The Messianic fulfillment's in the book of Matthew include the waymark of the time of the end, the waymark of the message being formalized, two witnesses of the waymark of 9/11, one a witness of the internal message to Laodicea and the other the external message of Islam’s terrorism. It is fitting that the waymark of 9/11 is represented by two of the twelve Messianic fulfillment's in Matthew, for 9/11 includes the message of the second angel, where there is always a doubling. The death of July 18, 2020, was the fifth waymark we considered, and then the voice in the wilderness in July 2023, was the sixth and the resurrection of 2024 was number seven. The eighth Messianic fulfillment is the Midnight Cry.
Akomodisman mesyanik yo nan liv Matye a gen ladan yo siy chemen tan lafen an, siy chemen mesaj la k ap vin pran fòm ofisyèl, de temwen siy chemen 9/11 la, youn kòm temwen mesaj entèn pou Laodise, e lòt la kòm mesaj ekstèn teworis Islam lan. Li apwopriye pou siy chemen 9/11 la reprezante pa de nan douz akomodisman mesyanik yo nan Matye, paske 9/11 gen ladan l mesaj dezyèm zanj lan, kote toujou gen yon doubleman. Lanmò 18 jiyè 2020 la te senkyèm siy chemen nou te konsidere a; apre sa, vwa nan dezè a nan jiyè 2023 te sizyèm nan, epi rezirèksyon 2024 la te setyèm nan. Wityèm akomodisman mesyanik la se Kri Minwi a.
The Eighth Messianic Waymark is the Midnight Cry
Wout Mesiyaanik Wout Wout Wèremit Kri a se Wout Wityèm nan
All this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, Tell ye the daughter of Sion, Behold, thy King cometh unto thee, meek, and sitting upon an ass, and a colt the foal of an ass. Matthew 21:4, 5.
Tout cela arriva afin que s’accomplît ce qui avait été annoncé par le prophète, disant : Dites à la fille de Sion : Voici, ton Roi vient à toi, doux et monté sur une ânesse, et sur un ânon, le petit d’une ânesse. Matthieu 21:4, 5.
Prediction
Prédiksyon
Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass. Zechariah 9:9.
Se pou ou kontan anpil, O pitit fi Siyon; rele byen fò, O pitit fi Jerizalèm: gade, Wa ou a ap vini kote ou: li jis, e li pote delivrans; li dou, e li monte sou yon bourik, sou yon ti bourik, pitit yon bourik. Zakari 9:9.
“Five hundred years before, the Lord had declared by the prophet Zechariah, ‘Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem. Behold, thy King cometh unto thee. He is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass.’ [Zechariah 9:9.] Had the disciples realized that Christ was going to judgment and to death, they could not have fulfilled this prophecy.
“Senk san lane anvan sa, Senyè a te deklare pa mwayen pwofèt Zakari a: ‘Rejwi anpil, o fi Siyon; rele byen fò, o fi Jerizalèm. Gade, Wa ou a ap vin jwenn ou. Li jis, e li pote delivrans; li dou, e li monte sou yon bourik, sou yon ti bourik, pitit yon bourik.’ [Zakari 9:9.] Si disip yo te rann yo kont Kris la t ap ale nan jijman ak nan lanmò, yo pa t ap kapab akonpli pwofesi sa a.”
“In like manner, Miller and his associates fulfilled prophecy, and gave a message which inspiration had foretold should be given to the world, but which they could not have given had they fully understood the prophecies pointing out their disappointment, and presenting another message to be preached to all nations before the Lord should come. The first and second angels’ messages were given at the right time, and accomplished the work which God designed to accomplish by them.” The Great Controversy, 405.
“Menm jan an tou, Miller ak asosye li yo te akonpli pwofesi a, epi yo te bay yon mesaj ke enspirasyon te gentan predi yo ta dwe bay lemonn, men yo pa t ap kapab bay li si yo te fin konprann nèt pwofesi ki te montre desepsyon yo, epi ki te prezante yon lòt mesaj pou yo preche bay tout nasyon anvan Senyè a ta vini. Premye ak dezyèm mesaj zanj yo te bay nan bon moman an, epi yo te akonpli travay Bondye te gen plan akonpli pa mwayen yo.” The Great Controversy, 405.
The misunderstanding of God’s prophetic Word was involved with the history of Christ’s triumphal entry, and also with the parallel history of the proclamation of the Midnight Cry message in 1844. The one hundred and forty-four thousand are required to understand “the prophecies pointing out their disappointment.” John in Revelation ten is told in advance, that the message of the little book that was going to be sweet in his mouth, would turn bitter.
Move byenkonpreyansyon Pwofesi Bondye a te enplike nan istwa antre triyonfal Kris la, epi tou nan istwa paralèl pwoklamasyon mesaj Kri Minwi a an 1844. San karant-kat mil yo oblije konprann “pwofesi ki t ap montre desepsyon yo.” Jan, nan Revelasyon dis, yo di l davans ke mesaj ti liv la, ki t apral dous nan bouch li, t ap tounen anmè.
“We have nothing to fear for the future, except as we shall forget the way the Lord has led us, and His teaching in our past history.” Life Sketches, 196.
“Nou pa gen anyen pou nou pè konsènan lavni an, eksepte si nou ta bliye fason Seyè a te mennen nou, ak ansèyman Li nan istwa pase nou an.” Life Sketches, 196.
The “Lord’s leading” in the past is represented among other providential acts, as His hand covering a mistake in the figures, for it was not best for the Millerites to understand their disappointment in advance, any more than it was for the disciples to understand all the elements of their disappointment at the cross. But the history of the proclamation of the Midnight Cry is identified as the very light that leads to heaven, and this is noted in Ellen White’s very first vision. The one hundred and forty-four thousand must understand the disappointments of the disciples and the Millerites. To refuse that light is to fall off the path.
“Dirèksyon Senyè a” nan tan pase a reprezante, pami lòt zak pwovidans li yo, tankou men li ki te kouvri yon erè nan chif yo; paske li pa t pi bon pou Millerit yo konprann desepsyon yo davans, menm jan li pa t pi bon pou disip yo konprann tout eleman desepsyon yo nan kwa a. Men, istwa pwoklamasyon Kri Minwi a idantifye kòm menm limyè ki mennen nan syèl la, e sa note nan premye vizyon Ellen White la. San karantkat mil yo dwe konprann desepsyon disip yo ak desepsyon Millerit yo. Refize limyè sa a, se tonbe kite chemen an.
“They had a bright light set up behind them at the beginning of the path, which an angel told me was the ‘midnight cry.’ This light shone all along the path, and gave light for their feet, so that they might not stumble.
“Yo te mete yon limyè klere dèyè yo nan kòmansman chemen an, e yon zanj te di m se te ‘kri minwi a.’ Limyè sa a te klere sou tout longè chemen an, epi li te bay limyè pou pye yo, pou yo pa bite.
“If they kept their eyes fixed on Jesus, who was just before them, leading them to the city, they were safe. But soon some grew weary, and said the city was a great way off, and they expected to have entered it before. Then Jesus would encourage them by raising His glorious right arm, and from His arm came a light which waved over the advent band, and they shouted ‘Alleluia!’ Others rashly denied the light behind them, and said that it was not God that had led them out so far. The light behind them went out, leaving their feet in perfect darkness, and they stumbled and lost sight of the mark and of Jesus, and fell off the path down into the dark and wicked world below.” Christian Experience and Teachings of Ellen G. White, 57.
“Si yo te kenbe je yo fikse sou Jezi, ki te jis devan yo, k ap mennen yo nan vil la, yo te an sekirite. Men, byento, kèk ladan yo te vin bouke, epi yo te di vil la te byen lwen toujou, e yo te espere yo ta deja antre ladan l. Lè sa a, Jezi te ankouraje yo lè Li leve bra dwat Li ki gen laglwa; epi, soti nan bra Li, yon limyè te parèt ki t ap balanse anlè gwoup adven an, e yo te rele: ‘Alelouya!’ Gen lòt ki, avèk prese san sajès, te demanti limyè ki te dèyè yo, epi yo te di se pa Bondye ki te mennen yo soti jis lwen sa a. Limyè ki te dèyè yo a te etenn, sa ki te kite pye yo nan yon fènwa nèt; epi yo te bite, yo te pèdi mak la ak Jezi devan je yo, epi yo te tonbe sòti sou chemen an desann nan mond tenèb ak mechanste ki te anba a.” Christian Experience and Teachings of Ellen G. White, 57.
The eighth waymark is the Midnight Cry as typified by Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem.
Wityèm bòn nan se Kri nan Mitan Lannwit la, jan li te prefigire pa antre triyonfal Kris la nan Jerizalèm.
“The midnight cry was not so much carried by argument, though the Scripture proof was clear and conclusive. There went with it an impelling power that moved the soul. There was no doubt, no questioning. Upon the occasion of Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem, the people who were assembled from all parts of the land to keep the feast, flocked to the Mount of Olives, and as they joined the throng that were escorting Jesus, they caught the inspiration of the hour, and helped to swell the shout, ‘Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord!’ [Matthew 21:9.] In like manner did unbelievers who flocked to the Adventist meetings—some from curiosity, some merely to ridicule—feel the convincing power attending the message, ‘Behold, the Bridegroom cometh!’” Spirit of Prophecy, volume 4, 250, 251.
“Rèl minwi a pa tèlman pote pa agiman, byenke prèv ki soti nan Ekriti yo te klè e desizif. Te gen yon pouvwa ki pouse avèk li ki te brannen nanm nan. Pa t gen okenn dout, okenn kestyonman. Nan okazyon antre triyonfal Kris la nan Jerizalèm, pèp la ki te rasanble soti nan tout pati peyi a pou selebre fèt la, te foule sou Mòn Oliv la, epi lè yo te mete tèt yo ansanm ak foul la ki t ap akonpaye Jezi, yo te pran enspirasyon lè a, e yo te ede fè rèl la vin pi fò: ‘Beni se sila a ki vini nan non Senyè a!’ [Matthew 21:9.] Menm jan an tou, moun ki pa t kwè yo ki te kouri ale nan reyinyon Advantis yo—kèk pa kiryozite, kèk sèlman pou pase yo nan betiz—te santi pouvwa konvenkan ki te akonpaye mesaj la: ‘Men, Veterinè maryaj la ap vini!’” Spirit of Prophecy, volume 4, 250, 251.
To be a wise virgin in the latter days, would of prophetic necessity require that those wise virgins suffer a disappointment, that in turn ushers in the tarrying time of the parable. Without the tarrying time experience you are not a wise or a foolish virgin.
Pou yon vyèj saj nan dènye jou yo, sa ta mande, pa nesesite pwofetik, pou vyèj saj sa yo sibi yon desepsyon, ki an retou fè tan reta parabòl la rive. San eksperyans tan reta a, ou pa ni yon vyèj saj ni yon vyèj sòt.
“The parable of the ten virgins of Matthew 25 also illustrates the experience of the Adventist people.” The Great Controversy, 393.
«Parabòl dis vyèj yo nan Matye 25 la tou montre eksperyans pèp Advantis la.» The Great Controversy, 393.
Either way, the wise virgins of the last days must experience a disappointment that paralleled April 19, 1844, for the experience of the parable is the experience of the one hundred and forty-four thousand, who John in the Revelation identifies as virgins.
Nenpòt jan sa ye a, vyèj saj yo nan dènye jou yo dwe fè eksperyans yon desepsyon ki te koresponn ak 19 avril 1844, paske eksperyans parabòl la se eksperyans san karannkat mil yo, ke Jan, nan Revelasyon an, idantifye kòm vyèj.
These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb. Revelation 14:4.
Se sa yo ki pa t sal ak fanm; paske yo se vyèj. Se sa yo ki suiv Ti Mouton an kote li ale. Yo te rachte pami lèzòm, kòm premye fwi pou Bondye ak pou Ti Mouton an. Revelasyon 14:4.
How many parables of Christ are directly and specifically identified as being fulfilled to the very letter? Every parable will be fulfilled to the very letter, but the parable of the ten virgins is specifically set forth as being fulfilled in the past and the future “to the very letter.” It is compared to the third angel that is to remain present truth from 1844 onward until Michael stands up and human probation closes.
Konbyen parabòl Kris yo yo idantifye dirèkteman ak espesyalman kòm yo te akonpli jiska dènye detay la? Chak parabòl pral akonpli jiska dènye detay la, men parabòl dis vyèj yo prezante espesyalman kòm li te akonpli nan tan pase a epi kòm li gen pou l akonpli nan lavni “jiska dènye detay la.” Yo konpare li ak twazyèm zanj lan, ki dwe rete verite prezan depi 1844 e kontinye konsa jouk lè Mikaèl leve kanpe epi tan gras limanite a fini.
“I am often referred to the parable of the ten virgins, five of whom were wise, and five foolish. This parable has been and will be fulfilled to the very letter, for it has a special application to this time, and, like the third angel’s message, has been fulfilled and will continue to be present truth till the close of time.” Review and Herald, August 19, 1890.
“Mwen souvan jwenn yo fè referans avè m ak parabòl dis vyèj yo, senk ladan yo ki te saj, epi senk ki te sòt. Parabòl sa a te akonpli epi l ap akonpli jis nan dènye detay la, paske li gen yon aplikasyon espesyal pou tan sa a, e menm jan ak mesaj twazyèm zanj lan, li te akonpli epi l ap kontinye rete verite prezan jouk nan fen tan an.” Review and Herald, 19 out 1890.
Until the close of time, the parable of the ten virgins is present truth, and the Midnight Cry will be fulfilled again to the very letter.
Jiska fen tan an rive nan bout li, parabòl dis vyèj yo se verite pou tan sa a, e Rèl Mitanwit la pral akonpli ankò jis jan li ekri a, nan tout detay li yo.
“There is a world lying in wickedness, in deception and delusion, in the very shadow of death,—asleep, asleep. Who are feeling travail of soul to awaken them? What voice can reach them? My mind was carried to the future, when the signal will be given. ‘Behold, the Bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him.’ But some will have delayed to obtain the oil for replenishing their lamps, and too late they will find that character, which is represented by the oil, is not transferable.” Review and Herald, February 11, 1896.
“Gen yon monn k ap viv nan mechanste, nan twonpri ak nan ilizyon, anba menm lonbraj lanmò a,—ap dòmi, ap dòmi. Kilès ki santi agoni nanm pou reveye yo? Ki vwa ki ka rive jouk jwenn yo? Lespri mwen te transpòte nan lavni, lè y ap bay siyal la. ‘Men, Veterinè a ap vini; soti al kontre li.’ Men, gen kèk ki pral pran reta pou yo jwenn lwil pou ranpli lanp yo ankò, epi twò ta yo pral dekouvri ke karaktè a, ki reprezante pa lwil la, pa ka transfere.” Review and Herald, 11 fevriye 1896.
The Midnight Cry is the next waymark on the horizon in the movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand. That waymark is accompanied by the persecution that begins against the faithful in advance of the Sunday law. That persecution is external, and internal, and the internal persecution includes two distinct symbols. One of those symbols is Judas, the other the Sanhedrin.
Rèl Minwi a se pwochen repè ki parèt sou orizon an nan mouvman san karannkat mil yo. Repè sa a mache ansanm ak pèsekisyon ki kòmanse kont fidèl yo anvan lwa dimanch lan. Pèsekisyon sa a se ekstèn, epi li se entèn tou; epi pèsekisyon entèn lan gen ladan li de senbòl diferan. Youn nan senbòl sa yo se Jida, lòt la se Sanedren an.
The Ninth Messianic Waymark is the Betrayal for 30 Silver Pieces
Nevyèm Siy Mesyanik la se Trayizon an pou 30 Mòso Ajan
Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value; And gave them for the potter’s field, as the Lord appointed me. Matthew 27:9, 10.
Lè sa a, sa ki te di pa pwofèt Jeremi an te akonpli, lè li te di: Epi yo pran trant pyès ajan yo, pri sila a yo te evalye a, sila pitit Izrayèl yo te bay valè a; epi yo bay yo pou jaden potye a, jan Seyè a te òdone m. Matye 27:9, 10.
Prediction
Prévision
And I said unto them, If ye think good, give me my price; and if not, forbear. So they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver. And the Lord said unto me, Cast it unto the potter: a goodly price that I was prised at of them. And I took the thirty pieces of silver, and cast them to the potter in the house of the Lord. Zechariah 11:12, 13.
Epi mwen di yo: Si nou wè sa bon, ban m salè m; epi si nou pa vle, kite sa. Konsa yo peze trant pyès ajan kòm salè m. Epi Seyè a di m: Jete sa bay bòs potye a, bèl pri yo te estime m lan. Epi mwen pran trant pyès ajan yo, mwen jete yo bay bòs potye a nan kay Seyè a. Zakari 11:12, 13.
The betrayal of Judas represents the betrayal of the counterfeit priests, for the number 30 represents the age of the priests. The priests, who are also Levites are purified as gold and silver by the Messenger of the Covenant. Judas’s thirty pieces of silver represents the purging of the false priests at the Sunday law, though Judas died just before the cross, it was still the same day. Judas is not the symbol of the Sanhedrin; he is a symbol of one who was thought to be among the disciples of Christ.
Trayizon Jida a reprezante trayizon fo prèt yo, paske chif 30 la reprezante laj prèt yo. Prèt yo, ki se Levit tou, yo pirifye tankou lò ak ajan pa Mesaje Alyans lan. Trant pyès ajan Jida yo reprezante netwayaj fo prèt yo nan lwa dimanch la; byenke Jida te mouri jis anvan kwa a, se te toujou menm jou a. Jida pa senbòl Sannedren an; li se yon senbòl yon moun yo te panse ki te pami disip Kris yo.
As a disciple of Christ, you were a disciple of the anointing of Jesus. The anointing at His baptism changed Jesus’ name unto Jesus Christ, for Christ means—the anointed one. His name then changed, for He was then to confirm the covenant with many for one week, and a premier symbol of covenant relationship is a changed name. Jesus was anointed with power at His baptism. To be a disciple of Christ, meant you were a disciple of His baptism. It was at His baptism that He was anointed with power. The statement by Peter in Matthew 16:18 is known in the Christian theological world as the “Christian Confession.” It is one of the great themes for discussion among theologians and scholars. Generally, a discussion of the theologians and scholars identifies something of no, or perhaps minor importance, but the point remains, that Christianity understands that when Jesus was anointed, He then became the Messiah.
Kòm yon disip Kris la, ou te yon disip onksyon Jezi a. Onksyon an nan batèm Li a te chanje non Jezi pou l vin Jezi Kris, paske Kris vle di—Moun Bondye chwazi a. Lè sa a, non Li te chanje, paske Lè sa a Li te gen pou konfime alyans lan ak anpil moun pandan yon semèn, e youn nan pi gwo senbòl relasyon alyans lan se yon non ki chanje. Jezi te resevwa onksyon ak pouvwa nan batèm Li a. Pou yon moun te disip Kris la, sa te vle di li te disip batèm Li a. Se nan batèm Li a Li te resevwa onksyon ak pouvwa. Deklarasyon Pyè fè nan Matye 16:18 la konnen nan mond teyolojik kretyen an kòm “Konfesyon Kretyen an.” Li se youn nan gwo tèm diskisyon pami teyolojyen ak entelektyèl yo. An jeneral, yon diskisyon teyolojyen ak entelektyèl yo fè idantifye yon bagay ki pa gen okenn enpòtans, oswa petèt sèlman yon enpòtans minè; men pwen an rete menm jan an, se ke Krisyanis la konprann ke lè Jezi te resevwa onksyon an, se lè sa a Li te vin Mesi a.
He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. Matthew 16:15, 16.
Li di yo: Men nou menm, kiyès nou di mwen ye? Simon Pyè reponn, li di: Ou se Kris la, Pitit Bondye vivan an. Matye 16:15, 16.
Peter’s original name conveyed that very truth, for Simon Barjona means “one who hears the message of the dove,” which was the message of His baptism. His baptism aligns with 9/11, and Judas represents those who at some point professed an understanding of 9/11, but lose their way along the path. Judas is not a symbol of the Sanhedrin, for they represent the Laodicean Seventh-day Adventist church. Judas provided a witness for the Sanhedrin, but the symbolism of the Sanhedrin’s rebellion is different than the rebellion of Judas. The Sanhedrin’s rebellion is expressed in the following dream.
Non orijinal Pierre a te transmèt laverite sa menm, paske Simon Barjona vle di “moun ki tande mesaj pijon an,” ki te mesaj batèm Li a. Batèm Li a ann amoni ak 9/11, e Jida reprezante moun sa yo ki, nan yon moman, te deklare yo te konprann 9/11, men ki pèdi chemen yo sou wout la. Jida pa yon senbòl Sanedren an, paske yo menm reprezante legliz Advantis Setyèm Jou Laodise a. Jida te bay yon temwayaj pou Sanedren an, men senbolis rebelyon Sanedren an diferan de rebelyon Jida a. Rebelyon Sanedren an eksprime nan rèv ki vin apre a.
“I gathered up my writings, and we started on our journey. On the way we held two meetings in Orange and had evidence that the church was profited and encouraged. We were ourselves refreshed by the Spirit of the Lord. That night I dreamed that I was in Battle Creek looking out from the side glass at the door and saw a company marching up to the house, two and two. They looked stern and determined. I knew them well and turned to open the parlor door to receive them, but thought I would look again. The scene was changed. The company now presented the appearance of a Catholic procession. One bore in his hand a cross, another a reed. And as they approached, the one carrying a reed made a circle around the house, saying three times: ‘This house is proscribed. The goods must be confiscated. They have spoken against our holy order.’ Terror seized me, and I ran through the house, out of the north door, and found myself in the midst of a company, some of whom I knew, but I dared not speak a word to them for fear of being betrayed. I tried to seek a retired spot where I might weep and pray without meeting eager, inquisitive eyes wherever I turned. I repeated frequently: ‘If I could only understand this! If they will tell me what I have said or what I have done!’
“Mwen te ranmase ekriti mwen yo, epi nou te kòmanse vwayaj nou an. Sou chemen an nou te fè de reyinyon nan Orange, e nou te gen prèv ke legliz la te resevwa benefis epi te ankouraje. Nou menm tou, nou te rafrechi pa Lespri Senyè a. Jou swa sa a mwen te reve mwen te nan Battle Creek, ap gade pa vit bò pòt la, epi mwen wè yon gwoup moun ap monte vini bò kay la, de pa de. Yo te parèt sevè e detèmine. Mwen te konnen yo byen, epi mwen vire pou m louvri pòt salon an pou resevwa yo; men mwen te panse m ap gade ankò. Sèn nan te chanje. Kounye a gwoup la te prezante aparans yon pwosesyon katolik. Youn te pote yon kwa nan men li, yon lòt yon wozo. E pandan yo t ap pwoche, sila ki t ap pote wozo a fè yon sèk toutotou kay la, li di twa fwa: ‘Kay sa a entèdi. Byen yo dwe sezi. Yo pale kont lòd sen nou an.’ Sezisman te anvayi m, epi mwen kouri travèse kay la, sòti pa pòt nò a, epi mwen jwenn tèt mwen nan mitan yon gwoup moun, kèk ladan yo mwen te konnen, men mwen pa t oze di yo yon sèl mo, paske mwen te pè pou yo pa trayi m. Mwen te eseye chèche yon kote apa kote mwen te ka kriye epi priye san m pa rankontre je moun ki te plen zèl ak kiryozite, kèlkeswa bò mwen te vire. Mwen te repete souvan: ‘Si sèlman mwen te ka konprann sa! Si yo ta di m sa mwen te di oswa sa mwen te fè!’”
“I wept and prayed much as I saw our goods confiscated. I tried to read sympathy or pity for me in the looks of those around me, and marked the countenances of several whom I thought would speak to me and comfort me if they did not fear that they would be observed by others. I made one attempt to escape from the crowd, but seeing that I was watched, I concealed my intentions. I commenced weeping aloud, and saying: ‘If they would only tell me what I have done or what I have said!’ My husband, who was sleeping in a bed in the same room, heard me weeping aloud and awoke me. My pillow was wet with tears, and a sad depression of spirits was upon me.” Testimonies, volume 1, 577, 578.
“Mwen te kriye e mwen te priye anpil pandan m t ap wè yo sezi byen nou yo. Mwen te eseye li nan gade moun ki te bò kote m yo si yo te gen senpati oswa pitye pou mwen; epi mwen te remake figi plizyè moun mwen te panse ki ta pale avè m e ki ta konsole m si yo pa t pè pou lòt moun pa remake yo. Mwen te fè yon tantativ pou m chape kò m anba foul la; men lè m te wè yo t ap siveye m, mwen te kache entansyon m. Mwen te kòmanse kriye fò, epi m t ap di: ‘Si sèlman yo ta di m sa m fè oswa sa m di!’ Mari m, ki t ap dòmi sou yon kabann nan menm chanm nan, te tande m ap kriye fò epi li te reveye m. Zòrye m te mouye ak dlo nan je, e yon gwo tristès te peze sou lespri m.” Testimonies, volume 1, 577, 578.
Applying the principle that the prophets speak more about the latter days than the days in which they lived, raises a very solemn question for the leaders of the Seventh-day Adventist church. Sister White “gathered up” her “writings” and began a return journey to Battle Creek. Battle Creek was then the heart of the work, as is Tacoma Park today, or Jerusalem in the days of Christ. She gathered up her writings for the trip, after she set forth a struggle she had been having concerning her writings. The context of her dream is about her writings. The struggle took place in the town of Wright.
Lè yo aplike prensip ki di pwofèt yo pale plis sou dènye jou yo pase sou jou kote yo te viv yo, sa leve yon kestyon trè solanèl pou dirijan Legliz Advantis Setyèm Jou a. Sè White te “ranmase” “ekri” li yo epi li te kòmanse yon vwayaj retou pou ale Battle Creek. Battle Creek te lè sa a kè travay la, menm jan Tacoma Park ye jodi a, oswa Jerizalèm nan jou Kris yo. Li te ranmase ekri li yo pou vwayaj la, apre li te fin esplike yon lit li t ap mennen konsènan ekri li yo. Kontèks rèv li a konsène ekri li yo. Lit la te fèt nan vil Wright.
“While in Wright we had sent my manuscript for No. 11 to the office of publication, and I was improving almost every moment when out of meeting in writing out matter for No. 12. My energies, both physical and mental, had been severely taxed while laboring for the church in Wright. I felt that I should have rest, but could see no opportunity for relief. I was speaking to the people several times a week, and writing many pages of personal testimonies. The burden of souls was upon me, and the responsibilities I felt were so great that I could obtain but a few hours of sleep each night.
“Pandan nou te nan Wright, nou te voye maniskri mwen pou Nimewo 11 lan bay biwo piblikasyon an, epi m t ap amelyore prèske chak moman lè m pa t nan reyinyon, pandan m t ap ekri materyèl pou Nimewo 12 la. Fòs mwen, ni fizik ni mantal, te sibi yon gwo presyon pandan m t ap travay pou legliz la nan Wright. Mwen te santi mwen te bezwen repo, men mwen pa t wè okenn posiblite pou jwenn soulajman. Mwen t ap pale ak pèp la plizyè fwa pa semèn, epi mwen t ap ekri anpil paj temwayaj pèsonèl. Chay nanm yo te sou mwen, epi responsablite mwen te santi yo te tèlman gwo, ke mwen pa t kapab dòmi plis pase kèk èdtan chak swa.
“While thus laboring in speaking and writing, I received letters of a discouraging character from Battle Creek. As I read them I felt an inexpressible depression of spirits, amounting to agony of mind, which seemed for a short period to palsy my vital energies. For three nights I scarcely slept at all. My thoughts were troubled and perplexed. I concealed my feelings as well as I could from my husband and the sympathizing family with whom we were. None knew my labor or burden of mind as I united with the family in morning and evening devotion, and sought to lay my burden upon the great Burden Bearer. But my petitions came from a heart wrung with anguish, and my prayers were broken and disconnected because of uncontrollable grief. The blood rushed to my brain, frequently causing me to reel and nearly fall. I had the nosebleed often, especially after making an effort to write. I was compelled to lay aside my writing, but could not throw off the burden of anxiety and responsibility upon me, as I realized that I had testimonies for others which I was unable to present to them.
“Pandan m t ap travay konsa nan pale ak ekri, mwen te resevwa lèt ki te gen yon karaktè dekourajan soti Battle Creek. Lè m te li yo, mwen te santi yon depresyon lespri ki pa t ka esplike, rive jouk nan agoni nan lespri mwen, ki, pandan yon ti tan, te sanble paralize fòs vital mwen yo. Pandan twa nwit mwen prèske pa t dòmi ditou. Panse mwen yo te boulvèse e yo te plen konfizyon. Mwen te kache santiman mwen yo jan m te kapab devan mari mwen ak fanmi senpatik lakay yo nou te ye a. Pèsonn pa t konnen travay mwen ni chay lespri mwen, pandan m t ap ini ak fanmi an nan adorasyon maten ak aswè, e m t ap chèche depoze chay mwen sou gran Pòtè Chay la. Men, siplikasyon mwen yo te soti nan yon kè tòtire pa angwas, e priyè mwen yo te brize e dekousi akoz lapenn mwen pa t kapab kontwole. San an te monte nan sèvo mwen, sa ki souvan te fè m toudi e prèske tonbe. Mwen te senyen nan nen souvan, sitou apre m te fè efò pou m ekri. Mwen te oblije mete ekriti mwen sou kote, men mwen pa t kapab wete sou mwen chay kè sote ak responsablite ki te peze sou mwen an, paske mwen te rann mwen kont mwen te gen temwayaj pou lòt moun ke mwen pa t kapab prezante yo.”
“I received still another letter, informing me that it was thought best to defer the publication of No. 11 until I could write out that which I had been shown in regard to the Health Institute, as those in charge of that enterprise stood in great want of means and needed the influence of my testimony to move the brethren. I then wrote out a portion of that which was shown me in regard to the Institute, but could not get out the entire subject because of pressure of blood to the brain. Had I thought that No. 12 would be so long delayed, I should not in any case have sent that portion of the matter contained in No. 11. I supposed that after resting a few days I could again resume my writing. But to my great grief I found that the condition of my brain made it impossible for me to write. The idea of writing testimonies, either general or personal, was given up, and I was in continual distress because I could not write them.
“Mwen te resevwa ankò yon lòt lèt, ki te fè m konnen yo te panse li pi bon pou yo ranvwaye piblikasyon Nimewo 11 la jouk lè m ta ka ekri sa yo te montre m konsènan Enstiti Lasante a, paske moun ki te responsab antrepriz sa a te nan yon gwo bezwen lajan e yo te bezwen enfliyans temwayaj mwen pou ankouraje frè yo. Lè sa a, mwen te ekri yon pati nan sa yo te montre m konsènan Enstiti a, men mwen pa t kapab mete tout sijè a deyò akòz presyon san ki te monte nan sèvo m. Si m te panse Nimewo 12 la t ap pran tout tan sa a anvan li parèt, mwen pa t ap voye, nan okenn ka, pati nan kestyon an ki te nan Nimewo 11 la. Mwen te sipoze ke apre m ta fin pran repo pandan kèk jou, mwen t ap kapab rekòmanse ekri ankò. Men, pou gwo lapenn mwen, mwen te wè kondisyon sèvo m te fè li enposib pou m ekri. Yo te abandone lide ekri temwayaj, kit yo jeneral kit yo pèsonèl, e mwen te nan yon detrès san rete paske mwen pa t kapab ekri yo.”
“In this state of things it was decided that we would return to Battle Creek and there remain while the roads were in a muddy, broken-up condition, and that I would there complete No. 12. My husband was very anxious to see his brethren at Battle Creek and speak to them and rejoice with them in the work which God was doing for him. I gathered up my writings, and we started on our journey. …” Testimonies, volume 1, 576, 577.
“Nan eta bagay sa yo, yo te deside pou nou retounen Battle Creek epi rete la pandan chemen yo te nan yon kondisyon labou, gate, epi mwen t ap la fini Nimewo 12. Mari m te gen anpil anvi wè frè l yo nan Battle Creek, pale avèk yo, epi rejwi ansanm avèk yo nan travay Bondye t ap fè pou li a. Mwen ranmase ekriti m yo, epi nou te kòmanse vwayaj nou an. …” Testimonies, volim 1, 576, 577.
In the latter days, the leadership of the Seventh-day Adventist church, represented as Battle Creek and those she “knew well,” changed into a Catholic procession. The leadership of the Seventh-day Adventist church changed into a Catholic procession. In the dream they came “two by two,” one with a reed, another with a cross. They drew a circle around the house and proclaimed three times, “This house is proscribed. The goods must be confiscated. They have spoken against our holy order.” What are the “goods” in the “house” which the Catholic leaders of Battle Creek “confiscated?” What “holy order” of the Catholic church was “spoken against?”
Nan dènye jou yo, lidèchip Legliz Advantis Setyèm Jou a, ki te reprezante pa Battle Creek ak moun li “te byen konnen,” te chanje pou l tounen yon pwosesyon katolik. Lidèchip Legliz Advantis Setyèm Jou a te chanje pou l tounen yon pwosesyon katolik. Nan rèv la yo te vini “de pa de,” youn ak yon wozo, yon lòt ak yon kwa. Yo te trase yon sèk toutotou kay la epi yo te pwoklame twa fwa: “Kay sa a anba entèdiksyon. Byen yo dwe sezi. Yo te pale kont lòd sen nou an.” Ki “byen” ki te nan “kay” la ke lidè katolik Battle Creek yo te “sezi?” Ki “lòd sen” legliz katolik la yo te “pale kont?”
More directly the question might be, “what order of Catholicism led out in the inquisition?” The inquisition began with the order of Dominicans, before the Jesuits arrived in history, but once involved they became the order that championed the cruelty and bloodshed.
Pi dirèkteman, kestyon an ta kapab konsa: «Ki òd Katolik ki te pran latèt nan Enkizisyon an?» Enkizisyon an te kòmanse ak òd Dominiken yo, anvan Jezuit yo te parèt nan listwa; men depi yo te vin angaje ladan l, se yo menm ki te vin òd ki te pran defans mechanste a ak san koule a.
“Throughout Christendom, Protestantism was menaced by formidable foes. The first triumphs of the Reformation past, Rome summoned new forces, hoping to accomplish its destruction. At this time the order of the Jesuits was created, the most cruel, unscrupulous, and powerful of all the champions of popery. Cut off from earthly ties and human interests, dead to the claims of natural affection, reason and conscience wholly silenced, they knew no rule, no tie, but that of their order, and no duty but to extend its power. The gospel of Christ had enabled its adherents to meet danger and endure suffering, undismayed by cold, hunger, toil, and poverty, to uphold the banner of truth in face of the rack, the dungeon, and the stake. To combat these forces, Jesuitism inspired its followers with a fanaticism that enabled them to endure like dangers, and to oppose to the power of truth all the weapons of deception. There was no crime too great for them to commit, no deception too base for them to practice, no disguise too difficult for them to assume. Vowed to perpetual poverty and humility, it was their studied aim to secure wealth and power, to be devoted to the overthrow of Protestantism, and the re-establishment of the papal supremacy.
“Nan tout lakretyente a, Pwotestantis te anba menas lènmi tèrib. Premye triyonf Refòm lan te fin pase, Wòm rele nouvo fòs, avèk espwa pou li reyalize destriksyon li. Se nan epòk sa a yo te kreye lòd Jezuit yo, ki te pi mechan, pi san skripil, e pi pwisan pase tout lòt defansè papis yo. Koupe ak tout lyen latè ak enterè imen, mouri pou reklamasyon afeksyon natirèl, ak rezon ansanm ak konsyans yo nèt ale fèmen bouch, yo pa t rekonèt okenn règ, okenn lyen, sof sa lòd pa yo a, epi okenn devwa, sof elaji pouvwa li. Levanjil Kris la te rann patizan li yo kapab fè fas ak danje epi sipòte soufrans, san yo pa dekouraje devan frèt, grangou, travay di, ak povrete, pou soutni drapo verite a devan tòti, kacho, ak poto boukantay la. Pou konbat fòs sa yo, Jezuitis te enspire disip li yo ak yon fanatis ki te fè yo kapab sipòte menm kalite danje yo, epi opoze ak pouvwa verite a tout zam twonpri yo. Pa t gen okenn krim ki twò gwo pou yo te komèt, okenn twonpri ki twò ba pou yo te pratike, okenn degizman ki twò difisil pou yo te pran. Malgre yo te fè ve povrete ak imilite tout tan, objektif yo te pouswiv avèk anpil kalkil se te jwenn richès ak pouvwa, pou yo te konsakre tèt yo nan ranvèsman Pwotestantis la, ak retablisman sipremasi pap la.”
“When appearing as members of their order, they wore a garb of sanctity, visiting prisons and hospitals, ministering to the sick and the poor, professing to have renounced the world, and bearing the sacred name of Jesus, who went about doing good. But under this blameless exterior the most criminal and deadly purposes were often concealed. It was a fundamental principle of the order that the end justifies the means. By this code, lying, theft, perjury, assassination, were not only pardonable but commendable, when they served the interests of the church. Under various disguises the Jesuits worked their way into offices of state, climbing up to be the counselors of kings, and shaping the policy of nations. They became servants to act as spies upon their masters. They established colleges for the sons of princes and nobles, and schools for the common people; and the children of Protestant parents were drawn into an observance of popish rites. All the outward pomp and display of the Romish worship was brought to bear to confuse the mind and dazzle and captivate the imagination, and thus the liberty for which the fathers had toiled and bled was betrayed by the sons. The Jesuits rapidly spread themselves over Europe, and wherever they went, there followed a revival of popery.
“Lè yo te parèt kòm manm òd yo a, yo te abiye ak yon aparans sentete, yo t ap vizite prizon ak lopital, yo t ap sèvi malad yo ak pòv yo, yo t ap deklare yo te renonse ak lemonn, epi yo t ap pote non sakre Jezi a, li menm ki te mache toupatou ap fè byen. Men anba aparans san repwòch sa a, yo te souvan kache pwojè ki pi kriminèl ak pi mòtèl yo. Se te yon prensip fondamantal nan òd la ke fen an jistifye mwayen yo. Daprè kòd sa a, manti, vòl, fo temwayaj sou sèman, asasina, pa t sèlman padonab, men yo te menm merite lwanj, lè yo te sèvi enterè legliz la. Anba divès degizman, Jezuit yo te rive antre nan fonksyon leta, yo t ap monte pou yo vin konseye wa yo, epi yo t ap fòme politik nasyon yo. Yo te vin sèvi kòm domestik pou yo aji kòm espyon sou mèt yo. Yo te etabli kolèj pou pitit gason prens ak gran nèg yo, ak lekòl pou pèp komen an; epi timoun paran pwotestan yo te vin trennen antre nan pratik rit popis yo. Yo te mete tout ponp ak demonstrasyon ekstèn adorasyon women an an aksyon pou twouble lespri a, pou ebloui epi kaptive imajinasyon an, e konsa libète pou ki zansèt yo te travay di epi te vide san yo a te trayi pa pitit yo. Jezuit yo te gaye rapidman toupatou an Ewòp, e nenpòt kote yo te ale, te gen yon renesans popri ki te swiv.”
“To give them greater power, a bull was issued re-establishing the inquisition. Notwithstanding the general abhorrence with which it was regarded, even in Catholic countries, this terrible tribunal was again set up by popish rulers, and atrocities too terrible to bear the light of day were repeated in its secret dungeons. In many countries, thousands upon thousands of the very flower of the nation, the purest and noblest, the most intellectual and highly educated, pious and devoted pastors, industrious and patriotic citizens, brilliant scholars, talented artists, skillful artisans, were slain or forced to flee to other lands.
“Pou yo te ba yo plis pouvwa, yo te pibliye yon bòl ki te retabli enkizisyon an. Malgre degoutans jeneral yo te genyen pou li, menm nan peyi katolik yo, tribinal terib sa a te leve ankò pa chèf papis yo, epi yo te repete mechanste ki twò terib pou sipòte limyè lajounen nan kacho sekrè li yo. Nan anpil peyi, yo te touye dè milye sou dè milye nan pi bèl flè nasyon an menm, sa ki te pi pwòp e pi nòb yo, sa ki te gen plis entèlijans e ki te byen fòme, pastè relijyeu e devwe, sitwayen travayè e patriyòt, savan briyan, atis talan, atizan abil, oswa yo te fòse yo kouri al nan lòt peyi.”
“Such were the means which Rome had invoked to quench the light of the Reformation, to withdraw from men the Bible, and to restore the ignorance and superstition of the Dark Ages. But under God’s blessing and the labors of those noble men whom He had raised up to succeed Luther, Protestantism was not overthrown. Not to the favor or arms of princes was it to owe its strength. The smallest countries, the humblest and least powerful nations, became its strongholds. It was little Geneva in the midst of mighty foes plotting her destruction; it was Holland on her sandbanks by the northern sea, wrestling against the tyranny of Spain, then the greatest and most opulent of kingdoms; it was bleak, sterile Sweden, that gained victories for the Reformation.” The Great Controversy, 234, 235.
“Se konsa te ye mwayen Wòm te envoke pou etenn limyè Refòm nan, pou retire Bib la nan men lèzòm, epi pou retabli inyorans ak sipèstisyon Mwayennaj fènwa yo. Men, anba benediksyon Bondye ak grasa travay mesye nòb sa yo Li te leve pou pran swit Luther, Pwotestantis pa t ranvèse. Se pa ni favè ni zam prens yo li te dwe fòs li. Se pi piti peyi yo, se nasyon ki pi enb yo ak ki gen mwens pouvwa yo, ki te vin tounen fòtrès li. Se te ti Jenèv la nan mitan gwo ènmi ki t ap fè konplo pou detwi li; se te Oland, sou bann sab li yo bò lanmè nò a, k ap lite kont tirani Espay, ki alò te pi gran ak pi rich nan wayòm yo; se te Syèd, frèt, dezole, esteril, ki te ranpòte viktwa pou Refòm nan.” The Great Controversy, 234, 235.
The Catholic church did all they could to hide the Bible from men, by claiming their pagan traditions and customs are above God’s Word. The leaders of Laodicean Adventism will not take dissenters to court over the writings of Ellen White, but Catholics professing to be the leaders of Battle Creek will. The very essence of the beast of Catholicism is employing secular power to accomplish religious purposes. When Adventism sought the legal secular power to manage its institutions, the fruits of their ”holy order” can be seen.
Legliz katolik la te fè tout sa yo te kapab pou kache Bib la anba je lèzòm, pandan yo t ap pretann tradisyon ak koutim payen yo pi wo pase Pawòl Bondye a. Dirijan Advantis Laodiseyen yo pa pral mennen moun ki pa dakò yo nan tribinal poutèt ekriti Ellen White yo, men katolik ki deklare tèt yo kòm dirijan Battle Creek yo pral fè sa. Sans menm bèt katolikis la se sèvi ak pouvwa eksklizivman sivil pou reyalize objektif relijye. Lè Advantis la te chèche pouvwa legal sivil la pou jere enstitisyon li yo, fwi “lòd sen” yo a kapab wè.
In the context of the Spanish Inquisitions auto-da-fé (act of faith) ceremonies, the reed and cross appear as symbolic elements tied to Christ’s crucifixion. The reed refers to the mock scepter placed in Jesus’ hand during his crowning with thorns, used by Roman soldiers to strike him, symbolizing mockery, suffering, and scorn.
Nan kontèks seremoni auto-da-fé (zak lafwa) Enkizisyon panyòl la, wozo a ak kwa a parèt kòm eleman senbolik ki lye ak kwa Kris la. Wozo a fè referans ak baton wa manti yo te mete nan men Jezi pandan yo t ap kouwone l ak pikan, epi sòlda women yo te sèvi avè l pou frape li, sa ki senbolize rizib, soufrans, ak mepri.
The cross is prominently featured in auto-da-fé processions. A green cross (often veiled in black crepe) served as the emblem of the Inquisition, carried in a separate preparatory procession the day before and displayed during the event. It symbolized the tribunal’s authority.
Kwa enpòtan, kwa a parèt nan pwosesyon oto-da-fé yo. Yon kwa vèt (souvan kouvri ak krepon nwa) te sèvi kòm anblèm Enkizisyon an; yo te pote l nan yon pwosesyon preparatwa apa jou anvan an epi yo te ekspoze l pandan seremoni an. Li te senbolize otorite tribinal la.
Proscribing of goods refers to the confiscation (sequestration or proscription) of a convicted person’s property, a common Inquisition penalty to fund the tribunal and punish heresy. This was publicly announced in the auto-da-fé sentences, emphasizing public humiliation and deterrence.
Pwoskripsyon byen yo refere a konfiskasyon (sekestrasyon oswa pwoskripsyon) pwopriyete yon moun ki kondane, yon pinisyon komen Enkizisyon an te itilize pou finanse tribinal la epi pini erezi. Sa te anonse piblikman nan santans auto-da-fé yo, pou mete aksan sou imilyasyon piblik ak efè disuazif la.
The writings of Ellen G. White clearly and conclusively condemn the leadership that will proscribe her writings in an attempt to silence the song of the vineyard being sung, but it is the last action of an unholy order, just before they manifest their characters openly at the Sunday law. A “Catholic procession,” aligns with 25 ancient men bowing to the sun. In the following four paragraphs, the first paragraph sets forth the “professed people of God,” in the “last days.” The passage clearly teaches that in the last days, Seventh-day Adventist ministers will in “churches and in large gatherings in the open air,” “urge upon the people the necessity of keeping the first day of the week.”
Ekriti Ellen G. White yo klèman e yon fason desizif kondane dirijan yo ki pral entèdi ekriti li yo nan yon tantativ pou fè chante jaden rezen an, yo ap chante a, vin an silans; men sa se dènye aksyon yon lòd ki pa sen, jis anvan yo manifeste karaktè yo ouvètman nan lwa dimanch lan. Yon “pwosesyon Katolik” aliyen ak vennsenk ansyen gason k ap bese devan solèy la. Nan kat paragraf ki vin apre yo, premye paragraf la prezante “pèp Bondye a ki fè pwofesyon,” nan “dènye jou yo.” Pasaj la anseye klèman ke nan dènye jou yo, pastè Advantis Setyèm Jou yo pral, nan “legliz yo ak nan gwo rasanbleman anplennè,” “ensiste devan pèp la sou nesesite pou yo obsève premye jou semèn nan.”
“The Lord has a controversy with his professed people in these last days. In this controversy men in responsible positions will take a course directly opposite to that pursued by Nehemiah. They will not only ignore and despise the Sabbath themselves, but they will try to keep it from others by burying it beneath the rubbish of custom and tradition. In churches and in large gatherings in the open air, ministers will urge upon the people the necessity of keeping the first day of the week. There are calamities on sea and land: and these calamities will increase, one disaster following close upon another; and the little band of conscientious Sabbath-keepers will be pointed out as the ones who are bringing the wrath of God upon the world by their disregard of Sunday.”
“Senyè a gen yon kontwovès ak pèp li a ki fè pwofesyon suiv li nan dènye jou sa yo. Nan kontwovès sa a, mesye ki nan pozisyon responsablite yo pral pran yon chemen ki dirèkteman opoze ak sa Neyemi te swiv la. Non sèlman yo menm yo pral neglije epi meprize Saba a, men yo pral chèche anpeche lòt moun kenbe l, lè yo antere l anba debri koutim ak tradisyon. Nan legliz yo ak nan gwo rasanbleman an plenè, minis yo pral ensiste devan pèp la sou nesesite pou yo obsève premye jou semèn nan. Gen kalamite sou lanmè ak sou tè; epi kalamite sa yo pral ogmante, yon dezas ap swiv yon lòt byen sere; epi ti gwoup moun ki, pa konsyans yo, ap kenbe Saba a, pral vin montre ak dwèt kòm sila yo ki ap rale kòlè Bondye sou lemonn poutèt yo pa respekte dimanch.”
This is clearly identifying Seventh-day Adventists as the “professed people of God” who will encourage Sunday keeping, and that they will also point “out” “the little band of conscientious Sabbath-keepers.” The next paragraph she emphasizes that the persecution of past ages will be repeated. The previous paragraph ended with her identifying the professed people of God in contrast with those she says are conscientious Sabbath-keepers. She then introduces past histories, and warns those histories will be repeated in the latter days. She is very clear.
Sa a idantifye klèman Advantis Setyèm Jou yo kòm “pèp Bondye a ki fè pwofesyon,” ki pral ankouraje obsèvans dimanch, epi ki pral tou montre “deyò” “ti gwoup moun ki konsyansye k ap kenbe Saba a.” Nan paragraf ki vin apre a, li mete aksan sou lefèt ke pèsekisyon tan pase yo pral repete. Paragraf anvan an te fini ak li ki t ap idantifye pèp Bondye a ki fè pwofesyon an an kontrast ak sila yo li rele moun ki konsyansye k ap kenbe Saba a. Apre sa, li prezante istwa tan pase yo, epi li avèti ke istwa sa yo pral repete nan dènye jou yo. Li trè klè.
“Satan urges this falsehood that he may take the world captive. It is his plan to compel men to accept errors. He takes an active part in the promulgation of all false religions, and will stop at nothing in his efforts to enforce erroneous doctrines. Under a cloak of religious zeal, men, influenced by his spirit, have invented the most cruel tortures for their fellow-men, and have inflicted the most awful sufferings upon them. Satan and his agents have the same spirit still; and the history of the past will be repeated in our day.
Satan ap ankouraje manti sa a pou l kapab fè mond lan prizonye. Se plan li pou fòse lèzòm aksepte erè. Li pran yon pati aktif nan pwopagasyon tout fo relijyon, e li pap rete devan anyen nan efò li pou enpoze doktrin ki pa kòrèk. Anba yon vwal devouman relijye, lèzòm, ki anba enfliyans lespri li, te envante tòti ki pi mechan pou pwochen yo, e yo te fè yo sibi soufrans ki pi terib. Satan ak ajan li yo toujou gen menm lespri sa a; e listwa tan pase a pral repete nan jou pa nou yo.
“There are men who have set their minds and will to accomplish evil; in the dark recesses of their hearts they have resolved what crimes they will commit. These men are self-deceived. They have rejected God’s great rule of right, and in its stead have erected a standard of their own, and comparing themselves with this standard they pronounce themselves holy. The Lord will permit them to reveal what is in their hearts, to act out the spirit of the master that controls them. He will let them show their hatred of his law in their treatment of those who are loyal to its requirements. They will be actuated by the same spirit of religious frenzy that goaded on the mob that crucified Christ; church and State will be united in the same corrupt harmony.
“Gen moun ki fikse lespri yo ak volonte yo pou akonpli sa ki mal; nan fènwa ki pi fon nan kè yo, yo deja deside ki krim yo pral fè. Moun sa yo ap twonpe pwòp tèt yo. Yo rejte gran règ jistis Bondye a, e nan plas li yo leve yon prensip pa yo; epi lè yo konpare tèt yo ak prensip sa a, yo deklare tèt yo sen. Senyè a va pèmèt yo revele sa ki nan kè yo, pou yo mete an aksyon lespri mèt k ap domine yo. Li va kite yo montre rayisman yo pou lwa li a nan fason yo trete moun ki rete fidèl ak egzijans li yo. Menm lespri foli relijye ki te pouse foul la ki te kloure Kris sou kwa a pral anime yo; legliz ak Leta pral ini nan menm amoni kowonpi a.
“The church of today has followed in the steps of the Jews of old, who set aside the commandments of God for their own traditions. She has changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant, and now, as then, pride, unbelief, and infidelity are the result. Her true condition is set forth in these words from the song of Moses: ‘They have corrupted themselves, their spot is not the spot of his children; they are a perverse and crooked generation. Do ye thus requite the Lord, O foolish people and unwise? is not he thy father that hath bought thee? hath he not made thee, and established thee?’” Review and Herald, March 18, 1884.
“Legliz jodi a suiv tras Jwif lontan yo, ki te mete kòmandman Bondye yo sou kote pou pwòp tradisyon pa yo. Li chanje lòd la, li kraze alyans etènèl la, e kounye a, menm jan sa te ye lè sa a, ògèy, enkredilite, ak enfidelite se rezilta a. Vrè kondisyon li parèt aklè nan pawòl sa yo ki soti nan chan Moyiz la: ‘Yo fin gate tèt yo, tach yo pa tach pitit li yo; yo se yon jenerasyon tòde ak kwochi. Èske se konsa nou rann Seyè a, O pèp sòt e san sajès? èske se pa li menm ki Papa ou, ki achte ou a? èske li pa t fè ou, epi tabli ou?’” Review and Herald, 18 mas 1884.
There is passage after passage in the Spirit of Prophecy identifying the latter-day persecution of God’s faithful, and the “church of today” which she is identifying is not Christianity in general, it is the church she repeatedly identifies as being typified by the Jewish church. Those clear passages in her writings are the motivation for the Seventh-day Adventist church to attempt to place restrictions upon the writings of Sister White, as her dream so aptly identifies. Their actions against her writings, which were the obvious goods of her house that are to be proscribed by the leaders of Battle Creek who changed into a holy order of Catholicism. Their attack upon her writings is also represented by the attack upon Jeremiah’s writings. Ellen White’s dream is a second witness to Jeremiah’s writings being burned.
Gen pasaj apre pasaj nan Lespri Pwofesi a k ap idantifye pèsekisyon fidèl Bondye yo nan dènye jou yo; e “legliz jodi a” li menm ap idantifye a se pa Krisyanis an jeneral, men se legliz li repete idantifye kòm sa legliz jwif la te prefigire. Pasaj klè sa yo nan ekriti li yo se sa ki pouse legliz Advantis Setyèm Jou a eseye mete restriksyon sou ekriti Sè White yo, jan rèv li a idantifye sa avèk anpil presizyon. Aksyon yo kont ekriti li yo, ki te byen evidamman byen kay li ki dwe entèdi pa dirijan Battle Creek yo ki te chanje pou yo tounen yon lòd sen Katolis. Atak yo kont ekriti li yo reprezante tou pa atak kont ekriti Jeremi yo. Rèv Ellen White la se yon dezyèm temwen pou ekriti Jeremi yo ki te boule.
In the third generation of Laodicean Adventism compromise was the predominant theme. The third generation is represented by the church of Pergamos. Beginning with the publication of W. W. Prescott’s book titled The Doctrine of Christ in 1919, through to the publication of Questions on Doctrine in 1957, marks a period of transition represented by an alpha publication and ending with an omega publication. The first book represented W. W. Prescott’s rejection of the Lion of the tribe of Judah, for the apostate Protestant view of Christ. Prescott’s book, aptly titled The Doctrine of Christ, gutted the Millerite prophetic message, leaving the empty definition of Jesus that is worshipped by Catholicism and apostate Protestantism. The last book in that generation defines a sanctification and justification that destroys God’s law, His justice and mercy. Ancient Israel was given the responsibility to be the depositaries of God’s law, and Adventism was to be the depositaries of not only God’s law, but also His prophetic Word. In 1919 a book that rejected the defense of God’s prophetic Word, marking the beginning of the third generation of Laodicean Adventism that ended with a book that rejects God’s law.
Nan twazyèm jenerasyon Advantis Laodise a, konpwomi te tèm dominan an. Twazyèm jenerasyon an reprezante pa legliz Pergam lan. Kòmanse ak piblikasyon liv W. W. Prescott la ki gen tit The Doctrine of Christ an 1919, rive jouk nan piblikasyon Questions on Doctrine an 1957, sa make yon peryòd tranzisyon ki reprezante pa yon piblikasyon alfa epi ki fini ak yon piblikasyon omega. Premye liv la te reprezante rejè W. W. Prescott te fè sou Lyon branch fanmi Jida a, pou l te adopte opinyon Pwotestan aposta sou Kris la. Liv Prescott la, ki pote avèk jistès tit The Doctrine of Christ, te vide mesaj pwofetik Millerit la nèt, pou l te kite sèlman yon definisyon vid sou Jezi ke Katolisism ak Pwotestantis aposta adore. Dènye liv nan jenerasyon sa a defini yon sanktifikasyon ak yon jistifikasyon ki detwi lalwa Bondye a, jistis Li ak mizèrikòd Li. Ansyen Izrayèl te resevwa responsablite pou yo te gadyen lalwa Bondye a, epi Advantis la te dwe gadyen non sèlman lalwa Bondye a, men tou Pawòl pwofetik Li a. An 1919, yon liv ki te rejte defans Pawòl pwofetik Bondye a te make kòmansman twazyèm jenerasyon Advantis Laodise a, ki te fini ak yon liv ki rejte lalwa Bondye a.
“If you indulge stubbornness of heart, and through pride and self-righteousness do not confess your faults, you will be left subject to Satan’s temptations. If when the Lord reveals your errors you do not repent or make confession, his providence will bring you over the ground again and again. You will be left to make mistakes of a similar character, you will continue to lack wisdom, and will call sin righteousness, and righteousness sin. The multitude of deceptions that will prevail in these last days will encircle you, and you will change leaders, and not know that you have done so.” Review and Herald, December 16, 1890.
“Si vous vous abandonnez à l’obstination du cœur, et que, par orgueil et par propre justice, vous ne confessiez pas vos fautes, vous serez laissés à la merci des tentations de Satan. Si, lorsque le Seigneur vous révèle vos erreurs, vous ne vous repentez pas et n’en faites pas l’aveu, sa providence vous fera repasser encore et encore par le même terrain. Vous serez abandonnés à commettre des fautes d’un caractère semblable, vous continuerez à manquer de sagesse, et vous appellerez le péché justice, et la justice péché. La multitude des séductions qui prévaudront dans ces derniers jours vous enveloppera, et vous changerez de chef sans savoir que vous l’avez fait.” Review and Herald, 16 décembre 1890.
Pergamos, the third church led to Thyatira, the papal church, which is the fourth generation, when the 25 men bow to the symbol of Thyatira’s authority.
Pègam, twazyèm legliz la, te mennen nan Tiyatir, legliz papal la, ki se katriyèm jenerasyon an, lè 25 mesye yo bese devan senbòl otorite Tiyatir la.
“The regulation adopted by the early colonists, of permitting only members of the church to vote or to hold office in the civil government, led to most pernicious results. This measure had been accepted as a means of preserving the purity of the state, but it resulted in the corruption of the church. A profession of religion being the condition of suffrage and officeholding, many, actuated solely by motives of worldly policy, united with the church without a change of heart. Thus the churches came to consist, to a considerable extent, of unconverted persons; and even in the ministry were those who not only held errors of doctrine, but who were ignorant of the renewing power of the Holy Spirit. Thus again was demonstrated the evil results, so often witnessed in the history of the church from the days of Constantine to the present, of attempting to build up the church by the aid of the state, of appealing to the secular power in support of the gospel of Him who declared: ‘My kingdom is not of this world.’ John 18:36. The union of the church with the state, be the degree never so slight, while it may appear to bring the world nearer to the church, does in reality but bring the church nearer to the world.” The Great Controversy, 297.
“Règleman kolonis yo nan premye epòk la te adopte a, ki te pèmèt sèlman manm legliz yo vote oswa okipe fonksyon nan gouvènman sivil la, te mennen nan rezilta ki te pi danjere yo. Yo te aksepte mezi sa a kòm yon mwayen pou prezève pite leta a, men li te lakòz koripsyon legliz la. Kòm pwofesyon relijyon te vin kondisyon pou dwa vote ak pou okipe fonksyon, anpil moun, ki te motive sèlman pa enterè politik monn nan, te mete tèt yo ansanm ak legliz la san okenn chanjman kè. Konsa, legliz yo te vin gen ladan yo, nan yon gwo mezi, moun ki pa t konvèti; e menm nan ministè a te gen moun ki pa sèlman te kenbe erè nan doktrin, men ki te inyoran konsènan pouvwa renouvèlman Sentespri a. Se konsa ankò yo te demontre move rezilta yo, sa yo te wè souvan nan istwa legliz la depi nan epòk Konstanten rive jouk jounen jodi a, lè yo eseye bati legliz la avèk èd leta, lè yo fè apèl ak pouvwa sekilye a pou soutni levanjil Sila a ki te deklare: ‘Wayòm mwen an pa soti nan mond sa a.’ Jan 18:36. Inyon legliz la ak leta, menm si degre a ta parèt piti anpil, pandan li ka sanble ap fè mond lan vin pi pre legliz la, an reyalite li pa fè anyen lòt pase mennen legliz la vin pi pre mond lan.” Gwo Kontwovès la, 297.
The “union of the church with the state, be the degree never so slight, while it may appear to bring the world nearer to the church, does in reality but bring the church nearer to the world.” On May 18, 1977, Bert B. Beach (a director in the church’s Northern Europe-West Africa Division and involved in interchurch relations) presented a gold-covered medallion to the antichrist, Pope Paul VI during a group audience in Rome. It was part of a meeting of the Conference of Secretaries of World Confessional Families. The event was reported in the Adventist Review (August 11, 1977) and noted by Religious News Service as the first time an official SDA representative met a Pontiff.
“sendika legliz la ak leta, kèlkeswa jan degre a ta piti, pandan li ka parèt ap mennen mond lan pi pre legliz la, an reyalite li pa fè anyen lòt pase mennen legliz la pi pre mond lan.” Nan dat 18 me 1977, Bert B. Beach (yon direktè nan Divizyon Nò Ewòp–Lwès Afrik legliz la epi ki te angaje nan relasyon ant legliz yo) te prezante yon medayon kouvri ak lò bay antikris la, Pap Pòl VI, pandan yon odyans an gwoup nan Wòm. Sa te fè pati yon reyinyon Konferans Sekretè Fanmi Konfesyonèl Mondyal yo. Evènman an te rapòte nan Adventist Review (11 dawou 1977) epi Religious News Service te fè remake sa kòm premye fwa yon reprezantan ofisyèl SDA te rankontre yon Pontif.
“The Lord has pronounced a curse upon those who take from or add to the Scriptures. The great I AM has decided what shall constitute the rule of faith and doctrine, and he has designed that the Bible shall be a household book. The church that holds to the word of God is irreconcilably separated from Rome. Protestants were once thus apart from this great church of apostasy, but they have approached more nearly to her, and are still in the path of reconciliation to the Church of Rome. Rome never changes. Her principles have not altered in the least. She has not lessened the breach between herself and Protestants; they have done all the advancing. But what does this argue for the Protestantism of this day? It is the rejection of Bible truth which makes men approach to infidelity. It is a backsliding church that lessens the distance between itself and the Papacy.
“Seyè a pwononse yon madichon sou moun ki wete nan Ekriti yo oswa ki ajoute sou yo. Gran MWEN MENM MWEN AN deside kisa ki va konstitye règ lafwa ak doktrin nan, epi li fikse pou Bib la vin yon liv pou chak fanmi. Legliz ki kenbe Pawòl Bondye a separe ak Wòm yon fason ki pa ka rekonsilye. Pwotestan yo te yon lè konsa separe ak gran legliz apostazi sa a, men yo vin pwoche pi pre li, e yo toujou sou chemen rekonsilyasyon ak Legliz Wòm nan. Wòm pa janm chanje. Prensip li yo pa chanje menm piti. Li pa diminye twou ki genyen ant li menm ak Pwotestan yo; se yo menm ki fè tout pa yo pou avanse. Men ki sa sa montre konsènan Pwotestantis jounen jodi a? Se rejè verite Bib la ki fè lèzòm pwoche bò kote enfidelite. Se yon legliz ki fè bak ki diminye distans ki genyen ant li menm ak Papote a.”
“It is souls like Luther, Cranmer, Ridley, Hooper, and the thousands of noble men who were martyrs for the truth’s sake, who are the true Protestants. They stood as faithful sentinels of truth, declaring that Protestantism is incapable of union with Romanism, but must be as far separated from the principles of the Papacy as is the east from the west. Such advocates of truth could no more harmonize with ‘the man of sin’ than could Christ and his apostles. In earlier ages the righteous felt that it was impossible to affiliate with Rome, and, though their antagonism to this system of error was maintained at risk of property and life, yet they had courage to maintain their separation, and manfully struggled for the truth. Bible truth was dearer to them than wealth, honor, or even life itself. They could not endure to see the truth buried under a mass of superstition and lying sophistry. They took the word of God in their hands, and raised the standard of truth before the people, boldly declaring that which God had revealed unto them through diligent searching of the Bible. They died the cruelest of deaths for their fidelity to God, but by their blood they purchased for us liberties and privileges that many who claim to be Protestants are easily yielding up to the power of evil. But shall we yield up these dearly bought privileges? Shall we offer insult to the God of heaven, and, after he has freed us from the Romish yoke, again place ourselves in bondage to this antichristian power? Shall we prove our degeneracy by signing away our religious liberty, our right to worship God according to the dictates of our own conscience?
“Se nanm tankou Luther, Cranmer, Ridley, Hooper, ak plizyè milye gason nòb ki te mati pou kòz verite a, ki vrè Pwotestan yo. Yo te kanpe kòm vijilan fidèl pou verite a, yo t ap deklare ke Pwotestantis pa kapab ini ak Romanis, men li dwe rete separe ak prensip Papote a menm jan lès se lwen lwès. Defansè verite konsa pa t kapab ann amoni ak ‘nonm peche a’ plis pase Kris ak apot li yo te kapab. Nan tan ki te vin anvan yo, moun jis yo te santi li te enposib pou yo asosye ak Wòm; e, byenke opozisyon yo kont sistèm erè sa a te soutni nan danje pou byen yo ak lavi yo, yo te gen kouraj pou kenbe separasyon yo, epi yo te goumen avèk fèmte pou verite a. Verite Bib la te pi chè pou yo pase richès, onè, oswa menm lavi yo menm. Yo pa t kapab sipòte wè verite a antere anba yon pil sipèstisyon ak sofis mansonjè. Yo te pran pawòl Bondye a nan men yo, epi yo te leve drapo verite a devan pèp la, avèk odas yo t ap deklare sa Bondye te revele yo atravè rechèch dilijan nan Bib la. Yo te mouri nan lanmò ki pi mechan yo poutèt fidelite yo anvè Bondye, men pa san yo yo te achte pou nou libète ak privilèj ke anpil moun ki pretann yo se Pwotestan ap lage fasilman bay pouvwa mechanste a. Men èske nou va lage privilèj sa yo ki te koute chè konsa? Èske nou va fè Bondye syèl la joure, epi, apre li fin delivre nou anba jouk Women an, nou va mete tèt nou ankò anba esklavaj pouvwa antikris sa a? Èske nou va pwouve degenerasyon nou lè nou siyen ale libète relijye nou, dwa nou genyen pou adore Bondye dapre enperatif pwòp konsyans nou?”
“The voice of Luther, that echoed in mountains and valleys, that shook Europe as with an earthquake, summoned forth an army of noble apostles of Jesus, and the truth they advocated could not be silenced by fagots, by tortures, by dungeons, by death; and still the voices of the noble army of martyrs are telling us that the Roman power is the predicted apostasy of the last days, the mystery of iniquity which Paul saw beginning to work even in his day. Roman Catholicism is rapidly gaining ground. Popery is on the increase, and those who have turned their ears away from hearing the truth are listening to her delusive fables. Papal chapels, papal colleges, nunneries, and monasteries are on the increase, and the Protestant world seems to be asleep. Protestants are losing the mark of distinction that distinguished them from the world, and they are lessening the distance between themselves and the Roman power. They have turned away their ears from hearing the truth; they have been unwilling to accept light which God shed upon their pathway, and are therefore going into darkness. They speak with contempt of the idea that there will be a revival of the past cruel persecution on the part of Romanists and those who affiliate with them. They do not recognize the fact that the word of God fully predicts such a revival, and will not concede that the people of God in the last days shall suffer persecution, although the Bible says, ‘The dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.’
“Vwa Luther la, ki te sonnen nan mòn ak nan vale, ki te souke Ewòp tankou ak yon tranblemanntè, te rele soti yon lame nòb apot Jezi yo, epi verite yo t ap defann nan pa t kapab fèmen bouch li pa bwa pou boule moun, pa tòti, pa kacho, pa lanmò; e toujou vwa lame nòb mati yo ap di nou ke pouvwa women an se apostazi yo te predi pou dènye jou yo, mistè inikite a Pòl te wè ki te kòmanse ap aji menm nan epòk pa li a. Katolik women ap pran teren byen vit. Papis la ap ogmante, epi sila yo ki te vire zòrèy yo pou yo pa tande verite a ap koute fab twonpe li yo. Chapèl papal yo, kolèj papal yo, kouvan mè relijyez yo, ak monastè yo ap ogmante, epi monn pwotestan an sanble ap dòmi. Pwotestan yo ap pèdi mak distenksyon ki te fè yo diferan ak monn lan, epi yo ap diminye distans ki genyen ant yo menm ak pouvwa women an. Yo vire zòrèy yo pou yo pa tande verite a; yo pa t dispoze aksepte limyè Bondye te voye sou chemen yo, e poutèt sa yo ap antre nan fènwa. Yo pale avèk mepri de lide ki fè konnen pral gen yon renesans ansyen pèsekisyon mechan yo bò kote womenis yo ak sila yo ki afilye avèk yo. Yo pa rekonèt lefèt ke pawòl Bondye a predi nèt ale yon renesans konsa, epi yo pa vle admèt ke pèp Bondye a nan dènye jou yo pral soufri pèsekisyon, byenke Bib la di: ‘Dragon an te fache sou fanm lan, epi li ale fè lagè ak rès desandans li a, sila yo ki kenbe kòmandman Bondye yo, epi ki gen temwayaj Jezikri a.’”
“Popery is the religion of human nature, and the mass of humanity love a doctrine that permits them to commit sin, and yet frees them from its consequences. People must have some form of religion, and this religion, formed by human device, and yet claiming divine authority, suits the carnal mind. Men who think themselves wise and intelligent turn away in pride from the standard of righteousness, the ten commandments, and do not think it is in harmony with their dignity to inquire into the ways of God. Therefore they go into false ways, into forbidden paths, become self-sufficient, self inflated, after the pattern of the pope, not after the pattern of Jesus Christ. They must have the form of religion that has the least requirement of spirituality and self-denial, and as unsanctified human wisdom will not lead them to loathe popery, they are naturally drawn toward its provisions and doctrines. They do not want to walk in the ways of the Lord. They are altogether too much enlightened to seek God prayerfully and humbly, with an intelligent knowledge of his word. Not caring to know the ways of the Lord, their minds are all open to delusions, all ready to accept and believe a lie. They are willing to have the most unreasonable, most inconsistent falsehoods palmed off upon them as truth.
“Poperi se relijyon nati imen an, e majorite limanite a renmen yon doktrin ki pèmèt yo fè peche, epi poutan ki delivre yo anba konsekans li yo. Moun dwe genyen yon fòm relijyon, e relijyon sa a, ki fòme pa envansyon lèzòm, men ki pretann li gen otorite diven, adapte ak lespri lachè a. Moun ki panse tèt yo saj e entèlijan vire do bay estanda jistis la, dis kòmandman yo, avèk ògèy, e yo pa panse li ann amoni ak diyite yo pou yo chèche konnen chemen Bondye yo. Se poutèt sa yo antre nan fo chemen, nan santye entèdi, yo vin gen konfyans nan tèt yo, yo gonfle ak ògèy, dapre modèl pap la, pa dapre modèl Jezikri. Yo dwe genyen yon fòm relijyon ki mande pi piti kantite espirityalite ak renonsman pwòp tèt yo, e piske sajès imen ki pa sen pa mennen yo pou yo pran poperi an degoutans, yo natirèlman atire vè dispozisyon ak doktrin li yo. Yo pa vle mache nan chemen Senyè a. Yo twò eklere nèt pou yo chèche Bondye avèk lapriyè ak imilite, avèk yon konesans entèlijan sou pawòl li. Paske yo pa pran swen pou yo konnen chemen Senyè a, lespri yo ouvè nèt pou sediksyon, yo tout pare pou aksepte e kwè yon manti. Yo dispoze pou yo kite yo fè pase fo pawòl ki pi derezonab, ki pi kontradiktwa, tankou se laverite.”
“Satan’s masterpiece of deception is popery; and while it has been demonstrated that a day of great intellectual darkness was favorable to Romanism, it will also be demonstrated that a day of great intellectual light is also favorable to its power; for the minds of men are concentrated on their own superiority, and do not like to retain God in their knowledge. Rome claims infallibility, and Protestants are following in the same line. They do not desire to search for truth and go on from light to a greater light. They wall themselves in with prejudice, and seem willing to be deceived and to deceive others.
« Pi gwo chèfdèv twonpri Satan an se papis la; e pandan li te deja demontre ke yon epòk gwo fènwa entelektyèl te favorab pou romanis, li pral demontre tou ke yon epòk gwo limyè entelektyèl favorab tou pou pouvwa li; paske lespri lèzòm fikse sou pwòp siperyorite pa yo, e yo pa renmen kenbe Bondye nan konesans yo. Wòm reklame enfayibilite, epi Pwotestan yo ap suiv nan menm liy lan. Yo pa vle chèche verite a epi avanse soti nan limyè pou rive nan yon limyè ki pi gran. Yo fèmen tèt yo dèyè miray prejije, e yo sanble dispoze pou yo twonpe tèt yo epi twonpe lòt moun. »
“But though the attitude of the churches is discouraging, yet there is no need of being disheartened; for God has a people who will preserve their fidelity to his truth, who will make the Bible, and the Bible alone, their rule of faith and doctrine, who will elevate the standard, and hold aloft the banner on which is inscribed, “The commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.” They will value a pure gospel, and make the Bible the foundation of their faith and doctrine.
“Menmsi atitid legliz yo dekourajan, poutan pa gen okenn nesesite pou nou dekouraje; paske Bondye gen yon pèp ki pral prezève fidelite yo anvè verite li a, ki pral fè Labib, e Labib sèlman, vin règ lafwa ak doktrin yo, ki pral leve estanda a, epi kenbe byen wo drapo ki gen ekriti sa a sou li: “Kòmandman Bondye yo ak lafwa Jezi a.” Yo pral bay yon levanjil ki pwòp anpil valè, epi fè Labib vin fondasyon lafwa ak doktrin yo.
“For such a time as this, when men are casting aside the law of the Lord of hosts, the prayer of David is applicable,—‘It is time for thee, Lord, to work; for they have made void thy law.’ We are coming to a time when almost universal scorn will be heaped upon the law of God, and God’s commandment-keeping people will be severely tried; but will they lose their respect for the law of Jehovah because others do not see and realize its binding claims? Let God’s commandment-keeping people, like David, reverence God’s law in proportion as men cast it aside and heap upon it disrespect and contempt.” Signs of the Times, February 19, 1894.
“Pou yon tan konsa, lè lèzòm ap rejte lalwa Seyè a, Bondye lame yo, lapriyè David la aplikab,—‘Li lè pou ou aji, Seyè; paske yo anile lalwa ou a.’ N ap rive nan yon tan kote prèske mepri inivèsèl pral vide sou lalwa Bondye a, epi pèp Bondye a ki kenbe kòmandman li yo pral sibi eprèv sevè; men èske yo pral pèdi respè yo pou lalwa Jewova a poutèt lòt moun pa wè ni pa rekonèt obligasyon li enpoze? Se pou pèp Bondye a ki kenbe kòmandman li yo, menm jan ak David, gen reverans pou lalwa Bondye a nan menm mezi lèzòm ap mete l sou kote epi ap akable l ak derespekt ak mepri.” Signs of the Times, 19 fevriye 1894.
Two years before the antichrist was given a golden medal by a leader of the Laodicean Seventh-day Adventist church, in 1975, a lawsuit was brought against the Seventh-day Adventist church; EEOC v. Pacific Press Publishing Association (Case No. C-74-2025 CBR in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California), where the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued the church’s publishing house on behalf of two female employees—Merikay Silver (a former editor who had left by the time of the suit) and Lorna Tobler—alleging gender-based discrimination in pay and benefits. The church defended its practices partly by invoking religious exemptions and discussing its governance structure.
De zan anvan antikris la te resevwa yon meday an lò nan men yon dirijan legliz Advantis Setyèm Jou Lawodise a, an 1975, yo te pote yon pwosè kont legliz Advantis Setyèm Jou a; EEOC v. Pacific Press Publishing Association (Ka No. C-74-2025 CBR nan Tribinal Distri Etazini pou Distri Nò Kalifòni an), kote Komisyon pou Opòtinite Egal nan Travay la te pouswiv mezon piblikasyon legliz la nan non de anplwaye fi—Merikay Silver (yon ansyen editè ki te deja kite anvan lè pwosè a te depoze) ak Lorna Tobler—sou akizasyon diskriminasyon ki baze sou sèks nan salè ak avantaj yo. Legliz la te defann pratik li yo an pati lè li te envoke egzanpsyon relijye epi lè li te diskite sou estrikti gouvènans li.
In a sworn statement dated February 6, 1976 (part of a defense brief submitted to the court), Neal C. Wilson (then president of the church’s North American Division, and later General Conference president from 1979–1990) addressed the church’s historical views on Roman Catholicism. The statement was made in the context of arguing against characterizations of the church as having a “hierarchy” similar to the papal system. The full relevant quote is: “Although it is true that there was a period in the life of the Seventh-day Adventist Church when the denomination took a distinctly anti-Roman Catholic viewpoint, and the term ‘hierarchy’ was used in a pejorative sense to refer to the papal form of church governance, that attitude on the Church’s part was nothing more than a manifestation of widespread anti-popery among conservative protestant denominations in the early part of this century and the latter part of the last, and which has now been consigned to the historical trash heap so far as the Seventh-day Adventist Church is concerned.”
Nan yon deklarasyon sou sèman ki pote dat 6 fevriye 1976 (yon pati nan yon mémoire defans ki te soumèt bay tribinal la), Neal C. Wilson (ki te lè sa a prezidan Divizyon Amerik di Nò legliz la, epi pita prezidan Konferans Jeneral la soti 1979 rive 1990) te pale sou pozisyon istorik legliz la konsènan Katolik Women an. Deklarasyon an te fèt nan kontèks yon agiman kont fason yo t ap dekri legliz la kòm li gen yon “yerachi” ki sanble ak sistèm papal la. Men sitasyon konplè ki konsène a: “Malgre se vre te gen yon peryòd nan lavi Legliz Advantis Setyèm Jou a kote denominasyon an te pran yon pozisyon klèman anti-Katolik Women, epi yo te sèvi ak tèm ‘yerachi’ a nan yon sans pejoratif pou fè referans ak fòm papal gouvènans legliz la, atitid sa a bò kote Legliz la pa t anyen plis pase yon manifestasyon anti-papalis ki te gaye anpil pami denominasyon pwotestan konsèvatè yo nan kòmansman syèk sa a ak nan dènye pati syèk ki sot pase a, e ki kounye a, an sa ki konsène Legliz Advantis Setyèm Jou a, voye sou pil fatra listwa.”
This reflects a shift away from the church’s traditional prophetic interpretation, which identified the papacy as the ‘beast’ or antichrist in Revelation. Critics within and outside the church have interpreted it as downplaying or abandoning that anti-Catholic stance to align with modern ecumenism or legal defenses. Wilson, in 1985 identified the Presidents of the various Divisions of the church as “cardinals,” when he stated, “… there is no ‘cardinal’ from all the countries of the Far East, while there will probably be two ‘cardinals’ from Africa.”
Sa a reflete yon deplasman lwen entèpretasyon pwofetik tradisyonèl legliz la, ki te idantifye papote a kòm “bèt la” oswa antikris la nan Revelasyon. Kritik, ni anndan ni andeyò legliz la, te entèprete sa kòm yon diminye enpòtans oswa yon abandonnman pozisyon anti-katolik sa a pou aliman li ak ekimenis modèn oswa ak defans legal yo. Wilson, an 1985, te idantifye Prezidan divès Divizyon legliz la kòm “kadinal”, lè li te deklare: “… pa gen okenn ‘kadinal’ ki soti nan tout peyi Ekstrèm Oryan an, tandiske pral pwobableman gen de ‘kadinal’ ki soti Afrik.”
Sister White stated that it is a backslidden church that lessens the distance between itself and the pope! The compromise of the third generation is represented as weeping for Tammuz in Ezekiel eight, and by the compromise of Pergamos. The first generation from 1863 unto 1888 represented the church of Ephesus, a church that lost its first love, and the Millerite movements first love was the prophetic message, and the first chapter of that prophetic message was the “seven times” that were set aside in 1863.
Sè White te deklare ke se yon legliz ki retounen dèyè ki diminye distans ki genyen ant li menm ak pap la! Konpwomi twazyèm jenerasyon an reprezante kòm moun k ap kriye pou Tamouz nan Ezekyèl uit, epi tou pa konpwomi Pergam lan. Premye jenerasyon an soti 1863 rive 1888 te reprezante legliz Efèz la, yon legliz ki te pèdi premye lanmou li; epi premye lanmou mouvman Millerit la se te mesaj pwofetik la, epi premye chapit mesaj pwofetik sa a se te “sèt fwa yo” yo te mete sou kote an 1863.
From 1888 unto 1919, the second generation represented by Smyrna and Ezekiel’s secret chambers, witnessed the death of the Spirit of Prophecy, as Sister White was laid to rest in 1915. More details of the four generations are necessary to complete the testimony, but the progressive rebellion must be understood to fully appreciate how an apostate people could “proscribe” the writings of Ellen White, or how they could promote the first day of the week as acceptable. Judas works with the “drunkards of Ephraim” that “rule this people” in Jerusalem, and those that rule Jerusalem and bow to the sun, are represented by the Sanhedrin.
Depi 1888 rive 1919, dezyèm jenerasyon an, ki reprezante pa Smirn ak chanm sekrè Ezekyèl yo, te temwen lanmò Lespri Pwofesi a, lè Sè White te depoze pou repo li an 1915. Plis detay sou kat jenerasyon yo nesesè pou konplete temwayaj la, men rebelyon pwogresif la dwe konprann pou yo ka apresye nèt kijan yon pèp apostazi te kapab “entèdi” ekriti Ellen White yo, oswa kijan yo te kapab ankouraje premye jou semèn nan kòm yon bagay akseptab. Jida ap travay ak “tafyatè Efrayim yo” ki “gouvène pèp sa a” nan Jerizalèm; e sila yo ki gouvène Jerizalèm epi ki bese devan solèy la, se Sinedren an ki reprezante yo.
We will continue this study in the next article.
Nou pral kontinye etid sa a nan atik k ap vini an.
“Among the professed children of God, how little patience has been manifested, how many bitter words have been spoken, how much denunciation has been uttered against those not of our faith. Many have looked upon those belonging to other churches as great sinners, when the Lord does not thus regard them. Those who look thus upon the members of other churches, have need to humble themselves under the mighty hand of God. Those whom they condemn may have had but little light, few opportunities and privileges. If they had had the light that many of the members of our churches have had, they might have advanced at a far greater rate, and have better represented their faith to the world. Of those who boast of their light, and yet fail to walk in it, Christ says, ‘But I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of judgment, than for you. And thou, Capernaum [Seventh-day Adventists, who have had great light], which art exalted unto heaven [in point of privilege], shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.’ At that time Jesus answered and said, ‘I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent [in their own estimation], and hast revealed them unto babes.’
“Pami moun ki deklare yo se pitit Bondye, ala ti kras pasyans ki te manifeste, konbyen pawòl anmè ki te pale, konbyen denonsyasyon ki te pwononse kont sila yo ki pa nan lafwa pa nou. Anpil moun te gade sila yo ki fè pati lòt legliz kòm gwo pechè, tandiske Senyè a pa konsidere yo konsa. Sila yo ki gade manm lòt legliz yo konsa, bezwen imilye tèt yo anba men pwisan Bondye a. Sila yo yo kondane yo te ka resevwa sèlman ti kras limyè, kèk ti opòtinite ak privilèj. Si yo te genyen limyè anpil nan manm legliz nou yo te genyen an, yo te ka avanse pi rapid anpil, epi yo te ka reprezante lafwa yo pi byen devan lemonn. Konsènan sila yo ki vante tèt yo de limyè yo genyen, epi poutan yo pa mache ladan l, Kris di: ‘Men mwen di nou sa, jou jijman an, sa ap pi sipòtab pou Tir ak Sidon pase pou nou. E ou menm, Kapènawòm [Adventis Setyèm Jou yo, ki te resevwa gwo limyè], ou menm ki leve jouk nan syèl [nan pwen privilèj], yo pral desann ou jouk nan lanfè; paske si zèv pwisan yo, ki te fèt lakay ou yo, te fèt nan Sodòm, li ta rete jouk jounen jodi a. Men mwen di nou sa, jou jijman an, sa ap pi sipòtab pou peyi Sodòm pase pou ou.’ Lè sa a Jezi reponn, li di: ‘Mwen di ou mèsi, O Papa, Seyè syèl la ak tè a, paske ou kache bagay sa yo pou moun ki saj ak pridan [nan pwòp estimasyon pa yo], epi ou revele yo bay timoun piti yo.’”
“‘And now, because ye have done all these works, saith the Lord, and I spake unto you, rising up early and speaking, but ye heard not; and I called you, but ye answered not; therefore will I do unto this house, which is called by my name, wherein ye trust, and unto the place which I gave to you and to your fathers, as I have done to Shiloh. And I will cast you out of my sight, as I have cast out all your brethren, even the whole seed of Ephraim.’
“‘Epi kounyeya, paske nou fè tout bagay sa yo, se SENYÈ a ki di sa, e mwen te pale avèk nou, m te leve byen bonè pou m pale, men nou pa t koute; mwen te rele nou, men nou pa t reponn; se poutèt sa m ap fè kay sa a, ki pote non mwen, kote nou mete konfyans nou an, ak kote mwen te bay nou ansanm ak zansèt nou yo, menm jan mwen te fè Silo. Epi m ap jete nou byen lwen devan je m, menm jan mwen te jete tout frè nou yo, wi, tout desandans Efrayim lan.’”
“The Lord has established among us institutions of great importance, and they are to be managed, not as worldly institutions are managed, but after God’s order. They are to be managed with an eye single to his glory, that by all means perishing souls may be saved. To the people of God the testimonies of the Spirit have come, and yet many have not taken heed to reproofs, warnings, and counsels.
“Seyè a etabli pami nou enstitisyon ki gen anpil enpòtans, epi yo dwe administre yo, non pa jan enstitisyon monn nan administre, men dapre lòd Bondye. Yo dwe administre yo ak yon je ki fikse sèlman sou glwa li, pou, pa tout mwayen, nanm k ap peri yo ka sove. Bay pèp Bondye a temwayaj Lespri a rive, men anpil pa t pran avètisman, repwòch, ak konsèy yo oserye.”
“‘Here now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not: fear ye not me saith the Lord: will ye not tremble at my presence, which have placed the sand for the bound of the sea by a perpetual degree, that it cannot pass it: and though the waves thereof toss themselves, yet can they not prevail; though they roar, yet can they not pass over it? but this people hath a revolting and a rebellious heart; they are revolted and gone. Neither say they in their heart, Let us now fear the Lord our God, that giveth rain, both the former and the latter, in his season: he reserveth unto us the appointed weeks of the harvest. Your iniquities have turned away these things, and your sins have withholden good things from you. . . . They judge not the cause, the cause of the fatherless, yet they prosper; and the right of the needy do they not judge. Shall I not visit for these things? saith the Lord; shall not my soul be revenged on such a nation as this?’
“Koute sa kounye a, nou menm pèp sòt sa a, ki san konprann; nou gen je, men nou pa wè; nou gen zòrèy, men nou pa tande: èske nou pa pè mwen? se Senyè a ki di sa. Èske nou pa tranble devan prezans mwen, mwen menm ki mete sab la kòm limit lanmè a pa yon lòd tout tan, pou li pa ka depase l? Menm lè vag li yo ap bat kò yo, yo pa ka genyen; menm lè yo gwonde, yo pa ka pase sou li. Men pèp sa a gen yon kè rebèl e tèt di; yo vire do, yo ale. Yo pa di nan kè yo: Annou gen krentif pou Senyè a, Bondye nou an, ki bay lapli, ni premye a ni dènye a, nan sezon pa li; li rezève pou nou semèn ki fikse pou rekòt la. Inikite nou yo fè bagay sa yo vire do ba nou, e peche nou yo anpeche bon bagay rive jwenn nou.... Yo pa rann jistis nan koz la, koz òfelen an, epi yo menm yo pwospere; e dwa moun ki nan bezwen yo, yo pa rann jijman sou li. Èske m pa ta pini pou bagay sa yo? se Senyè a ki di sa; èske nanm mwen pa ta tire revanj sou yon nasyon konsa?”
“Shall the Lord be compelled to say, ‘Pray not thou for this people, neither lift up cry nor prayer for them, neither make intercession to me: for I will not hear thee’? ‘Therefore the showers have been withholden, and there hath been no latter rain. . . . Wilt thou not from this time cry unto me, My father, thou art the guide of my youth?’” Review and Herald, August 1, 1893.
“Èske Senyè a va oblije di: ‘Pa lapriyè pou pèp sa a, pa leve kri ni priyè pou yo, epi pa fè lapledwaye devan mwen pou yo; paske mwen p ap tande ou’? ‘Se poutèt sa lapli yo te sispann, e pa t gen lapli ta.... Èske depi kounye a ou p ap rele jwenn mwen: Papa mwen, ou se gid jenès mwen?’” Review and Herald, 1 out 1893.