As we begin to consider the typification of the time of the end in 1989, by the prophetic history of verse ten, it is necessary to drop back into the history of the third generation of both horns of the earth beast. In 1913, the earth beast’s horn of Republicanism began its generation of compromise with the globalist banking system, and in 1919, the horn of true Protestantism began its generation of compromise with the theologians of apostate Protestantism and also the American Medical Association as it surrendered the accreditation of its educational system to the world. Both horns began a compromised relationship with the world that would change the direction of their respective messages from that point onward.
Pandan nou kòmanse konsidere tipifikasyon tan lafen an nan ane 1989, dapre istwa pwofetik vèsè diz la, li nesesè pou nou retounen nan istwa twazyèm jenerasyon toude kòn bèt tè a. An 1913, kòn Repiblikenis bèt tè a te kòmanse jenerasyon konpwomi pa li avèk sistèm bankè globalis la; epi an 1919, kòn vrè Pwotestantis la te kòmanse jenerasyon konpwomi pa li avèk teyolojyen Pwotestantis aposta yo, ansanm ak Asosyasyon Medikal Ameriken an, lè li te remèt akreditasyon sistèm edikasyon li a bay lemonn. Toude kòn yo te kòmanse yon relasyon konpwomèt avèk lemonn ki t ap chanje direksyon mesaj respektif yo depi lè sa a pou pi devan.
In that history the starting point for the king of the north, and the king of the south of the last days also reached a turning point. The Miracle of Fatima occurred on October 13, 1917, in Fatima, Portugal. It was the culmination of a series of Marian apparitions witnessed by three young shepherd children: Lucia dos Santos and her cousins Francisco and Jacinta Marto. According to the accounts provided by the children, the Virgin Mary, identified as Our Lady of Fatima, appeared to them on the 13th day of each month from May to October 1917.
Nan listwa sa a, pwen depa pou wa nò a, epi wa sid la nan dènye jou yo tou, te rive nan yon pwen tounen. Mirak Fatima a te fèt 13 oktòb 1917, nan Fatima, Pòtigal. Li te akonplisman yon seri aparisyon marial twa jèn timoun bèje te temwen: Lucia dos Santos ak kouzen li yo, Francisco ak Jacinta Marto. Dapre temwayaj timoun yo te bay, Vyèj Mari a, ki te idantifye kòm Dam Fatima nou an, te parèt devan yo sou 13yèm jou chak mwa soti me rive oktòb 1917.
During the final apparition on October 13, 1917, tens of thousands of people gathered at the Cova da Iria, near Fatima, expecting to witness a miracle as predicted by the children. According to the witnesses, the sun appeared to change colors, spin, and dance in the sky. This event came to be known as the Miracle of the Sun or the Miracle of Fatima.
Pandan dènye aparisyon an, nan dat 13 oktòb 1917, plizyè dizèn milye moun te rasanble nan Cova da Iria, toupre Fatima, avèk espwa pou yo temwen yon mirak, jan timoun yo te predi sa. Dapre temwen yo, solèy la te sanble chanje koulè, vire sou tèt li, epi danse nan syèl la. Evènman sa a vin rele Mirak Solèy la oswa Mirak Fatima a.
The Miracle of Fatima is a significant event in Catholic history and devotion, and it has been the subject of much study, debate, and religious interpretation over the years. The events at Fatima have had a lasting impact on popular piety, Marian devotion, and the interpretation of apocalyptic themes within the Catholic Church.
Mirak Fatima a se yon evènman enpòtan nan istwa ak devosyon Katolik, e pandan ane yo li te fè sijè a anpil etid, deba, ak entèpretasyon relijye. Evènman Fatima yo te gen yon enpak dirab sou pyete popilè, devosyon marial, ak entèpretasyon tèm apokaliptik yo anndan Legliz Katolik la.
The Bolshevik Revolution occurred in Russia on November 7, 1917, when Bolshevik forces, led by Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik Party, seized key government buildings and infrastructure in Petrograd (now Saint Petersburg). This event marked the culmination of the Russian Revolution of 1917, which had begun with the February Revolution earlier in the year that led to the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the establishment of a provisional government.
Revolisyon Bolchevik la te fèt nan Larisi nan dat 7 novanm 1917, lè fòs bolchevik yo, anba direksyon Vladimir Lenin ak Pati Bolchevik la, te pran kontwòl prensipal batiman gouvènman yo ak enfrastrikti yo nan Petrograd (kounye a Sen Pètèbou). Evènman sa a te make akonplisman Revolisyon Ris la nan ane 1917 la, ki te kòmanse ak Revolisyon Fevriye a pi bonè nan menm ane a, ki te mennen nan abdikasyon Tsar Nikolà II ak etablisman yon gouvènman pwovizwa.
During the Revolution, the Bolsheviks successfully overthrew the provisional government and established Soviet control over Russia. The Bolsheviks proclaimed the establishment of a socialist state and began implementing their revolutionary program, including the nationalization of industry, land redistribution, and the withdrawal of Russia from World War I. The October Revolution ultimately led to the creation of the Soviet Union and had profound and far-reaching consequences for Russia and the world, shaping the course of 20th-century history.
Pandan Revolisyon an, Bolchevik yo te rive ranvèse gouvènman pwovizwa a avèk siksè epi yo te tabli kontwòl Sovyetik sou Larisi. Bolchevik yo te pwoklame etablisman yon eta sosyalis epi yo te kòmanse mete an aplikasyon pwogram revolisyonè yo a, ki te gen ladan nasyonalisasyon endistri yo, redistribisyon tè a, ak retrè Larisi nan Premye Gè Mondyal la. Alafen, Revolisyon Oktòb la te mennen nan kreyasyon Inyon Sovyetik la epi li te gen konsekans pwofon ak byen lwen pou Larisi ak pou lemonn, pandan li te fòme kou listwa ventyèm syèk la.
Jesus illustrates the end with the beginning, and in order to fully see the king of the north and the king of the south of the last days, it is necessary to understand their beginnings. The literal kings of the south and the north that are identified in Daniel chapter eleven are defined as the power that rules the literal area of Egypt as the king of the south, and the power that rules the literal geographical area associated with Babylon as the king of the north.
Jezi ilistre la fen an avèk kòmansman an, e pou nou wè nèt ale wa sid la ak wa nò a nan dènye jou yo, li nesesè pou nou konprann kòmansman yo. Wa sid la ak wa nò a literal yo, ki idantifye nan Danyèl chapit onz la, defini kòm pouvwa ki gouvène zòn literal peyi Lejip la kòm wa sid la, ak pouvwa ki gouvène zòn jewografik literal ki asosye avèk Babilòn kòm wa nò a.
Literal prophecy transitioned to spiritual prophecy in the time of the cross, when ancient literal Israel was transitioning to modern spiritual Israel. Literal pagan Rome trampled down literal Jerusalem for three and a half literal years from 67 AD unto 70 AD, and spiritual papal Rome trampled down spiritual Jerusalem for three and a half spiritual years.
Pwofesi literal te fè tranzisyon pou l vin pwofesi espirityèl nan epòk kwa a, lè ansyen Izrayèl literal t ap fè tranzisyon pou l vin Izrayèl espirityèl modèn. Wòm payen literal te pilonnen Jerizalèm literal pandan twa ane edmi literal, depi 67 aprè Jezikri jouk 70 aprè Jezikri; epi Wòm papal espirityèl te pilonnen Jerizalèm espirityèl pandan twa ane edmi espirityèl.
Spiritual Babylon is identified in Revelation chapter seventeen, as the whore who commits fornication with the kings of the earth. Spiritual Egypt is identified in Revelation chapter eleven as atheistic France. The modern manifestations of the spiritual king of the north, that received its deadly wound at the time of the end in 1798 and then retaliated against the modern manifestation of the spiritual king of the south at the time of the end in 1989, are both represented in verse forty of Daniel eleven. Both powers have their origins in their last day manifestation in the 1917 to 1918 time frame, which is the same time frame as the generation of compromise for both horns of the earth beast. Those beginnings must be recognized to rightly apply the endings. The beginnings of the last day kings of the north and south both start at the French Revolution.
Babylòn espirityèl la idantifye nan Revelasyon chapit disèt la kòm gwo pwostitiye a ki fè fònikasyon ak wa latè yo. Ejip espirityèl la idantifye nan Revelasyon chapit onz la kòm Lafrans ate. Manifestasyon modèn wa espirityèl nò a, ki te resevwa blesi mòtèl li nan tan lafen an an 1798 epi apre sa li te retalye kont manifestasyon modèn wa espirityèl sid la nan tan lafen an an 1989, yo toude reprezante nan vèsè karant nan Danyèl onz. Toude pouvwa yo gen orijin yo nan manifestasyon dènye jou yo nan peryòd 1917 rive 1918 la, ki se menm peryòd la ak jenerasyon konpwomi a pou toude kòn bèt ki soti sou latè a. Kòmansman sa yo dwe rekonèt pou yo ka byen aplike finisman yo. Kòmansman wa dènye jou nò a ak wa dènye jou sid la toude kòmanse nan Revolisyon fransè a.
“In the sixteenth century the Reformation, presenting an open Bible to the people, had sought admission to all the countries of Europe. Some nations welcomed it with gladness, as a messenger of Heaven. In other lands the papacy succeeded to a great extent in preventing its entrance; and the light of Bible knowledge, with its elevating influences, was almost wholly excluded. In one country, though the light found entrance, it was not comprehended by the darkness. For centuries, truth and error struggled for the mastery. At last the evil triumphed, and the truth of Heaven was thrust out. ‘This is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light.’ John 3:19. The nation was left to reap the results of the course which she had chosen. The restraint of God’s Spirit was removed from a people that had despised the gift of His grace. Evil was permitted to come to maturity. And all the world saw the fruit of willful rejection of the light.
“Nan sèzyèm syèk la, Refòm nan, pandan li te prezante yon Bib ouvè bay pèp la, te chèche jwenn aksè nan tout peyi Ewòp yo. Gen kèk nasyon ki te akeyi li avèk kè kontan, tankou yon mesaje ki soti nan Syèl la. Nan lòt peyi yo, papote a te reyisi, nan yon gwo mezi, anpeche li antre; e limyè konesans Bib la, ansanm ak enfliyans li yo ki elve moun, te prèske nèt eskli. Nan yon peyi, byenke limyè a te jwenn antre, fènwa a pa t konprann li. Pandan plizyè syèk, verite ak erè te lite pou sipremasi a. Anfen, mal la te triyonfe, e verite Syèl la te pouse deyò. ‘Sa a se kondanasyon an: limyè a vini nan mond lan, e lèzòm te renmen fènwa pito pase limyè.’ Jan 3:19. Nasyon an te rete pou l rekòlte rezilta chemen li te chwazi a. Fren Lespri Bondye a te retire sou yon pèp ki te meprize kado gras Li a. Yo te pèmèt mal la rive nan matirite li. E tout lemonn te wè fwi rejè volontè limyè a.”
“The war against the Bible, carried forward for so many centuries in France, culminated in the scenes of the Revolution. That terrible outbreaking was but the legitimate result of Rome’s suppression of the Scriptures. It presented the most striking illustration which the world has ever witnessed of the working out of the papal policy—an illustration of the results to which for more than a thousand years the teaching of the Roman Church had been tending.
“Lagè kont Bib la, ki te kontinye pandan anpil syèk an Frans, te rive nan pwen final li nan sèn Revolisyon an. Eklatman terib sa a pa t anyen lòt pase rezilta lejitim sipresyon Ekriti yo pa Wòm. Li te prezante ilistrasyon ki pi frapan lemonn te janm temwen sou fason politik papal la mennen bagay yo rive fèt—yon ilistrasyon sou rezilta ansèyman Legliz Wòm nan t ap mennen depi plis pase mil ane.”
“The suppression of the Scriptures during the period of papal supremacy was foretold by the prophets; and the Revelator points also to the terrible results that were to accrue especially to France from the domination of the ‘man of sin.’” The Great Controversy, 265, 266.
“Repreyansyon Ekriti yo pandan peryòd sipremasi papal la te predi pa pwofèt yo; epi Revelatè a montre tou rezilta terib ki t ap vini, espesyalman sou Lafrans, akoz dominasyon ‘moun peche a.’” The Great Controversy, 265, 266.
The French Revolution was produced by the suppression of the Scriptures “during the period of papal supremacy.” The birth of atheism, which was to become the archenemy of the papacy, was brought about by the papacy itself. The French Revolution took place from 1789 to 1799, but the atheistic revolutionary spirit that began in France continued to spread across Europe and beyond. One-hundred eighteen years after the end of the revolution in France, the Russian Revolution began in Russia. The revolution of atheism that began in France, ended in Russia, and in 1917 Russia became the prophetic representative of the nation symbolized by the atheism of Egypt. The dragon power represented as the king of the south had migrated from France to Russia.
Revolisyon Franse a te pwodui pa sipresyon Ekriti yo “pandan peryòd sipremasi papal la.” Nesans ateyis la, ki t ap vin pi gwo lènmi papasi a, te fèt grasa papasi a menm. Revolisyon Franse a te dewoule soti 1789 rive 1799, men lespri revolisyonè ateis la ki te kòmanse an Frans te kontinye gaye atravè Ewòp ak pi lwen toujou. San dizwit ane apre fen revolisyon an an Frans, Revolisyon Ris la te kòmanse nan Larisi. Revolisyon ateyis la ki te kòmanse an Frans te fini nan Larisi, epi an 1917 Larisi te vin reprezantan pwofetik nasyon sa a ki te senbolize pa ateyis peyi Lejip la. Pouvwa dragon an, ki reprezante kòm wa sid la, te migre soti an Frans pou ale nan Larisi.
The revolution in France was represented politically and prophetically by Napoleon Bonaparte, and in that sense, Napoleon represents the first leader of a nation established in a revolution brought about by the atheism of Egypt. The narcissism of Napoleon is fitly repeated by the narcissism of Putin.
Revolisyon an Frans te reprezante, sou plan politik ak pwofetik, pa Napoléon Bonaparte, e nan sans sa a, Napoléon reprezante premye chèf yon nasyon ki te etabli nan yon revolisyon ateyis peyi Lejip te pwovoke. Nasisis Napoléon an repwodui avèk anpil presizyon nan nasisis Putin nan.
Napoleon was keenly aware of the power of imagery and propaganda, as is Putin, who was a former KGB officer. The KGB specializes in propaganda. Napoleon used portraiture as a means of projecting his authority, power, and image of leadership to the public. He commissioned portraits from some of the most celebrated artists of his time, including Jacques-Louis David, Antoine-Jean Gros, and Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, among others.
Napoléon te byen konsyan de pouvwa imajri ak pwopagann, menm jan ak Poutin, ki te yon ansyen ofisye KGB. KGB a espesyalize nan pwopagann. Napoléon te sèvi ak atizay pòtrè kòm yon mwayen pou pwojte otorite li, pouvwa li, ak imaj li kòm chèf devan piblik la. Li te bay kèk nan atis ki te pi selebre nan epòk li a lòd pou fè pòtrè li, pami yo Jacques-Louis David, Antoine-Jean Gros, ak Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, ansanm ak lòt ankò.
These portraits depicted Napoleon in various poses and settings, ranging from official state portraits to more informal scenes. They served not only as personal mementos for Napoleon himself but also as tools for spreading his image and influence both domestically and internationally. Putin has accomplished the identical work for himself, with a multitude of pictures of himself in settings that rival any of the modern influencers on the Internet.
Pòtrè sa yo te montre Napoléon nan divès pwèz ak nan divès anviwònman, depi nan pòtrè ofisyèl leta rive nan sèn ki pi enfòmèl. Yo te sèvi non sèlman kòm souvni pèsonèl pou Napoléon li menm, men tou kòm zouti pou gaye imaj li ak enfliyans li ni andedan peyi a ni aletranje. Putin reyalize menm travay la pou tèt pa li, ak yon foul foto kote li parèt nan anviwònman ki kapab fè konpetisyon ak nenpòt enfliyansè modèn sou Entènèt la.
At the beginning of the French Revolution the king, his family and staff were overthrown and executed. At the beginning of the Russian Revolution the Czar, his family and staff were overthrown and executed. The revolution that began in France culminated in Russia. The French Revolution is the subject of the prophecy of chapter eleven of Revelation, and therefore the French Revolution is subject to the rules of prophetic interpretation. Jesus always illustrates the end of a thing with the beginning of a thing, so the Russian Revolution is the end of the French Revolution.
Nan kòmansman Revolisyon franse a, yo te ranvèse wa a, fanmi li ak tout moun ki t ap sèvi bò kote l, epi yo te egzekite yo. Nan kòmansman Revolisyon ris la, yo te ranvèse Tsar la, fanmi li ak tout moun ki t ap sèvi bò kote l, epi yo te egzekite yo. Revolisyon ki te kòmanse an Frans lan te rive nan akonplisman li nan Larisi. Revolisyon franse a se sijè pwofesi ki nan chapit onz nan Revelasyon an, e se poutèt sa Revolisyon franse a soumèt anba règ entèpretasyon pwofetik yo. Jezi toujou sèvi ak kòmansman yon bagay pou ilistre fen bagay sa a; konsa, Revolisyon ris la se fen Revolisyon franse a.
Vladimir Putin represents the last leader of a nation established in a revolution brought about with the atheism of Egypt. The first leader of Russia was Vladimir Lenin. The name “Vladimir” is of Slavic origin and is composed of two elements: “vlad” and “mir.” “Vlad” is derived from the Slavic root “vladeti,” which means “to rule” or to wield power. “Mir” means “world”. The first Vladimir (Lenin) typifies the last Vladimir (Putin), who is also typified by the first leader of the revolution of atheism (Napoleon).
Vladimir Putin reprezante dènye dirijan yon nasyon ki te tabli nan yon revolisyon ki te fèt avèk ateyis peyi Lejip la. Premye dirijan Larisi te Vladimir Lenin. Non “Vladimir” lan soti nan orijin slav e li konpoze de de eleman: “vlad” ak “mir.” “Vlad” sòti nan rasin slav “vladeti,” ki vle di “gouvène” oswa egzèse pouvwa. “Mir” vle di “mond”. Premye Vladimir la (Lenin) se yon tip dènye Vladimir la (Putin), ki li menm tou se yon tip premye dirijan revolisyon ateyis la (Napoléon).
After Napoleon’s defeat in the War of the Sixth Coalition and the Treaty of Fontainebleau in April 1814, he abdicated the throne of France and was exiled to the Mediterranean island of Elba. He was granted sovereignty over the island and allowed to retain the title of Emperor, albeit in a much-reduced capacity. Napoleon spent around ten months on Elba, during which he made plans to return to power in France. Following his escape from Elba and his brief return to power in France during the Hundred Days, Napoleon was decisively defeated at the Battle of Waterloo in June 1815. After this defeat the Allied powers, particularly Great Britain, were determined to prevent Napoleon from causing any further trouble. Consequently, he was exiled again, this time to the remote island of Saint Helena in the South Atlantic. Napoleon spent the remainder of his life in exile on Saint Helena until his death in 1821.
Apre defèt Napoléon nan Lagè Sizyèm Kowalisyon an ak Trete Fontainebleau a nan mwa avril 1814, li te abdike twòn Lafrans e yo te depòte l sou zile Elba nan Lanmè Mediterane a. Yo te ba li souverennté sou zile a e yo te pèmèt li kenbe tit Anperè a, byenke nan yon kapasite ki te redwi anpil. Napoléon te pase anviwon dis mwa sou Elba, pandan tan sa a li te fè plan pou retounen sou pouvwa an Frans. Apre chape li soti Elba ak kout retou li sou pouvwa an Frans pandan San Jou yo, Napoléon te sibi yon defèt desizif nan Batay Waterloo a nan mwa jen 1815. Apre defèt sa a, pisans alye yo, sitou Grann Bretay, te detèmine pou anpeche Napoléon lakòz nenpòt lòt pwoblèm ankò. Se poutèt sa, yo te depòte l ankò, fwa sa a sou zile izole Sainte-Hélène nan Sid Atlantik la. Napoléon te pase rès lavi li ann egzil sou Sainte-Hélène jouk li mouri an 1821.
Putin is a representative of the old guard KGB. The KGB was the main security agency and intelligence agency of the Soviet Union from 1954 until its dissolution in 1991. It was responsible for internal security, counterintelligence, and intelligence gathering, both domestically and internationally. The KGB was known for its extensive network of spies, surveillance operations, and its role in maintaining the Communist regime’s control over the population. Vladimir Putin was a member of the KGB (Committee for State Security), the main security and intelligence agency of the Soviet Union.
Poutine se yon reprezantan ansyen gad KGB la. KGB la te prensipal ajans sekirite ak ajans ransèyman Inyon Sovyetik la depi 1954 jouk li te fonn an 1991. Li te responsab sekirite entèn, kont-ransèyman, ak ranmase enfòmasyon ransèyman, ni anndan peyi a ni aletranje. KGB la te konnen pou rezo espyon li ki te anpil, operasyon siveyans li yo, ak wòl li nan kenbe kontwòl rejim kominis la sou popilasyon an. Vladimir Poutine te yon manm KGB a (Komite pou Sekirite Leta), prensipal ajans sekirite ak ransèyman Inyon Sovyetik la.
Putin joined the KGB in 1975 after graduating from Leningrad State University. Putin worked for the KGB until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, after which he entered politics and eventually became the President of Russia in 2000. His background in the KGB has had a significant influence on his approach to governance and foreign policy. Napoleon’s first exile on the Island of Elba, represents the history of 1991 until the year 2000, when the philosophy of the KGB returned. When Putin is eventually defeated, as represented in verses thirteen to fifteen, that second defeat (the first being 1989), is typified by Waterloo and Napoleon’s second exile, where he died.
Putin te antre nan KGB an 1975 apre li te fin gradye nan Inivèsite Leta Leningrad. Putin te travay pou KGB a jouk lè Inyon Sovyetik la te tonbe an 1991; apre sa li te antre nan politik epi, finalman, li te vin Prezidan Larisi an 2000. Fòmasyon li nan KGB a te gen yon enfliyans enpòtan sou fason li te dirije gouvènman an ak sou politik etranjè li. Premye ekzil Napoléon sou zile Elba a reprezante istwa depi 1991 jouk rive ane 2000, lè filozofi KGB a te retounen. Lè Putin va finalman bat, jan sa reprezante nan vèsè trèz rive kenz yo, dezyèm defèt sa a (premye a se te an 1989) se Waterloo ak dezyèm ekzil Napoléon an ki sèvi kòm tipoloji li, kote li te mouri.
Napoleon delivered the deadly wound to the papacy in 1798 and 1799. In 1799 the French Revolution ended in France, but by 1917 it had reached Russia in the Bolshevik Revolution. In 1917 the miracle of Fatima took place in Portugal, and the three children who supposedly communicated with Mary and Joseph were given three secret messages. The three messages were secret in the sense they were only to be read by the pope, the king of the north. The messages directed the pope to call a special meeting with the leaders of the Catholic Church and hold a special ceremony in order to dedicate Russia, which had just become communist Russia the year before, to the virgin Mary.
Napoléon te bay pap la mòti ki te ka touyé’y an 1798 épi 1799. An 1799, Révolisyon fransé a té fini an Frans, mé jis an 1917 i té rivé Larisi adan Révolisyon bolchévik-la. An 1917, mirak Fatima-a té fèt an Pòtigal, épi twa timoun-lan ki, dapré sa yo di, té ka kominike épi Mari épi Jozèf, yo té resevwa twa mesaj sékrè. Twa mesaj-lasa té sékrè adan sans ki sé sèlman pap-la, wa nò-a, ki té ni dwa li yo. Mesaj-yo té ka bay pap-la lòd konvoké an reyinyon espesyal épi chèf Legliz katolik-la épi fè an sérémoni espesyal pou konsakré Larisi, ki té jis vini Larisi kominis lanné avan-an, bay Vyèj Mari.
The messages contained a warning that if the pope refused to follow through on the command to dedicate Russia to Mary, the world would suffer another world war (the first world war was to end the month after the miracle). The messages of Fatima became a structure for conservative Catholic prophetic interpretation. It identified a struggle within the Catholic church between conservative Catholicism, represented by pope John Paul II and the first Vatican council, and Liberal Catholicism represented by the current “woke-pope” and the second Vatican council.
Mesaj yo te genyen yon avètisman ki te di ke si pap la te refize egzekite kòmandman pou konsakre Larisi bay Mari, mond lan t ap soufri yon lòt lagè mondyal ankò (premye lagè mondyal la te dwe fini mwa apre mirak la). Mesaj Fatima yo te vin tounen yon kad pou entèpretasyon pwofetik katolik konsèvatè. Li te idantifye yon lit anndan Legliz Katolik la ant katolik konsèvatè, jan pap Jan Pòl II ak premye Konsèy Vatikan an te reprezante l, ak katolik liberal, jan “pap woke” aktyèl la ak dezyèm Konsèy Vatikan an te reprezante l.
In the messages of Fatima the “good pope”, was the “white pope”, and the “bad pope”, was the “black pope”. The good pope, Pope John Paul II, was the conservative pope who identified the Virgin of Fatima as his guiding idol, and the bad pope is the woke-pope, who also rejects any messages from the so-called virgin Mary. When you visit the shrine in Fatima, Portugal as you enter the premises the entrance is set between two giant statues of a black pope on one side and a white pope on the other side, thus representing the internal struggle identified in the Fatima prophecies.
Nan mesaj Fatima yo, “bon pap la” se te “pap blan an”, epi “move pap la” se te “pap nwa a”. Bon pap la, Pap Jan Pòl II, se te pap konsèvatè a ki te idantifye Vyèj Fatima a kòm zidòl k ap gide li; epi move pap la se pap woke la, ki rejte tou nenpòt mesaj ki soti nan sa yo rele vyèj Mari a. Lè ou vizite sanktyè a nan Fatima, Pòtigal, pandan w ap antre nan lokal la, antre a plase ant de gwo estati: yon pap nwa sou yon bò ak yon pap blan sou lòt bò a, konsa sa reprezante lit entèn yo idantifye nan pwofesi Fatima yo.
The other element of the three secret messages of Fatima was its emphasis on the warfare of Catholicism (the king of the north), and atheism (the king of the south). Without recognizing that the warfare of Catholicism and atheistic Russia is a subject of the satanic prophecy, which directs a large percentage of Catholicism, it is difficult, if not impossible to understand the support which the Catholic church provided to Nazi Germany during World War Two.
Lòt eleman nan twa mesaj sekrè Fatima yo se te anfaz li te mete sou lagè ant Katolikis (wa nò a) ak ateyis (wa sid la). San rekonèt ke lagè ant Katolikis ak Larisi ate a se yon sijè nan pwofesi satanik la, ki dirije yon gwo pousantaj nan Katolikis, li difisil, si se pa enposib, pou konprann sipò legliz Katolik la te bay Almay Nazi pandan Dezyèm Gè Mondyal la.
The Battle of Leningrad, which lasted from September 8, 1941 to January 27, 1944 during World War Two, was one of the longest and most brutal sieges in history. The Battle of Stalingrad, which occurred from August 23, 1942 to February 2, 1943, is often regarded as the bloodiest and most significant battle of World War Two. It resulted in immense casualties on both sides, with estimates of over 2 million total casualties, including deaths, wounded, and captured soldiers. The Battle of Stalingrad also marked a turning point in the war, as it resulted in a decisive Soviet victory over the German Army and led to the eventual defeat of Nazi Germany.
Batay Leningrad la, ki te dire depi 8 septanm 1941 rive 27 janvye 1944 pandan Dezyèm Gè Mondyal la, te youn nan syèj ki te pi long e ki te pi brital nan listwa. Batay Stalingrad la, ki te dewoule depi 23 dawout 1942 rive 2 fevriye 1943, souvan konsidere kòm batay ki te pi sanlan e ki te gen plis enpòtans nan Dezyèm Gè Mondyal la. Li te lakòz pèt imen ki te ekstrèmman gwo sou toude bò yo, avèk estimasyon ki depase 2 milyon viktim an total, sa ki gen ladan mò, blese, ak sòlda yo te pran kòm prizonye. Batay Stalingrad la te make tou yon pwen depa nan lagè a, paske li te debouche sou yon viktwa desizif Sovyetik yo sou Lame Alman an e li te mennen nan defèt final Almay Nazi a.
Without recognizing that Nazi Germany’s warfare against Russia, particularly in the two battles just cited, it is difficult to understand the role of Germany as the secret ally of the Catholic Church. Without the understanding of the premises of a spiritual war between Catholicism that was motivated by the satanic prophecy of Mary of Fatima, against the atheism of Russia, and thereafter the Communist Soviet Union, the logic for Catholicism secretly hiding and then transporting Nazi war criminals around the globe post-World War Two is missed. The Nazi’s were Catholicism’s proxy army in their struggle against Russia.
San rekonèt ke lagè Almay Nazi te mennen kont Larisi, patikilyèman nan de batay ki fèk site yo, li difisil pou konprann wòl Almay kòm alye sekrè Legliz Katolik la. San konpreyansyon sou prensip yon lagè espirityèl ant Katolikis la, ki te motive pa pwofesi satanik Mari de Fatima a, kont ateyis Larisi, epi apre sa kont Inyon Sovyetik kominis la, yo pa rive konprann lojik ki te dèyè fason Katolikis la te kache an sekrè, epi ansuit transpòte kriminèl lagè Nazi yo toupatou sou latè apre Dezyèm Gè Mondyal la. Nazi yo te lame pwokirasyon Katolikis la nan lit li kont Larisi.
It is in this prophetic logic that Putin, the head of atheistic Russia, is involved in a war in the Ukraine, whose leaders are openly known to be Nazi’s. The ground troops of Fatima’s war against atheism from World War Two and onward is fascism, and Nazism. Of course, even though this reality of the leaders of the Ukrainian government is well-documented, the modern manifestation of Hitler’s Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda (the mainstream media), has covered these facts as best they could.
Se nan lojik pwofetik sa a Putin, chèf Larisi ate a, angaje nan yon lagè nan Ikrèn, kote dirijan yo konnen piblikman kòm Nazi. Twoup sou tè lagè Fatima kont ateyis la, depi Dezyèm Gè Mondyal la e annapre, se fachis ak Nazism. Byen antandi, menm si reyalite sa a konsènan dirijan gouvènman ikrenyen an byen dokimante, manifestasyon modèn Ministè Reich Hitler la pou Limyè Piblik ak Pwopagann lan (medya dominan yo), kouvri reyalite sa yo jan yo te kapab pi byen.
The name “Ukraine” is derived from the Slavic word “ukraina,” which means “borderland” or “the edge.” The term historically referred to the border regions of the Kievan Rus’, the medieval state that preceded modern-day Ukraine, and is situated on the crossroads between Eastern Europe and Eurasia. Throughout history, it has served as a meeting point between various cultures, civilizations, and empires, including the Byzantine Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Russian Empire, and others. Its strategic location made it a frontier region that experienced significant cultural, political, and military interactions. During the medieval period, Ukraine was the border region of the Kievan Rus’, which was a powerful state that encompassed parts of modern-day Ukraine, Russia, and Belarus. As the Kievan Rus’ expanded and contracted over time, its borders often shifted, and Ukraine remained on the periphery of the state.
Non “Ikrèn” soti nan mo slavik “ukraina,” ki vle di “peyi fwontyè” oswa “rebò a.” Istorikman, tèm nan te sèvi pou deziyen rejyon fwontyè Kyevèn Ris la, eta medyeval ki te vini anvan Ikrèn modèn nan, e ki sitiye nan kwaze-chemen ant Ewòp de Lès ak Ewazi. Pandan tout listwa, li te sèvi kòm yon pwen rankont ant divès kilti, sivilizasyon, ak anpi, tankou Anpi Bizanten an, Anpi Otoman an, Anpi Ris la, ak lòt ankò. Pozisyon estratejik li te fè li tounen yon rejyon fwontyè ki te sibi entèraksyon enpòtan sou plan kiltirèl, politik, ak militè. Pandan peryòd medyeval la, Ikrèn te rejyon fwontyè Kyevèn Ris la, ki te yon eta pwisan ki te gen ladan l kèk pati nan Ikrèn, Larisi, ak Byelorisi jodi a. Pandan Kyevèn Ris la t ap elaji epi retresi avèk tan, fwontyè li yo te souvan chanje, e Ikrèn te rete sou periferik eta a.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989, as represented in verse ten, verses eleven and twelve identify a battle where the king of the south retaliates and prevails over the king of the north. That battle was fought at Raphia, which was the borderline of the domains of the king of the south and the king of the north.
Apre efondreman Inyon Sovyetik la an 1989, jan sa reprezante nan vèsè dis la, vèsè onz ak douz yo idantifye yon batay kote wa sid la vanje tèt li epi li ranpòte viktwa sou wa nò a. Batay sa a te fèt nan Rafya, ki te fwontyè ant teritwa wa sid la ak wa nò a.
The Battle of Raphia, which took place in 217 BC, comes from the name of the town near which the battle occurred. Raphia was a town located in the coastal region of ancient Palestine, near the border between the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt and the Seleucid Empire. At the time of the battle the border between the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, ruled by King Ptolemy IV Philopator, and the Seleucid Empire, ruled by King Antiochus III, was located in the vicinity of Raphia. The battle was fought near this border region as both sides sought to assert control over strategic territories in the Levant.
Batay Rafya a, ki te fèt an 217 anvan Jezikri, pran non li nan vil ki te toupre kote batay la te dewoule a. Rafya te yon vil ki te sitiye nan rejyon kotyè ansyen Palestin, toupre fwontyè ant Wayòm Ptolemeyen peyi Lejip la ak Anpi Seleusid la. Nan epòk batay la, fwontyè ant Wayòm Ptolemeyen peyi Lejip la, ki te anba dominasyon wa Ptoleme IV Filopatò, ak Anpi Seleusid la, ki te anba dominasyon wa Antiòkis III, te chita nan vwazinaj Rafya. Batay la te mennen toupre rejyon fwontyè sa a pandan toude pati yo t ap chèche tabli kontwòl sou teritwa estratejik nan Levan an.
The ancient town of Raphia, is located near the modern city of Rafah. Rafah is a city situated in the southern Gaza Strip, which is part of the Palestinian territories. After Ptolemy’s victory at Raphia in 217 BC, he initiated persecutions against the Jews in Jerusalem, and also in Egypt. The victory was short-lived and he met his Waterloo, so to speak, in the next three verses. In verse thirteen, the previously defeated king of the north returns and by verse fifteen he overwhelms the king of the south.
Ansyen vil Rafia a sitiye toupre vil modèn Rafah la. Rafah se yon vil ki sitiye nan sid Bann Gaza a, ki fè pati teritwa palestinyen yo. Apre viktwa Ptolemè te genyen nan Rafia an 217 anvan Jezi Kris, li te kòmanse pèsekisyon kont Jwif yo nan Jerizalèm, epi tou ann Ejip. Viktwa a pa t dire lontan, e li rankontre, si nou ka di sa konsa, pwòp Waterlo li nan twa vèsè ki vin apre yo. Nan vèsè trèz la, wa nò a, ki te deja sibi defèt, retounen; epi rive nan vèsè kenz la, li fin kraze wa sid la.
The victory of Putin in the Ukraine will be used by Putin, a former KGB officer who specialized in propaganda, to most likely expose the Nazi roots of the Ukrainian leadership, and also expose those in the Western World who supported the regime for economic greed, and no doubt also expose the hidden black-sites and bio-labs employed by the globalists, which have been funded by the taxpayers of the United States.
Viktwa Putin nan Ikrèn nan pral sèvi Putin, yon ansyen ofisye KGB ki te espesyalize nan pwopagann, pou, sa ki pi pwobab, devwale rasin nazi lidèchip ikrenyen an, epi tou devwale moun sa yo nan mond oksidantal la ki te soutni rejim nan poutèt avaris ekonomik, epi san dout tou devwale sit nwa kache yo ak laboratwa byolojik yo globalis yo te itilize, ki te finanse pa kontribyab Etazini yo.
Those revelations will destroy the current talking points of the world globalists, and also of the Democratic talking heads in the United States. That victory for Putin will provide the mandate for the eighth President, that is of the seven, to take his role as the prophetic despot that arrives into history just before verse sixteen; and verse sixteen is the soon coming Sunday law.
Revelasyon sa yo pral detwi pwen diskou aktyèl globalis mondyal yo, ansanm ak pawòl repete pòtpawòl Demokrat yo Ozetazini. Viktwa sa a pou Putin pral bay manda pou uityèm Prezidan an, ki se youn nan sèt yo, pou l pran wòl li kòm despòt pwofetik la ki antre nan listwa jis anvan vèsè sèz; epi vèsè sèz se lwa dimanch la ki pral vini talè a.
In verse thirteen, the king of the north regroups his army, and in verse fourteen, pagan Rome is introduced into history for the first time, though it is not yet the king of the north. It is there identified as the symbol which “establishes the vision”, and as the power who exalts himself and then falls. After the victory of Putin in the war in the Ukraine, the papacy will begin to lift itself up into world politics, just in advance of the Sunday law in verse sixteen.
Nan vèsè trèz la, wa nò a rekòmanse rasanble lame li; epi nan vèsè katòz la, Wòm payen antre nan listwa pou premye fwa, byenke li poko wa nò a. La a, yo idantifye l kòm senbòl ki “tabli vizyon an”, epi kòm pouvwa ki leve tèt li byen wo epi apre sa li tonbe. Apre viktwa Poutin nan lagè ann Ikrèn nan, papisite a pral kòmanse leve tèt li nan politik mondyal la, jis anvan lwa dimanch la nan vèsè sèz la.
The French Revolution, and its connection with the Russian Revolution; Napoleon and Putin; the miracle of Fatima, and its three secrets; the secret alliance between the Vatican and Hitler, the secret alliance between the Vatican and Reagan, are all prophetic “wheels” that intersect in the history of verses eleven through fifteen, which occur during the history of September 11, 2001 until the Sunday law in the United States. It was important to provide a brief summary of these prophetic “wheels” before we take up verse ten.
Revolisyon fransè a, ansanm ak koneksyon li avèk Revolisyon ris la; Napoléon ak Poutine; mirak Fatima a, ansanm ak twa sekrè li yo; alyans sekrè ant Vatikan an ak Hitler, alyans sekrè ant Vatikan an ak Reagan, se tout “wou” pwofetik ki kwaze youn ak lòt nan istwa vèsè onz rive kenz yo, ki dewoule pandan peryòd istorik ki soti 11 septanm 2001 rive jis nan lwa dimanch lan Ozetazini. Li te enpòtan pou bay yon kout rezime sou “wou” pwofetik sa yo anvan nou pran vèsè dis la.
The following article is taken from “NBC news,” which is as “Main Stream Media,” as it gets, and the “MSM” is the modern version of Hitler’s World War Two propaganda machine. The article is of course anti-Putin, anti-Russian, and pro-Ukraine, but that is not the point. As citizens of the heavenly kingdom, God’s people should not endorse either side of a satanic work, and all warfare is a satanic work.
Atik sa a ki vin apre a sòti nan “NBC News,” ki se youn nan pi gwo medya “Main Stream Media” yo, jan sa kapab ye, e “MSM” lan se vèsyon modèn machin pwopagann Hitler te itilize pandan Dezyèm Gè Mondyal la. Natirèlman, atik la kont Putin, kont Larisi, epi an favè Ikrèn, men se pa sa ki pwen an. Antanke sitwayen Wayòm selès la, pèp Bondye a pa dwe bay apwobasyon li a okenn nan de bò yo nan yon zèv satanik, e tout lagè se yon zèv satanik.
The purpose of this article is to allow those who are unfamiliar with the prophetic warfare between Catholicism (the king of the north) and atheism (the king of the south), and the fact that in the warfare of those two prophetic powers, Naziism has been employed as Catholicism’s proxy army (just as the United States was used in 1989). Students of prophecy need to have enough evidence to see that the background history of World War Two, and of the Cold War, are represented in the current war in Ukraine, as it fulfills verses eleven and twelve, of chapter eleven of Daniel.
Objektif atik sa a se pou pèmèt moun ki pa abitye ak lagè pwofetik ki genyen ant Katolisism (wa nò a) ak ateyis (wa sid la), ansanm ak lefèt ke nan lagè de pouvwa pwofetik sa yo, Naziyis te sèvi kòm lame pa pwokirasyon Katolisism nan (menm jan Etazini te sèvi an 1989). Etidyan pwofesi yo bezwen gen ase prèv pou yo wè ke istwa dèyè Dezyèm Gè Mondyal la, ak Lagè Fwad la, reprezante nan lagè k ap dewoule kounye a nan Ikrèn nan, pandan li ap akonpli vèsè onz ak douz yo, nan chapit onz Danyèl la.
“Historical events, showing the direct fulfillment of prophecy, were set before the people, and the prophecy was seen to be a figurative delineation of events leading down to the close of this earth’s history.” Selected Messages, book 2, 102.
« Yo te mete devan pèp la evènman istorik ki te montre akonplisman dirèk pwofesi a, epi yo te wè pwofesi a kòm yon deskripsyon senbolik evènman ki t ap mennen jouk rive nan fen istwa tè sa a. » Selected Messages, liv 2, 102.
NBC News Article: “Ukraine’s Nazi problem is real, even if Putin’s ‘denazification’ claim isn’t”
Atik NBC News la: “Pwoblèm Nazi Ikrèn nan reyèl, menm si deklarasyon Putin sou ‘denazifikasyon’ lan pa vre”
Of the many distortions manufactured by Russian President Vladimir Putin to justify Russia’s assault on Ukraine, perhaps the most bizarre is his claim that the action was taken to “denazify” the country and its leadership. In making his case for entering his neighbor’s territory with armored tanks and fighter jets, Putin has stated that the move was undertaken “to protect people” who have been “subjected to bullying and genocide,” and that Russia “will strive for the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine.”
Pami anpil defòmasyon Prezidan Larisi a, Vladimir Putin, fabrike pou jistifye atak Larisi a kont Ikrèn, petèt sa ki pi etranj la se deklarasyon li fè ki di aksyon an te pran pou “denazifye” peyi a ak dirijan li yo. Pou soutni agiman li pou antre sou teritwa vwazen li a ak tank blende ak avyon de gè, Putin deklare ke demach sa a te antreprann “pou pwoteje moun” ki te “sibi entimidasyon ak jenosid,” e ke Larisi “ap fè efò pou demilitarizasyon ak denazifikasyon Ikrèn.”
Putin’s destructive actions — among them the devastation of Jewish communities — make clear that he’s lying when he says his goal is to ensure anyone’s welfare.
Aksyon destriktif Putin yo — pami yo devastasyon kominote jwif yo — fè li klè li ap bay manti lè li di objektif li se asire byennèt nenpòt moun.
On its face, Putin’s smear is absurd, not least because Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is Jewish and has said that members of his family were killed during World War II. There is also no evidence of recent mass killings or ethnic purges taking place in Ukraine. Moreover, labeling enemies Nazis is a common political ploy in Russia, especially from a leader who favors disinformation campaigns and wants to stir up feelings of national vengeance against a WWII foe to justify conquest.
Sou devan li, kalomni Poutin nan se yon bagay absid, pa pi piti paske Prezidan Ikrèn nan, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, se Jwif e li te di ke manm fanmi pa li yo te mouri pandan Dezyèm Gè Mondyal la. Pa gen okenn prèv nonplis ki montre gen dènye asasina an mas oswa pirifikasyon etnik k ap fèt ann Ikrèn. Anplis de sa, mete etikèt Nazi sou lènmi yo se yon manèv politik ki komen nan Larisi, espesyalman nan men yon dirijan ki favorize kanpay dezenfòmasyon e ki vle brase santiman vanjans nasyonal kont yon advèsè Dezyèm Gè Mondyal la pou jistifye konkèt.
But even though Putin is engaging in propaganda, it’s also true that Ukraine has a genuine Nazi problem — both past and present. Putin’s destructive actions — among them the devastation of Jewish communities — make clear that he’s lying when he says his goal is to ensure anyone’s welfare. But important as it is to defend the yellow-and-blue flag against the Kremlin’s brutal aggression, it would be a dangerous oversight to deny Ukraine’s antisemitic history and collaboration with Hitler’s Nazis, as well as the latter-day embrace of neo-Nazi factions in some quarters.
Men, menm si Putin ap fè pwopagann, se vre tou ke Ikrèn gen yon pwoblèm Nazi reyèl — ni nan tan pase ni nan tan kounye a. Aksyon destriktif Putin yo — pami yo devastasyon kominote jwif yo — montre klèman ke l ap bay manti lè li di objektif li se asire byennèt nenpòt moun. Men, toutotan li enpòtan pou defann drapo jòn ak ble a kont agresyon brital Kremlin nan, se ta yon neglijans danjere pou nye istwa antisemitis Ikrèn nan ak kolaborasyon li ak Nazi Hitler yo, ansanm ak anbrasman, nan dènye tan sa yo, faksyon neo-Nazi nan kèk sektè.
Why are fleeing Ukrainians being talked about with such sympathy? They are white.
Poukisa yo pale ak yon konpasyon konsa sou Ikrenyen k ap kouri yo? Paske yo blan.
On the eve of World War II, Ukraine was home to one the largest Jewish communities in Europe, with estimates as high as 2.7 million, a remarkable number considering the territory’s long record of antisemitism and pogroms. By the end, more than half would perish. When German troops took control of Kyiv in 1941, they were welcomed by “Heil Hitler” banners. Soon after, nearly 34,000 Jews — along with Roma and other “undesirables” — were rounded up and marched to fields outside the city on the pretext of resettlement only to be massacred in what became known as the “Holocaust by bullets.”
Nan lavèy Dezyèm Gè Mondyal la, Ikrèn te lakay youn nan pi gwo kominote jwif ann Ewòp, avèk estimasyon ki rive jiska 2.7 milyon, yon chif remakab lè yo konsidere long istwa antisemitis ak pogrom sou teritwa sa a. Lè lagè a te fini, plis pase mwatye ladan yo t ap peri. Lè twoup alman yo te pran kontwòl Kyèv an 1941, yo te akeyi yo ak banyè ki te ekri “Heil Hitler”. Yon ti tan apre sa, prèske 34,000 jwif — ansanm ak Roma ak lòt moun yo te konsidere kòm “endesirab” — yo te rasanble epi fè yo mache ale nan chan ki te deyò vil la, anba pretèks y ap relokalize yo, sèlman pou yo masakre yo nan sa ki vin rele “Holocaust by bullets.”
The Babyn Yar ravine continued to fill up as a mass grave for two years. With as many as 100,000 murdered there, it became one of the largest single killing sites of the Holocaust outside of Auschwitz and other death camps. Researchers have noted the key role locals played in fulfilling Nazi kill orders at the site.
Ravin Babyn Yar la te kontinye plen kòm yon tonm mas pandan de ane. Avèk jiska 100,000 moun yo te asasinen la, li te vin youn nan pi gwo sit asasina izole Olokòs la andeyò Auschwitz ak lòt kan lanmò yo. Chèchè yo te remake wòl kle moun nan zòn nan te jwe nan egzekite lòd Nazi yo pou touye sou sit la.
Nowadays, Ukraine counts between 56,000 to 140,000 Jews, who enjoy freedoms and protections never imagined by their grandparents. That includes an updated law passed last month criminalizing antisemitic acts. Unfortunately, the law was intended to address a pronounced uptick in public displays of bigotry, including swastika-laden vandalism of synagogues and Jewish memorials, and eerie marches in Kyiv and other cities that celebrated the Waffen SS.
Jodi a, Ikrèn konte ant 56,000 ak 140,000 Jwif, ki jwi libète ak pwoteksyon granparan yo pa t janm menm imajine. Sa gen ladan l yon lwa ajou yo te adopte mwa pase a ki kriminalize zak antisemit. Malerezman, lwa sa a te fèt pou reponn a yon ogmantasyon klè nan manifestasyon piblik prejije rayisab, tankou zak vandalizasyon sinagòg ak memoryal jwif ki te chaje ak svastika, ansanm ak mach twoublan nan Kyèv ak lòt vil ki te selebre Waffen SS la.
In another ominous development, Ukraine has in recent years erected a glut of statues honoring Ukrainian nationalists whose legacies are tainted by their indisputable record as Nazi proxies. The Forward newspaper cataloged some of these deplorables, including Stepan Bandera, leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), whose followers acted as local militia members for the SS and German army. “Ukraine has several dozen monuments and scores of street names glorifying this Nazi collaborator, enough to require two separate Wikipedia pages,” the Forward wrote.
Nan yon lòt devlopman menasan, Ikrèn, pandan dènye ane yo, leve yon kantite twòp estati pou onore nasyonalis ikrenyen yo, ki eritaj yo sal pa dosye endiskitab yo kòm ajan Nazi yo. Jounal Forward la te fè yon envantè kèk nan moun deplorab sa yo, pami yo Stepan Bandera, lidè Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), ki disip li yo te aji kòm manm milis lokal pou SS la ak lame alman an. “Ikrèn gen plizyè dizèn moniman ak plizyè dizèn non lari ki bay glwa a kolaboratè Nazi sa a, ase pou mande de paj Wikipedia separe,” Forward la te ekri.
Another frequent honoree is Roman Shukhevych, revered as a Ukrainian freedom fighter but also the leader of a feared Nazi auxiliary police unit that the Forward notes was “responsible for butchering thousands of Jews and … Poles.” Statues have also been raised for Yaroslav Stetsko, a one-time chair of the OUN, who wrote “I insist on the extermination of the Jews in Ukraine.”
Yon lòt pèsonaj yo onore souvan se Roman Shukhevych, yo venere l kòm yon konbatan pou libète Ikrèn, men li te tou chèf yon inite polis oksilyè nazi moun te pè anpil, inite ke Forward fè remake li te “responsab pou masakre dè milye Jwif ak … Polonè.” Yo leve estati tou pou Yaroslav Stetsko, yon ansyen prezidan OUN lan, ki te ekri: “Mwen ensiste sou ekstèminasyon Jwif yo nan Ikrèn.”
Far-right groups have also gained political currency in the past decade, none more chilling than Svoboda (formerly the Social National Party of Ukraine), whose leader claimed the country was controlled by a “Muscovite-Jewish mafia” and whose deputy used an antisemitic slur to describe Ukrainian-born Jewish actor Mila Kunis. Svoboda has sent several members to Ukraine’s Parliament, including one who called the Holocaust a “bright period” in human history, according to Foreign Policy.
Gwoup ekstrèm dwat yo te pran valè politik tou pandan dis dènye ane yo, e pa gen youn ki pi fè frison pase Svoboda (ansyen Pati Sosyal Nasyonal Ikrèn nan), ki gen lidè li te deklare peyi a te anba kontwòl yon “mafiya mizkovit-jwif”, epi depite li te sèvi ak yon jouman antisemit pou dekri aktris jwif ki fèt an Ikrèn nan, Mila Kunis. Dapre Foreign Policy, Svoboda voye plizyè manm nan Palman Ikrèn nan, ladan yo youn ki te rele Olokòs la yon “peryòd briyan” nan listwa limanite.
Just as disturbing, neo-Nazis are part of some of Ukraine’s growing ranks of volunteer battalions. They are battle-hardened after waging some of the toughest street fighting against Moscow-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine following Putin’s Crimean invasion in 2014. One is the Azov Battalion, founded by an avowed white supremacist who claimed Ukraine’s national purpose was to rid the country of Jews and other inferior races. In 2018, the U.S. Congress stipulated that its aid to Ukraine couldn’t be used “to provide arms, training or other assistance to the Azov Battalion.” Even so, Azov is now an official member of the Ukraine National Guard.
Menm jan an ki twoublan, neo-Nazi yo fè pati kèk nan kantite batayon volontè k ap ogmante ann Ikrèn. Yo vin di nan lagè apre yo te mennen kèk nan pi di konba lari kont separatis ki te jwenn sipò Moskou nan lès Ikrèn apre envazyon Putin te fè nan Krime an 2014. Youn ladan yo se Batayon Azov la, yon sipremasis blan deklare te fonde l, li menm ki te pretann objektif nasyonal Ikrèn se te pou debarase peyi a de Jwif ak lòt ras li te konsidere kòm enferyè. An 2018, Kongrè Etazini an te presize èd li bay Ikrèn nan pa t kapab sèvi “pou bay Batayon Azov la zam, fòmasyon oswa lòt asistans.” Men malgre sa, Azov se kounye a yon manm ofisyèl Gad Nasyonal Ikrèn nan.
For sure, none of this disturbing context justifies the misery that has befallen Ukrainians over the past several weeks — and it’s unlikely that Putin was motivated by any of it when he launched his invasion. Indeed, thanks to Putin, Jews living in Odessa, Kharkiv and other eastern cities are under extreme duress. While many have taken refuge in local synagogues and Jewish centers, others have fled to foreign countries, including Israel, which has urged all Jews to leave Ukraine.
Sètènman, okenn nan kontèks twoublan sa a pa jistifye mizè ki tonbe sou Ikrenyen yo pandan plizyè dènye semèn ki sot pase yo — e li pa sanble ditou ke youn nan bagay sa yo te motive Poutine lè li te lanse envazyon li a. Anfèt, akoz Poutine, Jwif k ap viv nan Odesa, Kharkiv, ak lòt vil nan lès la ap sibi gwo detrès. Pandan anpil ladan yo pran refij nan sinagòg lokal yo ak nan sant jwif yo, lòt yo kouri al nan peyi etranje, pami yo Izrayèl, ki te ankouraje tout Jwif yo kite Ikrèn.
My own grandparents themselves had to flee western Ukraine to escape persecution, and it is tragic to see this cycle continue. If the country devolves into chaos and insurgency, Jews could once again be at risk from some of their fellow citizens. Not acknowledging this threat means that little is being done to guard against it.
Pwòp granparan pa m yo menm te oblije kouri kite lwès Ikrèn pou yo chape anba pèsekisyon, e sa se yon trajedi pou wè sik sa a kontinye. Si peyi a tonbe nan dezòd ak rebelyon ame, Jwif yo ta ka yon lòt fwa ankò an danje anba men kèk nan pwòp konpatriyòt pa yo. Lè yo pa rekonèt menas sa a, sa vle di yo prèske pa fè anyen pou pwoteje kont li.
But even if some elements of the country have been entangled with one of history’s most loathsome movements, standing with Ukraine is without doubt the honorable posture to take in this drama. Right now, every day that Putin ratchets up his assault against the Ukrainian people with scorched-earth zeal, it’s hard not to see who truly deserves the N-word.
Menm si kèk eleman nan peyi a te mele ak youn nan mouvman ki pi abominab nan listwa, kanpe bò kote Ikrèn se san okenn dout pozisyon onorab pou pran nan dram sa a. Kounye a, chak jou Putin ap ogmante atak li kont pèp ikrenyen an ak yon zèl tè-boule, li difisil pou pa wè kiyès ki vrèman merite mo ki kòmanse ak “N” nan.
Allen Ripp, March 5, 2022 – Source
Allen Ripp, 5 mas 2022 – Sous
We will continue this study in our next article.
N ap kontinye etid sa a nan pwochen atik nou an.
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” George Santayana.
“Moun ki pa kapab sonje pase a, yo kondane pou repete li.” George Santayana.
“All that God has in prophetic history specified to be fulfilled in the past has been, and all that is yet to come in its order will be. Daniel, God’s prophet, stands in his place. John stands in his place. In the Revelation the Lion of the tribe of Judah has opened to the students of prophecy the book of Daniel, and thus is Daniel standing in his place. He bears his testimony, that which the Lord revealed to him in vision of the great and solemn events which we must know as we stand on the very threshold of their fulfillment.
“Tout sa Bondye, nan listwa pwofetik, te presize pou akonpli nan tan pase a, sa te akonpli; epi tout sa ki poko rive, lè moman pa li vini nan lòd li, sa ap rive. Danyèl, pwofèt Bondye a, kanpe nan plas li. Jan kanpe nan plas li. Nan Revelasyon an, Lyon branch fanmi Jida a louvri pou etidyan pwofesi yo liv Danyèl la, e konsa Danyèl kanpe nan plas li. Li rann temwayaj li, sa Seyè a te revele l nan vizyon konsènan gwo evènman solanèl yo ke nou dwe konnen pandan nou kanpe sou menm papòt akonplisman yo.”
“In history and prophecy the Word of God portrays the long continued conflict between truth and error. That conflict is yet in progress. Those things which have been, will be repeated. Old controversies will be revived, and new theories will be continually arising. But God’s people, who in their belief and fulfillment of prophecy have acted a part in the proclamation of the first, second, and third angels’ messages, know where they stand. They have an experience that is more precious than fine gold. They are to stand firm as a rock, holding the beginning of their confidence steadfast unto the end.” Selected Messages, book 2, 109.
“Nan listwa ak nan pwofesi, Pawòl Bondye a montre konfli ki dire lontan ant verite ak erè. Konfli sa a poko fini; li toujou ap kontinye. Bagay ki te deja fèt yo pral repete. Ansyen konfli yo pral leve ankò, e nouvo teyori pral toujou ap parèt. Men pèp Bondye a, ki nan kwayans yo ak nan akonplisman pwofesi a te jwe yon wòl nan pwoklamasyon mesaj premye, dezyèm, ak twazyèm zanj yo, konnen byen ki kote yo kanpe. Yo genyen yon eksperyans ki pi presye pase lò rafine. Yo dwe rete fèm tankou yon wòch, kenbe kòmansman konfyans yo byen solid jouk nan fen an.” Selected Messages, book 2, 109.