We ended the last article with the sentence that stated, “In 2001 the government of the United States spoke the Patriot Act into law.”
Urang mungkas artikel pamungkas ku kalimah anu nyebutkeun, “Dina taun 2001 pamaréntah Amérika Sarikat netepkeun Patriot Act jadi undang-undang.”
“There are many, even of those engaged in this movement for Sunday enforcement, who are blinded to the results which will follow this action. They do not see that they are striking directly against religious liberty. There are many who have never understood the claims of the Bible Sabbath and the false foundation upon which the Sunday institution rests. Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.
“Aya loba jalma, kaasup anu ngalibetkeun diri dina ieu gerakan pikeun maksa panerapan Minggu, anu dibutakeun kana akibat-akibat anu bakal nuturkeun tina ieu tindakan. Maranéhna teu ningali yén maranéhna keur neunggeul langsung ka kabébasan ageman. Aya loba anu can kungsi ngartos kana tuntutan Sabat Alkitab jeung kana dasar palsu anu jadi tatapakan lembaga Minggu. Sagala gerakan anu ngadukung panerapan hukum ageman sabenerna mangrupa hiji kalakuan ngéléhkeun diri ka kapausan, anu salila mangabad-abad kalawan tetep geus merangan kabébasan nurani. Pangamalan Minggu miboga asal-usulna minangka hiji lembaga anu disebut Kristen tina ‘rusiah kajahatan;’ sarta paksaan kana eta bakal jadi pangakuan anu saéstuna kana prinsip-prinsip anu mangrupakeun batu puseri pisan tina Romanisme. Lamun bangsa urang nepi ka kitu mungkir kana prinsip-prinsip pamaréntahanana nepi ka ngaluarkeun hiji hukum Minggu, Protestanisme dina ieu kalakuan bakal ngahiji leungeun jeung kepausan; ieu moal lain iwal ti méré kahirupan ka kazaliman anu ti baheula pisan geus kalawan tarik ngawas-ngawas kasempetanana pikeun ngagedur deui kana despotisme anu aktip.” Testimonies, jilid 5, 711.
1888 typified 2001, and it was then that the Blair Bill was introduced, though its failure to be passed, prevented it from prophetically speaking. It became the sign of 66 AD, a siege that was initiated and then mysteriously withdrawn. When it is understood that there are two image of the beast testing periods, and that the second period begins with the Sunday law in the United States, typified by the year 321, and that the period ends when the world Sunday law, typified by 538, is fully enforced; then it demands prophetically that the beginning of the first image of the beast testing period also begins with some type of typification of a Sunday law being spoken. In 1888, the Blair Bill was an attempt to enforce a National Sunday law, and 1888 identifies when the angel of Revelation eighteen descends and lightens the earth with his glory.
1888 ngagambarkeun 2001, sarta dina mangsa éta Blair Bill diwanohkeun, sanajan gagalna éta RUU pikeun disahkeun nyegah éta tina nyarita sacara profétis. Éta jadi tanda taun 66 M, hiji pangepungan anu dimimitian tuluy sacara misterius ditarik mundur. Nalika kahartos yén aya dua mangsa pangujian gambar ka sato galak, sarta yén mangsa kadua dimimitian ku hukum Minggu di Amérika Sarikat, anu dilambangkeun ku taun 321, jeung yén mangsa éta réngsé nalika hukum Minggu sadunya, anu dilambangkeun ku 538, ditegakkan sapinuhna; mangka sacara profétis nuntut yén awal mangsa pangujian kahiji tina gambar ka sato galak ogé dimimitian ku hiji rupa perlambangan ngeunaan hukum Minggu anu diumumkeun. Dina 1888, Blair Bill téh hiji usaha pikeun ngalaksanakeun hukum Minggu Nasional, sarta 1888 nandaan iraha malaikat dina Wahyu dalapan welas turun sarta nyaangan bumi ku kamulyaanana.
The Patriot Act is the typification of a Sunday law that begins the image of the beast testing time in the United States. The United States speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven when it enforces the Sunday law. When it enforces that law it will speak as a dragon, and that Sunday law identifies that the image of the beast is fully formed in the United States. At that point the United States has filled up its cup of probationary time, and national apostasy is followed by national ruin. At that point the United States ceases to be the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy as the threefold union is established.
Undang-Undang Patriot mangrupa tipifikasi tina hiji hukum Minggu anu ngamimitian mangsa pangrojong pikeun gambar sato galak di Amérika Serikat. Amérika Serikat nyarita saperti naga dina ngalaksanakeun Wahyu pasal tilu welas ayat sabelas nalika éta nagara maksa hukum Minggu. Nalika éta maksa hukum éta, éta bakal nyarita saperti naga, sarta hukum Minggu éta nandakeun yén gambar sato galak geus kabentuk sagemblengna di Amérika Serikat. Dina titik éta, Amérika Serikat geus ngeusian cangkir mangsa pangrojongna, sarta kamurtadan nasional dituturkeun ku karuksakan nasional. Dina titik éta, Amérika Serikat eureun jadi karajaan kagenep tina nubuat Kitab Suci lantaran pakaitna tilu rupa geus ditegakkeun.
Alpha and Omega always portrays the end with the beginning and at the beginning of the United States there were three times the United States prophetically spoke that marked the beginning of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. The Declaration of Independence in 1776, followed by the Constitution of 1789 and then the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 identify the first three times the United States prophetically spoke. Each of those three publications represented the speaking of the United States. Those three steps led to 1798, the beginning of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Those same three waymarks in the beginning of the United States, represent three waymarks that lead to the ending of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy.
Alfa jeung Oméga salawasna ngagambarkeun tungtung bareng jeung awal, sarta dina awal Amérika Sarikat aya tilu kali Amérika Sarikat sacara nubuat nyarita anu nandaan awal Amérika Sarikat salaku karajaan kagenep dina nubuat Kitab Suci. Déklarasi Kamerdikaan dina taun 1776, diteruskeun ku Konstitusi taun 1789, tuluy Alien and Sedition Acts taun 1798, nandakeun tilu kali kahiji Amérika Sarikat sacara nubuat nyarita. Unggal tina tilu dokumén éta ngawakilan ucapan Amérika Sarikat. Tilu léngkah éta ngantarkeun ka taun 1798, awal Amérika Sarikat maréntah salaku karajaan kagenep dina nubuat Kitab Suci. Tilu pananda jalan anu sarua dina awal Amérika Sarikat éta ngawakilan tilu pananda jalan anu ngantarkeun ka tungtung pamaréntahan Amérika Sarikat salaku karajaan kagenep dina nubuat Kitab Suci.
The Patriot Act is the first of three times the United States speaks as it comes to its conclusion as the sixth kingdom. The third speaking, that identifies the end of the sixth kingdom is the Sunday law. In the middle of that history the Pelosi Trials of January 6, which began in 2022 were initiated. The trials were a direct rejection of the rights enshrined in the Constitution because the trials were political in nature, and the lawfare was not simply a fabrication of facts, but it was actually a direct attack upon “procedural” and “substantive” law as identified within the Constitution.
Patriot Act mangrupa nu kahiji tina tilu kali Amérika Sarikat nyarita nalika éta ngahontal kacindekan salaku karajaan kagenep. Nyarita nu katilu, anu nandaan ahirna karajaan kagenep, nyaéta hukum Minggu. Di tengah-tengah sajarah éta, Pelosi Trials tanggal 6 Januari, anu dimimitian dina taun 2022, diwanohkeun. Éta pangadilan mangrupa panolakan langsung kana hak-hak anu dikukuhkeun dina Konstitusi sabab pangadilan éta sipatna pulitik, jeung lawfare éta lain saukur ngararangkay fakta, tapi sabenerna mangrupa serangan langsung kana hukum “prosedural” jeung “substantif” sakumaha diidéntifikasi dina Konstitusi.
The Patriot Act in 2001 was a direct attack upon the “Due Process Clause” which appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. That was 2001, and in 2022 the attack against the Constitution was focused upon both “procedural due process” and “substantive due process.” The word “repudiate” means to deny, and Sister White identifies that at the Sunday law in the United States every principle of the Constitution will be repudiated.
Patriot Act dina taun 2001 téh mangrupa serangan langsung kana “Due Process Clause” anu aya boh dina Amandemen Kalima boh dina Amandemen Kaopat Welas kana Konstitusi Amérika Sarikat. Ieu netepkeun yén teu saurang ogé meunang dicabut hirupna, kabébasanana, atawa harta milikna tanpa prosés hukum anu merenah. Éta kajadian dina taun 2001, sarta dina taun 2022 serangan ngalawan Konstitusi dipuseurkeun kana boh “procedural due process” boh “substantive due process.” Kecap “repudiate” hartina mungkir, sarta Sister White nétélakeun yén dina waktu hukum Minggu di Amérika Sarikat unggal prinsip Konstitusi bakal dipungkir.
“By the decree enforcing the institution of the papacy in violation of the law of God, our nation will disconnect herself fully from righteousness. When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near.
“Ku dekrit anu ngalaksanakeun pangadegna kakapaan bari ngalanggar hukum Allah, bangsa urang bakal miceun dirina sapinuhna tina kabeneran. Nalika Protestanisme bakal ngalegaan leungeunna ngaliwatan jurang pikeun nyekel leungeun kakawasaan Roma, nalika manéhna bakal ngalegaan leungeunna ngaliwatan lebak nu jero pikeun silih cekel leungeun jeung spiritisme, nalika, dina pangaruh ieu persatuan tilu lapis, nagara urang bakal nampik unggal prinsip tina Konstitusina minangka pamaréntahan Protestan jeung républikan, sarta bakal ngayakeun pangrojong pikeun sumebarna kasalahan-kasalahan jeung tipu daya kakapaan, mangka urang bisa nyaho yén waktuna geus datang pikeun pagawéan Iblis anu matak pikaheraneun, sarta yén ahirna geus deukeut.
“As the approach of the Roman armies was a sign to the disciples of the impending destruction of Jerusalem, so may this apostasy be a sign to us that the limit of God’s forbearance is reached, that the measure of our nation’s iniquity is full, and that the angel of mercy is about to take her flight, never to return. The people of God will then be plunged into those scenes of affliction and distress which prophets have described as the time of Jacob’s trouble. The cries of the faithful, persecuted ones ascend to heaven. And as the blood of Abel cried from the ground, there are voices also crying to God from martyrs’ graves, from the sepulchers of the sea, from mountain caverns, from convent vaults: ‘How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost Thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?’
“Sakumaha deukeutna datangna bala tentara Romawi janten tanda ka para murid ngeunaan karuksakan Yerusalem anu parantos ngancam, kitu deui kamurtadan ieu tiasa janten tanda ka urang yén wates kasabaran Allah parantos kahontal, yén ukuran kajahatan bangsa urang parantos pinuh, sarta yén malaikat rahmat parantos ampir ngalayang angkat, moal kungsi mulang deui. Harita umat Allah bakal kacemplung kana rupa-rupa kaayaan kasangsaraan jeung kapeurih anu ku para nabi parantos digambarkeun minangka mangsa kasusah Yakub. Jerit jalma-jalma satia anu dianiaya naék ka sawarga. Jeung sakumaha getih Habel ngagorowok tina taneuh, kitu deui aya sora-sora anu ngagorowok ka Allah ti kuburan para syuhada, ti makam-makam di sagara, ti guha-guha gunung, ti kolong-kolong biara: ‘Sabaraha lami deui, nun Gusti, anu suci jeung satia, dugi ka Anjeun henteu ngahakiman jeung ngabales getih kami ka jalma-jalma anu maratuh di bumi?’”
“The Lord is doing His work. All heaven is astir. The Judge of all the earth is soon to arise and vindicate His insulted authority. The mark of deliverance will be set upon the men who keep God’s commandments, who revere His law, and who refuse the mark of the beast or of his image.
“PANGERAN keur ngalaksanakeun padamelan-Na. Sakumna sawarga keur gumelarna. Hakim sakuliah bumi moal lila deui bakal jumeneng sarta ngabélaan kawibawaan-Na anu geus dihina. Tanda kasalametan bakal dipasihkeun ka jalma-jalma anu ngajaga parentah-parentah Allah, anu ngajénan hukum-Na, sarta anu nampik tanda sato galak éta atawa gambar-na.
“God has revealed what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath. Those who have been warned of the events before them are not to sit in calm expectation of the coming storm, comforting themselves that the Lord will shelter His faithful ones in the day of trouble. We are to be as men waiting for their Lord, not in idle expectancy, but in earnest work, with unwavering faith. It is no time now to allow our minds to be engrossed with things of minor importance. While men are sleeping, Satan is actively arranging matters so that the Lord’s people may not have mercy or justice. The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending. Its professions are mild and apparently Christian, but when it shall speak it will reveal the spirit of the dragon. It is our duty to do all in our power to avert the threatened danger. We should endeavor to disarm prejudice by placing ourselves in a proper light before the people. We should bring before them the real question at issue, thus interposing the most effectual protest against measures to restrict liberty of conscience. We should search the Scriptures and be able to give the reason for our faith. Says the prophet: ‘The wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.’” Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.
“Gusti parantos ngungkabkeun naon anu bakal kajadian dina poé-poé panungtungan, supaya umat-Na tiasa disiapkeun pikeun nangtung nyanghareupan badai panentangan jeung amarah. Jalma-jalma anu parantos dipaparin panggeuing ngeunaan kajadian-kajadian anu aya di hareupeun maranéhna henteu meunang calik dina pangharepan anu tenang kana badai anu bakal datang, bari ngahibur dirina sorangan yén Gusti bakal nangtayungan jalma-jalma-Na anu satia dina poé kasusah. Urang kudu jadi saperti jalma-jalma anu ngadagoan Gustina, lain dina pangharepan anu nganggur, tapi dina pagawéan anu saéstuna, kalayan iman anu teu ngoyag. Ayeuna lain waktuna pikeun ngantepkeun pikiran urang kaserep ku perkara-perkara anu kirang penting. Nalika manusa keur saré, Sétan keur giat ngatur sagala perkara supaya umat Gusti henteu meunang karunya atawa kaadilan. Gerakan Minggu ayeuna keur ngaléngkah dina poékna. Para pamingpin nyumputkeun pasualan anu saéstuna, sarta loba anu ngahiji dina éta gerakan ogé sorangan henteu ningali ka mana arus jero éta keur ngarah. Pangakuan-pangakuanna leuleus jeung saolah-olah Kristen, tapi lamun éta geus nyarita, éta bakal ngungkabkeun sumanget naga. Kawajiban urang nyaéta ngalakukeun sagala anu aya dina kakawasaan urang pikeun nyegah bahaya anu keur diancamkeun. Urang kudu narékahan pikeun ngalemeskeun prasangka ku cara nempatkeun diri urang dina cahaya anu merenah di payuneun rahayat. Urang kudu nempatkeun di hareupeun maranéhna pasualan anu saéstuna keur dipertentangkeun, ku kituna ngalantarankeun panolakan anu pangmujarabna kana ukuran-ukuran pikeun ngawatesan kabébasan nurani. Urang kudu nalungtik Kitab Suci sarta sanggup méré alesan pikeun iman urang. Ceuk nabi: ‘Anu jahat bakal ngalakonan kajahatan: jeung moal aya saurang ogé ti antara anu jahat anu bakal ngarti; tapi anu wijaksana bakal ngarti.’ Testimonies, jilid 5, 451, 452.”
Sister White aligns the Sunday law with several last-day waymarks, and in so doing her words reveal “what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath.” Therefore, the waymarks that she aligns in this passage are to be carefully examined. I am suggesting that the point of reference is the line of prophecy that focuses upon the Constitution of the United States, along with the “speaking” of the nation as an interrelated symbol.
Ibu White nyaluyukeun hukum Minggu jeung sababaraha patokan dina poé-poé panungtungan, sarta ku cara kitu kecap-kecapna ngungkabkeun “naon anu bakal kajadian dina poé-poé panungtungan, supaya umat-Na siap nangtung ngalawan badai panentangan jeung amarah.” Ku sabab éta, patokan-patokan anu ku anjeunna disaluyukeun dina petikan ieu kudu dipariksa kalawan taliti. Kuring nyarankeun yén titik rujukanana nya éta garis nubuat anu museur kana Konstitusi Amérika Serikat, babarengan jeung “nyarita”-na éta bangsa minangka lambang anu silih patali.
By that, I mean, that the Blair Bill in 1888, the Patriot Act in 2001, and the political prosecutions that were carried out by the Democrats and globalist Republicans beginning in 2022 were each a direct denial of two essential elements of the Constitution. 1888 represents enforcement of Sunday worship, and then in 2001, the change from English law to Roman law. In 2022 “substantive” and “procedural” law was attacked.
Ku éta anu dimaksud téh, yén Blair Bill dina taun 1888, Patriot Act dina taun 2001, jeung panganiayaan pulitik anu dilaksanakeun ku pihak Demokrat jeung Republik globalis mimiti taun 2022, masing-masing mangrupa panolakan langsung kana dua unsur hakiki tina Konstitusi. Taun 1888 ngagambarkeun paksaan ibadah poé Minggu, tuluy dina taun 2001 aya robahan tina hukum Inggris kana hukum Romawi. Dina taun 2022, hukum “substantif” jeung “prosedural” diserang.
Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations. The law defines legal or illegal behavior and sets out the punishments for it. Substantive law covers many legal areas, including criminal, civil, and contract law.
Hukum substantif nangtukeun hak jeung kawajiban individu sarta organisasi, sedengkeun hukum prosedural ngagambarkeun prosés pikeun ngabéréskeun sengketa jeung ngalaksanakeun hak jeung kawajiban individu sarta organisasi. Hukum nangtukeun paripolah anu sah atawa henteu sah sarta netepkeun hukuman pikeun éta. Hukum substantif ngawengku loba widang hukum, kaasup hukum pidana, perdata, jeung kontrak.
Criminal law is an excellent example of substantive law. Criminal law defines what actions are considered criminal and the penalties for those crimes. Civil law, however, governs disputes between individuals and organizations, such as breach of contract, personal injury, or property disputes.
Hukum pidana mangrupa conto anu hadé pisan tina hukum substantif. Hukum pidana netepkeun lampah-lampah naon anu dianggap kriminal sarta hukuman pikeun kajahatan-kajahatan éta. Ari hukum perdata, sabalikna, ngatur pasualan antara individu jeung organisasi, saperti ingkar kana perjangjian, cilaka pribadi, atawa pasualan harta banda.
Substantive law is typically written in statutes, regulations, and case law. Statutes are laws passed by legislative bodies, such as national parliaments or state legislature, and regulations are rules and procedures created by administrative agencies. Case law is the law that judges create through their interpretation of statutes, regulations, and the Constitution.
Hukum substantif ilaharna ditulis dina undang-undang, peraturan, jeung yurisprudensi. Undang-undang nyaéta hukum anu disahkeun ku badan législatif, saperti parlemén nasional atawa législatif nagara bagian, sedengkeun peraturan nyaéta aturan jeung prosedur anu dijieun ku lembaga administrasi. Yurisprudensi nyaéta hukum anu dibentuk ku hakim ngaliwatan tafsir maranéhna kana undang-undang, peraturan, jeung Konstitusi.
Procedural law refers to the rules governing the legal process. It outlines how cases move through the legal system, from the initial filing of a complaint to the final resolution. Procedural law covers various legal areas, including civil, criminal, and administrative procedures. The purpose of procedural law is to ensure that the legal process is fair and efficient. It provides a framework for resolving disputes and ensures that everyone involved in the legal process, including judges, lawyers, and litigants, knows what is expected of them.
Hukum acara ngarujuk kana aturan-aturan anu ngatur prosés hukum. Ieu ngajentrekeun kumaha hiji perkara ngalangkungan sistem hukum, ti mimiti ngadaptarkeun gugatan nepi ka putusan ahir. Hukum acara nyakup rupa-rupa widang hukum, kaasup prosedur perdata, pidana, jeung administratif. Tujuan hukum acara nyaéta pikeun mastikeun yén prosés hukum lumangsung sacara adil jeung éfisien. Ieu nyadiakeun kerangka pikeun ngabéréskeun pasulayan sarta mastikeun yén sakumna pihak anu kalibet dina prosés hukum, kaasup hakim, pengacara, jeung para pihak nu ngagugat atawa nu digugat, nyaho naon anu dipiharep ti maranéhna.
Substantive and procedural law are intended to work together to ensure justice is served. Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing those rights and obligations. In other words, substantive law defines legal or illegal behavior and the consequences of illegal behavior, while procedural law outlines how those legal issues are resolved.
Hukum substantif jeung hukum prosedural dimaksudkeun pikeun gawé babarengan supaya kaadilan bisa ditegakkan. Hukum substantif nangtukeun hak jeung kawajiban jalma-jalma sarta organisasi, sedengkeun hukum prosedural ngajentrekeun tata cara pikeun ngaréngsékeun sengketa jeung ngalaksanakeun hak-hak sarta kawajiban-kawajiban éta. Kalayan kecap séjén, hukum substantif nangtukeun paripolah anu sah atawa anu teu sah nurutkeun hukum, kitu deui akibat tina paripolah anu teu sah, sedengkeun hukum prosedural ngajentrekeun kumaha perkara-perkara hukum éta diréngsékeun.
In 2001, the Patriot Act removed the right of habeas corpus. “Habeas corpus” is a Latin term that translates to “you shall have the body.” It refers to a legal principle that protects individuals from unlawful detention by requiring a court to examine the lawfulness of a person’s imprisonment. Habeas corpus is a fundamental right in many legal systems, especially those influenced by English common law. It ensures that a person cannot be held in custody without just cause and allows them to challenge the legality of their detention before a judge.
Dina taun 2001, Patriot Act ngaleungitkeun hak habeas corpus. “Habeas corpus” nyaéta istilah basa Latin anu hartina “anjeun bakal miboga awakna.” Ieu ngarujuk kana hiji asas hukum anu ngajaga jalma-jalma tina panahanan anu teu sah ku cara nungtut sangkan pangadilan nalungtik kasahihan hukum tina panjarana hiji jalma. Habeas corpus mangrupakeun hak dasar dina loba sistem hukum, hususna nu kapangaruhan ku common law Inggris. Ieu ngajamin yén hiji jalma teu bisa diteundeun dina tahanan tanpa alesan anu adil sarta méré kasempetan ka manéhna pikeun ngagugat kasaluyuan hukumna tina panahanan éta di payuneun saurang hakim.
A “Due Process Clause” appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Courts have developed two branches of due process doctrine: procedural due process and substantive due process. In 2001, with the Patriot Act habeas corpus was removed as a right, and English law was replaced by Roman law. English law defines that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty, and Roman law identifies that a person is considered guilty until proven innocent. In the Pelosi Trials of 2022, both procedural and substantive due process was trampled upon. Both substantive law and procedural law were applied in the Pelosi Trials in the exact opposite of their intended constitutional purpose.
Hiji “Klausa Prosés Nu Pantes” aya dina Amandemen Kalima jeung Amandemen Kaopat Welas kana Konstitusi A.S. Ieu netepkeun yén taya saurang ogé meunang dicabut nyawana, kabébasanana, atawa hak milikna tanpa prosés hukum nu pantes. Pangadilan geus ngamekarkeun dua cabang doktrin prosés nu pantes: prosés nu pantes sacara prosedural jeung prosés nu pantes sacara substantif. Dina taun 2001, ku Patriot Act, habeas corpus dipupus minangka hiji hak, sarta hukum Inggris diganti ku hukum Romawi. Hukum Inggris nangtukeun yén hiji jalma dianggap teu salah nepi ka kabuktian salah, sedengkeun hukum Romawi netepkeun yén hiji jalma dianggap salah nepi ka kabuktian teu salah. Dina Pelosi Trials taun 2022, boh prosés nu pantes sacara prosedural boh sacara substantif geus diinjak-injak. Boh hukum substantif boh hukum prosedural dilarapkeun dina Pelosi Trials pas pisan sabalikna ti tujuan konstitusionalna anu dimaksud.
The distinction between substantive due process and procedural due process lies in the different aspects of law and rights that each concept protects within the framework of the U.S. Constitution, particularly under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Bédana antara substantive due process jeung procedural due process aya dina béda aspék hukum jeung hak anu dijaga ku masing-masing konsép éta dina kerangka Konstitusi Amérika Sarikat, utamana dina Due Process Clauses tina Amandemen Kalima jeung Kaopat Belas.
Substantive due process is concerned with the fundamental rights and liberties that the government cannot infringe upon, regardless of the procedure used. It protects certain rights from government interference even if the proper procedures are followed. Substantive due process involves rights that are deemed fundamental, such as the right to privacy, the right to marry, and the right to raise one’s children. These rights are protected from government intrusion unless there is a compelling state interest. It serves as a check on the government’s power, ensuring that laws and regulations do not violate fundamental liberties.
Due process substantif patali jeung hak-hak sarta kabébasan-kabébasan dasar anu pamaréntah teu meunang ngalanggarna, henteu paduli prosedur naon anu dipaké. Ieu ngajaga sawatara hak tina campur tangan pamaréntah sanajan prosedur anu luyu geus diturut. Due process substantif ngalibetkeun hak-hak anu dianggap dasar, saperti hak kana privasi, hak pikeun nikah, jeung hak pikeun ngasuh barudak sorangan. Hak-hak ieu dijaga tina pangasupan pamaréntah kajaba aya kapentingan nagara anu kacida kuatna. Ieu ngalaksanakeun fungsi minangka pangawasan kana kakawasaan pamaréntah, mastikeun yén undang-undang jeung peraturan henteu ngalanggar kabébasan-kabébasan dasar.
Procedural due process is concerned with the procedures that the government must follow before it deprives an individual of life, liberty, or property. It ensures that individuals receive fair and impartial treatment through proper legal processes. Procedural due process requires the government to follow certain steps or procedures, such as providing notice, a fair hearing, and an opportunity to be heard, before depriving someone of their rights. It emphasizes the methods by which laws are enforced, ensuring that the government acts in a just and fair manner.
Prosés hukum anu pantes sacara prosedural patali jeung tata cara anu kudu diturutan ku pamaréntah saméméh nyabut hak hiji jalma kana hirup, kamerdikaan, atawa harta banda. Ieu ngajamin sangkan unggal jalma nampa perlakuan anu adil jeung teu pandang bulu ngaliwatan prosés hukum anu merenah. Prosés hukum anu pantes sacara prosedural nungtut sangkan pamaréntah nuturkeun léngkah-léngkah atawa tata cara nu tangtu, saperti méré béwara, ngayakeun pamariksaan anu adil, jeung méré kasempetan pikeun didangu, saméméh nyabut hak-hak hiji jalma. Ieu nekenkeun kana cara-cara hukum ditegakeun, bari ngajamin yén pamaréntah ngalakukeun lampahna kalawan adil jeung bener.
The lawfare that has been manifested since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a denial of both substantive and procedural due process. The fundamental rights of American citizens were openly and successfully denied. The false flag operations and the open corruption of the alphabet agencies of the United States has been regularly exposed since even before the Pelosi Trials began, but the legal procedures that have been employed by the globalists of both parties since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a clear illustration of the destruction of procedural due process.
Perang ngaliwatan hukum anu geus kaciri ti saprak Sidang Pelosi dimimitian, ngagambarkeun panolakan kana prosés hukum anu adil boh dina hal substansi boh dina hal prosedur. Hak-hak dasar warga nagara Amérika sacara kabuka jeung hasil dilanggar. Operasi bendera palsu jeung korupsi anu écés dina agénsi-agénsi “alphabet” Amérika Sarikat geus remen kabongkar ti saméméh kénéh Sidang Pelosi dimimitian, tapi prosedur-prosedur hukum anu dipaké ku kaum globalis ti dua partéy ti saprak Sidang Pelosi dimimitian, ngagambarkeun conto anu écés ngeunaan karuksakan prosés hukum anu adil sacara prosedural.
Earlier in the article we read, “Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.”
Dina bagian saméméhna tina éta artikel urang maca, “Sagala gerakan anu ngadukung panerapan agama saéstuna mangrupa hiji kalakuan konsési ka kapausan, anu salila mangabad-abad kalayan teu eureun-eureun geus merangan kabébasan haté nurani. Pangreksaan poé Minggu ngahutangkeun ayana minangka hiji lembaga anu disebut Kristen ka ‘misteri kajahatan;’ sarta paksaan pikeun ngalaksanakeunana bakal jadi hiji pangakuan anu nyata kana prinsip-prinsip anu jadi batu pangjuru pisan tina Romanisme. Nalika bangsa urang nepi ka mungkir kana prinsip-prinsip pamaréntahanana nepi ka netepkeun hiji hukum Minggu, dina ieu kalakuan Protestanisme bakal ngagandengan leungeun jeung kapopéran; éta moal lain iwal ti méré kahirupan ka tirani anu geus lila pisan kalayan kacida hayangna ngawas-ngawas kasempetan pikeun bangkit deui kana despotisme anu aktip.”
In the line of history that can be represented with the Constitution of the United States there are three specific waymarks representing some element of the Constitution in both the beginning and the ending of the United States. Each of those three waymarks are political actions, and therefore symbolize the speaking of the United States. The third of those three waymarks in the beginning, that marked 1798, was the Alien and Sedition Acts and the third of those waymarks at the ending is when the United States enforces a Sunday law, and speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven.
Dina runtuyan sajarah anu bisa digambarkeun ku Konstitusi Amérika Sarikat, aya tilu patokan husus anu ngawakilan sawatara unsur tina Konstitusi éta boh dina awal boh dina ahir Amérika Sarikat. Unggal tina tilu patokan éta mangrupa tindakan pulitik, ku kituna ngalambangkeun ucapan Amérika Sarikat. Patokan katilu tina éta tilu patokan dina awal, anu nandaan taun 1798, nyaéta Alien and Sedition Acts, jeung patokan katilu tina éta patokan dina ahir nyaéta nalika Amérika Sarikat ngalaksanakeun hiji hukum Minggu, sarta nyarita saperti naga dina minuhan Wahyu pasal tilu welas, ayat sabelas.
The prophetic history of the United States begins when, as represented by the earth, it opened its mouth and swallowed up the flood of the dragon’s persecution.
Sajarah nubuatan Amérika Sarikat dimimitian nalika, sakumaha dilambangkeun ku bumi, éta muka sungutna sarta nyelekep caah panganiayaan naga.
And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. Revelation 12:15, 16.
Jeung éta oray ngaluarkeun tina sungutna cai kawas caah nuturkeun éta awewe, supaya anjeunna kabawa ku éta caah. Jeung bumi nulungan éta awewe, sarta bumi muka sungutna, tuluy ngelek éta caah anu dikaluarkeun ku naga tina sungutna. Wahyu 12:15, 16.
In 1776, the beast that was to arise from the earth, and ultimately become the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy in 1798, swallowed up the flood of persecution against God’s people by establishing a nation with a Constitution that protested against the tyrants of European royalty and the tyrants of the papal church.
Dina taun 1776, sato galak anu bakal mucunghul ti bumi, sarta ahirna jadi karajaan kagenep dina nubuat Alkitab dina taun 1798, ngelek banjir panganiayaan ngalawan umat Allah ku ngadegkeun hiji bangsa anu miboga Konstitusi anu nolak para tiran karajaan-karajaan Éropa jeung para tiran garéja kapausan.
The Declaration of Independence in 1776 typified the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 typified the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 typified the Sunday law in the United States.
Déklarasi Kamerdékaan taun 1776 ngalambangkeun Patriot Act taun 2001. Konstitusi taun 1789 ngalambangkeun sidang-sidang Pelosi anu dimimitian dina taun 2022. Alien and Sedition Acts taun 1798 ngalambangkeun hukum Minggu di Amérika Sarikat.
The pronouncement of independence by the American patriots in 1776 represented the announcement of the loss of independence with the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 represented the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts represents the Sunday law. The history of the repudiation of every principle of the Constitution represents a progressive overturning of the Constitution that ends at the Sunday law.
Pangucapan kamerdikaan ku para patriot Amérika dina taun 1776 ngagambarkeun pangumuman leungitna kamerdikaan ngaliwatan Patriot Act taun 2001. Konstitusi taun 1789 ngagambarkeun Pelosi Trials anu dimimitian dina taun 2022. Alien and Sedition Acts ngagambarkeun hukum Minggu. Sajarah panampikan kana unggal prinsip Konstitusi ngagambarkeun pangagulingan Konstitusi sacara bertahap anu puncakna dina hukum Minggu.
These lines all align in the hidden history of verse forty of Daniel chapter eleven. In this article we quoted four paragraphs from Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.
Garis-garis ieu sadayana saluyu dina sajarah nu disumputkeun tina ayat ka opat puluh dina Daniel pasal sabelas. Dina artikel ieu urang ngutip opat paragraf tina Testimonies, jilid 5, 451, 452.
We will look closer at those paragraphs in the next article.
Dina artikel saterusna urang baris ngulik éta paragraf-paragraf kalawan leuwih jero.