Verse forty of Daniel chapter eleven, represents one of the most profound verses of God’s Word. The prophetic histories that are represented therein are where the wheels within the wheels of Ezekiel’s vision are brought together. With the time of the end of the Millerite movement in 1798, and also the time of the end of the movement of the third angel in 1989, the internal and external histories of God’s people of the last days are portrayed. Within the verse is the announcement of the approaching judgment which arrived with the first angel in 1798, all the way until the Sunday law of verse forty-one. The verse therefore represents the investigative judgment of God’s church beginning with the dead, through to the sealing of the one hundred and forty-four thousand, and God spewing Laodicean Adventism out of His mouth.

Vèsè karant nan chapit onz Danyèl la reprezante youn nan vèsè ki pi pwofon nan Pawòl Bondye a. Istwa pwofetik ki reprezante ladan li yo se la wou ki anndan wou yo nan vizyon Ezekyèl la reyini ansanm. Avèk tan lafen mouvman Millerit la an 1798, epi tou tan lafen mouvman twazyèm zanj lan an 1989, istwa entèn ak ekstèn pèp Bondye a nan dènye jou yo prezante. Nan vèsè a genyen anons jijman k ap pwoche a, ki te rive avèk premye zanj lan an 1798, jouk rive nan lwa dimanch vèsè karant-e-youn nan. Konsa, vèsè a reprezante jijman ankèt legliz Bondye a, ki kòmanse avèk mò yo, rive jis nan sele san karannkat mil yo, epi Bondye ap vomi Advantis Lawodise a soti nan bouch Li.

The history where the papacy received its deadly wound in 1798, until the deadly wound is healed in verse forty-one is represented in the history of the verse. Verse forty-one onward is set within the context of the escalating executive judgments of God, which begin in that verse. In this prophetic sense, verse forty is the end of Daniel chapter eleven, and verses one and two, of the chapter are the beginning. Chapter eleven presents the rebellion of the antichrist, and chapter ten represents the beginning of the Hiddekel River vision, and chapter twelve represents the end. Chapters ten and twelve represent the first and the last, and chapter eleven is the rebellion in the middle.

Istwa kote papote a te resevwa blesi mòtèl li an 1798, jouk lè blesi mòtèl la geri nan vèsè karant-yon an, reprezante nan istwa vèsè a. Depi vèsè karant-yon an pou pi devan, sa plase nan kontèks jijman egzekitif Bondye yo k ap vin pi sevè, ki kòmanse nan vèsè sa a. Nan sans pwofetik sa a, vèsè karant lan se fen Danyèl chapit onz la, epi vèsè youn ak de chapit douz la se kòmansman an. Chapit onz prezante rebelyon antikris la, epi chapit dis la reprezante kòmansman vizyon larivyè Hiddekel la, tandiske chapit douz la reprezante fen an. Chapit dis ak douz reprezante premye a ak dènye a, epi chapit onz la se rebelyon ki nan mitan an.

Chapters ten and twelve are the same, for, unlike chapter eleven, they represent Daniel’s experience in relation to the vision, and chapter eleven is the vision. Chapter ten is the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet, chapter eleven is the thirteenth rebellious letter of the Hebrew alphabet, and chapter twelve is the last letter of the alphabet. The Hiddekel River vision is the “Truth.”

Chapit dis ak douz yo se menm bagay la; paske, kontrèman ak chapit onz la, yo reprezante eksperyans Danyèl anrapò ak vizyon an, tandiske chapit onz la se vizyon an. Chapit dis la se premye lèt alfabè ebre a, chapit onz la se trèzyèm lèt rebèl alfabè ebre a, epi chapit douz la se dènye lèt alfabè a. Vizyon Rivyè Hiddekel la se “Verite” a.

In chapter eleven, the beginning illustrates the end, for Christ never changes. The final history represented in verse forty, is the testing time of the image of the beast. That testing time concludes with the mark of the beast, which is represented in verse forty-one. Verses one and two, must therefore address the sealing time of the one hundred and forty-four thousand, for that period of time is also the period of the formation of the image of the beast.

Nan chapit onz la, kòmansman an ilistre fen an, paske Kris la pa janm chanje. Istwa final la ki reprezante nan vèsè karant lan, se tan eprèv imaj bèt la. Tan eprèv sa a fini ak mak bèt la, ki reprezante nan vèsè karantyèm-en an. Kidonk, vèsè youn ak de yo dwe pale sou tan sele san karannkatmil yo, paske peryòd tan sa a se tou peryòd fòmasyon imaj bèt la.

“The Lord has shown me clearly that the image of the beast will be formed before probation closes; for it is to be the great test for the people of God, by which their eternal destiny will be decided. . ..

“Seyè a montre m byen klè ke imaj bèt la pral fòme anvan tan gras la fini; paske se li ki pral gwo eprèv pou pèp Bondye a, e se pa li menm sò etènèl yo pral deside....”

“This is the test that the people of God must have before they are sealed.” Manuscript Releases, volume 15, 15.

“Sa a se tès pèp Bondye a dwe genyen anvan yo resevwa sele a.” Manuscript Releases, volim 15, 15.

There are always two waymarks that identify a time of the end. In the reform movement of Moses, it was Aaron’s birth followed three years later with Moses’ birth. In the reform movement to come out of Babylon and rebuild the temple it was king Darius, followed by king Cyrus. In the reform movement of Christ, it was the birth of John the Baptist, followed in six months by the birth of Christ. In the reform movement of the Millerites it was the death of the papal system in 1798, followed by the death of the pope in 1799. In the reform movement of the third angel, it was president Reagan and president Bush the first, who both represented 1989. In Daniel chapter ten, verse one, we find king Cyrus identified.

Gen toujou gen de baliz ki idantifye yon tan lafen. Nan mouvman refòm Moyiz la, se te nesans Arawon, epi twa ane apre sa, nesans Moyiz. Nan mouvman refòm pou soti Babilòn epi rebati tanp lan, se te wa Dariyis, apre sa wa Siris. Nan mouvman refòm Kris la, se te nesans Jan Batis la, epi sis mwa apre sa, nesans Kris la. Nan mouvman refòm Millerit yo, se te lanmò sistèm papal la an 1798, apre sa lanmò pap la an 1799. Nan mouvman refòm twazyèm zanj lan, se te prezidan Reagan ak prezidan Bush premye a, ki toude te reprezante 1989. Nan Danyèl chapit dis, vèsè youn, nou jwenn wa Siris idantifye.

In the third year of Cyrus king of Persia a thing was revealed unto Daniel, whose name was called Belteshazzar; and the thing was true, but the time appointed was long: and he understood the thing, and had understanding of the vision. Daniel 10:1.

Nan twazyèm ane Siris, wa Pès la, yon bagay te revele bay Danyèl, yo te rele non li Beltchaza; e bagay la te vre, men tan ki te fikse a te long; epi li te konprann bagay la, e li te gen entèlijans sou vizyon an. Danyèl 10:1.

In the following verses of chapter ten, we see the experience of Daniel represented in advance of Gabriel delivering the vision of prophetic history in chapter eleven. Cyrus marks the time of the end, for previously Cyrus, Darius’ nephew, had been Darius’ general who slew Belshazzar, thus marking the end of the seventy years of captivity, which typified the twelve-hundred and sixty-year captivity of spiritual Israel in spiritual Babylon from 538 unto 1798.

Nan vèsè ki vin apre yo nan chapit dis la, nou wè eksperyans Danyèl la prezante davans anvan Gabriyèl delivre vizyon istwa pwofetik la nan chapit onz la. Siris make tan lafen an, paske anvan sa Siris, neve Dariyis la, te jeneral Dariyis ki te touye Bèlchaza, konsa li te make fen swasanndis ane kaptivite a, ki te yon tip kaptivite mil de san swasant ane Izrayèl espirityèl la nan Babilòn espirityèl la depi 538 rive 1798.

“God’s church on earth was as verily in captivity during this long period of relentless persecution as were the children of Israel held captive in Babylon during the period of the exile.” Prophets and Kings, 714.

“Legliz Bondye sou tè a te tout bon nan kaptivite pandan long peryòd sa a nan pèsekisyon san rete a, menm jan pitit Izrayèl yo te kenbe an kaptivite nan Babilòn pandan peryòd ekzil la.” Prophets and Kings, 714.

The end of the twelve hundred and sixty years in 1798, marked the time of the end, so the end of the seventy years marked the “time of the end” for that history. Both Darius and Cyrus are represented at the death of Belshazzar and end of the kingdom of Babylon, for as Darius’s general who accomplished the work, Cyrus was representing Darius. When George Bush the first was inaugurated on January 20, 1989, Reagan had been president for the first nineteen days of 1989.

Fin mil de san swasant ane yo an 1798 te make tan lafen an; konsa, fin swasanndis ane yo te make “tan lafen an” pou istwa sa a. Toude, Dariyis ak Siris, reprezante nan lanmò Bèlchaza ak nan fin wayòm Babilòn nan, paske antanke jeneral Dariyis ki te akonpli travay la, Siris t ap reprezante Dariyis. Lè premye George Bush la te prete sèman kòm prezidan 20 janvye 1989, Reagan te deja prezidan pandan premye diznèf jou yo nan ane 1989 la.

The vision of the Hiddekel began at the time of the end, in the third year of Cyrus. When Gabriel begins to unfold to Daniel the prophetic history of chapter eleven, he first references the first year of Darius, to establish clearly that the vision of prophetic history that he was about to present to Daniel begins in the last time of the end, in 1989, for all the prophets speak more of the last days than the days in which they lived.

Vizyon Idèkel la te kòmanse nan tan lafen an, nan twazyèm ane Siris la. Lè Gabriyèl kòmanse devwale bay Danyèl istwa pwofetik chapit onz la, li fè premye referans ak premye ane Dariyis la, pou l tabli aklè ke vizyon istwa pwofetik li t ap prezante bay Danyèl la kòmanse nan dènye tan lafen an, an 1989, paske tout pwofèt yo pale plis sou dènye jou yo pase sou jou yo menm te viv ladan yo.

But I will show thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince. Also I in the first year of Darius the Mede, even I, stood to confirm and to strengthen him. Daniel 10:21, 11:1.

Men m ap fè ou wè sa ki ekri nan liv verite a; e pa gen pèsonn ki kanpe avè m nan bagay sa yo, eksepte Mikaèl, chèf nou an. Epi mwen menm tou, nan premye ane Dariyis, Mèd la, mwen te kanpe pou m soutni l e pou m fòtifye l. Danyèl 10:21; 11:1.

In the first year of Darius, which represents the time of the end in 1989, Gabriel “stood”, thus identifying that at a “time of the end”, an angel arrives. In 1798 the first angel arrived, and in 1989, the third angel arrived. It wasn’t until the message of the third angel was empowered in 2001 that the sealing of the third angel began, but the movement of the third angel arriving in 1989, is represented by Gabriel standing at the time of the end. Gabriel is going to show Daniel “that which is noted in the scripture of truth,” and the vision of the Hiddekel possesses the signature of “Truth,” which Gabriel is about to set forth.

Nan premye ane Dariyis la, ki reprezante tan lafen an an 1989, Gabriyèl “te kanpe”, konsa li fè konnen ke nan yon “tan lafen”, yon zanj rive. An 1798, premye zanj lan te rive, epi an 1989, twazyèm zanj lan te rive. Se pa t jouk lè mesaj twazyèm zanj lan te resevwa pouvwa an 2001 ke sele twazyèm zanj lan te kòmanse, men mouvman twazyèm zanj lan ki te rive an 1989 la reprezante pa Gabriyèl ki kanpe nan tan lafen an. Gabriyèl pral montre Danyèl “sa ki ekri nan liv verite a,” epi vizyon Idekèl la pote mak “Verite” a, ke Gabriyèl pral prezante.

In verse fourteen of chapter ten Gabriel had already informed Daniel that what he was addressing in the vision of the Hiddekel was “what would happen to God’s people in the last days.”

Nan vèsè katòz chapit dis la, Gabriyèl te deja fè Dànyèl konnen ke sa li t ap adrese nan vizyon Hiddékèl la se te “sa ki t ap rive pèp Bondye a nan dènye jou yo.”

Now I am come to make thee understand what shall befall thy people in the latter days: for yet the vision is for many days. Daniel 10:14.

Koulye a, mwen vini pou m fè ou konprann sa ki pral rive pèp ou a nan dènye jou yo; paske vizyon an toujou la pou anpil jou ankò. Daniel 10:14.

Verse two of Daniel chapter eleven represents the knowledge that was unsealed at the time of the end in 1989, and which identifies what “shall befall” God’s people “in the latter days”.

Vèsè de nan chapit onz Danyèl la reprezante konesans ki te vin louvri nan tan lafen an an 1989, epi ki idantifye sa ki “pral rive” pèp Bondye a “nan dènye jou yo”.

And now will I show thee the truth. Behold, there shall stand up yet three kings in Persia; and the fourth shall be far richer than they all: and by his strength through his riches he shall stir up all against the realm of Grecia. Daniel 11:2.

Epi kounye a, m ap fè ou konnen verite a. Gade, ap gen ankò twa wa ki pral leve nan Pès; epi katriyèm nan ap pi rich anpil pase yo tout; e avèk fòs li, grasa richès li yo, li pral souke tout bagay kont wayòm Grès la. Danyèl 11:2.

Cyrus prefigures the second king since 1989. He is the king of the Medo-Persian Empire, which represents the kingdom of Bible prophecy in the last days that is made up of two horns, represented by the Medes and the Persians. After the second king of the kingdom of the two-horned earth beast at the time of the end in 1989, there would yet be three kings (Clinton, Bush the last, Obama), and then there would be a king that was far richer than they all were. The three kings that followed Bush the first, got wealthy after their presidencies, and only because they had become president. Trump, the fourth that was far richer, and was the wealthiest president ever, did not make his money because he had been president, but primarily through his work in real estate investments, well before he ran for president.

Siris se yon prefigirasyon dezyèm wa a depi 1989. Li se wa Anpi Medo-Pès la, ki reprezante wayòm pwofesi biblik la nan dènye jou yo, yon wayòm ki konpoze de de kòn, Med yo ak Pès yo. Apre dezyèm wa wayòm bèt tè ki gen de kòn nan nan tan lafen an an 1989, t ap toujou gen twa wa ankò (Clinton, Bush dènye a, Obama), epi apre sa t ap vini yon wa ki t ap pi rich anpil pase yo tout. Twa wa ki te swiv Bush premye a te vin rich apre prezidans yo, epi se sèlman paske yo te vin prezidan. Trump, katriyèm nan, ki te pi rich anpil e ki te prezidan ki te gen plis richès pase tout lòt yo, pa t fè lajan li paske li te prezidan, men sitou atravè travay li nan envestisman imobilye, byen lontan anvan li te kandida pou prezidan.

Formerly the richest president in American history, relatively speaking, was the first president of the United States. Prior to Donald Trump, George Washington was the richest president in American history, and he made his money as did Donald Trump, through real estate investments. Both Washington and Trump came to the presidency from non-traditional political backgrounds. Washington was primarily a military leader before becoming president, and Trump was a businessman and television personality, who like unto Washington was without any prior political experience.

Ansyen prezidan ki te pi rich nan listwa ameriken an, an tèm relatif, se te premye prezidan Etazini an. Anvan Donald Trump, George Washington te prezidan ki te pi rich nan listwa ameriken an, e li te fè lajan li menm jan ak Donald Trump, atravè envestisman nan byen imobilye. Ni Washington ni Trump te rive nan prezidans lan soti nan orijin politik ki pa t tradisyonèl. Washington te sitou yon chèf militè anvan li te vin prezidan, epi Trump te yon biznisman ak yon pèsonalite televizyon ki, menm jan ak Washington, pa t gen okenn eksperyans politik anvan sa.

Both presidents were known for their strong personalities and leadership styles, although they manifested these traits quite differently. Washington was known for his stoic, calm, and confident leadership and unifying presence during the Revolutionary War and the early years of the Republic, while Trump is known for his assertive approach to leadership and governance. Both Washington and Trump were figures of significant controversy, albeit for very different reasons. Washington, while widely revered, faced criticism during his time for various issues, including his views on slavery. Trump’s presidency was marked by numerous controversies, including his use of “mean tweets” on social media, his America-first policy decisions, and his own self-awareness.

Tou de prezidan yo te byen konnen pou pèsonalite fò yo ak estil lidèchip yo, byenke yo te manifeste kalite sa yo yon fason ki te byen diferan. Yo te rekonèt Washington pou lidèchip li ki te stoik, kalm, epi plen konfyans, ansanm ak prezans inifikatè li pandan Lagè Revolisyonè a ak premye ane Repiblik la, tandiske yo konnen Trump pou apwòch afime li nan lidèchip ak nan gouvènans. Ni Washington ni Trump te figi ki te lakòz gwo kontwovès, byenke sa te fèt pou rezon ki te trè diferan. Washington, malgre yo te venere l anpil, te sibi kritik pandan epòk pa li sou divès kestyon, pami yo opinyon li sou esklavaj. Prezidans Trump la te make pa anpil kontwovès, pami yo itilizasyon li te fè de “tweet mechan” sou rezo sosyal yo, desizyon politik li yo ki te mete Amerik an premye, ak pwòp konsyans li de tèt li.

The richest and sixth president was to stir up the globalist dragon powers. When we lay the history of verse two of chapter eleven, upon the history of the period of 1776, 1789, and 1798, we find further information addressing the last president of the earth beast, for Jesus illustrates the end with the beginning. The first two periods represented by 1776, and 1789, provide two witnesses that the final president, will be the eighth president, who was of the seven. Trump was the sixth president after Reagan, and as the eighth president, he will be “of the seven”. The final, and eighth president will rule when the United States forms the image “to and of” the beast.

Prezidan ki te pi rich la e ki te sizyèm nan te dwe eksite pouvwa dragon globalis yo. Lè nou mete istwa vèsè de nan chapit onz la sou istwa peryòd 1776, 1789, ak 1798, nou jwenn plis enfòmasyon ki konsène dènye prezidan bèt latè a, paske Jezi ilistre lafen an avèk kòmansman an. De premye peryòd yo, ke 1776 ak 1789 reprezante, bay de temwen ki montre prezidan final la pral uityèm prezidan an, ki te soti nan sèt yo. Trump te sizyèm prezidan an apre Reagan, epi kòm uityèm prezidan an, li pral “nan sèt yo”. Dènye prezidan an, ki se uityèm nan, pral gouvène lè Etazini fòme imaj “a e de” bèt la.

The president who rules when the image of the beast is formed by the United States, must be the eighth, that is of the seven, as witnessed to by Peyton Randolph, and John Hancock. The papacy is the eighth head that was of the seven, and it received a prophetic deadly wound. To be an image of the papacy, the eighth president that is of the seven, must also have a prophetic identification of being prophetically “wounded” or “killed”.

Prezidan ki ap dirije lè Etazini fòme imaj bèt la, dwe wityèm nan, sa vle di, youn ki soti nan sèt yo, jan Peyton Randolph ak John Hancock temwaye sa. Papote a se wityèm tèt la ki te soti nan sèt yo, epi li te resevwa yon blesi lanmò pwofetik. Pou li kapab yon imaj papote a, wityèm prezidan an ki soti nan sèt yo dwe tou gen yon idantifikasyon pwofetik kòm youn ki pwofetikman “blese” oswa “touye”.

The papacy received its deadly wound from a dragon power (France), a dragon power who the papacy had been struggling against since the time when Paul identified that, the mystery of iniquity (the man of sin), did already work at that time. The dragon of paganism was restraining the papacy from taking the throne, which it did in 538.

Pap la te resevwa blesi mòtèl li nan men yon pouvwa dragon (Lafrans), yon pouvwa dragon ak ki pap la t ap lite depi nan tan lè Pòl te idantifye ke mistè inikite a (nonm peche a) te deja ap travay nan epòk sa a. Dragon paganism lan t ap anpeche pap la pran twòn nan, sa li te fè an 538.

From the beginning of the papacy unto its final demise it struggles against dragon powers. An image of the papacy requires that the image struggles with a dragon power. In Revelation seventeen the papacy, who is the eighth head, that is of the seven heads, is ultimately burned with fire and her flesh is eaten by the ten kings. In both deaths (1798 and the last days), the papal beast is killed by a dragon power. In order for the United States to form an image of the beast, the eighth president would also need to be killed by a dragon power that it was at war with, and the sixth king after the time of the end in 1989, is the king that stirred up all the dragon powers.

Depi nan kòmansman papote a jouk nan disparisyon final li, li lite kont pouvwa dragon yo. Yon imaj papote a egzije pou imaj la lite ak yon pouvwa dragon. Nan Revelasyon disèt, papote a, ki se uityèm tèt la, ki soti nan sèt tèt yo, finalman boule nan dife epi dis wa yo manje chè li. Nan toude lanmò yo (1798 ak dènye jou yo), bèt papal la touye pa yon pouvwa dragon. Pou Etazini fòme yon imaj bèt la, wityèm prezidan an ta dwe tou bezwen mouri anba men yon pouvwa dragon li te an lagè avè l, epi sizyèm wa a apre tan lafen an an 1989, se wa ki te souke tout pouvwa dragon yo.

Ronald Reagan was an apostate Protestant, but George Bush the first, was a classic globalist. One of his famous quotes is where he lied by saying, on August 18, 1988, “And I’m the one who will not raise taxes. My opponent now says he’ll raise them as a last resort, or a third resort. But when a politician talks like that, you know that’s one resort he’ll be checking into. My opponent won’t rule out raising taxes. But I will. And the Congress will push me to raise taxes and I’ll say no. And they’ll push, and I’ll say no, and they’ll push again, and all I can say to them is: read my lips: no new taxes.”

Ronald Reagan te yon Pwotestan aposta, men George Bush, premye a, te yon globalis klasik. Youn nan sitasyon li yo ki pi popilè se kote li te bay manti lè li te di, nan dat 18 dawout 1988: “E se mwen menm ki pap ogmante taks. Advèsè mwen an kounye a di l ap ogmante yo kòm dènye rekou, oswa kòm twazyèm rekou. Men lè yon politisyen pale konsa, ou konnen se yon rekou li pral sèvi avè l. Advèsè mwen an pa vle elimine posiblite pou ogmante taks. Men mwen menm, m ap elimine l. E Kongrè a ap pouse m ogmante taks, epi m ap di non. Epi yo ap pouse, epi m ap di non, epi yo ap pouse ankò, epi tout sa m ka di yo se: li sou bouch mwen: pa gen nouvo taks.”

Other than that public lie, which is an attribute of a representative of the dragon power, his most famous quote was at a joint session of Congress on September 11, 1990, where he said, “Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order. In the words of Winston Churchill, a ‘world order’ in which ‘the principles of justice and fair play … protect the weak against the strong …’ A world where the United Nations, freed from cold war stalemate, is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders.” Bush the senior was a globalist, even if he identified as a Republican.

Anplis manti piblik sa a, ki se yon atribi yon reprezantan pouvwa dragon an, pawòl li ki pi popilè te fèt devan yon sesyon konjwen Kongrè a nan dat 11 septanm 1990, kote li te di: “Koulye a, nou kapab wè yon nouvo mond ap parèt devan je nou. Yon mond kote gen yon vrè posibilite pou yon nouvo lòd mondyal. Dapre pawòl Winston Churchill, yon ‘lòd mondyal’ kote ‘prensip jistis ak jwèt onèt … pwoteje fèb yo kont fò yo …’ Yon mond kote Nasyonzini, delivre anba blokaj lagè frèt la, pare pou akonpli vizyon istorik fondatè li yo.” Bush granmoun nan te yon mondyalis, menm si li te idantifye tèt li kòm yon Repibliken.

Bill Clinton was the first president to hold his inauguration ceremony at the Lincoln Memorial, which means he turned his back to Lincoln and faced the obelisk of Washington’s monument, an obelisk that is internally filled with symbols of Freemasonry. Both the obelisk and the symbols of Freemasonry he chose to face as he falsely swore his allegiance to the Constitution, represented not only that he had turned his back upon the anti-slavery symbol of the Lincoln Memorial, but Clintons’ chosen historic positioning, agrees with his acceptance speech, where he praised a professor whom he had studied under in the Jesuit University that he had attended.

Bill Clinton se premye prezidan ki te fè seremoni inogirasyon li nan Lincoln Memorial la, sa ki vle di li te vire do bay Lincoln epi li te fè fas ak obelisk Moniman Washington nan, yon obelisk ki anndan li plen ak senbòl Masonri. Ni obelisk la ni senbòl Masonri li te chwazi fè fas ak yo pandan li t ap fè fo sèman fidelite li anvè Konstitisyon an, te reprezante non sèlman ke li te vire do bay senbòl anti-esklavajis Lincoln Memorial la, men tou pozisyonman istorik Clinton te chwazi a ann akò ak diskou akseptasyon li a, kote li te fè lwanj yon pwofesè li te etidye anba direksyon li nan Inivèsite Jezuit li te frekante a.

That professor, Carroll Quigley, wrote the book: Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, which was published in 1966, and is correctly and widely understood to represent “the Bible for globalist ideas”. As the Koran is to Islam, and as Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, written by Albert Pike, and published in 1871, is considered the most comprehensive exposition of the esoteric teachings of Freemasonry; or as The Book of Mormon is to the Latter Day Saints, Quigley’s book is the Bible of globalist philosophy. Most would have known if Clinton praised Mohammed of the Koran, or if he praised Joseph Smith of The Book of Mormon, and some would have known who Albert Pike was, but few knew that Clinton’s praise of Quigley was consistent with his own globalist agenda, and his rejection of the principles represented by Abraham Lincoln.

Pwofesè sa a, Carroll Quigley, te ekri liv la: Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, ki te pibliye an 1966, e yo konprann li, avèk rezon e lajman, kòm “Bib pou lide mondyalis yo”. Menm jan Koran an ye pou Islam, e menm jan Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, Albert Pike te ekri epi yo te pibliye an 1871, konsidere kòm eksplikasyon ki pi konplè sou ansèyman ezoterik Masonri a; oswa menm jan The Book of Mormon ye pou Sen Dènye Jou yo, konsa liv Quigley a se Bib filozofi mondyalis la. Pifò moun t ap konnen si Clinton te fè lwanj Mohammed nan Koran an, oswa si li te fè lwanj Joseph Smith nan The Book of Mormon, e kèk moun t ap konnen kiyès Albert Pike te ye, men se te yon ti kantite moun ki te konnen lwanj Clinton te fè pou Quigley te ann amoni ak pwòp ajanda mondyalis li, ansanm ak rejè li te fè prensip Abraram Lincoln te reprezante yo.

In the speech, Clinton said: “As a teenager, I heard John Kennedy’s summons to citizenship. And then, as a student at Georgetown, I heard that call clarified by a professor named Carroll Quigley, who said to us that America was the greatest nation in history because our people have always believed in two things: that tomorrow can be better than today and that every one of us has a personal moral responsibility to make it so.” Carroll Quigley’s idea on how to “make America great again”, was for the United States to surrender its national sovereignty to the United Nations. Clinton was a Democrat, globalist, representative of the dragon.

Nan diskou a, Clinton te di: “Lè m te adolesan, mwen te tande apèl John Kennedy te lanse pou sitwayènte. Epi apre sa, antanke etidyan nan Georgetown, mwen te tande yon pwofesè yo te rele Carroll Quigley bay apèl sa a plis klète, li te di nou Amerik se te pi gran nasyon nan listwa, paske pèp nou an te toujou kwè nan de bagay: demen ka pi bon pase jodi a, epi chak grenn nan nou gen yon responsablite moral pèsonèl pou fè sa rive.” Lide Carroll Quigley sou fason pou “rann Amerik gran ankò”, se te pou Etazini renonse ak souvrènte nasyonal li devan Nasyonzini. Clinton te yon Demokrat, yon globalis, yon reprezantan dragon an.

“Like father, like son”, George Bush the last, was a globalist, and just as was his father, a globalist who professed to be Republican. The apple does not fall far from the tree. The Bible raises the rhetorical question, “Can two walk together, except they be agreed?” One simply needs to track the many enterprises that Bush the last, accomplished together with Bill and Hillary Clinton to see who Bush the last agreed with.

“Menm papa, menm pitit gason”; dènye George Bush la te yon mondyalis, menm jan ak papa li, yon mondyalis ki te deklare tèt li Repibliken. Pòm nan pa tonbe lwen pyebwa a. Bib la poze kestyon retorik sa a: “Èske de moun ka mache ansanm, si yo pa dakò?” Se sèlman pou yon moun swiv anpil antrepriz dènye Bush la te akonpli ansanm ak Bill ak Hillary Clinton pou wè ak kiyès dènye Bush la te dakò.

Barack Hussein Obama made a statement about fundamentally transforming the United States during a campaign rally shortly before he was elected as President. On October 30, 2008, in Columbia, Missouri, Obama said: “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” The statement was part of Obama’s broader message of “hope and change”, which was a central theme of his 2008 presidential campaign, emphasizing his commitment to significant policy reforms and a different direction for the country. The direction he turned the country was into the dragon policies of globalism, anti-white, pro-abortion, anti-carbon fuels, anti-America pro-globalism, Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, the false history of Critical Race Theory, and on and on. Obama was not simply a community organizer; he was and still is a representative of the dragon power’s globalist agenda.

Barack Hussein Obama te fè yon deklarasyon konsènan yon transfòmasyon fondamantal Etazini pandan yon rasanbleman kanpay yon ti tan anvan yo te eli li kòm Prezidan. Nan dat 30 oktòb 2008, nan Columbia, Missouri, Obama te di: “Nou sèlman gen senk jou ankò anvan nou transfòme Etazini d Amerik la nan fondasyon li menm.” Deklarasyon sa a te fè pati mesaj pi laj Obama a sou “espwa ak chanjman”, ki te yon tèm santral nan kanpay prezidansyèl li an 2008, e ki te mete aksan sou angajman li pou gwo refòm politik ak pou yon direksyon diferan pou peyi a. Direksyon li te fè peyi a pran se te nan politik dragon mondyalis la: anti-blan, anfavè avòtman, kont konbistib kabòn, kont Amerik, anfavè mondyalis, Divèsite, Ekite, Enklizyon, fo istwa Teyori Kritik sou Ras la, epi lis la kontinye. Obama pa t senpleman yon òganizatè kominotè; li te, e li toujou ye, yon reprezantan ajanda mondyalis pouvwa dragon an.

Trump however, unlike a typical modern politician, kept more promises than all the other seven presidents in the period beginning in 1989, combined. He was committed to making America great again, and in so attempting, he stirred up the globalist powers that be, not only in the United States, but in the entire world.

Sepandan, Trump, kontrèman ak yon politisyen modèn tipik, te kenbe plis pwomès pase tout sèt lòt prezidan yo ansanm pandan peryòd ki te kòmanse an 1989. Li te angaje pou fè Amerik vin gran ankò, epi, pandan l t ap chèche fè sa, li te soulve kont li pouvwa globalis ki an plas yo, pa sèlman Ozetazini, men nan lemonn antye.

Joe Biden has no evidence whatsoever that he is anything other than another globalist.

Joe Biden pa gen okenn prèv ditou ki montre li se anyen lòt pase yon lòt globalis.

The beast of Catholicism waged a long-drawn-out war with the dragon powers, and the president that is reigning when the United States forms an image of the papacy, will, of prophetic necessity, be in a struggle with the dragon powers. None of the living presidents, other than Donald Trump, would wage war with the dragon powers, for the Democrats are openly globalist (dragons), and George Bush the last, was, as his father was (a professed Republican, that is actually a globalist dragon), for Jesus always illustrates the last with the first.

Bèt Katolik la te mennen yon lagè ki te dire lontan ak pouvwa dragon yo, epi prezidan k ap gouvènen lè Etazini va fòme yon imaj papiyote a, ap, pa nesesite pwofetik, nan yon lit ak pouvwa dragon yo. Okenn nan prezidan ki vivan yo, lòt pase Donald Trump, pa t ap fè lagè ak pouvwa dragon yo, paske Demokrat yo ouvètman globalis (dragon), epi George Bush, dènye a, te, menm jan papa l te ye a, (yon Repibliken deklare, ki an reyalite se yon dragon globalis), paske Jezi toujou ilistre dènye a avèk premye a.

We will continue this study in the next article.

Nou pral kontinye etid sa a nan atik k ap vini an.

“A great crisis awaits the people of God. A crisis awaits the world. The most momentous struggle of all the ages is just before us. Events which for more than forty years we have upon the authority of the prophetic word declared to be impending are now taking place before our eyes. Already the question of an amendment to the Constitution restricting liberty of conscience has been urged upon the legislators of the nation. The question of enforcing Sunday observance has become one of national interest and importance. We well know what the result of this movement will be. But are we ready for the issue? Have we faithfully discharged the duty which God has committed to us of giving the people warning of the danger before them?

“Yon gwo kriz ap tann pèp Bondye a. Yon kriz ap tann mond lan. Pi gwo konfli ki te janm genyen nan tout epòk yo toupre devan nou. Evènman ke, pandan plis pase karant ane, nou te deklare, sou otorite pawòl pwofetik la, t ap vini, kounye a ap dewoule devan je nou. Deja yo te soumèt devan lejislatè nasyon an kesyon yon amandman nan Konstitisyon an ki ta limite libète konsyans lan. Kesyon enpoze obsèvans dimanch lan vin tounen yon sijè ki gen enterè ak enpòtans nasyonal. Nou konnen byen ki sa rezilta mouvman sa a pral ye. Men, èske nou pare pou sa k ap vini an? Èske nou te akonpli avèk fidelite devwa Bondye te konfye nou an, sa vle di avèti pèp la sou danje ki devan yo a?”

“There are many, even of those engaged in this movement for Sunday enforcement, who are blinded to the results which will follow this action. They do not see that they are striking directly against religious liberty. There are many who have never understood the claims of the Bible Sabbath and the false foundation upon which the Sunday institution rests. Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.

“មានមនុស្សជាច្រើន សូម្បីតែក្នុងចំណោមអ្នកដែលកំពុងចូលរួមក្នុងចលនានេះ ដើម្បីអនុវត្តការរក្សាថ្ងៃអាទិត្យដោយច្បាប់ ក៏ត្រូវបានបិទភ្នែកមិនឲ្យឃើញលទ្ធផលដែលនឹងតាមមកពីសកម្មភាពនេះដែរ។ ពួកគេមិនឃើញថា ពួកគេកំពុងវាយប្រហារដោយផ្ទាល់ប្រឆាំងនឹងសេរីភាពខាងសាសនា។ មានមនុស្សជាច្រើនដែលមិនធ្លាប់យល់អំពីការទាមទាររបស់ថ្ងៃសប្ប័ទតាមព្រះគម្ពីរ និងអំពីមូលដ្ឋានមិនពិតដែលស្ថាប័នថ្ងៃអាទិត្យឈរលើវា។ ចលនាណាមួយដែលគាំទ្រច្បាប់សាសនា តាមពិតទៅ គឺជាសកម្មភាពនៃការយល់ព្រមចុះចាញ់ចំពោះសាសនាចក្ររ៉ូម ដែលអស់រយៈពេលជាច្រើនសតវត្សមកហើយ បានតស៊ូប្រឆាំងយ៉ាងខ្ជាប់ខ្ជួននឹងសេរីភាពនៃមនសិការ។ ការរក្សាថ្ងៃអាទិត្យ ជាស្ថាប័នដែលហៅថាគ្រីស្ទានមួយ នោះ មានដើមកំណើតពី ‘អាថ៌កំបាំងនៃអំពើទុច្ចរិត’; ហើយការបង្ខំឲ្យគោរពវា នឹងជាការទទួលស្គាល់ជាក់ស្តែងចំពោះគោលការណ៍ទាំងឡាយ ដែលជាគ្រឹះមុំដ៏សំខាន់បំផុតនៃសាសនានិយមរ៉ូម។ នៅពេលដែលជាតិរបស់យើងបោះបង់ចោលគោលការណ៍នៃរដ្ឋាភិបាលរបស់ខ្លួនដល់ថ្នាក់អនុម័តច្បាប់ថ្ងៃអាទិត្យ នោះព្រូតេស្តង់និយម ក្នុងសកម្មភាពនេះ នឹងចាប់ដៃជាមួយនឹងសាសនាចក្ររ៉ូម; វានឹងមិនមែនជាអ្វីផ្សេងទៀតឡើយ ក្រៅពីការផ្តល់ជីវិតដល់អំណាចផ្តាច់ការដ៏ឃោរឃៅ ដែលបានរង់ចាំដោយក្តីអន្ទះសារជាយូរមកហើយនូវឱកាសរបស់ខ្លួន ដើម្បីលោតត្រឡប់មកកាន់អំណាចផ្តាច់ការយ៉ាងសកម្មម្តងទៀត។”

“The National Reform movement, exercising the power of religious legislation, will, when fully developed, manifest the same intolerance and oppression that have prevailed in past ages. Human councils then assumed the prerogatives of Deity, crushing under their despotic power liberty of conscience; and imprisonment, exile, and death followed for those who opposed their dictates. If popery or its principles shall again be legislated into power, the fires of persecution will be rekindled against those who will not sacrifice conscience and the truth in deference to popular errors. This evil is on the point of realization.

“Mouvman Refòm Nasyonal la, pandan l ap egzèse pouvwa lejislasyon relijye a, lè li rive nan tout devlopman li, pral manifeste menm entolerans ak opresyon ki te domine nan syèk pase yo. Lè sa a, konsèy lèzòm yo te pran prerogatè Divinite a sou yo, yo te kraze anba pouvwa despotik yo libète konsyans; epi prizon, egzil, ak lanmò te swiv pou sila yo ki te opoze ak dekrè yo. Si papis la oswa prensip li yo ta ankò resevwa fòs lalwa, dife pèsekisyon yo pral re-limen kont sila yo ki pa vle sakrifye konsyans ak verite a pa deferans anvè erè popilè yo. Mal sa a prèske rive reyalize.”

“When God has given us light showing the dangers before us, how can we stand clear in His sight if we neglect to put forth every effort in our power to bring it before the people? Can we be content to leave them to meet this momentous issue unwarned?” Testimonies, volume 5, 711, 712.

“Lè Bondye ban nou limyè ki montre nou danje ki devan nou yo, ki jan nou ka parèt san koupab devan je Li si nou neglije fè tout efò ki nan pouvwa nou pou mete li devan pèp la? Èske nou ka rete satisfè lè nou kite yo rankontre gwo kestyon sa a san avètisman?” Testimonies, volume 5, 711, 712.