Habakkuk's Two Tables 4 of 95

ހަބައްކޫކުގެ ދެ ތާވަލު 4 އިން 95

For me it is pretty difficult to get through eight pages of notes in an hour's presentation, roughly. And if you will notice, we have 20 pages; so, I am just letting you know that I do not intend to read these notes. I intend to read some of these passages in here for those who are watching on LiveStream that can download the notes; and for those that ultimately watch this on DVD that they have this in the record for themselves, if they do not already have these articles available to them. What we are dealing with is Habakkuk's Two Tables, and at this point all we are doing is trying to demonstrate that Ellen White was in agreement with the truths represented on this 1843 Chart.

बाउ̄ंकि मेरे लिए लगभग एक घंटे की प्रस्तुति में टिप्पणियों के आठ पृष्ठ पूरे कर लेना काफ़ी कठिन है। और यदि आप ध्यान दें, तो हमारे पास 20 पृष्ठ हैं; इसलिए मैं केवल आपको यह बता रहा हूँ कि मेरा इन टिप्पणियों को पूरा पढ़ने का इरादा नहीं है। मेरा इरादा है कि यहाँ से इनमें से कुछ अंश पढ़ूँ, उन लोगों के लिए जो LiveStream पर देख रहे हैं और जो इन टिप्पणियों को डाउनलोड कर सकते हैं; और उन लोगों के लिए भी जो अंततः इसे DVD पर देखेंगे, ताकि उनके लिए यह अभिलेख में रहे, यदि ये लेख पहले से उनके पास उपलब्ध न हों। हम जिस विषय पर विचार कर रहे हैं, वह हबक्कूक की दो पटियाएँ है, और इस समय हम केवल यह प्रदर्शित करने का प्रयास कर रहे हैं कि Ellen White इस 1843 Chart पर प्रस्तुत सत्यों के साथ सहमत थीं।

The first three presentations we concluded yesterday were showing that Ellen White clearly and specifically endorses the 2520 time prophecy as valid in Early Writings, page 236.

Tîr pêşkêşkirinên yekem ên me ku duh bi dawî kirin, nîşan didan ku Ellen White di Early Writings, rûpel 236 de bi awayekî eşkere û taybet pêxemberiya dema 2520 wekî derbasdar piştrast dike.

When speaking of the first disappointment in March of 1844, she says that after the disappointment the Millerites continued to study the Bible, and they discovered that the same evidence that had led them to predict 1843 for the 2520, the 2300, and the 1335, that same evidence was then recognized in 1844, to prove that these prophetic periods ended in 1844. And we discussed how the only prophetic periods that she could be speaking of are these two [referring to the 2520 and the 2300 on the 1843 Chart], not the 1335. The 1335 started in the AD time period; it ended in 1843. Therefore, she is putting her endorsement upon the understanding of the 2520 and the 2300-year prophecy.

1844-njy ýylyň mart aýyndaky ilkinji lapykeçlik barada aýdanda, ol lapykeçlikden soň Milleritleriň Mukaddes Kitaby öwrenmegini dowam etdirendiklerini aýdýar, we olara 2520, 2300 we 1335 baradaky hasapda 1843-nji ýyly öňünden çaklamaga getiren şol bir subutnamanyň, soňra 1844-nji ýylda hem ykrar edilendigini, bu pygamberlik döwürleriniň 1844-nji ýylda tamamlanýandygyny subut etmek üçin kabul edilendigini anykladylar. Biz hem onuň diňe şu iki pygamberlik döwri barada aýdyp biljekdigini ara alyp maslahatlaşdyk [1843-nji ýylyň Çyzgysyndaky 2520 we 2300-e salgylanyp], 1335 barada däl. 1335 biziň eramyz döwründe başlady; ol 1843-nji ýylda tamamlandy. Şonuň üçin, ol 2520 we 2300 ýyllyk pygamberlik baradaky düşünişe öz goldawyny berýär.

And then she went on further to say that during that time period, as they began to prove that three time prophecies ended in 1844, this is what caused the persecution that drove the Millerites out of the church. So, it is not a coincidence that here at the end of the world men and women are being persecuted in the Adventist Church for presenting the information for why the 2520 ended in 1844.

Hanyuma, akayongera kuvuga ko muri icyo gihe, ubwo batangiraga kugaragaza ko ubuhanuzi butatu bw’ibihe bwarangiriye mu 1844, ari cyo cyateye itotezwa ryatumye ab’aba-Millerite birukanwa mu itorero. Bityo rero, si impanuka ko hano ku mperuka y’isi abagabo n’abagore batotezwa mu Itorero ry’Abadivantisiti bazira gutanga amakuru asobanura impamvu 2520 yarangiriye mu 1844.

Directed by the Hand of the Lord

Na Mukono wa Mukama ayolekereddwa

So, now we are moving to another subject, this one right here [referring to AD508 on the 1843 Chart]. You will find, if you have not looked at these Charts, Sister White says of this 1843 Chart, "I saw that the Lord directed in this Chart," and she says of this 1850 Chart that God was in the publishment of this Chart. So, she has told us that God was involved in the production of both of these Charts, and how they are structured was humanly purposeful. The Millerites did it on purpose, but it was by God's design.

Basi, nansha tulingile ku mutwe mukwavo, uyu uno pano [ukulembela ku AD508 pa Chati ya 1843]. Muzaasanga, na kwamba tamunatalile kuzi Chati ezi, kuti Sister White alandapo pa iyi Chati ya 1843 ati, “Nalimwene kuti Mukama alekeelela muli iyi Chati,” kabili alandapo pa iyi Chati ya 1850 ati Lesa ali mu kupalula kwa iyi Chati. E ico, atwebele kuti Lesa ali mu kubomba kwa zombi ezi Chati, kabili ifyo zashindamishiwa fyali ku mutima wa muntu. Aba Millerite bacitile pa kupanga, lelo fyali mu kupanga kwa Lesa.

Up here, from 677BC down to what they believed, AD1843, this is the column [referring to the second column right the left on the 1843 Chart] that defines the 2520, that begins in 677BC and they thought ended in AD1843.

Kuno juu, ku 677 BC kuteremka hadi kile walichoamini kuwa ni AD 1843, huu ndio safu [ikirejelea safu ya pili kulia kwa kushoto kwenye Chati ya 1843] inayoifafanua 2520, inayoanza mwaka 677 BC, na walidhani ilikoma katika AD 1843.

And they retained this graphic illustration on the 1850 Chart, from here [referring to the third column from the left] 677BC to here, AD1844. This is the column of the 2520 that exists on both Charts.

Yꞌochiꞌik le baꞌax tsꞌíibtabil tu juumilil 1850 le ilik kꞌáat chiꞌob teech, tuꞌuxaꞌ [táan u tsolik le óoxpꞌéel columna káajal tu tsꞌéel tsꞌíiknal] 677 a.C. tak AD1844. Leꞌeꞌ u columnail le 2520 yaan ichil kaꞌatúulil le kaꞌa chartoꞌoboꞌ.

And right in the middle of these columns is the cross, in both instances.

Û li navenda van van stûnanan de xaç heye, di herdu rewşan de.

And right below the cross is the reference to the Daily. And the symbol of the Daily, Paganism, the root of the Pagan religion, is self-exaltation; and, this is where you can see the Lord's hand in it, not necessarily the human hand on both of these charts.

Û li binê xaçê de jî referansa bo Rojane heye. Û sembola Rojane, Putperestî, koka ola putperestî, bilindkirina xwe ye; û, li vir e ku hûn dikarin destê Xudan tê de bibînin, ne ku pêwîst be destê mirovî li ser her du van nexşeyan.

For you and me, or anyone, to have our self-exaltation removed from us, we must come to the foot of the cross, reflected on both of these Charts. That lesson is illustrated.

Ili kwa mimi na wewe, au mtu yeyote, kuondolewa kujikweza kwetu, yatupasa kuja chini ya msalaba, kama kunavyoonyeshwa katika Chati hizi zote mbili. Fundisho hilo linaonyeshwa wazi.

And, of course, when we talk about the columns of the 2520 with the cross in the middle, we know that in fulfillment of Daniel 9, when Christ came to confirm the covenant with many for one week, that one week equates to 2520 days, and in the midst of that week He was crucified. So, in the middle of these columns on each of these Charts we see the cross, and these are inferring the 2520 days that Christ confirmed the covenant with many.

Na, bila shaka, tunaponena juu ya safu za 2520 zenye msalaba katikati, twajua ya kuwa, katika utimilifu wa Danieli 9, Kristo alipokuja kulithibitisha agano pamoja na wengi kwa juma moja, juma hilo moja lalingana na siku 2520, na katikati ya juma hilo alisulubiwa. Basi, katikati ya safu hizi katika kila mojawapo ya Chati hizi twaona msalaba, na hizi zinaashiria siku 2520 ambazo Kristo alithibitisha agano pamoja na wengi.

So, now we are going to take up the Daily and Ellen White's endorsement of it.

Ku nendje, twafuminepo ukufwisha pa Cila Bushiku ne cishininkisho caiko na Ellen White.

"September 23, the Lord showed me that He had stretched out His hand the second time to recover the remnant of His people, and that efforts must be redoubled in this gathering time. In the scattering, Israel was smitten and torn, but now in the gathering time God will heal and bind up His people. In the scattering, efforts made to spread the truth had but little effect, accomplished but little or nothing; but in the gathering, when God has set His hand to gather His people, efforts to spread the truth will have their designed effect. All should be united and zealous in the work. I saw that it was wrong for any to refer to the scattering for examples to govern us now in the gathering; for if God should do no more for us now than He did then, Israel would never be gathered. I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until His hand was removed.

Itariki ya 23 Septemba, Bwana alinionyesha ya kwamba alikuwa amenyoosha mkono Wake mara ya pili ili kuwarejesha mabaki ya watu Wake, na ya kwamba juhudi zapasa kuongezwa maradufu katika wakati huu wa kukusanya. Katika kutawanyika, Israeli alipigwa na kuraruliwa, lakini sasa katika wakati wa kukusanya Mungu atawaponya na kuwafunga watu Wake. Katika kutawanyika, juhudi zilizofanywa ili kueneza kweli zilikuwa na athari ndogo sana, zikitimiza kidogo tu au kutotimiza chochote; lakini katika kukusanya, Mungu akiisha kuweka mkono Wake ili kuwakusanya watu Wake, juhudi za kueneza kweli zitakuwa na athari iliyokusudiwa. Wote wanapaswa kuungana na kuwa na bidii katika kazi hiyo. Niliona ya kwamba ilikuwa kosa kwa mtu yeyote kurejelea kutawanyika ili kupata mifano ya kutuongoza sasa katika kukusanya; kwa maana kama Mungu hangetutendea zaidi sasa kuliko alivyotenda wakati ule, Israeli hangekusanywa kamwe. Nimeona ya kwamba chati ya 1843 iliongozwa na mkono wa Bwana, na ya kwamba haikupaswa kubadilishwa; ya kwamba tarakimu zilikuwa kama alivyotaka; ya kwamba mkono Wake ulikuwa juu yake na ulificha kosa katika baadhi ya tarakimu, ili asiwepo mtu yeyote awezaye kuliona, hata mkono Wake ulipoondolewa.

"Then I saw in relation to the —daily' (Daniel 8:12) that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text, and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —daily'; but in the confusion since 1844, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion have followed. Time has not been a test since 1844, and it will never again be a test.

Bwanyuma neebona ku bikwata ku —buli lunaku” (Danieri 8:12) nti ekigambo —ssaddaaka” kyongerwamu amagezi g’omuntu, era tekiri mu byawandiikibwa, era nti Mukama yawa okutegeera okutuufu kw’ensonga eyo eri abo abaabuulira okukaaba okw’essaawa ey’omusango. Obumu bwe bwaliwo, nga 1844 tannatuuka, kumpi bonna baali bumu ku kutegeera okutuufu okw’eby’—buli lunaku”; naye mu kavuyo akaaddirira okuva mu 1844, endowooza endala zaakwatibwako, era ekizikiza n’akavuyo ne bigoberera. Obudde tebubadde kikemebwa okuva mu 1844, era tebujja kuddamu kuba kikemebwa nate.

"The Lord has shown me that the message of the third angel must go, and be proclaimed to the scattered children of the Lord, but it must not be hung on time. I saw that some were getting a false excitement, arising from preaching time; but the third angel's message is stronger than time can be. I saw that this message can stand on its own foundation and needs not time to strengthen it; and that it will go in mighty power, and do its work, and will be cut short in righteousness.

“Bwana amenionyesha kwamba ujumbe wa malaika wa tatu hauna budi kwenda mbele, na kutangazwa kwa watoto wa Bwana waliotawanyika, lakini haupaswi kutegemezwa juu ya wakati. Nikaona kwamba wengine walikuwa wakipata msisimko wa uongo, unaotokana na kuhubiri wakati; lakini ujumbe wa malaika wa tatu una nguvu kuliko wakati unavyoweza kuwa nazo. Nikaona kwamba ujumbe huu unaweza kusimama juu ya msingi wake wenyewe wala hauhitaji wakati ili kuutiatia nguvu; na kwamba utaenda kwa uwezo mkuu, na kuifanya kazi yake, nao utakamilishwa kwa haki.”

"Then I was pointed to some who are in the great error of believing that it is their duty to go to Old Jerusalem, and think they have a work to do there before the Lord comes. Such a view is calculated to take the mind and interest from the present work of the Lord, under the message of the third angel; for those who think that they are yet to go to Jerusalem will have their minds there, and their means will be withheld from the cause of present truth to get themselves and others there. I saw that such a mission would accomplish no real good, that it would take a long while to make a very few of the Jews believe even in the first advent of Christ, much more to believe in His second advent. I saw that Satan had greatly deceived some in this thing and that souls all around them in this land could be helped by them and led to keep the commandments of God, but they were leaving them to perish. I also saw that Old Jerusalem never would be built up; and that Satan was doing his utmost to lead the minds of the children of the Lord into these things now, in the gathering time, to keep them from throwing their whole interest into the present work of the Lord, and to cause them to neglect the necessary preparation for the day of the Lord." Early Writings, 74–76.

“Bongo nalangizo ku ŵanji awo ŵali mu upusikizgi ukuru wa kugomezga kuti ni mulimo wawo kuluta ku Yerusalemu Wakale, ndipo ŵakughanaghana kuti ŵali na ntchito yakuchita kula pambere Fumu yindize. Maghanoghano ghantheura ngakukhumbikwa kuti ghatole maghanoghano na chidwi ku mulimo wa sono wa Fumu, pasi pa uthenga wa mungelo wachitatu; pakuti awo ŵakughanaghana kuti ŵachali kuluta ku Yerusalemu ŵaŵenge na maghanoghano ghawo kula, ndipo ndalama zawo zizamukanizgika ku mulimo wa unenesko wa sono kuti ŵajitozgere iwoŵene na ŵanyawo kuluta kula. Nkhalora kuti ntchito yantheura yingafiska uwemi uliwose wanadi chara, kuti vingatora nyengo yitali chomene kuti Ŵayuda ŵachoko waka ŵagomezge nanga ni za kwiza kwakwamba kwa Khristu, ndipo chomenechomene kugomezga za kwiza Kwake kwachiŵiri. Nkhalora kuti Satana wakapuska chomene ŵanji pa nkhani iyi, ndipo mizimu ya ŵanthu yose yakuzingilira iwo mu charu ichi yingawovwirika na iwo na kulongozgeka kusunga malango gha Chiuta, kweni iwo ŵakaŵaleka kuti ŵaparare. Nakuso nkhalora kuti Yerusalemu Wakale wazamuzengekaso chara; ndiposo kuti Satana wakachitanga vyose ivyo wangakwaniska kuti walongozgere maghanoghano gha ŵana ŵa Fumu ku vinthu ivi sono, mu nyengo ya kuwunganya, kuti waŵatondeske kuponya chidwi chawo chose mu mulimo wa sono wa Fumu, na kuŵachitiska kuti ŵaleke kunozgekera kwakukhumbikwa pa zuŵa la Fumu.” Early Writings, 74–76.

A few things that we are going to show is we have a passage from Early Writings, page 74. We have dealt with this before. Many of these things we will be dealing with in this presentation, we have dealt with before; but, most of us do not understand that this passage in Early Writings went through an evolution. As it exists in the book Early Writings, men will use what is in Early Writings to misrepresent the truth. But, if you go back to the original source documents, the logic for their misrepresenting the truth is removed.

Biloko moke oyo tokolakisa ezali ete tozali na eteni moko na *Early Writings*, lokasa 74. Tobandaki kosala na yango kala. Biloko mingi kati na oyo tokosalela na liteya oyo, tosali na yango liboso; kasi mingi kati na biso basosoli te ete eteni oyo na *Early Writings* elekaki na bokoli moko. Lokola ezali sikawa na buku *Early Writings*, bato bakosalela oyo ezali na *Early Writings* mpo na kobebisa bosolo na ndenge ya lokuta. Kasi soki bozongi na mikanda ya ebandeli ya euti na yango, nzela ya makanisi oyo basalelaka mpo na kobebisa bosolo elongolami.

So, there is much that can be said about this. I am only going to identify a couple of points, because we are dealing with the Daily here. But, in this passage from Early Writings, I would have you take note of the very first two thoughts, September 23rd.

E hena a mea ku‘u pono ke fai atu ki he me‘á ni. Te u fakahaa‘i pē ha ngaahi poini si‘i ‘e ua, he ‘oku tau fehangahangai heni mo e Daily. Ka, ‘i he kupu ko eni mei he Early Writings, ‘oku ou loto ke mou fakatokanga‘i ‘a e ongo fakakaukau ‘uluaki taha pē, Sepitema 23.

Okay. September 23rd, if you are not familiar with it, you can put 1850 there; September 23, 1850. This has an impact on correctly understanding the Daily.

Sawa. Septemba 23, kama hujaifahamu, unaweza kuweka 1850 hapo; Septemba 23, 1850. Hili lina athari katika kuelewa kwa usahihi Dhabihu ya Kila Siku.

The end of the first paragraph is a statement that we have dealt with here already for the past few days, "I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it until His hand was removed."

Paragrafu ya kwanza inakamilika kwa kauli ambayo tumeshughulika nayo hapa tayari kwa siku chache zilizopita: “Nimeona kwamba chati ya 1843 iliongozwa na mkono wa Bwana, na kwamba haikupaswa kubadilishwa; kwamba tarakimu zilikuwa kama alivyotaka Yeye; kwamba mkono Wake ulikuwa juu yake na ulificha kosa katika baadhi ya tarakimu, ili asiwepo yeyote ambaye angeweza kuliona mpaka mkono Wake ulipoondolewa.”

The second paragraph says, "Then I saw in relation to the —daily' (Daniel 8:12) . . . ." Now, I want you to just put in your memory bank—we will deal with this no doubt later, the Lord willing—when the Daily is represented on the 1843 Chart, right here, it says, "taking away the daily"; it says, "Daniel 12: 11 and 12." On the 1850 Chart, when it is dealing with the Daily, it says, "pagan dominion or when the daily taken away, Daniel 11:31." So, on these two Charts, the emphasis that they are identifying from Daniel 11:31 and Daniel 12:11 is the taking away of the Daily. All right?

Mavungu gha vavali ghanangile ngwavo, “Dipo ngwamwene mu kuyanika na —’Daily’ (Daniel 8:12) . . . .” Hambi, ndinakuyanda muviike eyi mu ngumbungulu yenu ya kuvulukila—twikatambula yeyi, kakwechi kusinina, munyima, Mwene kutuvule—luno, po Daily yile yikamonikila mu Chati cha 1843, hano vene, yati, “taking away the daily”; yati, “Daniel 12:11 and 12.” Mu Chati cha 1850, po chikumbulula vya Daily, chati, “pagan dominion or when the daily taken away, Daniel 11:31.” Lwenu, mu Yichati eyi yivali, kuyanika chavene chikavangijila kufuma mu Daniel 11:31 na Daniel 12:11 chili pakusosola kutusokoka cha Daily. Chakwoloka?

And in Daniel 11:31 and Daniel 12:11, the Hebrew word that is translated as "take away" is sur, and it means "to take away"; it means "to remove."

Na katika Danieli 11:31 na Danieli 12:11, neno la Kiebrania lililotafsiriwa kuwa “kuondoa” ni *sur*, nalo linamaanisha “kuondoa”; linamaanisha “kuweka mbali.”

But, in Daniel 8, in verse 11, where it says the Daily is taken away, it is a different Hebrew word. It is rum, and it means "to lift up and to exalt."

Ariko, muri Daniyeli 8, ku murongo wa 11, aho havuga ko “Ibitambo bya buri munsi” bikurwaho, hakoreshejwe ijambo ry’Igiheburayo ritandukanye. Ni rum, kandi risobanura “gushyira hejuru no gukuza.”

So, William Miller used the Cruden's Concordance, and the Cruden's Concordance does not give you any insight on the Hebrew or the Greek. So, the Lord was directing the Millerites; because, of the three places where the Daily is referenced in the Book of Daniel, Daniel chapter 8, Daniel chapter 11, and Daniel chapter 12, in chapters 11 and 12 the Hebrew that is translated "take away" means "take away." And that is what they are emphasizing on these Charts, is when Paganism was taken away the 1290 and the 1335 prophecies would begin.

Kūn, William Miller la Cruden's Concordance a tê lo, ka Cruden's Concordance hian Hebrew leh Greek chungchangah hriatthiamna engmah a pe lo. Chuvangin, Lalpa chuan Millerite-te a hruai a ni; a chhan chu, Daniel lehkhabuah Daily thu sawi hmun pathum—Daniel bung 8, Daniel bung 11, leh Daniel bung 12—zingah, bung 11 leh 12-ah chuan Hebrew tawngkam “take away” tia lehlin chu a awm ang ngeiin “take away” tihna ngei a ni. Chu chu a ni hête Chart-ahte hian an sawi uar ber, chu Paganism lak bo a nih hian 1290 leh 1335 hrilhlâwkna-te chu an ṭan ang tih.

But, in Daniel 8, when the Daily is taken away, it is not talking about being removed; it is talking about the religion of Paganism being lifted up and exalted. So, the Millerites got it right. They referenced the two chapters in Daniel that are about the Daily being taken away.

Lê, di Daniel 8 de, dema ku Ya Rojane tê rakirin, axaftin li ser jêbirinê nake; lê li ser vê yekê dike ku ola Paganîzmê tê bilindkirin û tê bilindgirtin. Ji ber vê yekê, Milleriyan rast gotin. Wan amaje bi herdu beşên di Daniel de kir ku li ser Ya Rojane ya ku tê rakirin in.

But here in Early Writings and as we go back through the original source documents you are going to see in this chapter that originally this reference of Daniel 8:12 is not there. I do not know that Ellen White told them to include that in there in 1882 when they printed Early Writings, or if one of the editors put it in. I am not threatened by it, because it is not talking about the taking away here.

Lakini hapa katika *Early Writings*, na tunaporudi kupitia nyaraka za asili za chanzo, mtaona katika sura hii kwamba hapo mwanzo rejea hii ya Danieli 8:12 haipo. Sijui kama Ellen White aliwaambia waiingize humo mwaka 1882 walipochapisha *Early Writings*, au kama mmoja wa wahariri aliitia ndani. Sihisi kutishiwa nayo, kwa sababu hapa haisemi kuhusu kuondolewa.

It says in the second paragraph, "Then I saw in relation to the —daily' (Daniel 8:12) that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text, and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry."

Ɛka ho asɛm wɔ nkyekyem a ɛto so abien mu sɛ, “Afei mihuu sɛnea ɛfa ‘daa daa no’ ho (Daniel 8:12) sɛ, nnipa nyansa na ɛde asɛmfua ‘afɔre’ no kaa ho, na ɛnyɛ ade a ɛwɔ nkyerɛwee no mu, na Awurade de ne ntease a ɛteɛ faa ho maa wɔn a wɔde atemmu bere no sufrɛ no mae.”

Now, we had a meeting with some of the prominent pastors in Germany and some of the seminary teachers from Germany several years ago, in Germany, where I presented and they threw their stones at this message.

Ndongo yeyi yi nthi yiaim mweene na athomi amwe ma andu ma kwenda nza ya Kiumani na amwe ma alongi ma seminari kuuma Kiumani myaka imwe mbee, kuu Kiumani, vala niwasilithisye, nao makwata mawe ma kuminyana na ujumbe uu.

And there was a pastor there from Italy, and he expressed one of the foolish arguments about this verse. And what he said was—and there are several foolish arguments about the Daily, so you find this foolish argument used often and we will put it in the record here. It says, "Then I saw in relation to the —daily' (Daniel 8:12) that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text, and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry." Here is the foolish argument: They say Ellen White is not endorsing the Daily here; she is endorsing the Pioneer understanding that the word sacrifice was added by human wisdom and does not belong to the text. Okay? So, this Italian pastor is making this argument.

Na kulikuwa na mchungaji mmoja huko kutoka Italia, naye akatoa mojawapo ya hoja za kipumbavu kuhusu aya hii. Na alichosema kilikuwa hiki—na kuna hoja kadhaa za kipumbavu kuhusu lile la Kila Siku, kwa hiyo utaona hoja hii ya kipumbavu ikitumiwa mara nyingi, nasi tutaweka katika kumbukumbu hapa. Inasema, “Kisha nikaona kuhusu ‘kila siku’ (Danieli 8:12) kwamba neno ‘dhabihu’ liliongezwa kwa hekima ya mwanadamu, wala si sehemu ya maandishi, na kwamba Bwana aliwapa mtazamo sahihi juu yake wale walioitoa sauti ya saa ya hukumu.” Hapa ndipo ilipo hoja ya kipumbavu: Wanasema Ellen White haungi mkono lile la Kila Siku hapa; anaunga mkono uelewa wa waanzilishi kwamba neno dhabihu liliongezwa kwa hekima ya kibinadamu na si sehemu ya maandishi. Sawa? Kwa hiyo, huyu mchungaji wa Kiitalia anatoa hoja hii.

And I said, "Well, explain the next sentence to me, Pastor."

Na nĩngwĩrire atĩ, “Wega, ndondithia gĩcigo gĩkĩ kĩngĩrĩrĩria, Mũruti.”

The next sentence says, "When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —daily'; . . . ." This is not about the correct view of the word sacrifice being added by human wisdom. Ellen White here—and this is a hard one, this is a hard one for these people that are refusing to hear and are refusing to see in Adventism today. This paragraph, there are probably more theologians have lost their salvation over this paragraph than any other paragraph in the Spirit of Prophecy. I am not exaggerating; I think that is probably accurate.

ꯃꯈꯥ ꯂꯥꯏꯔꯤꯛꯑꯁꯤꯗꯥ ꯑꯗꯨꯅꯥ ꯍꯥꯏ, “ꯑꯄꯨꯟꯕ ꯂꯩꯔꯝꯕ ꯃꯇꯝꯗꯥ, 1844 ꯂꯩꯔꯝꯗ꯭ꯔꯤꯡꯗꯥ, ꯃꯤ ꯄꯨꯝꯅꯃꯛꯁꯦ ꯑꯗꯣꯝꯗꯥ ‘daily’ ꯍꯥꯏꯕꯒꯤ ꯃꯄꯨꯡ ꯆꯥꯅꯕ ꯑꯃ ꯇꯧꯅꯥ ꯑꯄꯨꯟꯅ ꯂꯩꯔꯝꯃꯤ; . . . .” ꯃꯤꯁꯤꯒꯤ ꯑꯔꯨꯝꯕꯗꯤ, ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯕ ꯄꯥꯟꯗꯝꯒꯤ ꯁꯤꯚꯥꯒꯤ ꯏꯁꯩꯅꯥ “sacrifice” ꯍꯥꯏꯕ ꯋꯥꯍꯦꯡ ꯍꯥꯞꯆꯤꯜꯂꯛꯄꯒꯤ ꯃꯄꯨꯡ ꯆꯥꯅꯕ ꯑꯃꯒꯤ ꯃꯇꯪ ꯅꯠꯇꯦ꯫ ꯃꯁꯤꯗꯥ Ellen White-ꯅꯥ—ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯃꯁꯤ ꯑꯍꯥꯟꯕ ꯑꯃꯅꯤ, ꯃꯁꯤ ꯑꯍꯥꯟꯕ ꯑꯃꯅꯤ ꯑꯗꯨꯅꯥ ꯉꯥꯡꯕ ꯇꯥꯕ ꯌꯥꯗꯕ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯎꯕ ꯌꯥꯗꯕ, ꯑꯅꯥꯏ ꯑꯗꯨꯅꯥ Adventism-ꯗꯥ ꯂꯩꯔꯤꯕ ꯃꯤꯈꯩꯁꯤꯡꯒꯤꯗꯃꯛꯇꯥ꯫ ꯃꯁꯤ ꯄꯔꯦꯒ꯭ꯔꯥꯐ ꯑꯁꯤꯗꯥ, Spirit of Prophecy ꯒꯤ ꯄꯔꯦꯒ꯭ꯔꯥꯐ ꯑꯇꯣꯞꯄ ꯑꯃꯄꯨꯝꯃꯛꯇꯒꯤ ꯍꯦꯟꯅꯥ, theologian ꯑꯌꯥꯝꯕꯅꯥ ꯃꯁꯤ ꯄꯔꯦꯒ꯭ꯔꯥꯐ ꯑꯁꯤꯒꯤ ꯃꯔꯝꯗꯥ ꯃꯈꯣꯏꯒꯤ ꯈꯥꯟꯗꯣꯛꯄ ꯂꯣꯏꯁꯤꯟꯈ꯭ꯔꯦ ꯍꯥꯏꯕꯅꯥ ꯍꯧꯏ; ꯑꯗꯨꯃ ꯊꯥꯗꯣꯛꯄ ꯌꯥꯏ꯫ ꯑꯩ ꯊꯥꯗꯣꯛꯄ ꯇꯧꯔꯤꯕ ꯅꯠꯇꯦ; ꯑꯩꯅꯥ ꯈꯪꯏ, ꯃꯁꯤ ꯁꯤꯖꯤꯟꯅꯕꯗꯤ ꯃꯇꯝ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯑꯆꯨꯝꯕ ꯑꯃꯅꯤ꯫

In the early part of the 20th Century when the false view of the Daily is being introduced into Adventism, everyone that was fighting about it on both sides of the issue knew that they were fighting about this paragraph. When Stephen Haskell came to the defense of the Pioneer view that the Daily was Paganism, what did he do? He reprinted this 1843 Chart, and he put this paragraph on the bottom. So this paragraph is the focus of controversy, and it is here where many, many men have fallen on their swords and died.

20ನೇ ಶತಮಾನದ ಪ್ರಾರಂಭಿಕ ಅವಧಿಯಲ್ಲಿ “ದೈನಂದಿನ” ಕುರಿತು ಇರುವ ಸುಳ್ಳು ದೃಷ್ಟಿಕೋಣವನ್ನು ಅಡ್ವೆಂಟಿಸಂನಲ್ಲಿ ಪರಿಚಯಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾಗ, ಆ ವಿಷಯದ ಎರಡೂ ಬದಿಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಅದರ ಕುರಿತು ಹೋರಾಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ಎಲ್ಲರೂ ತಾವು ಈ ಪರಿಚ್ಛೇದದ ಕುರಿತೇ ಹೋರಾಟ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದೇವೆಂದು ತಿಳಿದಿದ್ದರು. “ದೈನಂದಿನ” ಎಂದರೆ ಪೇಗನಿಸಮ್ ಎಂಬ ಪಯೋನಿಯರ್‌ಗಳ ದೃಷ್ಟಿಕೋಣವನ್ನು ರಕ್ಷಿಸಲು ಸ್ಟೀಫನ್ ಹಾಸ್ಕಲ್ ಮುಂದಾಗಿದಾಗ, ಅವರು ಏನು ಮಾಡಿದರು? ಅವರು 1843ರ ಈ ಚಾರ್ಟ್ ಅನ್ನು ಮರುಮುದ್ರಿಸಿದರು, ಮತ್ತು ಈ ಪರಿಚ್ಛೇದವನ್ನು ಅದರ ಕೆಳಭಾಗದಲ್ಲಿ ಇರಿಸಿದರು. ಆದಕಾರಣ ಈ ಪರಿಚ್ಛೇದವೇ ವಿವಾದದ ಕೇಂದ್ರಬಿಂದು; ಮತ್ತು ಇಲ್ಲಿಯೇ ಅನೇಕ, ಅನೇಕ ಮಂದಿ ತಮ್ಮ ಕತ್ತಿಗಳ ಮೇಲೆ ಬಿದ್ದು ಸತ್ತಿದ್ದಾರೆ.

So, at a minimum level of what I want you to see here, because you have men like recently, Steve Wohlberg of White Horse Ministries, he has been opposing this message. And one of his arguments is, "Well, Ellen White never had a position on the Daily, so I don't have to have one," which was just an absolutely foolish position. But, even if we grant him the possibility that Ellen White did not have a position on it, what does she say in this quote? She says that the Pioneers had the correct view of it. Even if she did not know what it was, here she is saying that there is a correct view, which means there are a wrong view, maybe several wrong views.

Nuko, angalau katika kiwango cha chini kabisa cha yale ninachotaka muone hapa, kwa sababu mna watu kama hivi karibuni, Steve Wohlberg wa White Horse Ministries, amekuwa akipinga ujumbe huu. Nayo mojawapo ya hoja zake ni, “Vema, Ellen White hakuwahi kuwa na msimamo kuhusu Daily, kwa hiyo mimi pia si lazima niwe nao,” jambo ambalo lilikuwa msimamo wa kipumbavu kabisa. Lakini, hata kama tutamkubalia uwezekano wa kwamba Ellen White hakuwa na msimamo juu yake, anasema nini katika nukuu hii? Anasema kwamba Waanzilishi walikuwa na mtazamo sahihi juu yake. Hata kama hakujua ilikuwa nini, hapa anasema kwamba kuna mtazamo sahihi, jambo linalomaanisha kwamba kuna mtazamo usio sahihi, labda mitazamo kadhaa isiyo sahihi.

You have men like Vance Ferrell. Vance Ferrell; people have confidence in Vance Ferrell's prophetic interpretations, and I do not know why. Vance Ferrell is not the only one but he is one of the men that says that the Daily represents both Paganism and Christ's Sanctuary ministry. Okay? He is saying that this symbol represents Satan and Christ.

U na bantu nga Vance Ferrell. Vance Ferrell; bantu bane ne kittibwa mu kunnyonnyola kwa Vance Ferrell okw’obunnabbi, era simanyi lwaki. Vance Ferrell si ye yekka, naye ali omu ku basajja abagamba nti “the Daily” ekiikirira byombi Obupagaani n’obuweereza bwa Kristo mu Watukuvu. Kale? Agamba nti akabonero kano kakiikirira byombi Setaani ne Kristo.

What kind of discernment is being employed with that kind of reasoning?

Ubujajiyi bw’ubwoko ki buri gukoreshwa muri bene ubwo buryo bwo gutekereza?

Okay, Sister White, no matter what the Daily represents here, she says there is a correct view. So, we can at least agree with that premise here, right?

بەڵێ، خوشک وایت، هەرچەندە «ڕۆژانە» لێرە هەرچییەک پێشبکات، ئەو دەڵێت بۆی تێگەیشتنێکی دروست هەیە. کەواتە، دەتوانین لااقل لەسەر ئەو بنەمایە لێرە هاوڕابین، وایە نا؟

"Then I saw in relation to the —daily' (Daniel 8:12) that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text, and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry. When union exited, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —daily'; but in the confusion since 1844, other views have been embraced,"—

“Naye nikalola mayelana le —daily” (Danyeli 8:12) ukuthi ibala elithi —sacrifice” lafakwa yinhlakanipho yomuntu, njalo kalisilo lombhalo, lokuthi iNkosi yanika umbono oqondileyo walo kulabo abanika ukukhala kwehora lokwahlulela. Kwathi ubunye busaphuma, kungakafiki umnyaka ka-1844, kwacina sekuyikuthi phose bonke babemanyene phezu kombono oqondileyo we —daily”; kodwa ekudidekeni okwaba khona kusukela ngo-1844, eminye imibono yasemukelwa,”

This is what I told the Italian pastor. I said, "Okay. Can you give me any historical references where after 1844 there were other views about the word sacrifice that have been embraced?

Eyi ni ibyo nabwiye uwo mupasitori w’Umutaliyani. Naravuze nti: “Ni byiza. Ushobora kumpa inkomoko z’amateka zose zerekana aho, nyuma ya 1844, habayeho izindi nyigisho ku ijambo ‘igitambo’ zakiriwe?”

And he kind of backed out of that at this point.

Na panzi aha, washi kindi wakwe kile hamwe.

Since 1844 other views of the Daily have been embraced, and what have they produced? Darkness and confusion.

Tangu mwaka wa 1844, maoni mengine kuhusu “Ya Kila Siku” yamekubaliwa, nayo yamezalisha nini? Giza na machafuko.

Underline "darkness and confusion," because when Sister White further talks about the Daily, she talks about darkness and confusion, and we are going to show you some of those this morning.

Pina muts e “darkness and confusion,” ku amik Sister White itangna tuzangpi tamungau ti Daily, atangna tuzangpi darkness and confusion, kaitu tuniak itun tapawngnak ah na hmuhtu ding a si.

Take the wrong view of the Daily and it produces darkness and confusion.

Ukta mtazamo usio sahihi kuhusu Sadaka ya Kila Siku, nao huzaa giza na machafuko.

"Time has not been a test since 1844, and it will never again be a test."

“1844년 이래로 때는 시험거리가 아니었으며, 다시는 결코 시험거리가 되지 않을 것이다.”

So, in connection with the Daily you see here, here is the argument. Here is the argument today; here is the argument that was introduced by Ellen White's son. It was introduced by others, but he is the one that put it into the historical record of Adventism. It is that when you read this passage, the context of time setting is what you need to understand.

Noolo, mu kuendana no Daily oyo bozali komona awa, talá ntembe yango. Talá ntembe ya lelo; talá ntembe oyo mwana mobali ya Ellen White akotisaki. Bamosusu mpe nde bakotisaki yango, kasi ye nde moto oyo akomaki yango na mokanda ya lisolo ya Adventisme. Ezali ete, ntango bozali kotánga eteni oyo, eloko oyo bosengeli kososola ezali ndenge ya contexte ya kobongisa ntango.

—"other views have been embraced,"—in concerning the Daily—"and darkness and confusion have followed. Time has not been a test since 1844, and it will never again be a test.

—"نێگای دیکە پەسەند کراون،"—لەبارەی «ڕۆژانە»وە—"و تاریکی و ئاڵۆزی دوایان کەوتووە. کات لە ساڵی 1844ەوە تاقیکردنەوەیەک نەبووە، و هەرگیزیش دوبارە تاقیکردنەوە نایەتەوە.

"The Lord has shown me that the message of the third angel must go, and be proclaimed to the scattered children of the Lord, but it must not be hung on time."

Mukama andaze ng’obubaka bwa malayika ow’okusatu buteekwa okugenda, era bubuulirwe abaana ba Mukama abaasaasaanira wonna, naye tebulina kukuumirizibwa ku kiseera.

Do you see why Willy White is saying that we need to see the context of time-setting?

Niɛ wu yeŋi wɔɔ Willy White nɛ̀ yɛke e kɛ́ mɔɔrɛ̀ a yɛ dii ka nyɛ́ taamɛ̂n-taamɛ̂n bɛ̀rɛ̀-kpɛ̂?

It talks about the confusion that the wrong views of the Daily produced, time has not been a test; and then there is a paragraph about time setting.

Ekyogerera ku kusobera okwavudde mu ndowooza enkyamu ku Buli Lunaku kwe kwaleta, obudde tebubadde kigezo; era oluvannyuma waliwo akatundu akakwata ku kuteekawo ebiseera.

Okay, this is what you have to understand: This paragraph about time setting, it was not in the original source document; and, the statement about time has not been a test, that sentence has been altered. It misrepresents Ellen White's original thought. She did not connect anything about time setting with the Daily. This is what we want to look at this morning.

Sawa, hili ndilo unalopaswa kuelewa: Fungu hili kuhusu kuweka wakati halikuwamo katika hati ya chanzo ya awali; na kauli ile kwamba suala la wakati halijawa jaribio, sentensi hiyo imebadilishwa. Inapotosha wazo la asili la Ellen White. Yeye hakuunganisha jambo lo lote kuhusu kuweka wakati na “Daily.” Hili ndilo tunalotaka kulitazama asubuhi hii.

So, as I said, we are not going to read all these pages. I am just going to make sure that you have them in your possession so you can test what I am saying; because, as a human being, there is a possibility that I am misleading you.

Kuo, monga nilivyosema, hatutasoma kurasa hizi zote. Nitahakikisha tu kwamba mnazo mikononi mwenu ili mpate kuyajaribu yale ninayosema; kwa sababu, kama mwanadamu, yapo uwezekano kwamba nawapotosha.

Arthur White—"The Context of Time Setting"

ئارثەر وایت—«بارودۆخی دیاریکردنی کات»

"The advocates of the old view maintained that the wording of this statement [Early Writings, 74–75.] placed Heaven's endorsement on the view of the daily held by Miller and eventually repeated by Uriah Smith.

Bashigiki b’iciyumviro ca kera bakomeje bavuga ko imvugo y’iri jambo [Early Writings, 74–75.] yashizeko ukwemeza kw’Ijuru kuri ca ciyumviro c’ivyerekeye “the daily” cari gifiswe na Miller kandi mu nyuma gisubirwamwo na Uriah Smith.

Arthur White, the son of Willy White, in his six-volume set about the history of Ellen White, speaking of his father's position rejecting the correct view of the Daily, he says, in EGW, volume 6, on page 252,

Arthur White, mwana wa Willy White, katika mkusanyo wake wa juzuu sita kuhusu historia ya Ellen White, akizungumzia msimamo wa baba yake wa kukataa mtazamo sahihi wa “Daily,” anasema, katika EGW, juzuu ya 6, kwenye ukurasa wa 252,

"The advocates of the old view"—that the Daily represented Paganism—"maintained that the wording of this statement [Early Writings, 74–75.] placed Heaven's endorsement on the view of the daily held by Miller and eventually repeated by Uriah Smith."—

“Maoni ya watetezi wa mtazamo wa zamani”—ya kwamba ya Kila Siku yaliwakilisha Upagani—“walidumisha kwamba maneno ya kauli hii [Early Writings, 74–75.] yaliweka uthibitisho wa Mbingu juu ya mtazamo wa ya kila siku ulioshikiliwa na Miller na hatimaye kurudiwa na Uriah Smith.”

If Arthur White was going to be a genuine, accurate historian, do you know what he would have said there? He would have just put one word in there; but, Arthur White, he missed the boat here. He would have said, "The advocates of the old view maintained [correctly] that the wording of this statement, —maintained that the wording of this statement [Early Writings, 74-75.],' placed Heaven's endorsement on the view of the daily held by Miller and eventually repeated by Uriah Smith."

Omu Arthur White ali wa kala musongi wa bya bukalenge wa cya bushuwa, wa kwoloka, udi mumanye cidiye ne cya kwamba apu? Neye ngǎdi mufwanye kuteka mwadi umwepele amu; kadi Arthur White, apa wakapita ku bwato. Neye ngǎdi mwambe ne: “Badi ba kuyindula mbono wa kale bakashala [mu bulelela] ne mudi wa dîyi wa cyôcì cishimikidi eci,—bakashala ne mudi wa dîyi wa cyôcì cishimikidi eci [Early Writings, 74-75.],’ wakateka bujadiki bwa Dyulu pa mbono wa ‘daily’ uvwa mushikidila kudi Miller ne paanyima wakadi upetangana cyakabidi kudi Uriah Smith.”

But he does not put correctly in there. He is just saying what they maintain, like there is the possibility that they were maintaining a wrong position. But they were not; they had the right position.

Lakini hakuweki humo kwa usahihi. Yeye anasema tu yale wanayoshikilia, kana kwamba yapo uwezekano kwamba walikuwa wakishikilia msimamo usio sahihi. Lakini hawakuwa hivyo; walikuwa na msimamo ulio sahihi.

—"The new-view advocates"—his father, Willy, A. G. Daniells, W. W. Prescott, and I will not go there right now—"The new-view advocates held that the statement must be taken in its context—the context of time setting."—

—«Abaharanira icyerekezo gishya»—se, Willy, A. G. Daniells, W. W. Prescott, nanjye sinjya kubijyamo ubu—«abaharanira icyerekezo gishya bavugaga ko ayo magambo agomba gufatirwa mu rwego rw’imvugiro yayo—urwego rw’igenwa ry’ibihe.»

We just told you their argument in Early Writings, page 74.

Mpya twamwambile mu Early Writings, peji 74.

—"The new-view advocates held that the statement must be taken in its context—the context of time setting. Ellen White's repeated statements that I have no light on the point' (Letter 226, 1908) and I am unable to define clearly the points that are questioned' (Letter 250, 1908), and her inability to make a definite statement when the question was urged upon her, seemed to give support to their conclusion. They were confident also that the messages given through Ellen White would not conflict with the clearly established events of history." Arthur White, EGW, volume 6, 252.

—“Bavakalaliki wa maoni mapya walishikilia ya kwamba kauli hiyo ni lazima ichukuliwe katika muktadha wake—muktadha wa kuweka wakati. Kauli za Ellen White zilizorudiwa-rudiwa kwamba ‘Sina nuru juu ya jambo hilo’ (Letter 226, 1908) na ‘Siwezi kufafanua kwa uwazi mambo yanayoulizwa’ (Letter 250, 1908), na kutoweza kwake kutoa kauli ya hakika wakati swali hilo liliposisitizwa kwake, zilionekana kutoa uungaji mkono kwa hitimisho lao. Walikuwa na hakika pia kwamba jumbe zilizotolewa kupitia kwa Ellen White hazingepingana na matukio ya historia yaliyowekwa wazi kabisa.” Arthur White, EGW, juzuu ya 6, 252.

The Original Version—Review and Herald, November 1, 1850

ສະບັບຕົ້ນສະບັບ—Review and Herald, ວັນທີ 1 ເດືອນພະຈິກ, 1850

And Early Writings, page 74, when was it printed? 1882; the book Early Writings was printed in 1882.

پاشان *Early Writings*، لاپەڕەی 74، کەی چاپ کرا؟ لە ساڵی 1882؛ کتێبی *Early Writings* لە ساڵی 1882 چاپ کرا.

But where in the passage of Early Writings that we are considering is originally found is in the Review and Herald, November 1, 1850, and you have that in your notes. And it is several paragraphs, and as I have said, we are not going to read them all.

Ndibakwo mu gice cyo mu nyandiko za Early Writings turimo kureba aho byabanje kuboneka ni mu Review and Herald yo ku wa 1 Ugushyingo 1850, kandi ibyo mufite mu nyandiko zanyu. Kandi ni paragarafu nyinshi, kandi nk’uko navuze, ntitugiye kuzasoma zose.

We see four paragraphs on page 2, then four paragraphs on page 3:

Twamona nheto nne ha peji 2, bahi nheto nne ha peji 3:

"Dear Brethren and Sisters I wish to give you a short sketch of what the Lord has recently shown to me in vision. I was shown the loveliness of Jesus, and the love that the angels have for one another. Said the angel—Can ye not behold their love?—follow it. Just so God's people must love one another. Rather let blame fall on thyself than on a brother. I saw that the message —sell that ye have and give alms' had not been given, by some, in its clear light; that the true object of the words of our Saviour had not been clearly presented. I saw that the object of selling was not to give to those who are able to labor and support themselves; but to spread the truth. It is a sin to support and indulge those who are able to labor, in idleness. Some have been zealous to attend all the meetings; not to glorify God, but for the —loaves and fishes.' Such had much better been at home laboring with their hands, —the thing that is good,' to supply the wants of their families, and to have something to give to sustain the precious cause of present truth.

박애하는 형제자매들이여, 주께서 최근에 환상 가운데 내게 보여 주신 바를 간략히 그대들에게 전하고자 합니다. 나는 예수의 사랑스러움과, 천사들이 서로에게 품고 있는 사랑을 보았습니다. 천사가 말하기를, “그대들은 그들의 사랑을 보지 못하느냐?—그것을 따르라.” 하였습니다. 이와 같이 하나님의 백성도 서로 사랑하여야 합니다. 차라리 형제에게 비난을 돌리기보다 그 비난이 자신에게 돌아가게 하십시오. 나는 “너희 소유를 팔아 구제하라”는 기별이 어떤 이들에 의하여 그 분명한 빛 가운데 제시되지 않았으며, 우리 구주의 그 말씀의 참된 목적도 분명히 제시되지 않았음을 보았습니다. 나는 파는 목적이 노동하여 스스로를 부양할 수 있는 자들에게 주기 위한 것이 아니라, 진리를 전파하기 위한 것임을 보았습니다. 노동할 수 있는 자들을 게으름 가운데서 부양하고 방임하는 것은 죄입니다. 어떤 이들은 모든 집회에 참석하는 데 열심을 내었으나, 하나님께 영광을 돌리기 위함이 아니라 “떡과 물고기” 때문이었습니다. 그러한 자들은 집에 머물러 자기 손으로 “선한 일”을 힘써 행하여 자기 가족의 필요를 공급하고, 또한 귀중한 현대 진리의 사업을 유지하기 위하여 드릴 것을 가지는 편이 훨씬 더 나았을 것입니다.

"Some, I saw, had erred in praying for the sick to be healed before unbelievers. If any among us are sick, and call for the elders of the church to pray over them, according to James 5:14, 15, we should follow the example of Jesus. He put unbelievers out of the room, then healed the sick; so we should seek to be separated from the unbelief of those who have not faith, when we pray for the sick among us.

Nakasiga ko, banji balemwene mu kusabila abalwele ukuti bapole ngaphambi ya batetekeli. Nga cakuti kuli umo pakati kesu alwele, no kwita abakote ba lukuta ukuti bamusabile no kumusubila, ukulingana na Yakobo 5:14, 15, tulingile ukukonka icilangililo ca kwa Yesu. Atamfishe abatetekeli mu cipinda, elyo apoleshe omulwele; efyo naifwe tulingile ukufwaya ukusankaniwa ku butetekele bwabashili no lwetekelo, lintu tusabila abalwele abali pakati kesu.

"Then I was pointed back to the time that Jesus took his disciples away alone, into an upper room, and first washed their feet, and then gave them to eat of the broken bread, to represent his broken body, and juice of the vine to represent his spilled blood. I saw that all should move understandingly, and follow the example of Jesus in these things, and when attending to these ordinances, should be as separate from unbelievers as possible.

Basi ningĩonjerwo thutha ku gihe Yesu aatwarire arutwo ake bari bonyene, akabinjiza nyũmba ya igũrũ, na mbere agasukia magũrũ mao, hanyuma akamaria kurĩa mũgate ũrĩa wamĩenĩtwo, wĩ kĩmenyithia gĩa mwĩrĩ wake ũrĩa wamĩenĩtwo, na ndawa ya mũthabibũ ũngĩmenyithia thakame yake ũrĩa yaitikĩtio. Nĩonire atĩ andũ othe no nginya mamenyereire wega ũhoro ũcio, na marũmĩrĩre mfano wa Yesu maũndũ-inĩ macio, na hingo ya gwĩka marũrĩrio macio, no nginya maikare matandũrũkĩte na andũ atarĩ aamini o ta ũrĩa no mangĩhota.

"Then I was shown that the seven last plagues will be poured out, after Jesus leaves the Sanctuary. Said the angel—It is the wrath of God and the Lamb that causes the destruction or death of the wicked. At the voice of God the saints will be mighty and terrible as an army with banners; but they will not then execute the judgment written. The execution of the judgment will be at the close of the 1000 years.

“Ndipo nalionyeshwa kwamba mapigo saba ya mwisho yatamiminwa baada ya Yesu kuondoka Patakatifu. Malaika akasema—Ni ghadhabu ya Mungu na ya Mwana-Kondoo inayosababisha uangamizo au mauti ya waovu. Kwa sauti ya Mungu watakatifu watakuwa wenye nguvu na wa kutisha kama jeshi lenye mabango; lakini hapo ndipo hawatatekeleza hukumu iliyoandikwa. Utekelezaji wa hukumu utakuwa mwishoni mwa miaka 1000.”

"After the saints are changed to immortality, and are caught up together, and receive their harps, crowns, &c., and enter the Holy City, Jesus and the saints set in judgment. The books are opened, the book of life and the book of death; the book of life contains the good deeds of the saints, and the book of death contains the evil deeds of the wicked. These books were compared with the Statute book, the Bible, and according to that they were judged. The saints in unison with Jesus pass their judgment upon the wicked dead. Behold ye! said the angel, the saints sit in judgment, in unison with Jesus, and mete out to each of the wicked, according to the deeds done in the body, and it is set off against their names what they must receive, at the execution of the judgment. This, I saw, was the work of the saints with Jesus, in the Holy City before it descends to the earth, through the 1000 years. Then at the close of the 1000 years, Jesus, and the angels, and all the saints with him, leaves the Holy City, and while he is descending to the earth with them, the wicked dead are raised, and then the very men that —pierced him,' being raised, will see him afar off in all his glory, the angels and saints with him, and will wail because of him. They will see the prints of the nails in his hands, and in his feet, and where they thrust the spear into his side. The prints of the nails and the spear will then be his glory. It is at the close of the 1000 years that Jesus stands upon the Mount of Olives, and the Mount parts asunder, and it becomes a mighty plain, and those who flee at that time are the wicked, that have just been raised. Then the Holy City comes down and settles on the plain.

Baada ya watakatifu kubadilishwa wapate kutokufa, na kunyakuliwa pamoja, na kupokea vinubi vyao, taji, n.k., na kuingia katika Mji Mtakatifu, Yesu na watakatifu huketi hukumu. Vitabu hufunguliwa, kitabu cha uzima na kitabu cha mauti; kitabu cha uzima kina matendo mema ya watakatifu, na kitabu cha mauti kina matendo maovu ya waovu. Vitabu hivi vililinganishwa na Kitabu cha Sheria, yaani, Biblia, na kulingana nacho walihukumiwa. Watakatifu, kwa umoja na Yesu, hutoa hukumu yao juu ya wafu waovu. Tazameni ninyi! akasema malaika, watakatifu huketi katika hukumu, kwa umoja na Yesu, na humpimia kila mmoja wa waovu kulingana na matendo yaliyotendwa katika mwili, nayo huandikwa kando ya majina yao yale wapaswayo kupokea wakati wa utekelezaji wa hukumu. Hili, naliona, lilikuwa kazi ya watakatifu pamoja na Yesu, katika Mji Mtakatifu kabla haujashuka duniani, katika muda wa miaka 1000. Kisha mwisho wa miaka 1000, Yesu, na malaika, na watakatifu wote pamoja naye, huondoka katika Mji Mtakatifu, na wakati anaposhuka pamoja nao kuja duniani, wafu waovu hufufuliwa, ndipo wale watu wale hasa waliomchoma, wakiisha kufufuliwa, watamwona kwa mbali katika utukufu wake wote, malaika na watakatifu wakiwa pamoja naye, nao watamlilia kwa sababu yake. Wataona alama za misumari mikononi mwake, na miguuni mwake, na mahali walipomchoma ubavuni kwa mkuki. Alama za misumari na za mkuki ndizo zitakazokuwa utukufu wake wakati huo. Ni mwisho wa miaka 1000 Yesu husimama juu ya Mlima wa Mizeituni, nao mlima huo hupasuka katikati, ukawa tambarare kubwa sana, na wale wakimbiao wakati huo ni waovu wale waliokuwa wamefufuliwa punde tu. Ndipo Mji Mtakatifu hushuka na kutua juu ya tambarare hiyo.

"Then Satan imbues the wicked, that have been raised, with his spirit. He flatters them that the army in the City is small, and that his army is large, and that they can overcome the saints and take the City. While Satan was rallying his army, the saints were in the City, beholding the beauty and glory of the Paradise of God. Jesus was at their head, leading them. All at once the lovely Saviour was gone from our company; but soon we heard his lovely voice, saying, —Come ye blessed of my Father inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.' We gathered about Jesus, and just as he closed the gates of the City, the curse was pronounced upon the wicked. The gates were shut. Then the saints used their wings and mounted to the top of the wall of the City. Jesus was also with them; his crown looked brilliant and glorious. It was a crown within a crown, seven in number. The crowns of the saints were of the most pure gold, decked with stars. Their faces shone with glory, for they were in the express image of Jesus; and as they arose, and moved all together to the top of the City, I was enraptured with the sight.

Kisha Shetani akawajaza waovu, waliokuwa wamefufuliwa, roho yake. Akawadanganya kwa maneno ya kujipendekeza kwamba jeshi lililo ndani ya Mji ni dogo, na kwamba jeshi lake ni kubwa, na kwamba wanaweza kuwashinda watakatifu na kuutwaa Mji. Shetani alipokuwa akilikusanya jeshi lake, watakatifu walikuwa ndani ya Mji, wakitazama uzuri na utukufu wa Paradiso ya Mungu. Yesu alikuwa mbele yao, akiwaongoza. Ghafula Mwokozi huyo mzuri akaondoka kutoka katika kampuni yetu; lakini mara tukaisikia sauti yake nzuri, ikisema, —Njoni, ninyi mliobarikiwa na Baba yangu, urithini ufalme mliowekewa tayari tangu kuwekwa misingi ya ulimwengu.’ Tukakusanyika kumzunguka Yesu, na mara tu alipofunga malango ya Mji, laana ikatangazwa juu ya waovu. Malango yakafungwa. Kisha watakatifu wakazitumia mbawa zao, wakapaa hadi juu ya ukuta wa Mji. Yesu naye alikuwa pamoja nao; taji yake iling’aa kwa uangavu na utukufu. Ilikuwa taji ndani ya taji, saba kwa hesabu. Taji za watakatifu zilikuwa za dhahabu safi kabisa, zikipambwa kwa nyota. Nyuso zao zilang’aa kwa utukufu, kwa maana walikuwa katika mfano halisi wa Yesu; na walipoinuka, na kusonga wote pamoja kuelekea kilele cha Mji, nilinyakuliwa na maono kwa uzuri wa mandhari hiyo.

"Then the wicked saw what they had lost; and fire was breathed from God upon them, and consumed them. This was the Execution of the Judgment. The wicked then received according as the saints in unison with Jesus had meted out to them during the 1000 years. The same fire from God that consumed the wicked, purified the whole earth. The broken ragged mountains melted with fervent heat, the atmosphere, also, and all the stubble was consumed. Then our inheritance opened before us, glorious and beautiful, and we inherited the whole earth made new. We all shouted with a loud voice, Glory, Alleluia.

“Ɪngi məməkəya bəbə́na mʉ̀sangʉ ma bábúúka ma wááka; nɨ̀ mɔ́tɔ maánáma kwa Ngai pamə́na bɔ, nɨ̀ mɔ́tɔ máná məmíísa bɔ. A nɨ̀ kwábáta kwa Lámulɔ. Məməkəya bəbə́na bákə́lɛ́tɛ́ ásáŋga na yááya bɔ, ta bábulá bákristo pámɔ́dʉ na Yesu báábakáta bɔ mʉ́ ndaŋga ya myáka 1000. Mɔ́tɔ máámɔ̂ kwa Ngai, ma mímíísa məməkəya, másɛ́hɛsa mpe nsɨ̂ yɔ́nsɔ. Mámɛ́nɛ ma bíbátá, ma bíbə́kə́ləkə́la, maŋgááná na ndʉ́ndʉ́ ya makásá; mpe mbúla ya likoló, nɨ̀ byɔ́nsɔ bya matiti mabúúma byámíísama. Bóyi bʉ́tánga bwáásu bʉ́kú́luka mbele bwáásu, bwa nkémɛ́nɛ na bwa bʉ̌lə́, nɨ̀ twááli bwáánga nsɨ̂ yɔ́nsɔ, yáákóónsama bʉ́pya. Twésɛ́ twáákánga na lííwi linɛ́nɛ, Nkémɛ́nɛ, Aleluya.”

"I also saw that the shepherds should consult those in whom they have reason to have confidence, those who have been in all the messages, and are firm in all the present truth, before they advocate any new point of importance, which they may think the Bible sustains. Then the shepherds will be perfectly united, and the union of the shepherds will be felt by the church. Such a course I saw would prevent unhappy divisions, and then there would be no danger of the precious flock being divided, and the sheep scattered, without a shepherd."—

“Nami nĩonire atĩ arĩithi nĩmagwĩka inama hamwe na arĩa marĩ na kĩhooto gĩa kwĩhoka kũrĩ o, arĩa matũire me hamwe na ndũmĩrĩri ciothe, na marĩ a hinya mũno kũhũthĩrĩria ma atĩrĩri ma rĩrĩa rĩu, mbere ya kũheanĩra na kũhũthĩrĩria rũgendo rũrĩa rũhũũrũ rwonjorithie, rũrĩa mangĩĩtĩkĩra atĩ Bibilia nĩrũhũthĩrĩria. Hĩndĩ ĩyo arĩithi nĩmakorwo marĩ hamwe biũ na biũ, na ũmwe wao nĩũkaonekanĩra kanitha. Njĩra ta ĩyo nĩonire atĩ no igũrũke kũgĩa mĩtugo mĩũru ya kũgayana; na hĩndĩ ĩyo gũtirĩ ũgwati wa kĩrĩrĩ gĩa bata mũno kũgayanywa, na ng’ondu gũtharakana, itarĩ na mũrĩithi.” —

And then it concludes with five more paragraphs which I have in a box for you, because these five paragraphs out of the article are the ones that are going to end up in Early Writings. That is why these final five paragraphs have the box around them.

Na kisha inahitimisha kwa aya tano zaidi ambazo nimeziweka ndani ya kisanduku kwa ajili yenu, kwa sababu aya hizi tano kutoka katika makala ndizo zitakazokuja kuingizwa katika Early Writings. Ndiyo sababu aya hizi tano za mwisho zimezungukwa na kisanduku.

"September 23d, the Lord showed me that he had stretched out his hand the second time to recover the remnant of his people, and that efforts must be redoubled in this gathering time. In the scattering time Israel was smitten and torn; but now in the gathering time God will heal and bind up his people. In the scattering, efforts made to spread the truth had but little effect, accomplished but little or nothing; but in the gathering when God has set his hand to gather his people, efforts to spread the truth will have their designed effect. All should be united and zealous in the work. I saw that it was a shame for any to refer to the scattering for examples to govern us now in the gathering; for if God does no more for us now than he did then, Israel would never be gathered. It is as necessary that the truth should be published in a paper, as preached.

“Seputembala 23d, Mwene andangisye kuti ŵanyolosye jala lyakwe kaŵi kaŵi kuti awusye ŵakusigalira ŵa ŵanthu ŵakwe, ni kuti kuyezgayezga kukwenera kusazgikaso chomene mu nyengo iyi ya kuwunganya. Mu nyengo ya kumwazgika, Israyeli wakatimbika na kutumbuka; kweni sono mu nyengo ya kuwunganya, Chiuta wazamuchizga na kupfunga ŵanthu ŵakwe. Mu nyengo ya kumwazgika, kuyezgayezga uko kukachitikanga pakwambiska unenesko kukaŵa na vyakukhwaska vichoko waka, kukafiska vichoko waka panji palije; kweni mu nyengo ya kuwunganya, para Chiuta waŵika jala lyakwe kuti wawunganye ŵanthu ŵakwe, kuyezgayezga kwa kwambiska unenesko kuzamuŵa na vyakukhwaska ivyo kukaŵikikira. Wose ŵakwenera kuŵa ŵakukolerana na ŵakujipereka chomene mu ntchito iyi. Nanguwona kuti ntchakukhozga soni kuti munyake walongosorenge ku nyengo ya kumwazgika kuti waŵe na viyelezgero vyakuti vitiwuske sono mu nyengo ya kuwunganya; pakuti usange Chiuta walekenge kutichitira vinandi sono kuluska ivyo wakachita pa nyengo yira, Israyeli wangawungana yayi. Ndiposo ntchakukhumbikwa waka kuti unenesko ufumiskikenge mu pepala, nga umo ukupharazgikira.”

"The Lord showed me that the 1843 chart was directed by his hand, and that no part of it should be altered; that the figures were as he wanted them. That his hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until his hand was removed.

UMwami yanyeretse yuko igishushanyo cyo mu 1843 cyari kiyobowe n’ukuboko kwe, kandi ko nta gice na kimwe cyacyo cyagombaga guhindurwa; ko imibare yari uko yashakaga ko iba. Ko ukuboko kwe kwari kuri cyo kandi guhisha ikosa mu mibare imwe n’imwe, kugira ngo hatagira n’umwe uribona, kugeza igihe ukuboko kwe rwakuwagaho.

"Then I saw in relation to the —Daily,' that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text; and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —Daily;' but since 1844, in the confusion, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion has followed.

Nuko nabonye, ku byerekeye “Buri munsi,” yuko ijambo “igitambo” ryongereweho n’ubwenge bw’umuntu, kandi ko ritari iry’umwandiko; kandi ko Uwiteka yahaye igitekerezo gikwiye cyabyo abatanze ubutumwa bw’isaha y’urubanza. Igihe ubumwe bwariho, mbere ya 1844, hafi ya bose bari bahuje ku gitekerezo gikwiye cy’“Buri munsi”; ariko kuva mu wa 1844, muri urwo rujijo, ibindi bitekerezo byarakiriwe, maze hakurikiraho umwijima n’urujijo.

"The Lord showed me that Time had not been a test since 1844, and that time will never again be a test.

Mfumu anandisonyeza kuti Nthawi sinali mayesero kuyambira mu 1844, ndipo nthawi sidzakhalanso mayesero konse.

"Then I was pointed to some who are in the great error, that the saints are yet to go to Old Jerusalem, &c., before the Lord comes. Such a view is calculated to take the mind and interest from the present work of God, under the message of the third angel; for if we are to go to Jerusalem, then our minds will naturally be there, and our means will be withheld from other uses, to get the saints to Jerusalem. I saw that the reason why they were left to go into this great error, is because they have not confessed and forsaken their errors, that they have been in for a number of years past." Review and Herald, November 1, 1850."

“Heta min ku vegotin ci ten pe kime boi ni, se awon monima ye bo sai fu ko na Jerusalem biiba, &c., kaba Baa de doro. Luku disi de meki fu weyti ati nanga benki komoto na a tide wroko fu Gadu, na ini boskopu fu di di fu di dritem wan engel; bikasi efu wi bo sai fu go na Jerusalem, dan fu tru wi ati sa de de na pe dati, nanga wi sani fu yepi sa hori gwe fu trawan yus, fu tyari den santu go na Jerusalem. Mi si taki a fasi fu pe den ben lusu fu fadon ini disi bigi fowtu, na bikasi den no ben bekent nanga gi opo den fowtu fu den, disi den ben de ini kaba fu wan bun tu nomba yari psa.” Review and Herald, November 1, 1850.

Do you see them? Do you know what I am talking about?

آیا ئەوان دەبینیت؟ ئایا دەزانیت من لەبارەی چی دەدوێم؟

Okay. If we go into these five final paragraphs, you will see some things that are different in the original than you will find in Early Writings, page 74.

Uko. Ngi twinjila mu tuparagraphe utu tunna utwa kulekelesha, mukamona ifintu fimbi ifya pusana mu cakulya ca ntendekelo ukucila ifyo mukasanga mu Early Writings, peji 74.

FROM THE AUDIENCE: So, you are saying these in the box are the originals?

KUTOKA KWA HADHIRA: Kwa hiyo, unasema kwamba hivi vilivyo ndani ya sanduku ndivyo vya asili?

These in the box, these are the last five paragraphs in this original article, and this box is around them. These five paragraphs are what ultimately end up in Early Writings, page 74.

Aba abali mu kisanduku, bano be ndagiriro etaano ez’enkomerero mu kiwandiiko kino ekyasooka, era ekisanduku kino kibetoolodde. Endagiriro zino etaano ze ezaakomekkereza nga zifulumira mu Early Writings, omuko 74.

But, when was this printed, when was this written? November 1850.

Ne, ebyo byacapirwe ddi, ebyo byawandiikibwa ddi? Noovemba 1850.

So, I have in bold-faced the things that are going to be changed from these five paragraphs. There is going to be a metamorphosis with this; because, in the very near future in 1851 the book A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White is going to be printed and they are going to take these paragraphs and put them in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and View of Ellen G. White. And from here [article in Review and Herald, November 1850] to A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White there are some minor editorial changes that happened to these five paragraphs. And then from A Sketch of the Christian Experience and View of Ellen G. White in 1851 to Early Writings in 1882, there are some more editorial changes, and those editorial changes are what make Early Writings, page 74, convoluted.

Neryo, ndzi tsarisile hi maletere yo tiya swilo leswi nga ta cinciwa eka tindzimana leti ntlhanu. Ku ta va ni ku hundzuka ka xivumbeko eka leswi; hikuva, enkarhini wa le kusuhi swinene hi 1851, buku leyi nge A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White yi ta kandziyisiwa, kutani va ta teka tindzimana leti va ti veka eka A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White. Kutani ku suka laha [athikili eka Review and Herald, November 1850] ku ya eka A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, ku ni ku cinca lokutsongo ka ku hlela loku humeleleke eka tindzimana leti ntlhanu. Kutani endzhaku, ku suka eka A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White hi 1851 ku ya eka Early Writings hi 1882, ku ni ku cinca kun’wana ka ku hlela, naswona ku cinca koloko ka ku hlela hi kona loku endlaka leswaku Early Writings, pheji 74, yi tika ku yi twisisa.

So, in these five paragraphs that conclude in the original manuscript, in the first paragraph, "September 23d, the Lord showed me . . . ," that is going to be changed.

Kwa hiyo, katika aya hizi tano zinazohitimisha katika hati ya asili, katika aya ya kwanza, “September 23d, Bwana alinionyesha . . . ,” hilo litabadilishwa.

In the next paragraphs: "Then I saw . . ."; "Then I saw . . ."; The Lord showed me . . . "; and, "Then I was pointed to . . ."; these things get some minor adjustments.

Mu biwandiiko ebiddirira: “Awo ne ndaba . . .”; “Awo ne ndaba . . .”; “Mukama yandaga . . .”; era, “Awo ne nnoonyezebwa eri . . .”; ebintu bino bikolebwako okutereeza okutono.

Shown Ten Primary Truths in Thirteen Paragraphs

Amaqiniso Ayishumi Ayinhloko Aboniswe Ezindimeni Eziyishumi Nantathu

But, what I want you to see in these thirteen paragraphs from the original article, she has shown ten primary things.

Nanshi, nica ngani nikumwene mu ino mishitala ikumi na itatu ukufuma mu cilembelo ca ntendekelo, alilangishe ifintu ikumi ifya ntanshi.

And now I remember why I have these things bold-faced. It is not because those are going to get changed. I am emphasizing something for you, if you will see, that in these thirteen paragraphs she was shown this . . . , she was shown this . . . , she was shown this . . . , she was shown this. And when she was shown one thing, after she tells us about it, then she is shown something that is not necessarily connected to what she was just shown: "I was shown this . . . ; I was shown this . . . ; I was shown this . . . .

ئەمەستا ئەز بîr tînim çima min ev tişt bi xeta qelew nivîsandine. Ev ne ji ber ku ew dê bên guhertin. Ger hûn bibînin, ez ji bo we tiştekî didim xuyakirin: ku di van sêzdeh paragrafan de, wê ev hate nîşandan . . . , wê ev hate nîşandan . . . , wê ev hate nîşandan . . . , wê ev hate nîşandan. Û dema ku wê tiştek hate nîşandan, piştî ku ew me agahdar dike derbarê wê de, paşê jê re tiştekî din tê nîşandan ku ne pêdivî ye bi tiştê ku wê nûçe xwe jê gotibû ve girêdayî be: "Min ev hate nîşandan . . . ; min ev hate nîşandan . . . ; min ev hate nîşandan . . . ."

You can check me out and read it for yourself, but she was shown ten primary truths in these thirteen paragraphs.

Unaweza kunichunguza na kuisoma mwenyewe, lakini alionyeshwa kweli kuu kumi katika aya hizi kumi na tatu.

Here is what she was shown. She was shown about God's love, about offerings, about prayer for the sick, about the communion service, about the Seven Last Plagues connected with the Millennium, about new light, about the gathering after 1844, about the publishing work, about the 1843 Chart, about the "Daily," about "time" as a test, and about pilgrimages to Jerusalem. And if you read it carefully, this is not a flow of thought. This is a very, "I was shown this," and she records what she was shown; and, she was shown something that is not necessarily connected. You have to see that; because, as they begin to pull these paragraphs together, they begin to create the thought that she saying something that she really did not say.

Apa ni byo yerekanywe. Yerekanywe ibyerekeye urukundo rw’Imana, ibyerekeye amaturo, ibyerekeye gusabira abarwayi, ibyerekeye umurimo w’Igaburo Ryera, ibyerekeye Ibyago Birindwi bya Nyuma bifitanye isano n’Ikinyagihumbi, ibyerekeye umucyo mushya, ibyerekeye guteranirizwa hamwe nyuma ya 1844, ibyerekeye umurimo wo gusohora inyandiko, ibyerekeye Imbonerahamwe ya 1843, ibyerekeye “Daily,” ibyerekeye “igihe” nk’igeragezwa, n’ibyerekeye ingendo ntagatifu zijya i Yerusalemu. Kandi nimubisoma mwitonze, ibi si urujya n’uruza rw’ibitekerezo. Ahubwo ni ukuvuga ngo, “Nyeretswe ibi,” kandi yandika ibyo yerekanywe; kandi yerekanywe ikintu kidafitanye isano byanze bikunze n’ibindi. Ibyo mugomba kubibona; kuko, uko batangira gushyira hamwe iyi mirongo, batangira kurema igitekerezo cy’uko avuga ikintu mu by’ukuri atavuze.

Review and Herald, November 1, 1850

Review and Herald, 1 Kapingi 1850

Okay. Notice the first paragraph of the five paragraphs that we are dealing with from November 1850.

حسناً. لاحِظوا الفقرة الأولى من الفقرات الخمس التي نتعامل معها من نوفمبر 1850.

"September 23d, the Lord showed me that he had stretched out his hand the second time to recover the remnant of his people, and that efforts must be redoubled in this gathering time. In the scattering time Israel was smitten and torn; but now in the gathering time God will heal and bind up his people. In the scattering, efforts made to spread the truth had but little effect, accomplished but little or nothing; but in the gathering when God has set his hand to gather his people, efforts to spread the truth will have their designed effect. All should be united and zealous in the work. I saw that it was a shame for any to refer to the scattering for examples to govern us now in the gathering; for if God does no more for us now than he did then, Israel would never be gathered. It is as necessary that the truth should be published in a paper, as preached."—

“Septemba 23, Bwana alinionyesha kwamba alikuwa amenyoosha mkono wake mara ya pili ili kuwakomboa mabaki ya watu wake, na kwamba jitihada zinapaswa kuongezwa maradufu katika wakati huu wa kukusanya. Katika wakati wa kutawanywa Israeli alipigwa na kuraruliwa; lakini sasa katika wakati wa kukusanya Mungu atawaponya na kuwafunga watu wake. Katika kutawanywa, jitihada zilizofanywa za kuieneza kweli zilikuwa na matokeo madogo sana, zilitimiza kidogo tu au hazikutimiza chochote; lakini katika kukusanya, wakati Mungu ameuweka mkono wake ili kuwakusanya watu wake, jitihada za kuieneza kweli zitakuwa na matokeo yaliyokusudiwa. Wote wanapaswa kuungana na kuwa na bidii katika kazi hii. Nikaona kwamba ilikuwa aibu kwa yeyote kurejelea kutawanywa kama mifano ya kutuongoza sasa katika kukusanya; kwa maana ikiwa Mungu hatufanyii zaidi sasa kuliko alivyofanya wakati ule, Israeli hatakusanywa kamwe. Ni muhimu kwa kweli kuchapishwa katika karatasi, kama ilivyo kuhubiriwa.”—

The last sentence from that paragraph, it says, "It is as necessary that the truth should be published in a paper, as preached." Okay. This thought is going to be dropped.

ਜਿਸ ਪੈਰਾਗ੍ਰਾਫ਼ ਦੀ ਆਖਰੀ ਪੰਗਤੀ ਹੈ, ਉਹ ਕਹਿੰਦੀ ਹੈ, “ਇਹ ਉਤਨਾ ਹੀ ਅਨਿਵਾਰ ਹੈ ਕਿ ਸੱਚਾਈ ਇੱਕ ਪੱਤਰ ਵਿੱਚ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ਿਤ ਕੀਤੀ ਜਾਵੇ, ਜਿੰਨਾ ਕਿ ਉਸ ਦਾ ਪ੍ਰਚਾਰ ਕੀਤਾ ਜਾਵੇ।” ਠੀਕ ਹੈ। ਇਸ ਵਿਚਾਰ ਨੂੰ ਛੱਡ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਜਾਵੇਗਾ।

The second paragraph of the five that we are considering, where it says, "The Lord showed me," you see I have it underlined.

Parafu ya kabiri muri izo eshanu turimo gusuzuma, aho havuga ngo, “Umwami Yangaragarije,” murabona ko naciyeho umurongo.

—"The Lord showed me that the 1843 chart was directed by his hand, and that no part of it should be altered; that the figures were as he wanted them. That his hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until his hand was removed."—

—"Ovwa kandjangura kutya etata lya 1843 lya longithwa komake gaye, nokutya kape na eenghendabala nande yimwe yalo yi na oku lundululwa; kutya omafiyu ogo oga li ngaashi ye a hala. Kutya eke lye olya li pombada yalo, nde lya hole ombudi mwe mwa li mu vamwe vomomafiyu, opo kape na nande umwe e i mone, fiyo opo eke lye la kufwa po."—

The reason I have anything underlined in these four paragraphs at the top of the page is that those are going to have editorial changes when it gets reprinted in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White in 1851.

ئەو هۆکارەی من لەو چوار پەڕەگرافەی سەرەوەی لاپەڕەکەدا هەر شتێکم ژێر هێڵ کێشاوە، ئەوەیە کە ئەوانە کاتێک دووبارە لە ساڵی 1851 لە *A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White*دا چاپ دەکرێنەوە، گۆڕانکارییە دەستکاریکارییەکانیان بەسەردا دەهێنرێت.

Okay. "The Lord showed me," is going to be changed; "by his hand" is going to be changed, "that no part of it should be altered" is going to be changed.

Loongo. “Mwami wanyilekele” cikahindulwa; “na lyoshi lyakwe” cikahindulwa; “ngecihela nangu cimo ca ici cikatanguluka” cikahindulwa.

Then in the next bold-faced paragraph [fourth paragraph] on the page says,

Emva kwalokho, endimeni elandelayo ebhalwe ngokugqamile [indima yesine] ekhasini, kuthiwa,

—"The Lord showed me that Time had not been a test since 1844, and that time will never again be a test."—

—“Mwene angunangisye yanti Kati jya Mwaka jiŵaŵe ngaani ja kuyesa kutandikila mwaka wa 1844, soni kuti kati jya mwaka jikatamilila ngaani ja kuyesa.” —

"The Lord showed me," that is going to be changed. What they are going to do the next year in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, they are going to take that one-sentence paragraph and they are going to combine it with the previous paragraph. They are going to turn it into one paragraph.

“Bwana alinionyesha,” hilo litabadilishwa. Mwaka unaofuata, katika A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, wataichukua aya hiyo ya sentensi moja na kuiunganisha na aya iliyotangulia. Wataigeuza kuwa aya moja.

But, also, if a word or words are bold-faced, there is going to be some other types of changes; and, I will give you an example of what I mean.

Lakin, həm də, əgər bir söz və ya sözlər qalın şriftlə verilmişdirsə, başqa növ dəyişikliklər də olacaqdır; və mən nə demək istədiyimi sizə bir nümunə ilə göstərəcəyəm.

And in the third paragraph it says,

Na mu gika cya gatatu havuga ngo,

—"Then I saw in relation to the —Daily,' that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text; and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —Daily;' but since 1844, in the confusion, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion has followed."—

—“Lê hî li ser —Herrojane’ ez dît ku peyva —qurban’ bi aqilmendiya mirovan hatiye zêdekirin, û ne ji metnê ye; û ku Xudan dîtina rast a wê da wan kesên ku bangê saeta dadweriyê da. Dema yekbûn hebû, berî 1844-an, hema hemû li ser dîtina rast a —Herrojane’ yekbûyî bûn; lê ji 1844-an vir ve, di nav tevliheviyê de, dîtinên din hatine qebûlkirin, û tarîtî û tevlihevî li pey wê hatine.”—

Then in the next bold-faced paragraph [fourth paragraph] on the page says,

Nuko omu kagambo akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi akahandi [akacweka ka kana] aha rupapura hagira hati,

"The Lord showed me that Time had not been a test since 1844, and that time will never again be a test."—

“Yehova akanereka masomphenya kwa ine kuti Nthawi siinali mayesero kuyambira mu 1844, ndipo nthawi sidzakhala mayesero konse.”—

"The Lord showed me," that is going to be changed.

"Mutuyọnu andiśikisyé," shi nashitondoka.

What they are going to do the next year in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, they are going to take that one-sentence paragraph and they are going to combine it with the previous paragraph. They are going to turn it into one paragraph.

Mu mwaka wakurikiyeho, mu gitabo *A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White*, bagiye gufata iyo paragarafu y’interuro imwe maze bayihuze na paragarafu ibanziriza. Bagiye kuyihindura paragarafu imwe.

And they are going to change "The Lord showed me" to "I was also shown." Okay? They are going to make those two paragraphs one paragraph, and they are going to change it to, "I was also shown," in 1851.

Na bango bakobongola “Nkolo alakisaki ngai” na “Ngai mpe nalakisamaki.” Malamu? Bakokómisa biteni mibale wana eteni moko, mpe bakobongola yango na, “Ngai mpe nalakisamaki,” na 1851.

—"Then I was pointed to some who are in the great error, that the saints are yet to go to Old Jerusalem, &c., before the Lord comes. Such a view is calculated to take the mind and interest from the present work of God, under the message of the third angel; for if we are to go to Jerusalem, then our minds will naturally be there, and our means will be withheld from other uses, to get the saints to Jerusalem. I saw that the reason why they were left to go into this great error, is because they have not confessed and forsaken their errors, that they have been in for a number of years past." Review and Herald, November 1, 1850.

—“Basi nikaonyeshwa watu fulani walio katika kosa kubwa, ya kwamba watakatifu bado wanapaswa kwenda Yerusalemu ya Kale, n.k., kabla Bwana hajaja. Mtazamo wa namna hiyo unaelekezwa kuiondoa akili na shauku kutoka katika kazi ya sasa ya Mungu, chini ya ujumbe wa malaika wa tatu; kwa maana ikiwa tunapaswa kwenda Yerusalemu, basi fikira zetu kwa kawaida zitakuwa huko, na mali zetu zitazuiliwa zisitumike kwa matumizi mengine, ili kuwafikisha watakatifu Yerusalemu. Nikaona kwamba sababu ya wao kuachwa waingie katika kosa hili kubwa ni kwamba hawajakiri na kuziacha makosa yao, ambayo wamekuwa nayo kwa miaka kadhaa iliyopita.” Review and Herald, November 1, 1850.

But, when you get to Early Writings, do you know what they do? They drop the "I was also shown," where in Early Writings this one paragraph, it is going to say, "When union existed before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —Daily,' but since 1844, in the confusion, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion has followed." They dropped the "I was also shown," and the next sentence is, "time had not been a test since 1844." Suddenly you do not know that this thought about time not being a test is one of things that she was specifically shown. You believe that this was part of her light on the Daily in the false view producing confusion.

Lelo, mukoka ohela ku *Early Writings*, ewe wejiwa vechava? Vanevusha vakwa “I was also shown,” apo mu *Early Writings* muli ndima imwe yinji kuvuluka ngwavo, “Omu uwanana wapo kochili manga 1844, vavangi vosi vapwelele hamwe mu mona wa kwoloka wa —Daily,’ oloheya ku 1844, mu nyongopelo, mona dingi da tambuliliwe, ndele chipembele na nyongopelo vyakulilile.” Vanevusha vakwa “I was also shown,” ndele sentense ya kulonda ngwayo, “time had not been a test since 1844.” Mwangana vene kaweshi kujiwa chetu ngwove ngulwilo luno lwa ngwavo ntanda kayapwile chipimo kufuma ku 1844 luli chimwe cha vinthu vino ene apweshili kusolwelwa ha kukanduka. Ewe walitavila ngwove echi chapwile chikuma cha mwangaza wenyi pa *Daily* mu mona wa udesi uvalisa nyongopelo.

That is not the original. You have the original. Check it out.

Acho si ya asili. Una asili. Ichunguze.

The Next Step (Step Two)—1851 A Sketch of the Christian Experience and View of Ellen G. White

Eri Ly’Ombuyaga (Oluyingo Lw’Kabiri)—1851 Ekifaananyi ky’Obumanyirivu bw’Omukristaayo n’Endowooza ya Ellen G. White

Then underneath this, you have, A Sketch of the Christian Experience and View of Ellen G. White, printed in 1851; and, you have the breakdowns of the changes that took place, and there is a very, very significant change.

Hapo chini ya hili, mna A Sketch of the Christian Experience and View of Ellen G. White, kilichochapishwa mwaka 1851; na mna uchambuzi wa mabadiliko yaliyotokea, nayo kuna badiliko la maana kubwa sana.

"September 23d, the Lord shewed [formerly—"showed"] me that he had stretched out his hand the second time to recover the remnant of his people, and that efforts must be redoubled in this gathering time. In the scattering, Israel was smitten and torn; but now in the gathering time God will heal and bind up his people. In the scattering, efforts made to spread the truth had but little effect, accomplished but little or nothing; but in the gathering, when God has set his hand to gather his people, efforts to spread the truth will have their designed effect. All should be united and zealous in the work. I saw that it was wrong for any to refer to the scattering for examples to govern us now in the gathering; for if God does no more for us now than he did then, Israel would never be gathered. [Removed: It is as necessary that the truth should be published in a paper, as preached.] [Paragraphs Combined] I have seen [formerly—"the Lord showed me] that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, [formerly—"by His hand"] and that it should not be altered; [formerly—"no part of it should be altered"] that the figures were as he wanted them. That his hand was over, and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until his hand was removed.

«ᏑᎾᎴᎢ 23 ᎢᏳᏓᎸ, ᎤᎬᏫᏳᎯ ᎠᏴ ᎠᏆᏄᏩᏛᎯ [ᎢᎬᏱᏱ—“showed”] ᎾᏍᎩ ᎯᎠ ᎠᏍᏓᏯᏗ ᎤᏬᏰᏂ ᎦᎵᏉᎩ ᏔᎵᏁ ᎤᏬᏰᏂ ᎤᎦᏔᎲᎢ ᎤᏪᏥ ᎠᏂᏴᏫ ᏧᎵᏃᎮᎯ ᎨᏒᎢ, ᎠᎴ ᎾᏍᎩ ᎠᏂᏰᎸᏍᎩ ᏚᎵᏂᎩᏛ ᎤᏟ ᏴᏫᏯᏛ ᎠᎾᏛᏁᏗ ᎠᏂᏟᏯᏍᏗ ᎿᏉ ᎠᏂᏟᏯᏍᏙᏗ ᏗᎨᏒᎢ. ᎠᏂᏘᏍᏔᏅᎢ ᎠᎢ, ᎢᏏᎵ ᎡᏣᎵᏍᏓᏴᏁᎸᎯ ᎠᎴ ᎡᏣᏣᏕᏫᏍᏔᏅᎯ ᎨᏎᎢ; ᎠᏎᏃ ᎿᏉ ᎠᏂᏟᏯᏍᏙᏗ ᏗᎨᏒᎢ ᎤᏁᎳᎩ ᏙᏓᎦᏅᏩᏍᏔᏂ ᎠᎴ ᏙᏓᎸᏍᏓᏵᏓᏂ ᎤᏪᏥ ᎠᏂᏴᏫ. ᎠᏂᏘᏍᏔᏅᎢ ᎠᎢ, ᎠᏂᏰᎸᏍᎩ ᎤᏙᎯᏳᎯ ᎤᏃᏴᏫᏍᏙᏗ ᎠᏂᎦᏔᎲᎢ ᏞᎦ ᎤᏣᏘ ᎤᎾᏓᎴᎳᏫᏎᎢ, ᎤᏍᏆᏂᎪᏔᏅ ᏞᎦ ᎤᏣᏘ ᎠᎴ ᎪᎱᏍᏗ ᎾᏍᎩ ᏄᏍᏛ ᎾᎿᎭᎢ; ᎠᏎᏃ ᎠᏂᏟᏯᏍᏙᏗ ᎠᎢ, ᎤᏁᎳᎩ ᎤᏬᏰᏂ ᎤᏍᏛᏅ ᎤᏟᏯᏍᏙᏗ ᎤᏪᏥ ᎠᏂᏴᏫ, ᎤᏙᎯᏳᎯ ᎤᏃᏴᏫᏍᏙᏗ ᎠᏂᏰᎸᏍᎩ ᏛᏂᎬᏩᎸᏂ ᎾᏍᎩ ᎤᏅᏒ ᏗᎤᏓᏅᏖᏍᏗ ᎤᎾᏓᏡᎬᎢ. ᏂᎦᏛ ᎠᏎ ᏧᎾᏓᏅᏘᏗ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏂᏴᏫᏯᏍᏗ ᏱᎩ ᎤᏅᏒ ᎠᏓᏅᏖᏍᏗ ᎠᏕᎳᏆᎸᎢ. ᎠᏴ ᎠᏆᎪᎲᎩ ᎾᏍᎩ ᎤᏲ ᎨᏒ ᏱᎩ ᎩᎶ ᎠᏂᏘᏍᏔᏅᎢ ᎢᎬᏱᏱ ᎠᏂᎦᏔᎲ ᎤᎾᏤᎵᎦ ᏗᎦᎵᏍᏙᏗ ᎬᏗ ᎢᏕᎲᎢ ᎩᎯ ᎿᏉ ᎠᏂᏟᏯᏍᏙᏗ ᏗᎨᏒᎢ; ᎢᏳᏰᏃ ᎤᏁᎳᎩ ᎿᏉ ᎢᎦᏛ ᎤᏠᏱ ᏂᏚᎵᏍᏕᎸᏂ ᎠᏴᎩ ᎾᎯᏳ ᎤᏛᏁᎢ, ᎢᏏᎵ ᎶᏝ ᎤᏟᏯᏍᏗ ᏱᎨᏎᎢ. [Removed: ᎤᏙᎯᏳᎯ ᎠᏕᏣᎴᎲᏍᎬ ᎪᏪᎵ ᎤᏬᏪᎳᏅ ᎠᏓᏃᎮᏍᎬᎢ ᎤᏠᏱ ᎤᏓᏅᏛ ᎾᏍᎩᏯᏉ.] [Paragraphs Combined] ᎠᏴ ᎠᏆᎪᎲᎩ [ᎢᎬᏱᏱ—“the Lord showed me] ᎾᏍᎩ 1843 chart ᎤᎦᏘᏯ ᎤᏁᎳᎩ ᎤᏬᏰᏂ ᎤᏘᏃᎯᏍᏔᏅᎯ, [ᎢᎬᏱᏱ—“by His hand”] ᎠᎴ ᎾᏍᎩ ᎥᏝ ᏱᎦᎨᏒᏗ ᏱᎨᏎᎢ; [ᎢᎬᏱᏱ—“no part of it should be altered”] ᎾᏍᎩ ᏗᎪᎵᏰᎥ ᎾᏍᎩ ᎾᏍᎩᏯ ᎤᏚᎵᏍᎬ ᎨᏒᎢ. ᎾᏍᎩ ᎤᏬᏰᏂ ᎦᏚᎩ ᎤᏩᏒ ᎠᎴ ᎤᏕᎵᏛ ᎠᏰᎵ ᎪᎱᏍᏗ ᏗᎪᎵᏰᎥ ᎤᏬᎵᏤᎵᎢ, ᎾᏍᎩ ᎩᎶ ᎬᏩᎪᎲ ᏂᎨᏒᎾ ᎬᏗᏍᎬᎢ, ᎬᏂ ᎤᏬᏰᏂ ᎤᎡᏔᏅ ᎠᏓᏅᏎᎸᎢ.»

"Then I saw in relation to the —Daily,' that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text; and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —Daily;' but since 1844, in the confusion, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion have followed. [Paragraphs Combined] I have also seen [Formerly—"the Lord showed me"] that time had not been a test since 1844, and that time will never again be a test.]" A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, ExV 61–62.

“Na nni kelem na ngani a —Daily,’ yaa nɛnɛ nji a —sacrifice’ kɛ́lɛlɛi yi mǔndū wa maalu, ŋɔ́ɔ̀ yà à kɛ̀ ta wɔ̀ nà text; kàa nni kelem yaa Bwana à kaaháa lola lya kùsungata pa nà àbáa baaháa mɔ́lɔ̀ wa saa ya hukumu. Pà uungáno wààliiwo, mbere ya 1844, kàla nàlɛ́ nà bɔ́ɔ̀ baaháa uungáno pa lola lya kùsungata lya —Daily;’ ndee kuuma 1844, nà mkorogo, mialo mingine yàkàtigiibwa, kà ndindi nà mkorogo vikàlonda. [Paragraphs Combined] Nni kelem pia [Kale—“Bwana aanionyeshe”] yaa saa tiiwiio mtihani kuuma 1844, nà yaa saa taikàla tena mtihani kamwe.]” A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, ExV 61–62.

Time not Connected with the Message of the Third Angel

مۆدەت، پەیوەندیدار نەبوو لەگەڵ نامەی فریشتەی سێهەم

Ellen White had a different vision than the vision that she had that ultimately ends up in Early Writings. She had several visions; but, she had a vision where she was told something; she was told one paragraph, and she wrote it down.

ئێلێن وایت بینینێکی دیکەی هەبوو لەو بینینەی کە ئەنجامەکەی لە «Early Writings» دا هاتووە. ئەو چەندین بینینی هەبوو؛ بەڵام، بینینێکی هەبوو کە تێیدا شتێکی پێ وترا؛ یەک پەرەگرافی پێ وترا، و ئەویش نووسییەوە.

"The Lord has shown me that the message of the third angel must go, and be proclaimed to the scattered children of the Lord, and that it should not be hung on time; for time never will be a test again. I saw that some were getting a false excitement arising from preaching time; that the third angel's message was stronger than time can be. I saw that this message can stand on its own foundation, and that it needs not time to strengthen it, and that it will go in mighty power, and do its work, and will be cut short in righteousness." A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, ExV 48.

“Mutwa angulangisisye yati ujumbe wa malaika wa tatu wafwile ukuya no kulandwa ku bana ba Mutwa abasalangene, kabili wene tawafwile ukulembekwa pa nshita; pantu inshita tayakabe cilangililo nakabili. Nalimwene yati bamo baleingila mu kusangalala kwa bufi ukwaima mu kulanda pa nshita; yati ujumbe wa malaika wa tatu wali wakosa ukucila ifyo inshita ingaba. Nalimwene yati uyu ujumbe ulingile ukwiminina pa mushingi wa wene mwine, kabili tawafwile inshita ukumutamfya amaka, kabili ukaya mu maka ayakalamba, no kucita umulimo wa wene, kabili ukafupikishiwa mu bulungami.” A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, ExV 48.

What is she speaking about there? That we should never connect the Third Angel's Message with time again, right?

Apa iya sa wairaia tuga ama tei? Bahwa kita sekali-kali jangan lagi menghubungkan Pekabaran Malaikat Ketiga dengan penetapan waktu, bukan?

Amen? Are you with me?

Amina? Muli nanji?

Where do you find this? Where is it located?

Ni wapi unapopata hili? Liko wapi?

FROM THE AUDIENCE: (No response.)

KUTOKA KWA WASIKILIZAJI: (Hakuna jibu.)

FROM THE AUDIENCE: A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views.

KUTOKA KWA HADHIRA: Muhtasari wa Uzoefu na Mitazamo ya Kikristo.

A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, page 48, page 48.

Mkufikizo wa Uzoefu wa Kikristo na Maoni ya Ellen G. White, ukurasa 48, ukurasa 48.

Okay. Where do we find the passage that we are discussing that is derived from Review and Herald, November 1850; where is that located in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White? Well, it is located, if you back up in your notes, it is located in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White, page 61 and page 62.

Sawa. Ni wapi tunapopata kifungu tunachokijadili kilichotokana na *Review and Herald*, Novemba 1850; hicho kiko wapi katika *A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White*? Naam, kipo, mkirudi nyuma katika kumbukumbu zenu, kipo katika *A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White*, ukurasa wa 61 na ukurasa wa 62.

You have a vision in A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White that is recorded on page 48; then you have the vision that ultimately is going to end up in Early Writings, on pages 61 and 62. They are separated by 13 or 14 pages, right?

Li we di *A Sketch of the Christian Experience and Views of Ellen G. White* de dîtinek heye ku li rûpela 48-an hatiye tomar kirin; paşê jî we ew dîtin heye ku di dawiyê de dê di *Early Writings* de, li rûpelên 61 û 62-an, cih bigire. Ew bi 13 an 14 rûpelan ji hev veqetandî ne, rast e?

And what are they going to do when it comes to Early Writings? They are going to take this paragraph from page 48 and they are going to insert it right after her statement that time is no longer a test. They are going to put two visions together.

Na watafanya nini linapokuja suala la Early Writings? Watachukua aya hii kutoka ukurasa wa 48 na wataiingiza mara tu baada ya kauli yake kwamba wakati si mtihani tena. Wataweka maono mawili pamoja.

Are you following what I mean?

雖則我所說的意思,你可明白麼?

MAN IN THE AUDIENCE: Yes.

MUNDU NA BANTU BÁ YITELELÁ: Ee.

Are you following what I mean?

Ndzi landzelela leswi ndzi vulaka swona xana?

INDIVIDUAL ADDRESSED IN THE AUDIENCE: (Affirmation.)

MUTU ALIYEELEKEZWA MIONGONI MWA HADHIRA: (Uthibitisho.)

Okay, because you are the one that I am seeing less confirmation with.

Хубаво, учир нь батламж нь хамгийн бага харагдаж байгаа хүн нь чи юм.

The Last Step (Step Three)—1882 Early Writings

Gukwata Intambwe ya Mpera (Intambwe ya Gatatu)—Ivyanditswe vya Mbere 1882

Okay. Now, I am back to page 6 of your notes; and, now you have Early Writings again.

បានហើយ។ ឥឡូវនេះ ខ្ញុំត្រឡប់មកទំព័រ ៦ នៃកំណត់ត្រារបស់អ្នកវិញ; ហើយ ឥឡូវនេះ អ្នកមាន Early Writings ម្ដងទៀត។

"September 23, . . . I have seen that the 1843 chart was directed by the hand of the Lord, and that it should not be altered; that the figures were as He wanted them; that His hand was over and hid a mistake in some of the figures, so that none could see it, until His hand was removed.

"Sebtembar 23, . . . Ngamona kuti chati cha 1843 chinawongoleredwa ndi dzanja la Ambuye, ndi kuti sichiyenera kusinthidwa; kuti manambalawo anali monga momwe Iye anafunira; kuti dzanja Lake linali pamwamba pake, ndipo linabisa cholakwa m’manambala ena, kotero kuti panalibe amene akanatha kuchiona, kufikira dzanja Lake litachotsedwa.

"Then I saw in relation to the —daily' (Daniel 8:12) that the word —sacrifice' was supplied by man's wisdom, and does not belong to the text, and that the Lord gave the correct view of it to those who gave the judgment hour cry. When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —daily'; but in the confusion since 1844, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion have followed. Time has not been a test since 1844, and it will never again be a test.

Ndzi nga ha vona malunghana ni “ya siku ni siku” (Daniele 8:12) leswaku rito “xitlhavelo” ri nghenisiwe hi vutlhari bya munhu, naswona a ri katsiwi eka tsalwa; naswona Hosi yi nyike vonelo leri lulameke eka lava a va humesa xirilo xa nkarhi wa vuavanyisi. Loko vun’we a byi ri kona, emahlweni ka 1844, kwalomu ka hinkwavo a va ri xikan’we eka vonelo leri lulameke ra “ya siku ni siku”; kambe eka mpfilumpfilu lowu nga kona ku sukela hi 1844, ku amukeriwe mavonelo man’wana, kutani ku landzele munyama ni mpfilumpfilu. Nkarhi a wu si va ndzingo ku sukela hi 1844, naswona a wu nga ha pfuki wu tlhela wu va ndzingo.

"The Lord has shown me that the message of the third angel must go, and be proclaimed to the scattered children of the Lord, but it must not be hung on time. I saw that some were getting a false excitement, arising from preaching time; but the third angel's message is stronger than time can be. I saw that this message can stand on its own foundation and needs not time to strengthen it; and that it will go in mighty power, and do its work, and will be cut short in righteousness.

“Ambuye andilangize kuti uthenga wa mngelo wachitatu uyenera kupita, ndi kulalikidwa kwa ana a Ambuye obalalika, koma suyenera kumangirizidwa pa nthawi. Ndaona kuti ena anali kulandira chisangalalo chachinyengo, chochokera ku kulalikira za nthawi; koma uthenga wa mngelo wachitatu ndi wamphamvu kuposa momwe nthawi ingakhalire. Ndaona kuti uthenga uwu ungaime pa maziko ake wokha ndipo sufuna nthawi kuti uulimbikitse; ndipo udzapita ndi mphamvu yaikulu, ndi kuchita ntchito yake, ndipo udzafupikitsidwa m’chilungamo.

"Then I was pointed to some who are in the great error of believing that it is their duty to go to Old Jerusalem . . ." Early Writings, 74-76.

“Bong, ngangmuh lakhipna bam thupi tak ah omte hnenah ka sawi pui a si a, amaute’n an tihdan chu Old Jerusalem-ah kal hi an tihdan phung leh an mawhphurhna a ni tiin an ring a ni . . .” Early Writings, 74-76.

And the reason that this is bold-faced, this is the paragraph here where it says, ". . . When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —daily'; but in the confusion since 1844, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion have followed. Time has not been a test since 1844, and it will never again be a test." you need to remember that originally in her first record of this vision, she said, "I was shown that time has not been a test since 1844," and it was a different paragraph. She had made sure that there was a distinction in what she was shown about the Daily and what was shown her about time being a test; and that the next paragraph, which is talking about no connecting time with the Third Angel's Message, it was not in the original vision. It was on page 48 of Life Sketches, not pages 61 and 62.

ꞌŨ na chũ gĩkĩ nĩ kĩandĩkĩtwo na mĩhĩrĩga minene nĩ atĩ gĩkĩ nĩ kĩrĩa kĩama gĩkũyũ gĩkũ here kĩrĩ handũ harĩa hũgĩrwo atĩ, “. . . Rĩrĩa ũiguano warĩho, mbere ya 1844, andũ acio othe handũ hamwe nĩmaarĩ hamwe mũonero-inĩ ũrĩa woneku kũhusu ‘ya mĩthenya yothe’; no rĩrĩa gũtaranĩrio kwĩra kũgĩa kũuma 1844, mĩonero ĩngĩ nĩyakĩrĩtwo, nao nduma na gũtaranĩrio nĩcio ciacũrirĩte. Ihinda ndĩrĩrĩ riaheirwo gũtuĩka kĩgerio kuuma 1844, nayo ndĩkaagĩa gũtuĩka kĩgerio rĩngĩ o na rĩ.” ũtiganĩrĩrwo nĩwega gũcũmbũra atĩ, rĩrĩa wa mbere kũandĩka rekodi yake ya mbere ya kĩoneki gĩkĩ, oigire atĩ, “Nĩonekirwo atĩ ihinda ndĩrĩrĩ riaheirwo gũtuĩka kĩgerio kuuma 1844,” na gĩtũmi kĩu kĩarĩ kĩama gĩtĩrĩ kimwe. Nĩaheire ũhoro ũrĩa mwega mũno atĩ kwarĩ na gũtandukania gatagatĩ ka ũrĩa oonirwo ũhoro wa Daily na ũrĩa oonirwo ũhoro wa ihinda gũtuĩka kĩgerio; na atĩ kĩama kĩrĩa gĩgĩkũrũkĩrĩra, kĩrĩa gĩtwaraga ũhoro wa gũtikũgwatĩrania ihinda na Ũtumwa wa Malaika wa Gatatũ, gĩtirĩ mũ kĩoneki kĩrĩa kya mbere. Gĩarĩ mũrango wa 48 wa Life Sketches, ti marango ma 61 na 62.

But, when you come to Early Writings in 1882, they put them together; and, therefore, when you get to the 1930s and you are going off into deep darkness in Adventism, and Willie White says that when you are studying the Daily you must study it in the context of time—"Sorry, Willie, your responsibility was to be the one that gave the accurate historical record of the Spirit of Prophecy. You were to be the one that defeated the Spirit of Prophecy. And in your presentation of Early Writings, page 75, you disregarded the original sources, and those original sources say that when you lifted the argument that the Daily has to be considered in the context of time in Early Writings, 74, that is absolutely untrue."—It is untrue! It cannot be sustained by the record in the Spirit of Prophecy. It cannot be sustained by the history of that time period.

Lê, dema ku hûn di sala 1882-an de gihîştin Early Writings, wan ew li hev kom kirin; û, ji ber vê yekê, dema ku hûn di salên 1930-an de digihîjin û di Adventîzmê de ber bi tarîtiyek kûr ve diçin, û Willie White dibêje ku dema ku hûn Dailyê hîn dibin divê hûn wê di çarçoveya demê de hîn bibin—“Bibore, Willie, berpirsiyariya te ew bû ku tu yê tomara dîrokî ya rast a Ruhê Pêxemberiyê bidî. Divê tu ew kes bûya ku Ruhê Pêxemberiyê têk bibe. Û di pêşkêşkirina te ya Early Writings, rûpel 75 de, te çavkaniyên eslî paşguh kirin, û ew çavkaniyên eslî dibêjin ku dema ku te gotûbêja ku Daily divê di Early Writings, 74 de di çarçoveya demê de were hesibandin bilind kir, ev bi tevahî nerast e.”—Ew nerast e! Ev nikare bi tomara di Ruhê Pêxemberiyê de were piştgirîkirin. Ev nikare bi dîroka wê maqamê demê were piştgirîkirin.

Okay. Point 1, Sister White says that there is a correct view of the Daily, in Early Writings, 74. The primary argument that is foisted later on in history is that when you study that passage in Early Writings, 74, you have to place it in the context of time setting. That argument is bogus; it is not valid!

Eee. Ntu ya 1, Sister White ke tubila nde kele na luzabu ya mbote ya “Daily,” na Early Writings, 74. Nkanu ya ntete yina ba tulaka na makasi na nima na masolo ya ntangu kele nde, kana nge ke longuka ndambu yina na Early Writings, 74, nge fwete tula yo na kati ya mambu ya kutulaka ntangu. Nkanu yina kele ya luvunu; yo kele ya kieleka ve!

So, now we are stuck with just the position that there is a correct view of the Daily. Okay? But, we are going to take up one more thought out of this paragraph.

So, eno twasigara ni hamwe n’iki gusa: ko hariho uburyo bukwiriye bwo gusobanukirwa ibyerekeye “Daily.” Ni byo? Ariko rero, turaza gufata ikindi gitekerezo kimwe muri iyi paragarafu.

It says, "September 23d, the Lord showed me . . . ." September 23d, when? 1850: "September 23d, 1850, the Lord showed me."

Kù wà pé, “Lọ́jọ́ 23 Oṣù Kẹsán, Olúwa fi hàn mí . . . .” Lọ́jọ́ 23 Oṣù Kẹsán, ìgbà wo? 1850: “Lọ́jọ́ 23 Oṣù Kẹsán, 1850, Olúwa fi hàn mí.”

What did He show her?

Ni iki yamweretse?

Well one of the things that He showed her was that since 1844, other views of the Daily have been embraced.

Basi kimwe mu bintu yamweretse ni uko kuva mu 1844, izindi nyigisho ku Bijyanye n’Igitambo cya Buri Munsi zagiye zemererwa.

"September 23, 1850 the Lord showed me . . . . When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —Daily;' but since 1844, in the confusion, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion has followed. The Review and Herald, November 1850."

„1850 metų rugsėjo 23 dieną Viešpats man parodė . . . . Kai vienybė viešpatavo prieš 1844 metus, beveik visi laikėsi teisingo požiūrio į „Kasdienę“; tačiau nuo 1844 metų, sumišime, buvo priimti kiti požiūriai, ir po to sekė tamsa bei sumišimas. The Review and Herald, 1850 m. lapkritis.“

March 1850 The "Daily" is the Earthly Sanctuary

Machi 1850 “Ya Kila Siku” ni Patakatifu pa Kidunia

So, on the bottom of page 6 you have a paragraph that comes from the Review and Herald of March 1850, and it is an article by David Arnold.

Kwa hiyo, katika sehemu ya chini ya ukurasa wa 6, mna aya inayotoka katika Review and Herald ya Machi 1850, nayo ni makala iliyoandikwa na David Arnold.

"He [Daniel] also sees the same oppressive power —standing up against the Prince of princes;' thus putting an end to the legality of all the daily sacrifices instituted at Sinai to be daily observed until the Seed should come. Here Christ, the substance, or great antitypical sacrifice was slain by the Roman soldiers. Thus by Rome —the daily sacrifice was taken away,' and the place of his sanctuary was cast down by Titus, a Roman general, when he destroyed the city of Jerusalem, and the temple of God, which contained —the sanctuary.' Here commenced the fulfillment of Christ's prophetic declaration. And they shall fall by the edge of the sword and shall be led away captive into all nations, and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, UNTIL THE TIMES OF THE GENTILES BE FULFILLED.' Luke 21:24." David Arnold, Review and Herald, March 1850, Volume 1, Number 8.

“O [Daniel] juga amona uvuva wa kukandamiza — kusimama kinyume na Mwana wa wakuu;” hivyo ukikomesha uhalali wa dhabihu zote za kila siku zilizoanzishwa Sinai, ili zishikwe kila siku hata Mbegu itakapokuja. Hapa Kristo, uhalisi wenyewe, au dhabihu kuu ya kiulinganifu, alichinjwa na askari wa Kirumi. Hivyo kwa Roma — dhabihu ya kila siku iliondolewa,” na mahali pa patakatifu pake pakabomolewa na Tito, jemadari wa Kirumi, alipoiharibu mji wa Yerusalemu, na hekalu la Mungu, lililokuwa na — patakatifu.” Hapa ndipo ulipoanza utimilifu wa tangazo la kinabii la Kristo. “Nao wataanguka kwa makali ya upanga, nao watachukuliwa mateka na kupelekwa katika mataifa yote, na Yerusalemu utakanyagwa na Mataifa, HATA NYAKATI ZA MATAIFA ZITAKAPOTIMILIKA.” Luka 21:24.” David Arnold, Review and Herald, Machi 1850, Juzuu ya 1, Namba 8.

In this article David Arnold teaches that the Daily in the Book of Daniel represents the Jewish sanctuary in Jerusalem that was removed by Pagan Rome in AD70.

Mu kiganiro c’iyi nyandiko, David Arnold yigisha yuko “Igitambo ca buri musi” kivugwa mu Gitabu ca Daniyeli giserukira ahera h’Abayuda i Yerusalemu, hakurwanyijwe kandi havanwaho n’i Roma y’Abapagani mu mwaka wa 70 inyuma ya Kristo.

September 1850 The "Daily" is Christ's Sanctuary Ministry

Mwezi wa tisa, 1850 “Ya Kila Siku” ni Huduma ya Kristo katika Patakatifu

Then in September 1850, the same year—and by the way, who is the editor of the Review and Herald in 1850? His name is James White.

Hanyuma muri Nzeli 1850, muri uwo mwaka nyine—kandi, ku ruhande, ni nde mwanditsi wa Review and Herald mu 1850? Izina rye ni James White.

James White, then, in September of 1850, he prints an article by Crosier which teaches that the Daily represents Christ's Sanctuary ministry.

Bityo, James White, mu kwezi kwa cyenda ko mu mwaka wa 1850, yasohoye inyandiko ya Crosier yigisha ko “Iby’Itambo bihoraho” bishushanya umurimo wa Kristo wo mu Buturo Bwera.

Now, James White does not teach it directly, but people take the inference there and say that is what he is teaching. And why am I saying this? I am saying this for his reason: In September of 1850, Sister White says that since 1844 other views of the Daily have been embraced in darkness and confusion has followed.

Buno, James White ka kizonjila yo pwelele ne, po bantu basimbula munsamo wa muyo no kwamba mba yo yene ibyo akonzya. Nanshi nkaambo nzi ncilaamba boobo? Ndilaamba boobo nkaambo ka mulandu wakwe uyu: Mu September wa 1850, Sister White waamba kuti kufuma mu 1844, maano amwi a Daily akasimbwa mu mudima, eelyo kuvulungana kwakateelela.

These two views [Arnold and Crosier] are not the Pioneer view that the Daily is Paganism.

Maoni haya mawili [Arnold na Crosier] siyo maoni ya Waanzilishi kwamba “the Daily” ni Upagani.

And on page 7 you have the two paragraphs from Crosier's article, where he is inferring that the Daily is Christ's Sanctuary ministry.

Û li rûpel 7-an hûn du paragrafên ji gotara Crosier hene, li wir ew encam digire ku “Daily” xizmeta Perestgeha Mesîh e.

"—And the place of His Sanctuary was cast down;' Daniel 8:11. This casting down was in the days and by the means of the Roman power; therefore, the Sanctuary of this text was not the Earth, nor Palestine, because the former was cast down at the fall, more than 4,000 years, and the latter at the captivity, more than 700 years previous to the event of this passage, and neither by Roman agency.

“—na mahali pa Patakatifu Pake pakaangushwa chini;” Danieli 8:11. Kuangushwa huku kulitokea katika siku za mamlaka ya Kirumi na kwa njia yake; kwa hiyo, Patakatifu pa andiko hili hapakuwa Dunia, wala Palestina, kwa sababu ya kwanza iliangushwa chini wakati wa anguko, zaidi ya miaka 4,000, na ya pili wakati wa uhamisho, zaidi ya miaka 700 kabla ya tukio la kifungu hiki, wala hakuna mojawapo lililoangushwa kwa njia ya utendaji wa Kirumi.

"The Sanctuary cast down is His against whom Rome magnified himself, which was the Prince of the host, Jesus Christ; and Paul teaches that His Sanctuary is in heaven. Again, Daniel 11:30–31, —For the ships of Chittim shall come against him; therefore, shall he be grieved and return, and have indignation (the staff to chastise) against the holy covenant (Christianity), so shall he do; he shall even return and have intelligence with them (priests and bishops) that forsake the holy covenant. And arms (civil and religious) shall stand on his part, and they (Rome and those that forsake the holy covenant) shall pollute the Sanctuary of strength.' What was this that Rome and the apostles of Christianity should joint pollute? This combination was formed against the —holy covenant', and it was the Sanctuary of that covenant they polluted; which they could do as well as to pollute the name of God; Jeremiah 34:16; Ezekiel 20; Malachi 1:7. This was the same as profaning or blaspheming His name. In this sense this —politico-religious' beast polluted the Sanctuary, (Revelation 13:6), and cast it down from its place in heaven, (Psalm 102:19; Jeremiah 17:12; Hebrews 8:1–2) when they called Rome the holy city, (Revelation 21:2) and installed the Pope there with the titles, —Lord God the Pope', —Holy Father', —Head of the Church', etc., and there, in the counterfeit, —temple of God', he professes to do what Jesus actually does in His Sanctuary; 2 Thessalonians 2:1–8. The Sanctuary has been trodden under foot (Daniel 8:13), the same as the Son of God has. (Hebrews 10:29.)" O. R. L. Crosier, —The Sanctuary', Review and Herald, September, 1850.

“Ekanisa Ekikye kyasuulibwa wansi kye Kye, oyo Rooma gwe yeegulumizaako, eyali Omulangira w’eggye, Yesu Kristo; era Pawulo ayigiriza nti Ekklezia ye eri mu ggulu. Nate, Danyeri 11:30–31, —Kubanga amaato ga Kittimu galimujjira; kyanaava annyiikaala, akomewo, era aliba n’obusungu (omuggo ogw’okubonereza) ku ndagaano entukuvu (Obukristaayo), bw’atyo bw’alikola; era alikoma okudda n’ategeera wamu n’abo (bakabona ne ba bisopu) abava ku ndagaano entukuvu. Era emikono gy’amanyi (egy’obufuzi n’egy’eddiini) girimuyimirira ku ludda lwe, era bo (Rooma n’abo abava ku ndagaano entukuvu) balyonoona Ekklezia ey’amaanyi.’ Kino kyali ki, Rooma n’abatume b’Obukristaayo kye baali balina okwonoona awamu? Obwegassi buno bwateekebwawo okulwanyisa —endagaano entukuvu’, era yali Ekklezia ey’endagaano eyo gye baayonoona; ekyo baali basobola okukikola nga bwe basobola okwonoona erinnya lya Katonda; Yeremiya 34:16; Ezeekyeri 20; Malaki 1:7. Kino kyali kye kimu n’okuvoola oba okuwaaliriza erinnya lye. Mu ngeri eno ensolo eno ey’—eby’obufuzi n’eby’eddiini’ yayonoona Ekklezia, (Okubikkulirwa 13:6), n’egisuula okuva mu kifo kyayo mu ggulu, (Zabbuli 102:19; Yeremiya 17:12; Abaebbulaniya 8:1–2) bwe baayita Rooma ekibuga ekitukuvu, (Okubikkulirwa 21:2) ne bateekaayo Paapa n’ebitibwa bino, —Mukama Katonda Paapa’, —Taata Omutukuvu’, —Omukulu w’Ekkanisa’, n’ebirala; era eyo, mu —yeekaalu ya Katonda’ ey’obulimba, yeeyita okukola ekyo Yesu ky’akola ddala mu Ekklezia ye; 2 Abasessalonika 2:1–8. Ekklezia etambuliddwa wansi w’ebigere (Danyeri 8:13), kye kimu n’engeri Omwana wa Katonda gye yatambulibwamu. (Abaebbulaniya 10:29.)” O. R. L. Crosier, —Ekklezia’, Review and Herald, September, 1850.

The Logic of James White

Լեյմս Ուայթի տրամաբանությունը

Why would James White print this article if he knew better? The reason for it is "The Logic of James White" in your notes.

James White angamunyile kuñi atu usome wakutela nge alinyile chamwaza? Chifukwa cha echi chili mu “The Logic of James White” muvinembelo vyove.

The first thing that was printed after the Disappointment is called A Word to the Little Flock, and the three people who were authors in that publication were James and Ellen White and Joseph Bates. The first thing that was printed after October 22, 1844, by those people that were following on the path was this article; and, in this article Sister White endorses Crosier's view, not his view of the Daily but his view of Christ moving from the Holy Place to the Most Holy Place.

Tişta yekem a ku piştî Bêhêviyê hate çapkirin, bi navê A Word to the Little Flock tê zanîn, û sê kesên ku di wê weşanê de nivîskar bûn James White, Ellen White, û Joseph Bates bûn. Tişta yekem a ku piştî 22ê Cotmeha 1844-an ji aliyê wan kesan ve, yên ku li ser wê rêyê diçûn, hate çapkirin ev gotar bû; û di vê gotarê de, Xwişka White nerîna Crosier piştrast dike, ne nerîna wî ya derbarê Daily de, lê nerîna wî ya ku Mesîh ji Cihê Pîroz ber bi Cihê Herî Pîroz ve derbas bû.

Notice, this is Sister White. This is why James White would be willing to print Crosier's article, it says,

Mutegereze, uno ni Mushiki wacu White. Iyi ni yo mpamvu James White yari yiteguye gucapa inyandiko ya Crosier; iravuga iti,

"I believe the Sanctuary, to be cleansed at the end of the 2300 days, is the New Jerusalem Temple, of which Christ is a minister."—this is Ellen White—"The Lord shew me in vision, more than one year ago, that Brother Crosier had the true light, on the cleansing of the Sanctuary, &c; and that it was his will, that Brother C. should write out the view which he gave us in the Day-Star, Extra, February 7, 1846. I feel fully authorized by the Lord, to recommend that Extra, to every saint.

Ndzi pfumela leswaku Vuhlawulelo lebyi nga ta basisiwa emakumu ka masiku ya 2300, i Tempele ra Yerusalema Luntshwa, leri Kriste a nga mutirheli wa rona.” — leswi i Ellen White — “Hosi yi ndzi kombise embonweni, ku tlula lembe rin’we leri hundzeke, leswaku Makwerhu Crosier a a ri ni ku vonakala ka ntiyiso malunghana ni ku basisiwa ka Vuhlawulelo, ni swin’wana; naswona leswaku a ku ri ku rhandza ka yona leswaku Makwerhu C. a tsala hi ku helela mavonelo lawa a hi nyikeke wona eka Day-Star, Extra, February 7, 1846. Ndzi titwa ndzi nyikiwile matimba hi ku helela hi Hosi, ku bumabumela Extra yoleyo eka mukwetsimi un’wana ni un’wana.

"I pray that these lines may prove a blessing to you, and all the dear children who may read them." A Word to the Little Flock, May 12, 1847.

“Ndzi khongela leswaku marito lawa ma ta va nkateko eka wena, ni le ka vana hinkwavo lava rhandzekaka lava nga ha ma hlayaka.” A Word to the Little Flock, May 12, 1847.

So, people even to this day, some of the modern historians in Adventism say, "Look at there. Ellen White is giving her blanket endorsement on Crosier's article; and, therefore, what Crosier said about the Daily being Christ's Sanctuary ministry that has to be true." And when they say that, they are misrepresenting history; because, Crosier's article had eight sections in it and, from the very beginning, the Adventists understood that four of those sections were total darkness and they have never, ever, ever been reprinted in Adventism.

Noneho, abantu no kugeza no muri iki gihe, bamwe mu bahanga b’amateka ba none bo mu Badiventisime baravuga bati: “Nimurebe aho. Ellen White arimo atanga kwemeza kwe kuzuye ku nyandiko ya Crosier; kandi, rero, ibyo Crosier yavuze ku By’Urudaca, ko ari umurimo wa Kristo mu Buturo Bwera, bigomba kuba ari ukuri.” Kandi iyo bavuga batyo, baba bagoreka amateka; kuko inyandiko ya Crosier yari igizwe n’ibice umunani, kandi, uhereye mbere na mbere, Abadiventisti basobanukiwe ko bine muri ibyo bice byari umwijima wose rwose, kandi nta na rimwe, rwose nta na rimwe, rwigeze rusubirwamo mu icapiro muri Adventisime.

As an example, one of his positions in that article was that when Jesus returns there is going to be a thousand years of peace. Adventists do not believe that and they never did. That understanding is an understanding that William Miller rejected that actually puts William Miller in the right path for understanding truth. That teaching is one of the teachings that is directly opposite to Millerite understanding.

Kwa mfano, mojawapo ya misimamo yake katika makala hiyo ilikuwa kwamba Yesu atakaporudi kutakuwa na miaka elfu ya amani. Waadventista hawaamini hivyo, wala hawakuwahi kuamini hivyo kamwe. Uelewa huo ni uelewa ambao William Miller aliukataa, na kwa kweli humweka William Miller katika njia iliyo sahihi ya kuielewa kweli. Mafundisho hayo ni mojawapo ya mafundisho yaliyo kinyume moja kwa moja na uelewa wa Kimilleri.

So, when Crosier comes out with this eight-part article, they know right off the bat that four of these parts are not reprintable.

Basi, ubwo Crosier asohokanye iyi ngingo igizwe n’ibice umunani, bahise bamenya ko bine muri ibyo bice bidashobora kongera gucapwa.

But, James White prints the part where Crosier does infer that the Daily is Christ's Sanctuary ministry; but, he is only going to reprint those four parts. He is not going to reprint the other four. But, in order for James White to reprint Crosier's four parts, he has to print it in two issues. He had to print it twice in September 1850.

Lêbelê, James White ew beşa ku Crosier tê de encam dide ku “Daily” xizmeta Perestgeha Mesîh e çap dike; lê, ew tenê wê çar beşan ji nû ve çap bike. Ew ê çar beşên din ji nû ve çap neke. Lê, ji bo ku James White van çar beşên Crosier ji nû ve çap bike, pêdivî ye ku wan di du hejmaran de çap bike. Diviyabû ku ew di Îlona 1850-an de wan du caran çap bikira.

There was not enough room in his Review and Herald in September 1850, so he printed two Review and Heralds in September 1850 so he could get all of Crosier's article on Christ moving from the Holy Place to the Most Holy Place.

Mne wi tei he kire ni ko Review and Herald ona Septeba 1850, e takoia i buoki rua n te Review and Herald n te Septeba 1850 bwa e aonga n kabongana kaina n rongorongon te atikara a Crosier i aon Kristo n akioki mai te Tabo ae Tabu nakon te Tabo ae Rikia n Tabu.

Now, you will notice from Gerard Damsteegt that he is giving the historical evaluation that Adventists always knew that there were parts of Crosier's articles that were incorrect and that they could not be reprinted.

እንግዲህ፣ ከGerard Damsteegt ትመለከቱታላችሁ የሚሰጠው ታሪካዊ ግምገማ ይህ ነው፤ አድቬንቲስቶች ሁልጊዜ በCrosier ጽሑፎች ውስጥ የተሳሳቱ ክፍሎች እንዳሉ እና እነዚያም እንደገና ሊታተሙ እንደማይችሉ ያውቁ ነበር።

"She [Ellen Harmon] said: —The Lord showed me in vision, more than one year ago, that Brother Crosier had the true light, on the cleansing of the Sanctuary, &c; and that it was His will that Brother C. should write out the view which he gave us in the Day Star Extra, February 7, 1846. I feel fully authorized by the Lord, to recommend that Extra, to every saint' (Letter. E. G. White to Curtis, Word to the Little Flock, 12). Seventh-day Adventists have usually interpreted this statement to mean that Crosier's presentations were not without mistakes, but that his major typological argumentation was correct. Reprints of the article omitted the aspects which they felt to be inaccurate." P. Gerard Damsteegt, Foundations of the Seventh-day Adventist Message and Mission, 125.

“Ê [Ellen Harmon] got: —Xudanî di dîtinekê de, zêdetir ji salekê berê, nîşanî min da ku Birayê Crosier li ser paqijkirina Perestgehê, û hwd., ronahiya rast heye; û ku ew daxwaza Wî bû ku Birayê C. nêrîna ku wî di Day Star Extra, 7ê Sibatê, 1846-an de daye me, binivîse. Ez ji aliyê Xudan ve bi tevahî destûrdar hîs dikim ku wê Extra’yê ji her pîrozekî re pêşniyar bikim” (Name. E. G. White to Curtis, Word to the Little Flock, 12). Adventîstên Roja Heftem bi gelemperî vê gotinê wisa şîrove kirine ku pêşkêşkirinên Crosier bê xeletî nebûn, lê ku argumantasyona wî ya taybetî-tipolojîk a sereke rast bû. Çapên nû yên gotarê aliyên ku wan ew ne rast hîs dikirin jê derxistin.” P. Gerard Damsteegt, Foundations of the Seventh-day Adventist Message and Mission, 125.

Never Could Reprint His Complete Document

Kabure Kokalibisha Nyandiko Yiwe Yose

Now, on the next page you have W. A. Spicer giving testimony to the same thing: They always knew that Crosier's articles had error in them, and they never reprinted those four sections.

Hata, katika ukurasa unaofuata unamwona W. A. Spicer akitoa ushuhuda wa jambo lilo hilo: sikuzote walijua kwamba makala za Crosier zilikuwa na makosa ndani yake, wala hawakuwahi kuchapisha tena sehemu zile nne.

"Sad to say, young Crosier walked in the light of the Sabbath truth but a very little time. He later repudiated the sanctuary teaching that he had helped to establish. Our pioneer brethren reprinted his exposition on the sanctuary several times in their early papers, but they never could reprint his complete document. In it he had added to the sanctuary exposition some ideas on the age to come a temporal millennium, with a glorious age on this earth at the Second Advent. These things our brethren always omitted. These teachings of the age to come were all abroad in those days. The doctrine never fitted in with the definite advent message; and doubtless this leaven of error helped to lead the younger men away from the Sabbath and the sanctuary truths. He soon turned to bitter opposition to our early movement." W. A. Spicer, Review and Herald, December 14, 1939

“Sezgin emsiz, Crosier qulbabaan jaasiruutub nalxachag ajijikiguan maatim jinkasej. Jaya taishtan, mook taya itelxen anchridan setikasej amashatunuum aiban jaawing ipurnajin. Nunuulzabek aaban anchridan setikasej tuum jimej mibalxenej, jiubobam aadaiqqisbak nalxachag niuxajiink baanee; tseetsen, naqom jaawing ipurnajin jiubobam aadaiqqisbak nalxachag qangalsikiguan ebaang borma ziruubum guutsuubaan. Onia, qalsikiguan anchridan setikasej-baanee jimbitan, uunkonaltaanam namxagung gousaxat qangatigiin iqsin: aadi qanshiz maqang, taam qasaxiguan dabsimriin nuubaan gonja xalaat sijlun oobaan, xuniijibaan naxajubaan qozhal guaankitsibing qayabaja. Emsiijikiguan nunuulzabek xuniijibaan qalsikiguan ebaang qangam. “Qangatigiin iqsin” qalsikiguan emsi jaa baxagung iitsuun qax qanshizaguan. Taqsim, ankul qingaan binalx qangajiguul agej, gousaxat qozhal-banee anchridan setikasej amashatunuum, jaasiruutub nalxachag-tuubaan qalan aibaxaan qeeramguts. Jaya qai, emsiijibaan quuktar qaanats qaxgatanan nunuulzabek naxajubaan umjijang.” W. A. Spicer, Review and Herald, December 14, 1939

The point is, there are those people today that take Sister White's endorsement of Crosier's article in A Word to the Little Flock, people like Heidi Heikes, Heidi Heikes with his foolish book about the Daily being Christ's Sanctuary ministry. This is one of his arguments.

ហេតុសំខាន់គឺ សព្វថ្ងៃនេះមានមនុស្សខ្លះយកការគាំទ្ររបស់ Sister White ចំពោះអត្ថបទរបស់ Crosier នៅក្នុង A Word to the Little Flock មកប្រើ ដូចជាមនុស្សដូចជា Heidi Heikes គឺ Heidi Heikes ជាមួយសៀវភៅល្ងង់ខ្លៅរបស់គាត់អំពី “Daily” ថាជាកិច្ចបម្រើរបស់ព្រះគ្រីស្ទនៅក្នុងទីសក្ការៈ។ នេះគឺជាអំណះអំណាងមួយក្នុងចំណោមអំណះអំណាងរបស់គាត់។

People that do this are disregarding the historical facts. They never could reprint all of Crosier's articles. And to insist that Ellen White's endorsement in A Word to the Little Flock is a blanket endorsement of Crosier's position is to insist that Adventists believe that there is going to be a thousand years of peace. It is a foolish argument.

Abantu abakora ibi birengagiza ukuri kw’amateka. Ntibashoboraga na rimwe kongera gucapura inyandiko zose za Crosier. Kandi gutsimbarara ko kwemeza kwa Ellen White kuboneka muri *A Word to the Little Flock* ari ukwemera mu buryo busesuye no muri rusange umwanya wa Crosier, ni nko gutsimbarara ko Abadiventisiti bemera ko hagiye kubaho imyaka igihumbi y’amahoro. Iyi ni impaka y’ubupfapfa.

It is a misrepresentation of history, and it is done to deceive people and to produce confusion and darkness.

Ya buwongo bwa mateka, kandi bukorwa kugira buyobye abantu no kureeta okuvurugana n’ekizikiza.

So, you have two historians, Spicer who is deceased and Damsteegt who is still alive; but, I guarantee you, Spicer or Damsteegt, neither one of them, would agree with me with what I present. Okay, they would not. So, you have two antagonistic historians that are in agreement with what I am telling you. There is no justification whatsoever for taking Ellen White's endorsement of Crosier's article to mean that everything in it was perfect.

Noolyo, muli na bakambazi babili, Spicer uyo wafwile na Damsteegt uyo achili mumi; lelo, nkamwafwilisha na cine, nangu Spicer nangu Damsteegt, nangu umo pali bene, tabaumfwana nane pa fyo ndeleta. Eyo, tabengafye. E ico, muli na bakambazi babili abapingana abali mu bwafya na fyo ndeeba. Takuli nangu cimo icilungamika nangu panono ukusenda ukwasuminisha kwa Ellen White pa lyashi lya Crosier ukuti cilepilibula ukuti ifili fyonse muli lyena fyali ifya bulungami bwapwililika.

The Advent Review—Volume 1, Auburn NY, Number 3

Advent Review—Volumu 1, Auburn NY, Namba 3

The Advent Review—Volume 1, Auburn NY, Number 4

Ripitia ya Adventi—Juzuu ya 1, Auburn, NY, Namba 4

The Advent Review—Volume 1, Auburn NY, Number Special

Revista ya Adventi—Volumu 1, Auburn NY, Namba Maalumu

When James White began to print Crosier's article in September of 1850, of The Review and Herald, that was Volume 1, Number 3

Jems Waitenok Crosieri ain artikol taupirin sepetemba bilong 1850, long *The Review and Herald*, em i Volium 1, Namba 3.

But, he could not get it all in Volume 1, Number 3; so, he finished off the article in Volume 1 of The Review and Herald,, Number 4. And when did he do this? In September of 1850.

Baitu, akashindwa kulitia yote katika Juzuu ya 1, Nambari ya 3; hivyo, akakamilisha makala hiyo katika Juzuu ya 1 ya *The Review and Herald*, Nambari ya 4. Naye alifanya jambo hili lini? Mnamo Septemba, 1850.

Well, what happened in September of 1850? Sister White had a vision that says, "September 23, 1850 the Lord showed me . . . . When union existed, before 1844, nearly all were united on the correct view of the —Daily;' but since 1844, in the confusion, other views have been embraced, and darkness and confusion has followed. The Review and Herald, November 1850."

ئەی، لە مانگی ئەیلوولی ساڵی 1850 دا چی ڕوویدا؟ خوشکی وایت بینینێکی هەبوو کە دەڵێت: «لە 23ی ئەیلوولی 1850، یەزدان پێشانی دام . . . . کاتێک یەکگرتوویی هەبوو، پێش 1844، نزیکەی هەمووان لەسەر تێگەیشتنی ڕاستی ـ”Daily“ ـ یەکدەنگ بوون؛ بەڵام لەدوای 1844، لە ناو سەرلێشێواویی‌دا، بۆچوونی تر وەرگیراون، و تاریکی و سەرلێشێواوی بەدوایدا هاتوون. The Review and Herald, November 1850.»

Who was her husband? He was the editor of The Review and Herald.

Mukia wakwe yê? Âli mũhariri wa *The Review and Herald*.

So, what did he do when his wife said, "Do you know what I just was told by the Lord, James? I was told that we were not supposed to be introducing the views of the Daily that contradict the Pioneer understanding that the Daily is Paganism, because it is bringing darkness and confusion."

Awo, niki ekyo yakola mukyala we bwe yamugamba nti, “Omanyi ekyo Mukama ky’anŋambye nno, James? Nnabuuliddwa nti tetwandibadde tuyingiza ndowooza ezikwata ku Daily ezikontana n’okutegeera kw’Abawanguzi nti Daily bwe Bupagaani, kubanga kireeta ekizikiza n’okutabagana.”

So, what did James White do? In September of 1850 he printed another Review and Herald, three in one month. It is called Volume 1, Special Edition.

Rero, Yakobo White yakoze iki? Muri Nzeri 1850 yasohoye indi nimero ya Review and Herald, eshatu mu kwezi kumwe. Yitwa Umubumbe wa 1, Inyandiko Yihariye.

And what did he do? He reprinted Crosier's article and removed what Crosier said about the Daily!

Û wî çi kir? Wî gotara Crosier ji nû ve çap kir û tiştê ku Crosier li ser Daily gotibû jê derxist!

Brothers and Sisters, this is historical proof that James and Ellen White understood that Crosier's view about the Daily was wrong and that it brought darkness and confusion.

ئەی برا و خوشکان، ئەمە بەڵگەیەکی مێژووییە کە جەیمس و ئێلن وایت تێگەیشتن کە بۆچوونی کڕۆسیەر دەربارەی «ڕۆژانە» هەڵە بوو و تاریکی و سەرلێشێواوی هێنایە ئاراوە.

And what was Crosier's view about the Daily? That it was Christ's Sanctuary ministry.

Na Crosier mongituvo kuhusiana na “Daily” kilikuwa nini? Kwamba kilikuwa huduma ya Kristo katika Patakatifu Pake.

So, in Early Writings, 74, when she says, "September 23rd, the Lord showed me that the Millerites had the correct view of the Daily," the historical evidence is that the Millerites understood—

Noolwekyo, mu *Early Writings*, 74, bwe agamba nti, “Nga 23 Sebuttemba, Mukama yandaga nti abaMillerite baalina endowooza entuufu ku Daily,” obujulizi obw’ebyafaayo bulaga nti abaMillerite baategeera—

Now, Brothers and Sisters, Brothers and Sisters, do not miss this fact: What is this: September 1850 Sister White is shown that since 1844 other views of the Daily had been embraced; May 1850, Arnold presents the Daily as the Jewish sanctuary; September 1850, part 1 of 2 of Crosier's article is published, inclusive of his presentation of the Daily as Christ's Sanctuary ministry; September 1850, part 2 of 2 of Crosier's article is published; September 1850, Crosier's article is reprinted, but his view on the Daily has been removed? What is taking place?

Sasa, Ndugu Wanaume na Ndugu Wanawake, Ndugu Wanaume na Ndugu Wanawake, msikose jambo hili: Hili ni nini: Septemba 1850 Dada White anaonyeshwa kwamba tangu 1844 mitazamo mingine kuhusu Dhabihu ya Kila Siku ilikuwa imekubaliwa; Mei 1850, Arnold anawasilisha Dhabihu ya Kila Siku kuwa ni patakatifu pa Kiyahudi; Septemba 1850, sehemu ya 1 kati ya 2 ya makala ya Crosier inachapishwa, ikijumuisha uwasilishaji wake wa Dhabihu ya Kila Siku kuwa ni huduma ya Kristo katika patakatifu; Septemba 1850, sehemu ya 2 kati ya 2 ya makala ya Crosier inachapishwa; Septemba 1850, makala ya Crosier inachapishwa tena, lakini mtazamo wake kuhusu Dhabihu ya Kila Siku umeondolewa? Ni nini kinachotukia?

We see the same year that this 1850 Chart is produced, and what does this Chart say about the Daily? "Pagan Dominion or The DAILY taken away. Dan. 11:31 508."

Aynı yıl içinde bu 1850 Çizelgesi’nin hazırlandığını görüyoruz; peki bu Çizelge Günlük hakkında ne söylüyor? “Putperest Hâkimiyet yahut kaldırılan GÜNLÜK. Dan. 11:31 508.”

Ellen White knew what those who gave the Judgment Hour's cry position of the Daily was. When she says they had the correct view, she knew that the correct view was that it represented the Pagan Dominion being taken; the Daily represented Paganism.

Ellen White alitambua msimamo juu ya Daily uliokuwa wa wale waliotoa kilio cha Saa ya Hukumu. Anaposema kwamba walikuwa na mtazamo ulio sahihi, alijua kwamba mtazamo huo sahihi ulikuwa kwamba Daily iliwakilisha kuondolewa kwa utawala wa kipagani; Daily iliwakilisha upagani.

And in this year, 1850, the historical record proves that she rejected and her husband rejected the teaching that the Daily represents Christ Sanctuary ministry, which is the teaching that the Biblical Research Institute of the Seventh-day Adventist Church upholds. It is the teaching that the self-supporting ministries, such as Heartland and Steps to Life support. It is the teaching that brings darkness and confusion.

Û di vê salê de, 1850, tomara dîrokî îspat dike ku wê û mêrê wê hînkirina ku “Daily” xizmeta Mesîh di Pîrozgeha de nîşan dide, red kirin; ev jî ew hînkirin e ku Enstîtuya Lêkolîna Kitêbî ya Dêra Adventîst a Roja Heftem parastin dike. Ev ew hînkirin e ku xizmetên xwe-bixwe-piştgir, wek Heartland û Steps to Life, piştgirî dikin. Ev ew hînkirin e ku tariyê û tevliheviyê tîne.

Now, notice this concerning the 1850 Chart. This is in November of 1850. This is the same month that she has the vision that she records that ultimately goes through the evolution in 1851, and then in 1882 ends up in Early Writing, in this very month, in this very month, in November of 1850. It says,

Nangin, talungtungan yu iti daytoy maipapan iti 1850 Chart. Daytoy ket iti Nobyembre ti 1850. Daytoy met laeng ti bulan a nakitana dayta sirmata a nairekordna, a iti ud-udina nagdanas iti pannakabalbaliw idi 1851, ket kalpasanna idi 1882 nagbanag iti Early Writing, iti daytoy unay a bulan, iti daytoy unay a bulan, iti Nobyembre ti 1850. Kuna na,

"Monday we returned to Dorchester where our dear Brother Nichols and family live."—

“Ku wa Mbere twasubiye i Dorchester aho mwene Data wacu dukunda, Nichols, n’umuryango we batuye.”

Right up here [referring to the 1850 Chart, upper right-hand corner], "Published by Otis Nichols, Dorchester, Massachusetts." Okay? She is talking about this, right? Do you see it, this Chart?

Ici hejuru neza [yerekeza ku Mbonerahamwe yo mu 1850, mu mfuruka yo hejuru iburyo], “Byatangajwe na Otis Nichols, Dorchester, Massachusetts.” Ni byo? Arimo kuvuga ibi, si byo? Murabibona, iyi Mbonerahamwe?

—"There in the night God gave me a very interesting vision, the most of which you will see in the paper. God shewed me the necessity of getting out a chart. I saw it was needed and that the truth made plain upon tables would effect much and would cause souls to come to the knowledge of the truth." Manuscript Releases, number 15, 210 November, 1850.

—“Ho there mw’ijoro Ngai andaheirwo keria gĩa kuona kĩa gũkorwo gĩa kwĩrĩrĩria muno, gĩkuru kĩa kĩo nĩ mũkĩonaga thĩinĩ wa karatasi. Ngai andũngĩria ũrĩa gwatiganire wa kũruta chati. Ndaonire atĩ nĩ yaagĩrĩirwo, na atĩ ũhoro-wa-ma nĩwonekanĩrĩtio wega igũrũ rĩa mbao waandikio wakoragwo ũgũkĩra maũndũ maingĩ na nĩwagũtũma ngoro ciũke kũmenya ũhoro-wa-ma.” Manuscript Releases, number 15, 210 November, 1850.

She had a vision at Nichols's house in Dorchester—that is all on this Chart—saying, "You need to make a chart."

Atu a mona mbona na nganda ya Nichols na Dorchester—yina yonso kele na Chart yai—na kutuba nde, “Nge fwete sala chart mosi.”

And what does she say about the chart? How does she describe it?

Ne akatambula atya ku kyapa? Akinnyonnyola atya?

Go to Habakkuk 2, "I saw the need of getting out a chart," and what would it do? It was needed, "that the truth made plain upon tables." Habakkuk 2, verse 2, says, "And the Lord answered me and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, . . . ." She is saying that this Otis Nichols 1850 Chart, printed in Dorchester, Massachusetts, is a fulfillment of Habakkuk, just like she says in The Great Controversy that the 1843 Chart is a fulfillment of Habakkuk.

Kenda Habakuki 2, “Nabonye obwetaavu obw’okufulumya ekipande,” era kyandikoze ki? Kyali kyetaagisa, “ensonga zennyini ziteekebwe mu ngeri entegeerekeka ku bipande.” Habakuki 2, olunyiriri 2, lugamba nti, “Mukama n’anziramu n’aŋŋamba nti, Wandiika okwolesebwa, okufuule kutangaavu ku bipande, . . . .” Ayogera nti ekipande kino ekya Otis Nichols eky’omwaka 1850, ekyakubibwa mu Dorchester, Massachusetts, kye kituukiriza Habakuki, nga bw’agamba mu The Great Controversy nti Ekipande eky’omwaka 1843 kituukiriza Habakuki.

Okay, do you see that? Do you see when she got this vision? In the same time that this was going on: "September 23d, the Lord showed me . . . . that the teaching of the Daily as Christ's Sanctuary ministry brings darkness and confusion," and her husband immediately reprinted the article and removed those two paragraphs. It was never reprinted again in Adventism until 1931 when Willie White reprinted it; and, when he did so, he had some false witness in the very tract that he printed. It can be demonstrated.

Bhaa, oga na u shi mono? Oga na o ntaanu a mon dhen khuanyin yi? Pii o zhe nga a yi kue: “September 23d, Oghene rra me . . . . kpa ẹ, ẹmuọn ẹ Daily ghe ẹmiẹ Khrist gẹgẹ bi u yọ Sanctuary nẹ mien ọni ụkp̣ẹn kpọ ụgbọn,” nẹ ọkọọ rẹ̣ ọtẹ̣n ọ zẹ̣n a kpa nwiwi ạtịkuḷu na, o si kpọn ạma ẹvwẹ ẹrẹn ẹhẹn. A kpọn zẹ̣n a mighọ rrẹ muẹ gbọ ni Adventism kpọ 1931, nigba ti Willie White zẹ̣n a muẹ rrẹ; nẹ, nigba ti o ṣe bẹ, o ni ẹri eke ninu gan-an tract ti o tẹ jade. A le fi hàn.

Now, I want to read something here to you, a longer quote, about this same time period. This is from November 27, 1850.

Kũu nĩngwenda kũbasomera gĩkũyũ gĩkũnene hano, kĩrĩa kĩhota kĩhota gũkũhĩtithia ihinda rĩrĩa rĩu rĩrĩa. Ĩkĩ nĩ kiumbe kĩa mũthenya wa 27 wa Mweri wa Ikũmi na ĩmwe, 1850.

"I have neglected writing you for some time. I will now give my reasons. First, I had no time to write for weeks after I received Sister Arabella's kind and welcome letter, or I should have complied with her request to have answered it within two weeks. I liked the letter very much. We were all interested in the letter and hope my delay will not prevent you from answering this as soon as you read it, and I will not wait so long next time.

Ndzi tshame nkarhi wo karhi ndzi nga mi tsaleli. Sweswi ndzi ta mi nyika swivangelo swa mina. Xo sungula, a ndzi nga ri na nkarhi wo tsala ku ringana mavhiki yo hlayanyana endzhaku ka loko ndzi amukele papila ra Musa wa makwavo Arabella, leri a ri ri ra musa naswona ri amukeleka swinene; loko a swi nga ri tano, a ndzi ta va ndzi hetisile xikombelo xa yena xo leswaku a hlamuriwa endzeni ka mavhiki mambirhi. Ndzi ri tsakerile swinene papila rero. Hinkwerhu a hi tsakela papila rero naswona hi tshemba leswaku ku hlwela ka mina a ku nge mi siveli ku hlamula leri hi xihatla loko mi ri hlayile, naswona nkarhi lowu taka a ndzi nge he hlweli nkarhi wo leha swonghasi.

"James' and my health is quite good now. Our home is in Paris, at Brother Andrews', within a few steps of the post office and printing office. We shall stay here some little time. This is a very kind family, yet quite poor. Everything here is free as far as they have. We do not think it right to be any expense to them while here. I want to see you all very much and dear Sister Gorham.

Utano wa Yakobo na wangu ni mzuri sana sasa. Nyumba yetu iko Paris, kwa Ndugu Andrews, karibu tu na ofisi ya posta na ofisi ya uchapishaji. Tutakaa hapa kwa muda mfupi. Hii ni familia yenye fadhili sana, lakini ni maskini kabisa. Kila kitu hapa hutolewa bure kadiri walivyo nacho. Hatuoni kuwa ni jambo lililo sawa kuwa gharama yoyote kwao wakati tukiwa hapa. Natamani sana kuwaona ninyi nyote pamoja na dada mpendwa Gorham.

"Our conference at Topsham was one of deep interest. Twenty-eight were present; all took part in the meeting.

“Topsham ਵਿੱਚ ਸਾਡੀ ਸਭਾ ਡੂੰਘੀ ਰੁਚੀ ਵਾਲੀ ਸੀ। ਅਠਾਈ ਜਣੇ ਹਾਜ਼ਰ ਸਨ; ਸਭ ਨੇ ਸਭਾ ਵਿੱਚ ਭਾਗ ਲਿਆ। ”

"Sunday the power of God came upon us like a mighty rushing wind. All arose upon their feet and praised God with a loud voice; it was something as it was when the foundation of the house of God was laid. The voice of weeping could not be told from the voice of shouting. It was a triumphant time; all were strengthened and refreshed. I never witnessed such a powerful time before.

"Ku wa Jumapili nguvu za Mungu zilikuja juu yetu kama upepo mkuu wa kasi. Wote wakasimama kwa miguu yao, wakamsifu Mungu kwa sauti kuu; ilikuwa kama ilivyokuwa wakati msingi wa nyumba ya Mungu ulipowekwa. Sauti ya kulia haikuweza kutofautishwa na sauti ya kupiga kelele kwa shangwe. Ulikuwa wakati wa ushindi; wote walitiwa nguvu na kuburudishwa. Sijawahi kushuhudia wakati wenye nguvu namna hiyo hapo kabla.

"Our next conference was in Fairhaven. Brother Bates and wife were present. It was quite a good meeting. On our return to Brother Nichols', the Lord gave me a vision and showed me that the truth must be made plain upon tables, and it would cause many to decide for the truth by the three angels' messages, with the two former being made plain upon tables."—

“Ekaraabho kyaitu ekiraakuratira kikaba kiri omu Fairhaven. Ow’oruganda Bates hamwe n’omukazi we bakaba bariho. Kikaba kiri ekiteeranwa kirungi munonga. Ku twagarukire owa Ow’oruganda Nichols, Mukama yampaire okwolesibwa kandi yanyoreka ngu amazima gashemereire kuteerwa ahabona aha bipapura, kandi eki kiryareetera bangi kucwamu ahabw’amazima ku bwa obutumwa bw’abamarayika bashatu, obubiri obwabandize nibuteerwa ahabona aha bipapura.”

That is right down here, [indicating the lower left corner of the 1850 Chart]. Okay? They are on this Chart, what she is talking about.

Eyo ni hano hasi rwose, [yerekana mu mfuruka yo hasi ibumoso ku Mbonerahamwe yo mu 1850]. Ni byo? Ibyo avuga biri kuri iyi Mbonerahamwe.

—"I also saw it was as necessary for the paper to be published as for the messengers to go, for the messengers need a paper to carry with them, containing present truth, to put in the hands of those that hear, and then the truth would not fade from the mind, and that the paper would go where the messengers could not go. Other things I saw which will appear in the paper.

—“Ndzi tlhela ndzi vona leswaku a swi ri swa nkoka ku fana ni ku famba ka varhumiwa leswaku phepha ri kandziyisiwa, hikuva varhumiwa va lava phepha ro famba na rona, leri nga ni ntiyiso wa nkarhi wa sweswi, leswaku va ri veka emavokweni ya lava twaka, kutani ntiyiso a wu nga ha nyamalali emiehleketweni, ni leswaku phepha a ri ta ya laha varhumiwa va nga kotiki ku ya kona. Swilo swin’wana ndzi swi vonile leswi nga ta humelela ephepheni.

"How do you all get along? Are you all striving for eternal life? I want to see you very, very much and think I shall before long. Now is the preparation time and I hope we shall all make sure work for eternity. Time looks very short and what we do we must do quickly.

“Ni mwe mwese mugenda mute? Mbese mwese muraharanira ubugingo bw’iteka? Ndifuza cyane, cyane kubabona, kandi ntekereza yuko bidatinze nzababona. Ubu ni igihe cyo kwitegura, kandi niringira yuko twese tuzakora umurimo udashidikanywaho ku bw’iteka ryose. Igihe gisa n’igisigaye ari kigufi cyane, kandi icyo dukora tugomba kugikora vuba.”

"November 20, one week ago, Brother Henry Nichols and self went to Topsham. We had just risen from the dinner table Thursday [Nov. 21], when one of Brother Foey's children came in and said their mother was insensible. We hastened over the river one mile and found our dear Sister Foey dying. My distress was great as I found she did not know me. She continued long in great distress until between three and four o'clock and then breathed her last. She has left a husband and three children to mourn their loss.

“Novemba 20, wiki moko me yile, Ndugu Henry Nichols na mimi twalienda Topsham. Tulikuwa tumefufuka tu kutoka mezani pa chakula cha mchana siku ya Alhamisi [Nov. 21], wakati mmoja wa watoto wa Ndugu Foey alipoingia na kusema kwamba mama yao alikuwa hana fahamu. Tukafanya haraka kuvuka mto umbali wa maili moja, nasi tukamkuta dada yetu mpendwa Foey akiwa katika kufa. Huzuni yangu ilikuwa kuu sana nilipogundua kwamba hakuwa akinijua. Aliendelea kwa muda mrefu katika dhiki kubwa hata kati ya saa tatu na saa nne, ndipo akakata pumzi yake ya mwisho. Ameacha mume na watoto watatu waomboleze hasara yao.”

"Friday morning [Nov. 22], Brother Henry came to Paris for James to shave him to attend the funeral. We had a very solemn, interesting time. The Lord did not leave us but let His Spirit rest upon us. Sister Foey's last days were decidedly her most spiritual and best days. Brother Foey has this to console him, that she died a Christian. He bears up well. God gives him grace to endure the affliction. Oh, how good it is to have a hope in God that will sustain in all scenes of trial and affliction. Praise God for a hope, a good hope. What would you, any of you, give for your hope?

ꞌAso Falailei pongipongi [Nov. 22], naʻe haʻu ʻa Tokoua Henry ki Pale ke tafi ia ʻe Sēmisi ke ne lava ʻo ʻalu ki he putu. Naʻa mau maʻu ha taimi mātuʻaki fakaʻapaʻapa mo mālie ʻaupito. Naʻe ʻikai tuku kimautolu ʻe he ʻEiki, ka naʻá Ne fakaʻatā Hono Laumālie ke nofo kiate kimautolu. Ko e ngaahi ʻaho fakaʻosi ʻo Tuofefine Foey, ko hono moʻoni, ko hono ngaahi ʻaho fakalaumālie taha ia mo lelei taha. ʻOku maʻu ʻe Tokoua Foey ʻa e fakafiemālie ni, naʻá ne mate ko ha Kalisitiane. ʻOku ne kātekina lelei. ʻOku foaki ʻe he ʻOtua kiate ia ʻa e kelesi ke ne kātekina ʻa e mamahi ni. ʻAuē, hono lelei ʻo e maʻu ha ʻamanaki ki he ʻOtua ʻa ia ʻe ne poupouʻi kitautolu ʻi he ngaahi tūkunga kotoa pē ʻo e ʻahiʻahi mo e mamahi. Fakafetaʻi ki he ʻOtua koeʻuhi ko ha ʻamanaki, ko ha ʻamanaki lelei. Ko e hā ha meʻa te mou, ha taha pē ʻiate kimoutolu, foaki koeʻuhi ko hoʻomou ʻamanaki?

"Hold fast the faith. Be strong in God and lean upon His everlasting arm. It will never fail you but will bear you up under every affliction. I hope you will all grow stronger and stronger in the truth. Do not falter but press your way to the kingdom."—

Bambelela ngokuqinileyo ekukholweni. Yibani namandla kuThixo, nixhomekeke engalweni yaKhe engunaphakade. Ayisayi kunanela nangaliphi na ixesha, koko iya kunixhasa phantsi kwazo zonke iimbandezelo. Ndiyathemba ukuba nonke niya kuqhubeka nikhula, nisomelela ngakumbi nangakumbi enyanisweni. Musani ukudanduluka, koko qhubekani ninyanzela indlela yenu ukuya ebukumkanini.”—

Here we go. Here is what I want you to see.

Pêşî niha em diçin. Ev e tiştê ku ez dixwazim hûn bibînin.

—"One week ago, last Sabbath, we had a very interesting meeting. Brother Hewit from Dead River was there. He came with a message to the effect that the destruction of the wicked and the sleep of the dead was an abomination within a shut door that a woman Jezebel, a prophetess had brought in and he believed that I was that woman, Jezebel."—

—“Suma imwe iliyopita, Sabato iliyopita, tulikuwa na mkutano wa kuvutia sana. Ndugu Hewit kutoka Dead River alikuwapo. Alikuja na ujumbe wenye maana ya kwamba kuangamizwa kwa waovu na usingizi wa wafu vilikuwa chukizo ndani ya mlango uliofungwa ambalo mwanamke Yezebeli, nabii mke, alikuwa ameleta ndani, naye aliamini kwamba mimi nilikuwa mwanamke huyo, Yezebeli.”—

Okay? Brother Hewit is saying that Ellen White is Jezebel and she has introduced three errors.

Njo? Mfwetu Hewit ari kwamba Ellen White ni Yezebeli, na ameleta makosa matatu.

"—We told him of some of his errors in the past, that the 1335 days were ended and numerous errors of his. It had but little effect. His darkness was felt upon the meeting and it dragged."—

“—Twamubwīle bimwe pa biphene byāke bya kale, ukuti amashiku 1335 yapwīle, hamwe na biphene byāke bingi. Fyākwete fye ingalilamo inono sana. Umfifi wāke waumfwikile pa lukutano, kabili lwalendekelaga.”

Now, I want you to see this. I have something to say about this paragraph that I want you to follow, if you can.

Niha ez dixwazim ku hûn vê bibînin. Derbarê vê paragrafê de tiştek heye ku ez dixwazim bibêjim û, heke hûn bikaribin, ez dixwazim ku hûn wê bişopînin.

If you have ever dealt with those in Adventism that reapply the time prophecies at the end of the world, they only have three quotes that they use—they use lots of quotes, but they have three primary quotes that they use. This is one of them; because, they will go there and say, "We told him of some of his errors in the past," and they will claim that when she says "that the 1335 days were ended" that that was one of his errors. Do you see how you can kind of twist that grammar a little bit: "We told him of some of his errors in the past? We also told him that the 1335 days were ended; but the time setters say we told him some of his errors in the past and one of those errors was that you are teaching the 1335 days is ended and that is an error." So, you can twist it either way.

Ngeeye enìngisì óo a̱bo̱ me mbáa Adventism nùtúrú ámá̱ nyìkà̱n ìhè̱ àkókò-òfọ̀fọ̀ n’ókè ngwụ́gwụ́ ǹke ǹdụ̀, hà nwere nání àtụmatụ okwu atọ kà hà ji eme ihe—hà na-eji ọtụtụ àtụmatụ okwu, ma e nwere àtụmatụ okwu atọ bụ́ isi kà hà ji eme ihe. Nke a bụ otu n’ime ha; n’ihi na, hà ga-aga ebe ahụ sị, “Anyi gwara ya ụfọdụ n’ime njehie ya ndị gara aga,” ha ga-akọkwa na mgbe ọ sịrị “na ụbọchị 1335 ahụ agwụla,” na nke ahụ bụ otu n’ime njehie ya. Ị̀ na-ahụ otú e si enwe ike ịtụgharị obere ihe n’usoro ụtọasụsụ ahụ: “Anyị gwara ya ụfọdụ n’ime njehie ya ndị gara aga”? Anyị gwakwara ya na ụbọchị 1335 ahụ agwụla; ma ndị na-edobe oge na-asị na anyị gwara ya ụfọdụ n’ime njehie ya ndị gara aga, nakwa na otu n’ime njehie ndị ahụ bụ na ị na-akụzi na ụbọchị 1335 ahụ agwụla, na nke ahụ bụ njehie.” Ya mere, ị pụrụ ịtụgharị ya n’ụzọ ọ bụla n’ime ụzọ abụọ ahụ.

The first time I had a face-to-face confrontation with Eugene Prewitt was in Oklahoma, and he is arguing that the Millerite History does not repeat at the end of the world, and I give him a couple of quotes in the Spirit of Prophecy.

Lema yekem ku min bi Eugene Prewitt re rû bi rû ketim beramberî hev, li Oklahoma bû, û ew dibêje ku Dîroka Milleriyan di dawiya cîhanê de dubare nabe, û ez jê re çend gotinên ji Ruhê Pêxemberiyê didim.

And he says, "Jeff, you know that Ellen White was a careless writer."

사람들이 말하기를, “제프, 당신도 알다시피 엘렌 화이트는 부주의한 저술가였소.”

And I said, "What do you mean?"

Ndzi ku, “U vula yini?”

And he went to this quote. He says that this quote proves that she is a careless writer; because she knows that I know that the time setters can twist this quote, if they wish to.

Na ọ gara n’akụkụ nkebi okwu a. Ọ na-ekwu na nkebi okwu a na-egosi na ọ bụ onye na-ede ihe n’enweghị nlezianya; n’ihi na ọ maara na m maara na ndị na-akọwa oge pụrụ ịtụgharị nkebi okwu a n’ụzọ ha chọrọ, ma ọ bụrụ na ha chọrọ ime otú ahụ.

Now, the fact that someplace like Washita has the influence that teaches its students that Ellen White is a careless writer is one thing; but, is she a careless writer here?

Niha, gotinek wekî Washita xwedî bandorek be ku xwendekarên xwe fêr dike ku Ellen White nivîskarekî bêparwe ye, ev tiştek e; lê, gelo ew li vir nivîskarekî bêparwe ye?

—"I felt that I must say a few words. In the name of Jesus, I got up and in about five minutes the meeting changed. Everyone felt it at the same instant. Every countenance was lighted up. The presence of God filled the place. Brother Hewit dropped upon his knees and began to cry and pray. I was taken off in vision and saw much that I cannot write. It had a great effect upon Brother Hewit. He confessed it was of God and was humbled in the dust. He has been writing ever since that meeting, and is now writing from the same table renouncing all his errors that he has advanced. I believe God is bringing him up and he is calculated to do good, if God moves through him.

—“Ndzi titwe leswaku ndzi fanele ku vula marito matsongo. Hi vito ra Yesu, ndzi pfukile, kutani endzhaku ka kwalomu ka ntlhanu wa timinete nhlengeletano yi cincile. Un’wana ni un’wana u swi twile hi nkarhi wun’we. Mavonakelo hinkwawo ya vangama. Vukona bya Xikwembu byi tale ndhawu leyi. Makwerhu Hewit u we hi matsolo yakwe kutani a sungula ku rila ni ku khongela. Ndzi tekiwile hi xivono kutani ndzi vona swo tala leswi ndzi nga kotiki ku swi tsala. Leswi swi khumbe swinene Makwerhu Hewit. U pfumerile leswaku a swi huma eka Xikwembu kutani a titsongahata entshurini. U vile a tsala ku sukela enhlanganweni wolowo, naswona sweswi wa ha tsala esetafuleni rero rin’we, a landzula swihoxo hinkwaswo leswi a swi tlakusile. Ndzi pfumela leswaku Xikwembu xi le ku n’wi tlakuseni, naswona u endleriwe ku endla leswinene, loko Xikwembu xi tirhisa yena.”

"Much love to dear Sister Gorham. Tell her to be strong. God is with her and He will not leave her. Much love to you all. I hope the children will not get sleepy, but will be interested in the truth and be diligent to make their calling and election sure. Write, be sure and write, and do not do as I have done. I love you, all of you. Write." Manuscript Releases, volume 16, 206–209. Written from Paris, Maine, November 27, 1850.

Dada nyingi kwa Mpendwa Dada Gorham. Mwambie awe hodari. Mungu yu pamoja naye, naye hatamwacha. Dada nyingi kwenu nyote. Natumaini kwamba watoto hawatasinzia, bali watapendezwa na kweli na kuwa na bidii katika kuuthibitisha mwito wao na uteule wao. Andika, hakikisha unaandika, wala usifanye kama nilivyofanya mimi. Nawapenda ninyi, ninyi nyote. Andika.” Manuscript Releases, juzuu ya 16, 206–209. Imeandikwa kutoka Paris, Maine, Novemba 27, 1850.

Brothers and Sisters, what is the historical context of this; where is she writing this at? She is writing this in 1850, in Brother Nichols's house.

Bañina-bakaji, nsangilayi ya masolo ya kala ya likambo oyo ezali nini; azali kokoma yango wapi? Azali kokoma yango na mobu 1850, na ndako ya Ndeko Nichols.

In this time period, what is the Lord doing? He is showing that the Pioneers have the correct view of the Daily, and she is dealing with that. She is saying that Christ's Sanctuary ministry is the false view of the Daily.

Mû vê dema nîha de, Xudan çi dike? Ew nîşan dide ku Pêşeng nirxandina rast a “Daily” heye, û ew bi wê re mijûl dibe. Ew dibêje ku xizmeta Mesîh a Perestgeha Asmanî nirxandina derewîn a “Daily” ye.

In this history, this very history—not this very history and not just the very year, but the very month of the year she is getting visions and she is clarifying this truth about the Pioneer position of the Daily, saying those that gave the Judgment Hour Cry had the correct view of the Daily; and, in the same paragraph, she says, "I saw that the 1843 Chart was directed by the hand of the Lord and it should not be altered and that those that gave the Judgment Hour Cry had the correct view of the Daily."

Mu historia ino, historia ino chene—shi historia ino chene kadi te umwaka fye chene, lelo no mwezi wine wa mwaka umo wine alepokelela imibomfya, kabili alepelulula aya mashinka pa cishinka ca bapioneer pa ca Daily, alanda ukuti abo abapele Umwenso wa Insa ya Bupingushi bali no monekele uwasuma pa ca Daily; kabili, mu paragraph umo wine, atila, “Namoneni ukuti i Chart ya 1843 yalelondololwa ku kuboko kwa Mfumu kabili tayali no kushintilwa, kabili ukuti abo abapele Umwenso wa Insa ya Bupingushi bali no monekele uwasuma pa ca Daily.”

And what does it say about the Daily on this 1843 Chart? Well, it says that it was taken away in AD508; and, at 1335 years later brings you to 1843 and that the 1335 is in the past.

Na je, Chati hii ya 1843 yasema nini kuhusu Dhabihu ya Kila Siku? Basi, yasema kwamba iliondolewa katika mwaka wa Bwana 508; na kwamba miaka 1335 baadaye yakufikisha hadi 1843, na kwamba hiyo 1335 iko katika wakati uliopita.

Can you imagine, in the very month, in the very year, that she would tell Brother Hewit from Dead River that it was still future?

Ó ũhote ta, ngwɛri mũno, na mweri ũcio mũene, na mwaka ũcio mũene, atĩ nĩakũĩra Ndugũ Hewit wa Dead River atĩ ũcio warĩ wa kũũka?

Okay, these time setters, these time setters, and these people that believe that Sister White is a careless writer. History does not uphold this.

Okaa, hawa wawekaji wa nyakati, hawa wawekaji wa nyakati, na watu hawa wanaoamini kwamba Dada White ni mwandishi asiye makini. Historia haiungi mkono jambo hili.

So, I want you to see, in connection with the Daily, Ellen White even understood the 1335.

Noolé, ni nítọ̀ọ́sẹ̀ pẹ̀lú “Ojoojúmọ́” náà, Ellen White paapaa lóye 1335 náà.

Ellen White just did not put her seal of approval on the Daily being Paganism; she understood that it started the 1335-year prophecy, which ended in 1843, and she defended that position in public against Brother Hewit from Dead River. Do you see that?

Ellen White ti i eta pen mupaknam na gakna ukat “Daily” Paganism iti; i amuk man ti dayta ti nangrugi iti padto a 1335 a tawen, a nagpatingga idi 1843, ket insalaknibna dayta a tindeg iti publiko a pannakiinnupatna ken ni Brother Hewit manipud Dead River. Makitam kadi dayta?

And in the same month, where she is saying that Christ's Sanctuary ministry as the Daily only brings darkness and confusion; and, her husband, in response to that vision, removes that teaching from the Review and Herald.

Kandi mu mwezi uo huo, ambapo anasema ya kwamba huduma ya Kristo katika Patakatifu pake kama Sadaka ya Kila Siku huleta tu giza na machafuko; na mumewe, kwa kuitikia maono hayo, akaiondoa mafundisho hayo kutoka katika Review and Herald.

Up here in your notes, where it says "1850 Chart," this is what it says right here [referring to the third column from the left on the 1850 Chart, the text following Jesus on the cross in AD31]. I wanted you to be able to have it in your notes.

Maha juu hapa katika maandishi yenu, pale panaposema “Chati ya 1850,” ndivyo inavyosema hapa hapa [akirejelea safu ya tatu kutoka kushoto katika Chati ya 1850, maandishi yanayomfuata Yesu msalabani katika BK31]. Nilitaka muweze kuwa nayo katika maandishi yenu.

Away Daniel 11:31 508

Danieli 11:31 508

And then on the 1843 Chart over here [referring to the center column, underneath Jesus on the cross in AD31]:

Ãte mū 1843 Chart mā hĩ [omwĩrĩrĩria gīkoni gĩa gatagatĩ, rungu rwa Jesu aha mũtĩ mũrĩ 31 AD]:

Taking away of the daily sacrifice. Dan. 12:11, 12

Ukwepukwanuwa kwa ssaddaaka ey’emirembe gyonna. Dan. 12:11, 12

Okay, these are these two Charts.

Sawa, hizi ni Chati hizi mbili.

Sister White understood that these men had the correct view, and she understood that it initiated the 1335-year prophecy that ended in 1843; and, she understood that it represented the Pagan Dominion being taken away in 508.

Monna White o ile a utloisisa hore banna bana ba ne ba e-na le kutloisiso e nepahetseng, ’me o ile a utloisisa hore hoo ho qalile boprofeta ba lilemo tse 1335 bo ileng ba fela ka 1843; hape, o ile a utloisisa hore hoo ho ne ho emela ho tlosoa ha Puso ea Bohetene ka 508.

Under these two references to the Charts you have another quote in the time period of Brother Nichols, and she is rebuking people from making other charts because their artwork is satanic; whereas, she says that the artwork upon these two Charts is heavenly. She says,

Nder këto dy referenca për Kartat, ju keni edhe një citim tjetër në periudhën kohore të Vëllait Nichols, dhe ajo po i qorton njerëzit që të mos bëjnë karta të tjera, sepse punimi i tyre artistik është satanik; ndërsa, ajo thotë se punimi artistik mbi këto dy Karta është qiellor. Ajo thotë,

"I saw the chart-making business was all wrong. It originated with Brother Rhodes and was followed out by Brother Case. Means has been spent in making charts and forming uncouth disgusting images to represent angels and the glorious Jesus. Such things I saw were displeasing to God. I saw that God was in the publishment of the chart by Brother Nichols."—

“Ndzi vone leswaku ntirho wo endla tichati a wu hoxile hi ku helela. Wu sungule hi Makwerhu Rhodes kutani wu landzeleriwa hi Makwerhu Case. Mali yi tirhisiwile eku endleni ka tichati ni eku vumbekeni ka swifaniso swo ka swi nga basanga, leswi nyenyetsaka, leswaku swi yimela tintsumi na Yesu wa ku vangama. Swilo swo tano ndzi swi vone leswaku a swi nga tsakisi Xikwembu. Ndzi vone leswaku Xikwembu a xi ri eku kandziyisweni ka chati hi Makwerhu Nichols.”

Who was in the publishment of this 1850 Chart? God!

Vosi a le tiko ena kena tabaki na Tuvatuva oqo ni 1850? Na Kalou!

—"I saw that there was"—what?—"a prophecy of this chart in the Bible, and if this chart is designed for God's people, if it [is] sufficient for one it is for another, and if one needed a new chart painted on a larger scale, all need it just as much.

—“Ningamona ko nga may” —unsa?— “usa ka tagna mahitungod niining tsart sa Biblia, ug kon kining tsart gituyo alang sa katawhan sa Dios, kon kini igo na alang sa usa, igo usab kini alang sa lain; ug kon ang usa nanginahanglan nga usa ka bag-ong tsart ipintal sa mas daku nga sukdanan, ang tanan nagkinahanglan usab niini sa mao ra nga gidak-on.

"I saw that it was a restless, uneasy, unsatisfied, ungrateful feeling in Brother Case that desired another chart. I saw that these painted charts had a bad effect upon the congregation. It caused a light, chaffy spirit of ridicule to be in the meeting."—

"Namona kuti mwa M’bale Case munali malingaliro osakhazikika, osapumula, osakhutira, ndi osayamika, amene ankafuna tchati lina. Namona kuti matchati ojambulidwa amenewa anali ndi zotsatira zoipa pa mpingo. Izi zinachititsa kuti mu msonkhano mukhale mzimu wopepuka, wachabechabe, wa chipongwe."—

Now, this is the one that I want you to think through.

Ubu ni bwo nshaka ko ubitekerezaho witonze.

—"I saw that the charts ordered by God struck the mind favorably, even without an explanation."—

—"Ndzi vone leswaku tichati leti Xikwembu xi leriseke leswaku ti endliwa ti khumbe swinene miehleketo hi ndlela leyinene, hambi ku nga ri na nhlamuselo."—

"I saw that the charts," plural, "ordered by God . . . ." What charts, in the plural, were ordered by God? These two Charts [the 1843 and 1850 Charts] were ordered by God."

“Nakabona nti ebipande,” mu bungi, “byalagirirwa Katonda . . . .” Bipande ki, mu bungi, ebyalagirirwa Katonda? Ebipande bino byombi [Ekipande kya 1843 n’Ekipande kya 1850] byalagirirwa Katonda.

These two Charts are a fulfillment of Habakkuk 2.

Ā tūtohu e rua nei, ko te whakatutukitanga ēnei o Hapakuku 2.

—"There is something light, lovely, and heavenly in the representation of the angels on the charts. The mind is almost imperceptibly led to God and heaven. But the other charts that have been gotten up disgust the mind, and cause the mind to dwell more on earth than heaven. Images representing angels look more like fiends than beings of heaven. I saw that the charts had for days and weeks occupied Brother Case's mind when he should have been seeking heavenly wisdom from God, and should have been growing in graces of the Spirit and the knowledge of the truth.

—“Angelo on the chartgile ke sūchnā meṁ ek prakār kī halakāī, manohartā, aur svargīyatā hai. Man prāyaḥ apratyakṣ rūp se Parameśvar aur svarg kī or agrasar kiyā jātā hai. Parantu anya chart, jo taiyār kie gae haiṁ, man meṁ ghr̥ṇā utpann karte haiṁ, aur man ko svarg se adhik pṛthvī par lagāte haiṁ. Angelo ko darśāne vālī chhaviyāṁ svarg ke prāṇiyoṁ se adhik durātmāoṁ ke samān dikhāī detī haiṁ. Maine dekhā ki ve chart kai dinoṁ aur saptāhoṁ tak Bhāī Case ke man ko vyast rakhe rahe, jabki use Parameśvar se svargīya buddhi khojnī cāhiye thī, aur Ātmā ke anugrahoṁ tathā satya ke jñān meṁ baṛhnā cāhiye thā.”

"I saw that if the means that has been wasted in getting out charts had been spent in getting out the truth clear before the brethren in publishing tracts, etc., it would have done much good and saved souls. I saw that the chart-making business has spread like the fever." Manuscript Releases, number 13, 359; 1853.

Ndzi vonile leswaku loko mali leyi yi dlayisiweke hi ku kandziyisa tichati a yi tirhisiwile eku humeseni ka ntiyiso hi ku wu veka erivaleni emahlweni ka vamakwavo hi ku kandziyisa timphapfhazani, ni swin’wana, a swi ta va swi endle leswinene swinene ni ku ponisa mimoya. Ndzi vonile leswaku ntirho wa ku endla tichati wu hangalakile ku fana ni nhlokonho.” Manuscript Releases, nomboro 13, 359; 1853.

The 1290 and 1335 Days

1290 ne 1335 mazuba

I have following an article from the Review and Herald, January 28, 1858. The reason I have it in your notes is because you can see that in 1858 they are still teaching that the Daily is Paganism. You have it in your reference, eight years after 1850 they still understand the Daily is Paganism.

Ndzi ni xihloko lexi landzelaka lexi humaka eka Review and Herald, January 28, 1858. Leswi ndzi xi nga na xona eka tinotsi ta wena hi swona hikuva u nga vona leswaku hi 1858 a va ha dyondzisa leswaku “the Daily” i Vukhongeri bya Vupfukeri. U na xona eka xiletelo xa wena; endzhaku ka malembe ya nhungu endzhaku ka 1850 a va ha twisisa leswaku “the Daily” i Vukhongeri bya Vupfukeri.

"ANOTHER important prophetic period upon which the Advent doctrine is based, is the 1335 days of Daniel 12, with which the 1290 days are so intimately connected. These two periods are introduced to us as follows:

“Muunda gungi wa kinabii wa maana kuu, ambao mafundisho ya Ujio yamejengwa juu yake, ni siku 1335 za Danieli 12, ambazo siku 1290 zimeunganishwa nazo kwa ukaribu mkubwa sana. Vipindi hivi viwili vinatambulishwa kwetu kama ifuatavyo:”

"—And from the time that the daily (sacrifice) shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. Blessed is he that waiteth and cometh to the thousand three hundred and five and thirty days. But go thou thy way till the end be; for thou shalt rest and stand in thy lot at the end of the days.' Daniel 12:11–13.

“—Û ji dema ku qurbaniya rojane were rakirin, û keresteya qirêj a ku wêranî çêdike were danîn, hezar û du sed û nod roj wê hebin. Xwezî bi wî yê ku li bendê dimîne û digihe hezar û sê sed û pêncî û pênc rojan. Lê tu here rêya xwe heta dawiya wê; çimkî tu yê bêhna xwe bidî û di dawiya rojan de di para xwe de rawestî.” Daniel 12:11–13.

"The questions at once arise, Can we tell what the events are, from which these periods are to be dated; and if so, can we tell when they took place? We first enquire. What is the—'daily' (sacrifice) and the —abomination that maketh desolate'? It will be noticed that the word, sacrifice, is in italics: denoting that it is a supplied word. The same will be noticed in the other instances of its occurrence in the book of Daniel, viz., chapter 11:31 and 8:11–13. Let us briefly refer to this latter chapter. In verse 13 it will be observed that two desolations are brought to view; the daily (desolation,) and the transgression of desolation. This fact is made so plain by Josiah Litch that we cannot do better than quote his language:*

پرسنەکان بێ‌دواخستن هەڵدەستنەوە: ئایا دەتوانین بزانین ئەو ڕووداوانە چین کە ئەم ماوەیانە دەبێت لێوە مێژووبکرێن؛ و ئەگەر وا بێت، ئایا دەتوانین بزانین کەی ڕوویداون؟ سەرەتا لێکۆڵینەوە دەکەین: «هەمیشەیی» (قوربانی) چییە، و «قێزەونکردنەکەی وێرانکەر» چییە؟ سەرنج دەدرێت کە وشەی قوربانی بە پیتی لارە نووسراوە: ئەمەش ئاماژەیە بەوەی کە وشەیەکی زیادکراوە. هەمان شت لەو نمونانەی دیکەی هاتنەکەی لە پەڕتووکی دانیالدا دەبینرێت، واتە، لە بەشی 11:31 و 8:11–13. با بە کورتی بگەڕێینەوە بۆ ئەم بەشەی دواییە. لە ئایەتی 13دا دەبینرێت کە دوو وێرانکردن خراونەتە بەرچاو؛ هەمیشەیی (وێرانکردن)، و یاخیبوونی وێرانکردن. ئەم ڕاستییە بە شێوەیەکی هەتا ئەوەندە ڕوون لەلایەن جۆسایا لێچ ڕوونکراوەتەوە کە ناتوانین باشتر لەوە بکەین تەنها وشەکانی خۆی نەهێنینەوە:*

"—The daily sacrifice is the present reading of the text; but no such thing as sacrifice is found in the original. This is acknowledged on all hands. It is a gloss or construction put upon it by the translators. The true reading is, "the daily and the transgression of desolation;" daily and transgression being connected together by "and" the daily desolation and the transgression of desolation. They are two desolating powers which were to desolate the Sanctuary and the host.'

«—Mbeka ya kila siku ni usomaji wa sasa wa andiko; lakini kitu kama dhabihu hakipatikani kamwe katika maandishi ya asili. Jambo hili linakubaliwa na pande zote. Huo ni ufafanuzi wa pembeni au maana iliyowekwa juu yake na watafsiri. Usomaji wa kweli ni, “ya kila siku na uasi wa uharibifu;” ya kila siku na uasi vikiunganishwa pamoja kwa “na,” uharibifu wa kila siku na uasi wa uharibifu. Hizo ni nguvu mbili ziletazo uharibifu ambazo zilipaswa kuiharibu Patakatifu na jeshi.’»

"From this it is evident that the —daily,' can have no reference to the Jewish worship to which it has been applied by the older and more prevalent opinion; and this is further evident from the consideration that if these periods, taken either literally or figuratively, be dated from any taking away of this worship, they do not bring us to any event whatever worthy of note.

لە ئێرەوە ئاشکرایە کە «ڕۆژانە» ناتوانێت هیچ پەیوەندییەکی بە پەرستنی جولەکە هەبێت، ئەو پەرستنەی کە بە ڕای کۆنتر و باوتر پێوە دراوە؛ و ئەمە زیاتر ئاشکرادەبێت لە تێڕامانی ئەوەی کە ئەگەر ئەم ماوەیانە، چ بە واتای ڕاستەوخۆ و چ بە واتای مەجازی، لە هەر لابردنێکی ئەم پەرستنەوە دەست پێ بکەن، ئەوا بە هیچ ڕووداوێک ناگەن کە بە هیچ شێوەیەک شایانی تێبینی بێت.

"The daily and the abomination then, are two desolating powers which were to oppress the church: can we ascertain what these powers are? We have only to adopt William Miller's method of reasoning on this point to arrive at the same conclusion with him. He says:

“Buli lunaku n’ekivve eky’okuzikiriza, kale, maanyi abiri agazikiriza agaali okugirizibwa okunyigiriza ekkanisa: tuyinza okutegeera obulungi amaanyi gano kye gali? Tuteekwa bumu okukwata enkola ya William Miller ey’okulowooza ku nsonga eno okutuuka ku musango gwe gumu gwe yatuukako. Agamba nti:

"—I read on, and could find no other case in which if [the daily] was found but in Daniel. I then [by the aid of a concordance] took those words which stood in connection with it, —take away;' —he shall take away the daily'; —from the time that the daily shall be taken away'; &c. I read on and thought I should find no light on the text. Finally I came to 2 Thessalonians 2:7, 8, —For the mystery of iniquity doth already work; only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way, and then shall that wicked be revealed.'&c. And when I had come to that text, O, how clear and glorious the truth appeared! There it is! That is —the daily!' Well, now, what does Paul mean by —he who now letteth' or hindereth? By —the Man of Sin,' and the —wicked,' Popery is meant. Well what is it which hinders Popery from being revealed? Why it is Paganism. Well, then, —the daily' must mean Paganism.'+

«—Ndzi ya emahlweni ndzi hlaya, kambe a ndzi nga ha kumi mhaka yin’wana leyi eka yona loko [xa masiku hinkwawo] a xi kumeka handle ntsena eka Daniyele. Kutani ndzi [hi mpfuno wa buku ya tindzimana leti yelanaka] teka marito lawa a ma yime hi ku hlangana na xona, —susa;’ —u ta susa xa masiku hinkwawo’; —ku sukela enkarhini lowu xa masiku hinkwawo xi nga ta susiwa’; ni swin’wana. Ndzi ya emahlweni ndzi hlaya, naswona ndzi ehleketa leswaku a ndzi nge kumi ku vonakala eka temana leyi. Eku heteleleni ndzi fika eka 2 Vathesalonika 2:7, 8, —Hikuva xihundla xa ku homboloka se xa tirha; ntsena loyi sweswi a sivelaka u ta ya emahlweni a sivela, ku fikela a susiwa endleleni, kutani hi nkarhi wolowo lowo homboloka u ta paluxiwa.’ ni swin’wana. Kutani loko ndzi fikile eka temana yoleyo, oho, ntiyiso wu vonake njhani hi ku tshembeka ni hi ku vangama! Hi wona kwalaho! Hi wona —xa masiku hinkwawo!’ Kutani ke sweswi, Pawulo u vula yini hi —loyi sweswi a sivelaka’ kumbe a sivela? Hi —Munhu wa Xidyoho,’ ni —lowo homboloka,’ ku kongomisiwa eka Vupapa. Kutani i yini lexi sivelaka leswaku Vupapa byi nga paluxiwi? Hakunene i Vupfumeri bya Vukhongeri bya Vamatiko. Kutani ke, —xa masiku hinkwawo’ swi fanele ku vula Vukhongeri bya Vamatiko.’+»

"We see from Daniel 8, that it is the little horn, which succeeded the goat, or Grecian empire, that takes away the —daily;' and it is the only power brought to view after the division of Alexander's kingdom down to the time when the Sanctuary should be cleansed at the end of the 2300 days. This little horn we have in its proper place showed to be Rome taken as a unit, corresponding with the fourth kingdom of Daniel's other visions. Now it is a fact that a change did take place in the Roman power from Paganism to Papacy. Paganism from the days of the Assyrian kings down to the time of its modification into Popery, had been the daily, or as Professor Whiting renders it, —the continual' desolation, by which Satan had stood up against the cause of Jehovah. In its priests, its altars and its sacrifices, it bore resemblance to the Levitical form of Jehovah's worship; but when the Levitical gave place to the Christian form of worship, Satan, in order to successfully oppose the work, must change also his form of opposition; hence the temples, altars and statues of Paganism are baptized into the blasphemies of Popery.

Chitwe mona mu Danyele 8 amba, ni lusengo lunini, lwasakamine na mbuzi, nangu bufumu bwa Bugiliki, lwatolako “bwa cila bushiku”; kabili ni nguzu yeka iletwa ku moneka panyuma ya kukabana kwa bufumu bwa kwa Aleksanda ukufika ku nshita ilyo Ahema Akatampe akali no kusukulwa ku mpela ya nshiku 2300. Ulwii lusengo lunini twalulangisha mu ncende yalwo iyalinga ukuba ni Roma yakweebwa nga cimo, ukulingana ne bufumu bwa bune ubwa mu fibonekesho fimbi fya kwa Danyele. Lelo cishinka cakuti impinduko yalicitike mu nguzu sha Roma ukufuma ku Bupagani ukuya ku Bupaapa. Bupagani, ukufuma ku nshiku sha shamfumu sha Ashuri ukufika ku nshita ya kusansamukila kwabwo mu Bupaapa, bwali “bwa cila bushiku,” nangu nga Profesa Whiting alebusendeka ati, “ubutumpi ubwa lyonse,” umo Satana aiminine ukulwisha umulimo wa Yehova. Mu bapashi babwo, mu fitungu fyabwo, na mu milambo yakwe, bwali no kufwana ne mibele ya Bulevi iya kupepa Yehova; lelo ilyo imibele ya Bulevi yapashukile ukupa cifulo ku mibele ya Bwinakristu iya kupepa, Satana, pakuti alwishi bwino umurimo, aali no kucinja na ena imibele yakwe iya kulwisha; e ico amahempeli, amaaltare, ne fipasho fya Bupagani fyabatishiwe mu fibela fya Bupaapa.

"But the daily, Paganism, is said in the prophecy, to have a sanctuary, and the place of its sanctuary was to be cast down. That a sanctuary is frequently connected with idolatry and heathenism, as the place of its devotion and worship, is evident from the following scriptures: Isaiah 16:12; Amos 7:9, 13, margin. Ezekiel 28:18. Concerning the sanctuary of the daily of Daniel 8, we offer the following from Apollos Hale:*

“Asi buti bwa munda na munda, Upagani, ushiwa mu bulese bwa bupolofita ukuti bwali ne sancitwali, kabili impanga ya sancitwali yakwe yali ya kulasubwa panshi. Ukuti sancitwali ilingi ilelyanishiwa ku kupepa ififuba no buheni, nge mpanga ya ukwishinshimuna no kupepela kwafiko, cileumfwika bwino mu Malembo aya alandapo pano panshi: Esaya 16:12; Amosi 7:9, 13, margin. Esekiele 28:18. Pa mulandu wa sancitwali ya buti bwa munda na munda mu Daniele 8, tuleleta ifi ifyalandwa ukufuma kuli Apollos Hale:*”

"—What can be meant by the —sanctuary' of Paganism? Paganism, and error of every kind, have their sanctuaries, as well as truth. These are the temples or asylums consecrated to their service. Some particular and renowned temple of Paganism may, then, be supposed to be here spoken of. Which of its numerous distinguished temples may it be? One of the most magnificent specimens of classic architecture is called the Pantheon. Its name signifies the —temple or asylum of all the gods.' The place of its location is Rome.+ The idols of the nations conquered by the Romans were sacredly deposited in some niche or department of this temple, and in many cases became objects of worship by the Romans themselves. Could we find a temple of Paganism that was more strikingly —his sanctuary.'"

“—Upaganuzi bwa ‘ahantu hera’ hwa Upagani ni buha? Upagani, n’ikosa ry’ubwoko bwose, bifite ahantu habyo hera nk’uko ukuri na ko gufite ahahera. Aho ni insengero canke ubuhungiro bweguriwe igikorwa cavyo. Ni co gituma hashobora kwiyumvirwa yuko hano havugwa urusengero kanaka rwihariye kandi rurangiranwa rw’Upagani. Mu nsengero zarwo nyinshi zizwi cane, ni iyihe yoshobora kuba ari yo? Kimwe mu vyitegererezo vy’akataraboneka vy’ubwubatsi bwa kera citwa Pantheon. Izina ryaco risobanura ngo ‘urusengero canke ubuhungiro bw’imana zose.’ Aho ruherereye ni i Roma.+ Ibigirwamana vy’amahanga yatsinzwe n’Abaroma vyashirwa mu buryo bw’icubahiro mu kazu kanaka canke mu gice c’uru rusengero, kandi kenshi na kenshi vyaca biba ibintu Abaroma ubwabo basenga. Mbega twoshobora kuronka urusengero rw’Upagani rwoba rwari ‘ahantu hiwe hera’ mu buryo burushiriza kugaragara?”

"Having now ascertained that the daily is Paganism, and the transgression of desolation, or —the abomination that maketh desolate,' is the Papacy, and that the especial sanctuary of Paganism was the Pantheon, and that the —place' of its location was Rome, we inquire further.

Xino mbanze ikiketeko i bya munsi ku bupagani, kandi ko icaha c’uguhindura ikibanza umusaka, canke —icamazi gituma haba umusaka,’ ari Ubupapa, kandi ko ahera hihariye h’Ubupagani hari Pantheon, kandi ko —ikibanza’ c’aho cari kiri ari i Roma, turabandanya kubaza.

"1. Was Paganism —taken away' by the Roman civil power? The following statement of an important and well-known fact in the history of the church and world, we think answers to the prophecy. It refers to Constantine the first Christian emperor, and says:

"1. Upagaano—‘uliondolewa’—kwa mamlaka ya kiraia ya Kirumi? Taarifa ifuatayo ya ukweli muhimu na unaojulikana sana katika historia ya kanisa na ya ulimwengu, tunadhani, ndiyo jibu kwa unabii huo. Inamhusu Konstantino, mfalme wa kwanza Mkristo, nayo yasema:"

"—His first act of government was the dispatch of an edict throughout the empire, exhorting his subjects to embrace Christianity.'++

—Ukuhe kabola kwo kwa buteko kwali ukutuma umulayo mu bwami bonse, ukulomba abantu bahe ukwakabila Ubwina Kristi.'++

"2. Was Rome the city or place of his sanctuary, (the Pantheon,) cast down by the authority of the State? The following extract answers:

"2. Roho u Romali jiꞌi buali, no tolo ilikak ku noꞌon, (Pantheon,) no taꞌunji ku mamatail State-ik? Ebe noꞌon ke taꞌe na eoua:"

"—The death of the last rival of Constantine had sealed the peace of the empire. Rome was once more the undisputed queen of nations. But, in that hour of elevation and splendor, she had been raised to the edge of a precipice. Her next step was to be downward and irrecoverable. The change of the government to Constantinople still perplexes the historian. It was an act in direct repugnance to the whole course of the ancient and honorable prejudices of the Roman mind. It was the work of no luxurious Asiatic, devoted to the indulgences of eastern customs and climates, but an iron conqueror, born in the west, and contemptuous, like all Romans, of the habits of the orientals; it was the work of a keen politician, yet it was impolitic in the most palpable degree. Yet Constantine abandoned Rome, the great citadel and throne of the Caesars, for an obscure corner of Thrace, and expended the remainder of his vigorous and ambitious life in the double toil of raising a colony into the capital of his empire, and degrading the capital into the feeble honors and humiliated strength of a colony.'*

—Konstantineen azken arerioaren heriotzak inperioaren bakea zigilatu zuen. Erroma, berriz ere, nazioen erregina eztabaidaezina zen. Baina, goratze eta distira hartako orduan, amildegi baten ertzeraino jasoa izan zen. Haren hurrengo urratsa beherantzkoa eta itzulezina izan behar zen. Gobernua Konstantinoplara aldatzeak historialaria oraindik ere nahasten du. Erromatar adimenaren antzinako eta ohorezko aurriritzien ibilbide osoaren aurkako egintza zuzena izan zen. Ez zen ekialdeko ohitura eta klimen atseginei emana zegoen asiar oparo baten lana, baizik eta mendebaldean sorturiko konkistatzaile burdinazko batena, eta, erromatar guztiak bezala, ekialdetarren ohiturak mespretxatzen zituenarena; politikagile zorrotz baten lana izan zen, eta hala ere, agerikoen den mailan, politikagabea zen. Hala ere, Konstantinek Erroma utzi zuen, Zesarren gotorleku eta tronu handia, Traziako bazter ilun baten truke, eta bere bizitza kementsu eta handinahiaren hondarra ahalegin bikoitzean xahutu zuen: kolonia bat bere inperioko hiriburu bihurtzen, eta hiriburua, berriz, kolonia baten ohore ahuletara eta indar apalduetara beheratzen.'*

"This record from the pen of the historian is too plain to need comment. The place of his sanctuary was cast down, says the prophecy; and after a statement of facts like the above, the most fastidious in prophetic interpretation must be satisfied of its application.

“Erekodi ren korafa reri ro ikta reti nafa, etá komenti ro nadi. Sifra profeti ka, siwa teya areta koni pefari o im sanctuari; ani, peka fakta reta sirefa ga nori, eri siye na profeti-interpretasiona kasti fastidiosi, musti safisfakta de its aplikasioni.”

"From the time that the daily shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. Blessed is he that waiteth and cometh to the thousand three hundred five and thirty days. With the facts before us that the daily is Paganism, that the abomination that maketh desolate is the Papacy, that there was a change from the former to the latter in the Roman power, and by the authority of State we have but to inquire further when this took place in a manner to fulfill the prophecy; for if we can ascertain this, we have the starting point from which the prophetic periods in the text before us are to be dated. Therefore,

“Û ji dema ku qurbaniya rojane were rakirin, û kerêtiya ku wêraniyê çêdike were danîn, hezar û du sed û nod roj dê hebin. Xwezî bi wî yê ku li bendê dimîne û digihîje hezar û sê sed û pênc û sî rojan. Bi wan rastiyan ku li pêşiya me ne ku qurbaniya rojane Paganîzm e, ku kerêtiya ku wêraniyê çêdike Papatî ye, ku di desthilata Romayê de guhertinek ji ya pêşîn bo ya paşîn çêbû, û bi desthilata Dewletê, tenê divê em zêdetir lêkolîn bikin ka kengê ev yek bi awayekî ku pêxemberiyê pêk bîne qewimî; çimkî heger em karibin vê yekê diyar bikin, em xala destpêkê ya ku divê demên pêxemberî yên di vê nivîsê de ji wê bên hesab kirin, didozin. Ji ber vê yekê,”

"3. When did the event referred to in the prophecy take place? Let it be observed, the question is not, when were the saints given into the hands of the Papacy, but when had the change of religion from Paganism to Papacy been so far effected as to make the latter the national religion, and place it in a condition to start upon its career. This, like all other great revolutions, was not the work of a moment. Its incipient workings were manifest long before. Paul said that even in his day the mystery of iniquity, the Man of Sin, the —abomination that maketh desolate,' was already at work. And it is in the light of this scripture that we must understand our Lord's words in Mathew 24:15, concerning the abomination of desolation, where he makes evident reference to Daniel 9:27. For although Paganism had not given place to the Papacy in the year 70 when Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans we do understand that the power which then appeared modified somewhat in name and form, was the very power that should, as the abomination of desolation, wear out the saints and desolate the church of the Most High.

"3. Ukómbóko oyo elobelami na esakweli esalemaki ntango nini? Esengeli koyebana ete, motuna ezali te: basantu bapesamaki na mabɔkɔ ya Bopapa ntango nini; kasi: mbongwana ya lingomba longwa na Bopakano kino na Bopapa ekokisamaki na ndenge nini kino Bopapa ekóma lingomba ya ekólo mpe etiamaki na ezalela ya kobanda mosala na yango. Yango, lokola mabongwana nyonso minene mosusu, ezalaki mosala ya mwa ntango moke te. Misala na yango ya ebandeli emonanaki polele kala liboso. Paulo alobaki ete ata na mikolo na ye mpenza, libombami ya mabe, Moto ya Lisumu, “likambo ya mbindo oyo ememisaka kobebisama,” ezalaki déjà kosala. Mpe ezali na pole ya Makomi yango nde tosengeli kososola maloba ya Nkolo na biso na Matayo 24:15, na oyo etali likambo ya mbindo ya kobebisama, epai azali kolakisa polele ete azali kolobela Danyele 9:27. Mpo atako Bopakano epesaki naino esika te na Bopapa na mobu 70, tango Baloma babebisaki Yerusaleme, tososoli ete nguya oyo emonanaki wana, atako ebongwamaki mwa moke na nkombo mpe na lolenge, ezalaki mpenza nguya oyo esengelaki, lokola likambo ya mbindo ya kobebisama, kolembisa basantu mpe kobebisa Lingomba ya Ye-Oyo-Aleki-Likoló."

"Up to the time of the conversion of Clovis, king of France, which took place in 496, the French and other nations of western Rome were Pagan; but subsequent to that event the efforts to convert idolaters to Christ were crowned with great success. It is said that the conversion of Clovis gave rise to the custom of addressing the French monarch with the titles of Most Christian Majesty and Eldest Son of the Church.+ Between that time and A.D. 508 by "alliances," "capitulations" and conquests, "the Avborici," the "Roman garrisons in the west," Brittany, the Burgundians and the Visigoths, were brought into subjection.'++

«៤៩៦ թվականին տեղի ունեցած Ֆրանսիայի արքա Քլովիսի դարձի գալու ժամանակը մինչև՝ ֆրանսիացիները և Արևմտյան Հռոմի մյուս ազգերը հեթանոս էին. սակայն այդ իրադարձությունից հետո կռապաշտներին դեպի Քրիստոս դարձնելու ջանքերը պսակվեցին մեծ հաջողությամբ։ Ասվում է, որ Քլովիսի դարձի գալը առիթ տվեց ֆրանսիական միապետին դիմելու «Ամենաքրիստոնյա Մեծություն» և «Եկեղեցու Ավագ Որդի» տիտղոսներով։+ Այդ ժամանակի և մ.թ. 508 թվականի միջև «դաշնակցություններով», «կապիտուլյացիաներով» և նվաճումներով՝ «Արբորիկիները», «արևմուտքի հռոմեական կայազորները», Բրետանը, բուրգունդացիները և վեստգոթերը ենթարկվեցին»։++

"—Paganism in the western Roman Empire, though it doubtless retarded the progress of the Christian faith, especially in those nations which were molested, as in the case of England, by the inroads of the barbarous clans, who continued idolaters, henceforth had not the power, if it had the disposition to suppress the Catholic faith, or to hinder the encroachments of the Roman Pontiff.

—در ئیمپراتۆریای ڕۆمانیی ڕۆژئاوا دا، هەرچەندە بێگومان پەگانیەت پێشکەوتنی باوەڕی مەسیحی دواخست، بە تایبەتی لەو نەتەوانەدا کە وەک لە حاڵەتی ئینگلتەرا، بە هێرشی هۆزە بەرابەرە وحشییەکان، کە هەتا ئەو کاتەش بتپەرست مابوون، ئازار دەدران، لەمەودوا هێزی ئەوەی نەما، ئەگەر مەیلیشی هەبووبێت، کە باوەڕی کاتۆلیکی چەوسێنێتەوە یان ڕێ لە دەستدرێژییەکانی پۆنتیفی ڕۆمانی بگرێت.

"From that time, the Papal abomination was triumphant, so far as Paganism was concerned. Its future contests were with the other Christian sects, who were always treated as heretics; and with princes who were always treated as rebels or dividers of the body of Christ. The prominent powers of Europe gave up their attachment to Paganism only to perpetuate its abominations in another form; for Paganism needed only to be baptized to become Christian in the Catholic sense; and when the interests or vengeance of its presiding minister made the demand, their possessions and thrones,—perhaps their lives,—must be laid on the altar. SS

لەو کاتەوە، قێزەونی پاپایی سەرکەوتوو بوو، تا ئەو ئاستەی پەیوەندیدار بە پەگانییەت دەبوو. ملمەلانێ داهاتووی لەگەڵ ئەو کۆمەڵە مەسیحییەکانی دیکەدا بوو، کە هەمیشە وەک هەڕەتیک نیشان دەدران؛ و لەگەڵ ئەو شاژنانەی کە هەمیشە وەک یاخیبووان یان دابڕانکارانی جەستەی مەسیح مامەڵەیان لەگەڵ دەکرا. هێزە دیارەکانی ئەورووپا پەیوەندییان بە پەگانییەت واز لێ هێنا تەنها بۆ ئەوەی قێزەونەکانی لە شێوەیەکی دیکەدا بەردەوام بکەن؛ چونکە پەگانییەت تەنها پێویستی بە لەئاوهەڵکێشان هەبوو تاکو بە واتای کاتۆلیکی ببێتە مەسیحی؛ و کاتێک بەرژەوەندی یان تۆڵەی خزمەتکارە سەرپەرشتیارەکەی داوای دەکرد، سامانیان و تەختەکانیان—لەوانەیە ژیانیانیش—دەبوو لەسەر قوربانگاکە دابنرێن. SS

"* Prophetic Exposition, Volume 1, 127.

"* Ubusobanuro bw’Ubuhanuzi, Umuzingo wa 1, 127.

"+ Goodrich's Universal Hist. and Gutherie's Geog.'

"+ Histori ya Universale ya Goodrich na Jiografia ya Gutherie."

"+ Mosheim Christian History, Volume 1, 132, 133.

+ Mosheim wa Kiklisto Mambu ma Kale, Volumu 1, 132, 133.

"In England, Arthur, the first Christian king, founded the Christian worship on the ruins of the Pagan.* Rapin, who claims to be more exact in the chronology of events in his history, states that he was elected monarch of Britain in 508. Book 2, 129.

Ku Ingalandi, Ātua, mfalme wa kwanza Mkristo, alisimamisha ibada ya Kikristo juu ya magofu ya ile ya kipagani.* Rapin, ambaye hudai kuwa makini zaidi katika kronolojia ya matukio katika historia yake, asema kwamba alichaguliwa kuwa mfalme wa Britania mwaka 508. Kitabu cha 2, 129.

"What was the condition of the See of Rome at this time? —Symmachus was Pope from 498 or 9 to 514. His pontificate was distinguished by these remarkable circumstances and events:

Ni hali gani iliyokuwa ya Kiti cha Roma wakati huu? — Symmachus alikuwa Papa kuanzia 498 au 499 hadi 514. Upapa wake ulijulikana kwa mazingira na matukio haya ya ajabu:

"1. He —left Paganism' when he entered the —church of Rome.'

"1. Ew —dema ku ket nav —dêra Romayê’ da ji putperestiyê derket."

"2. He found his way to the Papal chair by striving with his competitor even unto blood. Du Pin.

"2. A ka fikea si nofoa faka-Pope ʻaki ʻene fakafepaki ki hono taha fakatahaʻanga, ʻo aʻu ʻo aʻu ki he toto. Du Pin.

"3. By the adulation paid to him as the successor of St. Peter.

"3. Ku mpono ye ke bampova ya lukumu yina bo ke pesa yandi bonso muvangi ya Santu Piere."

"4. By the excommunication of the Emperor Anastasius.+

"4. Kwa kumwondoa Mfalme Anastasius katika ushirika wa kanisa.+”

"—How much,' says Mosheim, —the opinions of some were favorable to the lordly demands of the Roman Pontiffs, may be easily imagined from an expression of Ennodius, that infamous and extravagant flatterer of Symmachus, who was a prelate of ambiguous fame. This parasitical panegyrist, among other impertinent assertions maintained that the Pontiff was constituted judge in the place of God, which he filled as the Vicegerent of the Most High.'++

“‘Kunene,’ niyo ashimina Mosheim, ‘amayelelo ya bamwe eyali yakwe ku byifuzo by’obwami by’Abapapa b’Abaroma, kyoroha okwiyumvila mu kigambo kimwe kya Ennodius, uwo muryarya mubi kandi urengeje urugero mu gusingiza Symmachus, wari umwepiskopi w’izina ridatomoye. Uwo muririmbyi w’ishimwe w’inyungu ze bwite, mu yandi magambo menshi adafite umumaro, yakomeje avuga ko Umupapa yashyizweho kuba umucamanza mu mwanya w’Imana, uwo mwanya yawuzuzaga nk’uhagarariye Isumbabyose.’++”

"By the strength secured to the Catholic cause in the west, by these successes, and the agency of the vicars, and other agents of the See of Rome, the Papal party in Constantinople were —placed' in a position to justify open hostilities in behalf of their master at Rome. In 508 the whirlwind of fanaticism and civil war swept in fire and blood through the streets of the eastern capital.'

بە هۆی ئەو هێزەی بۆ هۆکاری کاتۆلیکی لە ڕۆژاوا دەستەبەر کرابوو، بە هۆی ئەم سەرکەوتنانە، و بە کارگێڕی نائبان و هەروەها ئەو نوسەر و نوێنەرانەی کۆرسی ڕۆما، لایەنی پاپا لە قسطنطنیە ــ «دانرا» ــ لە بارودۆخێکدا بوون کە بتوانن شەرە ئاشکرایەکان لە پێناوی گەورەی خۆیان لە ڕۆما بەرەوپێش ببرن. لە ساڵی 508دا، گەردەلوولی تاوەری فەناتیکی و شەڕی ناوخۆ بە ئاگر و خوێن بە شەقامەکانی پایتەختی ڕۆژهەڵاتدا تێپەڕی.

"Gibbon, under the years 508–514, speaking of the commotions in Constantinople, says —The statues of the emperor were broken, and his person was concealed in a suburb, till, at the end of three days, he dared to implore the mercy of his subjects. [Popery is triumphant.] Without his diadem, and in the posture of a suppliant, Anastasius appeared on the throne of the circus. The Catholics, before his face, rehearsed the genuine Trisagion; they exulted in the offer which he proclaimed by the voice of a herald, of abdicating the purple; they listened to the admonition, that, since all could not reign, they should previously agree in the choice of a sovereign; and they accepted the blood of two unpopular ministers, whom their master, without hesitation, condemned to the lions. These furious but transient seditions were encouraged by the success of Vitalian, who with his army of Huns and Bulgarians, for the most part idolaters, declared himself the champion of the Catholic faith. In this pious rebellion he depopulated Thrace, besieged Constantinople, exterminated sixty-five thousand of his fellow Christians, till he obtained the recall of the bishops, the satisfaction of the Pope, and the establishment of the council of Chalcedon, an orthodox treaty, reluctantly signed by the dying Anastasius, and more faithfully performed by the uncle of Justinian. And such was the event of the first of the religious wars which have been waged in the name, and by the disciples, of the God of Peace." SS

Gibbon, myaka 508–514, pa kulandulapo vya fituntulu mu Constantinople, atila—Ifipasho fya mfumu fyatobekwe, kabili umubili wakwe wafiswemo mu mushi wa ku lubali, ukufika ku mpela ya nshiku shitatu, ilyo akashapo ukupapata uluse ku bantu bakwe. [Popery yalecimfya.] Ukwabula ing皇冠 yakwe, kabili mu mibele ya waku lomba, Anastasius amoneke pa cipuna ca bwami ca mu circus. AbaKatolika, pantanshi yakwe, babwekeshe Trisagion wa cine; basangalele pa cipao ico alandile ukupitila mu ishiwi lya kalanda, ica kufumyapo ubufumu bwa purple; bapwishishe ukutika ku kusoka ukwa kuti, pantu bonse tabenga teeka, bafwile intanshi basuminishanye pa kusala umutungulushi; kabili basumine umulopa wa bakapyunga babili abashatemenwe, abo shikulu wabo, ukwabula ukungungumana, apingwile ku nkalamo. Ifi fituntulu fya bukali lelo fya nshita inono fyakoseleshiwe no kucimfya kwa Vitalian, uwakwete impi yakwe iya baHuns na baBulgarians, icine cine abengi muli bena bali bakulambila utulubi, uwailengele umwine umutetezi wa citetekelo ca Katolika. Muli uku kupanduka kwa bukapepa, aponeshe abantu ba Thrace, asungwile Constantinople, apwishishe abantu amakumi mutanda na basano ba baKristo banankwe, ukufika apo apokelele ukubwekeshiwa kwa ba bishop, ukusangulula kwa Pope, no kukhazikishiwa kwa kansulo ya Chalcedon, icumfwano ca bwine bwa citetekelo, ico caisaikwilwe mu kukana kwa mutima na Anastasius uwaleisa kufwa, kabili cipeshiwe mu bufi no mukote wa Justinian. Kabili eifyo fyali ifyakucitika fya ntanshi pa ntwa sha bukapepa ishalwishiwe mwishina, kabili na basambi, ba Lesa wa Mutende. SS

"With the following extract from Appollos Hale, we close the testimony on this point: —We now invite our modern Gamaliels to take a position with us in the place of the sanctuary of Paganism (since claimed as the "patrimony of St. Peter") in 508. We look a few years into the past, and the rude Paganism of the northern barbarians is pouring down upon the nominally Christian empire of Western Rome—triumphing everywhere—and its triumphs everywhere distinguished by the most savage cruelty. . . . The empire falls and is broken into fragments. One by one the lords and rulers of these fragments, abandon their Paganism and profess the Christian faith. In religion the conquerors are yielding to the conquered. But still Paganism is triumphant. Among its supporters there is one stern and successful conqueror. (Clovis.) But soon he also bows before the power of the new faith and becomes its champion. He is still triumphant, but, as a hero and conqueror, reaches the zenith at the point we occupy, A.D. 508.

ئەم بەشەی خوارەوە لە Appollos Hale ـەوە، شایەتی لەسەر ئەم خاڵە پێی دەخەینە کۆتایی: —ئێستا ئێمە داوەت لە Gamaliel ـە مۆدێرنەکانمان دەکەین کە لەگەڵماندا شوێنێک بگرن لە شوێنی پێرۆزگای بت‌پەرستی (کە لە ساڵی 508 دا وەک "میراتی St. Peter" داواکرا)‌. چەند ساڵێک بۆ دواوە تەماشا دەکەین، و بت‌پەرستیی دڕندانەی بەرابەرەکانی باکوور بەسەر ئیمپراتۆریای ڕۆمای ڕۆژئاوا، کە بە ناوەوە مەسیحییە، دادەڕژێت—لە هەموو شوێنێکدا سەرکەوتوو دەبێت—و سەرکەوتنەکانی لە هەموو شوێنێکدا بە دڵڕەقییەکی زۆر دڕندانە ناسراون. . . . ئیمپراتۆریا دەکەوێت و بۆ پارچەپارچە دابەش دەبێت. یەک بە یەک، گەورە و فەرمانڕەواکانی ئەم پارچانە بت‌پەرستیی خۆیان بەجێدەهێڵن و باوەڕی مەسیحی دەردەبڕن. لە ئایین‌دا، زاڵبووان خۆیان بە زاڵبووەکان دادەنێن. بەڵام هێشتا بت‌پەرستی سەرکەوتووە. لە نێوان پشتگیریکارانییەوە، یەک داگیرکەری توند و سەرکەوتوو هەیە. (Clovis.) بەڵام زوو ئەویش لەبەردەم هێزی ئەو باوەڕە نوێیەدا سەر دادەنێوێت و دەبێتە پاڵەوانی ئەو. هێشتا سەرکەوتووە، بەڵام وەک قارەمان و داگیرکەر، لە خاڵی ئەوەی ئێمە تێیدا وەستاوین، واتە A.D. 508، دەگاتە لووتکە.

"—In or near the same year, the last important subdivision of the fallen empire is publicly, and by the coronation of its triumphant —monarch' Christianized.

—Wakati wa mwaka huohuo, au karibu nao, mgawanyo mdogo wa mwisho ulio wa maana wa himaya iliyoanguka unafanywa wa Kikristo hadharani, na kwa kutawazwa kwa “mfalme” wake mshindi.

"—The pontiff for the period on which we stand is a recently converted Pagan. The bloody contest which placed him in the chair was decided by the interposition of an Arian king. He is bowed to and saluted as filling —the place of God on earth.' The senate is so far under his power, that, on suspicion that the interests of the See of Rome demand it, they excommunicate the emperor. . . . In 508 the mine is sprung beneath the throne of the Eastern Empire. The result of the confusion and strife it occasions is the humiliation of its rightful lord. Now the question is, at what time was Paganism so far suppressed, as to make room for its substitute and successor, the Papal abomination? When was this abomination placed in a position to start on its career of blasphemy and blood? Is there any other date for its being "placed," or "set up" in the room of Paganism, but 508? If the mysterious enchantress has not now brought all her victims within her power, she has taken her position, and some have yielded to the fascination.

«—پۆنتیفی ئەو ماوەیەی کە ئێمە لەسەری وەستاوین، بت‌پەرستێکی تازە گەڕاوەیە. ئەو ململانێی خوێناوییەی کە ئەوی لەسەر کورسی دانا، بە دەستوەردانی پاشایەکی ئاریانی یەکلاکەرایەوە. وەک ئەوەی شوێنی خودا لەسەر زەوی پڕ بکاتەوە، کڕنوشی بۆ دەبەن و سڵاوی لێ دەکەن.» ئەنجوومەنی پیران تا ئەو ڕادەیە لەژێر دەسەڵاتی ئەودایە کە، تەنها بە گومانێک کە بەرژەوەندییەکانی کورسیی ڕۆما داوای بکات، ئیمپراتۆر حەرەم‌دەکەن. . . . لە ساڵی 508دا مینەکە لەژێر تەختی ئیمپراتۆریای ڕۆژهەڵات تەقێندرایەوە. ئەنجامی ئەو ئاڵۆزی و ململانێی کە لێی دەکەوێتەوە، سووکایەتی‌پێکردنی خاوەنە ڕاستەقینەکەیەتی. ئێستا پرسیارەکە ئەوەیە، لە کام کاتدا بت‌پەرستی تا ئەو ڕادەیە سەرکوت کرا، کە شوێن بۆ جێگرەوە و دوای خۆی، ئەو قێزەونیی پاپایی، چۆڵ بکات؟ لە کام کاتدا ئەم قێزەونە خرایە شوێنێکەوە کە دەستی پێ بکات بە ڕێڕەوی کفرگوتن و خوێنڕشتنەکەی؟ ئایا هیچ بەروارێکی تر هەیە بۆ «دانان» یان «دامەزراندن»ی ئەو لە شوێنی بت‌پەرستی، جگە لە 508؟ ئەگەر ئەو سحرحاڵە نەهێنییە هێشتا هەموو قوربانییەکانی نەخستبێتە ناو دەسەڵاتی خۆیەوە، بێگومان شوێنی خۆی گرتووە، و هەندێک خۆیان داوەتە دەستی ئەو دڵفریواندنە.»

"The others are at length subdued, —and kings, and peoples and multitudes, and nations, and tongues,' are brought under the spell which prepares them, even while —drunken with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus,' to —think they are doing God service,' and to fancy themselves the exclusive favorites of heaven, while becoming an easier and richer prey for the damnation of hell'*

“Abandi amaherezo baratsindwa, kandi ‘abami n’amoko n’imbaga nyamwinshi n’amahanga n’indimi’ bazanwa munsi y’uburozi bubategurira, ndetse no mu gihe ‘basinze amaraso y’abahowe Yesu,’ ‘kwibwira ko bakorera Imana umurimo,’ no kwiyumvisha ko ari bo bonyine bakunzwe by’umwihariko n’ijuru, mu gihe barushaho guhinduka umuhigo woroshye kandi urushijeho kuba umukungu wo gucirwaho iteka ry’umuriro w’iteka wa gehinomu.”*

"We have the date. The —daily' was taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up in 508. Dating from this point the 1290 days or years terminate in 1798 where, as has already been shown, the civil power was stricken from the Pope by the arm of Buonaparte. The 1335 days bring us 45 full years this side of that event.

Tuli na tarehe. “Ya kila siku” iliondolewa, na chukizo lile lifanyalo ukiwa likawekwa mwaka wa 508. Tukianzia katika hatua hii, zile siku 1290, yaani miaka, zinaishia mwaka wa 1798, ambapo, kama ilivyokwisha kuonyeshwa, mamlaka ya kiraia ilipokonywa Papa kwa mkono wa Buonaparte. Siku 1335 zatufikisha miaka 45 kamili upande huu wa tukio hilo.

"But some may say, How is it that you make the periods terminate in the past? Does it not read that Daniel should rest and stand in his lot at the end of the days? Certainly; and we believe it. But what is it for Daniel to stand in his lot? This point will come under consideration when we come to an explanation of the passing of the time, and an examination of the events that did take place at the end of the days. Meanwhile we here cast anchor till another week." Review and Herald, January 28, 1858.

"Lê hin kes dikarin bêjin, çawa ye ku hûn demên diyarkirî di rabirdûyê de bi dawî dibînin? Ma ne ku tê xwendin ku Daniel divê bêhna xwe bistîne û di para xwe de li dawiya rojan raweste? Bi rastî, erê; û em jê bawer dikin. Lê ji bo Danielê di para xwe de rawestan çi ye? Ev xal dê bikeve bin nirxandinê dema ku em werin bo ravekirina derbasbûna demê, û bo vekolîna bûyerên ku bi rastî li dawiya rojan qewimîn. Heta wê demê, em li vir lengerê xwe davêjin heta hefteyekî din." Review and Herald, January 28, 1858.

Errors and Dangers of Prescott and Daniells; The Cities to Be Worked

Amaphoso n’Akaga vya Prescott na Daniells; Ibisagara Bitegerezwa Gukorerwamwo

(A. G. Daniells was elected president of the General Conference in 1901. This suggests that this document was written in 1910, a time when Mrs. White was very concerned about Daniells' neglect of the cities and his involvement in the controversy over the "Daily.")

(A. G. Daniells alichaguliwa kuwa rais wa General Conference mwaka 1901. Hili ladokeza kwamba waraka huu uliandikwa mwaka 1910, kipindi ambacho Bi. White alikuwa na wasiwasi mkubwa kuhusu kupuuzwa kwa miji na Daniells pamoja na kuhusika kwake katika mabishano juu ya “Daily.”)

Now, recently Steve Wohlberg was saying that he does not have to take a position on the Daily because Ellen White never had a position on the Daily, and if it is good enough for the prophetess to take that position, it is good enough for him.

ئێستا، لەم دواییانەدا ستێڤ وۆلبێرگ دەیگوت کە پێویست ناکات هەڵوێستێک لەبارەی «ڕۆژانە»وە وەربگرێت، چونکە ئەلن وایت هەرگیز هەڵوێستێکی لەبارەی «ڕۆژانە»وە نەبووە؛ و ئەگەر بۆ پێغەمبەرەکە باش بێت کە ئەو هەڵوێستە وەربگرێت، بۆ ئەویش بەسە.

Well, Ellen White did have a position on the Daily. She said the Millerites had the correct view of it, and she understood it was Paganism. She understood that when Paganism was taken away, the 1335 began; and, she understood that other views than that only produced darkness and confusion.

باشە، ئێلن وایت هەڵوێستێکی دیاریکراوی لەسەر «ڕۆژانە» هەبوو. ئەو وتی کە میلەرییەکان تێگەیشتنی دروستیان لێی هەبوو، و ئەو تێدەگەیشت کە مەبەست لێی پەگانیزمە. ئەو تێدەگەیشت کە کاتێک پەگانیزم لابرا، 1335 دەستی پێکرد؛ و هەروەها تێدەگەیشت کە هەر بۆچوونێکی تر جگە لەوە، تەنها تاریکی و ئاڵۆزی بەرهەم دەهێنێت.

And the one that you can demonstrate from the history of 1850 that was really isolated as bringing darkness and confusion is Crosier's view that the Daily represented Christ's Sanctuary ministry; so, I think she had an understanding what the Daily was, not only what it was but what it represented because, if you left that position, you go into darkness and confusion.

Ọzọkwa, nke i nwere ike igosi site n’akụkọ ihe mere eme nke 1850, nke e kewapụrụ n’eziokwu dị ka ihe na-eweta ọchịchịrị na mgbagwoju anya, bụ echiche Crosier na “Daily” na-anọchi anya ozi Kraịst n’ụlọ nsọ; ya mere, echere m na ọ nwere nghọta banyere ihe “Daily” bụ—ọ bụghị naanị ihe ọ bụ, kama kwa ihe ọ na-anọchi anya ya—n’ihi na, ọ bụrụ na ị hapụ ọnọdụ ahụ, ị ga-abanye n’ọchịchịrị na mgbagwoju anya.

But, in 1910 Ellen White also rebuked the General Conference President and W. W. Prescott for pushing this same view as Crosier's.

Ane, mu 1910 Ellen White yanenzire kandi Perezida w’Inama Rusange na W. W. Prescott kubera gutsimbarara kuri iyi nyigisho imwe na ya Crosier.

And no historian is going to argue that Prescott and Willie White and A. G. Daniells, that when they were pushing the Daily, they were pushing the idea that the Daily represented Christ's Sanctuary ministry. Everyone knows that.

Û dîrokzanek jî ê nîqaş neke ku Prescott û Willie White û A. G. Daniells, dema ku wan “Daily” pêş ve didixistin, wan vê fikrê pêş ve didixist ku “Daily” xizmeta Mesîh a di Perestgehê de temsîl dike. Her kes vê dizane.

But, you have got the entire article here from Manuscript Releases, volume 20.

Nanga, i nzila yoso ya disolo yango kele awa, na Manuscript Releases, volume 20.

When was this released? Well, it was released in 1988; so, it is available for students of Adventism to consider in 1988.

இது எப்போது வெளியிடப்பட்டது? அது 1988ஆம் ஆண்டில் வெளியிடப்பட்டது; ஆகையால், 1988ஆம் ஆண்டில் அட்வெண்டிசத்தை ஆய்வு செய்பவர்களான மாணவர்கள் இதைப் பரிசீலிக்கக் கிடைக்கிறது.

When did Willie White and Prescott and Daniells establish the false view of the Daily in Adventism? From 1919 to 1931 is when they accomplished their work. By 1931, forget about it!! Adventism is going to teach that the Daily represents Christ's Sanctuary ministry because they have accepted the interpretation of the Scriptures that comes from apostate Protestantism and Catholicism. And from this point on, the Daily is identified as Christ's Sanctuary ministry.

Willie White와 Prescott와 Daniells는 재림교회 안에 ‘매일’에 대한 그릇된 견해를 언제 확립하였는가? 그들이 그 일을 이루어 낸 때는 1919년부터 1931년까지였다. 1931년에 이르러서는, 그것은 더 말할 것도 없게 되었다!! 재림교회는 ‘매일’이 그리스도의 성소 봉사를 대표한다고 가르치게 될 것인데, 이는 그들이 배도한 개신교와 천주교에서 비롯된 성경 해석을 받아들였기 때문이다. 그리고 이 시점부터 ‘매일’은 그리스도의 성소 봉사로 규정된다.

Awe, there are some voices that are opposing this that know better, but the tide has totally turned from that point on.

Eei, kukhona amazwi athile aphikisana nalokhu azi kangcono, kodwa kusukela kuleso sikhathi isimo sashintsha ngokuphelele.

And then in 1988, the Ellen White Estate releases for us this statement from 1910 at the very time the Daily was being agitated by Prescott, Daniells, and Willie White.

Na kene mu 1988, Ellen White Estate yatisile kuetu eci cishinka cilembelwe mu 1910, pa nshita yeneco ilyo ilya Daily cali ukulwishaulwa na Prescott, Daniells, na Willie White.

"At this stage of our experience we are not to have our minds drawn away from the special light given [us] to consider at the important gathering of our conference. And there was Brother Daniells, whose mind the enemy was working;"

ಈ ಹಂತದ ನಮ್ಮ ಅನುಭವದಲ್ಲಿ, ನಮ್ಮ ಸಭೆಯ ಮಹತ್ವದ ಸಮಾಗಮದಲ್ಲಿ [ನಮಗೆ] ಪರಿಗಣಿಸಲು ನೀಡಲ್ಪಟ್ಟ ವಿಶೇಷ ಬೆಳಕಿನಿಂದ ನಮ್ಮ ಮನಸ್ಸುಗಳು ತಿರುಗಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳಲ್ಪಡಬಾರದು. ಮತ್ತು ಅಲ್ಲಿ ಸಹೋದರ ಡೇನಿಯೆಲ್ಸ್ ಇದ್ದರು; ಅವರ ಮನಸ್ಸಿನ ಮೇಲೆ ಶತ್ರು ಕಾರ್ಯನಿರ್ವಹಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದನು;

What does that mean? What does it mean that the enemy is working your mind? It means the Holy Spirit is not working your mind.

Icho chilumbulula? Icho chilumbulula shani ukuti umulwani alebomba mu mano yobe? Chikulumbulula ukuti Mupashi wa Mushilo tabomba mu mano yobe.

"...and your mind and Elder Prescott's mind were being worked by the angels that were expelled from heaven..."

“...na akili yako na akili ya Mzee Prescott zilikuwa zikifanyiwa kazi na malaika wale waliofukuzwa kutoka mbinguni...”

"Satan's work was to divert your minds that jots and tittles should be brought in which the Lord did not inspire you to bring in. They were not essential. But this meant much to the cause of truth. And the ideas of your minds, if you could be drawn away to jots or tittles, is a work of Satan's devising. To correct little things in the books written, you suppose would be doing a great work. But I am charged, Silence is eloquence."

“Kaang ni Satanas ket tapno maiyawid dagiti kapanunotan yo, tapno maisingit dagiti bassit a banag—dagiti jot ken tittle—a saan a ti Apo ti nangipalawag kadakayo a maisingit. Saanda a nasken unay. Ngem daytoy ket dakkel ti kaipapananna iti pakasaritaan ti kinapudno. Ket no dagiti kapanunotan ti isip yo ket maawis a maiyasideg kadagiti jot wenno tittles, dayta ket maysa a trabaho a pinarsua ni Satanas. Iti panangipatulnog kadagiti bassit a banag iti dagiti libro a naisurat, ipagarup yo a dakkel a trabaho ti aramiden yo. Ngem naibilin kaniak, ‘Ti kinaulimek ket kinaurnos ti pagsasao.’”

They wanted to go into Uriah Smith's book, Thoughts on Daniel and Revelation, and remove what he said about the Daily being Paganism. That is why in this time period one of the men that is fighting against Willie White and Prescott and Daniells is a man named Larry Smith.

Baali baayagalire okuyingira mu kitabo kya Uriah Smith, *Thoughts on Daniel and Revelation*, ne baggyamu bye yayogera nti “the Daily” bwe bwali Obupagaani. Eyo ye nsonga lwaki mu kiseera kino omu ku basajja abalwana ne Willie White ne Prescott ne Daniells ye musajja ayitibwa Larry Smith.

Who is Larry Smith? That is Uriah's son, and he knows what they want to do and he is standing with his dad: the Daily is Paganism.

لارى سميث من هو؟ إنه ابن أوريا، وهو يعلم ما يريدون أن يفعلوه، وهو يقف مع أبيه: إن «اليومية» هي الوثنية.

"I am to say, Stop your picking flaws. If this purpose of the devil could only be carried out, then [it] appears to you [that] your work would be considered as most wonderful in conception. It was the enemy's plan to get all the supposed objectionable features where all classes of minds did not agree.

“Ngwenda kwamba nti, Lekani okutoola ensobi. Singa ekigendererwa kino kya Sitaani kyasobola okutuukirizibwa, kale [ki] kirabika gye muli [nga] omulimu gwammwe gwanditwaliddwa ng’ekintu ekyewuunyisa ennyo mu nteekateeka yaakyo. Gwali mugga gwa mulabe okukuŋŋaanya ebintu byonna ebyalowoozebwanga ng’ebisikiriza okwemulugunya mu kifo awali ebika byonna eby’amagezi eby’abantu we bitakkiriza.”

"And what then? The very work that pleases the devil would come to pass. There would be a representation given to the outsiders not of our faith just what would suit them, that would develop traits of character which would"

“Na basi nini? Kazi yenyewe impendezayo Ibilisi ingetukia. Kungetolewa uwakilishi kwa watu wa nje, si wa imani yetu, hasa ule unaowafaa wao, ambao ungeendeleza tabia za mwenendo ambazo zinge”

do what? "cause great confusion."

wakhe ikikangabanga kikulu.

Other views of the Daily have been adopted that bring confusion and darkness.

Ka mawonoo ga “Daily” ne aakooiyuk eetaayaniko koteneng’ koeng’utiet ak ng’waninto.

"and occupy the golden moments which should be used zealously to bring the great message before the people. The presentations upon any subject we have worked upon could not all harmonize, and the results would be to confuse the minds of believers and unbelievers. This is the very thing that Satan had planned that should take place—anything that could be magnified as a disagreement.

“na mundanire akanya k’agaciro kanini k’izahabu, kakwiriye gukoreshwa n’umwete mu kugeza imbere y’abantu ubutumwa bukomeye. Ibyerekanwa ku nsanganyamatsiko iyo ari yo yose twakozeho ntibyashoboraga byose guhuza, kandi ingaruka zari kuba urujijo mu bitekerezo by’abizera n’abatizera. Icyo ni cyo rwose Satani yari yarateguye ko kiba—ikintu cyose cyashoboraga gukabirizwa nk’ukutumvikana.”

Lord willing, when we begin to prove these doctrines from our Bible study, we will look at Ezekiel 28; because, Ezekiel 28 is where the very root of the Daily is identified. Ezekiel 28 is about the exaltation of Lucifer, and she is marking it; because, as they are trying to say that the Daily represents Christ's Sanctuary ministry, not only were they rejecting the true view of the Daily, a symbol of self-exaltation, but they were manifesting that very self-exaltation in their own experience. She emphasizes they would bring confusion into our ranks.

Bwana akipenda, tutakapoanza kuthibitisha mafundisho haya kutokana na funzo letu la Biblia, tutaangalia Ezekieli 28; kwa maana Ezekieli 28 ndipo panapotambulishwa mzizi wenyewe wa Daima. Ezekieli 28 inahusu kuinuliwa kwa Lusifa, naye analitia alama jambo hilo; kwa sababu, wanapojaribu kusema kwamba Daima inawakilisha huduma ya Kristo ya Patakatifu, hawakuwa wakikataa tu mtazamo wa kweli wa Daima, ishara ya kujitukuza, bali walikuwa wakidhihirisha huko kujitukuza huko katika uzoefu wao wenyewe. Anasisitiza kwamba wangeleta machafuko ndani ya safu zetu.

"Now, here is a grand work, where strange spirits can figure. But the Lord has a work to [be] done to save perishing souls; and the places which Satan, disguised, could fill in, bringing confusion into our ranks, he will do to perfection, and all those little differences will become enlarged, prominent.

“Noneho, hano hari igikorwa gikomeye, aho imyuka itari iy’ukuri ishobora kugira uruhare. Ariko Umwami afite umurimo ugomba gukorwa wo gukiza ubugingo burimbuka; kandi imyanya Satani, yihinduye ak’abandi, ashobora kwinjiramo, akazana urujijo mu nzego zacu, azabikora ku rugero rwuzuye rwose, maze ibyo bitandukaniro bito byose bizaguka, bigaragare cyane.”

And what does it mean, "And I was shown"? God specifically told her this.

Ne “Ne kazadyen me” yejî çi maneyê dide? Xwedê bi taybetî ev yek jê re got.

"And I was shown from the first that the Lord had given neither Elders Daniells nor Prescott the burden of this work. Should Satan's wiles be brought in, should this "Daily" be such a great matter as to be brought in to confuse minds and hinder the advancement of the work at this important period of time? It should not, whatever may be. This subject should not be introduced,"

“Ndzi kombisiwile ku sukela eku sunguleni leswaku Hosi a yi nyikanga vakulukumba Daniells kumbe Prescott ndzhwalo wa ntirho lowu. Xana maqhinga ya Sathana ma fanele ku tisiwa, naswona xana “Daily” leyi yi fanele ku endliwa mhaka leyikulu swinene lerova yi tisiwa leswaku yi pfilunganya miehleketo ni ku sivela ku ya emahlweni ka ntirho enkarhini lowu wa nkoka? A swi fanelanga, hambi ku nga va yini. Nhlokomhaka leyi a yi fanelanga ku nghenisiwa,”

Sister White understood the Daily, and she understood that teaching the Daily was Christ's Sanctuary ministry is something that came from angels that were expelled from Heaven and that it only brings confusion and darkness; and, she knew the Pioneer position that the Daily represented Paganism, and that when the Daily was taken away, the 1335-year time prophecy began. She knew that. She knew the difference, no matter what these guys want to say.

Sister White jifunze “the Daily,” kandi jifunze yuko kwigisha yuko “the Daily” ari umurimo wa Kristo wo mu Buturo Bwera ari ikintu cyavuye ku bamarayika birukanywe mu Ijuru kandi ko kizana gusa urujijo n’umwijima; kandi yari azi umwanya w’Abapayoniya yuko “the Daily” yagereranyaga Ubupagani, kandi ko igihe “the Daily” yakurwagaho, ubuhanuzi bw’igihe cy’imyaka 1335 bwahise butangira. Ibyo yari abizi. Yari azi itandukaniro, uko byagenda kose aba bagabo bashaka kubivuga.

"It should not, whatever may be. This subject should not be introduced, for the spirit that would be brought in would be forbidding, and Lucifer is watching every movement. Satanic agencies would commence his work and there would be confusion brought into our ranks. You have no call to hunt up the difference of opinion that is not a testing question; but your silence is eloquence. I have the matter all plainly before me. If the devil could involve any one of our own people on these subjects, as he has proposed to do, Satan's cause would triumph. Now the work without delay is to be taken up and not a [difference] of opinion expressed.

“Bikoleire nze omubazyo byona. Eki kigambo tikishemereire kuleetwa omu maisho, ahabw’okuba omwoyo ogurireetwa omwo gwakuba gwa kuziyiza, kandi Lusifa ali omu kurora buri kukyuka kwona. Ebikoreso bya Sitani biratandika omurimo gwe, kandi hakatwarwamu okutaburuka omu mirongo yaitu. Toine kwetwa kugira ngo onoonyereho obutaikirizana bw’ebirowoozo obutali kibuuzo ky’okugezesa; kwonka okushutama kwawe ni obugambiro. Eki kigambo kyonka nkireeba gye kandi kirambire omu maisho gange. Singa sitaani yakubaasa kuzingiza omuntu n’omwe ow’omu bantu baitu omu by’ebi bintu, nk’oku yateekateekire kukikora, ensonga ya Sitani yakusingura. Hati omurimo niguteekwa kukwatibwa ahonaaho, kandi hataboneireho [obutaikirizana] bw’ebirowoozo bwona oburagambibwa.”

"Satan would inspire those men who have gone out from us to unite with evil angels and retard our work on unimportant questions, and what rejoicing [there] would be in the camp of the enemy. Press together, press together. Let every difference be buried. Our work now is to devote all our physical and brain-nerve power to put these differences out of the way, and all harmonize. If Satan could with his great unsanctified wisdom be permitted to get the least hold, [he would rejoice].

Satani aiheheshha abantu bamwe abaturumye muri twe ngo bifatanye n’abamarayika babi kandi badindize umurimo wacu ku bibazo bidafite umumaro, kandi ni ukuntu ibyishimo [byaba] byinshi mu nkambi y’umwanzi. Mukomerane, mukomerane. Itandukaniro ryose rihambwe. Umurimo wacu ubu ni ukwegurira imbaraga zacu zose z’umubiri n’iz’ubwonko n’imitsi yabwo gukuraho ayo matandukaniro, kandi bose bahuze. Iyaba Satani, n’ubwenge bwe bukomeye butejejwe, yahabwa uburyo bwo kubona akanzu na gato, [yanezerwa].

"Now, when I saw how you were working, my mind took in the whole situation and the results if you should go forward and give the parties that have left us the least chance to bring confusion into our ranks. Your lack of wisdom would be just what Satan would have it. Your loud proclamation was not under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. I was instructed to say to you that your picking flaws in the writings of men that have been led of God is not inspired of God. And if this is the wisdom that Elder Daniells would give to the people, by no means give him an official position, for he cannot reason from cause to effect. Your silence on this subject is your wisdom. Now, everything like picking flaws in the publications of men who are not alive is not the work God has given any of you to do. For if these men—Elders Daniells and Prescott—had followed the directions given in working the cities, there would have been many, very many, convinced of the truth and converted, able men that [now] are in positions where they never will be reached.

ꯍꯧꯖꯤꯛ, ꯑꯩꯅ ꯑꯗꯣꯝ ꯀꯔꯝꯅ ꯊꯧꯔꯤꯕ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯎꯕ ꯃꯇꯝꯗ, ꯑꯩꯒꯤ ꯃꯅꯥꯁꯤꯡꯅ ꯐꯤꯕꯝ ꯑꯄꯨꯟꯕ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯑꯃꯨꯛ ꯈꯪꯕ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ, ꯑꯗꯣꯝꯅ ꯃꯈꯥ ꯆꯠꯊꯔꯛꯂꯕꯁꯨ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯑꯩꯈꯣꯏꯗꯒꯤ ꯈꯜꯂꯛꯈ꯭ꯔꯕ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯁꯤꯡꯗ ꯑꯩꯈꯣꯏꯒꯤ ꯐꯥꯡꯁꯤꯡꯗ ꯍꯦꯛꯇ ꯀꯍꯟꯕ ꯄꯨꯊꯣꯛꯅꯕ ꯃꯍꯥꯛꯄꯨ ꯈꯨꯗꯛ ꯑꯣꯏꯅ ꯄꯤꯕ ꯑꯃꯨꯛ ꯂꯩꯕꯔꯁꯨ ꯃꯍꯥꯛꯀꯤ ꯃꯐꯝ ꯀꯔꯝꯅ ꯑꯣꯏꯒꯗꯒꯦ ꯍꯥꯏꯕ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯑꯩ ꯈꯪꯈꯤ꯫ ꯑꯗꯣꯝꯒꯤ ꯂꯣꯏꯁꯤꯟꯕ ꯋꯥꯈꯜ ꯂꯩꯇꯕ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯁꯥꯇꯟꯅ ꯄꯥꯝꯕ ꯑꯗꯨꯅꯤ ꯑꯣꯏꯒꯅꯤ꯫ ꯑꯗꯣꯝꯒꯤ ꯂꯥꯎꯗꯅ ꯄꯥꯎꯊꯣꯛꯄ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯍꯣꯂꯤ ꯏꯁꯄꯤꯔꯤꯠꯀꯤ ꯄꯨꯔꯛꯏꯟꯅ ꯑꯣꯏꯗꯦ꯫ ꯑꯩꯗꯤ ꯑꯗꯣꯝꯗ ꯍꯥꯟꯕꯗ ꯋꯥꯐꯝ ꯄꯤꯈꯤ, ꯈꯣꯏꯅꯥ ꯏꯁꯔꯥꯏꯜꯅꯥ ꯂꯝꯗꯝ ꯄꯤꯕ ꯃꯤꯁꯤꯡꯒꯤ ꯏꯔꯥꯏꯕꯁꯤꯡꯗ ꯑꯁꯣꯏꯕ ꯊꯤꯕ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯏꯁꯔꯥꯏꯜꯅꯥ ꯄꯨꯔꯛꯄ ꯑꯣꯏꯗꯦ꯫ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯃꯁꯤ ꯏꯂꯗꯔ ꯗꯦꯅꯤꯑꯦꯜꯁꯅ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏꯁꯤꯡꯗ ꯄꯤꯒꯗꯕ ꯋꯥꯈꯜ ꯑꯣꯏꯔꯕꯗꯤ, ꯃꯍꯥꯛꯄꯨ ꯃꯈꯥꯅ ꯑꯃꯨꯛꯇ ꯑꯣꯐꯤꯁꯤꯌꯜ ꯄꯣꯁꯤꯁꯟ ꯄꯤꯕ ꯊꯤꯡꯕꯤꯌꯨ; ꯃꯔꯝꯗꯤ ꯃꯍꯥꯛꯅ ꯃꯔꯝꯗꯒꯤ ꯃꯍꯥꯟꯗ ꯊꯧꯏꯕ ꯃꯐꯝ ꯈꯪꯅ ꯋꯥꯈꯜ ꯊꯤꯕ ꯉꯝꯗꯦ꯫ ꯃꯁꯤꯒꯤ ꯃꯔꯝꯗ ꯑꯗꯣꯝꯒꯤ ꯂꯣꯏꯕ ꯑꯗꯨꯅꯤ ꯑꯗꯣꯝꯒꯤ ꯋꯥꯈꯜ ꯂꯩꯕ꯫ ꯍꯧꯖꯤꯛ, ꯍꯥꯏꯅ ꯑꯁꯨꯝꯕꯥ ꯃꯄꯨꯡ ꯐꯥꯕꯥ ꯌꯥꯏꯕ ꯃꯤꯁꯤꯡꯒꯤ ꯄꯨꯊꯣꯛꯄꯁꯤꯡꯗ ꯑꯁꯣꯏꯕ ꯊꯤꯕ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯑꯗꯣꯝ ꯑꯃꯇꯅꯥ ꯇꯧꯅꯕ ꯏꯁꯔꯥꯏꯜꯅꯥ ꯄꯤꯕ ꯊꯧꯔꯝ ꯑꯣꯏꯗꯦ꯫ ꯃꯔꯝꯗꯤ, ꯀꯔꯤꯒꯨꯝꯕꯗ ꯃꯤ ꯑꯁꯤꯡ—ꯏꯂꯗꯔ ꯗꯦꯅꯤꯑꯦꯜꯁ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯄ꯭ꯔꯦꯁꯀꯠ—ꯅꯥꯀꯁꯤꯡ ꯊꯧꯔꯤꯕ ꯃꯇꯝꯗ ꯄꯤꯕ ꯂꯝꯗꯝꯁꯤꯡ ꯇꯧꯖꯤꯟꯅ ꯂꯧꯊꯣꯛꯈꯤꯔꯛꯂꯕꯗꯤ, ꯑꯁꯤ ꯑꯁꯤꯅ ꯑꯇꯣꯞꯄ, ꯌꯥꯝꯅ ꯑꯇꯣꯞꯄ ꯃꯤꯑꯣꯏ ꯀꯌꯥ ꯑꯁꯤꯡ ꯑꯆꯨꯝꯕ ꯑꯗꯨ ꯊꯥꯖꯅꯔꯛꯂꯕ ꯑꯃꯁꯨꯡ ꯑꯣꯟꯊꯣꯛꯄ ꯑꯣꯏꯔꯛꯂꯕ ꯑꯣꯏꯒꯅꯤ, ꯑꯗꯨꯒ ꯅꯨꯄꯥ ꯁꯦꯟꯅꯕ ꯃꯤꯁꯤꯡ, [ꯍꯧꯖꯤꯛ] ꯑꯁꯨꯛ ꯍꯦꯟꯅ ꯐꯪꯒꯗꯕ ꯉꯝꯗꯔꯤꯕ ꯃꯐꯝꯁꯤꯡꯗ ꯂꯩꯔꯤꯕ ꯃꯤꯁꯤꯡ ꯑꯣꯏꯔꯤ꯫

"All the world is to be regarded as one great family. And when you have such a fountain of knowledge to draw from, why have you left the world to perish for years with the testimonies given by our Lord Jesus Christ? True religion teaches us to regard every man and woman as a person to whom we can do good.

"ዓለም ሁሉ እንደ አንዲት ታላቅ ቤተሰብ ሊቆጠር ይገባል። እና እንዲህ ያለ ምንጭ ዕውቀት ከምትቀዱበት ሲኖራችሁ፣ ጌታችን ኢየሱስ ክርስቶስ በሰጠው ምስክርነት ዓለምን ለዓመታት እንዲጠፋ ለምን ተዋችሁት? እውነተኛ ሃይማኖት ወንድና ሴት ሁሉን መልካም ልናደርግለት እንደምንችል ሰው አድርገን እንድንመለከት ያስተምረናል።"

"This has been in print many years: —A Balanced Mind,' testimony to Elder Andrews. The mind may be cultivated to become a power to know when to speak and what burdens to take up and to bear, for Christ is your teacher. And I feared greatly for you [when I saw you] exalting your wisdom and pursuing a course to bring in differences of opinion. The Lord calls for wise men who can hold their peace when it [is] wisdom for them to do so. If you would be a whole man, you need sanctification through Jesus Christ. Now there is a work just started, and let wisdom be seen in every minister, in every president of [a] conference. But here was a work for you to take hold of years ago where you were needed to lift your voice for this very work. Christ gave all His people special directions what they shall do and the things they shall not do. And there is a little time left us to work out the righteousness of the Lord. You can understand the way of the Lord. I saw your purpose of carrying things after your own devising after you were placed as president. You had thought you would do wonderful things, which would be a work God had not placed in your hands to do. Now, your work is not to oppress but to release every necessity possible if the Lord has accepted you to serve. But you have very early given evidence that wisdom and sanctified judgment have not been manifested by you. You blazed out matters that would not be received unless the Lord should give light.

ಇದು ಅನೇಕ ವರ್ಷಗಳಿಂದ ಮುದ್ರಣದಲ್ಲಿ ಬಂದಿದೆ: —‘ಸಮತೋಲಿತ ಮನಸ್ಸು,’ ಎಲ್ಡರ್ ಆಂಡ್ರ್ಯೂಸ್‌ ಅವರಿಗೆ ಸಾಕ್ಷ್ಯ. ಮನಸ್ಸನ್ನು ಬೆಳೆಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳಬಹುದಾಗಿದೆ; ಯಾವಾಗ ಮಾತಾಡಬೇಕು ಮತ್ತು ಯಾವ ಭಾರಗಳನ್ನು ಹೊತ್ತುಕೊಳ್ಳಬೇಕು ಹಾಗೂ ಸಹಿಸಬೇಕು ಎಂಬುದನ್ನು ತಿಳಿಯುವ ಶಕ್ತಿಯನ್ನಾಗಿ ಅದು ರೂಪುಗೊಳ್ಳಬಹುದು, ಯಾಕಂದರೆ ಕ್ರಿಸ್ತನೇ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಗುರು. ಮತ್ತು ನೀವು ನಿಮ್ಮ ಜ್ಞಾನವನ್ನು உயர್ತಿಸುತ್ತಾ ಭಿನ್ನಾಭಿಪ್ರಾಯಗಳನ್ನು ಉಂಟುಮಾಡುವ ಮಾರ್ಗವನ್ನು ಅನುಸರಿಸುತ್ತಿರುವುದನ್ನು [ನಾನು ನಿಮ್ಮನ್ನು ಕಂಡಾಗ] ನಾನು ನಿಮ್ಮ ವಿಷಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಬಹಳವಾಗಿ ಭಯಪಟ್ಟೆನು. ಯಾವಾಗ ಮೌನವಾಗಿರುವುದು ಅವರಿಗೆ ಜ್ಞಾನಕರವಾಗಿರುವುದೋ ಆಗ ತಮ್ಮ ಶಾಂತಿಯನ್ನು ಕಾಪಾಡಿಕೊಳ್ಳಬಲ್ಲ ಜ್ಞಾನಿಗಳಿಗಾಗಿ ಕರ್ತನು ಕರೆದಾಡುತ್ತಾನೆ. ನೀವು ಸಂಪೂರ್ಣ ಮಾನವನಾಗಿರಬೇಕೆಂದರೆ, ಯೇಸು ಕ್ರಿಸ್ತನ ಮೂಲಕ ಪರಿಶುದ್ಧೀಕರಣವು ನಿಮಗೆ ಅಗತ್ಯ. ಈಗ ಒಂದು ಕೆಲಸ ತಾನೇ ಆರಂಭವಾಗಿದೆ; ಮತ್ತು ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಬ್ಬ ಸೇವಕರಲ್ಲಿಯೂ, ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಬ್ಬ ಸಮ್ಮೇಳನದ ಅಧ್ಯಕ್ಷನಲ್ಲಿಯೂ ಜ್ಞಾನವು ಕಾಣಿಸಿಕೊಳ್ಳಲಿ. ಆದರೆ ಇಲ್ಲಿಯೇ, ವರ್ಷಗಳ ಹಿಂದೆ, ನೀವು ಕೈಗೆತ್ತಿಕೊಳ್ಳಬೇಕಾಗಿದ್ದ ಒಂದು ಕೆಲಸವಿತ್ತು; ಆ ಕೆಲಸಕ್ಕಾಗಿಯೇ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಧ್ವನಿಯನ್ನು ಎತ್ತಬೇಕಾಗಿದ್ದ ಸ್ಥಳದಲ್ಲಿ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಅಗತ್ಯವಿತ್ತು. ಕ್ರಿಸ್ತನು ತನ್ನ ಎಲ್ಲಾ ಜನರಿಗೆ ಅವರು ಏನು ಮಾಡಬೇಕು ಮತ್ತು ಯಾವ ವಿಷಯಗಳನ್ನು ಮಾಡಬಾರದು ಎಂಬುದರ ಕುರಿತು ವಿಶೇಷ ನಿರ್ದೇಶನಗಳನ್ನು ಕೊಟ್ಟನು. ಮತ್ತು ಕರ್ತನ ನೀತಿಯನ್ನು ಕಾರ್ಯಗತಗೊಳಿಸುವುದಕ್ಕೆ ನಮಗೆ ಇನ್ನೂ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ಕಾಲ ಮಾತ್ರ ಉಳಿದಿದೆ. ಕರ್ತನ ಮಾರ್ಗವನ್ನು ನೀವು ಅರ್ಥಮಾಡಿಕೊಳ್ಳಬಲ್ಲಿರಿ. ನೀವು ಅಧ್ಯಕ್ಷನಾಗಿ ನೇಮಿಸಲ್ಪಟ್ಟ ನಂತರ, ಸಂಗತಿಗಳನ್ನು ನಿಮ್ಮ ಸ್ವಂತ ಯುಕ್ತಿಯ ಪ್ರಕಾರ ನಡೆಸುವ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಉದ್ದೇಶವನ್ನು ನಾನು ಕಂಡೆನು. ನೀವು ಅದ್ಭುತ ಕಾರ್ಯಗಳನ್ನು ಮಾಡಬೇಕೆಂದು ಯೋಚಿಸಿದ್ದಿರಿ; ಆದರೆ ಅದು ದೇವರು ನಿಮ್ಮ ಕೈಗಳಿಗೆ ಒಪ್ಪಿಸದ ಕೆಲಸವಾಗಿತ್ತು. ಈಗ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಕೆಲಸವು ದಮನಿಸುವುದಲ್ಲ, ಆದರೆ ಕರ್ತನು ನಿಮ್ಮನ್ನು ಸೇವೆಗೆ ಅಂಗೀಕರಿಸಿದ್ದರೆ, ಸಾಧ್ಯವಾದ ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದು ಅಗತ್ಯಭಾರವನ್ನು ನಿವಾರಿಸುವುದಾಗಿದೆ. ಆದರೆ ಜ್ಞಾನವೂ ಪರಿಶುದ್ಧೀಕೃತ ವಿವೇಕವೂ ನಿಮ್ಮಲ್ಲಿ ವ್ಯಕ್ತವಾಗಿಲ್ಲ ಎಂಬ ಸಾಕ್ಷಿಯನ್ನು ನೀವು ಬಹಳ ಬೇಗನೇ ತೋರಿಸಿದ್ದೀರಿ. ಕರ್ತನು ಬೆಳಕನ್ನು ನೀಡದೆ ಇದ್ದರೆ ಸ್ವೀಕರಿಸಲ್ಪಡದ ವಿಷಯಗಳನ್ನು ನೀವು ಹೊರಗೆ ಸಿಡಿದು ಹೇಳಿದಿರಿ.

"I have been instructed that such hasty movements should not have [been] made [such] as selecting you as president of the conference even another year. But the Lord forbids any more such hasty transactions until the matter is brought before the Lord in prayer; and as you have had the message come to you that the work of the Lord resting upon the president is a most solemn responsibility, you had no moral right to blaze out as you did upon the subject of the —Daily' and suppose your influence would decide the question. There was Elder Haskell, who has carried the heavy responsibilities, and there is Elder Irwin and several men I might mention who have the heavy responsibilities.

Ndzi lerisisiwile leswaku ku nga fanelanga ku va ku endliwile matshalatshala yo hatlisa ya muxaka wolowo, ku fana ni ku hlawula wena tanihi presidente wa konferense ku ya emahlweni ni lembe rin’wana. Kambe Hosi yi ala ku tlhela ku va ni mabindzu lama hatlisaka yo tano ku kondza mhaka yi tisiwa emahlweni ka Hosi hi xikhongelo; naswona leswi rungula ri fikeke eka wena leswaku ntirho wa Hosi lowu tshamaka ehenhla ka presidente i vutihlamuleri lebyi hloniphekaka ngopfu, a wu nga ri na mfanelo ya maendlelo yo lulama yo phandluka hilaha u endleke hakona emhakeni ya —Daily’ ni ku ehleketa leswaku nkucetelo wa wena wu ta tsema mhaka. A ku ri kona Mukulukumba Haskell, loyi a rhwaleke vutihlamuleri lebyi tikaka, naswona ku ni Mukulukumba Irwin ni vavanuna van’wana vo hlayanyana lava ndzi nga va boxaka lava rhwalaka vutihlamuleri lebyi tikaka.

"Where was your respect for the men of age? What authority could you exercise without taking all the responsible men to weigh the matter? But let us now investigate the matter. We must now reconsider whether it is the Lord's judgment, in the face of the work that has been neglected, of showing your zeal to carry the work even another year. If you should carry the work another year with the help that shall unite with you, there should be a change take place in you and Elder Prescott. And humble your own hearts before God. The Lord will have to see in you a showing of a different experience, for if ever men needed to be reconverted at this present [time], it [is] Elder Daniells and Elder Prescott.

“Amã nĩ kwari na andũ a myaka? Wĩ na wathi ũrĩkũ mũngĩ hũthĩrĩria mũno mũtiarĩ hamwe na andũ othe arĩa marutwo gũtuĩra mũhĩrĩga ũcio? No nĩtwĩhoye rĩu tũthuurie ũhoro ũcio. Rĩu no nginya tũcookererie wĩĩcookereria kana nĩ kĩhooto gĩa Mwathani, mbere ya wĩra ũrĩa ũrehirwo, kũonania kĩyo kĩanyu gĩa kũringĩrĩra wĩra ũcio mwaka ũngĩ. Angĩkorwo mũgũtuĩra wĩra ũcio mwaka ũngĩ hamwe na ũteithio ũrĩa ũgũikarania na inyuĩ, no nginya hakorwo na mĩguongo ihinduke thĩinĩ wanyu na thĩinĩ wa Mũtumia Mukũrũ Prescott. Na mũnyihie ngoro cianyu mbere ya Ngai. Mwathani no nginya aone thĩinĩ wanyu ũhoro wa ũtũũro ũngĩ, nĩgũkorwo angĩkorwo andũ marĩ na bata wa gucookerwo rĩu, nĩ Mũtumia Mukũrũ Daniells na Mũtumia Mukũrũ Prescott.”

"Seven men should be chosen that are men of wisdom and through the working of the grace of God [give] evidence [of] a reconversion. For any men who are so blinded that they cannot reason from cause to effect, that they would ignore the men who have borne the responsibilities of the work and these presidents of conferences, [that] men [who] carry the work for over two years should be disregarded and such an impulsive consequence take place that men would neglect the very work kept before them for years—work the cities—and no, or but very little, attention [be] given to the old men for counsel, but proclaim the things they choose to give the people, bears its own testimony of the unsafety of the men to be entrusted with such a grand and wonderful work.

“Abasajja musanvu balina okulondebwa nga be basajja ab’amagezi era nga olw’okukola kw’ekisa kya Katonda balaga obukakafu obw’okukyusibwa nate. Kubanga abasajja bonna abazzibwako amaaso ennyo ne batayinza kutegeera okuva ku nsonga okutuuka ku kivaamu, ne bagaana okulowooza ku basajja abaetikka obuvunaanyizibwa bw’omulimu buno ne bapurizidenti b’ebitundu by’ensikirano, [nti] abasajja [aba] beenyamira omulimu okumala emyaka ebiri n’okusingawo bayinza okunyoomwa, era ne wabaawo ekivaamu eky’amangu eky’enjawulo bwe kityo nti abasajja bandirese omulimu gwennyini ogwateekebwa mu maaso gaabwe okumala emyaka—omulimu mu bibuga—era ne watabaawo, oba ne wabaawo okutunuulira okutono nnyo, eri abakadde olw’okufuna amagezi, naye ne babuulira abantu ebintu bye beesalirawo okubawa, kino kyetereeza okuba obujulirwa bwakyo ku butali bukuumi bw’abasajja abo okwesigibwa n’omulimu omukulu era ogw’ekitalo bwe gutyo.”

"Christ is not dead. He will never suffer His work to be carried on in this strange way. Let the books alone. If any change is essential, God will have the harmony in that change consistent, but when a message has been entrusted to men with the large responsibilities involved, [God] demands faithfulness that will work by love and purify the soul. Elders Daniells and Prescott both need reconversion. A strange work has come in, and it is not in harmony with the work Christ came to our world to do; and all who are truly converted will work the works of Christ.

"Kristo hakuufa. Hatakubali kamwe kazi Yake iendelezwe kwa njia hii ya ajabu. Yaacheni vitabu vivyo hivyo. Ikiwa badiliko lolote ni la lazima, Mungu atakuwa na upatano katika badiliko hilo unaopatana sawasawa, lakini ujumbe unapokuwa umewekwa amana kwa wanadamu pamoja na wajibu mkuu unaohusika, [Mungu] hudai uaminifu utendao kazi kwa upendo na kuisafisha nafsi. Wazee Daniells na Prescott wote wawili wanahitaji kuongoka tena. Kazi ya ajabu imeingia, nayo haipatani na kazi ambayo Kristo alikuja kuifanya katika ulimwengu wetu; nao wote walioongoka kweli watatenda matendo ya Kristo."

"We are everyone [to] work out the work which shall glorify the Father. We have come to the crisis—either to conform to the character of Jesus Christ right in this preparatory time or not attempt [it]. Elder Daniells, [you are not] to feel at liberty to let your voice be heard on high as you have done under similar circumstances. And understand, the president of a conference is not a ruler. He works in connection with the wise men who occupy the position as presidents whom God has accepted. He has not liberty to meddle with the writings in printed books from the pens that God has accepted. They are no longer to bear sway unless they show less of the ruling, dominating power. The crisis has come, for God will be dishonored.

«ဂါတို့အပေါင်းသည် ခမည်းတော်ကို ဘုန်းထင်ရှားစေမည့် အမှုကို ဆောင်ရွက်ရမည်။ ပြင်ဆင်ခြင်းကာလဤအချိန်၌ ယေရှုခရစ်၏ စရိုက်လက္ခဏာနှင့် အညီ ကိုက်ညီလာရန်ဖြစ်စေ၊ မဟုတ်လျှင် ထိုသို့ပြုရန်ပင် မကြိုးစားရန်ဖြစ်စေ၊ ဤအကျပ်အတည်းသို့ ဂါတို့ရောက်ရှိလာကြပြီ။ အယ်လ်ဒါ ဒန်နီယယ်စ်၊ ယခင် အလားတူအခြေအနေများအောက်၌ သင်ပြုခဲ့သကဲ့သို့ သင်၏အသံကို မြင့်မားစွာ ထုတ်ဖော်ခွင့်ရှိသည်ဟု မခံစားရပါစေနှင့်။ ထို့ပြင် ညီလာခံတစ်ရပ်၏ သမ္မတသည် အုပ်စိုးရှင်မဟုတ်ကြောင်းကို နားလည်ပါ။ သူသည် ဘုရားသခင်လက်ခံတော်မူပြီး သမ္မတရာထူးကို ထမ်းဆောင်နေသော ပညာရှိသူတို့နှင့် ဆက်စပ်လျက် အမှုထမ်းရသည်။ ဘုရားသခင်လက်ခံတော်မူသော လက်များမှ ရေးသားထားသည့် ပုံနှိပ်စာအုပ်များအတွင်းရှိ အရေးအသားတို့၌ ဝင်ရောက်စွက်ဖက်ရန် သူ၌ လွတ်လပ်ခွင့်မရှိ။ အုပ်ချုပ်လိုသော၊ လွှမ်းမိုးချုပ်ကိုင်လိုသော အာဏာသဘောကို ပိုနည်းသွားကြောင်း မပြသလျှင်၊ သူတို့သည် နောက်တဖန် ဩဇာမပြုရတော့။ အကျပ်အတည်းသည် ရောက်လာပြီ၊ အကြောင်းမူကား ဘုရားသခင်သည် အရှက်ကွဲစေခြင်းခံရမည်ဖြစ်သောကြောင့်တည်း။»

"How does the Lord look upon the unworked cities? Christ is in heaven. Now its acknowledgment is to be, —There is no kingly rule. And now is the crisis of this world. Now I am the Power to save or to destroy. Now is the time when the destiny of all is in My hands. I have given My life to save the world. And "I, if I be lifted up," the saving grace I shall impart will prove that all who will be fashioned after the divine similitude and will be one with Me shall work as I work with My power of redeeming grace.' Whoever will, [let him] take hold with his brethren to do the work given them to do when in responsible places under the counsel the Lord gives, and seek most earnestly to work in complete harmony with Him who so loved the world He gave His life a full sacrifice for the saving of the world. I speak to our ministers, that as they enter upon the work in our cities let there be a calm sacredness attending the ministry of the Word. We cannot make the proper impression upon the minds of the people if we . . . [Lower third of this page left blank.]

“Bwana huyaangaliaje miji ambayo haijafanyiwa kazi? Kristo yuko mbinguni. Sasa kukiri kwake kunapaswa kuwa, —Hakuna utawala wa kifalme. Na sasa ndiyo shida kuu ya ulimwengu huu. Sasa Mimi ndimi Uweza wa kuokoa au wa kuangamiza. Sasa ndiyo wakati ambao hatima ya wote imo mikononi Mwangu. Nimetoa uhai Wangu ili kuuokoa ulimwengu. Naye, “Nami, nikiinuliwa juu,” neema ile ya wokovu nitakayotoa itathibitisha kwamba wote watakaoundwa kwa mfano wa uungu na kuwa mmoja pamoja Nami watafanya kazi kama Mimi nifanyavyo kwa uweza Wangu wa neema ya ukombozi.’ Yeyote apendaye, na ashikamane pamoja na ndugu zake ili kuifanya kazi waliyopewa kuifanya wakiwa katika mahali pa wajibu chini ya shauri ambalo Bwana hutoa, tena wajitahidi kwa bidii nyingi sana kufanya kazi katika upatano mkamilifu na Yeye aliyeupenda ulimwengu kiasi cha kuutoa uhai Wake kuwa dhabihu kamili kwa ajili ya kuuokoa ulimwengu. Ninawaambia wahudumu wetu, kwamba wanapoingia kuifanya kazi katika miji yetu na kuwe na utulivu mtakatifu unaoandamana na huduma ya Neno. Hatuwezi kuleta mvuto unaofaa juu ya nia za watu ikiwa sisi . . . [Sehemu ya chini ya theluthi moja ya ukurasa huu imeachwa tupu.]”

"I copy from my Diary. The truth as it is in Jesus—talk it, pray it, believe every word in its simplicity. What would you gain if mistakes are brought before the men who have departed from the faith and given heed to seducing spirits, men who were not long ago with us in the faith? Will you stand on the devil's side? Give your attention to the unworked fields. A world-wide work is before us. I was given representations of John Kellogg.

Nakurumbura mu Gitabo cyanjye cy’Ibyabaye ku Munsi. Ukuri nk’uko kuri muri Yesu—mukuvuge, mugusengere, mwizere ijambo ryose mu bworoherane bwakwo. Mwakwunguka iki nimba amakosa azanwa imbere y’abantu batandukanye n’ukwizera kandi bakumviye imyuka iyobya, abantu batari kera bari kumwe natwe mu kwizera? Muzohagarara ku ruhande rwa wa murwanizi? Nimwitwararike imirima itarakozwemwo. Igikorwa co ku isi yose kiri imbere yacu. Nahawe ivyerekano vya John Kellogg.

"A very attractive personage was representing the ideas of the specious arguments that he was presenting, sentiments different from the genuine Bible truth. And those who are hungering and thirsting after something new were advancing ideas [so specious] that Elder Prescott was in great danger. Elder Daniells was in great danger [of] becoming wrapped in a delusion that if these sentiments could be spoken everywhere it would be as a new world.

“Umuntu w’ishusho ikwega cane yari ahagarariye ivyiyumviro vy’izo mpaka ziboneka nk’iz’ukuri yariko arashikiriza, ni ukuvuga ivyiyumviro bitandukanye n’ukuri nyakuri kwa Bibiliya. Kandi abari bafise inzara n’inyota y’ikintu gishasha bariko barateza imbere ivyiyumviro [biboneka cane nk’ivy’ukuri] ku buryo Umukuru Prescott yari mu kaga gakomeye. Umukuru Daniells yari mu kaga gakomeye [ko] gufatwa n’uruhendo rw’uko iyo ayo majambo y’ivyiyumviro ashobora kuvugwa hose, vyoba nk’isi nshasha.”

"Yes, it would, but while their minds were thus absorbed I was shown that Brother Daniells and Brother Prescott were weaving into their experience sentiments of a spiritual[istic] appearance and drawing our people to beautiful sentiments that would deceive, if possible, the very elect."

Ee, kyandikuba bwe kityo, naye mu kiseera eyo ebirowoozo byabwe bwe byali bityo nga binyweredde, ne ndagibwa nti Ow’oluganda Daniells ne Ow’oluganda Prescott baali baluka mu bulamu bwabwe endowooza ezirina okufaanana okw’omwoyo [okw’eby’omwoyo], nga basikiriza abantu baffe eri endowooza ennungi ezandibadde ez’okulimba, singa kyasoboka, n’abalonde bennyini.

The very elect is not going to be deceived, but there are going to be people who are standing with the very elect that are going to get deceived. The very elect are the wise virgins. The foolish virgins are going to get deceived, right?

Abatoranywe rwose ntibazahendwa, ariko hazabaho abantu bahagaze hamwe n’abatoranywe rwose bazahendwa. Abatoranywe rwose ni bo bakobwa b’inkumi b’abanyabwenge. Bakobwa b’inkumi b’abapfu ni bo bazahendwa, si byo?

And as the wise virgins in this time period, when the temptation is there to deceive the very elect, as the wise virgins are receiving the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, what are the foolish virgins receiving? The strong delusion of 2 Thessalonians. We will deal with that, too, in connection with the Daily.

Na kama wanawali wenye hekima katika kipindi hiki cha wakati, ambapo majaribu yapo ya kuwapotosha hata walio wateule, na huku wanawali wenye hekima wakipokea umiminiko wa Roho Mtakatifu, je, wanawali wapumbavu wanapokea nini? Ile nguvu ya upotevu ya 2 Wathesalonike. Tutashughulikia hilo pia, kwa uhusiano na ya Kila Siku.

—"were weaving into their experience sentiments of a spiritual[istic] appearance and drawing our people to beautiful sentiments that would deceive, if possible, the very elect."

—“baali bakwata mu by’obumanyirivu bwabwe endowooza ezirabika ng’ez’omwoyo [spiritualistic], era nga basikiriza abantu baffe eri endowooza ennungi ezandibuzezza, singa kyali kisoboka, n’abalonde bennyini.”

What is the very bottom line of spiritualism?

Kiini cha mwisho kabisa cha uwasiliani-roho ni nini?

When it comes to the story of King Saul, what did Samuel say? "Rebellion is as witchcraft." Rebellion is witchcraft.

Mabusu mambu ya ntotila Saulo, Samuele tubaka nki? “Nkengolo kele bonso kindoki.” Nkengolo kele kindoki.

Where does Saul end up?

Saulo afikia wapi?

FROM THE AUDIENCE: With the witch of Endor.

KUTOKA KWA HADHIRA: Pamoja na mchawi wa Endori.

With the witch of Endor.

N’alongozi wa ku Endori.

What was it that King Sault did to produce this train of events that leads him to the witch of Endor? He set his word above God's Word. He had been told what to do, but he went ahead and he did what he wanted to do.

Kral Sault çi bû ku ev rêza bûyeran ku wî digihîne sêrbaza Endorê derxist holê? Wî peyva xwe li ser Peyva Xwedê danî. Jê re hatibû gotin ku çi bike, lê dîsa pêş ve çû û ew yek kir ku xwe dixwest bike.

The very bottom line of spiritualism is placing your word above God's Word. That is where it all starts. That is witchcraft.

ئەو بنەڕەتییەی هەرە کۆتاییی ڕوحباوەڕییە ئەوەیە کە وتەی خۆت لە سەر وشەی خودا دابنێیت. هەموو شت لەوێوە دەست پێ دەکات. ئەوە جادوگەرێتییە.

Witchcraft is identifying how Satan brings you under his influence. How he entrances you it is a magical term dealing with magical deception.

Ulozi ni kutambua jinsi Shetani anavyokutia chini ya ushawishi wake. Jinsi anavyokulogea ni neno la kichawi linalohusu udanganyifu wa kichawi.

When you are bewitched, who is the first to become bewitched? The witch. It all starts when I place my word above God's Word. That is witchcraft, that is rebellion, and I am the one that has become bewitched. And that is what happened to Daniells and Prescott.

Bwe mwafwitiwa, ni ani utanshi ukufwitiwa? Ni mfwiti umwine. Fyonse bitendeka ilyo naikika icebo candi pa mulu pa Cebo cakwa Lesa. Ico ni ubwanga, ico ni ubupandamano, kabili nine nafwa wa ukufwitiwa. Kabili efyo efyacitike kuli Daniells na Prescott.

And what sentiments were Daniells and Prescott trying to bring in when this was happening? A wrong view of the Daily.

Na ni hisia zipi ambazo Daniells na Prescott walikuwa wakijaribu kuingiza wakati jambo hili lilipokuwa likitendeka? Mtazamo usio sahihi kuhusu “Sadaka ya Kila Siku.”

And what is the true view of the Daily? Is that it is Paganism, and Paganism is the religion of self-exaltation. It is a religion that began in the courts of Heaven when Satan, when Satan, set his word above God's Word and introduced into the history of mankind the mystery of iniquity.

Ŵaḍa wîi ni ɓeŋi ku ti “The Daily”? Ntii ndii Paganism, kaa Paganism ni dii ɗaaŋa di ɓeŋ ɓeŋi ndii ti kɔɔr yaa kɛn. Ndii dii ɗaaŋa ɗeɓeŋi e kɔɔrɓeŋa ka Saŋa, saati Satan, saati Satan, yaa ɗi haŋ ɓiiyaa yɔɔr kaa Ŋun yaa, kɛ yaa naŋa e taariikhi yaa bɨnaadam siri yaa ɗembi.

The mystery of iniquity is Satan's work in bewitching us. It is Satan's work in getting us to place our word or his word above God's Word.

Ekyama eky’obujeemu mulimu gwa Sitaani mu kutuloga. Mulimu gwa Sitaani okutuleetera okuteeka ekigambo kyaffe oba ekigambo kye waggulu w’Ekigambo kya Katonda.

Do you follow my thought?

ئایا بیرۆکەم شوێن دەکەویت؟

Look up iniquity. It will define iniquity in Strong's Concordance. And when you take it down to the root word, what is the root word for iniquity? Alpha, alpha. That is the Alpha Apostasy.

Saka uzani “uovu.” Utaelezwa “uovu” katika Konkodansi ya Strong. Nayo ukiufuatilia mpaka kwenye neno la mzizi, ni nini neno la mzizi la “uovu”? Alfa, alfa. Huo ndio Uasi-imani wa Alfa.

When were Daniells and Prescott pushing this foolish view? In the time period of the Alpha Apostasy.

Daniells na Prescott bakasindikiranga liti ebitekerezo by’obusiru bino? Mu gihe ky’Ubuhakanyi bwa Alpha.

So, do not miss what Sister White is saying here about deceiving the very elect and about reading Ezekiel 28. She knew what was going on. She knew that this Daily thing is something that is not only wrong doctrinally but it requires those who are going to preach the wrong view of the Daily to place their word above God's Word and puts them in the position where they are bewitched; and, therefore, they are a tool in the hand of Satan to bewitch others with their rebellion.

Noolwe, usikose kile ambacho Dada White anasema hapa kuhusu kuwadanganya wateule wenyewe na kuhusu kuisoma Ezekieli 28. Alijua yaliyokuwa yanaendelea. Alijua kwamba jambo hili la Daily si kosa la kimafundisho tu, bali linawataka wale watakaohubiri mtazamo usio sahihi wa Daily kuliweka neno lao juu ya Neno la Mungu, na kuwaweka katika hali ambayo wamelogwa; na kwa hiyo, wao ni chombo mkononi mwa Shetani cha kuwaloga wengine kwa uasi wao.

"I have to trace with my pen [the fact] that these brethren would see defects in their delusive ideas that would place the truth in an uncertainty; and [yet] they [would] stand out as [if they had] great spiritual discernment. Now I am to tell them [that] when I was shown this matter,"

Ndzi fanele ku tsala hi peni ya mina [mhaka ya leswaku] vamakwerhu lava a va ta vona swihoxo emianakanyweni ya vona ya vuxisi leswi a swi ta veka ntiyiso endhawini ya ku nga tiyiseki; naswona [hambiswiritano] vona [a va ta] yima erivaleni onge [hiloko va ri na] ku twisisa lokukulu ka moya. Kutani sweswi ndzi fanele ku va byela [leswaku] loko ndzi kombisiwile mhaka leyi,

People say, "Oh, Ellen White, she doesn't have a position on the Daily."

لە خەڵکەکان دەڵێن: «ئاه، ئێلەن وایت، ئەو لەسەر “Daily” هیچ هەڵوێستێکی نییە.»

"when I was shown this matter when Elder Daniells was lifting up his voice like a trumpet in advocating his ideas of the —Daily,' the after results were presented. Our people were becoming confused. I saw the result, and then there were given me cautions that if Elder Daniells without respect to the outcome should thus be impressed and let himself believe he was under the inspiration of God,"—

“ŋai ŋeŋe i yaŋa i wo na, ma Elder Daniells i ɗagaŋ koŋne ma feŋ feŋ nda tura, i ŋalna i hinda ndee ra ma aŋga i huru kange i ka ‘—Daily,’ gila ŋga ŋga wo taŋga i naŋga ra a yira ŋai. Ma fi ŋgai i uru i ndruŋga. Ŋai i yira fi wo taŋga, ma gusiyaŋa taŋga a naŋ ŋai feŋga ndee: nda Elder Daniells, ba a zira fi wo taŋga ra ko, ka i na huru ndee ma i zava i kili ndee ma i huru i ta ka i na nzaaŋga i Maŋga ma Nzapa,”—

This is spiritualism. He has placed his word above God's Word. He is believing that he is being inspired by God.

Echi ni u‑spiritualism. Ahanike izwi lakhe ngasentla kweLizwi likaNkulunkulu. Uyakholwa ukuthi uphefumulelwe nguNkulunkulu.

"that if Elder Daniells without respect to the outcome should thus be impressed and let himself believe he was under the inspiration of God, skepticism would be sown among our ranks everywhere, and we should be where Satan would carry his messages. Set unbelief and skepticism would be sown in human minds, and strangecrops of evil would take the place of truth. Ms 67, 1910, 1–8. Manuscript Release, volume 20, 17–22.

“ngenaha kwamba ikiwa Mzee Daniells, bila kujali matokeo, angeguswa hivyo na kujiruhusu kuamini kwamba alikuwa chini ya uvuvio wa Mungu, mashaka yangepandwa kila mahali miongoni mwa safu zetu, nasi tungekuwa mahali ambapo Shetani angebeba jumbe zake. Kutokuamini kulikokita mizizi na mashaka vingepandwa katika nia za wanadamu, na mazao ya ajabu ya uovu yangechukua mahali pa kweli. Ms 67, 1910, 1–8. Manuscript Release, volume 20, 17–22.”

The strange crops of evil are growing all over Adventism today.

Mbeju ikatúva vaí pe mba’e vai rehegua okakuaa hína opa rupi ko árape Adventísmo pukukue javeve.

Ellen White places her endorsement on the Pioneer understanding of the 2520.

Ellen White aliweka uungaji mkono wake juu ya uelewa wa waanzilishi kuhusu 2520.

Ellen White places her endorsement on the Pioneer understanding that the Daily in the Book of Daniel represents Paganism.

艾倫·懷特贊同先驅派對《但以理書》中「常獻的」之理解,認為其所代表者乃異教主義。