We left off the last article by writing, “Verses 10–15 represent three proxy wars accomplished by the king of the north, the papal power, from 1989 to the Sunday law.” These three proxy wars begin with the identification of the United States in verse 40 as “chariots, ships, and horsemen.”
Nofarananay tamin’ny lahatsoratra farany isika tamin’ny nanoratana hoe: “Ny andininy 10–15 dia maneho ady solontenam-panjakana telo notanterahin’ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra, dia ny fahefan’ny papa, nanomboka tamin’ny 1989 ka hatramin’ny lalàn’ny Alahady.” Ireo ady solontenam-panjakana telo ireo dia manomboka amin’ny famantarana an’i Etazonia ao amin’ny andininy 40 ho “kalesy, sambo, ary mpitaingin-tsoavaly.”
The next proxy war, represented by verse 11 and its historical fulfillment at the Battle of Raphia in 217 BC, was between Ptolemy IV Philopator, the southern king of Egypt, and Antiochus the Great, also called Antiochus Magnus, of the Seleucid Empire. Antiochus had fulfilled verse 10 when he retaliated against Egypt for his northern kingdom’s defeat and loss of possessions, retaking all the geography the southern kingdom had previously seized from his kingdom. He did so but stopped at the border of Egypt, thus fulfilling verse 10 and typifying 1989.
Ny ady an-trano amin’ny alalan’ny hafa manaraka, izay asehon’ny andininy faha-11 sy ny fahatanterahany ara-tantara tamin’ny Adin’i Raphia tamin’ny 217 tal. J.K., dia teo amin’i Ptolemaios IV Philopator, mpanjaka atsimon’i Egypta, sy Antiokosy Lehibe, izay antsoina koa hoe Antiokosy Magnus, avy amin’ny Empira Seleokida. Efa nahatanteraka ny andininy faha-10 i Antiokosy, rehefa namaly an’i Egypta izy noho ny faharesen’ny fanjakany avaratra sy ny fahaverezan’ny fananany, ka nalainy indray ny faritra ara-jeografia rehetra izay efa norobain’ny fanjakana atsimo tamin’ny fanjakany. Nanao izany tokoa izy, nefa nijanona teo amin’ny sisin-tanin’i Egypta, ka dia nahatanteraka ny andininy faha-10 sady naneho mialoha ny taona 1989.
But his sons shall be stirred up, and shall assemble a multitude of great forces: and one shall certainly come, and overflow, and pass through: then shall he return, and be stirred up, even to his fortress. Daniel 11:10.
Fa ny zanany lahy kosa dia ho taitra hampiomana ady ka hanangona hery lehibe maro; ary ny iray amin’izy ireo dia tsy maintsy ho avy tokoa ka handifotra sy hamaky, ary handroso hatrany; dia hiverina izy ka ho taitra hampiomana ady indray, hatrany amin’ny fiarovany mafy. Daniela 11:10.
The second proxy war was the Battle of Raphia. Raphia means the borderland. That battleground marks the point where Antiochus had ceased his previous invasion of verse 10. The three proxy wars are governed by truth, in the sense that the first proxy war aligns with the last proxy war. All three wars—verses 10, 11, and then the third war of verses 13–15—are waged by the same historical figure in their initial fulfillment. Antiochus Magnus is present in each of the three battles, prophetically tying them together into one line. Antiochus wins the first and last battles, but not the middle one, where the king of the south prevails.
Ny ady an-kolaka faharoa dia ny Adin’i Raphia. Ny hoe Raphia dia midika hoe tanin-tsisintany. Io sahan’ady io no manamarika ny teboka izay nitsaharan’i Antiochus tamin’ilay fanafihany teo aloha ao amin’ny andininy faha-10. Ireo ady an-kolaka telo dia fehezin’ny fahamarinana, amin’ny heviny fa ny ady an-kolaka voalohany dia mifanaraka amin’ny ady an-kolaka farany. Ireo ady telo rehetra—andininy faha-10, faha-11, ary avy eo ny ady fahatelo ao amin’ny andininy faha-13–15—dia samy notanterahin’ilay olona ara-tantara iray ihany tamin’ny fahatanterahany voalohany. Antiochus Magnus dia hita eo amin’ireo ady telo ireo avy, ka ampifamatorin’ny faminaniana ho tsipika iray ihany izy ireny. Antiochus no mandresy amin’ny ady voalohany sy farany, fa tsy amin’ilay eo afovoany, izay anjakan’ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo.
Just as Raphia means borderland, so does Ukraine. The second proxy war, first fulfilled by the Battle of Raphia, is now being fulfilled in the Ukrainian war. Vladimir Putin is the king of the south, the prophetic descendant of the first modern king of the south, Vladimir Lenin. Putin has repeatedly claimed that Russia’s response to Ukraine is based on a disputed agreement that, upon Germany’s reunification, NATO would not expand further into former USSR territory. Putin’s motivation mirrors Ptolemy’s in verses 5–9 and Napoleon’s in 1797. All three southern kings justify their actions against the northern king based on a broken treaty.
Tahaka an’i Raphia izay midika hoe sisintany, dia toy izany koa i Okraina. Ilay ady faharoa atao amin’ny alalan’ny mpisolo tena, izay tanteraka voalohany tamin’ny Adin’i Raphia, dia tanteraka ankehitriny amin’ny ady any Okraina. Vladimir Putin no mpanjakan’ny atsimo, taranaka ara-paminaniana avy amin’ilay mpanjakan’ny atsimo maoderina voalohany, dia Vladimir Lenin. Efa imbetsaka i Putin no nilaza fa ny valintenin’i Rosia manoloana an’i Okraina dia miorina amin’ny fifanarahana iadian-kevitra izay nilaza fa, rehefa tafaray indray i Alemaina, dia tsy hanitatra bebe kokoa ho ao amin’ny faritanin’ny URSS taloha ny OTAN. Ny antony manosika an’i Putin dia mitovy amin’ny an’i Ptolemaiosy ao amin’ny andininy 5–9 sy ny an’i Napoléon tamin’ny 1797. Ireo mpanjaka telo avy any atsimo ireo dia samy manamarina ny fihetsiny manohitra ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra noho ny fifanarahana voarava.
According to Isaiah 23, the whore of Tyre, representing the papal power, would be forgotten for seventy years, as the days of one king—a period repeatedly shown to be the time when the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, the earth beast of Revelation 13 (the United States), rules.
Araka ny Isaia 23, dia ho hadinoina mandritra ny fitopolo taona ilay vehivavy janga avy any Tyro, izay maneho ny fahefan’ny papa, toy ny andron’ny mpanjaka iray—fotoana izay aseho imbetsaka fa izy no fotoana anjakan’ny fanjakana fahenina ao amin’ny faminanian’ny Baiboly, dia ilay bibidia avy amin’ny tany ao amin’ny Apokalypsy 13 (Etazonia).
And it shall come to pass in that day, that Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years, according to the days of one king: after the end of seventy years shall Tyre sing as an harlot. Take an harp, go about the city, thou harlot that hast been forgotten; make sweet melody, sing many songs, that thou mayest be remembered. And it shall come to pass after the end of seventy years, that the Lord will visit Tyre, and she shall turn to her hire, and shall commit fornication with all the kingdoms of the world upon the face of the earth. Isaiah 23:15–17.
Ary amin’izany andro izany dia hohadinoina fitopolo taona Tyro, araka ny andron’ny mpanjaka iray; rehefa tapitra ny fitopolo taona dia hihira tahaka ny vehivavy janga Tyro. Makà harpa, mitety ny tanàna, ry janga efa hadino; manaova feon-kira mamy, mihirà hira maro, mba hahatsiarovana anao. Ary rehefa tapitra ny fitopolo taona, dia hotsidihin’i Jehovah Tyro, ka hiverina amin’ny karamany izy, ary hijangajanga amin’ny fanjakana rehetra amin’izao tontolo izao eny ambonin’ny tany. Isaia 23:15–17.
The symbolic seventy-year period spans from 1798 to the Sunday law, which is the history represented by verse 40. It is not until the ending of the seventy years, or the approach of the Sunday law, that the whore reappears. For this reason, the warfare of the three battles in verses 10–15 is carried out by a proxy of the papal power, for she is prophetically forgotten during this period.
Ny fe-potoana ara-tandindona fito-polo taona dia manomboka amin’ny 1798 ka hatramin’ny lalànan’ny Alahady, izay tantara asehon’ny andininy faha-40. Tsy raha tsy amin’ny fiafaran’ireo fito-polo taona ireo, na amin’ny fanatonan’ny lalànan’ny Alahady, no isehoan’ilay vehivavy janga indray. Noho izany antony izany, ny ady amin’ireo fifandonana telo ao amin’ny andininy 10–15 dia tanterahin’ny solontenam-pahefan’ny papa, satria izy dia adino ara-paminaniana mandritra io fe-potoana io.
In the first and last proxy battles, the king of the north prevails over the king of the south. In the middle battle, the king of the south prevails over the king of the north. The Battle of Raphia was the initial historical fulfillment of verse 11, and the verse and their historical fulfillment make up two witnesses that are to be combined with the parallel passages of papal Rome’s three and a half prophetic days of rule. Thus, two passages of Scripture within Daniel 11, accompanied by their historical fulfillments, set forth the prophetic characteristics of verse 11’s battle of the borderland, first fulfilled at the Battle of Raphia and then again at the time of the end in 1798.
Tamin’ireo ady an-kolaka voalohany sy farany, ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra no mandresy ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo. Amin’ilay ady eo afovoany kosa, ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo no mandresy ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra. Ny Adin’i Raphia no fanatanterahana ara-tantara voalohany an’ilay andininy faha-11, ary io andininy io mbamin’ny fanatanterahana azy ara-tantara no mandrafitra vavolombelona roa izay tokony hampiraisina amin’ireo andalan-teny mifanindran-dàlana momba ireo telo taona sy tapany ara-paminaniana nanjakan’i Roma papaly. Koa, andalan-tenin’ny Soratra Masina roa ao amin’ny Daniela 11, miaraka amin’ny fanatanterahana azy ara-tantara, no mametraka ireo toetra ara-paminaniana momba ny adin’ny sisin-tany ao amin’ny andininy faha-11, izay tanteraka voalohany tamin’ny Adin’i Raphia ary avy eo indray tamin’ny fotoan’ny farany tamin’ny taona 1798.
These lines of witness uphold that Vladimir Putin is the last Vladimir of the modern king of the south. “Vladimir” is often defined as meaning “ruler of the world,” but the word mir also correctly means “community.” Thus, Vladimir means “ruler of the community,” or “ruler of communism.” Putin identifies his involvement with Ukraine as based on a broken agreement addressing his concerns about NATO’s encroachment beyond the borders agreed upon after Germany’s unification. Putin’s direction is as much focused against NATO and the EU as it is against Zelenskyy and Ukraine. NATO and the EU’s encroachment upon territory Putin insists was to remain NATO-free parallels Ptolemy’s rage when the Seleucid king set the Egyptian princess bride aside for his former wife. That broken treaty pointed forward to the broken Treaty of Tolentino in 1797. In Daniel 11, when the southern king prevails over the northern king, it involves a broken treaty.
Ireo andalana fanambarana ireto dia manohana fa i Vladimir Putin no Vladimir farany amin’ilay mpanjaka maoderina avy any atsimo. Matetika ny hoe “Vladimir” dia faritana ho midika hoe “mpanapaka izao tontolo izao,” kanefa ny teny hoe mir dia midika ara-drariny koa hoe “fiarahamonina.” Noho izany, Vladimir dia midika hoe “mpanapaka ny fiarahamonina,” na “mpanapaka ny kaominisma.” Putin dia mampifandray ny fandraisany anjara amin’i Okraina ho miorina amin’ny fifanarahana voahitsakitsaka iray izay niresaka ny ahiahiny momba ny fidiran’ny NATO mihoatra ny sisin-tany izay nifanarahana fa tsy hihoarany taorian’ny fampiraisana indray an’i Alemaina. Ny fitarihan’i Putin dia mifantoka hanoherana ny NATO sy ny Vondrona Eoropeana tahaka ny ifantohany hanoherana an’i Zelenskyy sy i Okraina. Ny fidiran’ny NATO sy ny Vondrona Eoropeana amin’ny faritany izay i Putin dia manizingizina fa tokony ho nijanona ho tsy idiran’ny NATO dia mifanandrify amin’ny fahatezeran’i Ptolémée, raha nametraka ankilabao ilay andriambavy ejipsianina nampakarina ho vady ny mpanjaka seleokida ka naveriny ny vadiny taloha. Io fifanarahana voahitsakitsaka io dia nanondro mialoha ilay Fifanarahana tao Tolentino voahitsakitsaka tamin’ny 1797. Ao amin’ny Daniela 11, rehefa mandresy ny mpanjaka avy any atsimo ny mpanjaka avy any avaratra, dia misy fifanarahana voahitsakitsaka tafiditra amin’izany.
This broken treaty concerns the EU’s unwillingness to restrict NATO’s expansion beyond its borders when Germany was reunified. In this sense, Putin, the king of the south, is in a battle against the king of the north, represented by his proxy power. Just as the Nazis of World War II were a proxy for the Catholic Church, the Nazis of Ukraine become the symbol of the second proxy war of verses 10–15. Three world wars and three proxy wars—and in both lines, the Nazis are the proxy representative of the Catholic Church during the middle conflict.
Ity fanekem-pihavanana voahitsakitsaka ity dia mahakasika ny tsy fahavononan’ny Vondrona Eoropeana hametra ny fanitaran’ny OTAN mihoatra ny sisin-taniny tamin’ny fotoana nampiraisana indray an’i Alemaina. Amin’io heviny io, i Putin, mpanjakan’ny atsimo, dia ao anatin’ny ady manohitra ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra, izay asehon’ny hery solontenany. Tahaka ny naha-solontenan’ny Fiangonana Katolika ny Nazi tamin’ny Ady Lehibe Faharoa, dia tonga mariky ny ady faharoa amin’ny alalan’ny solontena ao amin’ny andininy 10–15 kosa ny Nazi ao Okraina. Ady lehibe maneran-tany telo sy ady telo amin’ny alalan’ny solontena—ary amin’ireo tsipika roa tonta, ny Nazi no solontena mpisolo tena ny Fiangonana Katolika mandritra ny fifandonana eo afovoany.
In the three original historical fulfillments of these proxy wars, Antiochus Magnus was in each battle. It has often been shown how the etymology of “Antiochus” and the symbolism associated with the Seleucid kingdom as the king of the north identify Antiochus as a symbol of the antichrist—the pope of Rome. But in the history of the three proxy wars, the whore of Tyre is forgotten, so the symbol of the “pope” represented in the name “Antiochus” stands for his proxy power. In the first and last battles, it is the United States openly doing the bidding for Rome. In verse 11, the proxy power is the Nazism of Ukraine, but it was and still is the ships and chariots of the United States that propped up Zelenskyy in the war. On the surface of the second proxy war, the United States is hidden, as is the pope during the seventy years of Isaiah 23. The United States is hidden in the very history where it develops all the characteristics of the beast, making it prophetically fitting that, once the second proxy war is underway, the United States is obscured by the proxy power of Nazism in Ukraine, though it remains the military and economic might of the earth beast that props up Ukraine until their demise.
Ao amin’ireo fahatanterahana ara-tantara telo tany am-boalohany amin’ireo ady solontena ireo, dia tao amin’ny ady tsirairay i Antiochus Magnus. Efa naseho matetika ny fomba anehoan’ny etimolojian’ny hoe “Antiochus” sy ny tandindona mifandray amin’ny fanjakan’ny Seleokida amin’ny maha-mpanjakan’ny avaratra azy, fa i Antiochus dia tandindon’ny antikristy—dia ny papa any Roma. Kanefa ao amin’ny tantaran’ireo ady solontena telo ireo, dia hadino ilay vehivavy janga avy any Tyro, ka noho izany ny tandindon’ny “papa” aseho ao amin’ny anarana hoe “Antiochus” dia mijoro ho an’ny fahefany solontena. Ao amin’ny ady voalohany sy farany, dia i Etazonia no manao ampahibemaso ny raharaha ho an’i Roma. Ao amin’ny andininy faha-11, ny fahefana solontena dia ny Nazisma ao Okraina, nefa ny sambo sy ny kalesin’i Etazonia no nanohana an’i Zelenskyy tamin’ny ady, ary mbola izy ireo ihany no manohana azy. Eo ivelan’ny hita maso amin’ny ady solontena faharoa, dia miafina i Etazonia, tahaka ny miafenan’ny papa nandritra ireo fito-polo taona ao amin’ny Isaia 23. Miafina ao anatin’ilay tantara mihitsy i Etazonia, izay namolavolany ny toetra rehetra ananan’ilay bibidia, ka mahatonga izany ho mifanaraka ara-paminaniana fa, vantany vao mandeha ny ady solontena faharoa, dia saron’ny fahefana solontenan’ny Nazisma ao Okraina i Etazonia, na dia mbola ny herin-tafika sy ny herin-toekaren’ilay bibidia avy amin’ny tany aza no manohana an’i Okraina mandra-paharingany.
When the king of the south went to Babylon and took the king of the north captive, and also when General Berthier took the pope captive, he walked right into the Vatican suggesting that the Ukrainian war will end with Putin’s victory at a point when any resistance from the Ukraine has been removed. The kingdom Ptolemy captured was Babylon, and the kingdom Napoleon captured was spiritual Babylon. Thus, Zelenskyy’s kingdom is represented by those subjects which provide him support. Now that Trump has withdrawn the support of the earth beast’s chariots horsemen and ships, Ukraine’s support is the EU, the very group that has been unwilling to hear Putin’s claims of the broken treaty concerning the encroachment of NATO.
Rehefa nankany Babylona ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo ka namabo ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra ho babo, ary koa rehefa nosamborin’i Jeneraly Berthier ho babo ny papa, dia niditra mivantana tao Vatikana izy, ka manondro fa hifarana amin’ny fandresen’i Putin ny ady ao Okraina amin’ny fotoana izay efa hofoanana avokoa izay fanoherana rehetra avy amin’i Okraina. Ny fanjakana azon’i Ptolémée dia Babylona, ary ny fanjakana azon’i Napoléon dia Babylona ara-panahy. Koa izany, ny fanjakan’i Zelenskyy dia asehon’ireo vahoaka manohana azy. Ankehitriny, rehefa nesorin’i Trump ny fanohanan’ny kalesin’ny bibidia avy amin’ny tany sy ny mpitaingin-tsoavaly ary ny sambo, ny fanohanana an’i Okraina dia ny Vondrona Eoropeana, dia ilay vondrona indrindra izay tsy nety nihaino ny fitakian’i Putin momba ilay fanekena voadika mikasika ny fanitaran’i OTAN.
The philosophy that guides the eurocrats of the EU is the Greenpeace movement. For this reason, Zelenskyy means, “green.” Zelenskyy is the symbolic head of the warmongers of the EU who are guided by the foolish global agenda of environmentalism. When the Ukraine war concludes Putin will celebrate not only a victory over Ukraine, but the entire EU and NATO.
Ny filozofia mitari-dalana ny eurocrate ao amin’ny Vondrona Eoropeana dia ny hetsika Greenpeace. Noho izany antony izany, Zelenskyy dia midika hoe “maitso.” Zelenskyy no loha ara-tandindona an’ireo mpampirisika ady ao amin’ny Vondrona Eoropeana izay tarihina amin’ny fandaharam-potoana maneran-tany adaladala momba ny fiarovana ny tontolo iainana. Rehefa mifarana ny ady any Okraina dia tsy fandresena an’i Okraina ihany no hankalazain’i Putin, fa fandresena amin’ny Vondrona Eoropeana manontolo sy ny OTAN ihany koa.
The three proxy wars therefore possess the signature of truth. The first and last proxy war the king of the south is defeated through an alliance between the sea beast and earth beast of Revelation thirteen. In the beginning the victory for the king of the north was brought about by an alliance between a conservative, Vatican I pope, who in the context of the Fatima secrets of Catholicism lore is the white or good pope. The current pope, who as I write this is on his deathbed is a Vatican II, liberal pope, who in the context of the Fatima secrets is the black or bad pope.
Noho izany, ireo ady ankolaka telo ireo dia mitondra ny mariky ny fahamarinana. Ao amin’ny ady ankolaka voalohany sy farany, ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo dia resy noho ny firaisan-kina eo amin’ilay bibidia avy amin’ny ranomasina sy ilay bibidia avy amin’ny tany ao amin’ny Apokalypsy toko fahatelo ambin’ny folo. Tamin’ny voalohany, ny fandresen’ny mpanjakan’ny avaratra dia nentin’ny firaisan-kina tamin’ny papa mpandala ny nentin-drazana, avy amin’ny Vatican I, izay, ao anatin’ny tontolon’ny lovantsofina katolika momba ny tsiambaratelon’i Fatima, no papa fotsy na papa tsara. Ny papa ankehitriny kosa, izay eo am-panoratako izao dia eo am-pandriana fiandrasam-pahafatesana, dia papa liberaly avy amin’ny Vatican II, izay, ao anatin’ny tontolon’ny tsiambaratelon’i Fatima, no papa mainty na papa ratsy.
Verse fourteen identifies that when the “robbers of thy people” who exalt themselves and fall, enter into prophetic history the vision is established. In the fulfillment of verses thirteen through fifteen in the Battle of Panium in 200 BC pagan Rome inserted itself into the issues concerning that very battle. In the three verses which address the Battle of Panium, verse fourteen identifies that the vision is established by Rome.
Ny andininy faha-efatra ambin’ny folo dia manambara fa rehefa miditra ao amin’ny tantara ara-paminaniana ireo “mpandroba ny firenenao” izay manandratra ny tenany ka lavo, dia miorina ny fahitana. Tamin’ny fahatanterahan’ny andininy faha-telo ambin’ny folo ka hatramin’ny faha-dimy ambin’ny folo tao amin’ny Adin’i Panium tamin’ny taona 200 tal. J.K., dia nampiditra ny tenany tao anatin’ireo raharaha momba izany ady izany indrindra i Roma jentilisa. Ao amin’ireo andininy telo izay miresaka ny Adin’i Panium, ny andininy faha-efatra ambin’ny folo no manambara fa i Roma no mampiorina ny fahitana.
In the Battle of Panium history a conservative, Vatican I white pope will join forces with the last of the eight presidents that began in the period of Reagan, who previously formed an alliance with a conservative Vatican I pope. They did so in 1989 to bring down the former USSR, and at the end they do so to bring down the last ruler of that very kingdom.
Ao amin’ny Adin’i Panium ara-tantara, papa fotsy mpandala ny nentin-drazana, avy amin’ny Vatican I, dia hiray hery amin’ilay filoha fahavalo farany izay nanomboka tamin’ny vanim-potoanan’i Reagan, izay teo aloha dia efa nanao firaisana tamin’ny papa mpandala ny nentin-drazana avy amin’ny Vatican I. Nanao izany izy ireo tamin’ny 1989 mba hampietry ny Firaisana Sovietika teo aloha, ary amin’ny farany dia hanao izany koa izy ireo mba hampietry ny mpanapaka farany amin’io fanjakana io indrindra.
In the Reagan years and with the alliance of pope John Paul II and the USA, John Paul II came to believe he was the good pope of the prophecies of Fatima. Motivated by that conviction he began to travel the world to promote what he understood to be a fulfillment of the predictions of Fatima. In doing so he became the most travelled pope in history, as well as the most recognized pope of all time as he fulfilled Revelation thirteen’s prediction that there would be a time when the whole world would wonder after the beast. Pope John Paul II’s public persona typifies the conservative Vatican I pope who comes into an alliance with the last president of the USA.
Tamin’ny taona nanjakan’i Reagan, sy tamin’ny alalan’ny fiombonan-kevitra nisy teo amin’ny papa Joany Paoly II sy i Etazonia, dia tonga tamin’ny finoana i Joany Paoly II fa izy no papa tsara resahin’ny faminanian’i Fatima. Nentin’izany faharesen-dahatra izany izy ka nanomboka nitety izao tontolo izao mba hampandroso izay noheveriny ho fahatanterahan’ireo faminaniana ao Fatima. Tamin’ny fanaovany izany dia tonga izy ho papa nitety tany indrindra teo amin’ny tantara, ary koa ho papa fantatra indrindra hatramin’izay, raha nanatanteraka ny faminaniana ao amin’ny Apokalypsy toko faha-telo ambin’ny folo izay nilaza fa hisy fotoana hahagagan’izao tontolo izao manontolo ny amin’ilay bibidia. Ny endrika nasehon’ny papa Joany Paoly II teo imason’ny besinimaro dia mampiavaka ilay papa mpandala ny nentin-drazana araka ny Vatikanina I, izay miditra ao anatin’ny firaisan-kina amin’ny filoha farany ao Etazonia.
Therefore, one of the prophetic characteristics of the Reagan contemporary pope is that there is a point where his public image is marked as a waymark. That mark is in verse fourteen, when the robbers of thy people establish the vision. Pope John Paul II fulfills a prophetic characteristic of being the pope that the entire world wondered after, thus pointing forward to the conservative end time Vatican I pope who comes into an alliance with Trump. When that happens the vision is established, and what establishes the vision is the pope inserting himself into the history of Panium and the year 200 BC.
Noho izany, iray amin’ireo toetra ara-paminaniana mampiavaka ny papa mitovy vanim-potoana amin’i Reagan dia ny fisian’ny teboka iray izay anamaritana ny endriny ampahibemaso ho marika famantarana. Ao amin’ny andininy faha-efatra ambin’ny folo izany marika izany, rehefa mampiorina ny fahitana ny mpandroba avy amin’ny firenenao. I Papa Joany Paoly II dia manatanteraka toetra ara-paminaniana amin’ny maha-papa izay nahagaga izao tontolo izao manontolo ka nanaraka azy, ka izany no manondro mialoha ilay papa vatikana mpandala nentin-drazana amin’ny fotoanan’ny farany, avy amin’ny Vatican I, izay miditra ao anatin’ny fiaraha-miasa amin’i Trump. Rehefa mitranga izany, dia miorina ny fahitana, ary izay mampiorina ny fahitana dia ny fampidiran’ny papa ny tenany ao amin’ny tantaran’i Panium sy ny taona 200 tal. J.K.
The beginning of the eight presidents illustrates the ending of the eight presidents and just before the Sunday law of verse sixteen the whore of Tyre who has been forgotten returns to open history as she forms an alliance with Reagan’s counterpart, Donald Trump. Together as represented by the alliance of Antiochus and Philip of Macedon they bring down the final generation of the southern kingdom as represented by the child king Ptolemy. A child in Bible prophecy is a symbol of the final generation, and after the Ukraine war Putin will repeat the history of the southern kings who are lifted up from military victories and lose their way in some type of church and state dilemma.
Ny fiandohan’ireo filoha valo dia maneho mialoha ny fiafaran’ireo filoha valo, ary taloha kelin’ny lalàn’ny Alahady ao amin’ny andininy fahenina ambin’ny folo, ilay vehivavy janga avy any Tyro, izay efa hadino, dia miverina eo amin’ny tantara misokatra rehefa manao firaisana izy amin’ilay mifanandrify amin’i Reagan, dia Donald Trump. Izy roa miaraka, araka ny asehon’ny firaisan’i Antiokosy sy Filipo avy any Makedonia, no mampirodana ny taranaka farany amin’ny fanjakana atsimo, araka ny asehon’ilay mpanjaka zaza Ptolemaiosy. Ny zaza ao amin’ny faminaniana ara-Baiboly dia tandindon’ny taranaka farany, ary aorian’ny ady any Okraina dia haverin’i Putin ny tantaran’ireo mpanjaka atsimo izay asandratra noho ny fandresena ara-miaramila ka very lalana ao anatin’ny karazana olana iray momba ny fiangonana sy ny fanjakana.
Thus, verse ten, representing 1989 and the first proxy war is the beginning, or the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet. The Battle of Raphia in verse eleven representing the Ukraine war is the thirteenth letter in the Hebrew alphabet. The number 13 is a symbol of rebellion, and the proxy army in the Ukrainian war are Nazi’s, the premier symbol of rebellion in the modern world. Panium is the last letter in the Hebrew alphabet, which is made up of twenty-two letters. Thus, the Hebrew word truth which is created by bringing the first, thirteenth and twenty-second letters of the alphabet together to form the Hebrew word “truth,” identifies the structure of these three proxy wars as truth. The twenty-second and last letter of the Hebrew alphabet is a symbol of divinity being combined with humanity, and the fulfillment of the Battle of Panium in the near future takes place during Trump’s presidency. Trump is the twenty-second president to have served two terms.
Araka izany, ny andininy faha-folo, izay maneho ny taona 1989 sy ny ady solontenam-pahefana voalohany, no fiandohana, na ny litera voalohany amin’ny abidy hebreo. Ny Adin’i Raphia ao amin’ny andininy faha-iraika ambin’ny folo, izay maneho ny ady any Okraina, dia ny litera faha-telo ambin’ny folo amin’ny abidy hebreo. Ny isa 13 dia tandindon’ny fikomiana, ary ny tafika solontenam-pahefana ao amin’ny ady any Okraina dia Nazia, izay tandindona lehibe indrindra amin’ny fikomiana eo amin’ny tontolo maoderina. Panium no litera farany amin’ny abidy hebreo, izay misy litera roa amby roapolo. Araka izany, ny teny hebreo hoe fahamarinana, izay noforonina amin’ny fampitambarana ny litera voalohany sy ny litera faha-telo ambin’ny folo ary ny litera faha-roa amby roapolo ao amin’ny abidy mba hamorona ny teny hebreo hoe “fahamarinana,” dia manondro fa ny firafitr’ireo ady solontenam-pahefana telo ireo dia fahamarinana. Ny litera faha-roa amby roapolo sady farany amin’ny abidy hebreo dia tandindon’ny maha-Andriamanitra ampiarahina amin’ny maha-olombelona, ary ny fahatanterahan’ny Adin’i Panium atsy ho atsy dia mitranga mandritra ny fitondran’i Trump. I Trump no filoha faha-roa amby roapolo izay nanompo fe-potoam-piasana roa.
Panium has a double witness to a twofold alliance and in both references the alliance represents an alliance identifying a hierarchical relationship between two parties. The alliance between Philip and Antiochus was strategic, aimed at countering Ptolemaic and Roman influence in the eastern Mediterranean. However, their collaboration was not focused on the Battle of Panium itself—Antiochus conducted this campaign independently, without Philip’s direct military involvement. Philip’s role was more indirect, providing political and strategic support by tying down Roman and Ptolemaic allies in Greece and the Aegean, allowing Antiochus to focus on Coele-Syria. The historians all identify that Antiochus was the more powerful in the alliance, and that it was only Antiochus who actually fought the battle. Their alliance was concerning the broader area associated with Alexander’s former kingdom. Thus, the alliance has a premier leader and a lesser subordinate as represented by the name Caesarea-Philippi, the name for Panium when Christ walked among men. Caesarea-Philippi therefore aligns with Antiochus and Philip, for Caesar was the more powerful in the alliance symbolized by both Caesar Augustus and Herod Philip the tetrarch.
Panium dia manana vavolombelona roa momba ny firaisana roa sosona, ary amin’ireo fanondroana roa ireo dia firaisana izay manondro fifandraisana ambaratongam-pahefana eo amin’ny antoko roa no asehon’izany. Ny firaisana teo amin’i Philip sy Antiochus dia tetika stratejika, nokendrena hanoherana ny fitaoman’ny Ptolemaika sy ny Romanina tao amin’ny Ranomasina Mediteranea atsinanana. Kanefa, ny fiaraha-miasan’izy ireo dia tsy nifantoka tamin’ny Adin’i Panium mihitsy—i Antiochus no nitarika irery io fampielezan-kevitra io, tsy nisy fandraisana anjara ara-tafika mivantana avy amin’i Philip. Ny anjara toeran’i Philip dia ankolaka kokoa, tamin’ny fanomezana fanohanana ara-politika sy ara-stratejika tamin’ny famatorana ny mpiara-dia amin’ny Romanina sy ny Ptolemaika tany Gresy sy ny Ranomasina Égée, ka nahafahan’i Antiochus nifantoka tamin’i Coele-Syria. Samy milaza avokoa ireo mpahay tantara fa i Antiochus no nahery kokoa tao amin’ny firaisana, ary i Antiochus irery ihany no tena niady tamin’ilay ady. Ny firaisan’izy ireo dia mikasika ilay faritra midadasika kokoa mifandray amin’ny fanjakan’i Aleksandra fahiny. Noho izany, ilay firaisana dia manana mpitarika ambony sy mpanompo ambany kokoa, araka ny asehon’ny anarana hoe Caesarea-Philippi, izay anaran’i Panium tamin’ny fotoana nandehanan’i Kristy teo amin’ny olona. Koa izany, Caesarea-Philippi dia mifanaraka amin’i Antiochus sy Philip, satria i Kaisara no natanjaka kokoa tao amin’ilay firaisana asehon’i Kaisara Aogosto sy Heroda Filipo tetrarka.
The word “Tetrarch” means ruler over a fourth. Caesar ruled the entire kingdom, and Philip ruled over a fourth of a territory thus placing the symbol of Philip in a subjective relationship in the alliances of Panium and Caesarea-Philippi. With Herod Philip we see the symbol of two blood lines which are both symbols of a broken covenant relationship with God. We also see echoes of one fourth of the division of Alexander’s kingdom into four parts, or four tetrarchs. Philip means lover of horses.
Ny teny hoe “Tetrarka” dia midika hoe mpanapaka ny ampahefatra. Kaisara no nanapaka ny fanjakana manontolo, ary Filipo no nanapaka ny ampahefatra amin’ny faritany iray, ka izany no nametrahana ny tandindon’i Filipo tao anatin’ny fifandraisana manandanja amin’ny fikambanan’i Panium sy Kaisaria-Filipy. Ao amin’i Heroda Filipo no ahitantsika ny tandindon’ny razambe roa, izay samy tandindon’ny fifandraisana amin’ny fanekena tapaka tamin’Andriamanitra. Hita ao koa ny akon’ny ampahefatra iray amin’ny fizarana ny fanjakan’i Aleksandra ho efatra, na tetrarka efatra. Filipo dia midika hoe tia soavaly.
At the Battle of Panium which is fulfilled at the conclusion of the Ukrainian war Antiochus Magnus, the United States will defeat Russia and will enter into an alliance with a lesser player represented by Philip. That lesser player will be involved but not directly in the battle. The battle will be between the USA and Putin, evidently directly connected with a religious controversy produced by Putin’s irritation and pride as illustrated by both Ptolemy IV Philopator after the Battle of Raphia, and by king Uzziah of Judah. Ptolemy and Uzziah were southern kings lifted up in pride by their military success who then desired to take up a sacred work which was only to be accomplished by the priests. Uzziah received leprosy for his efforts and Ptolemy in a rage slew 50,000 Jews in Alexandria.
Tamin’ny Adin’i Panium, izay tanteraka amin’ny famaranana ny ady Okrainiana, Antiochus Magnus, dia handresy an’i Rosia i Etazonia ary hiditra amin’ny firaisana amin’ny mpilalao madinika kokoa iray asehon’i Filipo. Ho voakasika io mpilalao madinika kokoa io, nefa tsy mivantana ao anatin’ilay ady. Eo amin’i Etazonia sy Putin no hisy ny ady, ary hita fa mifandray mivantana amin’ny adihevitra ara-pivavahana ateraky ny fahasosoran’i Putin sy ny fireharehany izany, araka ny asehon’i Ptolemaios IV Philopator taorian’ny Adin’i Raphia, sy ny mpanjaka Ozia avy amin’ny Joda. I Ptolemaios sy Ozia dia mpanjaka avy any atsimo, nasandratry ny fahombiazany ara-tafika ho amin’ny fireharehana, izay avy eo naniry handray asa masina izay ny mpisorona ihany no tokony hahatanteraka azy. Nahazo habokana i Ozia noho ny ezaka nataony, ary i Ptolemaios kosa, tamin’ny fahatezerana, dia namono Jiosy 50 000 tao Aleksandria.
Verse thirteen identifies the battle between the final generation of the modern king of the community, or communism, Vladimir Putin’s Russia and the USA. Trump prevails in the battle, but he does so with an ally from a fourth part of the kingdom, who is not actually at the battle. We are near the conclusion of verse eleven as testified to by the current events. Putin will be victorious over Ukraine, as represented by Raphia. He will then begin his progressive demise as represented by Uzziah being placed into a house until his death, due to leprosy. After his victory at Raphia in 217 BC, Ptolemy IV Philopator’s reign deteriorated due to corruption, extravagance, and reliance on unscrupulous advisors. He died in 204 BC, likely assassinated or poisoned by his ministers, Sosibius and Agathocles, as part of a conspiracy to secure power for his young son, Ptolemy V. This turbulent end reflects the instability and intrigue common in Hellenistic royal courts, marking a significant turning point in the decline of Ptolemaic Egypt.
Ny andininy faha-telo ambin’ny folo dia manondro ny ady eo amin’ny taranaka farany amin’ilay mpanjaka maoderina avy amin’ny fiaraha-monina, na ny kaominisma, dia i Rosian’i Vladimir Putin, sy i Etazonia. Mandresy amin’io ady io i Trump, nefa manao izany izy miaraka amin’ny mpiara-dia iray avy amin’ny ampahany fahefatra amin’ilay fanjakana, izay tsy tena eo amin’ilay ady akory. Manakaiky ny famaranana ny andininy faha-iraika ambin’ny folo isika, araka ny porofo omen’ny zava-mitranga amin’izao fotoana izao. Handresy an’i Okraina i Putin, araka ny asehon’i Rafia. Avy eo dia hanomboka ny faharavany miandalana izy, araka ny asehon’ny nametrahana an’i Ozia tao an-trano mandra-pahafatiny noho ny habokana. Taorian’ny fandreseny tao Rafia tamin’ny 217 tal. J.K., dia nihasimba ny fanjakan’i Ptolemaios IV Philopator noho ny kolikoly, ny fandaniam-poana tafahoatra, ary ny fiankinany tamin’ireo mpanolotsaina tsy manan-tsiny. Maty izy tamin’ny 204 tal. J.K., ary azo inoana fa novonoina na nohamamoizin’ireo minisiny, dia i Sosibius sy Agathocles, ho ampahany amin’ny firaisana tsikombakomba natao hiantohana ny fahefana ho an’ny zanany lahy mbola tanora, dia i Ptolemaios V. Ity fiafarana feno korontana ity dia maneho ny tsy fahamarinan-toetra sy ny teti-dratsy izay fahita teo amin’ny kianjan’ny mpanjaka helenistika, ka manamarika fiolahana lehibe teo amin’ny fihenan’i Ejipta ptolemaika.
A characteristic of the spiritual fulfillment of the king of the south which was typified by the literal fulfillments which took place in the struggle for world domination following Alexander’s death is “revolution.” France becomes the spiritual king of the south in the French Revolution time period. The modern king of the south, Russia was born in the Russian Revolution. As the philosophy introduced into the French Revolution matured from the anarchy of the French Revolution unto the communism of the Soviet revolution is a characteristic of the king of the south. Communism spread through the world with revolutions.
Toetra iray amin’ny fahatanterahana ara-panahin’ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo, izay nasehon’ireo fahatanterahana ara-bakiteny nitranga tao amin’ny ady ho amin’ny fanapahana izao tontolo izao taorian’ny nahafatesan’i Aleksandra, ny hoe “revolisiona.” I Frantsa dia tonga mpanjakan’ny atsimo ara-panahy tamin’ny vanim-potoanan’ny Revolisiona Frantsay. Ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo ankehitriny, dia i Rosia, izay teraka tamin’ny Revolisiona Rosiana. Ny filozofia nampidirina tao amin’ny Revolisiona Frantsay, raha nitombo hatramin’ny tsy fahampian’ny filaminana tao amin’ny Revolisiona Frantsay ho amin’ny kaominisma tao amin’ny revolisiona sovietika, dia toetran’ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo. Niely maneran-tany tamin’ny alalan’ny revolisiona ny kaominisma.
In modern times the CIA through the use of Non-Governmental Agencies has worked to overthrow nations around the globe, and the step-by-step plan which they have repeatedly employed is what is called color revolutions. The king of the south is a dragon power, and globalists are also the dragon power and the color revolutions of the CIA are markers of a dragon power. The history of France as the spiritual king of the south possesses a unique history that marks a conclusion of that particular line of prophecy.
Tamin’ny andro maoderina, ny CIA, tamin’ny alalan’ny fampiasana Fikambanana Tsy Miankina amin’ny Fanjakana, dia niasa hanongana firenena manerana izao tontolo izao; ary ilay drafitra misesy tsikelikely izay nampiasainy imbetsaka dia ilay antsoina hoe revolisiona miloko. Ny mpanjakan’ny atsimo dia fahefan’ny dragona, ary ireo globalista koa dia fahefan’ny dragona; ary ny revolisiona milokon’ny CIA dia famantarana ny fahefan’ny dragona. Ny tantaran’i Frantsa amin’ny maha-mpanjakan’ny atsimo ara-panahy azy dia manana tantara miavaka izay manamarika famaranana ny amin’io tsipika faminaniana manokana io.
That conclusion is represented by Napoleon. The French Revolution marks the beginning of France as the king of the south and Napoleon marks its end. Historians identify a series a steps which led Napoleon to his Waterloo, thus identifying a progressive ending to the first spiritual king of the south, as opposed to Babylon and Belshazzar being taken in one night. The first Vladimir of the modern king of the south, Vladimir Lenin died over a two-year period from a series of strokes. Some speculate Joseph Stalin poisoned him, just as some speculate the Ptolemy IV was poisoned by his counselors. The end of the modern king of the south as represented with the Soviet Union was also accomplished by a revolution.
Io famaranana io dia asehon’i Napoléon. Ny Revolisiona Frantsay no manamarika ny fiandohan’i Frantsa amin’ny maha-mpanjakan’ny atsimo azy, ary i Napoléon no manamarika ny fiafarany. Ny mpahay tantara dia mamantatra andian-dingana izay nitarika an’i Napoléon ho amin’ny Waterloo-ny, ka amin’izany dia mampiseho fiafarana miandalana an’ilay mpanjakan’ny atsimo ara-panahy voalohany, mifanohitra amin’i Babylona sy Belsazara izay resy tao anatin’ny alina iray. Ilay Vladimir voalohany amin’ilay mpanjakan’ny atsimo maoderina, dia i Vladimir Lenin, izay maty nandritra ny fe-potoana roa taona vokatry ny andiana fahatapahan-dra. Misy ny mihevitra fa i Joseph Stalin no namono azy tamin’ny poizina, tahaka ny iheveran’ny sasany fa i Ptolémée IV dia nohamonoina tamin’ny poizina nataon’ny mpanolotsainy. Ny fiafaran’ilay mpanjakan’ny atsimo maoderina, araka ny aseho amin’ny Firaisana Sôvietika, dia tontosa tamin’ny alalan’ny revolisiona koa.
The protest in Moscow that contributed to the demise of the USSR was the massive public resistance during the August 1991 Coup (August 19–21, 1991). This event, centered around the defense of the White House and Boris Yeltsin’s leadership, directly undermined the Soviet hardliners, exposed the regime’s fragility, and accelerated the USSR’s collapse. While earlier protests in Moscow (e.g., 1987–1990) and the Baltic Way (1989) built momentum, the August 1991 protests were the critical tipping point in Moscow, leading to the Soviet Union’s dissolution by the end of 1991. The beginning of Russia as the king of the south begins and ends in revolution. The ending of the USSR was a progressive disintegration of the kingdom, as was Ptolemy, Uzziah, Napoleon and even Vladimir Lenin. The ending of Putin is a progressive fall, which begins as soon as the Ukraine war is finished. His end is brought about at the Battle of Panium, when the USA takes control of the kingdom, while receiving support from an ally who is not actually at the battle.
Ny fihetsiketsehana tao Moscou izay nandray anjara tamin’ny faharavan’ny URSS dia ilay fanoheram-bahoaka goavana nandritra ny Fanonganam-panjakana tamin’ny Aogositra 1991 (19–21 Aogositra 1991). Io zava-nitranga io, izay nifantoka tamin’ny fiarovana ny Trano Fotsy sy ny fitarihan’i Boris Yeltsin, dia nanohintohina mivantana ireo mpitandro ny mafy ao amin’ny fitondrana Sovietika, nampiharihary ny fahalemen’ny fitondrana, ary nanafaingana ny firodanan’ny URSS. Na dia nanangana fironana aza ireo fihetsiketsehana teo aloha tao Moscou (ohatra, 1987–1990) sy ny Baltic Way (1989), ny fihetsiketsehana tamin’ny Aogositra 1991 no teboka manan-danja indrindra tao Moscou, ka nitarika tamin’ny fandravana ny Firaisana Sovietika tamin’ny faran’ny taona 1991. Ny fiandohan’i Rosia amin’ny maha-mpanjakan’ny atsimo azy dia manomboka ary mifarana amin’ny revolisiona. Ny fiafaran’ny URSS dia faharavan’ny fanjakana miandalana, tahaka an’i Ptolemaiosy, Ozia, Napoléon ary na dia i Vladimir Lenin aza. Ny fiafaran’i Putin dia fianjerana miandalana, izay manomboka raha vantany vao tapitra ny ady ao Okraina. Ny fiafarany dia tanterahina amin’ny Adin’i Panium, rehefa azon’i Etazonia eo ambany fifehezany ilay fanjakana, sady mahazo fanohanana avy amin’ny mpiara-dia iray izay tsy tena eo amin’ilay ady akory.
We will continue these lines in the next article.
Hanohy ireo hevitra ireo isika ao amin’ny lahatsoratra manaraka.