We ended the last article with the sentence that stated, “In 2001 the government of the United States spoke the Patriot Act into law.”
Soňky makalany “2001-nji ýylda Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň hökümeti Patriot Kanunyny kanun hökmünde güýje girizdi” diýen sözlem bilen tamamladyk.
“There are many, even of those engaged in this movement for Sunday enforcement, who are blinded to the results which will follow this action. They do not see that they are striking directly against religious liberty. There are many who have never understood the claims of the Bible Sabbath and the false foundation upon which the Sunday institution rests. Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.
“Ýekşenbe güni mejbury taýdan berjaý etdirmek ugrundaky bu herekete gatnaşýanlaryň arasynda-da, bu hereketiň yz ýanyndan geljek netijeler babatda kör edilenler köpdür. Olar özleriniň dini azatlyga gönüden-göni zarba urýandyklaryny görmeýärler. Mukaddes Kitabyň Sabatynyň talaplaryna hem-de ýekşenbe institutynyň daýanýan ýalan binýadyna hiç haçan düşünmedik köpler bardyr. Dini kanunçylygyň peýdasyna edilen islendik hereket, aslynda, ençeme asyrlaryň dowamynda ynsap azatlygyna yzygiderli garşy göreş alyp baran papalyga berlen eglişikdir. Ýekşenbe gününi berjaý etmek, guýa, hristiançylyk instituty hökmünde, öz barlygyny ‘bikanunlygyň syryna’ bergilidir; onuň mejbury berjaý etdirilmegi bolsa, Romanizmiň hut özen daşy bolan ýörelgeleri iş ýüzünde ykrar etmek bolar. Biziň milletimiz öz dolandyryşynyň ýörelgelerinden şeýle derejede ýüz öwrüp, ýekşenbe kanunyny kabul eden wagtynda, protestantlyk bu hereket arkaly papalyk bilen el ele berer; bu, uzak wagtdan bäri özüne täzeden işjeň despotizme bökmäge mümkinçilik gözläp garaşýan zulumkärlige jan bermekden başga zat bolmaz.” Testimonies, 5-nji tom, 711.
1888 typified 2001, and it was then that the Blair Bill was introduced, though its failure to be passed, prevented it from prophetically speaking. It became the sign of 66 AD, a siege that was initiated and then mysteriously withdrawn. When it is understood that there are two image of the beast testing periods, and that the second period begins with the Sunday law in the United States, typified by the year 321, and that the period ends when the world Sunday law, typified by 538, is fully enforced; then it demands prophetically that the beginning of the first image of the beast testing period also begins with some type of typification of a Sunday law being spoken. In 1888, the Blair Bill was an attempt to enforce a National Sunday law, and 1888 identifies when the angel of Revelation eighteen descends and lightens the earth with his glory.
1888-nji ýyl 2001-nji ýyly nyşanlady, hut şol wagt hem Bleýr kanuny teklip edildi; emma onuň kabul edilmezligi onuň pygamberlik taýdan gepläp bilmeginiň öňüni aldy. Şeýlelikde ol b.e. 66-njy ýylyň alamatyna öwrüldi, ýagny başlanyp, soň bolsa syrly bir görnüşde yzyna çekilen gabawa. Haçan-da wagşy haýwanyň keşbiniň synag döwürleriniň ikidigine, ikinji döwrüň bolsa ABŞ-da ýekşenbe kanuny bilen başlap, 321-nji ýyl tarapyndan nyşanlanýandygyna, hem-de şol döwrüň bütindünýä ýekşenbe kanuny, 538-nji ýyl tarapyndan nyşanlanyşy ýaly, doly güýje girende tamamlanýandygyna düşünilse; onda bu pygamberlik taýdan ilkinji wagşy haýwanyň keşbiniň synag döwrüniň hem başlangyjynda ýekşenbe kanunynyň haýsydyr bir nyşanly görnüşiniň yglan edilmegini talap edýär. 1888-nji ýylda Bleýr kanuny milli ýekşenbe kanunyny güýje girizmek üçin edilen bir synanyşykdy, we 1888-nji ýyl Ylham on sekizdäki perişdäniň inip, ýeri öz şöhraty bilen ýagtyldýan wagtyny görkezýär.
The Patriot Act is the typification of a Sunday law that begins the image of the beast testing time in the United States. The United States speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven when it enforces the Sunday law. When it enforces that law it will speak as a dragon, and that Sunday law identifies that the image of the beast is fully formed in the United States. At that point the United States has filled up its cup of probationary time, and national apostasy is followed by national ruin. At that point the United States ceases to be the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy as the threefold union is established.
Patriot baradaky Kanun Birleşen Ştatlarda haýwanyň keşbiniň synag döwrüni başladýan Ýekşenbe kanunynyň nusgasydyr. Birleşen Ştatlar, Ylham kitabynyň on üçünji baby, on birinji aýatynyň berjaý bolşy boýunça, Ýekşenbe kanunyny güýje girizen wagty aždarha ýaly gürlär. Ol şol kanuny güýje girizende, aždarha ýaly gürlär, we şol Ýekşenbe kanuny Birleşen Ştatlarda haýwanyň keşbiniň doly kemala gelendigini görkezýär. Şol pursatda Birleşen Ştatlar synag möhletiniň käsesini dolduryp gutarar, we milli dinden dönmek milli heläkçilik bilen yzarlanýar. Şol pursatda üç taraplaýyn birleşik döredilende, Birleşen Ştatlar Mukaddes Kitap pygamberliginiň altynjy patyşalygy bolmagyny bes eder.
Alpha and Omega always portrays the end with the beginning and at the beginning of the United States there were three times the United States prophetically spoke that marked the beginning of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. The Declaration of Independence in 1776, followed by the Constitution of 1789 and then the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 identify the first three times the United States prophetically spoke. Each of those three publications represented the speaking of the United States. Those three steps led to 1798, the beginning of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Those same three waymarks in the beginning of the United States, represent three waymarks that lead to the ending of the United States reigning as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy.
Alfa we Omega hemişe başlangyç bilen ahyry suratlandyrýar, we Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň başlangyjynda, pygamberlik taýdan Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlary Mukaddes Kitap pygamberliginiň altynjy patyşalygy hökmünde başlangyjyny alamatlandyran üç gezek sözledi. 1776-njy ýyldaky Garaşsyzlyk Jarnamasy, onuň yz ýanyndaky 1789-njy ýyldaky Konstitusiýa we soňra 1798-nji ýyldaky Daşary Ýurtlular hem Basyş Häsiýetli Kanunlar Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň pygamberlik taýdan ilkinji üç gezek sözländigini kesgitleýär. Şol üç neşiriň her biri Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň sözlemegini aňladýardy. Şol üç ädim 1798-nji ýyla, ýagny Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň Mukaddes Kitap pygamberliginiň altynjy patyşalygy hökmünde höküm sürmeginiň başlangyjyna getirdi. Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň başlangyjyndaky şol bir üç bellik, Mukaddes Kitap pygamberliginiň altynjy patyşalygy hökmünde Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň höküm sürmeginiň soňuna alyp barýan üç belligi hem aňladýar.
The Patriot Act is the first of three times the United States speaks as it comes to its conclusion as the sixth kingdom. The third speaking, that identifies the end of the sixth kingdom is the Sunday law. In the middle of that history the Pelosi Trials of January 6, which began in 2022 were initiated. The trials were a direct rejection of the rights enshrined in the Constitution because the trials were political in nature, and the lawfare was not simply a fabrication of facts, but it was actually a direct attack upon “procedural” and “substantive” law as identified within the Constitution.
“Patriot Act” Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň altynjy patyşalyk hökmünde öz jemlenişine gelýän döwründe gepleýän üç gezeginiň birinjisidir. Altynjy patyşalygyň soňuny kesgitleýän üçünji gepleýiş Ýekşenbe kanunydyr. Şol taryhyň ortasynda, 2022-nji ýylda başlanan 6-njy ýanwardaky Pelosi sud işi başladyldy. Bu sud işleri Konstitusiýada berkidilen hukuklaryň gönüden-göni ret edilmesi boldy, çünki bu sud işleri syýasy häsiýetli bolupdy, we kanuny söweş diňe bir faktlaryň galplaşdyrylmagy bolman, eýsem Konstitusiýanyň çäklerinde kesgitlenen “prosessual” hem-de “mazmunlaýyn” hukuga gönüden-göni hüjüm bolupdy.
The Patriot Act in 2001 was a direct attack upon the “Due Process Clause” which appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. That was 2001, and in 2022 the attack against the Constitution was focused upon both “procedural due process” and “substantive due process.” The word “repudiate” means to deny, and Sister White identifies that at the Sunday law in the United States every principle of the Constitution will be repudiated.
2001-nji ýyldaky “Patriot Act” ABŞ-nyň Konstitusiýasynyň Bäşinji Düzedişinde hem-de On Dördünji Düzedişinde duş gelýän “Degişli hukuk tertibi baradaky düzgün”e göni hüjüm boldy. Bu düzgünlere görä, hiç kim kanunyň degişli hukuk tertibi bolmazdan ýaşaýyşdan, azatlykdan ýa-da emläkden mahrum edilip bilinmez. Bu 2001-nji ýylda boldy, 2022-nji ýylda bolsa Konstitusiýa garşy hüjüm hem “iş ýörediş degişli hukuk tertibi”ne, hem-de “mazmun taýdan degişli hukuk tertibi”ne gönükdirildi. “Repudiate” sözi inkär etmek diýmegi aňladýar, we White uýtaş Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlaryndaky ýekşenbe güni baradaky kanunda Konstitusiýanyň her bir ýörelgesiniň inkär ediljekdigini görkezýär.
“By the decree enforcing the institution of the papacy in violation of the law of God, our nation will disconnect herself fully from righteousness. When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near.
“Hudaýyň kanunyny bozup, papalygyň institutyrylyşyny mejbury edýän perman arkaly milletimiz özüni dogrulykdan doly üzňeleşdirer. Protestantizm özüniň elini aýrylygyň üstünden uzadyp, rim häkimiýetiniň elinden tutanda; ol uçurymyň aňyrsyndan el uzadyp, spiritizm bilen el gysyşanda; şu üçtaraplaýyn birleşigiň täsiri astynda ýurdumyz öz Konstitusiýasynyň protestant we respublikan hökümet hökmünde ähli ýörelgelerini ret edip, papalyk galplyklarynyň we azdyryjy aldawlarynyň ýaýramagy üçin şert döredende, şonda biz Şeýtanyň täsin işleriniň başlan wagtynyň gelendigini we soňuň golaýdygyny bilip bileris.”
“As the approach of the Roman armies was a sign to the disciples of the impending destruction of Jerusalem, so may this apostasy be a sign to us that the limit of God’s forbearance is reached, that the measure of our nation’s iniquity is full, and that the angel of mercy is about to take her flight, never to return. The people of God will then be plunged into those scenes of affliction and distress which prophets have described as the time of Jacob’s trouble. The cries of the faithful, persecuted ones ascend to heaven. And as the blood of Abel cried from the ground, there are voices also crying to God from martyrs’ graves, from the sepulchers of the sea, from mountain caverns, from convent vaults: ‘How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost Thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?’
«Rim goşunlarynyň golaýlaşmagy şägirtler üçin Iýerusalimiň ýakynlaşýan weýrançylygynyň alamaty bolşy ýaly, bu dinden dönükligem hem bize Hudaýyň sabyrlylygynyň çägine ýetilendiginiň, halkymyzyň günäsiniň ölçeginiň dolandygynyň, hem-de rehim-perişdäniň yzyna hiç haçan dolanmazlyk üçin uçup gitmekçi bolýandygynyň alamaty bolup biler. Şonda Hudaýyň halky pygamberleriň Ýakubyň muşakgatly döwri diýip beýan eden şol jebir-jepa we gaýgy-gussaly wakalarynyň içine taşlanar. We yzarlanýan wepaly adamlaryň nalyşlary asmana göterilýär. Habylyň gany ýerden nalyş edişi ýaly, şehitleriň gabyrlaryndan, deňziň mazarlaryndan, dag gowaklaryndan, monastyrlaryň ýerasty mazarlyklaryndan hem Hudaýa ýüzlenýän sesler bar: “Haçana çenli, eý Reb, mukaddes we hakyky Bolan, ýerde ýaşaýanlardan biziň ganymyz üçin höküm çykarman we ar alman durjak?”»
“The Lord is doing His work. All heaven is astir. The Judge of all the earth is soon to arise and vindicate His insulted authority. The mark of deliverance will be set upon the men who keep God’s commandments, who revere His law, and who refuse the mark of the beast or of his image.
Reb Öz işini edýär. Bütin asman galjaň hereketdedir. Tiz wagtda bütin ýeriň Kazysy turup, masgaralanylan häkimiýetini aklar. Gutuluşyň nyşany Hudaýyň buýruklaryny berjaý edýän, Onuň kanunyna hormat goýýan hem-de haýwanyň ýa-da onuň keşbiniň nyşanyny kabul etmekden ýüz öwürýän adamlaryň üstünde goýlar.
“God has revealed what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath. Those who have been warned of the events before them are not to sit in calm expectation of the coming storm, comforting themselves that the Lord will shelter His faithful ones in the day of trouble. We are to be as men waiting for their Lord, not in idle expectancy, but in earnest work, with unwavering faith. It is no time now to allow our minds to be engrossed with things of minor importance. While men are sleeping, Satan is actively arranging matters so that the Lord’s people may not have mercy or justice. The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending. Its professions are mild and apparently Christian, but when it shall speak it will reveal the spirit of the dragon. It is our duty to do all in our power to avert the threatened danger. We should endeavor to disarm prejudice by placing ourselves in a proper light before the people. We should bring before them the real question at issue, thus interposing the most effectual protest against measures to restrict liberty of conscience. We should search the Scriptures and be able to give the reason for our faith. Says the prophet: ‘The wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.’” Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.
“Hudaý soňky günlerde nämeleriň boljakdygyny açyp görkezdi, şeýlelikde Onuň halky garşylyk we gazap tupanyna garşy durmaga taýýar bolsun. Öňlerinde duran wakalar barada duýduryş alanlar geljek tupany asuda garaşmak bilen garaşyp oturmaly däldirler, özlerini şeýle teselli berip: Reb kynçylyk gününde Öz sadyk bendelerini penalaýjakdyr. Biz öz Rebbine garaşýan adamlar ýaly bolmalydyrys, ýöne biderek garaşmak bilen däl-de, üýtgemez iman bilen yhlasly işde bolmalydyrys. Häzir aňymyzy ikinji derejeli zatlar bilen meşgul etdirmeli wagt däldir. Adamlar uklap ýatyrkalar, Şeýtan Rebbiň halkyna rehim ýa-da adalat görkezilmez ýaly ýagdaýlary işjeňlik bilen düzenleşdirýär. Ýekşenbe hereketi häzir garaňkylykda öňe ilerleýär. Ýolbaşçylar hakyky meseläni gizleýärler, we bu herekete goşulýanlaryň köpüsi özleri-de aşaky akymyň nirä tarap barýandygyny görmeýärler. Onuň öňe sürýän beýannamalary ýumşak hem daşyndan hristiança görünýär, emma ol geplände aždahanyň ruhuny ýüze çykarar. Biziň borjumyz abanýan howpy sowmak üçin elimizden gelen ähli zady etmekdir. Biz halkyň öňünde özümizi degişli ýagtylykda görkezmek bilen öňýargylary zyýansyzlandyrmaga çalyşmalydyrys. Biz olaryň öňüne jedeliň hakyky meselesini getirmelidiris, şeýlelikde wyždan azatlygyny çäklendirýän çäreleriň garşysyna iň täsirli garşylygy orta goýup. Biz Mukaddes Ýazgylary derňemelidiris we öz imanymyzyň sebäbini düşündirip bilmäge ukyply bolmalydyrys. Pygamber şeýle diýýär: ‘Erbetler erbetlik ederler; erbetleriň hiç biri düşünmez; emma paýhaslylar düşünerler.’ Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.”
Sister White aligns the Sunday law with several last-day waymarks, and in so doing her words reveal “what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath.” Therefore, the waymarks that she aligns in this passage are to be carefully examined. I am suggesting that the point of reference is the line of prophecy that focuses upon the Constitution of the United States, along with the “speaking” of the nation as an interrelated symbol.
Uýam Waýt ýekşenbe kanunyny soňky günleriň birnäçe ýolbellikleri bilen utgaşdyrýar, şeýle etmek bilen hem onuň sözleri «Onuň halkynyň garşylygyň we gazabyň tupanyna garşy durmaga taýýar bolmagy üçin, soňky günlerde nämeleriň bolup geçmelidigini» aýan edýär. Şonuň üçin, onuň bu parçada utgaşdyrýan ýolbellikleri ünsli öwrenilmelidir. Meniň öňe sürýän pikirim şudur: salgylanma nokady, Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň Konstitusiýasyna gönükýän pygamberlik çyzygydyr; munuň bilen birlikde, milletiň «gürlemegi» hem özara baglanyşykly bir nyşan hökmünde garalýar.
By that, I mean, that the Blair Bill in 1888, the Patriot Act in 2001, and the political prosecutions that were carried out by the Democrats and globalist Republicans beginning in 2022 were each a direct denial of two essential elements of the Constitution. 1888 represents enforcement of Sunday worship, and then in 2001, the change from English law to Roman law. In 2022 “substantive” and “procedural” law was attacked.
Şunu diýmek isleýärin: 1888-nji ýylda Blair Bill, 2001-nji ýylda Patriot Act hem-de 2022-nji ýyldan başlap demokratlar we globalist respublikanlar tarapyndan amala aşyrylan syýasy yzarlamalar Konstitusiýanyň iki möhüm düzüm böleginiň her birine göni inkär bolandyr. 1888 ýyl ýekşenbe ybadatynyň mejbury ýerine ýetirilmegini aňladýar, soňra 2001-nji ýylda bolsa iňlis hukugyndan rim hukugyna geçiş boldy. 2022-nji ýylda “substantive” we “procedural” hukuk hüjüme sezewar edildi.
Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations. The law defines legal or illegal behavior and sets out the punishments for it. Substantive law covers many legal areas, including criminal, civil, and contract law.
Maddy hukuk şahsyýetleriň we guramalaryň hukuklaryny hem-de borçlaryny kesgitleýär, prosessual hukuk bolsa jedelleri çözmegiň we şahsyýetleriň hem-de guramalaryň hukuklaryny we borçlaryny ýerine ýetirmegi üpjün etmegiň tertibini beýan edýär. Hukuk haýsy hereketleriň kanuny ýa-da bikanun bolandygyny kesgitleýär we olar üçin jezalary belleýär. Maddy hukuk jenaýat, raýat we şertnama hukugyny hem öz içine almak bilen, hukugyň köp ugurlaryny öz içine alýar.
Criminal law is an excellent example of substantive law. Criminal law defines what actions are considered criminal and the penalties for those crimes. Civil law, however, governs disputes between individuals and organizations, such as breach of contract, personal injury, or property disputes.
Jenaýat hukugy maddy hukugyň örän gowy nusgasydyr. Jenaýat hukugy haýsy hereketleriň jenaýat hasaplanylýandygyny hem-de şol jenaýatlar üçin nähili jezalandyryş çäreleriniň bellenýändigini kesgitleýär. Emma raýat hukugy şertnamanyň bozulmagy, şahsy zeper ýetirilmegi ýa-da emläk baradaky dawalary ýaly şahsyýetleriň we guramalaryň arasyndaky jedelleri düzgünleşdirýär.
Substantive law is typically written in statutes, regulations, and case law. Statutes are laws passed by legislative bodies, such as national parliaments or state legislature, and regulations are rules and procedures created by administrative agencies. Case law is the law that judges create through their interpretation of statutes, regulations, and the Constitution.
Maddy hukuk, adatça kanunlarda, düzgünnamalarda we kazyýet presedent hukukynda ýazylýar. Kanunlar milli parlamentler ýa-da ştatlaryň kanun çykaryjy organlary ýaly kanun çykaryjy edaralar tarapyndan kabul edilen hukuk kadalarydyr, düzgünnamalar bolsa dolandyryş edaralary tarapyndan döredilen düzgünler we proseduralardyr. Kazyýet presedent hukugy bolsa kazylaryň kanunlary, düzgünnamalary we Konstitusiýany düşündirmegi arkaly emele getirýän hukugydyr.
Procedural law refers to the rules governing the legal process. It outlines how cases move through the legal system, from the initial filing of a complaint to the final resolution. Procedural law covers various legal areas, including civil, criminal, and administrative procedures. The purpose of procedural law is to ensure that the legal process is fair and efficient. It provides a framework for resolving disputes and ensures that everyone involved in the legal process, including judges, lawyers, and litigants, knows what is expected of them.
Prosessual hukuk, hukuk işini düzgünleşdirýän kadalara degişlidir. Ol işleriň hukuk ulgamynyň içinde nähili alnyp barylýandygyny, şikaýatyň ilkinji berilmeginden ahyrky çözgüde çenli beýan edýär. Prosessual hukuk dürli hukuk ugurlaryny, şol sanda raýat, jenaýat we dolandyryş proseduralaryny öz içine alýar. Prosessual hukugyň maksady hukuk işiniň adalatly we netijeli bolmagyny üpjün etmekdir. Ol jedelleri çözmek üçin bir çäk döredýär hem-de hukuk işine gatnaşýanlaryň ählisiniň, şol sanda kazylaryň, aklawçylaryň we taraplaryň, olardan nämä garaşylýandygyny bilmegini üpjün edýär.
Substantive and procedural law are intended to work together to ensure justice is served. Substantive law defines the rights and obligations of individuals and organizations, while procedural law outlines the process for resolving disputes and enforcing those rights and obligations. In other words, substantive law defines legal or illegal behavior and the consequences of illegal behavior, while procedural law outlines how those legal issues are resolved.
Maddy we prosessual hukuk adalatyň üpjün edilmegi üçin bilelikde işlemäge niýetlenendir. Maddy hukuk şahsyýetleriň we guramalaryň hukuklaryny hem-de borçlaryny kesgitleýär, prosessual hukuk bolsa dawalaryň çözülmeginiň we şol hukuklaryň hem-de borçlaryň ýerine ýetirilmeginiň tertibini beýan edýär. Başgaça aýdylanda, maddy hukuk kanuny ýa-da bikanun özüni alyp barşy we bikanun özüni alyp barşyň netijelerini kesgitleýär, prosessual hukuk bolsa şol hukuk meseleleriniň nähili çözülýändigini beýan edýär.
In 2001, the Patriot Act removed the right of habeas corpus. “Habeas corpus” is a Latin term that translates to “you shall have the body.” It refers to a legal principle that protects individuals from unlawful detention by requiring a court to examine the lawfulness of a person’s imprisonment. Habeas corpus is a fundamental right in many legal systems, especially those influenced by English common law. It ensures that a person cannot be held in custody without just cause and allows them to challenge the legality of their detention before a judge.
2001-nji ýylda “Patriot Act” kanuny habeas corpus hukugyny ýatyrdy. “Habeas corpus” latynça adalga bolup, “bedeni almak hukugyň bar” diýmekdir. Bu adalga adamyň türmede saklanmagynyň kanunylygyny kazyýet tarapyndan barlatmagy talap etmek arkaly şahsyýetleri bikanun tussaglykda saklamakdan goraýan hukuk ýörelgesine degişlidir. Habeas corpus köp hukuk ulgamlarynda, aýratyn-da iňlis umumy hukugynyň täsiri astynda emele gelen ulgamlarda, esasy hukuklaryň biridir. Ol adamyň adalatly sebäpsiz gözegçilik astynda saklanyp bilinmejekdigini üpjün edýär we oňa öz tussaglygynyň kanunylygyny kazynyň öňünde jedelleşmäge mümkinçilik berýär.
A “Due Process Clause” appears in both the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These provide that nobody may be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Courts have developed two branches of due process doctrine: procedural due process and substantive due process. In 2001, with the Patriot Act habeas corpus was removed as a right, and English law was replaced by Roman law. English law defines that a person is considered innocent until proven guilty, and Roman law identifies that a person is considered guilty until proven innocent. In the Pelosi Trials of 2022, both procedural and substantive due process was trampled upon. Both substantive law and procedural law were applied in the Pelosi Trials in the exact opposite of their intended constitutional purpose.
ABŞ-niň Konstitusiýasynyň hem Bäşinji düzedişinde, hem-de On dördünji düzedişinde “Degişli kazyýet tertibi baradaky düzgün” bar. Olar hiç kimiň degişli kanun tertibi bolmazdan ýaşaýyşdan, azatlykdan ýa-da emläkden mahrum edilip bilinmejekdigini kesgitleýär. Kazyýetler degişli hukuk tertibi hakyndaky taglymatyň iki şahasy hökmünde iş ýörediş boýunça degişli hukuk tertibini we mazmun taýdan degişli hukuk tertibini ösdüripdirler. 2001-nji ýylda Patriot Act bilen habeas corpus hukuk hökmünde aýryldy, we iňlis hukugynyň ýerine rim hukugy girizildi. Iňlis hukugy adamyň günäsi subut edilýänçä günäsiz hasaplanýandygyny kesgitleýär, rim hukugy bolsa adamyň günäsizdigi subut edilýänçä günäkär hasaplanýandygyny belleýär. 2022-nji ýylyň Pelosi kazyýet işlerinde hem iş ýörediş boýunça degişli hukuk tertibi, hem-de mazmun taýdan degişli hukuk tertibi aýak astyna salyndy. Pelosi kazyýet işlerinde hem mazmun taýdan hukuk, hem-de iş ýörediş hukugy özleriniň Konstitusiýa boýunça niýetlenen maksadynyň edil tersine ulanyldy.
The distinction between substantive due process and procedural due process lies in the different aspects of law and rights that each concept protects within the framework of the U.S. Constitution, particularly under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
ABŞ-nyň Konstitusiýasynyň çäklerinde, aýratyn-da Bäşinji we On dördünji Üýtgetmeleriň degişli hukuk kadasy baradaky düzgünleriniň astynda, mazmunlaýyn degişli hukuk kadasy bilen tertip-düzgün taýdan degişli hukuk kadasynyň arasyndaky tapawut, bu düşünjeleriň hersiniň gorap saklaýan hukugyň we hukuklaryň dürli taraplarynda ýüze çykýar.
Substantive due process is concerned with the fundamental rights and liberties that the government cannot infringe upon, regardless of the procedure used. It protects certain rights from government interference even if the proper procedures are followed. Substantive due process involves rights that are deemed fundamental, such as the right to privacy, the right to marry, and the right to raise one’s children. These rights are protected from government intrusion unless there is a compelling state interest. It serves as a check on the government’s power, ensuring that laws and regulations do not violate fundamental liberties.
Maddy taýdan degişli hukuk tertibi hökümetiň haýsy düzgün ulanylandygyna garamazdan bozup bilmejek esasy hukuklary we azatlyklary bilen baglanyşyklydyr. Ol degişli düzgünler berjaý edilse-de, käbir hukuklary hökümetiň gatyşmagyndan goraýar. Maddy taýdan degişli hukuk tertibi şahsy durmuşyň eldegrilmesizligi hukugy, nikalaşmak hukugy we öz çagalaryny terbiýelemek hukugy ýaly esasy hasap edilýän hukuklary öz içine alýar. Bu hukuklar, döwletiň aýratyn derejede wajyp bähbidi bolmadyk ýagdaýynda, hökümetiň aralaşmagyndan goralýar. Bu ýörelge hökümet häkimiýetine gözegçilik serişdesi bolup hyzmat edýär we kanunlaryň hem-de kadalaryň esasy azatlyklary bozmazlygyny üpjün edýär.
Procedural due process is concerned with the procedures that the government must follow before it deprives an individual of life, liberty, or property. It ensures that individuals receive fair and impartial treatment through proper legal processes. Procedural due process requires the government to follow certain steps or procedures, such as providing notice, a fair hearing, and an opportunity to be heard, before depriving someone of their rights. It emphasizes the methods by which laws are enforced, ensuring that the government acts in a just and fair manner.
Amala degişli hukuk tertibi, hökümetiň bir şahsyýeti ýaşaýyşdan, azatlykdan ýa-da emläkden mahrum etmezinden öň berjaý etmeli tertip-düzgünleri bilen baglanyşyklydyr. Ol şahslaryň degişli hukuk amallarynyň üsti bilen adalatly we bitarap garalmagyny üpjün edýär. Amala degişli hukuk tertibi, hökümetiň birini onuň hukuklaryndan mahrum etmezinden öň habar bermek, adalatly diňlenişik geçirmek we öz pikirini beýan etmäge mümkinçilik bermek ýaly belli ädimleri ýa-da tertipleri berjaý etmegini talap edýär. Bu düşünje kanunlaryň nähili usullar bilen ýerine ýetirilýändigine aýratyn ähmiýet berýär hem-de hökümetiň adalatly we ynsaply hereket etmegini üpjün edýär.
The lawfare that has been manifested since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a denial of both substantive and procedural due process. The fundamental rights of American citizens were openly and successfully denied. The false flag operations and the open corruption of the alphabet agencies of the United States has been regularly exposed since even before the Pelosi Trials began, but the legal procedures that have been employed by the globalists of both parties since the Pelosi Trials began, represents a clear illustration of the destruction of procedural due process.
Pelosi kazyýet işleri başlanaly bäri ýüze çykarylan kanuny yzarlama, hem mazmun taýdan, hem-de amaly taýdan degişli hukuk tertibiniň inkär edilmegini aňladýar. Amerikanyň raýatlarynyň esasy hukuklary aç-açan we üstünlikli şekilde inkär edildi. Ýalan baýdakly operasiýalar hem-de Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň harplyk agentlikleriniň açyk korrupsiýasy hatda Pelosi kazyýet işleri başlamazyndan öňem yzygiderli paş edilip gelindi, ýöne Pelosi kazyýet işleri başlanaly bäri iki partiýanyň-da globalistleri tarapyndan ulanylan hukuk amallary, degişli hukuk tertibiniň amaly tarapynyň ýok edilmeginiň aýdyň bir mysalyny görkezýär.
Earlier in the article we read, “Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.”
Makalanyň öňki bölüminde şeýle diýilýärdi: “Dini kanunçylygy goldaýan islendik hereket, hakykatda, ençeme asyrlaryň dowamynda wyždan azatlygyna üznüksiz garşy göreşip gelen papalyga edilen bir eglişikdir. Ýekşenbe gününi berjaý etmek, güwänki hristiançylyk edarasy hökmünde, öz barlygyny ‘bikanunlygyň syrtyna’ bergilidir; we ony mejbury etmäge synanyşmak, aslynda, Romanizmiň hut binýatynyň burç daşy bolan prinsipleriň ykrar edilmegi bolar. Ýurdumyz öz hökümetiniň prinsiplerinden şeýle derejede ýüz öwrüp, ýekşenbe kanunyny kabul eden wagtynda, protestantlyk bu hereket arkaly papalyk bilen el ele berer; bu bolsa diňe şonça wagt bäri öz pursadyna tamakinlik bilen garaşyp, täzeden işjeň despotizme böküp çykmaga taýýar duran zulma jan bermekden başga zat bolmaz.”
In the line of history that can be represented with the Constitution of the United States there are three specific waymarks representing some element of the Constitution in both the beginning and the ending of the United States. Each of those three waymarks are political actions, and therefore symbolize the speaking of the United States. The third of those three waymarks in the beginning, that marked 1798, was the Alien and Sedition Acts and the third of those waymarks at the ending is when the United States enforces a Sunday law, and speaks as a dragon in fulfillment of Revelation chapter thirteen, verse eleven.
Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň Konstitusiýasy bilen şekillendirip bolýan taryh ugry içinde, Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň hem başlangyjynda, hem-de ahyrynda Konstitusiýanyň belli bir tarapyny görkezýän üç aýratyn ýol belgisi bar. Şol üç ýol belgisiniň her biri syýasy hereketlerdir, şonuň üçin olar Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň geplemegini alamatlandyrýar. Başlangyçdaky şol üç ýol belgisiniň üçünjüsi 1798-nji ýyly belläp, «Alien and Sedition Acts» boldy; ahyrdaky şol ýol belgileriniň üçünjüsi bolsa, Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlary ýekşenbe kanunyny mejbury berjaý etdirende we Ylham kitabynyň on üçünji bap, on birinji aýatynyň ýerine ýetmeginde aždaha ýaly geplejek wagtydyr.
The prophetic history of the United States begins when, as represented by the earth, it opened its mouth and swallowed up the flood of the dragon’s persecution.
Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlarynyň pygamberlik taryhy, ýer arkaly şekillendirilişi ýaly, ol agzyny açyp, aždarhanyň yzarlamasynyň silini ýuwdanda başlanýar.
And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood. And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth. Revelation 12:15, 16.
Ýylan aýalyň yzyndan, ony sil bilen alyp gitmek üçin, agzyndan sil deýin suw akdyrdy. Emma ýer aýala kömek etdi; ýer öz agzyny açyp, aždahanyň agzyndan akdyran silini ýuwutdy. Ylham 12:15, 16.
In 1776, the beast that was to arise from the earth, and ultimately become the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy in 1798, swallowed up the flood of persecution against God’s people by establishing a nation with a Constitution that protested against the tyrants of European royalty and the tyrants of the papal church.
1776-njy ýylda ýerden çykmaly bolan we ahyrsoňy 1798-nji ýylda Mukaddes Kitap pygamberliginiň altynjy patyşalygyna öwrülmeli haýwan, Ýewropa şa häkimiýetleriniň zalymlaryna hem-de papalyk ybadathanasynyň zalymlaryna garşy çykýan Konstitusiýaly bir milleti döretmek arkaly, Hudaýyň halkyna garşy edilen yzarlamalaryň silini öz içine siňdirdi.
The Declaration of Independence in 1776 typified the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 typified the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 typified the Sunday law in the United States.
1776-njy ýyldaky Garaşsyzlyk Jarnamasy 2001-nji ýyldaky Patriot Aktynyň nusgasy boldy. 1789-njy ýyldaky Konstitusiýa 2022-nji ýylda başlanan Pelosi kazyýet işleriniň nusgasy boldy. 1798-nji ýyldaky Daşary ýurtlular we Pitneçilik hakyndaky kanunlar Amerikanyň Birleşen Ştatlaryndaky ýekşenbe kanunynyň nusgasy boldy.
The pronouncement of independence by the American patriots in 1776 represented the announcement of the loss of independence with the Patriot Act of 2001. The Constitution of 1789 represented the Pelosi Trials beginning in 2022. The Alien and Sedition Acts represents the Sunday law. The history of the repudiation of every principle of the Constitution represents a progressive overturning of the Constitution that ends at the Sunday law.
1776-njy ýylda amerikan watançylarynyň garaşsyzlyk baradaky beýannamasy 2001-nji ýyldaky Patriot Act bilen garaşsyzlygyň ýitirilendiginiň yglan edilmegini aňladýardy. 1789-njy ýyldaky Konstitusiýa 2022-nji ýylda başlanan Pelosi Kazyýetlerini aňladýardy. Alien and Sedition Acts Ýekşenbe kanunyny aňladýar. Konstitusiýanyň her bir ýörelgesiniň inkär edilmeginiň taryhy Ýekşenbe kanuny bilen tamamlanýan Konstitusiýanyň tapgyrlaýyn agdarylmagyny aňladýar.
These lines all align in the hidden history of verse forty of Daniel chapter eleven. In this article we quoted four paragraphs from Testimonies, volume 5, 451, 452.
Bu setirleriň ählisi Daniel kitabynyň on birinji babyndaky kyrkynjy aýatyň gizlin taryhynda biri-birine gabat gelýär. Bu makalada biz Testimonies kitabynyň 5-nji tomunyň 451, 452-nji sahypalaryndan dört paragraf getirdik.
We will look closer at those paragraphs in the next article.
Indiki makalada şol abzaslara has içgin serederis.