There are many amazing and important prophetic lines and truths in the book of Ezekiel. Of the biblical illustrations of prophets within the temple, Ezekiel is the one above all others that identifies the wheels within the wheels. Those wheels, according to Sister White represent the complex interplay of human activity illustrating the sequence of events in the time of the latter rain. Those events are represented by the prophet when he became part of the prophecy in an acted-out parable, such as when Ezekiel lies on his left and then right side in chapter four’s illustration of the siege of Jerusalem. There are also thirteen specific dates that outline Ezekiel’s history, and in so doing provide the waymarks of the latter rain period, when the one hundred and forty-four thousand are sealed. There are truths conveyed not only through dates, but also by numbers such as seventeen, nineteen, twenty-five, seventy, forty, three hundred and ninety and of course, thirty. Another number that is perhaps the most important number in the book of Ezekiel is the number one hundred and fifty. Yet the number one hundred and fifty is not found in the book of Ezekiel. Still, line upon line—it is there.
Oĩ heta línea profética ha añetegua hechapyrã ha iñimportánteva Ezequiel kuatiañe’ẽme. Proféta kuéra ojehechauka hag̃ua pe témplope, Ezequiel ha’e opa ambuévagui pe ohechauka porãvéva umi rueda oĩva ambue rueda ryepýpe. Umi rueda, Sy White he’iháicha, ohechauka mba’éichapa ojoaju ha oñembohape hag̃ua tekove rembiasakue yvypóra rembiapo rehegua, oillustráva umi mba’e oikótava pe ama qhipagua ára jave. Umi mba’e oikótava ojehechauka proféta rupive, ha’e voi oñemoingérõ guare pe profesía ryepýpe peteĩ parábola ojeporandúva rupi, Ezequiel oñeno haguéicha iyképe asu ha upéi iakatúape, irundyha kapítulope oñemombe’uháicha Jerusalén ñemongorapy. Oĩ avei paapyha arange peteĩteĩva omyesakãva Ezequiel rembiasakue, ha upéicha rupi ome’ẽva umi techaukaha pe ama qhipagua períodope g̃uarã, upe jave umi cien cuarenta y cuatro mil oñemboty hag̃ua. Oĩ añetegua oñembohasáva ndaha’éi arange rupinte, síno avei papapy rupive, techapyrãrõ diecisiete, diecinueve, veinticinco, setenta, cuarenta, trescientos noventa ha, añetehápe, treinta. Ambue papapy, ikatu hag̃uáicha ha’e pe iñimportantevéva Ezequiel kuatiañe’ẽme, ha’e pe papapy cien cincuenta. Upéicharõ jepe, pe papapy cien cincuenta ndojejuhúi Ezequiel kuatiañe’ẽme. Upéicharamo jepe, línea ári línea—upépe oĩ.
The number one hundred and fifty is prophetically embedded within the line of the siege, and the siege is a distinct prophetic line; or if you will, the siege is a wheel. A prophetic line of history will always possess an alpha and omega, and in so doing the characteristics of alpha and omega must be represented at the beginning and end of the line, or it isn’t a line. The alpha event of the siege was the death of Ezekiel’s wife and the end of the siege was the death of the bride of Christ, as represented by the destruction of Jerusalem.
Pe papapy sa po ciento cincuenta oĩ maranduháraicha oñemoinge pe ñemongorápe, ha pe ñemongora ha’e peteĩ línea maranduhára ijojaha’ỹva; térã, reipotáramo, pe ñemongora ha’e peteĩ rueda. Peteĩ línea maranduhára tembiasakue rehegua akóinte oguerekóta peteĩ alfa ha omega, ha upéicha rupi umi mba’ekuaarã alfa ha omega rehegua tekotevẽ oñerepresenta pe línea ñepyrũme ha ipahápe; ndaupéichairamo, ndaha’éi peteĩ línea. Pe evento alfa pe ñemongora rehegua ha’e va’ekue Ezequiel rembireko omanóva, ha pe ñemongora pahápe oiko va’ekue Cristo novia omanóva, oñerepresentaháicha Jerusalén ñehundípe.
And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away. And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful. And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely. He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son. But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death. And there came unto me one of the seven angels which had the seven vials full of the seven last plagues, and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will show thee the bride, the Lamb’s wife. Revelation 21:2–9.
Ha che, Juan, ahecha táva marangatu, Jerusalén pyahu, oguejyha Tupãgui yvágagui, oñembosako'íva peteĩ novia ojeguerovy'aporãva hembirekorãme guarãicha. Ha ahendu peteĩ ñe'ẽ hatã osẽva yvágagui, he'íva: Péina ápe, Tupã róga oĩ yvypóra ndive, ha ha'e oikóta hendivekuéra, ha'ekuéra ha'éta ipuévlo, ha Tupã voi oĩta hendivekuéra, ha ha'éta Ijára. Ha Tupã omokãta opa tesay hesakuéragui; ha ndaiporimo'ãvéi mano, ni ñembyasy, ni jahe'o, ni mba'asyvéi; pórke umi mba'e yma guare ohasáma. Ha pe oguapýva guapyha ári he'i: Péina ápe, ajapo pyahu opa mba'e. Ha he'i chéve: Ehai; ko'ã ñe'ẽ ningo añetegua ha jeroviapy. Ha he'i chéve: Ojejapopáma. Che hína Alfa ha Omega, ñepyrũha ha paha. Pe ijuhéivape ame'ẽta rei y rekove yvu gui. Pe ipu'akáva ohupytyta opa mba'e erénsiaramo; ha che ha'éta Itupã, ha ha'e ha'éta che ra'y. Péro umi kyhyjéva, ha umi ndogueroviáiva, ha umi iñañaiteva, ha jukahára, ha tekovai kuéra rehegua, ha paje apoha, ha ta'angakuéra omomba'éva, ha opa japuva, oguerekóta hóga pe ypype ohapýva tata ha asúfre reheve; upéva hína pe mano mokõiha. Upéi ou chéve peteĩ umi siete ánhel apytégui, umi oguerekóva umi siete yryru henyhẽva umi siete plága pahague reheve, ha oñe'ẽ chendive, he'ívo: Eju ko'ápe, aikuaaukáta ndéve pe novia, pe Cordero rembireko. Apocalipsis 21:2–9.
Ezekiel’s wife dies at the outset of the siege, and she is there identified as the “desire of” Ezekiel’s “eyes,” and in the destruction of Jerusalem set forth in the same chapter, Jerusalem is identified as “the desire” of Israel’s “eyes.”
Ezequiel rembireko omano ñorairõ ojokopa hag̃ua ñepyrũme, ha upépe oñemombe’u hese ha’eha Ezequiel “resa rembipota”; ha Jerusalén ñehundi oñemoĩva tenonde pe capítulo-pe voi, Jerusalén oñemombe’u Israel “resa rembipota”-ramo.
Again in the ninth year, in the tenth month, in the tenth day of the month, the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, … Also the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, Son of man, behold, I take away from thee the desire of thine eyes with a stroke: yet neither shalt thou mourn nor weep, neither shall thy tears run down. Forbear to cry, make no mourning for the dead, bind the tire of thine head upon thee, and put on thy shoes upon thy feet, and cover not thy lips, and eat not the bread of men. So I spake unto the people in the morning: and at even my wife died; and I did in the morning as I was commanded. And the people said unto me, Wilt thou not tell us what these things are to us, that thou doest so?
Upéi, poteĩha arype, jasy pahápe, jasy rehegua ára pahápe, Ñandejára ñe’ẽ ou che rendápe, he’ívo: … Upéi avei Ñandejára ñe’ẽ ou che rendápe, he’ívo: Yvypóra ra’y, péina ápe, aipe’a nehegui peteĩ jejapi rupi umi mba’e nde resa oipotavéva; hákatu ani reñembyasy, ani rejahe’o, ani tosyrýi nde resay. Ejoko nde pyahẽ, ani rejapo ñembyasy omanóva rehe; emoĩ ne akã jeguaka nde ári, ha eñemonde nde pytu’u rehe nde py rehe, ani rejaho’i nde tembe, ha ani re’u avakuéra mbujape. Upémarõ añe’ẽ tavayguakuérape pyhareve; ka’arupytũme che rembireko omano; ha pyhareve ajapo upe he’íva chéve guaréicha. Ha tavayguakuéra he’i chéve: Ndere’emo’ãi piko oréve mba’épa ko’ã mba’e oréve ĝuarã, nde rejapóva péicha?
Then I answered them, The word of the Lord came unto me, saying, Speak unto the house of Israel, Thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I will profane my sanctuary, the excellency of your strength, the desire of your eyes, and that which your soul pitieth; and your sons and your daughters whom ye have left shall fall by the sword. And ye shall do as I have done: ye shall not cover your lips, nor eat the bread of men. And your tires shall be upon your heads, and your shoes upon your feet: ye shall not mourn nor weep; but ye shall pine away for your iniquities, and mourn one toward another.
Upéi ambohovái chupekuéra: Ñandejára ñe’ẽ ou che rendápe, he’ívo: Eñe’ẽ Israel róga peguakuérape: Péicha he’i Ñandejára Tupã; Péina ápe, che amongyʼaíta che tupaópe, pende mbarete jeguaka, pene resa rembipota, ha upéva pene ánga poriahuverekóva; ha pene raʼykuéra ha pene rajykuéra peheja vaʼekue hoʼáta kyse puku rupi. Ha peẽ pejapóta che ajapo haguéicha: ndapejahoʼimoʼãi pene juru, ni ndapekarumoʼãi yvypóra mbuja. Ha pene akã jeguaka oĩta pene akã ári, ha pene sapatu pende py rehe: ndapeñembyasymoʼãi ni ndapesẽsemoʼãi; síno pekangýta pene rembiapo vaikuére, ha pejaheʼóta ojoehe.
Thus Ezekiel is unto you a sign: according to all that he hath done shall ye do: and when this cometh, ye shall know that I am the Lord God. Also, thou son of man, shall it not be in the day when I take from them their strength, the joy of their glory, the desire of their eyes, and that whereupon they set their minds, their sons and their daughters, That he that escapeth in that day shall come unto thee, to cause thee to hear it with thine ears? In that day shall thy mouth be opened to him which is escaped, and thou shalt speak, and be no more dumb: and thou shalt be a sign unto them; and they shall know that I am the Lord. Ezekiel 24:1, 15–27.
Upéicha Ezequiel ha’e peẽme guarã peteĩ techaukaha: opa mba’e ha’e ojapóvaicha, upéicha avei peẽ pejapóta; ha ko mba’e oikóvo, peikuaáta Che ha’eha Ñandejára Tupã. Avei, nde, yvypóra ra’y, ndaha’éi piko upe árape aikuaáta chuguikuéra imbarete, hekoresãi ombohoryha, hesakuéra rembipota, ha upe omoĩva hikuái ipy’apype, imembykuéra kuimba’e ha kuña, upe ára pe osẽva okañýva ou ne rendápe, nde apysápe rehendu hag̃uáicha? Upe árape nde juru ojepe’áta upe okañývape guarã, ha reñe’ẽta, ha ndaikatuvéima reime kirirĩ hag̃uáicha; ha nde reikóta chupekuéra guarã peteĩ techaukaha; ha ha’ekuéra oikuaáta Che ha’eha Ñandejára. Ezequiel 24:1, 15–27.
The siege’s alpha is the death of Ezekiel’s desire, and the omega is the death of Israel’s desire.
Pe ñemongorá guýpe pe alfa ha’e Ezequiel rembipota mano, ha pe omega ha’e Israel rembipota mano.
Hearing, but Not Hearing
Ohendúva, ha katu ndohendúi hag̃ua
There are five times the elders or the people are portrayed in some fashion as listening to Ezekiel. In Ezekiel 8:1, the elders of Judah sit before him. In Ezekiel 14:1 the elders come and sit before him. In Ezekiel 20:1 the elders of Israel come to inquire of the Lord. In Ezekiel 37:18, God tells Ezekiel: “When the children of thy people shall speak unto thee, saying, Wilt thou not shew us what thou meanest by these?” In chapter twenty-four the people directly ask: “Wilt thou not tell us what these things are to us, that thou doest so?” In each of the five instances the elders or people are in a Laodicean condition.
Oĩ po vése umi karai guasu térã tavayguakuéra ojehechauka peteĩ hendáicha ohenduháicha Ezequiel-pe. Ezequiel 8:1-pe, Judá karai guasukuéra oguapy henondépe. Ezequiel 14:1-pe umi karai guasu ou ha oguapy henondépe. Ezequiel 20:1-pe Israel karai guasukuéra ou oporandu hag̃ua Ñandejárape. Ezequiel 37:18-pe, Tupã he’i Ezequiel-pe: “Ha nde retãyguakuéra ra’ykuéra oñe’ẽ ramo ndéve, he’ívo: Nde nderehechaukamo’ãi piko oréve mba’épa he’ise ko’ãva ndéve g̃uarã?” Mokõipa irundyha kapítulope tavayguakuéra voi oporandu directamente: “Nde ndere’emo’ãi piko oréve mba’épa ko’ã mba’e oreve hag̃ua, rejapógui péicha?” Peteĩteĩ umi po kásope umi karai guasu térã tavayguakuéra oĩ peteĩ condición Laodiceagua-pe.
And he said, Go, and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not. Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed. Isaiah 6:9, 10.
Ha he’i: Tereho, ha ere ko tavayguakuérape: Pehendu katu, ha ani peikũmby; pehecha katu, ha ani pehechakuaa. Embotavy ko tavayguakuéra korasõ, embopohýi ijapysa, ha emboty hesakuéra; ani hag̃ua ohecha hesa rupive, ha ohendu ijapysa rupive, ha ikorasõme oikũmby, ha ojevy, ha okuera. Isaías 6:9, 10.
The five representations of the people hearing but not hearing, and the five representations of the people seeing, but not seeing align with the five steps of those who refuse to see and hear in Isaiah’s testimony.
Pe po mombe’upa tavaygua ohendu ramo jepe ndohendúiva rehegua, ha pe po mombe’upa tavaygua ohecha ramo jepe ndohechái rehegua, ojoja umi po mba’e’ẽme umi ndoipotáva ohecha ha ohendu Isaías rembikuaauka ryepýpe.
But the word of the Lord was unto them precept upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little; that they might go, and fall backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken. Isaiah 28:13.
Ha pe Ñandejára ñe'ẽ oikóta chupekuéra mandamiento ári mandamiento, mandamiento ári mandamiento; línea ári línea, línea ári línea; ko'ápe michĩmi, ha amo michĩmi; ikatu hag̃uáicha oho, ho'a hag̃ua hapykuévo, ojekoka hag̃ua, oñembotavy hag̃ua ñuhãme, ha ojepokuaa hag̃ua. Isaías 28:13.
And many among them shall stumble, and fall, and be broken, and be snared, and be taken. Isaiah 8:15.
Ha heta apytépe heta oñepysanga hag̃ua, ha hoʼa hag̃ua, ha oñembyai hag̃ua, ha ojeytýta hag̃ua ñuhãme, ha ojepokokuaa hag̃ua. Isaías 8:15.
Signs
Techaukaha hag̃ua hag̃ua hag̃uino
In chapter twenty-four of Ezekiel, the period beginning at the siege and the death of Ezekiel’s wife—the desire of his eyes ends at the death of Jerusalem—the desire of Israel’s eyes. The one-and-a-half-year siege contains the signature of Alpha and Omega, and the period begins and ends with a sign. As in Ezekiel twenty-four, Jesus identifies the sign of the siege in Matthew twenty-four.
Ezequiel kapítulo mokõi pa irundyhápe, pe ára oñepyrũva pe jejoko guasu guive ha Ezequiel rembireko omanóva guive—pe ha’e resa rembipota opa Jerusalén ñemanope—Israel resa rembipota. Pe jejoko guasu peteĩ áño ha mbyte oguereko Alpha ha Omega réra tee, ha pe ára oñepyrũ ha opa peteĩ techaukaha reheve. Ezequiel mokõi pa irundyháicha, Jesús omombe’u pe jejoko guasu rechaukaha Mateo mokõi pa irundyhápe.
“Christ’s words had been spoken in the hearing of a large number of people; but when He was alone, Peter, John, James, and Andrew came to Him as He sat upon the Mount of Olives. ‘Tell us,’ they said, ‘when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of Thy coming, and of the end of the world?’ Jesus did not answer His disciples by taking up separately the destruction of Jerusalem and the great day of His coming. He mingled the description of these two events. Had He opened to His disciples future events as He beheld them, they would have been unable to endure the sight. In mercy to them He blended the description of the two great crises, leaving the disciples to study out the meaning for themselves. When He referred to the destruction of Jerusalem, His prophetic words reached beyond that event to the final conflagration in that day when the Lord shall rise out of His place to punish the world for their iniquity, when the earth shall disclose her blood, and shall no more cover her slain. This entire discourse was given, not for the disciples only, but for those who should live in the last scenes of this earth’s history.
«Cristo ñe'ẽkue oñe'ẽ va'ekue heta tapicha ohenduhápe; ha'eño jave katu, Pedro, Juan, Santiago ha Andrés oñemboja hendápe, oguapy aja Olivokuéra Yvyty ári. “Ere oréve,” he'i hikuái, “araka'épa ko'ã mba'e oikóta? ha mba'épa ne jeju rechaukaha, ha arapaha rehegua?” Jesús ndohováiri hemimbo'épe omboja'óvo ijehegui Jerusalén ñehundipa ha upe ára guasu ijeju rehegua. Ombojehe'a mokõive mba'e ojehu hag̃uáva ñemombe'u. Oikuaauka rire hemimbo'épe umi mba'e oútava ohechaháicha, ndaikatúi va'erãmo'ã hikuái ogueropu'aka upe jehecha. Poriahuvereko rupi hesekuéra, ombojehe'a mokõi apañuãi guasu ñemombe'u, ohejágui hemimbo'e kuérape toikuaa hag̃ua hikuái he'iséva ijehegui. Oñe'ẽvo Jerusalén ñehundipa rehe, iñe'ẽ maranduhára ohupyty mombyryve upe mba'e ojehúvagui pe tata guasu paha pe árape, Ñandejára opu'ãvo itendágui ombohovái hag̃ua yvórape hembiapo vaikuére, upe jave yvy oikuaaukáta huguy, ha ndojaho'imo'ãvéima umi omanóva ipype. Ko ñemongeta pukukue ome'ẽmbyre ndaha'éi va'ekue hemimbo'e kuérape añoite guarã, síno umi oikovévape guarã ko yvy rembiasakue pahaite ñehesa'ỹijópe.»
“Turning to the disciples, Christ said, ‘Take heed that no man deceive you. For many shall come in My name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.’ Many false messiahs will appear, claiming to work miracles, and declaring that the time of the deliverance of the Jewish nation has come. These will mislead many. Christ’s words were fulfilled. Between His death and the siege of Jerusalem many false messiahs appeared. But this warning was given also to those who live in this age of the world. The same deceptions practiced prior to the destruction of Jerusalem have been practiced through the ages, and will be practiced again.
“Ojere hag̃ua umi temimbo’épe, Cristo he’i: ‘Peñangareko ani hag̃ua avave penembotavy. Heta oútagui che rérape, he’ívo: Che hína Cristo; ha ombotavýta hetápe.’ Heta mesías japu osẽta, he’ívo ojapoha milágro, ha oikuaaukávo og̃uahẽma hague pe ára ojepe’átaha pe tetã judíape. Ko’ãva ombotavýta hetápe. Cristo ñe’ẽkuéra oñekumpli. Imano ha Jerusalén ñemongora guasu apytépe osẽ heta mesías japu. Ha ko ñemomarandu oñeme’ẽ avei umi oikovévape ko yvy arýpe g̃uarã. Umi añag̃ua ojeporúva Jerusalén ñehundírõ mboyve ojeporu raka’e opa ára pukukue, ha ojeporujeyta.”
“‘And ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.’ Prior to the destruction of Jerusalem, men wrestled for the supremacy. Emperors were murdered. Those supposed to be standing next the throne were slain. There were wars and rumors of wars. ‘All these things must come to pass,’ said Christ, ‘but the end [of the Jewish nation as a nation] is not yet. For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. All these are the beginning of sorrows.’ Christ said, As the rabbis see these signs, they will declare them to be God’s judgments upon the nations for holding in bondage His chosen people. They will declare that these signs are the token of the advent of the Messiah. Be not deceived; they are the beginning of His judgments. The people have looked to themselves. They have not repented and been converted that I should heal them. The signs that they represent as tokens of their release from bondage are signs of their destruction.” The Desire of Ages, 628.
“‘Ha pehendúta ñorairõguéra rehe ha ñorairõ ñe’ẽ rei rehe: peñangareko ani hag̃ua pejekepy’apy: opa ko’ã mba’e niko oiko va’erã, ha katu pe paha gueteri ndoúi.’ Jerusalén ñehundipa mboyve, kuimba’ekuéra oñorairõ ipu’akakuaávo hag̃ua. Emperadorkuéra ojejuka. Umi oje’éva oĩ hag̃uáicha tróno ykére jepe ojejuka. Oĩ ñorairõ ha ñorairõ ñe’ẽ rei. ‘Opa ko’ã mba’e oiko va’erã,’ he’i Cristo, ‘ha katu pe paha [pe tetã judía paha ramo tetã] gueteri ndoúi. Tetã opu’ãta tetã rehe, ha mburuvicharenda mburuvicharenda rehe: ha oĩta ñembyahýi, mba’asy vai ha yvyryrýi heta hendápe. Opa ko’ãva niko tembiasa asy ñepyrũnte.’ Cristo he’i: umi rabínokuéra ohechávo ko’ã techaukaha, he’íta hikuái umíva ha’eha Tupã juicio umi tetãnguéra ári, oguerekógui tembiguáiramo Itavayguakuéra oiporavopyre. He’íta hikuái ko’ã techaukaha ha’eha Mesías ou hag̃uáicha techaukaha. Ani peñembotavy; ko’ãva hína Ijuiciokuéra ñepyrũ. Tavayguakuéra oma’ẽ kuri ijehe año. Ndojepy’amongetái ni oñembojevýi chéve aikueraa hag̃ua chupekuéra. Umi techaukaha ha’ekuéra omoherakuãva peteĩ techaukaháramo isãsótagui tembiguái rekógui, ha’e hína techaukaha ñehundírã.” The Desire of Ages, 628.
The siege of Jerusalem in the year 66, contained the sign of Rome placing its standards in the precinct of the sanctuary. Jesus’ commentary of the events of the period of 66 to 70, aligned the destruction of the year 70 with His Second Coming; and there is a sign associated with His Second Coming.
Jerusalén ñemongorápe ary 66-pe oguereko vaekue pe techaukaha Roma omoĩha iestandárte-kuéra pe tupaópegua korapy jerére. Jesús ñe’ẽmondo umi mba’e oikóva’ekue pe arýpe 66 guive 70 peve, ombojoja pe ñehundi oikova’ekue ary 70-pe ha’e hag̃ua Ijuvy Mokõiha; ha oĩ peteĩ techaukaha ojoajúva Ijuvy Mokõiha rehe.
“Soon our eyes were drawn to the East, for a small black cloud had appeared about half as large as a man’s hand, which we all knew was the Sign of the Son of Man.” The Day Star, 1846.
“Pya’e ore resa ojegueraha Kuarahyresẽ gotyo, ojehecha rupi peteĩ arai hũ michĩva oiméva kuimba’e po tuichakuére mbyte rupi; upéva maymáva roikuaa hagueha pe Ta’ýra Yvypóra Señal.” The Day Star, 1846.
The beginning and ending of the history of 66 to 70 AD contain a sign associated with the beginning of the siege and the destruction of the city, that aligns with the alpha and omega sign of the death of the desire of the eyes in 587 BC and 586 BC.
Ñepyrũ ha opa ñemombe’u guasu ary 66 guive 70 d.C. peve oguereko peteĩ techaukaha ojoajúva ñepyrũ jey rehe pe ñembotýpe ha táva ñehundíre, ha upéva ombojoja pe techaukaha alfa ha omega ndive, ohechaukáva umi tesa rembipota ñemano ary 587 a.C. ha 586 a.C. pe.
The history of the one-and-a-half-year siege is a “sign,” for the latter days. The foolish virgins represented in the history of Ezekiel find the counterpart in the history of the wise virgins who saw the sign of the siege in the year 66 and fled to safety. The one-and-a-half-year siege is the sign that manifests two classes of worshippers. One class will understand the sign, the other class, represented as “many” by Isaiah—will not see or hear.
Peteĩ áño ha mbyte jave oñemongorava’ekue rembiasakue ha’e peteĩ “techaukarã” ára pahápe g̃uarã. Umi kuñataĩ tavy ojehechaukáva Ezequiel rembiasakuepe oguereko ijojaha umi kuñataĩ arandúva rembiasakuépe, ha’ekuéra ohecháva’ekue pe techaukarã ojejapóva pe ñemongorápe áño 66-pe ha okañy hag̃ua py’aguapýpe. Pe ñemongora peteῖ áño ha mbyte jave peve ha’e pe techaukarã ohechaukáva mokõi aty omomba’eguasúva. Peteĩ aty ontendéta pe techaukarã, ambue aty katu—Isaías omombe’uháicha “heta” ramo—ndojechái ni nohendu mo’ãi.
Many and Few
Heta ha Mbovy hag̃ua hag̃ua hag̃ua
Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. For many are called, but few are chosen. Matthew 22:13, 14.
Upéi pe rréi he'i umi tembiguáipe: Pejokua chupe ipo ha ipykuéra, peipe'a chugui ha peity okápe pytũ guasúpe; upépe oĩta jahe'o ha tãi ñembosarái. Oĩ heta ohenóiva, ha mbovymi ojeporavo va'ekue. Mateo 22:13, 14.
So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen. Matthew 20:16.
Upéicha, umi paháva haʼéta tenonderã, ha umi tenonderã paháva: heta niko oñehenói, ha mbovymi ojeporavo. Mateo 20:16.
To See and Hear
Ohecha ha Ohendu hag̃uáicha
There are five acted out parables in the book of Ezekiel and also five times that Ezekiel spoke to the leaders and people. Those two witnesses identify the five foolish virgins who refuse to ‘see’ and refuse to ‘hear.’ They refuse to see or hear the knowledge that is increased when Jesus, who as the Lion of the tribe of Judah unseals His prophetic Word.
Oĩ po paravóla ojejapóva kuatia Ezequiel-pe, ha avei po jey Ezequiel oñeʼẽ mburuvichakuérape ha tavayguakuérape. Koʼã mokõi testígo ohechauka umi po kuñataĩ tavy oñembotýva “ohecha” hag̃ua ha oñembotýva “ohendu” hag̃ua. Ndoipotái hikuái ohecha ni ohendu pe arandu oñembohetavéva Jesús, Judá ñemoñare Leõicha, oipeʼáramo Iñeʼẽ maranduhára sellokuéra.
The World will See and Hear
Yvóra ohecháta ha ohendúta
All ye inhabitants of the world, and dwellers on the earth, see ye, when he lifteth up an ensign on the mountains; and when he bloweth a trumpet, hear ye. Isaiah 18:3.
Peẽ opaite yvy arigua ha umi oikóva ko yvy ape ári, pehecha vove ha’e omopu’ã ramo peteĩ poyvi umi yvyty ári; ha ombopu ramo peteĩ turu, pehendúke. Isaías 18:3.
And in that day shall the deaf hear the words of the book, and the eyes of the blind shall see out of obscurity, and out of darkness. Isaiah 29:18.
Ha upe árape, umi sordo ohendúta pe kuatiañe’ẽ ñe’ẽnguéra, ha umi ára ha’ỹva resa ohecháta pytũmbýgui ha iñipytũhágui. Isaías 29:18.
My Foolish & Sottish People have no Knowledge
Che retãgua tavy ha vyrorei ndorekói arandu hag̃uáicha
How long shall I see the standard, and hear the sound of the trumpet? For my people is foolish, they have not known me; they are sottish children, and they have none understanding: they are wise to do evil, but to do good they have no knowledge. Jeremiah 4:21, 22.
Araka’e peve ahéta ahecha va’erã pende yvate ojehupiha, ha ahendu trompéta ryapu? Che retãgua niko tavy; ndoikuaái chéve. Ha’ekuéra mitã inútil ha arandu’ỹva; iñarandu mba’e vai apo hag̃uápe, ha mba’e porã apo hag̃uápe ndorekói kuaapy. Jeremías 4:21, 22.
Declare this in the house of Jacob, and publish it in Judah, saying, Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not. Jeremiah 5:20, 21.
Peikua hag̃ua ko mba’e Jacob róga pegua apytépe, ha emyasãi hag̃ua Judápe, erehápe: Pehendúke ko’ág̃a kóva, peẽ tavayguakuéra vyro ha arandurã’ỹva; peẽ pende resa va’ekue, ha ndapehecháiva; pende apysa va’ekue, ha ndapehendúiva. Jeremías 5:20, 21.
A Rebellious House
Óga opuʼãva
The word of the Lord also came unto me, saying, Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious house. Ezekiel 12:1, 2.
Upéi avei ou chéve Jehová ñe'ẽ, he'ívo: Yvypóra ra’y, nde reikove peteĩ óga pu’akareíva mbytépe, oguerekóva tesa ohecha hag̃ua, ha ndohechái; oguerekóva apysa ohendu hag̃uáicha, ha ndohendúi; pórke ha’e hikuái peteĩ óga pu’akareíva. Ezequiel 12:1, 2.
Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive: For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.
Upévare añeʼẽ chupekuéra parábola rupive: ohechávo nohechái; ohendúvo ndohendúi, ni noikũmbýi. Ha ipypekuéra oñemoañete profecía Isaías heʼíva: Pehendúta, ha ndapeikũmbymoʼãi; ha pehecháta, ha ndapehechakuaamoʼãi. Ko tetãygua pyʼa niko hatãmbaitéma, ha iapysakuéra ndojapysakakuaái, ha hesa kuéra voi ombotypa; ani hag̃ua oime hag̃uaicha ohecha hesakuéra rupive, ha ohendu iapysa rupive, ha oikũmby ipyʼa rupive, ha ojere, ha che amonguera chupekuéra.
But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear. For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them. Matthew 13:13–17.
Ha ovyʼa nde resa, ohechágui; ha nde apysa, ohendúgui. Añetehápe haʼe peẽme: heta proféta ha kuimbaʼe hekojojáva oipotaiterei ohecha umi mbaʼe peẽ pehecháva, ha ndohechái kuri; ha ohendu umi mbaʼe peẽ pehendúva, ha nohendúi kuri. Mateo 13:13–17.
The Old Paths
Tape Ymaguare hag̃ua Rape Kuéra
Thus saith the Lord, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken. Jeremiah 6:16, 17.
Péicha he’i Ñandejára: Peñembo’y tape rupi, pema’ẽ ha peporandu umi tape yma guaréva rehe, moõpa oĩ pe tape porã, ha peguata ipype; upéicha pejuhúta pytu’u pende ángape g̃uarã. Ha ha’ekuéra he’i: Ndoroguatamo’ãi ipype. Avei amoĩ penderehe ñangarekoha kuérape, he’ívo: Pehendu mimbypu ryapu. Ha ha’ekuéra he’i: Ndorohendumo’ãi. Jeremías 6:16, 17.
The Message of 1840–1844
Pe Marandu 1840–1844 rehegua
“All the messages given from 1840–1844 are to be made forcible now, for there are many people who have lost their bearings. The messages are to go to all the churches.
“Opaite marandu oñeme'ẽ va'ekue 1840–1844 guive oñemombarete va'erã ko'ág̃a, oĩgui heta tapicha okañýva hikuái iñesẽ rape. Umi marandu ohova'erã opaite tupaope.
“Christ said, ‘Blessed are your eyes, for they see; and your ears, for they hear. For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them’ [Matthew 13:16, 17]. Blessed are the eyes which saw the things that were seen in 1843 and 1844.
“Cristo he’i, ‘Ojehovasáva pene resa, ohecha rupi; ha pene apysa, ohendu rupi. Añetehápe ha’e peẽme, heta proféta ha kuimba’e hekojojáva oipotaiterei ohecha umi mba’e peẽ pehecháva, ha ndohechái; ha ohendu umi mba’e peẽ pehendúva, ha nohendúi’ [Mateo 13:16, 17]. Ojehovasáva umi resa ohecháva’ekue umi mba’e ojehecháva’ekue ary 1843 ha 1844-pe.”
“The message was given. And there should be no delay in repeating the message, for the signs of the times are fulfilling; the closing work must be done. A great work will be done in a short time. A message will soon be given by God’s appointment that will swell into a loud cry. Then Daniel will stand in his lot, to give his testimony.” Manuscript Releases, volume 21, 437.
“Oje’e pe marandu. Ha ndaiporiva’erã arete oñemombe’u jey hag̃ua pe marandu, pórke umi ára rechaukaha oñekumpli hína; pe tembiapo paha ojejapova’erã. Peteĩ tembiapo tuicha ojejapóta mbykymi tiémpope. Pya’e hag̃uáicha oñeme’ẽta peteĩ marandu Tupã ñemoĩ rupive, ha upéi okakuaáta oñemoherakuã hag̃ua hatã asýpe. Upérõ Daniel oñembo’yta ilótepe, ome’ẽ hag̃ua he’ẽ testimonia.” Manuscript Releases, volume 21, 437.
The Sign of the Siege
Pe Señal pe Cerco rehegua
There is five times in the book of Ezekiel where he ‘acted out’ a parable that the people refused to see, and also five times he ‘spoke’ with those people, who refused to hear. The two witnesses of the acted parable and the speaking were presented to the five foolish virgins. One of the acted parables, located in chapter four represents the “sign” of the siege, that warns of the coming destruction. The message of Ezekiel is the message to Laodicea.
Oĩ po vése pe kuatiañe’ẽ Ezequiel-pe ha’e “ohechauka hag̃ua” peteĩ ñe’ẽnga’u tavayguakuéra ndogueroviasevéiva, ha avei po vése “oñe’ẽ” umi tavayguakuéra ndohenduséivandi. Mokõi testígo, pe ñe’ẽnga’u ohechaukáva ha pe ñe’ẽ oñe’ẽva, oñemyesakã vaekue umi po kuñataĩ tavyvakuérape. Peteĩva umi ñe’ẽnga’u ojehechaukáva apytégui, oĩva kapítulo irundyhápe, ohechauka pe “techaukaha” jejokohaguasu rehegua, omomarandúva pe ñehundikatu oútava. Ezequiel marandu ha’e pe marandu Laodiceápe guarã.
The “sign” given for Laodicea is the ‘sign of the siege’, and the siege of the latter days is represented by several witnesses. The only sign given to the Jews of Christ’s day was the sign of Jonah, who represents an acted-out parable of three days in the belly of a whale.
Pe “señal” oñeme’ẽva Laodiceápe g̃uarã ha’e hína pe “señal jejokohápe guare”, ha umi ára pahápe oikótava jejoko ojehechauka heta testígo rupive. Pe única señal oñeme’ẽva’ekue judíokuérape Cristo ára-pe ha’e va’ekue pe señal Jonás rehegua, ha’éva peteĩ parábola ojehechaukáva tembiapópe mbohapy ára pukukue peteĩ pira guasu ryepýpe.
Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee. But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. Matthew 12:38–40.
Upéi, algunos kuatiahaiha ha fariséogui ombohovái hese, heʼívo: Mboʼehára, roipota rohecha ndehegui peteĩ techaukaha. Haʼe katu ombohovái ha heʼi chupekuéra: Peteĩ generación ivaíva ha itavýva oheka peteĩ techaukaha; ha ndohupytýi vaʼerã chupe techaukaha ambue, sino pe proféta Jonás rehegua techaukaha: Pórke, oĩ haguéicha Jonás mbohapy ára ha mbohapy pyhare pira guasu ryepýpe, upéicha avei oĩta Yvypóra Raʼy mbohapy ára ha mbohapy pyhare yvy pyʼapýpe. Mateo 12:38–40.
The Sign of Jonah
Jonás Rechaukaha
The sign of Jonah was an acted-out parable of a resurrection from death. John represents the same truth, for he was cast into a boiling pot of oil, and came out alive. Daniel in the lion’s den and the three worthies in the furnace of Nebuchadnezzar represent a resurrection from death. All represent the one hundred and forty-four thousand who are resurrected in Revelation chapter eleven.
Jonás rehecha ha’e va’ekue peteĩ parábola ojehechauka hag̃ua peteĩ jeikove jey mano-gui. Juan ohechauka upe añetegua avei, ha’e niko oñemombo va’ekue peteĩ ña’ẽ ryru ñandy ñembopupýpe, ha osẽ chugui oikovévo. Daniel león-kuéra yvykua ryepýpe ha umi mbohapy kuimba’e marangatu tatatĩ Nebucodonosor peguápe ohechauka peteĩ jeikove jey mano-gui. Opavave ohechauka umi cien cuarenta y cuatro mil oikove jey va’erãva Apocalipsis capítulo once-pe.
“The thoughts of the Saviour now returned from contemplating the past and future. While the people were endeavoring to explain what they had seen and heard according to the impressions made upon their minds, and according to the light they possessed, ‘Jesus answered and said, This voice came not because of me, but for your sakes.’ It was the crowning evidence of his Messiahship, the signal of the Father that Jesus had uttered the truth, and was the Son of God. Would the Jews turn from this testimony of high Heaven? They had once asked the Saviour, What sign showest thou that we may see and believe? Innumerable signs had been given all through the ministry of Christ; yet they had closed their eyes and hardened their hearts lest they should be convinced. The crowning miracle of the resurrection of Lazarus did not remove their unbelief, but filled them with increased malice; and now that the Father had spoken, and they could ask for no further sign, their hearts were not softened and they still refused to believe.” Spirit of Prophecy, volume 3, 79.
“Pe Salvador remiandu oñemoĩ jevy yma guarére ha oútava rehe. Umi tetãygua oñeha’ã aja omyesakã hag̃ua pe ohecha ha ohendúva he’iséva, iñakãme opytáva rupi ha pe tesape oguerekóva he’iháicha, ‘Jesús ombohovái ha he’i: Ko ñe’ẽ noúi cherehehápe, pende rehehápe katu.’ Kóva va’ekue pe techaukaha pahaite omoakãva Imésias-ramo, pe Túva señal ohechaukáva Jesús he’i hague añetegua, ha ha’eha Tupã Ra’y. Piko umi hudío kuéra ojere va’erã ko testimónio yvágagui yvatevévagui? Peteĩ jey oporandu va’ekue hikuái pe Salvador-pe: Mba’e techaukaha rehechaukáta oréve rohecha hag̃ua ha roguerovia hag̃ua? Hetaiterei techaukaha oñeme’ẽ va’ekue Cristo ministerio pukukue javeve; upéicharõ jepe, hikuái omboty ijesa ha omohatã ikorasõ ani hag̃ua oñekonvense. Pe milágro tuichavéva, Lázaro jeikove jevy, ndoipe’ái ijerovia’ỹ; upéva rangue, omyenyhẽ chupekuéra mba’evai akãme guasúvagui. Ha ko’ág̃a, pe Túva oñe’ẽ rire, ha ndaikatúi rire ojerure ambue techaukaha, ikorasõkuéra ndopy’aguapýi ni noñembopiro’ýi, ha upéichante avei ndojeroviái.” Spirit of Prophecy, volume 3, 79.
Lazarus was the sign of the resurrection as acted out by Jonah in the belly of the whale. The voice of the Father in connection with the resurrected Lazarus represents the combination of Divinity and humanity, which is of course the nature of Christ, who took human flesh upon Himself. The combination of Divinity with humanity is the ensign of the one hundred and forty-four thousand, and Lazarus is the sign of resurrection power which accomplishes the joining of Creator with creature.
Lázaro niko pe techaukaha ñemoingove jevy rehegua, oñembosaráikuaáva Jonás rupive pira guasu ryepýpe. Túva ñe’ẽ, ojoajúva Lázaro oñemoingove jevývare, orrepresenta Tupãrekove ha yvypóra rekove joaju, ha upéva hína, añetehápe, Cristo reko, ha’e omoĩva’ekue hi’ári yvypóra ro’o. Tupãrekove joaju yvypóra rekove ndive hína poyvi umi cien cuarenta y cuatro mil rehegua, ha Lázaro niko techaukaha pe pu’aka ñemoingove jevy rehegua omboguerekóva pe joaju Apohare ha hembiapo apytépe.
“By the raising of Lazarus, many were led to believe in Jesus. It was God’s plan that Lazarus should die and be laid in the tomb before the Saviour should arrive. The raising of Lazarus was Christ’s crowning miracle, and because of it many glorified God.” Manuscript Releases, volume 21, 111.
“Lázaro ñemopuʼã rupi, heta oñemotenonde ojerovia hag̃ua Jesús rehe. Tupã rembiapopyrã vaʼekue Lázaro omano ha oñemoĩ hag̃ua pe itakua ryepýpe, pe Salvador og̃uahẽ mboyve. Lázaro ñemopuʼã haʼe vaʼekue Cristo milágro tuichavéva, ha upévare heta omombaʼeguasu Tupãme.” Manuscript Releases, volumen 21, 111.
Lazarus led the triumphal entry into Jerusalem, and he was the living “sign” of the resurrection that is illustrated by Jonah.
Lázaro omotenonde pe jeike ñemomba’eguasu rehe Jerusalénpe, ha’e ha’eva’ekue pe “techaukaha” oikovéva ñemopu’ã jeýgui, pe ojehechauka hag̃ua Jonás rupive.
“Lazarus, whose body had seen corruption in the grave, but who now rejoiced in the strength of glorious manhood, led the beast on which the Saviour rode.” The Desire of Ages, 572.
“Lázaro, pe sepultura-pe hetekue oñembyai vaʼekue, ha koʼág̃a ovyʼáva kuimbaʼe rekove mimbipáva mbaretépe, ogueraha pe mymba hiʼári pe Salvador oguata hague.” The Desire of Ages, 572.
The triumphal entry aligns with the Exeter camp meeting, which was the alpha fulfillment of the parable of the ten virgins, and thus aligns the “sign” of Jonah and Lazarus with the omega and perfect fulfillment of the proclamation of the message, “Behold the Bridegroom cometh!”
Jeike triumfál oike hag̃ua Exeter-pe oñembyatýva kampopegua ndive, ha upéva ha’eva’ekue pe cumplimiento alfa pe parábola rehegua umi diez vírgenes-gui, ha upéicha rupi ombojoaju pe “señal” Jonás ha Lázaro rehegua pe omega ha cumplimiento perfecto ndive pe marandu oñemoherakuãva rehegua, “¡Péina ou pe Novio!”
“I am often referred to the parable of the ten virgins, five of whom were wise, and five foolish. This parable has been and will be fulfilled to the very letter, for it has a special application to this time, and, like the third angel’s message, has been fulfilled and will continue to be present truth till the close of time.” Review and Herald, August 19, 1890.
“Che areko hag̃ua heta jey pe ñemombeʼu joja umi pa virgen rehegua, po ijara hag̃ua arandu ha po avei itavýva. Ko ñemombeʼu joja oñekumpli vaʼekue ha oñekumplíta peve peteĩteĩ letra peve, pórke oguereko peteĩ aplicación especial ko ára guarã, ha, pe tercer ángel maranduicha, oñekumpli vaʼekue ha opytáta añetegua koʼag̃agua ramo pe ára paha peve.” Review and Herald, 19 de agosto de 1890.
Jonah, Lazarus and Samuel Snow arriving late to the Exeter camp meeting align with Ezekiel’s “sign of the siege.” Lazarus led Christ into Jerusalem on an ass.
Jonás, Lázaro ha Samuel Snow og̃uahẽrõ guare ipyahúpe Exeter pegua aty guasúpe, ojoaju Ezequiel “señal del sitio”-re. Lázaro omotenonde Cristo-pe Jerusalén-pe peteĩ mburika ári.
“Bates was one of the important leaders in the Exeter (New Hampshire) camp meeting in August, 1844, when the ‘true midnight cry’ was first presented. Bates, it happened, was the preacher chosen for that morning’s service at the camp. He was exhorting his hearers to be faithful and calmly assuring them that God was simply testing them, that they were in the tarrying time, and similar sentiments, when Samuel S. Snow rode into the camp on horseback. Taking a seat beside his sister, Mrs. John Couch, Snow reiterated his conviction that Christ would appear at the time appointed. Greatly stirred, Mrs. Couch startled the audience by rising and declaring, ‘Here is a man with a message from God!’” Leroy Froom, The Prophetic Faith of our Fathers, volume 4, 549.
“Bates niko peteĩva umi mburuvicha iñimportánteva Exeter (New Hampshire) pegua aty ñembyatyhápe agosto 1844-pe, upe jave ‘pyharé mbyte sapukái añetegua’ oñepresenta raẽ ypy. Ojehuháicha, Bates hína kuri pe predikadór ojeporavóva upe pyhareve rembiapópe pe atyhápe. Ha’e omokyre’ỹ hína kuri umi ohendúvape hag̃ua jerovia hag̃ua ha py’aguapýpe ombojerovia chupekuéra Tupã añoiteha oha’ãha chupekuéra, ha’ekuéra oĩha pe ára ñemboha’arõme, ha ambue ñe’ẽme upéicha avei, upe jave Samuel S. Snow oguahẽ pe atyhápe kavaju ári. Oguapyvo iñermana, señora John Couch, ykére, Snow omombe’ujey ikatuha hag̃uáicha ohecha añete Cristo ojehechaukataha pe ára oñemoĩ vaʼekuépe. Tuicha oñemongu’éva, señora Couch omondýi pe atyhápe opu’ãvo ha he’ívo: ‘Ko’ápe oĩ peteĩ kuimba’e oguerekóva peteĩ marandu Tupãgui!’” Leroy Froom, The Prophetic Faith of our Fathers, volumen 4, 549.
In April, 1521 Martin Luther travelled in a horse drawn wagon to the Diet of Worms, where he rejected papal traditions and customs and stated, “Unless I am convinced by the testimony of the Scriptures or by clear reason… I cannot and will not recant anything, since it is neither safe nor right to go against conscience. Here I stand. I can do no other. God help me. Amen.”
Jasyrundy 1521-pe, Martín Lutero ojepyrũ peteĩ karuéta kavaju otyryryhápe Dieta de Worms-pe, upépe omboykévo umi tradición ha costumbre papal ha he’ívo: “Ndacheresaráiramo Ñandejára Ñe’ẽme’ẽ rehegua testimonio rupive térã peteĩ razón hesakã porãva rupive… ndaikatúi ha ndajapomo’ãi mba’eveichagua ñe’ẽjevy, ndaha’éigui seguro térã iporã ojeho hag̃ua conciencia reheve. Ko’ápe aime. Ndaikatúi ambue mba’e ajapo. Tupã chepytyvõ. Amén.”
As the Pharisees opposed Christ’s triumphal entry, the papal authorities opposed Luther’s entry. Luther then changed his name (a symbol of the sealing) and was hidden away while he translated the New Testament into the German language. His presentation at the Diet of Worms typified the Midnight Cry which led to the death decree from the church state authorities of the time, thus typifying the Sunday law. After ten months in hiding under the name of ‘Junker Jörg’ the threat from authorities had changed, largely to two military problems faced by the corrupt Charles V. Those two military threats were France and Islam, representing the same unholy alliance of socialism and Islam that today is confronting mankind.
Fariséo kuéra oñemoĩ haguéicha Cristo jeike triunfál rehe, upéicha avei autoridad papál kuéra oñemoĩ Lutero jeike rehe. Upéi Lutero omoambue héra (peteĩ techaukaha sellamiento rehegua) ha oñemokañy hag̃ua, otradusi aja pe Testamento Pyahu alemán ñe’ẽme. Ijechauka Dieta de Worms-pe otypifika pe Sapukái Pyharepytegua, oguerúva’ekue pe decreto de muerte umi autoridad iglesia-estado upe ára guaréva-gui, ha upéicha otypifika pe léi domingo rehegua. Pa ary jasypa oñemokañy rire héra ‘Junker Jörg’ guýpe, pe amenaza umi autoridad-gui oñemoambue vaʼekue, hetavérõ mokõi apañuãi militar oguerekóva rupi pe Carlos V oñembyaíva. Umi mokõi amenaza militar haʼe vaʼekue Francia ha Islam, ohechaukáva upe joaju marangatuʼỹva socialismo ha Islam apytépe, ko árape oĩva yvypórape oñemoĩ hag̃ua.
“The work of God in the earth presents, from age to age, a striking similarity in every great reformation or religious movement. The principles of God’s dealing with men are ever the same. The important movements of the present have their parallel in those of the past, and the experience of the church in former ages has lessons of great value for our own time.” The Great Controversy, 343.
“Yvy ape ári Ñandejára rembiapo ohechauka, ára ha ára pukukue, peteĩ ojueheguáva hendaitépe opaite reforma guasu térã movimiento religioso-pe. Ñandejára oikóvo yvyporakuéra ndive umi principio akóinte peteĩcha. Ko’ág̃a gua umi movimiento iñimportánteva oreko ijojaha ymaguare guive oikova’ekue ndive, ha tupão rembiasakue umi ára yma guarépe oguereko mbo’epy tuicha mba’éva ñande ára haguã.” The Great Controversy, 343.
An ass led by Lazarus brought Christ into Jerusalem, a horse drawn carriage brought Luther to the Diet of Worms, and a horse brought Snow to the Exeter camp meeting, thus identifying the ass, and horse, both members of the “Equidae” family in the genus “Equus,” as the sign of the message of the Midnight Cry.
Peteĩ vúrro, Lázaro ogueraha vaʼekue, ogueru Cristo-pe Jerusalén-pe; peteĩ kárro kavaju rehegua ogueraha Lutero-pe Worms Diet-pe; ha peteĩ kavaju ogueraha Snow-pe Exeter-pe ojejapo vaʼekue aty ñemboʼe guasúpe; upéicha ojehechauka hag̃ua pe vúrro ha pe kavaju, mokõivéva pe familia “Equidae” pegua ha pe género “Equus” pegua, haʼeha pe techaukaha pe marandu “Midnight Cry” rehegua.
Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass. Zechariah 9:9.
Torypa tuicha, Sión rajy; esapukái, Jerusalén rajy: péina, nde Rréi ou ne rendápe: ha’e hekojojáva, oguerúva salvación; ñemomirĩme, ojupíva peteĩ vúrro ári, ha peteĩ mburika ra’y, vúrro memby ári. Zacarías 9:9.
The sign of the Midnight Cry message is the arrival of the ass or horse, both symbols of Islam. The chosen messenger of the true message of the midnight cry arrived upon a horse in alignment with Christ arriving on an ass. The “siege” in the latter days is marked by the fulfillment of Ellen White’s identification that the city of Nashville is to be struck by “fireballs.”
Pe marandu Pyhare Mbytegua rehegua ñemombe’upy ra’ã hína vúrro térã kavaju oguahẽha, mokõivéva Islam rehegua ta’ãnga ramo. Marandu tee pyhare mbytegua rehegua mensahéro ojeporavóva oguahẽ kavaju ári, ojoja hag̃ua Cristo oguahẽ haguéicha peteĩ vúrro ári. “Jere” ára pahápe rehegua ojehechauka Ellen White he’i hag̃ua ojekumpliha, ha’e ohechakuaa va’ekue táva Nashville ojeinupãtaha “tata bola” reheve.
Why does the siege begin at the fireballs of Nashville? Is it because Islam is represented by the ass and the horse in God’s prophetic Word?
Mba’érepa pe ñemboty guasu oñepyrũ Nashville tata apu’akuégui? ¿Ha’épa upéva Islam ojehechaukágui mburika ha kavaju rupive Tupã Ñe’ẽ maranduhárape?
Smyrna
Esmirna
The Emperor Nero marks the beginning of the church of Smyrna when the city of Rome was burned in the year 64. The date marks the beginning of the persecution of the Christian church accomplished over a two hundred and fifty year period that concluded at the Edict of Milan in the year 313. The formation of the image of the beast represents the alpha waymark that introduces a period that ends with an omega waymark represented by the mark of the beast at the soon-coming Sunday law. The period is identified as beginning with “edicts.”
Mburuvicha Guasu Nerón ohechauka pe iglesia de Esmirna ñepyrũ, táva Roma oñehapýramo ary 64-pe. Upe ára ohechauka ñepyrũrã pe persecución iglesia cristiana rehe, ojejapóva mokõi sua cincuenta ary pukukue aja, oñemohu’ãva Edicto de Milán-pe ary 313-pe. Pe mymbaguasu ra’ãnga ñemoheñói orrepresenta pe waymark alfa omoñepyrũva peteĩ periodo, oñemohu’ãva peteĩ waymark omega rehe, ojehechaukáva pe mymbaguasu marca rupive pe ley dominical hi’aguĩetéva ñeguahẽme. Pe periodo ojehechauka oñepyrũha “edictos” reheve.
“If the reader would understand the agencies to be employed in the soon-coming contest, he has but to trace the record of the means which Rome employed for the same object in ages past. If he would know how papists and Protestants united will deal with those who reject their dogmas, let him see the spirit which Rome manifested toward the Sabbath and its defenders.
“Oiméramo pe lector oikuaase hag̃ua umi mba’e’apopyrã ojeporútava pe ñorairõ oútavape pya’e, tekotevẽnte chupe omyesakã pe tembiasakue umi medio Roma oiporúva’ekue upe tembiaporãrã ymaite guive. Oikuaase ramo mba’éichapa papista ha protestante joajúvo oñangareko asýta umi ombotovévare idogma kuéra, tohecha pe espíritu Roma ohechauka va’ekue sábado rehe ha umi hapykueriguáre.”
“Royal edicts, general councils, and church ordinances sustained by secular power were the steps by which the pagan festival attained its position of honor in the Christian world. The first public measure enforcing Sunday observance was the law enacted by Constantine. (A.D. 321; see Appendix note for page 53.) This edict required townspeople to rest on ‘the venerable day of the sun,’ but permitted countrymen to continue their agricultural pursuits. Though virtually a heathen statute, it was enforced by the emperor after his nominal acceptance of Christianity.” The Great Controversy, 574.
“Mburuvicha kuéra rembiapoukapy, aty guasu jepivegua, ha tupão rembiapoukapy ojejokóva pokatu secular rupive, umíva hína umi tape rupi arete pagano oguahẽ haguéicha pe tenda ñemomba’eguasúpe mundo cristiano-pe. Pe tembiapoukapy peteĩha ojehechaukáva opavave renondépe ombohovái hag̃ua arapokõi jehecharamo ha ñemboaje, ha’e va’ekue pe léi omoĩva’ekue Constantino. (A.D. 321; ehecha Nota del Apéndice página 53-pe g̃uarã.) Ko mburuvicha rembiapoukapy ojerure va’ekue tavayguakuérape opytu’u hag̃ua ‘kuarahy ára venerable’pe, ha katu opermiti va’ekue okarayguakuérape osegi hag̃ua hembiapo ñemitỹ rehegua. Jepémo añetehápe peteĩ estatuto pagano, pe mburuvicha guasu omoañete upéva oñemoneĩ rire añoite cristianismo rehe.” The Great Controversy, 574.
The first royal edict that marked a transition from the church of Smyrna to the church of Pergamos was the Edict of Milan in 313. It represented the first step which led to the first Sunday law of 321. The destruction of Jerusalem typifies the Sunday law, and two prophetic witnesses identify a siege that preceded the destruction. Those two sieges represented by Babylon’s third siege in 587 BC and Rome’s second siege in the year 70 identify that the waymark that precedes the waymark of the Sunday law—is a prophetic siege.
Pe peteĩha mburuvicha guasu rembiapoukapy ombohechaukáva peteĩ jehasa tupao de Esmirna-gui tupao de Pérgamo-pe ha’eva’ekue Edicto de Milán ary 313-pe. Upéva orrepresenta va’ekue pe peteĩha paso ogueraháva pe peteĩha léi domingo rehegua ary 321-pe. Jerusalén ñehundipa ohechauka profétikamente pe léi domingo rehegua, ha mokõi testígo profético omombe’u peteĩ jejoko guasu oñemotenondéva upe ñehundi mboyve. Umi mokõi jejoko guasu, ojehechaukáva Babilonia mbohapyha jejoko guasúpe ary 587 a.C. ha Roma mokõiha jejoko guasúpe ary 70-pe, ombojekuaa pe señal oúva mboyve pe señal pe léi domingo rehegua—ha’eha peteĩ jejoko guasu profético.
Nebuchadnezzar laid siege against Jehoiakim, then Jehoiachin and finally Zedekiah. Cestius laid siege in the year 66, and fulfilled the sign Jesus had given the church, just as the third siege of 587 BC possessed the sign of Ezekiel’s wife’s death. The waymark that precedes the destruction of Jerusalem is a siege, and it is also a “sign.” The waymark that preceded the Sunday law of 321 was the Edict of Milan, where the transition from a church (Smyrna) that has no condemnation into Pergamos, the symbol of a compromised church.
Nabucodonosor omongora’e Jehoiaquim rehe, upéi Jehoiaquín rehe ha ipahápe Sedequías rehe. Cestio omongora’e ary 66-pe, ha omohu’ã pe techaukaha Jesús ome’ẽva’ekue pe iglésia-pe, peteĩchaite mba’éicha pe mbohapyha ñemongora’e ary 587 a.C.-pe oguereko va’ekue pe techaukaha Ezequiel rembireko mano rehegua. Pe hapykuerigua ohechaukáva Jerusalén ñehundihára ha’e peteĩ ñemongora’e, ha avei peteĩ “techaukaha”. Pe hapykuerigua oúva’ekue mboyve pe léi domingo ary 321-pe ha’e va’ekue Edicto de Milán, upépe ojehechauka pe ñemoambue peteĩ iglésia-gui (Esmirna), ndaipórihápe ñe’ẽ vai hese, Pergamo-pe, ha’éva peteĩ iglésia oñembyaíva ra’ãnga.
The Edict of Milan is therefore the beginning of a prophetic siege, and it is also a sign. It also marks where the Laodicean movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand transitions unto the Philadelphian movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand.
Upévare, pe Edicto de Milán ha’e hína ñepyrũ peteĩ jejopy profétikagui, ha avei ha’e peteĩ techaukaha. Avei ohechauka moõpa pe movimiento Laodicense umi cien cuarenta y cuatro mil rehegua oñembohasa pe movimiento Filadelfiagua umi cien cuarenta y cuatro mil reheguápe.
Philadelphia and Smyrna, represent the only two churches in Revelation’s seven churches which have no condemnation. This fact in turn identifies that transition, as the transition of the church militant unto the church triumphant. That transition aligns with the Edict of Milan, where the latter-day movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand becomes that eighth church, that is of the seven. Philadelphia and Smyrna are also the only two churches that struggle with those who claim they are Jews, but are actually of the synagogue of Satan.
Filadelfia ha Esmirna ohechauka mokõi iglesia añoite Apocalipsis-pe umi siete iglesia apytépe ndoguerekóiva ñeñemongy’a. Ko mba’e, upéicha rupi, ohechauka pe jehasa ha’eha iglesia oñorairõva guive iglesia ipu’akapáva peve. Pe jehasa oñemohenda Edicto de Milán ndive, upépe pe movimiento ára pahápegua umi cien cuarenta y cuatro milgui oiko hag̃ua upe iglesia poapyha, ha’éva umi sietegui. Filadelfia ha Esmirna avei ha’e umi mokõi iglesia añoite oñorairõva umi he’íva hikuáiha judío, ha añetépe ha’eha Satanás sinagógagui.
That waymark of 313 also aligns with the Exeter camp meeting from August 12 to 17 in 1844. When the camp meeting ended, the message swept across the eastern seaboard of the United States like a tidal wave until the door closed on October 22, 1844.
Pe hito ohechaukáva 313-pe ojokupyty avei pe aty guasu Exeter-pe, agosto 12 guive 17 peve ary 1844-pe. Upe aty guasu opávo, pe marandu ohasapa oñesẽ hag̃ua Estados Unidos rembe’y yguasu kuarahyresẽ gotyo rupi peteĩ ola guasuicha, pe okẽ oñemboty peve octubre 22, 1844-pe.
“Like a tidal wave the movement swept over the land. From city to city, from village to village, and into remote country places it went, until the waiting people of God were fully aroused. Fanaticism disappeared before this proclamation like early frost before the rising sun. Believers saw their doubt and perplexity removed, and hope and courage animated their hearts. The work was free from those extremes which are ever manifested when there is human excitement without the controlling influence of the word and Spirit of God. It was similar in character to those seasons of humiliation and returning unto the Lord which among ancient Israel followed messages of reproof from His servants. It bore the characteristics that mark the work of God in every age. There was little ecstatic joy, but rather deep searching of heart, confession of sin, and forsaking of the world. A preparation to meet the Lord was the burden of agonizing spirits. There was persevering prayer and unreserved consecration to God.” The Great Controversy, 400, 401.
“Y rembe’y guasuicha pe movimiento ohasapa pe tetã ári. Táva guive távape, tav’ígui tav’íme, ha mombyryete ñu rupi oho, peve Tupã tavaygua oha’arõva oñemombáy hag̃ua porãite. Ko proclamación renondépe pe fanatismo okañy, pytũmby pyhareve ro’y michĩva kuarahy osẽvape guáicha. Umi ojeroviáva ohecha mba’éichapa ipyahúvo iñakãrapu’ã’ỹ ha ipy’apy, ha esperánsa ha py’a guasu omoingove ijapytepekuéra. Pe tembiapo ndaipóri kuri umi extremo reheve, umi akóinte ojehecháva oĩ jave yvypóra vy’ápe oñemyasãiva, Tupã Ñe’ẽ ha Ijespíritu poguýre’ỹ. Ijoguahaite va’ekue umi ára ñemomirĩ ha jevy Ñandejárape rehegua, yma Israel ymaguarépe oiko va’ekue Hemimbiguái kuéra ñe’ẽ hatã rire. Ogueru umi mba’e techaukaha omombe’úva Tupã rembiapo opa árape. Sa’i kuri pe vy’a ecstático, ha katu hetave pe py’a pypuku jehekávo, angaipa mombe’u, ha arapy rehegua rejeheja. Ñembosako’i oñembohovái hag̃ua Ñandejárape ha’e va’ekue umi espíritu oñembyasýva pohýi rupi mba’apo guasu. Oĩ va’ekue ñembo’e opa’ỹre ha ñeme’ẽmbaitéva Tupãme.” The Great Controversy, 400, 401.
The door closing on October 22, 1844 typifies the soon-coming Sunday law, and the waymark that preceded the closed door of October 22, was the Exeter camp meeting. The Exeter camp meeting therefore aligns with the Edict of Milan. It also aligns with Christ’s triumphal entry.
Okẽ oñembotyva’ekue 22 jasypa 1844-pe ohechauka ñande rupi oumbaitétavape pe léi domingo rehegua, ha pe techaukaha tenonderãva omotenondéva pe okẽ oñembotyva’ekue 22 jasypa-pe, ha’e va’ekue pe aty guasu Exeter-pe. Upévare pe aty guasu Exeter-pegua oñemohenda joja pe Édito de Milán ndive. Avei oñemohenda joja Cristo jeike triunfal ndive.
“The midnight cry was not so much carried by argument, though the Scripture proof was clear and conclusive. There went with it an impelling power that moved the soul. There was no doubt, no questioning. Upon the occasion of Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem, the people who were assembled from all parts of the land to keep the feast, flocked to the Mount of Olives, and as they joined the throng that were escorting Jesus, they caught the inspiration of the hour, and helped to swell the shout, ‘Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord!’ [Matthew 21:9.] In like manner did unbelievers who flocked to the Adventist meetings—some from curiosity, some merely to ridicule—feel the convincing power attending the message, ‘Behold, the Bridegroom cometh!’” Spirit of Prophecy, volume 4, 250.
“Pyhare mbytegua sapukái ndojeguerahái hetaiterei ñe’ẽmondo rupive, jepe umi Escritura rehegua techaukaha iporã porã ha omohu’ãmbaitéva. Oho hendive peteĩ pu’aka omomýiva ánga. Ndaipóri va’ekue mokõi py’a, ni porandu. Cristo oike hag̃ua triumfálmente Jerusalén-pe ramo, umi tetãygua oñembyaty va’ekue opa tetãmegua guive arete ñembojerovia rehegua hag̃ua, oñembyaty Olivoty Yvytýpe, ha oikevo hikuái pe aty guasúpe omoirũva Jesúspe, ojapyhy upe aravo py’a guasu, ha oipytyvõ ombotuichave hag̃ua pe sapukái: ‘Tojehovasa pe oúva Ñandejára rérape!’ [Mateo 21:9.] Upéicha avei umi ndogueroviáiva osẽva Adventista atykuérape—oĩva kuri ñemombareterãnte, ha oĩva ñembohory hag̃uánte—oñandu upe pu’aka ogueroviakáva omoirũva pe marandu: ‘Pema’ẽ, ou pe novioména!’” Spirit of Prophecy, volumen 4, 250.
The Edict of Milan marks the prophetic siege that was typified by Nebuchadnezzar in 587 BC and Cestius in the year 66. Those two sieges led to the destruction of Jerusalem in 586 BC and 70, respectively. The siege of Cestius ended and three and a half years later, the siege resumed under Titus, thus providing a prophetic period that begins with an alpha Roman ruler and ends with an omega ruler. Those three and a half years represent the trampling down of Jerusalem by the papacy, and the soon-coming Sunday law when the papacy’s deadly wound is healed and she reigns again for three and a half symbolic years.
Milán Edicto ohechauka pe asy profético jejokoha, ojehechauka haguéicha Nabucodonosor rupive ary 587 a.C. ha Cestio rupive ary 66-pe. Umi mokõi jejokoha ogueru Jerusalén ñehundi ary 586 a.C. ha 70-pe, peteĩteĩ. Cestio jejokoha opa, ha mbohapy áño ha mbyte rire, jejokoha oñepyrũ jey Tito poguýpe; upéicha ome'ẽ peteĩ período profético oñepyrũva peteĩ mburuvicha guasu romano alpha rehe ha opa hag̃ua peteĩ mburuvicha guasu omega rehe. Umi mbohapy áño ha mbyte ohechauka Jerusalén ñembopyrũrã guýpe papado poguýpe, ha pe araka'eve oúmava léi domingo rehegua, oñemonguerajey vove papado ñekytĩ vaiete ha ha'e oguapyjey hag̃ua sãmbyhy hag̃ua mbohapy áño ha mbyte simbólico pukukue.
But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months. Revelation 11:2.
Ha pe korapy okapegua tupãógui, eheja okápe, ha ani remedi chugui; oñeme'ẽgui umi tetã ambuegua pópe; ha pe táva marangatu opyrũmbýta hikuái mokõi cuarenta ha mokõi jasy pukukue. Apocalipsis 11:2.
In 538, and then again at the coming Sunday law the trampling down of Jerusalem begins. Those two Sunday laws were represented by the year 321 when Constantine the Great passed the first Sunday law. In 538, the papacy was empowered to persecute (trample down) God’s church for three and a half years, as represented by the history from Cestius to Titus. In 538, the papacy passed a Sunday law at the third Counsel of Orleans. The soon-coming Sunday law identifies when the papacy is again empowered to trample down the temple (persecute).
Áño 538-pe, ha upéi jevy pe léi domingo oútavape, oñepyrũ Jerusalén oñemboyke ha oñembohasa asývo. Ko’ã mokõi léi domingo ojehechauka kuri pe áño 321 rehe, Constantino el Grande ombohasa ramo guare pe peteĩha léi domingo. Áño 538-pe, pe papado oñemombarete va’ekue omuña ha ombohasa asy hag̃ua Tupã iglésia-pe mbohapy áño ha mbyte aja, ojehechauka haguéicha pe tembiasakue Cestio guive Tito peve. Áño 538-pe, pe papado ombohasa peteĩ léi domingo pe mbohapyha Concilio de Orleans-pe. Pe léi domingo oguahẽ hag̃uáva pya’e ohechauka araka’e pe papado oñemombarete jey hag̃ua ombohasa asy pe templo-pe (omuña hag̃ua).
313 identifies the first edict that led to the first Sunday law in 321. Then in 330, the empire was prophetically divided into east and west, thus marking the omega conclusion of the second period of papal persecution of “forty-two” symbolic months—a period of persecution and trampling down that began at the alpha Sunday law in the United States.
313 ohechauka pe peteĩha edikto oguerúva pe peteĩha léi domingo rehegua ary 321-pe. Upéi, ary 330-pe, pe império oñemboja’o maranduháicha kuarahyresẽ ha kuarahyreike gotyo, ha upéicha ojehechauka pe omega paha mokõiha periodo papal jehasa asy rehegua “cuarenta y dos” jasy simbólico pukukue javeve—peteĩ periodo jehasa asy ha pyru rehegua oñepyrũva’ekue pe alpha léi domingo rehegua Estados Unidos-pe.
And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name. Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. Revelation 14:9–12.
Ha umi mbohapyha ánhel osegi chupekuéra, heʼívo ñeʼẽ hatãme: Oiméramo avave omombaʼe pe mymba ha taʼãnga, ha ohupyty imárka ihovape térã ipope, upevaʼete hoyʼúta Ñandejára pochy ryrýigui, oñehẽva ojeporoʼeʼỹre ipochy kaguy ryrupe; ha oñembohasa asýta tata ha asúfre reheve ánhel marangatu renondépe ha Ovecha Rymba renondépe. Ha ijasypa rata ojupi hag̃ua opa ára g̃uarã; ha ndaipóri pytuʼu chupekuéra ára ni pyhare, umi omombaʼéva pe mymba ha taʼãnga, ha opaite ohupytýva héra márka. Koʼápe oĩ umi marangatu paciencia: koʼápe oĩ umi oñongatúva Ñandejára mandamiénto ha Jesús jerovia. Apocalipsis 14:9–12.
The Plain
Pe Llano
The Latin meaning of ‘Milan’ means the middle of the plain. In the middle of east and west, in the year 313 Constantine of the west sought an alliance with Licinius of the east. The edict represented the attempt to bring east and west together, and the edict was ratified, by a treaty marriage, when Constantine’s half-sister Constantia married Licinius. Yet just as the first treaty marriage of Daniel eleven between the Seleucids of the north and Ptolemy of the south, the marriage was destined to fail as the old adage was fulfilled that says ‘east is east, and west is west, and never the twain shall meet.’
Pe “Milán” he’ise latínpe he’ise ñu mbyte. Kuarahyresẽ ha kuarahyreike mbytépe, ary 313-pe, Constantino, kuarahyreikegua, oheka peteĩ joaju Licinio ndive, ha’e kuarahyresẽgua. Pe edicto orrepresenta kuri pe ñeha’ã ombojoajúvo kuarahyresẽ ha kuarahyreike, ha pe edicto oñemoneĩ peteĩ ñemenda ñoñe’ẽme’ẽ rupive, Constantino joyke’y mbytegua Constantia omenda rupi Licinio rehe. Upéicharõ jepe, Daniel capítulo once-pe pe ñemenda ñoñe’ẽme’ẽ peteĩha, umi Seléucida yvategua ha Ptolomeo yvy gotyogua apytépe, pe ñemenda ojehechakuaava’erã vaekue ndoikoporãmo’ãiha, oñemoañete haguére pe ñe’ẽ yma guare he’íva: “kuarahyresẽ ha’e kuarahyresẽ, ha kuarahyreike ha’e kuarahyreike, ha mokõivéva araka’eve ndojoajúi hag̃ua.”
The year ‘330’ is directly presented in Daniel eleven verses twenty-four, twenty-seven and twenty-nine. This brings the seventeen years of 313 unto 330 into the prophetic line of Daniel eleven, and of prophetic necessity it identifies that treaty marriage of east and west in 313 as a parallel to the first treaty marriage in the same chapter.
Ary ‘330’ oñemombe’u hag̃ua hekoitépe Daniel kapítulo 11, umi versíkulo 24, 27 ha 29-pe. Kóva omoinge pe paapyha pakõi ary 313 guive 330 peve Daniel 11 línea profétikape, ha tekotevẽ profétikagui ohechauka hag̃ua pe ñemenda joajuha kuarahyresẽ ha kuarahyreikegua 313-peha ha’eha peteĩ paralelo pe ñemenda joajuha peteĩha rehe upe kapítulo-pe voi.
“The prophecy in the eleventh of Daniel has nearly reached its complete fulfillment. Much of the history that has taken place in fulfillment of this prophecy will be repeated.” Manuscript Releases, number 13, 394.
“Pe profesía oĩva Daniel kapítulo once-pe oguahẽma hiñemoañete hag̃uaite. Hetaiterei umi tembiasakue ojehu vaʼekue oñemoañetévo ko profesía oñembopyahúta.” Manuscript Releases, número 13, 394.
Antiochus II Theos who reigned from 261–246 BC, set aside his first wife Laodice I for Berenice, daughter of Ptolemy II Philadelphus of Egypt. The marriage was part of the peace settlement that ended the Second Syrian War in 252 BC. When Constantine thereafter defeated Licinius in 324 the marriage ended, as did the marriage of Antiochus and Bernice, when Laodice, the first wife poisoned Antiochus in 246 BC. The marriage which had marked the end of the second Syrian war, and the murder of Antiochus, and thereafter Bernice, her child and Egyptian entourage marked the beginning of the third Syrian war. The treaty marriage of 313 ended the period of persecution represented by the church of Smyrna and began the period of compromise represented by the church of Pergamos.
Antíoco II Theos, oisã guive ary 261–246 a.C., omboyke hembireko peteĩha Laodice I-pe omenda hag̃ua Berenice rehe, Tolomeo II Filadelfo Egipto pegua rajy. Ko ñemenda oiko vaʼekue pe joaju pyʼaguapyrã peteĩ parte ramo, omohuʼãva pe Mokõiha Ñorairõ Siria pegua ary 252 a.C.-pe. Upéi Constantino ogana rire Licinio rehe ary 324-pe, pe ñemenda opa, péicha avei Antíoco ha Berenice ñemenda, Laodice, pe tembireko peteĩha, ombohasy hag̃ua Antíoco-pe venéno rupi ary 246 a.C.-pe. Pe ñemenda ohechaukávaʼekue pe Mokõiha Ñorairõ Siria pegua paha, ha Antíoco jejuka, ha upéi Berenice, imemby ha umi Egiptogua oipytyvõva ichupe jejuka ohechauka pe Mbohapyha Ñorairõ Siria pegua ñepyrũ. Pe ñemenda ñeʼẽmeguáva ary 313-pe omohuʼã pe jehasa asy ára ojehechaukáva Esmirna iglesia rupive ha omoñepyrũ pe joavy rehegua ára ojehechaukáva Pérgamo iglesia rupive.
The marriage at the beginning of the Seleucid history typified the treaty marriage at the end of the Seleucid empire when Antiochus the Great gave his daughter Cleopatra I to Ptolemy V Epiphanes. The marriage took place at Raphia in 193 BC, but the alliance was soon finished, as had been the first treaty marriage between the king of the north and king of the south. The alpha and omega treaty marriages of the Seleucid empire, typify the treaty marriage noted later in the prophetic history of Daniel eleven when Octavian gave his sister Octavia Minor to Mark Antony in 40 BC. Mark Antony and Octavian were in a power struggle over the eastern and western areas of Rome that had broken out in 44 BC with the assassination of Julius Caesar. The treaty of Brundisium was put in place at the marriage in 40 BC, and eight years later in 32 BC Mark Antony formerly divorced Octavia and precipitated the battle of Actium in 31 BC where both Mark Antony and Cleopatra, (the very last Cleopatra) came to the end.
Pe ñemenda seléucida rembiasakue ñepyrũme ohechauka typológicamente pe ñemenda ñe’ẽme’ẽ rehegua pe imperio seléucida pahápe, Antioco el Grande ome’ẽrõ guare itajýra Cleopatra I Ptolomeo V Epífanes-pe. Pe ñemenda ojejapo Ráfiape ary 193 a.C.-pe, péro pe joaju pya’e opáma, oiko haguéicha avei pe peteĩha ñemenda ñe’ẽme’ẽ rehegua mburuvicha yvate gua ha mburuvicha ñemby gua apytépe. Umi ñemenda ñe’ẽme’ẽ rehegua alfa ha omega pe imperio seléucida-pe ohechauka typológicamente pe ñemenda ñe’ẽme’ẽ rehegua oñeñandu hag̃ua upe rire Daniel capítulo once rembiasakue profética-pe, Octaviano ome’ẽrõ guare ityvýra Octavia Minor Marco Antonio-pe ary 40 a.C.-pe. Marco Antonio ha Octaviano oĩ kuri peteĩ pu’aka ñorairõme Roma rembe’y kuarahyresẽ ha kuarahyreike gotyogua rehe, oñepyrũva’ekue ary 44 a.C.-pe Julio César jejuka rupive. Pe ñe’ẽme’ẽ Brundisium gua oñemoĩ va’ekue pe ñemenda jave ary 40 a.C.-pe, ha poapy ary rire, ary 32 a.C.-pe, Marco Antonio oficialmente omboja’o Octavia-gui, ha upéva ogueru pe Actium ñorairõ guasu ary 31 a.C.-pe, upépe mokõivéva, Marco Antonio ha Cleopatra, (pe Cleopatra pahaitévaite), og̃uahẽ ipahápe.
The omega marriage treaty of the Seleucid empire introduced the first Cleopatra who typified the last Cleopatra, whose line of descent formed the link to the prophetic alpha marriage treaty of the Roman empire in 40 BC. Those three treaty marriages typify the treaty marriage of the Edict of Milan. The Edict of Milan marks the beginning of a prophetic siege, it represents a prophetic sign, it marks a transition of a righteous church to an unrighteous church, thus aligning with the enigma of the eighth being of the seven. It marks a treaty marriage that ends a war, until the divorce of the treaty marriage thus marking the beginning of a war. In the two Roman marriages, the divorce precipitates the uniting of the empire. 313 also marks the Exeter camp meeting where the proclamation of the message of the Midnight Cry begins and leads to the closed door of October 22.
Pe omegagua menda ñemenda Joaju Seleúcida poguýpe omoinge pe Cleopatra peteĩha, ha upéva ohechauka pe Cleopatra pahaguépe; heñóiha rape omoheñói pe joaju pe menda ñe’ẽme’ẽ profético alfa rehegua, táva Romagua poguýpe ary 40 a.C.-pe. Umi mbohapy menda ñe’ẽme’ẽ rehegua ohechauka pe menda ñe’ẽme’ẽ Edicto de Milán rehegua. Pe Edicto de Milán omarka pe ñepyrũ peteĩ ñemongora guasu profético rehegua; ha’e peteĩ techaukaha profético, omarka peteĩ jehasa peteĩ iglesia hekojojávagui peteĩ iglesia tekojoja’ỹvape, ha upéicha ojoaju pe apañuãi ñemimby reheve pe poapyha oĩva umi siete apytépe. Omarka peteĩ menda ñe’ẽme’ẽ omohu’ãva peteĩ ñorairõ, pe divorcio peve upe menda ñe’ẽme’ẽ rehegua, ha upéicha omarka pe ñepyrũ peteĩ ñorairõ rehegua. Umi mokõi menda Romagua rehegua, pe divorcio omboúvo pe joaju pe imperio rehegua. Ary 313 avei omarka pe aty guasu Exeter-pe, upépe oñepyrũ pe marandu Ñe’ẽpyahu Pyharepyte Sapy’aguápe rehegua, ha ogueraha pe okẽ oñembotyva’ekuépe 22 de octubre-pe.
We will continue to consider these truths in the next article.
Rohesakãta ko'ã añetegua ambue artíkulope.