The key to rightly dividing verses ten through sixteen of Daniel eleven is found in the basic prophetic applications that were employed over thirty years ago, in 1996, when The Time of the End magazine was published. Thirty years later, the Lord has revealed that another prophetic message is to be formalized as was the Millerite message formalized in 1831. In the omega history of these thirty years the message to be formalized is represented as a correction of a previous message of Islam, as represented by Josiah Litch and also a corrected message of the closed door, as represented by Samuel Snow, which is the symbol of the parable of the ten virgins. A message of Islam, accompanied with a warning of the progressive closing doors of probation as Christ finishes His work of judgment will be proclaimed. The message is twofold, possessing and internal and external line, which in turn represent the first two steps of the three-step testing process that always occurs when a prophecy is unsealed, as was the revelation of Jesus Christ on December 31, 2023.

ንዳንኤል 11 ፡ 10–16 ያሉትን ጥቅሶች በትክክል የመከፋፈል ቁልፍ፣ ከሠላሳ ዓመታት በላይ በፊት፣ በ1996 ፣ *The Time of the End* መጽሔት በታተመበት ጊዜ የተጠቀሙባቸው መሠረታዊ ትንቢታዊ ተፈጻሚነቶች ውስጥ ይገኛል። ከሠላሳ ዓመታት በኋላ፣ ጌታ ሌላ ትንቢታዊ መልእክት እንዲደነገግ እንደሚገባ ገልጦአል፣ እንደ ሚለራውያን መልእክት በ1831 ዓ.ም. የተደነገገው እንደነበረው። በእነዚህ ሠላሳ ዓመታት የኦሜጋ ታሪክ ውስጥ፣ የሚደነገገው መልእክት እንደ እስልምና ቀደም ያለ መልእክት እርማት ተመስሎ ይቀርባል፣ እርሱም በጆሳያ ሊች የተወከለ ነው፤ እንዲሁም እንደ ዝግ ደጅ መልእክት የተስተካከለ መልእክት ነው፣ እርሱም በሳሙኤል ስኖው የተወከለ ሲሆን ይህም የአሥሩ ደናግል ምሳሌ ምልክት ነው። የእስልምና መልእክት፣ ክርስቶስ የፍርድ ሥራውን ሲፈጽም የምሕረት ዘመን ደጆች በደረጃ በደረጃ ስለሚዘጉ ከማስጠንቀቂያ ጋር ተያይዞ ይሰበካል። መልእክቱ ሁለት ገጽታ ያለው ነው፤ ውስጣዊ እና ውጫዊ መስመር ያለው ሲሆን፣ እነዚህም በተራቸው ትንቢት ሲፈታ ሁልጊዜ የሚከሰተውን ሦስት-ደረጃ የፈተና ሂደት የመጀመሪያዎቹን ሁለት ደረጃዎች ይወክላሉ፤ እንደ ኢየሱስ ክርስቶስ ራእይ በዲሴምበር 31, 2023 እንደተገለጠው።

The Time of the End magazine contains the basic overview of the future for America as represented in the last six verses of Daniel eleven which were unsealed at the time of the end in 1989. The magazine has been in the public record for thirty years and no one saw that a main theme of the magazine was the religious struggle between communism and the churches under the influence of Catholicism, especially in the Ukraine. That religious battle from the period of 1989, explains the context of the religious demise of Putin as represented by Ptolemy and Uzziah in the rebellion they both manifested at the temple in Jerusalem. The temple in Jerusalem was Uzziah’s temple, not Ptolemy’s temple. Both Putin and Zelenskyy desecrate the same temple in two different ways; one as an Egyptian and one as a Jew.

ئەو گۆڤاری «کاتی کۆتایی» پوختەیەکی سەرەکی لەسەر داهاتووی ئەمریکا لەخۆدەگرێت، وەک لە شەش ئایەتی دواوەی دانیال یازدەدا نیشان دراوە، کە لە کاتی کۆتاییدا ساڵی 1989 کراونەوە. ئەو گۆڤارە ماوەی سی ساڵ لە تۆماری گشتیدا بوو، و کەس نەیبینی کە یەکێک لە بابەتە سەرەکییەکانی ئەو گۆڤارە ململانێی ئایینییە لەنێوان کۆمۆنیزم و کڵێساکاندا لەژێر کاریگەریی کاتۆلیکایەتی، بە تایبەتی لە ئۆکراین. ئەو شەڕە ئایینییەی سەردەمی 1989، ڕوونکردنەوەی چوارچێوەی داڕمانی ئایینیی پوتین دەکات، وەک لە پطۆلێماوس و عوزیا لەو یاخیبوونەی هەردوکیان لە پەرستگای ئۆرشەلیمدا دەریانخست نێونمایی کراوە. پەرستگای ئۆرشەلیم پەرستگای عوزیا بوو، نە پەرستگای پطۆلێماوس. هەردووکی پوتین و زێلێنسکی هەمان پەرستگا بە دوو شێوازی جیاواز پیس دەکەن؛ یەکێک وەک میسرییەک و ئەوی دیکە وەک جولەکەیەک.

The church that was struggling against the king of the south in 1989 was the Catholic church. And why not? Atheism of France delivered the deadly wound to the king of the north in 1798, so why wouldn’t the papacy retaliate against atheism’s long-drawn-out persecution of the Catholic church, especially in the Ukraine? More significant is that this clear testimony about the Ukraine came from a publication in 1996, that was citing the secular historians about the history of 1989. Now that the Lord is unsealing the hidden history of verse forty, He has pointed to the struggle between two orthodox churches to provide the prophetic and historical context of the battle of Raphia and its aftermath, and He had already included the necessary insights in The Time of the End magazine that was published thirty years ago.

1989년에 남방의 왕에 맞서 투쟁하고 있던 교회는 가톨릭교회였다. 그리고 왜 그렇지 않겠는가? 프랑스의 무신론이 1798년에 북방의 왕에게 치명적인 상처를 입혔으니, 특히 우크라이나에서 가톨릭교회에 대한 무신론의 장구한 박해에 대하여 교황권이 보복하지 않을 이유가 무엇이겠는가? 더욱 중요한 것은, 우크라이나에 관한 이 분명한 증언이 1996년의 한 출판물에서 나온 것으로서, 1989년의 역사에 관하여 세속 역사가들을 인용하고 있었다는 점이다. 이제 주께서 40절의 감추어진 역사를 개봉하고 계시는 이때에, 그분은 라피아 전투와 그 여파의 예언적·역사적 문맥을 제공하기 위하여 두 정교회 사이의 투쟁을 가리키셨으며, 또한 이미 삼십 년 전에 출판된 『The Time of the End』 잡지 안에 필요한 통찰들을 포함시켜 두셨다.

The demise of Napoleon aligns with the progressive demise of Lenin, Stalin and the system of the Soviet Union. When the prophetic southern kingdom moved its capital to Russia there were two major revolutions in 1917. The first is what is called the Russian revolution when the Czar was overthrown, and then in the same year the Bolshevik Revolution followed, which led to the civil war of 1917 unto 1922. In 1922 the Soviet Union was formed.

Ukufa kwa Napoleon kunalingana na kufa kwa hatua kwa hatua kwa Lenin, Stalin, na mfumo wa Umoja wa Kisovieti. Wakati ufalme wa kusini wa kinabii ulipohamisha mji wake mkuu kwenda Urusi, kulikuwa na mapinduzi makubwa mawili katika mwaka wa 1917. La kwanza ndilo linaloitwa Mapinduzi ya Urusi, wakati Tsari alipoondolewa madarakani; kisha katika mwaka huohuo yakafuata Mapinduzi ya Wabolsheviki, ambayo yalisababisha vita vya wenyewe kwa wenyewe vya 1917 hadi 1922. Mwaka wa 1922 Umoja wa Kisovieti uliundwa.

The beginning of Russia as the spiritual king of the south represented a two-step revolution that led to civil war, then the formation of a confederacy of countries. The collapse of the Soviet Union was also two steps, beginning with the tearing down of the Berlin wall on November 9, 1989, which then led to the dissolution of the Soviet Union on December 31, 1991. As the last ruler of Russia, the king of the south, Vladimir Putin was typified by the first Russian ruler—Vladimir Lenin.

Urusi nilipoanza kuwa mfalme wa kusini wa kiroho, jambo hilo liliwakilisha mapinduzi ya hatua mbili yaliyopelekea vita vya wenyewe kwa wenyewe, kisha kuundwa kwa shirikisho la nchi. Kuanguka kwa Umoja wa Kisovieti nako kulikuwa kwa hatua mbili, kuanzia kubomolewa kwa ukuta wa Berlin mnamo Novemba 9, 1989, jambo lililoongoza baadaye kwenye kuvunjwa kwa Umoja wa Kisovieti mnamo Desemba 31, 1991. Akiwa mtawala wa mwisho wa Urusi, mfalme wa kusini, Vladimir Putin alifanishwa kwa mfano na mtawala wa kwanza wa Urusi—Vladimir Lenin.

Vladimir means “a great leader” and Putin means “the path.” Lenin means “a great river,” but Vladimir Lenin chose the name of Lenin to hide his real name, which was Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov. Ilyich means “son of Elijah,” and Ulyanov means “youthful son of Elijah.”

Vladimir ku maana yake ni “kiongozi mkuu,” na Putin maana yake ni “njia.” Lenin maana yake ni “mto mkuu,” lakini Vladimir Lenin alichagua jina la Lenin ili kuficha jina lake halisi, ambalo lilikuwa Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov. Ilyich maana yake ni “mwana wa Eliya,” na Ulyanov maana yake ni “mwana mchanga wa Eliya.”

The great Russian leader on the path, in the history represented by the battle of Raphia in 217 BC, was typified by the first leader of Russia, who as Vladimir Lenin was the great leader of the mighty river, but who hid his name. A name is a symbol of character, and for Vladimir to hide his two names represents a character that chose a great river of political thought, over a character represented by Elijah, which means “God is Jehovah.” The root of atheism is the denial of God, and atheism is a prime characteristic of the king of the south. The second and third given name of Lenin emphasize Elijah and his son, and the end of Russia as the king of the south is represented by Ptolemy IV, who was victorious at the battle of Raphia, but when Antiochus returned in 200 BC at the battle of Panium Ptolemy’s five-year-old son was then ruling. Lenin’s two original names identify Elijah and his son, and align with Ptolemy and his son. Elijah and the message to his children occurs in the latter days, just before “the great and dreadful day of the Lord;” which is where the battles of Raphia and Panium are also located.

ڕێبەری گەورەی ڕووسیە لەو ڕێگایەدا، لەو مێژوویەی کە بە شەڕی ڕافیا لە ساڵی ٢١٧ پێش زایین نیشان دراوە، بە یەکەمین ڕێبەری ڕووسیە نموونەکرابوو، ئەوەی وەک ڤڵادیمیر لێنین ڕێبەری گەورەی ڕووباری بەهێز بوو، بەڵام ناوی خۆی شاردەوە. ناو هێمای کارەکتەرە، و بۆ ڤڵادیمیر کە دوو ناوی خۆی بشارێتەوە، ئەوە نوێنەرایەتیی کارەکتەرێک دەکات کە ڕووبارێکی گەورەی بیرکردنەوەی سیاسی هەڵبژاردووە، لەسەر کارەکتەرێک کە بە ئیلیا نیشان دەدرێت، کە واتای «خودا یەهووەیە» دەبەخشێت. ڕەگی بێباوەڕی بریتییە لە نکۆڵیکردنی خودا، و بێباوەڕی خاسیەتێکی سەرەکیی پاشای باشوورە. ناوی دووەم و سێیەمی پێدراوی لێنین ئیلیا و کوڕەکەی جەخت لێدەکەنەوە، و کۆتایی ڕووسیە وەک پاشای باشوور بە پطڵێمایۆسی چوارەم نیشان دەدرێت، کە لە شەڕی ڕافیا سەرکەوتوو بوو، بەڵام کاتێک ئەنتیۆخۆس لە ساڵی ٢٠٠ پێش زایین لە شەڕی پانیۆم گەڕایەوە، ئەوکات کوڕە پێنج ساڵەکەی پطڵێمایۆس حوکمڕانی دەکرد. دوو ناوی بنەڕەتیی لێنین ئیلیا و کوڕەکەی دیاری دەکەن، و هاوتا دەبن لەگەڵ پطڵێمایۆس و کوڕەکەی. ئیلیا و پەیامەکەی بۆ منداڵەکانی لە دوا ڕۆژاندا ڕوودەدات، هەر پێش «ڕۆژی گەورە و ترسناکەکەی یەزدان؛» کە ئەوەش شوێنی ئەوەیە کە شەڕەکانی ڕافیا و پانیۆمیش تێدا هەڵکەوتوون.

Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord: And he shall turn the heart of the fathers to the children, and the heart of the children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the earth with a curse. Malachi 4:5, 6.

Dore, nzaboherereza Eliya umuhanuzi, imbere y'ukuza kw'umunsi ukomeye kandi uteye ubwoba w'Uhoraho: kandi azagarura imitima ya ba se ku bana babo, n'imitima y'abana ku ba se, kugira ngo ndataza ngakubita isi umuvumo. Malaki 4:5, 6.

The testimony of Uzziah and Ptolemy align in verse eleven of Daniel eleven, and Uzziah lived for eleven years after his rebellion and leprosy; whereas, Ptolemy ruled for a total of seventeen years, which is the same number of years between the battles of verse eleven and verse fifteen. The 250-year prophecy that began in 457 BC, ended in 207 BC in the middle of those two battles; ten years after Raphia and seven before Panium. Ptolemy IV’s reign began in 221 BC, and he died in 204 BC, so the seventeen years of Ptolemy are not the same line as the seventeen years from Raphia to Panium. Nor are they the same seventeen years that are represented by the conclusion of the 250-year prophecy beginning with Nero in 64 and ending in 313. From 313 to the first Sunday law in 321 is eight years, and nine years later in 330 Constantine divided the kingdom into east and west.

उज्जियाह और टॉलेमी की गवाही दानिय्येल 11 के ग्यारहवें पद में परस्पर मेल खाती है, और उज्जियाह अपने विद्रोह और कोढ़ के पश्चात् ग्यारह वर्ष जीवित रहा; जबकि टॉलेमी ने कुल सत्रह वर्ष राज्य किया, जो उतने ही वर्षों की संख्या है जितनी ग्यारहवें पद और पंद्रहवें पद के युद्धों के बीच है। 457 ईसा पूर्व में आरम्भ हुई 250-वर्षीय भविष्यवाणी 207 ईसा पूर्व में उन दो युद्धों के मध्य समाप्त हुई; राफिया के दस वर्ष बाद और पानियम से सात वर्ष पहले। टॉलेमी चतुर्थ का राज्य 221 ईसा पूर्व में आरम्भ हुआ, और वह 204 ईसा पूर्व में मर गया, इसलिए टॉलेमी के सत्रह वर्ष वही रेखा नहीं हैं जो राफिया से पानियम तक के सत्रह वर्ष हैं। और न ही वे वही सत्रह वर्ष हैं जिनका निरूपण 64 में नीरो से आरम्भ होकर 313 में समाप्त होने वाली 250-वर्षीय भविष्यवाणी के निष्कर्ष द्वारा किया गया है। 313 से 321 में प्रथम रविवार-विधि तक आठ वर्ष होते हैं, और नौ वर्ष बाद 330 में कॉन्स्टैन्टाइन ने राज्य को पूर्व और पश्चिम में विभाजित कर दिया।

In the very near future Putin and Russia will defeat Ukraine and the footsteps of Ptolemy and Uzziah will begin to repeat in the history represented by verse twelve. The two biblical witnesses place the final crisis for Putin in a church and state crisis. Their rebellion was manifested at the temple in Jerusalem, thus identifying Uzziah’s temple and religion as the point of prophetic reference.

Na nguva ya kusongela sana, Putin na Urusi wataishinda Ukraine, na nyayo za Ptolemy na Uzia zitaanza kujirudia katika historia inayowakilishwa na aya ya kumi na mbili. Mashahidi wawili wa kibiblia wanaweka mgogoro wa mwisho wa Putin katika mgogoro wa kanisa na serikali. Uasi wao ulidhihirishwa hekaluni huko Yerusalemu, hivyo kutambulisha hekalu na dini ya Uzia kuwa ndiyo sehemu ya marejeo ya kinabii.

Zelenskyy, which means “green,” is the puppet of the globalist bureaucrats of the European Union and the United Nations, whose globalist agenda is aptly represented by the green political movement that worships mother earth. It is fitting that Zelenskyy was an actor, for he is clearly a proxy of other powers, and his name meaning “green” identifies the political philosophy that guides his movements on the chess board of human history. Checkmate is right around the corner for Zelenskyy.

Zelenskyy, ekisobanura ngo “icyatsi,” ni igikinisho cy’abanyabirokarate b’aba‑globaliste bo mu Muryango w’Ubumwe bw’u Burayi no mu Muryango w’Abibumbye, kandi umugambi wabo wa kinyabglobaliste ugaragazwa neza n’umutwe wa politiki w’icyatsi usenga isi nk’umubyeyi. Birakwiriye ko Zelenskyy yari umukinnyi wa filimi, kuko bigaragara neza ko ari intumwa ikorera izindi mbaraga, kandi ibisobanuro by’izina rye ngo “icyatsi” bigaragaza ihame rya politiki riyobora ingendo ze ku kibaho cy’umukino wa shaki w’amateka ya muntu. Kunesha burundu Zelenskyy biri hafi cyane.

In this final history the rebellion of Uzziah and Ptolemy will once again be acted out, but Ptolemy (Putin) died four years before the battle of Panium, and the last ruler of the king of the south is represented by a five-year-old child who is being handled by a series of corrupt and incompetent regents.

Mu historia ya mwisho, uasi wa Uzia na wa Ptolemy utatendwa tena mara nyingine; lakini Ptolemy (Putin) alikufa miaka minne kabla ya vita vya Panium, na mtawala wa mwisho wa mfalme wa kusini anawakilishwa na mtoto wa miaka mitano anayesimamiwa na mfululizo wa mawakili wa utawala wafisadi na wasio na uwezo.

Ptolemy V was only about 5–6 years old when he ascended the throne in 204 BC (after his father’s mysterious death), and the Ptolemaic kingdom was paralyzed by a series of incompetent or corrupt regencies during his reign. The initial regency was from 204–202 BC, after Ptolemy IV’s death was concealed and his mother Arsinoe III murdered. The court favorites Sosibius, a longtime minister under Ptolemy IV, and Agathocles the brother of Ptolemy IV’s mistress Agathoclea, declared themselves regents. They forged or presented a will making them guardians, placed the young king under the care of Agathoclea and her family, and purged potential rivals. Sosibius handled much of the early administration.

Ptolemy V a na a dii mena 5–6 monɛnsii pɛ, mbarɛ a ɔtenaa ahennwa so wɔ afe 204 A.Y.B. mu (ne papa wuo a ɛyɛ ahintasɛm akyi), na Ptolemafo ahennie no yɛɛ mmerɛw yiye na ɛyɛɛ basaa esiane ahenniehwɛfoɔ a wɔnni nimdeɛ anaa wɔn a wɔaporɔw wɔn ho ntoatoasoɔ a na ɛwɔ ne berɛ so no nti. Ahenniehwɛ a edi kan no sii hɔ firi afe 204–202 A.Y.B., wɔ Ptolemy IV wuo a wɔde sieeɛ ne ne maame Arsinoe III a wɔkumm no akyi. Ahemfie mu adɔefoɔ Sosibius, a na ɔyɛ ɔsomfoɔ akyɛ wɔ Ptolemy IV ase, ne Agathocles, Ptolemy IV mpena Agathoclea nuabarima no, bɔɔ wɔn ho dawuro sɛ wɔn ne ahenniehwɛfoɔ no. Wɔyɛɛ apam anaa wɔde apam bi baeɛ a ɛma wɔn bɛyɛɛ ahwɛfoɔ, wɔde ɔhene abofra no hyɛɛ Agathoclea ne n’abusua nsa, na wɔpamoo wɔn a anka wɔbɛtumi asi wɔn akan no. Sosibius na ɔhwɛɛ ahennie nnwuma a edi kan no mu bebree so.

A shift occurred around 202 BC, when Agathocles became the dominant regent, but was widely hated for debauchery and mismanagement. A popular uprising in Alexandria led to his brutal lynching by a mob, with the boy-king nominally approving. Subsequent regents were Tlepolemus the governor of Pelusium, and then Aristomenes. By the time of the battle of Panium in 200 BC, the kingdom was under this rotating series of regents and court advisors.

Saad fɛlɛli taan 202 K.M. dɔrɔn, waati min na Agathocles kɛra manga faamulatigi ye; nka a tun bɛ koni ko jama b’a kanu tɛ ka sababu kɛlɛnkɛlɛnni ani ɲɛnabɔbali ye. Jama tɛmɛsira dɔ min kɛra Aleksandriya, o sababu la, jama kɔrɔbaga dɔ ye a fa a la juguya cogo la, ka mansa-denmisɛn-o y’a sɔn dɔrɔn tɔgɔ la. Faamulatigiw min nana a kɔfɛ ko Tlepolemus, Pelusium mara la, ani o kɔfɛ Aristomenes. San 200 K.M. na, waati min Panium kɛlɛ kɛra, masaya-o tun bɛ faamulatigiw ani fɛnkɛlɛla bolofɔlaw min tun bɛ bɛɛ bɛɛ yɛlɛma yɛlɛma la, olu siri la.

At the battle of Panium the Ptolemaic forces were led in the field by the general Scopas of Aetolia, a mercenary commander appointed under the regency, not by Ptolemy V himself. The young king had no real control—the decisions, military strategy, and kingdom’s overall weakness stemmed from the regents’ paralysis, internal revolts (like the native Egyptian uprisings), and court intrigue. This instability allowed Antiochus III the Great to decisively defeat Scopas at Panium, seizing Coele-Syria, including Judea permanently from Ptolemaic control.

Պանիումի ճակատամարտում Պտղոմեոսյան զորքերը դաշտում առաջնորդվում էին ոչ թե անձամբ Պտղոմեոս Ե-ի, այլ Էտոլիայից զորավար Սկոպասի կողմից՝ մի վարձկան հրամանատարի, որ նշանակված էր խնամակալության օրոք։ Երիտասարդ թագավորը իրական իշխանություն չուներ. որոշումները, ռազմական ռազմավարությունը և թագավորության ընդհանուր թուլությունը բխում էին խնամակալների կաթվածահար վիճակից, ներքին ապստամբություններից (ինչպես բնիկ եգիպտացիների ապստամբությունները) և արքունական խարդավանքներից։ Այս անկայունությունը հնարավորություն տվեց Անտիոքոս Գ Մեծին Պանիումում վճռականորեն հաղթել Սկոպասին՝ խլելով Կոյլե-Սիրիան, ներառյալ Հրեաստանը, Պտղոմեոսյան վերահսկողությունից մշտապես։

Historians discuss the probability that Ptolemy IV’s death was by poisoning, which is also part of the historical speculation concerning Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, as well as the queen of the south, Cleopatra. Putin prevails in the Ukrainian War, but then his demise begins with his desire to implement the controlling relationship that the Soviet Union formerly had with the Ukrainian church, which when removed in 1989, was the symbol of the victory of the king of the north over the king of the south.

Abaanditsi b’amateka baganira ku kuba bishoboka ko urupfu rwa Ptolémée IV rwatewe n’uburozi; kandi ibi na byo biri mu bitekerezo by’amateka bivugwa kuri Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, ndetse no ku mwamikazi w’ikusi, Cleopatra. Putin atsinda mu Ntambara yo muri Ukraine, ariko hanyuma iherezo rye ritangira n’icyifuzo cye cyo gushyiraho umubano wo kugenzura nk’uwo Leta Zunze Ubumwe z’Abasoviyeti zari zisanzwe zifitanye n’itorero ryo muri Ukraine; uwo mubano umaze gukurwaho mu 1989, wabaye ikimenyetso cy’intsinzi y’umwami w’ikusi ya ruguru ku mwami w’ikusi ya majyepfo.

The Ukraine is the cradle of Eastern Slavic Orthodoxy. The baptism of Vladimir the Great took place in 988 in Kyiv. Moscow later claimed the title “Third Rome” after Constantinople fell, positioning itself as the rightful heir and spiritual guardian of all Russian lands, including the Ukraine as its “canonical territory”.

Украина е бесикот на источнославјанското православие. Крштавањето на Владимир Велики се случило во 988 година во Киев. Москва подоцна ја присвои титулата „Трет Рим“ по падот на Константинопол, поставувајќи се себеси како законски наследник и духовен чувар на сите руски земји, вклучително и на Украина како нејзина „канонска територија“.

The Moscow Patriarchate has always viewed Ukraine as spiritually inseparable from Russia with the motto of “One people, one faith,” which is a phrase Putin himself has repeatedly used. Ukraine, especially since 2014/2022, increasingly sees Moscow’s oversight as colonial and imperial domination rather than true spiritual motherhood. As of February 2026, there are two competing Orthodox structures. One is the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, which since 2019 has been independent from Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople. In Kyiv the Orthodox Church of Ukraine is considered as the truly national church.

Paṱiriaki ya Moskva daima imeitazama Ukraine kuwa haiwezi kutenganishwa kiroho na Urusi kwa kauli mbiu ya “Watu mmoja, imani moja,” ambayo ni kauli ambayo Putin mwenyewe ameirudia mara nyingi. Ukraine, hasa tangu 2014/2022, inazidi kuyaona mamlaka ya usimamizi wa Moskva kuwa utawala wa kikoloni na wa kiimla badala ya ulezi wa kweli wa kiroho. Kufikia Februari 2026, kuna miundo miwili ya Kiorthodoksi inayoshindana. Mmoja ni Kanisa la Kiorthodoksi la Ukraine, ambalo tangu 2019 limekuwa huru kutoka kwa Paṱiriaki wa Kiekumene Bartholomew wa Konstantinopoli. Huko Kyiv, Kanisa la Kiorthodoksi la Ukraine linachukuliwa kuwa ndilo kanisa la kweli la kitaifa.

Reader beware: the Orthodox Church of Ukraine is a different church than the Ukrainian Orthodox church. The Ukrainian Orthodox church is connected with Russia’s orthodox church, and for this reason Zelenskyy has been attacking it. The Vatican opposes the attacks of Zelenskyy that are already underway, but Putin’s rebellion of verse twelve follows his victory at Raphia, and is yet future.

Omusomi ahangalikwe: Ekanisa ya Orthodox ya Ukraine ni kanisa yihandwike ku ya Ekanisa ya Orthodox ya Ukraine. Ekanisa ya Orthodox ya Ukraine i na oluungano no Ekanisa ya Orthodox ya Russia, ne kulw’ensonga eyi Zelenskyy ahetele okujikolera ebihasyo. Vatican ehakana ebihasyo bya Zelenskyy ebiriho kati, naye obujeemu bwa Putin obw’olunyiriri olw’ikumi na bubiri bulandira ku buwangule bwe e Raphia, kandi bukyali bwa mu maaso.

The Ukrainian Orthodox Church was historically linked to the Moscow body. In the aftermath of the invasion of 2022, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church declared full autonomy in May 2022, but Ukrainian state investigations (DESS) have repeatedly argued it remains canonically and legally affiliated with Moscow. Ukraine passed a law in August 2024 (signed by Zelenskyy) banning any religious body tied to the Russian Orthodox Church (the “aggressor state”). The Ukrainian Orthodox Church has been ordered to fully sever ties or face court-ordered dissolution of its Kyiv Metropolis. As of late 2025 and early 2026, there are ongoing raids, parish transfers to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (over 1,300 since 2022), court cases, and UN experts warning of religious-freedom concerns regarding the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.

Ортодоксальная Церковь Украины исторически была связана с Московским церковным телом. После вторжения 2022 года Ортодоксальная Церковь Украины в мае 2022 года провозгласила полную автономию, однако украинские государственные расследования (DESS) неоднократно утверждали, что она по-прежнему канонически и юридически аффилирована с Москвой. В августе 2024 года Украина приняла закон (подписанный Зеленским), запрещающий любую религиозную организацию, связанную с Русской Православной Церковью (государством-агрессором). Ортодоксальной Церкви Украины было предписано полностью разорвать связи либо столкнуться с ликвидацией её Киевской митрополии по решению суда. По состоянию на конец 2025 и начало 2026 года продолжаются обыски, переводы приходов в Ортодоксальную Церковь Украины (более 1 300 с 2022 года), судебные дела, а также предупреждения экспертов ООН о проблемах со свободой вероисповедания в отношении Ортодоксальной Церкви Украины.

The Vatican has publicly opposed any forced dissolution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Russia and Putin frame this as outright persecution of canonical Orthodoxy and have made protection of the “Russian Orthodox churches” an explicit demand in any peace negotiations. Russian propaganda consistently ties the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and the Ukrainian state attacks upon it as “Nazism” and as part of their “denazification” justification.

ਵੈਟਿਕਨ ਨੇ ਯੂਕਰੇਨੀ ਆਰਥੋਡਾਕਸ ਕਲੀਸਿਆ ਨੂੰ ਜਬਰਦਸਤੀ ਵਿਘਟਿਤ ਕਰਨ ਦੇ ਕਿਸੇ ਵੀ ਯਤਨ ਦਾ ਸਰਵਜਨਿਕ ਤੌਰ ’ਤੇ ਵਿਰੋਧ ਕੀਤਾ ਹੈ। ਰੂਸ ਅਤੇ ਪੁਤਿਨ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਕੈਨੋਨਿਕਲ ਆਰਥੋਡਾਕਸੀ ਉੱਤੇ ਸਪਸ਼ਟ ਅਤਿਆਚਾਰ ਵਜੋਂ ਪੇਸ਼ ਕਰਦੇ ਹਨ ਅਤੇ ਕਿਸੇ ਵੀ ਸ਼ਾਂਤੀ-ਵਾਰਤਾਂ ਵਿੱਚ “ਰੂਸੀ ਆਰਥੋਡਾਕਸ ਕਲੀਸਿਆਵਾਂ” ਦੀ ਰੱਖਿਆ ਨੂੰ ਇਕ ਪ੍ਰਤੱਖ ਮੰਗ ਬਣਾਇਆ ਹੈ। ਰੂਸੀ ਪ੍ਰਚਾਰ ਨਿਰੰਤਰ ਯੂਕਰੇਨੀ ਆਰਥੋਡਾਕਸ ਕਲੀਸਿਆ ਅਤੇ ਇਸ ਉੱਤੇ ਯੂਕਰੇਨੀ ਰਾਜ ਦੇ ਹਮਲਿਆਂ ਨੂੰ “ਨਾਜ਼ੀਵਾਦ” ਨਾਲ ਜੋੜਦਾ ਹੈ ਅਤੇ ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਆਪਣੀ “ਡੀ-ਨਾਜ਼ੀਫਿਕੇਸ਼ਨ” ਦੀ ਜਾਇਜ਼ ਠਹਿਰਾਉਣ ਵਾਲੀ ਦਲੀਲ ਦਾ ਹਿੱਸਾ ਦੱਸਦਾ ਹੈ।

Putin will presumptuously “enter the temple” and claim full spiritual dominion over Ukrainian Orthodoxy in attempt to re-subordinate the entire Ukrainian church structure under Moscow, demanding recognition as the rightful spiritual head of the Russian orthodox world.

پوتین بە خۆبەزلزانییەوە «دەچێتە پەرستگاکەوە» و بانگەشەی دەسەڵاتی تەواوی ڕۆحی بەسەر ئۆرتۆدۆکسییای ئۆکراین دەکات، لە هەوڵێکدا بۆ ئەوەی هەموو پێکهاتەی کڵێسایی ئۆکراین دووبارە بخاتە ژێر فەرمانبەرداریی موسکۆ، و داوای ناساندنی خۆی وەک سەرۆکی ڕۆحیی بەحەقی جیهانی ئۆرتۆدۆکسییای ڕووسی دەکات.

This is the exact parallel to Ptolemy entering the Most Holy Place, while Uzziah is Zelenskyy seeking to burn incense. Ptolemy’s rebellion was in the Most Holy Place and Uzziah’s was in the holy place. A southern king, flushed with the victory of the “borderline,” ending the proxy-power of Nazism, and then overstepping into the place that belongs only to the realm of religion. Then will come a sudden providential humbling, and Putin will disappear from the scene (as Ptolemy IV died in 204 BC). After the power vacuum of a ‘weak-successors phase,’ the northern king returns with greater force and prevails at the modern battle of Panium in verse 15.

Iki ni ikigereranyo nyacyo cya Ptolemy yinjira Ahera Cyane, naho Uziya akaba ari Zelenskyy ushaka kosha umubavu. Ubugome bwa Ptolemy bwabereye mu Ahera Cyane, naho ubwa Uziya bubera ahera. Umwami wo mu majyepfo, yishimiye intsinzi y’“umupaka,” arangiza ubutware bwa gikomisiyoneri bwa Nazisme, maze hanyuma akarenza urugero akinjira mu mwanya ugenewe gusa urwego rw’idini. Hanyuma hazaza gucishwa bugufi gutunguranye kw’igitabwaho n’ubuyobozi bw’Imana, kandi Putin azazimira ku rubuga (nk’uko Ptolemy wa IV yapfuye mu mwaka wa 204 mbere ya Kristo). Nyuma y’icyuho cy’ubutegetsi cy’“icyiciro cy’abasimbura b’abanyantege nke,” umwami wo mu majyaruguru azagaruka afite imbaraga zisumbuyeho kandi azanesha mu ntambara ya Panium y’iki gihe ivugwa mu murongo wa 15.

Seventeen

Kumi na saba

Seventeen years occurs three times in the history where the battles of Raphia and Panium merge together, line upon line. The seventeen years from the edict of Milan where the eastern and western thrones of the empire were brought together through marriage, until the kingdom was divided and divorced in 330. The seventeen years beginning and ending are waymarks of two other related prophetic periods. Beginning with Nero in the year 64 a period of persecution is marked that ended in the history of Constantine the Great. The transition from Nero’s period of persecution unto the compromise represented by Constantine identifies the transition from the church of Smyrna unto the church of Pergamos. 313 and the edict of Milan identify the end of the church of Smyrna, and the end of the seventeen-year period is the year 330, which was the fulfillment of the three-hundred-and-sixty-year prophecy of Daniel 11:24.

Kumi na saba hutokea mara tatu katika historia, mahali ambapo vita vya Raphia na Panium vinaungana pamoja, mstari juu ya mstari. Kumi na saba tangu amri ya Milan, ambapo viti vya enzi vya mashariki na magharibi vya himaya vililetwa pamoja kwa njia ya ndoa, hadi ufalme ulipogawanywa na talaka ikafanyika mwaka 330. Kumi na saba zinazoanza na kuishia ni alama za njia za vipindi viwili vingine vya kinabii vinavyohusiana. Kuanzia na Nero katika mwaka 64, kipindi cha mateso kinawekwa alama, ambacho kiliisha katika historia ya Constantine Mkuu. Mpito kutoka kipindi cha mateso cha Nero hadi maafikiano yanayowakilishwa na Constantine unatambulisha mpito kutoka kwa kanisa la Smirna hadi kwa kanisa la Pergamo. 313 na amri ya Milan vinatambulisha mwisho wa kanisa la Smirna, na mwisho wa kipindi cha miaka kumi na saba ni mwaka 330, ambao ulikuwa utimilifu wa unabii wa miaka mia tatu na sitini wa Danieli 11:24.

He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers’ fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time. Daniel 11:24.

Aketa mulembe, ata ne mu bitundu ebisinga obugagga eby’essaza; era alikola ekyo bajjajjaabe kye bataakola, newaakubadde bajjajja ba bajjajjaabe; era alibasaasaanyiza omuyiggo, n’omunyago, n’obugagga: weewaawo, aliteesa enkwe ze ku biggya ebinywevu, naye okumala akaseera. Danyeri 11:24.

The seventeen years from 313 and the edict of Milan, begins with a fulfillment of prophecy and ends at the fulfillment of another prophecy. The first prophetic fulfillment which marks the beginning, identifies the transition from the church of Smyrna unto the church of Pergamos, and the prophecy that marks the end of those seventeen years, identifies the division of Rome into eastern and western Rome. The seventeen years is identified by prophetic history, not by any specific seventeen-year proclamation. The alpha of the division of the second church from the third church aligned with the division of the empire into east and west at the fulfillment of the time prophecy of 360 years. Those two prophecies establish a period of seventeen years, and they need to be established as a legitimate prophetic period based upon the witness of two or three; if seventeen is a valid prophetic symbol.

313 年およびミラノ勅令からの十七年は、一つの預言の成就をもって始まり、別の預言の成就をもって終わる。始まりを画する最初の預言的成就は、スミルナの教会からペルガモの教会への移行を示し、それら十七年の終わりを画する預言は、ローマが東ローマと西ローマとに分割されることを示す。その十七年は、特定のいかなる十七年間の布告によってではなく、預言的歴史によって特定される。第二の教会と第三の教会との分離のアルファは、三百六十年の時の預言の成就において、帝国の東西への分割と一致していた。これら二つの預言は十七年の期間を確立するのであり、もし十七が有効な預言的象徴であるならば、二人または三人の証言に基づいて、それらは正当な預言的期間として確立されなければならない。

Those witnesses exist in another 250-year period which began in 457 BC. On that date the 2,300-year prophecy of Daniel 8:14 began. 457 BC is a prophetic starting point, and an established prophetic waymark. Extending 250 years into the future brings you to 207 BC, which is the history between the battles of Raphia and Panium. The battle of Raphia and Panium cannot be separated, for they are both engaged in by Antiochus the Great. From the battle of Raphia in 217 BC unto the battle of Panium in 200 BC is seventeen years. The 2,300-year prophecy identifies a change of dispensation at the beginning, when the third decree restored Judah’s national sovereignty and then at the ending there was a change of dispensation when Christ moved from the holy place to the Most Holy Place. 207 BC represents the change of dispensation of Egyptian rule over Judea, unto the Seleucid dispensation of rule over the glorious land. The dispensation of Seleucid control over the glorious land produced the revolt of the Maccabees in 167 BC.

Ibintu byo kwemeza biri mu kindi gihe cy’imyaka 250 cyatangiye mu 457 mbere ya Kristo. Kuri iyo tariki ni ho ubuhanuzi bw’imyaka 2,300 bwo muri Daniyeli 8:14 bwatangiriye. Umwaka wa 457 mbere ya Kristo ni intangiriro y’ubuhanuzi, kandi ni ikimenyetso cy’ubuhanuzi cyamaze gushingwa. Iyo wongereye imyaka 250 ujya imbere, ugera mu 207 mbere ya Kristo, ari yo mateka ari hagati y’intambara ya Raphia n’iya Panium. Intambara ya Raphia n’iya Panium ntizishobora gutandukanywa, kuko zombi zarwannywe na Antiochus Mukuru. Uhereye ku ntambara ya Raphia mu 217 mbere ya Kristo ukageza ku ntambara ya Panium mu 200 mbere ya Kristo ni imyaka cumi n’irindwi. Ubuhanuzi bw’imyaka 2,300 bugaragaza ihinduka ry’ingoma y’ibihe ku ntangiriro, ubwo itegeko rya gatatu ryasubizaga u Buyuda ubusugire bwabwo nk’ishyanga, hanyuma no ku iherezo habaho ihinduka ry’ingoma y’ibihe ubwo Kristo yavanwaga Ahera akinjira Ahera Cyane. Umwaka wa 207 mbere ya Kristo ugereranya ihinduka ry’ingoma y’ibihe ry’ubutegetsi bwa Egiputa kuri Yudaya, rijya ku ngoma y’ibihe y’ubutegetsi bw’Abaselewukiya ku gihugu cy’ubwiza. Ingoma y’ibihe y’ubugenzuzi bw’Abaselewukiya ku gihugu cy’ubwiza yabyaye ubwigomeke bw’Abamakabayo mu 167 mbere ya Kristo.

The Nero period of 250 years ends with the history of Constantine the GREAT and the 250 years that conclude between the two battles is the history of Antiochus the GREAT. At the battle of Raphia, Ptolemy IV defeated Antiochus the Great and Ptolemy reigned for seventeen years. Both 250-year periods contain a distinct seventeen-year period. Both end in the history of a ruler who is known as the GREAT. Both 250-year periods begin at an established prophetic waymark and they both end at an established prophetic waymark.

Ɔberɛ a wɔfrɛ no Nero no mfe ahannu ne aduonum no ba awiei wɔ Constantine Kɛse no abakɔsɛm mu, na mfe ahannu ne aduonum a ɛtoatoa akodi abien no ntam so no yɛ Antiochus Kɛse no abakɔsɛm. Wɔ Raphia ko no mu no, Ptolemy IV dii Antiochus Kɛse no so nkonim, na Ptolemy dii ade mfe dunsɔn. Mfe ahannu ne aduonum mmere abien no nyinaa kura mfe dunsɔn bere soronko bi mu. Ne nyinaa wie wɔ ɔhene bi abakɔsɛm mu a wonim no sɛ Kɛse no. Mfe ahannu ne aduonum mmere abien no nyinaa fi ase wɔ nkɔmhyɛ mu agyiraehyɛde a wɔde asi hɔ yiye so, na ne nyinaa wie nso wɔ nkɔmhyɛ mu agyiraehyɛde a wɔde asi hɔ yiye so.

The United States began on July 4, 1776 and 250 years later brings you to July 4, 2026 when Donald Trump, who is known as the one seeking to make America “great,” is going to celebrate those 250 years. 2026, like unto the 250 years from 457 BC concludes in the middle of the history of the modern battles of Raphia and Panium, known as the Ukrainian and Third World War. The reign of a southern king, the period of the first Sunday law and the period from the battle of Raphia to Panium provide three periods of seventeen years that are all connected with the same prophetic history. Three 250-year periods all arrive together in the same prophetic histories. The three periods of 250 years establish three lines of prophetic truth with history associated with Donald Trump, represented as either Constantine the Great, or Antiochus the Great.

United States yatandikire ku wa 4 Mukakaro 1776, kandi imyaka 250 nyuma yaho ikugeza ku wa 4 Mukakaro 2026, ubwo Donald Trump, uzwi nk’ushaka kugira Amerika “ikomeye,” azizihiza iyo myaka 250. Umwaka wa 2026, nk’uko bimeze ku myaka 250 ibarwa uhereye mu wa 457 mbere ya Kristo, urangirira hagati mu mateka y’intambara za none za Raphia na Panium, zizwi nk’Intambara ya Ukraine n’Intambara ya Gatatu y’Isi Yose. Ingoma y’umwami wo mu majyepfo, igihe cy’itegeko rya mbere ryo ku Cyumweru, n’igihe gikubiyemo uhereye ku ntambara ya Raphia ukageza kuri Panium, bitanga ibihe bitatu by’imyaka cumi n’irindwi, byose bifitanye isano n’amateka amwe y’ubuhanuzi. Ibihe bitatu by’imyaka 250 byose bihurira hamwe mu mateka amwe y’ubuhanuzi. Ibi bihe bitatu by’imyaka 250 bishyiraho imirongo itatu y’ukuri k’ubuhanuzi ifitanye isano n’amateka ajyanye na Donald Trump, ushushanywa nka Constantine Mukuru cyangwa Antiochus Mukuru.

The three lines of 250 years provide three different, but complementary illustrations of the latter days. Nero’s line identifies the seventeen-year history of compromise that perfectly speaks to the prophetic characteristics of the formation of the image of the beast.

The three lines of 250 years provide three different, but complementary illustrations of the latter days. Nero’s line identifies the seventeen-year history of compromise that perfectly speaks to the prophetic characteristics of the formation of the image of the beast.

“The Lord has shown me clearly that the image of the beast will be formed before probation closes; for it is to be the great test for the people of God, by which their eternal destiny will be decided. Your position is such a jumble of inconsistencies that but few will be deceived.

“Umwami yanyeretse neza ko ishusho y’inyamaswa izashyirwaho mbere y’uko igihe cy’igeragezwa kirangira; kuko ari yo izaba ikigeragezo gikomeye ku bwoko bw’Imana, ari na cyo iherezo ryabo ry’iteka rizagenderwaho rigafatirwaho icyemezo. Umwanya mufashe ni uruvange rw’ibidahuye cyane ku buryo bake cyane ari bo bazashukwa.

“In Revelation 13 this subject is plainly presented; [Revelation 13:11–17, quoted].

“Mu Kusokolola 13, ensonga eyi eragiddwa bulungi ddala; [Kusokolola 13:11–17, nga bwe kyajuliddwa].”

“This is the test that the people of God must have before they are sealed. All who proved their loyalty to God by observing His law, and refusing to accept a spurious sabbath, will rank under the banner of the Lord God Jehovah, and will receive the seal of the living God. Those who yield the truth of heavenly origin and accept the Sunday sabbath, will receive the mark of the beast.” Manuscript Releases, volume 15, 15.

“Echi ni cho kishipisho eyo andu a Ngai lazima wawe nayo kabla hawajatiwa muhuri. Wote waliothibitisha uaminifu wao kwa Ngai kwa kushika sheria Yake, na kwa kukataa kuikubali sabato ya uongo, watahesabiwa chini ya bendera ya Bwana Ngai Yehova, nao watapokea muhuri wa Ngai aliye hai. Nao wale wanaoisaliti kweli yenye asili ya mbinguni na kuikubali sabato ya Jumapili, watapokea chapa ya yule mnyama.” Manuscript Releases, volume 15, 15.

The image of the beast is the combination of church and state, with the church in control of the relationship. The compromise of Constantine in attempting to bring paganism together with Christianity is the classic example of the compromise of the latter days.

Ifanizo ry’inyamaswa ni uguhuriza hamwe kw’itorero na Leta, ariko itorero rikaba ari ryo rigenzura ubwo busabane. Ubwumvikane bwa Konstantino, mu kugerageza guhuza ubupagani n’Ubukristo, ni rwo rugero ngarukamwaka rw’ubwumvikane bwo mu minsi y’imperuka.

“In the movements now in progress in the United States to secure for the institutions and usages of the church the support of the state, Protestants are following in the steps of papists. Nay, more, they are opening the door for the papacy to regain in Protestant America the supremacy which she has lost in the Old World. And that which gives greater significance to this movement is the fact that the principal object contemplated is the enforcement of Sunday observance—a custom which originated with Rome, and which she claims as the sign of her authority. It is the spirit of the papacy—the spirit of conformity to worldly customs, the veneration for human traditions above the commandments of God—that is permeating the Protestant churches and leading them on to do the same work of Sunday exaltation which the papacy has done before them.

“United States-ngi nang chingna ningthou-shingna eigi mapung phadokpa amasung gi manungda leiriba church-ki phibam amasung thabak-singda state-ki tengbang piba ngamhanba pumnamakta, Protestants-singna papists-singgi khongchat matung inna chatli. Aduga, masigi mathanta, makhoina papacy-na Old World-ta manghallakhiba supremacy adu Protestant America-da amuk hanna phangba ngamhanbagi thong hangdokli. Aduga, eigi phibam asida henna maru oihalliba asi, matam asida khallibagi aphaba object asi Sunday observance adu enforce touba ni—Rome-da houjik khudongchaba amasung mahakna mahakki authority-gi sign oina claim touba custom ama. Papacy-gi spirit adu—mali-mari gi customs-singga chingnaba-gi spirit, amasung Ningthougi commandments-singdagi henna miyamgi traditions-singbu ikai khumnaba—adu Protestant churches-singgi manungda chaothokli amasung makhoibu papacy-na makhoigi mamangda toukhiba Sunday exaltation-gi thabak adumak touhanba matam pithokli.”

“If the reader would understand the agencies to be employed in the soon-coming contest, he has but to trace the record of the means which Rome employed for the same object in ages past. If he would know how papists and Protestants united will deal with those who reject their dogmas, let him see the spirit which Rome manifested toward the Sabbath and its defenders.

“Somoši syẽ pyõgũ, mũndũ ũrĩ kũmenya hinya cia gũtũmika thĩinĩ wa ngũrano ĩrĩa ĩgũka o hĩhĩ, ndakwĩhota no kũrũgamĩrĩra maandĩko ma njira iria Roma yatũmĩte nĩ ũndũ ũcio hĩndĩ cia tene. Angĩenda kũmenya ũrĩa Apapa na Aprotestanti marĩ hamwe magũtwarana na arĩa makũrega njĩra ciao cia wĩtĩkio, nĩareke one roho ũrĩa Roma yoonanĩrĩtie kũhĩtana na Sabato hamwe na arĩa maiyũmĩrĩire.

“Royal edicts, general councils, and church ordinances sustained by secular power were the steps by which the pagan festival attained its position of honor in the Christian world. The first public measure enforcing Sunday observance was the law enacted by Constantine. (A.D. 321) This edict required townspeople to rest on ‘the venerable day of the sun,’ but permitted countrymen to continue their agricultural pursuits. Though virtually a heathen statute, it was enforced by the emperor after his nominal acceptance of Christianity.” The Great Controversy, 574.

“Amabwiriza y’ubwami, inama nkuru z’itorero, n’amategeko y’itorero ashyigikiwe n’ubutegetsi bw’isi ni byo byabaye intambwe uwo munsi mukuru wa gipagani wanyuzemo kugira ngo ugere ku mwanya w’icyubahiro mu isi ya Gikristo. Igipimo cya mbere cyatangajwe ku mugaragaro gishyiraho kubahiriza ku Cyumweru cyari itegeko ryashyizweho na Konstantino. (A.D. 321) Iryo tegeko ryasabaga abatuye mu mijyi kuruhuka ku ‘munsi w’izuba wubahwa cyane,’ ariko rikemerera abatuye mu cyaro gukomeza imirimo yabo y’ubuhinzi. Nubwo mu by’ukuri ryari itegeko rya gipagani, umwami w’abami yarishyize mu bikorwa amaze kwemera Ubukristo mu buryo bw’izina gusa.” The Great Controversy, 574.

The progression of compromise that led to, and will again lead to the Sunday law is represented with the seventeen-year period from 313 to 330, with the first Sunday law of 321 as the midpoint of the history. At the beginning was a marriage of east and west, and at the end was the divorce of east and west. The first Sunday law is the middle waymark representing rebellion, just as the thirteenth letter of the Hebrew alphabet, when preceded by the first letter and followed by the twenty-second and last letter of the alphabet makes up the Hebrew word truth. Marriage at the beginning and divorce at the end identifies the alpha letter in agreement with the omega letter. The period of 250-years that began with Nero has the signature of Christ, and it speaks to a subject of present truth in the latter days.

Iterambere ry’ukwemera igice ryagejeje ku, kandi rizongera kuganisha ku itegeko ryo ku Cyumweru, rigereranywa n’igihe cy’imyaka cumi n’irindwi kuva mu wa 313 kugeza mu wa 330, aho itegeko rya mbere ryo ku Cyumweru ryo mu wa 321 riri hagati muri ayo mateka. Mu ntangiriro habaye ubukwe bw’iburasirazuba n’iburengerazuba, kandi ku iherezo habaye ubutane bw’iburasirazuba n’iburengerazuba. Itegeko rya mbere ryo ku Cyumweru ni ikimenyetso cyo hagati kigereranya ubugome bwo kwigomeka, nk’uko inyuguti ya cumi na gatatu y’inyuguti z’Igiheburayo, iyo ibanjirijwe n’inyuguti ya mbere kandi igakurikirwa n’inyuguti ya makumyabiri na kabiri kandi ya nyuma y’inyuguti zose, iba igize ijambo ry’Igiheburayo risobanura ukuri. Ubukwe ku ntangiriro n’ubutane ku iherezo bigaragaza inyuguti alufa ihuje n’inyuguti omega. Igihe cy’imyaka magana abiri na mirongo itanu cyatangiranye na Nero gifite ikimenyetso cya Kristo, kandi kivuga ku ngingo y’ukuri kw’iki gihe mu minsi y’imperuka.

The 250-year period that begins with 457 BC is emphasizing the statecraft represented by Antiochus the Great as he stands within the seventeen-year period from Raphia to Panium. We understand it as statecraft, for in 457 BC a prophecy of 2,300 years also began. The 2,300 years is the internal line of prophecy that speaks to God’s work of redemption, which aligns with a symbol of churchcraft. Unlike the 250-year period that began with Nero, the period that begins in 457 BC is addressing the political role of the last American president who is seeking to make America and then the world great, as he promotes the erroneous Catholic concept of a golden age of a thousand years of peace.

457 BC부터 시작되는 250년의 기간은, 라피아에서 파니움에 이르는 17년의 기간 안에 서 있는 안티오쿠스 대왕으로 표상되는 국가 경영술을 강조한다. 우리가 이것을 국가 경영술로 이해하는 것은, 457 BC에 또한 2,300년의 예언이 시작되었기 때문이다. 그 2,300년은 하나님의 구속 사역에 대하여 말하는 예언의 내적 선으로서, 교권적 경영술의 상징과 부합한다. 네로와 함께 시작된 250년의 기간과는 달리, 457 BC에 시작되는 그 기간은, 천년의 평화라는 황금시대에 대한 그릇된 가톨릭 개념을 조장하면서 미국을, 그리고 이어 온 세상을 위대하게 만들고자 하는 마지막 미국 대통령의 정치적 역할을 다루고 있다.

The 250 years of the United States, who is the earth beast of Revelation thirteen identifies the conclusion of the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, that ends where it began, in the midst of war. The victors of history, define the record of history that is preserved. The globalist dragon powered Democrats, view the current anarchy as a revolution, and the all-talk and no action Republicans view this current history as a civil war. The Democrats are representatives of the dragon of Bible prophecy, and the Republicans are represented as apostate Protestants, or in the terms of John in Revelation sixteen, they are the false prophet. The United States began in a war of revolution and it ends with a war of revolution. The Republican party began in a civil war and they end in a civil war. Republicans see the civil war that Democrats call a revolution.

अमेरिकाका २५० वर्ष, जो प्रकाशको पुस्तक अध्याय तेह्रको पृथ्वीको जनावर हो, बाइबलीय भविष्यवाणीको छैटौँ राज्यको निष्कर्षलाई चिन्हित गर्दछ, जुन जहाँ आरम्भ भएको थियो त्यहीँ, युद्धको बीचमा, अन्त हुन्छ। इतिहासका विजेताहरूले नै सुरक्षित राखिएको इतिहासको अभिलेख परिभाषित गर्छन्। विश्ववादी अजिङ्गरद्वारा सशक्त बनाइएका डेमोक्र्याटहरूले वर्तमान अराजकतालाई क्रान्तिका रूपमा हेर्छन्, र कुरा मात्रै गर्ने तर कुनै कार्य नगर्ने रिपब्लिकनहरूले यस वर्तमान इतिहासलाई गृहयुद्धका रूपमा हेर्छन्। डेमोक्र्याटहरू बाइबलीय भविष्यवाणीको अजिङ्गरका प्रतिनिधि हुन्, र रिपब्लिकनहरू धर्मत्यागी प्रोटेस्टेन्टहरूका रूपमा प्रतिनिधित्व गरिएका छन्, अथवा प्रकाशको पुस्तक अध्याय सोह्रमा यूहन्नाको शब्दावलीमा, तिनीहरू झूटा अगमवक्ता हुन्। संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिकाको आरम्भ क्रान्तिको युद्धद्वारा भयो, र यसको अन्त पनि क्रान्तिको युद्धसँग हुन्छ। रिपब्लिकन पार्टीको आरम्भ गृहयुद्धमा भयो, र तिनीहरूको अन्त पनि गृहयुद्धमै हुन्छ। रिपब्लिकनहरूले त्यही गृहयुद्ध देख्छन्, जसलाई डेमोक्र्याटहरूले क्रान्ति भन्छन्।

Trump, as the last Republican president possesses the prophetic attributes of the first Republican president, who arrived in the external history of the Civil War. Lincoln’s external Civil War was also the internal history of Isaiah’s prophecy of chapter seven, verse eight that ended in 1863, the very year of the Emancipation Proclamation. The distinction between the two parties is a primary and foundational prophetic principle. It began with Cain and Abel, who in the time of Christ were represented by the Sadducees and the Pharisees, two classes of Cain who were to murder one Abel.

Trump, kama rais wa mwisho wa Chama cha Republican, anamiliki sifa za kinabii za rais wa kwanza wa Chama cha Republican, aliyekuja katika historia ya nje ya Vita vya wenyewe kwa wenyewe. Vita vya wenyewe kwa wenyewe vya nje vya Lincoln pia vilikuwa historia ya ndani ya unabii wa Isaya sura ya saba, mstari wa nane, uliomalizika mwaka 1863, mwaka wenyewe wa Tangazo la Ukombozi. Tofauti kati ya vyama hivyo viwili ni kanuni ya kinabii ya kwanza na ya msingi. Ilianza na Kaini na Habili, ambao katika wakati wa Kristo waliwakilishwa na Masadukayo na Mafarisayo, makundi mawili ya Kaini yaliyopaswa kumuua Habili mmoja.

The Pharisees and Sadducees represent those who agreed to crucify their Messiah, for different reasons, but agreement—just the same. The Pharisees professed to uphold the law, but didn’t, as with Republicans. The Pharisees professed to uphold the original divine law, but interpreted the law through their own bigoted logic. The original Law for the Pharisees is the Constitution for the Republicans, the very Constitution they claim to support, but don’t. The Sadducees rejected the power of God, and though a smaller sect than the Pharisees, the Sadducees controlled the religious and political landscape of Judea in the time of Christ. The Democrats are a smaller sect than the Republicans, so small they must cheat to stay in power, but stay in power they do, for their opponents who profess to uphold equal justice for all, do nothing to enforce the principles of the law they profess to uphold.

Abafarisayo n’Abasadukayo bagereranya abemeye kubamba Mesiya wabo, nubwo byatewe n’impamvu zitandukanye, ariko bakaba bari mu bwumvikane—uko byari biri kose. Abafarisayo bavugaga ko baharanira amategeko, ariko ntibayakurikize, nk’uko biri ku Ba‑Republicans. Abafarisayo bavugaga ko baharanira amategeko y’umwimerere y’Imana, ariko bagasobanura ayo mategeko bakurikije imitekerereze yabo irangwa n’irondaruhu. Amategeko y’umwimerere ku Bafarisayo ni yo Itegeko Nshinga ku Ba‑Republicans, iryo Tegeko Nshinga nyine bavuga ko bashyigikiye, ariko batabikora. Abasadukayo bahakanaga imbaraga z’Imana; kandi nubwo bari itsinda rito kurusha Abafarisayo, ni bo Abasadukayo bagenzuraga imiterere y’iyobokamana n’iya politiki bya Yudaya mu gihe cya Kristo. Aba‑Democrats ni itsinda rito kurusha Aba‑Republicans, rito cyane ku buryo bagomba kunyereza kugira ngo bakomeze kuguma ku butegetsi; kandi koko baguma ku butegetsi, kuko abo bahanganye na bo, bavuga ko bashyigikiye ubutabera bungana kuri bose, nta cyo bakora ngo bashyire mu bikorwa amahame y’amategeko bavuga ko baharanira.

There is nothing new under the sun, and the two political parties in the United States are as much a part of the prophetic landscape as were the Pharisees and Sadducees. There are of course many other parallels along this prophetic line, but it is only when you see the prophetic relationship of the two unholy powers, who though adversaries, become united against holiness, that you then see Ptolemy and Uzziah in the proper light. Both southern kings attempted to sacrifice at the same temple, but Ptolemy, from Egypt represents a dragon power—the Democrats. Uzziah, as king of Judea is the leader of the glorious land, who is apostate Protestantism, or the false prophet—the Republicans.

ឥតមានអ្វីថ្មីនៅក្រោមព្រះអាទិត្យឡើយ ហើយគណបក្សនយោបាយទាំងពីរនៅសហរដ្ឋអាមេរិក ក៏ជាផ្នែកមួយនៃទិដ្ឋភាពព្យាករណ៍ ដូចជាពួកផារីស៊ី និងពួកសាឌូស៊ីដែរ។ ជាក់ជាមានសមភាពជាច្រើនទៀតតាមបន្ទាត់ព្យាករណ៍នេះ ប៉ុន្តែ មានតែពេលដែលអ្នកឃើញទំនាក់ទំនងព្យាករណ៍របស់អំណាចមិនបរិសុទ្ធទាំងពីរ ដែលទោះបីជាសត្រូវនឹងគ្នាក៏ដោយ ក៏រួបរួមគ្នាប្រឆាំងនឹងភាពបរិសុទ្ធ នោះទើបអ្នកឃើញប្តូឡេមី និងអូស៊ីយ៉ា ក្នុងពន្លឺត្រឹមត្រូវ។ ស្តេចខាងត្បូងទាំងពីរបានព្យាយាមថ្វាយយញ្ញបូជានៅព្រះវិហារតែមួយដូចគ្នា ប៉ុន្តែ ប្តូឡេមី ពីស្រុកអេស៊ីព្ទ តំណាងឲ្យអំណាចនាគមួយ គឺពួកប្រជាធិបតេយ្យ។ រីឯអូស៊ីយ៉ា ក្នុងនាមជាស្តេចនៃយូដា គឺជាមេដឹកនាំនៃដែនដីដ៏រុងរឿង ដែលគឺជាប្រូតេស្តង់ដែលបានក្បត់ជំនឿ ឬក៏ព្យាការីក្លែងក្លាយ គឺពួកសាធារណរដ្ឋ។

The relationship of the dragon and false prophet is classically represented at Mount Carmel. At the mount, Ahab represented the dragon and Jezebel’s prophets of Baal and Ashtaroth represented the false prophets who stood against Elijah. The beast that is Jezebel was still behind the scenes in Samaria. The dragon united with the false prophet was also represented by pagan Rome and the Jews unification at the cross, as will be the unification of the Democrats and the Republicans at the Sunday law. The elements of a united power are represented by the Democrats and Republicans within the Republican horn of the earth beast. Those two unholy political powers are represented by Cain, and the line of Abel also possesses a twofold division.

Uhusiano wa yule joka na nabii wa uongo unawakilishwa kwa namna ya kielelezo cha kawaida katika Mlima Karmeli. Mlimani hapo, Ahabu alimwakilisha joka, na manabii wa Baali na Ashtaroth wa Yezebeli waliwawakilisha manabii wa uongo waliosimama kinyume na Eliya. Mnyama ambaye ni Yezebeli alikuwa bado nyuma ya pazia huko Samaria. Joka aliyeunganishwa na nabii wa uongo pia aliwakilishwa na muungano wa Rumi ya kipagani na Wayahudi pale msalabani, kama vile utakavyokuwa muungano wa Democrats na Republicans katika sheria ya Jumapili. Vipengele vya mamlaka iliyoungana vinawakilishwa na Democrats na Republicans ndani ya pembe ya Kirepublican ya mnyama wa nchi. Hizo nguvu mbili zisizo takatifu za kisiasa zinawakilishwa na Kaini, na uzao wa Abeli nao pia una mgawanyiko wa namna mbili.

Abel’s line, which in relation to Cain’s external line is the internal line, and is represented by two classes of virgins. The progression of the Protestant horn of the earth beast that is the United States is represented by a series of religious purging’s beginning with the church of Sardis in 1798, when the United States became the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Sardis was a church who had a name claiming that it lived, but it was dead. By 1798 the Protestant sects that had broken away from the papal church were already returning to Rome. Christians were first named Christians in Antioch.

Abele me syi, ge Kaini me syi rya pa ma ni syi ge gu ni syi, ni nyɔmɛra kɔyɛ kɔsii ka klɛŋ yi ta. Purotestanti kpɛlɛŋ ɔko ni jɔrɔ-beast gye ni o Yunayitedi Steetsi, e tɛɛ mɔ nitswa shishi lɛlɛ kɛ hɛ ji, ni e shwɛɛ ni hɛlɛ lɛi kɔkɔe ni e yɔɔ ni Sardisi-haŋ lɛ 1798, ni Yunayitedi Steetsi kɛ Mlaŋtsɛii Kpaŋmɔ shishi nyɛ shiɔ lɔ Bible nyagbee kɛ ji. Sardisi kɛ hɛ ji ni e hewɔ hewalɛ ni e jee hewalɛ kɛ e he ni e yi, ni e kɛ gbohi. Kɛ 1798, Purotestanti sɔŋtsɛmɛi ni e bɔɔ kɛ papal hɛ lɛ, e baatsɛ ni e fɛɛ kɛ Rome. Antioch lɛ ni e tsɔɔ Kristofɔi hewalɛ kɛ Christians kɛ tsui ni kɛtsɔi.

“It was in Antioch that the disciples were first called Christians. The name was given them because Christ was the main theme of their preaching, their teaching, and their conversation. Continually they were recounting the incidents that had occurred during the days of His earthly ministry, when His disciples were blessed with His personal presence. Untiringly they dwelt upon His teachings and His miracles of healing. With quivering lips and tearful eyes they spoke of His agony in the garden, His betrayal, trial, and execution, the forbearance and humility with which He had endured the contumely and torture imposed upon Him by His enemies, and the Godlike pity with which He had prayed for those who persecuted Him. His resurrection and ascension, and His work in heaven as the Mediator for fallen man, were topics on which they rejoiced to dwell. Well might the heathen call them Christians, since they preached Christ and addressed their prayers to God through Him.

“Antioch-miŋŋa, nianiamiŋ-kho Kristan-ni khophi amasung khanghanba phanglammi. Maming adu makhoida pibagi maramdi, makhoigi hourakpa, makhoigi paothokpa, amasung makhoigi waheiba-gi marakta Christ adu anouba oina maruoigi amasung mapu oirammi. Makhoi-na matam pumnamakta, Mahakki leipak-ki thabak toukhiba numit-sing aduda thokkhiba thoudok-sing adu hantharakkhi. Mahakki nupa-singna Mahakki mi-oiba leibakpagi mapanna bor pikhre. Makhoi-na thajaba leitana, Mahakki paothok-sing amasung anaba phabagi mahak-ki khudol-sing aduda ningthina leirammmi. Chingnanaba khongchat-sing amasung ising thadokpa mit-singga loinana, makhoi-na lampak-ki aramda Mahakki nungshiba, Mahakki piba, bisar touba amasung hingsinnaba adu hai. Mahakna Mahakki yeknaba-singna Mahakki mathakta thok-hanba nungsitnaba amasung cheitheng-thokpada khudongchaba amasung ningshingba kari oina khangdaba leitana khudol piba adu, amasung Mahakna Mahakki tengthaba-singgidamak Ishwar-oiba chanurabaga haina haijakhiba adu, makhoi-na haiba ngamdre. Mahakki hinggatpa amasung swargada chatpa, amasung pukning leiringeida leitaba mi-singgidamak maichou oina swargada touba Mahakki thabak adu, makhoi-na nungairaba pukningna punsillaga leirammba maru oirammmi. Aduga, makhoi-na Christ adu hourak-i amasung Mahak khudakta Ishwarga makhoigi haijaba-sing puthok-i maramna, asida leiriba jati-lom-singna makhoi-bu Kristan haina khangkhiba adu matik chabani.”

“It was God who gave to them the name of Christian. This is a royal name, given to all who join themselves to Christ. It was of this name that James wrote later, ‘Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats? Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called?’ James 2:6, 7. And Peter declared, ‘If any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf.’ ‘If ye be reproached for the name of Christ, happy are ye; for the spirit of glory and of God resteth upon you.’ 1 Peter 4:16, 14.” Acts of the Apostles, 157.

“Ni Mungu aliyewapa jina la Mkristo. Hili ni jina la kifalme, walilopewa wote wanaojiunga na Kristo. Ni kuhusu jina hili ndipo Yakobo baadaye aliandika, ‘Je! matajiri hawawaonei ninyi, nao hawawavuta mbele ya viti vya hukumu? Je! hawalitukani lile jina jema mliloitiwa?’ Yakobo 2:6, 7. Naye Petro akatangaza, ‘Lakini mtu akiteswa kwa kuwa ni Mkristo, asione haya; bali na amtukuze Mungu kwa jambo hilo.’ ‘Mkilaumiwa kwa ajili ya jina la Kristo, heri yenu; kwa kuwa Roho wa utukufu, naam, Roho wa Mungu, anakaa juu yenu.’ 1 Petro 4:16, 14.” Matendo ya Mitume, 157.

The church of Ephesus was given the name of Christian which led to the persecuted church of Smyrna, that was followed by the church of compromise in the history of Pergamos. When the papacy took the throne, a separation identified God’s true church as the church in the wilderness. The Roman church was Thyatira. At the ending of the wilderness of twelve hundred and sixty years, the church of Protestantism arose, and from that point onward the Protestant horn is represented by a divine series of tests and purges.

Eklezia ya Efeso ilipewa jina la Ukristo, jambo lililoongoza kwa eklezia iliyoteswa ya Smirna; nayo ikafuatwa na eklezia ya maridhiano katika historia ya Pergamo. Upapa ulipochukua kiti cha enzi, utengano ulilitambulisha eklezia ya kweli ya Mungu kuwa ndiyo eklezia iliyoko jangwani. Eklezia ya Rumi ilikuwa Thiatira. Mwishoni mwa kipindi cha jangwani cha miaka elfu moja mia mbili na sitini, eklezia ya Uprotestanti iliinuka, na tangu wakati huo na kuendelea pembe ya Kiprotestanti inawakilishwa kwa mfululizo wa kiungu wa majaribu na utakaso.

Protestantism began when Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses upon the door in 1517, and “23” years later in 1540 the Jesuit order began. In 2013 the 95th and final presentation of Habakkuk’s Tables was nailed to the door, and on March 13, 2013¸ the first Jesuit pope was inaugurated. Martin Luther was excommunicated in that very history by pope Leo. Go figure…

Uprotestanti ulianza wakati Martin Luther alipobandika theses zake 95 mlangoni mwaka 1517, na miaka “23” baadaye, mwaka 1540, shirika la Wajesuiti lilianza. Mwaka 2013 uwasilishaji wa 95 na wa mwisho wa Meza za Habakuki ulipigiliwa mlangoni, na tarehe 13 Machi, 2013, papa wa kwanza Mjesuiti alitawazwa. Martin Luther alitengwa na ushirika wa kanisa katika historia iyo hiyo na papa Leo. Jione mwenyewe…

In 1798 the church of Sardis claimed to hold to the name of “Protestant,” but by returning to Rome they were already failing to uphold their name. When Millerite Adventism took the torch of Protestantism in 1844, they represented a rebuke against Jeroboam the first king of Israel, a nation who were blood relatives of the tribe in Judah, where God had placed His temple. Jeroboam set up a counterfeit, based upon the religion that represented his nation’s former bondage. He repeated Aaron’s foundational rebellion of erecting an image of a beast with all the prophetic significance associated with the story. But at his dedication service Millerite Adventism rebuked his unwillingness to continue to direct true worship to the sanctuary where God lives. Jeroboam, wanted the focus of worship to be in Bethel and Dan, representing those from Sardis in 1844 who refused to follow Christ into the Most Holy Place.

1798년 사데 교회는 자신들이 “개신교”라는 이름을 붙들고 있다고 주장하였으나, 로마로 되돌아감으로써 그들은 이미 그 이름을 지키는 데 실패하고 있었다. 1844년에 밀러파 재림신앙이 개신교의 횃불을 이어받았을 때, 그들은 이스라엘의 첫째 왕 여로보암에 대한 책망을 나타냈는데, 그는 하나님께서 자신의 성전을 두신 유다 지파와 혈족 관계에 있던 한 나라의 왕이었다. 여로보암은 자기 민족의 이전 속박을 상징하던 종교에 근거하여 위조된 체계를 세웠다. 그는 그 이야기와 연관된 모든 예언적 의미를 지닌 채, 짐승의 형상을 세운 아론의 근본적인 반역을 되풀이하였다. 그러나 그 봉헌 예배에서 밀러파 재림신앙은 하나님께서 거하시는 성소로 참된 예배를 계속 향하게 하기를 거부한 그의 마음을 책망하였다. 여로보암은 예배의 초점을 벧엘과 단에 두고자 하였는데, 이는 1844년에 그리스도를 따라 지성소로 들어가기를 거부한 사데의 사람들을 상징한다.

Millerite Adventism chose to return to the religion of Rome, and took up the very doctrinal arguments of those who had just been exposed as false prophets through their rejection of Miller’s message; as their theological masters in order to justify their rejection of the prophetic message of the seven times. Millerite Adventism, as with the disobedient prophet chose their own path, instead of following God’s direction. The path that is chosen by the foolish in all the tests and purges of the wise and foolish virgins from the Protestant reformation onward in prophetic history is the path which returns to the worship of the land that you were delivered from, and as they say, “all roads lead to Rome.” All roads except Jeremiah’s old paths.

Adventism ya Miller ilichagua kurudi kwenye dini ya Roma, na ikachukua hoja zilezile za mafundisho za wale waliokuwa wamekwisha kufunuliwa kuwa manabii wa uongo kwa njia ya kuukataa ujumbe wa Miller; ikiwafanya kuwa mabwana wao wa teolojia ili kuhalalisha kuukataa kwao ujumbe wa kinabii wa nyakati saba. Adventism ya Miller, kama ilivyokuwa kwa nabii asiitii, ilichagua njia yake yenyewe, badala ya kufuata uongozi wa Mungu. Njia ichaguliwayo na wapumbavu katika majaribu yote na utakaso wote wa mabikira wenye hekima na mabikira wapumbavu tangu Matengenezo ya Kiprotestanti na kuendelea katika historia ya unabii ni njia ile irudiyo kwenye ibada ya nchi uliyokombolewa kutoka humo, na kama wasemavyo, “njia zote huielekea Roma.” Njia zote isipokuwa mapito ya kale ya Yeremia.

The Protestant reformation had been typified by Moses’ return to Egypt in order to lead God’s people into the Promised Land. Once out of the land of captivity God purposed to give His chosen people His law. In the line of Moses and the Protestant reformation rebellion was manifested immediately after the deliverance. God tested Sardis, a people who claimed to have a living name, but were dead by the time of the message of William Miller. Two purging’s took place in 1844; the first was the purge of the church of Sardis, who had claimed to be Protestants, but were proven to be dead; and then the Millerite’s were purged in the same year, in fulfillment of the parable of the ten virgins.

Kubahindura kw’Abaporotesitanti kwari kwaragereranyijwe no kugaruka kwa Mose mu Egiputa kugira ngo ayobore ubwoko bw’Imana abujyane mu Gihugu cy’Isezerano. Bageze hanze y’igihugu cy’ubunyage, Imana yari ifite umugambi wo guha ubwoko bwayo bwatoranyijwe amategeko yayo. Mu murongo wa Mose n’uwo Kubahindura kw’Abaporotesitanti, ubugome bwo kwigomeka bwarigaragaje ako kanya nyuma yo kurokorwa. Imana yagerageje Sarudi, ubwoko bwavugaga ko bufite izina rizima, nyamara bwari bwarapfuye igihe ubutumwa bwa William Miller bwageragaho. Mu wa 1844 habayeho kwezwa kubiri; ubwa mbere habayeho kwezwa kw’itorero rya Sarudi, ryari ryarivugaga ko ari Abaporotesitanti, ariko rigahamwa ko ryapfuye; hanyuma no muri uwo mwaka nyine Abamilerite bejwe, mu gusohozwa kw’umugani w’abakobwa cumi.

The Democrats and Republicans represent two political classes that together make up the Republican horn on the earth beast of Revelation thirteen. The wise and foolish virgins are two religious classes that together make up the Protestant horn on the earth beast. The wise virgins possess the first name given at Antioch. The wise virgins are Christians, but they are also Philadelphians who have the promise of receiving a name.

바벨론민주당과 공화당은 함께 계시록 13장의 땅에서 올라오는 짐승의 공화주의 뿔을 이루는 두 정치 계층을 대표한다. 슬기로운 처녀들과 미련한 처녀들은 함께 그 땅의 짐승의 개신교 뿔을 이루는 두 종교 계층이다. 슬기로운 처녀들은 안디옥에서 처음 주어진 이름을 소유하고 있다. 슬기로운 처녀들은 그리스도인들이며, 또한 이름을 받을 약속을 지닌 빌라델비아 사람들이다.

Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name. Revelation 3:12.

ئەوەی سەردەکەوێت، دەیکەم بە ستوونێک لە پەرستگای خوداکەم، و ئیتر هەرگیز دەرناچێت؛ و ناوی خوداکەم و ناوی شارەکەی خوداکەم لەسەری دەنووسم، کە ئورشەلیمی نوێیە، ئەوەی لە خوداکەمەوە لە ئاسمان دابەزێت؛ هەروەها ناوی نوێی خۆشم لەسەری دەنووسم. مەکاشفە 3:12.

The first time God named His people Christian was at Antioch, and the history where the Laodicean movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand changes unto the Philadelphian movement of the one hundred and forty-four thousand is also the history of Antiochus the Great, who the city of Antioch is named after, and who is represented at the end of a 250-year period between the battles of Raphia and Panium.

Mulungu pa nthawi yoyamba anatcha anthu Ake Akhristu ku Antiokeya, ndipo mbiri imene kayendedwe ka Laodikeya ka zana limodzi ndi makumi anayi ndi anayi a chikwi kamasanduka kayendedwe ka Filadelfiya ka zana limodzi ndi makumi anayi ndi anayi a chikwi ilinso mbiri ya Antiokosi Wamkulu, amene mzinda wa Antiokeya unatchulidwa dzina lake kuchokera kwa iye, ndiponso amene akuimiridwa kumapeto kwa nyengo ya zaka mazana awiri ndi makumi asanu pakati pa nkhondo za Rafia ndi Paniyumu.

We will continue these things in the next article.

Twakutwalilila byonse ebi mu lukusa lulelondepo.