And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. Daniel 12:11.
Depi nan tan yo pral wete sakrifis kontinyèl la, epi y ap mete kanpe abominasyon ki fè dezolasyon an, pral gen mil desan katrevendis jou. Dànyèl 12:11.
Since October 22, 1844, the application of prophetic time is no longer a correct application of prophecy, by those who might wish to rightly divide the word of truth. The period of 1290 years in verse eleven is to be applied as a symbolic period after 1844, and the application after 1844, or a period without the elements of “time,” must retain the foundational understanding of the truth, as it was understood before 1844. The 1290 represents a period of 30, followed by 1260. The understanding before 1844 was that the thirty years from 508 unto 538 represented a period of preparation for the antichrist to begin to rule from 538 unto 1798.
Depi 22 oktòb 1844, aplikasyon tan pwofetik la pa yon aplikasyon pwofesi ki kòrèk ankò pou moun ki ta vle byen separe pawòl verite a. Peryòd 1290 ane ki nan vèsè onz la dwe aplike kòm yon peryòd senbolik apre 1844, epi aplikasyon sa a apre 1844, oswa yon peryòd san eleman “tan” yo, dwe kenbe konpreyansyon fondamantal verite a jan yo te konprann li anvan 1844. Chif 1290 la reprezante yon peryòd 30, epi apre sa 1260. Konpreyansyon anvan 1844 la se te ke trant ane ki soti nan 508 rive 538 te reprezante yon peryòd preparasyon pou antikris la kòmanse dirije depi 538 rive 1798.
The 30 years transition is the subject of Paul in 2 Thessalonians. Paul includes no reference to the element of “time,” but he identifies the prophetic characteristics of paganism giving way to papalism in those thirty years. Then the papal rule began. The historical understanding, absent any element of time, identifies the transition of the fourth kingdom of Bible prophecy unto the fifth kingdom, followed by the first of two papal blood baths, thus typifying the transition of the sixth kingdom unto the threefold union of the dragon, the beast and the false prophet and the second papal blood bath.
Tranzisyon 30 lane a se sijè Pòl trete nan 2 Tesalonisyen. Pòl pa mete okenn referans ak eleman “tan” an, men li idantifye karakteristik pwofetik payanis k ap bay plas li bay papalis pandan trant ane sa yo. Lè sa a, dominasyon papal la te kòmanse. Konpreyansyon istorik la, san okenn eleman tan, idantifye tranzisyon katriyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la pou rive nan senkyèm wayòm nan, epi answit premye nan de beny san papal yo, konsa li sèvi kòm tip tranzisyon sizyèm wayòm nan pou rive nan inyon an twa fòm dragon an, bèt la ak fo pwofèt la, ansanm ak dezyèm beny san papal la.
The thirty years preparation followed by a prophetic period is a primary symbol of God’s covenant with a chosen people. The transition of the two powers over the thirty years, that is followed by 1260 years of persecution aligns with Christ’s thirty years of preparation, followed by 1260 days of salvation. Antichrist’s thirty years preparation counterfeited Christ’s thirty years of preparation. The end of the thirty years identifies either the empowerment of Christ at His baptism, or the empowerment of the antichrist in 538. The empowerment of the antichrist came from the economic and military support that came from the previous kingdom, and the power poured out upon Christ came from the previous kingdom He left thirty years before.
Trant ane preparasyon yo, ki te swiv pa yon peryòd pwofetik, se yon senbòl prensipal alyans Bondye avèk yon pèp li chwazi. Tranzisyon de pouvwa yo pandan trant ane yo, ki apre sa te swiv pa 1260 ane pèsekisyon, ann amoni avèk trant ane preparasyon Kris la, ki te swiv pa 1260 jou sali. Trant ane preparasyon antikris la te yon kontrefason trant ane preparasyon Kris la. Fen trant ane yo idantifye swa otorizasyon Kris la nan batèm Li, swa otorizasyon antikris la an 538. Otorizasyon antikris la te soti nan sipò ekonomik ak militè ki te soti nan wayòm ki te vini anvan an, epi pouvwa ki te vide sou Kris la te soti nan wayòm anvan an, ke Li te kite trant ane pi bonè.
The break in the two periods is marked by an empowerment, and the break in the two periods set forth by Abram and Paul is recognized by simple comparison. In Abram and Pauls’ thirty-year distinction, the preparation period was the first thirty years representing the covenant process, which empowered Abram’s descendants to fulfill the prophecy of bondage in Egypt. The four hundred and thirty years has a further symbolic division, for correctly applied the first two hundred and fifteen years is represented by God’s representative and Pharaoh. For Joseph and the first 215 years it was the good Pharaoh, and for Moses and the second 215 years it was the bad Pharaoh.
Mak ki genyen ant de peryòd yo make pa yon bay pouvwa, e separasyon ki genyen ant de peryòd Abram ak Pòl mete devan yo rekonèt pa yon senp konparezon. Nan distenksyon trant ane Abram ak Pòl la, peryòd preparasyon an te premye trant ane yo, ki te reprezante pwosesis alyans lan, ki te bay desandan Abram yo pouvwa pou yo akonpli pwofesi esklavaj la nan peyi Lejip. Kat san trant ane yo genyen yon lòt divizyon senbolik ankò, paske lè yo aplike yo kòrèkteman, premye de san kenz ane yo reprezante pa reprezantan Bondye a ak Farawon an. Paske pou Jozèf ak premye 215 ane yo, se te bon Farawon an; epi pou Moyiz ak dezyèm 215 ane yo, se te move Farawon an.
That division identifies two periods of four generations. The first four generations can be laid over the second four generations line upon line, and in doing so, Joseph and Moses, a prophetic alpha and omega, interact with a alpha-good Pharaoh and an omega bad Pharaoh. There is great light to be derived from this parallel consideration, but I am simply identifying that Abram’s prediction of the fourth generation identifies two witnesses of the four generations in the 430 years. The twofold representation of four generations is found in the genealogies of Genesis four and five. When we consider Cain and Seth as the start of the listing of the blood lines, we find that there are eight generations from Seth to Noah, and that when divided in the middle there is a representation of two periods of four generations. This is recognized in the eight generational lines of both Seth and Cain.
Separasyon sa a idantifye de peryòd ki genyen kat jenerasyon chak. Premye kat jenerasyon yo ka poze sou dezyèm kat jenerasyon yo, liy sou liy; e lè sa fèt, Jozèf ak Moyiz, yon alfa ak omega pwofetik, antre an relasyon avèk yon Farawon alfa-bon ak yon Farawon omega-mechan. Gen anpil gran limyè ki ka sòti nan konsiderasyon paralèl sa a, men mwen sèlman ap idantifye ke prediksyon Abraram lan konsènan katriyèm jenerasyon an idantifye de temwen kat jenerasyon yo nan 430 ane yo. Reprezantasyon doub kat jenerasyon yo jwenn nan jeneyaloji Jenèz kat ak senk. Lè nou konsidere Kayen ak Sèt kòm kòmansman lis liy sangen yo, nou jwenn ke gen uit jenerasyon depi Sèt rive jouk Noye, epi lè yo divize yo nan mitan an, gen yon reprezantasyon de de peryòd kat jenerasyon. Sa rekonèt nan liy uit jenerasyon yo, ni pou Sèt ni pou Kayen.
The genealogies in chapters four and five are represented with the conclusion of the lines, which is Noah. Noah is the symbol of God’s covenant with mankind as represented by the rainbow. Abram is the symbol of God’s covenant with a chosen people as represented by circumcision. Those two covenants are always tied together, and Genesis eleven, where we find the tower of Babel right after Noah’s flood, is where the genealogy that leads to Abram is set forth. In that passage it is ten generations, not eight. In the passage that leads to Abram and the passage that lead to Noah the Noachian and Abrahamic covenants are represented.
Jeneyaloji ki nan chapit kat ak senk yo prezante avèk konklizyon liy fanmi yo, ki se Noe. Noe se senbòl alyans Bondye avèk limanite, jan lakansyèl la reprezante li. Abram se senbòl alyans Bondye avèk yon pèp Bondye chwazi, jan sikonsizyon an reprezante li. De alyans sa yo toujou mare ansanm, e nan Jenèz onz, kote nou jwenn toudeba Bàbèl la tousuit apre delij Noe a, se la yo tabli jeneyaloji ki mennen rive sou Abram nan. Nan pasaj sa a se dis jenerasyon, pa uit. Nan pasaj ki mennen sou Abram nan ak nan pasaj ki mennen sou Noe a, alyans Noeyik la ak alyans Abraramik la reprezante.
In the passage from chapter eleven that addresses a chosen people we find two of those generations are laden with great light.
Nan pasaj ki soti nan chapit onz la, ki adrese yon pèp chwazi, nou jwenn de nan jenerasyon sa yo chaje ak yon gwo limyè.
And Eber lived four and thirty years, and begat Peleg: And Eber lived after he begat Peleg four hundred and thirty years, and begat sons and daughters. And Peleg lived thirty years, and begat Reu. Genesis 11:16–19.
Ebè te viv trant-katran, epi li fè Peleg. Apre Ebè te fin fè Peleg, li viv katsantrant an, epi li fè pitit gason ak pitit fi. Peleg te viv trantan, epi li fè Reou. Jenèz 11:16–19.
The reference to Eber is the first reference of the Hebrew word that is eventually identified as the Hebrew word “Hebrew.” In the genealogy of a chosen people, one of the ten descendants is named Hebrew, which is what the chosen people were to be known as. In three verses Eber and Peleg are used to mark the distinction of the chosen Hebrew race. Eber means “crossing over” or “the one who crosses over” and is the root of the word, “Hebrew.” Abram is a symbol of those who cross over from Babylon to the Promised Land. “Peleg” means “division” or “split,” as referenced in Genesis 10:25, where we are informed that in Peleg’s days the “earth was divided.”
Referans a Eber la se premye referans mo ebre ki finalman idantifye kòm mo ebre “Ebre.” Nan jeneyaloji yon pèp chwazi, youn nan dis desandan yo rele Ebre, ki se non pèp chwazi a te dwe konnen. Nan twa vèsè, yo itilize Eber ak Peleg pou make distenksyon ras ebre chwazi a. Eber vle di “travèse” oswa “sila a ki travèse,” epi li se rasin mo “Ebre.” Abram se yon senbòl pou sila yo ki travèse soti Babilòn pou ale nan Tè Pwomiz la. “Peleg” vle di “divizyon” oswa “separasyon,” jan sa mansyone nan Jenèz 10:25, kote yo fè nou konnen ke nan jou Peleg yo “latè te divize.”
Eber and Peleg represent a prophetic division for those who wish to rightly divide the word of truth. The genealogy of Noah produced two lines of eight, which represented two sets of four generations, as does the 430 years in Egypt. The genealogy of Genesis eleven is represented by ten, not eight, for it is the genealogy of a chosen people. The chosen people are divided into two groups of five, thus aligning with the parable of the ten virgins, which is the parable of God’s covenant people.
Ebè ak Pelèg reprezante yon divizyon pwofetik pou moun ki vle byen separe pawòl verite a. Jeneyaloji Noye a te pwodui de liy uit, ki te reprezante de seri kat jenerasyon, menm jan ak 430 ane yo ann Ejip. Jeneyaloji Jenèz onz la reprezante pa dis, pa uit, paske se jeneyaloji yon pèp chwazi. Pèp chwazi a divize an de gwoup senk, konsa li aliyen ak parabòl dis vyèj yo, ki se parabòl pèp alyans Bondye a.
In that chosen people genealogy, Peleg’s name and his historical fulfillment represent a division of two classes of wise or foolish virgins, at the very point in biblical history that the earth had been divided at the tower of Babel. In the list of ten, Peleg is number five, for that is the center of ten. Eber the Hebrew, typified by Abram represents a foolish virgin who crosses over and becomes a wise virgin, when the two classes are divided at the cry at midnight. Eber, the first Hebrew in name, represents Abram, the first Hebrew by covenant. When the Lord called Abram out of Babylon, it typified the message of the midnight cry, which is the empowerment of the second angel, who calls men and women out of Babylon.
Nan jeyaloji pèp eli sa a, non Peleg la ak akonplisman istorik li a reprezante yon divizyon ant de klas vyèj saj oswa vyèj sòt, egzakteman nan moman sa a nan listwa biblik kote tè a te divize nan gwo fò won Babèl la. Nan lis dis la, Peleg se nimewo senk, paske se sant dis la. Ebè, Ebre a, jan Abraram te tipifye l la, reprezante yon vyèj sòt ki travèse pou vin tounen yon vyèj saj, lè de klas yo separe nan rèl la a minwi. Ebè, premye Ebre a nan non, reprezante Abraram, premye Ebre a pa alyans. Lè Seyè a te rele Abraram soti Babilòn, sa te tipifye mesaj rèl minwi a, ki se abilite dezyèm zanj lan, ki rele gason ak fanm soti Babilòn.
The parable of the ten virgins is represented with Eber and Peleg representing a call to come out, just before the dividing line of Peleg closes the door of probation. In the prophetic relationship Eber lived 430 years after Peleg, who then lived 30 years. The first step of Abram’s threefold covenant was represented by Eber and Peleg. Abram, as Eber and Peleg as the dividing line between two classes. Paul’s addition to Abram’s prophecy is Peleg’s addition to Eber’s prophecy. Eber proclaimed 400 years, but Peleg identified 430 years. Peleg therefore represented Paul, and Paul’s addition of 30 years to the 400 years, and Paul’s ministry was to identify the Peleg of Bible prophecy. The “Peleg” of Bible prophecy that Paul identified represented the dividing of the nation from literal to spiritual.
Parabòl dis vyèj yo reprezante avèk Ebè ak Pelèg kòm yon apèl pou soti, jis anvan liy divizyon Pelèg la fèmen pòt gras la. Nan relasyon pwofetik la, Ebè te viv 430 ane apre Pelèg, ki apre sa te viv 30 ane. Premye etap alyans Abraram nan ki gen twa pati te reprezante pa Ebè ak Pelèg. Abraram, menm jan ak Ebè ak Pelèg, se liy divizyon ant de klas. Adisyon Pòl fè nan pwofesi Abraram nan se adisyon Pelèg fè nan pwofesi Ebè a. Ebè te pwoklame 400 ane, men Pelèg te idantifye 430 ane. Se poutèt sa, Pelèg te reprezante Pòl, ansanm ak adisyon Pòl fè a, 30 ane sou 400 ane yo; epi ministè Pòl la te pou idantifye Pelèg pwofesi Bib la. “Pelèg” pwofesi Bib la, ke Pòl te idantifye a, te reprezante divizyon nasyon an soti nan literal pou rive nan espirityèl.
From Shem to Peleg is five descendants, and from Rue to Abram is five.
Depi Sèm rive Pegè, gen senk desandan, e depi Reou rive Abram, gen senk.
And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years. Genesis 15:13.
Epi li di Abraram: Konnen byen sèten desandan ou yo pral etranje nan yon peyi ki pa pa yo, y ap sèvi moun peyi sa a; epi moun sa yo ap maltrete yo pandan katsan (400) an. Jenèz 15:13.
Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise. Galatians 3:16–18.
Koulye a, se ak Abraram ak desandans li yo pwomès yo te fèt. Li pa di: “Epi ak desandans yo,” kòm si se te anpil; men kòm si se te youn sèl: “Epi ak desandans ou,” ki se Kris la. Men sa m ap di: alyans Bondye te konfime davans nan Kris la, lalwa ki te vini kat san trant ane apre pa kapab anile l, pou fè pwomès la vin san efè. Paske si eritaj la soti nan lalwa, li pa soti ankò nan pwomès; men Bondye te bay Abraram li pa mwayen pwomès. Galat 3:16–18.
Thirty Years Old
Trant an
Jesus was thirty when he began His ministry.
Jezi te gen trant an lè Li te kòmanse ministè Li.
And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli. Luke 3:23.
Jezi li menm te kòmanse gen anviwon trant an, antanke (jan yo te konprann li) pitit gason Jozèf, ki te pitit Eli. Lik 3:23.
Joseph began to serve Pharaoh in Egypt when he was thirty years old.
Jozèf te kòmanse sèvi Farawon an nan peyi Lejip lè li te gen trant an.
And Joseph was thirty years old when he stood before Pharaoh king of Egypt. And Joseph went out from the presence of Pharaoh, and went throughout all the land of Egypt. Genesis 41:46.
Epi Jozèf te gen trant an lè li te parèt devan Farawon, wa Lejip la. Epi Jozèf soti devan Farawon, epi li te vwayaje toupatou nan tout peyi Lejip la. Jenèz 41:46.
The prophet Ezekiel was thirty years old when he began his ministry, and his ministry lasted twenty-two years.
Pwofèt Ezekyèl te gen trantan lè li te kòmanse ministè li, epi ministè li te dire vennnde ane.
Now it came to pass in the thirtieth year, in the fourth month, in the fifth day of the month, as I was among the captives by the river of Chebar, that the heavens were opened, and I saw visions of God. Ezekiel 1:1.
Epi sa, nan trantyèm ane a, nan katriyèm mwa a, sou senkyèm jou mwa a, pandan mwen te nan mitan prizonye yo bò larivyè Keba a, syèl yo louvri, epi mwen wè vizyon Bondye. Ezekyèl 1:1.
Ezekiel has more historical references within his writings than any other prophet. There are thirteen direct references to ascertainable dates in the writings of Ezekiel, and unknowingly, the biblical scholars and historians confirm that his ministry spanned twenty-two years, though they know not that twenty-two is a symbol of the one hundred and forty-four thousand.
Ezikyèl gen plis referans istorik nan ekri li yo pase nenpòt lòt pwofèt. Gen trèz referans dirèk ak dat ki ka verifye nan ekri Ezikyèl yo, epi, san yo pa rann yo kont, etidyan biblik ak istoryen yo konfime ke ministè li te dire vennnde zan, byenke yo pa konnen vennnde se yon senbòl pou san karannkat mil la.
King David was thirty years old when he began to reign and he reigned for forty years.
Wa Daudi alikuwa na umri wa miaka thelathini alipoanza kutawala, naye akatawala kwa muda wa miaka arobaini.
David was thirty years old when he began to reign, and he reigned forty years. In Hebron he reigned over Judah seven years and six months: and in Jerusalem he reigned thirty and three years over all Israel and Judah. 2 Samuel 5:4, 5.
David te gen trant an lè li te kòmanse renye, e li te renye pandan karant an. Nan Ebwon li te renye sou Jida pandan sèt an ak sis mwa; epi nan Jerizalèm li te renye trant-twa an sou tout Izrayèl ak Jida. 2 Samyèl 5:4, 5.
David’s forty-year reign is a symbolic number, and the period of 40 is like Abram and Paul’s 430 years, for the 40 years is divided into two parts (7 and a half and 33 years). The two periods of David’s forty-year reign, have an added prophetic enigma, for another biblical witness records those two periods as seven years and thirty-three years. What does the extra six months in Second Samuel represent, and how does 7.5 and 33 equal 40? There is an overlap of six months that must represent a prophetic truth.
Rèy David la pandan karantan se yon nonb senbolik, e peryòd 40 an sanble ak 430 an Abraram ak Pòl mansyone yo, paske 40 an yo divize an de pati (7 an edmi ak 33 an). De peryòd rèy David la pandan karantan an pote yon lòt enigm pwofetik anplis, paske yon lòt temwen biblik anrejistre de peryòd sa yo kòm sèt an ak trant-twa an. Kisa sis mwa anplis nan Dezyèm Samyèl la reprezante, e kijan 7.5 ak 33 fè 40? Gen yon sipèpozisyon sis mwa ki dwe reprezante yon verite pwofetik.
And the days that David reigned over Israel were forty years: seven years reigned he in Hebron, and thirty and three years reigned he in Jerusalem. 1 Kings 2:11.
Epi jou David te wa sou Izrayèl yo te karant ane: li te wa pandan sèt ane nan Ebwon, epi li te wa pandan trant-twa ane nan Jerizalèm. 1 Wa 2:11.
22 is a symbolic number representing the combination of Divinity with humanity and Ezekiel’s ministry lasted twenty-two-years. Joseph’s fourteen years is divided into two periods of seven years, Christ’s covenant week divided into two equal 1260-day periods, and David’s forty year reign is broken into two periods, with an additional symbol connecting the two periods.
22 se yon nimewo senbolik ki reprezante konbinezon Divinite ak limanite, epi ministè Ezekyèl la te dire vennnde zan. Katòz ane Jozèf yo divize an de peryòd sèt ane; semèn alyans Kris la divize an de peryòd egal 1260 jou; epi rèy karant ane David la separe an de peryòd, avèk yon senbòl anplis ki konekte de peryòd yo.
Jesus is the Prophet, the Priest and the King. In the latter days He will lift up His church triumphant as an ensign, and that church is represented by Christ, the prophet, priest and king who has combined His Divinity with men, represented by Ezekiel the prophet, Joseph the priest and David the king. The four symbols represent three worthies in the furnace that was heated seven times above normal, and then there appeared the fourth, and He was as the son of God. All the world was represented at the celebration of Nebuchadnezzar’s golden image, and they all saw the church triumphant made up of a human prophet, a human priest and a human king, sustained by the fourth Divine person.
Jezi se Pwofèt la, Prèt la, ak Wa a. Nan dènye jou yo, li pral leve legliz li a ki triyonfan tankou yon drapo, e legliz sa a reprezante pa Kris la, pwofèt, prèt ak wa a, ki ini Divinite li ak lèzòm, jan Ezekyèl pwofèt la, Jozèf prèt la, ak David wa a reprezante yo. Kat senbòl sa yo reprezante twa diyitè yo nan fou a ki te chofe sèt fwa plis pase nòmal, epi apre sa katriyèm lan parèt, e li te tankou Pitit Bondye a. Tout mond lan te reprezante nan selebrasyon estati an lò Nebikadneza a, e yo tout te wè legliz la ki triyonfan, ki fòme ak yon pwofèt imen, yon prèt imen, ak yon wa imen, soutni pa katriyèm Pèsonn diven an.
“Satan has taken the world captive. He has introduced an idol sabbath, apparently giving to it great importance. He has stolen the homage of the Christian world away from the Sabbath of the Lord for this idol sabbath. The world bows to a tradition, a man-made commandment. As Nebuchadnezzar set up his golden image on the plain of Dura, and so exalted himself, so Satan exalts himself in this false sabbath, for which he has stolen the livery of heaven.” Review and Herald, March 8, 1898.
« Satan te pran lemonn nan kaptivite. Li prezante yon saba zidòl, e li sanble bay li yon gran enpòtans. Li vòlè omaj mond kretyen an te dwe rann a Saba Seyè a pou l dirije l bay saba zidòl sa a. Lemonn ap bese tèt devan yon tradisyon, yon kòmandman lèzòm fè. Menm jan Nebikadneza te leve imaj an lò pa li a sou plèn Doura a, epi konsa li te leve tèt pa li wo, konsa tou Satan leve tèt pa li wo nan fo saba sa a, saba pou li a li vòlè livrezon syèl la.» Review and Herald, 8 mas 1898.
The Number Four
Nimewo Kat la
At the prophetic level, forty is a tithe of Abram’s four hundred, and four is a tithe of forty. Any prophetic characteristic that is found in the number four, must align with the symbolism of forty, which in turn must align with the symbolism of four hundred. In context, four often represents “worldwide,” a familiar understanding, but it also represents “a progression” and in some contexts a “progressive destruction.”
Nan nivo pwofetik la, karant se yon ladim nan katsan Abraram nan, epi kat se yon ladim nan karant. Nenpòt karakteristik pwofetik ki jwenn nan nonb kat la, dwe ann amoni ak senbolis karant lan, ki menm tou dwe ann amoni ak senbolis katsan an. Nan kontèks la, kat souvan reprezante “atravè lemond,” yon konpreyansyon ki abitye, men li reprezante tou “yon pwogresyon” e nan kèk kontèks “yon destriksyon pwogresif.”
The first four of the seven trumpets represent the progressive destruction of Western Rome. Eastern Rome in Constantinople ended in submission to the four Ottoman Sultans. Line upon line eastern and western Rome progressively disintegrated over four periods, represented by four trumpets, while also being brought down by Islam of the fifth and sixth trumpets. Together the two lines identify the fall of Rome over four generations of trumpets, while an escalating war with Islam leads to the ultimate demise when the four sultans of Islam take supremacy over the kingdom. The history of west and east began with the division of the Empire by Constantine in 330.
Kat premye twonpèt yo pami sèt la reprezante destriksyon pwogresif Wòm oksidantal la. Wòm oryantal la, nan Konstantinòp, te fini pa soumèt anba kat Siltan Otoman yo. Liy sou liy, Wòm oryantal ak Wòm oksidantal te dezentegre pwogresivman atravè kat peryòd, ki reprezante pa kat twonpèt, pandan yo t ap tou vin ranvèse pa Islam atravè senkyèm ak sizyèm twonpèt yo. Ansanm, de liy sa yo idantifye tonbe Wòm nan sou kat jenerasyon twonpèt, pandan yon lagè k ap vin pi entans ak Islam mennen nan dènye disparisyon an lè kat siltan Islam yo pran sipremasi sou wayòm nan. Istwa lwès ak lès la te kòmanse ak divizyon Anpi a pa Konstanten an 330.
The four trumpets of western Rome begin in 330, and the fifth and sixth trumpet represent the power that bring eastern Rome down, an eastern Rome also began in 330. Both eastern and western Rome contributed to the work of placing the papal power on the throne of the earth in 538, so the two lines of western and eastern typify the two horns of the United States, who places the papal power back on the throne at the Sunday law. Western Rome is the symbol of churchcraft in the prophetic relationship and eastern Rome is the symbol of statecraft.
Kat twonpèt Wòm oksidantal yo kòmanse an 330, epi senkyèm ak sizyèm twonpèt la reprezante pouvwa ki fè Wòm oriental la tonbe, yon Wòm oriental ki te kòmanse tou an 330. Toude, Wòm oriental ak Wòm oksidantal, te kontribye nan travay pou mete pouvwa papal la sou twòn tè a an 538; konsa, de liy oksidantal ak oriental yo se yon tip de de kòn Etazini yo, ki remete pouvwa papal la sou twòn nan nan lwa dimanch la. Wòm oksidantal se senbòl atizay legliz la nan relasyon pwofetik la, epi Wòm oriental se senbòl atizay leta.
Within the history of the fall of western and eastern Rome, the history of papal Rome is set forth. Beginning with the church of the disciples, represented by Ephesus, the first three churches lead to the fourth church, which is the papacy from 538 until 1798. In Revelation thirteen, the papacy is identified as ruling for 42 months, after its deadly wound of 1798 is healed at the Sunday law. “Time is no longer” after 1844, so the forty-two months are a symbol of the period of persecution from the Sunday law until Michael stands up. The pioneers understood the churches, seals and trumpets represented three lines of history that run parallel to one another. Laying the prophetic testimony of western Rome over the line of eastern Rome and the line of papal Rome is not a prophetic application which was employed by the Millerites, but the technique does not contradict any of their established understandings.
Nan istwa tonbe Wòm lwès ak Wòm lès la, istwa Wòm papal la prezante. Kòmanse avèk legliz disip yo, ki reprezante pa Efèz, twa premye legliz yo mennen nan katriyèm legliz la, ki se papote a depi 538 rive 1798. Nan Revelasyon trèz, yo idantifye papote a kòm k ap dirije pandan 42 mwa, apre blesi mòtèl li te resevwa an 1798 geri nan lwa dimanch la. “Tan pa la ankò” apre 1844, kidonk karant-de mwa yo se yon senbòl peryòd pèsekisyon an depi lwa dimanch la jouk lè Mikayèl leve kanpe. Pyonye yo te konprann legliz yo, so yo ak twonpèt yo te reprezante twa liy istwa ki mache paralèl youn ak lòt. Mete temwayaj pwofetik Wòm lwès la sou liy Wòm lès la ak sou liy Wòm papal la se pa yon aplikasyon pwofetik Millerit yo te itilize, men teknik la pa kontredi okenn nan konpreyansyon etabli yo.
Line upon line, the first four trumpets are to be laid over the history represented by the fifth and sixth trumpets, and then the line of the first three churches that lead to the period of papal persecution represented by the fourth church. Four trumpets on the one line, four sultans on the second line, and four churches on the third line. The number “four” represents worldwide, but it also represents a progressive destruction of either a civil or religious power. What it represents is determined by context.
Liy apre liy, kat premye twonpèt yo dwe poze sou istwa senkyèm ak sizyèm twonpèt yo reprezante a, epi apre sa sou liy twa premye legliz yo ki mennen rive nan peryòd pèsekisyon pap la katriyèm legliz la reprezante a. Kat twonpèt sou yon liy, kat siltan sou dezyèm liy lan, epi kat legliz sou twazyèm liy lan. Chif “kat” la reprezante dimansyon mondyal, men li reprezante tou yon destriksyon pwogresif swa yon pouvwa sivil swa yon pouvwa relijye. Sa li reprezante a detèmine pa kontèks la.
At the Sunday law the papal power is restored. The first time the papacy was empowered there was a thirty-year period of preparation. In the first four churches, the fourth church is the papacy, and the first church was the disciples, represented as Ephesus. The first three generations of the Christian church led to the fourth church of Thyatira, that is represented by Jezebel. When you get to Thyatira, in 538, a Sunday law was enacted at the Counsel of Orleans, thus identifying the Sunday law in the United States, when the deadly wound of 1798 is healed.
Nan lwa dimanch lan, pouvwa papal la retabli. Premye fwa yo te bay papote a pouvwa, te gen yon peryòd preparasyon trant ane. Nan kat premye legliz yo, katriyèm legliz la se papote a, epi premye legliz la se te disip yo, ki reprezante kòm Efez. Twa premye jenerasyon legliz kretyen an te mennen nan katriyèm legliz Tiyatir la, ki reprezante pa Jezabèl. Lè ou rive nan Tiyatir, an 538, yo te mete yon lwa dimanch an aplikasyon nan Konsèy Orléans la, konsa sa idantifye lwa dimanch lan Ozetazini, lè blesi mòtèl 1798 la geri.
The history from 1798, until the Sunday law in the United States is represented by the first four churches. The fourth church of Thyatira is the Sunday law, and the papal persecution which follows. The first church of Ephesus, the church who lost its first love, ended up at the conclusion of the four-step progressive destruction, at the Sunday law of Thyatira. The generation that leads to the Sunday law of Thyatira, is the third generation of Pergamos. Thyatira represents the Sunday law until the close of probation, and Pergamos represents the compromise of the third generation that prepares the way for Thyatira. The third generation of Pergamos, and the compromise it represents was first fulfilled in the time of Constantine, who passed the very first Sunday law in 321. The United States began as the lamb of Ephesus, but when it places Thyatira back on the throne, it speaks as a dragon.
Istwa depi 1798 jouk rive nan lwa dimanch Ozetazini an reprezante pa kat premye legliz yo. Katriyèm legliz la, Tiyatir, se lwa dimanch lan, ansanm ak pèsekisyon papal ki vini apre li. Premye legliz la, Efez, legliz ki te pèdi premye lanmou li, te fini pa rive nan konklizyon destriksyon pwogresif an kat etap la, nan lwa dimanch Tiyatir la. Jenerasyon ki mennen nan lwa dimanch Tiyatir la se twazyèm jenerasyon Pègam lan. Tiyatir reprezante lwa dimanch lan jouk nan fen tan gras la, epi Pègam reprezante konpwomi twazyèm jenerasyon an ki prepare chemen an pou Tiyatir. Twazyèm jenerasyon Pègam lan, ansanm ak konpwomi li reprezante a, te premye akonpli nan epòk Konstanten, ki te pase premye lwa dimanch la menm nan ane 321. Etazini te kòmanse kòm ti mouton Efez la, men lè li mete Tiyatir tounen sou twòn nan, li pale tankou yon dragon.
The progressive destruction of the United States is represented by the first four churches of Revelation. The progressive destruction of the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy occurs over four generations that lead to the Sunday law, where the earth beast, speaks as a dragon. The final generation is represented by the dragon, that is a reptile, as in the Garden of Eden, and for this reason, both John the Baptist and Jesus called the last generation of ancient Israel, “a generation of vipers.”
Destriksyon pwogresif Etazini an reprezante pa kat premye legliz yo nan liv Revelasyon an. Destriksyon pwogresif sizyèm wayòm pwofesi biblik la fèt atravè kat jenerasyon ki mennen nan lwa dimanch lan, kote bèt tè a pale tankou yon dragon. Dènye jenerasyon an reprezante pa dragon an, ki se yon reptil, menm jan sa te ye nan Jaden Edenn nan; e se poutèt sa ni Jan Batis ni Jezi te rele dènye jenerasyon ansyen Izrayèl la: «yon jenerasyon sèpan pwazon.»
The fourth and last generation is either the “chosen generation” representing the one hundred and forty-four thousand, or its counterpart, the generation of vipers. One class has formed the image of Christ, the other the image of the beast—the serpent. The generation of vipers is directly set forth, four times in God’s Word. The context at each reference is different.
Katriyèm e dènye jenerasyon an se swa “jenerasyon eli a” ki reprezante san karannkat mil yo, swa kontrepati li a, jenerasyon sèpan pwazon yo. Yon gwoup fòme imaj Kris la, lòt la imaj bèt la—sèpan an. Jenerasyon sèpan pwazon yo prezante klèman, kat fwa, nan Pawòl Bondye a. Kontèks la diferan nan chak referans.
But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Matthew 3:7.
Men lè li wè anpil nan Farizyen yo ak Sadiseyen yo vini nan batèm li a, li di yo: O ras sèpan, ki moun ki te avèti nou pou nou sove anba kòlè k ap vini an? Matye 3:7.
If the “generation of vipers” were simply some derogatory remarks about a couple sects of people that John didn’t like, then there would be nothing to say about the expression. But every word is sacred within God’s Word, so John was assigning a specific label to the Sadducees and Pharisees. That label is defined prophetically by the context of the passage where it is expressed. In the passage John is identified as accomplishing his ministry, then the Sadducees and Pharisees enter the narrative. In the opening verses John is identified as Isaiah’s “voice in the wilderness.”
Si la « génération de vipères » n’était que quelques remarques péjoratives au sujet de quelques sectes de personnes que Jean n’aimait pas, alors il n’y aurait rien à dire de cette expression. Mais chaque mot est sacré dans la Parole de Dieu; Jean attribuait donc aux Sadducéens et aux Pharisiens une désignation précise. Cette désignation est définie prophétiquement par le contexte du passage où elle est employée. Dans ce passage, Jean est présenté comme accomplissant son ministère, puis les Sadducéens et les Pharisiens entrent dans le récit. Dans les versets d’ouverture, Jean est identifié comme la « voix dans le désert » d’Ésaïe.
In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judaea, And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.
Nan jou sa yo, Jan Batis la vini, li t ap preche nan dezè Jide a, epi li t ap di: Repanti nou, paske wayòm syèl la pwoche.
For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying,
Paske se li menm pwofèt Ezayi te pale a, lè li te di,
The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.
Vwa yon moun k ap rele nan dezè a: Prepare chemen Senyè a, fè santye li yo dwat.
And the same John had his raiment of camel’s hair, and a leathern girdle about his loins; and his meat was locusts and wild honey.
Menm Jan sa a Jan menm te gen yon rad fèt ak pwal chamo, ak yon senti kwi mare nan ren li; epi manje li se te krikèt ak siwo myèl sovaj.
Then went out to him Jerusalem, and all Judaea, and all the region round about Jordan, And were baptized of him in Jordan, confessing their sins. But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Matthew 3:2–7.
Lè sa a, Jerizalèm, tout Jide, ak tout rejyon ki te ozalantou Jouden an, t al jwenn li; epi li te batize yo nan Jouden, pandan yo t ap konfese peche yo. Men, lè li wè anpil nan Farizyen yo ak Sadiseyen yo vini nan batèm li a, li di yo: O ras sèpan pwazon, ki moun ki avèti nou pou nou chape anba kòlè k ap vini an? Matye 3:2–7.
The final generation of ancient Israel is labelled as “a generation of vipers,” by a prophet who came out of the wilderness. John is the prophet who fulfilled the role as Malachi’s messenger who prepared the way for the Messenger of the Covenant, who was also the voice in the wilderness identified by Isaiah.
Dènye jenerasyon ansyen Izrayèl la resevwa etikèt “yon jenerasyon sèpan pwazon,” nan men yon pwofèt ki te sòti nan dezè a. Jan se pwofèt ki te akonpli wòl mesaje Malachi a, ki te prepare chemen an pou Mesaje Alyans lan, e ki te tou vwa nan dezè a Ezayi te idantifye a.
If we consider “leaves” as a symbol, we find that they represent “profession.” The first reference is with Adam and Eve, who covered their unrighteousness, with fig leaves. They had previously worn the garment of light, the garment of righteousness, but when that was gone, they realized they were naked Laodiceans, who think all they need to do is hide behind the “leaves of profession,” and everything will be OK. Further on in the passage, John speaks directly against the Laodicean Jews trusting in the bloodline of Abraham to save them, for their presumption was simply the empty leaves of profession. A person’s garments represent who they are.
Si nous considérons les « feuilles » comme un symbole, nous constatons qu’elles représentent la « profession ». La première référence se trouve chez Adam et Ève, qui couvrirent leur injustice avec des feuilles de figuier. Ils avaient auparavant porté le vêtement de lumière, le vêtement de justice; mais, lorsque celui-ci eut disparu, ils se rendirent compte qu’ils étaient nus, tels des Laodicéens qui pensent qu’il leur suffit de se cacher derrière les « feuilles de la profession » et que tout ira bien. Plus loin dans le passage, Jean s’élève directement contre les Juifs laodicéens qui se confiaient dans la lignée d’Abraham pour les sauver, car leur présomption n’était rien d’autre que les feuilles vides de la profession. Les vêtements d’une personne représentent ce qu’elle est.
Trees are a symbol of men and of kingdoms, and the fruit, the branch, the seed, the soil, the water, the root and obviously the leaves all represent specific prophetic symbols unto themselves, but each of those truths is connected to the other symbols represented in the various lines of prophecy that employ the prophetic symbols that go to make up a “tree.” Of course, the first prophetic symbolism of a tree is that it represents a life-or-death test.
Pye yo se yon senbòl pou lèzòm ak pou wayòm yo; epi fwi a, branch lan, grenn nan, tè a, dlo a, rasin lan, epi evidamman fèy yo tout reprezante senbòl pwofetik espesifik chak poukont yo; men chak nan verite sa yo konekte ak lòt senbòl yo ki reprezante nan divès liy pwofesi ki sèvi ak senbòl pwofetik ki fòme yon “pye bwa.” Natirèlman, premye senbolis pwofetik yon pye bwa se ke li reprezante yon tès lavi oswa lanmò.
John’s message is represented by the clothes he wore, and the food he ate. Prophetic food, such as the manna at the beginning of ancient Israel, or the Bread of Heaven at the end; must be eaten. The food represents a prophetic testing message which must be eaten, for it is Christ’s flesh and His blood. The clothes John wore and the food he ate identifies the message, and messenger who prepared the way for Christ. John typifies the final messenger who prepares the way for Christ, who is the Messenger of the Covenant who suddenly comes to His temple at the Sunday law. When that takes place, the foolish virgins, who are also Laodiceans and tares, represent the final fourth generation of those who profess to be the legitimate covenant people of Abraham, just as did the Pharisees and Sadducees, in the time when John appeared out of the wilderness.
Mesaj Jan an reprezante pa rad li te mete sou li, ak manje li te manje a. Manje pwofetik, tankou lamàn nan kòmansman ansyen pèp Izrayèl la, oswa Pen Syèl la nan fen an, dwe manje. Manje a reprezante yon mesaj pwofetik tès ki dwe manje, paske se chè Kris la ak san Li. Rad Jan te mete yo ak manje li te manje a idantifye mesaj la, ansanm ak mesaje ki te prepare chemen an pou Kris la. Jan se yon tip dènye mesaje a ki prepare chemen an pou Kris la, ki se Mesaje Alyans lan ki vini toudenkou nan tanp Li a nan lwa dimanch lan. Lè sa rive, vyèj sòt yo, ki se tou Laodiseyen ak move zèb, reprezante dènye katriyèm jenerasyon moun ki fè pwofesyon yo se vrè pèp alyans Abraram nan, menm jan Farizyen yo ak Sadiseyen yo te fè sa nan epòk kote Jan te parèt soti nan dezè a.
John wore camel hair, a leather girdle that included a harness attachment, such as farm animals have with a yoke. He ate, and therefore his message was of locusts, a premier symbol of Islam in the Scriptures, and he mixed his message of Islam, with the honey.
Jan te pote yon rad fèt ak plim chamo, ansanm ak yon senti kwi ki te gen yon atachman tankou sele bèt nan fèm konn genyen ak yon jouk. Li te manje, e konsa mesaj li te konsène krikèt yo, ki se yon senbòl prensipal Islam nan Ekriti yo, epi li te melanje mesaj li sou Islam ak siwo myèl la.
And the house of Israel called the name thereof Manna: and it was like coriander seed, white; and the taste of it was like wafers made with honey. Exodus 16:31.
Epi kay Izrayèl la rele non li laman; li te tankou grenn koryand, blan; epi gou li te tankou gato mens ki fèt ak siwo myèl. Egzòd 16:31.
Manna is a symbol of God’s Word, and it tasted like honey, which the prophets identify as the taste of the message, they are represented as eating. John brought the message of Islam as represented by the locusts, and a girdle of camel leather and camel hair. The locusts and the camel are both symbols of Islam. That message of Islam was mixed with the enlightenment of God’s Word that is represented as “honey.”
Lamàn se yon senbòl Pawòl Bondye a, e li te gen gou siwo myèl, sa pwofèt yo idantifye kòm gou mesaj la, yo reprezante kòm y ap manje. Jan te pote mesaj Islam nan, jan sa reprezante pa krikèt yo, ansanm ak yon sentiwon an kwi chamo ak cheve chamo. Krikèt yo ak chamo a, toude, se senbòl Islam. Mesaj Islam sa a te melanje ak ekleraj Pawòl Bondye a ki reprezante kòm “siwo myèl.”
Then said Jonathan, My father hath troubled the land: see, I pray you, how mine eyes have been enlightened, because I tasted a little of this honey. 1 Samuel 14:29.
Lè sa a, Jonatan di: Papa m' boulvèse peyi a; tanpri, gade kijan je m' yo vin klere, paske mwen te goute yon ti kras nan siwo myèl sa a. 1 Samyèl 14:29.
John did not simply represent a message of Islam, but he came from the wilderness, as did Elijah, and John did not eat honey, he ate wild honey, for he, as with Christ, was not trained in the institutions of the day who had their own honey of a message, represented by the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees. John ate honey from the wilderness, for he was trained by the Holy Spirit outside the religious institutions of his day. The typical girdle of the time period contained a hinge mechanism that a person would tie their camel hair garment onto. The hinge represents John, who was the turning point from the earthly unto the heavenly sanctuary.
Jan pa t senpleman reprezante yon mesaj Islam, men li te soti nan dezè a, menm jan ak Eli; e Jan pa t manje siwo myèl, li te manje siwo myèl sovaj, paske li menm, menm jan ak Kris la, pa t resevwa fòmasyon nan enstitisyon epòk la, ki te gen pwòp siwo myèl mesaj pa yo, sa ki te reprezante pa ledven Farizyen yo ak Sadiseyen yo. Jan te manje siwo myèl ki soti nan dezè a, paske se Sentespri a ki te fòme l andeyò enstitisyon relijye epòk pa li a. Sentiwon tipik epòk sa a te genyen yon mekanis charnyè kote yon moun te mare rad li ki te fèt ak plim chamo a. Charnyè a reprezante Jan, ki te pwen tranzisyon an soti nan sa ki te sou tè a pou rive nan Tanp Sentespri ki nan syèl la.
“The prophet John was the connecting link between the two dispensations. As God’s representative he stood forth to show the relation of the law and the prophets to the Christian dispensation. He was the lesser light, which was to be followed by a greater. The mind of John was illuminated by the Holy Spirit, that he might shed light upon his people; but no other light ever has shone or ever will shine so clearly upon fallen man as that which emanated from the teaching and example of Jesus. Christ and His mission had been but dimly understood as typified in the shadowy sacrifices. Even John had not fully comprehended the future, immortal life through the Saviour.” The Desire of Ages, 220.
“Pwofèt Jan te lyen ki te fè koneksyon ant de dispansasyon yo. Kòm reprezantan Bondye, li te parèt pou montre relasyon lalwa ak pwofèt yo genyen ak dispansasyon kretyen an. Li te pi piti limyè a, ki te dwe swiv pa yon limyè ki pi gran. Lespri Jan te eklere pa Sentespri a, pou l te ka gaye limyè sou pèp li a; men pa gen okenn lòt limyè ki janm klere ni ki pral janm klere sou lèzòm ki tonbe a avèk menm klète ak sa ki soti nan ansèyman ak egzanp Jezi. Kris la ak misyon Li a te sèlman konprann fèbman jan yo te reprezante yo nan sakrifis senbolik ki te tankou lonbraj. Menm Jan pa t fin konprann nèt lavi ki gen pou vini an, lavi imòtèl la, atravè Sovè a.” The Desire of Ages, 220.
The hinge garment of John is introduced at the very point of Christ’s baptism, which was the turning point, represented by the place where John was baptizing. That place was named Bethabara meaning “ferry crossing,” and is the very place ancient Israel entered into the Promised Land as they came out of the wilderness, just as John had done.
Rad Chèn Jan an parèt jisteman nan moman batèm Kris la, ki te pwen kote tout bagay te chavire, jan kote Jan t ap batize a te reprezante sa. Kote sa a te rele Betabara, sa vle di “pasaj travèse pa ferry,” e se menm kote ansyen pèp Izrayèl la te antre nan Tè Pwomiz la lè yo te sòti nan dezè a, menm jan Jan te fè a.
Of course, the movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand are who John is representing, but we are simply pointing out that when Jesus was baptized, it was that generation that He and John called the “generation of vipers.” Jesus came to magnify God’s Ten Commandment law, and He inspired every word in the Bible, so when He calls the final generation of ancient Israel a generation of vipers, He knows full well that the second commandment identifies the judgment being accomplished in the third and fourth generations.
Natirèlman, mouvman san karannkat mil yo se sa Jan ap reprezante, men nou senpleman ap fè remake ke lè Jezi te batize, se jenerasyon sa a menm Li menm ak Jan te rele “jenerasyon sèpan pwazon.” Jezi te vini pou l elve lwa Dis Kòmandman Bondye a, e se Li ki te enspire chak mo nan Bib la; konsa, lè Li rele dènye jenerasyon ansyen Izrayèl la yon jenerasyon sèpan pwazon, Li konnen trè byen dezyèm kòmandman an idantifye jijman k ap akonpli nan twazyèm ak katriyèm jenerasyon yo.
The third and fourth generations represent a progressive judgment that ends in the fourth generation, which is the generation of vipers. Christ baptism typifies 9/11. The Laodicean Seventh-day Adventist generation has been in its final generation since that time. John’s message to the Pharisees and Sadducees was the Laodicean message.
Twazyèm ak katriyèm jenerasyon yo reprezante yon jijman pwogresif ki fini nan katriyèm jenerasyon an, ki se jenerasyon vipè yo. Batèm Kris la se yon tipoloji 9/11. Jenerasyon Laodiseyen Advantis Setyèm Jou a te antre nan dènye jenerasyon li depi lè sa a. Mesaj Jan te bay Farizyen yo ak Sadiseyen yo se te mesaj Laodiseyen an.
But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them,
Men, lè li wè anpil nan Farizyen yo ak Sadiseyen yo ki t ap vini nan batèm li a, li di yo,
O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?
O ras sèpan mechan yo, kiyès ki te avèti nou pou nou sove anba kòlè ki pral vini an?
Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance: And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father:
Se poutèt sa, pwodui fwi ki diy pou repantans; epi pa mete nan tèt nou pou nou di: Nou gen Abraram pou papa nou.
for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
paske m ap di nou: Bondye kapab, nan wòch sa yo, leve pitit pou Abraram.
And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire: Whose fan is in his hand, and he will throughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire.
Epi kounye a tou, rach la deja poze sou rasin pyebwa yo; se poutèt sa, tout pyebwa ki pa bay bon fwi, yo koupe l, yo voye l nan dife. Mwen menm, mwen batize nou ak dlo pou mennen nou nan repantans; men sila a k ap vini apre mwen an pi pisan pase mwen, e mwen pa menm diy pou pote soulye li; li menm, li va batize nou avèk Sentespri a ak dife. Li gen van li nan men li, e li va netwaye glasi li nèt; li va ranmase ble li nan depo a; men li va boule pay la ak yon dife ki pa janm etenn.
Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to Jordan unto John, to be baptized of him. Matthew 3:7–13.
Lè sa a, Jezi soti Galile pou l vin bò Jouden kot Jan, pou Jan batize li. Matye 3:7–13.
Jesus came from Galilee, which symbolizes a turning point in agreement with John’s girdle-hinge, and the meaning of Bethabara. John’s work of preparing the way, had then changed to Christ’s work of confirming the covenant. The thirty years of preparation was ended and the three and a half years before and after the cross began.
Jezi te soti Galile, ki senbolize yon pwen vire ann akò ak charnyè senti Jan an, ak siyifikasyon Bethabara. Lè sa a, travay Jan an pou prepare chemen an te vin chanje pou travay Kris la ki konfime alyans lan. Trant ane preparasyon an te fini, epi twa zan edmi anvan ak apre kwa a te kòmanse.
John’s message was a warning of the coming wrath at the destruction of Jerusalem, a destruction that also represents the end of the world and the seven last plagues. That warning message was set within the context of Islam, and it was delivered by a man who not only fulfilled Malachi’s messenger who prepares the way, and Isaiah’s voice in the wilderness, but also the message of Elijah, for John’s clothing paralleled Elijah’s just as John’s message paralleled Elijah’s.
Mesaj Jan an te yon avètisman konsènan kòlè k ap vini nan destriksyon Jerizalèm, yon destriksyon ki reprezante tou fen mond lan ak sèt dènye kalamite yo. Mesaj avètisman sa a te plase nan kontèks Islam, epi li te delivre pa yon nonm ki pa t sèlman akonpli mesaje Malachi a ki pare chemen an, ak vwa Ezayi a nan dezè a, men tou mesaj Eli a, paske rad Jan yo te koresponn ak pa Eli yo menm jan mesaj Jan an te koresponn ak pa Eli a.
And he said unto them, What manner of man was he which came up to meet you, and told you these words? And they answered him, He was an hairy man, and girt with a girdle of leather about his loins. And he said, It is Elijah the Tishbite. 2 Kings 1:7, 8.
Epi li di yo: Ki kalite nonm sa a te ye ki te monte vin rankontre nou, epi ki te di nou pawòl sa yo? Yo reponn li: Se te yon nonm pwal anpil, ki te mare ren li ak yon senti an kwi. Lè sa a li di: Se Eli, Tichbit la. 2 Wa 1:7, 8.
If they were to ask of John, and not of Elijah, “what manner of man was he?” they would be answered “a hairy man, and girt with a girdle of leather about his loins.” The entire six-month ministry of John is represented in the passage where the final and fourth generation is specifically identified and defined. The Laodicean message unto them directly attacks the profession of being God’s covenant people, it warns them of the coming wrath as illustrated by an ax striking the roots of the trees. The message included that Christ would finish the testing process that began with John. Later in Matthew, Jesus also calls the Jews “a generation of vipers,” and He takes the thought up from John’s theme of cutting down a tree, and explains why.
Si yo ta mande konsènan Jan, epi non pa konsènan Eli, “ki kalite nonm li te ye?” yo ta reponn yo: “Se te yon nonm pwal, e li te mare ak yon sentiwon kwi nan ren li.” Tout ministè sis mwa Jan an reprezante nan pasaj kote dènye ak katriyèm jenerasyon an idantifye e defini espesyalman. Mesaj Lawodise a voye ba yo a atake dirèkteman deklarasyon yo fè kòmkwa yo se pèp alyans Bondye a; li avèti yo konsènan kòlè k ap vini an, jan sa parèt nan yon rach k ap frape rasin pyebwa yo. Mesaj la te gen ladan l tou ke Kris t ap fini pwosesis eprèv la ki te kòmanse avèk Jan. Pi ta nan Matye, Jezi rele Jwif yo tou “yon jenerasyon sèpan,” e Li reprann panse a soti nan tèm Jan sou koupe yon pyebwa, epi Li eksplike poukisa.
Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his fruit. O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned. Matthew 12:33–37.
Swa fè pyebwa a bon, epi fwi li bon; osinon fè pyebwa a move, epi fwi li move; paske se dapre fwi li yo yo rekonèt pyebwa a. O ras sèpan, kijan nou ka di bon bagay, nou menm ki move? Paske se nan abondans kè a bouch la pale. Bon moun nan tire bon bagay soti nan bon trezò kè li; epi move moun nan tire move bagay soti nan move trezò li. Men, mwen di nou sa: pou tout pawòl initil lèzòm va pale, yo va rann kont pou sa nan jou jijman an. Paske se dapre pawòl ou yo ou va jwenn jistifikasyon, epi se dapre pawòl ou yo ou va jwenn kondanasyon. Matye 12:33–37.
The day of judgment, according to the second commandment is in the fourth generation. The judgment is based upon the message we speak, and that message comes out of our hearts. It is the message we speak that identifies whether we are Peter’s “chosen generation” or a “generation of vipers.” Either class is manifested at the conclusion of a testing process where Christ, as the dirt brush man cleans His floor. As with the oil in the parable of the ten virgins, the message is represented either by an evil or a good heart. Christ’s reference adds that this generation of vipers, which is the fourth and final generation—seek after a sign, and the only sign they would be given was the sign of Jonah.
Jou jijman an, dapre dezyèm kòmandman an, se nan katriyèm jenerasyon an li rive. Jijman an baze sou mesaj nou pale a, e mesaj sa a sòti nan kè nou. Se mesaj nou pale a ki fè konnen si nou se “jenerasyon chwazi” Pyè a, oswa yon “jenerasyon vipè.” Toude kategori sa yo parèt aklè nan fen yon pwosesis eprèv kote Kris la, tankou nonm ki gen bwòs pou pousyè a, netwaye planche pa li a. Menm jan ak lwil la nan parabòl dis vyèj yo, mesaj la reprezante swa pa yon move kè, swa pa yon bon kè. Referans Kris la ajoute tou ke jenerasyon vipè sa a, ki se katriyèm ak dènye jenerasyon an, ap chèche yon siy, e sèl siy yo t ap resevwa se te siy Jonas la.
Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, Master, we would see a sign from thee. But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here. The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here. Matthew 12:38–42.
Lè sa a, kèk nan dirèktè lalwa yo ak nan farizyen yo reponn, yo di: Mèt, nou ta renmen wè yon mirak nan men ou. Men li reponn, li di yo: Yon jenerasyon mechan ak adiltè ap chèche yon mirak; men yo p ap ba li okenn mirak, eksepte mirak pwofèt Jonas la. Paske, menm jan Jonas te pase twa jou ak twa nwit nan vant gwo pwason an, konsa tou Pitit Lòm nan pral pase twa jou ak twa nwit nan kè tè a. Moun Niniv yo pral leve nan jijman ansanm ak jenerasyon sa a, epi yo pral kondane li, paske yo te repanti lè Jonas t ap preche; epi gade, gen yon moun isit la ki pi gran pase Jonas. Rèn peyi Sid la pral leve nan jijman ansanm ak jenerasyon sa a, epi li pral kondane li; paske li te soti depi nan bout latè pou l tande sajès Salomon an; epi gade, gen yon moun isit la ki pi gran pase Salomon. Matye 12:38–42.
Christ referenced the Jews as a generation of vipers, and He uses illustrations of judgment as the message of Jonah, and the message of the wisdom of Solomon. Jesus is identifying by context, and with two witnesses, that the generation of vipers is the fourth generation, for the fourth generation is where judgment is accomplished.
Kris te fè referans ak Jwif yo kòm yon jenerasyon sèpan venen, epi Li sèvi ak ilistrasyon jijman tankou mesaj Jonas la ak mesaj sajès Salomon an. Jezi ap idantifye, dapre kontèks la ak avèk de temwen, ke jenerasyon sèpan venen an se katriyèm jenerasyon an, paske se nan katriyèm jenerasyon an jijman an rive akonpli.
The one hundred and forty-four thousand are the ensign, or the sign of the latter days, as is the law of God, and the Sabbath. The sign of Jonah is the sign of the resurrection, which for the Jews in Christ’s day and age was His baptism, when the Holy Spirit descended, represented as a dove. Jonah means “dove.” Jonah, John the Revelator, Daniel, Joseph and Lazarus represent the one hundred and forty-four thousand, who are resurrected from being dead in the street for three and a half days. At that point they are to transition from Laodiceans unto Philadelphians, thus becoming the eighth that is of the seven. Jonah represents baptism, for he was cast into the water and symbolically died when he was eaten by the whale. He was thereafter resurrected, as was John, when he was taken out of the boiling oil, and as was Daniel when he was taken out of the lion’s den, and as was Joseph, when he was taken out of the pit, as was Lazarus, the sealing miracle in the time of Christ. The Jews could not see the sign of Jonah, as represented by Christ’s resurrection any clearer than Adventism sees the sign of 9/11, which is the sign of Jonah.
San karant-kat mil yo se drapo a, oubyen siy dènye jou yo, menm jan lalwa Bondye a ak Saba a ye. Siy Jonas la se siy rezirèksyon an, ki pou Jwif yo nan epòk Kris la se te batèm Li, lè Sentespri a te desann, reprezante tankou yon pijon. Jonas vle di “pijon.” Jonas, Jan Revelatè a, Danyèl, Jozèf ak Laza reprezante san karant-kat mil yo, ki resisite apre yo te mouri nan lari a pandan twa jou edmi. Nan pwen sa a yo dwe fè tranzisyon soti nan Laodiseyen pou rive Philadelphien, konsa yo vin tounen uityèm nan ki soti nan sèt yo. Jonas reprezante batèm, paske yo te jete l nan dlo a epi li te mouri senbolikman lè balèn nan te vale l. Apre sa li te resisite, menm jan Jan te resisite lè yo te retire l nan lwil bouyi a, epi menm jan Danyèl te resisite lè yo te retire l nan twou lyon yo, epi menm jan Jozèf te resisite lè yo te retire l nan twou a, menm jan ak Laza, mirak sele a nan tan Kris la. Jwif yo pa t kapab wè siy Jonas la, jan rezirèksyon Kris la te reprezante l la, pi klè pase Advantis la wè siy 9/11 la, ki se siy Jonas la.
We will continue these subjects in the next article.
N ap kontinye sijè sa yo nan pwochen atik la.
“The burden of the warning now to come to the people of God, nigh and afar off, is the third angel’s message. And those who are seeking to understand this message will not be led by the Lord to make an application of the Word that will undermine the foundation and remove the pillars of the faith that has made Seventh-day Adventists what they are today. The truths that have been unfolding in their order, as we have advanced along the line of prophecy revealed in the Word of God, are truth, sacred, eternal truth today. Those who passed over the ground step by step in the past history of our experience, seeing the chain of truth in the prophecies, were prepared to accept and obey every ray of light. They were praying, fasting, searching, digging for the truth as for hidden treasures, and the Holy Spirit, we know, was teaching and guiding us. Many theories were advanced, bearing a semblance of truth, but so mingled with misinterpreted and misapplied scriptures, that they led to dangerous errors. Very well do we know how every point of truth was established, and the seal set upon it by the Holy Spirit of God. And all the time voices were heard, ‘Here is the truth,’ ‘I have the truth; follow me.’ But the warnings came, ‘Go not ye after them. I have not sent them, but they ran.’ (See Jeremiah 23:21.)
“Chay avètisman ki dwe vini kounye a bay pèp Bondye a, ni sa yo ki pre ni sa yo ki lwen, se mesaj twazyèm zanj lan. E moun k ap chèche konprann mesaj sa a p ap dirije pa Seyè a pou yo fè yon aplikasyon Pawòl la ki ta mine fondasyon an epi retire poto lafwa ki fè Advantis Setyèm Jou yo sa yo ye jodi a. Verite yo ki te devwale youn apre lòt nan lòd pa yo, pandan n ap avanse sou liy pwofesi ki revele nan Pawòl Bondye a, se verite, verite sakre, verite etènèl jodi a. Moun ki te mache sou tèren an etap pa etap nan listwa pase eksperyans nou an, pandan yo t ap wè chenn verite a nan pwofesi yo, te prepare pou aksepte epi obeyi chak reyon limyè. Yo t ap priye, yo t ap fè jèn, yo t ap fouye, yo t ap chèche verite a tankou trezò kache, e nou konnen Sentespri a t ap anseye nou epi gide nou. Anpil teyori te pwopoze, ki te gen yon aparans verite, men ki te tèlman melanje ak Ekriti yo mal entèprete ak mal aplike, yo te mennen nan erè danjere. Nou konnen trè byen kijan chak pwen verite te tabli, epi kijan Sentespri Bondye a te mete so li sou li. E pandan tout tan sa a, yo t ap tande vwa ki t ap di: ‘Men verite a,’ ‘Mwen gen verite a; suiv mwen.’ Men avètisman yo te vini: ‘Pa ale dèyè yo. Mwen pa t voye yo, men yo te kouri.’ (Gade Jeremi 23:21.)”
“The leadings of the Lord were marked, and most wonderful were His revelations of what is truth. Point after point was established by the Lord God of heaven. That which was truth then, is truth today. But the voices do not cease to be heard—‘This is truth. I have new light.’ But these new lights in prophetic lines are manifest in misapplying the Word and setting the people of God adrift without an anchor to hold them. If the student of the Word would take the truths which God has revealed in the leadings of His people, and appropriate these truths, digest them, and bring them into their practical life, they would then be living channels of light. But those who have set themselves to study out new theories, have a mixture of truth and error combined, and after trying to make these things prominent, have demonstrated that they have not kindled their taper from the divine altar, and it has gone out in darkness.” Selected Messages, book 2, 103, 104.
“Dirijman Senyè a te byen make, e revelasyon Li yo sou sa ki verite te pi bèl anpil. Pwen apre pwen te etabli pa Senyè Bondye syèl la. Sa ki te verite lè sa a, se verite jodi a. Men vwa yo pa sispann fè yo tande—‘Sa a se verite. Mwen gen nouvo limyè.’ Men nouvo limyè sa yo nan liy pwofetik yo parèt nan move aplikasyon Pawòl la ak nan lage pèp Bondye a ap flote san yon lank pou kenbe yo. Si etidyan Pawòl la ta pran verite Bondye te revele nan dirijman pèp Li a, e yo ta fè verite sa yo vin pa yo, dijere yo, epi mete yo nan lavi pratik yo, lè sa a yo t ap chanèl vivan limyè. Men sila yo ki mete tèt yo pou etidye nouvo teyori, yo gen yon melanj verite ak erè ansanm, e apre yo fin chèche fè bagay sa yo vin gen gwo enpòtans, yo demontre yo pa t limen ti chandèl yo nan lotèl diven an, e li etenn nan fènwa.” Selected Messages, liv 2, 103, 104.