We left off the last article by writing, “Verses 10–15 represent three proxy wars accomplished by the king of the north, the papal power, from 1989 to the Sunday law.” These three proxy wars begin with the identification of the United States in verse 40 as “chariots, ships, and horsemen.”
Seorang i mi ta ol las artikol taem mifala raetem, “Verses 10–15 i representem tri kaen proxy wars we king blong north, paoa blong papacy, i mekem stat long 1989 go kasem Sunday law.” Tri ia proxy wars i stat wetem taem yumi save identify United States long verse 40 olsem “chariots, ships, and horsemen.”
The next proxy war, represented by verse 11 and its historical fulfillment at the Battle of Raphia in 217 BC, was between Ptolemy IV Philopator, the southern king of Egypt, and Antiochus the Great, also called Antiochus Magnus, of the Seleucid Empire. Antiochus had fulfilled verse 10 when he retaliated against Egypt for his northern kingdom’s defeat and loss of possessions, retaking all the geography the southern kingdom had previously seized from his kingdom. He did so but stopped at the border of Egypt, thus fulfilling verse 10 and typifying 1989.
La guerre par procuration suivante, représentée par le verset 11 et son accomplissement historique lors de la bataille de Raphia en 217 av. J.-C., opposa Ptolémée IV Philopator, le roi du sud d’Égypte, à Antiochos le Grand, également appelé Antiochos Magnus, de l’Empire séleucide. Antiochos avait accompli le verset 10 lorsqu’il riposta contre l’Égypte pour la défaite de son royaume du nord et la perte de ses possessions, reprenant toute l’étendue géographique que le royaume du sud avait auparavant arrachée à son royaume. Il le fit, mais s’arrêta à la frontière de l’Égypte, accomplissant ainsi le verset 10 et préfigurant 1989.
But his sons shall be stirred up, and shall assemble a multitude of great forces: and one shall certainly come, and overflow, and pass through: then shall he return, and be stirred up, even to his fortress. Daniel 11:10.
Lakini wanawe watachochewa, nao watakusanya wingi wa majeshi makubwa; na mmoja hakika atakuja, naye atafurika na kupita katikati; kisha atarudi, naye atachochewa tena, hata kufikia ngome yake. Danieli 11:10.
The second proxy war was the Battle of Raphia. Raphia means the borderland. That battleground marks the point where Antiochus had ceased his previous invasion of verse 10. The three proxy wars are governed by truth, in the sense that the first proxy war aligns with the last proxy war. All three wars—verses 10, 11, and then the third war of verses 13–15—are waged by the same historical figure in their initial fulfillment. Antiochus Magnus is present in each of the three battles, prophetically tying them together into one line. Antiochus wins the first and last battles, but not the middle one, where the king of the south prevails.
La deuxième guerre par procuration fut la bataille de Raphia. Raphia signifie la région frontalière. Ce champ de bataille marque le point où Antiochus avait mis fin à son invasion précédente du verset 10. Les trois guerres par procuration sont régies par la vérité, en ce sens que la première guerre par procuration s’aligne sur la dernière. Les trois guerres — le verset 10, le verset 11, puis la troisième guerre des versets 13–15 — sont menées par le même personnage historique dans leur accomplissement initial. Antiochus Magnus est présent dans chacune des trois batailles, les reliant prophétiquement en une seule ligne. Antiochus remporte la première et la dernière bataille, mais non celle du milieu, où le roi du midi l’emporte.
Just as Raphia means borderland, so does Ukraine. The second proxy war, first fulfilled by the Battle of Raphia, is now being fulfilled in the Ukrainian war. Vladimir Putin is the king of the south, the prophetic descendant of the first modern king of the south, Vladimir Lenin. Putin has repeatedly claimed that Russia’s response to Ukraine is based on a disputed agreement that, upon Germany’s reunification, NATO would not expand further into former USSR territory. Putin’s motivation mirrors Ptolemy’s in verses 5–9 and Napoleon’s in 1797. All three southern kings justify their actions against the northern king based on a broken treaty.
Sidaa ay Raphia uga dhigan tahay dhul xuduudeed, ayay Ukraine-na sidaas oo kale u tahay. Dagaalkii labaad ee wakiillada, oo markii ugu horraysay lagu rumoobay Dagaalkii Raphia, ayaa hadda lagu rumoobayaa dagaalka Ukraine. Vladimir Putin waa boqorka koonfureed, farcanka nebiyadeed ee boqorkii ugu horreeyey ee casriga ah ee koonfureed, Vladimir Lenin. Putin marar badan ayuu ku dooday in jawaabta Ruushka ee Ukraine ay ku salaysan tahay heshiis la isku khilaafsan yahay oo dhigayay in, markii Jarmalku dib u midoobay, NATO aanay sii ballaadhin doonin gudaha dhulkii hore ee USSR. Ujeeddada Putin waxay la mid tahay tan Ptolemy ee aayadaha 5–9 iyo tan Napoleon ee 1797. Saddexdaas boqor ee koonfureedba waxay tallaabooyinkooda ka dhan ah boqorka waqooyi ku cudurdaartaan heshiis la jebiyey.
According to Isaiah 23, the whore of Tyre, representing the papal power, would be forgotten for seventy years, as the days of one king—a period repeatedly shown to be the time when the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, the earth beast of Revelation 13 (the United States), rules.
Selon Ésaïe 23, la prostituée de Tyr, représentant la puissance papale, serait oubliée pendant soixante-dix ans, selon les jours d’un seul roi — période qui s’est révélée à maintes reprises être le temps durant lequel le sixième royaume de la prophétie biblique, la bête terrestre d’Apocalypse 13 (les États-Unis), exerce sa domination.
And it shall come to pass in that day, that Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years, according to the days of one king: after the end of seventy years shall Tyre sing as an harlot. Take an harp, go about the city, thou harlot that hast been forgotten; make sweet melody, sing many songs, that thou mayest be remembered. And it shall come to pass after the end of seventy years, that the Lord will visit Tyre, and she shall turn to her hire, and shall commit fornication with all the kingdoms of the world upon the face of the earth. Isaiah 23:15–17.
И ще стане в онзи ден, че Тир ще бъде забравен седемдесет години, според дните на един цар; след изтичането на седемдесетте години Тир ще запее като блудница. Вземи арфа, обикаляй града, ти, забравена блуднице; свири сладкозвучно, пей много песни, за да бъдеш спомнена. И ще стане след изтичането на седемдесетте години, че Господ ще посети Тир, и той ще се върне към печалбата си и ще блудства с всички царства на света по лицето на земята. Исая 23:15–17.
The symbolic seventy-year period spans from 1798 to the Sunday law, which is the history represented by verse 40. It is not until the ending of the seventy years, or the approach of the Sunday law, that the whore reappears. For this reason, the warfare of the three battles in verses 10–15 is carried out by a proxy of the papal power, for she is prophetically forgotten during this period.
Het symbolische tijdvak van zeventig jaar strekt zich uit van 1798 tot aan de zondagswet, hetgeen de geschiedenis is die door vers 40 wordt voorgesteld. Pas bij het einde van de zeventig jaar, of bij het naderen van de zondagswet, verschijnt de hoer opnieuw. Om deze reden wordt de oorlogvoering van de drie veldslagen in de verzen 10–15 gevoerd door een plaatsvervanger van de pauselijke macht, want zij is gedurende deze periode profetisch vergeten.
In the first and last proxy battles, the king of the north prevails over the king of the south. In the middle battle, the king of the south prevails over the king of the north. The Battle of Raphia was the initial historical fulfillment of verse 11, and the verse and their historical fulfillment make up two witnesses that are to be combined with the parallel passages of papal Rome’s three and a half prophetic days of rule. Thus, two passages of Scripture within Daniel 11, accompanied by their historical fulfillments, set forth the prophetic characteristics of verse 11’s battle of the borderland, first fulfilled at the Battle of Raphia and then again at the time of the end in 1798.
Sa mga una ug ulahing mga gubat nga puli-puli lamang, ang hari sa amihanan modaog batok sa hari sa habagatan. Sa tunga-tungang gubat, ang hari sa habagatan modaog batok sa hari sa amihanan. Ang Gubat sa Raphia mao ang unang kasaysayanong katumanan sa bersikulo 11, ug ang maong bersikulo ug ang ilang kasaysayanong katumanan naglangkob ug duha ka mga saksi nga kinahanglan hiusahon uban sa kaparihong mga pahayag mahitungod sa tulo ug tunga ka manalagnaong mga adlaw sa paghari sa papal nga Roma. Busa, duha ka mga pahayag sa Kasulatan sulod sa Daniel 11, inubanan sa ilang mga kasaysayanong katumanan, nagapadayag sa manalagnaong mga kinaiya sa gubat sa utlanan diha sa bersikulo 11, nga unang natuman sa Gubat sa Raphia ug unya pag-usab sa panahon sa katapusan niadtong 1798.
These lines of witness uphold that Vladimir Putin is the last Vladimir of the modern king of the south. “Vladimir” is often defined as meaning “ruler of the world,” but the word mir also correctly means “community.” Thus, Vladimir means “ruler of the community,” or “ruler of communism.” Putin identifies his involvement with Ukraine as based on a broken agreement addressing his concerns about NATO’s encroachment beyond the borders agreed upon after Germany’s unification. Putin’s direction is as much focused against NATO and the EU as it is against Zelenskyy and Ukraine. NATO and the EU’s encroachment upon territory Putin insists was to remain NATO-free parallels Ptolemy’s rage when the Seleucid king set the Egyptian princess bride aside for his former wife. That broken treaty pointed forward to the broken Treaty of Tolentino in 1797. In Daniel 11, when the southern king prevails over the northern king, it involves a broken treaty.
Ebiragiro bino eby’obujulizi birwanirira nti Vladimir Putin ni we Vladimir asembayo ow’omulembe ogw’omulembe gwa kabaka ow’obukiikaddyo. “Vladimir” kitera okunnyonnyolwa ng’ekitegeeza “afuga ensi,” naye ekigambo mir era mu butuufu kitegeeza “ekibiina” oba “ekitundu ky’abantu.” N’olwekyo, Vladimir kitegeeza “afuga ekibiina,” oba “afuga obukomyunisiti.” Putin alaga nti okwenyigira kwe mu nsonga za Ukraine kwesigamye ku ndagaano eyamenyebwa eyali ekwata ku by’amweraliikiriza ku kweyongera kwa NATO okusukka ensalo ezaali zikkiriziddwa oluvannyuma lw’okwegatta kwa Germany. Ekkubo Putin ly’atambulamu liteekeddwako nnyo amaanyi okulwanyisa NATO ne EU nga bwe liteekeddwako okulwanyisa Zelenskyy ne Ukraine. Okweyongerayo kwa NATO ne EU ku ttaka Putin gw’akalambira nti lyalina okusigala nga teririmu NATO kufaanana n’obusungu bwa Ptolemy kabaka Omuselukasi bwe yassa omugole omulangira Omumisiri ku bbali olw’omukyala we ow’edda. Endagaano eyo eyamenyebwa yalaga mu maaso eri Endagaano ya Tolentino eyamenyebwa mu 1797. Mu Daniel 11, kabaka ow’obukiikaddyo bw’awangula kabaka ow’obukiikakkono, kizingiramu endagaano eyamenyebwa.
This broken treaty concerns the EU’s unwillingness to restrict NATO’s expansion beyond its borders when Germany was reunified. In this sense, Putin, the king of the south, is in a battle against the king of the north, represented by his proxy power. Just as the Nazis of World War II were a proxy for the Catholic Church, the Nazis of Ukraine become the symbol of the second proxy war of verses 10–15. Three world wars and three proxy wars—and in both lines, the Nazis are the proxy representative of the Catholic Church during the middle conflict.
Ang nabaling kasunduang ito ay tumutukoy sa kawalan ng pagnanais ng EU na higpitan ang paglawak ng NATO lampas sa mga hangganan nito nang muling pag-isahin ang Alemanya. Sa ganitong diwa, si Putin, ang hari ng timog, ay nasa isang pakikibaka laban sa hari ng hilaga, na kinakatawan ng kanyang kinakasangkapang kapangyarihan. Kung paanong ang mga Nazi noong Ikalawang Digmaang Pandaigdig ay naging kinakasangkapang kapangyarihan ng Simbahang Katolika, ang mga Nazi ng Ukraine ay nagiging sagisag ng ikalawang digmaang kinakasangkapan sa mga talata 10–15. Tatlong digmaang pandaigdig at tatlong digmaang kinakasangkapan—at sa kapuwa hanay, ang mga Nazi ang kinakasangkapang kinatawan ng Simbahang Katolika sa gitnang tunggalian.
In the three original historical fulfillments of these proxy wars, Antiochus Magnus was in each battle. It has often been shown how the etymology of “Antiochus” and the symbolism associated with the Seleucid kingdom as the king of the north identify Antiochus as a symbol of the antichrist—the pope of Rome. But in the history of the three proxy wars, the whore of Tyre is forgotten, so the symbol of the “pope” represented in the name “Antiochus” stands for his proxy power. In the first and last battles, it is the United States openly doing the bidding for Rome. In verse 11, the proxy power is the Nazism of Ukraine, but it was and still is the ships and chariots of the United States that propped up Zelenskyy in the war. On the surface of the second proxy war, the United States is hidden, as is the pope during the seventy years of Isaiah 23. The United States is hidden in the very history where it develops all the characteristics of the beast, making it prophetically fitting that, once the second proxy war is underway, the United States is obscured by the proxy power of Nazism in Ukraine, though it remains the military and economic might of the earth beast that props up Ukraine until their demise.
在这三场代理战争最初的历史性应验中，安提阿古·马格努斯在每一场战役中都在场。人们屡次指出，“安提阿古”一名的词源，以及与作为北方王之塞琉古王国相关的象征意义，如何将安提阿古指认为敌基督——罗马教皇——的象征。然而，在这三场代理战争的历史中，推罗的淫妇被遗忘了，因此，“安提阿古”这一名字所代表的“教皇”之象征，乃是指他的代理势力。在第一场和最后一场战役中，都是美国公开为罗马效命。在第11节中，那代理势力乃是乌克兰的纳粹主义，但在这场战争中，扶持泽连斯基的，过去是、如今仍然是美国的船只与战车。就第二场代理战争的表层而言，美国是隐藏的，正如在以赛亚书23章那七十年期间教皇是隐藏的一样。美国正隐藏在这样一段历史之中：它在那里发展出兽的一切特征；因此，从预言上说，一旦第二场代理战争展开，美国被乌克兰纳粹主义这一代理势力所遮蔽，乃是恰切的，尽管支撑乌克兰直到其灭亡的，仍然是那地兽的军事与经济强权。
When the king of the south went to Babylon and took the king of the north captive, and also when General Berthier took the pope captive, he walked right into the Vatican suggesting that the Ukrainian war will end with Putin’s victory at a point when any resistance from the Ukraine has been removed. The kingdom Ptolemy captured was Babylon, and the kingdom Napoleon captured was spiritual Babylon. Thus, Zelenskyy’s kingdom is represented by those subjects which provide him support. Now that Trump has withdrawn the support of the earth beast’s chariots horsemen and ships, Ukraine’s support is the EU, the very group that has been unwilling to hear Putin’s claims of the broken treaty concerning the encroachment of NATO.
Lokho hosi ya le dzong yiile Bobilone, a tseye hosi ya le leboa hi vuhlonga, naswona loko Jenerala Berthier na yena a teke papa hi vuhlonga, u nghene hi ku kongoma eVatican, leswi kombisaka leswaku nyimpi ya Ukraine yi ta hela hi ku hlula ka Putin hi nkarhi lowu ku hanyisa kwihi ni kwihi loku humaka eka Ukraine ku nga ta va ku susiwile. Mfumo lowu Ptolemy a wu khomeke a ku ri Bobilone, naswona mfumo lowu Napoleon a wu khomeke a ku ri Bobilone wa moya. Hikwalaho, mfumo wa Zelenskyy wu yimeleriwa hi vaaki volavo lava n’wi nyikaka nseketelo. Sweswi leswi Trump a tshikeke nseketelo wa makalichi, va gadzi va tihanci ni mabyatso ya xivandzana xa misava, nseketelo wa Ukraine i EU, ku nga ntlawa wolowo lowu nga swi lavangiki ku yingisa swivilelo swa Putin malunghana ni ntwanano lowu tshovekeke mayelana ni ku nghenelela ka NATO.
The philosophy that guides the eurocrats of the EU is the Greenpeace movement. For this reason, Zelenskyy means, “green.” Zelenskyy is the symbolic head of the warmongers of the EU who are guided by the foolish global agenda of environmentalism. When the Ukraine war concludes Putin will celebrate not only a victory over Ukraine, but the entire EU and NATO.
La philosophie qui guide les eurocrates de l’UE est le mouvement Greenpeace. C’est pourquoi Zelenskyy signifie « vert ». Zelenskyy est le chef symbolique des va-t-en-guerre de l’UE, lesquels sont guidés par l’insensé programme mondial de l’écologisme. Lorsque la guerre en Ukraine prendra fin, Poutine célébrera non seulement une victoire sur l’Ukraine, mais sur l’UE tout entière et l’OTAN.
The three proxy wars therefore possess the signature of truth. The first and last proxy war the king of the south is defeated through an alliance between the sea beast and earth beast of Revelation thirteen. In the beginning the victory for the king of the north was brought about by an alliance between a conservative, Vatican I pope, who in the context of the Fatima secrets of Catholicism lore is the white or good pope. The current pope, who as I write this is on his deathbed is a Vatican II, liberal pope, who in the context of the Fatima secrets is the black or bad pope.
Les trois guerres par procuration portent donc la marque de la vérité. Dans la première et la dernière guerre par procuration, le roi du sud est vaincu par une alliance entre la bête qui monte de la mer et la bête qui monte de la terre d’Apocalypse 13. Au commencement, la victoire du roi du nord fut rendue possible par une alliance avec un pape conservateur de Vatican I, lequel, dans le contexte des secrets de Fatima selon la tradition catholique, est le pape blanc ou le bon pape. Le pape actuel, qui, au moment où j’écris ces lignes, est à l’agonie, est un pape libéral de Vatican II qui, dans le contexte des secrets de Fatima, est le pape noir ou le mauvais pape.
Verse fourteen identifies that when the “robbers of thy people” who exalt themselves and fall, enter into prophetic history the vision is established. In the fulfillment of verses thirteen through fifteen in the Battle of Panium in 200 BC pagan Rome inserted itself into the issues concerning that very battle. In the three verses which address the Battle of Panium, verse fourteen identifies that the vision is established by Rome.
Verse quatorze indique que, lorsque les « violents de ton peuple », qui s’élèvent et tombent, entrent dans l’histoire prophétique, la vision est établie. Dans l’accomplissement des versets treize à quinze lors de la bataille de Panium, en 200 av. J.-C., la Rome païenne s’est immiscée dans les enjeux mêmes de cette bataille. Dans les trois versets qui traitent de la bataille de Panium, le verset quatorze indique que la vision est établie par Rome.
In the Battle of Panium history a conservative, Vatican I white pope will join forces with the last of the eight presidents that began in the period of Reagan, who previously formed an alliance with a conservative Vatican I pope. They did so in 1989 to bring down the former USSR, and at the end they do so to bring down the last ruler of that very kingdom.
Na história da Batalha de Pânio, um papa branco conservador do Vaticano I unirá forças com o último dos oito presidentes que começaram no período de Reagan, o qual anteriormente formou uma aliança com um papa conservador do Vaticano I. Assim fizeram em 1989 para derrubar a antiga URSS, e, no fim, assim o fazem para derrubar o último governante desse mesmo reino.
In the Reagan years and with the alliance of pope John Paul II and the USA, John Paul II came to believe he was the good pope of the prophecies of Fatima. Motivated by that conviction he began to travel the world to promote what he understood to be a fulfillment of the predictions of Fatima. In doing so he became the most travelled pope in history, as well as the most recognized pope of all time as he fulfilled Revelation thirteen’s prediction that there would be a time when the whole world would wonder after the beast. Pope John Paul II’s public persona typifies the conservative Vatican I pope who comes into an alliance with the last president of the USA.
በሬጋን ዘመንና በጳጳስ ዮሐንስ ጳውሎስ ሁለተኛ ከአሜሪካ ጋር ባደረገው ሕብረት፣ ዮሐንስ ጳውሎስ ሁለተኛ ራሱ በፋጢማ ትንቢቶች የተነገረው መልካሙ ጳጳስ እንደሆነ ሊያምን ጀመረ። በዚያ እምነት ተነስቶ፣ እርሱ እንደ ፋጢማ ትንቢቶች ፍጻሜ የተረዳውን ነገር ለማስተዋወቅ ዓለሙን መዞር ጀመረ። በዚህም ሂደት በታሪክ ከሁሉ በላይ ብዙ ጉዞ ያደረገ ጳጳስ ሆነ፤ እንዲሁም በራእይ ምዕራፍ አሥራ ሦስት የተነገረውን፣ መላው ዓለም ለአውሬው ይደነቃል የሚለውን ትንቢት ሲፈጽም፣ ከሁሉ በላይ የታወቀ ጳጳስ ሆነ። የጳጳስ ዮሐንስ ጳውሎስ ሁለተኛ የሕዝብ ፊት ማንነት፣ ከአሜሪካ የመጨረሻ ፕሬዚዳንት ጋር ወደ ሕብረት የሚገባውን ወግ አጥባቂ የቫቲካን ፩ ጳጳስ በምሳሌ ያሳያል።
Therefore, one of the prophetic characteristics of the Reagan contemporary pope is that there is a point where his public image is marked as a waymark. That mark is in verse fourteen, when the robbers of thy people establish the vision. Pope John Paul II fulfills a prophetic characteristic of being the pope that the entire world wondered after, thus pointing forward to the conservative end time Vatican I pope who comes into an alliance with Trump. When that happens the vision is established, and what establishes the vision is the pope inserting himself into the history of Panium and the year 200 BC.
Daher besteht eines der prophetischen Merkmale des dem Reagan zeitgenössischen Papstes darin, dass es einen Punkt gibt, an dem sein öffentliches Bild als Wegmarke gekennzeichnet wird. Dieses Merkmal findet sich in Vers vierzehn, wenn die Gewalttätigen deines Volkes das Gesicht aufrichten. Papst Johannes Paul II. erfüllt das prophetische Merkmal, der Papst zu sein, dem die ganze Welt staunend nachfolgte, und weist so voraus auf den konservativen endzeitlichen Papst des Vatikan I, der in ein Bündnis mit Trump tritt. Wenn das geschieht, wird das Gesicht aufgerichtet, und was das Gesicht aufrichtet, ist, dass der Papst sich selbst in die Geschichte von Panium und in das Jahr 200 v. Chr. einfügt.
The beginning of the eight presidents illustrates the ending of the eight presidents and just before the Sunday law of verse sixteen the whore of Tyre who has been forgotten returns to open history as she forms an alliance with Reagan’s counterpart, Donald Trump. Together as represented by the alliance of Antiochus and Philip of Macedon they bring down the final generation of the southern kingdom as represented by the child king Ptolemy. A child in Bible prophecy is a symbol of the final generation, and after the Ukraine war Putin will repeat the history of the southern kings who are lifted up from military victories and lose their way in some type of church and state dilemma.
Nauuna nang larawan ng walong pangulo ang pagwawakas ng walong pangulo, at bago pa lamang ang batas ng Linggo sa talata dieciséis, ang patutot ng Tiro na nalimutan na ay muling bumabalik sa hayag na kasaysayan habang siya ay bumubuo ng isang pakikipag-alyansa sa katapat ni Reagan, si Donald Trump. Magkasama, gaya ng inilarawan ng alyansa nina Antiochus at Felipe ng Macedonia, kanilang ibinabagsak ang pangwakas na salinlahi ng kahariang timugan na kinakatawan ng batang haring si Ptolemy. Ang isang bata sa hula ng Biblia ay sagisag ng pangwakas na salinlahi, at pagkatapos ng digmaan sa Ukraine, uulitin ni Putin ang kasaysayan ng mga haring timugan na naitaas dahil sa mga tagumpay-militar at nawawala ng landas sa isang uri ng suliranin ng iglesya at estado.
Thus, verse ten, representing 1989 and the first proxy war is the beginning, or the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet. The Battle of Raphia in verse eleven representing the Ukraine war is the thirteenth letter in the Hebrew alphabet. The number 13 is a symbol of rebellion, and the proxy army in the Ukrainian war are Nazi’s, the premier symbol of rebellion in the modern world. Panium is the last letter in the Hebrew alphabet, which is made up of twenty-two letters. Thus, the Hebrew word truth which is created by bringing the first, thirteenth and twenty-second letters of the alphabet together to form the Hebrew word “truth,” identifies the structure of these three proxy wars as truth. The twenty-second and last letter of the Hebrew alphabet is a symbol of divinity being combined with humanity, and the fulfillment of the Battle of Panium in the near future takes place during Trump’s presidency. Trump is the twenty-second president to have served two terms.
Hivyo, aya ya kumi, inayowakilisha mwaka 1989 na vita vya kwanza vya wakala, ndiyo mwanzo, au herufi ya kwanza ya alfabeti ya Kiebrania. Vita vya Raphia katika aya ya kumi na moja, vinavyowakilisha vita vya Ukraine, ni herufi ya kumi na tatu katika alfabeti ya Kiebrania. Namba 13 ni ishara ya uasi, na jeshi la wakala katika vita vya Ukraine ni Wanazi, ishara kuu ya uasi katika ulimwengu wa kisasa. Panium ni herufi ya mwisho katika alfabeti ya Kiebrania, ambayo imeundwa na herufi ishirini na mbili. Hivyo, neno la Kiebrania kweli, ambalo huundwa kwa kuziunganisha pamoja herufi za kwanza, za kumi na tatu, na za ishirini na mbili za alfabeti ili kuunda neno la Kiebrania “kweli,” linatambulisha muundo wa vita hivi vitatu vya wakala kuwa ni kweli. Herufi ya ishirini na mbili na ya mwisho ya alfabeti ya Kiebrania ni ishara ya uungu ukiunganishwa na ubinadamu, na utimilifu wa Vita vya Panium katika wakati ujao ulio karibu hutukia wakati wa urais wa Trump. Trump ndiye rais wa ishirini na pili kuhudumu mihula miwili.
Panium has a double witness to a twofold alliance and in both references the alliance represents an alliance identifying a hierarchical relationship between two parties. The alliance between Philip and Antiochus was strategic, aimed at countering Ptolemaic and Roman influence in the eastern Mediterranean. However, their collaboration was not focused on the Battle of Panium itself—Antiochus conducted this campaign independently, without Philip’s direct military involvement. Philip’s role was more indirect, providing political and strategic support by tying down Roman and Ptolemaic allies in Greece and the Aegean, allowing Antiochus to focus on Coele-Syria. The historians all identify that Antiochus was the more powerful in the alliance, and that it was only Antiochus who actually fought the battle. Their alliance was concerning the broader area associated with Alexander’s former kingdom. Thus, the alliance has a premier leader and a lesser subordinate as represented by the name Caesarea-Philippi, the name for Panium when Christ walked among men. Caesarea-Philippi therefore aligns with Antiochus and Philip, for Caesar was the more powerful in the alliance symbolized by both Caesar Augustus and Herod Philip the tetrarch.
ਪਾਨਿਯੁਮ ਕੋਲ ਦੋਹਰੇ ਗਠਜੋੜ ਬਾਰੇ ਦੁੱਗਣੀ ਗਵਾਹੀ ਹੈ, ਅਤੇ ਦੋਹਾਂ ਹੀ ਸੰਦਰਭਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ ਇਹ ਗਠਜੋੜ ਦੋ ਪੱਖਾਂ ਵਿਚਕਾਰ ਇੱਕ ਪਦਾਨੁਕ੍ਰਮਿਕ ਸੰਬੰਧ ਨੂੰ ਚਿੰਨ੍ਹਿਤ ਕਰਨ ਵਾਲਾ ਗਠਜੋੜ ਦਰਸਾਉਂਦਾ ਹੈ। ਫਿਲਿਪ ਅਤੇ ਐਂਟੀਓਕਸ ਵਿਚਕਾਰ ਗਠਜੋੜ ਰਣਨੀਤਿਕ ਸੀ, ਜਿਸ ਦਾ ਉਦੇਸ਼ ਪੂਰਬੀ ਭੂ-ਮੱਧ ਸਾਗਰ ਖੇਤਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਟੋਲੇਮੀਕ ਅਤੇ ਰੋਮੀ ਪ੍ਰਭਾਵ ਦਾ ਮੁਕਾਬਲਾ ਕਰਨਾ ਸੀ। ਤਥਾਪਿ, ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਸਹਿਯੋਗ ਖੁਦ ਪਾਨਿਯੁਮ ਦੀ ਲੜਾਈ ਉੱਤੇ ਕੇਂਦ੍ਰਿਤ ਨਹੀਂ ਸੀ—ਐਂਟੀਓਕਸ ਨੇ ਇਹ ਅਭਿਆਨ ਸੁਤੰਤਰ ਤੌਰ ‘ਤੇ ਚਲਾਇਆ, ਫਿਲਿਪ ਦੀ ਸਿੱਧੀ ਸੈਨਿਕ ਭਾਗੀਦਾਰੀ ਤੋਂ ਬਿਨਾ। ਫਿਲਿਪ ਦੀ ਭੂਮਿਕਾ ਹੋਰ ਅਪਰੋਕਸ਼ ਸੀ; ਉਸ ਨੇ ਯੂਨਾਨ ਅਤੇ ਐਜੀਅਨ ਵਿੱਚ ਰੋਮੀ ਅਤੇ ਟੋਲੇਮੀਕ ਮਿੱਤਰਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਬੱਝੇ ਰੱਖ ਕੇ ਰਾਜਨੀਤਿਕ ਅਤੇ ਰਣਨੀਤਿਕ ਸਮਰਥਨ ਪ੍ਰਦਾਨ ਕੀਤਾ, ਜਿਸ ਨਾਲ ਐਂਟੀਓਕਸ ਨੂੰ ਕੋਏਲੇ-ਸੀਰੀਆ ਉੱਤੇ ਧਿਆਨ ਕੇਂਦ੍ਰਿਤ ਕਰਨ ਦੀ ਸਹੂਲਤ ਮਿਲੀ। ਇਤਿਹਾਸਕਾਰ ਸਭ ਇਸ ਗੱਲ ਨੂੰ ਮੰਨਦੇ ਹਨ ਕਿ ਇਸ ਗਠਜੋੜ ਵਿੱਚ ਐਂਟੀਓਕਸ ਹੀ ਵੱਧ ਸ਼ਕਤੀਸ਼ਾਲੀ ਸੀ, ਅਤੇ ਅਸਲ ਵਿੱਚ ਲੜਾਈ ਵੀ ਕੇਵਲ ਐਂਟੀਓਕਸ ਨੇ ਹੀ ਲੜੀ। ਉਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਗਠਜੋੜ ਉਸ ਵਿਸ਼ਾਲ ਖੇਤਰ ਨਾਲ ਸੰਬੰਧਿਤ ਸੀ ਜੋ ਅਲੈਕਜ਼ੈਂਡਰ ਦੇ ਪੂਰਵ ਰਾਜ ਨਾਲ ਜੋੜਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਤਰ੍ਹਾਂ, ਗਠਜੋੜ ਵਿੱਚ ਇੱਕ ਪ੍ਰਮੁੱਖ ਨੇਤਾ ਅਤੇ ਇੱਕ ਘੱਟ ਦਰਜੇ ਦਾ ਅਧੀਨ ਹੈ, ਜਿਵੇਂ ਕਿ ਕੈਸਰੀਆ-ਫਿਲਿਪਪੀ ਨਾਮ ਵਿੱਚ ਪ੍ਰਤਿਨਿਧਿਤ ਹੈ, ਜੋ ਉਹ ਨਾਮ ਸੀ ਜਿਸ ਨਾਲ ਪਾਨਿਯੁਮ ਨੂੰ ਉਸ ਵੇਲੇ ਜਾਣਿਆ ਜਾਂਦਾ ਸੀ ਜਦੋਂ ਮਸੀਹ ਮਨੁੱਖਾਂ ਵਿਚਕਾਰ ਤੁਰਿਆ। ਇਸ ਲਈ ਕੈਸਰੀਆ-ਫਿਲਿਪਪੀ ਐਂਟੀਓਕਸ ਅਤੇ ਫਿਲਿਪ ਨਾਲ ਸੰਗਤ ਰੱਖਦਾ ਹੈ, ਕਿਉਂਕਿ ਉਸ ਗਠਜੋੜ ਵਿੱਚ ਕੈਸਰ ਹੀ ਵੱਧ ਸ਼ਕਤੀਸ਼ਾਲੀ ਸੀ, ਜਿਸ ਦਾ ਪ੍ਰਤੀਕ ਕੈਸਰ ਆਗੁਸਤਸ ਅਤੇ ਟੈਟਰਾਰਖ ਹੇਰੋਦ ਫਿਲਿਪ ਦੋਹਾਂ ਦੁਆਰਾ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ।
The word “Tetrarch” means ruler over a fourth. Caesar ruled the entire kingdom, and Philip ruled over a fourth of a territory thus placing the symbol of Philip in a subjective relationship in the alliances of Panium and Caesarea-Philippi. With Herod Philip we see the symbol of two blood lines which are both symbols of a broken covenant relationship with God. We also see echoes of one fourth of the division of Alexander’s kingdom into four parts, or four tetrarchs. Philip means lover of horses.
د “تيترارخ” کلمه د څلورمې برخې پر واکمن معنا لري. قیصر پر ټول سلطنت واکمني کوله، او فیلیپس د یوې سیمې پر څلورمې برخې واکمن و؛ له همدې امله د فیلیپس نښه د پانیوم او قیصریه-فیلیپي په تړونونو کې په یوه ذهني اړیکه کې ځای نیسي. د هیرود فیلیپس په باب موږ د دوو وینې کرښو نښه وینو، چې دواړه له خدای سره د مات شوي عهد د اړیکې نښې دي. همدارنګه موږ د اسکندر د سلطنت د څلورو برخو، یا د څلورو تيترارخانو، په وېش کې د یوې څلورمې برخې انګازې هم وینو. فیلیپس د اسونو مینهوال معنا لري.
At the Battle of Panium which is fulfilled at the conclusion of the Ukrainian war Antiochus Magnus, the United States will defeat Russia and will enter into an alliance with a lesser player represented by Philip. That lesser player will be involved but not directly in the battle. The battle will be between the USA and Putin, evidently directly connected with a religious controversy produced by Putin’s irritation and pride as illustrated by both Ptolemy IV Philopator after the Battle of Raphia, and by king Uzziah of Judah. Ptolemy and Uzziah were southern kings lifted up in pride by their military success who then desired to take up a sacred work which was only to be accomplished by the priests. Uzziah received leprosy for his efforts and Ptolemy in a rage slew 50,000 Jews in Alexandria.
في معركة بانيوم التي تتمّ عند اختتام الحرب الأوكرانية، سيهزم أنطيوخس الكبير، أي الولايات المتحدة، روسيا، وسيدخل في تحالف مع لاعب أصغر يمثّله فيليب. وسيكون ذلك اللاعب الأصغر منخرطًا، ولكن ليس مباشرةً، في المعركة. وستكون المعركة بين الولايات المتحدة وبوتين، ومرتبطةً على ما يبدو ارتباطًا مباشرًا بجدل دينيّ أحدثه تهيّج بوتين وكبرياؤه، كما يتجلّى في كلٍّ من بطليموس الرابع فيلوباتور بعد معركة رفحيا، وفي الملك عزّيا ملك يهوذا. وكان بطليموس وعزّيا ملكين جنوبيّين ارتفعا بالكبرياء بسبب نجاحهما العسكري، ثم رغبا في الاضطلاع بعمل مقدّس لم يكن ينبغي أن يقوم به إلا الكهنة. وقد أُصيب عزّيا بالبرص بسبب مساعيه، أمّا بطليموس ففي ثورة غضب قتل 50,000 من اليهود في الإسكندرية.
Verse thirteen identifies the battle between the final generation of the modern king of the community, or communism, Vladimir Putin’s Russia and the USA. Trump prevails in the battle, but he does so with an ally from a fourth part of the kingdom, who is not actually at the battle. We are near the conclusion of verse eleven as testified to by the current events. Putin will be victorious over Ukraine, as represented by Raphia. He will then begin his progressive demise as represented by Uzziah being placed into a house until his death, due to leprosy. After his victory at Raphia in 217 BC, Ptolemy IV Philopator’s reign deteriorated due to corruption, extravagance, and reliance on unscrupulous advisors. He died in 204 BC, likely assassinated or poisoned by his ministers, Sosibius and Agathocles, as part of a conspiracy to secure power for his young son, Ptolemy V. This turbulent end reflects the instability and intrigue common in Hellenistic royal courts, marking a significant turning point in the decline of Ptolemaic Egypt.
Le verset treize identifie la bataille entre la génération finale du roi moderne de la communauté, ou communisme, la Russie de Vladimir Poutine, et les États-Unis. Trump l’emporte dans la bataille, mais il le fait avec un allié provenant d’une quatrième partie du royaume, qui n’est pas en réalité au combat. Nous approchons de la conclusion du verset onze, comme en témoignent les événements actuels. Poutine sera victorieux de l’Ukraine, représentée par Raphia. Il commencera alors son déclin progressif, représenté par Ozias placé dans une maison jusqu’à sa mort, à cause de la lèpre. Après sa victoire à Raphia en 217 av. J.-C., le règne de Ptolémée IV Philopator se détériora en raison de la corruption, de l’extravagance et de la dépendance à l’égard de conseillers sans scrupules. Il mourut en 204 av. J.-C., vraisemblablement assassiné ou empoisonné par ses ministres, Sosibius et Agathocle, dans le cadre d’une conspiration visant à assurer le pouvoir à son jeune fils, Ptolémée V. Cette fin tumultueuse reflète l’instabilité et l’intrigue courantes dans les cours royales hellénistiques, marquant un tournant significatif dans le déclin de l’Égypte ptolémaïque.
A characteristic of the spiritual fulfillment of the king of the south which was typified by the literal fulfillments which took place in the struggle for world domination following Alexander’s death is “revolution.” France becomes the spiritual king of the south in the French Revolution time period. The modern king of the south, Russia was born in the Russian Revolution. As the philosophy introduced into the French Revolution matured from the anarchy of the French Revolution unto the communism of the Soviet revolution is a characteristic of the king of the south. Communism spread through the world with revolutions.
Un trait caractéristique de l’accomplissement spirituel du roi du sud, lequel fut typifié par les accomplissements littéraux survenus dans la lutte pour la domination du monde après la mort d’Alexandre, est la « révolution ». La France devient le roi du sud spirituel durant la période de la Révolution française. Le roi du sud moderne, la Russie, est né lors de la Révolution russe. Le fait que la philosophie introduite dans la Révolution française ait mûri, passant de l’anarchie de la Révolution française au communisme de la révolution soviétique, est une caractéristique du roi du sud. Le communisme s’est répandu dans le monde par des révolutions.
In modern times the CIA through the use of Non-Governmental Agencies has worked to overthrow nations around the globe, and the step-by-step plan which they have repeatedly employed is what is called color revolutions. The king of the south is a dragon power, and globalists are also the dragon power and the color revolutions of the CIA are markers of a dragon power. The history of France as the spiritual king of the south possesses a unique history that marks a conclusion of that particular line of prophecy.
A nóelbadùn atòlu, CIA tòsùl gbolò Non-Governmental Agencies gù dìnì akpanya nyè ma îmù gbolò ayikɔ nyi, tè kɔ̀kɔ̀kɔ̀ kà tɔ wɔ̀lì gù lɛ̀mì bùdùlù tɔ̀mù nɔ̀ nà, yì kɛ̀ à gɛ̀nɛ̀ color revolutions. Kàliŋ tɔ̀ gùrù lɔ̀hɔ̀ nà dragon power, à globalists mɔ̀ dragon power nà, à color revolutions tɔ̀ CIA nà mɔ̀ markers tɔ̀ dragon power. Tàriikì tɔ̀ France, gù spiritual king of the south nà, kɛ̀ à unique history tɔ̀ kɛ̀ à conclusion tɔ̀ particular line of prophecy nɔ̀ mɔ̀kù.
That conclusion is represented by Napoleon. The French Revolution marks the beginning of France as the king of the south and Napoleon marks its end. Historians identify a series a steps which led Napoleon to his Waterloo, thus identifying a progressive ending to the first spiritual king of the south, as opposed to Babylon and Belshazzar being taken in one night. The first Vladimir of the modern king of the south, Vladimir Lenin died over a two-year period from a series of strokes. Some speculate Joseph Stalin poisoned him, just as some speculate the Ptolemy IV was poisoned by his counselors. The end of the modern king of the south as represented with the Soviet Union was also accomplished by a revolution.
Hosiwaenendo hwaimirilwa na Napoleon. Mapidiguruko eFrance anoratidza kutanga kweFrance samambo wokumaodzanyemba, uye Napoleon anoratidza kuguma kwahwo. Vanyori venhoroondo vanocherekedza nhevedzano yamatanho akatungamirira Napoleon kuWaterloo kwake, nokudaro vachiratidza kuguma kunofambira mberi kwamambo wokutanga wokumaodzanyemba womudzimu, zvichipesana neBhabhironi naBherishazari, avo vakakundwa nousiku humwe chete. Vladimir wokutanga wamambo wemazuva ano wokumaodzanyemba, Vladimir Lenin, akafa mukati menguva yemakore maviri kubva kunhevedzano yezvirwere zvesitiroko. Vamwe vanofungidzira kuti Joseph Stalin akamuuraya nechepfu, sezvinongofungidzirwa nevamwewo kuti Ptolemy IV akaiswa chepfu navapi vamazano ake. Kuguma kwamambo wemazuva ano wokumaodzanyemba, sezvakamiririrwa neSoviet Union, kwakaitwawo neshanduko.
The protest in Moscow that contributed to the demise of the USSR was the massive public resistance during the August 1991 Coup (August 19–21, 1991). This event, centered around the defense of the White House and Boris Yeltsin’s leadership, directly undermined the Soviet hardliners, exposed the regime’s fragility, and accelerated the USSR’s collapse. While earlier protests in Moscow (e.g., 1987–1990) and the Baltic Way (1989) built momentum, the August 1991 protests were the critical tipping point in Moscow, leading to the Soviet Union’s dissolution by the end of 1991. The beginning of Russia as the king of the south begins and ends in revolution. The ending of the USSR was a progressive disintegration of the kingdom, as was Ptolemy, Uzziah, Napoleon and even Vladimir Lenin. The ending of Putin is a progressive fall, which begins as soon as the Ukraine war is finished. His end is brought about at the Battle of Panium, when the USA takes control of the kingdom, while receiving support from an ally who is not actually at the battle.
«Фф» тіліндегі аударманы сұрадыңыз, бірақ қай тіл меңзелгені анық емес. Аударылатын мақсатты тілді нақтылап жазыңыз.
We will continue these lines in the next article.
Ymlaen â’r trywyddau hyn y byddwn yn yr erthygl nesaf.