It has been a long process for me to get to this point in the study of Panium, and the title “Eleven, Eleven” is meant to emphasize that the Lion of the tribe of Judah coordinated both the book of Daniel and the book of Revelation to set forth the internal and external lines of the history of the sealing of God’s people in the eleventh chapter and eleventh verse. Just before probation closes a command to unseal the prophecy in Revelation that was sealed until the time when the internal and external prophetic histories represented by the two lines of eleven—eleven, found in the books of Daniel and Revelation became present truth.

Sa fè lontan depi m rive nan pwen sa a nan etid Panium lan, e tit “Onz, Onz” lan gen entansyon mete anfaz sou lefèt ke Lyon tribi Jida a te kowòdone ni liv Danyèl la ni liv Revelasyon an pou tabli liy entèn ak liy ekstèn istwa sele pèp Bondye a nan onzyèm chapit ak onzyèm vèsè a. Menm anvan tan gras la fèmen, te gen yon kòmandman pou dese sele pwofesi ki nan Revelasyon an, ki te sele jouk rive nan tan kote istwa pwofetik entèn ak ekstèn yo, ki reprezante pa de liy onz—onz yo, yo jwenn nan liv Danyèl ak Revelasyon an, te vin tounen verite prezan.

And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand. He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still. Revelation 22:10, 11.

Li di m: Pa sele pawòl pwofesi liv sa a ak so; paske tan an pre. Moun ki enjis la, se pou l kontinye fè enjistis toujou; epi moun ki sal la, se pou l kontinye rete sal toujou; epi moun ki jis la, se pou l kontinye pratike jistis toujou; epi moun ki sen an, se pou l kontinye viv nan sentete toujou. Revelasyon 22:10, 11.

The “time is at hand” just before the close of probation, and the “time is at hand” when the “Revelation of Jesus Christ” is unsealed.

“tan an rive” jis anvan fen tan gras la, epi “tan an rive” lè “Revelasyon Jezikri a” vin sele.

The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John: Who bare record of the word of God, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of all things that he saw. Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for the time is at hand. Revelation 1:1–3.

Revelasyon Jezikri a, Bondye te bay li sa, pou montre sèvitè li yo bagay ki dwe rive talè konsa; epi li te voye fè l konnen sa pa mwayen zanj li bay sèvitè li Jan: li menm ki rann temwayaj konsènan pawòl Bondye a, ak temwayaj Jezikri a, ak tout bagay li te wè yo. Benediksyon pou moun ki li a, ak pou moun ki tande pawòl pwofesi sa a, epi ki kenbe bagay ki ekri ladan li yo; paske tan an toupre. Revelasyon 1:1–3.

When the Lion of the tribe of Judah unseals the “Revelation of Jesus Christ” as He has been doing since the arrival of the message of the Midnight Cry in July of 2023, that unsealing includes the revelation that He is “Palmoni,” the Wonderful Numberer, or the Numberer of Secrets. Failure to accept this truth is to fail the testing process which seals the one hundred and forty-four thousand.

Lè Lyon branch fanmi Jida a ouvri sele sou “Revelasyon Jezikri a,” jan Li ap fè sa depi lè mesaj Kri Minwi a te rive an Jiyè 2023, ouvèti sele sa a gen ladan l revelasyon ke Li se “Palmoni,” Mèveye Moun ki Konte a, oswa Moun ki Konte Sekrè yo. Echèk pou aksepte verite sa a se echwe pwosesis eprèv la ki sele san karannkat mil yo.

I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire: Whose fan is in his hand, and he will thoroughly purge his floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but he will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire. Matthew 3:11, 12.

Mwen menm, mwen batize nou ak dlo pou repantans; men sila a k ap vini apre mwen an pi pwisan pase mwen; mwen pa diy pou m pote soulye li; li menm, l ap batize nou ak Sentespri a ak dife. Li gen laye li nan men li, e li pral netwaye glasi li nètale; l ap ranmase ble li nan depo a; men pay la, l ap boule l ak yon dife ki pa ka etenn. Matye 3:11, 12.

“Just how soon this refining process will begin I cannot say, but it will not be long deferred. He whose fan is in His hand will cleanse His temple of its moral defilement. He will thoroughly purge His floor.” Testimonies to Ministers, 372, 373.

“Mwen pa ka di egzakteman konbyen tan ankò pwosesis rafinman sa a pral kòmanse, men li p ap pran anpil reta. Li menm ki gen van li nan men Li a pral netwaye tanp Li a anba tout salte moral li yo. Li pral byen netwaye glasi Li a nèt.” Testimonies to Ministers, 372, 373.

The lines of prophecy which identify the time of the sealing as a prophetic testing process are more than abundant. It is clear that the testing process is based upon the students aptitude and ability to apply the correct or incorrect methodology for studying God’s prophetic Word. This truth is also abundantly set forth within the inspired record.

Liy pwòfesi yo ki idantifye tan sele a kòm yon pwosesis tès pwofetik yo plis pase abondan. Li klè ke pwosesis tès la baze sou aptitid ak kapasite etidyan an pou aplike metodoloji ki kòrèk oswa ki pa kòrèk nan etidye Pawòl pwofetik Bondye a. Verite sa a tou prezante avèk anpil abondans nan dosye enspire a.

As for these four children, God gave them knowledge and skill in all learning and wisdom: and Daniel had understanding in all visions and dreams. Now at the end of the days that the king had said he should bring them in, then the prince of the eunuchs brought them in before Nebuchadnezzar. And the king communed with them; and among them all was found none like Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah: therefore stood they before the king. And in all matters of wisdom and understanding, that the king enquired of them, he found them ten times better than all the magicians and astrologers that were in all his realm. Daniel 1:17–20.

Kanta pou kat jenn gason sa yo, Bondye te ba yo konesans ak ladrès nan tout kalite etid ak sajès; e Danyèl te gen konpreyansyon nan tout vizyon ak rèv. Kounye a, nan fen jou wa a te fikse pou yo te mennen yo antre, chèf enik yo mennen yo devan Nebikadneza. Epi wa a pale avèk yo; e pami yo tout, pa t jwenn okenn ki te tankou Danyèl, Ananya, Mizaèl, ak Azarya; se poutèt sa yo te kanpe devan wa a. E nan tout kestyon sajès ak konpreyansyon wa a te poze yo, li te jwenn yo dis fwa pi siperyè pase tout majisyen ak astwològ ki te nan tout wayòm li an. Danyèl 1:17–20.

A premier rule of prophetic interpretation is that truth is established upon the testimony of two, and those who fail to have confidence in the principle are setting themselves up for failure. An element of the testing process during the sealing time, involves the recognition of the connection of the internal and external histories represented in chapter eleven and verse eleven by Daniel and John.

Yon règ fondamantal nan entèpretasyon pwofetik se ke verite tabli sou temwayaj de; e moun ki pa rive mete konfyans yo nan prensip sa a ap prepare tèt yo pou echèk. Youn nan eleman nan pwosesis tès la pandan tan sele a, se rekonesans koneksyon ki genyen ant istwa entèn ak istwa ekstèn yo, jan Danyèl ak Jan reprezante sa nan chapit onz ak vèsè onz.

“Revelation is a sealed book, but it is also an opened book. It records marvelous events that are to take place in the last days of this earth’s history. The teachings of this book are definite, not mystical and unintelligible. In it the same line of prophecy is taken up as in Daniel. Some prophecies God has repeated, thus showing that importance must be given to them. The Lord does not repeat things that are of no great consequence.” Manuscript Releases, volume 9, 8.

“Revelasyon se yon liv sele, men li se yon liv ouvri tou. Li rapòte evènman mèveye ki gen pou rive nan dènye jou istwa tè sa a. Ansèyman liv sa a yo klè e presi, pa mistik ni enkonpreyansib. Nan li, menm liy pwofesi a reprann tankou nan Dànyèl. Gen kèk pwofesi Bondye repete, konsa Li montre yo dwe bay yo enpòtans. Senyè a pa repete bagay ki pa gen anpil konsekans.” Manuscript Releases, volim 9, 8.

The books of Daniel and Revelation represent two witnesses, and the one hundred and forty-four thousand are represented as two witnesses in Revelation chapter eleven. In verse eleven of the chapter the two witnesses, represented by Elijah and Moses are resurrected as typified by both John in the boiling oil and Daniel in the lion’s den. The one hundred and forty-four thousand are represented by Daniel and John, and also by Elijah and Moses. To succeed in the testing process which produces the one hundred and forty-four thousand a student must understand that truth is established upon two witnesses, and that the books of Daniel and Revelation represent two witnesses, and that the one hundred and forty-four thousand have been typified as Elijah and Moses and also Daniel and John.

Liv Dànyèl ak Revelasyon yo reprezante de temwen, e san karannkat mil yo prezante kòm de temwen nan Revelasyon chapit onz. Nan vèsè onz chapit la, de temwen yo, ki reprezante pa Eli ak Moyiz, resisite, jan sa te prefigire ni pa Jan nan lwil k ap bouyi a ni pa Dànyèl nan twou lyon yo. San karannkat mil yo reprezante pa Dànyèl ak Jan, epi tou pa Eli ak Moyiz. Pou reyisi nan pwosesis eprèv la ki pwodui san karannkat mil yo, yon etidyan dwe konprann verite a tabli sou de temwen, e ke liv Dànyèl ak Revelasyon yo reprezante de temwen, e ke san karannkat mil yo te prefigire kòm Eli ak Moyiz, epi tou kòm Dànyèl ak Jan.

These truths are only a brief sampling of prophetic truths associated with the internal and external history represented by “eleven, eleven” in both Daniel and Revelation. As Palmoni, Christ guided in the alignment of the two passages, and also that eleven, plus eleven equals twenty-two, which in turn is a tithe or tenth of two hundred and twenty, which is a symbol of the combination of divinity with humanity. Palmoni established upon more than two witnesses that “two hundred and twenty” represents the combination of divinity and humanity, which is in turn a description of the incarnation of Christ when He took upon Himself fallen flesh. In doing so He set forth the example for mankind that if they are willing to meet the requirements of the gospel, Christ is willing to combine His divinity with our humanity. Divinity and humanity are therefore two witnesses.

Verite sa yo se sèlman yon kout echantiyon verite pwofetik ki asosye ak istwa entèn ak ekstèn “onz, onz” reprezante nan tou de Danyèl ak Revelasyon. Antanke Palmoni, Kris te gide nan aliyen de pasaj yo, epi tou lefèt ke onz, plis onz egal vennde, ki, an retou, se yon dim oswa yon dizyèm de desanven, ki se yon senbòl konbinezon divinite ak limanite. Palmoni te etabli sou plis pase de temwen ke “desanven” reprezante konbinezon divinite ak limanite, ki, an retou, se yon deskripsyon enkarnasyon Kris la lè Li te pran sou tèt Li chè ki te tonbe. Lè Li te fè sa, Li te bay limanite egzanp lan ke si yo dispoze satisfè egzijans levanjil la, Kris dispoze konbine divinite Li avèk limanite nou. Se poutèt sa, divinite ak limanite se de temwen.

The “Revelation of Jesus Christ” that opened up just before probation closes includes that Jesus is the “Word” of God.

“Revelasyon Jezikri” ki te louvri jis anvan tan gras la fèmen an, gen ladan l verite ke Jezi se “Pawòl” Bondye a.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men. And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. John 1:1–5.

Nan kòmansman an te gen Pawòl la, e Pawòl la te avèk Bondye, e Pawòl la te Bondye. Menm Pawòl sa a te nan kòmansman an avèk Bondye. Se pa li tout bagay te fèt; e san li pa t gen anyen ki te fèt nan tout sa ki te fèt. Nan li te gen lavi; e lavi a te limyè lèzòm. E limyè a klere nan fènwa; men fènwa a pa t konprann li. Jan 1:1–5.

The Bible is the “Word” of God which, just as Christ represents the combination of divinity with humanity. The Bible represents the two witnesses of the Old and New Testaments, who are also Moses and Elijah in Revelation chapter eleven.

Bib la se “Pawòl” Bondye a ki, menm jan Kris la reprezante inyon divinite ak limanite. Bib la reprezante de temwen Ansyen ak Nouvo Testaman yo, ki se tou Moyiz ak Eli nan Revelasyon chapit onz la.

“Concerning the two witnesses the prophet declares further: ‘These are the two olive trees, and the two candlesticks standing before the God of the earth.’ ‘Thy word,’ said the psalmist, ‘is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.’ Revelation 11:4; Psalm 119:105. The two witnesses represent the Scriptures of the Old and the New Testament.” The Great Controversy, 267.

“Konsènan de temwen yo, pwofèt la deklare ankò: ‘Sa yo se de pye oliv yo, ak de pòtlanp yo ki kanpe devan Bondye tè a.’ ‘Pawòl ou a,’ se sa salmis la te di, ‘se yon lanp pou pye mwen, epi yon limyè sou chemen mwen.’ Revelation 11:4; Psalm 119:105. De temwen yo reprezante Ekriti yo nan Ansyen ak Nouvo Testaman an.” The Great Controversy, 267.

The two witnesses are the two olive trees, the two candlesticks and the Old and New Testaments, which is represented in the paragraph as “Thy word.” The “Revelation of Jesus Christ” that is unsealed by the Lion of the tribe of Judah just before the close of probation is “the final increase of knowledge” which tests those who are candidates to be one of the one hundred and forty-four thousand. The “final increase of knowledge” is also the message of the Midnight Cry in the parable of the ten virgins.

De temwen yo se de pye oliv yo, de gwo lanp yo, ak Ansyen ak Nouvo Testaman yo, ki reprezante nan paragraf la kòm “Pawòl ou.” “Revelasyon Jezikri a,” ke Lyon tribi Jida a de sele jis anvan fen tan gras la, se “dènye ogmantasyon konesans lan” ki mete anba eprèv moun ki kandida pou yo vin youn nan san karannkat mil yo. “Dènye ogmantasyon konesans lan” se tou mesaj Rèl Minwi a nan parabòl dis vyèj yo.

“‘Then answered I, and said unto him, What are these two olive trees upon the right side of the candlestick and upon the left side thereof? And I answered again, and said unto him, What be these two olive branches which through the two golden pipes empty the golden oil out of themselves? And he answered me and said, Knowest thou not what these be? And I said, No, my lord. Then said he, These are the two anointed ones, that stand by the Lord of the whole earth. Zechariah 4:11–14. These empty themselves into the golden bowls, which represent the hearts of the living messengers of God, who bear the Word of the Lord to the people in warnings and entreaties. The Word itself must be as represented, the golden oil, emptied from the two olive trees that stand by the Lord of the whole earth. This is the baptism by the Holy Spirit with fire. This will open the soul of unbelievers to conviction. The wants of the soul can be met only by the working of the Holy Spirit of God. Man can of himself do nothing to satisfy the longings and meet the aspirations of the heart.” The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, volume 4, 1180.

«Lè sa a, mwen reponn, epi mwen di li: Kisa de pye oliv sa yo ye ki sou bò dwat gwo chandelye a ak sou bò goch li? Epi mwen reponn ankò, epi mwen di li: Kisa de branch oliv sa yo ye ki, atravè de tiyo an lò yo, vide lwil an lò a soti nan yo menm? Epi li reponn mwen, li di: Èske ou pa konnen kisa yo ye? Epi mwen di: Non, mèt mwen. Lè sa a li di: Se de moun wen sa yo, ki kanpe bò kote Seyè tout tè a. Zakari 4:11–14. Sa yo vide tèt yo nan bòl an lò yo, ki reprezante kè mesaje vivan Bondye yo, ki pote Pawòl Seyè a bay pèp la nan avètisman ak siplikasyon. Pawòl la li menm dwe jan li reprezante a, lwil an lò a, ki vide soti nan de pye oliv yo ki kanpe bò kote Seyè tout tè a. Sa a se batèm Sentespri a avèk dife. Sa ap louvri nanm moun ki pa kwè yo pou konviksyon. Se sèlman pa aksyon Sentespri Bondye a bezwen nanm nan kapab satisfè. Lòm pa ka fè anyen pa li menm pou satisfè dezi pwofon yo epi reponn a aspirasyon kè a.» The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, volume 4, 1180.

The Word of God is both the Bible and Christ, and the Bible and Christ represent two witnesses, as do the one hundred and forty-four thousand. The two witnesses in turn represent a combination of divinity with humanity. They also represent internal and external prophetic histories. As witnesses, they provided evidence that divinity combined with humanity does not sin. They also represent the connection between divinity and humanity. Whether a ladder, conduit, pipes, angels or any of the other symbols of the communication link between God and man, the message conveyed to man is always life or death.

Pawòl Bondye a se ni Bib la ni Kris la, e Bib la ansanm ak Kris la reprezante de temwen, menm jan ak san karannkat mil yo. De temwen sa yo, an retou, reprezante yon konbinezon divinite ak limanite. Yo reprezante tou istwa pwofetik entèn ak ekstèn. Kòm temwen, yo te bay prèv ke divinite ini ak limanite pa peche. Yo reprezante tou koneksyon ki genyen ant divinite ak limanite. Kit se yon nechèl, yon kanal, tiyo, zanj, oswa nenpòt nan lòt senbòl lyen kominikasyon ant Bondye ak lòm, mesaj ki transmèt bay lòm toujou se lavi oswa lanmò.

The anointed ones standing by the Lord of the whole earth, have the position once given to Satan as covering cherub. By the holy beings surrounding his throne, the Lord keeps up a constant communication with the inhabitants of the earth. The golden oil represents the grace with which God keeps the lamps of believers supplied, that they shall not flicker and go out. Were it not that this holy oil is poured from heaven in the messages of God’s Spirit, the agencies of evil would have entire control over men.

“Moun Bondye chwazi yo, k ap kanpe bò kote Seyè tout latè a, gen pozisyon ki te yon fwa bay Satan kòm cheriben ki kouvri a. Pa mwayen èt sen yo ki antoure twòn li an, Seyè a kenbe yon kominikasyon konstan avèk moun ki rete sou latè yo. Lwil an lò a reprezante gras Bondye sèvi pou l kenbe lanp kwayan yo ap resevwa sa yo bezwen, pou yo pa tranble epi etenn. Si se pa t pou lwil sen sa a ki vide soti nan syèl la nan mesaj Lespri Bondye a, ajan mechanste yo t ap gen kontwòl total sou lèzòm.”

“God is dishonored when we do not receive the communications which he sends us. Thus we refuse the golden oil which he would pour into our souls to be communicated to those in darkness. When the call shall come, ‘Behold, the bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him,’ those who have not received the holy oil, who have not cherished the grace of Christ in their hearts, will find, like the foolish virgins, that they are not ready to meet their Lord. They have not, in themselves, the power to obtain the oil, and their lives are wrecked. But if God’s Holy Spirit is asked for, if we plead, as did Moses, ‘Show me thy glory,’ the love of God will be shed abroad in our hearts. Through the golden pipes, the golden oil will be communicated to us. ‘Not by might, nor by power, but by my Spirit, saith the Lord of Hosts.’ By receiving the bright beams of the Sun of Righteousness, God’s children shine as lights in the world.” Review and Herald, July 20, 1897.

“Bondye pa resevwa onè lè nou pa resevwa mesaj li voye ban nou yo. Konsa nou rejte lwil an lò li ta vide nan nanm nou pou yo ka transmèt li bay moun ki nan fènwa yo. Lè apèl la va vini, ‘Men, Veterinè maryaj la ap vini; soti al kontre li,’ moun ki pa t resevwa lwil sen an, ki pa t cheri gras Kris la nan kè yo, ap dekouvri, menm jan ak vyèj sòt yo, yo pa pare pou rankontre Seyè yo. Yo pa gen, nan tèt pa yo, pouvwa pou jwenn lwil la, e lavi yo kraze nèt. Men si yo mande Sentespri Bondye a, si nou sipliye, jan Moyiz te fè a, ‘Montre m glwa ou,’ lanmou Bondye va gaye nan kè nou. Atravè tiyo an lò yo, lwil an lò a va transmèt ban nou. ‘Se pa avèk fòs, ni pa avèk pouvwa, men se avèk Lespri mwen, di Seyè dèzame yo.’ Lè yo resevwa reyon klere Solèy Ladwati a, pitit Bondye yo briye tankou limyè nan lemonn.” Review and Herald, 20 jiyè 1897.

The outpouring of the Holy Spirit occurs during the internal and external histories marked by Daniel and Revelation 11:11. There are “at least” four prophetic characters represented in verses eleven and twelve of Daniel chapter eleven that need to be identified. There are also four that need to be identified in verses thirteen through fifteen, and four in verse sixteen. We are now living in that very history, so it behooves us, as students of prophecy to sort out who the symbolic characters of verses eleven through sixteen are, for they represent a line of prophecy that covers the hidden history of verse forty of the same chapter.

Vide Sentespri a rive pandan istwa entèn ak ekstèn yo ki make pa Danyèl ak Revelasyon 11:11. Gen “omwen” kat pèsonaj pwofetik ki reprezante nan vèsè onz ak douz nan chapit onz Danyèl la ki bezwen idantifye. Genyen tou kat ki bezwen idantifye nan vèsè trèz rive kenz yo, epi kat nan vèsè sèz la. Nou menm kounye a ap viv nan menm istwa sa a, se poutèt sa li nesesè pou nou, antanke etidyan pwofesi, detèmine kiyès pèsonaj senbolik vèsè onz rive sèz yo ye, paske yo reprezante yon liy pwofesi ki kouvri istwa kache vèsè karant nan menm chapit la.

It also seems relevant to identify the personalities represented in the history of verse forty which has been unsealing since 1989.

Li sanble enpòtan tou pou idantifye pèsonaj yo ki reprezante nan istwa vèsè karant lan, ki ap debloke depi 1989.

And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end. Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand. Daniel 12:9, 10.

Epi li di: Ale chemen ou, Danyèl; paske pawòl yo fèmen epi sele jouk nan tan lafen an. Anpil moun va pirifye, va vin blan, epi va pase anba eprèv; men mechan yo va aji avèk mechanste; e okenn nan mechan yo p ap konprann; men moun ki saj yo va konprann. Danyèl 12:9, 10.

Verse forty begins at the time of the end in 1798 with Napoleon of France taking the pope into captivity. Napoleon’s justification was based upon the broken Treaty of Tolentino in 1797. Napoleon and the pope’s battle had previously been typified in the history which fulfilled verses six and seven of Daniel chapter eleven. The broken marriage treaty and the defeat of the northern king by the southern king in fulfillment of verses six and seven were repeated in the history of 1798, and in doing so they represent the prediction of God’s Word in verses six and seven, and the fulfillment of those verses in the beginning of the warfare between Ptolemy Philadelphus, the second and king of Egypt, and Antiochus Theos, third king of Syria. Ptolemy represented the southern king and Antiochus represented the northern king.

Vèsè karant lan kòmanse nan tan lafen an an 1798, lè Napoleyon Lafrans te mennen pap la an kaptivite. Jistifikasyon Napoleyon an te baze sou Trete Tolentino a ki te vyole an 1797. Batay ant Napoleyon ak pap la te deja prefigire nan istwa ki te akonpli vèsè sis ak sèt nan Danyèl chapit onz. Trete maryaj ki te kraze a ansanm ak defèt wa nò a pa wa sid la, nan akonplisman vèsè sis ak sèt yo, te repete nan istwa 1798 la; epi lè sa te fèt, yo reprezante ni prediksyon Pawòl Bondye a nan vèsè sis ak sèt yo, ni akonplisman vèsè sa yo nan kòmansman lagè ant Ptolome Filadèlf, dezyèm wa peyi Lejip la, ak Antiòkis Teòs, twazyèm wa peyi Siri a. Ptolome te reprezante wa sid la, epi Antiòkis te reprezante wa nò a.

The prediction of the verses, brought together with the fulfillment of that prediction in the history of Ptolemy and Antiochus—which in turn typified and the history of Napoleon and the pope in 1798 provide three lines which typify the history of Putin and Zelenskyy in verses eleven and twelve. Thus, understanding that the time of the end in 1798 represents the history of Napoleon and the pope is incomplete if it ends there. We must understand what verses six and seven predict about Napoleon and the pope, and also what the history of Ptolemy and Antiochus teaches of that same period. When we understand those lines of truth, we may then understand that those previous historical fulfillments are identifying the beginning history of verse forty, and in so doing, they are also identifying the ending of verse forty when Putin, who has been typified by Napoleon and Ptolemy—Putin who has been predicted in verses six and seven, fulfills verses eleven and twelve.

Prediksyon vèsè yo, mete ansanm ak akonplisman prediksyon sa a nan istwa Ptolome ak Antyòkis—ki, an retou, te sèvi kòm tip, ansanm ak istwa Napoléon ak pap la an 1798—bay twa liy ki sèvi kòm tip pou istwa Putin ak Zelenskyy nan vèsè onz ak douz yo. Se konsa, konprann ke tan lafen an an 1798 reprezante istwa Napoléon ak pap la rete enkonplè si sa fini la. Nou dwe konprann sa vèsè sis ak sèt yo anonse konsènan Napoléon ak pap la, epi tou sa istwa Ptolome ak Antyòkis la anseye sou menm peryòd sa a. Lè nou konprann liy verite sa yo, nou kapab lè sa a konprann ke akonplisman istorik sa yo ki te vini anvan yo ap idantifye istwa kòmansman vèsè karant la; e, lè yo fè sa, yo ap idantifye tou fen vèsè karant la, lè Putin, ki te deja sèvi kòm tip pa Napoléon ak Ptolome—Putin yo te anonse nan vèsè sis ak sèt yo—akonpli vèsè onz ak douz yo.

An important observation concerning the prophetic relationship between the dragon and the beast as John would identify them, or as “the daily and the abomination of desolation” as Daniel would represent them is that they are prophetically very similar. John says it this way.

Yon obsèvasyon enpòtan konsènan relasyon pwofetik ant dragon an ak bèt la, jan Jan ta idantifye yo, oswa kòm “sakrifis tout tan an ak abominasyon dezolasyon an,” jan Danyèl ta reprezante yo, se ke yo pwofetikman trè sanble. Jan di sa konsa.

And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? Revelation 13:4.

Epi yo adore dragon an ki te bay bèt la pouvwa a; epi yo adore bèt la, yo t ap di: Kilès ki tankou bèt la? Kilès ki ka fè lagè avè l? Revelasyon 13:4.

To worship the dragon is to worship the beast, for both represent the religion of paganism. Like unto John, Daniel uses “the little horn” of Daniel chapter eight verses nine through twelve to represent both pagan and papal Rome, though he clearly distinguishes between the two by identifying the little horn of pagan Rome in the masculine sense, and the little horn of papal Rome in the feminine sense. In chapter seven Daniel identifies pagan Rome as “diverse” from the kingdoms before it, and Daniel further identifies that papal Rome was also “diverse.” Rome, whether pagan or papal is diverse. The male symbol of Rome representing pagan Rome is upheld by Ahab and Herod. Both were married to symbols of the papacy. The woman is churchcraft and the man is statecraft, so at the prophetic level when the Word of God speaks of a man and woman becoming one, it is confirming the reality that pagan Rome and papal Rome are very similar in the prophetic sense, for they are one flesh.

Adore dragon an, se adore bèt la tou, paske toude reprezante relijyon payen an. Menm jan ak Jan, Danyèl sèvi ak “ti kòn nan” nan Danyèl chapit uit, vèsè nèf rive douz, pou reprezante ni Wòm payen ni Wòm papal, byenke li fè yon distenksyon klè ant de yo lè li idantifye ti kòn Wòm payen an nan sans maskilen, epi ti kòn Wòm papal la nan sans feminen. Nan chapit sèt, Danyèl idantifye Wòm payen kòm “diferan” ak wayòm ki te vini anvan li yo, epi Danyèl idantifye plis ankò ke Wòm papal te tou “diferan.” Wòm, kit li payen kit li papal, diferan. Senbòl gason Wòm nan ki reprezante Wòm payen an soutni pa Akab ak Ewòd. Toude te marye ak senbòl papote a. Fanm nan se leglizri, epi gason an se leta, konsa sou plan pwofetik la, lè Pawòl Bondye a pale de yon gason ak yon fanm k ap vin fè yon sèl, li konfime reyalite ke Wòm payen ak Wòm papal sanble anpil nan sans pwofetik la, paske yo se yon sèl chè.

France’s relationship to the papacy in 1798 typifies the relationship of the United States with the papacy when the ten kings burn Rome with fire and eat her flesh.

Relasyon Lafrans ak papote a an 1798 la sèvi kòm yon tip relasyon Etazini ak papote a lè dis wa yo boule Wòm ak dife epi yo manje chè li.

And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire. Revelation 17:16.

Epi dis kòn ou te wè sou bèt la, yo menm, y ap rayi jennès la; y ap fè l tounen yon dezè, y ap kite l toutouni, y ap manje chè li, epi y ap boule l nan dife. Revelasyon 17:16.

France’s relationship to the papacy when it placed the papacy in power in 538, typifies the work of the United States in healing the papacies’ deadly wound at the soon coming Sunday law.

Relasyon Lafrans ak papote a lè li te mete papote a sou pouvwa an 538 la, prefigire travay Etazini pral fè nan geri blesi mòtèl papote a nan lwa dimanch ki prèt pou vini an.

And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men, And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. Revelation 13:11–14.

Apre sa, mwen wè yon lòt bèt k ap monte sòti nan tè a; li te gen de kòn tankou yon ti mouton, men li t ap pale tankou yon dragon. Li egzèse tout pouvwa premye bèt la devan li, e li fè tè a ak moun k ap viv ladan l yo adore premye bèt la, li menm ki te gen blesi mòtèl li a geri. Li fè gwo mèvèy, jis rive fè dife desann soti nan syèl la sou tè a devan je moun yo. Epi li twonpe moun k ap viv sou tè a pa mwayen mèvèy sa yo li te resevwa pouvwa pou l fè devan je bèt la; li di moun k ap viv sou tè a pou yo fè yon estati pou bèt la, li menm ki te resevwa blesi nepe a epi ki te kontinye viv. Revelasyon 13:11–14.

The “time of the end” in 1798 in fulfillment of verse forty identifies the spiritual king of the north being removed by the spiritual king of the south. That prophetic history is the ending history of the twelve hundred and sixty years of papal rule, and therefore the prophetic characteristics of the beginning of that prophetic history is represented at the ending. In 538 the fourth kingdom of Bible prophecy gave way to the fifth kingdom of Bible prophecy and in 1798 the fifth kingdom of Bible prophecy gave way to the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy.

“tan lafen” an nan ane 1798, nan akonplisman vèsè karant lan, idantifye wa espirityèl nò a kòm yon pouvwa wa espirityèl sid la retire. Istwa pwofetik sa a se istwa final douz san swasant ane dominasyon pap la; se poutèt sa, karakteristik pwofetik kòmansman istwa pwofetik sa a reprezante nan fen li. An 538, katriyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la te lage plas li bay senkyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la, epi an 1798, senkyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la te lage plas li bay sizyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la.

538 is also a middle waymark of the curse of the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six against the northern kingdom of Israel that began in 723 BC, when Assyria took Ephraim into captivity. 1798 therefore possesses not only the prophetic attributes of 538, but also of 723 BC. In 723 BC the ten tribes of Israel were being overthrown by Assyria, and twelve hundred and sixty years later in 538 pagan Rome was being overthrown by papal Rome, who was in turn overthrown by France in 1798 at the conclusion of the “seven times.”

538 se tou yon makè mitan tou nan madichon “sèt fwa” Levitik vennsis la kont wayòm nò Izrayèl la, ki te kòmanse an 723 anvan Jezikri, lè Lasiri te mennen Efrayim an kaptivite. Se poutèt sa, 1798 genyen non sèlman atribi pwofetik 538 yo, men tou sa ki pou 723 anvan Jezikri. An 723 anvan Jezikri, dis tribi Izrayèl yo t ap ranvèse anba Lasiri, epi mil de san swasant ane pi ta, an 538, Wòm payen t ap ranvèse pa Wòm papal, ki li menm, apre sa, te ranvèse pa Lafrans an 1798 nan fen “sèt fwa” yo.

In 1798 France, the king of the south, took the papacy off the throne. In 538 France, the premiere symbol of the disintegration of pagan Rome into ten kingdoms placed the papacy on the throne. At the Sunday law the United States repeats the role of France in 538, and when the ten kings burn the papacy with fire and eat her flesh the United States repeats the role of France in 1798.

Nan 1798, Lafrans, wa sid la, wete papote a sou twòn nan. Nan 538, Lafrans, premye senbòl dezentegrasyon Wòm payen an an dis wayòm, te mete papote a sou twòn nan. Lè lwa dimanch la vini, Etazini repete wòl Lafrans nan 538; epi lè dis wa yo boule papote a ak dife epi yo manje chè li, Etazini repete wòl Lafrans nan 1798.

The judgment of “seven times” against the northern and southern kingdoms of Israel was brought about by kingdoms which came out of the north.

Jijman “sèt fwa” kont wayòm nò ak wayòm sid Izrayèl la te vini pa mwayen wayòm ki te soti nan nò a.

Israel is a scattered sheep; the lions have driven him away: first the king of Assyria hath devoured him; and last this Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon hath broken his bones. Jeremiah 50:17.

Izrayèl se yon mouton gaye toupatou; lyon yo te chase l ale: an premye, wa Lasiri a te devore l; epi an dènye, Nebikadneza, wa Babilòn sa a, te kraze zo li yo. Jeremi 50:17.

Assyria came out of the north and conquered the ten tribes in 723 BC and Babylon took Judah captive in 677 BC. Though Israel was the northern kingdom in relation to Judah, still both kingdoms were conquered by enemies from the north, thus making both Israel and Judah southern kingdoms in relation to the enemy who took them into captivity. 723 BC represents the king of the north conquering a southern tenfold kingdom. 538 represents a transition from paganism to papalism and also a northern kingdom conquering a tenfold kingdom. 1798 represents a northern king being defeated by a southern king who represents a tenfold kingdom.

Asiri te soti nan nò a e li te konkeri dis tribi yo an 723 av. J.-K., epi Babilòn te mennen Jida ann kaptivite an 677 av. J.-K. Malgre Izrayèl te wayòm nò a an relasyon ak Jida, kanmenm toude wayòm yo te konkeri pa ènmi ki soti nan nò a, konsa sa fè ni Izrayèl ni Jida tounen wayòm sid an relasyon ak ènmi ki te mennen yo ann kaptivite a. 723 av. J.-K. reprezante wa nò a k ap konkeri yon wayòm sid ki gen dis pati. 538 reprezante yon tranzisyon soti nan paganism pou rive nan papalis, epi tou yon wayòm nò k ap konkeri yon wayòm ki gen dis pati. 1798 reprezante yon wa nò ki ap bat anba men yon wa sid ki reprezante yon wayòm ki gen dis pati.

And the same hour was there a great earthquake, and the tenth part of the city fell, and in the earthquake were slain of men seven thousand: and the remnant were affrighted, and gave glory to the God of heaven. Revelation 11:13.

Epi nan menm lè a, te gen yon gwo tranblemanntè, epi dizyèm pati vil la tonbe; e nan tranblemanntè a, sèt mil moun te mouri; epi rès yo te vin sezisman, e yo te bay Bondye syèl la glwa. Revelasyon 11:13.

The period of transition associated with 538, when Rome changed from pagan to papal, is also the change in Daniel chapter eight from masculine to the feminine, which symbolically is from statecraft to churchcraft. The prophecy of “seven times” bears the signature of “truth” for the first letter (723 BC) illustrates the twenty-second and last letter of the Hebrew alphabet (1798), while the thirteenth and middle letter represents rebellion (538). Daniel identifies that the “transgression” that is symbolized by the expression “the transgression of desolation” was the combination of church and state, with the church in control of the relationship. That “transgression” represents 538, which is the middle and metaphorically the thirteenth letter of the three primary waymarks in the period of the seven times against the ten northern tribes of Israel.

Peryòd tranzisyon ki asosye ak 538 la, lè Wòm te chanje soti nan payen pou l vin papal, se tou chanjman ki nan Danyèl chapit uit la, soti nan maskilen pou rive nan feminen an, sa ki senbolikman vle di soti nan gouvènans leta pou rive nan gouvènans legliz. Pwofesi “sèt tan yo” pote siyati “verite” a, paske premye lèt la (723 av. J.-K.) ilistre venn-dezyèm epi dènye lèt alfabè ebre a (1798), tandiske trèzyèm epi lèt ki nan mitan an reprezante rebelyon (538). Danyèl idantifye ke “transgresyon” ki senbolize pa ekspresyon “transgresyon dezolasyon an” se te konbinezon legliz ak leta, avèk legliz la ki te gen kontwòl relasyon an. “Transgresyon” sa a reprezante 538, ki se mitan an epi, nan sans metaforik, trèzyèm lèt la pami twa prensipal pwen repè yo nan peryòd sèt tan yo kont dis tribi nò Izrayèl yo.

In 1798, the “time of the end” as set forth in verse forty of Daniel chapter eleven, atheistic France, the king of the south delivered the deadly wound to the papacy, the king of the north. In 1989 the papacy retaliated against the atheistic king of the south, who had then become the Soviet Union. The retaliation included a secret alliance between the United States and the Vatican. The sweeping away of the Soviet Union in 1989 ends the written prophetic message of verse forty, and the next verse, verse forty-one, represents the Sunday law in the United States. Thus, from the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989 until the Sunday law in the next verse we have been living in the hidden history of verse forty.

An 1798, nan “tan lafen” jan sa prezante nan vèsè karant nan chapit onz Danyèl la, Lafrans ate a, wa disid la, te bay papote a, wa dinò a, blesi mòtèl la. An 1989, papote a te vanje tèt li sou wa disid ate a, ki lè sa a te vin tounen Inyon Sovyetik la. Vanjans sa a te gen ladan l yon alyans sekrè ant Etazini ak Vatikan an. Lefètke yo te ravaje Inyon Sovyetik la an 1989 mete fen nan mesaj pwofetik ekri vèsè karant lan, epi vèsè ki vin apre a, vèsè karantyèm e youn nan, reprezante lwa dimanch Ozetazini. Konsa, depi tonbe Inyon Sovyetik la an 1989 rive jouk lwa dimanch la nan vèsè ki vin apre a, nou te ap viv nan istwa kache vèsè karant lan.

Verse forty begins by identifying a king of the south and north in 1798, and then in 1989 a king of the south and north, as well as a third power represented by the chariots, ships and horsemen.

Vèsè karant lan kòmanse pa idantifye yon wa nan sid la ak yon wa nan nò a an 1798; epi answit, an 1989, li idantifye yon wa nan sid la ak yon wa nan nò a, ansanm ak yon twazyèm pouvwa ki reprezante pa cha yo, bato yo ak kavalye yo.

And at the time of the end shall the king of the south push at him: and the king of the north shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over. Daniel 11:40.

Epi nan tan lafen an, wa sid la va pouse sou li; epi wa nò a va vini kont li tankou yon toubiyon, avèk cha, avèk kavalye, epi avèk anpil bato; epi li va antre nan peyi yo, li va debòde epi li va travèse. Danyèl 11:40.

At the “time of the end” in 1798 a literal general of Napoleon entered the Vatican and literally took the pope and incarcerated him. In 1989 the retaliation for 1798 took place. There had been prophetic transitions which took place in the history between 1798 and 1989 that are important to note. Atheistic France, the king of the south in the 1798 time period was the first spiritual king of the south, and Putin’s Russia is destined to be its last. France is identified in Revelation eleven, which is directly identified by Sister White as atheistic France. One of the two symbols which identify France in chapter eleven is Egypt, which Sister White identifies as a symbol of atheism. In the chapter the beast who ascends out of the bottomless pit was atheism that came into history during that time period.

Nan “tan fen an” an 1798, yon jeneral literal Napoléon te antre nan Vatikan an epi li te literalman pran pap la e li te mete l nan prizon. An 1989, vanjans pou 1798 te rive. Te gen tranzisyon pwofetik ki te fèt nan listwa ant 1798 ak 1989 ki enpòtan pou remake. Lafrans ateis, wa sid la nan peryòd 1798 la, te premye wa sid espirityèl la, epi Larisi Putin nan destinen pou l dènye a. Lafrans idantifye nan Revelasyon onz, ke Sè White idantifye dirèkteman kòm Lafrans ateis. Youn nan de senbòl ki idantifye Lafrans nan chapit onz la se Lejip, ke Sè White idantifye kòm yon senbòl ateyis. Nan chapit la, bèt ki monte soti nan twou san fon an se te ateyis ki te antre nan listwa pandan peryòd tan sa a.

Atheism comes into history beginning with France in the 1798 time period and by 1989 the spiritual king of atheism has become the Soviet Union. The sweeping away of the Soviet Union in 1989 in fulfillment of a secret alliance between Pope John Paul II and Ronald Reagan had been typified in verse ten of Daniel chapter eleven, and a second witness to verse ten is found in Isaiah’s passage of the two curses of twenty-five hundred and twenty years against the northern and southern kingdoms of Israel as set forth in chapters seven through eleven.

Lantiyé antre nan listwa apati Lafrans nan peryòd 1798 la, e rive an 1989 wa espirityèl lantiyé a vin tounen Inyon Sovyetik la. Bale ale Inyon Sovyetik la an 1989, nan akonplisman yon alyans sekrè ant Pap Jan Pòl II ak Ronald Reagan, te deja tipifye nan vèsè dis nan Danyèl chapit onz; e yon dezyèm temwen pou vèsè dis la jwenn nan pasaj Ezayi a sou de madichon de mil senk san ven an yo kont wayòm nò a ak wayòm sid Izrayèl yo, jan sa prezante nan chapit sèt rive onz yo.

1989 therefore becomes the point of reference for resolving the prophetic riddles of the last days. It was then that verse forty was unsealed. It can now be recognized that verse forty begins in 1798 and ends at the Sunday law of verse forty-one.

Se poutèt sa, 1989 vin tounen pwen referans pou rezoud devinèt pwofetik dènye jou yo. Se lè sa a yo te desegele vèsè karant lan. Kounye a, li ka rekonèt ke vèsè karant lan kòmanse an 1798 epi li fini nan lwa dimanch vèsè karantyèm-en an.

At the Sunday law the United States will speak as a dragon and end its rule as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. It began its time to reign in 1798, when the fifth kingdom received a deadly wound. In 1798 the United States passed the Alien and Sedition Acts, thus typifying the end of the sixth kingdom at it’s very beginning. Verse forty is therefore the history of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy.

Nan lwa dimanch lan, Etazini pral pale tankou yon dragon e li pral fini rèy li kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la. Li te kòmanse tan rèy li an 1798, lè senkyèm wayòm nan te resevwa yon blesi mòtèl. An 1798, Etazini te pase Lwa sou Etranje ak Sedisyon yo, konsa li te prefigire fen sizyèm wayòm nan depi nan kòmansman li menm. Se poutèt sa, vèsè karant lan se istwa Etazini kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la.

1798 is the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet, the Sunday law is the twenty-second and last letter of the Hebrew alphabet and 1989 is the waymark in the middle that represents the rebellion symbolized by the number thirteen and the thirteenth letter of the Hebrew alphabet. 1989 represents the rebellion of Reagan’s secret alliance with the antichrist of Bible prophecy. 1989 introduces the first of the last eight presidents that reign during a period of escalating rebellion against the Constitution. 1989 began a testing process among Seventh-day Adventists that is designed to produce two classes of worshippers. The faithful are the few the unfaithful are the many. 1989 represents the center waymark of verse forty, and it represents the rebellion symbolized by the thirteenth letter. Verse forty bears the signature of “truth.”

1798 se premye lèt alfabè ebre a, lwa dimanch lan se venndezyèm ak dènye lèt alfabè ebre a, epi 1989 se repè ki nan mitan an ki reprezante rebelyon an, jan nimewo trèz la ak trèzyèm lèt alfabè ebre a senbolize li. 1989 reprezante rebelyon alyans sekrè Reagan te fè ak antikris pwofesi Bib la. 1989 prezante premye nan dènye uit prezidan yo ki gouvène pandan yon peryòd rebelyon k ap ogmante kont Konstitisyon an. An 1989 te kòmanse yon pwosesis tès pami Advantis Setyèm Jou yo ki fèt pou pwodui de kategori adoratè. Fidèl yo se kèk la; enfidèl yo se anpil la. 1989 reprezante repè santral vèsè karant lan, epi li reprezante rebelyon trèzyèm lèt la senbolize a. Vèsè karant lan pote siyati “verite” a.

Verse forty has kings of the north and the south who are different in the history at the end of the verse. It also has the United States, who according to John is the false prophet who works with the dragon and beast to lead the world to Armageddon. The king of the south in verse forty is the dragon, the king of the north is the beast; the chariots, ships and horsemen are the false prophet. The fulfillment of verse forty in 1989 becomes an important prophetic attribute for understanding verses eleven through fifteen. If you are not right on 1989, you cannot logically be right about the history we are in today.

Vèsè karant lan prezante wa nò a ak wa sid la ki diferan nan istwa a nan fen vèsè a. Li gen ladan tou Etazini, ki dapre Jan se fo pwofèt la k ap travay ansanm ak dragon an ak bèt la pou mennen mond lan nan Amagedon. Wa sid la nan vèsè karant lan se dragon an; wa nò a se bèt la; cha yo, bato yo ak kavalye yo se fo pwofèt la. Akonplisman vèsè karant lan an 1989 vin tounen yon atribi pwofetik enpòtan pou konprann vèsè onz rive kenz yo. Si ou pa nan laverite konsènan 1989, ou pa ka lojikman gen rezon sou istwa n ap viv ladan l jodi a.

From 1989 unto the Sunday law three proxy wars for the papacy are represented in verses ten through fifteen. These verses must be considered as one continuous history for the same “Antiochus Magnus” is found in the three battles represented in the historical fulfillment of verses ten through fifteen.

Depi ane 1989 jouk rive nan lwa dimanch lan, twa lagè pa pwokirasyon pou papote a reprezante nan vèsè dis rive kenz. Vèsè sa yo dwe konsidere kòm yon sèl istwa kontinyèl, paske se menm “Antiochus Magnus” la yo jwenn nan twa batay yo ki reprezante nan akonplisman istorik vèsè dis rive kenz yo.

All three battles are one prophetic line, for Antiochus Magnus was in each of the three battles. Verse ten, and Isaiah 8:8 provide two witnesses to the fulfillment of verse forty in 1989. Verse forty is the point of reference in verse ten and Isaiah 8:8. The “chariots, ships and horsemen” represent the two horns of the earth beast in chapter thirteen of Revelation. At the end, when the United States “speaks as a dragon” the two horns are no longer Republicanism and Protestantism. At that time the so-called Protestants will join with Catholicism, and the Constitutional Republic will be changed into a dictatorship. In that time period the two horns of the earth beast will be economic and military strength. In chapter thirteen of Revelation the United States forces the world to accept the mark of the beast in order to buy and sell, and also upon threat of death. Those two horns are Daniel’s “ships” representing economic power and his “horsemen and chariots” representing military strength.

Twa batay yo tout se yon sèl liy pwofetik, paske Antiòkis Magnus te nan chak nan twa batay yo. Vèsè dis, ansanm ak Ezayi 8:8, bay de temwen pou akonplisman vèsè karant lan an 1989. Vèsè karant lan se pwen referans nan vèsè dis la ak nan Ezayi 8:8. “Cha yo, bato yo ak kavalye yo” reprezante de kòn bèt latè a nan chapit trèz Revelasyon an. Nan fen an, lè Etazini “pale tankou yon dragon,” de kòn yo pa Repiblikanis ak Pwotestantis ankò. Lè sa a, sa yo rele Pwotestan yo pral mete tèt yo ansanm ak Katolik la, epi Repiblik Konstitisyonèl la pral chanje pou tounen yon diktati. Nan peryòd tan sa a, de kòn bèt latè a pral fòs ekonomik ak fòs militè. Nan chapit trèz Revelasyon an, Etazini fòse lemonn aksepte mak bèt la pou yo kapab achte ak vann, epi tou anba menas lanmò. De kòn sa yo se “bato” Danyèl yo, ki reprezante pouvwa ekonomik, ak “kavalye ak cha” li yo, ki reprezante fòs militè.

1989 establishes that when applying the historical fulfillment of the battles of Raphia and Panium in verses eleven through fifteen, the same prophetic methodology that was employed to understand 1989 and the collapse of the Soviet Union must be used for Antiochus Magnus was in all three battles represented in verses ten through fifteen. Antiochus represents the power of chariots, ships and horsemen, who in 1989 was Ronald Reagan, the first of eight presidents, of which the last was also the sixth and is now the eighth that is of the seven.

1989 etabli ke lè y ap aplike akonplisman istorik batay Raphia ak Panium ki nan vèsè onz rive kenz yo, se menm metodoloji pwofetik ki te sèvi pou konprann 1989 ak efondreman Inyon Sovyetik la ki dwe itilize, paske Antiochus Magnus te reprezante nan tout twa batay yo ki dekri nan vèsè dis rive kenz yo. Antiochus reprezante pouvwa cha lagè, bato ak kavalye, ki an 1989 te Ronald Reagan, premye nan uit prezidan, pami yo dènye a te sizyèm nan tou epi kounye a se wityèm nan ki soti nan sèt yo.

According to Isaiah twenty-three the papal power, (the whore who commits fornication with the kings of the earth) would be hidden during the reign of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. In 1989 the United States, that had been typified by Antiochus Magnus was the proxy power of the papacy in its warfare against the beast of atheism that delivered it a deadly wound in 1798.

Selon Ésaïe vingt-trois, la puissance papale (la prostituée qui se livre à la fornication avec les rois de la terre) devait être cachée durant le règne des États-Unis en tant que sixième royaume de la prophétie biblique. En 1989, les États-Unis, qui avaient été préfigurés par Antiochus Magnus, étaient la puissance mandataire de la papauté dans sa guerre contre la bête de l’athéisme, laquelle lui avait infligé une blessure mortelle en 1798.

The three battles of verse ten through fifteen represent warfare between the king of the north, who as the hidden whore of Tyre, employs proxy powers as she moves towards the restoration of her power and the defeat of the king of atheism—the king of the south. The historical fulfillments of the three battles of verses ten through fifteen instruct us that in the first and last battles Antiochus Magnus won, but the middle battle he lost. The prophetic characteristics of the 1989 Ronald Reagan years with Pope John Paul II and the collapse of the Soviet Union will have a counterpart in the last of the three battles, for these verses are what is unsealed just before probation closes. As verse forty was unsealed in 1798 and then again in 1989, the verse was unsealed at the end, beginning in July 2023.

Twa batay ki nan vèsè dis rive kenz yo reprezante lagè ant wa nò a, ki kòm pwostitiye kache Tir la, sèvi ak pouvwa pwokirasyon pandan l ap avanse nan direksyon restorasyon pwòp pouvwa pa li ak defèt wa ateyis la—wa sid la. Akonplisman istorik twa batay ki nan vèsè dis rive kenz yo anseye nou ke nan premye ak dènye batay yo, Antiochus Magnus te genyen, men nan batay mitan an li te pèdi. Karakteristik pwofetik ane 1989 yo nan epòk Ronald Reagan avèk Pap Jan Pòl II ak efondreman Inyon Sovyetik la ap gen yon korespondans nan dènye nan twa batay sa yo, paske vèsè sa yo se sa ki devwale jis anvan tan pwobasyon an fèmen. Menm jan vèsè karant lan te devwale an 1798 epi ankò an 1989, vèsè a te devwale nan fen an, kòmanse an jiyè 2023.

The Revelation of Jesus Christ is unsealed just before probation closes and it includes the preeminent truth that Jesus is the first and the last, and as such always illustrates the end with the beginning. Probation closes for Adventism at the Sunday law, and just before the close of probation the Revelation of Jesus Christ is unsealed. The message which concludes at the closed door of the Sunday law is the message of the Midnight Cry, which led to the closed door of October 22, 1844 in Millerite history. The unsealing of 1798 in the beginning of verse forty which is also the beginning of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy typified the unsealing of 1989 in the middle of verse forty and the start of the progressive ending of the United States. The unsealing in 1798 which typified 1989 represents two witnesses to the unsealing of the message of the Midnight Cry in 2023. The line, with its three waymarks 1798, 1989 and 2023 identifies the internal work of purifying ten virgins and the external line of the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy.

Revelasyon Jezi Kris la vin dezasele jis anvan tan gras la fèmen, e li gen ladan l verite siprèm nan ke Jezi se premye a ak dènye a, e kòm sa, li toujou montre fen an avèk kòmansman an. Tan gras la fèmen pou Advantis la nan lwa dimanch lan, e jis anvan tan gras la fèmen, Revelasyon Jezi Kris la vin dezasele. Mesaj ki rive nan konklizyon li nan pòt fèmen lwa dimanch lan se mesaj Rèl Minwi a, ki te mennen nan pòt fèmen 22 oktòb 1844 nan istwa Milerit la. Dezaselman ane 1798 la nan kòmansman vèsè karant lan, ki se tou kòmansman Etazini kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la, te tipifye dezaselman ane 1989 la nan mitan vèsè karant lan ak kòmansman fen pwogresif Etazini. Dezaselman an nan 1798 la, ki te tipifye 1989, reprezante de temwen pou dezaselman mesaj Rèl Minwi a nan 2023. Liy la, avèk twa repè li yo—1798, 1989, ak 2023—idantifye travay entèn pirifikasyon dis vyèj yo ak liy ekstèn sizyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la.

The battle set forth in verse eleven which was fulfilled at the Battle of Raphia when Antiochus was defeated by Ptolemy, represents a defeat of the papal proxy power, who in this current battle is the Nazi’s of the Ukraine allied with the Western European globalist nations that make up the EU, NATO and are in lock step with the political and economic globalists of the United Nations. If Antiochus Magnus was at all three battles and represents the papal proxy power against the king of the south, how can it be the United States in 1989, then the Ukrainians as typified by the Battle of Raphia and then the United States again at the Battle of Panium? Verse ten is the key to verses eleven through fifteen for its fulfillment in 1989 provides an illustration of the prophetic characteristics of the first of the three proxy wars. What is the prophetic justification for identifying Antiochus as the papal proxy power, while not applying the United States to each of the three battles?

Gè a ki prezante nan vèsè onz la, ki te akonpli nan Batay Rafya a lè Antyòk te bat pa Ptolemey, reprezante yon defèt pouvwa pwoksi papal la, ki nan batay aktyèl sa a se Nazi Ikrèn yo, alye ak nasyon globalis Ewòp oksidantal yo ki fòme Inyon Ewopeyèn nan, Òganizasyon Trete Nò Atlantik la, epi ki mache nan menm kadans ak globalis politik ak ekonomik Nasyonzini yo. Si Antyòk Gran te nan tout twa batay yo epi li reprezante pouvwa pwoksi papal la kont wa sid la, kijan sa ta ka Etazini an 1989, apre sa Ikrenyen yo jan Batay Rafya a tipifye yo, epi answit Etazini ankò nan Batay Panyòm nan? Vèsè dis la se kle pou vèsè onz rive kenz yo, paske akonplisman li an 1989 bay yon ilistrasyon sou karakteristik pwofetik premye a nan twa lagè pwoksi yo. Ki jistifikasyon pwofetik ki genyen pou idantifye Antyòk kòm pouvwa pwoksi papal la, pandan yo pa aplike Etazini a chak nan twa batay yo?

In the history of the Ukrainian war, which has been typified by the battle of Raphia the United States employed the Nazi’s of the Ukraine as their proxy power in the very history where they are forming and image of the papacy, the power who always and only uses proxy powers to do her dirty work.

Nan istwa lagè Ikrèn nan, ki te prezante davans pa batay Rafya a, Etazini te sèvi ak Nazi Ikrèn yo kòm fòs pwokirasyon pa yo nan menm istwa a kote yo ap fòme yon imaj papalite a, pouvwa ki toujou e sèlman sèvi ak fòs pwokirasyon pou fè move zak pa li yo.

To answer the question of proxy powers in verses ten through fifteen involves a prophetic study of the characteristics of Antiochus as a symbol. The Diadochi Wars were a series of conflicts from 323–281 BC among the Diadochi (Greek for “successors”), the generals and successors of Alexander the Great, who fought for control of his vast empire after his death in 323 BC. The first Antiochus was Antiochus I Soter, the son of Seleucus I Nicator, one of Alexander’s Diadochi (successors), who founded the Seleucid Empire.

Pou reponn kestyon konsènan pisans pa pwokirasyon nan vèsè dis rive kenz yo, sa mande yon etid pwofetik sou karakteristik Antiochus kòm yon senbòl. Lagè Diadochi yo te yon seri konfli soti 323 rive 281 anvan Jezikri pami Diadochi yo (mo grèk ki vle di “siksesè yo”), jeneral ak siksesè Aleksann Legran yo, ki te goumen pou pran kontwòl gwo anpi pa li a apre lanmò li an 323 anvan Jezikri. Premye Antiochus la se te Antiochus I Soter, pitit gason Seleucus I Nicator, youn nan Diadochi Aleksann yo (siksesè yo), ki te fonde Anpi Seleusid la.

The name Antiochus can be understood to mean one who stands in place of, in order to support. Antiochus is a symbol of Rome, and papal Rome is the antichrist, which possesses a similar symbolism as does Antiochus. Antiochus as a name represented the son of the founder of the Seleucid Empire, and in that sense, Antiochus stood in the place of his father, he stood as his proxy. Sister White identifies both Satan and the pope as the antichrist, and states that the pope is Satan’s representative on earth. It became a prominent dynastic name in the Seleucid Empire, partly due to its association with Antiochus I Soter and the city of Antioch, named after either Seleucus I’s father or son. The pope is the proxy for Satan, and symbolically the name Antiochus represents a proxy for his father, the founder of the northern kingdom who located its capital in Babylon.

Non Antiochus la ka konprann kòm youn ki kanpe nan plas yon lòt, pou soutni li. Antiochus se yon senbòl Wòm, epi Wòm papal la se antikris la, ki pote yon senbòl ki sanble ak sa Antiochus genyen an. Antiochus, kòm yon non, te reprezante pitit gason fondatè Anpi Selesid la, e nan sans sa a, Antiochus te kanpe nan plas papa li; li te kanpe kòm reprezantan li. Sè White idantifye ni Satan ni pap la kòm antikris la, epi li deklare ke pap la se reprezantan Satan sou tè a. Non sa a te vin tounen yon non dinastik enpòtan nan Anpi Selesid la, an pati akoz asosyasyon li avèk Antiochus I Soter ak vil Antiòch, yo te bay non sa a swa dapre papa Seleucus I la, swa dapre pitit gason li. Pap la se reprezantan Satan, epi, sou plan senbolik, non Antiochus la reprezante yon reprezantan pou papa li, fondatè wayòm nò a ki te tabli kapital li nan Babilòn.

After Alexander the Great’s death in 323 BC, his empire fragmented among the Diadochi (successors). In the Partition of Babylon (323 BC), Seleucus was initially appointed as the commander of the Companion cavalry (a prestigious military post) under Perdiccas, the regent of Alexander’s empire. By 321 BC, Seleucus was appointed satrap (governor) of Babylonia during the Partition of Triparadisus, following Perdiccas’ death and further negotiations among the Diadochi. In 316 BC, Antigonus I Monophthalmus, another Diadoch, forced Seleucus to flee Babylon due to Antigonus’ growing power. Seleucus sought refuge with Ptolemy I Soter in Egypt. In 312 BC, Seleucus returned to Babylon with a small force provided by Ptolemy. He defeated Antigonus’ forces and retook Babylon, marking the establishment of his power base. This event is often considered the founding of the Seleucid Empire, with 312 BC as the start of the Seleucid Era in historical reckoning.

Apre lanmò Aleksann Legran an an 323 anvan Jezikri, anpi li a te kraze epi li te vin separe pami Dyadòk yo (siksesè yo). Nan Patisyon Babilòn nan (323 anvan Jezikri), okòmansman yo te nonmen Seleikos kòm kòmandan kavaliye Konpayon yo (yon pòs militè prestijye) anba Pèrdikas, rejàn anpi Aleksann lan. Rive an 321 anvan Jezikri, yo te nonmen Seleikos satrap (gouvènè) Babiloni pandan Patisyon Triparadisos la, apre lanmò Pèrdikas ak lòt negosyasyon ki te fèt pami Dyadòk yo. An 316 anvan Jezikri, Antigòn I Monoftalmos, yon lòt Dyadòk, te fòse Seleikos kouri kite Babilòn akoz pouvwa Antigòn t ap ogmante. Seleikos te chèche refij bò kote Ptoleme I Sotè nan Ejip. An 312 anvan Jezikri, Seleikos te retounen Babilòn ak yon ti fòs Ptoleme te ba li. Li te bat fòs Antigòn yo epi li te reprann Babilòn, sa ki te make etablisman baz pouvwa pa li a. Yo souvan konsidere evènman sa a kòm fondasyon Anpi Seleusid la, avèk 312 anvan Jezikri kòm kòmansman Epòk Seleusid la nan kalkil istorik.

The name Seluecus is derived from Greek and comes from the root selas (σέλας), meaning “light,” “radiance,” or “flame.” The name suggests brilliance or illumination, fitting for a prominent figure like Seleucus I Nicator, the founder of the Seleucid Empire and who typifies the father who had been the light bearer in heaven.

Non Seluecus la sòti nan lang grèk e li soti nan rasin selas (σέλας), ki vle di “limyè,” “ekla,” oswa “flanm.” Non an sijere briyans oswa liminasyon, sa ki byen koresponn ak yon pèsonaj enpòtan tankou Seleucus I Nicator, fondatè Anpi Seleusid la, e ki se tip papa a ki te potè limyè nan syèl la.

“To secure worldly gains and honors, the church was led to seek the favor and support of the great men of earth; and having thus rejected Christ, she was induced to yield allegiance to the representative of Satan—the bishop of Rome.” The Great Controversy, 50.

“Pou jwenn avantaj ak onè mond sa a, legliz la te vin chèche favè ak sipò gran moun latè yo; epi konsa, lè li te rejte Kris, yo te pouse li rann fidelite bay reprezantan Satan an—evèk Wòm nan.” The Great Controversy, 50.

Antiochus Magnus represents the proxy of papal power, as the pope represents the proxy of Satan. The symbolism of Antiochus allows for differing proxy powers, just as there have been many popes. Reagan was the proxy of 1989, the Ukraine became the proxy of the United States in 2014 and Trump is the proxy at the Battle of Panium. Reagan was the first, Trump is the last and Zelenskyy is the rebellion in the middle.

Antiochus Magnus reprezante pwokirè pouvwa papal la, menm jan pap la reprezante pwokirè Satan. Senbolis Antiochus la pèmèt egziste divès pouvwa pa pwokirasyon, menm jan te gen anpil pap. Reagan te pwokirè ane 1989 la, Ikrèn te vin pwokirè Etazini an an 2014, epi Trump se pwokirè a nan Batay Panium nan. Reagan te premye a, Trump se dènye a, epi Zelenskyy se rebelyon ki nan mitan an.