We ended the last article with the sentence that stated, “In 2001 the government of the United States spoke the Patriot Act into law.”
Nou te fini dènye atik la ak fraz ki te deklare: “An 2001, gouvènman Etazini te fè Patriot Act la vin lwa.”
“There are many, even of those engaged in this movement for Sunday enforcement, who are blinded to the results which will follow this action. They do not see that they are striking directly against religious liberty. There are many who have never understood the claims of the Bible Sabbath and the false foundation upon which the Sunday institution rests. Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.
“Gen anpil moun, menm pami sila yo ki angaje nan mouvman sa a pou fè respekte dimanch, ki avèg sou rezilta ki pral swiv aksyon sa a. Yo pa wè yo frape dirèkteman kont libète relijye. Gen anpil moun ki pa janm konprann reklamasyon Saba Bib la ni fo fondasyon sou ki enstitisyon dimanch la chita. Nenpòt mouvman an favè lejislasyon relijye se an reyalite yon zak konsesyon anvè papote a, ki pandan anpil syèk te mennen yon lagè san rete kont libète konsyans. Obsèvans dimanch dwe egzistans li kòm yon enstitisyon sa yo rele kretyen a ‘mistè inikite a;’ e fòsman li pral yon rekonesans de reyalite prensip ki se menm pyè angilè Wòmis la. Lè nasyon nou an va renonse konsa ak prensip gouvènman li yo pou adopte yon lwa dimanch, Pwotestantis la, nan zak sa a, ap bay men ak papote a; sa pap anyen lòt pase bay lavi a tirani a ki depi lontan t ap veye ak anpil anvi opòtinite pa li pou l sote ankò nan despotis aktif.” Testimonies, volim 5, 711.
1888 typified 2001, and it was then that the Blair Bill was introduced, though its failure to be passed, prevented it from prophetically speaking. It became the sign of 66 AD, a siege that was initiated and then mysteriously withdrawn. When it is understood that there are two image of the beast testing periods, and that the second period begins with the Sunday law in the United States, typified by the year 321, and that the period ends when the world Sunday law, typified by 538, is fully enforced; then it demands prophetically that the beginning of the first image of the beast testing period also begins with some type of typification of a Sunday law being spoken. In 1888, the Blair Bill was an attempt to enforce a National Sunday law, and 1888 identifies when the angel of Revelation eighteen descends and lightens the earth with his glory.
1888 te prefigire 2001, e se lè sa a yo te prezante Blair Bill la; men lefètke li pa t rive pase, sa te anpeche li pale pwofetikman. Li te vin tounen siy ane 66 ap. J.-K. la, yon syèj ki te kòmanse epi answit yo te retire l yon fason misterye. Lè yo konprann gen de peryòd eprèv ki gen rapò ak imaj bèt la, e ke dezyèm peryòd la kòmanse ak lwa dimanch Ozetazini, ki prefigure pa ane 321, epi peryòd la fini lè lwa dimanch mondyal la, ki prefigure pa 538, vin aplike nèt; lè sa a sa egzije pwofetikman pou kòmansman premye peryòd eprèv imaj bèt la kòmanse tou ak yon kalite prefigirasyon kote yon lwa dimanch vin pwoklame. An 1888, Blair Bill la te yon tantativ pou fè respekte yon lwa dimanch nasyonal, e 1888 idantifye moman zanj Revelasyon dizwit la desann epi klere tè a ak laglwa li.
The Patriot Act is the typification of a Sunday law that begins the image of the beast testing time in the United States. The United States speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven when it enforces the Sunday law. When it enforces that law it will speak as a dragon, and that Sunday law identifies that the image of the beast is fully formed in the United States. At that point the United States has filled up its cup of probationary time, and national apostasy is followed by national ruin. At that point the United States ceases to be the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy as the threefold union is established.
Lwa Patriyòt la se tipifikasyon yon lwa dimanch ki kòmanse tan eprèv imaj bèt la Ozetazini. Lè Etazini fè respekte lwa dimanch lan, li pale tankou yon dragon, nan akonplisman Revelasyon chapit trèz, vèsè onz. Lè li fè respekte lwa sa a, li pral pale tankou yon dragon, epi lwa dimanch sa a idantifye ke imaj bèt la fin fòme nèt Ozetazini. Lè sa a, Etazini fin ranpli gode tan pwobasyon li, epi apostazi nasyonal la swiv pa destriksyon nasyonal. Lè sa a, Etazini sispann vin sizyèm wayòm pwofesi biblik la, pandan inyon an twa fwa etabli.
Alpha and Omega always portrays the end with the beginning and at the beginning of the United States there were three times the United States prophetically spoke that marked the beginning of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. The Declaration of Independence in 1776, followed by the Constitution of 1789 and then the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 identify the first three times the United States prophetically spoke. Each of those three publications represented the speaking of the United States. Those three steps led to 1798, the beginning of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Those same three waymarks in the beginning of the United States, represent three waymarks that lead to the ending of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy.
Alfa ak Omega toujou prezante fen an ansanm ak kòmansman an, epi nan kòmansman Etazini te gen twa fwa Etazini te pale pwofetikman ki make kòmansman Etazini kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi biblik la. Deklarasyon Endepandans lan an 1776, apre sa Konstitisyon an an 1789, epi answit Lwa sou Etranje ak Sedisyon yo an 1798, idantifye twa premye fwa Etazini te pale pwofetikman. Chak youn nan twa piblikasyon sa yo te reprezante pawòl Etazini. Twa etap sa yo te mennen nan 1798, kòmansman rèy Etazini kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi biblik la. Menm twa repè sa yo nan kòmansman Etazini an reprezante twa repè ki mennen nan fen rèy Etazini kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi biblik la.
The Patriot Act is the first of three times the United States speaks as it comes to its conclusion as the sixth kingdom. The third speaking, that identifies the end of the sixth kingdom is the Sunday law. In the middle of that history the Pelosi Trials of January 6, which began in 2022 were initiated. The trials were a direct rejection of the rights enshrined in the Constitution because the trials were political in nature, and the lawfare was not simply a fabrication of facts, but it was actually a direct attack upon “procedural” and “substantive” law as identified within the Constitution.
Lwa Patriot la se premye nan twa fwa Etazini pale pandan l ap rive nan konklizyon li kòm sizyèm wayòm nan. Twazyèm pale a, ki idantifye fen sizyèm wayòm nan, se lwa dimanch lan. Nan mitan istwa sa a, Pwosè Pelosi yo nan 6 Janvye, ki te kòmanse an 2022, te inisye. Pwosè sa yo te yon rejè dirèk dwa ki enskri nan Konstitisyon an, paske pwosè yo te politik nan nati yo, epi lawfare la pa t senpleman yon fabrikasyon reyalite, men li te an reyalite yon atak dirèk kont lwa “pwosediral” ak lwa “soustansyèl” jan yo idantifye yo anndan Konstitisyon an.
The Patriot Act in 2001 was a direct attack upon the “Due Process Clause” which appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. That was 2001, and in 2022 the attack against the Constitution was focused upon both “procedural due process” and “substantive due process.” The word “repudiate” means to deny, and Sister White identifies that at the Sunday law in the United States every principle of the Constitution will be repudiated.
Lwa Patriyòt la an 2001 te yon atak dirèk kont “Due Process Clause” la, ki parèt ni nan Senkyèm Amandman an ni nan Katòzyèm Amandman an nan Konstitisyon Etazini an. Sa yo prevwa ke pèsonn pa ka prive de lavi, libète, oswa byen san pwosedi legal ki apwopriye. Sa te fèt an 2001, epi an 2022 atak la kont Konstitisyon an te vize ni “procedural due process” ni “substantive due process.” Mo “repudiate” la vle di nye, epi Sè White fè konnen ke, nan moman lwa dimanch lan Ozetazini, tout prensip Konstitisyon an pral repudiye.
“By the decree enforcing the institution of the papacy in violation of the law of God, our nation will disconnect herself fully from righteousness. When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near.
“Pa dekrè ki fè respekte enstitisyon pap la an vyolasyon lalwa Bondye a, nasyon nou an ap koupe tout lyen li nèt ak jistis. Lè Pwotestantis la va lonje men li atravè gwo twou san fon an pou l pran men pouvwa women an, lè li va lonje men l lòt bò gwo twou san fon an pou l bay espirityalis lanmen, lè, anba enfliyans inyon twa fwa sa a, peyi nou an va rejte tout prensip Konstitisyon li kòm yon gouvènman pwotestan ak repibliken, epi l va pran dispozisyon pou pwopagasyon fo doktrin ak twonpri pap la, lè sa a nou ka konnen lè a rive pou travay mèvèy Satan an, e fen an toupre.”
“As the approach of the Roman armies was a sign to the disciples of the impending destruction of Jerusalem, so may this apostasy be a sign to us that the limit of God’s forbearance is reached, that the measure of our nation’s iniquity is full, and that the angel of mercy is about to take her flight, never to return. The people of God will then be plunged into those scenes of affliction and distress which prophets have described as the time of Jacob’s trouble. The cries of the faithful, persecuted ones ascend to heaven. And as the blood of Abel cried from the ground, there are voices also crying to God from martyrs’ graves, from the sepulchers of the sea, from mountain caverns, from convent vaults: ‘How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost Thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?’
«Menm jan pwoche lame women yo te yon siy pou disip yo konsènan destriksyon Jerizalèm ki t ap vini an, konsa tou apostazi sa a ka yon siy pou nou ke limit pasyans Bondye rive, ke mezi inikite nasyon nou an plen, e ke zanj mizèrikòd la près pou pran vòl li, pou l pa janm retounen ankò. Lè sa a, pèp Bondye a pral plonje nan sèn afliksyon ak detrès sa yo ke pwofèt yo te dekri kòm tan traka Jakòb la. Rèl fidèl yo, moun yo k ap sibi pèsekisyon yo, monte rive nan syèl la. E menm jan san Abèl te rele soti nan tè a, konsa tou gen vwa k ap rele bay Bondye soti nan tonm mati yo, soti nan kavo lanmè a, soti nan kavèn mòn yo, soti nan kavò kouvan yo: “Jiska kilè, O Senyè, ki sen e ki veritab, ou p ap jije ni vanje san nou sou moun ki rete sou tè a?”»
“The Lord is doing His work. All heaven is astir. The Judge of all the earth is soon to arise and vindicate His insulted authority. The mark of deliverance will be set upon the men who keep God’s commandments, who revere His law, and who refuse the mark of the beast or of his image.
“Seyè a ap fè travay li. Tout syèl la an mouvman. Jij tout tè a pral byento leve pou l jistifye otorite pa li yo te meprize a. Mak delivrans lan pral mete sou moun ki kenbe kòmandman Bondye yo, ki respekte lalwa li a, epi ki refize mak bèt la oswa mak imaj li a.
“God has revealed what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath. Those who have been warned of the events before them are not to sit in calm expectation of the coming storm, comforting themselves that the Lord will shelter His faithful ones in the day of trouble. We are to be as men waiting for their Lord, not in idle expectancy, but in earnest work, with unwavering faith. It is no time now to allow our minds to be engrossed with things of minor importance. While men are sleeping, Satan is actively arranging matters so that the Lord’s people may not have mercy or justice. The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending. Its professions are mild and apparently Christian, but when it shall speak it will reveal the spirit of the dragon. It is our duty to do all in our power to avert the threatened danger. We should endeavor to disarm prejudice by placing ourselves in a proper light before the people. We should bring before them the real question at issue, thus interposing the most effectual protest against measures to restrict liberty of conscience. We should search the Scriptures and be able to give the reason for our faith. Says the prophet: ‘The wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.’” Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.
“Bondye te revele sa ki gen pou rive nan dènye jou yo, pou pèp Li a ka prepare pou kanpe devan tanpèt opozisyon ak kòlè a. Moun ki resevwa avètisman konsènan evènman ki devan yo pa dwe chita ap tann kalmman tanpèt k ap vini an, pandan y ap konsole tèt yo ak lide ke Senyè a va pwoteje fidèl Li yo nan jou detrès la. Nou dwe tankou moun k ap tann Mèt yo, pa nan yon tann parese, men nan travay serye, avèk yon lafwa ki pa brannen. Kounye a se pa tan pou nou kite lespri nou okipe ak bagay ki gen ti enpòtans. Pandan lèzòm ap dòmi, Satan ap travay aktivman pou ranje bagay yo yon fason pou pèp Senyè a pa jwenn ni mizèrikòd ni jistis. Kouran mouvman dimanch lan ap fè chemen li kounye a nan fènwa. Dirijan yo ap kache vrè kestyon an, epi anpil ladan yo ki mete tèt ansanm ak mouvman an pa wè menm kote kouran kache a ap mennen. Deklarasyon li yo dou e yo sanble kretyen, men lè li va pale, li va revele lespri dragon an. Se devwa nou pou nou fè tout sa ki nan pouvwa nou pou anpeche danje ki menase a. Nou dwe fè efò pou nou dezame prejije lè nou prezante tèt nou devan pèp la nan bon limyè. Nou dwe mete devan yo vrè kestyon ki an koz la, konsa nou va leve pwotestasyon ki pi efikas kont mezi k ap chèche limite libète konsyans. Nou dwe fouye Ekriti yo e nou dwe kapab bay rezon lafwa nou. Pwofèt la di: ‘Mechan yo va kontinye fè mechanste; e okenn nan mechan yo p ap konprann; men saj yo va konprann.’” Testimonies, volim 5, 451, 452.
Sister White aligns the Sunday law with several last-day waymarks, and in so doing her words reveal “what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath.” Therefore, the waymarks that she aligns in this passage are to be carefully examined. I am suggesting that the point of reference is the line of prophecy that focuses upon the Constitution of the United States, along with the “speaking” of the nation as an interrelated symbol.
Sè White mete lwa dimanch lan an akò ak plizyè siy repè dènye jou yo, e lè li fè sa, pawòl li yo revele “sa ki gen pou rive nan dènye jou yo, pou pèp Li a ka pare pou kanpe kont tanpèt opozisyon ak kòlè a.” Se poutèt sa, siy repè li mete an akò nan pasaj sa a dwe egzamine avèk anpil swen. M ap sijere ke pwen referans lan se liy pwofesi a ki konsantre sou Konstitisyon Etazini an, ansanm ak “pawòl” nasyon an kòm yon senbòl ki gen rapò youn ak lòt.
By that, I mean, that the Blair Bill in 1888, the Patriot Act in 2001, and the political prosecutions that were carried out by the Democrats and globalist Republicans beginning in 2022 were each a direct denial of two essential elements of the Constitution. 1888 represents enforcement of Sunday worship, and then in 2001, the change from English law to Roman law. In 2022 “substantive” and “procedural” law was attacked.
Sa vle di, Pwojè Lwa Blair la an 1888, Patriot Act la an 2001, ak pèsekisyon politik ki te mennen pa Demokrat yo ak Repibliken globalis yo kòmanse an 2022, chak ladan yo te yon refi dirèk de de eleman esansyèl Konstitisyon an. Ane 1888 la reprezante aplikasyon adorasyon dimanch, epi ansuit, an 2001, chanjman soti nan lwa anglè pou rive nan lwa women. An 2022, yo te atake lwa “substantive” ak lwa “procedural” yo.
Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations. The law defines legal or illegal behavior and sets out the punishments for it. Substantive law covers many legal areas, including criminal, civil, and contract law.
Lwa sibstansyèl defini dwa ak obligasyon moun ak òganizasyon yo, tandiske lwa pwosediral la tabli pwosesis pou rezoud litij epi fè respekte dwa ak obligasyon moun ak òganizasyon yo. Lwa a defini konpòtman ki legal oswa ilegal epi li presize pinisyon ki aplikab pou sa. Lwa sibstansyèl la kouvri anpil domèn jiridik, tankou dwa penal, dwa sivil, ak dwa kontra.
Criminal law is an excellent example of substantive law. Criminal law defines what actions are considered criminal and the penalties for those crimes. Civil law, however, governs disputes between individuals and organizations, such as breach of contract, personal injury, or property disputes.
Lwa penal se yon ekselan egzanp lwa materyèl. Lwa penal defini ki aksyon yo konsidere kòm zak kriminèl ak ki pinisyon ki prevwa pou krim sa yo. Lwa sivil, sepandan, regle konfli ant moun ak òganizasyon, tankou vyolasyon kontra, domaj pèsonèl, oswa konfli sou pwopriyete.
Substantive law is typically written in statutes, regulations, and case law. Statutes are laws passed by legislative bodies, such as national parliaments or state legislature, and regulations are rules and procedures created by administrative agencies. Case law is the law that judges create through their interpretation of statutes, regulations, and the Constitution.
Lwa fondamantal yo anjeneral ekri nan lwa, règleman, ak jirisprudans. Lwa yo se dispozisyon kò lejislatif yo vote, tankou palman nasyonal oswa lejislati eta yo, epi règleman yo se règ ak pwosedi ajans administratif yo tabli. Jirisprudans se dwa jij yo fòme atravè entèpretasyon yo fè sou lwa yo, règleman yo, ak Konstitisyon an.
Procedural law refers to the rules governing the legal process. It outlines how cases move through the legal system, from the initial filing of a complaint to the final resolution. Procedural law covers various legal areas, including civil, criminal, and administrative procedures. The purpose of procedural law is to ensure that the legal process is fair and efficient. It provides a framework for resolving disputes and ensures that everyone involved in the legal process, including judges, lawyers, and litigants, knows what is expected of them.
Lwa pwosedi a refere ak règ ki gouvène pwosesis legal la. Li dekri kijan dosye yo avanse atravè sistèm legal la, depi premye depo yon plent jouk rive nan rezolisyon final la. Lwa pwosedi a kouvri divès domèn legal, tankou pwosedi sivil, kriminèl, ak administratif. Objektif lwa pwosedi a se asire ke pwosesis legal la jis e efikas. Li bay yon kad pou rezoud konfli yo epi li asire ke tout moun ki enplike nan pwosesis legal la, tankou jij, avoka, ak pati ki nan litij, konnen sa yo atann de yo.
Substantive and procedural law are intended to work together to ensure justice is served. Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing those rights and obligations. In other words, substantive law defines legal or illegal behavior and the consequences of illegal behavior, while procedural law outlines how those legal issues are resolved.
Lwa fondamantal ak lwa pwosedi fèt pou yo travay ansanm pou asire ke jistis rann. Lwa fondamantal defini dwa ak obligasyon moun ak òganizasyon yo, tandiske lwa pwosedi tabli pwosesis pou rezoud konfli yo epi pou fè dwa ak obligasyon sa yo respekte. Nan lòt mo, lwa fondamantal defini sa ki legal oswa ilegal ansanm ak konsekans konpòtman ilegal, tandiske lwa pwosedi esplike kijan kestyon legal sa yo rezoud.
In 2001, the Patriot Act removed the right of habeas corpus. “Habeas corpus” is a Latin term that translates to “you shall have the body.” It refers to a legal principle that protects individuals from unlawful detention by requiring a court to examine the lawfulness of a person’s imprisonment. Habeas corpus is a fundamental right in many legal systems, especially those influenced by English common law. It ensures that a person cannot be held in custody without just cause and allows them to challenge the legality of their detention before a judge.
An 2001, Patriot Act la te retire dwa habeas corpus la. “Habeas corpus” se yon tèm laten ki tradui konsa: “ou va gen kò a.” Li fè referans ak yon prensip jiridik ki pwoteje moun kont detansyon ilegal, lè li egzije pou yon tribinal egzamine legalite prizon yon moun. Habeas corpus se yon dwa fondamantal nan anpil sistèm legal, espesyalman sa yo ki enfliyanse pa common law anglè a. Li asire ke yo pa ka kenbe yon moun an detansyon san yon kòz jis, epi li pèmèt li konteste legalite detansyon li devan yon jij.
A “Due Process Clause” appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Courts have developed two branches of due process doctrine: procedural due process and substantive due process. In 2001, with the Patriot Act habeas corpus was removed as a right, and English law was replaced by Roman law. English law defines that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty, and Roman law identifies that a person is considered guilty until proven innocent. In the Pelosi Trials of 2022, both procedural and substantive due process was trampled upon. Both substantive law and procedural law were applied in the Pelosi Trials in the exact opposite of their intended constitutional purpose.
Yon “Kloz Pwosedi Regilye” parèt ni nan Senkyèm Amannman an ni nan Katòzyèm Amannman an nan Konstitisyon Etazini an. Yo prevwa ke pèsonn pa ka prive de lavi, libète, oswa byen san pwosedi regilye dapre lalwa. Tribinal yo devlope de branch nan doktrin pwosedi regilye a: pwosedi regilye pwosediral ak pwosedi regilye sibstansyèl. An 2001, avèk Patriot Act la, habeas corpus te retire kòm yon dwa, epi lwa anglè a te ranplase pa lwa women an. Lwa anglè a defini ke yon moun konsidere inosan jiskaske yo pwouve li koupab, epi lwa women an etabli ke yon moun konsidere koupab jiskaske yo pwouve li inosan. Nan Pwosè Pelosi yo an 2022, ni pwosedi regilye pwosediral ni pwosedi regilye sibstansyèl te foule anba pye. Ni lwa sibstansyèl ni lwa pwosediral te aplike nan Pwosè Pelosi yo egzakteman an kontrè ak objektif konstitisyonèl yo te fèt pou sèvi a.
The distinction between substantive due process and procedural due process lies in the different aspects of law and rights that each concept protects within the framework of the U.S. Constitution, particularly under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Distenksyon ant due process substantif ak due process pwosediral la chita nan diferan aspè lalwa ak dwa chak konsèp pwoteje nan kad Konstitisyon Etazini an, espesyalman anba Kloz Due Process yo nan Senkyèm ak Katòzyèm Amannman yo.
Substantive due process is concerned with the fundamental rights and liberties that the government cannot infringe upon, regardless of the procedure used. It protects certain rights from government interference even if the proper procedures are followed. Substantive due process involves rights that are deemed fundamental, such as the right to privacy, the right to marry, and the right to raise one’s children. These rights are protected from government intrusion unless there is a compelling state interest. It serves as a check on the government’s power, ensuring that laws and regulations do not violate fundamental liberties.
Pwosedi legal sibstantif konsène dwa fondamantal ak libète fondamantal ke gouvènman an pa ka vyole, kèlkeswa pwosedi yo itilize a. Li pwoteje sèten dwa kont entèferans gouvènman an menm si yo suiv pwosedi ki apwopriye yo. Pwosedi legal sibstantif gen rapò ak dwa yo konsidere kòm fondamantal, tankou dwa a vi prive, dwa pou marye, ak dwa pou elve pwòp pitit yon. Dwa sa yo pwoteje kont entruzyon gouvènman an sof si genyen yon enterè leta ki ijan e ki enperatif. Li sèvi kòm yon mezi kontwòl sou pouvwa gouvènman an, pou asire ke lwa ak règleman yo pa vyole libète fondamantal yo.
Procedural due process is concerned with the procedures that the government must follow before it deprives an individual of life, liberty, or property. It ensures that individuals receive fair and impartial treatment through proper legal processes. Procedural due process requires the government to follow certain steps or procedures, such as providing notice, a fair hearing, and an opportunity to be heard, before depriving someone of their rights. It emphasizes the methods by which laws are enforced, ensuring that the government acts in a just and fair manner.
Garanti pwosediral konsène pwosedi ke gouvènman an dwe swiv anvan li prive yon moun de lavi, libète, oswa pwopriyete li. Li asire ke moun yo resevwa tretman ki jis e san patipri atravè pwosesis legal ki apwopriye. Garanti pwosediral egzije pou gouvènman an swiv sèten etap oswa pwosedi, tankou bay avi, yon odyans jis, ak yon opòtinite pou moun nan fè tande vwa li, anvan li prive yon moun de dwa li yo. Li mete anfaz sou metòd yo itilize pou fè lwa yo respekte, pou asire ke gouvènman an aji yon fason ki jis e ekitab.
The lawfare that has been manifested since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a denial of both substantive and procedural due process. The fundamental rights of American citizens were openly and successfully denied. The false flag operations and the open corruption of the alphabet agencies of the United States has been regularly exposed since even before the Pelosi Trials began, but the legal procedures that have been employed by the globalists of both parties since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a clear illustration of the destruction of procedural due process.
Lagè jiridik ki te manifeste depi Pwosè Pelosi yo te kòmanse a, reprezante yon refi ni de pwosesis legal regilye sou fon an ni de pwosesis legal regilye sou pwosedi a. Dwa fondamantal sitwayen ameriken yo te refize ouvètman e avèk siksè. Operasyon fo drapo yo ak koripsyon ouvè ajans alfabet Etazini yo te regilyèman ekspoze depi menm anvan Pwosè Pelosi yo te kòmanse, men pwosedi legal globalis toude pati yo te itilize depi Pwosè Pelosi yo te kòmanse, reprezante yon ilistrasyon klè destriksyon pwosesis legal regilye sou pwosedi a.
Earlier in the article we read, “Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.”
Byen bonè nan atik la nou te li: “Nenpòt mouvman an favè lejislasyon relijye se an reyalite yon zak konsesyon anvè papote a, ki pandan tout kantite syèk sa yo te mennen yon lagè san rete kont libète konsyans. Obsèvans dimanch dwe egzistans li kòm yon sa yo rele enstitisyon kretyèn a ‘mistè inikite a’; e aplikasyon fòse li a pral yon rekonesans de-fakto prensip ki se menm wòch angilè Romanis la. Lè nasyon nou an va konsa renonse ak prensip gouvènman li yo jouk li adopte yon lwa dimanch, Pwotestantis nan zak sa a ap mete men ak papote; sa pap anyen lòt pase bay lavi a tirani ki depi lontan ap veye ak anvi opòtinite pa li pou l sote ankò nan despotis aktif.”
In the line of history that can be represented with the Constitution of the United States there are three specific waymarks representing some element of the Constitution in both the beginning and the ending of the United States. Each of those three waymarks are political actions, and therefore symbolize the speaking of the United States. The third of those three waymarks in the beginning, that marked 1798, was the Alien and Sedition Acts and the third of those waymarks at the ending is when the United States enforces a Sunday law, and speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven.
Nan liy istwa ki ka reprezante pa Konstitisyon Etazini an, gen twa pwen repè presi ki reprezante kèk eleman nan Konstitisyon an ni nan kòmansman ni nan fen Etazini. Chak nan twa pwen repè sa yo se aksyon politik, e poutèt sa yo senbolize fason Etazini pale. Twazyèm nan twa pwen repè sa yo nan kòmansman an, ki te make ane 1798, se te Lwa sou Etranje ak Sedisyon yo; epi twazyèm nan pwen repè sa yo nan fen an se lè Etazini fè respekte yon lwa dimanch, epi li pale tankou yon dragon, an akonplisman Revelasyon chapit trèz, vèsè onz.
The prophetic history of the United States begins when, as represented by the earth, it opened its mouth and swallowed up the flood of the dragon’s persecution.
Istwa pwofetik Etazini an kòmanse lè, jan tè a te reprezante l la, li te louvri bouch li epi li te vale inondasyon pèsekisyon dragon an.
And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. Revelation 12:15, 16.
Epi sèpan an voye dlo sòti nan bouch li tankou yon gwo inondasyon dèyè fanm nan, pou l te ka fè inondasyon an pote l ale. Men tè a te ede fanm nan; tè a louvri bouch li, li vale inondasyon dragon an te voye sòti nan bouch li a. Revelasyon 12:15, 16.
In 1776, the beast that was to arise from the earth, and ultimately become the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy in 1798, swallowed up the flood of persecution against God’s people by establishing a nation with a Constitution that protested against the tyrants of European royalty and the tyrants of the papal church.
Nan ane 1776, bèt ki te dwe sòti sou latè a, epi ki t ap finalman vin sizyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la an 1798, te vale gwo debòde pèsekisyon kont pèp Bondye a lè li te tabli yon nasyon avèk yon Konstitisyon ki te pwoteste kont tiran wayote Ewòp la ak tiran legliz papal la.
The Declaration of Independence in 1776 typified the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 typified the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 typified the Sunday law in the United States.
Deklarasyon Endepandans lan an 1776 te prefigire Patriot Act 2001 an. Konstitisyon 1789 la te prefigire Pwosè Pelosi yo ki te kòmanse an 2022. Lwa sou Etranje ak Sedisyon yo nan 1798 te prefigire lwa dimanch Ozetazini.
The pronouncement of independence by the American patriots in 1776 represented the announcement of the loss of independence with the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 represented the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts represents the Sunday law. The history of the repudiation of every principle of the Constitution represents a progressive overturning of the Constitution that ends at the Sunday law.
Pwoklamasyon endepandans patriyòt ameriken yo an 1776 te reprezante anons pèt endepandans lan avèk Patriot Act la an 2001. Konstitisyon an nan 1789 te reprezante Jijman Pelosi yo ki kòmanse an 2022. Lwa sou Etranje ak Sedisyon yo reprezante lwa dimanch lan. Istwa rejè chak prensip Konstitisyon an reprezante yon ranvèsman pwogresif Konstitisyon an ki fini nan lwa dimanch lan.
These lines all align in the hidden history of verse forty of Daniel chapter eleven. In this article we quoted four paragraphs from Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.
Liy sa yo tout aliyen nan istwa kache vèsè karant nan Daniel chapit onz la. Nan atik sa a nou te site kat paragraf nan Testimonies, volim 5, 451, 452.
We will look closer at those paragraphs in the next article.
N ap egzamine paragraf sa yo pi pre nan pwochen atik la.