We have been setting forth the sequence of prophetic events that are identified by the hidden history of the seven thunders that is represented in Revelation chapters eleven through thirteen. We have not yet reached the point in the development of these events, where we will overlay the history of the horn of Protestantism and the horn of Republicanism. Nor have we yet prepared a platform of understanding to pinpoint the role of Islam in the message of the Midnight Cry. There is, though, a very important truth connected with these events, that identifies what a person must do when they understand the truths that are being unsealed. The blessing of Revelation includes the responsibility of “keeping” those things that are written.
Nou ap prezante sekans evènman pwofetik yo ke yo idantifye pa istwa kache sèt loraj yo, jan sa reprezante nan Revelasyon chapit onz rive trèz. Nou poko rive nan pwen, nan devlopman evènman sa yo, kote n ap mete istwa kòn Pwotestantis la ak kòn Repiblikenis la youn sou lòt. Ni tou, nou poko prepare yon baz konpreyansyon pou detèmine avèk presizyon wòl Islam nan mesaj Rèl Minwi a. Men, gen yon verite ki trè enpòtan ki lye ak evènman sa yo, e ki idantifye sa yon moun dwe fè lè li konprann verite yo k ap vin devwale. Benediksyon ki nan Revelasyon an gen ladan l responsablite pou “kenbe” bagay sa yo ki ekri yo.
The line of history that is being unsealed conveys the creative power of God to those who would hear, read and keep those things written therein. It is therefore time to break away from our consideration of Isaiah’s last prophetic narrative, and Revelation chapters eleven through thirteen in order to establish the significance of the “three and a half days” that Elijah and Moses were dead in the street of the information super highway, that runs through the valley of dead dry bones. What we will identify now, is the symbolism of “the wilderness.”
Liy istwa a k ap devwale a transmèt pouvwa kreyatif Bondye bay sila yo ki ta tande, li, epi kenbe bagay sa yo ki ekri ladan l yo. Se poutèt sa, li lè pou nou detache nou de konsiderasyon nou sou dènye naratif pwofetik Ezayi a, ansanm ak Revelasyon chapit onz rive trèz, pou nou tabli enpòtans “twa jou edmi” pandan Eli ak Moyiz te mouri nan lari gran wout sipè enfòmasyon an, ki travèse vale zo sèk ki mouri yo. Sa n ap idantifye kounye a, se senbolis “dezè a.”
In the last article we identified four prophetic witnesses of the sequence of events that are established by the hidden history of the seven thunders. The line of the image of Christ, the line of the two witnesses, the line of the image of the beast and the line of the counterfeit king of the north.
Nan dènye atik la, nou te idantifye kat temwen pwofetik sou sekans evènman yo ki tabli pa istwa kache sèt loraj yo. Liy imaj Kris la, liy de temwen yo, liy imaj bèt la, ak liy wa kontrefè nò a.
The second half of the line of the counterfeit king of the north, begins with the empowerment of the papacy in 538. Then the papacy, the spiritual counterfeit king of the north, trampled down spiritual Jerusalem and spiritual Israel for twelve hundred and sixty years.
Dezyèm mwatye liy wa nò kontrefè a kòmanse ak bay papote a pouvwa an 538. Lè sa a, papote a, wa nò espirityèl kontrefè a, pilonnen Jerizalèm espirityèl la ak Izrayèl espirityèl la pandan mil desan swasant ane.
And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. Luke 21:24.
Epi yo pral tonbe anba file nepe a, epi yo pral mennen yo an kaptivite nan mitan tout nasyon; epi Jerizalèm pral pilonnen anba pye moun lòt nasyon yo, jiskaske tan moun lòt nasyon yo va akonpli. Lik 21:24.
John was told to measure both the sanctuary and the host, but he was also told to leave out the courtyard, for it had been given to the Gentiles for twelve hundred and sixty years.
Yo te di lòd pou mezire ni Tanp lan ni lame a, men yo te di l tou pou l kite lakou a deyò, paske yo te bay li bay nasyon lòt bò yo pandan mil de san swasant ane.
And there was given me a reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein. But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months. Revelation 11:1, 2.
Yo te ban m yon wozo ki sanble ak yon baton; epi zanj lan te kanpe, li t ap di: Leve, mezire tanp Bondye a, lotèl la, ak moun k ap adore ladan l yo. Men, kite lakou ki deyò tanp lan deyò, epi pa mezire li; paske yo bay li bay nasyon yo: epi y ap pilonnen vil sen an anba pye pandan karant-de mwa. Revelasyon 11:1, 2.
John and Luke testify that the Gentiles “tread under foot” “Jerusalem,” for “forty and two months.” John identifies the duration, and Luke marks the conclusion of the history. These two witnesses are addressing the question of Daniel chapter eight, and verse thirteen.
Jan ak Lik rann temwayaj ke nasyon lòt bò dlo yo “pile anba pye” “Jerizalèm,” pandan “karant-de mwa.” Jan idantifye dire a, epi Lik make konklizyon istwa a. De temwen sa yo ap adrese kestyon ki nan Danyèl chapit uit, vèsè trèz.
Then I heard one saint speaking, and another saint said unto that certain saint which spake, How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot? Daniel 8:13.
Lè sa a, mwen tande yon sen k ap pale; epi yon lòt sen di sen sa a ki t ap pale a: Jiska kilè vizyon an va dire konsènan sakrifis perpetyèl la, ak transgresyon dezolasyon an, pou yo livre ni sanktyè a ni lame a pou yo foule yo anba pye? Danyèl 8:13.
The question about the duration that the sanctuary and host were to be trodden under foot, identifies two desolating powers that would accomplish the act of treading down Jerusalem, which in Daniel is represented as the “sanctuary” and also the “host.” The correct foundational understanding of this verse, as expressed by J. N. Andrews, is that the verse identifies two desolating powers, which trampled down both the sanctuary and the host. The first desolating power identified in the verse is paganism, and the second is papalism. The word “host,” is Daniel’s expression for what John identifies as the “worshippers” in the temple, that is in Jerusalem.
Kesyon konsènan dire tan pandan tanp lan ak lame a t ap pilonnen anba pye, idantifye de pouvwa devastatè ki t ap akonpli zak pilonnen Jerizalèm nan, ki nan Danyèl reprezante kòm “tanp lan” epi tou kòm “lame a.” Bon konpreyansyon fondamantal sou vèsè sa a, jan J. N. Andrews eksprime l la, se ke vèsè a idantifye de pouvwa devastatè ki te pilonnen ni tanp lan ni lame a. Premye pouvwa devastatè yo idantifye nan vèsè a se paganism, epi dezyèm nan se papalis. Mo “lame a” se ekspresyon Danyèl sèvi pou sa Jan idantifye kòm “adoratè” ki nan tanp lan, sa vle di nan Jerizalèm.
“THERE ARE TWO ‘DESOLATIONS’ IN DANIEL 8.—This fact is made so plain by Josiah Litch that we present his words:
“GEN DE ‘DESOLASYON’ NAN DANYÈL 8.”—Reyalite sa a Josiah Litch fè l tèlman klè, nou prezante pawòl pa li yo:
“‘The daily sacrifice’ is the present reading of the English text. But no such thing as sacrifice is found in the original. This is acknowledged on all hands. It is a gloss or construction put on it by the translators. The true reading is, ‘the daily and the transgression of desolation,’ daily and transgression being connected together by “and;” the daily desolation and the transgression of desolation. They are two desolating powers, which were to desolate the sanctuary and the host.’—Prophetic Expositions, Volume 1, page 127.
“‘Sakrifis chak jou a’ se lekti aktyèl tèks angle a. Men pa gen okenn bagay tankou sakrifis yo jwenn nan tèks orijinal la. Sa rekonèt toupatou. Se yon glòs oswa yon entèpretasyon tradiktè yo mete sou li. Vrè lekti a se, ‘chak jou a ak transgresyon devastasyon an,’ kote chak jou a ak transgresyon an mare ansanm pa ‘ak’; devastasyon chak jou a ak transgresyon devastasyon an. Yo se de pouvwa devastatè ki te dwe devaste sanktyè a ak lame a.” —Prophetic Expositions, Volim 1, paj 127.
“It is plain that the sanctuary and the host were to be trodden under foot by the daily and the transgression of desolation. The careful reading of verse 13 settles this point. And this fact establishes another, viz.: that these two desolations are the two grand forms under which Satan has attempted to overthrow the worship and the cause of Jehovah. Mr. Miller’s remarks on the meaning of these two terms, and the course pursued by himself in ascertaining that meaning, is presented under the following head:
“Li klè ke tanp lan ak lame a te dwe pilonnen anba pye pa kontinyèl la ak transgresyon dezolasyon an. Yon lekti ak anpil atansyon sou vèsè 13 la regle pwen sa a. E reyalite sa a tabli yon lòt ankò, sètadi: ke de dezolasyon sa yo se de gwo fòm prensipal anba ki Satan te eseye ranvèse adorasyon an ak koz Jewova a. Remak Mesye Miller yo sou siyifikasyon de tèm sa yo, ansanm ak demach li menm te suiv pou detèmine siyifikasyon sa a, prezante anba tit ki vin apre a:”
“THE TWO DESOLATIONS ARE PAGANISM AND PAPACY
“DEZOLASYON TOUDE YO SE PAYENIS AK PAPOTE”
“‘I read on, and could find no other case in which it [the daily] was found, but in Daniel. I then [by the aid of a concordance] took those words which stood in connection with it, ‘take way;’ he shall take away, ‘the daily;’ ‘from the time the daily shall be taken away’, etc. I read on, and thought I should find no light on the text; finally, I came to 2 Thessalonians 2:7, 8. ‘For the mystery of iniquity doth already work; only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way, and then shall that wicked be revealed,’ etc. And when I had come to that text, oh! how clear and glorious the truth appeared! There it is! That is ‘the daily!’ Well now, what does Paul mean by ‘he who now letteth,’ or hindereth? By ‘the man of sin,’ and the ‘wicked,’ popery is meant. Well, what is it which hinders popery from being revealed? Why, it is paganism; well, then, ‘the daily’ must mean paganism.’—Second Advent Manual, page 66.” J. N. Andrews, The Sanctuary and the 2300 Days, 33, 34.
«Mwen te kontinye li, epi mwen pa t ka jwenn okenn lòt ka kote li [sakrifi tout tan an] te parèt, eksepte nan Danyèl. Apre sa, [avèk èd yon konkòdans] mwen te pran mo sa yo ki te kanpe an rapò avèk li: “retire”; li va retire, “sakrifi tout tan an”; “depi lè yo va retire sakrifi tout tan an”, elatriye. Mwen te kontinye li, epi mwen te panse mwen pa t ap jwenn okenn limyè sou tèks la; finalman, mwen rive nan 2 Tesalonisyen 2:7, 8. “Paske mistè inikite a deja ap travay; se sèlman sila a ki kounye a anpeche a ki va kontinye anpeche, jouk lè yo va retire l nan chemen an, epi lè sa a mechan an va parèt,” elatriye. E lè mwen te rive nan tèks sa a, o! ala jan verite a te parèt klè e gloriye! Men li la! Se sa ki “sakrifi tout tan an!” Ebyen kounye a, ki sa Pòl vle di pa “sila a ki kounye a anpeche”, oswa ki antrave? Pa “nonm peche a”, ak “mechan an”, se papis yo vle di. Ebyen, ki sa ki anpeche papis la parèt? Se payanis la; ebyen, alò, “sakrifi tout tan an” dwe vle di payanis.»—Second Advent Manual, paj 66.» J. N. Andrews, The Sanctuary and the 2300 Days, 33, 34.
In fulfillment of the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six, paganism trampled down the sanctuary and host for twelve hundred and sixty years, and then papalism did the same work for an additional twelve hundred and sixty years. The papacy had trampled down Jerusalem for twelve hundred and sixty years according to Luke and John, until the papacy received its deadly wound in 1798. Subtracting twelve hundred and sixty years from 1798, arrives at 538. Subtracting twelve hundred and sixty years from 538, arrives at 723 BC, when Assyria, the literal king of the north at that time, took the northern kingdom of Israel into slavery.
Nan akonplisman “sèt fwa” ki nan Levitik vennsis la, paganism te foule anba Tanp lan ak lame a pandan mil desan swasant ane, epi apre sa papalism te fè menm travay la pandan yon lòt mil desan swasant ane. Papote a te foule anba Jerizalèm pandan mil desan swasant ane dapre Lik ak Jan, jiskaske papote a te resevwa blesi mòtèl li an 1798. Lè yo soustrae mil desan swasant ane nan 1798, yo rive nan 538. Lè yo soustrae mil desan swasant ane nan 538, yo rive nan 723 av. J.-K., lè Lasiri, wa nò literal la nan epòk sa a, te mennen wayòm nò Izrayèl la nan esklavaj.
John only refers to the twelve hundred and sixty years that the papacy trampled down the sanctuary and the host, but Luke addresses both periods of twelve hundred and sixty years that paganism and papalism trampled down Jerusalem, for he states “until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.” Luke identifies the trampling down of Jerusalem as more than a single “time”, for he calls it the fulfillment of the “times” of the Gentiles.
Jan sèlman fè referans ak mil desan swasant ane pandan papasi a te pilonnen Tanp lan ak lame a, men Lik pale de toude peryòd mil desan swasant ane yo kote payanis ak papalis te pilonnen Jerizalèm, paske li deklare: “jiskaske tan nasyon yo va akonpli.” Lik idantifye pilonnaj Jerizalèm nan kòm plis pase yon sèl “tan”, paske li rele l akonplisman “tan” nasyon yo.
Of course, in 1856, Millerite Adventism became Laodicean, and seven years later they rejected the truth of the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six, so it is impossible for Adventism to see these simple biblical facts. The fact that I am identifying is that the hidden history of the seven thunders, which identifies three waymarks, and a period of time between the first and second waymark, and then a second period of time between the second and third waymark, is represented within the prophetic line of the counterfeit king of the north.
Natirèlman, an 1856, Advantis Milerit la te vin Lawodiseyen, e sèt ane pita yo te rejte verite “sèt fwa yo” nan Levitik venntsis; konsa li enposib pou Advantis la wè reyalite biblik senp sa yo. Reyalite m ap idantifye a se ke istwa kache sèt loraj yo, ki idantifye twa pwen repè, ansanm ak yon peryòd tan ant premye ak dezyèm pwen repè a, epi answit yon dezyèm peryòd tan ant dezyèm ak twazyèm pwen repè a, reprezante anndan liy pwofetik fo wa nò a.
That line started in 723 BC, with the northern kingdom of Israel going into slavery at the hands of the king of Assyria, a literal king of the north. Then in 538, the spiritual king of the north was empowered, and he then trampled down spiritual Jerusalem for another twelve hundred and sixty years, until he received a deadly wound in 1798. From 723 BC, until 538, the powers that held Israel in subjection were always pagan powers.
Liy sa a te kòmanse an 723 anvan Jezikri, lè wayòm nò Izrayèl la te ale ann esklavaj anba men wa Lasiri a, yon wa literal ki soti nan nò a. Apre sa, an 538, wa espirityèl nò a te resevwa pouvwa, epi li te pilonnen Jerizalèm espirityèl la pandan yon lòt mil de san swasant ane, jiskaske li te resevwa yon blesi mòtèl an 1798. Depi 723 anvan Jezikri rive 538, pouvwa ki te kenbe Izrayèl anba dominasyon te toujou pouvwa payen.
The line of Christ identifies the anointing of the true king of the north at His baptism in the year 27, and twelve hundred and sixty prophetic days later, He was crucified. His disciples were then empowered to present the message of the true king of the north, until the stoning of Stephen in the year 34. The only time Christ did not walk in the entire twelve hundred and sixty days of His ministry, was when he rode into Jerusalem in the triumphal entry. He therefore trod down Jerusalem for twelve hundred and sixty days, as did His disciples after the cross. Both lines, the counterfeit king of the north and Christ, the true king of the north, trod down Jerusalem and the host for twelve hundred and sixty days.
Liy Kris la idantifye onksyon vrè wa nò a nan batèm Li nan ane 27 la, e douz san swasant jou pwofetik apre sa, yo te kloure Li sou kwa a. Lè sa a, disip Li yo te resevwa pouvwa pou prezante mesaj vrè wa nò a, jouk rive nan lapidasyon Etèn nan ane 34 la. Sèl fwa Kris la pa t mache pandan tout douz san swasant jou sèvis Li a, se te lè Li te antre Jerizalèm monte sou yon bèt nan antre triyonfal la. Se poutèt sa, Li te foule Jerizalèm anba pye pandan douz san swasant jou, menm jan disip Li yo te fè apre kwa a. Toude liy yo, fo wa nò a ak Kris la, vrè wa nò a, te foule Jerizalèm ak lame a anba pye pandan douz san swasant jou.
Paganism was a counterfeit of the worship system of the earthly sanctuary service of the literal Jews, and papalism is a counterfeit of the heavenly sanctuary service of the spiritual Jews. Paganism’s twelve hundred and sixty years, was parallel to Christ’s twelve hundred and sixty days, and papalism’s twelve hundred and sixty years, was parallel to the disciples’ twelve hundred and sixty days.
Le paganisme était une contrefaçon du système d’adoration du service du sanctuaire terrestre des Juifs littéraux, et le papalisme est une contrefaçon du service du sanctuaire céleste des Juifs spirituels. Les mille deux cent soixante années du paganisme étaient parallèles aux mille deux cent soixante jours du Christ, et les mille deux cent soixante années du papalisme étaient parallèles aux mille deux cent soixante jours des disciples.
Each of the two lines contain the identical prophetic structure of the hidden history of the seven thunders, that began to be publicly unsealed in July, 2023. The unsealing was accomplished in part by the recognition of the Millerite movement’s first disappointment. Their first disappointment ushered in a period of time, called the “tarrying time” in the parable of the ten virgins. The “tarrying time” ended at the Exeter, New Hampshire camp meeting, when the message of the Midnight Cry had been fully established. The Exeter camp meeting became the second waymark, which then ushered in a period of time where the message of the Midnight Cry was proclaimed, until the third waymark of judgment and the last disappointment arrived.
Chak nan de liy yo genyen menm estrikti pwofetik ki idantik la konsènan istwa kache sèt loraj yo, ki te kòmanse devwale piblikman an jiyè 2023. Devwalman an te akonpli an pati grasa rekonesans premye desepsyon mouvman Milerit la. Premye desepsyon yo a te louvri yon peryòd tan yo rele “tan reta a” nan parabòl dis vyèj yo. “Tan reta a” te fini nan reyinyon kan Exeter, New Hampshire la, lè mesaj Kri Minwi a te fin byen tabli nèt. Reyinyon kan Exeter la te vin tounen dezyèm repè a, ki ansuit te louvri yon peryòd tan kote mesaj Kri Minwi a te pwoklame, jouk twazyèm repè jijman an ak dènye desepsyon an te rive.
The three waymarks were the first disappointment, the Midnight Cry message and the last disappointment. Those three waymarks align with the Hebrew word “truth” which represent the first, thirteenth and last letter of the Hebrew alphabet. The first and the last both being disappointments, represents the signature of Alpha and Omega.
Twa pwen repè yo se te premye desepsyon an, mesaj Kri a Minwi a, ak dènye desepsyon an. Twa pwen repè sa yo aliyen ak mo ebre “verite” a, ki reprezante premye, trèzyèm, ak dènye lèt alfabè ebre a. Lefèt ke ni premye a ni dènye a se desepsyon, sa reprezante siyati Alfa ak Omega.
There is no direct representation of twelve hundred and sixty days in the Millerite history, yet the Millerite history is the history of the first movement and therefore typifies the last movement. The history of the first disappointment in the last movement began on July 18, 2020, and it is illustrated in Revelation chapter eleven. In Revelation chapter eleven, the two witnesses are slain, marking the first disappointment in the last movement, that was typified by the first movement.
Pa gen okenn reprezantasyon dirèk de mil desan swasant jou nan istwa Millerit la; men, istwa Millerit la se istwa premye mouvman an e, poutèt sa, li sèvi kòm tip dènye mouvman an. Istwa premye dezapwentman an nan dènye mouvman an te kòmanse 18 Jiyè 2020, e li ilistre nan Revelasyon chapit onz. Nan Revelasyon chapit onz, yo touye de temwen yo, sa ki make premye dezapwentman an nan dènye mouvman an, ki te prefigire pa premye mouvman an.
In Revelation eleven the disappointment ushered in a period of twelve hundred and sixty days that their dead bodies were in the street, thus marking the tarrying time of the parable. At their resurrection they are lifted up as an ensign in the same hour as the judgment of the Sunday law. The history of the two witnesses includes a symbolic period of twelve hundred and sixty days.
Nan Revelasyon onz, desepsyon an te louvri yon peryòd mil desan swasant jou kote kadav yo te rete nan lari a, konsa sa make tan reta parabòl la. Lè yo resisite, yo leve yo kòm yon banyè nan menm lè ak jijman lwa dimanch lan. Istwa de temwen yo genyen ladan l yon peryòd senbolik mil desan swasant jou.
The details of the movement of the third angel in the hidden history of the seven thunders provides much more specification than the other parallel lines, but the line of the third angel, the line of the true king of the north, and the line of the counterfeit king of the north, all possess the same prophetic characteristics of a beginning point, followed by a period of time that reaches to a middle point, that is followed by a period of time that reaches to judgment at the end-point.
Detay mouvman twazyèm zanj lan nan istwa kache sèt loraj yo bay anpil plis presizyon pase lòt liy paralèl yo; men liy twazyèm zanj lan, liy vrè wa nò a, ak liy fo wa nò a, yo tout genyen menm karakteristik pwofetik yo: yon pwen depa, apre sa yon peryòd tan ki rive nan yon pwen mitan, epi sa suiv pa yon lòt peryòd tan ki rive nan jijman nan pwen final la.
The twelve hundred and sixty days is a primary element of the hidden history of the seven thunders. The twelve hundred and sixty days is symbolized as a “wilderness” in Revelation chapter twelve.
Mille deux cent soixante jours yo se yon eleman prensipal nan istwa kache sèt loraj yo. Mille deux cent soixante jou yo senbolize kòm yon “dezè” nan Revelasyon chapit douz.
And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. Revelation 12:6.
Epi fanm nan kouri al nan dezè a, kote li gen yon plas Bondye te prepare pou li, pou yo nouri li la pandan milde san swasanndis jou. Revelasyon 12:6.
The church fled into the wilderness to escape the treading down of the papal power for twelve hundred and sixty years. Verse fourteen provides another witness.
Legliz la kouri al nan dezè a pou l chape anba pye pouvwa papal la pandan mil de san swasant ane. Vèsè katòz bay yon lòt temwen.
And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent. Revelation 12:14.
Apre sa, yo te bay fanm nan de zèl yon gwo malfini, pou l te ka vole ale nan dezè a, nan plas pa li, kote yo nouri li pandan yon tan, ak tan, ak mwatye yon tan, lwen devan sèpan an. Revelasyon 12:14.
The church fled from the persecution of the dragon and the papacy for twelve hundred and sixty years, and therefore the “wilderness” is a symbol of the twelve hundred and sixty days. That number occurs directly seven times in the books of Daniel and Revelation, but it is represented several other ways in the Scriptures. In each case, it represents the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six.
Legliz la te kouri chape anba pèsekisyon dragon an ak papote a pandan mil desan swasant ane; se poutèt sa, “dezè a” se yon senbòl mil desan swasant jou yo. Chif sa a parèt dirèkteman sèt fwa nan liv Danyèl ak Revelasyon, men li reprezante plizyè lòt fason ankò nan Ekriti yo. Nan chak ka, li reprezante “sèt tan” Levitik vennsis la.
Whether it was paganism trampling down the sanctuary and host from 723 BC to the year 538, or the papacy trampling down spiritual Jerusalem and the worshippers therein, it was an illustration of the scattering of God’s people, that was brought about by God’s people breaking the “sabbaths-of-the-land” covenant as represented in Leviticus chapters twenty-five and twenty-six. In chapter twenty-six it is called the quarrel of God’s covenant.
Kit se te paganism t ap pilonnen tanp lan ak lame a depi 723 av. J.-K. rive nan ane 538, oswa se te papote a k ap pilonnen Jerizalèm espirityèl la ak adoratè ki ladan l yo, sa te yon ilistrasyon sou dispèsyon pèp Bondye a, ki te rive poutèt pèp Bondye a te kraze alyans “saba tè a” jan sa reprezante nan Levitik chapit vennsenk ak vennsis. Nan chapit vennsis la yo rele sa kontestasyon alyans Bondye a.
And I will bring a sword upon you, that shall avenge the quarrel of my covenant: and when ye are gathered together within your cities, I will send the pestilence among you; and ye shall be delivered into the hand of the enemy. Leviticus 26:25.
Epi m ap fè nepe vini sou nou, ki va tire revanj pou kont akò mwen an; epi lè nou rasanble anndan lavil nou yo, m ap voye epidemi nan mitan nou; epi y ap livre nou nan men lènmi an. Levitik 26:25.
The rebellion against God’s covenant brought upon God’s people the slavery and scattering that is represented as the “quarrel of my covenant.” Without understanding the punishment, which Daniel calls Moses’ “curse” and “oath”, that is also called the “quarrel of my covenant,” blinds a person from seeing the deeper meaning of Christ’s work as represented in Daniel chapter nine. A consistent evaluation of God’s people who are in Laodicean blindness in the writings of Ellen White is that they cannot “reason from cause, to effect.” You may profess to understand the twelve hundred and sixty years of the Dark Ages, but if you don’t know the “cause” of that trampling down you are blind.
Rebelyon kont alyans Bondye a te fè pèp Bondye a sibi esklavaj ak dispèsyon, sa ki reprezante kòm « diskisyon alyans mwen an ». San konpreyansyon sou pinisyon an, ke Danyèl rele « madichon » ak « sèman » Moyiz la, e ki rele tou « diskisyon alyans mwen an », yon moun vin avèg pou l wè siyifikasyon ki pi pwofon nan travay Kris la jan sa reprezante nan chapit nèf liv Danyèl la. Yon evalyasyon ki konsistan sou pèp Bondye a ki nan avègman Lawodise a nan ekriti Ellen White yo se ke yo pa kapab « rezone depi nan kòz rive nan efè ». Ou ka fè pwoklamasyon ou konprann mil de san swasant ane Mwayennaj tenèb yo, men si ou pa konnen « kòz » pilonnen anba pye sa a, ou avèg.
And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate. Daniel 9:27.
Li pral konfime alyans lan ak anpil moun pou yon semèn; e nan mitan semèn nan li pral fè sakrifis la ak ofrann lan sispann; epi poutèt depwazman abominasyon yo li pral fè l vin tounen yon dezolasyon, jis rive nan akonplisman final la; e sa ki detèmine a pral vide sou sila ki dezole a. Danyèl 9:27.
Christ’s confirmation of the covenant is directly associated with the “quarrel of His covenant.” The duration of the “curse” was twenty-five hundred and twenty years, and the duration of Christ confirming that very same covenant was twenty-five hundred and twenty days. In agreement with the Hebrew word “truth” which provides the structure of the hidden history of the seven thunders, the prophetic week that Christ was to confirm His covenant possessed three waymarks that are represented by the first, thirteenth and last letters of the Hebrew alphabet.
Konfimasyon Kris la bay alyans lan asosye dirèkteman ak “kontestasyon alyans Li a.” Dire “madichon” an te de mil senk san ven (2520) ane, epi dire Kris t ap konfime menm alyans sa a te de mil senk san ven (2520) jou. An akò ak mo ebre ki vle di “verite” a, ki bay estrikti istwa kache sèt loraj yo, semèn pwofetik Kris te dwe konfime alyans Li a te genyen twa pwen-repè ki reprezante pa premye, trèzyèm, ak dènye lèt alfabè ebre a.
The first waymark of the week was His baptism, the second waymark was the cross and the last was the death of Stephen. To refuse to see the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six, as the heavenly angels led William Miller to see the “seven times,” eliminates the ability to fully see the very prophecy where Christ shed His blood and confirmed the very covenant that His literal ancient people had rejected. Everyone that is ultimately saved will have only a partial and incomplete understanding of “truth.” But no one gets saved that purposely refuses to see the “truth.” There is only one way to the Father, and that is through Jesus, and Jesus is the “truth.”
Premye siy-trase semèn nan se te batèm Li, dezyèm siy-trase a se te kwa a, epi dènye a se te lanmò Etèn. Lè yon moun refize wè “sèt fwa” yo nan Levitik 26, jan zanj nan syèl la te mennen William Miller pou l wè “sèt fwa” yo, sa elimine kapasite pou wè nèt ale pwofesi menm kote Kris te vide san Li epi te konfime alyans menm nan ke pèp literal ansyen Li a te rejte. Tout moun ki finalman sove ap gen sèlman yon konpreyansyon pasyèl ak enkonplè sou “verite” a. Men pèsonn pa sove si li fè espre refize wè “verite” a. Gen yon sèl chemen pou rive jwenn Papa a, e se atravè Jezi; epi Jezi se “verite” a.
This is a worthwhile understanding to ponder, for it speaks to the covenant of Leviticus twenty-five and twenty-six. The “curse” of the “seven times” was brought upon ancient literal Israel through their unwillingness to implement the guidelines of allowing the land to rest, and of fulfilling the Jubilee instructions. It was a sin of omission. The curse was brought upon them for their omitting a work they were commanded to do, rather than because they had directly broken a commandment, such as thou shalt not kill or thou shalt not steal. They simply ignored the guidelines associated with allowing the land to rest. Adventists that simply do not accept the “seven times” (that the angels led William Miller to discover) because for whatever unsanctified reason, simply have never taken the time to truly investigate the truth, and are accomplishing the same type of rebellion of omission by disregarding the very same covenant information that ancient literal Israel disregarded. The beginning illustrates the ending.
Sa a se yon konpreyansyon ki merite pou moun medite sou li, paske li pale konsènan alyans Levitik venk senk ak venk sis. “Madichon” “sèt fwa” yo te tonbe sou ansyen Izrayèl literal la poutèt yo pa t dispoze mete an aplikasyon direktiv ki te mande pou yo kite tè a repoze, epi pou yo akonpli enstriksyon Jubile a. Se te yon peche omisyon. Madichon an te tonbe sou yo paske yo te neglije yon travay yo te resevwa kòmandman pou fè, olye ke poutèt yo te dirèkteman vyole yon kòmandman, tankou ou pa dwe touye oswa ou pa dwe vòlè. Yo te senpleman inyore direktiv ki te gen rapò ak kite tè a repoze. Advantis ki senpleman pa aksepte “sèt fwa” yo (ke zanj yo te mennen William Miller dekouvri), paske pou kèlkeswa rezon ki pa sanktifye, yo pa janm pran tan pou yo vrèman egzamine verite a, ap akonpli menm kalite rebelyon omisyon an lè yo neglije menm enfòmasyon alyans lan ke ansyen Izrayèl literal la te neglije. Kòmansman an ilistre fen an.
The twelve hundred and sixty days in Revelation twelve that is identified as a “wilderness,” is a symbol of the “seven times.” Both the twelve hundred and sixty days of Christ’s ministry, and the twelve hundred and sixty days of the disciple’s ministry represent the entire week that the covenant was being confirmed. Both the twelve hundred and sixty years that paganism trampled down God’s people, and the twelve hundred and sixty years that papalism trampled down God’s people, represent the entire “seven times” of the curse of Moses.
Mille de san swasant jou yo nan Revelasyon douz la, ki idantifye kòm yon “dezè”, se yon senbòl “sèt tan” yo. Ni mille de san swasant jou ministè Kris la, ni mille de san swasant jou ministè disip yo, reprezante tout semèn nan pandan alyans lan t ap konfime. Ni mille de san swasant ane paganism lan te pilonnen pèp Bondye a, ni mille de san swasant ane papism lan te pilonnen pèp Bondye a, reprezante tout “sèt tan” madichon Moyiz la.
In Revelation eleven, after twelve hundred and sixty days, the dead bones are brought back to life in order to enter into covenant as the one hundred and forty-four thousand. But in order for them to accomplish that covenant relationship, they are required to fulfill the terms of the covenant, just as Daniel did in chapter nine. The terms of the covenant of the “seven times” contains specific directions for those who find themselves in the land of the enemy. When those who wake up to the reality that they have been scattered desire to return to the Lord, Leviticus twenty-six provides directions for how they are to return.
Nan Revelasyon onz, apre mil desan swasant jou, zo mò yo tounen vivan ankò pou yo antre nan alyans antanke san karannkat mil yo. Men, pou yo kapab akonpli relasyon alyans sa a, yo oblije ranpli kondisyon alyans lan, menm jan Danyèl te fè sa nan chapit nèf. Kondisyon alyans “sèt fwa” a gen enstriksyon presi pou sila yo ki jwenn tèt yo nan peyi lènmi an. Lè sila yo ki reveye pou reyalite ke yo te gaye toupatou yo vin gen dezi pou yo retounen vin jwenn Senyè a, Levitik vennsis bay enstriksyon sou fason yo dwe retounen.
And they that are left of you shall pine away in their iniquity in your enemies’ lands; and also in the iniquities of their fathers shall they pine away with them. If they shall confess their iniquity, and the iniquity of their fathers, with their trespass which they trespassed against me, and that also they have walked contrary unto me; And that I also have walked contrary unto them, and have brought them into the land of their enemies; if then their uncircumcised hearts be humbled, and they then accept of the punishment of their iniquity: Then will I remember my covenant with Jacob, and also my covenant with Isaac, and also my covenant with Abraham will I remember; and I will remember the land. Leviticus 26:39–42.
Epi sa yo ki va rete nan mitan nou yo, y ap depafini nan inikite pa yo nan peyi lènmi nou yo; epi tou, nan inikite zansèt pa yo, y ap depafini ansanm ak yo. Si yo konfese inikite pa yo, ak inikite zansèt pa yo, ansanm ak fot yo te fè kont mwen an, epi si yo rekonèt tou yo te mache an opozisyon avè m; e ke mwen menm tou, mwen te mache an opozisyon avèk yo, e mwen te mennen yo nan peyi lènmi yo; si lè sa a kè ensikonsi pa yo imilye, e yo aksepte pinisyon inikite pa yo: Lè sa a, m ap sonje alyans mwen avèk Jakòb la, e tou alyans mwen avèk Izarak la, e tou alyans mwen avèk Abraram nan m ap sonje; epi m ap sonje peyi a. Levitik 26:39–42.
The expression “pine away” in the Scriptures means to be dissolved, corrupted and consumed away. To pine away is to deteriorate into dead dry bones. And the instruction identifies death, for it represents those that awaken to their condition as being “in your enemies land.”
Ekspresyon “deperi” nan Ekriti yo vle di fonn, kòwonpi epi fin depafini nèt. Deperi vle di deteryore jiskaske yon moun tounen zo mò sèk. E enstriksyon an idantifye lanmò, paske li reprezante moun ki reveye sou kondisyon pa yo kòm moun ki “nan peyi lènmi nou yo.”
The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death. 1 Corinthians 15:26.
Dènye lènmi ki pral detwi a se lanmò. 1 Korentyen 15:26.
July 18, 2020, the first disappointment in the movement of the third angel took place. It has been typified by all the other first disappointments in the sacred prophetic reform lines. Ezekiel chapter thirty-seven identifies God’s people in the last days as having been dissolved, corrupted and consumed away until they were simply a valley of dead dry bones. They are in the enemy’s land, which is the land of death. In Revelation eleven, the two witnesses were slain and left in the street. All the prophets agree with each other. Moses is therefore speaking to those that are dead in the street that runs through Ezekiel’s valley. In their disappointed condition they are given instruction through Jeremiah.
Nan dat 18 Jiyè 2020, premye desepsyon an nan mouvman twazyèm zanj lan te pran plas. Li te deja tipifye pa tout lòt premye desepsyon yo nan liy sakre refòm pwofetik yo. Ezekyèl chapit trant-sèt idantifye pèp Bondye a nan dènye jou yo kòm moun ki te fonn, kòwonpi, epi fin disparèt nèt, jiskaske yo te vin senpleman yon vale zo mò sèk. Yo nan peyi lènmi an, ki se peyi lanmò a. Nan Revelasyon onz, yo te touye de temwen yo epi yo te kite yo nan lari a. Tout pwofèt yo dakò youn ak lòt. Se poutèt sa, Moyiz ap pale ak moun ki mouri nan lari ki travèse vale Ezekyèl la. Nan kondisyon desepsyon yo a, yo resevwa enstriksyon pa mwayen Jeremi.
Therefore thus saith the Lord, If thou return, then will I bring thee again, and thou shalt stand before me: and if thou take forth the precious from the vile, thou shalt be as my mouth: let them return unto thee; but return not thou unto them. Jeremiah 15:19.
Se poutèt sa, men sa Senyè a di: Si ou tounen vin jwenn mwen, m ap fè ou tounen ankò, epi ou va kanpe devan mwen; epi si ou separe sa ki presye a ak sa ki derespektab la, ou va tankou bouch pa m. Se pou yo tounen vin jwenn ou; men ou menm, pa tounen vin jwenn yo. Jeremi 15:19.
Jeremiah is informed that if he desires to speak for God, he must return, and in so doing he must separate the precious from the vile. The context of the passage identifies that the vile are those that he is not to return unto. When he is represented in the passage as being in his disappointed state, he identifies that he was alone.
Jeremi resevwa enfòmasyon ke, si li vle pale pou Bondye, li dwe retounen; e, lè l ap fè sa, li dwe separe sa ki gen anpil valè ak sa ki degradan an. Kontèks pasaj la montre ke sa ki degradan yo se moun li pa dwe retounen bò kote yo. Lè pasaj la prezante l nan eta desepsyon li a, li fè konnen li te pou kont li.
I sat not in the assembly of the mockers, nor rejoiced; I sat alone because of thy hand: for thou hast filled me with indignation. Jeremiah 15:17.
Mwen pa t chita nan asanble moun k ap pase nan betiz yo, ni mwen pa t rejwi; mwen te chita pou kont mwen poutèt men ou: paske ou te ranpli mwen ak endiyasyon. Jeremi 15:17.
Jeremiah was not seated in the “assembly of mockers,” for he was seated alone. He was not to return to the vile, who are the assembly of mockers. In 1863, Adventism began its return to the “assembly of mockers” when it returned to the biblical methodology of the daughters of Babylon in order to reject Moses’ “seven times.” But Jeremiah is more specifically speaking of the last days, than the Millerite history. When those in the valley of dead bones awaken to the fact that they are in the enemies’ land, they are never to return to those that rejoiced over their death in the street. That group can return unto Jeremiah, but he cannot return unto them.
Jérémie ne siégeait pas dans « l’assemblée des moqueurs », car il siégeait seul. Il ne devait pas retourner vers les vils, qui sont l’assemblée des moqueurs. En 1863, l’adventisme commença son retour à « l’assemblée des moqueurs » lorsqu’il revint à la méthodologie biblique des filles de Babylone afin de rejeter les « sept temps » de Moïse. Mais Jérémie parle plus particulièrement des derniers jours que de l’histoire millérite. Lorsque ceux qui sont dans la vallée des ossements desséchés s’éveillent au fait qu’ils sont dans le pays de l’ennemi, ils ne doivent jamais retourner vers ceux qui se sont réjouis de leur mort dans la rue. Ce groupe peut revenir à Jérémie, mais lui ne peut pas retourner vers eux.
But if they are to return, they also must fulfill the directions given by Moses that are directly associated with the “seven times.” Those that are dead in the street in Revelation eleven, are dead for three and a half days, which prophetically is the “wilderness.”
Men si yo dwe retounen, yo menm tou yo dwe akonpli enstriksyon Moyiz te bay ki asosye dirèkteman ak “sèt fwa yo.” Moun ki mouri nan lari a nan Revelasyon onz la, yo mouri pandan twa jou edmi, ki pwofetikman se “dezè a.”
This is why the initial awakening of the dead is accomplished by a message that causes the bones to be formed together, but they are not yet alive. It takes the message of the four winds, which is the sealing message, to turn them into a mighty army. The first message that brings them together comes from a “voice.”
Se poutèt sa, premye reveye mò yo akonpli pa yon mesaj ki fè zo yo rasanble ansanm, men yo poko vivan. Se mesaj kat van yo, ki se mesaj sele a, ki nesesè pou fè yo tounen yon gwo lame vanyan. Premye mesaj ki rasanble yo ansanm nan soti nan yon “vwa.”
Comfort ye, comfort ye my people, saith your God. Speak ye comfortably to Jerusalem, and cry unto her, that her warfare is accomplished, that her iniquity is pardoned: for she hath received of the Lord’s hand double for all her sins. The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight in the desert a highway for our God. Every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be made low: and the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough places plain. Isaiah 40:1–4.
Konsole pèp mwen an, konsole li, se Bondye nou an ki di sa. Pale ak Jerizalèm yon fason ki touche kè li, epi rele byen fò ba li, fè li konnen tan sèvis difisil li a fini, mechanste li padonnen; paske li resevwa nan men Seyè a doub pou tout peche li yo. Se vwa yon moun k ap rele nan dezè a: Pare chemen Seyè a, fè yon gran wout dwat nan dezè a pou Bondye nou an. Tout fon va leve byen wo, tout mòn ak tout ti mòn va bese; sa ki kwochi va vin dwat, epi kote ki graj yo va tounen plenn. Ezayi 40:1–4.
The voice comes from the wilderness, which is a symbol of the scattering of the “seven times.” That voice is in the wilderness, for Ezekiel was also taken to the valley of dead bones. He was testifying from the very valley, not from a distance.
Vwa a soti nan dezè a, ki se yon senbòl dispèsyon “sèt tan” yo. Vwa sa a nan dezè a, paske Ezekyèl tou te mennen nan vale zo mò yo. Li t ap rann temwayaj depi nan menm vale a, pa soti byen lwen.
The hand of the Lord was upon me, and carried me out in the spirit of the Lord, and set me down in the midst of the valley which was full of bones. Ezekiel 37:1.
Men Senyè a te sou mwen, epi li te pote m deyò nan Lespri Senyè a, li mete m nan mitan fon an ki te plen zo. Ezekyèl 37:1.
The valley is the wilderness of three and a half days. The promise of the voice is that Jerusalem’s iniquity is pardoned and that her warfare is finished. The promise is representing the sealing of the one hundred and forty-four thousand that is accomplished in the last days. But the pardoning of her iniquity is associated with her receiving “double” for all her sins. The remedy offered by Moses requires a confession of not only their iniquities, but also the iniquities of their fathers. If they will fulfill that command, their iniquity will be pardoned.
Vale a se dezè twa jou edmi a. Pwomès vwa a se ke inikite Jerizalèm padonnen e ke lagè pa li a fini. Pwomès la reprezante sele sant karannkat mil la ki akonpli nan dènye jou yo. Men padon inikite pa li a asosye ak lefèt ke li resevwa “double” pou tout peche pa li yo. Remèd Moyiz te ofri a egzije yon konfesyon non sèlman inikite pa yo, men tou inikite zansèt pa yo. Si yo va akonpli kòmandman sa a, inikite pa yo va padonnen.
We will continue these truths in the next article.
Nou pral kontinye verite sa yo nan atik k ap vini an.
Yea, all Israel have transgressed thy law, even by departing, that they might not obey thy voice; therefore the curse is poured upon us, and the oath that is written in the law of Moses the servant of God, because we have sinned against him. And he hath confirmed his words, which he spake against us, and against our judges that judged us, by bringing upon us a great evil: for under the whole heaven hath not been done as hath been done upon Jerusalem. As it is written in the law of Moses, all this evil is come upon us: yet made we not our prayer before the Lord our God, that we might turn from our iniquities, and understand thy truth. Daniel 9:11–13.
Wi, tout Izrayèl transgrese lwa ou a, menm lè yo te vire do pou yo pa obeyi vwa ou; se poutèt sa madichon an vide sou nou, ansanm ak sèman ki ekri nan lwa Moyiz, sèvitè Bondye a, paske nou peche kont li. Epi li konfime pawòl li yo, pawòl li te pale kont nou, ak kont jij nou yo ki te jije nou yo, lè li fè yon gwo malè tonbe sou nou; paske anba tout syèl la pa janm fèt sa ki fèt sou Jerizalèm. Jan sa ekri nan lwa Moyiz la, tout malè sa a rive sou nou; men nou pa t fè lapriyè nou devan Seyè a, Bondye nou an, pou nou te ka vire do bay mechanste nou yo, epi konprann verite ou. Daniel 9:11–13.