All the prophets identify the end of the world.

Yépp yonni ci yonent yi dañuy jàppale mujjug àddina.

“Each of the ancient prophets spoke less for their own time than for ours, so that their prophesying is in force for us. ‘Now all these things happened unto them for ensamples: and they are written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the world are come.’ 1 Corinthians 10:11. ‘Not unto themselves, but unto us they did minister the things, which are now reported unto you by them that have preached the gospel unto you with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven; which things the angels desire to look into.’ 1 Peter 1:12. . . .

“Benn yonent yu magi waxoon nañu gën a jëm ci sunu jamono gii ba ci seen bopp jamono, ba tax na seen waxu yëgle bi di jariñal nun tey. ‘Lépp lii daldi woon ci ñoom ngir nekk misaal ci sunuy kanam; te bindees na ko ngir sunuy xelal, nun ñi mujjug àddina ji dikkël.’ 1 Corinthians 10:11. ‘Du woon ci seen bopp lañu doon liggéey, waaye ci nun lañu doon liggéey ci mbir yi nu léegi yégal, jaarale ko ci ñi leen yégle xebaar bu baax bi, ci Xel mu Sell mi jóge asamaan; te mbir yooyu malaaka yi sax bëgg a settu ci seen biir.’ 1 Peter 1:12....

“The Bible has accumulated and bound up together its treasures for this last generation. All the great events and solemn transactions of Old Testament history have been, and are, repeating themselves in the church in these last days.” Selected Messages, book 3, 338, 339.

“Biibël bi dajale na teyeefam yi, te boole leen benn ngir maas gu mujj gii. Bépp xew-xew bu mag ak bépp jëf ju sell ci jaar-jaari Kóllëre gu Yàgg ga amoon na, te am na ba tey, di dellusi ci jàngoro yiir kërceen bi ci fan yu mujj yii.” Selected Messages, book 3, 338, 339.

All the books of the Bible conclude in the book of Revelation.

Lépp yi téerey Biibël bi dafa jeex ci téereb Peeñ mi.

“In the Revelation all the books of the Bible meet and end.” Acts of the Apostles, 585.

«Ci Kàddug Yàlla yépp dajaloo te jeex ci Mbirum Peeñ mi.» Acts of the Apostles, 585.

The final warning message for planet earth’s inhabitants is identified in Revelation eighteen.

Bataaxal bu mujj bi ci artu waasi addina si ñu leen di artu moom, ñu ko xamale na ci Peeñu atum fukk ak juróom-ñett.

And after these things I saw another angel come down from heaven, having great power; and the earth was lightened with his glory. And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. Revelation 18:1–3.

Gannaaw loolu gis naa beneen malaaka mu wàcce asamaan, yor kàttan gu réy; te ndëpp mi leer ak ndamuam. Mu woo ak baat bu réy bu dëgër, naan: “Babilon bu mag bi daanu na, daanu na, te mu nekk kërug rab yi, ak dëkkub bépp xel mu ñaaw, ak paañub bépp picc mu sellul te ñaaw. Ndax xeet yépp naan nañu ci biiñu merum ay njaaloom, te buur yu àddina si njaaloowoon nañu ak moom, te jaaykat yi ci àddina si bareel nañu alal ci ngëneelug ay xéewëlam yu bare.” Peeñu Yowaana 18:1–3.

The phrase “Babylon the great” represents the Roman Catholic church and in Isaiah chapter twenty-three “Babylon the great” is represented as Tyre.

Wax ji nekk “Babilon bu mag bi” dafay tegtal Kàngam Katolik Room, te ci Esayi saar ñaar-fukk ak ñett “Babilon bu mag bi” dees na ko fésal ni Tir.

The burden of Tyre. Howl, ye ships of Tarshish; for it is laid waste, so that there is no house, no entering in: from the land of Chittim it is revealed to them. Be still, ye inhabitants of the isle; thou whom the merchants of Zidon, that pass over the sea, have replenished. And by great waters the seed of Sihor, the harvest of the river, is her revenue; and she is a mart of nations. Be thou ashamed, O Zidon: for the sea hath spoken, even the strength of the sea, saying, I travail not, nor bring forth children, neither do I nourish up young men, nor bring up virgins. As at the report concerning Egypt, so shall they be sorely pained at the report of Tyre. Pass ye over to Tarshish; howl, ye inhabitants of the isle. Is this your joyous city, whose antiquity is of ancient days? her own feet shall carry her afar off to sojourn. Who hath taken this counsel against Tyre, the crowning city, whose merchants are princes, whose traffickers are the honourable of the earth? The Lord of hosts hath purposed it, to stain the pride of all glory, and to bring into contempt all the honourable of the earth. Pass through thy land as a river, O daughter of Tarshish: there is no more strength. He stretched out his hand over the sea, he shook the kingdoms: the Lord hath given a commandment against the merchant city, to destroy the strong holds thereof. And he said, Thou shalt no more rejoice, O thou oppressed virgin, daughter of Zidon: arise, pass over to Chittim; there also shalt thou have no rest. Behold the land of the Chaldeans; this people was not, till the Assyrian founded it for them that dwell in the wilderness: they set up the towers thereof, they raised up the palaces thereof; and he brought it to ruin. Howl, ye ships of Tarshish: for your strength is laid waste. And it shall come to pass in that day, that Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years, according to the days of one king: after the end of seventy years shall Tyre sing as an harlot. Take an harp, go about the city, thou harlot that hast been forgotten; make sweet melody, sing many songs, that thou mayest be remembered. And it shall come to pass after the end of seventy years, that the Lord will visit Tyre, and she shall turn to her hire, and shall commit fornication with all the kingdoms of the world upon the face of the earth. And her merchandise and her hire shall be holiness to the Lord: it shall not be treasured nor laid up; for her merchandise shall be for them that dwell before the Lord, to eat sufficiently, and for durable clothing. Isaiah 23:1–18.

Yeenub Tir. Yéen gaal yu Tarsis, jooyleen, ndaxte ñu ko yàq na, ba noppi këru desul, duggeentu amul; jële nañu leen xibaar gi ca réewum Kittim. Neleen dal te noppi, yéen dëkkkat dunu bi; yaw mi jaaykat yu Sidon, yiy jàll géej, feesaloon nañu la. Te ca ndox mu bare, peppin Sikor, ngóobug dex gi, mooy woon ay dencam; te mu doonoon péncum xeeti xeet yi. Ruslul, yaw Sidon; ndaxte géej gi wax na, kàttanu géej gi sax nee: “Man mettituma ngir jur, te juruma doom; xooluma góor-gu-ndaw yi, te yaruma janq yi.” Ni ñu metti bu ñu déggee xibaaru Misra, noonu lañuy metti lool bu ñu déggee xibaaru Tir. Jàllleen dem Tarsis; jooyleen, yéen dëkkkat dunu bi. Ndax kii mooy seen dëkk bu bég, bi njàlbéenam jógée ay fan yu yàgg-a-yàgg? Ay tànkam lañuy yóbbu ba fu sore ngir mu dëkkuwaay. Ana ku fexe pexe mii ci kaw Tir, dëkk bi di sol buur, bi ay jaaykatam di buur, te ay sacckatam di ñi ñu màggal ci suuf si? Aji Boroom gàngoor yi moo ko dogal, ngir toroxal réyréylu bépp ndam, te yóbbu ci suufeeku ñi ñu màggal yépp ci suuf si. Jàllal sa réew ni dex, yaw jigéenu Tarsis; doole amulati. Mu yókk na loxoom ci kaw géej, mu yëngal nguur yi; Aji Boroom joxe na ndigal ci kaw dëkk buy jënd di jaay, ngir alag ay tataam yu dëgër. Mu ne: “Dootuloo bégati, yaw janq ju ñu sonal, doom ju jigéen ju Sidon; jogal, jàll dem Kittim; fa sax du la am noppaliku.” Xoolal réewu Kalde yi; xeet woowu nekkoonul, ba ker Assur sampal ko ñi dëkk ci màndiŋ mi. Ñu taxawal ay toweram, ñu yékkati ay kër yu magam; te mu yóbbu ko ca yàquwaay. Yéen gaal yu Tarsis, jooyleen, ndaxte seen kàttan yàqu na. Te dina am ca bés booba ne, dees na fàtte Tir diirub juróom-ñaar-fukk at, ni ay fanu benn buur; gannaaw jeexital juróom-ñaar-fukk at yooyu, Tir dina woy ni jigéen ju di soxna. Jàppal xalam, wër dëkk ba, yaw soxna si ñu fàtte; defal taalif yu neex, woyal woy yu bare, ngir ñu fàttali la. Te dina am gannaaw jeexital juróom-ñaar-fukk at yooyu ne, Aji Boroom dina seeti Tir, te mu dellu ca peyam, te dina soxnaal ak bépp nguurug àddina ci kaw suuf si. Waaye jaayam ak peyam dina doon lu sellaloo Aji Boroom; deesuko denc, te deesuko dajale, ndaxte jaayam dina nekk ñi dëkk fa kanam Aji Boroom, ngir ñu lekk ba suur, te ngir ay yére yu sax. Esayi 23:1–18.

Sister White writes: “All the great events and solemn transactions of Old Testament history have been, and are, repeating themselves in the church in these last days.”

Sœur White bind na ne: “Lépp luy xew-xewu mag yi ak jëf yu réy te di lu tedd ci taarixu Testament Bu Yàgg bi am nañu, te dañuy dellu di am ci kërceen gi ci fan yu mujj yii.”

Isaiah twenty-three addresses the prophetic relationships of the United Nations, the Papacy, the United States and Islam. In order to recognize these truths certain symbols in the chapter must be defined by Inspiration. Once the symbols are defined, the sequence of events is fairly straightforward. The symbols in the chapter that need to be defined are:

Esayi fanweer ak ñett wax na ci jëfandikookat yu wax ci àddina bi diggante Mbooloom Xeet yi, Pape bi, Etazini ak Lislaam. Ngir xam dëgg yii, war nañu teg leeral benn ay misaal yu nekk ci saar bi, ni Ko xel mu Sell mi waxe ko. Bu ñu tekkee misaal yi, toftalinu xew-xew yi dafay leer bu baax. Misaal yi nekk ci saar bi te soxla nga ñu faram ci njàngale gu wër aŋkorooyu yii di:

The Burden, Tyre, The harlot, The Assyrian, The land of the Chaldeans, Towers and Palaces, Tarshish, The Seed of Sihor, The Land of Chittim, Zidon, The Merchants City, The report of Egypt and the report of Tyre, The Howling, A Daughter, Seventy Years, The Days of One King, Forgetting, and Remembering

Yëg bi, Tir, jigéenu jaaykat bi, Asiriyaankat bi, suufu Kalde yi, kër yu kawe yi ak palàasi yi, Tarsis, askanu Sixor, suufu Kittim, Sidon, dëkkub jaaykat yi, xibaaru Misra ak xibaaru Tir, jooy gu metti gi, doom ju jigéen ji, juróom-ñaar-fukk at, fan yu benn buur, fàtte, ak fàttaliku

The word “burden” in verse one identifies a prophecy of doom against the kingdom of Tyre.

Kàddu biñ wax ne “yéen” ci benn kàddug waajal bi jëkk moo xamle ab yégleb alag ci kaw nguurug Tir.

Burden: H4853—From H5375; a burden; specifically tribute, or (abstractly) porterage; figuratively an utterance, chiefly a doom, especially singing; mental, desire: – burden, carry away, prophecy, X they set, song, tribute.

Yebóot bi: H4853—Jóge ci H5375; yebóot; bu gaaroon, galag, walla (ci anam gu xel) yebóotug porterage; ci taalif, wax ju ñuy wax, li gën a doon àtteb musiba, rawatina woy; ci xel, bëgg-bëgg: – yebóot, yóbbu, waxu yonent, X ñoo ko teg, woy, galag.

The burden of Tyre is one of many passages in the Bible where the final judgment of the Roman Catholic church is identified. A “burden” by use and definition is a prophecy, and primarily a prophecy of doom. There are eleven “burdens” in Isaiah and eight times the word is used to describe a burden carried on the shoulders. The eleven times the word “burden” is represented as prophecy of doom are Isaiah 13:1; 15:1; 17:1; 19:1; 21:1, 11, 13; 22:1; 30:6 and of course chapter twenty-three where we find the burden of Tyre. It is worthwhile to place all of Isaiah’s prophecies of doom together in order to evaluate which power is being represented in the last days. Eleven prophecies of doom are difficult to cover at one time, so I will give a brief definition of each doom prophecy to set the context for chapter twenty-three.

Yëf Tyre mooy benn ci bari xaaj yu nekk ci Biibël bi, fu ñu jàppale fay àtteb mujjug kanamug kaniis gu Room gu Katolik. “Yëf” ci ni ñuy ko jëfandikoo ak ci ni ñu koy tekki, mooy ab waxu Yàlla, te ci li gën a bare mooy waxu musiba. Am na fukk ak benn i “yëf” ci Esayi, te juróom-ñett yoon baat bi jëfandikoo nañu ko ngir melal yëf buy ñu yékkati ci gati yi. Fukk ak benn yoon yu baat bi “yëf” di wone waxu musiba mooy Esayi 13:1; 15:1; 17:1; 19:1; 21:1, 11, 13; 22:1; 30:6 ak, lu leer, saraxalekat ñaar-fukk ak ñett fa nu fekk yëfu Tyre. Dafay am njariñ ñu boole benn yoon bépp waxi musiba yi Esayi wax, ngir seet ba xam kàttan gii ngay tegtal ci fan yu mujj yi. Fukk ak benn i waxi musiba yu am solo yooyu jafe na leen laaj ci benn yoon, moo tax dinaa joxe ab tekki bu gàtt bu bépp waxu musiba, ngir teg leeral ci saraxalekat ñaar-fukk ak ñett.

In chapter thirteen the prophecy of doom against Babylon is modern Babylon at the end of the world, which is the whore of Rome that is also illustrated in chapter seventeen of the book of Revelation.

Ci ñaareelu fukki saar bi ak benn, kàddug yëgleb alag bi ci Babilon mooy Babilon bu bees bi ci mujju àddina, muy jigéenu njaalookat bu Room, mi itam ñu nettali ci ñaareelu fukki saar bi ak juróom-ñaari ci téereb Peeñu gi.

And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will show unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication. So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. Revelation 17:1–5.

Noonu benn malaaka yi juróom-ñaariñ ñi yoroon juróom-ñaariñ bëñ yi ñëw, wax ak man ne ma: «Ñëwal fii; dinaa la won atteb jigéen ju ñaaw ju mag jii toog ci kaw ndox yu bare yi; moom la buur yi ci suuf si def ak njaloo, te waa suuf si màndi ak biiñu njaloom.» Noonu yóbbu ma ci Xel mi ca màndiŋ ma; te gis naa jigéen ju toog ci kaw rab wu xonq, fees dell ak tur yu xas Yàlla, am juróom-ñaariñ bopp ak fukki wàll. Jigéen ja soloon na mbubb mu xonq-cuur ak xonq, te taaru ak wurus ak doj yu tedd ak per, yor kaasu wurus ci loxoom, fees dell ak lu bon ak sobey njaloom. Te ci jëfrontam amoon na tur bu ñu bind: «SUTURA, BABILON BU MAG BI, NDEYU JIGEEN YU ÑAAW YI AK YËF YU BON YI CI SUUF SI.» Peeñu Yoxaan 17:1–5.

I need to digress a little. The purpose of the study of the prophecy of Tyre is ultimately to align the prophetic history of the United States with that of the Seventh-day Adventist church. We will show that the government of the United States is one horn on the lamb-like beast of Revelation thirteen and that Protestantism that came out of the Dark Ages was the other horn. The horn of Protestantism became Millerite Adventism at the point the Protestants of the United States rejected the first angel’s message. When we have that in place, we will show that the history of the Protestant horn and the history of the Republican horn run parallel to one another and possess parallel prophetic characteristics. After all they are on the same beast representing that both horns are contemporary to one another. I will illustrate one example of this parallel of the horns of church and state in the United States. They both ‘forget’ in their own way.

Dama maa jéexal tuuti. Njariñu njàngum waxu yonent bi ci mbirum Tir, ci mujj, mooy méngale jaar-jaaru yonent bu États-Unis ak bu kërceenug Adventiste du Septième Jour. Dañuy wone ne nguurug États-Unis mooy benn geenu mbëj mi mel ni xar mi nekk ci Apocalypse fukk ak ñett, te Protestantisma bi génn ci Jamono Ju Lëndëm ji mooy beneen geenu gi. Geenu Protestantisma bi nekkoon Millerite Adventism ba ca jamonoy bi Protestants yu États-Unis bañee yégleb malaaka bi jëkk. Bu loolu taxawee, dañuy wone ne jaar-jaaru geenu Protestant bi ak jaar-jaaru geenu Républicain bi dañuy dawandoo ak seen bopp te am nañ ay melokaani yonent yu méngoo. Ndax, ci gëm-gëm, ñoom ñaar ñépp a ngi ci benn mbëj, loolu di wone ne ñaari geenu yaa ngi dëkkandoo ci benn jamono. Dinaa melaxal benn misaal ci boobu dawandikoo bu nekk ci diggante geeni kërce ak nguur ci États-Unis. Ñoom ñaar ñépp dañuy “fàtte” ci seen anam.

Isaiah twenty-three marks the prophetic point that the papal power is forgotten for seventy years, and in those seventy symbolic years men forget the papacy and why the Dark Ages are called the Dark Ages. The Protestant horn’s motto when they separated from the Catholic church was the Bible and the Bible alone. They forgot that the Bible informs us who the papacy really is. They forgot the message enshrined in the sacred document they were entrusted with, and professed to be the champion defenders of.

Esayi 23 mooy noppi na taxawaayu yonent bi ne doole baapal bi dees na ko fàtte ñaar-fukk ak juróom-ñaar at, te ci ñaari-fukk ak juróom-ñaar at yooyu tegu ci misaal, nit ñi dañuy fàtte baapal bi ak lu tax Jamonoy Lëndëm ñi koy wax Jamonoy Lëndëm. Motto bu benn kaatant bu Protestant yi mooy bi ñu tasoo ak kërceen Katolik bi mooy: Biibël bi, te Biibël bi rekk. Dañoo fàtte ne Biibël bi moo nu xamal ku baapal bi di dëgg-dëgg. Dañoo fàtte yëgle bi ñu tëj ci binde bu sell bi ñu dénk woon, te ñuy wax ne ñoom ñoo di ay sàmm yu mag yu koy aar.

“Those who become confused in their understanding of the word, who fail to see the meaning of antichrist, will surely place themselves on the side of antichrist. There is no time now for us to assimilate with the world. Daniel is standing in his lot and in his place. The prophecies of Daniel and of John are to be understood. They interpret each other. They give to the world truths which everyone should understand. These prophecies are to be witness in the world. By their fulfillment in these last days, they will explain themselves.Kress Collection, 105.

“Ñi ñëw ci njàngum kàddu bi ba jaaxle, te duñu gis li antikrist di tekki, faw dinañu taxaw ci wetu antikrist. Léegi amul waxtu ngir nu boole sunu bopp ak àddina. Daniel mooy taxaw ci wàllam ak ci berabam. War nañu xam waxi wax yu Daniel ak Yowaana. Ñoom dañuy firndeelante seen bopp. Ñoom dañuy jox àddina dëgg yu kenn ku nekk war a xam. Waxi wax yii war nañu nekk seede ci àddina. Jaarale ko ci seeni matug yépp ci fan yii mujj, dinañu leeral seen bopp.” Kress Collection, 105.

Likewise, the Republican horn representing the government of the United States was to be by the people and for the people, but the citizens of the United States have also forgotten the sacred document that they were entrusted with. That sacred document is the Constitution of the United States and the motto of the government that was designed to be for the people was the separation of church and state. They have forgotten the message of the Constitution they were entrusted with, and professed defenders of.

Noonu itam, bëñu wax ne bëccëg Réewum-Republiig bi, miy tegtalu nguurug Mbootaayu États-Unis, waroon na ne nguur gi bokk ci nit ñi te jariñ nit ñi; waaye itam, waa États-Unis fàtte nañu këyit gu sell gi ñu dénk woon. Këyit googu gu sell mooy Constitution of the United States, te màndarga nguur ga ñu tabaxoon ngir mu nekku ngir nit ñi mooy tasare diggante kërceen ak nguur. Fàtte nañu ndigalu Constitution bi ñu dénk woon, te ñoom ci seen bopp daan nañu wax ne ñooy aji sàmmam.

“And let it be remembered, it is the boast of Rome that she never changes. The principles of Gregory VII and Innocent III are still the principles of the Roman Catholic Church. And had she but the power, she would put them in practice with as much vigor now as in past centuries. Protestants little know what they are doing when they propose to accept the aid of Rome in the work of Sunday exaltation. While they are bent upon the accomplishment of their purpose, Rome is aiming to re-establish her power, to recover her lost supremacy. Let the principle once be established in the United States that the church may employ or control the power of the state; that religious observances may be enforced by secular laws; in short, that the authority of church and state is to dominate the conscience, and the triumph of Rome in this country is assured.

“Te nañu fàttaliku ne, mooy mbokku Rom ne mënul soppeeku. Tekkiin yu Gregory VII ak Innocent III, ñoo tey itam di tekkiini Mbooloom Katolik bu Rom. Te bu amoon rekk kàttan, dina leen jëfe ak doole ju mel ni ci at-yoon yu weesu. Protestaa yi xamuwuñu bu baax li ñuy def, bu ñuy jébbal nangu ndimbal Rom ci liggéeyu yékkati Bésub-Dimbal. Bi ñuy sax ci matal seen mébet, Rom moom dafay fexeel delloo ay dooleem, ba feyy ci nguuram gu réy ga mu yàqu woon. Bu benn yoonu taxaw ci Réewum Iniw di Etazuni ne mbooloo mën na jëfandikoo walla yor dooley réew mi; ne ñu mën na sàkku toppal yëngu-yëngu diine ci yooni àddina; ci gàttal, ne sañ-sañu mbooloo ak réew war na noot xel ak yéene nit, ndamum Rom ci réew mii dina wóor.”

“God’s word has given warning of the impending danger; let this be unheeded, and the Protestant world will learn what the purposes of Rome really are, only when it is too late to escape the snare. She is silently growing into power. Her doctrines are exerting their influence in legislative halls, in the churches, and in the hearts of men. She is piling up her lofty and massive structures in the secret recesses of which her former persecutions will be repeated. Stealthily and unsuspectedly she is strengthening her forces to further her own ends when the time shall come for her to strike. All that she desires is vantage ground, and this is already being given her. We shall soon see and shall feel what the purpose of the Roman element is. Whoever shall believe and obey the word of God will thereby incur reproach and persecution.” The Great Controversy, 581.

“Kàddu Yàlla artu na ci musiba gu bëgg a xëy; bu ñu bañee déglu artu woowu, àddina protestante bi dina xam li Rom bëggoon ci dëgg-dëgg, waaye bu yàgg ba mu weesu ngir rëcc ci sëq bi. Moom, ci sutura te ci noppi, muy màgg ci kàttan. Ay njàngaleem di joxe seen doole ci kër yu bind yoon, ci yëngu-yënguy mboolooy gëmkat yi, ak ci xol yi nit ñi. Muy dajale ay tabax yu kawe te réy, yu ay barab yu nëbbu nekk ci seen biir, fa ay fitnaam yu njëkk di dellu ci. Ci sutura te kenn xamul, muy gëna dëgërël ay dooleem ngir matal ay mébétam boppam bu waxtu jotee ngir mu dóor. Lépp lu mu bëgg mooy suufu gu mu man a taxaw ci kaw, te loolu nag dees ko may ba noppi. Fi ak kanam dinañu gis te dinañu yég li mbirum Rom ak i nitam di jëm. Ku gëm te topp Kàddu Yàlla, loolu dina ko indi ñaawal ak fitna.” The Great Controversy, 581.

If you can locate any dictionary that was published before 1950, and look up “scarlet colored woman” or some variation of that phrase from Revelation seventeen, every one of those pre-1950 dictionaries identifies that the Roman Catholic church is the whore of Revelation seventeen. The United States, Revelation thirteen’s two-horned earth-beast forgets its past, whether it be the horn of Protestantism or the horn of Republicanism. Both of these institutions came about from the protest against the religious tyranny of the papacy and the political tyranny of the kings that supported her, or as the Bible says, the kings that “committed fornication” with her. Before we take up Isaiah twenty-three, we will briefly give an overview of the other ten times Isaiah identifies a ‘prophecy of doom,’ for all of the eleven “burdens” are just that.

Bu fekkee beneen diksyoner buñu génne woon bala 1950, te nga seet ci baat yi “jigéen ju sol xonq” walla benn soppikoom ci wax ju Jóotu ndaw ñaareel fukki ñaar ci Peeñ mi, kon képp ku ci nekk ci diksyoner yooyu bala 1950, dañuy wax ne kërg yoonu Room Katolik mooy jigéen ju di njalooj ji ci Peeñ mi, Jóotu fukki ñaar. États-Unis, rab wu dëkk suuf wu ñaari geñ ci Jóotu fukki ñett, fàtte na jamono jëm kanamam, bu dee geñu Protestantisma walla geñu Républicanisma. Ñaari mbooloo yii ñoom ñépp ci bàyyikooñu nañu ci naxar ci nootug diine gu pàppaas bi ak nootug politig bu buur ya doon taxawal, walla ni Biibël bi waxe, buur yi “def njaloo ak moom.” Bala nu jël Isaaya ñaar-fukk ak ñett, dinañu jox ab xool bu gàtt ci beneen fukki yoon yi Isaaya tuddee “kàddu alkande,” ndax ñépp ñaar-fukk ak benn “yëf yu diis” yi, loolu lañu doon.

Isaiah thirteen is the burden of Babylon in the “last days.” Babylon, though controlled and directed by the Catholic church in the last days is made up of three powers that lead the world to Armageddon in chapter sixteen of Revelation. In chapter thirteen’s prophecy of doom against modern Babylon there are three powers represented; Babylon, Lucifer and Assyria representing the beast (Assyria), the dragon (Lucifer) and the false prophet (Babylon). Assyria and Babylon are the two desolating powers God employed to punish ancient Israel and Assyria came first taking the northern ten tribes into captivity and thereafter Babylon took the southern two tribes of Judah.

Esayi bés ñatt fukk ak ñett mooy yëgleb Babilon ci “fan yu mujj yi.” Babilon, doonte ne Kàttig bu Katolig moo koy yor te di ko jiite ci fan yu mujj yi, dafay am ñetti doole yu àddina ji jiite ba ca Armagedon ci ñettelu fukk ak juróom-benn saraxetu Révélation. Ci kàddug wax ci alkande gu Esayi 13 gi, biy yëgle bàkkaar ak texe ci Babilon bu jamono jii, ñetti doole a fa teewoo: Babilon, Lusifeer ak Asiri; ñuy teewlu rab wi (Asiri), njaay mi (Lusifeer) ak yonent bu dëggul bi (Babilon). Asiri ak Babilon ñoo nekkoon ñaari doole yu yàq te Yàlla jëfandikoo ngir mbugal Israayil gu mag gi; Asiri moo njëkk, jël fukk gi ak ñaari xeetu bëj-gànnaar yi ca njaam ga, te gannaaw loolu Babilon jël ñaari xeet yi dëkk Yuda ca bëj-saalum.

Israel is a scattered sheep; the lions have driven him away: first the king of Assyria hath devoured him; and last this Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon hath broken his bones. Therefore thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will punish the king of Babylon and his land, as I have punished the king of Assyria. Jeremiah 50:17, 18.

Israyel mooy xar mu tasaaroo la; gaayi rab yi dañu ko dàqal. Bu njëkk buur Asiri moo ko lekk; te mujj Nebukadnesar, buur Babilon bii, dafa damm ay yaxam. Moo tax ni Boroom gàngoor yi, Yàlla Israyel, waxe: Gisal, dinaa mbugal buur Babilon ak suufam, ni ma mbugale woon buur Asiri. Yeremi 50:17, 18.

First Assyria took the northern ten tribes of Israel into captivity and thereafter Babylon took the southern two tribes of Judah into captivity. Both of these captivities were fulfillment of Leviticus twenty-six’s “seven times.” The “seven times” of Leviticus was the very first “time prophecy” William Miller discovered, and it identifies that when Assyria captured the northern tribe it marked the beginning of a scattering that continued for twenty-five hundred and twenty years. That period began at their captivity in 723BC and ended at the “time of the end” in 1798. The southern tribes were taken by Babylon in 677BC, beginning the “seven times” against Judah which ended at the same point as the 2300-year prophecy of Daniel eight verse fourteen, on October 22, 1844. Assyria and Babylon fulfilled the same purpose of punishment against the rebellion of God’s people, but the punishment was first carried out by Assyria and then by Babylon.

Ñaata, Asiri mooñ na fukk kabila yu bëj-sin yi Israyil, jël leen ci njaam; gannaaw gi, Babilon moo jël ñaari kabila yu bëj-sin yi Yuda, jël leen itam ci njaam. Ñaari njël gi yépp dafa doon matug wax ji ci Lewit gu ñaar-fukk ak juróom-benn bi wax ne “juróom-ñaar yoon.” “Juróom-ñaar yoon” yi ci Lewit mooy ab “yonent gu jëm ci waxtu” gu njëkk ga William Miller gis, te mooy wone ne, bi Asiri jàppée kabila yu bëj-sin yi, loolu mooy tàmbaliw tasaare bu sax di dem diirub ñaari junni ak juróom-ñaar téeméer ak ñaar-fukk at. Waxtu woowu tàmbalee na ca seen njël ga ci atum 723 ba laata Kirist, te mujje ca “waxtuw mujj” wa ci 1798. Kabila yu bëj-sin yi ci bëj-gannaar, Babilon moo leen jël ci atum 677 ba laata Kirist, di tàmbali “juróom-ñaar yoon” yi jëm ci Yuda, yi yamoon ca benn bérab bi ak yonentub 2300 at yi nekk ci Daniel juróom-ñett aaya ñent, ci 22 Oktoobar 1844. Asiri ak Babilon dañoo matale woon benn mébet ci mbugal jëm ci ngëmadi doxalin askanu Yàlla, waaye mbugal moomu, Asiri moo ko njëkka yëngal, te mu topp ci Babilon.

In the prophetic relationship of the three powers in chapter thirteen Babylon is the image of Assyria, for she came after but did the same work against God’s people.

Ci diggantek yonent ñaari doole yi ci saar bi fukk ak ñett, Babilon mooy nataalu Asiri, ndaxte moom dafa ñëw gannaaw, waaye def na woon jëf ju mel ni jëf ji muy def ci kaw askanu Yàlla.

In chapter fifteen, the burden against Moab is against the Protestant churches.

Ci tereelu fukk, yëggale bi ci kaw Moab mooy ci kaw kërgëm yu Protestaaŋ.

“This description of Moab represents the churches that have become like Moab. They have not stood at their post of duty as faithful sentinels. They have not cooperated with the heavenly intelligences by exercising their God-given ability to do the will of God, pressing back the powers of darkness, and using every power God has given them to advance truth and righteousness in our world. They have a knowledge of the truth, but they have not practiced what they know.” Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, volume 4, 1159.

«Njàngale bii ci Moab dafay tegtal mboolooy gëm-gëm yi nekk ni Moab. Duñu taxawoon ci seen bérab bu war, ni ay wottukat yu takku. Duñu jàppalanteek xel yu asamaan yi, dajale seen kàttan gu leen Yàlla may ngir def coobareem, di delloo dooley lëndëm yi ginnaaw, te di jëfandikoo bépp kàttan gu Yàlla jox leen ngir yëngal dëgg ak njubte ci sunu àddina. Am nañu xam-xam bu dëgg bi, waaye jëfe wuñu li ñu xam.» Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, volume 4, 1159.

The Protestant church that has fallen is the church that continued to walk with the Lord when the rest of Protestantism fled at the second angel’s message. Moab is Adventism, the fallen Protestant horn.

Mbooloom Protestante bi daanu mooy mboolem gëm-gëm gu sax ci dox ak Boroom bi, ba ca beneen yépp ci Protestantism dawée ndax yégleb malaaka ñaareelu bi. Moab mooy Adventism, geenu Protestante gu daanu gi.

Chapter seventeen is about Damascus, and it is identified as a city that is taken away. A city is a symbol of a kingdom and the kingdom that is taken away in the “last days” is the United States.

Saar bi fukk ak juróom-ñaar mi jëm na ci Damas, te waxees na ci moom ne dëkk la buñi yóbbu. Dëkk, mandarga la nguur, te nguur gi ñuy yóbbu ci “bés yu mujj yi” mooy Etats-Unis.

Chapter nineteen is the prophecy of doom against Egypt, representing the United Nations and the whole world.

Xaaj bu fukk ak juróom-ñett mooy yëgle gu bon ci kaw Misra, te muy màndarga Mbootaayu Xeet yi ak àddina si bépp.

The next three prophecies of doom in chapter twenty-one are against the terrible desert land of the south, Dumah and Arabia. These three prophecies of doom identify Islam, in agreement with the three woes of Revelation 8:13.

Ñetti ñatt yi ci ay musiba yi ci ay waxi yëgle yu nekk ci saar ñaar-fukk ak benn bi, jëm nañu ci suuf su metti, dëkkuwaayu màndiŋ ma ci bëj-gànnaaru bëj-saalum, Dumah ak Arabi. Ñetti waxi yëgle yu musiba yi dañuy won Islam, te lëkkaloo nañu ak ñetti wo yi nekk ci Peeñu 8:13.

The prophecy of doom in chapter twenty-two portrays the separation of the Laodicean Adventists from the Philadelphian Adventists at the Sunday law.

Yëgleb alàggu ci ñaar-fukk ak ñaarle bi day woneñee tassaroog Adãwantisiy Laodise yi ak Adãwantisiy Filadelfi yi ca yoonu Dibeer ba.

And then in chapter thirty we find the burden of the beasts of the south, which is a second illustration of the rebellion of Laodicean Adventists. Bringing all the burdens of Isaiah together virtually addresses every prophetic player in the “last days.” I am selecting Isaiah twenty-three in order to demonstrate that the history of the United States, as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy, reigns from 1798 to the Sunday law.

Ba noppi ci saraxu rab yu bokk ci bëst yu bëj-gànnaar yi, te loolu mooy ñaareelu misaal bu fës ngir wone ngëmadiyoo Adventist yi ci Laodise. Boo dajale lépp saraxi Esayi, lu ni mel dafa jëm ci bépp kilifa gu wax ci yonent ci “fan yu mujj yi.” Damay tànn Esayi ñaar-fukk ak ñett ngir won ne jaar-jaaru États-Unis, ni mu nekk buurug juróomeelu buuru ci yonenti Biibël, di nguur dale ko ci 1798 ba ca yoonu Dibéer.

Because “each of the ancient prophets spoke less for their own time than for ours, so that their prophesying is in force for us,” every prophetic utterance is addressing the events at the end of the world. This truth combined with the fact that “all the books of the Bible meet and end” in the book of Revelation, establishes the book of Revelation as the point of reference for aligning the prophetic testimony about the events at the end of the world.

Ndaxte “kenn ci yonent yu yàgg ya waxul woon lu gën a jëm ci jamonoam bopp, waaye ci sunu jamono, ba tax na seen kàddug wax ci kanam nekk dooleel ngir nun,” kon bépp waxu yonent jublu na ci xew-xew yi di ame ci mujju àddina. Dëgg googu, booleek dëgg bi ne “téere yu Bibil bi yépp daje te mujj” ci téereb Peeñ mi, daldi tax Téereb Peeñ mi nekk buntu tegtal ngir ràññee seede yonent yi ci mbirum xew-xew yi ci mujju àddina.

In the seventeenth chapter of Revelation, we see the great whore that commits fornication with the kings of the earth and her final judgment.

Ci saraxaleelu Kàddug Yàlla, gis nañu jigéen ju ndawul ju mag ji di njaalook ak buur yi ci suuf, ak àtteb mujjam.

And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will show unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters: With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication. Revelation 17:1, 2.

Noonu benn ci juróom-ñaari malaaka ya yoroon juróom-ñaari koppi ya ñëw wax ak man ne ma: «Ñëwal fii; dinaa la won mbugalu jigéen ju bon ju mag, ji toog ci kaw ndox yu bari, te buur yi ci suuf si def nañu ak moom njaaloo, te waa suuf si màndi ak biiñu njaaloom.» Peeñu Yàlla 17:1, 2

The prophets never contradict one another.

Yonent yi duñu bàyyi seen bopp ci jàppante mukk.

And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets. For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. 1 Corinthians 14:32, 33.

Te xelu yonent yi mi ngi topp yonent yi. Ndaxte Yàlla du boroom jaxasoo, waaye mooy boroom jàmm, ni ko nekke ci mboolem kërk yi yu gaayi Yàlla. 1 Korent 14:32, 33.

At the end of the world “the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters,” the great whore with “whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication,” the great whore that has made “the inhabitants of the earth” drunk “with the wine of her fornication;” is represented by Isaiah as the “harlot” who is forgotten for “the days of one king,” or seventy prophetic years. When the seventy years conclude Tyre “shall commit fornication with all the kingdoms of the world.” Isaiah’s harlot is John’s great whore. Isaiah’s harlot and John’s whore represent the Roman Catholic church, for a woman is a symbol of a church in God’s Word.

Ci mujjug àddina, “atte njubum jigéen ju mag juy gànc te toog ci kaw ndox yu bare,” moom jigéen ju mag ji “bu buur yi ci suuf dëkke dañoo def njaaloo ak moom,” jigéen ju mag ji def ne “waa àddina” màndi “ak biiñu njaaloom;” Esayi bind na ko ni “ndey-ju-gànc” ji ñu fàtte “fan yu benn buur,” walla juróom-ñaar-fukk at yu yonent. Bu juróom-ñaar-fukk at yooyu mattee, Tir “dina def njaaloo ak mboolem nguur yi ci àddina si.” Ndey-ju-gànc ji Esayi wax mooy jigéen ju mag ji Yowaana wax. Ndey-ju-gànc ji Esayi ak jigéen ju gànc ji Yowaana diir mooy ndawsi katolik Room, ndaxte jigéen moy màndarga kërceen ci Kàddu Yàlla.

Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church: For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church. Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband. Ephesians 5:22–33.

Jabar yi, suusaluleen seen bopp seen jëkkër yu leen moom, ni ngeen koy defal Boroom bi. Ndaxte jëkkër mooy boppu jabar, ni Kirist itam di boppu kërce gi, te mooy Musalkatu yaram wi. Kon nag, ni kërce gi di toppoo Kirist, noonu itam na jabar yi topp seen jëkkër ci lépp. Yéen jëkkër yi, sopp-leen seen jabar, ni Kirist itam sopp-e kërce gi ba joxe boppam ndax moom, ngir sellal ko te setal ko ci sangu ndox mu ànd ak Kàddu gi, ngir man koo taxawal ci kanamam muy kërce gu tedd, gu amul benn tuuma, mbaa benn xott, mbaa leneen lu ni mel; waaye ngir mu doon gu sell te amul benn gàkk. Noonu la góor yi war a sopp seen jabar ni seen yaram ci seen bopp. Ku sopp sa jabar, sa bopp la sopp. Ndaxte amul kenn ku mas a bañ sa yaram; waaye day ko yar te fonk ko, ni Boroom bi itam di defal kërce gi. Ndaxte nun ay céram lañu ci yaramam, ci suufam, te ci yaxam. Loolu moo tax góor dina bàyyi baayam ak ndeyam, taq ci jabaram, ñoom ñaar di nekk benn yaram. Këyit gu réy la lii; waaye maa ngi wax ci mbirum Kirist ak kërce gi. Waaye nak, ku nekk ci yéen na sopp jabaram ni boppam, te jabar itam na ragal jëkkëram. Efees 5:22–33.

The apostle Paul identifies that the church of Christ is prophetically represented as a woman. Therefore, a woman in prophecy is a church, but Christ’s church is “holy and without blemish.” An unholy church is represented as an unholy woman, thus Isaiah identifies a harlot and John a whore. They represent the papacy as a whore and God’s church is a virgin.

Ndaw Póol mi di ndawum Yàlla xamale ne kërceenug Kirist dañoo koy melal ci waxu yonent yi ni jigéen. Kon nag, jigéen ci waxu yonent mooy kërceen, waaye kërceenug Kirist “sell na te amul benn sikk.” Kërceen gu sellul dees na ko melal ni jigéen ju sellul; moo tax Esayi tudde ko njaaloo, te Yowaana tudde ko jigéenu ndaw. Ñoom dañuy tegtal papaas bi ni jigéenu ndaw, te kërceenug Yàlla mooy janq bu set.

For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. 2 Corinthians 11:2.

Ndaxte dama leen bëgg ak bëgg gu sell gu jóge ci Yàlla; ndaxte dama leen jox benn góor rekk, ngir ma man a wone leen Kirist ni janq bu set, bu teey. 2 Korent 11:2.

Not only is God’s church represented as a virgin, but she is espoused to only one husband. Tyre and John’s great whore commit fornication with the kings of the earth. The Catholic church has relations with several men, not one. Daniel informs us the kings are kingdoms.

Daxul Yàlla rekkul a ñu misaale ni ab janq bu set, waaye itam ñu jébbal ko ci benn jëkkër rekk. Tir ak jigéen ju mag ju ñaw ju Yowaana wax di njaaloo ak buur yi ci suuf si. Kërgëstu Katolig am na jokkoo ak ay góor yu bare, du kenn ku benn. Danyeel xamal na nu ne buur yi ay nguur lañu.

This is the dream; and we will tell the interpretation thereof before the king. Thou, O king, art a king of kings: for the God of heaven hath given thee a kingdom, power, and strength, and glory. And wheresoever the children of men dwell, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the heaven hath he given into thine hand, and hath made thee ruler over them all. Thou art this head of gold. And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth. And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iron that breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise. Daniel 2:36–40.

Lii mooy gént gi; te nun dinañu wax tekkiinu ko ci kanam buur bi. Yaw, é buur, yaa di buurub buur yi; ndax Yàlla Aji Asamaan jox na la nguur, kàttan, doole, ak ndam. Te fu nit ñi dëkk fépp, rab yi ci tool yi ak picci asamaan yi, jébbal na leen sa loxo, te def na la nguurkat ci seen kaw yépp. Yaw yaa di boppu wurus wii. Te gannaaw yaw dina taxaw beneen nguur bu gën la suufeel, te beneen ñetteelu nguur bu xonq, bu di jiite ci suuf sépp. Te ñeenteelu nguur gi dina am doole ni weñ; ndaxte weñ dafa damm ay xaaj te daan lépp; te ni weñ wi di damm yooyu yépp, noonu la di damm ay xaaj te rébb. Daniel 2:36–40.

In Daniel two, the kingdoms of Bible prophecy are identified and explained. As Daniel explains the dream to Nebuchadnezzar, he informs Nebuchadnezzar that he is the head of gold. The head of gold is a king, but a king represents a kingdom. The Roman Catholic church is the great harlot that commits fornication with all the kings of the earth at the end of seventy prophetic years. The kings are symbolic of men, and Tyre is an impure woman. A woman is a church, a whore is an unholy church; a man is a king and a king is a kingdom. A woman is a church and a king is a state. The unlawful relationship of these two entities represents spiritual fornication.

Ci ñaareel téereb Daniel, dañuy jëfandikoo te leeral ay nguur yu waxu Yàlla ci kàddug wax ci jamono yi. Bi Daniel di firndeel Nebukadnetsar gént ga, mu xamal ko ne moom mooy boppu wurus bi. Boppu wurus bi buur la, waaye buur dafay tegtal itam ab nguur. Kërgëm Room bu Katolik mooy jigéen ju ndawte ju mag ji di def njaalook ak bépp buur bu àddina si ci mujju juróom-ñaari fukki at yu wax ci jamono yi. Ay buur yooyu tegtalu nit lañu, te Tir mooy jigéen ju setul. Jigéen mooy mbooloom gëmkat yi, ndawte mooy mbooloo mu sellul; góor mooy buur te buur mooy nguur. Jigéen mooy mbooloom gëmkat yi te buur mooy réew. Jëfandoo gu yoonul gi ci diggante ñaari mbir yii mooy tegtal njaalook gu xel mu sell.

The Constitution of the United States is a divine document that enshrines the necessity of keeping these two entities separate. Though we are not yet finished with identifying Tyre as the Roman Catholic church, it seems appropriate at this point to address another symbol in Isaiah twenty-three that explains the symbolism of man and woman—church and state.

Sàrtu Réewum Bennoo Réewi Amerig mooy benn kéyit bu Yàlla wone te samp ci biir am solo gu mag ne war nañu bàyyi ñaari mbir yii ñu weccoo. Doonte saxtewul nu ba noppi ci jëfandikoo Tir ngir tekki ne mooy kanam Kàngiise Room Kaatolik, dafa mel ni baax na ci xàjjaat bii nu jëf ci beneen aalam ci Esayi ñaar-fukk ak ñett, miy leeral misaalu góor ak jigéen—kàngiis ak nguur.

Behold the land of the Chaldeans; this people was not, till the Assyrian founded it for them that dwell in the wilderness: they set up the towers thereof, they raised up the palaces thereof; and he brought it to ruin. Isaiah 23:13.

Xooluleen réewum Kalde yi; askan wii nekku woonul, ba keroog Asiriyee ngi ko sosal ñi dëkk ci màndiŋ mi; ñoom taxawal nañu ay kër yu kawe yi, yékkati nañu ay kër-nguuru yi; te mu yóbbu ko ci yàqub. Esayi 23:13.

In the verse, the Assyrian founded the land of the Chaldeans and set up both “towers” and “palaces.” The Assyrian is a symbol of Nimrod, and the Chaldeans represent the religious leaders of Babylon’s mystery religions. A “tower” is a symbol of a church. When Jesus set forth the parable of the vineyard, Sister White comments on the parable as follows:

Ci kàdd gi, Asir mooy ki samp suufug Kaldéen yi te taxawal fa ñaari mbir yii di “tur” ak “palas.” Asir mooy misaal Nimrod, te Kaldéen yi di misaalu njiitu diiney dencukaayu Babilon. “Tur” mooy misaalu kërg Yàlla. Bi Yeesu joxe léebu tolub reseñ bi, Sœur White wax ci léebu boobu nii:

“In the parable the householder represented God, the vineyard the Jewish nation, and the hedge the divine law which was their protection. The tower was a symbol of the temple.” Desire of Ages, 596.

“Ci lépp, boroom kër ga doon na mel ni Yàlla, toolub reseñ ba mooy xeetu Yawut ya, te pakku mi mooy yoonu Yàlla wi doon seen aar. Tuur bi nag, moyoon ndigal bu njëkk ci kër Yàlla ga.” *Desire of Ages*, 596.

The Assyrian founded the land of the Chaldeans who set up a church (tower) and a “palace.” A “palace’ represents a “king” which in turn represents a kingdom. A kingdom is also represented as a city.

Asiriye jiitu réewum Kalde yi, ñoom ñoo taxaw ab kërgëm (tóor-tóor) ak ab « kërub buur ». « Kërub buur » day tegtal ab « buur », te buur boobu itam day tegtal nguur. Nguur itam manees na ko tegtale ni ab dëkk.

And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. Genesis 11:4.

Noonu wax nag ne: “Ñëwal, na nu tabax ab dëkk ak ab kër gu kaweem di egg ba asamaan; te na nu am tur, ngir bañ a tasaaroo ci kaw suufu àddina sépp.” Génesis 11:4.

The “tower” and “palace” that the Assyrian founded are the “city” and “tower” which Nimrod built.

“Ñaaxa” ak “këru buur” gi Asiriin tabax, ñoom lañu doon “dëkk” ak “ñaaxa” yi Nimrood tabax.

And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified. Revelation 11:8.

Seeni yaram dina nekk ci mbedd mi ca dëkk bu mag ba, bi ñuy wax ci ruu mu nekk Sodom ak Misra, fa sunu Boroom itam dañoo ko daajale ci bant. Njàlbéen ga 11:8.

Inspiration informs us the “great city” in Revelation eleven represents the kingdom of France during the period of the French Revolution.

Xel mi ñu may ci xel yi dafay wax ne “dëkk bu mag bi” bi nekk ci Peeñu 11 dafay tegu ci nguurug Franse ci jamono ji Njàngatug Révolusionu Franse bi.

“‘The great city’ in whose streets the witnesses are slain, and where their dead bodies lie, is ‘spiritually’ Egypt. Of all nations presented in Bible history, Egypt most boldly denied the existence of the living God and resisted His commands. No monarch ever ventured upon more open and highhanded rebellion against the authority of Heaven than did the king of Egypt. When the message was brought him by Moses, in the name of the Lord, Pharaoh proudly answered: ‘Who is Jehovah, that I should hearken unto His voice to let Israel go? I know not Jehovah, and moreover I will not let Israel go.’ Exodus 5:2, A.R.V. This is atheism, and the nation represented by Egypt would give voice to a similar denial of the claims of the living God and would manifest a like spirit of unbelief and defiance. ‘The great city’ is also compared, ‘spiritually,’ to Sodom. The corruption of Sodom in breaking the law of God was especially manifested in licentiousness. And this sin was also to be a pre-eminent characteristic of the nation that should fulfill the specifications of this scripture.

«“Dëkk bu mag bi” te seede yi dee ca ay mbeddam ya, te seen yaram yu dee ya ne ca, mooy, “ci wàllu xel,” Misra. Ci xeeti àddina yépp yi téereb Biibël wax, Misra mooy réew mi gën a ñakk kawe ngëm ne Yàlla miy dund am na, te mu gën a bañ a topp ay ndigalam. Amoonul benn buur bu xam ne dafa ñëw ak njàmbaar gu leer te réy a fexee buntu ci kàttanu Asamaan ni buurub Misra. Bi Musaa indilée ko xibaar bi ci turu Boroom bi, Firawna tontu ak réy-réylu naan: “Kan mooy Yexowa, ba ma dégg baatam te bàyyi Israyil mu dem? Xamuma Yexowa, te itam duma bàyyi Israyil mu dem.” Esóot 5:2, A.R.V. Lii mooy weddi-ne-Yàlla-amul. Te xeet wi Misra di melal dina wax it weddi gu ni mel ci mbirum sañ-sañi Yàlla miy dund, te dina won xel mu mel noonu, di xelub ñàkk ngëm ak bañ a dégg. “Dëkk bu mag bi” dees na ko itam méngale, “ci wàllu xel,” ak Sodom. Yàqute Sodom ci jéggi yoonu Yàlla feeñoon na rawatina ci njaaloo. Te bàkkaar boobu it mooy doon benn melokaan mu mag, ba di bu ëpp solo, ci réew mi war a matale li Mbind mi wax.»

“According to the words of the prophet, then, a little before the year 1798 some power of satanic origin and character would rise to make war upon the Bible. And in the land where the testimony of God’s two witnesses should thus be silenced, there would be manifest the atheism of the Pharaoh and the licentiousness of Sodom.

“Kon, ci waxi yonent bi, lu jiitu atum 1798, benn doole buy jóge ci Seytaane te am ay melokaanam dina jóg ngir xare ak Biibël bi. Te ci réew mi nga xam ne seedey ñaari seede Yàlla yi dees leen fa noppi noonu, fay feeñ seenul Firawna buy weddi Yàlla ak yàqute Sodom.”

“This prophecy has received a most exact and striking fulfillment in the history of France. During the Revolution, in 1793, ‘the world for the first time heard an assembly of men, born and educated in civilization, and assuming the right to govern one of the finest of the European nations, uplift their united voice to deny the most solemn truth which man’s soul receives, and renounce unanimously the belief and worship of a Deity.’—Sir Walter Scott, Life of Napoleon, vol. 1, ch. 17. ‘France is the only nation in the world concerning which the authentic record survives, that as a nation she lifted her hand in open rebellion against the Author of the universe. Plenty of blasphemers, plenty of infidels, there have been, and still continue to be, in England, Germany, Spain, and elsewhere; but France stands apart in the world’s history as the single state which, by the decree of her Legislative Assembly, pronounced that there was no God, and of which the entire population of the capital, and a vast majority elsewhere, women as well as men, danced and sang with joy in accepting the announcement.’—Blackwood’s Magazine, November, 1870.” The Great Controversy, 269.

«Bii wax ci, am na matal gu gëna yéeme te baax xel ci jaar-jaari màndargaatu Frãs. Ca yëngu-yëngu Réew mi, ci atum 1793, “àddina déggoon na bu jëkk yoon mbooloom nit, yu juddoo te yaroo ci sivilisasiyoŋ, te jàpp ne am nañu sañ-sañu nguur benn ci réew yi gëna rafet ci Ewrop, yékkati seen baat bu benn ngir weddi dëgg gu gëna màgg gi ruuhu nit di jot, te bàyyi ci benn xel gëm ak jaamu Yàlla.” —Sir Walter Scott, Life of Napoleon, vol. 1, ch. 17. “Frãs mooy reew mi kennam ci àddina bi, ci lu jëm ci moom la bind bu wóor bi desee ne, ni mu nekkee ab réew, mu yékkati loxoom ci ubbiku buntuk bàkkaar ngir fippu ak Aji Sos àddina si. Ay way-xastey Yàlla bari nañu, ay way-weddi ngëm bari nañu itam, te ñu nekkoon ba tey ci Angleter, Almaañ, Espaañ, ak yeneen fu nekk; waaye Frãs moom dafa taxaw boppam ci jaar-jaari àddina, nekk rew mi kenn doŋŋ ci ndigalum Mbooloom Aji Def Yoonam, yégle ne Yàlla amul, te ñoom la mbooloom waa dëkk bu mag ba, ak ña bari lool ci yeneen fànn, jigéen ni góor, fecc te woy ak mbégte ci nangu yégle bi.” —Blackwood’s Magazine, Novembre, 1870.» The Great Controversy, 269.

The “great city” in Revelation eleven was the nation of France that passed a “decree of her Legislative Assembly” pronouncing that there was no God. The decree was an expression of atheism as represented by the rebellion of Pharaoh. A great city is a kingdom, or a “nation” or a “state.” In Revelation eleven France consists of two symbols—Egypt and Sodom.

“Dëkk bu mag bi” ci Kàddug Yàlla yi nekk ci Peeñu gi fukki-benn benn la doon réewum Farãs, mi jàllale woon “ndigal bu Jëfandikukatam yu dogal” ngir wax ne Yàlla amul. Ndigal loolu dafa doon wone yëngu-yëngu gu weddi Yàlla, ni ko ñàkk déggin ga Firawna teewaloon. Dëkk bu mag mooy nguur, walla “réew” walla “eta.” Ci Peeñu gi fukki-benn benn, Farãs dafa yor ñaari misaal: Misra ak Sodom.

We are informed, “This is atheism, and the nation represented by Egypt would give voice to a similar denial of the claims of the living God and would manifest a like spirit of unbelief and defiance. ‘The great city’ is also compared, ‘spiritually,’ to Sodom. The corruption of Sodom in breaking the law of God was especially manifested in licentiousness.”

Ñu xamal nañu ne: “Lii mooy ateism, te xeet wi Misra di wone moo war a wax benn weddiin bu mel ni boobu ci yëf-yëfu Yàlla jiy dund, te mu feeñal it benn xel mu mel noonu bu ngëmadi ak défi.” “Dekk bu mag bi” itam ñu koy mengale, “ci wallu xel,” ak Sodom. Yàqute Sodom ci jàll ndigali Yàlla feeñ na rawatina ci safara gannaaw bëgg-bëgg yu bon.

The great city or nation of France is symbolically represented by a nation (Egypt) and a city (Sodom.) Egypt “would give voice,” and the speaking of a nation represents statecraft, not churchcraft. Egypt was the state and Sodom was the church is the representation found in chapter eleven of Revelation

Réew mu mag walla xeetu réewu Farãs dañuy ko tegtal ci ay màndarga yu mel ni réew (Misra) ak dëkk (Sodom). Misra “dina wax,” te waxug réew mooy màndargay yooni nguur, du yooni kërceen. Misra mooyoon nguur gi, te Sodom mooyoon kërceen gi; loolu mooy tegtal bi ñu gis ci xaaj bi fukk ak benn ci Peeñu Yàlla.

“The ‘speaking’ of the nation is the action of its legislative and judicial authorities.” The Great Controversy, 442.

«Waxu réew mi di “wax” mooy jëfandikoo ay ndigali ak ay dogali boroom yoonu yi ak boroom àtte yi.» The Great Controversy, 442.

In Revelation eleven John sets forth the events of the French Revolution in prophetic symbolism. The actual Revolution provided ample historical evidence of the validity of John’s predictions in the chapter. John predicted, then the French Revolution fulfilled the prediction, and then in turn—both the prediction and the historical fulfillment of the prediction identify and parallel events at the end of the world, when once again a corrupt state is combined with a corrupt church. Of course, a bloodbath follows that unholy marriage. The kingdom of God is also a great city.

Ci téere bu Fésal yu ndaw yi, Yowaana dafa wone xew-xewi Réewulüsooŋ Farãs ci melokaanu waxu yonent. Réewulüsooŋ bi ci boppam joxe na firnde yu bari ci taarix ngir wone dëggug waxi Yowaana yi ci tere boobu. Yowaana waxoon na ko ci kanam; gannaaw ga Réewulüsooŋ Farãs matal na wax jooju; te gannaaw loolu it, ñoom ñaar—wax jooju ak mataleem ci taarix—dëggal nañu te yamale ak xew-xew yi ci mujjug àddina bi, baat bu bees, su fekkee ne réew bu yàq boolees na ak kërgémmiñ gu yàq. Ci dëgg-dëgg, reylu deret moo topp seetlu bu sellul boobu. Nguuru Yàlla itam dëkk gu mag la.

And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and showed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God. Revelation 21:10.

Noonu mi ci biir ci xel ba ci tund wu réy te kawe, te won ma dëkk boobu réy, Yerusalem bu sell bi, di wàccé asamaan, jóge ci Yàlla. Révélation 21:10.

“The coming of the bridegroom, here brought to view, takes place before the marriage. The marriage represents the reception by Christ of His kingdom. The Holy City, the New Jerusalem, which is the capital and representative of the kingdom, is called ‘the bride, the Lamb’s wife.’ Said the angel to John: ‘Come hither, I will show thee the bride, the Lamb’s wife.’ ‘He carried me away in the spirit,’ says the prophet, ‘and showed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God.’ Revelation 21:9, 10.” The Great Controversy, 426.

«Ñëwub Boroom kër gi, ni ko fee wone, di am bala céet bi. Céet bi moo tegtal nangu gi Kirist di nangu nguuram. Dëkk bu Sell bi, Yerusalem bu Bees bi, mi nekk capitale ak tegtalu nguur gi, ñu koy wax “jabar ji, jabaru Xar mi.” Malaaka mi ne Yowaana: “Ñëwal fii, ma won la jabar ji, jabaru Xar mi.” “Mu yóbbu ma ci Xelum bi,” wax na yonent bi, “te won ma dëkk bu mag boobu, Yerusalem bu sell bi, mi wàccé asamaan, jóge ci Yàlla.” Peeñu gi 21:9, 10.» The Great Controversy, 426.

Nimrod’s rebellion is represented by his building a tower and a city, which typifies the combination of church and state at the end of the world, for all the prophets spoke of the end of the world. Nimrod’s rebellion was also a continuation of the rebellion of Lucifer whose desire was to take control of both God’s church and God’s state.

Ñàkkug Nimrod dafa feeñ ci tabaxam këru kawe ak dëkk, te loolu mooy misaal gu wone booloo mbooloom ngëm ak nguur gi ci mujjub àddina, ndax yépp yonent yi wax nañu ci mujjub àddina. Ñàkkug Nimrod itam dafa doon yokkute ñàkkug Lusifeer, mi bëgg woon a nangu saytu ci mbooloom ngëmu Yàlla ak ci nguurug Yàlla.

How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Isaiah 14:12–14.

Naka nga rottee asamaan, yow Luusifeer, doom ju njëkk ci suba! naka nga dagg ba nekk suuf, yaw miy woyofal xeeti àddina yi! Ndaxte wax nga ci sa xol ne: “Dinaa yéeg asamaan, dinaa yékkati sama gàngune ba weesu biddéewi Yàlla; te it dinaa toog ci tundu ndaje ma, ci wet yu bëj-gànnaar; dinaa yéeg ba weesu kawug niiri yi; dinaa mel ni Kawe ji gën a Kawe.” Esayi 14:12–14.

As Isaiah reveals Lucifer’s secret heart-desires to be “like the most High,” he points out that Lucifer is seeking to be seated in two distinctly different chairs. He wishes to “exalt” his “throne above the stars of God” and to “sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north.”

Ni Esayi di wonee bëgg-bëgg yu nëbbu yu xolam Luusifeer ngir nekk “ni Kawe ji gën a Kowe,” mu tegtal ne Luusifeer dafa seet a toog ci ñaari gàngune yu wuute bu baax. Dafay bëgg a “yékati” “gangunaam ci kaw biddéeyi Yàlla,” te itam “toog ci tundu ndaje mi, ci weti bëj-gànnaar.”

The throne is a symbol of the king’s authority—or state authority and “the sides of the north” is God’s church.

Gàngune bi mooy misaalu ndigalu buur bi—mbaa ndigalu réew mi, te “wet yu bëj-gànnaar yi” mooy kër Yàlla gi.

A Song and Psalm for the sons of Korah. Great is the Lord, and greatly to be praised in the city of our God, in the mountain of his holiness. Beautiful for situation, the joy of the whole earth, is mount Zion, on the sides of the north, the city of the great King. God is known in her palaces for a refuge. Psalm 48:1–3.

Woyu ak Zabuur ci doom yi Korax. Boroom bi mag na, te yey nañu koo santa lool ci dëkk bu sunu Yàlla, ci tundu sellam. Mu rafet ci berabam, mooy mbégteb suuf si bépp; tundu Siyon, ci wet yu bëj-gànnaar, mooy dëkku Buur bu mag bi. Yàlla xam nañu ko ci ay kër yu kaweem ngir mu nekk aji rawati. Zabuur 48:1–3.

Jerusalem is “the city of the great King,” thus marking the political throne of God, and Jerusalem is also “the mountain of his holiness,” “on the sides of the north,” thus marking the religious throne of God. From the beginning Satan’s rebellion and warfare are portrayed within the context of his desire to rule over both God’s church and God’s state. Satan thereafter led in the rebellion of Nimrod and the land that he founded for the Chaldeans is represented as a land where Nimrod built both a tower and a city—church and state.

Yerusalem mooy “dëkk bu Buur bu mag bi,” loolu di mel ni mooy kër gu politig gu Yàlla, te Yerusalem itam mooy “tundu sellam,” “ci wet yu bëj-gànnaar,” loolu di mel ni mooy kër gu diine gu Yàlla. Li dale ca njàlbéen ga, ngërëm ak xarey Seytaane dañu leen wone ci biir jumtukaayu bëgg-bëggam ngir noot ci kaw kërgëstu Yàlla ak réewum Yàlla. Gannaaw loolu Seytaane jiite na ci ngërëmu Nimrod, te suuf sa mu sosal woon ngir Kaldeyen yi dañu ko tekki ni suuf su Nimrod tabaxee benn këru kaw ak benn dëkk—kërgëstu ak réew.

Therefore, when Isaiah’s harlot and John’s great whore commit fornication with the kings of the earth, prophecy is marking that an unholy relationship takes place between the Roman Catholic church and the kings of the earth at the end of seventy prophetic years.

Kon nag noonu, bi Esayi yé jigéen ju ndeyjooram ak “jigéen ju réy juy njaaloo” yu Yowaana wax di njaaloo ak buur-yi àddina si, waxu yonent bi di màndargaal ne, bu jeegé waxtu juróom-ñaar-fukk at yu yonent yi, am na jëfandikoo gu sellul gu diggante mbooloom katolik bu Room ak buur-yi àddina si.

Isaiah’s line of prophecy describes the judgment of the harlot Tyre in chapter twenty-three and John describes the same judgment with the symbol of a scarlet-colored woman who is identified as “Babylon the great.” A third witness to the same judgment of the same whore is as follows:

Sàrtu waxu Esayi mi ngi mel ne dafay nettali àtte bu jigeen ju moykat Tir ci saar ñeent-fukk ak ñaar, te Yowaana itam dafay nettali benn àtte boobu ak misaal u jigéen ju solon xonq, te waxees na ko ne “Babilon bu mag bi.” Ñetteelu seede ci benn àtte boobu ci benn jigeen ju moykat ji mooy lii:

“The woman (Babylon) of Revelation 17 is described as ‘arrayed in purple and scarlet color, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness: . . . and upon her forehead was a name written, Mystery, Babylon the Great, the mother of harlots.’ Says the prophet: ‘I saw the woman drunk with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus.’ Babylon is further declared to be ‘that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.’ Revelation 17:4–6, 18. The power that for so many centuries maintained despotic sway over the monarchs of Christendom is Rome.” The Great Controversy, 382.

“Jigéen ji (Babylone) ci Apocalipse 17, mel ne moom lañu wax ne dafa ‘sol mbubb mu xonq bu xeeb ak bu xonq, te ñu taar ko ak wurus, ak doj yu tedd, ak per, yor kaasu wurus ci loxoom, fees dell ak ay yàqute ak sobe.’ … te ci jëram ji bindoon nañu tur wii: Kumpa, Babylone bu Mag bi, ndeyu njànj ak ay yàqute yi ci suuf.” Yonent bi ne: “Gis naa jigéen ji màndi deretu gaayi Yàlla yi sell, ak deretu seede yi Yeesu.” Rax-ci-dolli, wax nañu ne Babylone mooy “dëkk bu mag boobu buy nguuru ci kaw buur yi ci suuf.” Apocalipse 17:4–6, 18. Kàttan ga caay jaar ay at yu bare di teg noot gu dóor ci kaw buur yu Kiristaan yi, mooy Room. ” Xeex bu Mag bi, 382.

Tyre is the Roman Catholic church in the “last days.” At that time the papacy will go forth and sing her seductive songs to the kings of the earth, thus leading the kings into the act of fornication, which is prophetically the combination of church and state.

Tir mooy kanam kër-katolik Room gi ci “bés yu mujj yi.” Ca waxtu woowu, paap bi dina génn, di woy ay woyam yu nax nguru yi ci suuf si, ba tax mu yóbbu nguru yi ci jëfandikoo njaaloo boobu, te ci waxu yonent yi loolu mooy boole kërgëm ak réew mi.

And it shall come to pass in that day, that Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years, according to the days of one king: after the end of seventy years shall Tyre sing as an harlot. Isaiah 23:15.

Te bés na ci fan booba, Tir dina ñàk fàttalikku juróom-ñaar-fukk at, ni fani benn buur; gannaaw jeexug juróom-ñaar-fukk at yooyu, Tir dina woy ni jigéen ju ndeyjoor. Esayi 23:15.

A king is a kingdom in Bible prophecy, so Tyre shall be forgotten during the time when a prophetic kingdom rules for seventy years.

Buur mooy nguur ci waxu yonent yi ci Biibël bi, ba tax na Tir dinañu ko fàtte biir jamono ji nguur gu yonent gi di nguur diiw atum juróom-ñaar fukk.

And it shall come to pass in that day, that Tyre shall be forgotten seventy years, according to the days of one king: after the end of seventy years shall Tyre sing as an harlot. Take an harp, go about the city, thou harlot that hast been forgotten; make sweet melody, sing many songs, that thou mayest be remembered. And it shall come to pass after the end of seventy years, that the Lord will visit Tyre, and she shall turn to her hire, and shall commit fornication with all the kingdoms of the world upon the face of the earth. Isaiah 23:15–17.

Te bés na ca bésub jamono jooju, Tir dinañu ko fàtte juróom-ñaar-fukk at, ni ay fan yu benn buur; gannaaw jeexug juróom-ñaar-fukk at yooyu, Tir dina woy ni jigéen ju jaay sa bopp. Jëlal xalam, wër dëkk ba, yaw jigéen ju jaay sa bopp te ñu fàtte la; defal neex melodi, woyal ay woy yu bare, ngir ñu xalaat la. Te bés na ca gannaaw jeexug juróom-ñaar-fukk at yooyu, Boroom bi dina seeti Tir, te moom dina dellu ci peyam, te dina def njaalook ak bépp nguur gi nekk ci àddina, ci kaw suuf. Esaay 23:15–17.

During the days of one kingdom that rules for seventy prophetic years the Roman Catholic church will be forgotten. At the end of the seventy years, the papal power will “make sweet melody, sing many songs.” Prophetically a “song” represents “experience.”

Ci biir benn nguur gu nguur ngir juróom-ñaar-fukk at yu yoonent yi, kërgëstu Room-Katolig dinañu ko fàtte. Ci mujju juróom-ñaar-fukk at yi, kàttanu paap bi dina “woy lu neex, woy woy yu bari.” Ci yoonent, “woy” di tegu “jàngoro xam-xam bu jëm ci dund.”

“Upon the crystal sea before the throne, that sea of glass as it were mingled with fire,—so resplendent is it with the glory of God,—are gathered the company that have ‘gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name.’ With the Lamb upon Mount Zion, ‘having the harps of God,’ they stand, the hundred and forty and four thousand that were redeemed from among men; and there is heard, as the sound of many waters, and as the sound of a great thunder, ‘the voice of harpers harping with their harps.’ And they sing ‘a new Song’ before the throne, a song which no man can learn save the hundred and forty and four thousand. It is the song of Moses and the Lamb—a song of deliverance. None but the hundred and forty-four thousand can learn that song; for it is the song of their experience—an experience such as no other company have ever had. ‘These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever He goeth.’ These, having been translated from the earth, from among the living, are counted as ‘the first fruits unto God and to the Lamb.’ Revelation 15:2, 3; 14:1-5. ‘These are they which came out of great tribulation;’ they have passed through the time of trouble such as never was since there was a nation; they have endured the anguish of the time of Jacob’s trouble; they have stood without an intercessor through the final outpouring of God’s judgments. But they have been delivered, for they have ‘washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.’ ‘In their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault’ before God. ‘Therefore are they before the throne of God, and serve Him day and night in His temple: and He that sitteth on the throne shall dwell among them.’ They have seen the earth wasted with famine and pestilence, the sun having power to scorch men with great heat, and they themselves have endured suffering, hunger, and thirst. But ‘they shall hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall the sun light on them, nor any heat. For the Lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall feed them, and shall lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes.’ Revelation 7:14-17.” The Great Controversy, 648.

“Ci géej gu kristal gi nekk kanam gàngune bi, géej gu mel ni werantees ak safara,—ndax dafa fees ak ndamlu Yàlla gu leer lool,—foofa la booloo bi dajale, ñi ‘daan nañu rab wi ak nataalam, ak màndargaam, ak limu turam.’ Ak Xaritu-Mi ca tundu Siyoŋ, ‘yor saraxi Yàlla yi,’ taxaw nañu, ñaar-fukk ak ñeent junni ak ñeent téeméer ñi jotoon njot ci biir nit ñi; te déggu na fa, ni riifum ndox mu bare, ak ni riifum dënnu gu mag, ‘baatub ñiy xalam, di xalam ak seeni xalam.’ Te woy nañu ‘woy wu bees’ kanam gàngune bi, woy wu kenn mënu koo jàng ludul ñaar-fukk ak ñeent junni ak ñeent téeméer ña. Mooy woyu Musaa ak Xarit bi—woyu mucc. Kenn du man a jàng woy woowu ludul ñaar-fukk ak ñeent junni ak ñeent téeméer ña; ndax mooy woyu seeni jaar-jaari dund—jaar-jaari dund wu benn mbooloo mënul woon a am mukk. ‘Ñii ñooy ñiy topp Xaritu-Mi fu Mu jëm fépp.’ Ñii, gannaaw ñu yéeleen leen ci suuf si, ci biir ñiy dund, dañu leen jàpp ni ‘ñoom ñooy góob gu njëkk ngir Yàlla ak ngir Xaritu-Mi.’ Peeñu 15:2, 3; 14:1-5. ‘Ñii ñooy ñi jóge ci fitna gu réy gi;’ jaar nañu ci jamonoju tiis bu melul dara lu ko ni mel gannaaw amee réew; muñ nañu metitug jamonoy tiisub Yanqóoba; taxaw nañu ci lu mujj li te amuñu ab rammkat biir ci bi, ba àttey Yàlla di tuuru ci seen kow. Waaye musal nañu leen, ndaxte ‘rakk nañu seeni yére, weexal leen ci deretu Xaritu-Mi.’ ‘Ci seen gémmiñ giseesul genn naafaq: ndaxte amuñu benn tooñ’ kanam Yàlla. ‘Looloo tax ñu nekk kanam gànguney Yàlla, di ko jaamu guddi ak bëccëg ci kër jaamubam: te Ki toog ci gàngune bi dina dëkk ci seen biir.’ Gis nañu suuf si, bi xiif ak mbas mu bon yàq ko, jant bi am doole ba lakk nit ñi ak tàngoor gu metti, te ñoom ci seen bopp muñ nañu sonn, xiif, ak mar. Waaye ‘duñu xiifati, duñu marati; jant du leen taal, mbaa benn tàngoor. Ndaxte Xaritu-Mi miy nekk ci diggu gàngune bi dina leen yar, te dina leen jiite ba ca teen yu dund yu ndox; te Yàlla dina far mboolem rangoo ci seen bët yi.’ Peeñu 7:14-17.” Xareb Réy bi, 648.

“‘In His temple doth everyone speak of His glory’ (Psalm 29:9), and the song which the ransomed ones will sing—the song of their experience—will declare the glory of God: ‘Great and marvelous are Thy works, O Lord God, the Almighty; righteous and true are Thy ways, Thou King of the ages. Who shall not fear, O Lord, and glorify Thy name? for Thou only art holy.’ Revelation 15:3, 4, R.V.” Education, 308.

«“Ci kërkati Yàlla gi, képp day wax ci ndamam” (Psalm 29:9), te woy wi ñi jot ci njot gu sell gi di woy—woy wu seen jéego la—dina yégle ndamu Yàlla ne: “Sa jëf yu mag te yéemu nanu, Boroom bi Yàlla Aji Man ji; sa yoon yu jub te dëgg lañu, yaw Buur bu jamono yi. Kan moo dul ragal, Boroom bi, te màggal sa tur? ndax yaw doŋŋ nga sell.” Revelation 15:3, 4, R.V.» Education, 308.

At the end of seventy prophetic years the papacy will “make sweet melody, sing many songs, that” she “mayest be remembered.” At the end of the kingdom that rules for seventy prophetic years the Roman Catholic church will remind the world of the experience of her past history. In that history she ruled as the moral authority in a relationship between her and the kings of Europe. That history is rightly identified as the Dark Ages, and all the darkness that might in any way be associated with the history where the Papacy ruled over the kings of Europe can be attributed to the very foundational action that produced all the following darkness. That action was the combination of church and state, the combination of the kings of Europe and the Catholic church. In a biblical marriage the man is to rule over the woman, but the fornication that took place in that history was upside down from the true order of the relationship of man and woman.

Ci njeexital juróom-ñaar-fukk at yu wax ci kàddu Yàlla, nguur gu mag gu papaa yi dina “woy lu neex, jàng woy yu bare, ngir” moom “ñaariñu ko fàttaliku.” Ci njeexital nguur gi nguuróon juróom-ñaar-fukk at yu wax ci kàddu Yàlla, kër gu Room-Katolig dina fàttali àddina jéego ba ca mbiri nettali gu weesu. Ci mbir moomu moom moo doon boroom sañ-sañ bu àtte ak yoonu jikko ci digganteem ak buur yi réewi Tugal. Mbir moomu dees na ko tudde bu baax Jamono yu Lëndëm, te lëndëm gu ne man a bennale ak mboolem nettali boobu, fa nguur gu papaa yi doon jiite buur yi réewi Tugal, manees na ko tëral ci jëf ju sax ci suuf te jiitu woon mboolem lëndëm li topp. Jëf jooju mooy boole mbooloom jaamono yiy jaam Yàlla ak nguur, boole buur yi réewi Tugal ak kër gu Katolig. Ci séy bu sell ci Biibël, góor moo war a jiite jigéen, waaye njaaloo gi amoon ci nettali boobu dafay wàcci ba mel ni lu wërsëg ci dëggu diggante góor ak jigéen.

At the end of seventy years there will be a great crisis when the kingdom of Bible prophecy that rules the world during the period of time when the Papacy is prophetically forgotten comes to a conclusion. The worldwide crisis produced by the collapse of that kingdom opens the door for the Catholic church to begin to inform the world that in order to navigate the troublous times produced by the collapse of that kingdom, the world must submit to the moral authority of the Roman Catholic church, as illustrated in the history of the Dark Ages.

Ci jeexal juróom-ñett fukki at yi dina am jafe-jafe bu mag bi ñuy jeexale nguur gi kàddu yonent yi ci Biibël wax ne mooy kilifte àddina bi ci jamono ji ñu faatali ci waxu yonent ci Papasi bi. Jafe-jafe bu àddina sépp bi nguur googu tasar di jur ubbite na buntu ngir njëg liigéeyu kërceenug Katolik bi tàmbali a xamal àddina ne ngir man a dajale ak jamono yu metti yi tasaru nguur googu jur, war na àddina bi wottu ci sañ-sañu yoonu jikko yi kërceenug Katolik gu Room, ni ko taarixu Jamonoy Lëndëm gi leeral.

When the kingdom ends and the papacy sings the song of her past experience, an experience that historians label as darkness; so how could that dark history possibly be a message for the papacy to share with the kings of the earth that would convince them to commit fornication with her? In a great crisis why would the experience of the past ages, (her song) her experience before she was forgotten prophetically, provide the logic for the kings of the earth to accept the experience of darkness as the solution for their great crisis?

Bu nguuru gi jeexee, te papas bi woyee woyam gu aju ci li mu daj woon bu njëkk, di daj ju jaaraf yi tudde lëndëm; kon naka la jaar-jaaru lëndëm jooju man a doon yégleb bu papas bi war a wax ak buur yi ci suuf si ngir tax ñu njaaloo ak moom? Ci benn jafe-jafe bu mag, lu tax dajinu jamono yi weesu, (woyam) xam-xamam ak li mu daj woon bala ñu fàtte ko ci waxu yonent, di joxe xel mu waral ngir buur yi ci suuf si nangu dajinu lëndëm ni feyda bu seen jafe-jafe bu mag?

“A large class, even of those who look upon Romanism with no favor, apprehend little danger from her power and influence. Many urge that the intellectual and moral darkness prevailing during the Middle Ages favored the spread of her dogmas, superstitions, and oppression, and that the greater intelligence of modern times, the general diffusion of knowledge, and the increasing liberality in matters of religion forbid a revival of intolerance and tyranny. The very thought that such a state of things will exist in this enlightened age is ridiculed. It is true that great light, intellectual, moral, and religious, is shining upon this generation. In the open pages of God’s Holy Word, light from heaven has been shed upon the world. But it should be remembered that the greater the light bestowed, the greater the darkness of those who pervert and reject it.

“Ñu bari, sax ci ñi seet Romanism te bëgguñu ko, xamatuñu bu baax waayeeg mucc ci dooleem ak yëfëram. Ñu bare wax ne lëndëm gu xel ak gu yoon, gi lawoon ca diggante jamono yu digg, moo tax ay dogmaam, ay gëm-gëmi luy réer, ak njàppandam law; te xel mu gën a yaatu ci jamono jii, tasaarug xam-xam ci nit ñépp, ak yokkug muñante ci mbiri diine, tere na dellusi toleraansul ak tirani. Xalaat kese ne xaalis bu mel nii dina am ci jamono jii bu leer, nit ñi di ko ree. Dëgg la ne leer gu mag, ci xel, ci yoon, ak ci diine, ngi leer ci kaw xeetu nit bii. Ci xëti Kàddu Yàlla ju Sell ji ubbeeku, leer gu joge asamaan wàcc na ci àddina si. Waaye war nañu fàttaliku ne bu leer gi ñu mey gëna réyée, noonu it lëndëmug ñi koy soppi ba ñaaw te bañ ko gëna réy.”

“A prayerful study of the Bible would show Protestants the real character of the papacy and would cause them to abhor and to shun it; but many are so wise in their own conceit that they feel no need of humbly seeking God that they may be led into the truth. Although priding themselves on their enlightenment, they are ignorant both of the Scriptures and of the power of God. They must have some means of quieting their consciences, and they seek that which is least spiritual and humiliating. What they desire is a method of forgetting God which shall pass as a method of remembering Him. The papacy is well adapted to meet the wants of all these. It is prepared for two classes of mankind, embracing nearly the whole world—those who would be saved by their merits, and those who would be saved in their sins. Here is the secret of its power.

“Jàngat bu ñuy def ci Biibël ak ñaan dina won Protestaŋ yi dund ak melokaan gu dëggu gu paapasi, te dina tax ñu sib ko te moytu ko; waaye ñu bare am nañu xel mu réy ci seen bopp ba ñu yëg ne soxla wuñu woon ci wut Yàlla ak suufeel ngir mu jiite leen ci dëgg gi. Doonte ñuy bëgg a màggal seen leer gu ñu am, xamuñu Mbind mi ak dooley Yàlla. Fàww am nañu ab yoon ngir dalal seen xol yi, te ñuy seet li gëna néew ruu ak li gëna toroxal. Li ñuy bëgg mooy ab pexe ngir fàtte Yàlla te muy mel ni ab pexe ngir fàttalikoo ko. Paapasi méngoo na bu baax ak a jëfandikoo ngir ci àggale soxlay ñépp ñi. Waajal nañu ko ngir ñaari xeeti nit ñi, te ñoo yor lu tollook àddina sépp—ñi bëgg a mucc ci seen yiw, ak ñi bëgg a mucc ci seen bàkkaar. Fii la kumpay dooleem nekk.”

A day of great intellectual darkness has been shown to be favorable to the success of the papacy. It will yet be demonstrated that a day of great intellectual light is equally favorable for its success. In past ages, when men were without God’s word and without the knowledge of the truth, their eyes were blindfolded, and thousands were ensnared, not seeing the net spread for their feet. In this generation there are many whose eyes become dazzled by the glare of human speculations, ‘science falsely so called;’ they discern not the net, and walk into it as readily as if blindfolded. God designed that man’s intellectual powers should be held as a gift from his Maker and should be employed in the service of truth and righteousness; but when pride and ambition are cherished, and men exalt their own theories above the word of God, then intelligence can accomplish greater harm than ignorance. Thus the false science of the present day, which undermines faith in the Bible, will prove as successful in preparing the way for the acceptance of the papacy, with its pleasing forms, as did the withholding of knowledge in opening the way for its aggrandizement in the Dark Ages.” The Great Controversy, 572.

“Bés bu réy a lëf bu mag ci xel lañu won ne dafa jariñ ngir ndamug papaas bi. Te dinañu feeñal it ne bés bu réy a leer ci xel itam dafa yam ci jariñ ngir ndamam. Ci jamonoy weesu yi, ba nit ñi amul woon Kàddu Yàlla te xamul woon dëgg gi, dañu daan tëj seeni gët, te junniy nit dañu daan dugg ci mbaal mi, te gisul woon mbaal mi ñu lalal ci seen tànk. Ci maas gi nu nekk, am na ñu bare ñi leerug xalaati nit, “xam-xam wu dul dëgg, wu ñuy wax ne mooy xam-xam,” di yëngu seeni gët ba muy lëndëm; xamuñu mbaal mi, te dañu ci dox dugg noonu rekk ni ku ñu tëj ay gëtam. Yàlla dogaloon na ne dooley xelu nit ñi dañuy yor ko ni maye gu jóge ci Seen Boroom, te war nañu koo jëfandikoo ci liggéeyu dëgg ak njub; waaye bu ñuy yar réyréylu ak bëgg-sa-bopp, te nit ñi di kaweel seeni xalaat bopp ci kaw Kàddu Yàlla, kon xam-xam man na jur gàcce gu gën a réy gàcceg ñakk xam-xam. Noonu la xam-xam wu dul dëgg wu jamono jii, miy yàq ngëm ci Biibël bi, di war a wone ne dina am ndam ci waajal yoon ngir nangu papaas bi, ak ay melokaanam yu neex, ni ñàkk xam-xam bi itam doon na jur yoon ngir ngóoram ak yaatalam ci Jamonoy Lëndëm gi.” The Great Controversy, 572.

“Roman Catholics acknowledge that the change in the Sabbath was made by their church, and they cite this very change as evidence of the supreme authority of the church. They declare that by observing the first day of the week as the Sabbath, Protestants are recognizing her power to legislate in divine things. The Roman church has not relinquished her claim to infallibility; and when the world and the Protestant churches accept a spurious Sabbath of her creating, while they reject the Sabbath of Jehovah, they virtually acknowledge this claim. They may cite the authority for this change, but the fallacy of their reasoning is easily discerned. The papist is sharp enough to see that Protestants are deceiving themselves, willingly closing their eyes to the facts in the case. As the Sunday institution gains favor, he rejoices, feeling assured that it will eventually bring the whole Protestant world under the banner of Rome.

“Katolig yu Room nangu ne soppi ne coppite ne soppi ngir Cér bi mo seen jaamu jëf, te ñu di jëfandikoo soppi boobu sax ngir firndeel ndamu kàttanu gëm-gëm bu kawe bu jaamub yoon wi. Ñu wax ne, bi Protestaan yi di sàmm bés bu jëkk bu ayu-bés bi ni Cér, dañuy nangu sañ-sañam ngir sàkk yoon ci mbiri Yàlla. Jaamub Room bañagul bàyyi mbind mi muy wax ne du juum; te bu àddina ak jaamu Protestaan yi nangee ab Cér bu dëggul, bi mo sos, fekk dañuy bañ Céru Yexowa, kon ci dëgg dañuy nangu mbind moomu. Mën nañu tudd authority bi ñu sukkandiku ngir soppi boobu, waaye juumtey seeni xalaat feeñ na yomb. Papis bi am na xel ba gis ne Protestaan yi dañuy nax seen bopp, di bëgg a tëj seen bët ci dëgg yi aju ci mbir mi. Bu dogalu Dibéer di gëna am ngërëm, mu di bég, ndaxte mu wóor ne ci mujj dina indi àddinay Protestaan gépp ci suufu ràkka Room.”

“The change of the Sabbath is the sign or mark of the authority of the Roman church. Those who, understanding the claims of the fourth commandment, choose to observe the false Sabbath in the place of the true, are thereby paying homage to that power by which alone it is commanded. The mark of the beast is the papal Sabbath, which has been accepted by the world in the place of the day of God’s appointment.

“Soppi Bés bi mooy màndarga walla firnde gu ndawtey kàttanu kërcegu Room. Ñi, te xam dalu ndigaluñeenteel bi, tànn di sàmm Noflaay bu dul dëgg ngir wuutu bi dëgg bi, noonu dañuy jox ndam ak màggal kaat gu am kàttan gi rekk moo ko santaane. Màndargay rab bi mooy Noflaayu Paap bi, bi àddina nangu woon ngir wuutu bés bi Yàlla tànn.”

“But the time to receive the mark of the beast, as designated in prophecy, has not yet come. The testing time has not yet come. There are true Christians in every church, not excepting the Roman Catholic communion. None are condemned until they have had the light and have seen the obligation of the fourth commandment. But when the decree shall go forth enforcing the counterfeit Sabbath, and when the loud cry of the third angel shall warn men against the worship of the beast and his image, the line will be clearly drawn between the false and the true. Then those who still continue in transgression will receive the mark of the beast in their foreheads or in their hands.

“Waaye jamono ji nuy jox màndargay rabu gàkk bi, ni ko waxu yonent bi tëral, jotagul. Jamonoy nattu ba noppi jotagul. Am na ay Kiristaan yu dëgg ci bépp mbooloom jaamu Yàlla, te mbootaayu Room-Katolik it bokk ci. Kenn duñu ko daan ndax bàkkaar, su fekkee ne jotagul leer gi te gisagul warug ndigël ñeenteel bi. Waaye bu dogal ba génnee ngir ga forcée bésub noflaay bu fenn bi, te baat bu réy bu malaaka bu ñetteel bi di waare nit ñi ci kanamu màggalu rabu gàkk bi ak nataalam, suuf si dina leer bu baax ci diggante lu fals ak lu dëgg. Noonu, ñi sax di dëkk ci moytu yoonu Yàlla dinañu jot màndargay rabu gàkk bi ci seen kanam walla ci seen loxo.”

“With rapid steps we are approaching this period. When Protestant churches shall unite with the secular power to sustain a false religion, for opposing which their ancestors endured the fiercest persecution, then will the papal Sabbath be enforced by the combined authority of church and state. There will be a national apostasy, which will end only in national ruin.” Bible Training School, February 2, 1913.

“Ak tànk yu gaaw, nunu ngi jëgë si jamono jii. Bu kilifaag yi diine protestante yi boolee ak kàttanu adina ngir taxawal diine bu dëggul, diine boobu la seen maam ya taxawoon ba muñ ndax mbugal mu gëna metti, kon bésu Noppalu bu pap bi dinañu ko sàkku ci kàttanu bennoo gu mbooloom diine ak réew. Dina am bàkkaaru réew mi yépp, te loolu du jeex ludul ci yàqub réew mi yépp.” Bible Training School, February 2, 1913.

We have now touched upon five of the symbols we are seeking to identify before we fully address the chapter itself. A city is a kingdom in Bible prophecy and in Isaiah twenty-three there are two kingdoms that are closely related, but distinctly different. The first is the “crowning city” and the other is the “merchant city.” In the last days the power who is in control of the three-fold union of the dragon, beast and false prophet is the papacy. It is the kingdom that has the crown.

Léegi, dañoo laal na juróomi misaal yi nu di wut ngir xam leen bu baax laata nu jàll ba ci wetu sareet bi boppam. Dëkk, ci waxi yonent yi ci Biibël bi, mooy nguur; te ci Esayi 23 am na ñaari nguur yu lëkkaloo bu baax, waaye wuute nañu bu leer. Ki jëkk mi mooy “dëkk bi di sol buurukaay,” te beneen bi mooy “dëkku jaaykat yi.” Ci fan yu mujj yi, dooley ki yor nguur gi ci boole bu ñetti wàll yi, mooy janq, rab wi ak yonent bu dëggul bi, mooy papaas bi. Moom mooy nguuru bi yor buurukaay bi.

“As we approach the last crisis, it is of vital moment that harmony and unity exist among the Lord’s instrumentalities. The world is filled with storm and war and variance. Yet under one headthe papal power—the people will unite to oppose God in the person of His witnesses. This union is cemented by the great apostate. While he seeks to unite his agents in warring against the truth he will work to divide and scatter its advocates. Jealousy, evil surmising, evilspeaking, are instigated by him to produce discord and dissension.” Testimonies, volume 7, 182.

“Bi nu jëggee ci musiba bu mujj bi, am na solo lool ngir déggoo ak bennal nekk ci diggante jumtukaayi Boroom bi. Àddina bi fees na ak ngelawlu, xare ak juuyoo. Waaye ci suufu benn bopp — doole bu paapal bi — nit ñi dinañu boole seen bopp ngir taxawu Yàlla ci nit ki mooy seedeem yi. Bennal boobu, ku mag ki dëddu bi moo ko dëppoo. Bi muy seet a boole ay ndawam ngir xeex dëgg gi, dina liggéey it ngir taxawal ay taxawaaykatam ak tas leen. Kañ, xalaat yu bon, wax-jiiñ, mooy yi mu di sartal ngir juroo juuyoo ak tasoo.” Testimonies, volume 7, 182.

The kingdom with the crown is Tyre, which means, “a rock.” In this chapter Tyre represents the papacy that works to counterfeit Christ, for the papacy is antichrist. The word “anti” in antichrist means “in place of.” The papacy seeks to counterfeit Christ at every level, and the name Tyre means rock, for the papacy is a counterfeit of the “Rock of Ages.”

Nguur gi ak kaalaas bi mooy Tir, te li mu tekki mooy “xeer.” Ci xaaj bii, Tir dafa taxawal papaas bi di jëf ngir weddi Almasi bi ak fenn, ndaxte papaas bi mooy antikiris. Baatu “anti” ci antikiris dafay tekki “ci barabu.” Papaas bi dafay seet a weddi Almasi bi ak fenn ci bépp wattuwaay, te turu Tir dafay tekki xeer, ndaxte papaas bi mooy fennu “Xeeru Jamono yi.”

Who hath taken this counsel against Tyre, the crowning city, whose merchants are princes, whose traffickers are the honourable of the earth? The Lord of hosts hath purposed it, to stain the pride of all glory, and to bring into contempt all the honourable of the earth. Pass through thy land as a river, O daughter of Tarshish: there is no more strength. He stretched out his hand over the sea, he shook the kingdoms: the Lord hath given a commandment against the merchant city, to destroy the strong holds thereof. Isaiah 23:8–11.

Kan mooy xalaat na li ci Tuur, dëkk bi di takkaayu kaala, mi nga xam ne ñi di jaaykatam ay buur lañu, te ñi di jëndkatam ay nit ñu tedd ci suuf si? Aji Boroom mbind mi moo ko dogal, ngir toroxal réyug bépp ndam, te ngir wacc ci yoonu torox bépp nit ku tedd ci suuf si. Jallal sa réew ni dex, yow doom Tarshish; doole amatu fa dara. Mu yooroxal loxoom ci kaw géej gi, mu yëngal nguur-nguuri yi; Aji Boroom bi joxe na ndigal ci kaw dëkk bu jaaykat yi, ngir alag seen kër yu dëgër. Isaiah 23:8–11.

We intend to show upon many witnesses that “the shaking of the kingdoms” is accomplished by God, through Islam. Islam is the power that angers the nations and is used to shake the nations. At this point we are identifying that the Lord has determined to bring into contempt “all the honorable of earth,” who are the “merchants” and “traffickers” whose “strong holds” are to be destroyed. The merchant city and the crowning city “have provoked the displeasure of heaven” and the Lord has purposed to destroy their “strong holds” and that represents the economy. The collapse of the economy occurs before the Sunday law in the United States, for before the Sunday law the citizens of the United States are demanding to be returned “to divine favor and temporal prosperity.” Their argument is that the judgments of God will not end until Sunday is “strictly enforced.” Several Bible witnesses agree that we are on the verge of a tremendous crash in the economy of the world. That crash occurs before the Sunday law, just as the crash of 1837, occurred before October 22, 1844.

Nunu noo bëgg a wone ci seeni seede yu bari ne “yëngalug nguur yi” Yàlla mooy ko defare, jaarale ko ci Islam. Islam mooy doole ji di merloo xeeti àddina yi te ñu di ko jëfandikoo ngir yëngal xeet yi. Ci jamono jii, nunu ngi leen xamale ne Boroom bi dogal na yónnee ci torox “bépp ku am teraanga ci suuf si,” ñoom ñi di “jaaykat yi” ak “nijaaykat yi” yu seeni “tat yu dëgër” war a yàqu. Dëkkub jaay ak dëkk bi di fal nguur “woo nañu merum asamaan,” te Boroom bi fas na yéene yàq seeni “tat yu dëgër,” te loolu mooy firi koom-koom gi. Daanu koom-koom gi mooy xew bala yoonu Dibéer bi ci États-Unis, ndaxte bala yoonu Dibéer bi, waa États-Unis yi dañuy laaj ñu delloo leen “ci ndamlu Yàlla ak jàmmu dund gu yàggul.” Seeni wax mooy ne àttey Yàlla duñu jeex mukk lu dul bu Dibéer “ñu ko di doxal bu wér te sax.” Seede yu bari ci Biibël bi déggoo nañu ne nu ngi ci wetug bëre bu réy ci koom-koomu àddina si. Bërë boobu daan mooy xew bala yoonu Dibéer bi, ni daanug 1837 xewoon na bala 22 Oktoobar 1844.

“And then the great deceiver will persuade men that those who serve God are causing these evils. The class that have provoked the displeasure of Heaven will charge all their troubles upon those whose obedience to God’s commandments is a perpetual reproof to transgressors. It will be declared that men are offending God by the violation of the Sunday sabbath; that this sin has brought calamities which will not cease until Sunday observance shall be strictly enforced; and that those who present the claims of the fourth commandment, thus destroying reverence for Sunday, are troublers of the people, preventing their restoration to divine favor and temporal prosperity. Thus the accusation urged of old against the servant of God will be repeated and upon grounds equally well established: ‘And it came to pass, when Ahab saw Elijah, that Ahab said unto him, Art thou he that troubleth Israel? And he answered, I have not troubled Israel; but thou, and thy father’s house, in that ye have forsaken the commandments of the Lord, and thou hast followed Baalim.’ 1 Kings 18:17, 18. As the wrath of the people shall be excited by false charges, they will pursue a course toward God’s ambassadors very similar to that which apostate Israel pursued toward Elijah.” The Great Controversy, 590.

«Te gannaaw loolu, nax seetaan bu mag bi dina wóor nit ñi ne ñiy jaamu Yàlla ñoo waral ay ñaawtéef yii. Kuréelu ñi merloo Asamaan dinañu teg seeni jafe-jafe yépp ci kaw ñi, ngir seen topp ndigali Yàlla di yëgle yoon wu sax ci kaw ñi bàyyi yoon. Dinañu wax ne nit ñi dañuy tooñ Yàlla ci jàggal gañu Dibéer; ne bàkkaar boobu moo indi musiba yi, te duñu taxaw feek ba ñu sàmm Dibéer ci anam wu dëgër; te ñiy yégle sañ-sañu ndigal lu ñënteel bi, ba tax ñu yàq ragal gi ñu war a am ci Dibéer, ñoom lañuy jébbal ne ay sonalikat yu askan wi, te ñu tax ñu mëna dellu ci ngërëmu Yàlla ak ci barkeel gu addina. Noonu, accusaasioŋ bi ñu mas a jiiñ ci jamono ju yàgg jaamub Yàlla bi dina dellusi, te ci sabab yu ni mel noonu lañu ko di samp: “Te am na, ba Axaab gisee Eliya, Axaab ne ko: Yaw nga di ki sonal Israyil?” Mu tontu ne: “Man sonalu ma Israyil; waaye yaw ak kër sa baay, ndax bàyyi ngeen ndigali Boroom bi, te nga topp Baalim yi.” 1 Kings 18:17, 18. Naka seen mer dina taxaw ci kaw ay jiiñ yu dul dëgg, noonu lañuy topp yoon wu mel ni wii ci diggante yonnenti Yàlla yi, mel ni ni Israyil gu wacc dëgg gën a toppoon Eliya.» The Great Controversy, 590.

Elijah confronting the prophets of Baal and the priests of the grove on Mount Carmel represents the Sunday law. The message for the church was “choose this day whom you will serve.” When this history is repeated at the Sunday law the question is “which day are you going to choose, for the day you pick indicates whom you serve.” Before Mount Carmel was three and a half years of severe drought. Before the Sunday law there is a series of Sunday laws, but they have not been “strictly enforced.” The principle associated with a Sunday law is that national apostacy is followed by national ruin. The example of that is Constantine in the year 321 passed a Sunday law and shortly thereafter the first four trumpets of Revelation chapter eight began to bring Western Rome to its conclusion by the year 476. The story of Constantine is important for it included a progressive exalting of Sunday, and simultaneous progressive restrictions on the seventh-day Sabbath. The progressive history reached its conclusion when the citizens were forced to observe Sunday or be persecuted for keeping the Sabbath. That is also the conclusion of the escalating Sunday legislation in the United States. One principle associated with Sunday worship enforcement is “national apostasy is followed by national ruin.” This principle means escalating Sunday law enforcements, produces an escalation of God’s judgments, before the actual Sunday law of Revelation thirteen verse eleven. Every enactment will bring a corresponding ruin. The judgments the citizens are accusing the Sabbath-keepers of producing are actually produced by the escalating enforcement of Sunday legislation. We have included a passage from The Great Controversy, which I titled Sunday Progression. I would recommend that you read that once again. It is in the category entitled The Spirit of Prophecy.

Eliya di jàkkarloo ak yonent yi Baal ak saraxalekat yi ca kër gi ci tundu Karmel dafay tegtal yoonu dibiir. Baatu ndigalu jàngoro bi ñeeloon mbooloom ngëm mi mooy woon: “Tannleen tey ki ngeen bëgg a jaamu.” Bu jaar-jaar boobu dellusi ci yoonu dibiir bi, laaj bi mooy: “ban bés ngeenay tann, ndaxte bés bi ngeen tann dafay won kan ngeen di jaamu.” Balaa tundu Karmel amoon na ñetti at ak genn-wàll ci wow gu metti. Balaa yoonu dibiir bi am, amna ay yooni dibiir yu toftalante, waaye “ñoom deesu leen daan a jëfe bu wér.” Xeetu njàng mi ci boole ak yoonu dibiir mooy ne ngëm-gàtt gu réew mi topp na ko musiba gu réew mi. Misaal bi mooy Konstantin ci atum 321 moo jëloon yoonu dibiir; gannaaw loolu lu gaaw, ñeenti trompet yu njëkk yi ci Peeñu Yàlla saar 8 tàmbalee indi bëj-gànnaar Room ngir mu agsi ci mujjam ci atum 476. Jaar-jaaru Konstantin am na solo ndaxte dafa boole woon yékkati dibiir bu yokku ndànk-ndànk, ak, ci benn yoon wi, teg ay tënku yu yokku ndànk-ndànk ci noflaay bésub juróom-ñaareel bi. Jaar-jaar gu yokku googu agsi na ci njeexitalam bi ñu gaawloo waa réew mi ngir ñu sàmm dibiir mbaa ñu fitnaal leen ndax ñu di sàmm Noflaay bi. Loolu itam mooy njeexitalu yooni dibiir yiy yéeg tey ca Etazini. Benn njàng mu boole ak daanel jaamu dibiir mooy ne “ngëm-gàtt gu réew mi topp na ko musiba gu réew mi.” Njàng mii dafay tekki ne daanel yi yokku-yokku ci yoonu dibiir, ñooy jur àttey Yàlla yu yokku-yokku, balaa yoonu dibiir bu dëgg bi ci Peeñu Yàlla 13:11. Bépp sàkkum yoon dina and ak yàquleem bu ko waral. Àtte yi waa réew mi di tuumaal way-sàmm noflaay yi ne ñooy leen jur, ci dëgg-dëgg dafa nekk li daanel yiy yokku ci yooni dibiir di jur. Nu boole nañu ab pàcc bu jógé ci The Great Controversy, bi ma tudde Sunday Progression. Maa ngi leen di digle ngeen jàng ko benn yoonaat. Mii nekk na ci wàll wi ñuy wax The Spirit of Prophecy.

God has revealed what is to take place in the last days, that His people may be prepared to stand against the tempest of opposition and wrath. Those who have been warned of the events before them are not to sit in calm expectation of the coming storm, comforting themselves that the Lord will shelter His faithful ones in the day of trouble. We are to be as men waiting for their Lord, not in idle expectancy, but in earnest work, with unwavering faith. It is no time now to allow our minds to be engrossed with things of minor importance. While men are sleeping, Satan is actively arranging matters so that the Lord’s people may not have mercy or justice. The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending. Its professions are mild and apparently Christian, but when it shall speak it will reveal the spirit of the dragon. It is our duty to do all in our power to avert the threatened danger. We should endeavor to disarm prejudice by placing ourselves in a proper light before the people. We should bring before them the real question at issue, thus interposing the most effectual protest against measures to restrict liberty of conscience. We should search the Scriptures and be able to give the reason for our faith. Says the prophet: ‘The wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand.’” Testimonies, volume 5, 452.

“Yàlla feeñal na li wara xew ci mujjug fan yi, ngir ay doomam waajaloo man a taxaw ci kanam ngelawlu bëre ak mer. Ñi ñu artu ci mbir yi nekk ci seen kanam waruñu toog ci dal gu neex, di xaar ngelawlu gi di ñëw, di féexal seen bopp ne Boroom bi dina sàmm ñi ko takku ci bésub tiis bi. War na nu nekk ni nit ñi xaar seen Boroom, waaye du ci xaaru rekk ak tëdd; danu wara nekk ci liggéey gu dëgg, ak ngëm gu yengutul. Léegi du jamono jox sunu xel mbir yu ndaw yuy jaaxal xel. Bi nit ñi nelawee, Seytaane dafay doxal ay pexe ngir xeetu Boroom bi bañ a am yërmande walla àtte ju jub. Yëngu-yëngu Dibéeri ga léegi mi ngi yoonam ci biir lëndëm. Njiit yi dañuy nëbb dëgg-dëgg mbir mi, te ñu bare ñi bokk ci yëngu-yëngu bi gis-uñu sax fan la doxalin gu suufe gi jëm. Waxam ak mbindam yi lewet nañu te mel ni yu Kiristaan, waaye bu waxee dina wone xel mi mboolem njiit mi am, mooy xelub njoen. Sunu warugar mooy def lépp lu nekk ci sunu kàttan ngir aar bopp ci musiba mi ñuy ragal. War na nu jéem a dindi bañ-bañ ci xol yi, dajale sunu bopp ci leer gu jub ci kanam nit ñi. War na nu teg ci seen kanam laaj bu dëgg bi ñuy joŋante ci moom, ngir taxawal fa njàngat gu gën a am doole ci luñuy def ngir wàññi sañ-sañu xelu dégg. War na nu seet Mbind mi te man a joxe sabab bu tax nu am sunu ngëm. Yonent bi nee na: ‘Ñi bon dinañu def lu bon; te kenn ci ñi bon du ko xam; waaye ñi am xel dinañu ko xam.’ Testimonies, volume 5, 452.”

It is difficult to recognize the movement for Sunday legislation, for it is making its way in “darkness” and the papacy is “stealthily and unsuspectedly” “strengthening her forces to further her own ends.” It is a fact that the work to pass Sunday legislation in darkness is a central issue in the testing process of the one hundred and forty-four thousand. “None of the wicked shall understand” according to Daniel and Sister White. The “wicked” in Daniel are Matthew’s “foolish virgins,” who Sister White identifies as Laodiceans. The wise will understand the events that are now taking place, even if the history around us appears to contradict God’s word. Do we believe God’s word or what is happening around us? Yet we have been forewarned that the end would be as the days of Noah.

Dafa metti lëg léegi ngir xam yëngu-yëngu bi ngir yoonu Dibeer, ndaxte dafa di jëfandikoo ay yoonu “lëndëm,” te baabuur bi di “ci sutura ak ci anam gu nit ñi du seetlu” di “gën a dëgëral ay dooleem ngir yokk yoonu boppam.” Dëgg la ne liggéey bi ngir jëfandikoo yoonu Dibeer ci lëndëm mooy benn mbir mu mag ci jéemanté bi ñeel ñaar-fukk ak ñent junni ak ñent-fukk ak ñent. “Kenn ci ñi bon du ko xam” ni ko Daniyel ak Sœur White waxe. “Ñi bon” yi ci Daniyel mooy “janqale yi dof” yu Matye, yi Sœur White sant ni ay Laodise. Ñi xel mu leer am dinañu xam mbir yi di xew léegi, doonte taariix bi nu wër mel ni dafay weddi Kàddug Yàlla. Ndaxte, ndax Kàddug Yàlla lañuy gëm walla li di xew ci sunu wër? Waaye dees na nu wax lu jiitu ne mujj ga dina mel ni fan yi Nóoh doon.

“The world, full of rioting, full of godless pleasure, is asleep, asleep in carnal security. Men are putting afar off the coming of the Lord. They laugh at warnings. The proud boast is made, ‘All things continue as they were from the beginning.’ ‘Tomorrow shall be as this day, and much more abundant.’ 2 Peter 3:4; Isaiah 56:12. We will go deeper into pleasure loving. But Christ says, ‘Behold, I come as a thief.’ Revelation 16:15. At the very time when the world is asking in scorn, ‘Where is the promise of His coming?’ the signs are fulfilling. While they cry, ‘Peace and safety,’ sudden destruction is coming. When the scorner, the rejecter of truth, has become presumptuous; when the routine of work in the various money-making lines is carried on without regard to principle; when the student is eagerly seeking knowledge of everything but his Bible, Christ comes as a thief.

“Adduña, fees ak riis-riis, fees ak bànneex yu amul Yàlla, nelaw na, nelaw ci kaaraange ju yaram rekk. Nit ñi da ñuy jëlee ñëwug Boroom bi ba fu sore. Ñuy ree ci artu yi. Wax ju réy gi ñuy wax mooy ne, ‘Lépp day wéy di deme ni mu nekkoon ca njàlbéen ga.’ ‘Suba dina mel ni tey jii, te gën a bari ci mbégte.’ 2 Pierre 3:4; Esaïe 56:12. Danuy dugge gëna sâu ci bëgg bànneex. Waaye Kirist nee na, ‘Xool-leen, maa ngi ñëw ni sacc.’ Apokalips 16:15. Ca jamono jooju sax bi adduña di laaj ci yéy, ‘Ana digeb ñëwam bi?’ màndarga yi dañuy am. Bi ñuy wax ne, ‘Jàmm ak kaaraange,’ yàqule gu bett dina ñëw. Bu ku ree, kuy bañ dëgg gi, nekkée ku xalaat ne dara mënul ko, bu doxalin liggéey ci wàll yu bare yu nit ñi di liggéey ngir am xaalis di wéy ndaxte seenul njubte, bu taalibe bi bëgg xam-xam ak doole di seet xam-xam ci lépp lu dul ci Biibëlam, Kirist dina ñëw ni sacc.”

“Everything in the world is in agitation. The signs of the times are ominous. Coming events cast their shadows before. The Spirit of God is withdrawing from the earth, and calamity follows calamity by sea and by land. There are tempests, earthquakes, fires, floods, murders of every grade. Who can read the future? Where is security? There is assurance in nothing that is human or earthly. Rapidly are men ranging themselves under the banner they have chosen. Restlessly are they waiting and watching the movements of their leaders. There are those who are waiting and watching and working for our Lord’s appearing. Another class are falling into line under the generalship of the first great apostate. Few believe with heart and soul that we have a hell to shun and a heaven to win.

“Lépp lu nekk ci aduna bi nekk na ci yëngu-yëngu. Màndargay jamono yi metti nañu te ragal. Lu di ñëw yi di sànni seen ker gu lëndëm balaa ñuy aksi. Xelu Yàlla mi ngi deñkiku ci suuf si, te musiba di toppante ak musiba ci géej ak ci suuf. Am na ngelaw yu tar, yëngu-yëngu suuf, safara, mbëy, reyi nit ci bépp melokaan. Kan moo man a jàng ëllëg? Ana kaaraange? Amul benn lu wóor ci dara lu nit walla lu àddina. Bu gaaw la nit ñi di taxawu ci suufu rëy ba ñu tànn. Ak seen xol yu daladi, ñu ngi xaar te di seet yëngu-yëngu seen njiit yi. Am na ñi di xaar, di seet, te di liggéey ngir feeñug sunu Boroom. Am beneen mbooloo buy dugg ci rëdd bi ngir topp ndigalug jëfandikukat bu njëkk ba, moom mi gëna mag ci ñi dëddu woon. Ñu néew lañuy gëm ak xol bu mépp ak bakkan bu mépp ne am na safara su war a moytu ak asamaan su war a jot.”

“The crisis is stealing gradually upon us. The sun shines in the heavens, passing over its usual round, and the heavens still declare the glory of God. Men are still eating and drinking, planting and building, marrying, and giving in marriage. Merchants are still buying and selling. Men are jostling one against another, contending for the highest place. Pleasure lovers are still crowding to theaters, horse races, gambling hells. The highest excitement prevails, yet probation’s hour is fast closing, and every case is about to be eternally decided. Satan sees that his time is short. He has set all his agencies at work that men may be deceived, deluded, occupied and entranced, until the day of probation shall be ended, and the door of mercy be forever shut.

“Kaw gaa ngi ñëw ndànk-ndànk ci sunu kow. Jant bi day leer ci asamaan si, di wéy ci yoonam wu mu daan defe, te asamaan yi sax di yégle ndamalu Yàlla. Nit ñi sax a ngi lekk di naan, di bey di tabax, di séy, di joxe ci séy. Jëndkat yi sax a ngi jënd di jaay. Nit ñi a ngi dëppoo ak seen bopp, di xuloo ngir bérab bu gën kawe. Ñi bëgg bànneex sax a ngi feesal teyaatar yi, yarışu fas yi, kër yu ciyaaxaante. Bëgg-bëgg bu gën a metti moo law, waaye waxtuw probasioŋ bi dafa bëgg a tëj gaaw, te lépp lu jëm ci kenn ku nekk mu ngi ci tubaab bu dul jeex di àtte ba fàww. Seytaane gis na ne jamonoam gàtt na. Def na ay jëfandikookam yépp di liggéey ngir nit ñi ñu nax, ñu réer, ñu melokaan, ñu jàpp ci bët, ba kera waxtuw probasioŋ bi di jeex, te buntu yërmande bi tëj ba fàww.”

“Solemnly there come to us down through the centuries the warning words of our Lord from the Mount of Olives: ‘Take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come upon you unawares.’ ‘Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man.’” Desire of Ages, 635, 636.

“Ci njàqare lool, baat yu artu yi sunu Boroom waxee ci tundu Olibe yi ngi ñëw ci nun jaarale ko ci ay xarnu: ‘Wottuleen seen bopp, ngir seen xol bañ a diis ndax lekk bu ëpp, naan lu màndargaal, ak sonñ-sañ yi ci dundug addina sii, te bés boobu dal ci yéen fekk leen ko ak yéglewul.’ ‘Kon nag xoolleen te ñaan saa su ne, ngir ñu man a jàppe ne yéena yem ngir rëcc mboolem mbir yii di ñëw am, ak ngir taxaw ci kanam Doomu nit ki.’” Desire of Ages, 635, 636.

In chapter twenty-three of Isaiah Zidon is the United States and Tyre is the papacy. Tyre and Zidon were ancient contemporary Phoenician cities located on the Mediterranean coast. They were known for their maritime trade, wealth, and influence in the ancient world. Zidon and its “merchants” replenished Tarshish in the passage. Zidon’s merchants trafficked the “seed of Sihor,” which is “the harvest of a river,” and is the fruit “of the river,” and it is “her revenue,” for she is the “mart of nations.” All the prophets speak of the end of the world, so who is the mart of nations at the end of the world? It’s the USA.

Ci ay ñaar-fukk ak ñettelu Esayi, Sidon mooy Etazini, te Tir mooy papasi. Tir ak Sidon dañoo doon dëkk-yu Fenisi yu mag yu jamono ji, te ñu nekk ci wetu géej gu mag gi. Xamoon nañu leen ci seen jaay-jaay gu géej, seen alal, ak seen doole ci àddina ju yàgg ji. Ci kàddu gi, Sidon ak ay “jaaykatam” ñoo yor Tarcis ngir mu feesaat. Jaaykat yi Sidon daan nañu jëfandikoo “pepu Sikor,” muy “ngóobug dex,” te mooy meññetu “dex gi,” te mooy “ay dugubam,” ndaxte mooy “penku xeeti xeet yi.” Yonent yépp wax nañu ci mujjug àddina si; kon, kan mooy penku xeeti xeet yi ci mujjug àddina si? Mooy USA bi.

Sihor is a river in Egypt (likely the Nile delta) and is used to represent the wealth of the world, for Egypt is the world. Zidon’s “virgin daughter” represents the last generation of the USA, and she is oppressed from the martial law that accompanies the Sunday law and the national ruin that immediately follows. Those virgins of Zidon are rebuked by the question concerning Tyre saying, “is this your joyous city” (kingdom) that the USA rejoiced in? Is “this the kingdom “whose antiquity is of ancient days,” when according to the passage it was founded by Nimrod, just after the flood?

Sihor mooy dexu Misraayim (dama mel ni mooy deltau Nil bi), te ñu dafa koy jëfandikoo ngir tegtal alalu addina si, ndaxte Misraayim mooy addina si. “Jigéen bu xonq, doom ju jigéen” bu Sidon day tegtal xeetu maas bu mujj bu États-Unis, te ñu dafa ko sonnal ndax yoonu soldaar yu réy yi ànd ak yoonu Dibeer bi ak yàqug réew mi di ko topp ci saa si. Ñaari jigéen yu xonq yu Sidon yooyu ñu dafa leen yedd ak laaj bi jëm ci Tir ne: “ndax lii mooy sa dëkk bu bég” (nguuru) bi États-Unis daan bég ci? Ndax “lii mooy nguuru” gi “njalbéenam jóge na ca fan yu yàgg ya,” ba ci wax ji mu ne ñu sos ko woon ko ci Nimrod, gannaaw mbëll mi reyee?

God has determined and “purposed” for “Tyre, the crowning city,” to punish her. The papacy’s punishment includes the collapse of the financial structure of the world, for “the Lord hath given” “a commandment against” “Zidon” “the merchant city,” (the United States.) His commandment “to destroy the strong holds,” or the economy of the United States is the Sabbath commandment, for national apostasy is followed by national ruin.

Yàlla dogal na te “àtte” ci “Tir, dëkk bu di fal ay kaala,” ngir mbugal ko. Mbugalu papasi bi dafa ëmb yàqub taxawaayu xaalisu àddina si, ndaxte “Boroom bi joxe na” “ndigal ci” “Sidon” “dëkku jaaykat bi,” (Estados-Ünis.) Ndigaalam “ngir yàq këri doole yi,” walla ekonomii Estados-Ünis, mooy ndigalu Bésub Noflaay bi, ndaxte ngànnaayu réew mi ci yoonu Yàlla topp na ko yàqu réew mi.

The punishment of the papacy begins with the economic collapse of the entire world in response to the economy of the United States being destroyed. Zidon has a “house” associated with its economy, thus representing a financial structure that is destroyed, for you can no longer enter in. No more investments or profits from that “house,” for it is destroyed. The destruction takes place at the Sunday law, even though prior to the Sunday law there are already escalating judgments. When the collapse hits, the papacy, the USA with its merchant princes and honorable traffickers and the ships of Tarshish are going to “howl.”

Mbugalu papasi bi tàmbalee ak wàññiku ekonomig addina bépp, ci tontu ngir ekonomig États-Unis bi dañu ko yàq. Sidon am na “kër” gu ñu boole ak ekonomigam, ba tax mu mel ni ab tabaxu xaalis bu ñuy yàq, ndaxte dootul yéeg ci biir. Dootul am benn i inwestismaas walla benn i njariñ ci “kër” googu, ndaxte dañu ko yàq. Yàqug googu am na ci yoonu Dibéeri, doonte lu jiitu yoonu Dibéeri am na ay àtte yu di yokku. Bu wàññikoo gi dalée, papasi, États-Unis ak ay buur-jàngatam ak ay jaaykat yu tedd te am kàllaama, ak gaal yu Tarsis, dinañu “jooy bu metti.”

The location of “Tarshish” in the passage is associated with wealth in antiquity, and the ships of Tarshish in the Bible are the premier symbol of economic strength.

Barab “Tarshish” bi ci xët wi, dañu ko boole ak alal ak qanaam ci jamono yu yàgg ya, te gaaliyu Tarshish yi ci Biibël bi ñooy misaal bi gën a mag ngir dooley koom-koom.

For the king’s ships went to Tarshish with the servants of Huram: every three years once came the ships of Tarshish bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes, and peacocks. And king Solomon passed all the kings of the earth in riches and wisdom. 2 Chronicles 9:21, 22.

Ndax gaal yi buur bi moom dafa doon dem Tarsis ak surga yi Huram: benn yoon ci ñetti at, gaal yu Tarsis yi daan ñëw, di indi wurus, xaalis, bànn, golo, ak pitax yu rafet. Te buur Suleymaan dafa ëppoon gépp buur yu àddina si ci alal ak xam-xam. 2 Chroniques 9:21, 22.

Ships represent economic strength, and Tarshish is the leading economic ship in Bible prophecy. The final generation of Tarshish, represented by the “daughter” of Tarshish is told to “pass through thy land as a river,” and what she finds is that her land has “no more strength,” and can no longer “rejoice” over the kingdom of Tyre. The strength they were looking for was the former economic strength of Zidon, but it was gone for the sea had spoken “saying, I travail not, nor bring forth children, neither do I nourish up young men, nor bring up virgins,” thus identifying the final generation of the sea, which is the peoples of the world lamenting the destruction of the economy of the world and at which point the people of the world wake up to the reality that they are the last generation of earth’s history, and its too late to prepare for eternal life.

Gaal yi tegtal dooleb koom-koom lañu di tektale, te Tarsis mooy gaal gu jiite ci dooleb koom-koom ci kàddug waxu Yàlla buy xamle lu ñëw. Maam-sa doom ju mujj ji Tarsis, ji ñuy tektale ci “doomu” Tarsis, dees na ko wax ne mu “jàllale sa suuf ni dex”; te li mu fa fekk mooy ne suufam “amatu doole”, te manatulati “bég” ci nguurug Tir. Doole ji ñuy seetoon mooy dooleb koom-koom bu njëkk bu Sidon, waaye demoon na, ndaxte géej gi waxoon na “naan: yegul metitub jur, te juruma ay doom, itam yaruma ay góor yu ndaw, te yóbbu ma ay janq”; noonu lañuy xamale maam-sa gi mujj gi géej gi, maanaam xeeti àddina, yi di jooy ngir yàqute koom-koomu àddina, te ca jamono jooju la nit ñi ci àddina yeewu ci dëgg ne ñoom ñooy maam-sa gi mujj ci jaar-jaaru suuf, te góor-góorlu na ba jeex ngir waajal bopp ngir dund gu ba faaw.

Money will soon depreciate in value very suddenly when the reality of eternal scenes opens to the senses of man.” Evangelism, 62.

“Xaalis dina yàggul ba soppiku ci jëfandikoom bu ñuul te gaaw, bu dëggug yeneen mbir yu ba fàww feeñee ci xel ak yëfi nit.” Evangelism, 62.

There are two “reports” or messages that cause pain to everyone in the passage. The first “report” concerns Egypt and the second “report” is Tyre. The report of Egypt is in the past tense for Isaiah says, “as at the report concerning Egypt,” thus showing that God had done something with Egypt prior to His destruction of Zidon (the USA.) What God did to Egypt, that also represents the “report” of Egypt, is that He destroyed Egypt in connection with the first time God entered into covenant with a chosen people. The two reports are the same “report.” The report of Egypt is the beginning and the report of Tyre is the ending. The Alpha and Omega has illustrated the covenant with the one hundred and forty-four thousand in the last days with the beginning history of that subject. The “report” concerning Egypt is the Red Sea deliverance when Pharaoh and his host were destroyed, which typifies the final deliverance of God’s people as represented by the “report” which is the “burden of Tyre.”

Am naari “xibaar” walla yégle yu tax metital ci képp ku nekk ci kàddu gi. Bu njëkk bi mooy “xibaar” bu jëm ci Misra, te ñaareel “xibaar” bi mooy Tir. “Xibaar” bu Misra nekk na ci jamono ju weesu ndax Esayi nee na: “ni ci xibaar bi jëm ci Misra,” te loolu di wone ne Yàlla defoon na lu jëm ci Misra bala muy alag Sidon (USA). Li Yàlla def ci Misra, moom it moo di tegtal “xibaar” bu Misra, mooy ne Yàlla alagoon na Misra ci jokkoo ak bi mu jëkk a dugg ci kóllëre ak askan wu mu tànn. Ñaari xibaar yi benn “xibaar” lañu. Xibaaru Misra mooy tàmbali, te xibaaru Tir mooy mujje. Alfa ak Omega na melal kóllëre gi ak téeméeri junni ak ñeent-fukk ak ñeent ci fan yu mujj yi ak jaar-jaaru ndoorteel bu mbir moomu. “Xibaar” bi jëm ci Misra mooy musalug Géeju Xonq bi, ba Faraon ak mbooloom sank, te loolu di misaal bu jëme ci mucc gu mujj gu askanu Yàlla, ni ko tegtale “xibaar” bi di “yèqalug Tir.”

The power represented in the Bible that destroys the ships of Tarshish is Islam. The subject of Islam will be taken up later, so we will address the subject more fully at a later time. It is represented in the passage as “Chittim” an ancient word for Cyprus, and the passage says that the destruction of Zidon and Tyre is revealed from “Chittim.” The symbol of Islam includes a very specific illustration of the destruction of the United States in Bible prophecy.

Doole bi ñu teewal ci Biibël bi di alag gaal yu Tarshish mooy Islam. Njàngum Islam dinañu ko jël ci gannaaw; mooy tax nu dinañu wax ci mbiram gën a mat ci kanam. Ci xët wi, dañu koy teewal ni “Kittim,” baat bu yàgg bu doon wax ci Sipar; te xët wi nee na ne alagug Sidon ak Tir dees na ko xamale ci “Kittim.” Misaalu Islam bi dafa ëmb nataal bu wér te bu leer ngir alagug Etazini ci kàddu-yëgale yi ci Biibël bi.

It is important to follow the days and years referenced in the book of Isaiah for they often identify the prophetic time of the passage that follows. Isaiah twenty-three follows the “burden” of the valley of vision in chapter twenty-two, that is preceded by chapter twenty-one that has three burdens,” and all three identify Islam. Before that chapter, in verse one of chapter twenty the setting of the prophetic history where the following prophecies of doom are identified in the following chapters.

Am solo na topp fan yu nekk ak ay at mi ñu tudd ci téere Esayi, ndaxte yu bari ci ñoom dañuy wone waxtu waxu yonent bi ci xóot mi di topp. Esayi ñaar-fukk ak ñett di topp “yégle bu metti” bu xuru gis-gis bi ci saar ñaar-fukk ak ñaar; te loolu itam saar ñaar-fukk ak benn moo ko jiitu, te am na fa ñetti “yégle yu metti,” te ñett ñoom ñépp dañuy jox misaal Islaam. Bala loolu, ci aaya benn ci saar ñaar-fukk, dañu fésal taxawaayu jaar-jaaru waxu yonent bi, fa nga xam ne ci saar yi di topp lañuy jàppal yeneen wax yu alkande yu musiba.

In the year that Tartan came unto Ashdod (when Sargon the king of Assyria sent him,) and fought against Ashdod, and took it. Isaiah 20:1.

At mi nga Tartan agsiwoon ci Asdod (ba ci jamono booba la Sargon buur Asiri yi yónnee ko), te mu xare ak Asdod, daldi ko nangu. Esayi 20:1.

The word “Tartan” may be a name or it is most likely a title of a military leader. Tartan came to Ashdod, a city in Egypt and took it in the period of history when the Assyrians were progressively taking control of the world. Assyria typified Babylon. Both Assyria and Babylon were kingdoms that came from the north, kingdoms identified as “lions” that “scattered” God’s sheep and both receive the same punishment. Assyria was first Babylon was last.

Kàddu bi ñuy wax “Tartan” man naa doon tur, waaye li ëpp seetlu mooy ne day doon tuddal bu njiitu xare. Tartan dikk na Ashdod, dëkk bu nekk Misra, te dafa ko nangu ci jamono ju ci taarix bi ñu doon gis ni Asiriyaa dañuy ndànk-ndànk jël nguurug àddina bi ci seen loxo. Asiriyaa dafa melaloon Babilon. Ñoom ñaar, Asiriyaa ak Babilon, ay nguur lañu woon yu jóge bëj-gànnaar, ay nguur yu ñu ràññee ni “gaynde” yu “tasaaroo” xariti Yàlla, te ñoom ñaar-it dañuy jot ci benn mbugal. Asiriyaa moo jiitu; Babilon moo mujj.

Israel is a scattered sheep; the lions have driven him away: first the king of Assyria hath devoured him; and last this Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon hath broken his bones. Therefore thus saith the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will punish the king of Babylon and his land, as I have punished the king of Assyria. Jeremiah 50:17, 18.

Israyeel mooy xar mu tasaaroo; gaïndey yi dàq nañu ko: bu jëkk buurub Asiri moo ko lekk; te ci mujj bii Nebukadnecar, buurub Babilon, damm na yaxam. Moo tax noonu la Boroom gàngoor yi, Yàllay Israyeel, waxe: Gisleen, dinaa mbugal buurub Babilon ak suufam, ni ma mbugale buurub Asiri. Yeremi 50:17, 18.

Prophetically they are both the “haughty Assyrian.”

Ci yoon, ñoom ñaar ñépp ñoo di “Asirien bu réy xel.”

“When Sennacherib, the haughty Assyrian, reproached and blasphemed God, and threatened Israel with destruction, ‘it came to pass that night, that the angel of the Lord went out, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians an hundred fourscore and five thousand.’ There were ‘cut off all the mighty men of valor, and the leaders and captains,’ from the army of Sennacherib. ‘So he returned with shame of face to his own land.’ [2 Kings 19:35; 2 Chronicles 32:21.]” The Great Controversy, 512.

«Ba Senakerib, wa Asirien bu réy te yéngu, toroxal Yàlla te wax ay xaalis réy ci kaw Israyil ngir alag ko, “mu am ne ci guddi googu, malaakam Boroom bi génn na, daldi rey ci kër guurug Asirien yi téeméer ñaar-fukk ak juróom-bennni junni nit.” Foofa “ñu dagg bépp góor gu am kàttan ci xare, ak njiit yi ak kapitɛn yi,” ci mbooloom xareb Senakerib. “Noonu mu dellu ca réewam ak rus gu tar ci kanamam.” [2 Kings 19:35; 2 Chronicles 32:21.]» The Great Controversy, 512.

The year that “Tartan came unto Ashdod” and “took it,” represents the progressive conquering of the world by the papal power as illustrated in the last six verses of Daniel eleven. The history of the Sunday law crisis, which is the “last days” of the investigative judgment, and which leads directly into the executive judgment, (the seven last plagues) is the historical setting represented by the “year” that Tartan came to Ashdod. With the context of that history in place Isaiah then gives three prophecies of doom concerning Islam, one concerning Laodicean Adventism and then the burden of Tyre. Chapter twenty-four is one of the classic examples of the seven last plagues that is followed by chapter twenty-five representing the final deliverance of God’s people, where we find God’s people expressing one of the most well-known statements during the great time of trouble.

At mi ñëw bi “Tartan agsi Ashdod” te “jël ko,” mooy melokaan bu leer ci ni kàttanu paapal di nott àddina ndànk-ndànk ni ko juróom-benni ay sarax yi mujj ci Daniel fukk ak benn wane. Jaar-jaaru xalaat bi ci jafe-jafe yoonu Dibéeri, mi di “fan yu mujj yi” yu àtteb seetkat bi, te miy yóbbu jàkk ci àtteb amal gi, (juróom-ñaari musiba yu mujj yi) mooy taxawaayu jaar-jaar bi “at mi” diiru bi Tartan agsee Ashdod. Bi ñu sampée ci bir moome lu aju ci jaar-jaar woowu, Yàlla jaare ci Isaiah di joxe ñetti waxi alkande yu jëm ci Islaam, benn ci Aduvantis bu Laodise, ba noppi “yéene” Tàyr. Saar ñent-fukk ak ñeent mooy benn ci misaal yu mag yi ci juróom-ñaari musiba yu mujj yi, te mu teg ci saar ñent-fukk ak juróom, miy tegtal xettali mujj gi ci nit ñi Yàlla, fa nu gis nit ñi Yàlla di wax benn ci kàddu yi gën a siiw jamono jafe-jafe ju réy ji.

And it shall be said in that day, Lo, this is our God; we have waited for him, and he will save us: this is the Lord; we have waited for him, we will be glad and rejoice in his salvation. Isaiah 25:9.

Te ci bésub bés, ñu dina wax ne: “Xool-leen, kii mooy sunu Yàlla; daan nañu ko xaar, te moo nuy musal; kii mooy Aji Sax ji; daan nañu ko xaar; dinanu bég te bànneexu ci muccam.” Esayi 25:9.

The one hundred and forty-four thousand are the wise virgins that waited for their Lord to come to the wedding, though He tarried in agreement with the parable of the ten virgins. They are not Laodiceans, they are Philadelphians. Up to this point this article has been setting the context.

Junni téeméer ak ñeent fukki junni ñent areet ñoo di janq yu xam, yi muñoon di xaar seen Boroom ngir mu ñëw ci céet ga, doonte mu yàgg woon, ni ko léebal ga waxee ci mburoom fukki janq ya. Duñu Laodise; ñooy Filadelfi. Ba fi nekk, bind bii dafa doon teg xaalis bi ci yoonam.

In 1798, Napoleon took the pope captive delivering the prophetic deadly wound that is healed at the end of the world according to Revelation thirteen. At that point the United States took its place as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy according to Daniel two, seven, eight and eleven and Revelation twelve, thirteen, sixteen, seventeen and eighteen. From that point on both the Republican horn of the United States and the Protestant horn (Adventism) have forgotten who the papacy is. 1798 is the first year that the nations of the rest of the world acknowledged the United States as a sovereign nation, and it is also the year the first angel’s message arrived in history.

Ci at ak 1798, Napoléon jàppale baabu Rome bi, di indi ci moom gaaw gu rey ga ñu wax ne dina wéraat ci mujjug àddina, ni ko Apokalipsi fukki at ak ñett waxe. Ca jamono jooju, États-Unis jël na boppam fi mu war a nekk mel ni juróomeel buur bi ci waxu yonent ci Biibël, ni ko Danyeel ñaar, juróom-ñaari, juróom-ñett ak fukk ak benn, ak Apokalipsi fukk ak ñaar, fukk ak ñett, fukk ak juróom-benn, fukk ak juróom-ñaar, ak fukk ak juróom-ñett waxe. Li dalee fa, ñaari wàll yi, maanaam bëñu Républicain bu États-Unis ak bëñu Protestan bi (Adventisme), fàtte nañu kan mooy papasi bi. Atum 1798 mooy njëkk at bi xeeti réew yi ci desug àddina bi nangoo États-Unis ni réew bu am boppam, te itam mooy at bi yégleb malaaka bu njëkk bi agsi ci jaar-jaaruy nettali.

The “motto” of a Protestant at that time was, “the Bible and the Bible only.” Protestants identify themselves as defenders of the Bible alone, and when Adventism took their mantel at the arrival of the second angel, they accepted that “motto,” and were afterward labelled the “people of the book.” They had been given, through the ministry of William Miller a set of rules that would, if properly employed open the Bible to the minds of all who wished to hear. Miller’s Rules of Prophetic Interpretation are what inspiration says we must study if we are to give the third angel’s message.

“Mbind mi” bu Protestan yi ci jamono jooju mo doon: “Biibël bi ak Biibël bi rekk.” Protestan yi dañuy xamle seen bopp ni ay aarukat yu Biibël bi rekk, te ba Adwantisma jëlée seen ndigël bi ci ñëwug malaaka ñaareel bi, dañu nangu “mbind mi” moomu, te gannaaw loolu ñu tudde leen “nit ñi yu téere bi.” Ñu joxoon na leen, jaarale ko ci ministéeru William Miller, ab kuréelu yoon yu, bu ñu ko jëfandikoo ni mu waree, dina ubbi Biibël bi ci xel yu ñépp ñi bëgg a dégg. Yoonu Miller yu firi Kàddug yonent yi mooy li waxinug Yàlla wax ne war nañu ko jàng ngir man a yégle yëgleb malaaka ñetteel bi.

“Said Christ, ‘If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.’ Again he said, ‘I am the light of the world; he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness.’ The light of truth is going forth like a burning lamp, and those who love the light will not walk in darkness. They will study the Scriptures, that they may know of a surety that they are listening to the voice of the true Shepherd, and not that of a stranger.

Kirist wax na: “Ku nekk bëgg a topp ma, na weddi boppam, yëkkati bantam, te topp ma.” Te dellu na wax: “Man maa di leeru àddina; ku ma topp, du dox ci lëndëm.” Leerug dëgg mi mi ngi génn mel ni làmp bu tàkk; te ñi bëgg leer, duñu dox ci lëndëm. Dinañu jàng Mbind mi, ngir xam ci lu wóor ne déglu nañu baatu Sàmm-kat bu dëgg bi, waaye du baatu ku doxandéem.

Those who are engaged in proclaiming the third angel’s message are searching the Scriptures upon the same plan that Father Miller adopted. In the little book entitled Views of the Prophecies and Prophetic Chronology, Father Miller gives the following simple but intelligent and important rules for Bible study and interpretation:

“Ñi ñuy boole yi ngi ci yégleb xibaaru ñetteelu malaaka, dañuy seet Mbind mi ci benn pexe bu niroo ak bi Baay Miller jëfandikoo woon. Ci téere bu ndaw bi tudd Views of the Prophecies and Prophetic Chronology, Baay Miller joxe na yoon yii teewul solo, waaye am xel te am solo lool ngir njàngum Bibël ak firndeelam:

“‘1. Every word must have its proper bearing on the subject presented in the Bible; 2. All Scripture is necessary, and may be understood by diligent application and study; 3. Nothing revealed in Scripture can or will be hid from those who ask in faith, not wavering; 4. To understand doctrine, bring all the scriptures together on the subject you wish to know, then let every word have its proper influence; and if you can form your theory without a contradiction, you cannot be in error; 5. Scripture must be its own expositor, since it is a rule of itself. If I depend on a teacher to expound to me, and he should guess at its meaning, or desire to have it so on account of his sectarian creed, or to be thought wise, then his guessing, desire, creed, or wisdom is my rule, and not the Bible.’

«1. Baat bu nekk war na am jëfandikoom bu baax ci mbir mi ñu wone ci Biibël bi; 2. Mbind mu Sell mi mépp am na solo, te manees na koo xam ci njàngum góor-góorlu ak seetlu gu dëgër; 3. Dara lu ñu feeñal ci Mbind mi du, mbaa du nekk lu nëbbu ci kanam ñi koy laaj ak ngëm, te duyu waver; 4. Ngir xam njàngale, dajaleel mboolem Mbind yi ci mbir mi ngeen bëgg a xam, te na baat bu nekk am sañ-sañam bu yoon; te bu ngeen mënee samp seen xalaat te amul benn juuyoo, kon dungeen nekk ci njumte; 5. Mbind mi war na nekk ki koy leeral boppam, ndaxte mooy ndigal ci boppam. Su ma sukkandikoo ci benn jàngalekat ngir mu firndeel ma ko, te mu doon xalaat rekk ci maanaam, walla mu bëgg mu deme noonu ndax ngëmam gu bokk ak mbooloom, walla ngir ñu jàpp ko ku xam-xam, kon xalaatam rekk, bëgg-bëggam, ngëmam, walla xamam mooy sama ndigal, waaye du Biibël bi.»

“The above is a portion of these rules; and in our study of the Bible we shall all do well to heed the principles set forth.

“Li ci kaw moo doy benn ci yoon yii; te ci sunu jàngum Biibël, ñépp dinañu def lu baax su nu toppée ndigal yi ñu wone.”

“Genuine faith is founded on the Scriptures; but Satan uses so many devices to wrest the Scriptures and bring in error, that great care is needed if one would know what they really do teach. It is one of the great delusions of this time to dwell much upon feeling, and to claim honesty while ignoring the plain utterances of the word of God because that word does not coincide with feeling. Many have no foundation for their faith but emotion. Their religion consists in excitement; when that ceases, their faith is gone. Feeling may be chaff, but the word of God is the wheat. And ‘what,’ says the prophet, ‘is the chaff to the wheat?’

“Ngëm gu dëgg, mi ngi koy sos ci Mbind mi Sell yi; waaye Seytaane di jëfandikoo ay pexe yu bare ngir jéngal Mbind yi te dugal njuumte, ba taxte war nañu am artu gu mag bu nit bëggee xam li ñuy jàngal dëgg-dëgg. Benn ci njubte yu mag yi jamono jii mooy ne, nit ñi dañuy dëkk lool ci yëg-yëg, te di woote seen bët gu jub, fekk dañuy bañ wax yu leer yu Kàddug Yàlla, ndaxte kàddu googu àndul ak seen yëg-yëg. Ñu bare amuñu benn fondmaŋ bu seen ngëm sosul ludul ci yëg-yëg. Seen diine mooy xumb ak yëngu-yëngu; bu loolu jeexee, seen ngëm deñk. Yëg-yëg man naa doon mboq, waaye Kàddug Yàlla mooy dugub ji. Te “lu mboq doon ci dugub?” la yonent bi wax.»

“None will be condemned for not heeding light and knowledge that they never had, and they could not obtain. But many refuse to obey the truth that is presented to them by Christ’s ambassadors, because they wish to conform to the world’s standard; and the truth that has reached their understanding, the light that has shone in the soul, will condemn them in the Judgment. In these last days we have the accumulated light that has been shining through all the ages, and we shall be held correspondingly responsible. The path of holiness is not on a level with the world; it is a way cast up. If we walk in this way, if we run in the way of the Lord’s commandments, we shall find that the ‘path of the just is as the shining light, that shineth more and more unto the perfect day.’” Review and Herald, November 25, 1884.

«Kenn du ñàkk yoon ndax dafa bañ a topp leer ak xam-xam yu mu amul woon te mënul leen a jot. Waaye ñu bare dañuy bañ a déggal dëgg gi ñu leen indil jaarale ko ci yonnent yi Kirist, ndaxte bëgg nañu méngoo ak sàrtu àddina; te dëgg gi jëm ci seen xel mi, leer gi leer ci seen bakkan, mooy leen daan ci Bésub Àtte ba. Ci fan yu mujj yii, am nanu leer gu dajale woon gi di leer lu jaar ci jamono yépp, te dees na nu tegoon yéene wu méngoo ak loolu. Yoonu sell gi bokkul ak tolluwaayu àddina; mooy yoon wu yékkat. Su nu doxee ci yoon wii, su nu daw ci yoonu ndigali Boroom bi, dinanu gis ne “yoonu aji jub yi mel na ak leer gu di fenk, di gën a leer ba ci bëccëg bu mat sëkk.” Review and Herald, 25 Nowàmbar 1884.»

You can read in more detail about William Miller’s rules in the Article entitled William Miller under the Prophetic Keys category.

Man ngaa man a gëna bari ci yoonu William Miller yi ci Mbind mi tudd William Miller, ci wàllu Prophetic Keys.

In “our study of the Bible we shall all do well to heed the principles set forth” within “Father Miller’s” rules of prophetic interpretation. The horn of Protestantism was given the sacred document we call the Bible, and also given the responsibility to defend and promote the principles contained therein, and the Protestant horn was also given a set of rules to rightly divide the sacred documents’ meaning and intent.

Ci sunuy Biibal bi, nunu ñépp dina nu baax a déglu te topp njàngale yi ñu tëral ci yoonu teki waxi yonent yi yu “Baay Miyeer”. Bëj-golo bu Protestaŋ moom lañu jox kërgu xel mu sell mi nuy wax Biibal, te itam lañu ko jox yëfandikoo ak warugaru sàmm te yégle prinsip yi nekk ci moom; te itam lañu jox bëj-golo bu Protestaŋ ab njëginu yoon yu muy séddale bu jub tekki ak xalaatu kërgu xel mu sell ga.

The horn of Republicanism was given a sacred document we call the Constitution, and also given the responsibility to defend and promote the principles contained therein. The Republican horn was also given a set of rules to rightly divide the sacred documents’ meaning and intent. The rules given to rightly divide the Constitution is the Bill of Rights and it enshrines the most important purpose of the Constitution in the first rules of the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment listed in the Bill of Rights is the freedom of religion, expression, speech, and the press.

Bëñu ko joxoon bëccëg bu Républicanism bi ab kayit bu sell bi nu di wax Constitution, te itam bënn yëgle ci ay warugar yu ñu koy aar di yokk njàngale yi ci nekk. Bëccëg bu Républican bi ñu ko joxoon itam ab tëralininu yoon ngir xale bu baax tekki ak mébetu kayit yu sell yi. Ay yoon yi ñu jox ngir xale bu baax Constitution bi mooy Bill of Rights, te mooy li denc jiitu njariñu Constitution bi ci ay yoonam yu njëkk yi nekk ci Bill of Rights. First Amendment bi ñu lim ci Bill of Rights mooy sañ-sañu diine, waxe, kàddu, ak sañ-sañu saaray xibaar.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” U.S. Constitution, amend. I

“Kongre bii defar benn yoon ci wàllu samp ay yoonu diine, mbaa tere jëfandikoo diine ci yoonu goreel; mbaa wàññi sañ-sañu wax, mbaa bu mbind mi; mbaa sañ-sañu nit ñi ngir dajaloo ci jàmm, te ñaan Gouvernement bi ngir am njubbal ci seeni naqar.” Sàrttéetu États-Unis, amend. I

The Sunday law is an open attack against the first issue of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion, which is eliminated at the Sunday law, thus marking the end of the Constitution, the end of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy and the beginning of the persecution against those who are then proclaiming the third angel’s message in a loud cry. Those who are proclaiming the loud cry of the third angel and protesting against the destruction of the first Amendment and the Constitution are persecuted by those who were supposed to be upholding and applying the sacred rules, which defend the sacred document they were ordained to defend. This is an illustration of understanding and applying the parallel histories of the two horns of the lamb-like earth beast. The founding Fathers of the Constitution parallel Father Miller. The term Father used for Miller is used to designate a leader, not a popish priest. The Bible forbids calling men father who are professing to be spiritual guides. The Millerites are named after their father, as is often the case. To miss this distinction is to miss some of what the Elijah message means, when it turns the hearts of the fathers unto the children and vice-versa.

Sàrtu Dibeer bi mooy jàppale bu ubbeeku ci jëfandikookat bu njëkk bu Konstitusiyoŋ bi, mi war a wóorale sañ-sañu diine, te loolu ñu dindi ko ci biir sàrtu Dibeer bi; noonu mu màndargaal jeexitalu Konstitusiyoŋ bi, jeexitalu Etazini tamit ni mooy juróomeelu nguur gi ci waxi yonent yi ci Biibël bi, ak tàmbaliw fitna bi ci kaw ñi di waare yégle ndigalub ñetteelu malaaka bi ak xaacu kàddu gu réy. Ñi di yégle xaacu kàddu gu réy gu ñetteelu malaaka bi te di weddi yàqub Amendma bu njëkk bi ak Konstitusiyoŋ bi, ñi ñu doon yaakaar ne ñoo war a taxawal ak jëfandikoo sàrt yu sell yi, yi di aar kéyitu bu sell bi ñu teg ci seen loxo ngir ñu ko aar, ñoo leen di fitnaal. Lii mooy misaal ci ni ñuy dégg ak jëfandikoo jaar-jaari nettali yi bokk ci ñaari waxin wiir wi mel ni xar mi ci rabu suuf ba. Baayi réew mi ñi sos Konstitusiyoŋ bi, ñoo tollook Baay Miller. Kàddug Baay bi ñu di jëfandikoo ci Miller, ngir màndargaal kilifa la, waaye du saraxalekat bu Pàpp bi. Biibël bi tere na woo nit baay bu fekkee ne dafa wax ne mooy yemale bu xel mu sell. Millerite yi, tudd na leen ci seen baay, ni ko bët-bët di deme. Su nit réccu woonale woote wooñ wi, dina réccu yenn ci li yégleb Eliya bi di tekki, bi muy delloo xolu baay yi ci doom yi, ak xolu doom yi ci baay yi.

The United States in Isaiah twenty-three is the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy and it remains so until it overturns its Constitution at the rapidly approaching Sunday law. The sixth kingdom rules for seventy prophetic years, which are the days of one king. The kingdom (a king is a kingdom) that ruled for seventy years was Babylon. During the seventy years the horn of the state was the government of Babylon and the horn of the church was the Chaldeans. Daniel, Shadrach, Meshack and Abednego represent the one hundred and forty-four thousand. Both horns and God’s people are represented in Daniel’s testimony. The seventy years of captivity in Babylon was the days of one king that Isaiah employs to identify that the prophetic history of the United States and the history of Adventism as 1798 until the Sunday law.

Réewum Bennoo Bittiméeriik ci Esayi ñaar-fukk ak ñett mooy juróomeel buur bu kàdduy waxu Yàlla te dina nekk noonu ba kera mu dindi Sàrtu Réewam ci yoonu Dibeer bu gaaw a ñëw. Juróomeel buur boobu dafa nguur diirub juróom-ñaar-fukk at yu waxu Yàlla, te yooyu mooy fanu benn buur. Nguru gi (buur mooy nguur) gi nguuruwoon juróom-ñaar-fukk at mooy Babilon. Ci biir juróom-ñaar-fukk at yooyu, wàll wiirug réew mi mooy gouvernementu Babilon, te wàll wiirug kerk bi mooy Kaldéye yi. Daniel, Shadrach, Meshack ak Abednego dañuy tegtal ñetti-fukk ak ñent junni ak ñent-fukk ak ñent. Ñaari wàll yi ak nit ñi Yàlla bokkël ñépp dañu leen tegtal ci seede Daniel. Juróom-ñaar-fukk atu njaamte ci Babilon mooy fani benn buur yi Esayi jëfandikoo ngir xamle ne taarixu waxu Yàlla bu Réewum Bennoo Bittiméeriik ak taarixu Adventism mooy 1798 ba ca yoonu Dibeer.

Identifying that the line of prophetic history for both horns of the United States allows us to consider the ending and beginning, with the two horn witnesses to identify the characteristic of the other horn. After all the horns were the same. In Daniel there were horns, some broken, with horns that grew out of the broken horn. Some horns in Daniel were not the same size as each other, coming up later than the other. Not so, with the two horns of the United States. Those two horns parallel each other through the same history and produce the same waymarks, though different from one another in terms of their purpose. There are caveats within the history that are also important to understand.

Xam-xam ne sàrtu jaar-jaaru bind ci yonent yi ngir ñaari mbaam-u kaw yi ci Étaas-Üni moo nu may nu seet muj gi ak tàmbali gi, te jëfandikoo ñaari seede yu mbaam yi ngir xam melokaanu baneen mbaam ma. Ndaxte, ci demal, mboolem mbaam ya benn lañu woon. Ci Danyeel amoon na ay mbaam; am na yu dammiku, te ay mbaam sax di génn ci mbaam ma dammiku. Yenn ci mbaam yi ci Danyeel tolluwuñu benn rëyteek, ndaxte am na yu génn gannaaw yeneen yi. Waaye du noonu ak ñaari mbaam yi ci Étaas-Üni. Ñaari mbaam yooyu dañuy dëppoo ak seen bopp jaar ci benn jaar-jaar, te di jur benn xeetu màndarga-yoon yi, doonte ñu wuute ci seen njariñ. Am na itam ay cëmbu yu nekk ci biir jaar-jaaru woowu, yu war a xamle bu baax.

In the beginning of Adventism there was a change from the prophetic history represented by the church of Philadelphia unto the church of Laodicea. There must be therefore at the end a change from the prophetic history of Laodicea. The Revelation of Jesus Christ includes the light of this understanding and it is part of what is being unsealed at this time.

Ci njàlbéenug Adventisme, am na soppi gu jóge ci jaar-jaaru waxu yonent bi miir ci mbooloom Filadelfi, ba ca mbooloom Laodise. Kon nag war na am itam ci mujj ga ab soppi gu jóge ci jaar-jaaru waxu yonent bu Laodise. Peeñug Yeesu Kirist bi ëmb leerug xam-xam boobu, te muy benn cér ci li ñuy ubbi léegi.

And “after the end of seventy years” the pope will “sing” and the “forgotten” “harlot” will be remembered. She is “remembered” at the Sunday law, where the issue is between the worship of the sun, or the worship of the day that God’s law informed mankind to “remember.”

Te “gannaaw jeexug juróom-ñaar-fukk at” ba, pàpp bi dina “woy”, te “janook” ji ñu “fàtte woon”, “njaaloo” ji, dees na ko “fàttaliku”. Dees na ko “fàttaliku” ca yoonu Dibéer ba, fa njariñ li nekk ci diggante jaamu jant bi, walla jaamu bés bi yoonu Yàlla xamal nit ñi ne ñu “fàttalikoo” ko.

In this article we have identified that the history of Babylon’s seventy-year rule typifies the history of the United States from 1798 until the Sunday law. In a previous article and often in Habakkuk’s Tables we identify that the captivity in and deliverance from Egypt, also typifies the history of the United States and God’s people. Those four histories of Babylon, Egypt, Adventism and the United States are not the only lines to bring upon these lines, but when we apply the rule of first mention to those four lines—it is absolutely amazing. I will close this article with one simple and partial illustration of what I mean, and what I intend to continue with when we further address the history of Isaiah twenty-three at a later time.

Ci mbind mi, nu gis ne jaar-jaaru nguurug Babilon bu juróom-ñaar-fukk mi di misaal jaar-jaaru États-Unis bi dale ci 1798 ba ci yoonu Dimas. Ci beneen mbind bu njëkk, te yoon wu bari ci Xaaj-yu Habakuk, nu gis itam ne jaamono njaam ak gàmmu gi ci Misra, itam di misaal jaar-jaaru États-Unis ak xeetu Yàlla. Ñetti jaar-jaar yooyu—Babilon, Misra, Adventisme ak États-Unis—duñoo rekk ay réew-yoon yu ñu mën a yóbbu ci yeneen yii, waaye bu nu jëfe yoonu wax ji njëkk ci ñetti rëdd yooyu, lu neex lool la. Dinaa tëj mbind mi ak benn misaal bu yomb te doyadi, ngir wone li ma bëgg a wax, ak li ma namm a wéyal su nu delloo gën a wax ci jaar-jaaru Esayi ñaar-fukk ak ñett ci beneen waxtu.

The history of Babylon has a converted king at the beginning and a wicked king at the end. Doesn’t matter if it were Biden or Trump, for the book of Daniel teaches that it is God who sets up rulers and takes them down. What can be sure about either a Democrat or Republican leader at the time of the Sunday law is that they are a wicked leader. Nebuchadnezzar was Babylon, he was the tyrant of Babylon, willing to throw three good men into the fire. But he was eventually converted to Daniel’s God. Not so with the last leader Belshazzar. He was a wicked king. The United States in prophecy begins as a lamb, a symbol of Christ and His sacrifice for mankind. At the end the United States will speak as a dragon. The change from Christ to Satan in this line of history is represented by the difference of Nebuchadnezzar and Belshazzar.

Jàngoro Babilon dafa am buur bu ñu waxtu ci njàlbéen te am buur bu bon ci mujj. Su fekkee sax moo doon Biden walla Trump, loolu amul solo, ndaxte téereb Daniel jàngale ne Yàlla mooy taxawal kilifay te mooy leen wàcc. Li ñu man a wóor ci képp ku nekk njiitu Demokaraat walla Réew-piblik ci jamonoy yoonu Dibeer mooy ne njiit bu bon la. Nebukadnecar mooyoon Babilon; mooyoon jaamkat bu taru Babilon, ku bëgg a sànni ñetti góor yu baax ci safara. Waaye ci mujj, mu soppeeku ci Yàllay Daniel. Waaye noonu la mujjul ak buur bu mujj bi, Belshaccar. Moom buur bu bon la woon. États-Unis bi ci waxu yonent yi tàmbalee na ni xar, te loolu misaal la ci Almasi bi ak saraxam ngir nit ñi. Ci mujj, États-Unis bi dina wax ni nàg. Coppite gi nekk ci bindu jàngoro bii, jógé ci Almasi ba jëm ci Seytaane, ñu ngi ko tektal ci wuute gi nekk diggante Nebukadnecar ak Belshaccar.

“Belshazzar had been given many opportunities for knowing and doing the will of God. He had seen his grandfather Nebuchadnezzar banished from the society of men. He had seen the intellect in which the proud monarch gloried taken away by the One who gave it. He had seen the king driven from his kingdom, and made the companion of the beasts of the field. But Belshazzar’s love of amusement and self-glorification effaced the lessons he should never have forgotten; and he committed sins similar to those that brought signal judgments on Nebuchadnezzar. He wasted the opportunities graciously granted him, neglecting to use the opportunities within his reach for becoming acquainted with truth. ‘What must I do to be saved?’ was a question that the great but foolish king passed by indifferently.” Bible Echo, April 25, 1898.

“Belsaccar am na ay yoon yu bare ngir xam te def coobare Yàlla. Gisoon na baayam-mag Nabukadnesar ñu dàq ko bàyyi ko ci mbooloom nit ñi. Gisoon na it xel mi buur bu réy, bu réer ci ngërëmam bopp, doon màggal, ne Ki ko ko joxoon nangu ko ko. Gisoon na buur bi ñu dàq ko génne ci nguuram, ba def ko moroomu rab yi ci àll bi. Waaye bëgg-bëggu Belsaccar ci bànneex ak màggal boppam far na ay njàngale yu waroon a nekk ci yéenem ba fàww; te moo def bàkkaar yu ni mel ak yi indi àtte yu tar ci Nabukadnesar. Yàq na ay waxtu ak yoon yu ngëneel jox ko, te bàyyi na jëfandikoo yoon yi nekk ci ay loxoom ngir xam dëgg. ‘Lan laa wara def ngir ma mucc?’ la doon laaj bu buur bu mag waaye bu dof bi romb cig yéemu xol.” Bible Echo, 25 Awril 1898.

Notice that the wicked Belshazzar was the foolish king. He suffered the same judgment as his father Nebuchadnezzar, for both judgments were represented as the “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six. Nebuchadnezzar was in the fields living like a beast for twenty-five hundred and twenty days, which is seven biblical years and his son Belshazzar’s judgment which written on the wall represents twenty-five hundred and twenty as well. The difference was the judgment against Nebuchadnezzar converted him and made him a wise king, whereas Belshazzar’s judgment was upon the foolish king.

Seetleen ne Buur Belshassar mooy buur bu ñàkk xel. Moom dafa dékku woon atine bu mel ni bu baayam Nebukadnesar, ndaxte ñaari atine yooyu dañoo leen tegtal woon ni “juróom-ñaari jamono” yi ci Léwítik ñaar-fukk ak juróom-benn. Nebukadnesar nekkoon ca tool ya, di dund ni rab, diirub ñaar-fukk ak juróom-ñett téeméer ak ñaar-fukk fan, loolu mooy juróom-ñaari at yu xelu ci Mbind mi; te atine doomam Belshassar, bi ñu bindee ci miir mi, moom itam dafay tegtal ñaar-fukk ak juróom-ñett téeméer ak ñaar-fukk. Wuute gi mooy ne atine bi daloon Nebukadnesar soppi na ko ba def ko buur bu am xel, waaye atine Belshassar daldi dal ci buur bu ñàkk xel.

To the last ruler of Babylon, as in type to its first, had come the sentence of the divine Watcher: ‘O king, . . . to thee it is spoken; The kingdom is departed from thee.’ Daniel 4:31.” Prophets and Kings, 533.

“Ci buur nguur gu mujj ga bu Babilon, ni mu mel ci misaal ak buur bu njëkk ba, dogalu Samaay Kiy Wottu jot na ko: ‘Yow buur bi, … waxees na la ne; nguur gi teq na la.’ Daniel 4:31.” Prophets and Kings, 533.

The handwriting on the wall for the last president is the first amendment which identifies the “wall” of separation of church and state, which the final foolish king does not understand. The “seven times” of Leviticus twenty-six represents a “scattering of the people” that is accomplished by the king of the north at the Sunday law. That scattering is the national ruin that follows the Sunday law. The sixth nation forgot the lessons of their founding fathers who penned the Constitution to protect not only from a corrupt church, but also from the tyrannical European kings that the corrupt woman slept with. The founding fathers represent those who rejected the papacy and the kings of Europe for they knew from their own experience after coming out of a scattering of twelve hundred and sixty years of papal darkness, that protections against that type of tyranny must be the center piece of their new Constitution. They were wise fathers, they were lamb-like, but not so with the last father, for he will speak as a dragon. The Fathers came out of a scattering and the son goes back into a scattering. The tyrant in both instances is the first papacy and the last papacy.

Bind biir bi ci miir gi nguur gu mujj gi mooy amendmaa bu njëkk bi, bi wone “miir” mi taxawal diggante kërceen ak réew mi, te buur bu dof bu mujj bii xamul loolu. “Juróom-ñaari yoon” yi ci Léwitiik ñaar-fukk ak juróom-benn dafa tekki “tasaaroo nit ñi”, te buur bu bëj-gànnaar mooy ko yeggale ci yoonu Dibeer bi. Tasaaroo boobu mooy yàqu réew mi, mi topp yoonu Dibeer bi. Réew bu juróom-benneel bi fàtte na njàngat yi ay baayam yu samp nguur gi jàngale woon, ñi bind Dëggalinbaat gi ngir aar duñu rekk ci ab kërceen gu yàqute, waaye it ci ay buur yu Yorop yu doy waar, yi jigéen ju yàqute ja tëddoon ak ñoom. Baay yi samp nguur gi mooy ñi bañ papaas bi ak ay buur yu Yorop, ndaxte xamoon nañu ci seen bopp, gannaaw ba ñu génnee ci tasaaroo bu junni ak ñaar téeméer ak juróom-benn-fukk at yu lëndëmug papaas bi, ne aar yi ci melokaanu noonu war nañu doon xeer wu njëkk ci seen Dëggalinbaat bu bees bi. Ñoom ay baay yu xel lañu woon, ñoom mel nañu woon ni xar, waaye du noonu ci baay bu mujj bi, ndaxte moom dina wax ni nago. Baay yi génn nañu ci tasaaroo, te doom ji dellu jàllaat ci tasaaroo. Boroom tooñ bi ci ñaari misaal yi mooy papaas bu njëkk bi ak papaas bu mujj bi.

The symbol of the judgment upon Nebuchadnezzar, the first king and the last king Belshazzar was the “seven times” scattering of Leviticus twenty-six. Nebuchadnezzar lived it, and Belshazzar had it written upon the wall as his epitaph the very night he died. The symbol of the Republican horn in the beginning was its escape from the king of the north’s bondage and the symbol of the Republican horn at its end is captivity brought about from the king of the north. The Sunday law is the “very night” that it dies as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. In all four illustrations, Belshazzar, Nebuchadnezzar, and the beginning and ending of the Republican horn the twenty-five twenty of Leviticus twenty-six, is the symbol represented at the beginning and the ending. That represents the signature of Alpha and Omega.

Mbindu àtte ngir àtteb Nebukadnesar, buur bu njëkk ak buur bu mujj Belshazar, mooy “juróom-ñaari jamono” yu tasare ci Levitik ñaar-fukk ak juróom-benn. Nebukadnesar dund na ko, te Belshazar am na ko bindu ci miir mi mu nekk ay bàkku-jàmmam gannaaw guddi gi mu dee. Mbindu bu kàddu Republican ci njàlbéenam mooy muccam ci jaamug buur bu bëj-gànnaar, te mbindu bu kàddu Republican ci mujjam mooy njaamloo gu jóge ci buur bu bëj-gànnaar. Yoonu Dibéer mooy “guddi googu sax” bi mu dee ni juróom-benni nguur gi ci waxi yëgleb Biibël. Ci ñeenti misaal yooyu yépp, Belshazar, Nebukadnesar, ak njàlbéen ak mujjug kàddu Republican, ñaar-fukk ak juróom-ñeent ci Levitik ñaar-fukk ak juróom-benn, mooy mbindu mi ñu teewal ci njàlbéen ak ci mujj. Loolu moo di màndargay Alpha ak Omega.

The first “time prophecy” William Miller discovered was the twenty-five twenty of Leviticus twenty-six. It was the first stone in the foundation that Jesus laid through the work of Miller. It was also the first foundational truth that was set aside by Adventism in 1863. When all of Miller’s stones of truth were put into the foundation, those truths were represented on the two tables of Habakkuk, which are the 1843 and 1850 pioneer charts. Those two tables represent the covenant relationship between God and His denominated people just as the two tables of the Ten Commandments represented the covenant with ancient Israel.

Njëkk “keroog yégle” bi William Miller gisoon mooy ñaar-fukk ak juróom ñaar-fukk bi ci Leviticus ñaar-fukk ak juróom benn. Moo nekkoon xaalis bu jëkk bi ci fondamaaŋ bi Yeesu samp ci liggéeyu Miller. Te itam moo nekkoon dëgg-dëggu fondamaaŋ bu jëkk bi Adventism bàyyi woon ci 1863. Bi ñépp xeer yi Miller yégle woon ci dëgg deesee tabaxee ci fondamaaŋ bi, dëgg yooyu dañoo doon ndawtal ci ñaari tablaayu Habakkuk, yu di chart yi pionnier yi 1843 ak 1850. Ñaari tablaa yooyu dañuy tegtal jokkoo gu kóvenaaŋ bi nekk diggante Yàlla ak ñoñam yuñu tudd, ni ko ñaari tablaayi Fukk Yoonu ndigël yi doon tegtalee kóvenaaŋ bi ak Israayil gu yàgg ga.

At the end of Laodicean Adventism, when it is spewed out of the mouth of the Lord at the Sunday law, the handwriting on the wall is those two sacred pioneer charts. Charts which they are unable to read, for they refused to be benefitted by the warning message in their beginning of their history….

Ci mujju Awanntis bu Laodise, bi ñu ko tuddé ci gémmiñu Boroom bi ci jamonoy yoonu Dibeer, bind bi nekk ci miir mi mooy ñaari sàrt yu sell yu ñëkk ya. Sàrt yi nga xam ne maneesuñu leen a jàng, ndaxte dañoo bañ a jariñoo ak yégleb waare ga ci ndoorte seen jaar-jaar….

The financial crisis of 1837 in the United States was a complex event triggered by a combination of economic factors, policies, and speculative activities.

Krisisu xaalis bu 1837 ci États-Unis nekkoon lu jafe-jafe, te ay yëf yu bare ci wàllu ekonomi, yoon yi ak politik yi, ak itam jëfandikoo gu wéradi ci wàllu spéculation moo ko indi.

Speculative Bubble: In the years leading up to 1837, there was a speculative boom in land and investments, driven in part by the westward expansion of the country. Land speculation, particularly in the western frontier, led to inflated land prices and excessive borrowing.

Buubël spekulatif: Ci at yi jiitu woon 1837, amoon na yëngu-yëngu gu réy ci spekulasyonu suuf ak ci jëfandikookat yi, te loolu réyee woon ci benn xaaj ndax yaataluwaayu réew mi jëm penku. Spekulasyonu suuf, rawatina ci suufu diggante penku gi, indi woon yëkkute njariñu suuf yu ëpp ak boroom alal yu bari a jël ay bor.

Easy Credit and Speculative Lending: Banks and financial institutions were issuing large amounts of credit and loans, often without adequate collateral. This easy access to credit contributed to the speculative frenzy and increased the risks of financial instability.

Krédi yu yomb ak lendu yu aju ci xel doxalin: Banq yi ak kuréel yu xaalis yi daan joxe ay mbëy yu bari ci krédi ak ay bor, yu bari ci yooyu amul woon sax colatéral yu doy. Jot yu yomb jii ci krédi moo yokk seen dugub ci xel doxalin bu réy bi te gëna yokk risk yi ci yàqu-yàqu gu xaalis gu dul dëgër.

Overexpansion of Banks: Banks were expanding their operations rapidly, often issuing more paper money (banknotes) than they had specie (gold and silver) to back it up. This practice, known as “wildcat banking,” resulted in an overabundance of unregulated and unreliable currency in circulation.

Yokkute gi bank yi loolu: Bank yi doon yaatal seen liggéey bu gaaw, te yu bari ci ñoom daan génne ay xaalis-kayit (banknotes) yu ëpp woroom seen xaalis bu dëgg bi ñuy wax specie (wuram ak xaalis-gu-xonq) ngir waral ko. Jëfandikoo boobu, bi ñuy tudde “wildcat banking,” indiwoon na yokkute bu ëpp ci xaalis buñ génne te amul ndoorte yoonu kilifteef, te bu kenn mënul wóolu, ci biir yëngu-yëngu gi.

Jackson’s Economic Policies: President Andrew Jackson’s policies played a role in exacerbating the crisis. He issued the Specie Circular in 1836, which required that public lands be purchased with hard currency (gold and silver) rather than paper money. This led to a rush to convert banknotes into specie, causing financial strains and bank failures.

Politig ekonomig Jackson: Politig yi Prezidaa Andrew Jackson jël na céru ngir gëna mettal jafe-jafe bi. Moom mo génnee Specie Circular bi ci atum 1836, te mooy santaane ne suuf yu askan wi di jaay, war nañu leen jënd ak xaalis bu dëgër (wurus ak xaalis gu xonq), waaye du ak xaalis bu kayit. Loolu indi na gaaw-gaaw ngir soppi billet bank yi ci specie, te loolu jur na coono ci wàllu xaalis ak bank yu bare yu daanu.

International Factors: The crisis in the United States was also influenced by international economic conditions. A slump in the British economy, a major trading partner of the United States, led to a reduction in demand for American goods and exports. This, in turn, affected American businesses and contributed to economic distress.

Faktor yu Mag ci Àdduna bi: Jafe-jafe bi nekk ci États-Unis bi amoon na itam ay sabab yu jóge ci xaalis ak xaaluwaay yu mag yu àdduna bi. Wàññiku bu metti ci ekonomi Britaan, mi nekkoon benn ci ñi gëna mag ci ñu États-Unis di jëfandikoo ci njënd ak jaayante, indi na wàññiku ci laajug marchandises ak exportations yu Amerig. Loolu nag daldi laal liggéey yu Amerig te yokk jafe-jafey ekonomi.

Panic and Bank Runs: In May 1837, a series of financial shocks, including bank failures and credit contractions, led to a panic among investors and depositors. This panic triggered a wave of bank runs and a severe contraction of credit.

Ragal ak mbëggum bank yi: Ci weeru Mee 1837, ab taxawaayu yëngu-yëngu yu jëm ci xaalis, boole ci gàkkug bank yi ak wàññiku kredii, jur na ragal ci biir ñi di dugal seen xaalis ak ñi koy denkaane. Ragal moomu daldi yóbbu ab yoonu daw ci bank yi ak ab wàññiku kredii bu tar.

Contraction of Money Supply: As banks failed and credit tightened, the overall money supply in the economy contracted significantly. This contraction of money aggravated economic difficulties and deepened the recession. The combination of these factors led to a severe economic downturn, characterized by bank failures, unemployment, reduced consumer spending, and a general economic depression.

Wàññi xaalisu: Bi bank yi daanee te keredi ji gëna jafe, mbooloom xaalis bi nekk ci ekonomi bi daldi wàññiku bu bare. Wàññiku xaalis boobu gëna yokk jafe-jafe yi ci ekonomi bi te gëna xóotël réseysóŋ bi. Boolookaatu mbir yooyu indi na wàllu ekonomi bu tar, buy mel ni daanu bank yi, ñàkk liggéey, wàññiku jënd ak lekkug nit ñi, ak noflaayu ekonomi bu yaatu.

“We have nothing to fear for the future, except as we shall forget the way the Lord has led us, and His teaching in our past history.” Life Sketches, 196.

«Amuñu dara lu nu wara ragal ci ëllëg, ludul bu nu fàtte yoon wi Boroom bi gindee nu, ak njàngaleem ci sunu jaar-jaari jamono ji weesu.» Life Sketches, 196.