کے درمیان ایک آنے والی خانہ جنگی کی نشان دہی کی جا رہی تھی۔ اخز کی جنوبی مملکت قدیم اسرائیل کی لفظی جلالی سرزمین تھی۔ 1798 میں بائبل کی نبوت کی روحانی جلالی سرزمین نے بائبل کی نبوت کی چھٹی سلطنت کے طور پر حکمرانی کرنا شروع کیا۔ جب 1844 میں لفظی جلالی سرزمین کے خلاف سات زمانے پورے ہوئے، تو بادشاہ اخز کی تاریخ کی مانند ایک آنے والی خانہ جنگی موجود تھی۔ 1844 تک، سیاسی جماعتوں کے ٹوٹنے اور اتحاد قائم کرنے کا ہنگامہ تقریباً مکمل طور پر سیاسی رجحانات کی دو جماعتوں میں ڈھل چکا تھا۔ غلامی کے حوالے سے ڈیموکریٹ غلامی کے حامی تھے اور ریپبلکن غلامی کے مخالف تھے۔ 1798 سے 1860 میں خانہ جنگی کے آغاز تک، سیاسی جماعتوں کی دو جماعتیں تشکیل پانے کا عمل طے پا چکا تھا۔
Ahaz represented the literal glorious land and therefore typified the spiritual glorious land. The history of Ahaz typifies the prophetic history where the prophecy was proclaimed in 742 BC therefore typifies the history where the prophecy ended. In the beginning history the northern kingdom consisting of ten tribes had broken away from the other two tribes in protest against the divinely established government of the southern two tribes. The ten northern tribes had formed a confederacy with Syria, typifying the alliance between the southern confederacy and a power represented symbolically by Syria.
আহাজ আক্ষরিক গৌরবময় দেশের প্রতিনিধিত্ব করেছিল এবং সেইজন্য আধ্যাত্মিক গৌরবময় দেশেরও প্রতিরূপ ছিল। আহাজের ইতিহাস সেই ভবিষ্যদ্বাণীমূলক ইতিহাসের প্রতিরূপ, যেখানে খ্রিষ্টপূর্ব ৭৪২ সালে ভবিষ্যদ্বাণী ঘোষণা করা হয়েছিল; অতএব এটি সেই ইতিহাসেরও প্রতিরূপ, যেখানে ভবিষ্যদ্বাণীর সমাপ্তি ঘটেছিল। প্রারম্ভিক ইতিহাসে, দশ গোত্র নিয়ে গঠিত উত্তর রাজ্য দক্ষিণের দুই গোত্রের ঐশ্বরিকভাবে প্রতিষ্ঠিত শাসনের বিরুদ্ধে প্রতিবাদস্বরূপ অপর দুই গোত্র থেকে বিচ্ছিন্ন হয়ে গিয়েছিল। উত্তরাঞ্চলের সেই দশ গোত্র সিরিয়ার সঙ্গে একটি মৈত্রীজোট গঠন করেছিল, যা সেই জোটের প্রতিরূপ, যেখানে দক্ষিণের সংঘবদ্ধ শক্তি সিরিয়ার দ্বারা প্রতীকীভাবে উপস্থাপিত এক শক্তির সঙ্গে যুক্ত হয়।
This brief summary is identifying that the seven times of Leviticus twenty-six is a covenant promise that sets forth either a blessing for obedience or the “curse” of slavery for disobedience. The northern and southern kingdoms started together as one nation that was delivered out of slavery, only to be delivered back into slavery at their respective endings.
Ce bref résumé montre que les « sept temps » de Lévitique vingt-six constituent une promesse d’alliance qui établit soit une bénédiction pour l’obéissance, soit la « malédiction » de l’esclavage pour la désobéissance. Les royaumes du Nord et du Sud commencèrent ensemble comme une seule nation délivrée de l’esclavage, pour être ensuite livrés de nouveau à l’esclavage à leurs fins respectives.
The sixty-five years at the ending of those prophecies of slavery concluded with spiritual Israel in the spiritual glorious land, at the very dead center of a civil war of the north against the south. The antagonists in the civil war was a kingdom that formed a confederacy and broke away from the divinely established government that was located in the opposing kingdom.
Iminyaka engamashumi ayisithupha nanhlanu ekupheleni kwalezo ziprofetho zobugqila yaphetha u-Israyeli womoya esezweni lenkazimulo lomoya, maphakathi nendawo impela yempi yombango yasenyakatho imelene neningizimu. Abaphikisanayo kule mpi yombango kwakuwumbuso owakha umfelandawonye wase wehlukana nohulumeni omiswe nguNkulunkulu owayekulowo mbuso ophikisayo.
From 1798 onward to the civil war, the horn of Republicanism was put through a process which produced two classes of political antagonists that represent two sides of the issues of slavery. The proslavery antagonists that sought to continue the practice of slavery lost the battle.
Kuanzia mwaka 1798 na kuendelea hadi vita vya wenyewe kwa wenyewe, pembe ya Urepublikanismu iliwekwa katika mchakato uliotoa madarasa mawili ya wapinzani wa kisiasa yanayowakilisha pande mbili za masuala ya utumwa. Wapinzani wanaounga mkono utumwa waliotafuta kuendeleza desturi ya utumwa walishindwa katika pambano hilo.
From 1798 onward to the civil war, the horn of Protestantism was put through a process which produced two classes of religious antagonists that represent two sides of the issues of slavery. The proslavery antagonists that sought to continue the original understanding of the prophecy of slavery lost the battle.
Kuanzia mwaka 1798 na kuendelea hadi Vita vya wenyewe kwa wenyewe, pembe ya Uprotestanti ilipitishwa katika mchakato uliotoa madaraja mawili ya wapinzani wa kidini wanaowakilisha pande mbili za masuala ya utumwa. Wapinzani wanaounga mkono utumwa, waliotaka kuendeleza uelewa wa asili wa unabii wa utumwa, walishindwa katika pambano hilo.
In 1863 the horn of Republicanism succeeded in rejecting the practice of slavery.
Ɔafe 1863 no, Republicanism abɛn no tumi poow nkoasom amanne no.
In 1863 the horn of Protestantism succeeded in rejecting the prophecy of slavery.
Mnamo 1863 pembe ya Uprotestanti ilifanikiwa kukataa unabii wa utumwa.
In doing so they rejected the work of Miller, the Elijah for his time. In so doing they also rejected “the oath of Moses,” the foundation stone for their time. Moses and Elijah were then rejected, only to return on September 11, 2001.
En agissant ainsi, ils ont rejeté l’œuvre de Miller, l’Élie pour son temps. Ce faisant, ils ont également rejeté « le serment de Moïse », la pierre de fondement pour leur temps. Moïse et Élie furent alors rejetés, pour ne revenir que le 11 septembre 2001.
Alpha and Omega, the wonderful linguist recorded His divine signature throughout the time prophecy of the “oath of Moses” that He himself proclaimed as Palmoni, the Wonderful Numberer. If ye will not believe, surely ye shall not be established.
Alfa na Omega, mwanaisimu wa ajabu, aliandika sahihi Yake ya kimungu katika unabii wote wa wakati wa “kiapo cha Musa” ambao Yeye mwenyewe aliutangaza kama Palmoni, Mhesabuji wa Ajabu. Msipoamini, hakika hamtathibitika.