The sealing began on September 11, 2001 when the mighty angel of chapter eighteen of Revelation descended. His descent was typified by the descent of the angel of Revelation ten on August 11, 1840, and also by the descent of the Holy Spirit at Christ’s baptism. Christ’s baptism points forward to the latter rain descending when the great buildings of New York City were brought down. The power from above began, and also at that time the power from beneath (bottomless pit) would be manifested, for God’s Word never fails.
Pe sellamiento oñepyrũkuri 11 jasyporundy 2001-pe, pe ánhel mbarete Apocalipsis capítulo dieciocho-pegua oguejy ramo. Iguejy ojehechauka hag̃ua vaʼekue pe ánhel Apocalipsis diez-pegua oguejy haguére 11 jasypoapy 1840-pe, ha avei Espíritu Santo oguejy haguére Cristo ñemongarai jave. Cristo ñemongarai ohechauka tenonderã gotyo pe ama pahápeguápe oguejýtaha, Nueva York táva guasu óga tuichakuéra oñemboguejy jave. Pe pokatu yvate guive oñepyrũkuri, ha upe jave avei pe pokatu yvýgui guýpegua (yvykua pypukuʼỹre) ojehechaukáta vaʼekue, Ñandejára Ñeʼẽ arakaʼeve ndojavy moʼãi hag̃uére.
When Christ was baptized, He immediately went into the wilderness and fasted for forty days, after which He was tempted by Satan with three temptations. Each of those three temptations represent primary characteristics of each of the three powers who lead the world to Armageddon. Those three temptations were pride, a characteristic of the dragon; appetite, a characteristic of the beast, and presumption, a characteristic of the false prophet. Pride and self-exaltation are represented by Lucifer in the classic description of Isaiah.
Cristo oñemongarai rire, pya’evoi oike ñu meguápe ha ojapo ayuno cuarenta ára pukukue; upéi Satanás ombohasa chupe mbohapy ñemo’ã. Umi mbohapy ñemo’ã peteĩteĩ ohechauka umi tekotevẽ tee peteĩteĩva umi mbohapy pokatu ogueraháva ko yvy Armagedón-pe. Umi mbohapy ñemo’ã niko vaʼekue ñemomba’eguasu, dragón rembiapo tee; jekaru remimbota, mymba pochy rembiapo tee; ha jejapose rei, maranduhára japu rembiapo tee. Ñemomba’eguasu ha jehupi yvate hag̃ua ijehegui voi ojehechauka Lucifer rupive Isaías ñe’ẽme’ẽ yma guarépe.
How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms. Isaiah 14:12–16.
Mba'éichaite reikúi yvágagui, Lucífer, ko'ẽmbyte ra'y! mba'éichaite reity yvýre, nde remokangyva'ekue tetãnguérape! Nde ningo ere va'ekue nde py'apýpe: Ajupi va'erã yvágape, amopu'ãta che guapyha Tupã mbyjakuéra ári; aguapýta avei aty guasu yvyty ári, yvate gotyo kuarahyresẽ'ỹme; ajupíta arai yvatekue ári; ajoguaséta pe Yvatetévape. Upéicharõ jepe, reñemomboíta añaretãme, yvykua pypukukue gotyo. Umi nde recháva omañáta nderehe porãite, ha oikundaháta ne rehe he'ívo: “Kóva piko pe kuimba'e omongu'eva'ekue yvy, omboryrýiva'ekue mburuvichakuéra retãnguéra?” Isaías 14:12–16.
Five times Lucifer proclaims in his heart “I will.” Satan, once named the “light bearer” (Lucifer), who now only bears darkness, is he “that did shake the nations.” Prophetically he is associated with the “nations,” for he is the leader of the evil confederacy of the nations, and the confederacy of merchants identified in Revelation chapters seventeen and eighteen.
Po ára Lucifer he’i ipy’apýpe: “Ajapóta.” Satanás, yma hérava “mba’e rendy rerahaha” (Lucifer), ko’ág̃a ogueraháva añoite pytũ, ha’e pe “omongu’éva tetãnguéra”. Maranduháicha oñembojoaju chupe “tetãnguéra” rehe, ha’e hag̃uére pe mburuvicha pe ñembyaty añáva tetãnguéragui, ha avei pe ñembyaty ñemuha kuéra rehegua ojehechakuaáva Apocalipsis kapítulo 17 ha 18-pe.
“Kings and rulers and governors have placed upon themselves the brand of antichrist, and are represented as the dragon who goes to make war with the saints—with those who keep the commandments of God and who have the faith of Jesus.” Testimonies to Ministers, 38.
“Mburuvicha guasu ha mburuvicha kuéra ha governadór kuéra omoĩ hi’ári kuéra pe anticristo marca, ha ojehechauka chupekuéra dragón ramo ohóva oñorairõ hag̃ua umi santo ndive—umi oñongatúva Tupã mandamiénto ha oguerekóva Jesús jerovia.” Testimonies to Ministers, 38.
At Christ’s baptism the Holy Spirit descended, typifying post-September 11, 2001. After His baptism Satan tempted Christ with the offer to give Christ the power Satan uses to rule the kingdoms of the world, for at the fall of Adam, Satan had become the ruler of the kingdoms of the world.
Cristo ñemongarai jave, Espíritu Santo oguejy hi’ári, ohechauka hag̃ua mba’éichapa oiko va’erã September 11, 2001 rire. Iñemongarai rire, Satanás oityvyro Cristo-pe ome’ẽ hag̃ua chupe pe pokatu Satanás oipurúva ogoverna hag̃ua yvy arigua rréino-kuérape; Adán ho’a ramo guare, Satanás ojepyta va’ekue yvy arigua rréino-kuéra ruvicha ramo.
And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, showed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time. And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve. Luke 4:5–8.
Ha pe añáme, ojupi hag̃ua chupe peteĩ yvyty yvate ári, ohechauka chupe opa umi mburuvicharenda ko yvy arigua peteĩ sapy’aitépe. Ha pe añáme he’i chupe: Ne mboja’óta ko’ãmba’e pokatu ha hesakã porãite, cheme’ẽmbyre hag̃ua; ha ame’ẽ chupe che aipota hag̃uápe. Nde, upévare, reñesũramo che renondépe, opa mba’e ne mba’éta. Ha Jesús ombohovái ha he’i chupe: Eho che renondégui, Satanás; ojehaígui: “Tupã nde Jára rehe añoite reñesũ va’erã, ha chupe añoite remomba’e guasu ha remba’apo va’erã.” Lucas 4:5–8.
Two primary characteristics of papal Rome (the beast), is her fornication and the poisoned “food” and drink she distributes.
Mokõi tekotevẽ tee Roma papal rehegua (mymba) ha’e iñemonda kuña rekopegua ha umi “tembi’u” ha mba’yru ojeporavóva oñembohyru vaíva omyasãiva.
Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols. Revelation 2:14.
Upéicharamo jepe, areko mbovymi mba’e nde rehe ajeruréva, rehejágui pe kuña Jezabel, ohenóiva ijehe peteĩ kuña maranduhára ramo, ombo’e ha ombotavy hag̃ua che rembiguáipe hag̃ua oiko tekovai hag̃ua ha ho’u hag̃ua mba’e oñekuave’ẽva ta’angágui. Apocalipsis 2:14.
The “food” and drink she provides is her false doctrines.
Pe “tembi’u” ha pe mba’e’y’u o ome’ẽva ha’e hína iñembo’eapýra japu.
“The great sin charged against Babylon is that she ‘made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her fornication.’ This cup of intoxication which she presents to the world represents the false doctrines that she has accepted as the result of her unlawful connection with the great ones of the earth.” The Great Controversy, 388.
“Pe tuicha anga ojeapítava Babilonia rehe hína ha’eha ‘omboy’u opa tetãme hekovai pochy rysýigui.’ Ko kagua ka’uha reheve ome’ẽva mundo-pe ohechauka umi mbo’epy japu ha’e oguerovia va’ekue iñembojoaju ndoikóiva rupi umi yvy arigua mburuvicha guasukuéra ndive.” The Great Controversy, 388.
The beast of Catholicism also deceives the world by her sorceries, which is once again something that is taken internally.
Pe catolicismopegua ombotavy avei yvy arigua hembiporu paje rupive, ha upéva jevy jey peteĩ mba’e oñemongu’éva hyepýpe.
And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived. Revelation 18:23.
Ha aratiri peteĩ vela rehegua nohesapevéimo’ãite nde pype; ha pe ñe’ẽ omendatáva rehegua ha pe omendátava rehegua noñehenduvéimo’ãite nde pype; nde ñemuhára kuéra niko yvy arigua kuimba’e guasuete vaekue; nde paje kuéra rupive opa tetã nguéra oñembotavy. Apocalipsis 18:23.
The Greek word translated as “sorceries,” is pharmakeia, meaning medications. The golden cup in her hand, represents not only a cup to drink wine from, but also the cup where her magical medical potions are prepared and delivered. In the modern world today, those magical potions are delivered in needles, not so much in a cup. When Satan appears after the soon-coming Sunday law, he will perform miracles of healing. The miracles associated with the potions and false doctrines of the papacy, was represented by Satan telling Christ to perform a miracle in turning the stone into bread.
Pe ñe’ẽ griego oñembohasáva “pohã ñe’ẽngatu” ramo ha’e *pharmakeia*, he’iséva pohãnguéra. Pe káso óro oĩva ipope, ndaha’éi añoite peteĩ káso oñemboy’u hag̃ua víno, ha avei pe káso oñembosako’i ha oñeme’ẽhápe ipohãngatupyry pohãmbyky. Ko yvy ape ári ko árape, umi pohãmbyky oñeme’ẽ jey hag̃ua juru’i rupive, ndaha’éi tuichaiterei káso rupive. Satanás ojehechauka vove pe léi arateĩ oútava pya’e rire, ha’e ojapóta mba’eporã ñepohano rehegua. Umi milagro ojoajúva umi pohãmbyky ha umi mbo’epy japu papado rehegua ndive, ojehechauka kuri Satanás he’ívo Cristo-pe tojapo peteĩ milagro omoambuévo ita mbujape ramo.
The prophetic history before and after the Sunday law possesses the same characteristics. The image of the beast testing period for Adventism leading to the Sunday law in the United States typifies the image of the beast testing period for the entire world. This is why we are informed that, “the same crisis will come upon our people in all parts of the world.”
Pe tembiasakue maranduhára arapokõindy mboyve ha rire pe léi arateĩgua rehegua oguereko umi mba’ekuaarã peteĩchagua. Pe arapokõindy ñehesa’ỹijo pe ta’ãnga mymba ñarõhára rehegua Adventismo-pe g̃uarã, ogueraháva peve pe léi arateĩgua Tetã peteĩ rekovéme, ohechaukarã pe arapokõindy ñehesa’ỹijo pe ta’ãnga mymba ñarõhára rehegua opaite yvy ape ári g̃uarã. Upévare ñañemomarandu: “upe jehasa asy peteĩcha oguahẽta ñande tavayguakuérape opaite hendápe ko yvy ape ári.”
The miracles of satanic healings that are accomplished by Satan after the Sunday law, represent the “sorceries” of so-called medicine that are pawned off during the history beginning on September 11, 2001. Jesus stated that, “man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.” Rome’s “food” is traditions and customs which she places above the Word of God.
Umi milagrokuéra pohã sataniko rehegua ojapóva Satanás pe léi domingo rire, ohechauka umi “pohã ñepohãno” hérava péicha pe pohãnohára rembiporu oñemomba’eguasúva pe tembiasakue oñepyrũva 11 jasyporundy 2001 guive jave. Jesús he’i va’ekue: “ndaha’éi mbujape año rehe oikovéva yvypóra, ha katu opa Tupã ñe’ẽ rehe.” Pe “tembi’u” Roma rehegua ha’e tradición ha jepokuaa, omoĩva ha’e Tupã Ñe’ẽ ári.
“In the movements now in progress in the United States to secure for the institutions and usages of the church the support of the state, Protestants are following in the steps of papists. Nay, more, they are opening the door for the papacy to regain in Protestant America the supremacy which she has lost in the Old World. And that which gives greater significance to this movement is the fact that the principal object contemplated is the enforcement of Sunday observance—a custom which originated with Rome, and which she claims as the sign of her authority. It is the spirit of the papacy—the spirit of conformity to worldly customs, the veneration for human traditions above the commandments of God—that is permeating the Protestant churches and leading them on to do the same work of Sunday exaltation which the papacy has done before them.” The Great Controversy, 573.
“Umi movimiento koʼág̃a ojepysóva Estados Unidos-pe, oñehaʼã hag̃uáicha iglesia remimoĩmby ha jepokuaa kuéra oguereko hag̃ua Estado pytyvõ, umi protestánte oho hína umi papista pyporére. Ha ndahaʼéi upéva añoite; haʼekuéra oipeʼa hína okẽ papadope ikatu hag̃uáicha ojey jey supremasía oguerekovaʼekue América Protestántepe, pe oheja vaʼekue Mundo Tuja-pe. Ha pe omeʼẽva tuichave heʼiséva ko movimiento-pe haʼe ko añetegua: pe mbaʼe tenondegua ojehechaukáva haʼe domingo ñemboaje hag̃ua; peteĩ jepokuaa oñepyrũ vaʼekue Roma-gui, ha haʼe voi heʼi upéva haʼeha ichugui autoridad rechaukaha. Haʼe pe espíritu papadopegua—pe espíritu omoĩ hag̃ua yvypóra jepokuaa ko yvy arigua rehegua, ha pe omombaʼe hag̃ua yvypóra tradición Tupã mandamiénto ári—pe oike ha ojapyhyva umi iglesia protestántepe ha ogueraha chupekuéra ojapo hag̃ua pe tembiapo peteĩcha, domingo momorãha rehegua, pe papado ojapóma vaʼekue hesekuéra mboyve.” The Great Controversy, 573.
Tradition and custom are the doctrinal “food” which the beast replaces for the Word of God, in order that it might lift up its pagan idolatry.
Tekome’ẽ ha jepokuaa hína pe “tembi’u” mbo’epy rehegua mymba vai omoambuéva Tupã Ñe’ẽ rendaguépe, ikatu hag̃uáicha omopu’ã yvate hag̃ua iñemomba’eguasu ta’anga paganokuéra rehegua.
“How the Roman Church can clear herself from the charge of idolatry we cannot see. True, she professes to worship God through these images; so did the Israelites when they bowed before the golden calf. But the Lord’s wrath was kindled against them, and many were slain. God pronounced them impious idolaters, and the same record is made today in the books of heaven against those who adore images of saints and so-called holy men.
“Mba’éicha pe Tupao Romano ikatu oñemopotĩ pe jehechauka oje’éva heseha ta’anga ñemomba’e, ndorohechakuaái. Añetehápe, ha’e he’i omomba’eha Tupã ko’ã ta’anga rupive; péicha avei ojapo vaekue israelgua-kuéra oñesũrõ guare pe vakara’y óroguigua renondépe. Ha Ñandejára pochy hendy hesekuéra, ha heta ojejukapa. Tupã omoĩva’ekue hesekuéra pe ñe’ẽ ohechaukáva ha’ekuéraha ta’anga ñemomba’e vaiapóva ha hekoañáva; ha upe kuatiañe’ẽ peteĩchaite oñeñongatu ko árape yvágape umi aranduka-kuérape umi omomba’éva umi santo ra’anga ha umi oje’éva kuimba’e marangatu hag̃ua rehe.”
“And this is the religion which Protestants are beginning to look upon with so much favor, and which will eventually be united with Protestantism. This union will not, however, be effected by a change in Catholicism; for Rome never changes. She claims infallibility. It is Protestantism that will change. The adoption of liberal ideas on its part will bring it where it can clasp the hand of Catholicism. ‘The Bible, the Bible, is the foundation of our faith,’ was the cry of Protestants in Luther’s time, while the Catholics cried, ‘The Fathers, custom, tradition.’ Now many Protestants find it difficult to prove their doctrines from the Bible, and yet they have not the moral courage to accept the truth which involves a cross; therefore they are fast coming to the ground of Catholics, and, using the best arguments they have to evade the truth, cite the testimony of the Fathers, and the customs and precepts of men. Yes, the Protestants of the nineteenth century are fast approaching the Catholics in their infidelity concerning the Scriptures. But there is just as wide a gulf today between Rome and the Protestantism of Luther, Cranmer, Ridley, Hooper, and the noble army of martyrs, as there was when these men made the protest which gave them the name of Protestants.
“Ha kóva hína pe religión umi Protestánte oñepyrũma ohecha hese tuicha mba’e porãme, ha ipahápe oñembojoajúta Protestantísmo ndive. Ko joaju katu ndoguerekomo’ãi Catholiscísmope peteĩ ñemoambue rupive; Roma niko araka’eve ndemoambuéi. Ha’e oñembo’e ijehe ha’eha ndaikatúiva ojavy. Protestantísmo voi pe oñemoambuetáva. Pe oñemoneĩ haguére iñakãme umi idea liberal oguerúta chupe pe tenda ikatuhápe ojepopyhy Catholicísmo rehe. ‘La Biblia, la Biblia, ha’e ñande jerovia pyenda’, upéva va’ekue Protestánte kuéra sapukái Lutero ára-pe, ha umi Católico osapukái: ‘Umi Túva kuéra, jepokuaa, tradición’. Ko’ág̃a heta Protestánte ohecha hasyha ohechauka hag̃ua idoktrína kuéra la Bíbliagui, ha upéicharõ jepe ndoguerekói py’a guasu moral omoneĩ hag̃ua pe añetegua oguerúva kurusu; upévare pya’e ohóma hikuái umi Católico yvýpe, ha oipurúvo umi argumento iporãvéva oguereko hag̃ua pe añetegua jeheja, omoĩ hikuái túva kuéra testimónio, ha umi jepokuaa ha tembiapoukapy yvypóra rehegua. Heẽ, umi Protestánte siglo XIX-pegua pya’e oñemboja hína umi Católico rehe ijerovia’ỹme Ñandejára Ñe’ẽporã kuatiañe’ẽnguérape guare. Péro ko árape gueteri oĩ peteĩ yvykuaa pypuku guasu Roma ha pe Protestantísmo Lutero, Cranmer, Ridley, Hooper, ha pe mártir kuéra aty marangatu mbytépe, peteĩchaite pe oĩ haguéicha umi kuimba’e ojapo ramo guare pe protesta ome’ẽ va’ekue chupekuéra pe téra Protestánte.”
“Christ was a protestant. He protested against the formal worship of the Jewish nation, who rejected the counsel of God against themselves. He told them that they taught for doctrines the commandments of men, and that they were pretenders and hypocrites. Like whited sepulchers they were beautiful without, but within full of impurity and corruption. The Reformers date back to Christ and the apostles. They came out and separated themselves from a religion of forms and ceremonies. Luther and his followers did not invent the reformed religion. They simply accepted it as presented by Christ and the apostles. The Bible is presented to us as a sufficient guide; but the pope and his workers remove it from the people as if it were a curse, because it exposes their pretensions and rebukes their idolatry.” Review and Herald, June 1, 1886.
“Cristo ha’e va’ekue peteĩ protestánte. Ha’e oñemoĩ va’ekue pe judío retãgua kuéra ñemomba’eguasu yvytimbo rekovére, omboykéva’ekue Tupã consejo ijehekuéra rehegua. Ha’e he’i chupekuéra ombo’éha doctrina ramo yvypóra kuéra mandamiénto, ha ha’ekuéraha ñembotavyhára ha tekovai rovakuaahára. Ta’ãngamýi oñemopotĩvaicha okáguio, porã hikuái okápe; hyepýpe katu henyhẽ ky’águi ha ñembyaígui. Umi Reformadór kuéra ypykue og̃uahẽ Cristo ha apóstol kuéra peve. Ha’ekuéra osẽ ha oñemboja’o peteĩ religión peteĩchagua téra ha ceremonia guive. Lutero ha umi hapykuéri oguatáva ndohupytypyahu mo’ãi pe religión reformada. Ojeguerovia hag̃uánte pe ojehechaukáva’ekue Cristo ha apóstol kuéra rupive. La Biblia oñeme’ẽ ñandéve guía suficiente ramo; péro pe papa ha umi omba’apóva hendive oipe’a chugui tavayguakuérape, peteĩ mba’e vai ramo guáicha, ohechauka rupi iñembotavyha ha omoñe’ẽ rupi ikatu’ỹva iñembo’e ta’ãngamýi rovake.” Review and Herald, June 1, 1886.
Miracles of healing, that form the basis of spiritualism, are her stock and trade.
Umi milagrokuéra pohãno rehegua, omoheñóiva espiritismo remimo’ãrã, ha’e hína hembiapo tee ha ojepuru hag̃uáicha.
“Many endeavor to account for spiritual manifestations by attributing them wholly to fraud and sleight of hand on the part of the medium. But while it is true that the results of trickery have often been palmed off as genuine manifestations, there have been, also, marked exhibitions of supernatural power. The mysterious rapping with which modern spiritualism began was not the result of human trickery or cunning, but was the direct work of evil angels, who thus introduced one of the most successful of soul-destroying delusions. Many will be ensnared through the belief that spiritualism is a merely human imposture; when brought face to face with manifestations which they cannot but regard as supernatural, they will be deceived, and will be led to accept them as the great power of God.
Heta oĩ oñehaʼã omyesakã hag̃ua umi jehechauka espiritual omoĩvo tuichakue japu ha po pyaʼe rehe umi médium rembiapópe. Péro, añetehápe umi mbaʼe osẽva ñembotavy rupive heta jey oñemoĩ hag̃ua jehechauka añetetéva ramo, upéicha avei oĩ kuri jehechauka hesakã porãva puʼaka sobrenatural rehegua. Umi ñembotaʼi hechapyrãʼỹva reheve oñepyrũ vaʼekue espiritualismo moderno ndahaʼéi vaʼekue yvypóra ñembotavy térã arandu vai rembiapo, síno umi ánhel aña rembiapo tee, ha péicha oike hag̃ua hikuái peteĩva umi ñembotavy oñehundi hag̃uáicha umi ánga, umi osẽ porãvéva apytégui. Heta oĩta oñembohysýiva pe jerovia rupi espiritualismo haʼeha añónte peteĩ ñembotavy yvypóra rehegua; oñembohováivo jehechauka ndikatúiva ohechakuaaʼỹ hag̃ua sobrenatural ramo, oñembotavýta hikuái, ha oñegueraháta omoneĩ hag̃uáicha umíva Tupã puʼaka guasu ramo.
“These persons overlook the testimony of the Scriptures concerning the wonders wrought by Satan and his agents. It was by satanic aid that Pharaoh’s magicians were enabled to counterfeit the work of God. Paul testifies that before the second advent of Christ there will be similar manifestations of satanic power. The coming of the Lord is to be preceded by ‘the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, and with all deceivableness of unrighteousness.’ 2 Thessalonians 2:9,10. And the apostle John, describing the miracle-working power that will be manifested in the last days, declares: ‘He doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men, and deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do.’ Revelation 13:13, 14. No mere impostures are here foretold. Men are deceived by the miracles which Satan’s agents have power to do, not which they pretend to do.” The Great Controversy, 553.
“Koʼã tapicha oheja rei Ñandejára Ñeʼẽme oĩva testimónio Satanás ha hembiguái kuéra ojapóva hechapyrãva rehegua. Pytyvõ satánikore ae Faraón paje kuéra ikatu vaʼekue ojapo hag̃ua ñembohovái ramo Ñandejára rembiapo. Pablo ohechauka porã Cristo ou jeýta mboyve oĩtaha upéicha avei jehechauka kuéra puʼaka satánikogua. Ñandejára ou jey mboyve oikótava hína ‘Satanás rembiapo opa puʼaka, techaukaha ha mbaʼeporã guasu japu reheve, ha opa ñembotavy tekojojaʼỹ rehegua reheve.’ 2 Tesalonicenses 2:9, 10. Ha apóstol Juan, omombeʼúvo pe puʼaka ojapóva milagro ojehechaukátava ára pahápe, heʼi: ‘Haʼe ojapo techaukaha guasu, ikatu hag̃uáicha ogueru tata yvágagui yvy ári yvypóra renondépe, ha ombotavy umi oikóva yvy ári umi milagro rupive orekóva puʼaka ojapo hag̃ua.’ Apocalipsis 13:13, 14. Koʼápe ndojeʼéi mbaʼeve ñembotavy reínte rehegua. Yvypóra kuéra oñembotavy umi milagro rupive Satanás rembiguái kuéra oguerekóva puʼaka ojapo hag̃ua, ndahaʼéi umi oñemboʼe hag̃uánte ojapohague.” El Gran Conflicto, 553.
The false doctrines built upon customs and traditions, the spiritualistic manifestations of miracles, the counterfeit medical-industrial industry and the combination of churchcraft with statecraft are all the attributes of the beast of Catholicism. Pride is a characteristic of the dragon power. Presumption is the characteristic of the false prophet of apostate Protestantism.
Umi doctrina japuiva oñemopu’ãva jepokuaa ha ñembo’e rape ypykue ári, umi jehechauka espiritista milagrokuéra rehegua, pe industria pohãnohára–industrial japuiva ha pe ñembojoaju tupaórape guare ha estado rape ndive, opa ko’ãva hína pe mymba Catholicismo rehegua rekokatu. Ñembotuicha ha’e peteĩ tekokatu dragón pokatu rehegua. Ñembotavy he’iséva jerovia peteĩva ijehegui ha’e pe proféta japu Protestantismo apóstata rehegua rekokatu.
And Jesus being full of the Holy Ghost returned from Jordan, and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness, Being forty days tempted of the devil. And in those days he did eat nothing: and when they were ended, he afterward hungered. And the devil said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, command this stone that it be made bread. And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God. Luke 4:1–4.
Ha Jesús, henyhẽva Espíritu Santo-gui, oujey Jordán-gui, ha pe Espíritu ogueraha chupe desiértope, cuarenta ára aja oñeha’ã hag̃ua chupe Aña. Ha umi árape ndo’u mba’eve; ha opa rire umi ára, upéi okaruvai. Upérõ Aña he’i chupe: Nde ha’éramo Ñandejára Ra’y, ere ko ita-pe toiko mbujape. Ha Jesús ombohovái chupe he’ívo: Ojehai: Yvypóra ndovevemo’ãi mbujape añónte rehe, síno opa Ñandejára ñe’ẽ rehe. Lucas 4:1–4.
Presumption is a noun that refers to the act or instance of assuming something to be true without sufficient evidence or proof. It involves making a judgment or drawing a conclusion based on incomplete or insufficient information. Presumption can also imply a certain level of confidence in one’s assumption, even when it may not be entirely justified.
Ñemoĩ ha’e peteĩ téra tee ohechaukáva pe tembiapo térã mba’e oikóva peteĩ tapicha omoneĩ jave peteĩ mba’e añetetéva ramo, ndoguerekóigui prueba térã mba’e rechaukaha hekopete hag̃ua upéva. Upéva oike peteĩ tapicha ojapo hag̃ua peteĩ juicio térã oguenohẽ hag̃ua peteĩ conclusión marandu ndaiporipáivagui térã ndohupytýivagui. Pe ñemoĩ ikatu avei he’ise peteĩ nivel de jerovia peteĩ tapicha oguerekóva he’i hag̃uáicha pe ha’e omoneĩva, jepe upéva ndaha’éi hag̃ua opa mba’épe oñemboajéva hekopete.
Apostate Protestantism has accepted Sunday as God’s day of worship without any evidence to support that flawed idea from God’s Word, and they do so while knowingly professing that they are Protestants, whose motto is “God’s word alone,” or as Martin Luther proclaimed, “Sola Scriptura!” They choose to accept it based upon the traditions and customs of the Roman church, or perhaps as simply an accepted inheritance from their forefathers. At the loud cry of the third angel the truth that there is absolutely no justification for worshipping the sun that can be provided from the Bible will be clearly revealed, and then those who continue in their flawed presumption will receive the mark of the beast.
Protestantísmo apóstata omoneĩ domingo Tupã ñemomba’eguasurã ára ramo, mba’eveichagua tekovekuaa’ỹre omopyenda hag̃ua upe idea vai Tupã Ñe’ẽgui; ha ojapo upéva oikuaávo voi he’iha hikuái ha’eha protestánte, ha ijapytépe hína pe ñe’ẽnguéra, “Tupã Ñe’ẽ añoite”, térã, Martin Luther omoherakuã haguéicha, “Sola Scriptura!” Ha’ekuéra oiporavo omoneĩ hag̃ua upéva pe iglesia romana ñemoĩmbyre ha jepokuaágui, térã ikatu hag̃uáicha peteĩ ñemoñare oñemoneĩmava itúva kuéra ypykuégui. Pe mbohapyha ánhel ñe’ẽ hatã guasu jave, pe añetegua ndaiporiha mba’eveichagua ñemopyenda hag̃ua kuarahy ñemomba’eguasu oúva hag̃ua la Bíbliagui ojekuaaukáta hesakã porã hag̃uáicha; upérõ umi oseguíva gueteri iñemoĩ vai rehe oguerekóta mymba ñaña marca.
“If the light of truth has been presented to you, revealing the Sabbath of the fourth commandment, and showing that there is no foundation in the Word of God for Sunday observance, and yet you still cling to the false sabbath, refusing to keep holy the Sabbath which God calls ‘my holy day,’ you receive the mark of the beast. When does this take place?—When you obey the decree that commands you to cease from labor on Sunday and worship God, while you know that there is not a word in the Bible showing Sunday to be other than a common working-day, you consent to receive the mark of the beast, and refuse the seal of God. If we receive this mark in our foreheads or in our hands, the judgments pronounced against the disobedient must fall upon us. But the seal of the living God is placed upon those who conscientiously keep the Sabbath of the Lord.” Review and Herald, April 27, 1911.
“Oñepresentáramo ndéve añetegua resape, oikuaaukávo pe tembiapoukapy irundyha sábado, ha ohechaukávo ndaiporiha fundamento Tupã Ñeʼẽme domingo ñeñangarekorã, ha upéicharõ jepe reikóramo rejejokópe pe sábado japu rehe, remboykévo remomarangatu hag̃ua pe sábado Tupã ohenóiva ‘che ára marangatu’, upéicharõ reguereko pe mymba ñaña marka. Arakaʼépa péva oiko?—Nde nerendúramo pe tembiapoukapy heʼíva ndéve repytuʼu hag̃ua ne rembiapógui domingo-pe ha remombaʼe guasu hag̃ua Tupãme, ha reikuaa porãramo ndaiporiha peteĩ ñeʼẽnte jepe Biblia-pe ohechaukáva domingoha ambue mbaʼe peteĩ ára tembiapo hag̃uánteva rangue, nde reñemoĩ reasepta hag̃ua pe mymba ñaña marka, ha rembotove Tupã sello. Ñamoguahẽramo ko marka ñane syváre térã ñande pópe, umi juicio oñemoñeʼẽva umi naiñeʼẽrendúivare oúta ñande ári. Péro Tupã oikovéva sello oñemoĩ umi tapicha ári, pyʼaporãite reheve oñangarekóva Ñandejára sábado rehe.” Review and Herald, 27 de abril de 1911.
The commonly understood weakness of the Republican party is their willingness to assume their political opponents are fair and honest, when the fruits of the Democratic party clearly reveal that they are the children of the father of lies. Repeatedly and consistently the Republicans take their political opponents at their word, when they have been shown over and over that their opponents never keep their word. They project honest motivations upon those who repeatedly have manifested no rational justification to support the Republicans flawed projections of expected honesty and integrity. It is true also that many Republicans refuse to uphold principle for personal financial gain, or because of secret immoral circumstances that allow them to be easily manipulated, but the primary prophetic attribute of the Republican party is presumption.
Partído Republicano rembiaykue ojeikuaáva jepi ikangyha niko hína ipy’a guasu hag̃uáicha oguerovia hag̃ua iñorairõha polítiko kuéra hekojojaha ha imarangatuha, péro Partído Demócrata rembiaykue heñóiva hesakã porã hag̃ua ha’ekuéraha túva japu memby. Jey hag̃ua ha peteĩcha meme, Republicano kuéra oguerovia iñorairõha polítiko kuéra ñe’ẽre, peteĩ ha ambue jey ojehechaukáramo jepe iñorairõhakuéra araka’eve ndojapóiha iñe’ẽ. Ha’ekuéra omoĩ tekove potĩ ha hembiapo añeteguáva umi ohechaukáva jey jey ndorekoiha mba’eve hag̃uaicha oñemopyenda hag̃ua umi Republicano remimo’ã vai, oha’arõva tekojoja ha jeroviaha. Añete avei heta Republicano ndopytáiha principio rehe ipirapire rembiapo rehehápe térã tekove ñemi ivaíva rehe, upévare ikatu hag̃uáicha oñemboguata ndahasýi; hag̃uaicha jepe, Partído Republicano mba’ekuaarã profétiko tenondegua niko hína pe oñemoĩreíva hag̃ua mba’eveve hag̃ua.
It is the attribute of presumption which is prophetically marked in apostate Protestants, that allows them to pretend they have taken the higher moral and political ground, when in reality they have abdicated their civil responsibilities under the empty expectation that their political opponents will keep their word. The very common definition of insanity is to try and do the same thing over and over, while expecting a different outcome, yet the Republicans argue that it is the Democrats that have been infected with insanity as manifested in their hatred of Trump.
Pe ñemombaʼeguasu rehegua mbaʼeichagua ojehechauka hag̃ua marandu hag̃ua apóstata protestántekuérape, upéva ohejáva chupekuéra oñemboja hag̃ua ku omoguahẽ haguáicha hikuái peteĩ yvyvateve tekoporã ha polítikape, ha añetépe katu oheja rei iñangarekoha tetãygua rembiaporã, peteĩ ñehaʼã rei rupive ohaʼarõvo ipolítika iñamotareʼỹva omoañetetaha iñeʼẽ. Pe tekove akãnunduhápe ñemyesakã ojeipuruvéva niko jajapo jevy jevy hag̃ua upe mbaʼe peteĩchante, ha jahaʼarõ hag̃ua peteĩ osẽ ambuéva; upéicharõ jepe, umi Republicano heʼi umi Demócrataha umi ojejapyhýva akãnundúgui, ojehechaukaháicha upéva iñañeteʼỹ Trump rehegua ñemotareʼỹme.
Yet the insanity of the Republicans is repeatedly illustrated as they agree to compromises, under the premise of compromise being the work of the legislative process, while their political compromises, which they claim are based upon the principle of “the legislative process,” is made with a class who never compromise. Democrats only give ground in the political process when they are fully restrained by the numbers against them. They have never provided evidence of truly working for a middle ground with the political process. The insanity of Republicans is their repeated optimistic expectations of others that are fully unwarranted.
Upéicharamo jepe, umi Republicano kuéra ñembotavy ojehechauka jey jey hague rehe, oñemoĩvo peteĩ ñe’ẽme’ẽme, oimo’ãvo pe ñe’ẽme’ẽha ha’eha tembiapo legislativo rape; ha katu iñe’ẽme’ẽ política, he’íva omopyendaha pe principio “pe proceso legislativo” ári, ojapo hikuái peteĩ aty ndive araka’eve noñemoĩriva ñe’ẽme’ẽme. Umi Demócrata kuéra ome’ẽ yvyra’i añoite pe proceso político-pe oñeñapytĩmbaitéramoite chupekuéra pe papapy oĩva hesekuéra. Araka’eve nome’ẽi hikuái techaukarã añetéva omba’apohague peteĩ mbyte gotyo pe proceso político rupive. Umi Republicano kuéra ñembotavy ha’e hína iha’arõ porã jey jeýva ambuekuéra rehe, ha upéva ndaipóri mba’eveichavérõ ñemomarangatu hag̃ua.
By far and away the majority of those who are supportive of Donald Trump will testify to the fact that the worst attribute of Trump is his willingness to accept men as supporters of his agenda, when the available evidence identifies that it was totally presumption on Trump’s part to make that choice. Presumption is the prophetic attribute of apostate Protestantism. Satan tempted Christ by quoting the Bible, but in so doing, Satan twisted the passage into an unwarranted and unscriptural test.
Hetavevérõite, umi oipytyvõva Donald Trump-pe omombeʼúta pe mbaʼe vaivéva Trump rehegua haʼeha hembipota oasepta hag̃ua kuimbaʼekuéra iñirũnguéra ramo haʼe omotenondéva rembipotápe, pe evidencia oĩva ningo ohechauka porãiterei haʼe hague peteĩ presunción añónte Trump-gui ojapo hag̃ua upéva. Pe presunción haʼe pe tekomeʼẽ profétika protestantismo apóstata rehegua. Satanás ombohovái Cristo-pe oiporúvo la Biblia, ha upéicha ojapóvo, Satanás omombojyvyra pe pasáhe omoambuévo chupe peteĩ jehechajey reiete ha ndahaʼéiva Escritúrape guarã.
And he brought him to Jerusalem, and set him on a pinnacle of the temple, and said unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down from hence: For it is written, He shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee: And in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone. And Jesus answering said unto him, It is said, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God. Luke 4:9–12.
Ha upéi ogueraha chupe Jerusalénpe, ha omoĩ chupe tupaópe yvatevehápe, ha he'i chupe: Nde ha'éramo Tupã Ra'y, eñemombo yvýpe ko'águi; ojehai niko: Ha'e he'íta heko hag̃ua iñángelkuérape nderehe, neñangareko hag̃ua; ha ipopekuéra nde reraháta, ani hag̃ua araka'eve nde py oñekutu itáre. Ha Jesús ombohovái ha he'i chupe: Oje'e: Ani reñeha'ã Tupã nde Jára rehe. Lucas 4:9–12.
At the soon-coming Sunday law it will be the Protestants of the United States who will take the biblical mandate to cease from labor on the Sabbath day, and twist the commandment to worship God on the seventh-day Sabbath into a fabricated command that it is actually paganism’s day of the sun that men are required to worship upon. They will twist a biblical passage into an unwarranted and unscriptural test.
Pe léi hi’aguĩma pe léi arapokõindygua rehegua, umi protestánte Tetã Unidos-pegua voi ojagarráta pe mandato bíblico he’íva oñepytu’u hag̃ua tembiapógui pe ára sábado-pe, ha ombojere hag̃ua pe mandamiénto ojeadora hag̃ua Tupãme pe sábado ára sietehápe, peteĩ mandádo gua’úva ramo he’íva añetehápe kuimba’e ha kuñanguéra ojeovliga hag̃ua omomba’e hag̃ua paganismo ára kuarahy rehegua. Ha’ekuéra ombojere joáta peteĩ pasáhe bíblico peteĩ prueba-pe ndorekóiva fundamento ha ndaha’éiva Escritura-pe guarã.
We will continue this study in the next article.
Romoñe’ẽta ko ñehesa’ỹijo rehe pe artíkulo oúvape.
“I saw that the two-horned beast had a dragon’s mouth, and that his power was in his head, and that the decree would go out of his mouth. Then I saw the Mother of Harlots; that the mother was not the daughters, but separate and distinct from them. She has had her day, and it is past, and her daughters, the Protestant sects, were the next to come on the stage and act out the same mind that the mother had when she persecuted the saints. I saw that as the mother has been declining in power, the daughters had been growing, and soon they will exercise the power once exercised by the mother.
“Ahecha pe mymba mokõi hatĩva oguereko hague dragón jurú, ha ipu’aka oĩha iñakãme, ha pe decreto osẽtaha ijurúgui. Upéi ahecha kuña sy oporomoakãratĩvakuéra rehegua; pe sy ndaha’éiha umi tajýra, ha oñemboja’óva ha ijojaha’ỹva chuguikuéra. Ha’e oguereko va’ekue hi ára, ha upéva ohasáma, ha itajyrakuéra, umi secta Protestante-kuéra, ha’e va’ekue umi ou hag̃ua upe rire escenario-pe ha ohechauka hag̃ua upe temimo’ẽ peteĩcha pe sy oguerekova’ekue oñemoĩrõ guare umi santo-kuéra rehe. Ahecha pe sy oguejyháicha ipu’akápe, umi tajyrakuéra katu okakuaa hague, ha pya’eterei omboguatáta hikuái pe pu’aka peteĩ ára oiporúva’ekue pe sy.”
“I saw the nominal church and nominal Adventists, like Judas, would betray us to the Catholics to obtain their influence to come against the truth. The saints then will be an obscure people, little known to the Catholics; but the churches and nominal Adventists who know of our faith and customs (for they hated us on account of the Sabbath, for they could not refute it) will betray the saints and report them to the Catholics as those who disregard the institutions of the people; that is, that they keep the Sabbath and disregard Sunday.
“Ahecha tupão guigua héra rehegua ha Adventista héra rehegua, Judasicha, oreme’ẽtaha katuólikopekuérape ore rovake hag̃ua ha’e kuéra pytyvõ, oúvo añeteguáre oñorairõ hag̃ua. Upe ramo umi marangatu ha’éta peteĩ tetã ojehechakuaa’ỹva, michĩmi ojekuaáva katuólikopekuérape; katu umi tupao ha umi Adventista héra rehegua, oikuaáva ñande jerovia ha ñande jepokuaa (ndaija’éigui ore rehe pytu’u ára rehehápe, ndaikatúigui ombotove upéva), ome’ẽta marangatúpekuéra ñorairõrãme ha omombe’úta hesekuéra katuólikopekuérape peteĩvaicha umi omboykéva tavayguakuéra mba’e oñemoĩva; upéva he’ise, ha’ekuéra oñangarekótaha pytu’u árare ha omboykétaha arateĩ.”
“Then the Catholics bid the Protestants to go forward, and issue a decree that all who will not observe the first day of the week, instead of the seventh day, shall be slain. And the Catholics, whose numbers are large, will stand by the Protestants. The Catholics will give their power to the image of the beast. And the Protestants will work as their mother worked before them to destroy the saints. But before their decree bring or bear fruit, the saints will be delivered by the Voice of God.” Spalding and Magan, 1, 2.
“Upéi umi Católiko he’íta umi Protestántepe toho hag̃ua tenonderãme, ha omoĩta peteĩ decreto opavave ndoguerekóiva hag̃ua ára peteĩha arapokõindy pegua, ára séptimo rangue, tojejuka va’erãha. Ha umi Católiko, hetaitereíva, oĩta umi Protestánte ykére. Umi Católiko ome’ẽta ipu’aka mymba ñaña ra’ãngápe. Ha umi Protestánte omba’apóta isy ojapo haguéicha hesekuéra mboyve, ombyaipa hag̃uáicha umi marangatu. Ha katu mboyve idekréto ogueru térã ogueraha yva, umi marangatu oñemosãsóta Tupã Ñe’ẽ rupi.” Spalding and Magan, 1, 2.