In the last article we noted that inspiration identified that the Jews “sealed their rejection” of the gospel at the cross, and then confirmed their rejection again at the stoning of Stephen. How can this be? Of course, the rejection of the gospel by the quibbling Jews of that history was accomplished progressively. They had already been passed by at His birth. Christ’s birth to the stoning of Stephen illustrates a progressive rejection of the gospel.
Ci artik bi mujj, nanguy wax ne xel mu sell mi xamlewoon ne Yawut yi “tàmme nañu seen bañub xebaar bu baax bi” ci bant bi, te ginnaaw loolu ñu yokk doole seen bañ biat ci sànni Esteefaan ay doj. Naka la loolu man a nekk? Lu wóor mooy ne, bañug xebaar bu baax bi, gi Yawut yu werantekat yi ci jamono jooju def, dafa amoon ndank-ndank. Ba noppi sax, ñu weesu leen woon ba ca màggalu juddug Yeesu. Juddug Kirist ba ci sànni Esteefaan ay doj, loolu dafay won bañug xebaar bu baax bi buy dem ndank-ndank.
“Men know it not, but the tidings fill heaven with rejoicing. With a deeper and more tender interest the holy beings from the world of light are drawn to the earth. The whole world is brighter for His presence. Above the hills of Bethlehem are gathered an innumerable throng of angels. They wait the signal to declare the glad news to the world. Had the leaders in Israel been true to their trust, they might have shared the joy of heralding the birth of Jesus. But now they are passed by.” The Desire of Ages, 47.
“Nit ñu xamul ko, waaye xibaar bi feesal asamaan ak mbégte. Ak njort gu gën a xóot te gën a lewet, mbind yu sell yi jóge ci àdduna leer gi jëme seen bopp ci suuf si. Mbëggeelu nekk ci addina si yépp gën a leer ndax ngëmam. Kaw tundu Betleyem yi la mbooloo mu ñàkk a man a ñàkk limu malaaka yi dajale. Ñu ngi xaar mandarga bi ngir yégle xibaar bu baax bi ci àddina si. Su ñiy jiite ca Israyil ñooyoon ay ñu dëggu ci seen ndénkaane, kon dañu manoon a bokk ci mbégte mi ci yégle juddu Yeesu. Waaye léegi, wacc nañu leen.” The Desire of Ages, 47.
From the birth of Jesus to the death of Stephen the progressive rejection of the gospel by ancient Israel is illustrated. Acknowledging the Jews rejection of Christ as progressive allows an identification of “sealing their rejection,” at both the cross, where the veil of the temple was rent, and at Stephen’s death. The rending of the veil was a symbol that they were no longer God’s covenant people, and when Stephen was stoned, Stephen saw Jesus standing on the right hand of God, which in Daniel chapter twelve, verse one is a symbol of the close of probation. The destruction of Jerusalem is also a symbol of the close of probation.
Li daleu Yeesu ba fa, ba ci dee Estëfaan, wone nañu ci melokaanug bañ-bañ gu njëkk gu Israayil yàgg a yàgg di def ci xebaar bu baax bi. Su ñu nangu ne Yawut yaa ngi bañ Kirist ci anam yu yokkantu, loolu dina may ñu xàmme “sëydaatug bañ-bañ boobu,” ci ñaari fan yi: ci bant ba, fa sëru kër Yàlla ga xaroon, ak ci dee Estëfaan. Xarug sëru ga moo doon màndarga ne duñu askanu kóllëre Yàllaati; te ba ñuy sànni ay doj ci Estëfaan, Estëfaan gis na Yeesu taxaw ci ndeyjooru Yàlla, te loolu, ci Daniel saar 12, aaya 1, màndarga la bu jëm ci jeexitalu waxtu yoon wi. Yàqute Yerusalem itam màndarga la bu jëm ci jeexitalu waxtu yoon wi.
“The retribution to come upon Jerusalem could be delayed only a short time; and as Christ’s eye rested upon the doomed city, he saw not merely its destruction, but the destruction of a world. He saw that as Jerusalem was given up to destruction, so the world will be given up to its doom. He saw the retribution that will be visited on the adversaries of God. The scenes that were transacted at the destruction of Jerusalem will be repeated at the great and terrible day of the Lord, but in a more fearful manner.” Review and Herald, December 7, 1897.
“Mboolem bi di ñëw ci Yerusalem, mën nañu ko yebal rekk ab waxtu wu gàtt; te bi gisug Kirist tàbbee ci dëkk bi ñu dogal ngir alag, gisul rekk yàqu-yàquam, waaye itam yàqu-yàqu àddina si. Mu gis ne ni ñu jébbalée Yerusalem ngir alag, noonu lañuy jébbale àddina ngir moom it doomam. Mu gis mboolem mbugal bi ñuy dalal noon yi Yàlla. Lépp lu xewoon ca yàqu-yàqu Yerusalem ga, dinañu ko delloo ca bés bu mag ba te tiit lu réy bu Boroom bi, waaye ci anam gu gën a ragal.” Review and Herald, December 7, 1897.
It was only God’s mercy that prevented Jerusalem from being destroyed at the cross.
Yërmande Yàlla rekk moo terewoon Yerusalem bañ a sànku ca bant ba.
“In the Jews’ crucifixion of Christ was involved the destruction of Jerusalem. The blood shed upon Calvary was the weight that sank them to ruin for this world and for the world to come. So it will be in the great final day, when judgment shall fall upon the rejecters of God’s grace. Christ, their rock of offense, will then appear to them as an avenging mountain. The glory of His countenance, which to the righteous is life, will be to the wicked a consuming fire. Because of love rejected, grace despised, the sinner will be destroyed.” The Desire of Ages, 600.
“Ci daanu Yude yi daajee Almasi bi ci bant ba, yàqute Yerusalem bokkoon ci loolu. Deret ji tuur ci Kalwer ba mooy weesu wi leen suulal ci alkande ngir addina sii ak ngir addina di ñëw. Noonu it la nekk ci bés bu mujj bu mag bi, bu àtte bi di wàcc ci kaw ñi bañ yërmande Yàlla. Kirist, doj wi tax ñu tëq, dina feeñ ci seen kanam ni tund wu ngir fey. Ndàmli kanamam, gi nekk dund ci ñi jub, dina nekk safara su lekk ci ñi bon. Ndax mbëggeel mi ñu bañ, ak yërmande gi ñu xeeb, bàkkaarkat bi dina sànku.” The Desire of Ages, 600.
It was only God’s mercy that lingered in not bringing Jerusalem’s destruction at the time of the cross.
Yërmande Yàlla rekk moo tax ne sànkug Yerusalem yàgg na, ba ñu ko indiwuñ woon ca jamonoy bant ba.
“For nearly forty years after the doom of Jerusalem had been pronounced by Christ Himself, the Lord delayed His judgments upon the city and the nation. Wonderful was the long-suffering of God toward the rejectors of His gospel and the murderers of His Son.” The Great Controversy, 27.
«Bës nag nekk na juróom-ñeent fukki at gannaaw bi Kirist moom ci boppam yégle woon mbugal Yerusalem, Boroom bi yàggaloon na ay atam ci kaw dëkk ba ak xeet ba. Yéemu woon na muñug Yàlla gu yàgg ci diggante ñi bañ xebaar bu baaxam ak reykat Doomam.» The Great Controversy, 27.
At the time of His last temple cleansing Jesus had set forth the warning to flee Jerusalem when the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, was seen by His followers. The first time He cleansed the temple He had stated that the Jews had made His father’s house a den of thieves, but the last time He said “your house” is left unto you desolate. Even before the cross, which was just about to take place, the temple where the veil was to be rent at the crucifixion had already been identified as the Jew’s house, not God’s house. Sister White addresses when Christ made that declaration, and as her testimony proceeds she also addresses the forty years of extended mercy.
Ca jamono yu njëkk bi Mu setale kër Yàlla, Yeesu waxoon na artu bi ci daw Yerusalem bu ñu gis ci ay toppkatam ña “yëf wu bon wu yàq” wi, mi Daniel yonent bi waxoon. Bi Mu ko setalee kër Yàlla ba njëkk, Mu waxoon ne Yawut yi def nañu kër Baayam muy kër sàcc; waaye bi mujj bi Mu wax ne, “seen kër” bàyyi nañu leen ko muy neen. Sax bala bant ba, bi nekkoon lu bëgga xew ci saa si, kër Yàlla ga, fa ñu war a xottale mbubb mi ca jamono jébbale ga, ñu ko ràññee woon ba noppi ne kërug Yawut yi la, du kër Yàlla. Jigéen ju bees bi, White, wax na ci kanam jamono bi Almasi waxe yëgle boobu, te bi seedeem di wéy, mu dellu it ci ñaar-fukk ak ñeent at yi yërmande yiñ leen yokkoon.
“Christ’s words to the priests and rulers, ‘Behold, your house is left unto you desolate’ (Matthew 23:38), had struck terror to their hearts. They affected indifference, but the question kept rising in their minds as to the import of these words. An unseen danger seemed to threaten them. Could it be that the magnificent temple, which was the nation’s glory, was soon to be a heap of ruins? . . .
«Kàddu Kirist yi jëm ci saraxalekat yi ak kilifay yi ne leen: “Xoolleen, seen kër bàyyiku na leen, neen” (Matthew 23:38), dafa dugg ragal ci seen xol. Ñu mel ni ñu saxuma ci loolu, waaye laaj bi di feyaat ci seen xel ngir xam li wax yooyu tekki. Mu mel ni ab musiba bu kenn gisul doon leen tàkk. Ndax mën na doon ne kër Yàlla gu màgg ga, gi doon màggalu xeet wi, dina gaaw a nekk bëj-gànnaar yu yàqu?...»
“Christ gave His disciples a sign of the ruin to come on Jerusalem, and He told them how to escape: ‘When ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. Then let them which are in Judea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto. For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.’ This warning was given to be heeded forty years after, at the destruction of Jerusalem. The Christians obeyed the warning, and not a Christian perished in the fall of the city.” The Desire of Ages, 628, 630.
“Kirist moo jàngam yi ab tektal ci mbooleem yàquwaay bi di ñëw ci Yerusalem, te wax na leen ni ñuy rëcc: ‘Bu ngeen gisee Yerusalem ñu wër ko ak ay xarekat, xamleen ne yàquwaayam jege na. Kon ñi nekk ci Yudee nañu daw dem ca tundu ya; te ñi nekk ci biiram nañu génn; te ñi nekk ci dëkk ya buñu duggati ca biir. Ndaxte fan yii ay fan la yu fayu, ngir lépp luñu bind amaliku.’ Joxees na waare wooyu ngir ñu topp ko ñeent-fukk at gannaaw, ba ci saa si ñu alagoon Yerusalem. Kiristaan yi dégg nañu waare wa, te benn Kiristaan sàccul ci réerug dëkk ba.” The Desire of Ages, 628, 630.
Christ was crucified in the year 31, and nearly forty years later in the year 70, Jerusalem was destroyed after a three-and-a-half-year siege. How could Jerusalem have been destroyed at the cross in the year 31, if there was still three and a half years of probationary time identified as seventy weeks in Daniel chapter nine, verse twenty-four? How can these seeming inconsistencies be resolved? The easiest resolution is to simply identify the fact that when it comes to the close of the probationary time represented by the seventy weeks, that it must be understood as a progressive close of probation. This is true, but it removes any prophetic specificity when applying the waymarks of that history. I will try to explain.
Kirist moom nañu ko ci atum 31, te lu matul ñeent fukki at gannaaw loolu, ci atum 70, Yerusalem yàqu na gannaaw ab wër-gu-yàgg buy ñetti at ak genn-wàll. Naka la Yerusalem man a far a yàqu ca bant ba ci atum 31, su fekkee amoon na ba tey ñetti at ak genn-wàll yu waxtu muñuñoo ngir tuub, yi ñuy wax juróom-ñaar-fukki ayubés yi ci Danyeel saar 9, aaya 24? Naka lañuy settantal li mel ni ay jàq-jàqaley yooyu? Fésal gu gëna yomb mooy rekk a xamle ne bu ñu déggee ci jeexital waxtu muñuñoo, mi juróom-ñaar-fukki ayubés yi teyiru, war nañu koo xam ni dafa doon jeexital bu jot ci anam yu njëkk ndànk-ndànk. Loolu dëgg la, waaye dafay dindi bépp xam-xamu waxu yonent bi bu dëppook waymark yi ci jëfandikoo waa jaar-jaaru mboolem waxtu woowu. Dinaa jéem a leerale.
If Pentecost represents the soon-coming Sunday law where the other flock in Babylon is called out, why was it three and a half years after Pentecost that the gospel went to the Gentiles? Is the death of Christ or the death of Stephen a sign of the close of probation for ancient Israel? If Laodicean Adventism ceases to be a church at the soon-coming Sunday law, did the destruction of the temple in the year 70, represent the end of the temple of Laodicean Adventism at the Sunday law? What might appear as seeming inconsistencies is resolved by the application of “line upon line,” and when that application is employed the testimony of the waymarks we are identifying become very clear and concise.
Bu Pentekoos mooyoon na ndigalub Dibeer bu agsi, bi ñu di woo juróom ña ca Babilon, lu tax xibaaru xel mu baax demoon ca xeeti ñi dul Yawut ñi ñaari at ak genn-wàll gannaaw Pentekoos? Ndax deeꞌug Kirist walla deeꞌug Eteyaŋ mooy mandarga jeexital yoon wi ñu maye woon Israeel gu mag ga? Su fekkee ne Awaŋtis bu Laodisee doyatul ne mbooloo la ca ndigalub Dibeer bu agsi, ndax tasug kër Yàlla ga ca atum 70 teg na niti jeexital kër Yàlla gu Awaŋtis bu Laodisee ca ndigalub Dibeer ba? Li mën a mel ni ay juumte yu feeñ, dañuy xeloo ci jëfandikoo “rëdd ci kaw rëdd,” te bu jëfandikoo googu amee, seede waymark yi nuy xame day nekk lu leer te gatt.
The week that Christ confirmed the covenant is broken up into two equal periods of three and a half years. The first three and a half years begins at Christ’s baptism and ends with His death. Baptism is the symbol of His death and resurrection, so the beginning of that period of three and a half years is identical to the ending. In that period Christ presented the gospel exclusively to the Jews. The end of that three and a half years marks the beginning of the following three and a half years. The beginning of the second period of three and a half years begins with the death of Christ, and it ends with the death of Stephen. In that period the disciples presented the gospel exclusively to the Jews.
Ayub dëkk bi Kirist jëfe ko ngir dëggal kóllëre gi, ñu xàjj ko ñaari àpp yu yem, kenn ku nekk am ñetti at ak genn-wàll. Ñetti at ak genn-wàll yu njëkk yi tàmbalee ci sóobu ndoxu Kirist te mujje ci deeam. Sóobu ndox mooy misaalu deeam ak dekkiwaayam; moo tax tàmbaleg jamono jooju bu ñetti at ak genn-wàll yem ak mujjam. Ci jamono jooju, Kirist joxee xebaar bu baax bi Yawut yi rekk. Mujjug ñetti at ak genn-wàll yooyu moo mel ni mooy tàmbalig ñetti at ak genn-wàll yi koy topp. Tàmbalig ñaareelu jamono ju ñetti at ak genn-wàll jooju tàmbalee ci deeŋu Kirist, te mujje ci deeŋu Ecen. Ci jamono jooju, taalibe yi joxee xebaar bu baax bi Yawut yi rekk.
Those two periods, which are separate prophetic lines, are to be brought together “line upon line.” Both beginnings and endings possess the signature of Alpha and Omega, for the beginning and ending histories are the same. Both periods of duration are identical, and the work that is carried out during each period is identical. Christ who is the First and the Last, is also the creator of all things, and in that regard He is the Creator of Truth. The Hebrew word “truth” was created by three Hebrew letters. The first letter, followed by the thirteenth letter, followed by the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet are combined to make the Hebrew word “truth.”
Ñaari jamono yu ñu weesoo, te ñuy ay rëdd yu njëkk ci waxu yonent yi, war nañu leen boole “rëdd ci kaw rëdd.” Benn njàlbéen ak benn jeexital ñépp dañuy yor mandargu Alpha ak Omega, ndaxte jaar-jaari tàmbali ak jaar-jaari jeexital benn la. Ñaari diir yu nit di seet fii dañuy yem, te liggéey bi ñuy def ci bépp diir yem na. Kirist mooy Ki njëkk te mooy Ki mujj, te itam mooy Mi bind lépp, te ci loolu mooy Bindkatug Dëgg. Baatu Ebrë “dëgg” ñu bind ko ak ñetti araf yu Ebrë. Araaf bu njëkk bi, toppante ak araaf bu fukk ak ñett ba, toppante ak araaf bu mujj ci alifbe Ebrë, boolees na leen ngir sos baatu Ebrë bi di “dëgg.”
Both of the periods of three and a half years have Christ as the first and the last, for Christ is at the beginning of the first period at His baptism, as He is at the ending at His death in the first period. And Christ is at His death in the beginning of the second period and He is standing at the right hand of God at the ending of the second period. The number thirteen is the symbol of rebellion, and in both periods whether the gospel was presented in person by Christ, or in the second period by His disciples, the quibbling Jews rebelled against the message of the gospel.
Ñaari waxtu yu tollu at ak genn weer, ñoom ñaar ñépp, Kirist mooy ki ci njëkk te mooy ki ci mujj; ndaxte Kirist mungi ci tàmbali waxtu wu jëkk wi ca Njamu-bëggam, ni mu nekk itam ci mujjam ca dee baam bi ci waxtu wu jëkk wi. Te Kirist mungi ci dee baam bi ci tàmbali waxtu wu ñaareel wi, te mungi taxaw ci ndeyjoor Yàlla ci mujj waxtu wu ñaareel wi. Limu fukk ak ñett mooy misaalu ñàkk dégg-dëgg, te ci ñaari waxtu yooyu, muy xibaaru jàmm bi tegtaloon ci boppam ci Kirist, walla ci waxtu wu ñaareel wi jaarale ko ci taalibeem yi, Yawut yu di werante daan nañu bëgg a jalgati xibaaru jàmm bi.
Both periods are the same duration, possess the signature of Alpha and Omega, and identify the same gospel message. Those two periods are to be brought together “line upon line.” The methodology of “line upon line,” is the testing methodology of the latter rain. It is the methodology of the last days, and the truths which are identified and established by that methodology in the last days are what purges or purifies the sons of Levi during the sealing of the one hundred and forty-four thousand.
Ñaari jamono ñaar yi benn diiru lañu, am nañu màndarga Alfa ak Omega, te dañuy jëfandikoo benn yëgleb xebaaru xam-xam bu baax bi. Ñaari jamono yooyu war nañu leen boole “rëdd ci rëdd.” Yoonu “rëdd ci rëdd” mooy yoonu nattu gu taw gu mujj ga. Mooy yoonu jamonoy mujj yi, te dëgg yi ñuy xamle ak saxal ci yoonu boobu ci jamonoy mujj yi, mooy li setal walla laabal doom yi Léewi biir tëj giirug téeméeri ñeent fukk ak ñeent junni.
Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine? them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts. For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little: For with stammering lips and another tongue will he speak to this people. To whom he said, This is the rest wherewith ye may cause the weary to rest; and this is the refreshing: yet they would not hear. But the word of the Lord was unto them precept upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little; that they might go, and fall backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken. Isaiah 28:9–13.
Kan laa mooy jàngal xam-xam? Te kan laa mooy may mu xam njàngale? Ñi ñu dogal ci meew mi, te ñu teqale leen ak naamp yi. Ndaxte sàrt bi war na nekk ci kaw sàrt, sàrt ci kaw sàrt; rëdd bi ci kaw rëdd, rëdd ci kaw rëdd; fii tuuti, fale tuuti: Ndaxte ak bëñu gémmiñ yu daldi taxaw ak waxin wu weneen laa wax ak xeet wii. Ñoom la waxoon ne: Lii mooy noflaay bi ngeen di may ñi sonn noppi; te lii mooy yeesal gi: waaye bëgguñu woon dégg. Waaye kàddug Boroom bi nekkoon na ci ñoom sàrt ci kaw sàrt, sàrt ci kaw sàrt; rëdd ci kaw rëdd, rëdd ci kaw rëdd; fii tuuti, fale tuuti; ngir ñu dem, ba dellu gannaaw, ba damm, ba jàpp ci pièg, ba ñu jàpp leen. Esayi 28:9–13.
The next verse in Isaiah addresses the scornful men that rule the people of Jerusalem. For those scornful men, the “rest and the refreshing” (the latter rain), which they refused to “hear,” is what causes them to “go, and fall backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken.” That test was presented to them from another tongue, for Elijah, John the Baptist and William Miller were not trained in the theological schools of their respective histories. The latter rain message that tests Laodicean Adventism, is the message that is produced by the application of “line upon line.”
Saar bii ci nekk ci Esayi bi jëm ci góor yu xeex ci ñaawte, ñiy nguur nit ñi nekk Yerusalem. Ci ñoom góor yooyu yu ñaawal, “noppalu ak yeesal bi” (taw wu mujj wi), bi ñu bañ a “dégg”, mooy li tax ñu “dem, dellu gannaaw, daanu, tooglu, te ñu jàpp leen.” Nattu boobu ñëw na ci ñoom jaarale ko ci beneen làkk, ndaxte Eliya, Yaxya Miy Sooɓ, ak William Miller, jànguñuwoon ci eskool yu tewoloji yi ci jamono yu seen historiyu bopp. Yégleb taw wu mujj wi, biy natt Advenistiyu Laodise, mooy yégleb bi juddoo ci jëfandikoo “rëdd ci kaw rëdd.”
When the first three and a half years of the week in which Christ confirmed the covenant is laid over the second three and a half years, we find prophetic light that clarifies any seeming inconsistencies that might arise in an inquiring mind. The week was when the Messenger of the Covenant was to confirm the covenant, and a biblical covenant must be confirmed with blood. The baptism and crucifixion of Christ and the stoning of Stephen all identify blood. Both lines represent the blood of the covenant, and those lines are confirming the covenant.
Bu ñetti juróom-ñaar ak genn-wàll ci ay at yu njëkk ci waxtu-weer wi Kirist doon dëgëral kóllëre gi, su ñu ko tegalee ci juróom-ñaar ak genn-wàll ci ay at yu mujj yi, danuy gis leeru yonent bi di leeral bépp lu mel ni am na jàkkaarloo ci xel muy seet. Waxtu-weer woowu mooy bi Yonnentub Kóllëre gi waroon a dëgëral kóllëre gi, te ci Mbind mi, kóllëre war nañu koo dëgëral ak deret. Sóobu Kirist ci ndox mi ak daajam ci bant ba, ak dóor Setefan ba ba mu dee, ñoom ñépp dañuy firndeel deret. Ñaari rëdd yi ñoom ñépp dañuy teewal deretu kóllëre gi, te rëdd yooyu dañuy dëgëral kóllëre gi.
When brought together “line upon line,” the baptism and crucifixion are the first waymark, and the crucifixion and stoning of Stephen are the last waymark. When brought together into one line we find the cross and Michael standing up at the death of Stephen as two witnesses of the Jews sealing their rejection of the gospel. The death of Christ, is also the death of His disciple Stephen, which is Passover when the two lines are combined. Three days later Christ is resurrected as the First Fruit offering.
Buñ ñëpp boole “rëdd-rëdd ci kaw rëdd,” sóobu ndox mi ak daajale ci bant bi mooy njëkk àtteb yoon wi, te daajale ci bant bi ak rey Setefaan ak xeex mooy mujj àtteb yoon wi. Bu ñu leen boole ci benn rëdd, dañuy gis bant bi ak Miikaayel di taxaw ci dee Setefaan ni ñaari seede yu Yawut ya jiital ngir tëj seen bañ xebaar bu baax bi. Dee Kirist mooy it dee taalibeem Setefaan, te loolu mooy Paskaa bi bu ñu boolee ñaari rëdd yi. Ñetti fan ginnaaw loolu, dees na dekkal Kirist ni Saraxu Njàlbéen gi.
But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the first fruits of them that slept. 1 Corinthians 15:20.
Waaye léegi Kirist dafa dekki ci gàtt yi, te mu nekk ñu jëkk ci meññeefu ñi nelawoon. 1 Korent 15:20.
In between Passover and the feast of First Fruits on the third day is the beginning of the feast of Unleavened Bread. Unleavened bread does not “rise”, and Christ did not rise on the second day, He rose on the third day. Christ and Stephen die together in the “line upon line” application, but Stephen is resurrected after Christ for there is an order to the first fruit resurrection.
Ci diggante Njàngu Màggalu Mucc ak màggalu Njàmbat bu jëkk ba ca ñetteelu bés, mooy ndoorte màggalu Mburu mu amul lawiir. Mburu mu amul lawiir du “yéegu”, te Almasi bi yéegul ca ñaareelu bés ba; dafa yéeg ca ñetteelu bés ba. Ci jëfandikoo gu “rëdd ci kaw rëdd”, Almasi ak Istefaan dee nañu benn; waaye Istefaan dekkat na gannaaw Almasi, ndaxte am na tëralin ci ndekkite gi ñu jëkk a góob.
But every man in his own order: Christ the first fruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming. 1 Corinthians 15:22.
Waaye ku nekk ci yeemam: Almasi bi mooy njëg mi jëkk; gannaaw loolu, ñiy Almasi ci kàddug ñëwam. 1 Korent 15:22.
The Spring feasts cannot be separated from each other, for they are directly related to one another. In this sense, Pentecost represents the soon-coming Sunday law, when there will be a repetition of the pouring out of the Holy Spirit, and the second voice of Revelation chapter eighteen will then call those that do not currently know the gospel, to come out of Babylon. The word “Babylon,” is based upon the word, “Babel,” which means confusion, for it was in the fall of Babel that God confused the languages, and it was at Pentecost that God reverses the confusion of the languages in order to carry the gospel to the world. Thus Pentecost and the Sunday law align.
Bëggub Noppalu bëriñu mën a tasanteekantewuñu, ndaxte dañuy jëfandikoo ci seen diggante bu jub. Ci noonu, Pentekot day tektale yoonu Dibéer bu dëgër di ñëw gaaw, ba fa ñuy amaat benn dellusiw ci tuurug Xel Mu Sell mi, te ba noppi baat bu ñaareel bi ci Peeñu gi, saraxle 18, dina woo ñi xamaguñu tey xibaar bu baax bi, ngir ñu génne Bàbbiloon. Kàddug “Bàbbiloon” mi, mi ngi sosoo ci kàddug “Babel,” buy tekki jaxasoo, ndaxte ci màbbug Babel la Yàlla jaxasee làkk yi, te ci Pentekot la Yàlla delloo jaxasoo bu làkk yi ngir yóbbu xibaar bu baax bi àddina si. Noonu nag Pentekot ak yoonu Dibéer bi dañuy méngoo.
At Pentecost the gift of languages was given to the disciples, but their message then was still restricted to the Jews. When both lines are brought together Pentecost occurs in the year 34, when Stephen was stoned and the gospel was then carried to those who do not currently know the gospel.
Ca bésub Pentekot, maye wax ak làkk yi joxoon nañ ko taalibey Yeesu yi, waaye seen yéglekaay bi booba dafa nekkoon rekk ci yawut yi. Bu ñu boolee ñaari réewu jëfandikoo yi, Pentekot dafa am ci atum 34, ba ñu sànni ay doj ba rey Setefan, te waxtu woowu lañu yóbbu xibaar bu baax bi ci ñi xamagul leegi xibaar bu baax bi.
Stephen represents those who are resurrected “at His coming,” but who have died with Him. The First Fruit offering marks the resurrection of Christ on the third day, and it also marks the beginning of the Feast of Weeks, which is also the feast of Pentecost, and which commemorates the giving of the Ten Commandments at Sinai.
Eten mooñ ñi dekkat “ca ñëwamam,” waaye ñoo dee ak Moom. Saraxu Njëkk meññ na dekkite Kirist bésu ñetteel bi, te itam mooy tàmbalee Béj-gànnaar gi, gi itam di Béj Pentikost, te buy fàttali joxe Fukk yoon yi ca Sinaay.
October 22, 1844, aligns with the cross, for among other proofs Sister White aligns the disappointment of the disciples after the cross with the disappointment that followed October 22, 1844. Both the cross and October 22, 1844, prefigure the soon-coming Sunday law. Pentecost also typifies the soon coming Sunday law, but Pentecost came fifty-two days after the cross. The cross, which was typified by Passover, ushers in a series of feasts which commemorate the old paths of ancient Israel from the night the angel of death passed over Egypt, through to the giving of the law. Though the feasts possess their own distinctions, they are inseparably linked to each other. It is therefore accurate to apply the complete fifty-two days from Passover to Pentecost as one singular waymark.
22 Oktoobar 1844, méngoo na ak bàmmeel, ndaxte ci yeneen firnde yu bare, Sœur White dafa méngale naqaru taalibe yi gannaaw bàmmeel bi ak naqar ga topp 22 Oktoobar 1844. Bàmmeel bi ak 22 Oktoobar 1844, ñoom ñaar ñépp dañuy misaalal yoonu dimbali bi ñuy waajal, mooy ndigalu Dimas bi di ñëw léegi. Pentekoost itam dafay misaalal ndigalu Dimas bi di ñëw léegi, waaye Pentekoost ñëw na juróom-ñaari fan ak ñaar gannaaw bàmmeel bi. Bàmmeel bi, bi Pasee bi doon misaalal, mooy ubbi ab taxawaayu màggal yu di fàttali yoon yu yàgg yaay yi Israayil gu mag doon jaar, dale ko ca guddi ga malaakam deewee weesu Misra, ba agsi ca joxe yoon wi. Doonte màggal yi am nañu seen bopp séq ak seen melokaan, dañoo tëjoo ak seen bopp bu taxul a daggante. Kon nag, dafa jub a jëfandikoo juróom-ñaari fan ak ñaar yépp, dale ko ca Pasee ba ca Pentekoost, ni benn rekk waymark.
For this reason, the cross, the death of Stephen, and Pentecost all prefigure the soon coming Sunday law, when the progressive executive judgment upon Modern Babylon begins, as the second voice of Revelation chapter eighteen begins to call God’s other flock out of Babylon. It is at that waymark that the executive judgment upon Jerusalem arrived, though God in His mercy deferred the actual destruction of the temple and city nearly forty years after the cross to the year 70. The destruction of ancient Jerusalem represents the beginning of the progressive executive judgment that begins in the United States when “national apostasy is followed by national ruin.”
Ndaxte loolu, banbu kurwaa bi, dee-goor Stefano, ak Pentekot, ñépp dafa jëkk a won yoonu sàbbaat bi di ñëw ci lu gaaw, bi dogalu àtte gu mat sëriñ ci Babilon bu Bees di tàmbalee, baat bu ñaareel bi nekk ci Peeñu Yàlla saaru fukki ak juróom-ñett di tàmbali woo juróom ñaari gàllankooru Yàlla génn ci Babilon. Ci moomu màndarga yoon la dogalu àtte gu mat sëriñ ci Yerusalem agsiwoon, waaye Yàlla ci yërmandeem yàggal na sankug kër Yàlla ga ak dëkk ba lu tollu ci at yu ñaar-fukki ak juróom ñenti gannaaw banbu kurwaa bi, ba ci atum 70. Sankug Yerusalem gu yàggoon day tegtal tàmbalig dogalu àtte gu mat sëriñ te di gën a dem ndànk-ndànk, gi di tàmbali ci États-Unis bi “ngàntu réew mi toppoo sankug réew mi.”
Truth is established upon the testimony of two, and in the two lines of three and a half years that Christ confirmed the covenant we find two witnesses of a death and resurrection that is associated with the history that identifies the soon-coming Sunday law. That Sunday law in Revelation chapter eleven, is identified as the “hour of the great earthquake.” That “hour” is directly connected to two witnesses that gave a testimony of three and a half years. Their testimony ends with their death and resurrection.
Dëgg gi mi ngi tabax ci seedeeru ñaar, te ci ñaari xët yu ñetti at ak genn-wàll bi Kirist moom dëggal kóllëre ga, nu gis ñaari seede yu seede ab dee ak dekki, te loolu jàpp ci jaar-jaaru taariix bi di wone yoonu dibeer bi di ñëw lu gaaw. Yoonu Dibéer boobu, ci Revelasioŋ sàppali 11, ñu ko ràññee ni mooy “waxtu yëngu-yëngu su mag si.” “Waxtu” woowu am na njaxlaf bu jub ak ñaari seede yi joxe woon seedeer bu ñetti at ak genn-wàll. Seen seedeer jeex na ak seen dee ak seen dekki.
Their testimony of three and a half years, followed by their death and resurrection has been represented by the death and resurrection of both Jesus and Stephen, for “line upon line,” Stephen is represented as being resurrected with Christ. In the feast of First Fruits, two primary offerings were presented.
Seen seede bu ñaari at ak genn-wàll, topp ci seen dee ak seen ndekkitewaat, jëfandikoo nañu ko ngir tegtal dee ak ndekkitewaatug Yeesu ak Etiyen ñoom ñaar; ndaxte, “rëdd ci kaw rëdd,” Etiyen dafa tegtalu ni mu dekkitewaat ak Kirist. Ci màggalu Njàlbéen yi, ñaari sarax yu mag yaa nga fa woon.
One was a lamb without blemish, and the other an offering of barley. The barley represented the crop to follow, and the lamb represented Christ. Christ was resurrected on the third day, and Stephen represented those that follow, and the barley represented the crop that was to follow. The two witnesses in Revelation eleven testified for three and a half years, after which they were then slain and then were resurrected three and a half days later. Those two witnesses had been typified by Christ, who was the First Fruits, for they represent the one hundred and forty-four thousand, who are also first fruits.
Kenn bennoon mooy xar bu amul benn sikk, te ki ci des mooy saraxu orj. Orj gi dafa mel ni meññ mi war a toppsi, te xar ba dafa tegtal Almasi bi. Almasi dekkiwaat na ca ñetteelu bés ba, te Seetaañ mooy ki tegtal ñi koy topp, te orj gi mooy meññ mi war a toppsi. Ñaari seede ya nekk ci Peeñ gu Sell gi, fasal 11, seedeel nañu diirub ñetti at ak genn-wàll, gannaaw loolu ñu rey leen, te gannaaw ñetti bés ak genn-wàll ñu dekkiwaat. Ñaari seede yooyu, Almasi bi mooyoon seen misaal, moom miy Ñakk Mbëy Mi Jëkk, ndaxte ñoom dañuy tegtal téeméer ak ñeent-fukk ak ñeent junni ña, ñoom itam ñooy ñakk mbëy yu jëkk ya.
And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father’s name written in their foreheads. And I heard a voice from heaven, as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps: And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth. These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the first fruits unto God and to the Lamb. And in their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before the throne of God. Revelation 14:1–5.
Noonu ma xool, te gis ma ne, ab Xar-mbuur taxaw ci tundu Siyon, te amoon na ak moom junniy ñent-fukk ak ñent junni, ñi ñu bindoon turu Baayam ci seen jë. Noonu ma dégg baat bu jóge asamaan, mel ni riirum ndox mu bare, te mel it ni riirum dënnu gu réy; te baat ba ma dégg doon baatu ñiy taal xalam, di taal seen xalam. Ñu di woy, mel ni ab woy wu bees, kanam gàngune ga, ak kanam ñeenti mbindeef ya, ak mag ña; te kenn mënu ko jàng, woy woowu, kudul ñaari junni ak ñent-fukk ak ñent junni ña, ñi ñu jotale woon ci suuf si. Ñoomooy ñi ñuulul ak jigéen ñi; ndaxte janq lañu. Ñoomooy ñiy topp Xar-mbuur ba fu mu dem. Ñii lañu jotalee ci biir nit ñi, ngir nekk njiitu meññeef yi ñeel Yàlla ak Xar-mbuur bi. Te kennu naaféq walla fen nekkuloon ci seen gémmiñ; ndaxte amuñu benn tooñ kanam gàngune Yàlla gi. Peeñu Yowaana 14:1–5.
The barley offering on the feast of First Fruits represented the crop that was to follow, and Stephen in the year 34, followed Christ’s death in the year 31, though “line upon line,” they died at the same waymark. In relation to the first fruit offerings, Christ was the lamb that was slain and Stephen was the barley. According to Paul “Christ” is “the first fruits of them that slept,” and then “afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.” The one hundred and forty-four thousand are first fruits, and they are those “which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth.”
Saraxu orjinal bi ci ñëw ci bésu Njàngat gu njëkk gi doon misaalu mbey mi war a topp, te Siteefaan ci atum 34 topp na deeñu Kirist ci atum 31, doonte ne “rëdd ci kaw rëdd,” ñoom ñaar dee nañu ca benn màndargay yoonu waa jii. Ci jëmale bi ak sarax yi ñuy wax njëkk mbey, Kirist moo doon xar mi ñu rendi, te Siteefaan moo doon orj. Ni Pool waxe, “Kirist” mooy “njëkk mbeyu ñi nelawoon,” te gannaaw loolu “ñi bokk ci Kirist bu ñëwee.” Téeméer ak ñeent-fukk ak ñeent junni ñoo di njëkk mbey, te ñoom ñoo di ñi “toppa Gàtt gi fu mu demee fépp.”
In the “hour” of the “great earthquake” of Revelation chapter eleven, the two witnesses that have prophesied for three and a half years, only to be slain and lie in the streets for three and a half days, are resurrected. They are those represented by Stephen who prophetically was resurrected with Jesus, but also after Jesus. They are therefore resurrected “three and a half days,” after they are murdered by the beast that ascended from the bottomless pit. The same “hour,” that they are resurrected they ascend to heaven as an ensign. The process of their resurrection and ascension is carefully outlined in God’s prophetic Word, and it includes that they were typified by the literal death of Stephen, thus representing a spiritual death that is accomplished upon the two witnesses as they are transformed from the Laodicean movement of the third angel unto the Philadelphian movement of the third angel.
Ci “waxtu” buy yëngu yëngu “réy-réy bu mag” bi nekk ci Peeñu Yàlla sarax fukk ak benn, ñaari seede yi doon wax ci turu Yàlla diirub ñetti at ak genn-wàll, te ba noppi ñu rey leen, ñu tëdd ci mbedd yi diirub ñetti fan ak genn-wàll, dees na leen dekkal. Ñoom lañuy tegtal ci Etyen, mi ci yoon wu jëfandikookk bu yonent lañu dekkaloon ak Yeesu, waaye itam gannaaw Yeesu. Kon nag, dees na leen dekkal “gannaaw ñetti fan ak genn-wàll,” gannaaw bi leen rab wa ju jóge ci xur wi amul suuf dee. Ci benn “waxtu” boobu bi ñu leen dekkalee, ñuy yéeg asamaan muy ràññee. Yoonu seen ndekkite ak seen yéeg asamaan, Kàddu Yàlla gu yonent gi lim na ko bu baax; te boobu yoon dafay ànd ak ne ñu leen misaalaloon ak dee gu dëggu gu Etyen, noonu mu war a tegtal dee gu xel bu mat ci ñaari seede yi, bi ñuy soppeeku jële ci yëngu-yëngu Laodise bu malaaka bu ñetteel ba ca yëngu-yëngu Filadelfi bu malaaka bu ñetteel.
We will continue this study in the next article.
Dinanu wéyal ci xët wi ci topp.
“One thing is certain: those Seventh-day Adventists who take their stand under Satan’s banner will first give up their faith in the warnings and reproofs contained in the Testimonies of God’s spirit.
“Benn mbir mooy lu wóor: ñi bokk ci Seexi-Juroom-Ñaareelu-Bés yi te taxawu ci suufu ràkkaayu Seytaane, ñooy jëkk a bàyyi seen ngëm ci waare yi ak yedd yi nekk ci Seede yi yu Xelu Yàlla.”
“The call to greater consecration and holier service is being made, and will continue to be made. Some who are now voicing Satan’s suggestions will come to their senses. There are those in important positions of trust who do not understand the truth for this time. To them the message must be given. If they receive it, Christ will accept them, and will make them workers together with him. But if they refuse to hear the message, they will take their stand under the black banner of the Prince of Darkness.
«Woote ngir gëna sellal bopp ak ngir liggéey bu gëna sellañ dees koy yégle, te dina sax di yéglees. Ñenn ci ñi taxaw léegi di wax li Seytaane di xelal dinañu dellusi seen xel. Am na ñu nekk ci ay berab yu am solo te ñu dénk leen lu am solo, waaye xamunuñu dëgg gi ngir jamono jii. Ci ñoom lañu wara jottali bataaxal bi. Su ñu ko nangu, Kirist dina leen nangu, te dina leen def ay liggéeykat yu bokk ak moom. Waaye su ñu bañee dégg ndaw li, dinañu taxaw ci suuful banniere bu ñuul bu Buur bu Lëndëm gi.»
“I am instructed to say that the precious truth for this time is open more and more clearly to human minds. In a special sense men and women are to eat of Christ’s flesh and drink of his blood. There will be a development of the understanding, for the truth is capable of constant expansion. The divine originator of truth will come into closer and still closer communion with those who follow on to know him. As God’s people receive his word as the bread of heaven, they will know that his goings forth are prepared as the morning. They will receive spiritual strength, as the body receives physical strength when food is eaten.
«Ñu digle ma ma wax ne dëgg ju am solo jii ci jamono jii dafay ubbeeku gën a leer ci xel yi nit ñi. Ci benn anam bu ëpp solo, góor ak jigéen dañuy lekk yaramu Kirist te naan deretam. Dëgg day indi yokkute ci xam-xam, ndaxte man naa yaatal ba fàww. Ki dëkkal dëgg te bokk ci Yàlla, dina ñëw ci booloo gu gëna jege, te di gëna jege ak ñi sax ci xam ko. Bu askanu Yàlla nangee kàddoom ni mburu asamaan, dinañu xam ne génn-génnaam ñu waajal na ko ni suba si. Dinañu jot doole ju xel mu sell, ni yaram di jote doole ju yaram bu ñu lekkee lekk.»
“We do not half understand the Lord’s plan in taking the children of Israel from Egyptian bondage, and leading them through the wilderness into Canaan.
“Nun nuy xam bu baax sàkku Boroom bi ci nangu waa Israyil ci jaamug Misra, te jiite leen jaar ci màndiŋ mi ba ca Kanaan.
“As we gather up the divine rays shining from the gospel, we shall have a clearer insight into the Jewish economy, and a deeper appreciation of its important truths. Our exploration of truth is yet incomplete. We have gathered up only a few rays of light. Those who are not daily students of the Word will not solve the problems of the Jewish economy. They will not understand the truths taught by the temple service. The work of God is hindered by a worldly understanding of his great plan. The future life will unfold the meaning of the laws that Christ, enshrouded in the pillar of cloud, gave to his people.” Spalding and Magan, 305, 306.
“Bi nuy dajale ray yu Yàlla yi jëng ci xibaaru jàmm bi, dina nu am xam-xam bu gëna leer ci tàmbali yoonu Yawut yi, ak njëg gu gëna xóot ci dëgg yu am solo yi nekk ci moom. Sunu seetlu dëgg ba noppiagul. Dajale nanu rekk ay tuuti ray yu leer. Ñi dul taalibey Kàddu gi bés bu nekk, duñu man a fésal jafe-jafe yi nekk ci tàmbali yoonu Yawut yi. Duñu xam dëgg yi liggéeyu kër Yàlla ga di jàngale. Liggéeyu Yàlla mi ngi ayare ndax njëg gu àddina ci planam bu mag bi. Dund gu ëllëg gi dina ubbi tekkiinu yoon yi Kirist, mi woon ku ñu muur ci ndëgëm njaxlaayu niir wi, joxaat askanam.” Spalding and Magan, 305, 306.