We ended the last article with the sentence that stated, “In 2001 the government of the United States spoke the Patriot Act into law.”

Peb xaus tsab xov xwm dhau los nrog kab lus uas hais tias, “Xyoo 2001 tsoom fwv Meskas tau tshaj tawm kom Txoj Cai Patriot Act los ua txoj cai.”

“There are many, even of those engaged in this movement for Sunday enforcement, who are blinded to the results which will follow this action. They do not see that they are striking directly against religious liberty. There are many who have never understood the claims of the Bible Sabbath and the false foundation upon which the Sunday institution rests. Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.

“Muaj coob leej, txawm yog ntawm cov uas koom tes hauv txoj kev txav no los txhawb kom yuam kom hwm hnub Sunday, uas raug dig muag tsis pom tej txiaj ntsig uas yuav raws los tom qab ntawm qhov kev ua no. Lawv tsis pom tias lawv tab tom ntaus ncaj qha tawm tsam txoj kev ywj pheej ntawm kev ntseeg. Muaj coob leej uas yeej tsis tau to taub txog qhov Vajlugkub hais kom hwm Hnub Xanpataus thiab lub hauv paus cuav uas txoj kev tsa hnub Sunday ua ib lub koom haum raug hu ua Christian ntawd tsa los saum. Txhua txoj kev txav uas txhawb txoj cai lij choj hais txog kev ntseeg yeej yog ib qho kev pub nyog rau lub hwj chim papacy tiag tiag, uas tau ua rog tsis tseg tawm tsam txoj kev ywj pheej ntawm lub siab xav thiab kev ntseeg tau ntev ntau tiam neeg los lawm. Kev hwm hnub Sunday muaj nws txoj kev muaj nyob raws li ib lub koom haum uas luag hu ua Christian vim ‘qhov tsis ncaj uas zais tob tob;’ thiab kev yuam kom hwm nws yuav yog ib qho kev lees paub tseeb tseeb rau tej ntsiab cai uas yog lub pob zeb ceg kaum tseem ceeb heev ntawm Romanism. Thaum peb lub teb chaws yuav tsis lees thiab tso tseg tej ntsiab cai ntawm nws txoj kev kav xeem mus txog qib uas nws tsim ib txoj cai hnub Sunday, Protestantism hauv qhov kev ua no yuav tuav tes nrog popery; qhov ntawd yuav tsis yog lwm yam li tsuas yog muab txoj sia rau txoj kev tsim txom uas tau ntev los lawm saib ntsoov tos hlo nws lub sijhawm kom dhia rov qab los rau hauv txoj kev kav hwm nruj tsiv xwmfab dua.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.

1888 typified 2001, and it was then that the Blair Bill was introduced, though its failure to be passed, prevented it from prophetically speaking. It became the sign of 66 AD, a siege that was initiated and then mysteriously withdrawn. When it is understood that there are two image of the beast testing periods, and that the second period begins with the Sunday law in the United States, typified by the year 321, and that the period ends when the world Sunday law, typified by 538, is fully enforced; then it demands prophetically that the beginning of the first image of the beast testing period also begins with some type of typification of a Sunday law being spoken. In 1888, the Blair Bill was an attempt to enforce a National Sunday law, and 1888 identifies when the angel of Revelation eighteen descends and lightens the earth with his glory.

Xyoo 1888 yog tus qauv qhia txog xyoo 2001, thiab yog thaum ntawd uas Blair Bill raug muab tawm los, txawm li cas los xij, vim nws tsis tau raug pom zoo kom dhau, qhov ntawd thiaj txwv tsis pub nws hais lus raws li yaj saub. Nws thiaj los ua lub cim ntawm xyoo 66 AD, ib txoj kev vov nroog uas tau pib lawm ces rov raug thim mus yam txaus ntshai kawg. Thaum to taub tias muaj ob ntu sijhawm ntawm kev sim siab txog daim duab ntawm tsiaj qus, thiab tias ntu sijhawm thib ob pib nrog txoj cai hnub Sunday hauv Tebchaws Meskas, uas raug qhia ua qauv los ntawm xyoo 321, thiab tias ntu sijhawm ntawd xaus thaum txoj cai hnub Sunday thoob ntiajteb, uas raug qhia ua qauv los ntawm xyoo 538, raug siv kom tiav hlo; ces raws li yaj saub nws yuav tsum yog li no tias qhov pib ntawm thawj ntu sijhawm ntawm kev sim siab txog daim duab ntawm tsiaj qus kuj pib nrog ib yam kev qhia ua qauv ntawm txoj cai hnub Sunday uas raug hais tawm. Xyoo 1888, Blair Bill yog ib qho kev sim los yuam kom siv ib txoj cai hnub Sunday ntawm lub tebchaws, thiab xyoo 1888 qhia meej txog thaum tus timtswv saum ntuj ceeb tsheej ntawm Tshwmsim kaum yim nqes los thiab ua rau lub ntiajteb ci kaj nrog nws lub yeeb koob.

The Patriot Act is the typification of a Sunday law that begins the image of the beast testing time in the United States. The United States speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven when it enforces the Sunday law. When it enforces that law it will speak as a dragon, and that Sunday law identifies that the image of the beast is fully formed in the United States. At that point the United States has filled up its cup of probationary time, and national apostasy is followed by national ruin. At that point the United States ceases to be the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy as the threefold union is established.

Txoj Cai Patriot yog qhov qauv piv txwv ntawm ib txoj cai Hnub Caiv uas pib lub sijhawm xeem ntawm daim duab ntawm tsiaj qus hauv Tebchaws Meskas. Tebchaws Meskas hais lus zoo li ib tug zaj raws li kev ua tiav ntawm Tshwmsim tshooj kaum peb, nqe kaum ib thaum nws yuam kom coj raws txoj cai Hnub Caiv. Thaum nws yuam kom coj raws txoj cai ntawd nws yuav hais lus zoo li ib tug zaj, thiab txoj cai Hnub Caiv ntawd qhia meej tias daim duab ntawm tsiaj qus twb raug tsim kom tiav hauv Tebchaws Meskas lawm. Thaum ntawd Tebchaws Meskas twb puv npo nws lub khob ntawm lub sijhawm sim siab lawm, thiab kev tso kev ntseeg tseg ntawm lub tebchaws yuav raug raws los ntawm kev puas tsuaj ntawm lub tebchaws. Thaum ntawd Tebchaws Meskas yuav tsis ua ntxiv lawm tus nceeg vaj thib rau ntawm tej lus faj lem hauv Vajlugkub thaum kev sib koom ua peb txheej raug tsim tsa.

Alpha and Omega always portrays the end with the beginning and at the beginning of the United States there were three times the United States prophetically spoke that marked the beginning of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. The Declaration of Independence in 1776, followed by the Constitution of 1789 and then the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 identify the first three times the United States prophetically spoke. Each of those three publications represented the speaking of the United States. Those three steps led to 1798, the beginning of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Those same three waymarks in the beginning of the United States, represent three waymarks that lead to the ending of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy.

Alpha thiab Omega ib txwm nthuav tawm qhov kawg nrog qhov pib, thiab thaum pib ntawm Tebchaws Meskas muaj peb zaug uas Tebchaws Meskas tau hais raws li lus faj lem uas cim qhov pib ntawm Tebchaws Meskas ua lub nceeg vaj thib rau hauv lus faj lem hauv Phau Vajlugkub. Daim Ntawv Tshaj Tawm Kev Ywj Pheej xyoo 1776, tom qab ntawd yog Txoj Cai Lij Choj xyoo 1789, thiab ces yog Alien and Sedition Acts xyoo 1798, qhia txog peb thawj zaug uas Tebchaws Meskas tau hais raws li lus faj lem. Txhua yam ntawm peb daim ntaub ntawv tshaj tawm ntawd sawv cev rau kev hais tawm ntawm Tebchaws Meskas. Peb theem ntawd coj mus rau xyoo 1798, yog qhov pib ntawm Tebchaws Meskas kav ua lub nceeg vaj thib rau hauv lus faj lem hauv Phau Vajlugkub. Peb lub cim ciam teb tib yam ntawd nyob rau thaum pib ntawm Tebchaws Meskas, sawv cev rau peb lub cim ciam teb uas coj mus rau qhov xaus ntawm Tebchaws Meskas kav ua lub nceeg vaj thib rau hauv lus faj lem hauv Phau Vajlugkub.

The Patriot Act is the first of three times the United States speaks as it comes to its conclusion as the sixth kingdom. The third speaking, that identifies the end of the sixth kingdom is the Sunday law. In the middle of that history the Pelosi Trials of January 6, which began in 2022 were initiated. The trials were a direct rejection of the rights enshrined in the Constitution because the trials were political in nature, and the lawfare was not simply a fabrication of facts, but it was actually a direct attack upon “procedural” and “substantive” law as identified within the Constitution.

Txoj Cai Patriot yog thawj zaug ntawm peb zaug uas Tebchaws Meskas hais lus thaum nws los txog rau nws qhov xaus raws li lub nceeg vaj thib rau. Qhov kev hais lus thib peb, uas qhia txog qhov kawg ntawm lub nceeg vaj thib rau, yog txoj cai Hnub Caiv. Hauv nruab nrab ntawm zaj keeb kwm ntawd, Pelosi Trials ntawm Lub Ib Hlis 6, uas tau pib xyoo 2022, raug pib tsa. Cov kev txiav txim ntawd yog ib qho kev tsis lees txais ncaj qha rau cov cai uas raug sau tseg ruaj khov hauv Txoj Cai Lij Choj vim cov kev txiav txim ntawd muaj yam ntxwv nom tswv, thiab kev siv cai lij choj ua riam phom ntawd tsis yog tsuas yog kev tsim ntaub ntawv dag xwb, tab sis qhov tseeb yog ib qho kev tawm tsam ncaj qha rau txoj cai “txheej txheem” thiab txoj cai “yam tseem ceeb” raws li tau raug txheeb qhia nyob hauv Txoj Cai Lij Choj.

The Patriot Act in 2001 was a direct attack upon the “Due Process Clause” which appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. That was 2001, and in 2022 the attack against the Constitution was focused upon both “procedural due process” and “substantive due process.” The word “repudiate” means to deny, and Sister White identifies that at the Sunday law in the United States every principle of the Constitution will be repudiated.

Txoj Cai Patriot xyoo 2001 yog ib qho kev tawm tsam ncaj qha rau “Due Process Clause” uas muaj nyob hauv ob qho tib si ntawm Kev Hloov Kho Tsib thiab Kev Hloov Kho Kaum Plaub rau Txoj Cai Lij Choj ntawm Tebchaws Meskas. Cov no hais tseg tias tsis pub muaj leejtwg raug muab tshem ntawm txoj sia, kev ywj pheej, los yog cuab tam, yog tsis muaj txoj txheej txheem raws cai ntawm txoj cai lij choj. Qhov ntawd yog xyoo 2001, thiab xyoo 2022 qhov kev tawm tsam tawm tsam Txoj Cai Lij Choj tau tsom rau ob qho tib si “procedural due process” thiab “substantive due process.” Lo lus “repudiate” txhais tias tsis lees txais, thiab Muam White qhia meej tias thaum txoj cai hnub Sunday raug tsim tsa hauv Tebchaws Meskas, txhua lub hauv paus ntsiab lus ntawm Txoj Cai Lij Choj yuav raug tsis lees txais.

“By the decree enforcing the institution of the papacy in violation of the law of God, our nation will disconnect herself fully from righteousness. When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near.

“Los ntawm txoj cai txiav txim uas yuam kom tsa lub koom haum papacy, ua txhaum rau Vajtswv txoj kevcai, peb lub tebchaws yuav txiav nws tus kheej tawm tag nrho ntawm txojkev ncaj ncees. Thaum Protestantism yuav ncab nws txhais tes hla lub hav tob mus tuav tes nrog Roman lub hwjchim, thaum nws yuav hla dhau lub qhov tsua tob mus sib tuav tes nrog kev ntseeg dab qhuas, thaum, nyob hauv txoj kev cuam tshuam ntawm no peb seem kev koom ua ke, peb lub tebchaws yuav tsis lees paub txhua txoj hauv paus ntsiab lus ntawm nws Txoj Cai Lij Choj raws li ib lub tseemfwv Protestant thiab republican, thiab yuav npaj kev txhawb nqa rau kev nthuav tawm tej lus cuav thiab tej kev dag ntxias ntawm papacy, ces peb thiaj yuav paub tias lub sijhawm twb los txog rau Xatas txoj haujlwm ua txuj ci tseemceeb kawg nkaus, thiab tias qhov kawg twb nyob ze lawm.”

“As the approach of the Roman armies was a sign to the disciples of the impending destruction of Jerusalem, so may this apostasy be a sign to us that the limit of God’s forbearance is reached, that the measure of our nation’s iniquity is full, and that the angel of mercy is about to take her flight, never to return. The people of God will then be plunged into those scenes of affliction and distress which prophets have described as the time of Jacob’s trouble. The cries of the faithful, persecuted ones ascend to heaven. And as the blood of Abel cried from the ground, there are voices also crying to God from martyrs’ graves, from the sepulchers of the sea, from mountain caverns, from convent vaults: ‘How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost Thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?’

“Raws li txoj kev los ze ntawm cov tub rog Loos yog ib lub cim rau cov thwjtim txog kev puas tsuaj uas yuav los raug rau Yeluxalees, ib yam li ntawd txoj kev thim txoj kev ntseeg no kuj yuav yog ib lub cim rau peb tias qhov kawg ntawm Vajtswv txoj kev ua siab ntev twb txog lawm, tias qhov ntsuas ntawm kev txhaum ntawm peb haiv neeg twb puv nkaus lawm, thiab tias tus tim tswv ntawm txoj kev hlub tshua tab tom yuav ya ncaim mus, tsis rov qab los ib txhis. Ces Vajtswv haiv neeg yuav raug poob rau hauv tej xwm txheej ntawm kev txom nyem thiab kev nyuaj siab uas cov yaj saub tau piav tseg tias yog lub sijhawm ntawm Yakhauj txoj kev ntxhov siab. Cov suab quaj ntawm cov ncaj ncees, cov uas raug tsim txom, nce mus txog saum ntuj ceeb tsheej. Thiab ib yam li Abel cov ntshav tau quaj tawm hauv av tuaj, kuj muaj tej suab quaj hu mus cuag Vajtswv los ntawm cov ntxa ntawm cov tim khawv tuag, los ntawm tej qhov ntxa hauv hiav txwv, los ntawm qhov tsua hauv roob, los ntawm cov qhov ntxa hauv tsev teev ntuj niam nkauj xwb: ‘Au tus Tswv, tus Dawb Huv thiab tus Tseeb, koj tsis txiav txim thiab tsis pauj peb cov ntshav rau cov neeg uas nyob saum lub ntiajteb no yuav ntev npaum li cas?’”

“The Lord is doing His work. All heaven is astir. The Judge of all the earth is soon to arise and vindicate His insulted authority. The mark of deliverance will be set upon the men who keep God’s commandments, who revere His law, and who refuse the mark of the beast or of his image.

“Tus Tswv tab tom ua Nws tes hauj lwm. Tag nrho saum ntuj ceeb tsheej tab tom kub ntxhov. Tus Kws Txiav Txim ntawm tag nrho lub ntiaj teb yuav sawv tsees los sai no thiab yuav tsa Nws txoj cai uas raug thuam kom rov tau meej mom. Lub cim ntawm txoj kev cawm dim yuav raug teeb rau saum cov txiv neej uas ceev Vajtswv tej lus txib, uas hwm Nws txoj kev cai, thiab uas tsis kam txais lub cim ntawm tus tsiaj qus los yog ntawm nws daim duab.

God has revealed what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath. Those who have been warned of the events before them are not to sit in calm expectation of the coming storm, comforting themselves that the Lord will shelter His faithful ones in the day of trouble. We are to be as men waiting for their Lord, not in idle expectancy, but in earnest work, with unwavering faith. It is no time now to allow our minds to be engrossed with things of minor importance. While men are sleeping, Satan is actively arranging matters so that the Lord’s people may not have mercy or justice. The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending. Its professions are mild and apparently Christian, but when it shall speak it will reveal the spirit of the dragon. It is our duty to do all in our power to avert the threatened danger. We should endeavor to disarm prejudice by placing ourselves in a proper light before the people. We should bring before them the real question at issue, thus interposing the most effectual protest against measures to restrict liberty of conscience. We should search the Scriptures and be able to give the reason for our faith. Says the prophet: ‘The wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.’” Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.

“Vajtswv tau qhia yam uas yuav tshwm sim nyob rau hnub kawg, kom Nws haiv neeg thiaj npaj tau sawv tiv tej cua daj cua dub ntawm kev tawm tsam thiab kev chim siab. Cov uas twb raug ceeb toom txog tej xwm txheej uas nyob tom lawv hauv ntej lawm, tsis tsim nyog zaum tos yam tus yees rau cua daj cua dub uas yuav los, nplij lawv tus kheej tias tus Tswv yuav tiv thaiv Nws cov neeg ncaj ncees rau hnub muaj kev txom nyem. Peb yuav tsum zoo li cov neeg uas tos lawv tus Tswv, tsis yog tos qaug zog tsis ua dab tsi, tiam sis ua hauj lwm tiag tiag, nrog txoj kev ntseeg uas ruaj khov tsis txawj tsiv. Nim no tsis yog lub sijhawm uas yuav cia peb lub siab thiab peb lub tswv yim raug tej yam tsis tseem ceeb ntxias tuav cia. Thaum neeg tab tom tsaug zog, Xatas tab tom ua hauj lwm npaj txhua yam kom tus Tswv haiv neeg tsis txhob tau kev khuv leej los sis kev ncaj ncees. Tam sim no txoj kev txav ntawm hnub Xya Hli tab tom qheb nws txoj hauv kev mus hauv qhov tsaus ntuj. Cov thawj coj tab tom zais qhov teeb meem tiag tiag, thiab coob leej uas koom nrog txoj kev txav ntawd, lawv tus kheej los yeej tsis pom tias tus dej ntws zais hauv qab tab tom coj mus qhov twg. Nws tej lus tshaj tawm saib mos muag thiab zoo li neeg Khixatia, tiam sis thaum nws pib hais lus, nws yuav nthuav tawm tus ntsuj plig ntawm zaj. Nws yog peb tes dej num kom ua txhua yam uas nyob hauv peb lub hwj chim los thaiv qhov kev phom sij uas raug hem tseg ntawd. Peb yuav tsum rau siab ntso nrhiav kev tshem kev ntxub ntxaug tawm mus los ntawm kev muab peb tus kheej tso rau hauv qhov pom zoo thiab tsim nyog nyob ntawm cov neeg xub ntiag. Peb yuav tsum coj lo lus nug tiag tiag uas tab tom muaj kev sib cav ntawd los tso rau ntawm lawv xub ntiag, ua li ntawd thiaj sawv tau los tawm tsam uas muaj hwj chim tshaj plaws tawm tsam tej kev cai uas txwv kev ywj pheej ntawm lub siab dawb paug. Peb yuav tsum tshawb nrhiav Vajluskub thiab muaj peev xwm qhia tau qhov laj thawj rau peb txoj kev ntseeg. Tus cev Vajtswv lus hais tias: ‘Cov neeg phem yuav ua phem mus ntxiv; thiab tsis muaj ib tug ntawm cov neeg phem yuav to taub; tiam sis cov neeg muaj tswvyim yuav to taub.’” Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.

Sister White aligns the Sunday law with several last-day waymarks, and in so doing her words reveal “what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath.” Therefore, the waymarks that she aligns in this passage are to be carefully examined. I am suggesting that the point of reference is the line of prophecy that focuses upon the Constitution of the United States, along with the “speaking” of the nation as an interrelated symbol.

Muam White txuas txoj cai Hnub Caiv rau ntau lub cim taw qhia ntawm hnub kawg, thiab thaum ua li ntawd nws cov lus nthuav tawm “yam uas yuav tshwm sim nyob rau hnub kawg, xwv kom Nws haiv neeg yuav npaj tau sawv tiv thaiv cua daj cua dub ntawm kev tawm tsam thiab txoj kev chim.” Yog li ntawd, cov cim taw qhia uas nws txuas ua ke hauv nqe no yuav tsum raug tshuaj xyuas kom zoo zoo. Kuv tab tom hais tias lub ntsiab chaw siv ua kev taw qhia yog txoj kab lus faj lem uas tsom rau Txoj Cai Lij Choj ntawm Tebchaws Meskas, nrog rau qhov “hais lus” ntawm lub tebchaws ntawd ua ib lub cim uas sib raug zoo nrog lwm yam.

By that, I mean, that the Blair Bill in 1888, the Patriot Act in 2001, and the political prosecutions that were carried out by the Democrats and globalist Republicans beginning in 2022 were each a direct denial of two essential elements of the Constitution. 1888 represents enforcement of Sunday worship, and then in 2001, the change from English law to Roman law. In 2022 “substantive” and “procedural” law was attacked.

Qhov ntawd, kuv txhais hais tias, Txoj Cai Blair xyoo 1888, Txoj Cai Patriot xyoo 2001, thiab kev foob raws nom tswv uas cov Democrats thiab cov Republicans ntiaj teb no tau ua pib xyoo 2022, txhua qhov ntawd puav leej yog kev tsis lees ncaj qha rau ob qho tseem ceeb uas yog lub hauv paus ntawm Txoj Cai Lij Choj. Xyoo 1888 sawv cev rau kev yuam kom pe hawm hnub Sunday, thiab tom qab ntawd, xyoo 2001, yog kev hloov ntawm txoj cai Askiv mus rau txoj cai Loos. Xyoo 2022 “substantive” thiab “procedural” law raug tawm tsam.

Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations. The law defines legal or illegal behavior and sets out the punishments for it. Substantive law covers many legal areas, including criminal, civil, and contract law.

Txoj cai raws li cov ntsiab lus tseeb txhais kom meej txog cov cai thiab cov luag hauj lwm ntawm tib neeg thiab cov koom haum, hos txoj cai raws txheej txheem qhia txog txoj kev daws cov kev tsis sib haum thiab kev yuam kom cov cai thiab cov luag hauj lwm ntawm tib neeg thiab cov koom haum raug coj los siv. Txoj cai txhais tias yam kev coj cwj pwm twg yog raws cai lossis txhaum cai thiab teev tseg cov txim rau yam ntawd. Txoj cai raws li cov ntsiab lus tseeb muaj feem xyuam rau ntau yam kev cai lij choj, suav nrog kev cai lij choj txhaum cai, pej xeem, thiab ntawv cog lus.

Criminal law is an excellent example of substantive law. Criminal law defines what actions are considered criminal and the penalties for those crimes. Civil law, however, governs disputes between individuals and organizations, such as breach of contract, personal injury, or property disputes.

Txoj cai lij choj hais txog kev ua txhaum yog ib qho piv txwv zoo heev ntawm txoj cai lij choj uas hais txog cov ntsiab lus tseem ceeb. Txoj cai lij choj hais txog kev ua txhaum txhais tias yam kev coj ua twg raug suav tias yog kev ua txhaum cai thiab cov kev rau txim rau cov kev ua txhaum ntawd. Txoj cai lij choj pej xeem, txawm li cas los xij, tswj hwm cov kev tsis sib haum xeeb ntawm cov tib neeg thiab cov koom haum, xws li kev ua txhaum daim ntawv cog lus, kev raug mob rau tus kheej, los sis kev tsis sib haum xeeb txog cuab yeej cuab tam.

Substantive law is typically written in statutes, regulations, and case law. Statutes are laws passed by legislative bodies, such as national parliaments or state legislature, and regulations are rules and procedures created by administrative agencies. Case law is the law that judges create through their interpretation of statutes, regulations, and the Constitution.

Txoj cai tseem ceeb feem ntau raug sau cia rau hauv cov cai lij choj, cov kev tswj hwm, thiab cov cai tsim los ntawm kev txiav txim plaub ntug. Cov cai lij choj yog cov kev cai uas cov koomhaum tsim cai lij choj tau pom zoo tawm los, xws li lub teb chaws parliament lossis lub xeev legislature, hos cov kev tswj hwm yog cov kev cai thiab cov txheej txheem uas cov koomhaum thawj tswj hwm tsim tawm. Cov cai tsim los ntawm kev txiav txim plaub ntug yog txoj cai uas cov kws txiav txim plaub ntug tsim los ntawm lawv txoj kev txhais cov cai lij choj, cov kev tswj hwm, thiab Txoj Cai Loj.

Procedural law refers to the rules governing the legal process. It outlines how cases move through the legal system, from the initial filing of a complaint to the final resolution. Procedural law covers various legal areas, including civil, criminal, and administrative procedures. The purpose of procedural law is to ensure that the legal process is fair and efficient. It provides a framework for resolving disputes and ensures that everyone involved in the legal process, including judges, lawyers, and litigants, knows what is expected of them.

Txoj cai hais txog txheej txheem yog hais txog cov cai uas tswj hwm txoj kev ua raws cai hauv tsev hais plaub. Nws piav qhia tias cov rooj plaub txav mus li cas hauv txoj kev cai lij choj, txij thaum xub thawj foob ib daim ntawv tsis txaus siab mus txog rau qhov kev txiav txim kawg. Txoj cai hais txog txheej txheem suav nrog ntau yam thaj tsam ntawm txoj cai lij choj, nrog rau txheej txheem hais plaub pej xeem, kev ua txhaum cai, thiab kev tswj hwm. Lub hom phiaj ntawm txoj cai hais txog txheej txheem yog kom paub tseeb tias txoj kev cai lij choj ncaj ncees thiab muaj txiaj ntsig zoo. Nws muab ib lub hauv paus txheej txheem rau kev daws teeb meem thiab ua kom paub tseeb tias txhua tus uas koom nrog hauv txoj kev cai lij choj, nrog rau cov kws txiav txim, cov kws lij choj, thiab cov neeg foob lossis raug foob, paub tias yam twg raug cia siab ntawm lawv.

Substantive and procedural law are intended to work together to ensure justice is served. Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing those rights and obligations. In other words, substantive law defines legal or illegal behavior and the consequences of illegal behavior, while procedural law outlines how those legal issues are resolved.

Txoj cai hais txog cov ntsiab lus tseem ceeb thiab txoj cai hais txog txheej txheem raug tsim los kom ua haujlwm koom tes ua ke kom ntseeg tau tias kev ncaj ncees raug ua kom tiav. Txoj cai hais txog cov ntsiab lus tseem ceeb txhais tseg txog cov cai thiab cov luag hauj lwm ntawm tib neeg thiab cov koom haum, hos txoj cai hais txog txheej txheem qhia tseg txog txoj kev daws teeb meem kev tsis sib haum thiab kev yuam kom cov cai thiab cov luag hauj lwm ntawd raug coj los siv. Hais dua lwm yam, txoj cai hais txog cov ntsiab lus tseem ceeb txhais tseg txog tus cwj pwm uas raug cai lossis tsis raug cai thiab cov kev raug txim ntawm tus cwj pwm tsis raug cai, hos txoj cai hais txog txheej txheem qhia tseg txog yuav daws cov teeb meem raws cai ntawd li cas.

In 2001, the Patriot Act removed the right of habeas corpus. “Habeas corpus” is a Latin term that translates to “you shall have the body.” It refers to a legal principle that protects individuals from unlawful detention by requiring a court to examine the lawfulness of a person’s imprisonment. Habeas corpus is a fundamental right in many legal systems, especially those influenced by English common law. It ensures that a person cannot be held in custody without just cause and allows them to challenge the legality of their detention before a judge.

Xyoo 2001, txoj cai Patriot Act tau tshem tawm txoj cai habeas corpus. “Habeas corpus” yog ib lo lus Latin uas txhais tias “koj yuav tsum muaj lub cev.” Lo lus no hais txog ib txoj cai lij choj hauv paus ntsiab lus uas tiv thaiv tibneeg ntawm kev raug kaw yam tsis raws cai, los ntawm kev yuav tsum kom lub tsev hais plaub tshuaj xyuas seb ib tug neeg txoj kev raug kaw puas raws cai. Habeas corpus yog ib txoj cai tseem ceeb hauv ntau lub txheej txheem kev cai lij choj, tshwj xeeb yog cov uas tau txais kev cuam tshuam los ntawm English common law. Nws ua kom paub tseeb tias ib tug neeg tsis raug tuav cia hauv kev saib xyuas yam tsis muaj laj thawj ncaj ncees, thiab pub rau lawv tawm tsam qhov raug cai ntawm lawv txoj kev raug kaw nyob rau ntawm ib tug kws txiav txim plaub.

A “Due Process Clause” appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Courts have developed two branches of due process doctrine: procedural due process and substantive due process. In 2001, with the Patriot Act habeas corpus was removed as a right, and English law was replaced by Roman law. English law defines that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty, and Roman law identifies that a person is considered guilty until proven innocent. In the Pelosi Trials of 2022, both procedural and substantive due process was trampled upon. Both substantive law and procedural law were applied in the Pelosi Trials in the exact opposite of their intended constitutional purpose.

Ib kab lus hais txog “Due Process” muaj nyob hauv ob qho tib si Kev Hloov Kho Thib Tsib thiab Kev Hloov Kho Thib Kaum Plaub ntawm Txoj Cai Lij Choj Tebchaws Meskas. Cov no teev tseg tias tsis muaj leejtwg raug muab txeeb txoj sia, kev ywj pheej, lossis cuab yeej cuab tam yam tsis muaj txoj txheej txheem raws cai uas tsim nyog. Cov tsev hais plaub tau tsim ob ceg ntawm txoj kev qhuab qhia hais txog due process: procedural due process thiab substantive due process. Xyoo 2001, los ntawm Patriot Act, habeas corpus raug tshem tawm tsis pub ua ib txoj cai lawm, thiab txoj cai lij choj Askiv raug hloov los ntawm txoj cai lij choj Loos. Txoj cai lij choj Askiv txhais tias ib tug neeg raug suav tias tsis muaj txim kom txog thaum muaj pov thawj tias nws muaj txim, hos txoj cai lij choj Loos qhia tias ib tug neeg raug suav tias muaj txim kom txog thaum muaj pov thawj tias nws tsis muaj txim. Hauv Pelosi Trials xyoo 2022, ob qho tib si procedural due process thiab substantive due process raug tsuj hnyo kiag. Ob qho tib si substantive law thiab procedural law raug siv hauv Pelosi Trials nyob rau hauv txoj kev uas tawm tsam ncaj qha rau lub hom phiaj raws cai lij choj uas Txoj Cai Lij Choj tau npaj tseg rau lawv.

The distinction between substantive due process and procedural due process lies in the different aspects of law and rights that each concept protects within the framework of the U.S. Constitution, particularly under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Qhov kev sib txawv ntawm substantive due process thiab procedural due process nyob rau hauv cov yam ntxwv sib txawv ntawm txoj cai thiab cov cai lij choj uas txhua lub tswv yim no tiv thaiv hauv qab tus qauv txheej txheem ntawm Txoj Cai Lij Choj Meskas, tshwj xeeb tshaj yog hauv Due Process Clauses ntawm Fifth thiab Fourteenth Amendments.

Substantive due process is concerned with the fundamental rights and liberties that the government cannot infringe upon, regardless of the procedure used. It protects certain rights from government interference even if the proper procedures are followed. Substantive due process involves rights that are deemed fundamental, such as the right to privacy, the right to marry, and the right to raise one’s children. These rights are protected from government intrusion unless there is a compelling state interest. It serves as a check on the government’s power, ensuring that laws and regulations do not violate fundamental liberties.

Substantive due process hais txog tej cai thiab kev ywj pheej tseem ceeb hauv paus uas tsoom fwv tsis muaj cai rhuav tshem lossis cuam tshuam, tsis hais tias siv txoj txheej txheem twg los xij. Nws tiv thaiv qee yam cai kom tsis txhob raug tsoom fwv cuam tshuam txawm yog twb ua raws li cov txheej txheem kom raug lawm los xij. Substantive due process muaj feem nrog cov cai uas raug suav tias yog cai tseem ceeb hauv paus, xws li txoj cai rau kev ntiag tug, txoj cai sib yuav, thiab txoj cai los tu thiab cob qhia yus cov me nyuam. Cov cai no raug tiv thaiv kom tsis txhob muaj tsoom fwv kev nkag los cuam tshuam tshwj tsis yog thaum muaj ib qho txiaj ntsig tseem ceeb heev ntawm lub xeev uas yuam kom ua li ntawd. Nws ua haujlwm raws li ib qho kev txwv thiab kev tshuaj xyuas rau lub hwj chim ntawm tsoom fwv, kom paub tseeb tias tej kev cai lij choj thiab kev tswj hwm tsis ua txhaum rau cov kev ywj pheej tseem ceeb hauv paus.

Procedural due process is concerned with the procedures that the government must follow before it deprives an individual of life, liberty, or property. It ensures that individuals receive fair and impartial treatment through proper legal processes. Procedural due process requires the government to follow certain steps or procedures, such as providing notice, a fair hearing, and an opportunity to be heard, before depriving someone of their rights. It emphasizes the methods by which laws are enforced, ensuring that the government acts in a just and fair manner.

Kev txheej txheem raws cai ntawm kev ncaj ncees tsom rau cov txheej txheem uas tsoom fwv yuav tsum ua raws ua ntej nws txeeb ntawm ib tug neeg nws txoj sia, kev ywj pheej, lossis cuab tam. Nws xyuas kom meej tias tib neeg tau txais kev saib xyuas ncaj ncees thiab tsis xaiv ntsej muag raws li cov txheej txheem cai lij choj uas tsim nyog. Kev ncaj ncees raws txheej txheem yuav kom tsoom fwv ua raws qee kauj ruam lossis txheej txheem, xws li kev ceeb toom ua ntej, kev mloog rooj plaub uas ncaj ncees, thiab lub sijhawm rau tus neeg ntawd raug mloog nws tej lus, ua ntej txeeb ntawm ib tug neeg nws cov cai. Nws hais txog cov hau kev uas cov kev cai lij choj raug coj los siv, kom paub tseeb tias tsoom fwv ua raws li kev ncaj thiab kev haum xeeb.

The lawfare that has been manifested since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a denial of both substantive and procedural due process. The fundamental rights of American citizens were openly and successfully denied. The false flag operations and the open corruption of the alphabet agencies of the United States has been regularly exposed since even before the Pelosi Trials began, but the legal procedures that have been employed by the globalists of both parties since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a clear illustration of the destruction of procedural due process.

Kev siv cai lij choj ua riam phom uas tau tshwm sim txij thaum cov Pelosi Trials pib los, sawv cev rau kev tsis lees paub ob qho tib si txog txoj cai raws ntsiab lus thiab txoj cai raws txheej txheem hauv kev txiav txim ncaj ncees. Cov cai tseem ceeb hauv paus ntawm cov pej xeem Meskas raug tsis lees paub tawm plaws thiab ua tiav lawm. Cov haujlwm false flag thiab txoj kev qias neeg qhib lug ntawm cov koom haum “alphabet agencies” ntawm Tebchaws Meskas tau raug nthuav tawm tsis tu ncua txij ua ntej txawm tias cov Pelosi Trials pib lawm los, tiam sis cov txheej txheem cai lij choj uas cov globalists ntawm ob tog tau siv txij thaum cov Pelosi Trials pib los, sawv cev rau ib qho piv txwv meej tseeb ntawm kev rhuav tshem txoj cai raws txheej txheem hauv kev txiav txim ncaj ncees.

Earlier in the article we read, “Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.”

Yav dhau los hauv tsab xov xwm no peb tau nyeem hais tias, “Txhua txoj kev txav uas txhawb nqa txoj cai lij choj kev ntseeg yeej yog ib qho kev lees tseg rau lub hwjchim papacy, uas tau ua rog tsis tu ncua tawm tsam txoj kev ywj pheej ntawm lub siab kaj siab lug los lawm ntau tiam neeg. Kev coj hnub Sunday dawb huv tshuav nws qhov kev muaj nyob ua ib lub koom haum uas hu ua Khixatia rau ‘txoj kev tsis ncaj ncees uas zais tob;’ thiab kev yuam kom coj raws li ntawd yuav yog ib qho kev lees paub ncaj qha rau tej ntsiab cai uas yog lub hauv paus pob zeb tiag tiag ntawm Romanism. Thaum peb lub teb chaws tsis lees yuav tej ntsiab cai ntawm nws txoj kev tswj hwm kom mus txog qhov tsim ib txoj cai Sunday, Protestantism yuav, hauv txoj kev ua no, tuav tes nrog popery; nws yuav tsis yog dabtsi li tsuas yog muab txoj sia rau txoj kev lim hiam uas tau ntev los lawm tab tom tos ntsoov nrhiav lub sijhawm kom sawv rov los dua rau hauv txoj kev tswj hwm nruj ua phem.”

In the line of history that can be represented with the Constitution of the United States there are three specific waymarks representing some element of the Constitution in both the beginning and the ending of the United States. Each of those three waymarks are political actions, and therefore symbolize the speaking of the United States. The third of those three waymarks in the beginning, that marked 1798, was the Alien and Sedition Acts and the third of those waymarks at the ending is when the United States enforces a Sunday law, and speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven.

Nyob rau hauv kab keeb kwm uas sawv cev tau los ntawm Txoj Cai Lij Choj ntawm Tebchaws Meskas, muaj peb lub cim tseem ceeb tshwjxeeb uas sawv cev rau qee yam hauv Txoj Cai Lij Choj ntawd, ob leeg nyob rau thaum chiv keeb thiab thaum kawg ntawm Tebchaws Meskas. Txhua lub cim tseem ceeb peb ntawd yog tej kev ua nom tswv, thiab vim li ntawd thiaj ua lub cim ntawm Tebchaws Meskas txoj kev hais lus. Lub cim tseem ceeb thib peb ntawm peb lub ntawd nyob rau thaum chiv keeb, uas cim xyoo 1798, yog Txoj Cai Alien and Sedition Acts; hos lub cim tseem ceeb thib peb ntawm cov cim ntawd nyob rau thaum kawg yog thaum Tebchaws Meskas yuam kom coj txoj cai Sunday law, thiab hais lus zoo li ib tug zaj, raws li kev ua tiav ntawm Tshwmsim tshooj kaum peb, nqe kaum ib.

The prophetic history of the United States begins when, as represented by the earth, it opened its mouth and swallowed up the flood of the dragon’s persecution.

Keeb kwm yaj saub hais txog Tebchaws Meskas pib thaum nws, raws li lub ntiajteb sawv cev rau nws, qhib nws lub qhov ncauj thiab nqos dej nyab ntawm tus zaj kev tsim txom.

And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. Revelation 12:15, 16.

Tus nab tawm hauv nws lub qhov ncauj dej zoo li ib tug dej nyab caum raws tus poj niam qab, kom nws thiaj ua rau tus poj niam raug dej nyab ntawd kwj mus. Thiab lub ntiajteb tau pab tus poj niam; lub ntiajteb qhib nws lub qhov ncauj, thiab nqos tus dej nyab uas tus zaj tau ntuav tawm hauv nws lub qhov ncauj. Tshwmsim 12:15, 16.

In 1776, the beast that was to arise from the earth, and ultimately become the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy in 1798, swallowed up the flood of persecution against God’s people by establishing a nation with a Constitution that protested against the tyrants of European royalty and the tyrants of the papal church.

Xyoo 1776, tus tsiaj qus uas yuav sawv los ntawm lub ntiajteb, thiab thaum kawg los ua lub nceeg vaj thib rau hauv tej lus faj lem hauv Phau Vajlugkub xyoo 1798, tau nqos dej nyab ntawm kev tsim txom tawm tsam Vajtswv haiv neeg tseg los ntawm kev tsim tsa ib lub tebchaws uas muaj ib tsab Cai Lij Choj tawm tsam cov nom huab tais lim hiam ntawm tebchaws Europe thiab cov thawj coj lim hiam ntawm pawg ntseeg papacy.

The Declaration of Independence in 1776 typified the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 typified the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 typified the Sunday law in the United States.

Tsab Ntawv Tshaj Tawm Kev Ywj Pheej xyoo 1776 yog ib qho piv txwv txog txoj kev yaj saub ntawm Patriot Act xyoo 2001. Txoj Cai Lij Choj xyoo 1789 yog ib qho piv txwv txog txoj kev yaj saub ntawm Pelosi Trials pib xyoo 2022. Cov Cai Alien thiab Sedition xyoo 1798 yog ib qho piv txwv txog txoj cai Sunday nyob hauv Tebchaws Meskas.

The pronouncement of independence by the American patriots in 1776 represented the announcement of the loss of independence with the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 represented the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts represents the Sunday law. The history of the repudiation of every principle of the Constitution represents a progressive overturning of the Constitution that ends at the Sunday law.

Kev tshaj tawm txog kev ywj pheej los ntawm cov neeg hlub teb chaws Asmeskas xyoo 1776 sawv cev rau kev tshaj tawm txog kev plam kev ywj pheej nrog Patriot Act xyoo 2001. Txoj Cai Lij Choj xyoo 1789 sawv cev rau Pelosi Trials uas pib xyoo 2022. Alien and Sedition Acts sawv cev rau txoj cai Hnub Caiv. Keeb kwm ntawm kev tsis lees paub txhua lub hauv paus ntsiab cai ntawm Txoj Cai Lij Choj sawv cev rau kev rhuav tshem Txoj Cai Lij Choj zuj zus mus, uas xaus rau ntawm txoj cai Hnub Caiv.

These lines all align in the hidden history of verse forty of Daniel chapter eleven. In this article we quoted four paragraphs from Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.

Cov kab no txhua kab no sib haum ua ke nyob rau hauv keeb kwm zais cia ntawm nqe plaub caug hauv Daniyees tshooj kaum ib. Hauv tsab xov xwm no peb tau hais plaub nqe lus tawm hauv Testimonies, phau 5, 451, 452.

We will look closer at those paragraphs in the next article.

Peb yuav tshuaj xyuas cov nqe lus ntawd kom ze dua hauv zaj ntawv tom ntej.