As we begin to consider the typification of the time of the end in 1989, by the prophetic history of verse ten, it is necessary to drop back into the history of the third generation of both horns of the earth beast. In 1913, the earth beast’s horn of Republicanism began its generation of compromise with the globalist banking system, and in 1919, the horn of true Protestantism began its generation of compromise with the theologians of apostate Protestantism and also the American Medical Association as it surrendered the accreditation of its educational system to the world. Both horns began a compromised relationship with the world that would change the direction of their respective messages from that point onward.
Rehefa atombotsika mandinika ny fanoharana ara-paminaniana momba ny fotoanan’ny farany amin’ny taona 1989, araka ny tantara ara-paminaniana ao amin’ny andininy faha‑folo, dia ilaina ny miverina ao amin’ny tantaran’ny taranaka fahatelo amin’ireo tandroka roa an’ilay bibidia niakatra avy tamin’ny tany. Tamin’ny 1913, ny tandroky ny Repoblikanisma an’ilay bibidia avy amin’ny tany dia nanomboka ny taranaky ny marimaritra iraisana nataony tamin’ny rafitra banky maneran-tany, ary tamin’ny 1919, ny tandroky ny tena Protestantisma dia nanomboka ny taranaky ny marimaritra iraisana nataony tamin’ireo teolojiana ao amin’ny Protestantisma mpihemotra ary koa tamin’ny American Medical Association, rehefa natolony ho an’izao tontolo izao ny fanomezan-dàlana ara-pankatoavana ny rafi-panabeazany. Samy nanomboka fifandraisana feno marimaritra iraisana tamin’izao tontolo izao ireo tandroka roa ireo, ka nanova ny lalan’ny hafatra nentin’izy ireo tsirairay avy hatreo mandroso.
In that history the starting point for the king of the north, and the king of the south of the last days also reached a turning point. The Miracle of Fatima occurred on October 13, 1917, in Fatima, Portugal. It was the culmination of a series of Marian apparitions witnessed by three young shepherd children: Lucia dos Santos and her cousins Francisco and Jacinta Marto. According to the accounts provided by the children, the Virgin Mary, identified as Our Lady of Fatima, appeared to them on the 13th day of each month from May to October 1917.
Tamin’izany tantara izany dia tonga teo amin’ny teboka fiaingana ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra, ary ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo amin’ny andro farany koa dia tonga tamin’ny teboka fihodinana. Ny Fahagagana tao Fatima dia nitranga tamin’ny 13 Oktobra 1917, tao Fatima, Portiogaly. Izany no famaranana ny andiana fisehoan’i Maria izay hitan’ny ankizy mpiandry ondry tanora telo: i Lucia dos Santos sy ny zanak’olo-mpiray tam-po aminy, i Francisco sy Jacinta Marto. Araka ny fitantarana nomen’ireo ankizy, ny Virjiny Maria, izay nantsoina hoe Ilay Vadintsika tao Fatima, dia niseho tamin’izy ireo tamin’ny andro faha-13 isam-bolana hatramin’ny Mey ka hatramin’ny Oktobra 1917.
During the final apparition on October 13, 1917, tens of thousands of people gathered at the Cova da Iria, near Fatima, expecting to witness a miracle as predicted by the children. According to the witnesses, the sun appeared to change colors, spin, and dance in the sky. This event came to be known as the Miracle of the Sun or the Miracle of Fatima.
Nandritra ny fisehoana farany tamin’ny 13 Oktobra 1917, olona an’aliny maro no nivory tao Cova da Iria, akaikin’i Fatima, niandry hahita fahagagana araka ny nambaran’ireo ankizy mialoha. Araka ny filazan’ireo vavolombelona, dia hita ho niova loko ny masoandro, nihodina, ary nandihy teny amin’ny lanitra. Nanjary fantatra tamin’ny anarana hoe Fahagagana tamin’ny Masoandro na Fahagagana tao Fatima izany zava-nitranga izany.
The Miracle of Fatima is a significant event in Catholic history and devotion, and it has been the subject of much study, debate, and religious interpretation over the years. The events at Fatima have had a lasting impact on popular piety, Marian devotion, and the interpretation of apocalyptic themes within the Catholic Church.
Ny Fahagagana tao Fatima dia zava-nitranga lehibe teo amin’ny tantara sy ny fitiavam-bavaka katolika, ary efa lohahevitry ny fandalinana maro, ny adihevitra, ary ny fandikana ara-pivavahana nandritra ny taona maro izy io. Nisy fiantraikany maharitra teo amin’ny toe-panahy feno fivavahan’ny vahoaka, ny fitiavam-bavaka ho an’i Maria, ary ny fandikana ny lohahevitra apokaliptika ao anatin’ny Fiangonana Katolika ny zava-nitranga tao Fatima.
The Bolshevik Revolution occurred in Russia on November 7, 1917, when Bolshevik forces, led by Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik Party, seized key government buildings and infrastructure in Petrograd (now Saint Petersburg). This event marked the culmination of the Russian Revolution of 1917, which had begun with the February Revolution earlier in the year that led to the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the establishment of a provisional government.
Ny Revolisiona Bolshevika dia nitranga tany Rosia tamin’ny 7 Novambra 1917, raha ireo hery Bolshevika, notarihin’i Vladimir Lenin sy ny Antoko Bolshevika, no naka an-keriny ireo tranom-panjakana lehibe sy ny fotodrafitrasa tany Petrograd (Saint Petersburg ankehitriny). Io zava-nitranga io no nanamarika ny fahataperan’ny Revolisiona Rosiana tamin’ny 1917, izay nanomboka tamin’ny Revolisiona Febroary tany am-piandohan’io taona io, ka nitarika ho amin’ny fialan’i Tsar Nicholas II teo amin’ny fitondrana sy ny fananganana governemanta vonjimaika.
During the Revolution, the Bolsheviks successfully overthrew the provisional government and established Soviet control over Russia. The Bolsheviks proclaimed the establishment of a socialist state and began implementing their revolutionary program, including the nationalization of industry, land redistribution, and the withdrawal of Russia from World War I. The October Revolution ultimately led to the creation of the Soviet Union and had profound and far-reaching consequences for Russia and the world, shaping the course of 20th-century history.
Nandritra ny Revolisiona, nahomby ny Bolsheviks tamin’ny nanongana ny governemanta vonjimaika sy nametraka ny fifehezan’ny Sovietika teo ambonin’i Rosia. Nanambara ny fananganana fanjakana sosialista ny Bolsheviks ary nanomboka nampihatra ny fandaharan’asany revolisionera, anisan’izany ny fanjakazakana ny indostria, ny fizaràna indray ny tany, ary ny fialàn’i Rosia tamin’ny Ady Lehibe Voalohany. Tamin’ny farany, ny Revolisiona Oktobra dia nitarika ho amin’ny fananganana ny Firaisana Sovietika ary niteraka vokatra lalina sy lavitra ezaka ho an’i Rosia sy izao tontolo izao, ka namolavola ny fizotry ny tantaran’ny taonjato faha-20.
Jesus illustrates the end with the beginning, and in order to fully see the king of the north and the king of the south of the last days, it is necessary to understand their beginnings. The literal kings of the south and the north that are identified in Daniel chapter eleven are defined as the power that rules the literal area of Egypt as the king of the south, and the power that rules the literal geographical area associated with Babylon as the king of the north.
I Jesosy dia manazava ny farany amin’ny alalan’ny fiandohana, ary mba hahitana amin’ny fahafenoany ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra sy ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo amin’ny andro farany, dia ilaina ny mahatakatra ny fiandohany. Ny mpanjaka ara-bakiteny amin’ny atsimo sy ny avaratra izay amantarana ao amin’ny Daniela toko fahairaika ambin’ny folo dia faritana ho hery izay manjaka amin’ny faritra ara-bakitenin’i Egypta amin’ny maha-mpanjakan’ny atsimo azy, ary ny hery izay manjaka amin’ny faritra ara-jeografika ara-bakiteny mifandray amin’i Babylona amin’ny maha-mpanjakan’ny avaratra azy.
Literal prophecy transitioned to spiritual prophecy in the time of the cross, when ancient literal Israel was transitioning to modern spiritual Israel. Literal pagan Rome trampled down literal Jerusalem for three and a half literal years from 67 AD unto 70 AD, and spiritual papal Rome trampled down spiritual Jerusalem for three and a half spiritual years.
Ny faminaniana ara-bakiteny dia nifindra ho faminaniana ara-panahy tamin’ny andron’ny hazo fijaliana, raha i Isiraely ara-bakiteny fahiny kosa nifindra ho amin’i Isiraely ara-panahy ankehitriny. Roma jentilisa ara-bakiteny dia nanitsakitsaka an’i Jerosalema ara-bakiteny nandritra ny telo taona sy tapany ara-bakiteny, hatramin’ny taona 67 taor. J.K. ka hatramin’ny taona 70 taor. J.K., ary Roma papa ara-panahy dia nanitsakitsaka an’i Jerosalema ara-panahy nandritra ny telo taona sy tapany ara-panahy.
Spiritual Babylon is identified in Revelation chapter seventeen, as the whore who commits fornication with the kings of the earth. Spiritual Egypt is identified in Revelation chapter eleven as atheistic France. The modern manifestations of the spiritual king of the north, that received its deadly wound at the time of the end in 1798 and then retaliated against the modern manifestation of the spiritual king of the south at the time of the end in 1989, are both represented in verse forty of Daniel eleven. Both powers have their origins in their last day manifestation in the 1917 to 1918 time frame, which is the same time frame as the generation of compromise for both horns of the earth beast. Those beginnings must be recognized to rightly apply the endings. The beginnings of the last day kings of the north and south both start at the French Revolution.
Babylona ara-panahy dia faritana ao amin’ny Apokalypsy toko faha-fito ambin’ny folo ho ilay vehivavy janga izay mijangajanga amin’ny mpanjakan’ny tany. Ejipta ara-panahy dia faritana ao amin’ny Apokalypsy toko faha-iraika ambin’ny folo ho i Frantsa tsy mino an’Andriamanitra. Ny fisehoana maoderin’ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra ara-panahy, izay nandray ny ratra mahafaty azy tamin’ny fotoan’ny farany tamin’ny taona 1798, ary avy eo namaly tamin-kery ny fisehoana maoderin’ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo ara-panahy tamin’ny fotoan’ny farany tamin’ny taona 1989, dia samy aseho ao amin’ny andininy faha-efapolo amin’ny Daniela 11. Ireo hery roa ireo dia samy manana ny fiaviany, amin’ny fisehoany amin’ny andro farany, ao anatin’ny vanim-potoana 1917 ka hatramin’ny 1918, izay vanim-potoana mitovy amin’ny taranaky ny fifanarahana ho an’ny tandroka roa amin’ilay bibidia avy amin’ny tany. Tsy maintsy ekena ireo fiandohana ireo mba hampiharana araka ny tokony ho izy ny fiafarana. Ny fiandohan’ireo mpanjakan’ny avaratra sy atsimo amin’ny andro farany dia samy manomboka amin’ny Revolisiona frantsay.
“In the sixteenth century the Reformation, presenting an open Bible to the people, had sought admission to all the countries of Europe. Some nations welcomed it with gladness, as a messenger of Heaven. In other lands the papacy succeeded to a great extent in preventing its entrance; and the light of Bible knowledge, with its elevating influences, was almost wholly excluded. In one country, though the light found entrance, it was not comprehended by the darkness. For centuries, truth and error struggled for the mastery. At last the evil triumphed, and the truth of Heaven was thrust out. ‘This is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light.’ John 3:19. The nation was left to reap the results of the course which she had chosen. The restraint of God’s Spirit was removed from a people that had despised the gift of His grace. Evil was permitted to come to maturity. And all the world saw the fruit of willful rejection of the light.
“Tamin’ny taonjato fahenina ambin’ny folo, ny Fanavaozana, izay nanolotra Baiboly misokatra ho an’ny vahoaka, dia nitady fidirana ho amin’ny firenena rehetra tany Eoropa. Ny firenena sasany nandray izany tamim-pifaliana, tahaka ny iraky ny Lanitra. Tany amin’ny tany hafa kosa, ny fahefan’ny papa dia nahomby be tamin’ny fanakanana ny fidirany; ary ny fahazavan’ny fahalalana ny Baiboly, mbamin’ny heriny manandratra, dia saiky voaroaka tanteraka. Tao amin’ny firenena iray, na dia niditra aza ny mazava, dia tsy azon’ny maizina. Nandritra ny taonjato maro, ny fahamarinana sy ny fahadisoana dia nifaninana hahazo ny fanapahana. Farany dia nandresy ny ratsy, ary ny fahamarinan’ny Lanitra dia noroahina hivoaka. “Ary izao no fanamelohana: tonga amin’izao tontolo izao ny mazava, nefa ny olona tia ny maizina noho ny mazava.” Jaona 3:19. Navelan’ilay firenena hijinja ny vokatry ny lalana izay nofidiny izany. Nesorina ny fangejan’ny Fanahin’Andriamanitra tamin’ny vahoaka izay nanamavo ny fanomezam-pahasoavany. Navelan’ny ratsy hahatratra ny fahamasahany. Ary izao tontolo izao manontolo dia nahita ny vokatry ny fandavana an-tsitrapo ny mazava.”
“The war against the Bible, carried forward for so many centuries in France, culminated in the scenes of the Revolution. That terrible outbreaking was but the legitimate result of Rome’s suppression of the Scriptures. It presented the most striking illustration which the world has ever witnessed of the working out of the papal policy—an illustration of the results to which for more than a thousand years the teaching of the Roman Church had been tending.
“Ny ady natao tamin’ny Baiboly, izay notohizana nandritra ny taonjato maro tany Frantsa, dia tonga tamin’ny faratampony tao amin’ireo zava-niseho tamin’ny Revolisiona. Io fipoahana mahatahotra io dia tsy inona fa vokatra ara-dalàna avy amin’ny famoretan’i Roma ny Soratra Masina. Nasehony tamin’ny fomba miavaka indrindra, izay mbola tsy hitan’izao tontolo izao hatrizay, ny fisehoan’ny fampiharana ny politikam-panjakan’ny papa—dia fanehoana ny vokatra izay efa nandrosoany nandritra ny arivo taona mahery ny fampianaran’ny Fiangonana romana.”
“The suppression of the Scriptures during the period of papal supremacy was foretold by the prophets; and the Revelator points also to the terrible results that were to accrue especially to France from the domination of the ‘man of sin.’” The Great Controversy, 265, 266.
“Nialoha mialoha tamin’ny alalan’ny mpaminany ny famoretana ny Soratra Masina nandritra ny vanim-potoanan’ny fahefana fara tampon’ny papa; ary ny Mpanambara koa dia manondro ireo vokatra mahatsiravina izay haterak’izany, indrindra indrindra ho an’i Frantsa, avy amin’ny fanapahan’ilay ‘olona ota.’” The Great Controversy, 265, 266.
The French Revolution was produced by the suppression of the Scriptures “during the period of papal supremacy.” The birth of atheism, which was to become the archenemy of the papacy, was brought about by the papacy itself. The French Revolution took place from 1789 to 1799, but the atheistic revolutionary spirit that began in France continued to spread across Europe and beyond. One-hundred eighteen years after the end of the revolution in France, the Russian Revolution began in Russia. The revolution of atheism that began in France, ended in Russia, and in 1917 Russia became the prophetic representative of the nation symbolized by the atheism of Egypt. The dragon power represented as the king of the south had migrated from France to Russia.
Ny Revolisiona Frantsay dia vokatry ny famoretana ny Soratra Masina “nandritra ny vanim-potoanan’ny fahefana papaly.” Ny nahaterahan’ny tsy finoana an’Andriamanitra, izay ho tonga fahavalo lehibe indrindran’ny papaly, dia ny papaly ihany no nahatonga izany. Ny Revolisiona Frantsay dia nitranga nanomboka tamin’ny 1789 ka hatramin’ny 1799, nefa ilay toe-panahy revolisionera tsy mino an’Andriamanitra izay niantomboka tany Frantsa dia nanohy niely nanerana an’i Eoropa sy tany ankoatra. Rehefa afaka zato sy valo ambin’ny folo taona taorian’ny nifaranan’ny revolisiona tany Frantsa, dia nanomboka tany Rosia ny Revolisiona Rosiana. Ny revolisionan’ny tsy finoana an’Andriamanitra izay niantomboka tany Frantsa dia nifarana tany Rosia, ary tamin’ny 1917 dia tonga solontena ara-paminaniana ny firenena notandindonin’ny tsy finoan’i Egypta an’Andriamanitra i Rosia. Ilay hery dragona aseho ho mpanjakan’ny atsimo dia nifindra avy tany Frantsa ho any Rosia.
The revolution in France was represented politically and prophetically by Napoleon Bonaparte, and in that sense, Napoleon represents the first leader of a nation established in a revolution brought about by the atheism of Egypt. The narcissism of Napoleon is fitly repeated by the narcissism of Putin.
Ny revolisiona tany Frantsa dia naseho ara-politika sy ara-paminaniana tamin’i Napoléon Bonaparte, ary amin’izany heviny izany, i Napoléon dia maneho ny mpitarika voalohany ny firenena iray natsangana tao anatin’ny revolisiona nateraky ny tsy finoana an’Andriamanitra avy amin’i Egypta. Ny fitiavan-tena tafahoatran’i Napoléon dia averina araka ny tokony ho izy amin’ny fitiavan-tena tafahoatran’i Putin.
Napoleon was keenly aware of the power of imagery and propaganda, as is Putin, who was a former KGB officer. The KGB specializes in propaganda. Napoleon used portraiture as a means of projecting his authority, power, and image of leadership to the public. He commissioned portraits from some of the most celebrated artists of his time, including Jacques-Louis David, Antoine-Jean Gros, and Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, among others.
Napoléon dia nahafantatra lalina ny herin’ny sary famantarana sy ny fampielezan-kevitra, tahaka an’i Poutine, izay manamboninahitra KGB taloha. Ny KGB dia manampahaizana manokana amin’ny fampielezan-kevitra. Nampiasa ny zavakanto fanaovana sarin’olona i Napoléon ho fomba anehoana amin’ny besinimaro ny fahefany sy ny heriny ary ny endriky ny fitarihana nasehony. Nanafatra sariny tamin’ireo mpanakanto malaza indrindra tamin’ny androny izy, anisan’izany i Jacques-Louis David, Antoine-Jean Gros, ary Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, sy ny hafa koa.
These portraits depicted Napoleon in various poses and settings, ranging from official state portraits to more informal scenes. They served not only as personal mementos for Napoleon himself but also as tools for spreading his image and influence both domestically and internationally. Putin has accomplished the identical work for himself, with a multitude of pictures of himself in settings that rival any of the modern influencers on the Internet.
Ireo sary ireo dia nampiseho an’i Napoléon tamin’ny fihetsika sy sehatra samihafa, nanomboka tamin’ireo sarim-panjakana ofisialy ka hatramin’ireo sehatra tsy dia ara-pomba loatra. Tsy natao ho fahatsiarovana manokana ho an’i Napoléon tenany ihany izy ireny, fa koa fitaovana nampielezana ny endriny sy ny heriny, na tao an-tanindrazana na teo amin’ny sehatra iraisam-pirenena. I Putin dia nahavita asa mitovy tanteraka ho an’ny tenany, amin’ny alalan’ny sary maro be momba ny tenany ao anatin’ny sehatra izay mifaninana amin’izay an’ireo mpanentana maoderina rehetra ao amin’ny Internet.
At the beginning of the French Revolution the king, his family and staff were overthrown and executed. At the beginning of the Russian Revolution the Czar, his family and staff were overthrown and executed. The revolution that began in France culminated in Russia. The French Revolution is the subject of the prophecy of chapter eleven of Revelation, and therefore the French Revolution is subject to the rules of prophetic interpretation. Jesus always illustrates the end of a thing with the beginning of a thing, so the Russian Revolution is the end of the French Revolution.
Tamin’ny fiandohan’ny Revolisiona frantsay dia naongana sy novonoina ny mpanjaka sy ny fianakaviany ary ny mpanara-dia azy. Tamin’ny fiandohan’ny Revolisiona rosiana dia naongana sy novonoina ny Tsar sy ny fianakaviany ary ny mpanara-dia azy. Ny revolisiona izay nanomboka tany Frantsa dia tonga tamin’ny fara tampony tany Rosia. Ny Revolisiona frantsay no lohahevitry ny faminaniana ao amin’ny toko fahairaika ambin’ny folo ao amin’ny Apokalypsy, ka noho izany dia iharan’ny fitsipiky ny fandikana ara-paminaniana ny Revolisiona frantsay. Mandrakariva i Jesosy no mampiseho ny fiafaran’ny zavatra iray amin’ny fiandohan’ny zavatra iray, koa ny Revolisiona rosiana no fiafaran’ny Revolisiona frantsay.
Vladimir Putin represents the last leader of a nation established in a revolution brought about with the atheism of Egypt. The first leader of Russia was Vladimir Lenin. The name “Vladimir” is of Slavic origin and is composed of two elements: “vlad” and “mir.” “Vlad” is derived from the Slavic root “vladeti,” which means “to rule” or to wield power. “Mir” means “world”. The first Vladimir (Lenin) typifies the last Vladimir (Putin), who is also typified by the first leader of the revolution of atheism (Napoleon).
I Vladimir Putin dia maneho ny mpitarika farany amin’ny firenena iray natsangana tao anatin’ny revolisiona iray nentin’ny tsy finoana an’Andriamanitra an’i Egypta. Ny mpitarika voalohany tao Rosia dia i Vladimir Lenin. Ny anarana hoe “Vladimir” dia avy amin’ny fototra Slavy ary voaforon’ny singa roa: “vlad” sy “mir.” Ny hoe “vlad” dia avy amin’ny fototeny Slavy “vladeti,” izay midika hoe “hanapaka” na hitana fahefana. Ny hoe “mir” dia midika hoe “izao tontolo izao”. Ilay Vladimir voalohany (Lenin) dia tandindon’ilay Vladimir farany (Putin), izay tandindonin’ny mpitarika voalohan’ny revolisionan’ny tsy finoana an’Andriamanitra (Napoléon) koa.
After Napoleon’s defeat in the War of the Sixth Coalition and the Treaty of Fontainebleau in April 1814, he abdicated the throne of France and was exiled to the Mediterranean island of Elba. He was granted sovereignty over the island and allowed to retain the title of Emperor, albeit in a much-reduced capacity. Napoleon spent around ten months on Elba, during which he made plans to return to power in France. Following his escape from Elba and his brief return to power in France during the Hundred Days, Napoleon was decisively defeated at the Battle of Waterloo in June 1815. After this defeat the Allied powers, particularly Great Britain, were determined to prevent Napoleon from causing any further trouble. Consequently, he was exiled again, this time to the remote island of Saint Helena in the South Atlantic. Napoleon spent the remainder of his life in exile on Saint Helena until his death in 1821.
Taorian’ny faharesen’i Napoléon tamin’ny Adin’ny Firaisan’ny Enina sy ny Fifanarahana tao Fontainebleau tamin’ny Aprily 1814, dia niala tamin’ny seza fiandrianan’i Frantsa izy ka natao sesitany tany amin’ny nosy Elba ao amin’ny Ranomasina Mediteranea. Nomena fiandrianana tamin’io nosy io izy ary navela hihazona ny anaram-boninahitra hoe Emperora, na dia voafetra be aza izany fahefana izany. Nandany folo volana teo ho eo tany Elba i Napoléon, ka nandritra izany no namolavolany drafitra hiverenany eo amin’ny fitondrana tao Frantsa. Taorian’ny fandosirany avy tany Elba sy ny fiverenany vetivety teo amin’ny fahefana tao Frantsa nandritra ny Zato Andro, dia resy tanteraka i Napoléon tamin’ny Ady tao Waterloo tamin’ny Jona 1815. Taorian’io faharesena io, dia tapa-kevitra ny hisakana an’i Napoléon tsy hiteraka korontana intsony ny hery mpiray dina, indrindra fa i Grande-Bretagne. Noho izany, dia natao sesitany indray izy, tamin’ity indray mitoraka ity tany amin’ny nosy lavitra Saint Helena any amin’ny Atlantika Atsimo. Nandany ny sisa tamin’ny androm-piainany tany an-tsesitany tao Saint Helena i Napoléon mandra-pahafatiny tamin’ny 1821.
Putin is a representative of the old guard KGB. The KGB was the main security agency and intelligence agency of the Soviet Union from 1954 until its dissolution in 1991. It was responsible for internal security, counterintelligence, and intelligence gathering, both domestically and internationally. The KGB was known for its extensive network of spies, surveillance operations, and its role in maintaining the Communist regime’s control over the population. Vladimir Putin was a member of the KGB (Committee for State Security), the main security and intelligence agency of the Soviet Union.
Putin dia solontenan’ilay KGB mpiandany amin’ny filaminana fahiny. Ny KGB no sampan-draharaha lehibe misahana ny filaminam-panjakana sy ny fitsikilovana tao amin’ny Firaisana Sovietika nanomboka tamin’ny 1954 ka hatramin’ny fandravana azy tamin’ny 1991. Izy no niandraikitra ny filaminana anatiny, ny fanoherana ny fitsikilovana, ary ny fanangonana vaovao miafina, na tao an-toerana izany na tany ivelany. Nalaza ny KGB noho ny tambajotran’ireo mpitsikilo marobe nananany, ny asam-panarahamaso nataony, ary ny anjara asany tamin’ny fitazonana ny fanjakazakan’ny fitondrana Komonista teo ambonin’ny mponina. Vladimir Putin dia mpikambana tao amin’ny KGB (Committee for State Security), ilay sampan-draharaha lehibe misahana ny filaminana sy ny fitsikilovana tao amin’ny Firaisana Sovietika.
Putin joined the KGB in 1975 after graduating from Leningrad State University. Putin worked for the KGB until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, after which he entered politics and eventually became the President of Russia in 2000. His background in the KGB has had a significant influence on his approach to governance and foreign policy. Napoleon’s first exile on the Island of Elba, represents the history of 1991 until the year 2000, when the philosophy of the KGB returned. When Putin is eventually defeated, as represented in verses thirteen to fifteen, that second defeat (the first being 1989), is typified by Waterloo and Napoleon’s second exile, where he died.
Putin dia niditra tao amin’ny KGB tamin’ny 1975 taorian’ny nahavitany fianarana tao amin’ny Oniversitem-panjakana ao Leningrad. Niasa tao amin’ny KGB i Putin mandra-pirodanan’ny Firaisana Sôvietika tamin’ny 1991, ary taorian’izany dia niditra teo amin’ny sehatra politika izy ka nony farany dia tonga ho Filohan’i Rosia tamin’ny 2000. Ny fiaviany tao amin’ny KGB dia nisy fiantraikany lehibe teo amin’ny fomba fitantanany sy ny politikany ivelany. Ny sesitany voalohany nahazo an’i Napoleon tao amin’ny Nosin’i Elba dia maneho ny tantara nanomboka tamin’ny 1991 ka hatramin’ny taona 2000, fotoana izay niverenan’ny filozofian’ny KGB. Rehefa resin-kafatra amin’ny farany i Putin, araka ny aseho ao amin’ny andininy faha-telo ambin’ny folo ka hatramin’ny faha-dimy ambin’ny folo, izany faharesena faharoa izany (ny voalohany dia tamin’ny 1989) dia tandindonin’i Waterloo sy ny sesitany faharoa nahazo an’i Napoleon, izay nahafatesany.
Napoleon delivered the deadly wound to the papacy in 1798 and 1799. In 1799 the French Revolution ended in France, but by 1917 it had reached Russia in the Bolshevik Revolution. In 1917 the miracle of Fatima took place in Portugal, and the three children who supposedly communicated with Mary and Joseph were given three secret messages. The three messages were secret in the sense they were only to be read by the pope, the king of the north. The messages directed the pope to call a special meeting with the leaders of the Catholic Church and hold a special ceremony in order to dedicate Russia, which had just become communist Russia the year before, to the virgin Mary.
Napoléon dia nanome ny ratra mahafaty ny fahefana papaly tamin’ny 1798 sy 1799. Tamin’ny 1799 dia nifarana tany Frantsa ny Revolisiona Frantsay, nefa tamin’ny 1917 dia tonga tany Rosia izany tao amin’ny Revolisiona Bolshevika. Tamin’ny 1917 dia niseho tany Portiogaly ny fahagagana tao Fatima, ary ireo ankizy telo izay nolazaina fa nifandray tamin’i Maria sy Josefa dia nomena hafatra miafina telo. Miafina ireo hafatra telo ireo amin’ny heviny hoe ny papa ihany, dia ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra, no tokony hamaky azy. Nibaiko ny papa ireo hafatra mba hiantso fivoriana manokana miaraka amin’ireo mpitarika ny Fiangonana Katolika sy hanao fombafomba manokana mba hanokanana an’i Rosia, izay vao lasa Rosia kaominista tamin’ny taona teo aloha, ho an’i Maria virijiny.
The messages contained a warning that if the pope refused to follow through on the command to dedicate Russia to Mary, the world would suffer another world war (the first world war was to end the month after the miracle). The messages of Fatima became a structure for conservative Catholic prophetic interpretation. It identified a struggle within the Catholic church between conservative Catholicism, represented by pope John Paul II and the first Vatican council, and Liberal Catholicism represented by the current “woke-pope” and the second Vatican council.
Ny hafatra dia nirakitra fampitandremana fa raha mandà tsy hanatanteraka ny didy hanokanana an’i Rosia ho an’i Maria ny papa, dia hijaly amin’ny ady lehibe eran-tany hafa indray izao tontolo izao (ny ady lehibe voalohany eran-tany dia hifarana ny volana manaraka aorian’ilay fahagagana). Nanjary rafitra iray ho an’ny fandikana ara-paminaniana katolika mpandala ny nentin-drazana ny hafatry Fatima. Izy io dia namaritra tolona iray tao anatin’ny Fiangonana Katolika teo amin’ny katolisisma mpandala ny nentin-drazana, izay nosoloan’ny papa Joany Paoly II sy ny konsily voalohany tao Vatikana, sy ny katolisisma liberaly, izay nosoloan’ilay “papa woke” amin’izao fotoana izao sy ny konsily faharoa tao Vatikana.
In the messages of Fatima the “good pope”, was the “white pope”, and the “bad pope”, was the “black pope”. The good pope, Pope John Paul II, was the conservative pope who identified the Virgin of Fatima as his guiding idol, and the bad pope is the woke-pope, who also rejects any messages from the so-called virgin Mary. When you visit the shrine in Fatima, Portugal as you enter the premises the entrance is set between two giant statues of a black pope on one side and a white pope on the other side, thus representing the internal struggle identified in the Fatima prophecies.
Ao amin’ireo hafatry Fatima, ny “papa tsara” dia ilay “papa fotsy”, ary ny “papa ratsy” dia ilay “papa mainty”. Ny papa tsara, dia ny Papa Joany Paoly II, ilay papa mpandala ny nentin-drazana izay nanondro ny Virjiny tao Fatima ho sampy mpitari-dalana azy, ary ny papa ratsy dia ilay papa “woke”, izay mandà koa ny hafatra rehetra avy amin’ilay antsoina hoe virjiny Maria. Rehefa mitsidika ny fitoerana masina ao Fatima, any Portiogaly, ianao, dia eo am-pidirana ny tokotany no misy vavahady napetraka eo anelanelan’ny sarivongana goavana roa: papa mainty eo an-daniny iray ary papa fotsy eo an-daniny iray, ka izany no maneho ny tolona anatiny voatondro ao amin’ireo faminanian’i Fatima.
The other element of the three secret messages of Fatima was its emphasis on the warfare of Catholicism (the king of the north), and atheism (the king of the south). Without recognizing that the warfare of Catholicism and atheistic Russia is a subject of the satanic prophecy, which directs a large percentage of Catholicism, it is difficult, if not impossible to understand the support which the Catholic church provided to Nazi Germany during World War Two.
Ny singa iray hafa amin’ireo hafatra miafina telo tao Fatima dia ny fanamafisana ny ady nifanaovan’ny Katolisisma (ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra) sy ny tsy finoana an’Andriamanitra (ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo). Raha tsy ekena fa ny ady misy eo amin’ny Katolisisma sy i Rosia tsy mino an’Andriamanitra dia lohahevitry ny faminaniana satanika, izay mitarika ampahany lehibe amin’ny Katolisisma, dia sarotra—raha tsy hoe tsy azo atao mihitsy—ny mahatakatra ny fanohanana nomen’ny fiangonana Katolika an’i Alemaina Nazi nandritra ny Ady Lehibe Faharoa.
The Battle of Leningrad, which lasted from September 8, 1941 to January 27, 1944 during World War Two, was one of the longest and most brutal sieges in history. The Battle of Stalingrad, which occurred from August 23, 1942 to February 2, 1943, is often regarded as the bloodiest and most significant battle of World War Two. It resulted in immense casualties on both sides, with estimates of over 2 million total casualties, including deaths, wounded, and captured soldiers. The Battle of Stalingrad also marked a turning point in the war, as it resulted in a decisive Soviet victory over the German Army and led to the eventual defeat of Nazi Germany.
Ny Adin’i Leningrad, izay naharitra hatramin’ny 8 Septambra 1941 ka hatramin’ny 27 Janoary 1944 nandritra ny Ady Lehibe Faharoa, dia iray amin’ireo fahirano naharitra indrindra sy nahatsiravina indrindra teo amin’ny tantara. Ny Adin’i Stalingrad, izay nitranga hatramin’ny 23 Aogositra 1942 ka hatramin’ny 2 Febroary 1943, dia heverina matetika ho ady nandatsahan-dra indrindra sy manan-danja indrindra tamin’ny Ady Lehibe Faharoa. Niteraka fatiantoka olona goavana teo amin’ny andaniny sy ny ankilany izany, ary tombanana ho nihoatra ny 2 tapitrisa ny fitambaran’ny fatiantoka, anisan’izany ny maty, ny naratra, ary ny miaramila voababo. Ny Adin’i Stalingrad koa dia nanamarika fiovam-pitodihana teo amin’ny ady, satria niafara tamin’ny fandresena lehibe azon’ny Tafika Sovietika tamin’ny Tafika Alemàna izany ary nitarika ho amin’ny faharesen’i Alemaina Nazi tatỳ aoriana.
Without recognizing that Nazi Germany’s warfare against Russia, particularly in the two battles just cited, it is difficult to understand the role of Germany as the secret ally of the Catholic Church. Without the understanding of the premises of a spiritual war between Catholicism that was motivated by the satanic prophecy of Mary of Fatima, against the atheism of Russia, and thereafter the Communist Soviet Union, the logic for Catholicism secretly hiding and then transporting Nazi war criminals around the globe post-World War Two is missed. The Nazi’s were Catholicism’s proxy army in their struggle against Russia.
Raha tsy ekena fa ny ady nataon’i Alemaina Nazi tamin’i Rosia, indrindra tao anatin’ireo ady roa vao notononina ireo, dia sarotra ny mahatakatra ny anjara toeran’i Alemaina amin’ny maha-mpiara-dia miafina azy amin’ny Fiangonana Katolika. Raha tsy takarina ny foto-kevitry ny ady ara-panahy teo amin’ny Katolisma, izay noentanin’ny faminaniana satanika nataon’i Maria avy any Fatima, hanoherana ny tsy finoana an’Andriamanitra tao Rosia, ary tatỳ aoriana ny Firaisana Sovietika Komonista, dia very ny lojika nanetsika ny Katolisma hanafina mangingina sy avy eo hitatitra ireo mpanao heloka bevava tamin’ny ady Nazi nanerana izao tontolo izao taorian’ny Ady Lehibe Faharoa. Ny Nazi dia tafika nisolo tena ny Katolisma tamin’ny tolony nanohitra an’i Rosia.
It is in this prophetic logic that Putin, the head of atheistic Russia, is involved in a war in the Ukraine, whose leaders are openly known to be Nazi’s. The ground troops of Fatima’s war against atheism from World War Two and onward is fascism, and Nazism. Of course, even though this reality of the leaders of the Ukrainian government is well-documented, the modern manifestation of Hitler’s Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda (the mainstream media), has covered these facts as best they could.
Ao anatin’ity lojika ara-paminaniana ity no ahitana an’i Putin, ilay filohan’i Rosia tsy mino an’Andriamanitra, tafiditra ao anatin’ny ady any Okraina, izay fantatra ampahibemaso fa Nazia ny mpitarika azy. Ny tafika an-tanety amin’ny adin’i Fatima manohitra ny tsy finoana an’Andriamanitra, hatramin’ny Ady Lehibe Faharoa sy nanomboka teo, dia ny fasista sy ny Nazisma. Mazava ho azy fa, na dia voarakitra an-tsoratra tsara aza io zava-misy mikasika ny mpitarika ao amin’ny governemanta Okrainiana io, ny fisehoana maoderina amin’ny Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda an’i Hitler (ny fampahalalam-baovao mahazatra) dia nanafina ireo zava-misy ireo araka izay tratry ny heriny.
The name “Ukraine” is derived from the Slavic word “ukraina,” which means “borderland” or “the edge.” The term historically referred to the border regions of the Kievan Rus’, the medieval state that preceded modern-day Ukraine, and is situated on the crossroads between Eastern Europe and Eurasia. Throughout history, it has served as a meeting point between various cultures, civilizations, and empires, including the Byzantine Empire, the Ottoman Empire, the Russian Empire, and others. Its strategic location made it a frontier region that experienced significant cultural, political, and military interactions. During the medieval period, Ukraine was the border region of the Kievan Rus’, which was a powerful state that encompassed parts of modern-day Ukraine, Russia, and Belarus. As the Kievan Rus’ expanded and contracted over time, its borders often shifted, and Ukraine remained on the periphery of the state.
Ny anarana hoe “Ukraine” dia avy amin’ny teny slavy hoe “ukraina,” izay midika hoe “faritra sisintany” na “ny sisiny.” Tamin’ny lafiny ara-tantara, io voambolana io dia nanondro ireo faritra sisintanin’ny Kievan Rus’, ilay fanjakana tamin’ny Andro Antenatenany izay nialoha an’i Ukraine ankehitriny, ary mitoetra eo amin’ny fihaonan-dàlan’i Eoropa Atsinanana sy i Eorazia izy. Nandritra ny tantara manontolo, dia toerana fihaonan’ny kolontsaina sy ny sivilizasiona ary ny empira samihafa izy, anisan’izany ny Empira Bizantina, ny Empira Ottomanina, ny Empira Rosiana, ary ny hafa. Ny toerana stratejika misy azy no nahatonga azy ho faritra anoloan-tsisintany izay niaina fifandraisana ara-kolontsaina, ara-politika, ary ara-tafika lehibe. Nandritra ny vanim-potoana tamin’ny Andro Antenatenany, Ukraine no faritra sisintanin’ny Kievan Rus’, izay fanjakana mahery vaika nahafaoka ampahany amin’i Ukraine, Rosia, ary Belarosia ankehitriny. Raha nihanitatra sy nihena ny Kievan Rus’ rehefa nandeha ny fotoana, dia niova matetika ny sisintaniny, ary i Ukraine dia nitoetra hatrany teo amin’ny manodidina ivelan’ny foiben’ilay fanjakana.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989, as represented in verse ten, verses eleven and twelve identify a battle where the king of the south retaliates and prevails over the king of the north. That battle was fought at Raphia, which was the borderline of the domains of the king of the south and the king of the north.
Taorian’ny firodanan’ny Firaisana Sovietika tamin’ny 1989, araka ny aseho ao amin’ny andininy faha‑folo, ny andininy faha‑iraika ambin’ny folo sy faha‑roa ambin’ny folo dia manondro ady iray izay namalian’ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo ka nandreseny ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra. Tao Rafia no niadian’izany ady izany, izay sisin-tanin’ny fanjakazakan’ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo sy ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra.
The Battle of Raphia, which took place in 217 BC, comes from the name of the town near which the battle occurred. Raphia was a town located in the coastal region of ancient Palestine, near the border between the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt and the Seleucid Empire. At the time of the battle the border between the Ptolemaic Kingdom of Egypt, ruled by King Ptolemy IV Philopator, and the Seleucid Empire, ruled by King Antiochus III, was located in the vicinity of Raphia. The battle was fought near this border region as both sides sought to assert control over strategic territories in the Levant.
Ny Adin’i Raphia, izay nitranga tamin’ny 217 talohan’i Kristy, dia avy amin’ny anaran’ilay tanàna teo akaikin’izay nitrangan’ny ady. Raphia dia tanàna iray tao amin’ny faritra amorontsirak’i Palestina fahiny, teo akaikin’ny sisintany nizara ny Fanjakana Ptolemaika tao Egypta sy ny Empira Seleokida. Tamin’ny fotoana nisian’ilay ady, ny sisintany teo amin’ny Fanjakana Ptolemaika tao Egypta, izay notarihin’i Mpanjaka Ptolemaiosy IV Philopator, sy ny Empira Seleokida, izay notarihin’i Mpanjaka Antiochosy III, dia teo amin’ny manodidina an’i Raphia. Teo akaikin’io faritra sisintany io no niadiana, satria samy nitady hanamafy ny fifehezany ireo faritany stratejika tao amin’ny Levanta ny andaniny sy ny ankilany.
The ancient town of Raphia, is located near the modern city of Rafah. Rafah is a city situated in the southern Gaza Strip, which is part of the Palestinian territories. After Ptolemy’s victory at Raphia in 217 BC, he initiated persecutions against the Jews in Jerusalem, and also in Egypt. The victory was short-lived and he met his Waterloo, so to speak, in the next three verses. In verse thirteen, the previously defeated king of the north returns and by verse fifteen he overwhelms the king of the south.
Ny tanàna fahiny atao hoe Rafia dia miorina eo akaikin’ny tanàna maoderina atao hoe Rafah. Rafah dia tanàna any amin’ny faritra atsimon’ny Gaza Strip, izay anisan’ny faritany palestiniana. Taorian’ny fandresen’i Ptolemaios tao Rafia tamin’ny 217 talohan’i Kristy, dia nanomboka fanenjehana tamin’ny Jiosy tao Jerosalema izy, ary koa tany Egypta. Vetivety ihany izany fandresena izany, ary nihaona tamin’ny “Waterloo”-ny izy, raha azo lazaina izany, ao amin’ireo andininy telo manaraka. Ao amin’ny andininy faha-telo ambin’ny folo, dia miverina ilay mpanjakan’ny avaratra izay efa resin-dry zareo teo aloha, ary amin’ny andininy faha-dimy ambin’ny folo dia mandresy tanteraka ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo izy.
The victory of Putin in the Ukraine will be used by Putin, a former KGB officer who specialized in propaganda, to most likely expose the Nazi roots of the Ukrainian leadership, and also expose those in the Western World who supported the regime for economic greed, and no doubt also expose the hidden black-sites and bio-labs employed by the globalists, which have been funded by the taxpayers of the United States.
Ny fandresen’i Putin ao Okraina dia hampiasain’i Putin, manamboninahitra talohan’ny KGB izay niavaka tamin’ny propagandy, indrindra indrindra mba hamoahana miharihary ny fakany nazi-n’ny fitarihana Okrainiana, ary koa hamoahana miharihary ireo ao amin’ny Tontolo Tandrefana izay nanohana io fitondrana io noho ny fitiavam-bola ara-toekarena, ary tsy isalasalana fa hamoahana miharihary koa ireo toeram-piasana miafina sy laboratoara biolojika miafina ampiasain’ireo globalista, izay novatsian’ny hetran’ny mpandoa hetra ao Etazonia vola.
Those revelations will destroy the current talking points of the world globalists, and also of the Democratic talking heads in the United States. That victory for Putin will provide the mandate for the eighth President, that is of the seven, to take his role as the prophetic despot that arrives into history just before verse sixteen; and verse sixteen is the soon coming Sunday law.
Ireo fanambaràna ireo dia handrava ny hevitra ambaran’ireo globalista maneran-tany amin’izao fotoana izao, ary koa ireo mpitondra teny sy mpandaha-tenin’ny Antoko Demokraty any Etazonia. Io fandresena ho an’i Putin io no hanome ny fanomezan-dalana ho an’ilay Filoha fahavalo, dia ilay avy amin’ny fito, mba handray ny anjara asany amin’ny maha-mpanao jadona ara-paminaniana azy, izay miseho eo amin’ny tantara mialoha kelin’ny andininy fahenina ambin’ny folo; ary ny andininy fahenina ambin’ny folo dia ny lalàn’ny Alahady izay ho avy tsy ho ela.
In verse thirteen, the king of the north regroups his army, and in verse fourteen, pagan Rome is introduced into history for the first time, though it is not yet the king of the north. It is there identified as the symbol which “establishes the vision”, and as the power who exalts himself and then falls. After the victory of Putin in the war in the Ukraine, the papacy will begin to lift itself up into world politics, just in advance of the Sunday law in verse sixteen.
Ao amin’ny andininy fahatelo ambin’ny folo, ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra dia manangona indray ny tafiny, ary ao amin’ny andininy fahatelo ambin’ny folo sy efatra ambin’ny folo, Roma jentilisa dia ampidirina ao amin’ny tantara voalohany, na dia mbola tsy ilay mpanjakan’ny avaratra aza izy amin’izany. Eo no anondroana azy ho ilay tandindona izay “manorina ny fahitana”, ary ho ilay fahefana izay manandra-tena avy eo dia lavo. Rehefa avy nandresy tamin’ny ady tao Okraina i Putin, dia hanomboka hanandratra ny tenany ho ao anatin’ny politika maneran-tany ny fahefana papaly, mialoha indrindra ny lalàn’ny Alahady ao amin’ny andininy fahenina ambin’ny folo.
The French Revolution, and its connection with the Russian Revolution; Napoleon and Putin; the miracle of Fatima, and its three secrets; the secret alliance between the Vatican and Hitler, the secret alliance between the Vatican and Reagan, are all prophetic “wheels” that intersect in the history of verses eleven through fifteen, which occur during the history of September 11, 2001 until the Sunday law in the United States. It was important to provide a brief summary of these prophetic “wheels” before we take up verse ten.
Ny Revolisiona Frantsay, sy ny fifandraisany amin’ny Revolisiona Rosiana; Napoléon sy Putin; ny fahagagana tao Fatima, sy ireo zava-miafina telo ao aminy; ny firaisana miafina teo amin’ny Vatikana sy Hitler, ny firaisana miafina teo amin’ny Vatikana sy Reagan, dia “kodiarana” ara-paminaniana avokoa izay mifanojo ao amin’ny tantaran’ny andininy iraika ambin’ny folo ka hatramin’ny fahadimy ambin’ny folo, izay miseho mandritra ny vanim-potoara miainga amin’ny 11 Septambra 2001 ka hatramin’ny lalàna Alahady any Etazonia. Zava-dehibe ny nanolorana famintinana fohy momba ireo “kodiarana” ara-paminaniana ireo, alohan’ny handraisantsika ny andininy fahafolo.
The following article is taken from “NBC news,” which is as “Main Stream Media,” as it gets, and the “MSM” is the modern version of Hitler’s World War Two propaganda machine. The article is of course anti-Putin, anti-Russian, and pro-Ukraine, but that is not the point. As citizens of the heavenly kingdom, God’s people should not endorse either side of a satanic work, and all warfare is a satanic work.
Ity lahatsoratra manaraka ity dia nalaina avy amin’ny “NBC news,” izay tena anisan’ny “Main Stream Media” indrindra araka izay azo atao, ary ny “MSM” dia endrika maoderina amin’ilay milina fampielezan-kevitra nampiasain’i Hitler tamin’ny Ady Lehibe Faharoa. Mazava ho azy fa manohitra an’i Putin sy i Rosia ary manohana an’i Okraina ilay lahatsoratra, kanefa tsy izany no fototra resahina. Amin’ny maha-olom-pirenen’ny fanjakana any an-danitra antsika, dia tsy tokony hanohana na ny andaniny na ny ankilany amin’ny asan’i Satana ny olon’Andriamanitra, ary asan’i Satana ny ady rehetra.
The purpose of this article is to allow those who are unfamiliar with the prophetic warfare between Catholicism (the king of the north) and atheism (the king of the south), and the fact that in the warfare of those two prophetic powers, Naziism has been employed as Catholicism’s proxy army (just as the United States was used in 1989). Students of prophecy need to have enough evidence to see that the background history of World War Two, and of the Cold War, are represented in the current war in Ukraine, as it fulfills verses eleven and twelve, of chapter eleven of Daniel.
Ny tanjon’ity lahatsoratra ity dia ny hanome lalana ireo izay tsy mbola mahalala ny ady ara-paminaniana misy eo amin’ny Katolisisma (ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra) sy ny ateisma (ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo), ary koa ny zava-misy fa, tao amin’ny adin’ireo hery ara-paminaniana roa ireo, ny Nazisma dia nampiasaina ho tafika solontenan’ny Katolisisma (tahaka ny nampiasana an’i Etazonia tamin’ny 1989). Ireo mpianatra ny faminaniana dia mila manana porofo ampy hahitany fa ny tantara ambadiky ny Ady Lehibe Faharoa sy ny Ady Mangatsiaka dia aseho ao amin’ny ady ankehitriny any Okraina, satria izany no fanatanterahana ny andininy faha-11 sy faha-12 ao amin’ny toko faha-11 ao amin’ny Daniela.
“Historical events, showing the direct fulfillment of prophecy, were set before the people, and the prophecy was seen to be a figurative delineation of events leading down to the close of this earth’s history.” Selected Messages, book 2, 102.
“Naseho teo anatrehan’ny vahoaka ireo zava-nitranga teo amin’ny tantara, izay naneho ny fahatanterahana mivantana ny faminaniana, ary hita fa ny faminaniana dia fanehoana an’ohatra ny zava-mitranga izay mitarika midina ho amin’ny famaranana ny tantaran’ity tany ity.” Selected Messages, boky 2, 102.
NBC News Article: “Ukraine’s Nazi problem is real, even if Putin’s ‘denazification’ claim isn’t”
Lahatsoratra NBC News: “Tena misy ny olan’i Okraina momba ny Nazi, na dia tsy marina aza ny filazan’i Putin momba ny ‘fanafoanana ny Nazi’”
Of the many distortions manufactured by Russian President Vladimir Putin to justify Russia’s assault on Ukraine, perhaps the most bizarre is his claim that the action was taken to “denazify” the country and its leadership. In making his case for entering his neighbor’s territory with armored tanks and fighter jets, Putin has stated that the move was undertaken “to protect people” who have been “subjected to bullying and genocide,” and that Russia “will strive for the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine.”
Amin’ireo fanodinkodinana maro novokarin’ny Filohan’i Rosia, Vladimir Putin, mba hanamarinana ny fanafihan’i Rosia an’i Okraina, angamba ny tena hafahafa indrindra dia ny filazany fa natao mba “hanafoanana ny Nazia” ao amin’ilay firenena sy ny mpitondra azy izany hetsika izany. Raha nanangana ny antony nidirany tao amin’ny tanin’ny firenena mpifanolo-bodirindrina aminy tamin’ny fiara mifono vy sy fiaramanidina mpiady i Putin, dia nilaza izy fa natao “hiarovana ny olona” izay “niharan’ny fampijaliana sy fandripahana ara-poko,” izany fihetsika izany, ary fa i Rosia “hiezaka hanatanteraka ny fanafoanana fitaovam-piadiana sy ny fanafoanana ny Nazia ao Okraina.”
Putin’s destructive actions — among them the devastation of Jewish communities — make clear that he’s lying when he says his goal is to ensure anyone’s welfare.
Ny asa manimba ataon’i Putin — ka anisany ny fandravana ireo fiarahamonina jiosy — dia mampiharihary mazava fa mandainga izy rehefa milaza fa ny tanjony dia ny hiantoka ny fiadanan’iza na iza.
On its face, Putin’s smear is absurd, not least because Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is Jewish and has said that members of his family were killed during World War II. There is also no evidence of recent mass killings or ethnic purges taking place in Ukraine. Moreover, labeling enemies Nazis is a common political ploy in Russia, especially from a leader who favors disinformation campaigns and wants to stir up feelings of national vengeance against a WWII foe to justify conquest.
Raha jerena ivelany, dia tsy mitombina tanteraka ny fanaratsian’i Putin, indrindra fa satria Jiosy ny Filohan’i Okraina, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, ary efa nilaza izy fa nisy mpikambana tao amin’ny fianakaviany novonoina nandritra ny Ady Lehibe Faharoa. Tsy misy porofo koa milaza fa misy famonoana faobe na fanadiovana ara-poko mitranga ao Okraina tato ho ato. Ambonin’izany, tetika politika mahazatra ao Rosia ny fanondroana ny fahavalo ho Nazi, indrindra avy amin’ny mpitondra iray izay mankasitraka fampielezana vaovao diso ary te hampihetsi-po ny fihetseham-pamalian-katezeram-pirenena manoloana ny fahavalo tamin’ny Ady Lehibe Faharoa mba hanamarinana ny fandresena an-keriny.
But even though Putin is engaging in propaganda, it’s also true that Ukraine has a genuine Nazi problem — both past and present. Putin’s destructive actions — among them the devastation of Jewish communities — make clear that he’s lying when he says his goal is to ensure anyone’s welfare. But important as it is to defend the yellow-and-blue flag against the Kremlin’s brutal aggression, it would be a dangerous oversight to deny Ukraine’s antisemitic history and collaboration with Hitler’s Nazis, as well as the latter-day embrace of neo-Nazi factions in some quarters.
Kanefa na dia mirotsaka amin’ny propagandy aza i Putin, dia marina ihany koa fa manana olana tena izy momba ny Nazia i Okraina — na tamin’ny lasa izany na amin’izao fotoana izao. Ny asa fandravana ataon’i Putin — anisan’izany ny fandravana ireo fiarahamonina jiosy — dia mampiseho mazava fa mandainga izy rehefa milaza fa ny tanjony dia ny hiantoka ny fiadanan’iza na iza. Saingy na dia zava-dehibe aza ny miaro ny saina mavo sy manga manoloana ny herisetra feno habibian’ny Kremlin, dia ho tsikombakomba mampidi-doza ny mandà ny tantaran’ny fankahalana Jiosy tao Okraina sy ny fiarahany niasa tamin’ireo Nazin’i Hitler, ary koa ny fandraisana tatỳ aoriana ireo vondrona neo-Nazi amin’ny faritra sasany.
Why are fleeing Ukrainians being talked about with such sympathy? They are white.
Nahoana no iresahana amin’ny fangorahana lehibe toy izany ireo Okrainiana mandositra? Fotsy hoditra izy ireo.
On the eve of World War II, Ukraine was home to one the largest Jewish communities in Europe, with estimates as high as 2.7 million, a remarkable number considering the territory’s long record of antisemitism and pogroms. By the end, more than half would perish. When German troops took control of Kyiv in 1941, they were welcomed by “Heil Hitler” banners. Soon after, nearly 34,000 Jews — along with Roma and other “undesirables” — were rounded up and marched to fields outside the city on the pretext of resettlement only to be massacred in what became known as the “Holocaust by bullets.”
Tamin’ny ankatoky ny Ady Lehibe Faharoa, i Okraina dia fonenan’ny iray amin’ireo vondrom-piarahamonina Jiosy lehibe indrindra tany Eorôpa, ka ny tombatombana sasany dia nahatratra hatramin’ny 2,7 tapitrisa, isa mahatalanjona raha heverina ny tantara lavan’ilay faritany momba ny fankahalana Jiosy sy ny pôgrôma. Tamin’ny farany, maherin’ny antsasany no ho ringana. Rehefa azon’ny tafika alemà i Kyiv tamin’ny 1941, dia noraisina tamin’ny sora-baventy “Heil Hitler” izy ireo. Tsy ela taorian’izay, Jiosy efa ho 34 000 — niaraka tamin’ny Roma sy ireo “tsy ilaina” hafa — no nosamborina sy nalahatra handeha ho any amin’ny saha ivelan’ny tanàna tamin’ny fialan-tsiny hoe hafindra monina, kanjo novonoina faobe tamin’ilay nantsoina tatỳ aoriana hoe “Holocauste tamin’ny bala.”
The Babyn Yar ravine continued to fill up as a mass grave for two years. With as many as 100,000 murdered there, it became one of the largest single killing sites of the Holocaust outside of Auschwitz and other death camps. Researchers have noted the key role locals played in fulfilling Nazi kill orders at the site.
Nandritra ny roa taona dia mbola notohizana ny famenoana ny lohasahan-driakan’i Babyn Yar ho fasana iombonana. Noho ny fahafatesan’olona novonoina tao izay nahatratra hatramin’ny 100 000, dia tonga iray amin’ireo toerana tokana lehibe indrindra nanaovana famonoana nandritra ny Holocaust izy io, ivelan’i Auschwitz sy ireo toby famonoana hafa. Nanamarika ny mpikaroka fa nandray anjara lehibe ny mponina teo an-toerana tamin’ny fanatanterahana ny baikon’ny Nazia hamono tao amin’ilay toerana.
Nowadays, Ukraine counts between 56,000 to 140,000 Jews, who enjoy freedoms and protections never imagined by their grandparents. That includes an updated law passed last month criminalizing antisemitic acts. Unfortunately, the law was intended to address a pronounced uptick in public displays of bigotry, including swastika-laden vandalism of synagogues and Jewish memorials, and eerie marches in Kyiv and other cities that celebrated the Waffen SS.
Amin’izao andro ankehitriny izao, i Okraina dia manana Jiosy eo anelanelan’ny 56.000 sy 140.000, izay mankafy fahafahana sy fiarovana izay tsy noeritreretin’ny raibe sy renibeny akory. Anisan’izany ny lalàna nohavaozina nolaniana tamin’ny volana lasa, izay manasazy ho heloka bevava ny asa feno fankahalana Jiosy. Indrisy anefa, io lalàna io dia natao hamaliana ny fisondrotana mazava teo amin’ny fanehoam-pankahalana ampahibemaso, anisan’izany ny fanimbana sinagoga sy tsangambato fahatsiarovana jiosy tamin’ny sarin’ny svastika, ary ireo diabe mampivarahontsana tany Kyiv sy tanàna hafa izay nankalaza ny Waffen SS.
In another ominous development, Ukraine has in recent years erected a glut of statues honoring Ukrainian nationalists whose legacies are tainted by their indisputable record as Nazi proxies. The Forward newspaper cataloged some of these deplorables, including Stepan Bandera, leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), whose followers acted as local militia members for the SS and German army. “Ukraine has several dozen monuments and scores of street names glorifying this Nazi collaborator, enough to require two separate Wikipedia pages,” the Forward wrote.
Tamin’ny fivoarana mampanahy iray hafa, i Okraina dia nanangana tato anatin’ny taona vitsivitsy sarivongana marobe manome voninahitra ireo nasionalista okrainiana, izay voaloton’ny lova tsy azo lavina amin’ny maha-solontenam-panjakana nazirà azy ireo. Ny gazety The Forward dia nandahatra ny sasany amin’ireo olona mendrika fanamelohana ireo, anisan’izany i Stepan Bandera, mpitarika ny Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), izay ny mpanaraka azy dia niasa ho mpikambana tao amin’ny milisy eo an-toerana ho an’ny SS sy ny tafika alemàna. “Manana tsangambato am-polony maro sy anaran-dalambe am-polony maro manome voninahitra ity mpiara-miasa tamin’ny Nazia ity i Okraina, ampy ka nahatonga pejy Wikipedia roa misaraka ilaina momba azy,” hoy ny nosoratan’ny Forward.
Another frequent honoree is Roman Shukhevych, revered as a Ukrainian freedom fighter but also the leader of a feared Nazi auxiliary police unit that the Forward notes was “responsible for butchering thousands of Jews and … Poles.” Statues have also been raised for Yaroslav Stetsko, a one-time chair of the OUN, who wrote “I insist on the extermination of the Jews in Ukraine.”
Olona iray hafa omem-boninahitra matetika koa i Roman Shukhevych, hajaina ho mpiady ho an’ny fahafahan’i Okraina, nefa koa mpitarika vondron’ny polisy mpanampy nazi nahatahorana, izay lazain’ny Forward fa “tompon’andraikitra tamin’ny famonoana tamin-kabibiana Jiosy an’arivony sy … Poloney.” Natsangana koa ny tsangambato ho an’i Yaroslav Stetsko, filoha indray mandeha tao amin’ny OUN, izay nanoratra hoe: “Manizingizina aho ny amin’ny fandringanana ny Jiosy ao Okraina.”
Far-right groups have also gained political currency in the past decade, none more chilling than Svoboda (formerly the Social National Party of Ukraine), whose leader claimed the country was controlled by a “Muscovite-Jewish mafia” and whose deputy used an antisemitic slur to describe Ukrainian-born Jewish actor Mila Kunis. Svoboda has sent several members to Ukraine’s Parliament, including one who called the Holocaust a “bright period” in human history, according to Foreign Policy.
Nahazo vahana ara-politika ihany koa ireo vondrona havanana faran’izay henjana tato anatin’ny folo taona lasa, ary tsy nisy nampangovitra kokoa noho ny Svoboda (fantatra taloha hoe Antoko Sosialy Nasionalin’i Okraina), izay nilazan’ny mpitarika azy fa voafehin’ny “mafia Moskovita-Jiosy” ilay firenena, ary ny lefiny kosa dia nampiasa teny fanaratsiana manohitra ny Jiosy hilazana an’ilay mpilalao sarimihetsika Jiosy teraka tany Okraina, Mila Kunis. Nandefa solombavambahoaka maromaro ho ao amin’ny Parlemanta Okrainiana ny Svoboda, anisan’izany ny iray izay niantso ny Holocaust hoe “vanim-potoana mamirapiratra” teo amin’ny tantaran’ny olombelona, araka ny Foreign Policy.
Just as disturbing, neo-Nazis are part of some of Ukraine’s growing ranks of volunteer battalions. They are battle-hardened after waging some of the toughest street fighting against Moscow-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine following Putin’s Crimean invasion in 2014. One is the Azov Battalion, founded by an avowed white supremacist who claimed Ukraine’s national purpose was to rid the country of Jews and other inferior races. In 2018, the U.S. Congress stipulated that its aid to Ukraine couldn’t be used “to provide arms, training or other assistance to the Azov Battalion.” Even so, Azov is now an official member of the Ukraine National Guard.
Mampanahy tahaka izany koa, ireo neo-Nazi dia anisan’ny sasany amin’ireo andian-tafika an-tsitrapo mitombo isa ao Okraina. Efa zatra ady sy nohamafisin’ny fifandonana izy ireo, taorian’ny niadiany tamin’ny sasany amin’ireo ady an-dalambe mafy indrindra nanohitra ireo mpisintaka tohanan’i Moskva tany atsinanan’i Okraina, taorian’ny fanafihan’i Poutine an’i Krimea tamin’ny 2014. Anisan’izany ny Battalion Azov, izay naorin’ny olona iray mpanohana miharihary ny fahambonian’ny fotsy hoditra, izay nilaza fa ny tanjona nasionalin’i Okraina dia ny hanafaka ny firenena amin’ny Jiosy sy ireo foko hafa heveriny ho ambany. Tamin’ny 2018, ny Kongresy Amerikana dia nametra fa tsy azo ampiasaina “hanomezana fitaovam-piadiana, fiofanana na fanampiana hafa ho an’ny Battalion Azov” ny fanampiany an’i Okraina. Na dia izany aza, Azov dia mpikambana ofisialy ao anatin’ny Mpiambina Nasionalin’i Okraina ankehitriny.
For sure, none of this disturbing context justifies the misery that has befallen Ukrainians over the past several weeks — and it’s unlikely that Putin was motivated by any of it when he launched his invasion. Indeed, thanks to Putin, Jews living in Odessa, Kharkiv and other eastern cities are under extreme duress. While many have taken refuge in local synagogues and Jewish centers, others have fled to foreign countries, including Israel, which has urged all Jews to leave Ukraine.
Tsy isalasalana fa tsy misy amin’izao toe-javatra mampitebiteby izao afaka manamarina ny fahoriana nahazo ny Okrainiana tato anatin’ny herinandro maromaro — ary tsy dia inoana loatra fa nisy tamin’ireo no nanosika an’i Putin raha nanomboka ny fanafihany izy. Eny tokoa, noho i Putin, ny Jiosy monina ao Odessa, Kharkiv, ary tanàna hafa any atsinanana dia iharan’ny fahoriana faran’izay mafy. Raha maro no efa nitady fialofana tany amin’ny synagoga sy foibe jiosy eo an-toerana, ny sasany kosa dia nandositra nankany amin’ny firenena vahiny, anisan’izany i Israely, izay efa niantso ny Jiosy rehetra hiala ao Okraina.
My own grandparents themselves had to flee western Ukraine to escape persecution, and it is tragic to see this cycle continue. If the country devolves into chaos and insurgency, Jews could once again be at risk from some of their fellow citizens. Not acknowledging this threat means that little is being done to guard against it.
Ny raibeko sy renibeko manokana aza dia voatery nandositra an’i Okraina andrefana mba hiala amin’ny fanenjehana, ary mampalahelo tokoa ny mahita izao tsingerina izao mitohy. Raha miroso ho amin’ny korontana sy fikomiana ny firenena, dia mety ho tandindomin-doza indray ny Jiosy avy amin’ny sasany amin’ireo mpiara-belona aminy. Ny tsy fanekena izao loza mitatao izao dia midika fa vitsy dia vitsy no atao hiarovana mialoha azy.
But even if some elements of the country have been entangled with one of history’s most loathsome movements, standing with Ukraine is without doubt the honorable posture to take in this drama. Right now, every day that Putin ratchets up his assault against the Ukrainian people with scorched-earth zeal, it’s hard not to see who truly deserves the N-word.
Kanefa na dia voasaringotra tamin’ny iray amin’ireo hetsika mampivarahontsana indrindra teo amin’ny tantara aza ny singa sasany ao amin’ilay firenena, dia tsy misy fisalasalana fa ny fijoroana miaraka amin’i Ukraine no fihetsika mendrika sy manan-kaja horaisina ao anatin’ity tantara an-tsehatra ity. Amin’izao fotoana izao, isan’andro izay mampitomboan’i Putin ny fanafihany ny vahoaka Okrainiana amin-kafanam-po mandoro tany sy mandrava tsy an-kijanona, dia sarotra ny tsy hahita izay tena mendrika antsoina amin’ilay teny manomboka amin’ny litera N.
Allen Ripp, March 5, 2022 – Source
Allen Ripp, 5 Martsa 2022 – Loharano
We will continue this study in our next article.
Tsy hatsahatra eto ity fandalinana ity, fa mbola hotohizintsika ao amin’ny lahatsoratra manaraka.
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” George Santayana.
“Ireo izay tsy mahatsiaro ny lasa dia voaheloka hamerina izany.” George Santayana.
“All that God has in prophetic history specified to be fulfilled in the past has been, and all that is yet to come in its order will be. Daniel, God’s prophet, stands in his place. John stands in his place. In the Revelation the Lion of the tribe of Judah has opened to the students of prophecy the book of Daniel, and thus is Daniel standing in his place. He bears his testimony, that which the Lord revealed to him in vision of the great and solemn events which we must know as we stand on the very threshold of their fulfillment.
“Izay rehetra izay efa nofaritan’Andriamanitra ao amin’ny tantara ara-paminaniana fa tokony ho tanteraka tamin’ny lasa dia efa tanteraka; ary izay rehetra mbola ho avy, amin’ny filaharany avy, dia ho tanteraka. Daniela, mpaminanin’Andriamanitra, dia mijoro eo amin’ny toerany. Jaona mijoro eo amin’ny toerany. Ao amin’ny Apokalypsy, ny Liona avy amin’ny firenen’i Joda dia nanokatra ho an’ireo mpianatra ny faminaniana ny bokin’i Daniela, ka amin’izany no ijoroan’i Daniela eo amin’ny toerany. Mitondra ny fanambarany izy, dia izay nambaran’ny Tompo taminy tao amin’ny fahitana momba ireo zava-dehibe sy manetriketrika izay tsy maintsy ho fantatsika eo am-pijoroantsika eo amin’ny tokonam-baravaran’ny fahatanterahany mihitsy.”
“In history and prophecy the Word of God portrays the long continued conflict between truth and error. That conflict is yet in progress. Those things which have been, will be repeated. Old controversies will be revived, and new theories will be continually arising. But God’s people, who in their belief and fulfillment of prophecy have acted a part in the proclamation of the first, second, and third angels’ messages, know where they stand. They have an experience that is more precious than fine gold. They are to stand firm as a rock, holding the beginning of their confidence steadfast unto the end.” Selected Messages, book 2, 109.
“Ao amin’ny tantara sy ny faminaniana dia asehon’ny Tenin’Andriamanitra ny fifanandrinana maharitra ela eo amin’ny fahamarinana sy ny fahadisoana. Mbola mitohy izany fifanandrinana izany ankehitriny. Izay zavatra efa nisy dia mbola haverina indray. Hovelomina indray ireo adihevitra fahiny, ary hisy teoria vaovao hipoitra mandrakariva. Kanefa ny vahoakan’Andriamanitra, izay tamin’ny finoany sy tamin’ny fahatanterahan’ny faminaniana no nandray anjara tamin’ny fanambarana ny hafatry ny anjely voalohany sy faharoa ary fahatelo, dia mahalala izay ijoroany. Manana fanandramana sarobidy kokoa noho ny volamena voadio izy ireo. Tokony hijoro tsy hozongozonina tahaka ny vatolampy izy, ka hihazona mafy hatramin’ny farany ny fiandohan’ny fahatokiany.” Selected Messages, boky 2, 109.