In Isaiah twenty-eight the “scornful men which rule” “Jerusalem” are represented as the “drunkards of Ephraim,” and as the “crown of pride.” “Crown” represents leadership and “pride” represents a satanic character.
Nan Ezayi venntuit la, “moun k ap pase nan rizib ki ap gouvènen” “Jerizalèm” yo reprezante kòm “tafyatè Efrayim yo,” epi kòm “kouwòn lògèy la.” “Kouwòn” reprezante lidèchip, epi “lògèy” reprezante yon karaktè satanik.
The drunkards are contrasted with the remnant (“residue”) who become God’s “crown” of glory, for during the latter rain the Lord sets up His “kingdom of glory” as typified by Him setting up the “kingdom of grace” at the cross. The kingdom of grace at the cross typifies the kingdom of glory at the Sunday law. The latter rain began on 9/11 when the sealing of the one hundred and forty-four thousand and the judgment of the living began.
Sou yo mete tafyatè yo an kontrast ak rès la (“rezidi a”), ki vin tounen “kouwòn” laglwa Bondye, paske pandan lapli ta a Senyè a etabli “wayòm laglwa” Li a, jan sa te prefigire pa Li menm lè Li te etabli “wayòm gras la” sou kwa a. Wayòm gras la sou kwa a prefigire wayòm laglwa a nan lwa dimanch la. Lapli ta a te kòmanse 11/9 lè sele san karant-kat mil yo ak jijman moun vivan yo te kòmanse.
“I saw that all things are intensely looking and stretching their thoughts on the impending crisis before them. The sins of Israel must go to judgment beforehand. Every sin must be confessed at the sanctuary, then the work will move. It must be done now. The remnant in the time of trouble will cry, My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken me?
“Mwen te wè ke tout bagay ap gade avèk anpil atansyon e yo ap lonje panse yo sou kriz k ap vini ki devan yo. Peche Izrayèl yo dwe ale an jijman davans. Chak peche dwe konfese nan tanp lan; lè sa a travay la va avanse. Sa dwe fèt kounye a. Rès la, nan tan detrès la, va rele: Bondye mwen, Bondye mwen, poukisa Ou abandone mwen?”
“The latter rain is coming on those that are pure—all then will receive it as formerly.
“Lapli ta a ap vini sou sila yo ki pir—lè sa a, yo tout ap resevwa li tankou anvan.
“When the four angels let go, Christ will set up His kingdom. None receive the latter rain but those who are doing all they can. Christ would help us. All could be overcomers by the grace of God, through the blood of Jesus. All heaven is interested in the work. Angels are interested.” Spalding and Magan, 3.
«Lè kat zanj yo lage, Kris la pral etabli wayòm li an. Pèsonn pa resevwa dènye lapli a eksepte sila yo k ap fè tout sa yo kapab. Kris la ta ede nou. Tout moun te kapab vin genyen batay la pa gras Bondye, atravè san Jezi. Tout syèl la enterese nan travay la. Zanj yo enterese tou.» Spalding and Magan, 3.
The four winds of Revelation are also represented by Isaiah as a rough wind that had been stayed during the day of the east wind, as are Revelation’s four winds of strife held in check by the four angels. The four winds are identified as an “angry horse seeking to break loose” bringing “death and destruction” by Sister White. The four winds are progressively released, beginning at 9/11 then greatly amplified at the Sunday law, and then fully loosed when human probation closes.
Kat van Revelasyon an reprezante tou pa Ezayi kòm yon van di ki te kenbe anplas pandan jou van lès la, menm jan kat van konfli Revelasyon yo kenbe anba kontwòl pa kat zanj yo. Sè White idantifye kat van yo kòm yon “chwal fache k ap chèche kase kòd li” k ap pote “lanmò ak destriksyon.” Kat van yo lage pwogresivman, kòmanse nan 9/11, apre sa yo vin anpil fwa pi fò nan lwa dimanch lan, epi finalman yo lage nèt lè tan gras limanite a fini.
Released and Restrained
Lage ak Retni
The seventh trumpet, which is also the third woe, which announces the finishing of the mystery of God was prophetically sounded at 9/11 when Islam was released and then prophetically restrained by George W. Bush post-911. The mother of Islam, Hagar, Ishmael’s mother is a symbol of restraint and release. She was released by Sarah to procreate with Abraham by Sarah, then because of jealousy she was restrained by Sarah, causing Hagar to run away, until the angel restrained Hagar from running and told her to return. After the birth of Isaac, the strife of Hagar and Sarah continued until Abraham cast out the bondwoman, thus placing another restraint upon her.
Twonpèt setyèm nan, ki se tou twazyèm malè a, ki anonse akonplisman mistè Bondye a, te sonnen pwofetikman nan 11 septanm, lè yo te lage Islam, epi apre 11 septanm George W. Bush te mete l anba kontrent pwofetikman. Agar, manman Islam nan, manman Izmayèl la, se yon senbòl kontrent ak lage. Sara te lage li pou l fè pitit ak Abraram pou Sara; apre sa, poutèt jalouzi, Sara te mete l anba kontrent, sa ki te fè Agar kouri ale, jouk lè zanj lan te anpeche Agar kontinye kouri epi li te di l retounen. Apre nesans Izarak la, konfli Agar ak Sara a te kontinye jouk Abraram te mete esklav la deyò, konsa li te mete sou li yon lòt kontrent ankò.
The four angels of Islam were released at the beginning of the three hundred and ninety-one year and fifteen-day prophecy of Revelation chapter nine verse fifteen and they were then restrained on August 11, 1840.
Kat zanj Islam yo te lage nan kòmansman pwofesi twa san katrevendizennyen ane ak kenz jou ki nan Revelasyon chapit nèf vèsè kenz la, epi apre sa yo te mete yo anba restriksyon le 11 dawou 1840.
And the sixth angel sounded, and I heard a voice from the four horns of the golden altar which is before God, Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates. And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men. Revelation 9:13–15.
Epi sizyèm zanj lan kònen twonpèt li a, epi mwen tande yon vwa ki soti nan kat kòn lotèl an lò a ki devan Bondye, ki t ap di sizyèm zanj ki te gen twonpèt la: Lage kat zanj ki mare yo nan gran rivyè Lefrat la. Epi yo lage kat zanj sa yo, ki te pare pou yon lè, yon jou, yon mwa, ak yon ane, pou touye yon tyè nan lèzòm. Revelasyon 9:13–15.
After Islam of the third woe was released to attack at 9/11, George W. Bush initiated his worldwide war on terrorism and put a restraint on Islam. The first mention of Ishmael, the symbol of Islam identifies that Ishmael descendants would be against every man and every man would be against them.
Apre Islam twazyèm malè a te lage pou atake nan 11 Septanm, George W. Bush te lanse lagè mondyal li kont teworis la epi li te mete yon restriksyon sou Islam. Premye fwa yo mansyone Izmayèl, senbòl Islam lan, sa montre desandan Izmayèl yo t ap kont tout moun, e tout moun t ap kont yo.
And the angel of the Lord said unto her, Behold, thou art with child, and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the Lord hath heard thy affliction. And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren. Genesis 16:11, 12.
Epi zanj Senyè a di li: Gade, ou ansent, epi w ap fè yon pitit gason, epi w ap rele non li Izmayèl; paske Senyè a tande mizè ou. Epi li pral yon nonm sovaj; men li pral leve kont tout moun, epi men tout moun pral leve kont li; epi li pral rete anfas tout frè li yo. Jenèz 16:11, 12.
Islam is the power at the end of the world that “every man’s hand” will be against, and Islam will be against every man, just as it is being perfectly fulfilled today. The particular work of Islam as a symbol of prophecy is to bring about a world war. This subject is confirmed by the story of Elijah, John the Baptist and is represented as “the angering of the nations” in the book of Revelation.
Islam se pouvwa nan fen mond lan kote “men chak moun” pral leve kont li, epi Islam li menm pral kont chak moun, menm jan sa ap akonpli nèt ale jodi a. Travay patikilye Islam kòm yon senbòl pwofetik se pou mennen yon lagè mondyal. Sijè sa a konfime pa istwa Eli, Jan Batis, epi li reprezante kòm “kòlè nasyon yo” nan liv Revelasyon an.
“‘The commencement of that time of trouble,’ here mentioned does not refer to the time when the plagues shall begin to be poured out, but to a short period just before they are poured out, while Christ is in the sanctuary. At that time, while the work of salvation is closing, trouble will be coming on the earth, and the nations will be angry, yet held in check so as not to prevent the work of the third angel. At that time the ‘latter rain,’ or refreshing from the presence of the Lord, will come, to give power to the loud voice of the third angel, and prepare the saints to stand in the period when the seven last plagues shall be poured out.” Early Writings, 85.
“Kòmansman tan detrès sa a,” jan sa mansyone isit la, pa fè referans ak tan kote kalamite yo pral kòmanse vide, men pito ak yon kout peryòd jis anvan yo vide yo, pandan Kris la nan sanktyè a. Nan tan sa a, pandan travay delivrans lan ap rive nan fen li, detrès pral vin sou tè a, e nasyon yo pral fache, men yo pral kenbe anba kontwòl pou yo pa anpeche travay twazyèm zanj lan. Nan tan sa a, “dènye lapli a,” oswa rafrechisman ki soti nan prezans Seyè a, pral vini pou bay pouvwa a gwo vwa twazyèm zanj lan, epi pou prepare sen yo pou yo kanpe nan peryòd kote sèt dènye kalamite yo pral vide.” Early Writings, 85.
In the “days” when the latter rain is falling, Christ sets up His kingdom of glory as represented in the book of Daniel.
Nan “jou” kote lapli ta a ap tonbe, Kris tabli wayòm glwa Li a jan sa reprezante nan liv Danyèl la.
And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever. Daniel 2:44.
Nan jou wa sa yo, Bondye syèl la va etabli yon wayòm ki p ap janm detwi; e wayòm nan p ap kite bay lòt pèp, men li va kraze an miyèt moso e li va fini ak tout wayòm sa yo, epi li menm li va kanpe pou tout tan. Danyèl 2:44.
In the “days” when Christ sets up His kingdom of glory, those who are Christ’s “crown” of glory are contrasted with the drunkards who wear the “crown” of pride. Habakkuk’s “vision” that was to be written and made plain upon “tables” graphically illustrates the historical witness of the foundational truths of Adventism. In Habakkuk’s testimony Joel’s two classes of either “pride” or “glory” are represented as a class who are—justified by faith or who are—lifted up in pride. Verse four of chapter two addresses the two classes and they parallel the classic illustration of the Pharisee and the Publican. The Publican went home justified and the Pharisee’s “soul” is “not upright” for it is “lifted up.”
Nan “jou” lè Kris etabli wayòm laglwa Li a, sila yo ki pou Kris yo, ki se “kouwòn” laglwa Li a, yo mete an kontrast ak tafyatè yo ki pote “kouwòn” ògèy la. “Vizyon” Abakik la, ki te dwe ekri epi fè klè sou “tab” yo, montre avèk fòs temwayaj istorik verite fondamantal Advantis yo. Nan temwayaj Abakik la, de klas Joel yo, swa “ògèy” oswa “laglwa”, yo reprezante kòm yon klas moun ki swa—jistifye pa lafwa—oswa ki—leve anlè nan ògèy. Vèsè kat nan chapit de a pale ak de klas yo, epi yo mache an paralèl ak ilistrasyon klasik Farizyen an ak Pibliken an. Pibliken an te retounen lakay li jistifye, epi “nanm” Farizyen an “pa dwat”, paske li “leve anlè”.
Behold, his soul which is lifted up is not upright in him: but the just shall live by his faith. Habakkuk 2:4.
Gade, nanm li ki gonfle ak lògèy la pa dwat nan li; men moun ki jis la va viv pa lafwa li. Abakik 2:4.
In the next verse Habakkuk identifies the class whose hearts are lifted up in pride as drunk, thus connecting Isaiah’s and Habakkuk’s drunks with “pride.”
Nan vèsè ki vin apre a, Abakik idantifye kategori moun ki gen kè yo leve nan lògèy kòm moun sou, konsa li mete an relasyon moun sou Ezayi ak Abakik yo ak “lògèy.”
Yea also, because he transgresseth by wine, he is a proud man, neither keepeth at home, who enlargeth his desire as hell, and is as death, and cannot be satisfied, but gathereth unto him all nations, and heapeth unto him all people. Habakkuk 2:5.
Wi, ankò, paske li fè peche ak diven, li se yon nonm ògeye; li pa rete lakay li; li louvri dezi li laj tankou lanfè, li tankou lanmò, epi li pa ka janm satisfè; men li rasanble bò kote li tout nasyon yo, epi li ranmase pou tèt li tout pèp yo. Abakik 2:5.
It is worth remembering that these verses in Habakkuk were not only fulfilled in Millerite history, but their fulfillment was a common subject of both Ellen White and the early pioneers of Adventism. Those who were justified by the faith represented in verse four of Millerite history were those who endured the crisis of the first disappointment, which marked both the tarrying time and the arrival of the second angel’s message announcing the fall of Babylon. The Millerites understood within that testing history that the former covenant people, who had been historically Protestants had become the daughters of Babylon. Those Protestants were Protestants represented by the church of Sardis, representing a covenant people, for they had a “name”, symbol of both character and covenant relationship, but they were dead.
Li enpòtan pou nou sonje ke vèsè sa yo nan Abakik pa t sèlman akonpli nan istwa Millerit la, men akonplisman yo te yon sijè komen ni pou Ellen White ni pou premye pyonye Advantis yo. Moun ki te jistifye pa lafwa ki reprezante nan vèsè kat la nan istwa Millerit la se te sila yo ki te andire kriz premye desepsyon an, ki te make ni tan reta a ni rive mesaj dezyèm zanj lan ki t ap anonse tonbe Babilòn nan. Millerit yo te konprann, nan istwa eprèv sa a, ke ansyen pèp alyans lan, ki te istorikman Pwotestan, te vin tounen pitit fi Babilòn yo. Pwotestan sa yo se te Pwotestan legliz Sàd la te reprezante, legliz ki te reprezante yon pèp alyans, paske yo te gen yon “non”, senbòl ni karaktè ni relasyon alyans, men yo te mouri.
And unto the angel of the church in Sardis write; These things saith he that hath the seven Spirits of God, and the seven stars; I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead. Revelation 3:1.
Epi pou zanj legliz ki nan Sardis la, ekri: Men sa sila a ki gen sèt Lespri Bondye yo ak sèt zetwal yo di: Mwen konnen zèv ou yo; ou gen repitasyon kòmsi ou vivan, men ou mouri. Revelasyon 3:1.
In the testing process of 1844 that began on April 19 and thereafter ended on October 22—those who failed the testing process were lifted up in pride, and if we would but read the verses that follow verse five, the characteristic of human pride is there exemplified with an illustration of papal arrogance and self-exaltation. It ends in verse twenty where it is pronounced that the Lord is in His holy temple, let all the earth keep silent.
Nan pwosesis eprèv la nan ane 1844, ki te kòmanse 19 avril epi ki te fini apre sa 22 oktòb la—sila yo ki te echwe nan pwosesis eprèv la te vin leve nan ògèy; e si nou ta sèlman li vèsè ki vin apre vèsè senk la, karakteristik ògèy imen an parèt la kòm yon egzanp avèk yon ilistrasyon awogans papal ak pwòp tèt li leve byen wo. Sa fini nan vèsè ven an, kote yo pwononse ke Senyè a nan tanp sen li a; se pou tout tè a rete an silans devan li.
But the Lord is in his holy temple: let all the earth keep silence before him. Habakkuk 2:20.
Men, Seyè a nan tanp sen li a; se pou tout latè rete an silans devan li. Abakik 2:20.
Verse two of Habakkuk chapter two identifies the first disappointment of April 19, 1844 and the chapter ends in verse twenty, which clearly marks October 22, 1844 when the Lord came suddenly to His temple.
Vèsè de nan chapit de Abakik la idantifye premye desepsyon 19 avril 1844 la, epi chapit la fini nan vèsè ven, ki make klèman 22 oktòb 1844, lè Senyè a te vini toudenkou nan tanp Li a.
Four Comings on October 22, 1844 (line upon line)
Kat Vini yo, 22 Oktòb 1844 (liy sou liy)
“The coming of Christ as our high priest to the most holy place, for the cleansing of the sanctuary, brought to view in Daniel 8:14; the coming of the Son of man to the Ancient of Days, as presented in Daniel 7:13; and the coming of the Lord to His temple, foretold by Malachi, are descriptions of the same event; and this is also represented by the coming of the bridegroom to the marriage, described by Christ in the parable of the ten virgins, of Matthew 25.” The Great Controversy, 426.
“Vini Kris la kòm gran prèt nou an nan Kote ki Trè Sen an, pou pirifye Tanp lan, jan sa parèt nan Danyèl 8:14; vini Pitit lòm nan bò kote Ansyen Jou yo, jan sa prezante nan Danyèl 7:13; epi vini Senyè a nan tanp Li a, jan Malachi te pwofetize l la, se deskripsyon menm evènman an; epi sa reprezante tou pa vini nèg marye a nan nòs la, jan Kris dekri l nan parabòl dis vyèj yo, nan Matye 25.” The Great Controversy, 426.
Verses three and four identify the two classes which are produced in the testing process of verse two through to verse twenty, the testing process of April 19, 1844 unto October 22, 1844. Verse four through nineteen are addressing the papal power with the exception of verse fourteen which addresses the history that follows the descent of the angel of Revelation chapter eighteen at 9/11.
Vèsè twa ak kat idantifye de klas ki pwodui nan pwosesis eprèv ki nan vèsè de a rive jouk vèsè ven an, pwosesis eprèv ki soti 19 Avril 1844 rive 22 Oktòb 1844. Vèsè kat rive diznèf yo ap pale ak pouvwa papal la, eksepte vèsè katòz la, ki pale sou istwa ki swiv desandan zanj Revelasyon chapit dizwityèm nan nan 9/11.
For the earth shall be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea. Habakkuk 2:14.
Paske tè a pral plen ak konesans glwa Senyè a, menm jan dlo yo kouvri lanmè a. Abakik 2:14.
In the testing process of the second angel in Millerite history two classes of worshippers were developed and thereafter manifested at the crisis of October 22, 1844. The character of the wicked in the passage is the character of the papacy, and in that testing period the faithful Millerites came to proclaim in agreement with the message of the second angel that the Protestant church had become the daughters of Rome through their rejection of the Millerite message. The controversy that unfolded between the starting at April 19 and the ending on October 22 is where character either as a proud drinker of Babylon’s wine as was Belshazzar or as someone who like Daniel before Belshazzar was justified by his faith. That controversy is where the drama unfolds that awakens the world to the eternal realities associated with the third angel’s message. The backdrop of the drunk verses the justified is placed within the context of the argument being how the world is enlightened to the issues, “For the earth shall be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea.” That enlightening began at 9/11.
Nan pwosesis eprèv dezyèm zanj lan nan istwa Millerite la, de klas adoratè te devlope, epi apre sa yo te manifeste nan kriz 22 oktòb 1844 la. Karaktè mechan yo nan pasaj la se karaktè papote a, epi pandan peryòd eprèv sa a, Millerite fidèl yo te rive pwoklame, an akò ak mesaj dezyèm zanj lan, ke legliz Pwotestan an te vin tounen pitit fi Wòm yo poutèt yo te rejte mesaj Millerite la. Kontwovès ki te dewoule ant kòmansman 19 avril la ak fen 22 oktòb la se kote karaktè swa kòm yon moun ògèy ki sou anba diven Babilòn nan, menm jan ak Bèlchaza, oswa kòm yon moun ki, tankou Danyèl devan Bèlchaza, te jistifye pa lafwa li. Se nan kontwovès sa a dram nan dewoule ki reveye mond lan sou reyalite etènèl ki asosye ak mesaj twazyèm zanj lan. Dekò moun sou anba kont moun ki jistifye a plase nan kontèks agiman sou fason mond lan resevwa limyè sou kestyon yo: “Paske tè a pral plen ak konesans laglwa Seyè a, menm jan dlo yo kouvri lanmè a.” Ekleraj sa a te kòmanse nan 9/11.
At the conclusion of the history represented in Habakkuk chapter two the Lord suddenly came to His temple on October 22, 1844. He did so in fulfillment of the prophecy that He set forth as Palmoni in verse fourteen of Daniel eight.
Nan fen istwa ki reprezante nan Abakik chapit de a, Senyè a te vini toudenkou nan tanp li le 22 oktòb 1844. Li te fè sa nan akonplisman pwofesi li te prezante kòm Palmoni nan vèsè katòz Danyèl uit la.
Palmoni
Palmoni
On the tenth day of the seventh month of the biblical calendar, which in 1844 fell upon the twenty-second day of the tenth month, Habakkuk 2:20 was fulfilled, and the symbolical number “220” can be seen in the ‘chapter and verse’ which identifies a dispensational change in the work of Christ in the heavenly sanctuary. A prophetic characteristic of the one hundred and forty-four thousand is that they are those who follow the Lamb whithersoever He goeth. To follow Christ means to follow Him in His Word.
Nan dizyèm jou setyèm mwa kalandriye biblik la, ki an 1844 te tonbe sou vennndezyèm jou dizyèm mwa a, Habakik 2:20 te akonpli, epi yo ka wè nonb senbolik “220” la nan “chapit ak vèsè” ki idantifye yon chanjman dispensasyonèl nan travay Kris la nan sanktyè selès la. Youn nan karakteristik pwofetik san karantkat mil yo se ke se yo menm ki swiv Ti Mouton an nenpòt kote Li ale. Swiv Kris vle di swiv Li nan Pawòl Li.
In His Word, the number “220” symbolically represents the combination of divinity and humanity, and the very work Christ began on that date was the work of combining His divinity with humanity. In 1844 on the twenty-second day of the tenth month, or symbolically twenty-two times ten equaling “220” (22 X 10 = 220) or you might say, on the very date that equates symbolically to “220,” Habakkuk “2:20” was fulfilled as Christ moved from the holy place to the Most Holy Place to begin the investigative judgment.
Nan Pawòl Li a, nonb «220» la reprezante yon fason senbolik konbinezon divinite ak limanite, e menm travay Kris te kòmanse nan dat sa a se te travay pou mete divinite Li ansanm ak limanite. An 1844, nan venn-dezyèm jou dizyèm mwa a, oswa senbolikman venn-de fwa dis ki bay «220» (22 X 10 = 220), oswa, jan ou ta ka di l, nan menm dat ki senbolikman koresponn ak «220» la, Abakik «2:20» te akonpli lè Kris te deplase soti nan kote ki sen an pou antre nan Kote ki Trè Sen an pou kòmanse jijman ankèt la.
Palmoni, the Wonderful Number stands within the ‘question and answer’ that is the central pillar of Adventism and most Adventists are fully unaware of that truth.
Palmoni, Nimewo Mèveye a, kanpe anndan “kesyon ak repons” ki se poto mitan Advantis la, e pifò Advantis yo pa menm okouran nèt de verite sa a.
“The scripture which above all others had been both the foundation and central pillar of the Advent faith was the declaration, ‘Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed.’ [Daniel 8:14.]” The Great Controversy, 409.
“Ekriti ki, pami tout lòt yo, ki te sèvi ansanm kòm fondasyon ak poto mitan lafwa Advan an, se te deklarasyon sa a: ‘Jiska de mil twa san jou; apre sa, y’a netwaye sanktyè a.’ [Daniel 8:14.]” The Great Controversy, 409.
Daniel chapter eight verses thirteen and fourteen represent a question in verse thirteen that is followed by an answer in verse fourteen. The Hebrew word Palmoni is translated as “that certain saint” in verse thirteen, and that particular name of Christ means the Wonderful Numberer or the Numberer of Secrets.
Nan Danyèl chapit uit, vèsè trèz ak katòz prezante yon kestyon nan vèsè trèz, epi yon repons ki vin apre nan vèsè katòz. Mo ebre Palmoni a tradui kòm « sen sa a » nan vèsè trèz, epi non patikilye Kris sa a vle di Mèveye ki konte a, oswa Sila ki konte sekrè yo.
When Ellen White identifies that verse fourteen is the central pillar and foundation of Adventism, she places the divine emphasis upon the question and answer of these two verses which demands that Christ as the Wonderful Numberer must be the primary point of reference. Sister White repeatedly emphasized the importance of viewing Christ as the central truth of any passage, and in verses thirteen and fourteen there is a direct appearance of Christ—“that certain saint,”—who is Palmoni.
Lè Ellen White idantifye ke vèsè katòz se poto santral ak fondasyon Advantis la, li mete anfaz diven an sou kesyon ak repons de vèsè sa yo, sa ki egzije pou Kris, antanke Bèl Mèveyè ki konte a, dwe vin pwen referans prensipal la. Sè White te repete anpil fwa enpòtans pou nou wè Kris kòm verite santral nenpòt pasaj; e nan vèsè trèz ak katòz yo, gen yon aparisyon dirèk Kris la—“saint sa a,”—ki se Palmoni.
When Adventism rejected the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six in 1863, they closed their eyes to Palmoni, for the prophetic structure of the question and answer is based upon the relationship of Moses’ “seven times” and Daniel’s “twenty-three hundred days.” Moses’ “seven times” or twenty-five hundred and twenty years and Daniel’s “twenty-three hundred evenings and mornings” or twenty-three hundred years prophetic relationship is established by time, which is represented by numbers, and the Wonderful Numberer is right in the center of the question and answer that are the central pillar of Adventism. Those who may have read the writings of Josephus might remember his logical arguments identifying two special things created by God. One was the Hebrew language and the other was measurable time, which in turns requires mathematics.
Lè Advantis te rejte “sèt fwa” Levitik vennsis an 1863, yo te fèmen je yo sou Palmoni, paske estrikti pwofetik kesyon ak repons lan baze sou relasyon ki genyen ant “sèt fwa” Moyiz yo ak “de mil twa san jou” Danyèl yo. Relasyon pwofetik ant “sèt fwa” Moyiz yo, sa vle di de mil senksan ven ane, ak “de mil twa san aswè ak maten” Danyèl yo, sa vle di de mil twa san ane, tabli pa tan, ki reprezante pa chif; epi Bèl Moun ki Konte a kanpe egzakteman nan sant kesyon ak repons ki se poto santral Advantis la. Moun ki petèt te li ekriti Josephus yo ka sonje agiman lojik li yo ki idantifye de bagay espesyal Bondye te kreye. Youn se te lang ebre a, epi lòt la se te tan mezirab, ki, annapre, mande matematik.
Verse thirteen asks “How long?” The verse does not ask “when,” it asks “how long?” If the question is about duration (how long?) or if the question is about a point in time (when?) is essential to correctly understand. The answer to the question in verse fourteen is either identifying a point in time, or a period of time and possibly both, but whatever the answer may be it must be set within the context of the question of verse thirteen. To rightly divide the word, or that is to say to rightly understand the answer of verse fourteen requires a correct understanding of the context of the question. Is it “when” or “then?”
Vèsè trèz poze kesyon an: “Jiska kilè?” Vèsè a pa poze kesyon “ki lè”; li poze kesyon “jiska kilè?” Si kesyon an konsène dire yon dire tan (jiska kilè?) oswa si kesyon an konsène yon pwen presi nan tan (ki lè?) se yon bagay esansyèl pou yo konprann kòrèkteman. Repons kesyon ki nan vèsè katòz la swa idantifye yon pwen nan tan, swa yon peryòd tan, e petèt toude; men kèlkeswa repons lan ye, fòk li tabli andedan kontèks kesyon vèsè trèz la. Pou byen separe pawòl la, oubyen sa vle di pou byen konprann repons vèsè katòz la, li nesesè pou genyen yon bon konpreyansyon sou kontèks kesyon an. Èske se “ki lè” oswa “jiska kilè?”
The drunkards of Ephraim vaguely teach that verse fourteen is identifying a point in time, which they identify as October 22, 1844, and when they do so they may very well refer to the passage we just cited from The Great Controversy, but God’s Word never changes and it never fails. The question of “how long” is identifying duration, not a point in time. October 22, 1844 began the period of the investigative judgment and the truths associated with that work represent the everlasting gospel and are much more important than simply the date it started.
Tafyatè Efrayim yo anseye yon fason vag ke vèsè katòz la ap idantifye yon pwen nan tan, pwen sa a yo idantifye kòm 22 oktòb 1844; epi lè yo fè sa, yo ka byen refere yo ak pasaj nou sot site a nan The Great Controversy, men Pawòl Bondye a pa janm chanje e li pa janm fè fay. Kesyon “konbyen tan an” ap idantifye yon dire, pa yon pwen nan tan. Jou 22 oktòb 1844 la te kòmanse peryòd jijman ankèt la, epi verite ki asosye ak travay sa a yo reprezante levanjil etènèl la e yo gen anpil plis enpòtans pase senpleman dat li te kòmanse a.
The Hebrew grammar is clear, and that identical meaning was translated into the King James Version. Not only is the grammar clearly placing the question in the context of duration, but the question “how long” is a symbol of biblical prophecy. It can be demonstrated upon several witnesses that the question “how long” as a symbol represents the history of 9/11 unto the Sunday law. We will first consider the symbol of “how long” before we return to Palmoni and Joel.
Gramè ebreyen an klè, e menm sans idantik sa a te tradui nan King James Version lan. Non sèlman gramè a ap mete kestyon an aklè nan kontèks dire a, men kestyon “konbyen tan” an se yon senbòl nan pwofesi biblik. Sa ka demontre sou plizyè temwen ke kestyon “konbyen tan” an, kòm senbòl, reprezante istwa 9/11 rive jouk lwa dimanch lan. Nou pral premye konsidere senbòl “konbyen tan” an anvan nou retounen sou Palmoni ak Jowèl.
How Long? Isaiah Six
Konbyen tan ankò? Ezayi Sis Lè sa a mwen di: “Seyè, jis kilè?” Epi li reponn: “Jouk lè lavil yo fin kraze nèt, san okenn moun rete ladan yo, ak kay yo san okenn moun, epi peyi a fin tounen yon dezè nèt, jouk SENYÈ a fin depòte moun yo byen lwen, e kote ki te abandone yo vin anpil nan mitan peyi a. Men si yon dizyèm rete ladan l, l ap ankò pou yo detwi l; men tankou yon terebent oswa yon pye bwadchenn, lè yo fin koupe yo, kòd lonbrik la rete; konsa desandan ki sen an ap kòd lonbrik li.” (Ezayi 6:11–13) Menm apre li fin wè Seyè a nan bèlte li, menm apre li fin resevwa yon asirans pèsonèl sou padon pou peche li yo, menm apre li fin konsakre tèt li nèt pou sèvis Bondye, pwofèt la toujou pa t ka konprann nesesite jijman ki t apral tonbe sou pèp li a. Li te poze kesyon sa a bay Bondye: “Konbyen tan? … Jis kilè?” (Ezayi 6:11). Malgre sa, li pa t mande pou l chanje mesaj la. Li pa t mande yon ministè ki ta pi fasil oswa ki ta bay plis rezilta. Li te vle sèlman konnen konbyen tan li t ap gen pou l kontinye preche mesaj sa a ki t ap sanble yon echèk. Kesyon li an, jan mwen konprann li, pa t pou mande “Poukisa?” men pito “Konbyen tan ankò?” Kesyon li an se kesyon tout moun Bondye voye, kesyon tout vrè temwen ki rete fidèl yo, kesyon tout vejetè nanm, kesyon tout moun ki bay tèt yo pou yo travay kòm salè pou lòt moun yo viv e pou Bondye glorifye. Li se sèvitè nanm yo ki grangou yo; li se gadò k ap veye nan mitan lannuit la. Li se moun ki depanse fòs li, ki vide lavi li, epi ki sanble li pa rekòlte okenn rezilta vizib. Li travay, li rele, li avèti, li sipliye, men tè a rete fè, epi moun yo vire do yo. Alò, kesyon an leve natirèlman sou bouch li: “Seyè, jis kilè?” Sa se pa langaj rebelyon; se pa yon plenyen kont volonte Bondye. Se kri yon kè ki santi chay trajedi espirityèl la e ki anvi wè sò moun yo chanje. Li se vwa lanmou fidèl la, ki tèlman ini ak Bondye ak ak nanm moun yo, li pa ka rete endiferan pandan jijman an kontinye e pandan impenitans la pèsiste. Repons Bondye a te grav anpil. Li pa t pwomèt yon chanjman rapid. Li pa t di pèp la t ap repanti an mas anba predikasyon pwofèt la. Olye de sa, li te fè konnen dezolasyon an t ap kontinye jiskaske peyi a fin kraze, lavil yo fin vid, kay yo fin abandone, epi pèp la fin depòte byen lwen. Menm lè sa a, si yon ti rès ta rete, li menm tou t ap sibi yon lòt pasaj jijman ankò. E poutan, jijman sa a pa t dènye mo a. Kòm pye bwa ki koupe men ki toujou kenbe kòd lonbrik li, konsa t ap gen yon “desandan ki sen,” yon ras sen, yon ti rès Bondye t ap prezève dapre objektif li. Se konsa vizyon an louvri ansanm sou severite ak sou espwa. Rès la pap fèt pa fòs lèzòm ni pa reyisit aparan ministè pwofèt la, men pa fidelite Bondye ak alyans li. Menm lè tout bagay sanble pèdi, rasin pwomès Bondye a pa detwi. Kòd lonbrik la rete. Desandan ki sen an rete. Se ladan l avni pèp Bondye a repoze. Pou tout moun ki travay anba peze travay sa a, anba chay poum lavi yo, anba dekourajman ki soti nan absans rezilta, pasaj sa a pale avèk yon fòs espesyal. Li pa flate sèvitè Bondye a ak ilizyon siksè imedya. Li pa kache posibilite pou anpil tan travay san rekonpans vizib. Men li montre ke fidelite pa mezire pa efikasite aparan. Devwa pwofèt la se pou l pale jan Bondye voye l pale a; rezilta yo rete nan men Bondye. Se poutèt sa, lè sèvitè Bondye a mande: “Seyè, jis kilè?” li ka resevwa yon repons ki pa retire travay la, ki pa diminye doulè a, e ki pa pwomèt yon delivrans imedya. Men li resevwa asirans ke menm nan jijman, objektif Bondye a ap kanpe; menm nan devastasyon, Bondye konsève yon semans; menm lè travay la sanble initil, pawòl Bondye a pa retounen vin jwenn li san efè. Kidonk, kesyon an toujou rete youn ki lejitim sou bouch lafwa a. “Konbyen tan?” Men se yon kesyon ki dwe rete anba soumisyon. Li ka poze l avèk dlo nan je, avèk fatig, avèk anvi wè delivrans la; men li dwe poze l san l pa sispann obeyi. Ezayi te resevwa repons li, epi li te kontinye. Se konsa tout vrè sèvitè dwe fè: poze kesyon an, tande repons Bondye a, epi rete fidèl, menm jouk lè peyi a tounen dezè, menm jouk lè se sèlman kòd lonbrik la ki rete, paske Bondye toujou kenbe pou tèt li desandan ki sen an.
In Isaiah chapter six verse three the angels identify that the earth is full of God’s glory.
Nan Ezayi chapit sis vèsè twa, zanj yo deklare ke tout tè a plen ak glwa Bondye.
And one cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory. Isaiah 6:3.
Yonn t ap rele youn bay lòt, yo t ap di: Sen, sen, sen, se SENYÈ ki gen tout lame yo; tout tè a plen ak glwa li. Ezayi 6:3
Sister White connects the descent of the angel of Revelation eighteen with the angels if verse three.
Sè White fè lyen ant desandan zanj ki nan Revelasyon dizuit la ak zanj yo nan vèsè twa a.
“As they [the angels] see the future, when the whole earth shall be filled with His glory, the triumphant song of praise is echoed from one to another in melodious chant, ‘Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord of Hosts.’” Review and Herald, December 22, 1896.
“Pandan y ap [zanj yo] wè lavni an, lè tout tè a pral ranpli ak glwa Li, chante triyonfan louwanj lan ap repete soti nan youn rive nan lòt nan yon kantik melodik: ‘Sen, sen, sen, se Seyè Lame yo.’” Review and Herald, 22 Desanm 1896.
Isaiah is at 9/11 and he asks “how long” he must present the message of 9/11 to a Laodicean people who do not wish to see or hear. He is told he must persevere until the cities are broken down, and the destruction of the cities, which begins at the Sunday law when national apostasy is followed by national ruin.
Ezayi 9/11, e li mande: “Jiska kilè” li dwe prezante mesaj 9/11 la bay yon pèp Lawodise ki pa vle wè ni tande. Yo di l li dwe pèsevere jiskaske vil yo kraze nèt; epi destriksyon vil yo, ki kòmanse nan lwa dimanch lan lè apostazi nasyonal la swiv pa dega nasyonal, vini.
Then said I, Lord, how long? And he answered, Until the cities be wasted without inhabitant, and the houses without man, and the land be utterly desolate, And the Lord have removed men far away, and there be a great forsaking in the midst of the land. But yet in it shall be a tenth, and it shall return, and shall be eaten: as a teil tree, and as an oak, whose substance is in them, when they cast their leaves: so the holy seed shall be the substance thereof. Isaiah 6:11–13.
Lè sa a, mwen di: Seyè, jouk kilè? E li reponn: Jouk lè lavil yo vin tounen dezè san moun k ap viv ladan yo, kay yo san pesonn, epi peyi a fin vin nèt ale yon dezolasyon; jouk lè Seyè a fin depòte moun yo byen lwen, e gen yon gran abandònman nan mitan peyi a. Men, ap gen ankò yon dizyèm pati ladan l; li va retounen, epi yo va devore l; menm jan ak terebent lan ak pye bwadchenn lan, ki kenbe sève yo ladan yo lè yo fin pèdi fèy yo: konsa desandans sen an va sève peyi a. Ezayi 6:11–13.
At 9/11, when the earth was lightened with God’s glory Isaiah is anointed to present the latter rain message and he asks “how long” does he need to present the message of 9/11 to people whose hearts are fat? The answer is “until” the Sunday law, when there will be “a great forsaking in the midst of the land.” The “great forsaking” is accomplished by Laodicean Adventism who Isaiah in chapter twenty-two, represents as Shebna.
Nan moman 9/11, lè tè a te klere ak glwa Bondye, Ezayi resevwa onksyon pou prezante mesaj lapli dèyè a, epi li mande: “Jiska kilè” li dwe prezante mesaj 9/11 la bay yon pèp ki gen kè yo gra? Repons lan se: “Jiskaske” lwa dimanch la vini, lè pral gen “yon gwo abandonman nan mitan peyi a.” “Gwo abandonman” sa a akonpli pa Advantis Lawodise a, ke Ezayi, nan chapit vennnde a, reprezante kòm Shebna.
Behold, the Lord will carry thee away with a mighty captivity, and will surely cover thee. He will surely violently turn and toss thee like a ball into a large country: there shalt thou die, and there the chariots of thy glory shall be the shame of thy lord’s house. And I will drive thee from thy station, and from thy state shall he pull thee down. Isaiah 22:17–19.
Gade, Senyè a pral depòte ou avèk yon gwo depòtasyon, e li pral sètènman kouvri ou. Li pral sètènman vire ou avèk vyolans, epi voye ou tankou yon boul nan yon gran peyi; se la ou pral mouri, e se la cha laglwa ou yo pral tounen wont pou kay mèt ou a. E mwen pral chasse ou soti nan pozisyon ou, e li pral rale ou desann soti nan eta ou. Ezayi 22:17–19.
Laodicean Adventism forsake the truth at the Sunday law and are there “overthrown” as represented in Daniel chapter eleven verse forty-one.
Advantis Lawodiseyen yo abandone verite a nan lwa dimanch lan, epi se la yo “ranvèse,” jan sa reprezante nan Danyèl chapit onz, vèsè karant youn.
He shall enter also into the glorious land, and many countries shall be overthrown: but these shall escape out of his hand, even Edom, and Moab, and the chief of the children of Ammon. Daniel 11:41.
L ap antre tou nan peyi bèl pouvwa a, e anpil peyi pral chavire; men sila yo va chape anba men li: Edòm, Moab, ak chèf pami pitit Amon yo. Danyèl 11:41.
When Isaiah asks “how long,” he is told to present the message to Adventism right up to the Sunday law when the “many” of Daniel eleven verse forty-one will be “overthrown,” when they forsake the Sabbath and God. They will then be spewed out of the mouth of the Lord as represented in the book of Revelation, where all the books of the Bible meet and end, and where Isaiah twenty-two Shebna being “violently” tossed “like a ball into a large country” as they are “removed” “far away.”
Lè Ezayi mande: “Jiska kilè?”, yo di li prezante mesaj la bay Advantis yo jouk rive jis nan lwa dimanch lan, lè “anpil” yo nan Danyèl onz vèsè karant-yon pral “ranvèse”, lè yo va abandone saba a ak Bondye. Lè sa a, yo pral vomi soti nan bouch Senyè a, jan sa reprezante nan liv Revelasyon an, kote tout liv Bib la rankontre epi fini, epi kote Ezayi vennndeu a, Chèbna, yo ap voye l “vyolamman” “tankou yon boul nan yon gran peyi”, pandan y ap “wete” yo “byen lwen”.
In that time period the remnant, represented as a “tenth” (which is a tithe) “return”; who in the passage are compared to trees which have “substance” that remains when the leaves are cast off. “Leaves” represent profession in prophetic symbolism. When Adventism comes to the Sunday law and accepts the first day of the week in place of God’s Sabbath, they will cast off their leaves of “profession” and no longer claim to uphold God’s seventh-day Sabbath.
Nan peryòd tan sa a, rès la, ki reprezante kòm yon “dizyèm” (ki se yon ladim), “retounen”; yo menm ki, nan pasaj la, konpare ak pyebwa ki gen “substans” ki rete lè fèy yo tonbe. “Fèy” yo reprezante pwoklamasyon nan senbolis pwofetik. Lè Advantis yo rive devan lwa dimanch lan epi yo aksepte premye jou semèn nan an plas Saba Bondye a, yo pral lage fèy “pwoklamasyon” yo, epi yo pap reklame ankò pou yo soutni Saba setyèm jou Bondye a.
“The cursing of the fig tree was an acted parable. That barren tree, flaunting its pretentious foliage in the very face of Christ, was a symbol of the Jewish nation. The Saviour desired to make plain to His disciples the cause and the certainty of Israel’s doom. For this purpose He invested the tree with moral qualities, and made it the expositor of divine truth. The Jews stood forth distinct from all other nations, professing allegiance to God. They had been specially favored by Him, and they laid claim to righteousness above every other people. But they were corrupted by the love of the world and the greed of gain. They boasted of their knowledge, but they were ignorant of the requirements of God, and were full of hypocrisy. Like the barren tree, they spread their pretentious branches aloft, luxuriant in appearance, and beautiful to the eye, but they yielded “nothing but leaves.” The Jewish religion, with its magnificent temple, its sacred altars, its mitered priests and impressive ceremonies, was indeed fair in outward appearance, but humility, love, and benevolence were lacking.
“Madichon pyebwa fig la se te yon parabòl an aksyon. Pyebwa esteril sa a, ki t ap fè gran parada ak feyaj pretansye li yo devan menm figi Kris la, te yon senbòl nasyon jwif la. Sovè a te vle fè disip li yo konprann aklè kòz ak sètitid destriksyon Izrayèl la. Pou rezon sa a, li te bay pyebwa a kalite moral, epi li te fè li tounen yon entèprèt verite diven an. Jwif yo te parèt apa de tout lòt nasyon yo, kòm moun ki t ap deklare fidelite yo anvè Bondye. Li te ba yo favè espesyal, e yo menm yo t ap reklame yon jistis ki depase tout lòt pèp yo. Men yo te fin gate pa lanmou pou mond lan ak avaris pou richès. Yo te fè lwanj tèt yo pou konesans yo, men yo te inyoran konsènan egzijans Bondye yo, e yo te plen ipokrizi. Menm jan ak pyebwa esteril la, yo te lonje branch pretansye yo byen wo, avèk yon aparans vèdan e bèl pou je a, men yo pa t bay “anyen eksepte fèy.” Relijyon jwif la, avèk tanp manyifik li, lotèl sakre li yo, prèt ki te pote mit yo ak seremoni enpresyonan li yo, te vrèman bèl nan aparans deyò, men imilite, lanmou ak byenveyans te manke.”
“All the trees in the fig orchard were destitute of fruit; but the leafless trees raised no expectation, and caused no disappointment. By these trees the Gentiles were represented. They were as destitute as were the Jews of godliness; but they had not professed to serve God. They made no boastful pretensions to goodness. They were blind to the works and ways of God. With them the time of figs was not yet. They were still waiting for a day which would bring them light and hope. The Jews, who had received greater blessings from God, were held accountable for their abuse of these gifts. The privileges of which they boasted only increased their guilt.” The Desire of Ages. 582, 583.
“Tout pyebwa ki te nan jaden fig frans lan te san fwi; men pyebwa ki pa t gen fèy yo pa t leve okenn espwa, e yo pa t lakòz okenn desepsyon. Se pa mwayen pyebwa sa yo, moun lòt nasyon yo te reprezante. Yo te san pyete menm jan ak Jwif yo; men yo pa t deklare yo t ap sèvi Bondye. Yo pa t fè okenn pretansyon vante tèt yo kòm moun ki bon. Yo te avèg devan zèv ak chemen Bondye yo. Pou yo, tan fig frans yo pa t ankò rive. Yo te toujou ap tann yon jou ki t ap pote limyè ak espwa ba yo. Jwif yo, ki te resevwa pi gwo benediksyon nan men Bondye, te konsidere kòm responsab pou move itilizasyon yo te fè de don sa yo. Privilèj yo te fè grandizè ladan yo te sèlman ogmante koupabilite yo.” The Desire of Ages, 582, 583.
At the Sunday law Laodicean Adventism’s profession of being God’s covenant people is gone as they accept the mark of the covenant of death and reject the seal of the covenant of life. They then cast off their leaves of profession and what is brought to view is a remnant represented by Isaiah, who at 9/11 “returned” to the old paths, were then humbled into the dust when they (Isaiah) realized his corrupted experience, and was thereafter purified with a coal from off the altar. Sister White informs us the coal from the altar represents purification, but purification is simply what is accomplished by the coal touching Isaiah’s lips.
Nan lwa dimanch lan, pwoklamasyon Advantis Laodiseyen an kòmkwa yo se pèp alyans Bondye a disparèt, lè yo aksepte mak alyans lanmò a epi yo rejte sele alyans lavi a. Lè sa a, yo voye jete fèy pwofesyon yo, e sa ki parèt devan nou se yon rès ki reprezante pa Ezayi, ki nan 9/11 te “retounen” sou ansyen chemen yo, epi apre sa yo te imilye jouk nan pousyè a lè yo (Ezayi) te vin rann yo kont eksperyans li te kòwonpi a, epi apre sa li te pirifye avèk yon chabon ki te soti sou lotèl la. Sè White fè nou konnen chabon ki soti sou lotèl la reprezante pirifikasyon, men pirifikasyon se senpleman sa ki reyalize lè chabon an touche bouch Ezayi yo.
“The live coal is symbolical of purification. If it touches the lips, no impure word will fall from them. The live coal also symbolizes the potency of the efforts of the servants of the Lord.” Review and Herald, October 16, 1888.
“Chabon dife a senbolize pirifikasyon. Si li manyen bouch yo, pa gen okenn pawòl ki pa pwòp k ap soti ladan yo. Chabon dife a senbolize tou fòs efikas efò sèvitè Senyè yo.” Review and Herald, 16 oktòb 1888.
The “coal” from the altar that are cast to earth in the last days are the coals cast to earth when the seventh and final seal is opened in the first five verses of Revelation chapter eight. Isaiah, and therefore the one hundred and forty-four thousand are purified by the coal touching their lips, but the “coal” is a message. It touches their lips when they take the book out of the angel’s hand and eat.
“Chabon” ki soti sou lotèl la, yo voye sou tè a nan dènye jou yo, se menm chabon yo voye sou tè a lè setyèm epi dènye sele a louvri nan senk premye vèsè chapit uit nan Revelasyon an. Ezayi, e konsa san karant-kat mil yo, yo pirifye lè chabon an manyen bouch yo; men “chabon” an se yon mesaj. Li manyen bouch yo lè yo pran liv la nan men zanj lan epi yo manje l.
Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth. John 17:17.
Sanktifye yo pa mwayen verite ou a: pawòl ou se verite. Jan 17:17.
Those who “return” and become the remnant (residue) are represented as being the oak and teal trees, and just as Christ had “invested the tree with moral qualities, and made it the expositor of divine truth” Isaiah’s trees have the “moral quality” within them as represented by the “substance.” The substance remains with the trees, even when those who were only leaves of profession are cast off. The “holy seed” is the “substance” and Christ is the “holy seed” of prophecy. Those trees who are represented as the remnant and by Isaiah himself in chapter six represents men and therefore humanity and the holy seed represent divinity. Thus, Isaiah six identifies the purification of Adventism from 9/11 unto the Sunday law, and the details which Isaiah contributes to that prophetic history are all represented by his question of “how long”. For Isaiah the answer to “how long” was from 9/11 unto the Sunday law.
Moun ki “retounen” epi ki vin tounen rès la (rezidi a) yo reprezante kòm pye bwadchenn ak pye teyal; e menm jan Kris te “envesti pyebwa a ak kalite moral, epi te fè li tounen entèprèt verite diven an”, pyebwa Ezayi yo gen “kalite moral” sa a anndan yo, jan sa reprezante pa “sibstans” lan. Sibstans lan rete avèk pyebwa yo, menm lè yo rejte moun ki te sèlman fèy yon pwofesyon. “Semans sen” an se “sibstans” lan, e Kris se “semans sen” pwofesi a. Pyebwa sa yo, ki reprezante rès la epi Ezayi li menm nan chapit sis la, reprezante lèzòm e konsa limanite; epi semans sen an reprezante divinite. Se konsa, Ezayi sis idantifye pirifikasyon Advantis la depi 9/11 rive jis nan lwa dimanch lan, epi tout detay Ezayi ajoute nan istwa pwofetik sa a yo tout reprezante nan kestyon li a: “jis kilè”. Pou Ezayi, repons kestyon “jis kilè” a te soti depi 9/11 rive jis nan lwa dimanch lan.
How Long? 1840–1844
Konbyen Tan? 1840–1844
August 11, 1840 typified 9/11 and with the prophetic history of August 11, 1840 unto October 22, 1844 the battle of Mount Carmel between Elijah and Jezebel’s prophets took place. Ultimately the prophets of Baal were demonstrated to be false prophets and executed by Elijah, but at the very outset of the confrontation Elijah asked the question, “how long” halt you between two opinions.
11 out 1840 te sèvi kòm yon tip pou 11 septanm, epi, nan istwa pwofetik la soti 11 out 1840 rive 22 oktòb 1844, batay Mòn Kamèl la ant Eli ak pwofèt Jezabèl yo te dewoule. Anfen, yo te demontre pwofèt Baal yo kòm fo pwofèt, epi Eli te egzekite yo; men, depi nan kòmansman menm konfwontasyon an, Eli te poze kesyon an: “jis kilè” n ap sispann ant de opinyon.
And Elijah came unto all the people, and said, How long halt ye between two opinions? if the Lord be God, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word. Then said Elijah unto the people, I, even I only, remain a prophet of the Lord; but Baal’s prophets are four hundred and fifty men. 1 Kings 18:21, 22.
Epi Eliya vini bò kote tout pèp la, li di: Jiska kilè n ap bwete ant de opinyon? Si Seyè a se Bondye, swiv li; men si se Baal, swiv li. E pèp la pa t reponn li yon sèl mo. Lè sa a Eliya di pèp la: Mwen menm, wi, se mwen menm sèl ki rete kòm pwofèt Seyè a; men pwofèt Baal yo se katsan senkant gason. 1 Wa 18:21, 22.
Elijah is at August 11, 1840; asking that generation whether the Millerite message is true or is it false? It is another message to Laodicea, as was Isaiah six.
Élie se trouve au 11 août 1840, demandant à cette génération si le message millérite est vrai ou s’il est faux. C’est un autre message adressé à Laodicée, comme l’était Ésaïe 6.
“Thousands were led to embrace the truth preached by William Miller, and servants of God were raised up in the spirit and power of Elijah to proclaim the message. Like John, the forerunner of Jesus, those who preached this solemn message felt compelled to lay the ax at the root of the tree, and call upon men to bring forth fruits meet for repentance. Their testimony was calculated to arouse and powerfully affect the churches and manifest their real character. And as the solemn warning to flee from the wrath to come was sounded, many who were united with the churches received the healing message; they saw their backslidings, and with bitter tears of repentance and deep agony of soul, humbled themselves before God. And as the Spirit of God rested upon them, they helped to sound the cry, ‘Fear God, and give glory to Him; for the hour of His judgment is come.’” Early Writings, 233.
“Plizyè milye moun te vin aksepte verite William Miller t ap preche a, epi Bondye te leve sèvitè nan lespri ak pouvwa Eli pou pwoklame mesaj la. Menm jan ak Jan, prekursè Jezi a, moun ki t ap preche mesaj solanèl sa a te santi yo oblije mete rach la nan rasin pyebwa a, epi rele lèzòm pou yo pote fwi ki merite repantans. Temwayaj yo te fèt pou leve konsyans moun yo, pou afekte legliz yo avèk fòs, epi pou montre vrè karaktè yo. Epi lè avètisman solanèl la pou kouri chape anba kòlè k ap vini an te fè tande, anpil nan moun ki te ini ak legliz yo te resevwa mesaj gerizon an; yo te wè retou yo nan peche, epi avèk dlo nan je anmè repantans ak gwo agoni nan nanm yo, yo te imilye tèt yo devan Bondye. Epi pandan Lespri Bondye te repoze sou yo, yo te ede fè apèl la sonnen byen fò, ‘Krentif pou Bondye, epi ba li glwa; paske lè jijman li a rive.’” Early Writings, 233.
In the testing history of 1840 to 1844 the Protestants who rejected the message of Elijah became the daughters of Rome and surrendered the mantle of Protestantism unto Millerite Adventism. With Isaiah and Elijah, we have two witnesses which testify to the fact that the question “how long” is a symbol of the history that begins at 9/11 and ends at the Sunday law. In the Millerite history August 11, 1840 aligns with 9/11, and October 22, 1844 aligns with the Sunday law. When fire came down out of heaven and consumed Elijah’s offering the twelve stones were all illuminated with the offering, thus marking the one hundred and forty-four thousand as an ensign represented as illuminated stones. The false prophets were then slain by Elijah just as the United States, the false prophet is slain as the sixth kingdom at the Sunday law.
Nan istwa eprèv 1840 rive 1844 la, Pwotestan yo ki te rejte mesaj Eli a te vin pitit fi Wòm yo epi yo te remèt manto Pwotestantis la bay Advantis Milerit la. Ansanm ak Ezayi ak Eli, nou gen de temwen ki rann temwayaj sou lefèt ke kesyon an, “konbyen tan”, se yon senbòl istwa ki kòmanse nan 9/11 epi ki fini ak lwa dimanch lan. Nan istwa Milerit la, 11 out 1840 aliyen ak 9/11, epi 22 oktòb 1844 aliyen ak lwa dimanch lan. Lè dife te desann soti nan syèl la epi li te boule nèt ofrann Eli a, douz wòch yo te tout eklere ansanm ak ofrann lan, konsa sa te make san karannkat mil yo kòm yon drapo, ki reprezante kòm wòch eklere. Apre sa, fo pwofèt yo te touye pa Eli, menm jan Etazini, fo pwofèt la, touye kòm sizyèm wayòm nan nan lwa dimanch lan.
Isaiah six is emphasizing a testing, purging and purification process among God’s people from 9/11 unto the Sunday law. Elijah is addressing the Laodicean attitude of God’s people, but also providing evidence between a true and false prophet and in turn a true or false message. Thus, beginning from August 11, 1840 and ending on October 22, 1844 a prophetic test was brought upon the Protestants of the period of Sardis, and just as the fire at Mount Carmel produced a division into two classes, two classes were manifested in 1844. One class in the testing process was the soon-to-be “former” covenant people, and the other class was Millerite Adventism that God would enter into covenant with on October 22, 1844. The period of testing and division is the story of the vineyard as Millerite Adventism was shown to be the true prophet at the same point that Sardian Protestantism began to fulfill its role as apostate Protestantism. Just as the prophets of Baal were exposed as false, so to was the former covenant people exposed and then identified by the Millerites as a daughter of Rome. The story of Mount Carmel and also the fulfillment of that history in the time of the Millerites provides a second witness to Isaiah six’s that the question, “how long” is a symbol of the period of time from 9/11 unto the Sunday law.
Ezayi sis mete anfaz sou yon pwosesis eprèv, pirjman ak pirifikasyon pami pèp Bondye a depi 9/11 rive jouk lwa dimanch lan. Eli ap adrese atitid Laodise pèp Bondye a, men li ap bay tou prèv ki fè diferans ant yon vrè ak yon fo pwofèt, epi konsa ant yon vrè oswa yon fo mesaj. Konsa, kòmanse depi 11 dawou 1840 epi fini 22 oktòb 1844, yon eprèv pwofetik te vini sou Pwotestan yo nan peryòd Sàd la; e menm jan dife sou Mòn Kamèl la te pwodui yon divizyon an de klas, de klas te parèt an 1844. Youn nan klas yo nan pwosesis eprèv la se te pèp alyans lan ki t apral vin “ansyen” an, epi lòt klas la se te Advantis Millerit la, avèk ki Bondye t ap antre nan alyans 22 oktòb 1844. Peryòd eprèv ak divizyon an se istwa jaden rezen an, paske Advantis Millerit la te demontre kòm vrè pwofèt la nan menm moman an kote Pwotestantis Sàdyen an te kòmanse akonpli wòl li kòm Pwotestantis aposta. Menm jan pwofèt Baal yo te devwale kòm fo, konsa tou ansyen pèp alyans lan te devwale epi apre sa Millerit yo te idantifye li kòm yon pitit fi Wòm. Istwa Mòn Kamèl la, ansanm ak akonplisman istwa sa a nan tan Millerit yo, bay yon dezyèm temwen pou Ezayi sis ke kesyon an, “konbyen tan,” se yon senbòl pou peryòd tan ki soti depi 9/11 rive jouk lwa dimanch lan.
“‘Lord God of Abraham, Isaac, and of Israel,’ the prophet pleads, ‘let it be known this day that Thou art God in Israel, and that I am Thy servant, and that I have done all these things at Thy word. Hear me, O Lord, hear me, that this people may know that Thou art the Lord God, and that Thou hast turned their heart back again.’
“‘Seyè Bondye Abraram, Izarak, ak Izrayèl,’ pwofèt la sipliye, ‘fè yo konnen jodi a ke se Ou menm ki Bondye an Izrayèl, e ke mwen se sèvitè Ou, e ke se dapre pawòl Ou mwen fè tout bagay sa yo. Reponn mwen, O Seyè, reponn mwen, pou pèp sa a ka konnen ke se Ou menm ki Seyè a, Bondye a, e ke se Ou menm ki fè kè yo tounen vin jwenn Ou ankò.’”
“A silence, oppressive in its solemnity, rests upon all. The priests of Baal tremble with terror. Conscious of their guilt, they look for swift retribution.
“Yon silans, ki peze ak tout solanite li, poze sou tout moun. Prèt Baal yo tranble anba laperèz. Konsyan de koupab yo, yo tann yon pinisyon rapid.”
“No sooner is the prayer of Elijah ended than flames of fire, like brilliant flashes of lightning, descend from heaven upon the upreared altar, consuming the sacrifice, licking up the water in the trench, and consuming even the stones of the altar. The brilliancy of the blaze illumines the mountain and dazzles the eyes of the multitude. In the valleys below, where many are watching in anxious suspense the movements of those above, the descent of fire is clearly seen, and all are amazed at the sight. It resembles the pillar of fire which at the Red Sea separated the children of Israel from the Egyptian host.
“Tousuit lapriyè Eli a fini, flanm dife, tankou gwo ekla zèklè ki klere anpil, desann soti nan syèl la sou lotèl ki te leve a, yo boule sakrifis la, yo niche dlo ki te nan tranche a, epi yo boule menm wòch lotèl la. Klète flanm nan klere mòn lan epi li fè foul moun yo rete tou etonnen anba fòs limyè a. Nan vale ki anba yo, kote anpil moun ap gade ak yon tansyon enkyè, ap swiv mouvman moun ki anwo yo, desandan dife a parèt byen klè, epi tout moun sezi devan sa yo wè a. Sa sanble ak poto dife ki te, bò Lanmè Wouj la, separe pitit Izrayèl yo ak lame Ejipsyen an.”
“The people on the mount prostrate themselves in awe before the unseen God. They dare not continue to look upon the Heaven-sent fire. They fear that they themselves will be consumed; and, convicted of their duty to acknowledge the God of Elijah as the God of their fathers, to whom they owe allegiance, they cry out together as with one voice, ‘The Lord, He is the God; the Lord, He is the God.’ With startling distinctness the cry resounds over the mountain and echoes in the plain below. At last Israel is aroused, undeceived, penitent. At last the people see how greatly they have dishonored God. The character of Baal worship, in contrast with the reasonable service required by the true God, stands fully revealed. The people recognize God’s justice and mercy in withholding the dew and the rain until they have been brought to confess His name. They are ready now to admit that the God of Elijah is above every idol.” Prophets and Kings, 153.
“Pèp la ki sou mòn nan pwostène tèt yo avèk lakrent devan Bondye yo pa wè a. Yo pa oze kontinye gade dife ki soti nan syèl la. Yo pè pou yo menm tou pa boule nèt; epi, anba kondanasyon devwa yo genyen pou yo rekonèt Bondye Eli a kòm Bondye zansèt yo, Bondye yo dwe fidelite ba li, yo rele ansanm tankou ak yon sèl vwa: ‘Seyè a, se li menm ki Bondye a; Seyè a, se li menm ki Bondye a.’ Avèk yon klate ki fè moun sezi, rèl la sonnen sou tout mòn nan epi li repete nan plenn ki anba a. Finalman Izrayèl leve nan letaji li, li pa twonpe ankò, li repanti. Finalman pèp la wè jis nan ki pwen yo te dezonore Bondye. Karaktè adorasyon Baal la, an kontrast ak sèvis rezonab vrè Bondye a mande a, parèt nèt aklè. Pèp la rekonèt jistis ak mizèrikòd Bondye lè li te kenbe lawouze a ak lapli a jiskaske yo te mennen yo pou yo konfese non li. Koulye a yo pare pou yo admèt ke Bondye Eli a pi wo pase tout zidòl.” Prophets and Kings, 153.
How Long? Moses
Konbyen Tan? Moyiz
The first time the symbolic question, “how long” is raised in the prophetic Word is in the eighth plague upon the Egyptians in the time of Moses. The eighth plague is “locusts” (a symbol of Islam) that are brought by an “east wind” (a symbol of Islam).
Premye fwa kesyon senbolik la, “konbyen tan,” parèt nan Pawòl pwofetik la, se nan wityèm kalamite ki te frape Ejipsyen yo nan tan Moyiz. Wityèm kalamite a se “krikèt” (yon senbòl Islam) yo, ke yon “van lès” (yon senbòl Islam) te pote.
And Moses and Aaron came in unto Pharaoh, and said unto him, Thus saith the Lord God of the Hebrews, How long wilt thou refuse to humble thyself before me? let my people go, that they may serve me. Else, if thou refuse to let my people go, behold, tomorrow will I bring the locusts into thy coast: And they shall cover the face of the earth, that one cannot be able to see the earth: and they shall eat the residue of that which is escaped, which remaineth unto you from the hail, and shall eat every tree which groweth for you out of the field: And they shall fill thy houses, and the houses of all thy servants, and the houses of all the Egyptians; which neither thy fathers, nor thy fathers’ fathers have seen, since the day that they were upon the earth unto this day. And he turned himself, and went out from Pharaoh.
Moyiz ak Arawon antre lakay Farawon, epi yo di li: Men sa SENYÈ a, Bondye Ebre yo, di: Jiska kilè ou va refize imilye tèt ou devan mwen? Kite pèp mwen an ale, pou yo ka sèvi mwen. Men, si ou refize kite pèp mwen an ale, gade, demen m ap fè krikèt yo antre sou tout teritwa ou a. Y ap kouvri sifas tè a, yon jan pou moun pa ka wè tè a; y ap manje rès sa ki te chape, sa ki rete pou nou apre lagrèl la, epi y ap manje tout pyebwa k ap pouse pou nou nan jaden yo. Y ap plen kay ou yo, kay tout sèvitè ou yo, ak kay tout Ejipsyen yo; yon bagay ni papa ou yo ni papa papa ou yo pa janm wè, depi jou yo te sou latè jouk jòdi a. Epi li vire do, li soti devan Farawon.
And Pharaoh’s servants said unto him, How long shall this man be a snare unto us? let the men go, that they may serve the Lord their God: knowest thou not yet that Egypt is destroyed?
Epi sèvitè Farawon yo di li: “Konbyen tan nonm sa a ap sèvi nou kòm yon pyèj? Kite mesye yo ale, pou yo ka sèvi Seyè a, Bondye pa yo a. Èske ou poko konnen peyi Lejip fin detwi?”
And Moses and Aaron were brought again unto Pharaoh: and he said unto them, Go, serve the Lord your God: but who are they that shall go?
Moyiz ak Arawon te mennen devan Farawon ankò; epi li di yo: Ale, sèvi SENYÈ a, Bondye nou an; men kiyès ki moun sa yo k ap ale?
And Moses said, We will go with our young and with our old, with our sons and with our daughters, with our flocks and with our herds will we go; for we must hold a feast unto the Lord.
Moyiz te di: N ap ale ak jèn nou yo ansanm ak granmoun nou yo, ak pitit gason nou yo ansanm ak pitit fi nou yo, ak mouton nou yo ansanm ak bèf nou yo n ap ale; paske nou dwe selebre yon fèt pou Seyè a.
And he said unto them, Let the Lord be so with you, as I will let you go, and your little ones: look to it; for evil is before you. Not so: go now ye that are men, and serve the Lord; for that ye did desire. And they were driven out from Pharaoh’s presence.
Li di yo: Se pou SENYÈ a avèk nou konsa, si m ta janm kite nou ale ansanm ak pitit nou yo! Pran prekosyon nou; paske se mal ki devan nou. Sa pa konsa: ale koulye a, nou menm ki gason, sèvi SENYÈ a; paske se sa nou te mande. E yo te chase yo soti devan farawon an.
And the Lord said unto Moses, Stretch out thine hand over the land of Egypt for the locusts, that they may come up upon the land of Egypt, and eat every herb of the land, even all that the hail hath left. And Moses stretched forth his rod over the land of Egypt, and the Lord brought an east wind upon the land all that day, and all that night; and when it was morning, the east wind brought the locusts. And the locusts went up over all the land of Egypt, and rested in all the coasts of Egypt: very grievous were they; before them there were no such locusts as they, neither after them shall be such. For they covered the face of the whole earth, so that the land was darkened; and they did eat every herb of the land, and all the fruit of the trees which the hail had left: and there remained not any green thing in the trees, or in the herbs of the field, through all the land of Egypt.
Epi Senyè a di Moyiz konsa: Lonje men ou sou peyi Lejip pou krikèt yo, pou yo monte sou peyi Lejip la, epi pou yo manje tout zèb nan peyi a, wi, tout sa lagrèl la te kite. Epi Moyiz lonje baton li sou peyi Lejip la, epi Senyè a fè yon van lès soufle sou peyi a pandan tout lajounen sa a ak tout nuit sa a; e lè maten rive, van lès la pote krikèt yo. Epi krikèt yo monte sou tout peyi Lejip la, epi yo poze sou tout fwontyè peyi Lejip yo; yo te terib anpil. Anvan yo, pa t janm gen krikèt tankou yo, ni apre yo p ap janm gen menm jan an. Paske yo kouvri fas tout tè a, konsa peyi a te vin fè nwa; epi yo manje tout zèb nan peyi a ansanm ak tout fwi pyebwa lagrèl la te kite; e pa t rete okenn bagay vèt ni nan pyebwa yo ni nan zèb nan chan yo, nan tout peyi Lejip la.
Then Pharaoh called for Moses and Aaron in haste; and he said, I have sinned against the Lord your God, and against you. Now therefore forgive, I pray thee, my sin only this once, and intreat the Lord your God, that he may take away from me this death only. And he went out from Pharaoh, and intreated the Lord. And the Lord turned a mighty strong west wind, which took away the locusts, and cast them into the Red sea; there remained not one locust in all the coasts of Egypt. Exodus 10:3–19.
Lè sa a, Farawon rele Moyiz ak Arawon prese prese; epi li di: Mwen peche kont Seyè a, Bondye nou an, epi kont nou menm. Koulye a, poutèt sa, padonnen mwen, m ap mande nou, peche mwen sa a, pou yon sèl fwa sa a sèlman, epi sipliye Seyè a, Bondye nou an, pou l ka wete lanmò sa a sou mwen. Epi Moyiz soti kite Farawon, li sipliye Seyè a. Epi Seyè a fè leve yon gwo van lwès ki te fò anpil; li pote krikèt yo ale, li jete yo nan Lanmè Wouj la; pa t rete yon sèl krikèt nan tout fwontyè peyi Lejip la. Egzòd 10:3–19.
First “the Lord God of the Hebrews” asks, How long wilt thou refuse to humble thyself before me?” and then Pharaoh’s servants thereafter asked Pharaoh again, “How long shall this man be a snare unto us?” The question is asked during the eighth plague, which aligns with 9/11 for several reasons. The tenth plague is the slaying of the first born, which aligns with the cross and is followed by the disappointment by the Red Sea, which inspiration aligns with the disappointment of the disciples at the cross, which aligns with the great disappointment of the Millerites in 1844. Those three witnesses all align with the Sunday law. The tenth plague is the Sunday law and two plagues earlier the eighth plague brought the “locusts” upon an “east wind.” The “locusts” filled the entire earth, just as Islam is shaking the entire world today as it has spread its darkness through forced immigration. The “desert locust’s” Latin name is “locusta migratoria,” representing the spread of Islam through immigration that is typified in the natural world as migration.
An premye, “Seyè a, Bondye Ebre yo,” mande: “Jiskilè ou va refize imilye tèt ou devan mwen?”; epi apre sa, sèvitè Farawon yo mande Farawon ankò: “Jiskilè nonm sa a va yon pyèj pou nou?” Kesyon an poze pandan uityèm flewo a, ki aliyen ak 9/11 pou plizyè rezon. Dizyèm flewo a se masak premye pitit gason yo, ki aliyen ak kwa a, epi li swiv pa desepsyon bò Lanmè Wouj la, sa enspirasyon aliyen ak desepsyon disip yo devan kwa a, ki aliyen ak gran desepsyon Millerit yo an 1844. Twa temwen sa yo tout aliyen ak lwa dimanch lan. Dizyèm flewo a se lwa dimanch lan, epi de flewo pi bonè, uityèm flewo a te mennen “krikèt yo” sou yon “van lès.” “Krikèt yo” te kouvri tout tè a nèt, menm jan Islam ap souke lemonn antye jodi a pandan li gaye fènwa li atravè imigrasyon fòse. Non laten “krikèt dezè a” se “locusta migratoria,” ki reprezante pwopagasyon Islam nan atravè imigrasyon, jan sa tipifye nan mond natirèl la kòm migrasyon.
The ninth plague was a darkness that could be felt.
Nevyèm kalamite a se te yon tenèb yo te ka santi.
And the Lord said unto Moses, Stretch out thine hand toward heaven, that there may be darkness over the land of Egypt, even darkness which may be felt. And Moses stretched forth his hand toward heaven; and there was a thick darkness in all the land of Egypt three days: They saw not one another, neither rose any from his place for three days: but all the children of Israel had light in their dwellings. Exodus 10:21–23.
Seyè a di Moyiz: Lonje men ou nan direksyon syèl la, pou fènwa kouvri peyi Lejip la, menm yon fènwa yo ka santi. E Moyiz lonje men l nan direksyon syèl la; epi te gen yon fènwa epè sou tout peyi Lejip pandan twa jou: Yo pa t wè youn lòt, ni pèsonn pa t leve kite plas li pandan twa jou; men tout pitit Izrayèl yo te gen limyè nan kay yo. Egzòd 10:21–23.
In the symbolism of “how long” represented by Mount Carmel and Elijah there is a distinction manifested when the fire comes down out of heaven. Elijah’s God did what Baal cannot do. In Millerite history the distinction was made between fallen Sardian Protestantism and Millerite Adventism. With Moses the distinction was darkness or light. There was light in the Hebrew homes. Isaiah further informs us that those who have no light in Moses line, who are also those destroyed by Elijah, and those who lose the mantle of Protestantism in the Millerite time period are a “people” who “hear” “indeed, but understand not; and see” “indeed, but perceive not.” Then a pronouncement is made of these people which states, “Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed.”
Nan senbolis “konbyen tan” Mòn Kamèl ak Eli reprezante a, gen yon distenksyon ki parèt lè dife a desann soti nan syèl la. Bondye Eli a te fè sa Baal pa t kapab fè. Nan istwa Millerit la, distenksyon an te fèt ant Pwotestantis Sardis ki tonbe a ak Advantis Millerit la. Avèk Moyiz, distenksyon an te swa fènwa swa limyè. Te gen limyè nan kay Ebre yo. Ezayi fè nou konnen ankò ke sila yo ki pa gen limyè nan liy Moyiz la, ki se menm sila yo Eli detwi yo, epi sila yo ki pèdi manto Pwotestantis la nan peryòd tan Millerit la, se yon “pèp” ki “tande” “vre, men yo pa konprann; epi yo wè” “vre, men yo pa pèsevwa.” Lè sa a, yo fè yon pwononsyasyon sou pèp sa a ki di: “Fè kè pèp sa a gra, fè zòrèy yo lou, epi fèmen je yo; pou yo pa wè ak je yo, ni tande ak zòrèy yo, ni konprann ak kè yo, ni konvèti, ni geri.”
Willing to do the work, but overwhelmed with the assignment to preach to those who will not listen Isaiah “then said,” “Lord, how long?”
Dispoze fè travay la, men akable anba manda pou l preche bay moun ki pa vle koute yo, Ezayi “di lè sa a,” “Seyè, jouk ki lè?”
The last three of Egypt’s ten plagues provide a witness of the three steps from 9/11 unto the Sunday law. On August 11, 1840 the first angel’s message was empowered, and on April 19, 1844 the second angel arrived and was empowered at the Exeter Camp Meeting August 12–17, and the third angel arrived on October 22, 1844. The third angel aligns with the Sunday law, and therefore identifies a three-step process for you cannot have a third, without a first and a second.
Twa dènye nan dis kalamite Ejip yo bay yon temwayaj sou twa etap ki mennen soti 9/11 rive jouk lwa dimanch lan. Nan 11 dawout 1840, mesaj premye zanj lan te resevwa puisans; epi nan 19 avril 1844, dezyèm zanj lan te rive e li te resevwa puisans nan Reyinyon Kan Exeter la, 12–17 dawout; epi twazyèm zanj lan te rive nan 22 oktòb 1844. Twazyèm zanj lan aliyen avèk lwa dimanch lan, e poutèt sa li idantifye yon pwosesis twa etap, paske ou pa ka gen yon twazyèm, san yon premye ak yon dezyèm.
“The first and second messages were given in 1843 and 1844, and we are now under the proclamation of the third; but all three of the messages are still to be proclaimed. It is just as essential now as ever before that they shall be repeated to those who are seeking for the truth. By pen and voice we are to sound the proclamation, showing their order, and the application of the prophecies that bring us to the third angel’s message. There cannot be a third without the first and second. These messages we are to give to the world in publications, in discourses, showing in the line of prophetic history the things that have been and the things that will be.” Selected Messages, book 2, 104, 105.
“Premye ak dezyèm mesaj yo te bay nan ane 1843 ak 1844, e kounye a nou anba pwoklamasyon twazyèm nan; men tout twa mesaj yo dwe toujou kontinye pwoklame. Sa enpòtan menm jan kounye a menm jan sa te toujou ye anvan, pou yo repete yo bay moun k ap chèche verite a. Avèk plim ak vwa nou dwe fè pwoklamasyon an sonnen, pandan n ap montre lòd yo, ansanm ak aplikasyon pwofesi yo ki mennen nou rive nan mesaj twazyèm zanj lan. Pa ka gen yon twazyèm san premye ak dezyèm nan. Se mesaj sa yo nou dwe bay mond lan nan piblikasyon ak nan diskou, pandan n ap montre, nan liy istwa pwofetik la, bagay ki te rive deja ak bagay ki gen pou rive.” Selected Messages, liv 2, 104, 105.
The tenth plague of Egypt has been aligned by inspiration with the cross and the following disappointment associated with it. The tenth plague is therefore the third message, which of prophetic necessity must be preceded by a first and second message. At 9/11 the Lord asked Pharaoh, “how long” and immediately thereafter Pharaoh’s servants also asked, “how long.” After Moses delivered God’s question of “how long” to Pharaoh, and just before the servants repeat the question of Moses to Pharaoh, Moses marks a turning point as, “he turned himself, and went out from Pharaoh.” Exodus 10:6.
Dizyèm flewo peyi Lejip la te aliyen pa enspirasyon ak kwa a ak desepsyon ki te swiv li. Se poutèt sa, dizyèm flewo a se twazyèm mesaj la, ki pa nesesite pwofetik dwe vini apre yon premye ak yon dezyèm mesaj. Nan 9/11, Seyè a te mande Farawon, “jis kilè ankò,” epi tousuit apre sa sèvitè Farawon yo tou te mande, “jis kilè ankò.” Apre Moyiz te delivre bay Farawon kestyon Bondye a, “jis kilè ankò,” epi jis anvan sèvitè yo repete bay Farawon kestyon Moyiz la, Moyiz make yon pwen vire lè, “li vire kò l, li soti kite Farawon.” Egzòd 10:6.
9/11 was a prophetic turning point, that was typified when Moses delivered the plague of locusts that came on the east wind.
9/11 se te yon pwen vire pwofetik, sa ki te prefigire lè Moyiz te lage kalamite krikèt yo ki te vini ak van lès la.
“There are periods which are turning points in the history of nations and of the church. In the providence of God, when these different crises arrive, the light for that time is given.” Bible Echo, August 26, 1895.
“Gen peryòd ki se pwen tòde nan istwa nasyon yo ak nan istwa legliz la. Nan pwovidans Bondye, lè kriz sa yo rive, limyè ki pou tan sa a bay.” Bible Echo, 26 out 1895.
The next plague produced darkness or light depending on which class you were in. 9/11 was a “turning point in the history of nations and of the church.” At that point God’s people were called to return and walk in the old paths, but they refused to walk therein and hearkened not to the sound of the trumpet. A separation between darkness and light was accomplished after Elijah, and Moses asked, “how long?” She further states in the passage:
Pwochen flewo a te pwodui fènwa oswa limyè, selon ki klas ou te ladan l. 9/11 te yon “pwen vire nan istwa nasyon yo ak legliz la.” Nan moman sa a, pèp Bondye a te rele pou yo retounen epi mache nan ansyen chemen yo, men yo te refize mache ladan yo e yo pa t koute son twonpèt la. Yon separasyon ant fènwa ak limyè te akonpli apre Eli, e Moyiz te mande, “konbyen tan?” Li deklare ankò nan pasaj la:
“There are periods which are turning points in the history of nations and of the church. In the providence of God, when these different crises arrive, the light for that time is given. If it is received, there is spiritual progress; if it is rejected, spiritual declension and shipwreck follow.” Bible Echo, August 26, 1895.
“Gen peryòd ki make pwen vire nan istwa nasyon yo ak nan istwa legliz la. Nan pwovidans Bondye, lè diferan kriz sa yo rive, limyè pou tan sa a bay. Si yo resevwa li, gen pwogrè espirityèl; si yo rejte li, dekadans espirityèl ak nofraj vin apre.” Bible Echo, 26 out 1895.
We will continue the subject of “how long” in the next article.
N ap kontinye sijè “konbyen tan” an nan atik ki vin apre a.
“In May, 1842, a General Conference was convened in Boston, Massachutes. At the opening of this meeting, Brethren Charles Fitch and Apollos Hale, of Haverhill, presented the pictorial prophecies of Daniel and John, which they had painted on cloth, with the prophetic numbers, showing their fulfillment. Brother Fitch in explaining from his chart before the Conference, said, while examining these prophecies, he had thought if he could get out something of the kind as here presented it would simplify the subject and make it easier for him to present to an audience. Here was more light in our pathway. These brethren had been doing what the Lord had shown Habakkuk in his vision 2,468 years before, saying, ‘Write the vision and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it. For the vision is yet for an appointed time.’ Habakkuk 2:2.
“Nan mwa me 1842, yo te konvoke yon Konferans Jeneral nan Boston, Massachusetts. Lè reyinyon sa a te louvri, Frè Charles Fitch ak Apollos Hale, ki soti Haverhill, te prezante pwofesi Daniel ak Jan yo an imaj, yo te pentire sou twal, ansanm ak chif pwofetik yo, pou montre akonplisman yo. Frè Fitch, pandan li t ap eksplike apati tablo li a devan Konferans lan, te di ke, pandan li t ap egzaminen pwofesi sa yo, li te panse si li te kapab fè parèt yon bagay nan menm jan ak sa ki prezante isit la, sa t ap rann sijè a pi senp epi sa t ap fè li pi fasil pou li prezante l devan yon odyans. Men te gen plis limyè sou chemen nou. Frè sa yo te ap fè sa Senyè a te montre Habakouk nan vizyon li 2,468 ane anvan, lè li te di: ‘Ekri vizyon an, epi fè l klè sou tab yo, pou moun k ap li l la ka kouri. Paske vizyon an se toujou pou yon tan fikse.’ Habakouk 2:2.”
“After some discussion on the subject, it was voted unanimously to have three hundred similar to this one lithographed, which was soon accomplished. They were called ‘the ‘43 charts.’ This was a very important Conference.” The Autobiography of Joseph Bates, 263.
“Apre kèk diskisyon sou sijè a, yo te vote a inanimite pou yo fè litografi twa san ki sanble ak sa a, sa ki te byento akonpli. Yo te rele yo ‘tablo 43 yo.’ Sa a te yon Konferans ki te trè enpòtan.” The Autobiography of Joseph Bates, 263.
“I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until His hand was removed.” Early Writings, 74.
“Mwen wè ke tablo 1843 a te dirije pa men Senyè a, e ke li pa t dwe chanje; ke chif yo te jan Li te vle yo a; ke men Li te sou li epi li te kache yon erè nan kèk nan chif yo, pou pèsonn pa t ka wè li, jiskaske men Li te retire.” Early Writings, 74.
“It was the united testimony of Second Advent lecturers and papers, when standing on ‘the original faith,’ that the publication of the chart was a fulfillment of Habakkuk 2:2, 3. If the chart was a subject of prophecy (and those who deny it leave the original faith), then it follows that BC 457 was the year from which to date the 2300 days. It was necessary that 1843 should be the first published time in order that ‘the vision’ should ‘tarry,’ or that there should be a tarrying time, in which the virgin band was to slumber and sleep on the great subject of time, just before they were to be aroused by the Midnight Cry.” Second Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, Volume I, Number 2, James White.
“Se te temwayaj ini konferansye yo ak jounal Dezyèm Avènman yo, lè yo t ap kanpe sou ‘lafwa orijinal la,’ ke piblikasyon tablo a te yon akonplisman Abakik 2:2, 3. Si tablo a te yon sijè pwofesi (epi moun ki demanti sa a ap kite lafwa orijinal la), alò sa suiv ke 457 av. J.-K. te ane depi ki pou yo date 2300 jou yo. Li te nesesè pou 1843 te premye tan ki te pibliye a, pou ‘vizyon an’ te kapab ‘retade,’ oswa pou te gen yon tan reta, pandan ki gwoup vyèj yo te dwe annik dòmi sou gran sijè tan an, jis anvan yo te dwe reveye pa Kri Minwi a.” Second Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, Volim I, Nimewo 2, James White.