We ended the last article with the sentence that stated, “In 2001 the government of the United States spoke the Patriot Act into law.”

Twakisha inyandiko iheruka n’interuro yagiraga iti: “Mu 2001 guverinoma ya Leta Zunze Ubumwe za Amerika yashyize itegeko rya Patriot Act mu mategeko.”

“There are many, even of those engaged in this movement for Sunday enforcement, who are blinded to the results which will follow this action. They do not see that they are striking directly against religious liberty. There are many who have never understood the claims of the Bible Sabbath and the false foundation upon which the Sunday institution rests. Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.

“Benshi ni benshi, ndetse no muri abo bakora muri uyu mugambi wo gushyiraho itegeko ryo kwubahiriza ku Cyumweru, bahumishijwe amaso ku ngaruka zizakurikiraho icyo gikorwa. Ntibabona ko barimo kurwanya mu buryo butaziguye umudendezo w’iyobokamana. Hari benshi batigeze basobanukirwa n’ibyo Isabato ya Bibiliya isaba n’urufatiro rw’ibinyoma urwego rwo ku Cyumweru rwubakiyeho. Umugambi uwo ari wo wose ushyigikira amategeko y’idini, mu by’ukuri uba ari igikorwa cyo kwemera ubupapa, bwamaze ibihe byinshi burwanya ubutajegajega umudendezo w’umutimanama. Ukwubahiriza ku Cyumweru kubaho kwako nk’urwego rwitwa urwa Gikristo kubikesha ‘ubwiru bw’ubugome;’ kandi guhatirwa kwako kuzaba ari ukwemera mu by’ukuri amahame ari yo mabuye y’imfuruka ya Romanizimu. Igihe igihugu cyacu kizaba cyihakanye bene ako kageni amahame y’ubutegetsi bwacyo ku buryo gishyiraho itegeko ryo ku Cyumweru, Ubuporotesitanti muri icyo gikorwa buzafatanya n’ubupapa; nta kindi kizaba ari cyo keretse guha ubugingo igitugu kimaze igihe kirekire gitegereje n’ishyaka ryinshi uburyo bwacyo bwo kongera kwaduka mu butegetsi bw’igitugu bukora.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.

1888 typified 2001, and it was then that the Blair Bill was introduced, though its failure to be passed, prevented it from prophetically speaking. It became the sign of 66 AD, a siege that was initiated and then mysteriously withdrawn. When it is understood that there are two image of the beast testing periods, and that the second period begins with the Sunday law in the United States, typified by the year 321, and that the period ends when the world Sunday law, typified by 538, is fully enforced; then it demands prophetically that the beginning of the first image of the beast testing period also begins with some type of typification of a Sunday law being spoken. In 1888, the Blair Bill was an attempt to enforce a National Sunday law, and 1888 identifies when the angel of Revelation eighteen descends and lightens the earth with his glory.

1888 sala 2001 nîşan da, û di wê demê de J. Blair Bill hate pêşkêşkirin; lê ji ber ku nehate pejirandin, ew nekarî bi awayekî pêxemberî biaxive. Ew bû nîşana sala 66 PZ, dorpêçek ku hate destpêkirin û paşê bi awayekî nepenî hate vekişandin. Gava ku tê famkirin ku du demên ceribandina wêneyê heywanê hene, û ku dema duyemîn bi yasaya Yekşemê li Dewletên Yekbûyî dest pê dike, ku bi sala 321 tê nîşandan, û ku ew dem diqede gava yasaya Yekşemê ya cîhanî, ku bi 538 tê nîşandan, bi tevahî tê bicîhkirin; hingê ji aliyê pêxemberiyê ve pêdivî ye ku destpêka dema yekem a ceribandina wêneyê heywanê jî bi cûreyek nîşandana yasayekî Yekşemê ya ku tê gotin dest pê bike. Di 1888-an de, Blair Bill hewldanek bû ji bo bicîhkirina yasayekî Yekşemê ya Neteweyî, û 1888 nîşan dide kengê ferişteya Wahiyê hejdeh dadikeve û bi rûmeta xwe erdê ronahî dike.

The Patriot Act is the typification of a Sunday law that begins the image of the beast testing time in the United States. The United States speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven when it enforces the Sunday law. When it enforces that law it will speak as a dragon, and that Sunday law identifies that the image of the beast is fully formed in the United States. At that point the United States has filled up its cup of probationary time, and national apostasy is followed by national ruin. At that point the United States ceases to be the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy as the threefold union is established.

Patriot Act ni ufananisho wa sheria ya Jumapili inayoanzisha wakati wa kujaribiwa wa sanamu ya mnyama katika Marekani. Marekani hunena kama joka katika utimilifu wa Ufunuo sura ya kumi na tatu, aya ya kumi na moja, inapotekeleza sheria ya Jumapili. Itakapotekeleza sheria hiyo, itanena kama joka, nayo sheria hiyo ya Jumapili hutambulisha kwamba sanamu ya mnyama imeumbika kikamilifu katika Marekani. Wakati huo Marekani itakuwa imekijaza kikombe chake cha muda wa rehema ya majaribio, na uasi wa taifa hufuatwa na maangamizo ya taifa. Wakati huo Marekani huacha kuwa ufalme wa sita wa unabii wa Biblia, huku muungano wa namna tatu ukisimamishwa.

Alpha and Omega always portrays the end with the beginning and at the beginning of the United States there were three times the United States prophetically spoke that marked the beginning of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. The Declaration of Independence in 1776, followed by the Constitution of 1789 and then the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 identify the first three times the United States prophetically spoke. Each of those three publications represented the speaking of the United States. Those three steps led to 1798, the beginning of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Those same three waymarks in the beginning of the United States, represent three waymarks that lead to the ending of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy.

אלפא ואומגה מציגים תמיד את הקץ עם הראשית, ובראשיתה של ארצות־הברית היו שלוש פעמים שבהן דיברה ארצות־הברית באופן נבואי, אשר סימנו את תחילתה של ארצות־הברית כמלכות השישית של נבואת המקרא. הכרזת העצמאות בשנת 1776, ולאחריה החוקה של 1789, ולאחר מכן חוקי הזרים וההסתה של 1798, מזהים את שלוש הפעמים הראשונות שבהן דיברה ארצות־הברית באופן נבואי. כל אחד משלושת הפרסומים הללו ייצג את דיבורה של ארצות־הברית. שלושת הצעדים הללו הובילו אל 1798, ראשית מלכותה של ארצות־הברית כמלכות השישית של נבואת המקרא. אותם שלושה ציוני־דרך עצמם בראשיתה של ארצות־הברית מייצגים שלושה ציוני־דרך המובילים אל קץ מלכותה של ארצות־הברית כמלכות השישית של נבואת המקרא.

The Patriot Act is the first of three times the United States speaks as it comes to its conclusion as the sixth kingdom. The third speaking, that identifies the end of the sixth kingdom is the Sunday law. In the middle of that history the Pelosi Trials of January 6, which began in 2022 were initiated. The trials were a direct rejection of the rights enshrined in the Constitution because the trials were political in nature, and the lawfare was not simply a fabrication of facts, but it was actually a direct attack upon “procedural” and “substantive” law as identified within the Constitution.

법률명 「패트리어트 법」은 미국이 제육 왕국으로서 그 종결에 이르러 발언하는 세 번 가운데 첫 번째이다. 제육 왕국의 끝을 확인해 주는 세 번째 발언은 일요일 법이다. 그 역사의 중간에서, 2022년에 시작된 1월 6일의 펠로시 재판들이 개시되었다. 그 재판들은 그 본질상 정치적이었으므로, 헌법 안에 보장된 권리들에 대한 직접적인 거부였으며, 그 법률전을 통한 공격은 단순히 사실의 조작에 그친 것이 아니라, 실제로 헌법 안에 규정된 “절차적” 법과 “실체적” 법에 대한 직접적인 공격이었다.

The Patriot Act in 2001 was a direct attack upon the “Due Process Clause” which appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. That was 2001, and in 2022 the attack against the Constitution was focused upon both “procedural due process” and “substantive due process.” The word “repudiate” means to deny, and Sister White identifies that at the Sunday law in the United States every principle of the Constitution will be repudiated.

Mu 2001, Patriot Act yāka vu kuteleka myīmbā ku “Due Process Clause,” yīna yikonekela mu Fifth Amendment na mu Fourteenth Amendment ku Constitution ya United States. Yīvi vyāsosela nti muntu nansha umo kechi wangakufutwako mūoyo, buteko, nansha bupiya bwihe, chābula due process ya mīlōngā. Chāchi chāli mu 2001, kabiji mu 2022 ku kuteleka ku Constitution kwāfokuswapo ku byonse bibidi, “procedural due process” na “substantive due process.” Ishiwi lya “repudiate” lya mūjilo wakulāmbila, kabiji Sister White walondolola nti pa Sunday law mu United States, mūprinciple yense ya Constitution ikarepudiwapo.

“By the decree enforcing the institution of the papacy in violation of the law of God, our nation will disconnect herself fully from righteousness. When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near.

“Ku papacy kuanzishilikwa kwa amri yenye kulazimisha, kwa kukiuka sheria ya Mungu, taifa letu litajitenga kabisa na haki. Wakati Uprotestanti utakaponyosha mkono wake kuvuka pengo ili kuushika mkono wa mamlaka ya Kirumi, wakati utakapofika juu ya shimo kuu ili kushikana mikono na uwasiliani-roho, wakati, chini ya mvuto wa muungano huu wa namna tatu, nchi yetu itakapokataa kila kanuni ya Katiba yake kama serikali ya Kiprotestanti na ya jamhuri, na kufanya matayarisho kwa ajili ya kuenezwa kwa uongo na udanganyo wa kipapa, ndipo tutakapoweza kujua kwamba wakati umefika wa utendaji wa ajabu wa Shetani, na kwamba mwisho umekaribia.

“As the approach of the Roman armies was a sign to the disciples of the impending destruction of Jerusalem, so may this apostasy be a sign to us that the limit of God’s forbearance is reached, that the measure of our nation’s iniquity is full, and that the angel of mercy is about to take her flight, never to return. The people of God will then be plunged into those scenes of affliction and distress which prophets have described as the time of Jacob’s trouble. The cries of the faithful, persecuted ones ascend to heaven. And as the blood of Abel cried from the ground, there are voices also crying to God from martyrs’ graves, from the sepulchers of the sea, from mountain caverns, from convent vaults: ‘How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost Thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?’

“Roma ko mundrә dʉ nɔp kɔr-ya na daal kar-ya noŋa ŋɛrɛsalɛm ko halak-ya kɔŋ-ɲi disiɓul-rɛ ko saŋket ti, oŋa heŋa i apostasi nɲi am-rɛ ko saŋket ti kɔr-ya, Ande ko sahansilata ko sima pɔhɔc-ya, am-rɛ jati ko paap ko maap pura ho-ya, aar daya ko dūt iŋi uṛ-ker cal-ya kɔŋa, aar kabo phir na laut-ya. Tabe Ande ko lok o dukh aar kaṣṭ ko drisya-rɛ dub-ya, jɛnko bhaviṣyadbakta-rɛ Yakub ko saŋkaṭ ko samay boli barnan kar-ya. Biswasi, sataya-ya lok-rɛ ko cry swarg-ra caṛ-ya. Aar jɛm Abel ko rakta bhuĩ-ṭhen cry kar-ya, oŋaheŋa śahid-rɛ ko kabar-ṭhen, samundar ko samadhi-rɛ-ṭhen, pahar ko guha-rɛ-ṭhen, aar convent ko bhitar ko kabar-griha-rɛ-ṭhen bɔni-rɛ Ande-ra cry kar-ya: ‘Hey Prabhu, pavitra aar satya, ketna der tak Tu dharti-ra basa-ya lok-rɛ upar am-rɛ rakta ko bichar aar badla na le-ba?’”

“The Lord is doing His work. All heaven is astir. The Judge of all the earth is soon to arise and vindicate His insulted authority. The mark of deliverance will be set upon the men who keep God’s commandments, who revere His law, and who refuse the mark of the beast or of his image.

“Omukama akola omulimu gwe. Eggulu lyonna lisasamaza. Omulamuzi w’ensi yonna ali kumpi okuyimuka n’okulaga obutuukirivu bw’obuyinza bwe obuvumiriddwa. Akabonero ak’obulokozi kaliteekebwa ku basajja abakwata ebiragiro bya Katonda, abassa ekitiibwa mu mateeka ge, era abagaana akabonero k’ensolo oba ak’ekifaananyi kyayo.

“God has revealed what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath. Those who have been warned of the events before them are not to sit in calm expectation of the coming storm, comforting themselves that the Lord will shelter His faithful ones in the day of trouble. We are to be as men waiting for their Lord, not in idle expectancy, but in earnest work, with unwavering faith. It is no time now to allow our minds to be engrossed with things of minor importance. While men are sleeping, Satan is actively arranging matters so that the Lord’s people may not have mercy or justice. The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending. Its professions are mild and apparently Christian, but when it shall speak it will reveal the spirit of the dragon. It is our duty to do all in our power to avert the threatened danger. We should endeavor to disarm prejudice by placing ourselves in a proper light before the people. We should bring before them the real question at issue, thus interposing the most effectual protest against measures to restrict liberty of conscience. We should search the Scriptures and be able to give the reason for our faith. Says the prophet: ‘The wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.’” Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.

“Mungu ameifunua yale yatakayopata nafasi katika siku za mwisho, ili watu Wake wapate kutayarishwa kusimama dhidi ya tufani ya upinzani na ghadhabu. Wale walioonywa kuhusu matukio yaliyo mbele yao hawapaswi kuketi katika tarajio la utulivu wakilisubiri dhoruba inayokuja, wakijifariji kwamba Bwana atawafunika waaminifu Wake siku ya taabu. Yapasa tuwe kama watu wamngojeao Bwana wao, si katika matarajio ya uvivu, bali katika kazi ya bidii, kwa imani isiyotikisika. Sasa si wakati wa kuruhusu akili zetu kushughulishwa sana na mambo yenye umuhimu mdogo. Wakati wanadamu wamelala, Shetani anapanga mambo kwa bidii ili watu wa Bwana wasipate rehema wala haki. Harakati ya Jumapili sasa inasonga mbele gizani. Viongozi wanaficha suala la kweli, na wengi wanaojiunga na harakati hiyo wenyewe hawaoni mkondo wa chini unaelekea wapi. Madai yake ni ya upole na kwa kuonekana ni ya Kikristo, lakini itakaposema, itaidhihirisha roho ya yule joka. Ni wajibu wetu kufanya yote yaliyo katika uwezo wetu ili kuzuia hatari inayotishia. Yapasa tujitahidi kuondoa chuki kwa kujiweka mbele ya watu katika nuru inayofaa. Yapasa tuwaletee swali halisi lililo katika mashindano, na hivyo kuweka pingamizi lenye ufanisi mkuu dhidi ya hatua za kuzuia uhuru wa dhamiri. Yapasa tuyachunguze Maandiko na tuweze kutoa sababu ya imani yetu. Asema nabii: ‘Wabaya watatenda maovu; wala hakuna hata mmoja wa wabaya atakayefahamu; bali wenye hekima watafahamu.’” Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.

Sister White aligns the Sunday law with several last-day waymarks, and in so doing her words reveal “what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath.” Therefore, the waymarks that she aligns in this passage are to be carefully examined. I am suggesting that the point of reference is the line of prophecy that focuses upon the Constitution of the United States, along with the “speaking” of the nation as an interrelated symbol.

Mutima White ayunganikile ulukata lwa pa Mulungu ku waymark ezininzi za ku nshita sha kulekelesha, kabili mu kufanya ifyo amashi yakwe yalangulula “ifyo fikafikilishiwa mu nshiku sha kulekelesha, pakuti abantu Bakwe babe abaiteyanya ukwiminina ukususha inkunyu ya kupingula no bukali.” E ico, amawaymark ayo ayunganisha muli ici ciputulwa yafwile ukupimwa nanshila yakwe yonsi no busuma bwingi. Ndelangisha ukuti icintu ico ciletwalilwapo amano ni mulongo wa buprofeti uwalola pa Constitution ya United States, pamo ne “kulanda” kwa ilo ishinga nge cishibilo cakulondoloka icayungene.

By that, I mean, that the Blair Bill in 1888, the Patriot Act in 2001, and the political prosecutions that were carried out by the Democrats and globalist Republicans beginning in 2022 were each a direct denial of two essential elements of the Constitution. 1888 represents enforcement of Sunday worship, and then in 2001, the change from English law to Roman law. In 2022 “substantive” and “procedural” law was attacked.

Na mbovo wana, nalombaka koloba ete Mobeko ya Blair na 1888, Patriot Act na 2001, mpe bolandi-bolobeli ya politiki oyo esalemaki na Bademocrate mpe ba Républicains ya mondialisation kobanda na 2022, moko na moko ezalaki koboya polele biteni mibale ya ntina mingi ya Constitution. 1888 emonisaka kotyela bato makasi mpo na losambo ya mokolo mwa Lomingo, mpe na 2001, mbongwana uta na mobeko ya Anglais kino na mobeko ya Baroma. Na 2022, mobeko “substantive” mpe “procedural” ebundisamaki.

Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations. The law defines legal or illegal behavior and sets out the punishments for it. Substantive law covers many legal areas, including criminal, civil, and contract law.

Yasayînî ya bingehîn maf û berpirsiyariyên kesan û rêxistinan diyar dike, lê yasayînî ya pêvajoyî rêya çareserkirina nakokiyan û bicihkirina maf û berpirsiyariyên kesan û rêxistinan destnîşan dike. Yasa tevgerên qanûnî an neqanûnî diyar dike û cezaên têkildar bi wan re destnîşan dike. Yasayînî ya bingehîn gelek qadên yasayî digire nav xwe, di nav de yasaya ceza, medenî û ya peymanan.

Criminal law is an excellent example of substantive law. Criminal law defines what actions are considered criminal and the penalties for those crimes. Civil law, however, governs disputes between individuals and organizations, such as breach of contract, personal injury, or property disputes.

Ture y’abantu ni akarorero keza cane k’amategeko y’ishingiro. Ture y’abantu igena ibikorwa bifatwa nk’ivyaha n’ibihano vy’ivyo vyaha. Ariko amategeko y’imanza z’abenegihugu agenga impari ziri hagati y’abantu n’amashirahamwe, nk’ukutubahiriza amasezerano, gukomeretsanya kw’umuntu, canke impari zerekeye amatungo.

Substantive law is typically written in statutes, regulations, and case law. Statutes are laws passed by legislative bodies, such as national parliaments or state legislature, and regulations are rules and procedures created by administrative agencies. Case law is the law that judges create through their interpretation of statutes, regulations, and the Constitution.

Yasa bingehîn bi gelemperî di qanûnan, rêziknameyan û hukûqê qezayî de tê nivîsandin. Qanûn ew yasayên ku ji aliyê organên yasadanan ve hatine pejirandin in, wek meclîsên neteweyî an meclîsên eyaletê; û rêzikname ew qaide û prosedurên ku ji aliyê ajansên îdarî ve hatine afirandin in. Hukûqê qezayî ew hukûq e ku dadwer bi şîrovekirina wan a qanûnan, rêziknameyan û Destûrê diafirînin.

Procedural law refers to the rules governing the legal process. It outlines how cases move through the legal system, from the initial filing of a complaint to the final resolution. Procedural law covers various legal areas, including civil, criminal, and administrative procedures. The purpose of procedural law is to ensure that the legal process is fair and efficient. It provides a framework for resolving disputes and ensures that everyone involved in the legal process, including judges, lawyers, and litigants, knows what is expected of them.

နည်းလမ်းဆိုင်ရာ ဥပဒေဆိုသည်မှာ ဥပဒေရေးရာ လုပ်ငန်းစဉ်ကို အုပ်ချုပ်သည့် စည်းမျဉ်းစည်းကမ်းများကို ရည်ညွှန်းသည်။ ၎င်းသည် အမှုတစ်ခု မည်သို့ ဥပဒေစနစ်အတွင်း ရွေ့လျားဆောင်ရွက်သွားသည်ကို သတ်မှတ်ဖော်ပြပြီး၊ တိုင်ကြားချက်ကို ကနဦး တင်သွင်းခြင်းမှ နောက်ဆုံး ဖြေရှင်းဆုံးဖြတ်ချက်အထိ ပါဝင်သည်။ နည်းလမ်းဆိုင်ရာ ဥပဒေတွင် အရပ်ဘက်၊ ရာဇဝတ်မှုဆိုင်ရာနှင့် အုပ်ချုပ်ရေးဆိုင်ရာ လုပ်ထုံးလုပ်နည်းများ အပါအဝင် ဥပဒေရေးရာ နယ်ပယ်အမျိုးမျိုး ပါဝင်သည်။ နည်းလမ်းဆိုင်ရာ ဥပဒေ၏ ရည်ရွယ်ချက်မှာ ဥပဒေလုပ်ငန်းစဉ်သည် မျှတ၍ ထိရောက်မှုရှိစေရန် ဖြစ်သည်။ ၎င်းသည် အငြင်းပွားမှုများကို ဖြေရှင်းရန် မူဘောင်တစ်ရပ် ပံ့ပိုးပေးပြီး၊ တရားသူကြီးများ၊ ရှေ့နေများနှင့် အမှုသည်များ အပါအဝင် ဥပဒေလုပ်ငန်းစဉ်တွင် ပါဝင်သူအားလုံးက မိမိတို့ထံမှ မည်သည့်အရာကို မျှော်မှန်းထားသည်ကို သိရှိစေကြောင်းလည်း အာမခံပေးသည်။

Substantive and procedural law are intended to work together to ensure justice is served. Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing those rights and obligations. In other words, substantive law defines legal or illegal behavior and the consequences of illegal behavior, while procedural law outlines how those legal issues are resolved.

Îso îvavu i law'ichi ku îso îvavu i law'vnosetli, mvtoyet os cehesdi osda vsa. Îso îvavu i law'ichi ku, vt hiyohli usdi ani’tsila ale igalitsvdanedi ayvha, mvto îso îvavu i law'vnosetli osda, a vtvsgvyi nigohilv i anetsohisdvna ayvha, hiyohli usdi ani’tsila ale igalitsvdanedi ayvha osda nigohilv yiwoniha ale osda adanvdoha. Vt osu, îso îvavu i law'ichi ku, hla nigada danvto ale hla nigada osdanvdoha ayvha, mvto hla nigada osdanvdoha yigi adanvdoha ayvha usdi; mvto îso îvavu i law'vnosetli osda ku, hla law'ginalii ayvha nigohilv yiwoniha ale osda adanvdoha ayvha usdi.

In 2001, the Patriot Act removed the right of habeas corpus. “Habeas corpus” is a Latin term that translates to “you shall have the body.” It refers to a legal principle that protects individuals from unlawful detention by requiring a court to examine the lawfulness of a person’s imprisonment. Habeas corpus is a fundamental right in many legal systems, especially those influenced by English common law. It ensures that a person cannot be held in custody without just cause and allows them to challenge the legality of their detention before a judge.

Ku mwaka wa 2001, Patriot Act iliondoa haki ya habeas corpus. “Habeas corpus” ni neno la Kilatini linalotafsiriwa kuwa “utakuwa na mwili.” Linarejelea kanuni ya kisheria inayowalinda watu dhidi ya kuwekwa kizuizini kinyume cha sheria kwa kuitaka mahakama ichunguze uhalali wa kufungwa kwa mtu. Habeas corpus ni haki ya msingi katika mifumo mingi ya kisheria, hasa ile iliyoathiriwa na common law ya Kiingereza. Huhakikisha kwamba mtu hawezi kushikiliwa kizuizini bila sababu ya haki, na humwezesha kupinga uhalali wa kuwekwa kwake kizuizini mbele ya hakimu.

A “Due Process Clause” appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Courts have developed two branches of due process doctrine: procedural due process and substantive due process. In 2001, with the Patriot Act habeas corpus was removed as a right, and English law was replaced by Roman law. English law defines that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty, and Roman law identifies that a person is considered guilty until proven innocent. In the Pelosi Trials of 2022, both procedural and substantive due process was trampled upon. Both substantive law and procedural law were applied in the Pelosi Trials in the exact opposite of their intended constitutional purpose.

“Due Process Clause” ọkan bila ya Urekebisho wa Tano na Urekebisho wa Kumi na Nne wa Katiba ya Marekani. Haya yanaweka kwamba hakuna mtu anayepaswa kunyimwa uhai, uhuru, au mali bila utaratibu unaostahili wa sheria. Mahakama zimetengeneza matawi mawili ya mafundisho ya utaratibu unaostahili: utaratibu unaostahili wa kiutaratibu na utaratibu unaostahili wa kimada. Mnamo 2001, kwa Sheria ya Patriot, habeas corpus iliondolewa kama haki, na sheria ya Kiingereza ilibadilishwa na sheria ya Kirumi. Sheria ya Kiingereza hufafanua kwamba mtu huchukuliwa kuwa hana hatia mpaka athibitishwe kuwa na hatia, na sheria ya Kirumi hutambua kwamba mtu huchukuliwa kuwa na hatia mpaka athibitishwe kuwa hana hatia. Katika Pelosi Trials za 2022, utaratibu unaostahili wa kiutaratibu na wa kimada vilikanyagwa. Sheria ya kimada na sheria ya kiutaratibu zote zilitumika katika Pelosi Trials kwa kinyume kabisa cha kusudi lao la kikatiba lililokusudiwa.

The distinction between substantive due process and procedural due process lies in the different aspects of law and rights that each concept protects within the framework of the U.S. Constitution, particularly under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Amerika ya Kaskazini Katiba yake, hasa chini ya vifungu vya Due Process vya Marekebisho ya Tano na ya Kumi na Nne, tofauti kati ya substantive due process na procedural due process imo katika nyanja mbalimbali za sheria na haki ambazo kila dhana hulinda ndani ya mfumo huo wa kikatiba.

Substantive due process is concerned with the fundamental rights and liberties that the government cannot infringe upon, regardless of the procedure used. It protects certain rights from government interference even if the proper procedures are followed. Substantive due process involves rights that are deemed fundamental, such as the right to privacy, the right to marry, and the right to raise one’s children. These rights are protected from government intrusion unless there is a compelling state interest. It serves as a check on the government’s power, ensuring that laws and regulations do not violate fundamental liberties.

Nadharia ya mchakato wa haki wa kiini inahusu haki na uhuru wa msingi ambao serikali haiwezi kuuvunja, bila kujali utaratibu uliotumiwa. Hulinda haki fulani dhidi ya kuingiliwa na serikali hata kama taratibu zinazofaa zimefuatwa. Mchakato wa haki wa kiini unahusisha haki zinazochukuliwa kuwa za msingi, kama vile haki ya faragha, haki ya kufunga ndoa, na haki ya kulea watoto wa mtu mwenyewe. Haki hizi hulindwa dhidi ya uvamizi wa serikali isipokuwa pale ambapo kuna maslahi ya dola yenye nguvu ya lazima. Hii hutumika kama kizuizi juu ya mamlaka ya serikali, ikihakikisha kwamba sheria na kanuni hazikiuki uhuru wa msingi.

Procedural due process is concerned with the procedures that the government must follow before it deprives an individual of life, liberty, or property. It ensures that individuals receive fair and impartial treatment through proper legal processes. Procedural due process requires the government to follow certain steps or procedures, such as providing notice, a fair hearing, and an opportunity to be heard, before depriving someone of their rights. It emphasizes the methods by which laws are enforced, ensuring that the government acts in a just and fair manner.

Istilahi ya haki ya kisheria kwa upande wa utaratibu inahusu taratibu ambazo serikali inapaswa kufuata kabla ya kumnyima mtu uhai, uhuru, au mali. Inahakikisha kwamba watu wanapatiwa matendo ya haki na yasiyo na upendeleo kupitia michakato sahihi ya kisheria. Haki ya kisheria kwa upande wa utaratibu inaitaka serikali kufuata hatua au taratibu fulani, kama vile kutoa taarifa, kusikilizwa kwa haki, na nafasi ya kusikilizwa, kabla ya kumnyima mtu haki zake. Inasisitiza mbinu ambazo kwa hizo sheria hutekelezwa, ikihakikisha kwamba serikali hutenda kwa namna ya haki na ya uadilifu.

The lawfare that has been manifested since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a denial of both substantive and procedural due process. The fundamental rights of American citizens were openly and successfully denied. The false flag operations and the open corruption of the alphabet agencies of the United States has been regularly exposed since even before the Pelosi Trials began, but the legal procedures that have been employed by the globalists of both parties since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a clear illustration of the destruction of procedural due process.

Ukutombotshelwa komthetho osekubonakele selokhu kwaqala amaCala kaPelosi kumela ukuphikwa kwakho kokubili ukwenziwa komthetho okufanele ngokwendaba uqobo kanye nokwenziwa komthetho okufanele ngokwenqubo. Amalungelo ayisisekelo ezakhamuzi zaseMelika aphikwe obala futhi ngempumelelo. Imisebenzi yokukhohlisa eyenziwe sengathi ivela kwabanye kanye nenkohlakalo esobala yezikhungo zase-United States ezaziwa ngezinhlamvu zokuqala zamagama azo kuye kwembulwa njalo kusukela nangaphambi kokuba kuqale amaCala kaPelosi, kodwa izinqubo zomthetho ezisetshenziswe ngabamhlaba-wonke bamaqembu omabili selokhu kwaqala amaCala kaPelosi zimela isibonelo esicacile sokubhujiswa kokwenziwa komthetho okufanele ngokwenqubo.

Earlier in the article we read, “Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.”

Mu ngwadili wa kubangula twasomine nti, “Buli kyakunyanyusa okulamula kwa byadi byandi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa byadi bya bupopolo bwa Papa, ye amaze emyaka mingi ng’alwana obutaleka ddembe ly’omuntu ery’okugoberera ebyo omwoyo gwe by’akkiriza. Okukuuma Sande kulina obulamu bwakwo ng’ekitongole ekigambibwa nti kya Kikirisitu okuva mu ‘kyama eky’obujeemu;’ era okukiwaliriza kujja kuba kukkiriza okw’amazima okw’emisingi egyo egyennyini egiri ejjinja ery’oku nsonda ery’Obuloma. Eggwanga lyaffe bwe linaatuuka okwegaana bwe lityo emisingi gya gavumenti yaalyo ne liteekawo etteeka lya Sande, Obupolotesitante mu kikolwa kino bulikwatagana n’Obupapa; tewali kirala kye kiriba okuggyako okuwa obulamu obuggya obukambwe obwo obw’obufuzi obukambwe obumaze ebbanga ddene nga bulindiridde n’obwegomba obungi akakisa kaabwo okusituka nate ne buddamu okufuga n’obukambwe obw’amanyi.”

In the line of history that can be represented with the Constitution of the United States there are three specific waymarks representing some element of the Constitution in both the beginning and the ending of the United States. Each of those three waymarks are political actions, and therefore symbolize the speaking of the United States. The third of those three waymarks in the beginning, that marked 1798, was the Alien and Sedition Acts and the third of those waymarks at the ending is when the United States enforces a Sunday law, and speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven.

Mulongoti gwa kahle wa matimu lowunga yimeleriwaka hi Vumbiwa ra United States, ku ni swikombiso swinharhu swo karhi leswi yimelaka xiphemu xo karhi xa Vumbiwa hi le ku sunguleni ni le ku heleni ka United States. Xin’wana ni xin’wana xa swikombiso sweswo swinharhu i swiendlo swa tipolitiki, kutani hikwalaho swi fanekisela ku vulavula ka United States. Xa vunharhu exikarhi ka swikombiso sweswo swinharhu eku sunguleni, lexi xixweke hi 1798, a ku ri Milawu ya Vatswari ni ya Ku Pfala Nomu, kutani xa vunharhu exikarhi ka swikombiso sweswo eku heleni i nkarhi lowu United States yi sindzisaka nawu wa Sonto, naswona yi vulavula kukota dragona hi ku hetiseka ka Nhlavutelo ndzima ya khume na nharhu, ndzimana ya khume na yin’we.

The prophetic history of the United States begins when, as represented by the earth, it opened its mouth and swallowed up the flood of the dragon’s persecution.

Profetie ya historia ya Leta Zetu za Amerika huanza wakati, kama ilivyowakilishwa na dunia, ilifungua kinywa chake na kuimeza gharika ya mateso ya joka.

And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. Revelation 12:15, 16.

Kandi nyoka akatupa mu kanwa ke amazi nk’umwuzure inyuma y’umugore, kugira ngo amutwarwe n’uwo mwuzure. Maze isi itabara uwo mugore, isi ibumbura akanwa kayo, imira uwo mwuzure ikiyoka cyari cyataye mu kanwa kacyo. Ibyahishuwe 12:15, 16.

In 1776, the beast that was to arise from the earth, and ultimately become the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy in 1798, swallowed up the flood of persecution against God’s people by establishing a nation with a Constitution that protested against the tyrants of European royalty and the tyrants of the papal church.

Mu 1776, inyamaswa yagombaga kuzamuka iva mu isi, kandi amaherezo ikazaba ubwami bwa gatandatu bw’ubuhanuzi bwa Bibiliya mu 1798, yamize uwo mwuzure w’itotezwa ryakorewe ubwoko bw’Imana ishyiraho ishyanga rifite Itegeko Nshinga ryamaganye abanyagitugu b’ubwami bw’i Burayi n’abanyagitugu b’itorero rya gipapa.

The Declaration of Independence in 1776 typified the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 typified the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 typified the Sunday law in the United States.

Kuhula kwa Uhuru kwa mwaka wa 1776 kulikuwa kielelezo cha Patriot Act ya mwaka wa 2001. Katiba ya mwaka wa 1789 ilikuwa kielelezo cha Kesi za Pelosi zilizoanza mwaka wa 2022. Sheria za Wageni na Uchochezi za mwaka wa 1798 zilikuwa kielelezo cha sheria ya Jumapili nchini Marekani.

The pronouncement of independence by the American patriots in 1776 represented the announcement of the loss of independence with the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 represented the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts represents the Sunday law. The history of the repudiation of every principle of the Constitution represents a progressive overturning of the Constitution that ends at the Sunday law.

1776年にアメリカの愛国者たちが発した独立宣言は、2001年の愛国者法による独立喪失の宣告を表していた。1789年の憲法は、2022年に始まるペロシ裁判を表していた。外国人・治安諸法は日曜法を表している。憲法のあらゆる原則を否認してきた歴史は、日曜法において終結する、憲法の漸進的な覆滅を表している。

These lines all align in the hidden history of verse forty of Daniel chapter eleven. In this article we quoted four paragraphs from Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.

Mirilja ta lini pyonsi tifwaninila mu mashina a chisese ya vesi foti ya Daniele chapta leveni. Mu ichi chakwata twafumishe ma paragrafu yane ukufuma mu Testimonies, volyumu 5, 451, 452.

We will look closer at those paragraphs in the next article.

Tutatazama kwa ukaribu zaidi mafungu hayo katika makala inayofuata.