The subject of the sanctuary was the “key” that unlocked the disappointment of October 22, 1844 at the beginning of the third angel’s message, and it is the subject of the disappointment that is the “key” to unlock the sanctuary message of the temple test at the end of the third angel.

Sijè sanktyè a te “kle” ki te louvri konpreyansyon sou desepsyon 22 oktòb 1844 la nan kòmansman mesaj twazyèm zanj lan, e se sijè desepsyon an ki se “kle” pou louvri mesaj sanktyè tès tanp lan nan fen twazyèm zanj lan.

And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. Matthew 16:19.

E m ap ba ou kle wayòm syèl la; e tou sa ou va mare sou latè a va mare nan syèl la; e tou sa ou va demare sou latè a va demare nan syèl la. Matye 16:19.

The fact that September 11, 2001 is understood as “9/11” in agreement with “911” being the symbol of an emergency call in the United States, was designed by the One who designed all things. Understanding the disappointment of July 18, 2020 is what allows the movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand to be recognized as such; but only by those who wish to see that Jesus represents the spiritual with the natural today no differently than He did two thousand years ago. “20/20” vision is the best you can have, and the disappointment of 2020 is the waymark that allows the temple to be recognized in the prophetic history of the ten virgins.

Lefètke yo konprann 11 septanm 2001 kòm “9/11”, ann amoni ak lefètke “911” se senbòl yon apèl ijans Ozetazini, se Sila a ki te ranje tout bagay ki te planifye sa. Konprann desepsyon 18 jiyè 2020 la se sa ki pèmèt yo rekonèt mouvman san karannkat mil yo kòm sa li ye a; men se sèlman pa moun ki vle wè ke Jezi reprezante espirityèl la pa natirèl la jodi a pa okenn lòt jan pase jan Li te fè sa de mil ane de sa. Vizyon “20/20” se pi bon vizyon ou ka genyen, epi desepsyon 2020 la se repè a ki pèmèt yo rekonèt tanp lan nan istwa pwofetik dis vyèj yo.

“The parable of the ten virgins of Matthew 25 also illustrates the experience of the Adventist people.The Great Controversy, 393.

« Parabòl dis vyèj yo nan Matye 25 la montre tou eksperyans pèp Advantis la. » The Great Controversy, 393.

Twenty 20 vision is even better when combined with the hindsight represented by the foundational truths. Paul teaches that “the spirits of the prophets are subject to the spirits of the prophets,” and Matthew’s virgins are therefore the same virgins that John identifies as the one hundred and forty-four thousand, and John identifies them as virgins in—Revelation 144.

Vizyon ven/20 la pi bon toujou lè li mete ansanm ak gade dèyè verite fondamantal yo reprezante. Pòl anseye ke “lespri pwofèt yo soumèt devan lespri pwofèt yo,” kidonk vyèj Matye yo se menm vyèj Jan idantifye kòm san karant-kat mil yo, epi Jan idantifye yo kòm vyèj nan—Revelation 144.

These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb. Revelation 14:4.

Se yo menm ki pa t sal ak fanm; paske yo se vyèj. Se yo menm ki swiv Ti Mouton an nenpòt kote li ale. Se yo menm ki te rachte pami lèzòm, kòm premye fwi pou Bondye ak pou Ti Mouton an. Revelasyon 14:4.

The first fruits of the fall season are the virgins who follow the Lamb into the temple, and the “key” to understanding the temple is the disappointment of 2020.

Premye fwi sezon otòn nan se vyèj yo ki suiv Ti Mouton an antre nan tanp lan, epi “kle” pou konprann tanp lan se desepsyon ane 2020 la.

And the key of the house of David will I lay upon his shoulder; so he shall open, and none shall shut; and he shall shut, and none shall open. Isaiah 22:22.

M’ap mete kle kay kay David la sou zepòl li; konsa l’a louvri, e pesonn p’ap fèmen; epi l’a fèmen, e pesonn p’ap louvri. Ezayi 22:22.

If an Adventist is to be among the 144,000, they will of prophetic necessity have suffered a disappointment that was caused by the presentation of a public prediction that failed.

Si yon Advantis dwe pami 144,000 yo, selon nesesite pwofetik, li pral te sibi yon desepsyon ki te koze pa prezantasyon yon prediksyon piblik ki pa t akonpli.

“I am often referred to the parable of the ten virgins, five of whom were wise, and five foolish. This parable has been and will be fulfilled to the very letter, for it has a special application to this time, and, like the third angel’s message, has been fulfilled and will continue to be present truth till the close of time.” Review and Herald, August 19, 1890.

“Yo souvan voye m al gade parabòl dis vyèj yo, senk ladan yo te saj, e senk te sòt. Parabòl sa a te akonpli e li pral akonpli jis nan pi piti detay li, paske li gen yon aplikasyon espesyal pou tan sa a, e, menm jan ak mesaj twazyèm zanj lan, li te akonpli epi l ap kontinye rete verite prezan jouk nan fen tan an.” Review and Herald, 19 out 1890.

The battle of Panium in verse fifteen of Daniel eleven is the battle that leads to verse sixteen, which identifies the Sunday law in the United States.

Batay Panium nan vèsè kenz nan Danyèl onz lan se batay ki mennen nan vèsè sèz, ki idantifye lwa dimanch lan Ozetazini.

So the king of the north shall come, and cast up a mount, and take the most fenced cities: and the arms of the south shall not withstand, neither his chosen people, neither shall there be any strength to withstand. Daniel 11:15.

Se konsa wa nò a pral vini, li pral leve yon ranpa, epi li pral pran vil ki pi byen fòtifye yo; e fòs wa sid la pa pral kapab kenbe tèt, ni pèp li te chwazi a non, ni p ap gen okenn fòs pou kenbe tèt. Danyèl 11:15.

In this verse the United States defeats Russia, along with Russia’s chosen people. But in the next verse. No one can stand against the rise of Rome, which marks Judah and Jerusalem as the first step in its conquest of the world; as Rome rose up as the fourth kingdom of Bible prophecy. By standing in the literal glorious land in verse sixteen, the symbol of literal Rome’s authority was within the literal glorious land; thus, typifying verse forty-one, when the mark of spiritual Rome’s authority is enforced upon the spiritual glorious land of the United States.

Nan vèsè sa a Etazini bat Larisi, ansanm ak pèp Larisi te chwazi a. Men nan vèsè ki vin apre a, pèsonn pa ka kanpe devan monte Wòm nan, ki make Jida ak Jerizalèm kòm premye pa nan konkèt li sou mond lan; menm jan Wòm te leve kòm katriyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la. Lè li te kanpe nan peyi bèl pouvwa literal la nan vèsè sèz, senbòl otorite Wòm literal la te anndan peyi bèl pouvwa literal la; konsa, sa t ap prefigire vèsè karantyèn, lè mak otorite Wòm espirityèl la ap enpoze sou peyi bèl pouvwa espirityèl Etazini an.

The two horns of the earth-beast of Revelation thirteen represent Republicanism and Protestantism. In verse fifteen of Daniel eleven Antiochus Magnus, known as Antiochus III and Antiochus the Great defeats the southern kingdom, represented by the Ptolemaic dynasty. Antiochus represents Donald Trump and the southern king represents Russia. The battle of Panium is the battle between the United States and Russia and Russia’s chosen people, a battle which Antiochus prevailed, but thereafter saw his kingdom conquered by literal Rome—the power of verse fourteen, that establishes the external vision of the Republican horn of the earth beast. The internal vision is represented by the Protestant horn of the earth beast. Both horns are at the battle of Panium, for Peter is there as a Protestant with his message from the book of Joel.

De kòn de bèt ki sòti sou tè a nan Revelasyon trèz la reprezante Repiblikanis ak Pwotestantis. Nan vèsè kenz nan Danyèl onz la, Antyòkis Magnus, yo rele tou Antyòkis III ak Antyòkis Gran an, bat wayòm sid la, ki reprezante pa dinasti Ptolemeyen an. Antyòkis reprezante Donald Trump, epi wa sid la reprezante Larisi. Batay Panyòm nan se batay ant Etazini ak Larisi ansanm ak pèp Larisi te chwazi a, yon batay Antyòkis te ranpòte, men apre sa li te wè wayòm li a konkeri pa Wòm literal la—pisans vèsè katòz la, ki tabli vizyon ekstèn kòn repibliken bèt ki sòti sou tè a. Vizyon entèn nan reprezante pa kòn pwotestan bèt ki sòti sou tè a. Toude kòn yo prezan nan batay Panyòm nan, paske Pyè la kòm yon Pwotestan avèk mesaj li soti nan liv Jowèl la.

250 Years

250 Ane

When we consider the two lines of the earth beast, we find that in 1776 the earth beast began its rise, and by 1798, (twenty-two years later) the sea beast of Revelation thirteen received its deadly wound, and the earth beast began its rule as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Two hundred and fifty years later, in 2026 we have awakened to the internal temple test that began May 8, 2025.

Lè nou konsidere de liy bèt ki soti sou tè a, nou jwenn ke an 1776 bèt ki soti sou tè a te kòmanse leve, epi an 1798, (vennde zan apre) bèt ki soti nan lanmè a nan Revelasyon trèz la te resevwa blesi mòtèl li a, epi bèt ki soti sou tè a te kòmanse gouvène kòm sizyèm wayòm pwofesi biblik la. De san senkant ane apre, an 2026, nou reveye devan eprèv tanp entèn lan ki te kòmanse 8 me 2025.

Those “250” years are also connected with Antiochus Magnus. Beginning with the decree in 457 BC and projecting from that decree two hundred and fifty years we arrive at 207, seven years before the battle of Panium, and ten years after Ptolemy defeated Antiochus at the battle of Raphia, which is represented in verse eleven of Daniel eleven. Daniel 11:11 is of course the external line of the Republican horn that aligns with Revelation 11:11, which is the internal line of the Protestant horn. Daniel and the Revelation are the same book, and Revelation employs the seals as symbols of external prophecy and the churches as symbols of the parallel internal prophecy.

250 ane sa yo gen rapò tou ak Antiochus Magnus. Kòmanse avèk dekrè a an 457 av. J.-K., epi lè nou pwolonje soti nan dekrè sa a de san senkant ane, nou rive nan 207, sèt ane anvan batay Panium lan, epi dis ane apre Ptolome te bat Antiochus nan batay Raphia a, ki reprezante nan vèsè onz nan Daniel onz. Daniel 11:11 se, natirèlman, liy ekstèn kòn Repibliken an ki aliyen ak Revelation 11:11, ki se liy entèn kòn Pwotestan an. Daniel ak Revelation se menm liv la, epi Revelation sèvi ak sele yo kòm senbòl pwofesi ekstèn nan ak legliz yo kòm senbòl pwofesi entèn paralèl la.

Cyrus represents all three decrees, for you cannot have a third without a first and a second.

Siris reprezante tout twa dekrè yo, paske ou pa ka gen yon twazyèm san yon premye ak yon dezyèm.

“In the seventh chapter of Ezra the decree is found. Verses 12–26. In its completest form it was issued by Artaxerxes, king of Persia, 457 BC. But in Ezra 6:14 the house of the Lord at Jerusalem is said to have been built ‘according to the commandment [“decree,” margin] of Cyrus, and Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia.’ These three kings, in originating, reaffirming, and completing the decree, brought it to the perfection required by the prophecy to mark the beginning of the 2300 years. Taking 457 BC, the time when the decree was completed, as the date of the commandment, every specification of the prophecy concerning the seventy weeks was seen to have been fulfilled.” The Great Controversy, 326.

“Nan setyèm chapit Ezra a, dekrè a jwenn. Vèsè 12–26. Nan fòm ki pi konplè li, se Atakzès, wa Pès la, ki te pibliye li an 457 anvan Jezikri. Men, nan Ezra 6:14, yo di kay Senyè a nan Jerizalèm te bati ‘dapre kòmandman [“dekrè,” nan maj la] Siris, Dariyis, ak Atakzès, wa Pès la.’ Twa wa sa yo, nan inisye, konfime ankò, epi konplete dekrè a, te mennen li nan pèfeksyon pwofesi a te egzije pou make kòmansman 2300 ane yo. Lè yo pran 457 anvan Jezikri, tan kote dekrè a te konplete a, kòm dat kòmandman an, yo te wè chak presizyon pwofesi a konsènan swasanndis semèn yo te akonpli.” The Great Controversy, 326.

From the three decrees that are represented by Cyrus in 457 BC, “250” years concludes in the history between the battle of Raphia in 217 BC, when Ptolemy IV defeated Antiochus the Great and 200 BC when Antiochus then defeated Ptolemy at the battle of Panium in verse fifteen. The line aligns Antiochus Magnus with Donald Trump. At the beginning of the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy in 1776 unto 1798 there is a period of “22” years that represent the rise of the sixth kingdom. Those “22” years also illustrate the history represented by the number “22” at the end of the history of the sixth kingdom from 2001 unto 2023. “22” is the symbol of the combination of Divinity with humanity which is accomplished within the history of the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, who is the earth beast with an external horn of Republicanism and an internal horn of Protestantism.

Soti nan twa dekrè Siriyis yo reprezante an 457 anvan Jezikri, “250” ane fini nan listwa ki ant batay Rafya an 217 anvan Jezikri, lè Ptolemey IV te bat Antiòk Gran an, ak 200 anvan Jezikri, lè Antiòk te bat Ptolemey nan batay Panyòm nan vèsè kenz. Liy lan aliyen Antiòk Magnus ak Donald Trump. Nan kòmansman sizyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la, soti 1776 rive 1798, gen yon peryòd “22” ane ki reprezante monte sizyèm wayòm nan. “22” ane sa yo tou ilistre listwa nimewo “22” a reprezante nan fen listwa sizyèm wayòm nan, soti 2001 rive 2023. “22” se senbòl konbinezon Divinite ak limanite, ki reyalize nan listwa sizyèm wayòm pwofesi Bib la, ki se bèt tè a avèk yon kòn ekstèn Repiblikenis ak yon kòn entèn Pwotestantis.

The work Christ accomplishes with the union represented by “22” is the final work of Christ in the Most Holy Place, that is represented by the blotting out of sin, which according to Joel accompanied with Peter’s inspired commentary takes place during the outpouring of the latter rain.

Travay Kris la akonpli pa mwayen inyon “22” a reprezante se dènye travay Kris la nan Sentespri ki Pi Sen an, sa ki reprezante pa efasman peche a; dapre Joèl, ansanm ak kòmantè enspire Pyè a, sa fèt pandan vide lapli dèyè a.

Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord. Acts 3:19.

Se poutèt sa, repanti nou, epi tounen vin jwenn Bondye, pou peche nou yo ka efase, lè tan rafrechisman yo va soti nan prezans Senyè a. Travay 3:19.

The blotting out of sin is the last work of the heavenly High Priest.

Efase peche a se dènye travay Gran Prèt selès la.

“As anciently the sins of the people were by faith placed upon the sin offering and through its blood transferred, in figure, to the earthly sanctuary, so in the new covenant the sins of the repentant are by faith placed upon Christ and transferred, in fact, to the heavenly sanctuary. And as the typical cleansing of the earthly was accomplished by the removal of the sins by which it had been polluted, so the actual cleansing of the heavenly is to be accomplished by the removal, or blotting out, of the sins which are there recorded. But before this can be accomplished, there must be an examination of the books of record to determine who, through repentance of sin and faith in Christ, are entitled to the benefits of His atonement. The cleansing of the sanctuary therefore involves a work of investigation—a work of judgment. This work must be performed prior to the coming of Christ to redeem His people; for when He comes, His reward is with Him to give to every man according to his works. Revelation 22:12.” The Great Controversy, 421.

“Menm jan nan tan lontan peche pèp la te, pa lafwa, mete sou ofrann pou peche a epi, atravè san li, transfere an senbòl nan tanp sou tè a, konsa tou nan nouvo alyans lan peche moun ki repanti yo, pa lafwa, mete sou Kris epi transfere an reyalite nan tanp ki nan syèl la. E menm jan netwayaj senbolik tanp sou tè a te akonpli pa retire peche ki te sal li yo, konsa tou netwayaj reyèl tanp ki nan syèl la dwe akonpli pa retire, oubyen efase, peche ki anrejistre la yo. Men, anvan sa kapab akonpli, fòk gen yon egzamen liv rejis yo pou detèmine kiyès ki, grasa repantans pou peche ak lafwa nan Kris, gen dwa pou benefis ekspyasyon Li a. Se poutèt sa, netwayaj tanp lan enplike yon travay ankèt—yon travay jijman. Travay sa a dwe fèt anvan Kris vini pou delivre pèp Li a; paske lè Li vini, rekonpans Li avèk Li pou Li bay chak moun selon zèv li yo. Revelasyon 22:12.” The Great Controversy, 421.

The work that began on October 22, 1844, began at the climax of the Midnight Cry and the work is finished at the climax of the Midnight Cry, which Peter identifies as the period of the blotting out sin, which marks the period of the judgment of the living, when the “times of refreshing” arrives.

Travay ki te kòmanse 22 oktòb 1844 la, te kòmanse nan pwen culminan Kri Minwi a; epi travay la fini nan pwen culminan Kri Minwi a, peryòd Pyè idantifye kòm tan efasman peche a, ki make peryòd jijman moun vivan yo, lè “tan rafrechisman yo” rive.

“The work of the investigative judgment and the blotting out of sins is to be accomplished before the second advent of the Lord. Since the dead are to be judged out of the things written in the books, it is impossible that the sins of men should be blotted out until after the judgment at which their cases are to be investigated. But the apostle Peter distinctly states that the sins of believers will be blotted out ‘when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; and He shall send Jesus Christ.’ Acts 3:19, 20. When the investigative judgment closes, Christ will come, and His reward will be with Him to give to every man as his work shall be.” The Great Controversy, 485.

“Travay jijman ankèt la ak efasman peche yo dwe akonpli anvan dezyèm avènman Seyè a. Piske yo gen pou jije mò yo dapre bagay ki ekri nan liv yo, li enposib pou peche lèzòm yo efase anvan jijman an fini, jijman kote ka pa yo dwe egzamine. Men apot Pyè deklare klèman ke peche kwayan yo pral efase ‘lè tan rafrechisman yo va soti nan prezans Seyè a; epi Li va voye Jezikri.’ Travay 3:19, 20. Lè jijman ankèt la fini, Kris la ap vini, epi rekonpans li ap avèk li pou l bay chak moun dapre zèv li.” The Great Controversy, 485.

The “times of refreshing” are also the “times of the restitution of all things.”

“Tan rafrechisman yo” se tou “tan retablisman tout bagay yo.”

Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you: Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began. Acts 3:19–21.

Se poutèt sa, repanti nou, epi konvèti nou, pou peche nou yo ka efase, lè tan rafrechisman yo va soti nan prezans Senyè a; epi li va voye Jezikri, sila a ki te deja anonse nou an: li menm syèl la dwe resevwa jouk nan tan retablisman tout bagay yo, bagay Bondye te pale pa bouch tout pwofèt sen li yo depi kòmansman mond lan. Travay 3:19–21.

The “times of refreshing” comes “from the presence of the Lord” that occurs when “Jesus Christ” is sent. When the angel of Revelation ten descended on August 11, 1840, Sister White identified that the angel “was no less a personage than Jesus Christ.” The work Christ began on October 22, 1844 was ushered in by the history of 1840 to 1844; a history which Sister White says was “a glorious manifestation of the power of God,” while aligning that very history with the Pentecostal season in the time of Peter, and then using those two lines of prophetic history to point forward to the descent of the angel of Revelation eighteen who lightens the earth with His glory.

“Tan rafrechisman” an vini “soti nan prezans Senyè a” lè yo voye “Jezikri.” Lè zanj Revelasyon dis la te desann nan dat 11 dawout 1840, Sè White te idantifye zanj lan kòm “pa t yon moun pèsonaj ki mwens pase Jezikri menm.” Travay Kris la te kòmanse 22 oktòb 1844 la te antre sou sèn nan atravè istwa 1840 rive 1844 la; yon istwa Sè White di ki te “yon manifestasyon gloriyeu pouvwa Bondye a,” pandan li mete menm istwa sa a ann amoni ak sezon Pannkot la nan tan Pyè, epi answit li sèvi ak de liy istwa pwofetik sa yo pou lonje dwèt pi devan sou desandan zanj Revelasyon dizwit la ki klere tè a avèk glwa Li.

“The angel who unites in the proclamation of the third angel’s message is to lighten the whole earth with his glory. A work of world-wide extent and unwonted power is here foretold. The advent movement of 1840–44 was a glorious manifestation of the power of God; the first angel’s message was carried to every missionary station in the world, and in some countries there was the greatest religious interest which has been witnessed in any land since the Reformation of the sixteenth century; but these are to be exceeded by the mighty movement under the last warning of the third angel.

“Zanj ki ini akonpaye pwoklamasyon mesaj twazyèm zanj lan dwe klere tout tè a ak glwa li. La a, yo anonse davans yon travay ki gen yon dimansyon mondyal ak yon pisans ki pa t janm abitye. Mouvman advantis 1840–44 la te yon manifestasyon gloriyeu pisans Bondye; mesaj premye zanj lan te pote rive nan chak pòs misyonè nan mond lan, e nan kèk peyi te gen pi gwo enterè relijye yo te janm temwen nan okenn peyi depi Refòm sèzyèm syèk la; men tout sa yo dwe depase pa mouvman pisan an anba dènye avètisman twazyèm zanj lan.

The work will be similar to that of the Day of Pentecost. As the ‘former rain’ was given, in the outpouring of the Holy Spirit at the opening of the gospel, to cause the upspringing of the precious seed, so the ‘latter rain’ will be given at its close for the ripening of the harvest. ‘Then shall we know, if we follow on to know the Lord: His going forth is prepared as the morning; and He shall come unto us as the rain, as the latter and former rain unto the earth.’ Hosea 6:3. ‘Be glad then, ye children of Zion, and rejoice in the Lord your God: for He hath given you the former rain moderately, and He will cause to come down for you the rain, the former rain, and the latter rain.’ Joel 2:23. ‘In the last days, saith God, I will pour out of My Spirit upon all flesh.’ ‘And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.’ Acts 2:17, 21.

“Travay la pral sanble ak sa ki te fèt nan Jou Pannkòt la. Menm jan yo te bay ‘premye lapli a’, nan efizyon Sentespri a nan kòmansman levanjil la, pou fè semans presye a pouse, konsa y ap bay ‘dènye lapli a’ nan fen li pou fè rekòt la mi. ‘Lè sa a, n ap konnen, si nou pèsevere pou nou konnen Seyè a: sòti Li prepare tankou maten an; epi Li va vin jwenn nou tankou lapli, tankou dènye ak premye lapli sou tè a.’ Oze 6:3. ‘Se poutèt sa, fè kè nou kontan, nou menm pitit Siyon yo, epi rejwi nou nan Seyè a, Bondye nou an: paske Li ban nou premye lapli a avèk mezi, epi Li pral fè lapli a desann pou nou, premye lapli a ak dènye lapli a.’ Jowèl 2:23. ‘Nan dènye jou yo, Bondye di, M ap vide nan Lespri Mwen sou tout chè.’ ‘Epi sa va rive, nenpòt moun ki va rele non Seyè a va sove.’ Travay 2:17, 21.”

“The great work of the gospel is not to close with less manifestation of the power of God than marked its opening. The prophecies which were fulfilled in the outpouring of the former rain at the opening of the gospel are again to be fulfilled in the latter rain at its close. Here are ‘the times of refreshing’ to which the apostle Peter looked forward when he said: ‘Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; and He shall send Jesus.’ Acts 3:19, 20.” The Great Controversy, 611.

“Gran travay levanjil la pa dwe fini ak mwens manifestasyon pouvwa Bondye pase sa ki te make kòmansman li. Pwofesi ki te akonpli nan vide ansyen lapli a nan kòmansman levanjil la dwe ankò akonpli nan dènye lapli a lè l ap fini. Men ‘tan refrijerasyon’ apot Pyè t ap tann yo, lè li te di: ‘Se poutèt sa, repanti nou, epi konvèti nou, pou peche nou yo ka efase, lè tan refrijerasyon yo va soti nan prezans Senyè a; epi Li va voye Jezi.’ Travay 3:19, 20.” The Great Controversy, 611.

The Advent movement of 1840 to 1844 was a glorious manifestation of the power of God that ushered in the opening of the work of Christ in cleansing His sanctuary. That history began when Jesus, represented as the first angel of Revelation fourteen, descended on August 11, 1840 as represented in chapter ten of Revelation. The manifestation of the power of God that then began escalated to the opening of the investigative judgment, and therefore typified a manifestation of the power of God which would escalate to the close of the investigative judgment. The period at the end began at 9/11, when Jesus again descended as the angel of Revelation eighteen when the great buildings of New York were brought down by the touch of God, and the work of the investigative judgment changed from the dead, unto the living. The rains arrive when Jesus is sent.

Mouvman Advantis la soti 1840 rive 1844 te yon manifestasyon gloriye pouvwa Bondye ki te fè antre ouvèti travay Kris la nan netwaye Tanp li a. Istwa sa a te kòmanse lè Jezi, ki te reprezante kòm premye zanj Revelasyon katòz la, te desann 11 dawout 1840, jan sa reprezante nan chapit dis nan Revelasyon an. Manifestasyon pouvwa Bondye ki te kòmanse lè sa a te vin ogmante jouk nan ouvèti jijman ankèt la, e poutèt sa li te sèvi kòm tip yon manifestasyon pouvwa Bondye ki t ap ogmante jouk nan fèmti jijman ankèt la. Peryòd ki nan fen an te kòmanse nan 11/9, lè Jezi te desann ankò kòm zanj Revelasyon dizwit la, lè gwo bilding Nouyòk yo te fè tonbe pa manyen Bondye, epi travay jijman ankèt la te chanje soti nan mò yo pou rive sou vivan yo. Lapli yo rive lè yo voye Jezi.

Jesus taught that we are to ask in order to receive, and Zechariah says we are to ask for the latter rain, in the time of the latter rain. It is therefore evident you must know that you are in the time of the latter rain, in order to fulfill Zechariah’s direction.

Jezi te anseye nou pou nou mande afin nou resevwa, e Zakari di nou pou nou mande lapli dèyè sezon, nan tan lapli dèyè sezon an. Se poutèt sa, li klè ou dwe konnen ke ou nan tan lapli dèyè sezon an, pou ou ka akonpli enstriksyon Zakari a.

Ask ye of the Lord rain in the time of the latter rain; so the Lord shall make bright clouds, and give them showers of rain, to every one grass in the field. Zechariah 10:1.

Mande Senyè a lapli nan tan lapli ta a; konsa Senyè a va fè nyaj klere, e li va bay yo gwo lapli, pou chak moun zèb nan jaden an. Zakari 10:1.

At 9/11 Jesus descended as the angel of Revelation eighteen and the latter rain began to sprinkle, but it only falls on those who meet Zechariah’s command to “ask for the latter rain,” when you have the genuine understanding that “the times of refreshing” and restoration of all things has arrived. The soul must “recognize” that the prophetic period of the latter rain has arrived.

Nan 9/11, Jezi te desann kòm zanj Revelasyon dizwit la, epi lapli tayè a te kòmanse vide an ti gout; men li tonbe sèlman sou moun ki satisfè kòmandman Zakari a pou yo “mande lapli tayè a,” lè ou gen konpreyansyon otantik ke “tan rafrechisman yo” ak retablisman tout bagay yo rive. Nanm nan dwe “rekonèt” ke peryòd pwofetik lapli tayè a rive.

“We must not wait for the latter rain. It is coming upon all who will recognize and appropriate the dew and showers of grace that fall upon us. When we gather up the fragments of light, when we appreciate the sure mercies of God, who loves to have us trust Him, then every promise will be fulfilled. [Isaiah 61:11 quoted.] The whole earth is to be filled with the glory of God.” The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, volume 7, 984.

“Nou pa dwe tann dènye lapli a. L ap vini sou tout moun ki va rekonèt epi resevwa lawouze ak gwo lapli gras yo k ap tonbe sou nou. Lè nou ranmase moso limyè yo, lè nou apresye mizèrikòd sèten Bondye yo, li menm ki renmen wè nou mete konfyans nou nan Li, lè sa a chak pwomès pral akonpli. [Ezayi 61:11 site.] Tout tè a dwe ranpli ak laglwa Bondye.” The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, volim 7, 984.

At 9/11 the times of refreshing began, and the blotting out of the sins of the living began. That judgment is aligned with the very first tenant of the three-step covenant of Abraham. That first tenant was that when the Lord brought Israel out of Egyptian bondage He would judge both His covenant people, and the nation where they had been living as pilgrims and strangers. The first covenant people typified the last covenant people who are the one hundred and forty-four thousand. Those prophetic people will be judged as the Protestant horn of the earth beast, while the Republican horn of the earth beast is simultaneously judged.

Nan dat 11 Septanm lan, tan rafrechisman yo te kòmanse, epi efasman peche moun vivan yo te kòmanse. Jijman sa a aliyen avèk premye prensip menm nan alyans Abraram nan ki fèt an twa etap. Premye prensip sa a se te ke, lè Senyè a te fè Izrayèl soti anba esklavaj peyi Lejip, Li t ap jije ni pèp alyans Li a, ni nasyon kote yo te rete kòm pèlren ak etranje. Premye pèp alyans lan te yon tip ki te reprezante dènye pèp alyans lan, ki se san karantkat mil la. Pèp pwofetik sa yo pral jije kòm kòn pwotestan bèt ki soti sou tè a, pandan kòn repibliken bèt ki soti sou tè a ap jije anmenmtan.

The judgment of the Republican horn comes at the end of its history, which is the Sunday law. The Sunday law is represented in verse sixteen’s fulfillment of Rome taking control of Judah in 63 BC—on the Day of Atonement according to some historians.

Jijman kòn Repibliken an vini nan fen istwa li, ki se lwa dimanch lan. Lwa dimanch lan reprezante nan akonplisman vèsè sèz la, kote Wòm te pran kontwòl Jida an 63 anvan Kris—nan Jou Ekspyasyon an, dapre kèk istoryen.

Antiochus Magnus, represents the United States in verses ten through fifteen. Ronald Reagan prevailed in the battle of verse ten, that typified verse forty’s collapse of the Soviet Union. Isaiah 8:8 identifies the same battle represented in verses ten and forty of Daniel eleven, and those three parallel verses allow Russia to be identified as the victor in verse eleven’s battle of Raphia.

Antiòkis Magnus reprezante Etazini nan vèsè dis rive kenz yo. Ronald Reagan te genyen batay vèsè dis la, ki te prefigire efondreman Inyon Sovyetik la nan vèsè karant lan. Ezayi 8:8 idantifye menm batay ki reprezante nan vèsè dis ak karant nan Danyèl onz la, e twa vèsè paralèl sa yo pèmèt Larisi idantifye kòm gayan nan batay Rafya ki nan vèsè onz la.

The battle of Raphia in verse eleven prefigured the war in Ukraine between the king of the south (Russia) and the papacy’s proxy power (the Ukraine). The war was initiated by the Obama Administration in the time of the first pope from the southern hemisphere, who was also the first pope from the America’s, though it was south America. “South” is a symbol of globalism, spiritualism and communism, and the first southern pope from the America’s aligned with the globalist president Obama, when the war of verse eleven arrived. Reagan as the United States in verse ten entered into a secret alliance with a conservative pope; then the Nazi’s of Ukraine were employed by a globalist president in a period of a globalist pope. The United States under Trump, is now in an open relationship with the first north American, and so-called conservative pope.

Batay Rafya a nan vèsè onz la te prefigire lagè ann Ikrèn ant wa sid la (Larisi) ak pouvwa pwokirasyon papote a (Ikrèn). Administrasyon Obama a te inisye lagè sa a nan epòk premye pap ki soti nan emisfè sid la, ki te tou premye pap ki soti nan Amerik yo, byenke se te Amerik di Sid. “Sid” se yon senbòl mondyalis, espirityalis ak kominis, e premye pap sid la ki soti nan Amerik yo te aliyen ak prezidan mondyalis Obama, lè lagè vèsè onz la te rive. Reagan, kòm Etazini nan vèsè dis la, te antre nan yon alyans sekrè ak yon pap konsèvatè; ansuit, Nazi Ikrèn yo te itilize pa yon prezidan mondyalis pandan yon peryòd yon pap mondyalis. Etazini anba Trump kounye a nan yon relasyon ouvè ak premye pap nò-ameriken an, ansanm ak sa yo rele pap konsèvatè a.

Reagan had a secret alliance with the antichrist of Bible prophecy in the battle of verse ten, and Obama initiated the battle of verse eleven, in a period when the pope was also a globalist, like unto Obama. Trump is now in an open relationship with a parallel pope to Reagan, with the exception that the initial secret alliance, is now an open alliance. The three popes, and the three presidents, align with the three battles of verses ten, eleven and fifteen.

Reagan te gen yon alyans sekrè ak antikris pwofesi biblik la nan lagè vèsè dis la, epi Obama te inisye lagè vèsè onz la, nan yon peryòd kote pap la te tou yon globalis, menm jan ak Obama. Kounye a, Trump nan yon relasyon ouvè ak yon pap paralèl ak Reagan, ak eksepsyon ke alyans sekrè inisyal la vin tounen kounye a yon alyans ouvè. Twa pap yo ak twa prezidan yo aliyen ak twa lagè vèsè dis, onz ak kenz yo.

“Marvelous in her shrewdness and cunning is the Roman Church. She can read what is to be. She bides her time, seeing that the Protestant churches are paying her homage in their acceptance of the false sabbath and that they are preparing to enforce it by the very means which she herself employed in bygone days. Those who reject the light of truth will yet seek the aid of this self-styled infallible power to exalt an institution that originated with her. How readily she will come to the help of Protestants in this work it is not difficult to conjecture. Who understands better than the papal leaders how to deal with those who are disobedient to the church?

“Legliz Wòm nan se mèvèy nan abilite li ak nan riz li. Li kapab li sa k pral rive. Li ap tann tan pa li, paske li wè legliz pwotestan yo ap rann li omaj nan lefèt yo aksepte fo saba a e yo ap prepare pou fè l respekte pa mwayen menm mwayen sa yo li menm te sèvi avèk yo nan tan lontan. Moun ki rejte limyè verite a va toujou chèche èd pouvwa sa a ki bay tèt li non enfayib la pou leve anwo yon enstitisyon ki soti nan li menm. Jan li va prese vini pou ede pwotestan yo nan travay sa a, sa pa difisil pou devine. Kilès ki konprann pi byen pase chèf papal yo kijan pou yo aji ak moun ki dezobeyi legliz la?”

“The Roman Catholic Church, with all its ramifications throughout the world, forms one vast organization under the control, and designed to serve the interests, of the papal see. Its millions of communicants, in every country on the globe, are instructed to hold themselves as bound in allegiance to the pope. Whatever their nationality or their government, they are to regard the authority of the church as above all other. Though they may take the oath pledging their loyalty to the state, yet back of this lies the vow of obedience to Rome, absolving them from every pledge inimical to her interests.

Legliz Katolik Women an, avèk tout branch li yo toupatou sou latè, fòme yon sèl gwo òganizasyon anba kontwòl syèj papal la, e ki fèt pou sèvi enterè li yo. Plizyè milyon fidèl li yo, nan chak peyi sou latè, resevwa ansèyman pou yo konsidere tèt yo kòm moun ki mare pa fidelite anvè pap la. Kèlkeswa nasyonalite yo oswa gouvènman yo, yo dwe konsidere otorite legliz la kòm pi wo pase tout lòt otorite. Menm si yo ka prete sèman pou yo angaje fidelite yo anvè leta a, dèyè sa toujou rete ve obeyisans anvè Wòm nan, ki lage yo anba tout angajman ki ta kontrè ak enterè li yo.

History testifies of her artful and persistent efforts to insinuate herself into the affairs of nations; and having gained a foothold, to further her own aims, even at the ruin of princes and people. In the year 1204, Pope Innocent III extracted from Peter II, king of Arragon, the following extraordinary oath: ‘I, Peter, king of Arragonians, profess and promise to be ever faithful and obedient to my lord, Pope Innocent, to his Catholic successors, and the Roman Church, and faithfully to preserve my kingdom in his obedience, defending the Catholic faith, and persecuting heretical pravity.’—John Dowling, The History of Romanism, b. 5, ch. 6, sec. 55. This is in harmony with the claims regarding the power of the Roman pontiff ‘that it is lawful for him to depose emperors’ and ‘that he can absolve subjects from their allegiance to unrighteous rulers.’—Mosheim, b. 3, cent. 11, pt. 2, ch. 2, sec. 9, note 17.

“Istwa rann kont sou efò li yo, ki fèt avèk anpil ladrès e avèk pèsistans, pou li fofile tèt li nan zafè nasyon yo; epi, yon fwa li fin pran pye, pou li pousuiv pwòp objektif pa li, menm si sa ta mennen nan destriksyon chèf yo ak pèp yo. Nan ane 1204, Pap Inosan III te rale nan men Pyè II, wa Aragòn, sèman ekstraòdinè sa a: ‘Mwen menm, Pyè, wa Aragonè yo, mwen deklare epi mwen pwomèt pou m toujou fidèl ak obeyisan anvè mèt mwen, Pap Inosan, anvè siksesè katolik li yo, ak Legliz Wòm nan, epi pou m fidèlman kenbe wayòm mwen an nan obeyisans anvè li, pandan m ap defann lafwa katolik la, e pandan m ap pèsekite mechanste eretik la.’—John Dowling, The History of Romanism, b. 5, ch. 6, sec. 55. Sa a annamoni ak pretansyon konsènan pouvwa pontif womèn nan, ‘ke li legal pou li depoze anperè yo’ epi ‘ke li kapab delye sijè yo anba fidelite yo anvè chèf enjis yo.’—Mosheim, b. 3, cent. 11, pt. 2, ch. 2, sec. 9, note 17.”

“And let it be remembered, it is the boast of Rome that she never changes. The principles of Gregory VII and Innocent III are still the principles of the Roman Catholic Church. And had she but the power, she would put them in practice with as much vigor now as in past centuries. Protestants little know what they are doing when they propose to accept the aid of Rome in the work of Sunday exaltation. While they are bent upon the accomplishment of their purpose, Rome is aiming to re-establish her power, to recover her lost supremacy. Let the principle once be established in the United States that the church may employ or control the power of the state; that religious observances may be enforced by secular laws; in short, that the authority of church and state is to dominate the conscience, and the triumph of Rome in this country is assured.

“Epi se pou yo sonje sa: se yon gwo vante lavil Wòm ke li pa janm chanje. Prensip Grégoire VII ak Innocent III yo toujou rete prensip Legliz Katolik Women an. E si li te sèlman gen pouvwa a, li ta mete yo an pratik kounye a ak menm fòs ak nan syèk pase yo. Pwotestan yo pa vrèman konnen sa y ap fè lè yo pwopoze aksepte èd Wòm nan travay egzaltasyon dimanch lan. Pandan yo fikse sou akonplisman objektif pa yo a, Wòm ap chèche retabli pouvwa pa li, pou reprann sipremasi li te pèdi a. Se pou prensip la yon fwa tabli Ozetazini ke legliz la ka sèvi ak oswa kontwole pouvwa leta a; ke obsèvans relijye yo ka fòse pa lwa sivil; an kout, ke otorite legliz ak leta dwe domine konsyans lan, epi triyonf Wòm nan peyi sa a asire.”

“God’s word has given warning of the impending danger; let this be unheeded, and the Protestant world will learn what the purposes of Rome really are, only when it is too late to escape the snare. She is silently growing into power. Her doctrines are exerting their influence in legislative halls, in the churches, and in the hearts of men. She is piling up her lofty and massive structures in the secret recesses of which her former persecutions will be repeated. Stealthily and unsuspectedly she is strengthening her forces to further her own ends when the time shall come for her to strike. All that she desires is vantage ground, and this is already being given her. We shall soon see and shall feel what the purpose of the Roman element is. Whoever shall believe and obey the word of God will thereby incur reproach and persecution.” The Great Controversy, 580, 581.

“Pawòl Bondye a te bay avètisman konsènan danje k ap pwoche a; si yo pa pran sa oserye, mond pwotestan an ap aprann ki objektif Wòm yo vrèman ye, sèlman lè li twò ta pou chape anba pyèj la. Li ap grandi an silans pou l vin gen pouvwa. Doktrin li yo ap fè enfliyans pa yo nan sal lejislatif yo, nan legliz yo, ak nan kè lèzòm. Li ap monte estrikti li yo ki wo e masiv yo, nan fon sekrè kote ansyen pèsekisyon li yo pral repete. An kachèt e san moun pa sispèk, li ap ranfòse fòs li yo pou pouse pwòp objektif pa li pi devan lè lè a va rive pou li frape. Tout sa li anvi se yon pozisyon avantaj, e sa deja ap bay li. Byento nou pral wè epi nou pral santi ki objektif eleman women an ye. Nenpòt moun ki va kwè epi obeyi pawòl Bondye a, poutèt sa menm, ap tonbe anba repwòch ak pèsekisyon.” The Great Controversy, 580, 581.

In 2016 Trump was elected, then the globalists represented by Biden stole the election of 2020, but that is only recognized by those who have 20/20 vision. In verse thirteen Donald Trump “returns” in 2024, with more power than ever, and begins his preparation for the golden age as well as the battle of Panium in verse fifteen. Then Leo the pope arrived to establish the vision in 2025, the third pope associated with the three battles of verses ten through fifteen, and also with the three presidents of those battles. The first and third popes and presidents are considered conservative, and the middle pope and president were globalists. The first alliance was secret, the last is open, for it is represented in verse fourteen as the symbol that establishes the external vision of the prophecies of the latter days.

An 2016, yo te eli Trump; answit, mondyalis yo, Biden t ap reprezante yo, vòlè eleksyon 2020 an, men sa se sèlman moun ki gen vizyon 20/20 ki rekonèt li. Nan vèsè trèz, Donald Trump “retounen” an 2024, avèk plis pouvwa pase tout tan, epi li kòmanse preparasyon li pou laj dò a ansanm ak batay Panium nan vèsè kenz la. Lè sa a, Leo, pap la, rive pou tabli vizyon an an 2025, twazyèm pap ki asosye ak twa batay vèsè dis rive kenz yo, epi tou ak twa prezidan batay sa yo. Premye ak twazyèm pap yo ansanm ak prezidan yo konsidere kòm konsèvatè, epi pap ak prezidan ki nan mitan yo te mondyalis. Premye alyans lan te sekrè; dènye a ouvèt, paske li reprezante nan vèsè katòz kòm senbòl ki tabli vizyon ekstèn pwofesi dènye jou yo.

On December 31, 2023 the work of the first angel, as typified by the work of the first decree began laying the foundation. The foundational test was over whether William Miller was correct or incorrect in his identification that it was Rome that establishes the vision in verse fourteen. Miller’s identification of Rome as the symbol that established the prophetic vision of the latter days is in some aspects the most significant of all of Miller’s foundational truths. How Miller arrived at certain understandings can only be derived from applying sanctified logic to his time and circumstances, but with some of his prophetic discoveries there is very specific testimony as to why he came to his understandings. The most fundamental of his understandings was his identification that it is Rome that establishes the vision.

Nan dat 31 desanm 2023, travay premye zanj lan, jan sa te reprezante tipolojikman pa travay premye dekrè a, te kòmanse poze fondasyon an. Tès fondamantal la te konsène si William Miller te gen rezon oswa li te nan erè nan idantifikasyon li ke se Wòm ki tabli vizyon an nan vèsè katòz la. Idantifikasyon Miller fè de Wòm kòm senbòl ki tabli vizyon pwofetik dènye jou yo se, nan kèk aspè, verite ki pi enpòtan pami tout verite fondamantal Miller yo. Fason Miller te rive nan sèten konpreyansyon yo ka sòti sèlman lè yo aplike yon lojik sanktifye a tan ak sikonstans li yo, men, pou kèk nan dekouvèt pwofetik li yo, gen temwayaj trè presi sou rezon ki fè li te rive nan konpreyansyon sa yo. Pi fondamantal nan konpreyansyon li yo se te idantifikasyon li ke se Wòm ki tabli vizyon an.

Miller directly testifies how he searched to understand what it was that was “taken away” in the book of Daniel. He not only identifies where he found his answer, but he speaks of his excitement when he discovered the jewel, he had been searching for. Apollos Hale records a commentary upon Miller’s own writings, and in the following passage Hale is identifying how Miller became a student of prophecy. Miller, as the messenger of the light which was unsealed in 1798, is a sacred example of those who Daniel called the “wise” who “understand” when the book is “unsealed.” Miller’s testimony of how he was led into studying the Bible is a purposeful example by the One who controls all things. Pay attention to Miller’s development, for he is the example of the wise who understand the increase of knowledge, even if they, as Miller, come out from the darkness of error.

Miller rann temwaye dirèkteman kijan li te chèche konprann kisa li te ye yo te “retire” nan liv Danyèl la. Li pa sèlman idantifye ki kote li te jwenn repons li a, men li pale tou de eksitasyon li lè li te dekouvri bijou li t ap chèche a. Apollos Hale anrejistre yon kòmantè sou pwòp ekri Miller yo, epi nan pasaj ki vin apre a, Hale ap montre kijan Miller te vin yon etidyan pwofesi. Miller, kòm mesaje limyè ki te desele an 1798 la, se yon egzanp sakre pou moun Danyèl te rele “saj” yo, ki “konprann” lè liv la “desele.” Temwayaj Miller sou fason yo te mennen l nan etidye Bib la se yon egzanp entansyonèl pa Sila a ki kontwole tout bagay. Bay anpil atansyon ak devlopman Miller, paske li se egzanp saj yo ki konprann ogmantasyon konesans lan, menm si yo, menm jan ak Miller, soti nan fènwa erè a.

“‘In the month of May, 1816, I was brought under conviction, and O, what horror filled my soul! I forgot to eat. The heavens appeared like brass, and the earth like iron. Thus I continued till October, when God opened my eyes; and O, my soul, what a Saviour I discovered Jesus to be! My sins fell like a burden from my soul: and then how plain the Bible seemed to me! It all spoke of Jesus; he was in every page and every line. O, that was a happy day! I wanted to go right home to heaven; Jesus was all to me, and I thought I could make everybody else see him as I saw him, but I was mistaken.

«Nan mwa me 1816, mwen te vin anba konviksyon peche, epi, o, ala laterè ki te ranpli nanm mwen! Mwen te bliye manje. Syèl la te parèt tankou kwiv, epi tè a tankou fè. Se konsa mwen te kontinye jouk nan mwa oktòb, lè Bondye te louvri je m yo; epi, o, nanm mwen, ala yon Sovè mwen te dekouvri Jezi ye! Peche m yo te tonbe tankou yon chay soti sou nanm mwen; epi lè sa a, ala Bib la te sanble klè pou mwen! Tout bagay ladan l te pale konsènan Jezi; li te nan chak paj ak nan chak liy. O, se te yon jou beni! Mwen te vle ale touswit lakay mwen nan syèl la; Jezi te tout bagay pou mwen, epi mwen te panse mwen te kapab fè tout lòt moun wè li jan mwen te wè li a, men mwen te twonpe m.

“‘During, the twelve years I was a deist, I read all histories I could find; but now I loved the Bible. It taught of Jesus! But still there was a good deal of the Bible that was dark to me. In 1818 or 19, while conversing with a friend! To whom I made a visit, and who had known and heard me talk while I was a deist, he inquired, in rather a significant manner, “What do you think of this text, and that?” referring to the old texts I objected to while a deist. I understood what he was about, and replied—If you will give me time, I will tell you what they mean. “How long time do you want?” I don’t know, but I will tell you, I replied, for I could not believe that God had given a revelation that could not be understood. I then resolved to study my Bible, believing I could find out what the Holy Spirit meant. But as soon as I had formed this resolution the thought came to me—“Suppose you find a passage that you cannot understand, what will you do?”

«Pandan douz ane mwen te yon deis, mwen te li tout istwa mwen te ka jwenn; men kounye a mwen te renmen Bib la. Li te anseye konsènan Jezi! Men toujou te gen yon bon pati nan Bib la ki te fè nwa pou mwen. An 1818 oswa 1819, pandan mwen t ap pale ak yon zanmi mwen te rann vizit, e ki te konnen mwen epi te tande m pale lè mwen te yon deis, li te mande m, nan yon fason ki te byen siyifikatif, “Ki sa ou panse de tèks sa a, ak tèks sa a?” li t ap fè referans ak ansyen tèks mwen te konn opoze lè mwen te yon deis. Mwen te konprann sa li t ap vize a, epi mwen te reponn—Si ou ban mwen tan, m ap di ou sa yo vle di. “Konbyen tan ou bezwen?” Mwen pa konnen, men m ap di ou, mwen te reponn, paske mwen pa t ka kwè Bondye te bay yon revelasyon ki pa t ka konprann. Lè sa a, mwen te pran desizyon pou etidye Bib mwen an, avèk konviksyon ke mwen te kapab dekouvri sa Sentespri a te vle di. Men, kou mwen te fin pran desizyon sa a, panse sa a te vin nan lespri mwen—“Sipoze ou jwenn yon pasaj ou pa ka konprann, kisa w ap fè?”»

This mode of studying the Bible then came to my mind:—I will take the words of such passages, and trace them through the Bible, and find out their meaning in this way. I had Cruden’s Concordance, [purchased in 1798] which I think is the best in the world; so I took that and my Bible, and set down to my desk, and read nothing else, except the newspapers a little, for I was determined to know what my Bible meant. I began at Genesis, and read on slowly; and when I came to a text that I could not understand, I searched through the Bible to find out what it meant. After I had gone through the Bible in this way, O, how bright and glorious the truth appeared! I found what I have been preaching to you. I was satisfied that the seven times terminated in 1843. Then I came to the 2300 days; they brought me to the same conclusion; but I had no thought of finding out when the Saviour was coming, and I could not believe it; but the light struck me so forcibly I did not know what to do. Now, I thought, I must put on spurs and breeching; I will not go faster than the Bible, and I will not fall behind it. Whatever the Bible teaches, I will hold on to it. But still there were some texts that I could nor understand.”

«Lè sa a, metòd sa a pou etidye Bib la vin nan lespri mwen:—M ap pran mo ki nan pasaj sa yo, m ap suiv yo atravè Bib la, epi m ap dekouvri siyifikasyon yo konsa. Mwen te gen Konkòdans Cruden lan, [achte an 1798], ki, dapre mwen, se pi bon nan lemonn; konsa mwen pran li ansanm ak Bib mwen, epi mwen chita bò biwo mwen, san m pa t li anyen ankò, eksepte jounal yo yon ti kras, paske mwen te detèmine pou m konnen kisa Bib mwen an te vle di. Mwen te kòmanse nan Jenèz, epi mwen te kontinye li dousman; epi lè m te rive sou yon tèks mwen pa t ka konprann, mwen te fouye atravè Bib la pou m dekouvri sa li te vle di. Apre m te fin pase atravè Bib la nan fason sa a, o, ala klere ak gloriye verite a te parèt! Mwen te dekouvri sa m te ap preche nou an. Mwen te vin konvenki ke sèt tan yo te fini an 1843. Apre sa mwen rive sou 2300 jou yo; yo te mennen m nan menm konklizyon an; men mwen pa t gen okenn lide pou m dekouvri kilè Sovè a t ap vini, e mwen pa t ka kwè sa; men limyè a te frape m avèk yon fòs tèlman pwisan, mwen pa t konnen kisa pou m fè. Kounye a, mwen te panse, fòk mwen mete espyon ak brid; mwen p ap ale pi vit pase Bib la, e mwen p ap rete dèyè li. Kèlkeswa sa Bib la anseye, m ap kenbe l fèm. Men, malgre sa, te toujou gen kèk tèks mwen pa t ka konprann.»

“So much for his general mode of studying the Bible. On another occasion he stated his mode of settling the meaning of the text before us—the meaning of ‘the daily.’ ‘I read on,’ said he, ‘And could find no other case in which it was found, but in Daniel. I then took those words which stood in connection with it, “take away.” “He shall take away the daily,” “from the time the daily shall be taken away,” etc. I read on, and thought I should find no light on the text; finally I came to 2 Thessalonians 2:7, 8. ‘For the mystery of iniquity doth already work, only he who now letteth, will let, until he be taken out of the way, and then shall that wicked be revealed,’ etc. And when I had come to that text, O, how clear and glorious the truth appeared! There it is! that is “the daily!” Well, now, what does Paul mean by “he who now letteth,” or hindereth? By “the man of sin,” and “the wicked,” Popery is meant. Well, what is it which hinders Popery from being revealed? Why, it is Paganism; well, then, “the daily” must mean Paganism.’” Apollos Hale, The Second Advent Manual, 66.

“Konsa pou m fini ak fason jeneral li te konn etidye Bib la. Nan yon lòt okazyon, li te esplike fason li te fikse sans tèks ki devan nou an—sans ‘sa ki chak jou a.’ ‘Mwen te kontinye li,’ li di, ‘epi mwen pa t ka jwenn okenn lòt kote yo te jwenn li, eksepte nan Danyèl. Lè sa a, mwen te pran mo ki te kanpe ann akò avè l yo, “wete.” “L ap wete sa ki chak jou a,” “depi lè yo va wete sa ki chak jou a,” elatriye. Mwen te kontinye li, e mwen te panse mwen pa t ap jwenn okenn limyè sou tèks la; finalman mwen rive nan 2 Tesalonisyen 2:7, 8. “Paske mistè inikite a deja ap travay; se sèlman sila a ki kounye a anpeche a, ap kontinye anpeche jiskaske yo wete l nan chemen an, epi lè sa a, mechan sa a va parèt,” elatriye. E lè mwen te rive nan tèks sa a, o, jan verite a te parèt klè e gloriye! Men li! se sa ki ‘chak jou a’! Bon, kounye a, ki sa Pòl vle di pa “sila a ki kounye a anpeche a,” oswa ki mete baryè a? Pa “nonm peche a,” ak “mechan an,” yo vle di Papis la. Bon, ki sa ki anpeche Papis la pou l pa revele? Se Pèganis la; ebyen, “sa ki chak jou a” dwe vle di Pèganis la.’” Apollos Hale, The Second Advent Manual, 66.

The Providential guidance of Miller’s study by both human and Divine is in the record. His old friend pushed him, and the thoughts which came to him were the voice of the angel Gabriel, who Sister White identifies “line upon line” as the angel who repeatedly visited Miller. He identifies the seven times as his first discovery and then identifies the 2,300 as the second witness to the seven times, for they both ended in 1843, (he initially believed). Those two prophecies are his alpha and omega discoveries, and within the prophetic relationship to Miller they identify the mistake that would be corrected by Samuel Snow with the message of the Midnight Cry that initiated the “seventh-month movement.” The movement of the Midnight Cry was the “seventh-month movement” when it left the Exeter camp meeting, for it was identifying the coming of the Lord on the tenth day of the seventh month, which in 1844 fell on October 22.

Gidans pwovidansyèl etid Miller la, pa mwayen imen kou pa mwayen diven, ekri nan dosye a. Ansyen zanmi li a te pouse l, e panse ki te vin jwenn li yo se te vwa zanj Gabriyèl la, ke Sè White idantifye “line upon line” kòm zanj ki te vizite Miller plizyè fwa. Li idantifye sèt tan yo kòm premye dekouvèt li, epi apre sa li idantifye 2,300 yo kòm dezyèm temwen pou sèt tan yo, paske toude te fini an 1843, (jan li te kwè okòmansman). De pwofesi sa yo se dekouvèt alfa ak omega li yo, e anndan relasyon pwofetik ak Miller yo, yo idantifye erè ki t ap korije pa Samuel Snow avèk mesaj Rèl Minwi a ki te inisye “mouvman setyèm mwa a.” Mouvman Rèl Minwi a se te “mouvman setyèm mwa a” lè li te kite reyinyon kan Exeter la, paske li t ap idantifye vini Senyè a nan dizyèm jou setyèm mwa a, ki, an 1844, te tonbe sou 22 Oktòb.

The mistake that produces the empowerment of the second angel is represented by Miller’s initial understanding that the seven times and the 2,300 years concluded together in 1843. In the passage the next doctrine that is discussed is how Miller came to identify Rome as the symbol that establishes the vision. The Adventist history teachers identify that all of William Miller’s prophetic understandings were based upon his identifying two desolating powers. He understood those two desolating powers to be pagan and papal Rome, and he saw those two powers in 2 Thessalonians when he came to understand that the “daily” in the book of Daniel is pagan Rome. Every prophetic model set forth by Miller, who Sister White informs us was repeatedly visited by angels, was based upon his understanding that Rome establishes the vision. Every one!

Erè ki pwodui ranfòsman dezyèm zanj lan reprezante pa premye konpreyansyon Miller te genyen an, selon ki sèt tan yo ak 2,300 ane yo te fini ansanm an 1843. Nan pasaj la, pwochen doktrin yo diskite a se fason Miller te rive idantifye Wòm kòm senbòl ki tabli vizyon an. Pwofesè istwa Advantis yo idantifye ke tout konpreyansyon pwofetik William Miller yo te baze sou lefèt ke li te idantifye de pouvwa k ap dezole. Li te konprann de pouvwa k ap dezole sa yo kòm Wòm payen ak Wòm papal, e li te wè de pouvwa sa yo nan 2 Thessalonians lè li te rive konprann ke “kontinyèl la” nan liv Danyèl la se Wòm payen. Chak modèl pwofetik Miller te prezante, li menm Sè White fè nou konnen zanj yo te vizite repete, te baze sou konpreyansyon li ke Wòm tabli vizyon an. Chak youn!

From December 31, 2023 the Lion of the tribe of Judah has been unsealing the Revelation of Jesus Christ. From that point the foundational test had begun, and it reached its conclusion when the first pope from the United States began his reign on May 8, 2025. At that point, the temple test began.

Depi 31 desanm 2023, Lyon tribi Jida a t ap louvri sele sou Revelasyon Jezikri a. Depi lè sa a, tès fondamantal la te kòmanse, e li te rive nan konklizyon li lè premye pap ki soti Ozetazini an te kòmanse rèy li nan dat 8 me 2025. Nan moman sa a, tès tanp lan te kòmanse.

We will continue these things in the next article and employ the “250” years as a witness to uphold our identification that the foundational test ended with the current pope.

Nou pral kontinye bagay sa yo nan pwochen atik la epi sèvi ak “250” ane yo kòm yon temwen pou soutni idantifikasyon nou an ke tès fondamantal la te fini avèk pap aktyèl la.