We will now address some of the implications of verse twelve of Daniel eleven, and thereafter, bring the three lines of “250” years into the history of verses eleven through fifteen, that was fulfilled at the battle of Panium in 200 BC. The line of “250” years that began in 457 BC ends in 207 BC in the middle of the period that begins with the battle of Raphia and ends with the battle of Panium. The “250” years in the line of Nero ends with the three-step history of Constantine, represented by the years 313, 321 and 330. The “250” years of the United States ends on July 4, 2026.
Nous allons maintenant examiner certaines des implications du verset douze de Daniel onze, puis intégrer les trois lignes des « 250 » années dans l’histoire des versets onze à quinze, laquelle s’est accomplie à la bataille de Panium en 200 av. J.-C. La ligne des « 250 » années qui commence en 457 av. J.-C. s’achève en 207 av. J.-C., au milieu de la période qui commence avec la bataille de Raphia et se termine avec la bataille de Panium. Les « 250 » années de la ligne de Néron s’achèvent avec l’histoire en trois étapes de Constantin, représentée par les années 313, 321 et 330. Les « 250 » années des États-Unis s’achèvent le 4 juillet 2026.
Nero’s line represents the history of the image of the beast testing time, first in the United States, and then in the world. The line of 457 BC places Trump at a midpoint militarily between two battles. The period that extends from 1776 also marks a midpoint for Trump’s final presidency. In order to place these lines in their proper place we will first address verse twelve, and the demise of Russia and Putin. Then the three lines of “250” years, then the line of the Hasmonean Dynasty. With those lines in place, we will place Peter in alignment with Panium. When those lines are in place we should be able to recognize how the message of July 18, 2020 is to be corrected and proclaimed, and that it is the message of the book of Joel.
የኔሮ መስመር የአውሬው ምስል የሚፈተንበትን ዘመን ታሪክ ይወክላል፤ መጀመሪያ በአሜሪካ አንድ ሕብረት ውስጥ፣ ከዚያም በዓለም ውስጥ። የ457 ዓ.ዓ. መስመር ትራምፕን በወታደራዊ ጎን በሁለት ጦርነቶች መካከል ባለ መካከለኛ ነጥብ ላይ ያኖረዋል። ከ1776 የሚዘረጋው ዘመን ለትራምፕ የመጨረሻ ፕሬዚዳንትነት ደግሞ አንድ መካከለኛ ነጥብ ያመለክታል። እነዚህን መስመሮች በተገቢ ስፍራቸው ለማኖር፣ በመጀመሪያ ቁጥር አሥራ ሁለትን፣ እና የሩስያንና የፑቲንን ውድቀት እንመለከታለን። ከዚያም የ“250” ዓመታት ሶስቱን መስመሮች፣ ከዚያም የሐስሞናውያን ሥርወ መንግሥት መስመርን። እነዚህ መስመሮች በስፍራቸው ከተቀመጡ በኋላ፣ ጴጥሮስን ከፓኒየም ጋር በተስማሚ ሁኔታ እናስቀምጣለን። እነዚያ መስመሮች በስፍራቸው ሲሆኑ፣ የጁላይ 18, 2020 መልእክት እንዴት መታረምና መታወጅ እንዳለበት፣ እናም እርሱ የኢዮኤል መጽሐፍ መልእክት መሆኑን ማስተዋል ሊቻል ይገባል።
King Uzziah of Judah & Ptolemy King of Egypt
Mfalme Uzia wa Yuda na Ptolemaio Mfalme wa Misri
The history that fulfilled verse eleven at the battle of Raphia aligns with the history of king Uzziah. When Isaiah is purified and empowered to proclaim the message of the latter rain, his calling came in the year that Uzziah died.
Tarihin da ya cika aya ta goma sha ɗaya a yaƙin Raphia ya yi daidai da tarihin sarki Uzziah. Sa’ad da aka tsarkake Ishaya kuma aka ba shi iko ya shelanta saƙon ruwan sama na ƙarshe, kiransa ya zo a shekarar da Uzziah ya mutu.
In the year that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple. Isaiah 6:1.
Na mwaka ambao mfalme Uzia alikufa, nami nikamwona Bwana ameketi juu ya kiti cha enzi, juu sana na ametukuzwa; na pindo la vazi lake likaijaza hekalu. Isaya 6:1.
Uzziah’s death was preceded by the rebellion he manifested that paralleled and aligned with the rebellion of Ptolemy just after the victory at the battle of Raphia. Uzziah and Ptolemy are symbols of a southern king whose heart has been lifted up, who rebel by seeking to combining their state authority with church authority. When Uzziah attempted to combine church and state, the leprosy on his forehead typified the mark of the beast.
Kifo cha Uzia kilitanguliwa na uasi alioudhihirisha, ambao ulifanana na kuendana na uasi wa Ptolemy mara tu baada ya ushindi katika vita vya Raphia. Uzia na Ptolemy ni alama za mfalme wa kusini ambaye moyo wake umeinuliwa, ambaye huasi kwa kutafuta kuunganisha mamlaka yake ya dola na mamlaka ya kanisa. Uzia alipojaribu kuunganisha kanisa na dola, ukoma uliokuwa juu ya kipaji cha uso wake ulikuwa mfano wa alama ya mnyama.
And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name. Revelation 14:9–11.
Apokalipsy 14:9–11 Ary nanaraka azy ireo ny anjely fahatelo ka nanao tamin’ny feo mahery hoe: Raha misy olona miankohoka amin’ny bibidia sy ny sariny, ka mandray ny mariny eo amin’ny handriny, na eo amin’ny tanany, dia izy koa no hisotro ny divain’ny fahatezeran’Andriamanitra, izay naiditra tsy misy fangaro ao amin’ny kapoakan’ny fahavinirany; ary hampijalina amin’ny afo sy solifara izy eo anatrehan’ny anjely masina sy eo anatrehan’ny Zanak’ondry; ary ny setroky ny fijaliany dia miakatra mandrakizay doria; ary tsy manam-pitsaharana na andro na alina izay miankohoka amin’ny bibidia sy ny sariny, dia izay rehetra mandray ny mariky ny anarany.
Uzziah then represents a progressive death from the time of his rebellious attempt to combine church and state. He then represents a lame-duck co-regency with his son for eleven years. Uzziah lived for eleven years after his rebellion. The beginning of his rebellion symbolizes the Sunday law, where church and state are combined and the mark of the beast is enforced. Eleven years later he died, representing the end of his reign as king of the southern kingdom of Judah, which was the glorious land, which is the United States.
ᎤᏏᏯ ᎿᏉ ᎤᎵᏂᎩᏛ ᎤᏲᎱᏒ ᎤᏁᎵᏒ ᎤᏓᏂᎸᎢ ᎤᏍᏆᎸᎲ ᏧᏓᎴᎩ ᎤᎵᏍᎨᏍᏗ ᎤᏅᏒ ᎠᎴ ᎠᏰᎵ ᎤᏓᏠᏍᎬ ᎤᏰᎸᏒ ᎾᎯᏳ ᏅᏓᎬᏩᎴᏅᎮᎢ ᎤᏚᎩ. ᎿᏉ ᎠᏍᎦᏯ ᎤᎵᏍᎨᏍᏗ ᎬᏩᏟᏏᏍᏗ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏪᏥ ᎠᏂᏓᏠᎯᏍᏗ ᎤᏁᎳᎩ ᎤᏓᏡᬂᎢ ᏌᏊ ᎢᎸᏉᏔᏅ ᏗᏕᏘᏴᏛ. ᎤᏏᏯ ᏌᏊ ᎢᎸᏉᏔᏅ ᏗᏕᏘᏴᏛ ᎤᎴᏅᎯ ᎣᏂ ᎤᏚᎩ ᎣᏂ ᎤᎴᏅᎯ ᎤᏲᎱᏒ. ᎤᏚᎩ ᎤᎴᏅᎲ ᎤᏎᎪᎩᏍᎪ ᏅᎩ ᏅᎦᎵᏍᏗ ᎤᎵᏍᎨᏍᏗ, ᎾᎿᎭᏧ ᏧᏓᎴᎩ ᎠᎴ ᎠᏰᎵ ᎠᏓᏠᏍᎬ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏃᏪᎸ ᎤᎿᏩᏛ ᏗᎦᏍᏛ ᎤᎵᏰᎢ. ᏌᏊ ᎢᎸᏉᏔᏅ ᏗᏕᏘᏴᏛ ᎣᏂ, ᎤᏲᎱᏒ, ᎾᏍᎩ ᎤᏎᎪᎩᏍᎪ ᎤᏍᏆᎸᎲ ᎤᎬᏫᏳᎯ ᎤᏤᎵᎪ ᏧᎦᏃᗰ ᏧᏓᎴᎩ ᏧᏏᏓ, ᎾᏍᎩ ᎦᎸᏉᏗ ᎦᏙᎯ, ᎾᏍᎩ ᎠᎹᏰᏟ ᎤᏂᏍᏛᏗ.
In prophetic relation to Ptolemy, Uzziah represents Judah, the glorious land and apostate Protestantism, whereas; Ptolemy represents Egypt, which is the dragon power, whose religion is spiritualism. When the two kings are considered as parallel lines, Uzziah ceases to be an illustration of the glorious land and together they become a symbol of two nations. Egypt and Judah are symbols of the religions of spiritualism and apostate Protestantism. They are a symbol of the state and the church. The statecraft and the churchcraft they represent when they are aligned as one symbol contain two nations, as was the Medes and Persians, as was France’s Egypt and Sodom, as is the United States Republican and Protestant horns, as were the northern and southern kingdoms of Israel and Judah, as well as pagan Rome and papal Rome. As a symbol of two kingdoms, they are prophetically tied together by the temple in Jerusalem where both Uzziah and Ptolemy sought to sacrifice at the temple in Jerusalem. Two nations who both rebel at the same sanctuary.
በትንቢታዊ ግንኙነት ከጶጦሌሚዎስ ጋር ሲመለከት፣ ዑዝያ ይሁዳን፣ የክብሩን ምድር እና ከእምነት የራቀውን ፕሮቴስታንትነት ይወክላል፤ ሲሆን ጶጦሌሚዎስ ግብፅን ይወክላል፣ እርሷም የዘንዶው ኃይል ናት፣ ሃይማኖቷም መንፈሳዊነት ነው። እነዚህ ሁለቱ ነገሥታት እንደ ተመሳሳይ መስመሮች ሲቆጠሩ፣ ዑዝያ የክብሩ ምድር ምሳሌ መሆኑን ያቆማል፣ እና በአንድነት የሁለት አሕዛብ ምልክት ይሆናሉ። ግብፅና ይሁዳ የመንፈሳዊነትና የከእምነት የራቀ ፕሮቴስታንትነት ሃይማኖቶች ምልክቶች ናቸው። እነርሱ የመንግሥትና የቤተ ክርስቲያን ምልክት ናቸው። እንደ አንድ ምልክት በአንድ መስመር ሲደራጁ የሚወክሉት የመንግሥት አስተዳደርና የቤተ ክርስቲያን አስተዳደር ሁለት አሕዛብን ይይዛሉ፤ እንደ ሜዶና ፋርስ እንደነበሩት፣ እንደ ፈረንሳይ ግብፅና ሰዶም እንደነበሩት፣ እንደ ዩናይትድ ስቴትስ ሪፐብሊካንና ፕሮቴስታንት ቀንዶች እንደሆኑት፣ እንዲሁም የእስራኤልና የይሁዳ ሰሜናዊና ደቡባዊ መንግሥታት፣ እንዲሁም አረማዊ ሮምና ጳጳሳዊ ሮም እንደነበሩት። እንደ ሁለት መንግሥታት ምልክት፣ ዑዝያና ጶጦሌሚዎስ ሁለቱም በኢየሩሳሌም ቤተ መቅደስ ውስጥ መሥዋዕት ሊያቀርቡ በፈለጉበት በዚያ ቤተ መቅደስ ምክንያት በትንቢት አንድ ላይ ተገናኝተዋል። በአንድ መቅደስ ላይ ሁለቱም የሚያምፁ ሁለት አሕዛብ።
It is important to notice that the rebellion of both kings was in relation to the temple at Jerusalem, which is a symbol of the temple where Daniel saw Christ in chapter ten. Both these king’s histories align at the Ukrainian War, and in so doing they begin their testimony in 2014. They both were lifted up with military victories represented by the battle of Raphia in verse eleven. Raphia marks the borderland of the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy and the threefold union of the Sunday law. It is also the border of the transition of the church militant unto the church triumphant.
Nagkakahalaga nga mapanid-an nga ti panagrebelde dagiti dua nga ari ket naisangsangayan iti templo idiay Jerusalem, nga isu ti simbolo ti templo a nakitana ni Daniel a ni Cristo idiay kapitulo sangapulo. Ti pakasaritaan dagitoy nga dua nga ari ket nagtutunos iti Gubat iti Ucrania, ket iti kasta, rugian da ti pammaneknekda idi 2014. Naipangato ida agraman kadagiti balligi iti gubat a naisagisag babaen iti gubat iti Raphia idiay bersikulo onse. Ti Raphia ket tandaan ti pagilian iti maikanem a pagarian iti padto ti Biblia ken ti tallo a nainurnos a panagkaykaysa ti linteg ti Domingo. Isu met laeng ti beddeng ti panagballasiw manipud iti iglesia a makigubat agingga iti iglesia a managballigi.
After 2014, the richest king announced his intention to run for the presidency in 2015. In 2020 the richest king, representing the Republican horn received its deadly wound that would later be healed. In 2022 the Ukrainian War escalated. Trump then returned in fulfillment of verse thirteen, in the election of 2024. In July of 2023, a voice in the wilderness was sounded. December 31, 2023 the Protestant horn was resurrected, as was the Republican horn in the election of 2024, when Trump returned and then in 2025 the foundation test ended with the arrival of the temple test.
Tar éis 2014, d’fhógair an rí ba shaibhre go raibh sé ar intinn aige seasamh d’uachtaránacht in 2015. In 2020 fuair an rí ba shaibhre, ag déanamh ionadaíochta ar adharc na bPoblachtánach, a chréacht mharfach a leigheasfaí ina dhiaidh sin. In 2022, chuaigh Cogadh na hÚcráine in olcas. Ansin d’fhill Trump mar chomhlíonadh ar véarsa a trí dhéag, i dtoghchán 2024. I mí Iúil 2023, glaodh guth amach san fhásach. An 31 Nollaig 2023, athbheochtaíodh an adharc Phrotastúnach, mar a athbheochtaíodh adharc na bPoblachtánach i dtoghchán 2024, nuair a d’fhill Trump, agus ansin in 2025 tháinig deireadh le tástáil an bhunúis le teacht thástáil an teampaill.
1989
1989
The truths which were unsealed in 1989 was twofold. The prophetic parallels of the reform movements and the last six verses of Daniel eleven were unsealed at the same time. There are certain prophetic rules that were employed to establish the initial message of verse forty. Some of those very truths are now the key to the hidden history of the very same verse where those prophetic gems were discovered. I’ll give you an example.
Les vérités qui furent descellées en 1989 étaient doubles. Les parallèles prophétiques des mouvements de réforme et les six derniers versets de Daniel onze furent descellés en même temps. Certaines règles prophétiques furent employées pour établir le message initial du verset quarante. Quelques-unes de ces mêmes vérités sont maintenant la clé de l’histoire cachée de ce même verset où ces joyaux prophétiques furent découverts. J’en donnerai un exemple.
In 1989, there was no unified understanding in Adventism as to what the last six verses of Daniel represented. That lack of unification was twofold. There was no consensus of the meaning of the verses. Those who professed to have understanding of the verses presented human ideas mixed the theology of apostate Protestantism and Catholicism, the birthright heritage they received from their forefathers of the rebellion of 1863, when they fulfilled the role of the disobedient prophet at Jeroboam’s foundational rebellion. Those individual ideas of what the verses were private interpretations, at best. Their ideas of the verses were either contradictory to basic prophetic application, and often contrary to the very premise they themselves identified of the verses.
१९८९ मा, डानिएलका अन्तिम छ पदहरूले के प्रतिनिधित्व गर्छन् भन्ने विषयमा एडभेन्टवादभित्र कुनै एकीकृत समझाइ थिएन। त्यो एकताको अभाव दुई तहमा थियो। ती पदहरूको अर्थबारे कुनै सहमति थिएन। ती पदहरूबारे आफूलाई समझाइ भएको दाबी गर्नेहरूले मानव-कल्पना प्रस्तुत गरे, जसमा धर्मत्यागी प्रोटेस्टेन्टवाद र क्याथोलिकवादको धर्मशास्त्र मिसिएको थियो—त्यही जन्मसिद्ध अधिकारको पैतृक विरासत, जुन तिनीहरूले १८६३ को विद्रोहका आफ्ना पितृपूर्वजहरूबाट प्राप्त गरेका थिए, जब तिनीहरूले यारोबामको आधारभूत विद्रोहमा आज्ञा नमान्ने अगमवक्ताको भूमिका पूरा गरे। ती पदहरू के हुन् भन्नेबारे तिनका व्यक्तिगत धारणाहरू, बढीमा, निजी व्याख्याहरू मात्र थिए। ती पदहरूबारे तिनका विचारहरू या त भविष्यवाणीसम्बन्धी आधारभूत प्रयोगकै विपरीत थिए, र प्रायः त स्वयं तिनीहरूले ती पदहरूको बारेमा पहिचान गरेको मूल आधारकै प्रतिकूल थिए।
What we saw in the verses was a consistent understanding of all six verses. It was the consistency of the message we saw that encouraged me to present my understanding, even when I knew all of Adventism rejected what I understood. What we understood of those verses was published first in 1996, and the understanding there set forth has only grown stronger as time has marched out over thirty years!
Okubyo twabonye muri iyo mirongo yari ugusobanukirwa guhamye kandi kuhuje kw’iyo mirongo yose uko ari itandatu. Uwo mubane n’ubudahinduka bw’ubutumwa twabonye ni byo byantereye umwete wo kugaragaza uko nasobanukiwe, ndetse n’igihe nari nzi ko Abadiventisime bose bahakanye ibyo nasobanukiwe. Ibyo twasobanukiwe kuri iyo mirongo byatangajwe bwa mbere mu 1996, kandi uko gusobanukirwa kwashyizwe ahagaragara aho kwarakomeje gusa kurushaho gukomera uko igihe cyakomeje kugenda mu myaka mirongo itatu!
If you consider the very first reference in the magazine The Time of the End, you find Testimonies, volume 9, page 11. Five years before 9/11, the magazine starts with 9/11. One of those understandings that encouraged me was in understanding that at “the time of the end” in verse forty, the kings of the north and south were spiritual, not literal powers. At that time, I already knew that Sister White said that the books of Daniel and Revelation are the same book, and that the same line of prophecy that is in Daniel, is taken up by John in the Revelation. I had found that in Revelation eleven, which was fulfilled in the history surrounding the time of the end in 1798; Sister White’s commentary upon the chapter clearly teaches that France was spiritual Egypt, and she was just as clear that in Revelation seventeen, the whore upon the beast was spiritual Babylon.
若你查考《末时》(The Time of the End)这本杂志最开头所引用的第一处资料,你会发现那是《证言》卷九,第11页。在9/11事件发生前五年,这本杂志便以9/11开始。那些曾鼓励我的理解之一,就是明白了第四十节中“到了末时”之际,北方王与南方王乃是属灵的势力,而非字面的势力。那时,我已经知道怀爱伦姊妹曾说,但以理书与启示录乃是同一本书,并且但以理书中的同一条预言线,也被约翰在启示录中接续展开。我曾发现,在启示录第十一章中——其应验发生于1798年末时前后的历史之中——怀爱伦姊妹对于该章的注释清楚地教导说,法国就是属灵的埃及;同样,她也十分明确地指出,在启示录第十七章中,那骑在兽上的淫妇就是属灵的巴比伦。
Sister White’s identification of those two powers is in The Great Controversy, and those comments tie together John and Daniel’s testimony. The definition of the king of the south in Daniel chapter eleven is the power that controls Egypt, and the king of the north is the power who controls Babylon. When the Bible and Spirit of Prophecy worked in tandem to establish a truth by bringing Daniel and Revelation together to prove the point, was something I could never surrender to any misguided theologian, or misguided self-appointed leader of a self-supporting ministry.
L’identification, par sœur White, de ces deux puissances se trouve dans La Tragédie des siècles, et ces commentaires relient ensemble le témoignage de Jean et celui de Daniel. La définition du roi du midi, au chapitre onze de Daniel, est la puissance qui contrôle l’Égypte, et le roi du nord est la puissance qui contrôle Babylone. Lorsque la Bible et l’Esprit de prophétie ont œuvré de concert pour établir une vérité en réunissant Daniel et l’Apocalypse afin d’en démontrer le bien-fondé, c’était là quelque chose que je ne pouvais jamais abandonner à quelque théologien égaré, ni à quelque dirigeant égaré, autoproclamé, d’un ministère de soutien autonome.
To understand Ptolemy and Uzziah as symbols of the battle of Raphia and the fallout that occurs after their hearts are lifted up, is to be governed by the fact that Ptolemy represents the dragon power who defeats the proxy power of Rome, only to lose to the proxy power who had defeated Ptolemy in verse ten and in 1989. The historical distinctions are purposeful and important.
Κατανοεῖν τὸν Πτολεμαῖον καὶ τὸν Ὀζίαν ὡς σύμβολα τῆς μάχης τῆς Ῥαφίας καὶ τῶν ἐπακολούθων ἀποτελεσμάτων, ἃ ἐπεγίγνονται ἀφ’ οὗ ὑψωθῶσιν αἱ καρδίαι αὐτῶν, σημαίνει ὅτι δεσμευόμεθα ὑπὸ τοῦ γεγονότος ὅτι ὁ Πτολεμαῖος ἀντιπροσωπεύει τὴν δύναμιν τοῦ δράκοντος, ἥτις νικᾷ τὴν ἀντιπρόσωπον δύναμιν τῆς Ῥώμης, μόνον ἵνα ἡττηθῇ ὑπὸ τῆς ἀντιπροσώπου δυνάμεως ἥτις εἶχεν ἡττήσει τὸν Πτολεμαῖον ἐν τῷ δεκάτῳ ἐδαφίῳ καὶ ἐν τῷ 1989. Αἱ ἱστορικαὶ διακρίσεις εἰσὶ σκόπιμοι καὶ σημαντικαί.
Uzziah receives the mark of the beast when he attempts to bring church and state together, Uzziah is the glorious land, and the glorious land was a major argument in the beginning of the message in 1989. Is the glorious land the United States, or is it the Seventh-day Adventist church? Those who then held to the erroneous idea that the glorious land is the Adventist church, along with any who still do—would argue that the glorious holy mountain of verse forty-five was clearly God’s church, so that meant to them, that a mountain and a land were the same symbol. Standard human reasoning, I suppose.
ਆਜ਼ਜ਼ਿਆਹ ਉਸ ਵੇਲੇ ਪਸ਼ੂ ਦਾ ਨਿਸ਼ਾਨ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਤ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ ਜਦੋਂ ਉਹ ਕਲੀਸਿਆ ਅਤੇ ਰਾਜ ਨੂੰ ਇਕੱਠਾ ਕਰਨ ਦਾ ਯਤਨ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ; ਆਜ਼ਜ਼ਿਆਹ ਮਹਿਮਾਮਈ ਦੇਸ਼ ਹੈ, ਅਤੇ 1989 ਵਿੱਚ ਸੰਦੇਸ਼ ਦੀ ਸ਼ੁਰੂਆਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਮਹਿਮਾਮਈ ਦੇਸ਼ ਇੱਕ ਮੁੱਖ ਦਲੀਲ ਸੀ। ਕੀ ਮਹਿਮਾਮਈ ਦੇਸ਼ ਸੰਯੁਕਤ ਰਾਜ ਅਮਰੀਕਾ ਹੈ, ਜਾਂ ਸੱਤਵੇਂ-ਦਿਨ ਦੀ ਐਡਵੈਂਟਿਸਟ ਕਲੀਸਿਆ ਹੈ? ਜਿਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਨੇ ਉਸ ਵੇਲੇ ਇਸ ਭ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਧਾਰਣਾ ਨੂੰ ਧਾਰਿਆ ਹੋਇਆ ਸੀ ਕਿ ਮਹਿਮਾਮਈ ਦੇਸ਼ ਐਡਵੈਂਟਿਸਟ ਕਲੀਸਿਆ ਹੈ—ਅਤੇ ਉਹਨਾਂ ਦੇ ਨਾਲ ਉਹ ਸਾਰੇ ਜੋ ਅਜੇ ਵੀ ਐਸਾ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ—ਇਹ ਦਲੀਲ ਦਿੰਦੇ ਕਿ ਪੈਂਤਾਲੀਹਵੇਂ ਪਦ ਦਾ ਮਹਿਮਾਮਈ ਪਵਿੱਤਰ ਪਹਾੜ ਸਪਸ਼ਟ ਤੌਰ ’ਤੇ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੀ ਕਲੀਸਿਆ ਸੀ; ਇਸ ਲਈ ਉਹਨਾਂ ਲਈ ਇਸ ਦਾ ਅਰਥ ਇਹ ਸੀ ਕਿ ਪਹਾੜ ਅਤੇ ਦੇਸ਼ ਇੱਕੋ ਹੀ ਪ੍ਰਤੀਕ ਹਨ। ਮੇਰੇ ਖਿਆਲ ਵਿੱਚ, ਇਹ ਆਮ ਮਨੁੱਖੀ ਤਰਕ ਹੈ।
Uzziah is the glorious land, and Ptolemy is Egypt. Uzziah, as the glorious land has the two horns of Protestantism and Republicanism. The political manifestation of Ptolemy is communism and its varied forms, and the religious manifestation of Ptolemy is spiritualism and its varied forms. A characteristic of the dragon power is that it is a confederacy, but the false prophet, who is the glorious land is a single nation with two horns.
עוזיה הוא הארץ המפוארת, ותלמי הוא מצרים. עוזיה, בהיותו הארץ המפוארת, יש לו שתי הקרניים של הפרוטסטנטיות והרפובליקניזם. הביטוי המדיני של תלמי הוא הקומוניזם וצורותיו השונות, והביטוי הדתי של תלמי הוא הספיריטואליזם וצורותיו השונות. מאפיין של כוח הדרקון הוא היותו קונפדרציה, אך נביא השקר, שהוא הארץ המפוארת, הוא אומה אחת בעלת שתי קרניים.
Daniel eleven verse forty established that the United States was the proxy power of the papacy when the Soviet Union was swept away in 1989. This truth aligns with the role of the two-horned earth beast of Revelation thirteen, for the two books are the same.
Daniyeli kumi na moja mstari wa arobaini uliweka bayana kwamba Marekani ilikuwa nguvu wakala ya upapa wakati Umoja wa Kisovieti ulipoondolewa mwaka 1989. Ukweli huu unaafikiana na wajibu wa mnyama wa nchi mwenye pembe mbili wa Ufunuo kumi na tatu, kwa maana vitabu hivyo viwili ni kilekile.
And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. Revelation 13:11, 12.
Et je vis monter de la terre une autre bête; elle avait deux cornes semblables à celles d’un agneau, et elle parlait comme un dragon. Elle exerçait toute l’autorité de la première bête en sa présence, et elle amenait la terre et ses habitants à adorer la première bête, dont la blessure mortelle avait été guérie. Apocalypse 13:11, 12.
Revelation thirteen identifies the United States as the proxy power of the Papacy, for the earth beast “exerciseth al the power of the” beast out of the sea that came “before him.” In verse two the dragon of pagan Rome had given the Papacy its power, seat and great authority. The word translated as “power” means power, but in verse twelve it is a different word that is translated as “power,” meaning “delegated authority.”
अफ़्काश के तेरहवें अध्याय में संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका को पोपसी की प्रतिनिधि शक्ति के रूप में पहचाना गया है, क्योंकि पृथ्वी से निकलने वाला पशु उस समुद्र से निकलने वाले पशु की “सारी सत्ता चलाता है” जो “उसके साम्हने” आया था। पद दो में मूर्तिपूजक रोम के अजगर ने पोपसी को अपनी शक्ति, अपना आसन, और बड़ी प्रभुता दी थी। “शक्ति” के रूप में अनूदित शब्द का अर्थ शक्ति ही है, परन्तु पद बारह में “सत्ता” के रूप में अनूदित शब्द भिन्न है, जिसका अर्थ है “प्रत्यायोजित अधिकार।”
The United States is the proxy power of the papacy, who has been typified by pagan Rome, who gave its military and economic support to the papacy as set forth in verse two. In doing so pagan Rome typified the United States who would also give its “chariots, ships and horsemen” to do the dirty-work of the papal power.
Les États-Unis sont la puissance mandataire de la papauté, laquelle a été typifiée par la Rome païenne, qui apporta à la papauté son soutien militaire et économique, comme l’expose le verset deux. Ce faisant, la Rome païenne typifiait les États-Unis, qui donneraient eux aussi leurs « chars, navires et cavaliers » pour accomplir les basses œuvres de la puissance papale.
When the three battles of verse ten, eleven and fifteen were fulfilled in history, Antiochus Magnus was at each battle. This fact identifies that the power represented in the three battles is a proxy power of the beast, for it is always Antiochus, and Antiochus in 1989 was the proxy power of the United States.
لە کاتێکدا سێ شەڕی ئایەتی دەیەم، یانزەیەم و پازدەیەم لە مێژوودا هاتنە دی، ئانتیۆخۆسی مەگنوس لە هەر سێ شەڕەکەدا ئامادە بوو. ئەم ڕاستییە دیاری دەکات کە ئەو هێزەی کە لەو سێ شەڕەدا نیشانەکراوە، هێزێکی جێگرەوەی دڕندەکەیە، چونکە هەمیشە ئانتیۆخۆسە، و ئانتیۆخۆس لە ساڵی 1989دا هێزی جێگرەوەی ویلایەتە یەکگرتووەکان بوو.
The three battles that lead to the Sunday law of verse sixteen bear the signature of Alpha and Omega, and also the structure of truth. It is the United States in the first battle and the third battle, identifying an alpha and omega in the first and last battle. The three battles that lead to the Sunday law of verse sixteen also bear the signature of truth. The proxy power of Nazi Ukraine is the battle in the middle that represents the rebellion of the middle waymark in the framework of the Hebrew word truth. The three battles represent 1989 unto the Sunday law, which means they represent the “hidden history” of verse forty.
Verse zia anu kyerɛwatoɔ mmienu a ɛde kɔ Homeda mmara a ɛwɔ nkyekyɛmu du nsia no mu no kura Alpha ne Omega agyiraeɛ, na ɛsan so kura nokorɛ nhyehyɛeɛ no. Ɛyɛ United States na ɛwɔ ɔko a ɛdi kan no mu ne ɔko a ɛto so mmiɛnsa no mu, de rekyerɛ alpha ne omega wɔ ɔko a ɛdi kan ne deɛ ɛtwa toɔ no mu. Ɔko mmiɛnsa a ɛde kɔ Homeda mmara a ɛwɔ nkyekyɛmu du nsia no mu no san so kura nokorɛ agyiraeɛ no. Nazi Ukraine tumi a wɔde gyina ananmu no ne ɔko a ɛwɔ mfimfini no, a egyina hɔ ma atuateɛ a ɛwɔ mfimfini waymark no mu wɔ Hebri asɛmfua “nokorɛ” nhyehyɛeɛ no mu. Ɔko mmiɛnsa no gyina hɔ ma 1989 de bɛsi Homeda mmara no, a ɛkyerɛ sɛ wɔgyina hɔ ma “abakɔsɛm a ahinta” a ɛwɔ nkyekyɛmu aduanan no.
Verse eleven of Revelation eleven identifies 2023, as the point where both horns are resurrected. Daniel eleven, verse eleven identifies the very same period of history. The internal line of prophecy and the external line of prophecy align in 2023. The internal line is the “thing” Daniel understood and the external line is the “vision” he understood.
Le verset onze d’Apocalypse onze désigne 2023 comme le moment où les deux cornes ressuscitent. Daniel onze, verset onze, désigne cette même période de l’histoire. La ligne de prophétie interne et la ligne de prophétie externe s’alignent en 2023. La ligne interne est la « chose » que Daniel a comprise, et la ligne externe est la « vision » qu’il a comprise.
The temple test that Daniel illustrates began at the twenty-second day, and twenty-two years after 9/11, which is the point that Isaiah entered the temple brings you to 2023. Isaiah identifies the death of Uzziah after living with leprosy for eleven years at 9/11. The work of erecting the temple consists of first laying the foundation, and thereafter erecting the temple and placing the cap stone which then leads to the third litmus test, represented by the feast of trumpets in the line of Leviticus twenty-three. The internal work of the everlasting gospel is accomplished during the history of the external line. In verse eleven Putin has been typified by Ptolemy, and king Uzziah provides a second witness to the illustration of the king of the south who is lifted up through military success, who thereafter attempts to insert themselves into the realm of religion.
Mwâniriro wa hekalu ambao Danieli anaueleza kwa mfano ulianza siku ya ishirini na mbili, na miaka ishirini na miwili baada ya 9/11, ambalo ndilo wakati Isaya aliingia hekaluni, hukuleta kwenye mwaka wa 2023. Isaya anautambua kifo cha Uzia baada ya kuishi na ukoma kwa miaka kumi na moja katika 9/11. Kazi ya kulijenga hekalu inajumuisha kwanza kuweka msingi, na baadaye kulisimamisha hekalu na kuliweka jiwe la kilele, jambo ambalo ndipo huongoza kwenye jaribio la tatu la kipimo, linalowakilishwa na sikukuu ya tarumbeta katika mstari wa Mambo ya Walawi ishirini na tatu. Kazi ya ndani ya injili ya milele inatimizwa katika kipindi cha historia ya mstari wa nje. Katika aya ya kumi na moja Putin amewekwa kama mfano kwa Ptolemy, na mfalme Uzia anatoa shahidi wa pili kwa mfano wa mfalme wa kusini anayeinuliwa kwa mafanikio ya kijeshi, ambaye baadaye hujaribu kujiingiza katika nyanja ya dini.
And the king of the south shall be moved with choler, and shall come forth and fight with him, even with the king of the north: and he shall set forth a great multitude; but the multitude shall be given into his hand. And when he hath taken away the multitude, his heart shall be lifted up; and he shall cast down many ten thousands: but he shall not be strengthened by it. Daniel 11:11, 12.
Na mokonzi ya sudi akotonda na nkanda, mpe akobima mpe akobunda na ye, elingi koloba na mokonzi ya nɔrdi; mpe akotombola ebele monene; kasi ebele yango ekopesama na lobɔkɔ na ye. Mpe ntango akolongola ebele yango, motema na ye ekomata; mpe akokweya bankóto ebele; kasi akokóma makasi te na yango. Daniel 11:11, 12.
Uriah Smith addresses Ptolemy Philopator’s history and his attempt to offer sacrifices in Jerusalem’s temple.
Ouria Smith onɔnɔ Ptolémée Philopator maŋlɔɖuɖu kple eƒe agbalẽ si me wòte ŋu be yéawɔ vɔsadetɔwo ɖe Yerusalem ƒe xɔseme.
“Ptolemy lacked the prudence to make a good use of his victory. Had he followed up his success, he would probably have become master of the whole kingdom of Antiochus; but content with making only a few menaces and a few threats, he made peace that he might be able to give himself up to the uninterrupted and uncontrolled indulgence of his brutish passions. Thus, having conquered his enemies, he was overcome by his vices, and, forgetful of the great name which he might have established, he spent his time in feasting and lewdness.
「プトレマイオスには、自らの勝利を善用するだけの思慮が欠けていた。もし彼がその成功を追撃していたなら、おそらくアンティオコスの全王国の支配者となっていたであろう。しかるに、ただわずかな威嚇といくつかの脅しを加えるだけで満足し、絶え間なく、また何ものにも拘束されることのない獣欲の放縦に身を委ねることができるようにするため、彼は講和した。このようにして、彼は敵を征服したにもかかわらず、自らの悪徳に征服され、自ら打ち立て得たであろう偉大な名を忘れ、宴楽と淫蕩のうちに時を費やした。」
“His heart was lifted up by his success, but he was far from being strengthened by it; for the inglorious use he made of it caused his own subjects to rebel against him. But the lifting up of his heart was more especially manifested in his transactions with the Jews. Coming to Jerusalem, he there offered sacrifices, and was very desirous of entering into the most holy place of the temple, contrary to the law and religion of that place; but being, though with great difficulty, restrained, he left the place burning with anger against the whole nation of the Jews, and immediately commenced against them a terrible and relentless persecution. In Alexandria, where the Jews had resided since the days of Alexander, and enjoyed the privileges of the most favored citizens, forty thousand according to Eusebius, sixty thousand according to Jerome, were slain in this persecution. The rebellion of the Egyptians, and the massacre of the Jews, certainly were not calculated to strengthen him in his kingdom, but were sufficient rather almost totally to ruin it.” Uriah Smith, Daniel and the Revelation, 254.
«قلب او به سبب کامیابیاش برافراشته شد، اما از آن نیرو نیافت؛ زیرا بهرهگیری ننگین او از آن، موجب شد که رعایای خود او بر ضدش سر به شورش بردارند. اما برافراشتگی قلب او بهویژه در رفتارهایش با یهودیان آشکار شد. چون به اورشلیم آمد، در آنجا قربانیها تقدیم کرد، و سخت مشتاق بود که بر خلاف شریعت و آیین آن مکان، به قدسالاقداسِ هیکل داخل شود؛ اما چون، هرچند با دشواری بسیار، از این کار بازداشته شد، آنجا را در حالی ترک گفت که از تمامی قوم یهود آتشینخشم بود، و بیدرنگ آزار و اذیتی هولناک و بیامان را بر ضد آنان آغاز کرد. در اسکندریه، جایی که یهودیان از روزگار اسکندر اقامت داشتند و از امتیازاتِ برخوردارترین شهروندان بهرهمند بودند، در این آزار، بنا بر قول اوسبیوس چهل هزار تن، و بنا بر قول جروم شصت هزار تن، کشته شدند. شورش مصریان و کشتار یهودیان، بیگمان، چیزی نبود که او را در پادشاهیاش نیرومند سازد، بلکه کافی بود که آن را نزدیک بهکلی تباه کند.» اوریا اسمیت، دانیال و مکاشفه، 254.
Ptolemy Philopator’s military victory at Raphia in 217 BC, did not strengthen Ptolemy, but it caused “his heart to be lifted up.” Victory in the Ukrainian War will not strengthen Putin, but it will “lift up his heart,” as did military success cause king Uzziah to lift up his heart.
การมีชัยชนะทางทหารของปโตเลมี ฟิโลปาเตอร์ที่ราฟิอาในปี 217 ก่อนคริสตกาล มิได้ทำให้ปโตเลมีเข้มแข็งขึ้น แต่กลับทำให้ “ใจของเขาถูกยกขึ้น” ชัยชนะในสงครามยูเครนก็จะไม่ทำให้ปูตินเข้มแข็งขึ้น แต่จะ “ยกใจของเขาขึ้น” ดังเช่นความสำเร็จทางทหารได้ทำให้กษัตริย์อุสซียาห์ยกใจของตนขึ้น.
And Uzziah prepared for them throughout all the host shields, and spears, and helmets, and habergeons, and bows, and slings to cast stones. And he made in Jerusalem engines, invented by cunning men, to be on the towers and upon the bulwarks, to shoot arrows and great stones withal. And his name spread far abroad; for he was marvellously helped, till he was strong. But when he was strong, his heart was lifted up to his destruction: for he transgressed against the Lord his God, and went into the temple of the Lord to burn incense upon the altar of incense. 2 Chronicles 26:14–16.
ئۇززىيا پۈتكۈل قوشۇن ئۈچۈن قالقانلار، نەيزىلەر، دۇبلۇغىلار، ساۋۇتلار، ئوقيىلار ۋە تاش ئېتىش ئۈچۈن سىلاڭلارنى تەييارلىدى. ئۇ يەنە يېرۇسالېمدە ھۈنەرۋەن كىشىلەر ئىجاد قىلغان، مۇنارلار ئۈستىدە ۋە قورغانلار ئۈستىدە قويۇلۇش ئۈچۈن، ئوقلار ۋە زور تاشلارنى ئاتىدىغان ماشنىلارنى ياساتتى. ئۇنىڭ نامى ناھايىتى يىراق يەرلەرگىچە تارقالدى؛ چۈنكى ئۇ كۈچلۈك بولغۇچە ئاجايىپ ياردەمگە ئېرىشتى. لېكىن ئۇ كۈچلۈك بولغاندا، ئۇنىڭ قەلبى ئۆزىنىڭ ھالاك بولۇشىغا ئېگىز كۆتۈرۈلدى؛ چۈنكى ئۇ پەرۋەردىگار خۇداسىغا قارشى گۇناھ قىلدى ۋە پەرۋەردىگارنىڭ ئىبادەتخانىسىغا كىرىپ، خۇشبۇي ئىس چىقىرىش قۇربانگاھى ئۈستىدە خۇشبۇي ئىس كۆيدۈرگىلى باردى. 2 تەوارىخ 26:14–16.
Two southern kings whose hearts were lifted up from military victories, attempted to enter the same temple and offer and offering, which only a priest was allowed to do. In both cases, the priests resisted the proud kings attempts to do so. One king then initiated a retaliation upon the Jews, and the other was struck in the forehead with leprosy.
Kettō mālikū naūrūne yēn ībārū līḥū min nāṣirāt al-ḥarb, ḥāwalū an yadkhulū ilā al-haykal nafsahu wa yuqaddimū taqdima, wa hādhā mā kāna masmūḥan bihi illā lil-kāhin. Fī kilā al-ḥālatayn, qāwama al-kahanah muḥāwalāt al-mulūk al-mutakabbirīn li-fiʿl dhālika. Thumma bādaʾa aḥad al-malikayn inti qāman ḍidd al-Yahūd, wa ḍuriba al-ākhar bil-barṣ fī jabhatihi.
And Azariah the priest went in after him, and with him fourscore priests of the Lord, that were valiant men: And they withstood Uzziah the king, and said unto him, It appertaineth not unto thee, Uzziah, to burn incense unto the Lord, but to the priests the sons of Aaron, that are consecrated to burn incense: go out of the sanctuary; for thou hast trespassed; neither shall it be for thine honour from the Lord God. Then Uzziah was wroth, and had a censer in his hand to burn incense: and while he was wroth with the priests, the leprosy even rose up in his forehead before the priests in the house of the Lord, from beside the incense altar. And Azariah the chief priest, and all the priests, looked upon him, and, behold, he was leprous in his forehead, and they thrust him out from thence; yea, himself hasted also to go out, because the Lord had smitten him. And Uzziah the king was a leper unto the day of his death, and dwelt in a several house, being a leper; for he was cut off from the house of the Lord: and Jotham his son was over the king’s house, judging the people of the land. Now the rest of the acts of Uzziah, first and last, did Isaiah the prophet, the son of Amoz, write. 2 Chronicles 26:17–22.
Na Aserdifo Asaria ka wɔnɔ no akyi, ne Awurade asɔfo aduɔwɔtwe a wɔyɛ mmarima akokodurufo kaa ne ho. Na wogyinaa Ɔhene Usia anim, ka kyerɛɛ no sɛ: Ɛnyɛ wo dea, Usia, sɛ wobɛhyew aduhuam ama Awurade, na mmom asɔfo no, Aaron mma a wɔatew wɔn ho so ama aduhuamhyew no. Fi kronkronbea hɔ kɔ, efisɛ woabu mmara so; na eyi renyɛ wo anuonyam mfi Awurade Nyankopɔn hɔ. Afei Usia bo fuwii, na na ɔkura aduhuamhyew adewuruo bi wɔ ne nsa mu sɛ ɔde rebɛhyew aduhuam. Na bere a ne bo da so afuw tia asɔfo no, kwata tuu wɔ ne moma so wɔ asɔfo no anim, wɔ Awurade fie hɔ, aduhuam afɔremuka no ho. Na ɔsɔfopanyin Asaria ne asɔfo no nyinaa hwɛɛ no, na hwɛ, na wakwata wɔ ne moma so. Enti wɔpam no fii hɔ ntɛm; na ɔno ankasa nso yɛɛ ntɛm puee, efisɛ na Awurade abɔ no. Na Ɔhene Usia yɛɛ ɔkwatani kosii ne wu da, na ɔtenaa fie soronko mu sɛ ɔkwatani; efisɛ wɔtwaa no fii Awurade fie ho. Na ne ba Yotam hwɛɛ ɔhene fie so, dii asase no so nnipa no atɛn. Na Usia nnwuma a aka no, nea edi kan ne nea edi akyiri no, Amoz ba odiyifo Yesaia na ɔkyerɛwee. 2 Beresosɛm 26:17–22.
In 2014, the globalists of Europe and the Obama regime initiated a color revolution upon the nation of the Ukraine. In 2022 Russia began an invasion that will ultimately lead to a victory for Putin and Russia; represented by Ptolemy and Uzziah, the kings of the south. Verse twelve says that after the victory of Putin, “his heart shall be lifted up; and he shall cast down many ten thousands: but he shall not be strengthened by it.” History then records a progressive demise of his kingdom.
Muna 2014, vafambisi venyika dzepasi rose veEurope nehutongi hwaObama vakatanga chimurenga cheruvara pamusoro penyika yeUkraine. Muna 2022 Russia yakatanga kupinda nechisimba kuchazoguma nokukunda kwaPutin neRussia; zvinomiririrwa naPtolemy naUzziah, madzimambo ezasi. Ndima yegumi nembiri inoti kuti mushure mokukunda kwaPutin, “mwoyo wake uchazvikudza; uye achakanda pasi zviuru zvizhinji zvamazana; asi haangasimbiswi nazvo.” Nhoroondo inobva yanyora kuparara kunopfuurira zvishoma nezvishoma kwoumambo hwake.
The progressive demise led to his death, and by the time Antiochus the Great retaliates for his loss at Raphia, Antiochus was no longer engaged with Ptolemy Philopator, Antiochus was then addressing a young child who was then Egypt’s ruler. A child is a symbol of the last generation, so at one level the child king that Antiochus defeats at Panium is the final generation of the kingdom of the south. At the practical level the child king represents weakness in relation to Antiochus’s strength.
ومرور هذا التدهور المتدرّج أفضى إلى موته، وبحلول الوقت الذي انتقم فيه أنطيوخس الكبير لخسارته في رافيا، لم يعد أنطيوخس منخرطًا مع بطليموس فيلوباتور، بل كان آنذاك يواجه طفلًا صغيرًا كان حاكم مصر في ذلك الحين. والطفل رمزٌ للجيل الأخير، ولذلك، فعلى أحد المستويات، فإن الملك الطفل الذي يهزمه أنطيوخس في بانيوم هو الجيل الأخير من مملكة الجنوب. وعلى المستوى العملي، يمثّل الملك الطفل الضعف في مقابل قوة أنطيوخس.
“The peace concluded between Ptolemy Philopater and Antiochus lasted fourteen years. Meanwhile Ptolemy died from intemperance and debauchery, and was succeeded by his son, Ptolemy Epiphanes, a child then four or five years old. Antiochus, during the same time, having suppressed rebellion in his kingdom, and reduced and settled the eastern parts in their obedience, was at leisure for any enterprise when young Epiphanes came to the throne of Egypt; and thinking this too good an opportunity for enlarging his dominion to be let slip, he raised an immense army “greater than the former” (for he had collected many forces and acquired great riches in his eastern expedition), and set out against Egypt, expecting to have an easy victory over the infant king. How he succeeded we shall presently see; for here new complications enter into the affairs of these kingdoms, and new actors are introduced upon the stage of history.” Uriah Smith, Daniel and the Revelation, 255.
「プトレマイオス・フィロパトルとアンティオコスとの間に締結された講和は十四年間続いた。その間に、プトレマイオスは放縦と酒色のために死に、その子プトレマイオス・エピファネスが跡を継いだが、彼はその時まだ四歳か五歳の幼児であった。同じ時期にアンティオコスは、自国における反乱を鎮圧し、東方の諸地域を征服して服従の下に確立し、これを安定させていたので、若きエピファネスがエジプトの王位に就いたとき、いかなる企ても遂行し得る余裕を持っていた。そして、自らの支配領域を拡大するにはこの上なく好機であり、これを逸してはならないと考え、彼は「以前のものより大いなる」莫大な軍勢を起こして(というのも、彼は東方遠征において多くの兵力を集め、大いなる富を獲得していたからである)、幼い王に対しては容易に勝利できるものと期待して、エジプトに向かって進軍した。彼がどのような結果を得たかは、ほどなく見ることにしよう。というのも、ここにおいてこれらの王国の affairs には新たな錯綜が入り込み、歴史の舞台には新たな登場人物が導き入れられるからである。」Uriah Smith, Daniel and the Revelation, 255.
The King of the South
ਦੱਖਣ ਦਾ ਰਾਜਾ
To outline the final steps of Russia, is to outline the final steps of the prophetic king of the south. A prophetic characteristic of the spiritual king of the south that arrived in prophetic history at the time of the end in 1798—is how it comes to its end. It is also a prophetic characteristic of the king of the north, and the false prophet. Each of the three powers that lead the world to Armageddon have endings that are specifically identified in God’s Word. Whatever happens to Putin and Russia will have been typified with past lines of the king of the south.
Pour esquisser les dernières étapes de la Russie, c’est esquisser les dernières étapes du roi du sud prophétique. Une caractéristique prophétique du roi du sud spirituel, qui est apparu dans l’histoire prophétique au temps de la fin en 1798, est la manière dont il parvient à sa fin. C’est aussi une caractéristique prophétique du roi du nord et du faux prophète. Chacune des trois puissances qui conduisent le monde à Armageddon a une fin spécifiquement identifiée dans la Parole de Dieu. Quoi qu’il advienne de Poutine et de la Russie, cela aura été préfiguré par les lignes passées du roi du sud.
The examples of the spiritual king of the south’s demise were typified by the demise of the first spiritual king of the south, who was atheistic France during the period of the Revolution. The demise of the southern kingdom includes the demise of the southern king. Napoleon’s demise corresponds to the demise of France, and aligns with the demise of the next kingdom of the south, who was Russia. Russia as the modern king of the south began in revolution, just as France, as the king of the south, began with revolution.
Les exemples de la chute du roi spirituel du sud furent préfigurés par la chute du premier roi spirituel du sud, qui fut la France athée durant la période de la Révolution. La chute du royaume du sud comprend la chute du roi du sud. La chute de Napoléon correspond à la chute de la France et s’aligne sur la chute du royaume suivant du sud, qui fut la Russie. La Russie, en tant que roi moderne du sud, commença dans la révolution, tout comme la France, en tant que roi du sud, avait commencé par la révolution.
Revolution is a characteristic of the dragon, who is the symbol of the southern kings. The dragon, the primary symbol of the king of the south is Satan, and as he attempts a revolution at the end of the millennium, fire comes down out of heaven and devours him. His rebellion in heaven at the beginning was the alpha of his rebellion at the conclusion of the millennium.
Révolution est une caractéristique du dragon, qui est le symbole des rois du sud. Le dragon, symbole premier du roi du sud, est Satan; et lorsqu’il tente une révolution à la fin du millénium, un feu descend du ciel et le dévore. Sa rébellion dans le ciel, au commencement, était l’alpha de sa rébellion à la conclusion du millénium.
In 1798, France prophetically took the throne as the spiritual king of the south during the French Revolution. That revolution swept through the nations of Europe and ultimately arrived at the Russian Revolution that was quickly followed by the Bolshevik Revolution in the same year.
Muna 1798, France ya ɗauki kursiyin annabci a matsayin sarkin kudu na ruhaniya a lokacin Juyin Juya Halin Faransa. Wannan juyin juya halin ya ratsa cikin al’umman Turai, kuma a ƙarshe ya kai ga Juyin Juya Halin Rasha, wanda nan da nan Juyin Juya Halin Bolshevik ya biyo baya a cikin wannan shekarar.
The Russian Revolution of 1917 consisted of two main steps: the February Revolution (which overthrew the Tsarist monarchy, ended autocracy, and established a provisional government amid a period of dual power with the Soviets) and the October Revolution (also called the Bolshevik Revolution, where the Bolsheviks under Lenin seized power in a coup, leading to the establishment of Soviet rule and the path to socialism/communism).
ئەو شۆڕشی ڕووسیای ساڵی 1917 لە دوو هەنگاوی سەرەکی پێکهاتبوو: شۆڕشی شوبات (کە مۆناڕشیای تساری ڕووخاند، کۆتایی بە دەسەڵاتداریی ڕەها هێنا، و حکومەتێکی کاتی دامەزراند لە ناو ماوەیەکی دەسەڵاتی دووانەدا لەگەڵ سۆڤیەتەکان)، و شۆڕشی ئۆکتۆبەر (کە بە شۆڕشی بۆڵشەڤیکییش ناسراوە، لەوێدا بۆڵشەڤیکەکان بە سەرکردایەتیی لێنین بە کودەتایەک دەسەڵاتیان دەستبەسەر کرد، کە بووە هۆی دامەزراندنی دەسەڵاتی سۆڤیەتی و گرتنی ڕێگای سۆسیالیزم/کۆمۆنیزم).
In historical analyses and revolutionary theory (particularly from Marxist perspectives like those of Trotsky, Luxemburg, and others drawing parallels), the French Revolution (1789–1799) is often seen as typifying or providing a schema for the course of the Russian events. The two steps of the French Revolution that typified these Russian phases are:
Na vuhlohpuia leh hmasawnna thuril zirchiannaahte leh hnam inthlakna theory-ahte (a bik takin Marxist thlîrnaa, Trotsky, Luxemburg, leh a dangte’n an inthlâkna inangna an kawhhmuhnaah), French Revolution (1789–1799) chu Russian thil thlengte kalphung entîrtu emaw, an hriatthiamna tûr schema pêktîrtu emaw anga hmuhtîr thin a ni. French Revolution-a hmasawnna hnih, heng Russian hun lai hmunte entîrtu an nih chu:
-
The initial moderate/constitutional phase (roughly 1789–1792), which aligns with the February Revolution. This French phase began with the storming of the Bastille, the convening of the Estates-General/National Assembly, the abolition of feudal privileges, the Declaration of the Rights of Man, and the establishment of a constitutional monarchy under the Girondins and moderate reformers. It overthrew absolute monarchy but retained elements of bourgeois/liberal governance and dual/contested power structures (e.g., between the Assembly and the lingering monarchy). Similarly, February 1917 ended Tsarism, but led to a bourgeois provisional government and dual power with the Soviets.
La phase initiale modérée/constitutionnelle (environ 1789–1792), qui correspond à la Révolution de Février. Cette phase française commença par la prise de la Bastille, la convocation des États généraux/de l’Assemblée nationale, l’abolition des privilèges féodaux, la Déclaration des droits de l’homme, et l’établissement d’une monarchie constitutionnelle sous les Girondins et les réformateurs modérés. Elle renversa la monarchie absolue, mais conserva des éléments de gouvernement bourgeois/libéral ainsi que des structures de pouvoir duales/contestées (par exemple entre l’Assemblée et la monarchie subsistante). De même, Février 1917 mit fin au tsarisme, mais déboucha sur un gouvernement provisoire bourgeois et sur un double pouvoir avec les Soviets.
-
The radical/Jacobin phase (roughly 1792–1794, including the establishment of the First Republic, the execution of Louis XVI, and the Reign of Terror under Robespierre and the Jacobins/Committee of Public Safety) aligns with the October (Bolshevik) Revolution. The Jacobins seized power from the more moderate Girondins through radical action, declared a republic, suppressed counter-revolution, and pushed the revolution toward deeper social transformation and defense against internal/external threats. This mirrors how the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government, consolidated proletarian/dictatorship-of-the-proletariat rule, and advanced revolutionary socialism.
Le stade radical/jacobin (environ 1792–1794, y compris l’établissement de la Première République, l’exécution de Louis XVI et la Terreur sous Robespierre et les Jacobins/le Comité de salut public) correspond à la Révolution d’Octobre (bolchevique). Les Jacobins s’emparèrent du pouvoir aux dépens des Girondins plus modérés par une action radicale, proclamèrent une république, réprimèrent la contre-révolution et poussèrent la révolution vers une transformation sociale plus profonde ainsi que vers la défense contre les menaces intérieures et extérieures. Cela reflète la manière dont les bolcheviks renversèrent le gouvernement provisoire, consolidèrent le pouvoir prolétarien/la dictature du prolétariat et firent progresser le socialisme révolutionnaire.
These parallels emphasize how revolutions often follow a pattern: an initial broad uprising against the old regime (led by moderates/bourgeois forces), followed by a more extreme seizure of power by radicals to ‘save’ and deepen the revolution amid crisis. The Bolsheviks themselves consciously drew on the French example, viewing their October uprising as akin to the Jacobin coup—necessary to prevent counter-revolution and fulfill the revolution’s potential.
Ces parallèles soulignent que les révolutions suivent souvent un schéma : une première insurrection générale contre l’ancien régime (menée par des forces modérées/bourgeoises), suivie d’une prise de pouvoir plus extrême par des radicaux afin de « sauver » et d’approfondir la révolution au milieu de la crise. Les bolcheviks eux-mêmes se sont consciemment inspirés de l’exemple français, considérant leur soulèvement d’Octobre comme analogue au coup jacobin — nécessaire pour empêcher la contre-révolution et accomplir le potentiel de la révolution.
This typology appears in works like Trotsky’s History of the Russian Revolution (which explicitly compares the dual power phase in Russia to similar dynamics in France) and Rosa Luxemburg’s writings on the Russian events, where she notes the Russian Revolution’s first period (March–October) follows the schema of the French (and English) revolutions, with the Bolshevik takeover paralleling the Jacobin ascent.
Cette typologie apparaît dans des ouvrages tels que l’Histoire de la Révolution russe de Trotsky (qui compare explicitement la phase de double pouvoir en Russie à des dynamiques analogues en France) et dans les écrits de Rosa Luxemburg sur les événements russes, où elle remarque que la première période de la Révolution russe (mars–octobre) suit le schéma des révolutions française (et anglaise), la prise du pouvoir par les bolcheviks correspondant à l’ascension des Jacobins.
Jesus always illustrates the end with the beginning, and the demise of Napoleon as the first spiritual king of the south followed the waymarks at the beginning of the revolution, and in so doing represented the demise of the Soviet Union.
Jesus tau qhia qhov kawg los ntawm qhov pib tas li, thiab txoj kev poob ntawm Napoleon uas yog thawj tus vajntxwv sab qab teb ntawm sab ntsuj plig tau raws li cov cim tseg thaum pib ntawm kev hloov tswj hwm, thiab hauv qhov ntawd nws sawv cev rau txoj kev poob ntawm Soviet Union.
Napoleon’s progressive (step-by-step) demise aligns closely with the Soviet Union’s gradual decline and 1991 collapse, in the same typological framework where the French Revolution’s two phases prefigured the Russian Revolution’s February and October 1917 stages. The parallel extends into the post-radical consolidation phase (Bonapartism) and its inevitable unraveling. This draws from both general historical patterns and Marxist analyses (especially Trotsky’s in The Revolution Betrayed and related works), which treat Napoleon as the archetype of Bonapartism: a strongman regime that arises after a revolution’s radical peak, balances between classes, preserves key structural gains of the revolution (while suppressing its democratic thrust), builds a personal/military-bureaucratic empire, overextends, and then suffers a phased collapse leading to partial restoration of the old order.
La disparition progressive (étape par étape) de Napoléon correspond étroitement au déclin graduel de l’Union soviétique et à son effondrement de 1991, dans le même cadre typologique où les deux phases de la Révolution française préfiguraient les étapes de février et d’octobre 1917 de la Révolution russe. Le parallèle s’étend jusqu’à la phase de consolidation post-radicale (le bonapartisme) et à son inévitable désagrégation. Cela procède à la fois de schémas historiques généraux et d’analyses marxistes (particulièrement celles de Trotsky dans La Révolution trahie et dans des ouvrages connexes), lesquelles considèrent Napoléon comme l’archétype du bonapartisme : un régime d’homme fort qui surgit après le sommet radical d’une révolution, s’équilibre entre les classes, conserve les principaux acquis structurels de la révolution (tout en en réprimant l’élan démocratique), édifie un empire personnel, militaire et bureaucratique, s’étend au-delà de ses forces, puis subit un effondrement par phases conduisant à une restauration partielle de l’ancien ordre.
Napoleon’s Bonapartist Rise Parallels the Stalinist Consolidation
L’ascension bonapartiste de Napoléon présente des parallèles avec la consolidation stalinienne
After the Jacobin radical phase and Thermidorian reaction (1794), the unstable Directory (1795–1799), Napoleon’s 18 Brumaire coup (1799) establishes the Consulate, then the Empire (1804). He codifies and exports bourgeois revolutionary gains (Napoleonic Code, end of feudal privileges, strong centralized state) but subordinates them to authoritarian rule, military glory, and a new elite.
Pe tava Jacobin radical thaj Thermidorian reaction (1794), o naśtipe Directory (1795–1799), o coup d’état le Napoleonosko 18 Brumaire (1799) ustanovil le Consulate, paľa leste o Empire (1804). Vov kodifikuil thaj eksportuil o bourgeois revolutionary gains (Napoleonic Code, teljaripen le feudal privileges, zoralo centralized state), ale podčinuil len autoritarno rule, military glory, thaj e neve elita.
After the Bolshevik/October radical phase and early Soviet experiments, bureaucratic degeneration sets in (especially from the mid-1920s). Stalin’s consolidation defeats the Left Opposition, enforces “socialism in one country,” and creates a police/military-bureaucratic dictatorship. The planned economy and nationalized property (core gains of October) are preserved but turned into tools of a privileged caste, with internationalism abandoned.
Après la phase radicale bolchevique/d’Octobre et les premières expériences soviétiques, une dégénérescence bureaucratique s’installe (surtout à partir du milieu des années 1920). La consolidation du pouvoir par Staline vainc l’Opposition de gauche, impose le « socialisme dans un seul pays » et instaure une dictature policière, militaire et bureaucratique. L’économie planifiée et la propriété nationalisée (acquis fondamentaux d’Octobre) sont préservées, mais transformées en instruments d’une caste privilégiée, tandis que l’internationalisme est abandonné.
In both cases, the revolutionary energy is “frozen” and redirected into state power and expansion under a single figure or apparatus (Trotsky explicitly called the Stalin regime a form of “Soviet Bonapartism,” closer to Napoleon’s Empire than the Consulate).
Nan toude ka yo, enèji revolisyonè a “jele” epi yo reoryante l pou l sèvi pouvwa leta ak ekspansyon anba yon sèl figi oswa yon sèl aparèy (Trotsky te rele rejim Stalin lan klèman yon fòm “Bonapartis Sovyetik,” ki pi pre Anpi Napoleyon an pase Konsila a).
The Step-by-Step Collapse
انهيارٌ خطوةً فخطوةً
This is the core alignment—the decline is not one sudden event but a successive series of erosions driven by overextension, internal contradictions, military quagmires, loss of peripheral control, failed reforms, and final dissolution/restoration.
Toto je základní soulad — úpadek není jedinou náhlou událostí, nýbrž postupnou řadou rozkladů způsobených nadměrným rozpětím, vnitřními rozpory, vojenskými bažinami, ztrátou kontroly nad okraji, ztroskotanými reformami a nakonec závěrečným rozpuštěním/obnovením.
Napoleonic side (1812 to 1815)
Fa'ahinga faka-Napolione (1812 ki he 1815)
-
1812: Disastrous invasion of Russia—Grande Armée (600,000 men) decimated by logistics, winter, and resistance. Catastrophic turning point; massive loss of prestige and manpower.
1812 : Invasion désastreuse de la Russie — la Grande Armée (600 000 hommes) est décimée par la logistique, l’hiver et la résistance. Tournant catastrophique ; perte massive de prestige et d’effectifs.
-
1813: Coalition forms against him; defeat at Leipzig (“Battle of the Nations”)—loss of German allies and territories; empire begins shrinking.
1813 : une coalition se forme contre lui ; défaite à Leipzig (« bataille des Nations ») — perte des alliés allemands et des territoires ; l’empire commence à se rétrécir.
-
1814: Allies invade France proper; Paris falls; Napoleon abdicates and is exiled to Elba.
1814: Les Alliés envahissent le territoire même de la France; Paris tombe; Napoléon abdique et est exilé à l’île d’Elbe.
-
1815: Brief return (Hundred Days), final defeat at Waterloo; permanent exile to St. Helena; Bourbon monarchy restored (reactionary rollback of revolutionary gains, though not total—some legal/administrative changes survived).
1815៖ ការវិលត្រឡប់មកវិញរយៈពេលខ្លី (រយៈពេលមួយរយថ្ងៃ) ការបរាជ័យចុងក្រោយនៅ Waterloo; ការនិរទេសជាអចិន្ត្រៃយ៍ទៅកាន់ St. Helena; រាជាណាចក្រប៊ួរបុងត្រូវបានស្ដារឡើងវិញ (ការត្រឡប់ថយក្រោយបែបប្រតិកម្មនៃសមិទ្ធផលនានានៃបដិវត្តន៍ ទោះបីមិនមែនទាំងស្រុងក៏ដោយ—ការផ្លាស់ប្តូរផ្នែកច្បាប់/រដ្ឋបាលមួយចំនួននៅតែស្ថិតស្ថេរ)។
Soviet side (1970s to 1991)
Lado soviético (de la década de 1970 a 1991)
-
Late 1970s–1980s: Economic stagnation (“zastoi” under Brezhnev), chronic shortages, technological lag, and crippling arms race with the US/NATO—systemic overextension begins to hollow out the economy.
Fundi i viteve 1970–vitet 1980: stanjacion ekonomik (“zastoi” nën Brezhnevin), mungesa kronike, prapambetje teknologjike dhe gara rraskapitëse e armatimeve me SHBA-në/NATO-n—mbishtrirja sistemike fillon ta gërryejë ekonominë nga brenda.
-
1979–1989: Afghanistan war—Soviet “Vietnam”; quagmire drains resources, morale, and international standing (note the ironic parallel: Napoleon destroyed in Russia; USSR bled in a rugged, resistant theater).
1979–1989: Gerra e Afganistanit—“Vietnami” sovjetik; një moçal që shteroi burimet, moralin dhe pozitën ndërkombëtare (vëreni paralelen ironike: Napoleoni u shkatërrua në Rusi; BRSS-ja u gjakos në një teatër të ashpër dhe qëndrestar).
-
1985–1989: Gorbachev’s perestroika/glasnost reforms (attempted “saving” of the system, like some late Napoleonic adjustments) instead expose and accelerate contradictions; Eastern Bloc satellites revolt and break free (Berlin Wall falls November 9, 1989, regimes collapse across 1989–1990)—loss of the “outer empire,” exactly like Napoleon’s loss of allied states.
1985–1989 : les réformes de perestroïka/glasnost de Gorbatchev (tentative de « sauver » le système, à l’instar de certains ajustements napoléoniens tardifs) ne font au contraire que mettre au jour et accélérer les contradictions ; les satellites du bloc de l’Est se soulèvent et s’affranchissent (le mur de Berlin tombe le 9 novembre 1989, les régimes s’effondrent dans toute la région entre 1989 et 1990) — perte de l’« empire extérieur », exactement comme la perte, pour Napoléon, des États alliés.
-
1990–1991: Internal nationalist crises, republics declare sovereignty; August 1991 hardliner coup fails spectacularly; Gorbachev resigns December 25, 1991; USSR dissolves into 15 states. Capitalist restoration follows (Yeltsin-era shock therapy, oligarchs, privatization)—analogous to the Bourbon restoration: prerevolutionary class elements (or their equivalents) return, rolling back full revolutionary property relations while keeping some administrative forms.
1990–1991: Vnútorné nacionalistické krízy, republiky vyhlasujú zvrchovanosť; augustový prevrat tvrdolinajníkov v roku 1991 katastrofálne zlyháva; Gorbačov 25. decembra 1991 rezignuje; ZSSR sa rozpadá na 15 štátov. Nasleduje kapitalistická reštaurácia (šoková terapia éry Jeľcina, oligarchovia, privatizácia) — analogická k bourbonskej reštaurácii: prvky predrevolučnej triedy (alebo ich ekvivalenty) sa vracajú a rušia plný rozsah revolučných vlastníckych vzťahov, pričom si ponechávajú niektoré administratívne formy.
In both, the “empire” (French Continental System vs. Soviet Eastern Bloc/COMECON influence) fragments outward-in, internal decay accelerates, a final crisis exposes the hollowness, and the old social forces reassert (monarchy/capitalism). Bonapartism proves unsustainable—a “pyramid balanced on its point,” as Trotsky put it—because it rests on suppressing the revolution’s democratic base while defending (but distorting) its economic base amid hostile external pressures. The Soviet collapse was not “sudden” in the long view but the culmination of progressive internal rot, just as Napoleon’s empire did not vanish overnight but eroded through successive defeats until restoration.
У оба случаја, „империја“ (француски Континентални систем насупрот совјетском Источном блоку/утицају СЕВ-а) распада се споља ка унутра, унутрашње труљење се убрзава, завршна криза разоткрива њену празнину, а старе друштвене силе поново се потврђују (монархија/капитализам). Бонапартизам се показује као неодржив — „пирамида ослоњена на свој врх“, како је то Троцки рекао — јер почива на потискивању демократске основе револуције, док у исто време брани (али изобличује) њену економску основу усред непријатељских спољашњих притисака. Совјетски слом, посматран у широј перспективи, није био „изненадан“, него врхунац постепеног унутрашњег распадања, као што ни Наполеонова империја није нестала преко ноћи, већ се истрошила кроз узастопне поразе, све до рестаурације.
The beginning and ending of France and the Soviet Union align with the testimony of king Uzziah and Ptolemy. Ptolemy IV Philopator wins a decisive victory at the Battle of Raphia (217 BC) against the king of the north (Antiochus III), but “he shall not be strengthened by it”—he makes peace instead of pressing the advantage, returns to luxury and self-exaltation, then (per the record preserved in 3 Maccabees 1–2) Ptolemy visits Jerusalem after his triumph. His heart lifted up, he attempts to enter the Holy of Holies and offer sacrifice himself—an act of usurpation and defiance against the true God. He is divinely struck (paralysis), humiliated, and turns to persecution of God’s people. His reign thereafter is one of progressive decline: moral corruption, internal revolts, and loss of strength until his death. This is the exact mirror of King Uzziah (2 Chronicles 26:16–21) whose heart was lifted up after military success., who then entered the temple to burn incense (usurping the priests) and was struck with leprosy in the forehead, which was a public, visible judgment. From then on Uzziah lived in isolation, cut off from the house of the Lord, until death—a slow, lingering demise rather than instant destruction.
ਫ਼ਰਾਂਸ ਅਤੇ ਸੋਵੀਅਤ ਯੂਨੀਅਨ ਦੀ ਸ਼ੁਰੂਆਤ ਅਤੇ ਅੰਤ ਰਾਜਾ ਉਜ਼ਜ਼ਿਆਹ ਅਤੇ ਟੋਲੇਮੀ ਦੀ ਗਵਾਹੀ ਨਾਲ ਮੇਲ ਖਾਂਦੇ ਹਨ। ਟੋਲੇਮੀ IV ਫਿਲੋਪਾਤੋਰ ਰਾਫ਼ੀਆ ਦੀ ਲੜਾਈ (217 BC) ਵਿੱਚ ਉੱਤਰ ਦੇ ਰਾਜੇ (ਅੰਤੀਓਕਸ III) ਉੱਤੇ ਨਿਰਣਾਇਕ ਜਿੱਤ ਹਾਸਲ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ, ਪਰ “ਉਹ ਇਸ ਨਾਲ ਮਜ਼ਬੂਤ ਨਾ ਹੋਵੇਗਾ”—ਉਹ ਲਾਭ ਨੂੰ ਅੱਗੇ ਵਧਾਉਣ ਦੀ ਬਜਾਇ ਸੰਧੀ ਕਰ ਲੈਂਦਾ ਹੈ, ਵਿਲਾਸਤਾ ਅਤੇ ਆਤਮ-ਮਹਿਮਾ ਵੱਲ ਮੁੜ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ, ਅਤੇ ਫਿਰ (ਜਿਵੇਂ 3 Maccabees 1–2 ਵਿੱਚ ਸੰਭਾਲੇ ਗਏ ਵਰਤਾਂਤ ਅਨੁਸਾਰ) ਆਪਣੀ ਜਿੱਤ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਟੋਲੇਮੀ ਯਰੂਸ਼ਲਮ ਦਾ ਦੌਰਾ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ। ਉਸ ਦਾ ਦਿਲ ਘਮੰਡ ਨਾਲ ਉੱਪਰ ਚੁੱਕਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਹੋਇਆ, ਉਹ ਪਵਿੱਤਰਾਂ ਦੇ ਪਵਿੱਤਰ ਸਥਾਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਦਾਖ਼ਲ ਹੋ ਕੇ ਆਪ ਹੀ ਬਲੀ ਚੜ੍ਹਾਉਣ ਦਾ ਯਤਨ ਕਰਦਾ ਹੈ—ਇਹ ਸੱਚੇ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ ਹੜਪ ਅਤੇ ਬਗਾਵਤ ਦਾ ਕਰਤੱਬ ਸੀ। ਉਹ ਦਿਵਯ ਦੰਡ ਨਾਲ ਮਾਰਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ (ਲਕਵਾ), ਹੇਠਾਂ ਲਿਆਂਦਾ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ, ਅਤੇ ਪਰਮੇਸ਼ੁਰ ਦੇ ਲੋਕਾਂ ਉੱਤੇ ਅਤਿਆਚਾਰ ਵੱਲ ਮੁੜਦਾ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਉਸ ਦਾ ਰਾਜ ਕ੍ਰਮਸ਼ਃ ਪਤਨ ਦਾ ਰਾਜ ਬਣ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ: ਨੈਤਿਕ ਭ੍ਰਿਸ਼ਟਤਾ, ਅੰਦਰੂਨੀ ਬਗਾਵਤਾਂ, ਅਤੇ ਉਸ ਦੀ ਮੌਤ ਤੱਕ ਤਾਕਤ ਦਾ ਘਾਟਾ। ਇਹ ਰਾਜਾ ਉਜ਼ਜ਼ਿਆਹ (2 Chronicles 26:16–21) ਦਾ ਬਿਲਕੁਲ ਦਰਪਣ ਹੈ, ਜਿਸ ਦਾ ਦਿਲ ਸੈਨਿਕ ਸਫਲਤਾ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਉੱਪਰ ਚੁੱਕਿਆ ਗਿਆ ਸੀ, ਅਤੇ ਜੋ ਫਿਰ ਧੂਪ ਸੁਆਹਣ ਲਈ ਮੰਦਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਦਾਖ਼ਲ ਹੋਇਆ (ਯਾਜਕਾਂ ਦਾ ਅਧਿਕਾਰ ਹੜਪਦਿਆਂ), ਅਤੇ ਆਪਣੇ ਮੱਥੇ ਉੱਤੇ ਕੋੜ੍ਹ ਨਾਲ ਮਾਰਿਆ ਗਿਆ, ਜੋ ਇੱਕ ਸਰਵਜਨਿਕ, ਦ੍ਰਿਸ਼ਮਾਨ ਨਿਆਂ ਸੀ। ਉਸ ਸਮੇਂ ਤੋਂ ਉਜ਼ਜ਼ਿਆਹ ਮੌਤ ਤੱਕ ਇਕਾਂਤ ਵਿੱਚ ਜੀਵਿਆ, ਪ੍ਰਭੂ ਦੇ ਘਰ ਤੋਂ ਵੱਖ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੋਇਆ—ਤੁਰੰਤ ਨਾਸ ਦੀ ਬਜਾਇ ਹੌਲੀ, ਲੰਬੀ ਖਿੱਚੀ ਹੋਈ ਮੌਤ।
Both are southern kings whose pride manifests in a temple intrusion at Jerusalem, followed by a progressive, erosive ending instead of immediate collapse. This is the typological template for every later “king of the south.”
Wote wawili ni wafalme wa kusini ambao kiburi chao hujidhihirisha katika uvamizi wa hekalu huko Yerusalemu, kikifuatiwa na mwisho wa hatua kwa hatua, unaodhoofisha, badala ya kuanguka kwa ghafla. Huu ndio mfano wa kiainisho kwa kila “mfalme wa kusini” wa baadaye.
1798: France Becomes the Spiritual King of the South
1798 : La France devient le roi spirituel du Sud
At “the time of the end” (1798), atheistic France (the power that had just manifested the spiritual characteristics of Egypt—open denial of God, as in Revelation 11:8) pushes at the king of the north (the Papacy) by taking the Pope captive. Napoleon is the military embodiment of that push. France wears the crown of the south in 1798, because it exalts the same atheistic spirit that ancient Egypt embodied.
अंत के समय (1798) में नास्तिक फ्रांस—वह शक्ति जिसने अभी-अभी मिस्र की आत्मिक विशेषताओं को प्रकट किया था, अर्थात् परमेश्वर का खुला इन्कार, जैसा कि प्रकाशितवाक्य 11:8 में है—उत्तर के राजा (पोपतंत्र) पर धक्का करता है, जब वह पोप को बन्दी बना लेता है। नेपोलियन उस धक्के का सैनिक मूर्त रूप है। 1798 में फ्रांस दक्षिण का मुकुट धारण करता है, क्योंकि वह उसी नास्तिक आत्मा को ऊँचा उठाता है जिसका मूर्त स्वरूप प्राचीन मिस्र था।
But just as Ptolemy could not “make the most of his victory,” the French Revolution’s radical phase could not sustain or fully export its gains. The crown of the south passes onward as the philosophy of atheism matures and finds a new governmental voice.
Mais, tout comme Ptolémée ne pouvait pas « tirer pleinement parti de sa victoire », la phase radicale de la Révolution française ne pouvait ni maintenir ni exporter pleinement ses acquis. La couronne du sud passe plus loin, à mesure que la philosophie de l’athéisme mûrit et trouve une nouvelle voix gouvernementale.
Progressive Leadership Symbols: Napoleon to Lenin to Stalin
Սիմվոլներ առաջադիմական առաջնորդության. Նապոլեոնից՝ Լենին, ապա՝ Ստալին
These three are not random; they are progressive endings—each representing a further stage in the king of the south’s trajectory toward its own slow dissolution. Napoleon—the first great symbol after 1798. Victorious in Egypt (the literal south), he overreaches (Russian campaign of 1812 was a disaster beginning a series of losses to his peripheral empire step by step (1813–1814), suffers final defeat (Waterloo 1815), and is exiled twice. Napoleon represents a progressive, phased demise—exactly like unto the Ptolemy and Uzziah.
Ces trois événements ne sont pas fortuits; ils constituent des fins progressives — chacune représentant une étape supplémentaire dans la trajectoire du roi du midi vers sa propre lente dissolution. Napoléon — le premier grand symbole après 1798. Victorieux en Égypte (le midi littéral), il dépasse ses limites (la campagne de Russie de 1812 fut un désastre, amorçant une série de pertes pour son empire périphérique, pas à pas [1813–1814]), subit une défaite finale (Waterloo, 1815) et est exilé à deux reprises. Napoléon représente une disparition progressive, par phases — exactement semblable à celle de Ptolémée et d’Ozias.
Lenin seized the crown in the 1917 October Revolution. The Bolshevik “push” continues the war against the old order (including religious power). But the radical phase cannot stabilize; Lenin’s own health fails early, and the system begins to bureaucratize.
Lénine s’empara de la couronne lors de la Révolution d’Octobre de 1917. La « poussée » bolchevique poursuit la guerre contre l’ancien ordre (y compris le pouvoir religieux). Mais la phase radicale ne peut se stabiliser ; la santé même de Lénine décline prématurément, et le système commence à se bureaucratiser.
Stalin, the consolidator (Soviet Bonapartism) “freezes” the revolution into a military-bureaucratic empire, preserves the core gains (nationalized economy the anti-feudal parallel to Napoleon’s Code), but turns the power inward (purges) and outward (expansion). Yet the heart is lifted up in atheism; the system cannot truly “make the most of its victory.” Overextension (Afghanistan parallel to Napoleon’s Russia), stagnation, failed reforms (perestroika was the last desperate attempt), loss of satellites (1989–90 = loss of “allies”), and final dissolution (1991).
ஸ்டாலின், ஒருங்கிணைப்பாளர் (சோவியத் போனபார்டிசம்), புரட்சியை ஒரு இராணுவ-அலுவலக ஆட்சிப்பேரரசாக “உறையச்” செய்கிறார்; அதன் மையச் சாதனைகளைப் பாதுகாக்கிறார் (தேசியமயமாக்கப்பட்ட பொருளாதாரம்—நெப்போலியனின் சட்டச் சாசனத்துக்கு எதிர்-சாமந்தத் தன்மையிலான இணை), ஆனால் அதிகாரத்தை உள்ள்நோக்கியும் (தூய்மைப்படுத்தல்கள்) வெளிநோக்கியும் (விரிவாக்கம்) திருப்புகிறார். ஆயினும், இருதயம் நாத்திகத்தில் மேட்டிமையடைகிறது; அந்த அமைப்பு தன் “வெற்றியை உண்மையாகப் பயன்படுத்திக் கொள்ள” முடியாது. அளவுகடந்த விரிவாக்கம் (நெப்போலியனின் ரஷ்யப் படையெடுப்புக்கான இணையாக ஆப்கானிஸ்தான்), தேக்கம், தோல்வியடைந்த சீர்திருத்தங்கள் (பெரெஸ்த்ரோய்கா கடைசி நிராசையான முயற்சியாக இருந்தது), துணைநாடுகளை இழத்தல் (1989–90 = “கூட்டாளிகள்” இழப்பு), மற்றும் இறுதியான கலைவு (1991).
The Soviet Union’s collapse was not sudden—it was progressive, exactly as Napoleon’s empire eroded step by step and as Ptolemy’s and Uzziah’s reigns withered after their temple-pride moment. The “spiritual” king of the south (atheism in governmental form) received its own lingering judgment: hollowed out from within, unable to sustain the lie, swept away in the counter-movement of the king of the north (the Papacy’s resurgence in the vacuum).
L’effondrement de l’Union soviétique ne fut pas soudain — il fut progressif, exactement comme l’empire de Napoléon s’éroda pas à pas et comme les règnes de Ptolémée et d’Ozias se flétrirent après leur moment d’orgueil envers le temple. Le roi du sud « spirituel » (l’athéisme sous forme gouvernementale) reçut son propre jugement prolongé : vidé de l’intérieur, incapable de soutenir le mensonge, emporté dans le contre-mouvement du roi du nord (la résurgence de la papauté dans le vide).
The French Revolution (two steps) typifies the Russian Revolution (February and October/Bolshevik). Napoleonic Bonapartism and progressive demise typify Stalinist consolidation and Soviet progressive demise. All of it is the modern outworking of Daniel 11’s king of the south line, from Ptolemy’s Raphia failure and temple arrogance, through Uzziah’s identical sin and slow end, to France in 1798 and its atheistic heir (Lenin–Stalin era) that could not strengthen itself by its victories.
La Révolution française (en deux étapes) préfigure la Révolution russe (Février et Octobre/bolchevique). Le bonapartisme napoléonien et son déclin progressif préfigurent la consolidation stalinienne et le dépérissement progressif soviétique. Tout cela constitue le déploiement moderne de la ligne du roi du midi dans Daniel 11, depuis l’échec de Ptolémée à Raphia et son arrogance envers le temple, en passant par le péché identique d’Ozias et sa fin lente, jusqu’à la France en 1798 et à son héritier athée (l’ère Lénine–Staline) qui ne put se fortifier par ses victoires.
Lenin, the radical founder or seizer of power (parallel to the Jacobin/Bolshevik ascent; the “push” phase post-1917, is akin to Napoleon’s early Consulate after Brumaire). Stalin was the Bonapartist consolidator (Soviet empire builder, purges, WWII victory, Cold War peak; heart lifted up in atheism, but unable to fully “strengthen” the victory long-term—overextension begins).
Ленин — радикальный основатель, или захвативший власть (параллельно якобинско-большевистскому восхождению; фаза «натиска» после 1917 года сродни раннему Консульству Наполеона после Брюмера). Сталин был бонапартистским консолидатором (строителем советской империи, проводившим чистки, одержавшим победу во Второй мировой войне, приведшим к вершине холодной войны; сердце его вознеслось в атеизме, но он не смог в полной мере надолго «укрепить» эту победу — начинается перерастяжение).
Khrushchev was the post-peak “thaw” leader (1953–1964): denounces Stalin (Secret Speech 1956), exposes some corruption, attempts limited reforms, but fails to resolve systemic contradictions. This parallels a “Thermidorian” or early-decline phase—loosening terror while the core atheist structure remains, yet prestige erodes (e.g., Cuban Missile Crisis humiliation 1962 mirrors minor Napoleonic setbacks before the big ones).
Khrushchev a suiv le dirigeant du « dégel » de l’après-apogée (1953–1964) : il dénonce Staline (Discours secret de 1956), met au jour une partie de la corruption, tente des réformes limitées, mais ne parvient pas à résoudre les contradictions systémiques. Cela correspond à une phase « thermidorienne » ou de début de déclin — un relâchement de la terreur tandis que subsiste la structure athée fondamentale, alors même que le prestige s’érode (par ex., l’humiliation de la crise des missiles de Cuba en 1962 reflète des revers napoléoniens mineurs avant les grands).
Gorbachev was the desperate reformer (1985–1991) with perestroika (restructuring) and glasnost (openness) as last-ditch efforts to “save” the system, but they accelerate collapse—loss of the Eastern Bloc (1989 Berlin Wall), internal revolts. This is the clearest “progressive ending” marker: like unto Napoleon’s late attempts at adjustment before the 1814 invasion, or Ptolemy/Uzziah’s lingering decline after temple-pride. Gorbachev’s 1989 concordat/meeting with Pope John Paul II (king of the north) symbolizes the spiritual defeat—the southern king’s atheism yielding to papal resurgence.
गोर्बाचेभ निराश सुधारक थिए (1985–1991), जसले perestroika (पुनर्संरचना) र glasnost (खुलापन) लाई व्यवस्थालाई “बचाउन” गरिएका अन्तिम हताश प्रयत्नहरूको रूपमा अघि सारे; तर यिनैले पतनलाई अझ तीव्र पारे—पूर्वी ब्लकको क्षति (1989 को Berlin Wall), आन्तरिक विद्रोहहरू। यही सबैभन्दा स्पष्ट “क्रमिक अन्त्य” को चिह्न हो: 1814 को आक्रमणभन्दा अघि नेपोलियनले समायोजनका लागि गरेका उत्तरकालीन प्रयत्नहरूजस्तै, अथवा मन्दिर-अभिमानपछि Ptolemy/Uzziah को दीर्घकालीन अवनतिजस्तै। 1989 मा Pope John Paul II (उत्तरका राजा) सँग गोर्बाचेभको concordat/भेटले आत्मिक पराजयको प्रतीक जनाउँछ—दक्षिणका राजाको नास्तिकता पोपीय पुनरुत्थानअगाडि झुक्दै गएको।
Yeltsin was the final dissolution figure (1991 onward) who led to the August 1991 coup resistance, becomes president of Russia, oversees USSR breakup (December 1991), shock therapy privatization, capitalist restoration. He embodies the chaotic end and partial “restoration” of prerevolutionary elements (oligarchic capitalism, like Bourbon’s return post-Napoleon). The southern king’s palace is swept away, fulfilling Daniel 11:40’s whirlwind conquest by the north (Papacy via US alliance).
Ельцин был заключительной фигурой распада (с 1991 года), приведшей к сопротивлению августовскому путчу 1991 года; он становится президентом России, наблюдает распад СССР (декабрь 1991 года), приватизацию по методу «шоковой терапии», капиталистическую реставрацию. Он воплощает хаотический конец и частичную «реставрацию» дореволюционных элементов (олигархический капитализм, подобно возвращению Бурбонов после Наполеона). Дворец южного царя сметается, исполняя Дан. 11:40, где север совершает завоевание вихрем (папство через союз с США).
The typology emphasizes lingering, step-by-step judgment rather than instant fall, just as Ptolemy IV’s Raphia victory led to pride, temple intrusion, divine striking, and slow decay; Uzziah’s leprosy isolation until death; Napoleon’s phased losses (Russia, Leipzig, Paris, Elba, Waterloo). The Soviet line identifies the peak strength under Stalin, the progressive hollowing during Khrushchev’s thaw that exposes the cracks in the system. Then the Brezhnev-era stagnation and then Gorbachev’s reforms become accelerants; Yeltsin’s era completes the sweep (USSR dissolved, atheism’s governmental form ends). The “heart lifted up” manifests across the line (atheistic defiance), but none “makes the most of victory.”
U typologie wordt de nadruk gelegd op een slepende, stapsgewijze oordeelstrekking in plaats van op een onmiddellijke val, zoals ook Ptolemaeus IV’s overwinning bij Raphia leidde tot hoogmoed, indringing in de tempel, goddelijke slaande hand en langzame aftakeling; Uzzia’s afzondering vanwege melaatsheid tot aan zijn dood; Napoleons gefaseerde nederlagen (Rusland, Leipzig, Parijs, Elba, Waterloo). De Sovjetlijn wijst op de piek van macht onder Stalin, de geleidelijke uitholling tijdens Chroesjtsjovs dooi, die de scheuren in het systeem blootlegt. Vervolgens worden de stagnatie van het Brezjnev-tijdperk en daarna Gorbatsjovs hervormingen tot versnellers; het tijdperk van Jeltsin voltooit de ommekeer (de USSR ontbonden, de regeringsvorm van het atheïsme ten einde). Het “hart verheven” openbaart zich door de gehele lijn heen (atheïstische trots), maar niemand “maakt het meeste van de overwinning.”
The end of the southern kings are progressive, Satan’s demise began at the cross, and he is ultimately sent into exile for 1,000 years and then he dies.
Mwisho wa wafalme wa kusini ni wa hatua kwa hatua; kuangamia kwa Shetani kulianza msalabani, na hatimaye atapelekwa uhamishoni kwa miaka 1,000, kisha ataangamia.
And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand. And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.
Na mimi nikamwona malaika akishuka kutoka mbinguni, mwenye ufunguo wa shimo lisilo na mwisho na mnyororo mkubwa mkononi mwake. Akamkamata yule joka, nyoka wa kale, ambaye ni Ibilisi na Shetani, akamfunga miaka elfu moja, akamtupa katika shimo lisilo na mwisho, akamfungia humo, akatia muhuri juu yake, asiwadanganye mataifa tena, hata ile miaka elfu moja itimie; na baada ya hayo hana budi kufunguliwa kwa kitambo kidogo.
And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished.
Et je vis des trônes; et ils s’y assirent, et le jugement leur fut donné. Et je vis les âmes de ceux qui avaient été décapités à cause du témoignage de Jésus et à cause de la parole de Dieu, et de ceux qui n’avaient adoré ni la bête ni son image, et qui n’avaient reçu sa marque ni sur leur front ni sur leur main; et ils vécurent et régnèrent avec Christ mille ans. Mais le reste des morts ne revécut point jusqu’à ce que les mille ans fussent accomplis.
This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.
Ceci est la première résurrection. Heureux et saint celui qui a part à la première résurrection : sur eux la seconde mort n’a point de pouvoir ; mais ils seront sacrificateurs de Dieu et de Christ, et ils régneront avec lui pendant mille ans.
And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them. And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever. Revelation 20:1–10.
Na wakati ile miaka elfu itakapokwisha, Shetani ataachiliwa kutoka gerezani mwake, naye atatoka kwenda kuyadanganya mataifa yaliyo katika pande nne za dunia, Gogu na Magogu, ili awakusanye pamoja kwa vita; ambao hesabu yao ni kama mchanga wa bahari. Nao wakapanda juu ya upana wa dunia, wakauzingira mji wa watakatifu na mji ule mpendwa; na moto ukashuka kutoka kwa Mungu mbinguni, ukawala. Naye yule Ibilisi aliyewadanganya akatupwa katika ziwa la moto na kiberiti, walimo yule mnyama na nabii wa uongo; nao watateswa mchana na usiku milele na milele. Ufunuo 20:1–10.
We will continue our considerations of the southern king in Daniel eleven, verses eleven through fifteen in the next article.
Nous poursuivrons, dans le prochain article, nos considérations sur le roi du midi dans Daniel onze, versets onze à quinze.
The Time of the End magazine was published in 1996 and it represents the prophecy from the book of Daniel that was unsealed in 1989. Recently the magazine was read by ChatGPT and asked to evaluate the role of Ukraine in the history of verse forty represented in the magazine. The following is the breakdown of the magazine that has been in the public record for thirty years. The first passage from the writings of Ellen White in the magazine is Testimonies, volume 9, 11.
Журнал «Час кінця» був опублікований у 1996 році, і він представляє пророцтво з книги Даниїла, яке було розпечатане у 1989 році. Нещодавно журнал було прочитано ChatGPT, якого попросили оцінити роль України в історії сорокового вірша, представленій у журналі. Нижче подано виклад змісту журналу, що перебуває в публічному доступі вже тридцять років. Перший уривок із творів Еллен Уайт, наведений у журналі, — це «Свідоцтва», том 9, с. 11.
Overview: Ukraine in the Prophetic Framework
Tinjauan Umum: Ukraina dalam Kerangka Kenabian
Within the magazine’s prophetic outline of Daniel 11:40–45, Ukraine is discussed in connection with the collapse of the Soviet Union and the struggle between the Papacy (king of the north) and atheistic communism (king of the south). Ukraine is presented as a key religious and geopolitical battleground during the closing stages of the proxy wars, particularly in relation to the Ukrainian Catholic Church and its legalization after decades of suppression under Soviet rule.
A cikin tsarin annabcin mujallar game da Daniyel 11:40–45, an tattauna Ukraine ne dangane da rushewar Tarayyar Soviet da kuma gwagwarmayar da ke tsakanin Paparoma (sarkin arewa) da kwaminisanci marar yarda da Allah (sarkin kudu). An gabatar da Ukraine a matsayin muhimmin fagen fama na addini da siyasa ta duniya a lokacin matakan ƙarshe na yaƙe-yaƙen wakilai, musamman dangane da Cocin Katolika ta Ukraine da kuma halatta ta bayan shekaru da dama na danniya a ƙarƙashin mulkin Soviet.
The magazine presents Ukraine as part of the broader prophetic fulfillment of Daniel 11:40, describing the sweeping away of the king of the south through a Vatican–United States alliance. Ukraine is shown as evidence of the weakening of Soviet atheism and the resurgence of Catholic influence in Eastern Europe.
Dergien fremstiller Ukraine som en del af den bredere profetiske opfyldelse af Daniel 11:40 og beskriver, hvordan sydens konge fejes bort gennem en alliance mellem Vatikanet og De Forenede Stater. Ukraine fremholdes som et bevis på svækkelsen af sovjetisk ateisme og den katolske indflydelses genopblussen i Østeuropa.
Ukraine in the War Between the King of the North and South
Украина във войната между северния и южния цар
The magazine teaches that the king of the south is atheism, embodied first by France (1798) and later by Soviet Russia. The king of the north is the papacy and Daniel 11:40 describes a spiritual war beginning in 1798 and culminating in the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989. Ukraine appears within this context as part of the Soviet bloc that is swept away in fulfillment of Daniel 11:40. The publication presents the collapse of the Soviet Union as the first step in the healing of the Papacy’s deadly wound (Revelation 13).
Revista inafundisha kwamba mfalme wa kusini ni ukana-Mungu, uliofanyika mwili kwanza katika Ufaransa (1798) na baadaye katika Urusi ya Kisovieti. Mfalme wa kaskazini ni Upapa, na Danieli 11:40 inaeleza vita vya kiroho vinavyoanza mwaka wa 1798 na kufikia kilele chake katika kuanguka kwa Muungano wa Kisovieti mwaka wa 1989. Ukraina inaonekana katika muktadha huu kama sehemu ya kambi ya Kisovieti inayofagiliwa mbali katika utimilifu wa Danieli 11:40. Chapisho hilo linaonyesha kuanguka kwa Muungano wa Kisovieti kuwa hatua ya kwanza katika kuponywa kwa jeraha la mauti la Upapa (Ufunuo 13).
Suppression of the Ukrainian Catholic Church (Quoted Sources)
უკრაინული კათოლიკური ეკლესიის ჩახშობა (ციტირებული წყაროები)
The magazine includes secular documentation of Catholic persecution under Soviet rule.
Majalah itu memuat dokumentasi sekuler mengenai penganiayaan terhadap umat Katolik di bawah pemerintahan Soviet.
From Time Magazine, December 4, 1989:
Из журнала Time, 4 декабря 1989 года:
“After World War II, fierce but generally less bloody persecution spread into the Ukraine and the new Soviet bloc, affecting millions of Roman Catholics and Protestants as well as Orthodox.”
« Après la Seconde Guerre mondiale, une persécution farouche, mais généralement moins sanglante, s’étendit à l’Ukraine et au nouveau bloc soviétique, touchant des millions de catholiques romains et de protestants, ainsi que d’orthodoxes. »
Ukraine is identified as a major area where Catholicism was suppressed under communism.
Ukraina jest wskazywana jako jeden z głównych obszarów, na których katolicyzm był tłumiony pod rządami komunizmu.
Legalization of the Ukrainian Catholic Church
Узаконення Української Католицької Церкви
A major focus of the Ukraine discussion is the legalization of the long-banned Ukrainian Catholic Church.
Un point majeur des discussions sur l’Ukraine est la légalisation de l’Église catholique ukrainienne, longtemps interdite.
From Life Magazine, December 1989:
Kutoka katika jarida la Life, Desemba 1989:
“Three new Catholic bishops have recently been named in Czechoslovakia. And this month Gorbachev meets Pope John Paul II during a visit to Italy—the first face-to-face encounter between leaders of the Kremlin and the Vatican. The sessions may lead to legalization of the long-banned Ukrainian Catholic Church in the U.S.S.R.”
「チェコスロヴァキアにおいて、最近、新たに三人のカトリック司教が任命された。そして今月、ゴルバチョフはイタリア訪問中に教皇ヨハネ・パウロ二世と会見する――これは、クレムリンとヴァチカンの指導者同士による初の直接会談である。この一連の会談は、ソ連において長らく禁圧されてきたウクライナ・カトリック教会の合法化へとつながる可能性がある。」
From U.S. News & World Report, December 11, 1989:
11 грудня 1989 р., U.S. News & World Report:
“The revival of religious freedom is expected to include lifting of an official ban on the five-million-member Ukraine Catholic Church, which has survived underground since 1946 when Stalin ordered it absorbed into the Russian Orthodox Church. Winning legalization for the Ukrainian Church has been a primary aim of the pope’s.”
Es wird erwartet, dass die Wiederbelebung der Religionsfreiheit auch die Aufhebung eines offiziellen Verbots der fünf Millionen Mitglieder zählenden ukrainischen katholischen Kirche einschließt, die seit 1946 im Untergrund überlebt hat, als Stalin ihre Eingliederung in die Russische Orthodoxe Kirche anordnete. Die Erlangung der Legalisierung für die ukrainische Kirche ist eines der vorrangigen Ziele des Papstes gewesen.
The magazine presents this as evidence of the weakening of atheistic control, the restoration of Catholic power. It is identified as a direct outcome of Vatican diplomatic pressure and a milestone in Daniel 11:40’s fulfillment is set forth as the Ukraine as a visible example of the Papacy regaining influence in former communist territory.
Le magazine présente cela comme une preuve de l’affaiblissement du contrôle athée et du rétablissement de la puissance catholique. Cela est présenté comme une conséquence directe de la pression diplomatique du Vatican, et comme une étape marquante dans l’accomplissement de Daniel 11:40 ; l’Ukraine est donnée comme exemple visible de la reconquête d’influence de la papauté dans un ancien territoire communiste.
Ukraine as Evidence of the Papacy’s Advance
युक्रेन पापाइ सत्ताको अग्रसरताको प्रमाणका रूपमा
The collapse of communism not merely as political change but as a spiritual defeat of atheism, a geopolitical advance of the Papacy and the beginning of the Papacy’s return to world dominance. The Ukraine becomes a case study in the dismantling of Soviet religious suppression and a strategic victory of Rome in Eastern Europe. It represents the visible shift from enforced atheism to restored Catholic authority and the legalization of the Ukrainian Catholic Church is treated as prophetic confirmation that the king of the north was sweeping away the king of the south “like a whirlwind.”
Kugwa kwa ukomunisti si kama mabadiliko ya kisiasa tu, bali kama kushindwa kwa kiroho kwa imani ya kutokuwako kwa Mungu, kusonga mbele kwa Kipapa katika siasa za kimataifa, na mwanzo wa kurejea kwa Kipapa katika utawala wa dunia. Ukraine inakuwa kielelezo cha kubomolewa kwa ukandamizaji wa kidini wa Kisovieti na ushindi wa kimkakati wa Roma katika Ulaya ya Mashariki. Hali hiyo inawakilisha mabadiliko yanayoonekana kutoka katika kutokuwako kwa Mungu kulikolazimishwa hadi katika kurejeshwa kwa mamlaka ya Kikatoliki, na kuhalalishwa kwa Kanisa Katoliki la Ukraine kunachukuliwa kuwa uthibitisho wa kiunabii kwamba mfalme wa kaskazini alikuwa akimfagia mbali mfalme wa kusini “kama kisulisuli.”
Ukraine and the Broader Prophetic Sequence
L’Ukraine et la séquence prophétique plus large
-
1798 – Papacy receives deadly wound.
1798 – Uupapa hupokea jeraha la mauti.
-
1917 – Atheism relocates to Russia (Bolshevik Revolution).
1917 – Le athéisme se relocalise en Russie (Révolution bolchevique).
-
1989 – Soviet Union collapses.
1989 – L’Union soviétique s’effondre.
-
Ukraine – Catholic Church legalized.
Украина — Католическая Церковь легализована.
-
Papacy regains geopolitical influence.
Upapà ubuye ufumana impembelelo yezopolitiko yehlabathi.
-
United States eventually comes under Papal influence (Daniel 11:41).
É.-U. tombe finalement sous l’influence papale (Daniel 11:41).
-
Entire world follows (Daniel 11:42–43).
Увесь світ іде слідом за ним (Daniel 11:42–43).
Ukraine fits into stages 3–4 as part of the transition between Soviet atheism and restored Papal influence.
Ukraina inalingana na hatua za 3–4 kama sehemu ya kipindi cha mpito kati ya ukana-Mungu wa Kisovieti na ushawishi wa Upapa uliorejeshwa.
Sources Referenced in Ukraine Discussion
Зереккөздер Украина жөніндегі талқылауда пайдаланылған
-
Jeff Pippenger (primary theological framework)
Jeff Pippenger (cadre théologique principal)
Spirit of Prophecy
Отро̄ндуруехуон хахуаҟәыгьраሢ
-
The Great Controversy
Le Grand Conflit
-
Selected Messages
Messages choisis
-
Testimonies for the Church
Témoignages pour l’Église
Secular Press
Matbuot-i dunyovî
-
Time Magazine
مجلهٔ تایم
-
Life Magazine
Revista Life
-
U.S. News & World Report
U.S. News & World Report
Ukraine is mentioned in connection with:
Ukraine is mentioned in connection with:
-
Post-World War II Catholic persecution
我看到你的要求是把英文翻译成“ff”,但“ff”不是可识别的目标语言名称。请告知要翻译成哪种语言。
-
Underground survival of the Ukrainian Catholic Church
Живување во илегала на Украинската Католичка Црква
-
Gorbachev–Vatican diplomacy
ਗੋਰਬਾਚੋਵ–ਵੈਟਿਕਨ ਕੂਟਨੀਤੀ
-
Legal restoration of Catholic hierarchy
Réhabilitation légale de la hiérarchie catholique
Summary of Ukraine’s Role in the Newsletter
Résumé du rôle de l’Ukraine dans le bulletin d’information
The Ukraine was a stronghold of suppressed Catholicism under Soviet atheism. The legalization of the Ukrainian Catholic Church signaled the weakening of the king of the south. The Vatican’s influence in the Ukraine demonstrated the Papacy’s resurgence and the Ukraine’s religious shift served as tangible evidence that Daniel 11:40 was being fulfilled. The events surrounding Ukraine formed part of the first step in the healing of the Papacy’s deadly wound. The Ukraine is therefore presented not as an isolated political event, but as a prophetic marker within the final movements of Daniel 11.
یوکرین در زیر الحاد شوروی، دژِ کاتولیسیزمِ سرکوبشده بود. قانونیشدنِ کلیسای کاتولیکِ اوکراین، تضعیفِ پادشاهِ جنوب را نشان داد. نفوذِ واتیکان در اوکراین، احیای پاپیّت را به نمایش گذاشت و دگرگونیِ دینیِ اوکراین بهعنوان شاهدی ملموس خدمت کرد که دانیال 11:40 در حال تحقق بود. رویدادهای مربوط به اوکراین بخشی از نخستین گام در التیامِ زخمِ مهلکِ پاپیّت را تشکیل داد. بنابراین، اوکراین نه بهمثابه رویدادی سیاسیِ منفرد، بلکه بهعنوان نشانهای نبوی در میان آخرین حرکاتِ دانیال 11 عرضه میشود.