Daniel chapter one, when overlaid with Daniel chapter four, represents the history of the first and second angels, from 1798 to 1844. In that history the book of Daniel was unsealed, and the portion that was unsealed was chapters seven, eight and nine. “Line upon line” chapters one, four and then seven through nine, illustrate the history of the Millerite movement of the first angel.
Lè yo mete Danyèl chapit premye a sou Danyèl chapit kat la, sa reprezante istwa premye ak dezyèm zanj yo, soti 1798 rive 1844. Nan istwa sa a, liv Danyèl la te louvri, epi pati ki te louvri a se te chapit sèt, uit ak nèf. “Liy sou liy,” chapit premye, kat, epi apre sa sèt rive nèf, montre istwa mouvman Millerit premye zanj lan.
In that history (1798 to 1844), the foundational truths of Adventism were established, and those truths were ultimately represented upon the 1843 pioneer chart. Nebuchadnezzar’s image of Daniel chapter two, is on the chart. The visions of Daniel seven and eight are on the chart. “The daily” of chapter eight is represented, as is the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six. The three Woes of Islam, as represented in Revelation chapter nine, are there. God forewarned repeatedly that those foundational truths would be attacked.
Nan istwa sa a (1798 rive 1844), verite fondamantal Advantis yo te tabli, epi verite sa yo te finalman reprezante sou tablo pyonye 1843 a. Estati Nebikadneza a nan Danyèl chapit de a sou tablo a. Vizyon Danyèl sèt ak uit yo sou tablo a. “Kontinyèl la” nan chapit uit la reprezante sou li, menm jan ak “sèt fwa yo” nan Levitik vennsis. Twa Malè Islam yo, jan yo reprezante nan Revelasyon chapit nèf la, la tou. Bondye te bay avètisman repete davans ke verite fondamantal sa yo t ap sibi atak.
“Let those who stand as God’s watchmen on the walls of Zion be men who can see the dangers before the people,—men who can distinguish between truth and error, righteousness and unrighteousness.
“Se pou sila yo ki kanpe kòm vijilan Bondye sou miray Siyon yo dwe moun ki kapab wè danje yo anvan pèp la,—moun ki kapab fè diferans ant verite ak erè, jistis ak enjistis.
“The warning has come: Nothing is to be allowed to come in that will disturb the foundation of the faith upon which we have been building ever since the message came in 1842, 1843, and 1844. I was in this message, and ever since I have been standing before the world, true to the light that God has given us. We do not propose to take our feet off the platform on which they were placed as day by day we sought the Lord with earnest prayer, seeking for light. Do you think that I could give up the light that God has given me? It is to be as the Rock of Ages. It has been guiding me ever since it was given.” Review and Herald, April 14, 1903.
“Avètisman an vini: Yo pa dwe pèmèt anyen antre ki ta deranje fondasyon lafwa a sou ki nou ap bati depi mesaj la te vini an 1842, 1843, ak 1844. Mwen te nan mesaj sa a, e depi lè sa a mwen kanpe devan mond lan, fidèl ak limyè Bondye ban nou an. Nou pa gen entansyon retire pye nou sou platfòm kote yo te mete yo pandan, jou apre jou, nou t ap chèche Senyè a ak lapriyè serye, ap chèche limyè. Èske nou panse mwen ta ka abandone limyè Bondye ban mwen an? Li dwe tankou Wòch tan yo. Li ap gide m depi lè li te ban mwen an.” Review and Herald, 14 avril 1903.
The work of the dirt brush man, that is to be accomplished with the participation of God’s last day people, is also represented by Isaiah, when he identifies the last day people and the work they are called to do, for the foundations were destined to be buried with error before the last days arrived.
Travay nonm bwòs pousyè a, ki dwe akonpli avèk patisipasyon pèp Bondye a nan dènye jou yo, reprezante tou pa Ezayi, lè li idantifye pèp dènye jou yo ak travay yo rele yo pou yo fè, paske fondasyon yo te destine pou yo antere anba erè anvan dènye jou yo te rive.
And they that shall be of thee shall build the old waste places: thou shalt raise up the foundations of many generations; and thou shalt be called, The repairer of the breach, The restorer of paths to dwell in. Isaiah 58:12.
Moun ki va soti nan ou yo va rebati ansyen kote ki te kraze yo; ou va leve fondasyon anpil jenerasyon; epi y ap rele ou, Moun ki repare brèch la, Moun ki retabli chemen pou moun rete ladan yo. Ezayi 58:12.
The “old waste places,” refers to the doctrinal truths associated with the two desolating powers of paganism and papalism. The two desolating powers of paganism being followed by papalism is what William Miller used for his framework of every prophecy he presented.
“Vye dezolasyon ansyen yo” yo refere ak verite doktrinal ki asosye ak de pouvwa k ap fè dezolasyon yo: paganism ak papism. Se lefèt ke de pouvwa k ap fè dezolasyon yo, paganism, vin swiv pa papism, ki te sèvi William Miller kòm kad pou chak pwofesi li te prezante.
And they shall build the old wastes, they shall raise up the former desolations, and they shall repair the waste cities, the desolations of many generations. Isaiah 61:4.
Epi yo pral bati ansyen dezolasyon yo, yo pral leve ankò ansyen kraze yo, epi yo pral repare vil ki te vin tounen dezè yo, dezolasyon anpil jenerasyon yo. Ezayi 61:4.
The structure of prophecy that is represented as the framework, is the history and relationship of those two powers. To restore “the paths to dwell in,” is the restoration of Miller’s framework, that was represented in his dream by the work of the dirt brush man. Isaiah used the illustration of the history of Ezra and those who returned from Babylon and repaired Jerusalem, to identify the restoration of the former desolations.
Estrikti pwofesi ki reprezante kòm fondasyon an, se istwa ak relasyon de pouvwa sa yo. Retabli “chemen pou moun rete ladan yo,” se restorasyon fondasyon Miller la, ki te reprezante nan rèv li a pa travay mesye ki te gen bwòs pou pousyè a. Ezayi te sèvi ak ilistrasyon istwa Esdras ak sila yo ki te tounen soti Babilòn epi ki te repare Jerizalèm, pou idantifye restorasyon ansyen dezolasyon yo.
Since the days of our fathers have we been in a great trespass unto this day; and for our iniquities have we, our kings, and our priests, been delivered into the hand of the kings of the lands, to the sword, to captivity, and to a spoil, and to confusion of face, as it is this day. And now for a little space grace hath been showed from the Lord our God, to leave us a remnant to escape, and to give us a nail in his holy place, that our God may lighten our eyes, and give us a little reviving in our bondage. For we were bondmen; yet our God hath not forsaken us in our bondage, but hath extended mercy unto us in the sight of the kings of Persia, to give us a reviving, to set up the house of our God, and to repair the desolations thereof, and to give us a wall in Judah and in Jerusalem. Ezra 9:7–9.
Depi nan jou zansèt nou yo jouk jòdi a, nou te nan yon gwo koupabilite; e poutèt inikite nou yo, nou menm, wa nou yo, ak prèt nou yo, nou te lage nan men wa peyi yo, anba nepe, nan kaptivite, nan piyaj, ak nan wont sou figi nou, jan sa ye jòdi a. E kounye a, pandan yon ti tan, Senyè a, Bondye nou an, fè nou gras, pou l kite nou yon rès ki chape, epi pou l ban nou yon pikèt nan kote ki sen li a, pou Bondye nou an ka klere je nou, epi ban nou yon ti soulajman nan esklavaj nou an. Paske nou te esklav; men Bondye nou an pa t abandone nou nan esklavaj nou an; okontrè, li lonje mizèrikòd sou nou devan je wa Pès yo, pou l ban nou yon renouvèlman, pou leve kay Bondye nou an, pou repare dezolasyon li yo, epi pou ban nou yon miray nan Jida ak nan Jerizalèm. Ezra 9:7–9.
Ezra and those who repaired Jerusalem, represent the “remnant” who are the restorers of the paths to dwell in, and they are those who are accomplishing the work in the context of the Leviticus twenty-six prayer, which Ezra references that “since the days of our fathers have we been in a great trespass unto this day; and for our iniquities have we, our kings, and our priests, been delivered into the hand of the kings of the lands, to the sword, to captivity, and to a spoil, and to confusion of face.” The “day” he is referring to is the “day” that the “remnant” of the last days restore the paths to dwell in.
Esdras ak moun ki t ap repare Jerizalèm yo reprezante “rès la”, ki se moun k ap restore chemen pou moun ka rete ladan yo; epi se yo menm k ap akonpli travay la nan kontèks priyè Levitik vennsis la, priyè Esdras site lè li di: “depi nan jou zansèt nou yo nou te nan yon gwo koupabilite jis jouk jounen jòdi a; e poutèt inikite nou yo, nou menm, wa nou yo, ak prèt nou yo, yo te lage nou nan men wa peyi yo, bay nepe, bay kaptivite, bay piyaj, ak nan konfizyon figi.” “Jou” li ap pale a se “jou” kote “rès” dènye jou yo restore chemen pou moun ka rete ladan yo.
Ezra’s remnant are the two witnesses who are resurrected at the end of three and a half days, and fulfill the Leviticus twenty-six prayer as illustrated by Daniel in chapter nine. When Ezra and his coworkers returned from exile and rebuilt Jerusalem, they typified the work of restoring Miller’s jewels, which is the work of restoring the foundational truths of Miller. For this reason, understanding the framework of Miller’s work is essential.
Rès Ezdras la se de temwen yo ki resisite nan fen twa jou edmi, e ki akonpli lapriyè Levitik vennsis la jan Danyèl montre l nan chapit nèf la. Lè Ezdras ak kòlèg li yo te retounen soti ann egzil epi yo te rebati Jerizalèm, yo te prefigire travay restorasyon bijou Miller yo, ki se travay restorasyon verite fondamantal Miller yo. Se poutèt sa, konprann kad travay Miller la esansyèl.
“The apostles built upon a sure foundation, even the Rock of Ages. To this foundation they brought the stones that they quarried from the world. Not without hindrance did the builders labor. Their work was made exceedingly difficult by the opposition of the enemies of Christ. They had to contend against the bigotry, prejudice, and hatred of those who were building upon a false foundation. Many who wrought as builders of the church could be likened to the builders of the wall in Nehemiah’s day, of whom it is written: ‘They which builded on the wall, and they that bare burdens, with those that laded, everyone with one of his hands wrought in the work, and with the other hand held a weapon.’ Nehemiah 4:17.” Acts of the Apostles, 596.
“Apot yo te bati sou yon fondasyon ki sèten, sa vle di Wòch ki p’ap janm brannen an. Se sou fondasyon sa a yo te pote wòch yo te rache nan mond lan. Se pa t san antrav konstriktè yo te travay. Travay yo te vin ekstrèmman difisil akoz opozisyon lènmi Kris yo. Yo te oblije lite kont fanatism, prejije, ak rayisman moun ki t ap bati sou yon fo fondasyon. Anpil nan moun ki te travay kòm konstriktè legliz la ta ka konpare ak konstriktè miray la nan epòk Neyemi an, konsènan yo li ekri konsa: ‘Moun ki t ap bati sou miray la, ak moun ki t ap pote chay, ansanm ak moun ki t ap chaje yo, chak moun t ap travay nan travay la ak yon men, epi ak lòt men an li te kenbe yon zam.’ Neyemi 4:17.” Acts of the Apostles, 596.
In both passages of Isaiah, the work is to raise up the foundations and desolations of many generations. Isaiah is identifying a spiritual work that was illustrated by the literal work. The foundations were to be guarded, but instead they were eventually totally covered up by a false foundation of counterfeit jewels. Those who Isaiah identifies are restoring the foundational truths of the Millerites, not literal bricks and stones. The symbol of those truths is Miller’s framework of the two desolating powers which trampled down the sanctuary and the host for “seven times.”
Nan toude pasaj Ezayi yo, travay la se pou leve fondasyon yo ak dezolasyon anpil jenerasyon yo. Ezayi ap idantifye yon travay espirityèl ki te ilistre pa travay literal la. Fondasyon yo te dwe pwoteje, men olye de sa, yo te fini pa kouvri nèt anba yon fo fondasyon ki fèt ak pyè presye kontrefè. Moun Ezayi idantifye yo ap retabli verite fondamantal Millerit yo, pa brik ak wòch literal. Senbòl verite sa yo se kad Miller la konsènan de pouvwa dezolatè yo ki te pilonnen Tanp lan ak lame a pandan “sèt fwa.”
That work of restoration is represented as raising up “the foundations” and “desolations of many generations,” and represents the prophetic work of restoring the foundational truths through the methodology that brings prophetic line upon prophetic line, from here a little and there a little. The work of reestablishing the foundations and desolations is the work of presenting and defending the original truths represented upon the 1843 and 1850 pioneer charts, which are the two tables of Habakkuk chapter two. And the work is accomplished with the latter rain methodology of “line upon line”. It is the work of returning to Jeremiah’s old paths in the controversy of those who wish to uphold a counterfeit foundation, as represented by the false jewels of Miller’s dream.
Travay restorasyon sa a dekri kòm leve “fondasyon yo” ak “dezolasyon anpil jenerasyon,” epi li reprezante travay pwofetik pou retabli verite fondamantal yo atravè metodoloji ki pote liy pwofetik sou liy pwofetik, yon ti kras isit la ak yon ti kras laba. Travay pou retabli fondasyon yo ak dezolasyon yo se travay pou prezante epi defann verite orijinal yo jan yo reprezante sou tablo pyonye 1843 ak 1850 yo, ki se de tab Habakouk chapit de a. Epi travay la akonpli avèk metodoloji lapli dèyè a ki se “liy sou liy”. Se travay pou retounen nan ansyen chemen Jeremi yo nan konfli ak sila yo ki vle soutni yon fondasyon fo, jan sa reprezante pa fo bijou yo nan rèv Miller la.
“The enemy is seeking to divert the minds of our brethren and sisters from the work of preparing a people to stand in these last days. His sophistries are designed to lead minds away from the perils and duties of the hour. They estimate as nothing the light that Christ came from heaven to give to John for His people. They teach that the scenes just before us are not of sufficient importance to receive special attention. They make of no effect the truth of heavenly origin and rob the people of God of their past experience, giving them instead a false science.
“Lènmi an ap chèche detounen lespri frè ak sè nou yo pou yo pa fè travay pou prepare yon pèp pou kanpe nan dènye jou sa yo. Sofis li yo fèt pou mennen lespri yo lwen danje ak devwa lè n ap viv la. Yo konsidere kòm anyen limyè Kris la te vini soti nan syèl la pou bay Jan pou pèp Li a. Yo anseye ke sèn ki devan nou tousuit yo pa gen ase enpòtans pou yo resevwa yon atansyon espesyal. Yo rann verite ki gen orijin selès la san efè epi yo vòlè pèp Bondye a eksperyans pase yo, pandan y ap ba yo yon fo syans nan plas li.”
“‘Thus saith the Lord, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein.’ Jeremiah 6:16.
“Konsa Senyè a di konsa: Kanpe sou chemen yo, gade byen, epi mande ki kote ansyen santye yo ye, kote bon chemen an ye, epi mache ladan li.” Jeremi 6:16.
“Let none seek to tear away the foundations of our faith—the foundations that were laid at the beginning of our work by prayerful study of the word and by revelation. Upon these foundations we have been building for the last fifty years. Men may suppose that they have found a new way and that they can lay a stronger foundation than that which has been laid. But this is a great deception. Other foundation can no man lay than that which has been laid.
“Se pou pèsonn pa chèche rache fondasyon lafwa nou yo—fondasyon ki te poze nan kòmansman travay nou an pa etid lapriyè sou Pawòl la ak pa revelasyon. Se sou fondasyon sa yo nou ap bati depi senkant dènye ane yo. Moun ka sipoze yo jwenn yon nouvo chemen e yo ka poze yon fondasyon ki pi solid pase sa ki deja poze a. Men sa se yon gwo twonpri. Pèsonn pa ka poze okenn lòt fondasyon pase sa ki deja poze a.
“In the past many have undertaken the building of a new faith, the establishment of new principles. But how long did their building stand? It soon fell, for it was not founded upon the Rock.
“Nan tan lontan, anpil moun te antreprann bati yon nouvo lafwa, etabli nouvo prensip. Men, konbyen tan konstriksyon yo a te dire? Li pa t pran tan pou l tonbe, paske li pa t fonde sou Wòch la. ”
“Did not the first disciples have to meet the sayings of men? Did they not have to listen to false theories, and then, having done all, to stand firm, saying: ‘Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid’? 1 Corinthians 3:11.
“Èske premye disip yo pa t oblije fè fas ak pawòl lèzòm? Èske yo pa t oblije koute fo teyori, epi answit, apre yo fin fè tout sa ki te nesesè, rete fèm, pandan yo t ap di: ‘Pèsonn pa ka poze yon lòt fondasyon pase sa ki deja poze a’? 1 Corinthians 3:11.
“So we are to hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast unto the end. Words of power have been sent by God and by Christ to this people, bringing them out from the world, point by point, into the clear light of present truth. With lips touched with holy fire, God’s servants have proclaimed the message. The divine utterance has set its seal to the genuineness of the truth proclaimed.” Testimonies, volume 8, 296, 297.
“Konsa nou dwe kenbe kòmansman konfyans nou fèm jouk nan fen an. Pawòl ki gen pouvwa yo te voye pa Bondye ak pa Kris bay pèp sa a, pou fè yo soti nan lemonn, pwen pa pwen, pou antre nan limyè klè verite prezan an. Avèk bouch ki te touche ak dife sen, sèvitè Bondye yo te pwoklame mesaj la. Pawòl diven an mete sele li sou otantisite verite ki te pwoklame a.” Testimonies, volim 8, 296, 297.
The “work of preparing a people to stand in the last days,” is the work associated with the two prophecies of Ezekiel in chapter thirty-seven. A message is delivered by Isaiah’s voice in the wilderness, and the first message of Ezekiel brings those that have been dead in the street of the city of Sodom and Egypt for three-and-a-half days together. They then recognize they have been in Matthew’s tarrying time of the parable of the ten virgins. They then hear the call given to Jeremiah to separate the precious from the vile if they wish to return. They also recognize that Daniel’s prayer in chapter nine as present truth. Therefore if and when they choose to return by accepting and accomplishing the conditions of the gospel, then they receive Ezekiel’s second message and stand upon their feet a mighty army.
“Travay pou prepare yon pèp pou kanpe nan dènye jou yo” a, se travay ki lye avèk de pwofesi Ezekyèl yo nan chapit trant-sèt la. Yon mesaj delivre pa vwa Ezayi nan dezè a, epi premye mesaj Ezekyèl la rasanble ansanm moun ki te mouri nan lari lavil Sodòm ak Lejip la pandan twa jou edmi. Lè sa a, yo rekonèt yo te nan tan reta Matye a nan parabòl dis vyèj yo. Apre sa, yo tande apèl ki te bay Jeremi an pou separe sa ki presye ak sa ki vil la si yo vle retounen. Yo rekonèt tou lapriyè Danyèl la nan chapit nèf la kòm verite prezan. Se poutèt sa, si e lè yo chwazi retounen lè yo aksepte epi akonpli kondisyon levanjil la, lè sa a yo resevwa dezyèm mesaj Ezekyèl la epi yo kanpe sou pye yo, yon gwo lame pisan.
The “work of preparing a people to stand in the latter days” is accomplished through the latter rain methodology of “line upon line.” That work involves a work of restoring the Millerite truths that are represented on the 1843 and 1850 pioneer charts. Those two charts are Habakkuk’s two tables and they are to be laid upon one another (line upon line), and in so doing the two charts represent the foundational truths that are to be restored in the last days by the dirt brush man.
“Travay pou prepare yon pèp pou kanpe nan dènye jou yo” reyalize atravè metodoloji lapli ta a, sètadi “liy sou liy.” Travay sa a enplike yon travay restorasyon verite Millerit yo ki reprezante sou tablo pyonye 1843 ak 1850 yo. De tablo sa yo se de tab Habakik yo, epi yo dwe mete youn sou lòt (liy sou liy); konsa, de tablo yo reprezante verite fondamantal yo ki dwe retabli nan dènye jou yo pa nonm bwòs pousyè a.
When brought together, line upon line, they identify the mistake in the 1843 chart, which was thereafter corrected upon the 1850 chart. When considered as one table (line upon line) they then represent both the experience of God’s people and the hidden history of the seven thunders, for together they illustrate the first disappointment, the tarrying time, the Midnight Cry, and October 22, 1844, and the great disappointment.
Lè yo mete yo ansanm, liy sou liy, yo idantifye erè ki te nan tablo 1843 a, erè ki te korije apre sa sou tablo 1850 a. Lè yo konsidere yo kòm yon sèl tablo (liy sou liy), yo reprezante alafwa eksperyans pèp Bondye a ak istwa kache sèt loraj yo; paske ansanm yo ilistre premye desepsyon an, tan reta a, Kri Minwi a, ak 22 Oktòb 1844, ansanm ak gwo desepsyon an.
It is the first disappointment, Midnight Cry and great disappointment that is the hidden history of the seven thunders. It is the structure of truth, for truth is based upon the first and last letter of the Hebrew word “truth” being the same as is the first and last disappointment of that history. The middle and thirteenth letter is a symbol of rebellion as represented by those who reject the message of the Midnight Cry. The two charts when brought together provide two witnesses to the prophetic truths of the Millerites that are to be restored by the dirt brush man, but they also identify the experience that typifies the experience of the one hundred and forty-four thousand.
Se premye desepsyon an, Kri a Lè Minwi a, ak gwo desepsyon an ki se istwa kache sèt loraj yo. Se estrikti verite a, paske verite a baze sou lefèt ke premye ak dènye lèt mo ebre pou “verite” a menm jan ak premye ak dènye desepsyon nan istwa sa a. Lèt ki nan mitan an, trèzyèm nan, se yon senbòl rebelyon, jan sa reprezante pa moun ki rejte mesaj Kri a Lè Minwi a. De tablo yo, lè yo mete yo ansanm, bay de temwen konsènan verite pwofetik Millerit yo ki dwe retabli pa nonm bwòs pousyè a, men yo idantifye tou eksperyans ki sèvi kòm tip eksperyans san karannkat mil yo.
Those called to be the ensign (the one hundred and forty-four thousand) were confronted with their first disappointment on July 18, 2020, and then in July of 2023, they were then presented with a message from a voice crying in the wilderness. The voice was calling them to return.
Moun yo te rele pou yo vin drapo a (san karant-kat mil yo) te fè fas ak premye desepsyon yo nan dat 18 jiyè 2020, epi answit nan jiyè 2023, yo te resevwa yon mesaj ki soti nan yon vwa k ap rele nan dezè a. Vwa a t ap rele yo pou yo retounen.
It is at this point in the hidden history of the seven thunders that rebellion will be manifested, for the next waymark is when the dirt brush man gathers the jewels and casts them into the casket. They then shine ten times brighter. At that point Miller was awakened. When the virgins (Miller) awake, it is too late. The restoration of the desolations of many generations is a work that the two witnesses must participate in. That work is now being carried out.
Se nan pwen sa a nan istwa kache sèt loraj yo ke rebelyon pral parèt, paske pwochen waymark la se lè nonm bwòs pousyè a ranmase bijou yo epi lage yo nan kofrè a. Lè sa a yo briye dis fwa pi klere. Se nan pwen sa a Miller te reveye. Lè vyèj yo (Miller) reveye, li twò ta. Retablisman dezolasyon anpil jenerasyon yo se yon travay de temwen yo dwe patisipe ladan li. Travay sa a ap fèt kounye a.
William Miller’s framework of the prophecies represented by the vision of the Ulai River, of Daniel chapters seven, eight and nine was the two desolating powers of paganism and papalism and the framework for Future for America is paganism (the dragon), followed by papalism (the beast) and apostate Protestantism (the false prophet). The key that establishes both frameworks is the writings of the apostle Paul. The apostle Paul was the prophetic voice that connected ancient Israel with spiritual Israel. Before his conversion, Paul’s name was Saul, which means “selected” or “set forth”.
Mkadre pwofesi William Miller yo, jan vizyon larivyè Olay la nan Danyèl chapit sèt, uit ak nèf la prezante yo, se te de pouvwa k ap fè dezolasyon yo, sètadi paganism ak papalis; epi kad pou Future for America a se paganism (dragon an), ki swiv pa papalis (bèt la) ak pwotestantis aposta a (fo pwofèt la). Kle ki tabli toude kad sa yo se ekriti apot Pòl yo. Apot Pòl te vwa pwofetik ki te konekte ansyen Izrayèl ak Izrayèl espirityèl la. Anvan konvèsyon li, non Pòl te Sòl, ki vle di “chwazi” oswa “mete apa”.
Paul was chosen (selected) to be the apostle to the Gentiles, and he was chosen among other things for his understanding of the Old Testament. Writing the majority of the New Testament, there is no other of the New Testament authors who possessed the understanding of the Old Testament as did Paul. He was chosen to lead out in presenting the gospel to the Gentiles, but he was also chosen to establish the relationship of the prophetic histories of the Old Testament with the prophetic history that followed the time period of the cross. Without Paul’s testimony the prophetic understanding of the Millerites, and that of Future for America would be non-existent. In the very history where literal Israel was divorced as God’s chosen people, Paul was chosen to identify that ancient Israel, though then divorced from God, was the symbol of the prophetic history of spiritual Israel. The necessary prophetic rules for the movements of the first and third angels are based primarily upon the writings of the apostle Paul.
Pòl te chwazi (seleksyone) pou l te apot pou moun lòt nasyon yo, e pami lòt rezon yo, yo te chwazi l poutèt konpreyansyon li te genyen sou Ansyen Testaman an. Kòm li te ekri majorite Nouvo Testaman an, pa t gen okenn lòt nan otè Nouvo Testaman yo ki te posede konpreyansyon sou Ansyen Testaman an jan Pòl te genyen l lan. Yo te chwazi l pou l pran devan nan prezante levanjil la bay moun lòt nasyon yo, men yo te chwazi l tou pou l tabli relasyon ki genyen ant istwa pwofetik Ansyen Testaman an ak istwa pwofetik ki te swiv peryòd kwa a. San temwayaj Pòl la, konpreyansyon pwofetik Millerites yo, ansanm ak pa Future for America, pa t ap egziste ditou. Nan menm istwa kote Izrayèl literal la te revoke kòm pèp Bondye te chwazi a, yo te chwazi Pòl pou l idantifye Izrayèl ansyen sa a, byenke li te deja revoke nan men Bondye lè sa a, kòm senbòl istwa pwofetik Izrayèl espirityèl la. Règ pwofetik nesesè pou mouvman premye ak twazyèm zanj yo baze sitou sou ekriti apot Pòl yo.
For this reason, we will consider some of the prophetic principles that are identified by Paul that impacted the message of the Millerites, that was set within the framework of two desolating powers, and in so doing we will also consider how those principles impact upon the framework of three desolating powers.
Pou rezon sa a, nou pral konsidere kèk nan prensip pwofetik Pòl idantifye yo ki te enfliyanse mesaj Millerit yo, mesaj ki te plase nan kad de pouvwa devastatè; epi, pandan n ap fè sa, nou pral konsidere tou kijan prensip sa yo afekte kad twa pouvwa devastatè yo.
Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea; And did all eat the same spiritual meat; And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ. But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness. Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted. Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play. Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand. Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents. Neither murmur ye, as some of them also murmured, and were destroyed of the destroyer. Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come. 1 Corinthians 10:1–10.
Anplis, frè m yo, mwen pa ta vle nou rete nan inyorans konsènan jan tout zansèt nou yo te anba nyaj la, e tout te pase nan lanmè a; tout te batize pou Moyiz nan nyaj la ak nan lanmè a; tout te manje menm manje espirityèl la; epi tout te bwè menm bwason espirityèl la, paske yo t ap bwè nan Wòch espirityèl ki t ap swiv yo a; e Wòch sa a se te Kris la. Men, Bondye pa t pran plezi nan anpil ladan yo; paske yo te tonbe mouri nan dezè a. Kounye a, bagay sa yo te sèvi kòm egzanp pou nou, pou nou pa ta anvi move bagay, menm jan yo menm tou yo te anvi yo. Pa vin sèvi zidòl non plis, tankou kèk ladan yo te fè; jan sa ekri: Pèp la te chita pou manje ak bwè, epi yo leve pou pran plezi. Pa annik lage kò nou nan imoralite seksyèl non plis, tankou kèk ladan yo te fè sa, epi nan yon sèl jou venntwa mil te tonbe. Pa annik tante Kris non plis, tankou kèk ladan yo tou te tante l, epi sèpan te detwi yo. Pa bougonnen non plis, tankou kèk ladan yo tou te bougonnen, epi destriktè a te detwi yo. Kounye a, tout bagay sa yo te rive yo kòm egzanp; e yo ekri yo pou avètisman pa nou menm, sou nou menm fen tan yo rive a. 1 Korentyen 10:1–10.
In ten short verses, Paul identifies that the rite of baptism was typified at the Red Sea crossing, that the Rock which followed ancient Israel, was a “spiritual Rock,” and that it was Christ. He identifies that ancient Israel was the example for those living in the last days. This passage is a warning, and the passage is a point of controversy between those who uphold truth and those who oppose truth. Adventist theologians teach that Paul was simply identifying that the histories of ancient Israel were illustrating moral lessons that needed to be understood by those living in the last days, but they insist Paul was not identifying that the histories of literal Israel were actually to be repeated by spiritual Israel. Sister White often uses this passage to confirm exactly what Paul meant.
Nan dis vèsè kout sa yo, Pòl idantifye ke rit batèm nan te prefigire nan travèse Lanmè Wouj la, ke Wòch ki te suiv ansyen Izrayèl la se te yon “Wòch espirityèl,” e ke se te Kris. Li idantifye ke ansyen Izrayèl te egzanp pou moun k ap viv nan dènye jou yo. Pasaj sa a se yon avètisman, e pasaj la se yon pwen kontwovès ant sila yo ki soutni verite a ak sila yo ki opoze verite a. Teyolojyen advantis yo anseye ke Pòl t ap senpleman idantifye ke istwa ansyen Izrayèl yo t ap ilistre leson moral moun k ap viv nan dènye jou yo te bezwen konprann, men yo ensiste ke Pòl pa t ap idantifye ke istwa Izrayèl literal yo te vrèman pou yo repete pa Izrayèl espirityèl la. Sè White souvan sèvi ak pasaj sa a pou konfime egzakteman sa Pòl te vle di.
“Each of the ancient prophets spoke less for their own time than for ours, so that their prophesying is in force for us. ‘Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.’ 1 Corinthians 10:11. ‘Not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven; which things the angels desire to look into.’ 1 Peter 1:12. . . .
“Chak nan ansyen pwofèt yo te pale mwens pou pwòp epòk pa yo pase pou pa nou an, konsa pwofetize yo a rete an vigè pou nou. ‘Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.’ 1 Corinthians 10:11. ‘Not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven; which things the angels desire to look into.’ 1 Peter 1:12....”
“The Bible has accumulated and bound up together its treasures for this last generation. All the great events and solemn transactions of Old Testament history have been, and are, repeating themselves in the church in these last days.” Selected Messages, book 3, 338, 339.
“Bib la te rasanble epi mare ansanm trezò li yo pou dènye jenerasyon sa a. Tout gwo evènman yo ak tout zak solanèl nan istwa Ansyen Testaman an te repete, e yo ap repete ankò, nan legliz la nan dènye jou sa yo.” Selected Messages, liv 3, 338, 339.
The “great events and solemn transactions of Old Testament history have been, and are, repeating themselves in the church in these last days,” is how Sister White summarizes Paul’s meaning in the verses. In an attempt to undermine Paul’s identification of ancient Israel as symbolically illustrating literal Israel’s history, Satan has foisted two primary attacks against this prophetic principle. The first, that I already mentioned, is the claim that Paul was simply identifying that those histories represented moral lessons. That false teaching is a half-truth, and a half-truth is not truth at all. It is true that the moral lessons that might be derived from the history of ancient Israel, is for the benefit of those living in the last days, but when that is used to deny that those histories are also an illustration of events that will be repeated, it becomes a half-truth, which is designed to deny the truth.
“Gwo evènman yo ak tranzaksyon solanèl nan istwa Ansyen Testaman an te repete, e yo ap repete ankò, nan legliz la nan dènye jou sa yo,” se konsa Sè White rezime sans pawòl Pòl yo nan vèsè sa yo. Nan yon efò pou mine idantifikasyon Pòl fè sou ansyen Izrayèl kòm yon ilistrasyon senbolik istwa Izrayèl literal la, Satan te enpoze de atak prensipal kont prensip pwofetik sa a. Premye a, ke mwen deja mansyone, se reklamasyon ki di Pòl t ap jis idantifye istwa sa yo kòm reprezantasyon leson moral. Fo ansèyman sa a se yon demi-verite, epi yon demi-verite pa verite ditou. Se vre ke leson moral yo ki ka sòti nan istwa ansyen Izrayèl la se pou byen moun k ap viv nan dènye jou yo; men lè yo sèvi ak sa pou nye ke istwa sa yo se tou yon ilistrasyon evènman ki pral repete, sa vin tounen yon demi-verite ki fèt pou nye verite a.
“A blessing or a curse is now before the people of God—a blessing if they come out from the world and are separate, and walk in the path of humble obedience; and a curse if they unite with the idolatrous, who trample upon the high claims of heaven. The sins and iniquities of rebellious Israel are recorded and the picture presented before us as a warning that if we imitate their example of transgression and depart from God we shall fall as surely as did they. ‘Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.’” Testimonies, volume 1, 609.
“Yon benediksyon oswa yon madichon kounye a devan pèp Bondye a—yon benediksyon si yo soti nan mitan lemonn nan epi yo mete tèt yo apa, epi yo mache nan chemen obeyisans enb; epi yon madichon si yo ini ak moun idolatr yo, ki pilonnen gwo egzijans syèl la. Peche ak inikite Izrayèl rebèl la ekri, epi foto a prezante devan nou kòm yon avètisman ke si nou imite egzanp transgresyon yo epi nou vire do bay Bondye, n ap tonbe menm jan ak yo, san mank. ‘Koulye a, tout bagay sa yo te rive yo kòm egzanp; epi yo ekri yo pou avètisman nou, nou menm sou ki bout lemonn yo rive.’” Testimonies, volim 1, 609.
One truth is not to be used to deny another truth, for when it is, it turns the truth of God into a lie.
Yon verite pa dwe sèvi pou demanti yon lòt verite, paske lè sa fèt, sa fè verite Bondye a tounen yon manti.
“One saying of the Saviour must not be made to destroy another.” The Great Controversy, 371.
“Yon pawòl Sovè a pa dwe sèvi pou detwi yon lòt.” The Great Controversy, 371.
The teaching that ancient Israel’s history represents moral lessons alone, is often used by Adventist theologians to destroy God’s prophetic Word, and it is one of the half-truths that is included in the dish of fables prepared to deceive God’s people into receiving a lie, and the lie they receive is identified in the writings of the apostle Paul.
Ansèyman ki fè konnen istwa ansyen Izrayèl la reprezante sèlman leson moral, se yon bagay teyolojyen Advantis yo souvan sèvi avè l pou detwi Pawòl pwofetik Bondye a; e li se youn nan mwatye verite yo ki ladan plat fab yo prepare pou twonpe pèp Bondye a pou yo resevwa yon manti; epi manti yo resevwa a idantifye nan ekri apot Pòl la.
The other primary attack against the principle that the history of ancient Israel illustrates the history of modern Israel was invented by Jesuits during the history of the counter reformation, and it consists of agreeing to the idea that the history of ancient Israel is repeated. The Jesuit lie is that the history is literally repeated, not spiritually repeated. The lie was invented as a way to prevent an understanding that the pope of Rome is the antichrist of Bible prophecy, for the teaching assents to the truth that there is an antichrist in the last days, but it argues that the antichrist is represented by a literal power, not a spiritual power. The whore in Revelation seventeen, who has mystery Babylon written on her forehead, would then be a whore that arises in the literal land of Babylon, which today is Iraq.
Lòt gwo atak prensipal kont prensip ki di listwa ansyen Izrayèl la ilistre listwa Izrayèl modèn nan se yon bagay Jezuit yo te envante pandan epòk kontre-refòmasyon an; e li konsiste nan dakò ak lide ke listwa ansyen Izrayèl la repete. Manti jezuit la se ke listwa a repete literalman, e non pa espirityèlman. Manti sa a te envante kòm yon mwayen pou anpeche yo konprann ke pap Wòm nan se antikris pwofesi Bib la; paske ansèyman sa a admèt verite a ke gen yon antikris nan dènye jou yo, men li soutni ke antikris la reprezante pa yon pouvwa literal, e non pa yon pouvwa espirityèl. Alò, fanm movèz vi ki nan Revelasyon disèt la, ki gen mistè Babilòn ekri sou fwon li, t ap yon fanm movèz vi ki leve nan peyi literal Babilòn nan, ki jodi a se Irak.
“Those who become confused in their understanding of the word, who fail to see the meaning of antichrist, will surely place themselves on the side of antichrist.” Kress Collection, 105.
“Moun ki vin twouble nan konpreyansyon yo sou pawòl la, ki pa rive wè siyifikasyon antikris la, yo pral sètènman mete tèt yo bò kote antikris la.” Kress Collection, 105.
The pope is a literal person, representing a literal power (the Catholic church), but he and his organization has been prophetically identified by literal Babylon, and can only be correctly identified when the subject of the antichrist is set forth as the spiritual fulfillment of a literal example. Paul identified that literal Israel illustrates spiritual Israel, but it was not a new prophetic truth that he presented, for his understanding was generally based upon the Old Testament, and it is there that his testimony is grounded.
Pap la se yon moun literal, ki reprezante yon pouvwa literal (Legliz Katolik la), men ni li menm ni òganizasyon li a te idantifye pwofetikman pa Babilòn literal, epi yo kapab idantifye kòrèkteman sèlman lè sijè antikris la prezante kòm akonplisman espirityèl yon egzanp literal. Pòl te idantifye Izrayèl literal kòm yon ilistrasyon Izrayèl espirityèl, men sa pa t yon nouvo verite pwofetik li t ap prezante, paske konpreyansyon li te, an jeneral, baze sou Ansyen Testaman an, e se la temwayaj li pran rasin.
Thus saith the Lord the King of Israel, and his redeemer the Lord of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God. And who, as I, shall call, and shall declare it, and set it in order for me, since I appointed the ancient people? and the things that are coming, and shall come, let them show unto them. Fear ye not, neither be afraid: have not I told thee from that time, and have declared it? ye are even my witnesses. Is there a God beside me? yea, there is no God; I know not any. Isaiah 44:6–8.
Men sa Seyè a, Wa Izrayèl la, ak Redanmtè li a, Seyè ki gen tout pouvwa a: Mwen se premye a, e mwen se dènye a; e apa de mwen pa gen okenn Bondye. E kiyès, tankou mwen, ki va rele, ki va deklare sa, epi ki va mete l annòd devan mwen, depi lè mwen te tabli pèp ansyen an? E bagay k ap vini yo, ak sa ki gen pou vini yo, se pou yo montre yo. Nou pa bezwen pè, ni nou pa bezwen tranble: èske mwen pa t di nou sa depi lè sa a, e èske mwen pa t deklare sa? Nou menm, nou se temwen mwen. Èske gen yon Bondye apa de mwen? Wi, pa gen okenn Bondye; mwen pa konnen okenn. Ezayi 44:6–8.
We are to be Christ’s witnesses, as was Paul, that the Alpha and Omega appointed not only ancient Israel, but all the biblical ancient people as symbols to show “the things that are coming,” upon those who live in the last days. Paul was an expert on the Old Testament, and he was raised up to be the prophetic connecting link between the dispensation of literal and spiritual Israel. It was his writings that guided those who understood the increase of knowledge at the time of the end in 1798, and also in 1989.
Nou dwe temwen Kris la, menm jan Pòl te ye a, pou montre ke Alfa ak Omega a te etabli pa sèlman Izrayèl tan lontan an, men tout pèp ansyen biblik yo kòm senbòl pou fè wè “bagay k ap vini yo” sou sila yo ki ap viv nan dènye jou yo. Pòl te yon ekspè nan Ansyen Testaman an, e li te leve pou vin lyen pwofetik ki konekte dispansasyon Izrayèl literal la ak Izrayèl espirityèl la. Se ekriti li yo ki te gide moun ki te konprann ogmantasyon konesans lan nan tan lafen an an 1798, epi tou an 1989.
Ancient literal Babylon, the ancient children of the east, ancient Egypt, ancient Greece, and the ancient Medo-Persian empire are symbols of spiritual powers at the end of the world. The ancient symbols are the literal that precedes, and represent, the spiritual that follows. Paul goes so far as to identify that literal Adam symbolized spiritual Adam (who is Christ).
Ansyen Babilòn literal la, ansyen pitit lès yo, ansyen Ejip, ansyen Lagrès, ak ansyen anpi Mèd ak Pès la se senbòl pouvwa espirityèl yo nan fen mond lan. Senbòl ansyen yo se reyalite literal ki vini anvan an, epi yo reprezante reyalite espirityèl ki vini apre a. Pòl ale jis nan pwen pou idantifye ke Adan literal la te senbolize Adan espirityèl la (ki se Kris la).
And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual. The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven. As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly. And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly. 1 Corinthians 15:45–49.
Epi konsa sa ekri: Premye nonm nan, Adan, te vin tounen yon nanm vivan; dènye Adan an te vin tounen yon lespri ki bay lavi. Men, se pa sa ki espirityèl la ki te premye, men sa ki natirèl la; epi apre sa, sa ki espirityèl la. Premye nonm nan soti nan tè a, li fèt ak tè; dezyèm nonm nan se Seyè a ki soti nan syèl la. Jan sa ki fèt ak tè a ye a, konsa tou se sa yo ye ki fèt ak tè; epi jan sa ki nan syèl la ye a, konsa tou se sa yo ye ki nan syèl. Epi menm jan nou te pote imaj sa ki fèt ak tè a, konsa tou n ap pote imaj sa ki nan syèl la. 1 Korentyen 15:45–49.
There are some very profound lessons Paul is teaching concerning the first and last Adam, but we are simply identifying the principle which he sets forth very clearly in the passage, when he states, “that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.” The literal, which Paul here identifies as “natural,” is first, and the spiritual is last. Literal Israel was first, and natural, and spiritual Israel comes “afterward.”
Gen kèk leson trè pwofon Pòl ap anseye konsènan premye ak dènye Adan an, men nou senpleman ap idantifye prensip li tabli avèk anpil klète nan pasaj la, lè li deklare: “sa ki espirityèl la pa t vini an premye, men sa ki natirèl la; epi apre sa, sa ki espirityèl la.” Sa ki literal la, ke Pòl isit la idantifye kòm “natirèl,” vini an premye, epi sa ki espirityèl la vini an dènye. Izrayèl literal la te vini an premye, li te natirèl, epi Izrayèl espirityèl la vini “apre sa.”
Literal Babylon precedes spiritual Babylon. The next important point that is emphasized in Paul’s writings is the point in history when the change from literal to spiritual is to be applied. It is the time period of the cross when the prophetic change from literal to spiritual is identified.
Babylòn literal vini anvan Babylòn espirityèl. Pwochen pwen enpòtan ki mete anfas nan ekriti Pòl yo se moman nan listwa kote chanjman ki soti nan literal pou rive nan espirityèl la dwe aplike. Se peryòd kwa a kote chanjman pwofetik ki soti nan literal pou rive nan espirityèl la idantifye.
For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise. Galatians 3:26–29.
Paske nou tout se pitit Bondye pa lafwa nan Jezikri. Paske tout moun pami nou ki te batize nan Kris la, nou te revèti Kris la. Pa gen ni Jwif ni Grèk, pa gen ni esklav ni moun lib, pa gen ni gason ni fi; paske nou tout fè yon sèl nan Jezikri. E si nou se pou Kris la, alò nou se desandans Abraram, e eritye dapre pwomès la. Galat 3:26–29.
It matters not what your birthright might be, if and when you accept Christ, you then become the seed of Abraham. You are not literal Israel; you are spiritual Israel. The transition from literal to spiritual was the cross. Paul divides mankind into two classes. Each class has their own covenant, each are descendants of Abraham. Each has a city that represents their family and covenant. Each is either a son of literal Adam or spiritual Adam.
Pa gen okenn enpòtans kèlkeswa dwa nesans ou ta ka genyen; lè ak si ou aksepte Kris la, lè sa a ou vin tounen desandans Abraram. Ou pa Izrayèl literal; ou se Izrayèl espirityèl. Tranzisyon ki soti nan sa ki literal pou rive nan sa ki espirityèl la se te kwa a. Pòl divize limanite an de kategori. Chak kategori gen pwòp alyans pa yo, e chak se desandan Abraram. Chak gen yon vil ki reprezante fanmi yo ak alyans yo. Chak moun swa se yon pitit Adan literal, swa yon pitit Adan espirityèl.
For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman. But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar. For this Agar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children. But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all. For it is written, Rejoice, thou barren that bearest not; break forth and cry, thou that travailest not: for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath an husband. Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now. Nevertheless what saith the scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman. So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free. Galatians 4:22–30.
Paske sa ekri: Abraram te gen de pitit gason, youn pa yon sèvant, lòt la pa yon fanm lib. Men, sila ki te soti nan sèvant lan te fèt selon lachè; tandiske sila ki te soti nan fanm lib la te fèt dapre pwomès la. Bagay sa yo se yon alegori; paske fanm sa yo reprezante de alyans yo: youn soti sou mòn Sina a, ki fè pitit pou esklavaj; se Agar. Paske Agar sa a se mòn Sina nan Arabi, e li koresponn ak Jerizalèm ki la kounye a, ki nan esklavaj ansanm ak pitit li yo. Men, Jerizalèm ki anwo a lib; se li menm ki manman nou tout. Paske sa ekri: Rejwi, ou menm ki esteril, ou menm ki pa fè pitit; pete chante, rele byen fò, ou menm ki pa janm nan tranche: paske fanm ki te dezole a gen anpil plis pitit pase sila ki gen mari. Kounye a, nou menm, frè yo, menm jan ak Izarak, nou se pitit pwomès la. Men, menm jan lè sa a sila ki te fèt selon lachè a t ap pèsekite sila ki te fèt selon Lespri a, konsa tou sa ye kounye a. Sepandan, kisa Lekriti a di? Mete deyò sèvant lan ak pitit gason li a; paske pitit gason sèvant lan p ap eritye ansanm ak pitit gason fanm lib la. Konsa, frè yo, nou pa pitit sèvant lan, men pitit fanm lib la. Galat 4:22–30.
In the time period of the cross, the ancient literal became symbols of the modern spiritual. The apostle Paul clarified these essential prophetic truths that allowed William Miller to establish the framework of two desolating powers, which he based all of his prophetic conclusions upon. The same work accomplished by the apostle Paul is what identifies the three desolating powers that is the framework for all the prophetic conclusions of Future for America.
Pandan peryòd tan kwa a, ansyen reyalite literal yo te vin senbòl reyalite espirityèl modèn yo. Apot Pòl te klarifye verite pwofetik esansyèl sa yo ki te pèmèt William Miller tabli kad de pouvwa k ap fè dezolasyon yo, sou baz sa a li te fonde tout konklizyon pwofetik li yo. Menm travay apot Pòl te akonpli a se sa ki idantifye twa pouvwa k ap fè dezolasyon yo, ki se kad pou tout konklizyon pwofetik Future for America.
The framework of Miller’s understanding of the increase of knowledge represented by the Ulai River vision of chapter seven, eight and nine was based upon his discovery that “the daily” in the book of Daniel represented pagan Rome. He made that discovery in Paul’s second letter to the Thessalonians. That understanding is the primary truth identified in association with the prophetic “lie,” that causes strong delusion to come upon Seventh-day Adventists in the last days.
Kad konpreyansyon Miller sou ogmantasyon konesans lan, jan vizyon larivyè Oulay la nan chapit sèt, uit ak nèf la reprezante li, te chita sou dekouvèt li ke “kontinyèl la” nan liv Danyèl la te reprezante Wòm payen. Li te fè dekouvèt sa a nan dezyèm lèt Pòl te ekri bay Tesalonisyen yo. Konpreyansyon sa a se verite prensipal ki idantifye an relasyon ak “manti” pwofetik la, ki lakòz yon gwo sediksyon vini sou Advantis Setyèm Jou yo nan dènye jou yo.
We will continue our study of the increase of knowledge represented by the vision of the Ulai River in the next article by considering what Miller recognized in Paul’s letter.
N ap kontinye etid nou sou ogmantasyon konesans lan, jan li reprezante nan vizyon Rivyè Oulayi a, nan atik k ap vini an, lè nou va konsidere sa Miller te rekonèt nan lèt Pòl la.
“One who sees beneath the surface, who reads the hearts of all men, says of those who have had great light: ‘They are not afflicted and astonished because of their moral and spiritual condition.’ Yea, they have chosen their own ways, and their soul delighteth in their abominations. I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before Mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not.’ ‘God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie,’ because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved,’ ‘but had pleasure in unrighteousness.’ Isaiah 66:3, 4; 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 10, 12.
“Moun ki wè anba sifas la, ki li kè tout moun, di konsènan sila yo ki te resevwa yon gwo limyè: ‘Yo pa aflije ni sezi poutèt kondisyon moral ak espirityèl yo.’ Wi, yo chwazi pwòp chemen pa yo, e nanm yo pran plezi nan bagay abominab yo. Mwen menm tou, m ap chwazi twonpri yo, e m ap fè sa yo pè a rive sou yo; paske lè m te rele, pèsonn pa t reponn; lè m te pale, yo pa t tande; men yo te fè sa ki mal devan je Mwen, e yo te chwazi sa Mwen pa t pran plezi ladan l.’ ‘Bondye va voye sou yo yon gwo twonpri, pou yo kwè manti a,’ paske yo pa t resevwa lanmou verite a, pou yo te kapab sove,’ ‘men yo te pran plezi nan lenjistis.’ Ezayi 66:3, 4; 2 Tesalonisyen 2:11, 10, 12.
“The heavenly Teacher inquired: ‘What stronger delusion can beguile the mind than the pretense that you are building on the right foundation and that God accepts your works, when in reality you are working out many things according to worldly policy and are sinning against Jehovah? Oh, it is a great deception, a fascinating delusion, that takes possession of minds when men who have once known the truth, mistake the form of godliness for the spirit and power thereof; when they suppose that they are rich and increased with goods and in need of nothing, while in reality they are in need of everything.’” Testimonies, volume 8, 249, 250.
“Pwofesè selès la te mande: ‘Ki pi gwo twonpri pase sa ki ka sedui lespri a, pase pretansyon ke n ap bati sou bon fondasyon an epi ke Bondye aksepte zèv nou yo, alòske an reyalite n ap fè anpil bagay dapre politik monn nan epi n ap peche kont Jewova? O, se yon gwo twonpri, yon ilizyon sediktè, ki pran posesyon lespri yo lè moun ki te yon lè konnen verite a pran fòm pyete a pou lespri ak pisans li; lè yo sipoze yo rich, yo ogmante nan byen, epi yo pa bezwen anyen, tandiske an reyalite yo bezwen tout bagay.’” Testimonies, volim 8, 249, 250.