We ended the last article with the sentence that stated, “In 2001 the government of the United States spoke the Patriot Act into law.”
Nous avons terminé le dernier article par la phrase qui disait : « En 2001, le gouvernement des États-Unis a promulgué le Patriot Act. »
“There are many, even of those engaged in this movement for Sunday enforcement, who are blinded to the results which will follow this action. They do not see that they are striking directly against religious liberty. There are many who have never understood the claims of the Bible Sabbath and the false foundation upon which the Sunday institution rests. Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.
„အတော်များများသည်—တနင်္ဂနွေနေ့ကို အတင်းအကျပ်လိုက်နာစေရန် ဆောင်ရွက်နေသော ဤလှုပ်ရှားမှုတွင် ပါဝင်နေသူများထဲကပင်—ဤလုပ်ရပ်နောက်တွင် ဖြစ်ပေါ်လာမည့် အကျိုးဆက်များကို မမြင်နိုင်အောင် မျက်စိကန်းလျက် ရှိကြသည်။ သူတို့သည် မိမိတို့က ဘာသာရေးလွတ်လပ်ခွင့်ကို တိုက်ရိုက် ထိခိုက်ရိုက်ခတ်နေကြသည်ကို မမြင်ကြ။ သမ္မာကျမ်းစာ၌ သတ်မှတ်ထားသော ဥပုသ်နေ့၏ တောင်းဆိုချက်များကိုလည်းကောင်း၊ တနင်္ဂနွေနေ့အဖွဲ့အစည်း တည်ရှိနေသည့် မှားယွင်းသော အခြေခံကိုလည်းကောင်း၊ မနားလည်ဖူးသောသူ အများရှိကြသည်။ ဘာသာရေးဥပဒေပြုရေးကို ထောက်ခံသည့် မည်သည့်လှုပ်ရှားမှုမဆို၊ အမှန်အားဖြင့်၊ သက်သေခံစိတ်၏ လွတ်လပ်ခွင့်ကို ရာစုနှစ်များစွာ မတိမ်းမယိမ်း ဆန့်ကျင်တိုက်ခိုက်လာခဲ့သော ပုပ်ရဟန်းမင်းစနစ်အား လျှော့ပေါ့အလျှော့ပေးခြင်းတစ်ရပ်ပင် ဖြစ်သည်။ တနင်္ဂနွေနေ့ကို လိုက်နာကျင့်သုံးခြင်းသည် ‘အပြစ်တရား၏ နက်နဲသောလျှို့ဝှက်ချက်’ မှ မိမိ၏ တည်ရှိမှုကို ရရှိထားသော၊ ခရစ်ယာန်အဖွဲ့အစည်းဟု ခေါ်ဆိုကြသည့် အရာတစ်ရပ်ပင် ဖြစ်သည်။ ထိုနေ့ကို အတင်းအကျပ်လိုက်နာစေခြင်းသည်လည်း ရောမဘာသာရေးစနစ်၏ ထောင့်ကျောက်တိုင်အဖြစ် တည်ရှိနေသော အခြေခံသဘောတရားများကို လက်တွေ့အားဖြင့် အသိအမှတ်ပြုခြင်းပင် ဖြစ်လိမ့်မည်။ ကျွန်ုပ်တို့၏ နိုင်ငံသည် မိမိအစိုးရ၏ အခြေခံမူများကို ထိုသို့ စွန့်ပယ်၍ တနင်္ဂနွေနေ့ ဥပဒေတစ်ရပ် ပြဋ္ဌာန်းလာသောအခါ၊ ပရိုတက်စတင့်ဝါဒသည် ဤလုပ်ရပ်၌ ပုပ်ရဟန်းမင်းဝါဒနှင့် လက်ချင်းချိတ်မည်ဖြစ်သည်။ ယင်းသည် အခြားမဟုတ်၊ မိမိအခွင့်အရေးရမည့် အချိန်ကို ကြာမြင့်စွာ ပြင်းပြစွာ စောင့်ကြည့်လျက် နောက်တစ်ဖန် တက်ကြွသော အာဏာရှင်စနစ်အဖြစ် ခုန်တက်လာရန် အသင့်ဖြစ်နေခဲ့သော အာဏာညှဉ်းပန်းမှုအား အသက်သွင်းပေးခြင်းသာ ဖြစ်လိမ့်မည်။” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.
1888 typified 2001, and it was then that the Blair Bill was introduced, though its failure to be passed, prevented it from prophetically speaking. It became the sign of 66 AD, a siege that was initiated and then mysteriously withdrawn. When it is understood that there are two image of the beast testing periods, and that the second period begins with the Sunday law in the United States, typified by the year 321, and that the period ends when the world Sunday law, typified by 538, is fully enforced; then it demands prophetically that the beginning of the first image of the beast testing period also begins with some type of typification of a Sunday law being spoken. In 1888, the Blair Bill was an attempt to enforce a National Sunday law, and 1888 identifies when the angel of Revelation eighteen descends and lightens the earth with his glory.
1888 2001-ийг бэлгэдэн дүрсэлсэн бөгөөд яг тэр үед Блэрийн хуулийн төсөл өргөн баригдсан юм. Гэвч уг төсөл батлагдаж чадалгүй өнгөрсөн нь эш үзүүллэгийн хувьд түүнийг яриулахгүй болгосон. Ингэснээр энэ нь МЭ 66 оны тэмдэг болсон бөгөөд эхлүүлэгдээд дараа нь нууцлаг байдлаар татагдан буулгагдсан бүслэлтийг төлөөлөв. Араатны дүрийн сорилтын хоёр үе байдаг, мөн хоёр дахь үе нь 321 оноор бэлгэдэгдсэн АНУ дахь Ням гаргийн хуулиар эхэлж, 538 оноор бэлгэдэгдсэн дэлхий нийтийн Ням гаргийн хууль бүрэн хэрэгжих үед төгсөнө гэдгийг ойлгох үед, эш үзүүллэгийн хувьд эхний араатны дүрийн сорилтын үеийн эхлэл ч мөн Ням гаргийн хууль яригдсан ямар нэгэн төрлийн бэлгэдэлт дүрслэлээр эхлэхийг зайлшгүй шаарддаг. 1888 онд Блэрийн хуулийн төсөл нь Үндэсний Ням гаргийн хуулийг хэрэгжүүлэх оролдлого байсан бөгөөд 1888 он Илчлэлт арван наймдугаар бүлгийн тэнгэрэлч бууж ирэн, алдар суугаар нь дэлхийг гэрэлтүүлдэг цагийг заадаг.
The Patriot Act is the typification of a Sunday law that begins the image of the beast testing time in the United States. The United States speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven when it enforces the Sunday law. When it enforces that law it will speak as a dragon, and that Sunday law identifies that the image of the beast is fully formed in the United States. At that point the United States has filled up its cup of probationary time, and national apostasy is followed by national ruin. At that point the United States ceases to be the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy as the threefold union is established.
Patriot Act waa tusaalaynka sharciga Axadda ee bilaabaya wakhtiga imtixaanka ee sawirka bahalka gudaha Maraykanka. Maraykanku wuxuu u hadlaa sida masduulaagii, isagoo gudanaya Muujintii cutubka saddex iyo tobnaad, aayadda kow iyo tobnaad, markuu dhaqan-geliyo sharciga Axadda. Markuu dhaqan-geliyo sharcigaas, wuxuu u hadli doonaa sida masduulaagii, sharcigaas Axadduna wuxuu caddeeyaa in sawirka bahalku si buuxda uga samaysmay gudaha Maraykanka. Halkaas marka la gaadho, Maraykanku wuxuu buuxiyey koobkii wakhtigiisa tijaabada, riddada qaranimaduna waxaa raaca halligaad qaran. Halkaas marka la gaadho, Maraykanku wuxuu joogsadaa inuu ahaado boqortooyadii lixaad ee wax sii sheegidda Kitaabka Quduuska ah, maadaama isbahaysiga saddex-geesoodka ah la aasaaso.
Alpha and Omega always portrays the end with the beginning and at the beginning of the United States there were three times the United States prophetically spoke that marked the beginning of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. The Declaration of Independence in 1776, followed by the Constitution of 1789 and then the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 identify the first three times the United States prophetically spoke. Each of those three publications represented the speaking of the United States. Those three steps led to 1798, the beginning of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Those same three waymarks in the beginning of the United States, represent three waymarks that lead to the ending of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy.
ئالفا اور اومیگا ہمیشہ انجام کو آغاز کے ساتھ پیش کرتے ہیں، اور ریاستہائے متحدہ کے آغاز میں تین مواقع ایسے آئے جب ریاستہائے متحدہ نے نبوّتی طور پر کلام کیا، اور انہی نے بائبل کی نبوت کے چھٹے مملکت کے طور پر ریاستہائے متحدہ کے آغاز کو نشان زد کیا۔ 1776 کا اعلانِ آزادی، جس کے بعد 1789 کا دستور آیا، اور پھر 1798 کے ایلین اینڈ سیڈیشن ایکٹس، ان پہلی تین بار کی نشان دہی کرتے ہیں جب ریاستہائے متحدہ نے نبوّتی طور پر کلام کیا۔ ان تینوں دستاویزات میں سے ہر ایک ریاستہائے متحدہ کے کلام کرنے کی نمائندگی کرتی تھی۔ یہ تینوں مراحل 1798 تک لے گئے، جو بائبل کی نبوت کے چھٹے مملکت کے طور پر ریاستہائے متحدہ کے حکمرانی کرنے کا آغاز تھا۔ ریاستہائے متحدہ کے آغاز کے یہی تین نشانات، تین ایسے ہی نشانات کی نمائندگی کرتے ہیں جو بائبل کی نبوت کے چھٹے مملکت کے طور پر ریاستہائے متحدہ کی حکمرانی کے اختتام تک لے جاتے ہیں۔
The Patriot Act is the first of three times the United States speaks as it comes to its conclusion as the sixth kingdom. The third speaking, that identifies the end of the sixth kingdom is the Sunday law. In the middle of that history the Pelosi Trials of January 6, which began in 2022 were initiated. The trials were a direct rejection of the rights enshrined in the Constitution because the trials were political in nature, and the lawfare was not simply a fabrication of facts, but it was actually a direct attack upon “procedural” and “substantive” law as identified within the Constitution.
Patriot Act ва аввали се маротиба сухан гуфтани Иёлоти Муттаҳида аст, ҳангоме ки он ҳамчун подшоҳии шашум ба анҷоми худ мерасад. Сухани сеюм, ки анҷоми подшоҳии шашумро муайян мекунад, қонуни якшанбе мебошад. Дар миёнаи он таърих мурофиаҳои Пелосӣ оид ба 6 январ, ки дар соли 2022 оғоз ёфтанд, оғоз карда шуданд. Он мурофиаҳо радди мустақими ҳуқуқҳое буданд, ки дар Конститутсия сабт шудаанд, зеро онҳо табиати сиёсӣ доштанд, ва lawfare на танҳо сохтакории воқеиятҳо буд, балки дар асл ҳамлаи мустақим бар қонуни «мурофиавӣ» ва «моҳиявӣ» буд, чунон ки дар дохили Конститутсия муайян шудааст.
The Patriot Act in 2001 was a direct attack upon the “Due Process Clause” which appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. That was 2001, and in 2022 the attack against the Constitution was focused upon both “procedural due process” and “substantive due process.” The word “repudiate” means to deny, and Sister White identifies that at the Sunday law in the United States every principle of the Constitution will be repudiated.
Le Patriot Act de 2001 fut une attaque directe contre la « clause de procédure régulière », qui figure à la fois dans le Cinquième Amendement et dans le Quatorzième Amendement de la Constitution des États-Unis. Ceux-ci disposent que nul ne peut être privé de la vie, de la liberté ou de ses biens sans procédure régulière de droit. Cela se passait en 2001, et en 2022 l’attaque contre la Constitution s’est concentrée à la fois sur la « procédure régulière procédurale » et sur la « procédure régulière substantielle ». Le mot « répudier » signifie nier, et Sister White indique qu’au moment de la loi du dimanche aux États-Unis, tout principe de la Constitution sera répudié.
“By the decree enforcing the institution of the papacy in violation of the law of God, our nation will disconnect herself fully from righteousness. When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near.
«Ka ta athana bharstit vishesh vyavastha, jo Parmeshwar ke vyavastha ke ullanghan me papacy ki sanstha ko lagu karegi, hamara rashtra apne aap ko dharmiktā se poorn roop se alag kar dega. Jab Protestantism us khāi ke pār apna hāth badhākar Roman shakti ka hāth pakdega, jab vah us athāh gart ke ūpar se badhkar spiritualism ke sāth hāth milāyegā, jab is trigun sangh ke prabhāv ke adhin hamāra desh ek Protestant aur republican shāsan ke rūp me apne Samvidhān ke pratyek siddhānt ka tyāg kar dega, aur papal mithyā-shikshāon aur bhrāntiyon ke prasār ke liye vyavasthā karega, tab ham jānenge ki Shaitān ke adbhut kārya-karan ka samay ā pahunchā hai aur ant nikat hai.»
“As the approach of the Roman armies was a sign to the disciples of the impending destruction of Jerusalem, so may this apostasy be a sign to us that the limit of God’s forbearance is reached, that the measure of our nation’s iniquity is full, and that the angel of mercy is about to take her flight, never to return. The people of God will then be plunged into those scenes of affliction and distress which prophets have described as the time of Jacob’s trouble. The cries of the faithful, persecuted ones ascend to heaven. And as the blood of Abel cried from the ground, there are voices also crying to God from martyrs’ graves, from the sepulchers of the sea, from mountain caverns, from convent vaults: ‘How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost Thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?’
« Sicut l’avvicinarsi degli eserciti romani fu per i discepoli un segno dell’imminente distruzione di Gerusalemme, così questa apostasia può essere per noi un segno che il limite della longanimità di Dio è stato raggiunto, che la misura dell’iniquità della nostra nazione è colma e che l’angelo della misericordia sta per spiccare il suo volo, per non ritornare mai più. Il popolo di Dio sarà allora immerso in quelle scene di afflizione e di angustia che i profeti hanno descritto come il tempo dell’angoscia di Giacobbe. Le grida dei fedeli perseguitati salgono al cielo. E come il sangue di Abele gridava dalla terra, così vi sono anche voci che gridano a Dio dalle tombe dei martiri, dai sepolcri del mare, dalle caverne dei monti, dalle cripte dei conventi: “Fino a quando, o Signore, santo e verace, non giudichi e non vendichi il nostro sangue su coloro che abitano sulla terra?” »
“The Lord is doing His work. All heaven is astir. The Judge of all the earth is soon to arise and vindicate His insulted authority. The mark of deliverance will be set upon the men who keep God’s commandments, who revere His law, and who refuse the mark of the beast or of his image.
Le Seigneur accomplit son œuvre. Tout le ciel est en émoi. Le Juge de toute la terre va bientôt se lever et faire valoir son autorité outragée. La marque de la délivrance sera mise sur les hommes qui gardent les commandements de Dieu, qui révèrent sa loi et qui refusent la marque de la bête ou de son image.
“God has revealed what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath. Those who have been warned of the events before them are not to sit in calm expectation of the coming storm, comforting themselves that the Lord will shelter His faithful ones in the day of trouble. We are to be as men waiting for their Lord, not in idle expectancy, but in earnest work, with unwavering faith. It is no time now to allow our minds to be engrossed with things of minor importance. While men are sleeping, Satan is actively arranging matters so that the Lord’s people may not have mercy or justice. The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending. Its professions are mild and apparently Christian, but when it shall speak it will reveal the spirit of the dragon. It is our duty to do all in our power to avert the threatened danger. We should endeavor to disarm prejudice by placing ourselves in a proper light before the people. We should bring before them the real question at issue, thus interposing the most effectual protest against measures to restrict liberty of conscience. We should search the Scriptures and be able to give the reason for our faith. Says the prophet: ‘The wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.’” Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.
“Ang Dios ay nagpahayag ng magaganap sa mga huling araw, upang ang Kaniyang bayan ay maging handang tumayo laban sa unos ng pagsalansang at poot. Yaong mga binalaan tungkol sa mga pangyayaring nasa kanilang harapan ay hindi dapat umupong payapa sa mahinahong paghihintay sa dumarating na bagyo, na inaaliw ang kanilang sarili na kukupkupin ng Panginoon ang Kaniyang mga tapat sa araw ng kabagabagan. Tayo ay dapat maging gaya ng mga taong naghihintay sa kanilang Panginoon, hindi sa walang-gawang pag-aabang, kundi sa masikap na paggawa, taglay ang di-natitinag na pananampalataya. Hindi ngayon ang panahon upang hayaang malubog ang ating mga pag-iisip sa mga bagay na may mumunting kahalagahan. Samantalang natutulog ang mga tao, si Satanas ay masikap na nagsasaayos ng mga bagay upang ang bayan ng Panginoon ay hindi pagkalooban ng awa o katarungan. Ang kilusang ukol sa Linggo ay ngayo’y umuusad sa kadiliman. Ikinalilingid ng mga pinuno ang tunay na usapin, at marami sa mga nakikisanib sa kilusan ay hindi rin nakikita kung saan patutungo ang ilalim na agos nito. Ang mga pahayag nito ay mahinahon at waring Kristiyano, ngunit kapag ito’y nagsalita ay ihahayag nito ang espiritu ng dragon. Tungkulin nating gawin ang lahat ng nasa ating kapangyarihan upang hadlangan ang nagbabantang panganib. Dapat nating sikaping pawiin ang pagtatangi sa pamamagitan ng paghaharap ng ating sarili sa wastong liwanag sa harap ng mga tao. Dapat nating ilagay sa harap nila ang tunay na usaping pinagtatalunan, sa gayon ay naihaharang ang pinakamabisa nating pagtutol laban sa mga hakbang na naglilimita sa kalayaan ng budhi. Dapat nating saliksikin ang mga Kasulatan at makayang ibigay ang kadahilanan ng ating pananampalataya. Sabi ng propeta: ‘Ang masama ay magpapakasama: at wala sa masasama ang makauunawa; ngunit ang marurunong ay mangakauunawa.’ Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.”
Sister White aligns the Sunday law with several last-day waymarks, and in so doing her words reveal “what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath.” Therefore, the waymarks that she aligns in this passage are to be carefully examined. I am suggesting that the point of reference is the line of prophecy that focuses upon the Constitution of the United States, along with the “speaking” of the nation as an interrelated symbol.
Siostir White a’ co-thaobhadh lagh na Sàbaid ri grunn chomharran-rathaid deireannach, agus, le sin a dhèanamh, tha a briathran a’ foillseachadh “na tha gu bhith a’ tachairt anns na làithean deireannach, airson gum bi a sluagh ullamh gu seasamh an aghaidh doininn an aghaidh agus na feirge.” Uime sin, tha na comharran-rathaid a tha i a’ co-thaobhadh anns an earrann seo ri bhith air an sgrùdadh gu cùramach. Tha mi a’ moladh gur e puing-iùil na loidhne fàidheadaireachd a tha a’ cuimseachadh air Bun-reachd Stàitean Aonaichte Ameireagaidh, còmhla ri “labhairt” na dùthcha mar shamhla co-cheangailte.
By that, I mean, that the Blair Bill in 1888, the Patriot Act in 2001, and the political prosecutions that were carried out by the Democrats and globalist Republicans beginning in 2022 were each a direct denial of two essential elements of the Constitution. 1888 represents enforcement of Sunday worship, and then in 2001, the change from English law to Roman law. In 2022 “substantive” and “procedural” law was attacked.
Par cela, j’entends que le projet de loi Blair de 1888, le Patriot Act de 2001, et les poursuites politiques menées par les Démocrates et les Républicains mondialistes à partir de 2022 ont chacun constitué une négation directe de deux éléments essentiels de la Constitution. 1888 représente l’application coercitive de l’observance du dimanche, puis, en 2001, le passage du droit anglais au droit romain. En 2022, le droit « substantiel » et le droit « procédural » ont été attaqués.
Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations. The law defines legal or illegal behavior and sets out the punishments for it. Substantive law covers many legal areas, including criminal, civil, and contract law.
Le droit substantiel définit les droits et les obligations des personnes et des organisations, tandis que le droit procédural expose le processus de règlement des différends et de mise en œuvre des droits et des obligations des personnes et des organisations. Le droit définit les comportements licites ou illicites et en établit les sanctions. Le droit substantiel couvre de nombreux domaines juridiques, notamment le droit pénal, le droit civil et le droit des contrats.
Criminal law is an excellent example of substantive law. Criminal law defines what actions are considered criminal and the penalties for those crimes. Civil law, however, governs disputes between individuals and organizations, such as breach of contract, personal injury, or property disputes.
我注意到您要求翻译成“ff”，但“ff”所指的目标语言不明确。请您说明“ff”是哪种语言，我再为您准确翻译。
Substantive law is typically written in statutes, regulations, and case law. Statutes are laws passed by legislative bodies, such as national parliaments or state legislature, and regulations are rules and procedures created by administrative agencies. Case law is the law that judges create through their interpretation of statutes, regulations, and the Constitution.
Maddi hukuku tipik olarak kanunlarda, yönetmeliklerde ve içtihatta yazılı hâlde bulunur. Kanunlar, ulusal parlamentolar veya eyalet yasama organları gibi yasama organlarınca çıkarılan hukuk kurallarıdır; yönetmelikler ise idari kurumlar tarafından oluşturulan kurallar ve usullerdir. İçtihat hukuku, hâkimlerin kanunları, yönetmelikleri ve Anayasa’yı yorumlamaları yoluyla oluşturdukları hukuktur.
Procedural law refers to the rules governing the legal process. It outlines how cases move through the legal system, from the initial filing of a complaint to the final resolution. Procedural law covers various legal areas, including civil, criminal, and administrative procedures. The purpose of procedural law is to ensure that the legal process is fair and efficient. It provides a framework for resolving disputes and ensures that everyone involved in the legal process, including judges, lawyers, and litigants, knows what is expected of them.
Le droit procédural désigne l’ensemble des règles qui régissent le déroulement de la procédure judiciaire. Il précise la manière dont les affaires cheminent au sein du système juridique, depuis le dépôt initial d’une plainte jusqu’à leur règlement définitif. Le droit procédural couvre divers domaines juridiques, notamment les procédures civile, pénale et administrative. Le droit procédural a pour objet d’assurer que la procédure judiciaire soit équitable et efficace. Il fournit un cadre pour le règlement des litiges et garantit que tous ceux qui participent à la procédure judiciaire, y compris les juges, les avocats et les parties au litige, sachent ce qui est attendu d’eux.
Substantive and procedural law are intended to work together to ensure justice is served. Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing those rights and obligations. In other words, substantive law defines legal or illegal behavior and the consequences of illegal behavior, while procedural law outlines how those legal issues are resolved.
Le droit matériel et le droit procédural sont destinés à fonctionner conjointement afin d’assurer que justice soit rendue. Le droit matériel définit les droits et les obligations des individus et des organisations, tandis que le droit procédural énonce le processus de règlement des différends et d’exécution de ces droits et obligations. Autrement dit, le droit matériel détermine ce qui constitue un comportement licite ou illicite ainsi que les conséquences d’un comportement illicite, tandis que le droit procédural précise la manière dont ces questions juridiques sont tranchées.
In 2001, the Patriot Act removed the right of habeas corpus. “Habeas corpus” is a Latin term that translates to “you shall have the body.” It refers to a legal principle that protects individuals from unlawful detention by requiring a court to examine the lawfulness of a person’s imprisonment. Habeas corpus is a fundamental right in many legal systems, especially those influenced by English common law. It ensures that a person cannot be held in custody without just cause and allows them to challenge the legality of their detention before a judge.
En 2001, le Patriot Act a supprimé le droit d’habeas corpus. « Habeas corpus » est une locution latine qui se traduit par « que tu aies le corps ». Elle désigne un principe juridique qui protège les personnes contre la détention illégale en exigeant qu’un tribunal examine la légalité de l’emprisonnement d’une personne. L’habeas corpus est un droit fondamental dans de nombreux systèmes juridiques, en particulier ceux qui sont influencés par la common law anglaise. Il garantit qu’une personne ne peut être maintenue en détention sans motif légitime et lui permet de contester la légalité de sa détention devant un juge.
A “Due Process Clause” appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Courts have developed two branches of due process doctrine: procedural due process and substantive due process. In 2001, with the Patriot Act habeas corpus was removed as a right, and English law was replaced by Roman law. English law defines that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty, and Roman law identifies that a person is considered guilty until proven innocent. In the Pelosi Trials of 2022, both procedural and substantive due process was trampled upon. Both substantive law and procedural law were applied in the Pelosi Trials in the exact opposite of their intended constitutional purpose.
ਇੱਕ “Due Process Clause” ਸੰਯੁਕਤ ਰਾਜ ਦੇ ਸੰਵਿਧਾਨ ਦੀ ਪੰਜਵੀਂ ਸੰਸ਼ੋਧੀ ਅਤੇ ਚੌਦਵੀਂ ਸੰਸ਼ੋਧੀ ਦੋਹਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਪ੍ਰਗਟ ਹੁੰਦੀ ਹੈ। ਇਹ ਪ੍ਰਬੰਧ ਕਰਦੀਆਂ ਹਨ ਕਿ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਦੀ ਯਥੋਚਿਤ ਪ੍ਰਕਿਰਿਆ ਤੋਂ ਬਿਨਾ ਕਿਸੇ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ ਨੂੰ ਜੀਵਨ, ਆਜ਼ਾਦੀ ਜਾਂ ਸੰਪਤੀ ਤੋਂ ਵੰਚਿਤ ਨਹੀਂ ਕੀਤਾ ਜਾ ਸਕਦਾ। ਅਦਾਲਤਾਂ ਨੇ due process ਦੇ ਸਿਧਾਂਤ ਦੀਆਂ ਦੋ ਸ਼ਾਖਾਵਾਂ ਵਿਕਸਿਤ ਕੀਤੀਆਂ ਹਨ: procedural due process ਅਤੇ substantive due process। 2001 ਵਿੱਚ, Patriot Act ਦੇ ਨਾਲ habeas corpus ਨੂੰ ਇੱਕ ਅਧਿਕਾਰ ਵਜੋਂ ਹਟਾ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਗਿਆ, ਅਤੇ English law ਦੀ ਥਾਂ Roman law ਲਾਗੂ ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਗਿਆ। English law ਇਹ ਨਿਰਧਾਰਤ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਕੋਈ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ ਦੋਸ਼ੀ ਸਾਬਤ ਹੋਣ ਤੱਕ ਨਿਰਦੋਸ਼ ਮੰਨਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ, ਅਤੇ Roman law ਇਹ ਮੰਨਦਾ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਕੋਈ ਵਿਅਕਤੀ ਨਿਰਦੋਸ਼ ਸਾਬਤ ਹੋਣ ਤੱਕ ਦੋਸ਼ੀ ਮੰਨਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ। 2022 ਦੇ Pelosi Trials ਵਿੱਚ procedural due process ਅਤੇ substantive due process ਦੋਹਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਰੌੰਦਿਆ ਗਿਆ। Pelosi Trials ਵਿੱਚ substantive law ਅਤੇ procedural law ਦੋਹਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦੇ ਅਭਿਪ੍ਰੇਤ ਸੰਵਿਧਾਨਕ ਉਦੇਸ਼ ਦੇ ਸਰਵਥਾ ਉਲਟ ਢੰਗ ਨਾਲ ਲਾਗੂ ਕੀਤਾ ਗਿਆ।
The distinction between substantive due process and procedural due process lies in the different aspects of law and rights that each concept protects within the framework of the U.S. Constitution, particularly under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Różnica między materialnym due process a proceduralnym due process polega na odmiennych aspektach prawa i praw, które każde z tych pojęć chroni w ramach Konstytucji Stanów Zjednoczonych, szczególnie na gruncie klauzul due process zawartych w Piątej i Czternastej Poprawce.
Substantive due process is concerned with the fundamental rights and liberties that the government cannot infringe upon, regardless of the procedure used. It protects certain rights from government interference even if the proper procedures are followed. Substantive due process involves rights that are deemed fundamental, such as the right to privacy, the right to marry, and the right to raise one’s children. These rights are protected from government intrusion unless there is a compelling state interest. It serves as a check on the government’s power, ensuring that laws and regulations do not violate fundamental liberties.
“ff” がどの言語を指すのか不明です。対象言語名を指定してください。
Procedural due process is concerned with the procedures that the government must follow before it deprives an individual of life, liberty, or property. It ensures that individuals receive fair and impartial treatment through proper legal processes. Procedural due process requires the government to follow certain steps or procedures, such as providing notice, a fair hearing, and an opportunity to be heard, before depriving someone of their rights. It emphasizes the methods by which laws are enforced, ensuring that the government acts in a just and fair manner.
La procédure régulière de forme concerne les procédures que le gouvernement doit suivre avant de priver un individu de sa vie, de sa liberté ou de ses biens. Elle garantit que les individus reçoivent un traitement juste et impartial au moyen de procédures juridiques appropriées. La procédure régulière de forme exige que le gouvernement observe certaines étapes ou procédures, telles que la notification, une audience équitable et la possibilité d’être entendu, avant de priver quelqu’un de ses droits. Elle met l’accent sur les modalités selon lesquelles les lois sont appliquées, en veillant à ce que le gouvernement agisse de manière juste et équitable.
The lawfare that has been manifested since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a denial of both substantive and procedural due process. The fundamental rights of American citizens were openly and successfully denied. The false flag operations and the open corruption of the alphabet agencies of the United States has been regularly exposed since even before the Pelosi Trials began, but the legal procedures that have been employed by the globalists of both parties since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a clear illustration of the destruction of procedural due process.
Chikhalh thupi thlengin thu hman dan leh thudik hmang a hmaihna, substantive due process leh procedural due process pahnih pawh an phatsan tih a entîr chiang hle. America khua leh tuite thil tih theihna leh an thuneihna bulpui berte chu a lang tlangin leh hneh takin an hnawl a ni. False flag operation-te leh United States-a alphabet agency-te inthlakna lang tak chu Pelosi Trials hma pawh atang khan a lo puan chhuak tawh reng a; nimahsela, Pelosi Trials tan tirh atang khan party pahnih lama globalist-ten an hman legal procedure-te chu procedural due process tihboralna entîrna chiang tak a ni.
Earlier in the article we read, “Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.”
Wɔkenkan dedaw wɔ asɛm no mu sɛ, “Akuw biara a ɛpene nyamesom mmara so no yɛ papacy no muhyia ankasa, efisɛ mfe pii a atwam nyinaa mu no, wɔadi ko denneennen atia ahofadi a ahonim wɔ. Kwasiada a wodie no de ne nkwa te sɛ so-called Kristofoɔ ahyehyɛde no fi ‘amumɔyɛ ahintasɛm’ no mu; na sɛ wɔhyɛ no den a, ɛbɛyɛ gyinapɛn horow a ɛyɛ Romanism fapem tɔnn no ankasa ho agyede. Sɛ yɛn man no bɛpo ne aban gyinapɛn ahorow no saa ara ma wɔayɛ Kwasiada mmara a, Protestantism bɛnam saa adeyɛ no so ne popery abom; na ɛrennyɛ hwee gye sɛ wɔde nkwa rema atirimuɔden a akyɛ yi ara de anigyina twɛn ne hokwan sɛ ɛbɛsan apia ne ho akɔ adwene mu ahenni a ani yɛ den no mu bio.”
In the line of history that can be represented with the Constitution of the United States there are three specific waymarks representing some element of the Constitution in both the beginning and the ending of the United States. Each of those three waymarks are political actions, and therefore symbolize the speaking of the United States. The third of those three waymarks in the beginning, that marked 1798, was the Alien and Sedition Acts and the third of those waymarks at the ending is when the United States enforces a Sunday law, and speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven.
در خطّ تاریخىای که میتوان آن را با قانون اساسی ایالات متحده نمایان ساخت، سه نشانهٔ معیّن وجود دارد که هر یک نمایانگر عنصری از قانون اساسی، هم در آغاز و هم در پایان ایالات متحده است. هر یک از آن سه نشانه، اقدامی سیاسی است، و از اینرو سخن گفتنِ ایالات متحده را نمادینه میکند. سومینِ آن سه نشانه در آغاز، که سال 1798 را مشخص ساخت، «قوانین بیگانگان و فتنه» بود؛ و سومینِ آن نشانهها در پایان، زمانی است که ایالات متحده قانون یکشنبه را به اجرا درمیآورد و بهمثابه اژدها سخن میگوید، در تحققِ مکاشفه، باب سیزدهم، آیه یازده.
The prophetic history of the United States begins when, as represented by the earth, it opened its mouth and swallowed up the flood of the dragon’s persecution.
L’histoire prophétique des États-Unis commence lorsque, représentés par la terre, ils ouvrirent leur bouche et engloutirent le flot de la persécution du dragon.
And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. Revelation 12:15, 16.
At ang ahas ay nagbuga mula sa kaniyang bibig ng tubig na gaya ng isang baha kasunod ng babae, upang siya’y matangay ng baha. At tinulungan ng lupa ang babae, at ibinuka ng lupa ang kaniyang bibig, at nilamon ang bahang ibinuga ng dragon mula sa kaniyang bibig. Apocalipsis 12:15, 16.
In 1776, the beast that was to arise from the earth, and ultimately become the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy in 1798, swallowed up the flood of persecution against God’s people by establishing a nation with a Constitution that protested against the tyrants of European royalty and the tyrants of the papal church.
En 1776, la bête qui devait monter de la terre, et devenir finalement le sixième royaume de la prophétie biblique en 1798, engloutit le fleuve de persécution dirigé contre le peuple de Dieu en établissant une nation dotée d’une Constitution qui protestait contre les tyrans de la royauté européenne et les tyrans de l’Église papale.
The Declaration of Independence in 1776 typified the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 typified the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 typified the Sunday law in the United States.
Décalaratione de Independentia de 1776 typificava le Patriot Act de 2001. Le Constitution de 1789 typificava le Processos de Pelosi, comenciante in 2022. Le Alien and Sedition Acts de 1798 typificava le lege dominical in le Statos Unite.
The pronouncement of independence by the American patriots in 1776 represented the announcement of the loss of independence with the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 represented the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts represents the Sunday law. The history of the repudiation of every principle of the Constitution represents a progressive overturning of the Constitution that ends at the Sunday law.
ប្រកាសឯករាជ្យរបស់អ្នកស្នេហាជាតិអាមេរិកនៅឆ្នាំ 1776 បានតំណាងឲ្យការប្រកាសអំពីការបាត់បង់ឯករាជ្យតាមរយៈ Patriot Act ឆ្នាំ 2001។ រដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញឆ្នាំ 1789 បានតំណាងឲ្យ Pelosi Trials ដែលចាប់ផ្តើមនៅឆ្នាំ 2022។ Alien and Sedition Acts តំណាងឲ្យច្បាប់ថ្ងៃអាទិត្យ។ ប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រនៃការបដិសេធគោលការណ៍នីមួយៗទាំងអស់នៃរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញ តំណាងឲ្យការបំផ្លាញរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញជាបន្តបន្ទាប់ ដែលបញ្ចប់នៅច្បាប់ថ្ងៃអាទិត្យ។
These lines all align in the hidden history of verse forty of Daniel chapter eleven. In this article we quoted four paragraphs from Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.
Ces lignes s’alignent toutes dans l’histoire cachée du verset quarante du chapitre onze de Daniel. Dans cet article, nous avons cité quatre paragraphes de Testimonies, volume 5, pages 451, 452.
We will look closer at those paragraphs in the next article.
A yi duba waɗannan sakin layi da kyau a maƙala ta gaba.