“Ministers and people declared that the prophecies of Daniel and the Revelation were incomprehensible mysteries. But Christ directed his disciples to the words of the prophet Daniel concerning events to take place in their time, and said, ‘Whoso readeth, let him understand.’ Matthew 24:15. And the assertion that the Revelation is a mystery, not to be understood, is contradicted by the very title of the book: ‘The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to show unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass. . . . Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein; for the time is at hand.’ Revelation 1:1–3.

“Minis yo ak pèp la te deklare ke pwofesi Danyèl ak Revelasyon an se te mistè enkonpreyansib. Men, Kris te dirije disip li yo sou pawòl pwofèt Danyèl la konsènan evènman ki t ap rive nan tan pa yo, epi li te di: ‘Nenpòt moun ki li, se pou l konprann.’ Matye 24:15. Epi deklarasyon ki fè konnen Revelasyon an se yon mistè, yon liv yo pa dwe konprann, se menm tit liv la ki demanti l: ‘Revelasyon Jezikri a, ke Bondye te ba li, pou l montre sèvitè li yo bagay ki dwe rive talè konsa.... Benediksyon pou sila a ki li a, ak pou sila yo ki tande pawòl pwofesi sa a, epi ki kenbe bagay ki ekri ladan l yo; paske tan an pre.’ Revelasyon 1:1–3.”

“Says the prophet: ‘Blessed is he that readeth’—there are those who will not read; the blessing is not for them. ‘And they that hear’—there are some, also, who refuse to hear anything concerning the prophecies; the blessing is not for this class. ‘And keep those things which are written therein’—many refuse to heed the warnings and instructions contained in the Revelation. None of these can claim the blessing promised. All who ridicule the subjects of the prophecy, and mock at the symbols here solemnly given, all who refuse to reform their lives, and prepare for the coming of the Son of man, will be unblest.

“Men sa pwofèt la di: ‘Benediksyon pou moun ki li a’—genyen ki pa vle li; benediksyon an pa pou yo. ‘E pou moun ki tande yo’—genyen tou ki refize tande anyen konsènan pwofesi yo; benediksyon an pa pou gwoup sa a. ‘E ki kenbe bagay ki ekri ladan l yo’—anpil refize pran oserye avètisman ak enstriksyon ki nan Revelasyon an. Okenn nan yo pa ka reklame benediksyon ki te pwomèt la. Tout moun ki pase sijè pwofesi a nan rizib, epi ki meprize senbòl yo bay isit la avèk tout solanite, tout moun ki refize refòme lavi yo, epi prepare yo pou vini Pitit lòm nan, pap resevwa benediksyon.”

“In view of the testimony of Inspiration, how dare men teach that the Revelation is a mystery, beyond the reach of human understanding? It is a mystery revealed, a book opened. The study of the Revelation directs the mind to the prophecies of Daniel, and both present most important instruction, given of God to men, concerning events to take place at the close of this world’s history.” The Great Controversy, 340.

“Lè nou konsidere temwayaj Enspirasyon an, ki jan lèzòm ta ka oze anseye ke Revelasyon an se yon mistè, ki depase kapasite konpreyansyon imen? Se yon mistè ki revele, yon liv ki louvri. Etid Revelasyon an dirije lespri a sou pwofesi Danyèl yo, e toulède prezante enstriksyon ki gen pi gwo enpòtans, Bondye bay lèzòm, konsènan evènman ki gen pou rive nan fen istwa mond sa a.” The Great Controversy, 340.

The “study of the Revelation directs the mind to the prophecies of Daniel.” Some persons only see prophecy within the book of Daniel. But Daniel presents two lines of truth and the truth that represent his prophecies are the last six chapters of his book. The first six chapters present illustrated prophecy, that, by and large, are still unrecognized. Before we consider the first six chapters of Daniel, we will explain why there is actually only two prophecies represented in the last six chapters of Daniel. Sister White points out the two prophecies by referring to the two great rivers of Shinar. When we accept the symbolism she sets forth we find the key to see two, and only two prophecies in the last six chapters of Daniel.

“Etid Revelasyon an dirije lespri a sou pwofesi Danyèl yo.” Kèk moun wè pwofesi sèlman anndan liv Danyèl la. Men Danyèl prezante de liy verite, e verite ki reprezante pwofesi li yo se dènye sis chapit liv li a. Premye sis chapit yo prezante pwofesi ilistre, ki, an jeneral, toujou pa rekonèt. Anvan nou konsidere premye sis chapit Danyèl yo, nou pral eksplike poukisa, an reyalite, gen sèlman de pwofesi ki reprezante nan dènye sis chapit Danyèl yo. Sè White montre de pwofesi yo lè li fè referans ak de gwo rivyè Chinéya yo. Lè nou aksepte senbolis li prezante a, nou jwenn kle a pou nou wè de, e sèlman de pwofesi, nan dènye sis chapit Danyèl yo.

“The light that Daniel received from God was given especially for these last days. The visions he saw by the banks of the Ulai and the Hiddekel, the great rivers of Shinar, are now in process of fulfillment, and all the events foretold will soon come to pass.” Testimonies to Ministers, 112.

“Limyè Danyèl te resevwa nan men Bondye a te bay espesyalman pou dènye jou sa yo. Vizyon li te wè bò rivyè Ulayi a ak Hiddèkèl la, gwo rivyè Chinea yo, yo kounye a an pwosesis akonplisman, e tout evènman yo te predi yo pral rive byento.” Testimonies to Ministers, 112.

The vision of chapter eight was given by the Ulai river.

Vizyon chapit wit la te bay bò larivyè Oulai.

In the third year of the reign of king Belshazzar a vision appeared unto me, even unto me Daniel, after that which appeared unto me at the first. And I saw in a vision; and it came to pass, when I saw, that I was at Shushan in the palace, which is in the province of Elam; and I saw in a vision, and I was by the river of Ulai. Daniel 8:1, 2.

Nan twazyèm ane rèy wa Belchaza, yon vizyon parèt devan mwen, wi devan mwen menm Danyèl, apre sa ki te parèt devan mwen anvan an. Mwen te wè nan yon vizyon; epi, pandan m t ap gade, sa rive m te nan Chouchan, nan palè a, ki nan pwovens Elam; mwen te wè nan vizyon an, e mwen te bò larivyè Oulayi. Danyèl 8:1, 2.

When we took the paragraph from Testimonies to Ministers, where Sister White referenced “the Ulai and Hiddekel” and called them “the great rivers of Shinar” we were dissecting that paragraph from one of the most important commentaries on the study of the books of Daniel and Revelation in Sister White’s writings. In the passage she states, “There is need of a much closer study of the word of God; especially should Daniel and the Revelation have attention as never before in the history of our work.”

Lè nou te pran paragraf la nan *Temwayaj pou Sèvitè yo*, kote Sè White te fè referans ak “Ulai ak Hiddekel” epi li te rele yo “gran rivyè Chinea yo,” nou t ap analize paragraf sa a ki soti nan youn nan kòmantè ki pi enpòtan sou etid liv Danyèl ak Revelasyon nan ekriti Sè White yo. Nan pasaj la li deklare: “Gen bezwen pou yon etid pi sere toujou sou pawòl Bondye a; espesyalman, Danyèl ak Revelasyon ta dwe resevwa yon atansyon tankou pa janm anvan nan istwa travay nou an.”

If we closely study the first two verses we just cited from Daniel chapter eight they provide two internal witnesses to a fact that is often overlooked. Daniel says “in the third year of” Belshazzar “a vision appeared unto me.” Then he adds, “after that which appeared to me at the first.” This verse can be understood two ways, and either way produces the identical conclusion.

Si nous étudions attentivement les deux premiers versets que nous venons de citer du chapitre huit de Daniel, ils fournissent deux témoignages internes d’un fait souvent négligé. Daniel dit : « la troisième année du » règne de Belshatsar, « une vision m’apparut ». Puis il ajoute : « après celle qui m’était apparue au commencement ». Ce verset peut être compris de deux manières, et chacune conduit à la même conclusion.

The angel Gabriel was the one that brought prophetic light to Daniel, as he did with all the prophets, for he had replaced Satan as the heavenly light bearer. This means that every prophetic rule that is located in the Scriptures was guided by Gabriel. Whether Daniel understood it or not, in verse one of chapter eight, not only is he identifying an important prophetic observation, but he provides two witnesses of the important prophetic observation in the verse. What Daniel recorded in verse one, is that he had received a vision previous to the vision he received by the Ulai river. The vision by the Ulai river came in Belshazzar’s third year. The vision, before the vision by the Ulai river, came in the first year of Belshazzar.

Zanj Gabriyèl la se te sila a ki te pote limyè pwofetik bay Danyèl, menm jan li te fè sa avèk tout pwofèt yo, paske li te ranplase Satan kòm potè limyè selès la. Sa vle di ke chak règ pwofetik ki twouve nan Ekriti yo te dirije pa Gabriyèl. Kit Danyèl te konprann sa oswa non, nan vèsè premye chapit uit la, non sèlman li idantifye yon obsèvasyon pwofetik enpòtan, men li bay tou de temwen sou obsèvasyon pwofetik enpòtan sa a nan vèsè a. Sa Danyèl te ekri nan vèsè premye a, se ke li te resevwa yon vizyon anvan vizyon li te resevwa bò larivyè Oulayi a. Vizyon bò larivyè Oulayi a te vini nan twazyèm ane Belchaza. Vizyon ki te vini anvan vizyon bò larivyè Oulayi a te vini nan premye ane Belchaza.

In the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon Daniel had a dream and visions of his head upon his bed: then he wrote the dream, and told the sum of the matters. Daniel 7:1.

Nan premye ane Bèlchaza, wa Babilòn nan, Danyèl te fè yon rèv ak vizyon nan tèt li pandan li te kouche sou kabann li; apre sa, li ekri rèv la, epi li rakonte esans bagay sa yo. Danyèl 7:1.

In verse one of chapter eight, Daniel is identifying that he also had a vision in the first year of Belshazzar, because he says, “after that which appeared to me at the first.” Did the Ulai vision appear after the vision of Belshazzar’s first year, or did the vision appear after the first of the two parallel visions? Either answer is correct. The vision of the Ulai river is the same vision as the vision of chapter seven. Gabriel is employing the prophetic principle of “repeat and enlarge,” and simultaneously the rule that upon the testimony of two establishes a thing. Both visions address the kingdoms of Bible prophecy.

Nan premye vèsè chapit uit la, Danyèl ap fè konnen li menm tou li te resevwa yon vizyon nan premye ane Belchaza a, paske li di: “apre sa ki te parèt devan mwen an premye.” Èske vizyon Ulayi a te parèt apre vizyon premye ane Belchaza a, oswa èske vizyon an te parèt apre premye nan de vizyon paralèl yo? Nenpòt nan de repons yo kòrèk. Vizyon bò larivyè Ulayi a se menm vizyon ak vizyon chapit sèt la. Gabriyèl ap sèvi ak prensip pwofetik “repete epi elaji,” epi, an menm tan, règ ki di se sou temwayaj de moun yon bagay tabli. Toude vizyon yo pale sou wayòm pwofesi biblik yo.

The vision of chapter seven, portrays those kingdoms as beasts of prey, thus emphasizing and presenting them in the setting of their civil power. The vision of chapter eight, portrays those same kingdoms with symbols from God’s sanctuary service, though each of the symbols of the sanctuary service are purposely corrupted, in order to represent a counterfeit worship. Daniel eight, portrays the same kingdoms as the vision of chapter seven, but it places the kingdoms in their religious setting.

Vizyon chapit sèt la dekri wayòm sa yo kòm bèt sovaj k ap dechire, konsa li mete aksan sou yo epi li prezante yo nan kontèks pouvwa sivil yo. Vizyon chapit uit la dekri menm wayòm sa yo avèk senbòl ki soti nan sèvis tanp Bondye a, byenke chak nan senbòl sèvis tanp lan yo fè espre defòme, pou reprezante yon adorasyon kontrefè. Danyèl uit dekri menm wayòm yo ak vizyon chapit sèt la, men li mete wayòm yo nan kontèks relijye yo.

The Ulai vision of Daniel chapter eight repeats and enlarges the vision of chapter seven. Chapter seven identifies the civil aspect of the kingdoms of Bible prophecy, and chapter eight identifies the religious aspect of the kingdoms of Bible prophecy. When this is recognized, it can then be understood that chapters seven and eight are the same vision. Chapter nine is where Gabriel comes to give the explanation of the element of time in the vision of chapter eight. Therefore, the vision of the Ulai represents chapters seven, eight and nine of the book of Daniel. The river Hiddekel is then introduced in chapter ten.

Vizyon Oulaï a nan Danyèl chapit uit la repete epi elaji vizyon chapit sèt la. Chapit sèt la idantifye aspè sivil wayòm yo nan pwofesi biblik la, epi chapit uit la idantifye aspè relijye wayòm yo nan pwofesi biblik la. Lè sa a rekonèt, li vin posib pou konprann ke chapit sèt ak uit yo se menm vizyon an. Se nan chapit nèf Gabriel vini pou bay eksplikasyon sou eleman tan an nan vizyon chapit uit la. Se poutèt sa, vizyon Oulaï a reprezante chapit sèt, uit ak nèf nan liv Danyèl la. Apre sa, rivyè Iddèkèl la prezante nan chapit dis la.

In the third year of Cyrus king of Persia a thing was revealed unto Daniel, whose name was called Belteshazzar; and the thing was true, but the time appointed was long: and he understood the thing, and had understanding of the vision. In those days I Daniel was mourning three full weeks. I ate no pleasant bread, neither came flesh nor wine in my mouth, neither did I anoint myself at all, till three whole weeks were fulfilled. And in the four and twentieth day of the first month, as I was by the side of the great river, which is Hiddekel. Daniel 10:1–4.

Nan twazyèm ane Siriyis, wa Pès la, yon bagay te revele bay Danyèl, li menm yo te rele Beltchaza; e bagay la te verite, men tan ki te fikse a te long; epi li te konprann bagay la, e li te gen entèlijans sou vizyon an. Nan jou sa yo, mwen menm Danyèl, mwen te nan dèy pandan twa semèn antye. Mwen pa t manje pen ki te bon gou, ni vyann ni diven pa t antre nan bouch mwen, ni mwen pa t penyen tèt mwen ditou, jouk twa semèn antye yo te rive bout. E sou vennkatriyèm jou premye mwa a, pandan mwen te bò gwo rivyè a, ki se Idèkèl. Danyèl 10:1–4.

The vision of the Hiddekel river introduces the prophetic history of the king of the north. It begins with the breakup of Alexander the Great’s kingdom, identifies the ebb and flow of the following history where ultimately the only two antagonists left from the disintegration of Alexander the Great’s former kingdom is a literal southern king versus a literal northern king. Ultimately it arrives at the history of the papacy, who then becomes the spiritual king of the north, who at the end of chapter eleven, comes to his end, Michael stands up and human probation closes. The simple overview is that the Ulai river vision is the internal vision of God’s sanctuary and host, and the Hiddekel river is the external vision of the enemy of God and His people during the same history. It is employing the same principle that is found in Revelation’s seven churches and seven seals.

Vizyon larivyè Lefrat Hiddekel la prezante istwa pwofetik wa nò a. Li kòmanse ak dezagregasyon wayòm Aleksann Legran an, li idantifye montay ak desant istwa ki vin apre a kote, alafen, sèl de advèsè ki rete apre dezintegrasyon ansyen wayòm Aleksann Legran an se yon wa sid literal kont yon wa nò literal. Finalman, li rive nan istwa papote a, ki lè sa a vin wa nò espirityèl la, ki, nan fen chapit onz la, rive nan fen li; Mikayèl leve kanpe epi tan pwobasyon limanite a fèmen. Rezime senp la se ke vizyon larivyè Lefrat Ulai a se vizyon entèn tanp Bondye a ak lame li a, epi larivyè Lefrat Hiddekel la se vizyon ekstèn ènmi Bondye a ak pèp Li a pandan menm istwa a. Sa ap itilize menm prensip ki parèt nan sèt legliz ak sèt sele nan Revelasyon an.

“Many ministers make no effort to explain Revelation. They call it an unprofitable book to study. They regard it as a sealed book, because it contains the record of figures and symbols. But the very name that has been given it, ‘Revelation,’ is a denial of this supposition. Revelation is a sealed book, but it is also an opened book. It records marvelous events that are to take place in the last days of this earth’s history. The teachings of this book are definite, not mystical and unintelligible. In it the same line of prophecy is taken up as in Daniel. Some prophecies God has repeated, thus showing that importance must be given to them. The Lord does not repeat things that are of no great consequence.” Manuscript Releases, volume 8, 413.

“Anpil minis pa fè okenn efò pou esplike Revelasyon. Yo rele li yon liv ki pa itil pou etidye. Yo konsidere li kòm yon liv sele, paske li gen anrejistreman figi ak senbòl. Men, menm non yo ba li a, ‘Revelasyon,’ se yon demanti sipozisyon sa a. Revelasyon se yon liv sele, men li se tou yon liv ouvri. Li rapòte evènman mèvèy ki gen pou fèt nan dènye jou istwa tè sa a. Ansèyman liv sa a klè e detèmine, yo pa mistik ni enkonpreyansib. Nan li, se menm liy pwofesi a yo reprann tankou nan Danyèl. Gen kèk pwofesi Bondye repete, konsa Li montre yo dwe bay yo enpòtans. Seyè a pa repete bagay ki pa gen gwo konsekans.” Manuscript Releases, volume 8, 413.

The same internal and external history that is represented in the book of Daniel is taken up in the book of Revelation. Aside from the prophetic light that is produced from these two visions, there is also a confirmation of the methodology of biblical interpretation that was adopted by William Miller, and thereafter by Future for America. Correctly considered, the book of Daniel, as well as the book of Revelation, are absolute gold mines for confirmation of the principles of prophetic interpretation that the Bible identifies within itself.

Menm istwa entèn ak ekstèn yo ki reprezante nan liv Danyèl la, yo reprann yo nan liv Revelasyon an. Apa limyè pwofetik ki sòti nan de vizyon sa yo, genyen tou yon konfimasyon metòd entèpretasyon biblik William Miller te adopte a, epi apre sa, Future for America te adopte li tou. Lè yo konsidere sa kòrèkteman, liv Danyèl la, menm jan ak liv Revelasyon an, se vrè min lò absoli pou konfime prensip entèpretasyon pwofetik Bib la idantifye anndan tèt pa li.

The Ulai being the internal theme and the Hiddekel being the external, also represent the two prophecies that were to be unsealed at the “time of the end.” The Ulai was unsealed at the “time of the end” in 1798, and the Hiddekel was unsealed at the “time of the end” in 1989, when, as described in Daniel eleven, verse forty, the countries representing the former Soviet Union were swept away by the papacy and the United States.

Ulai a, kòm tèm entèn lan, ak Hiddekel la, kòm tèm ekstèn lan, reprezante tou de pwofesi ki te dwe sele louvri nan “tan lafen an.” Ulai a te sele louvri nan “tan lafen an” an 1798, epi Hiddekel la te sele louvri nan “tan lafen an” an 1989, lè, jan sa dekri nan Danyèl onz, vèsè karant, peyi ki t ap reprezante ansyen Inyon Sovyetik la te disparèt anba aksyon papote a ak Etazini yo.

When these facts are recognized, it can then also be recognized that the two visions are actually one vision, the same as the prophetic history of the seven churches and the seven seals represent the same prophetic history. The two visions then become the avenue that the Lord used in the past movement of the first angel, and what the Lord will use in the current and future movement of the third angel, to produce a testing process as set forth in Daniel chapter twelve, verses nine and ten.

Lè yo rekonèt reyalite sa yo, lè sa a yo ka rekonèt tou ke de vizyon yo se an reyalite yon sèl vizyon, menm jan ak istwa pwofetik sèt legliz yo ak sèt sele yo ki reprezante menm istwa pwofetik la. Konsa, de vizyon yo vin tounen mwayen Senyè a te itilize nan mouvman pase premye zanj lan, epi sa Senyè a pral itilize nan mouvman aktyèl ak nan lavni twazyèm zanj lan, pou pwodui yon pwosesis eprèv jan sa tabli nan Danyèl chapit douz, vèsè nèf ak dis.

And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand. Daniel 12:9, 10.

Epi li di: Ale fè wout ou, Danyèl; paske pawòl yo fèmen e sele jouk tan lafen an. Anpil pral pirifye, yo pral vin blan, epi yo pral pase anba eprèv; men mechan yo pral aji avèk mechanste; e okenn nan mechan yo p ap konprann; men saj yo va konprann. Danyèl 12:9, 10.

As an example of the unsealing of the Hiddekel in 1989, consider what inspiration has said.

Kòm yon egzanp sou ouvèti Hiddekel la an 1989, konsidere sa enspirasyon an te di.

“In the Revelation all the books of the Bible meet and end. Here is the complement of the book of Daniel. One is a prophecy; the other a revelation. The book that was sealed is not the Revelation, but that portion of the prophecy of Daniel relating to the last days. The angel commanded, ‘But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end.’ Daniel 12:4.” Acts of the Apostles, 585.

“Nan Revelasyon an, tout liv Bib la rankontre ansanm epi yo fini. Men konpleman liv Danyèl la. Youn se yon pwofesi; lòt la se yon revelasyon. Liv ki te sele a se pa Revelasyon an, men pati sa a nan pwofesi Danyèl la ki gen rapò ak dènye jou yo. Zanj lan te bay lòd la: ‘Men ou menm, O Danyèl, fèmen pawòl yo, epi sele liv la, jouk nan tan lafen an.’ Danyèl 12:4.” Acts of the Apostles, 585.

Both the Ulai and Hiddekel relate to the last days, but Adventism has only been willing to acknowledge that 1798 was Daniel’s “time of the end,” when his book was to be unsealed. Yet the portion of the prophecy “relating to the last days” is more accurately the last six verses of Daniel chapter eleven, for those verses conclude with Michael standing up when human probation closes.

Tou de Ulai a ak Hiddekel gen rapò ak dènye jou yo, men Advantis la sèlman te dispoze rekonèt ke 1798 te “tan lafen” Danyèl la, lè liv li a te dwe ouvri. Men, pati nan pwofesi a “ki gen rapò ak dènye jou yo” pi egzakteman se sis dènye vèsè nan Danyèl chapit onz la, paske vèsè sa yo fini ak Mikal ki leve kanpe lè tan gras limanite a fèmen.

The vision of the judgment, as identified in Daniel chapters seven, eight and nine, was sealed up until the “time of the end” in 1798. The light (which the Ulai vision that was unsealed produced) was the announcement of the opening of the investigative judgment, not the close of judgment. The light that was unsealed with the Hiddekel vision, identifies the close of the investigative judgment, and it is also the passage in Daniel that contains “the portion of the prophecy relating to the last days.”

Vizyon jijman an, jan yo idantifye l nan Daniel chapit sèt, uit ak nèf, te sele jouk nan “tan lafen an” an 1798. Limyè a (ke vizyon Ulai a, ki te dezsele, te pwodui) se te anons ouvèti jijman ankèt la, pa fèmti jijman an. Limyè ki te dezsele avèk vizyon Hiddekel la idantifye fèmti jijman ankèt la, epi se li menm tou pasaj nan Daniel ki gen ladan l “pòsyon pwofesi a ki gen rapò ak dènye jou yo.”

The unsealing in 1798 announced the opening of the investigative judgment. The unsealing in 1989 announced the near-approaching close of the investigative judgment. The signature of Alpha and Omega is easily seen in the book of Daniel, but only if you know what it is, and are willing to look for it.

Deboucheman an 1798 te anonse ouvèti jijman ankèt la. Deboucheman an 1989 te anonse fen jijman ankèt la ki t ap pwoche trè pre. Siyati Alfa ak Omega a fasil pou wè nan liv Danyèl la, men sèlman si ou konnen sa li ye, epi ou dispoze chèche li.

When probation closes in Daniel chapter eleven, verse forty-five, the signature of Alpha and Omega is recorded. The beginning of Daniel illustrates exactly where it ends. It begins with a literal war between literal Babylon and literal Israel, and literal Babylon is victorious.

Lè tan gras la fini nan Danyèl chapit onz, vèsè karannsenk, siyati Alfa ak Omega a anrejistre. Kòmansman liv Danyèl la montre egzakteman kote li fini. Li kòmanse avèk yon lagè literal ant Babilòn literal ak Izrayèl literal, epi Babilòn literal genyen viktwa a.

In the third year of the reign of Jehoiakim king of Judah came Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon unto Jerusalem, and besieged it. And the Lord gave Jehoiakim king of Judah into his hand, with part of the vessels of the house of God: which he carried into the land of Shinar to the house of his god; and he brought the vessels into the treasure house of his god. Daniel 1:1, 2.

Nan twazyèm ane rèy Jojakim, wa Jida a, Nebikadneza, wa Babilòn nan, vini Jerizalèm e li sènen l. Epi Seyè a lage Jojakim, wa Jida a, nan men li, ansanm ak yon pati nan veso kay Bondye a; li pote yo nan peyi Chinea, nan kay bondye pa li a; e li mete veso yo nan kay trezò bondye pa li a. Danyèl 1:1, 2.

In Daniel chapter eleven, verse forty-five a spiritual war between spiritual Babylon, symbolized as “the king of the north”, and spiritual Israel, represented by “the glorious holy mountain”, concludes, and spiritual Israel is victorious over spiritual Babylon.

Nan Danyèl chapit onz, vèsè karannsenk, yon lagè espirityèl ant Babilòn espirityèl, ki senbolize pa “wa nò a”, ak Izrayèl espirityèl, ki reprezante pa “mòn sen gloriye a”, rive nan bout li, epi Izrayèl espirityèl genyen viktwa sou Babilòn espirityèl.

And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him. And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. Daniel 11:45; 12:1.

Epi l ap plante tant palè li yo ant de lanmè yo sou mòn sen gloriye a; men l ap rive nan fen li, e p ap gen pèsonn pou ede l. E nan tan sa a, Mikaèl ap leve kanpe, gran prens lan ki kanpe pou pitit pèp ou a; e pral gen yon tan detrès, jan pa t janm genyen depi lè te gen yon nasyon jouk rive nan menm tan sa a; e nan tan sa a, pèp ou a va delivre, chak moun yo jwenn ki ekri nan liv la. Danyèl 11:45; 12:1.

The books of Daniel and Revelation are one book:

Liv Danyèl ak Revelasyon yo se yon sèl liv:

“The books of Daniel and the Revelation are one. One is a prophecy, the other a revelation; one a book sealed, the other a book opened. John heard the mysteries which the thunders uttered, but he was commanded not to write them.” The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, volume 7, 971.

“Liv Danyèl ak Liv Revelasyon an se youn. Youn se yon pwofesi, lòt la se yon revelasyon; youn se yon liv sele, lòt la se yon liv ouvè. Jan te tande mistè loraj yo te pwononse, men yo te kòmande l pou l pa ekri yo.” The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, volume 7, 971.

The two books, which are one book, are the masterpiece of the angel Gabriel’s prophetic instruction. I write this knowing full well that what Gabriel delivered to Daniel and John came from Jesus, who received it from the Father. My point is not to lift up Gabriel, but to lift up the profound revelation of the evidences in both books, of how the Alpha and Omega designed prophetic rules of biblical interpretation which were to be represented within the two books, if we are willing to see.

De liv sa yo, ki se yon sèl liv, se chèf-dèv enstriksyon pwofetik zanj Gabriyèl la. Mwen ekri sa a avèk tout konsyans mwen ke sa Gabriyèl te delivre bay Danyèl ak Jan te soti nan Jezi, ki te resevwa li nan men Papa a. Pwen mwen se pa pou m leve Gabriyèl anlè, men pou m leve revelasyon pwofon prèv ki nan toude liv yo, sou fason Alfa ak Omega a te tabli règ pwofetik pou entèpretasyon biblik ki te dwe reprezante anndan de liv sa yo, si nou dispoze wè.

Let me remind you that, at this point, my purpose and intent is not to present an interpretation of the two prophecies of the Ulai and Hiddekel rivers. My purpose and intent are to deal with the prophecies in the first six chapters of Daniel’s book. I am simply making a case for the fact that the books of Daniel and Revelation are, perhaps, the most profoundly constructed books in the Word of God. They present the prophetic message, while also identifying God’s character, while also identifying the very rules necessary to be employed if a person would know the prophecies, and also know the One who set forth the prophecies.

Kite m fè nou sonje ke, nan pwen sa a, objektif ak entansyon pa m se pa pou prezante yon entèpretasyon de de pwofesi rivyè Oulai ak Idèkèl yo. Objektif ak entansyon pa m se pou trete pwofesi ki nan sis premye chapit liv Danyèl la. Mwen senpleman ap tabli yon agiman pou lefèt ke liv Danyèl ak Revelasyon yo se, petèt, liv ki pi pwofondman konstwi nan Pawòl Bondye a. Yo prezante mesaj pwofetik la, pandan y ap idantifye karaktè Bondye tou, pandan y ap idantifye menm règ ki nesesè pou itilize si yon moun ta vle konnen pwofesi yo, epi tou konnen Sila a ki te pwoklame pwofesi yo.

Another example of the profound nature of the books is Daniel’s presentation of the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six. The prophecy of the “seven times” was and is to be the “stumbling stone” for God’s people, both in ancient Israel, in the Millerite movement of the first angel, and also in the current and future movement of the third angel. A “stumbling stone”, by simple definition, is something that you do not see, even though it is clearly there. Therefore, once you recognize the “seven times” in the book of Daniel, you see that it is clearly there, but you also see that it is hidden to those who choose not to see.

Yon lòt egzanp sou pwofondè liv yo se fason Danyèl prezante “sèt tan” yo nan Levitik vennsis. Pwofesi “sèt tan” yo te ye e li toujou gen pou l ye “wòch ofans” pou pèp Bondye a, ni nan Izrayèl ansyen an, ni nan mouvman milerit premye zanj lan, ni tou nan mouvman twazyèm zanj lan k ap dewoule kounye a ak sa ki gen pou vini an. Yon “wòch ofans”, dapre definisyon ki pi senp la, se yon bagay ou pa wè, menm lè li klèman la. Se poutèt sa, yon fwa ou rekonèt “sèt tan” yo nan liv Danyèl la, ou wè li klèman la; men ou wè tou li kache pou sila yo ki chwazi pa wè.

Hiding something while it is in the open grammatically is a profound accomplishment, it’s something that could not be embedded into any human mystery novel. It’s a masterpiece, for it is there, plain to see for any who wish not to stumble, but impossible to see for those who do choose to stumble. It is “hiding in plain sight”, so to speak. It is accomplished by a combination of humanity and Divinity.

Kache yon bagay pandan li rete parèt aklè nan gramè a se yon akonplisman pwofon; se yon bagay ki pa t ap ka entegre nan okenn woman mistè imen. Se yon chèf-dèv, paske li la, klè devan je tout moun ki pa vle bite, men li enposib pou moun ki chwazi bite yo wè li. Se sa yo rele, pou nou pale konsa, “kache an plen je”. Li reyalize pa yon konbinezon limanite ak Divinite.

I make that claim, for I wish to remind us at this point, that there is a Catholic teaching within Adventism, at least since the publication of Questions on Doctrine in 1957, and that has also raised its unrighteous head within this present truth movement of Future for America. The idea is that Christ, at the incarnation, did not take the flesh He inherited from Mary. Of course, those who uphold this teaching do not express it that way, but it is none-the-less what they teach. I call it a Catholic teaching, for the premise that Christ’s flesh was as pure as the flesh of Adam before he sinned, is the very satanic logic employed by the Catholic church with their teaching of the so-called “immaculate conception.” And if you are unfamiliar with the pagan teaching of the “immaculate conception,” it teaches that Christ’s flesh was supernaturally made as was Adam’s lower nature was, before he and Eve sinned or, as it is claimed, Christ had Adam’s pre-fallen, sinless nature. It teaches that Mary herself was miraculously given the fleshly unfallen nature of Adam before he sinned, so that she could be a perfect vessel for the Holy Spirit to incarnate the baby Jesus into her perfect flesh.

Mwen fè deklarasyon sa a, paske mwen swete fè nou sonje, nan pwen sa a, ke gen yon ansèyman katolik anndan Advantis la, omwen depi piblikasyon Questions on Doctrine an 1957, e ki leve tèt mechan pa li tou andedan mouvman verite prezan sa a, Future for America. Lide a se ke Kris, nan enkarnasyon an, pa t pran chè li te eritye nan men Mari. Natirèlman, moun ki soutni ansèyman sa a pa eksprime li konsa, men se sa yo anseye kanmenm. Mwen rele sa yon ansèyman katolik, paske premis ke chè Kris la te osi pir ke chè Adan an anvan li te peche, se menm lojik satanik Legliz katolik la itilize nan ansèyman yo sou sa yo rele “immaculate conception.” E si ou pa abitye ak ansèyman payen sou “immaculate conception” nan, li anseye ke chè Kris la te fèt pa yon aksyon sipènatirèl, menm jan nati enferyè Adan an te ye anvan li menm ak Èv te peche; oswa, jan yo pretann li, Kris te gen nati Adan an anvan tonbe a, yon nati san peche. Li anseye ke Mari menm te resevwa yon fason mirakulezman nati chè ki pa t tonbe Adan te genyen anvan li te peche, pou l te ka yon veso pafè pou Sentespri a enkane tibebe Jezi a nan chè pafè pa li.

Of course, those in Adventism that uphold the very same conclusion concerning the flesh of Jesus, do not point to any miracles with Mary, but they do wrest passages of Sister White and the Bible, to teach the very same Catholic concept. Why did I just digress and turn away from the discussion of the book of Daniel? I’ll answer that.

Natirèlman, moun nan Advantis ki soutni egzakteman menm konklizyon konsènan chè Jezi a, pa lonje dwèt sou okenn mirak ki gen rapò ak Mari, men yo tòde pasaj Sè White ak Bib la pou anseye menm konsèp Katolik sa a. Poukisa mwen fèk fè yon digresyon epi m vire do bay diskisyon sou liv Danyèl la? M ap reponn sa.

The miraculous structure and design of Daniel and the Revelation was accomplished by a combination of humanity and Divinity. Jesus is the Word of God, and the Bible is the Word of God. Jesus’ divine and human nature is fully represented in the Bible. The words therein are Divine and contain the creative power to transform hearts and minds. Those words are the very same power that brought all things into existence. But those men who God chose to be His instruments in recording the Bible, were all sinners. The human part of the equation is represented by fallen human beings. The Bible is a combination of human and Divine, and the prophets were sinners, as every child of Adam has been. Christ never sinned in thought, word or deed. But He did take the flesh of Mary after four thousand years of degeneration. If He actually did take the lower fleshly nature of Adam before Adam had sinned, it would demand that every biblical author would have been sinless too.

Estrikti ak konsepsyon mirakilez Danyèl ak Revelasyon an te reyalize pa yon konbinezon limanite ak Divinite. Jezi se Pawòl Bondye a, e Bib la se Pawòl Bondye a. Nati diven ak nati imen Jezi yo reprezante nèt ale nan Bib la. Pawòl ki ladan l yo se pawòl diven, e yo genyen pouvwa kreyatif pou transfòme kè ak lespri. Pawòl sa yo se menm pouvwa ki te fè tout bagay vin egziste. Men, mesye Bondye te chwazi pou sèvi kòm enstriman Li nan ekri Bib la, yo tout te pechè. Pati imen nan ekwasyon an reprezante pa lèzòm tonbe yo. Bib la se yon konbinezon imen ak diven, e pwofèt yo te pechè, menm jan ak tout pitit Adan. Kris pa t janm peche ni nan panse, ni nan pawòl, ni nan aksyon. Men, Li te pran chè Mari a apre kat mil ane dejenere. Si an reyalite Li te pran nati chè pi ba Adan te genyen anvan Adan te peche, sa ta mande pou chak otè biblik te san peche tou.

The “hiding in plain sight” of the “seven times” in the book of Daniel was accomplished, not only by the words that Daniel recorded, but further by the fallen human beings that translated the King James Bible. Fallen human beings twice touched the book of Daniel, and what was accomplished would be impossible for any human being to do without God’s divine providential oversight.

“Cachette à la vue de tous” des “sept temps” dans le livre de Daniel s’est accomplie, non seulement par les paroles que Daniel a consignées, mais aussi par l’entremise des êtres humains déchus qui ont traduit la Bible du roi Jacques. Des êtres humains déchus ont touché deux fois au livre de Daniel, et ce qui a été accompli serait impossible à réaliser pour quelque être humain que ce soit sans la surveillance providentielle divine de Dieu.

In our next article we will begin to show how Divinity and humanity hid the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six in plain sight in the book of Daniel, for God foreknew, and even designed, that it should be the testing “stumbling stone” for both those in the movement of the first angel, and also for those in the movement of the third angel.

Nan pwochen atik nou an, nou pral kòmanse montre kijan Divinite ak limanite te kache “sèt tan” Levitik vennsis la devan je tout moun nan liv Danyèl la; paske Bondye te konnen davans, e menm te fè plan an konsa, pou sa tounen “wòch bite” pou tès la, ni pou moun ki te nan mouvman premye zanj lan, ni tou pou moun ki te nan mouvman twazyèm zanj lan.

“The light that Daniel received from God was given especially for these last days. The visions he saw by the banks of the Ulai and the Hiddekel, the great rivers of Shinar, are now in process of fulfillment, and all the events foretold will soon come to pass.” Testimonies to Ministers, 112.

“Limyè Danyèl te resevwa nan men Bondye a te bay espesyalman pou dènye jou sa yo. Vizyon li te wè bò rivyè Oulay la ak Iddèkèl la, gran rivyè Chinea yo, kounye a ap antre nan akonplisman yo, e tout evènman yo te anonse davans yo pral rive byento.” Testimonies to Ministers, 112.