In the book titled, Hitler’s Pope, the author John Cornwell starts the story of the future pope who reigned when Hitler ruled Germany, with his grandfather and Pope Pius IX, who were driven out of the City of Rome. When Pius IX fled from the city of Rome, disguised as a nun, the only man he took with him was the future pope’s grandfather. Cornwall addresses the close relationship of the two men, and thereafter identifies how the future pope’s father also was connected with the power center of the Catholic Church. In doing so he identifies the social, political and religious environment of the history from the time of Pius IX, through World War II. The overview of history is tremendously informative.

Hitler’s Pope zyaan te kitab maa, lekhak John Cornwell te bhavishyanaa pope ni vaat ena daadaa ane Pope Pius IX thi sharu kare chhe—eva be vyaktiyo thi, jeone Rome shaher mathi hankaari kaadhvamaa aavyaa hata—jene Hitler e Germany par shasan karyu te samaye raaj karyu hatu. Jyare Pius IX Rome shaher mathi bhagi gaya, ek sanyasin na vesh maa, tyare ekaj maanav jene te pota saathe lai gaya, te bhavishyanaa pope no daado hato. Cornwell aa be maanasona nikat sambandh ni charchaa kare chhe, ane tyaarbaad darshaave chhe ke bhavishyanaa pope na pita pan Catholic Church na shakti-kendra saathe kevi rite jodayela hata. Aam kartaa te Pius IX na samay thi lai ne World War II sudhini itihasik samaajik, raajkiy ane dharmik paristhiti ne olakhaave chhe. Itihas nu aa avlokan atyant jaankaariprad chhe.

“Another step in papal assumption was taken, when, in the eleventh century, Pope Gregory VII proclaimed the perfection of the Roman Church. Among the propositions which he put forth was one declaring that the church had never erred, nor would it ever err, according to the Scriptures. But the Scripture proofs did not accompany the assertion. The proud pontiff also claimed the power to depose emperors, and declared that no sentence which he pronounced could be reversed by anyone, but that it was his prerogative to reverse the decisions of all others.

«ييتاوا باپال تاتەنەكەن يەنە بىر قەدەم ئالغا بېسىلدى، 11-ئەسىردە پاپا گرىگورىي VII رىم چېركاۋىنىڭ كامالەتكە يەتكەنلىكىنى جاكارلىغاندا. ئۇ ئوتتۇرىغا قويغان باياننامىلەرنىڭ بىرىدە چېركاۋ ھېچقاچان خاتالىق قىلماپتۇ، شۇنداقلا مۇقەددەس يازمىلارغا ئاساسەن ھەرگىزمۇ خاتالىق قىلمايدىكەن، دەپ ئېلان قىلىنغان ئىدى. بىراق بۇ دەۋانىڭ ئارقىسىدىن مۇقەددەس يازمىلاردىن كەلتۈرۈلگەن ئىسپاتلار قوشۇپ بېرىلمىدى. بۇ مەغرۇر پونتيفىك يەنە ئىمپېراتورلارنى تەختتىن چۈشۈرۈش ھوقۇقىنىمۇ داۋا قىلدى، ھەمدە ئۆزى چىقارغان ھېچقانداق ھۆكۈمنىڭ ھېچكىم تەرىپىدىن بىكار قىلىنالمايدىغانلىقىنى، ئەمما باشقىلارنىڭ بارلىق قارارلىرىنى بىكار قىلىش ئۆزىنىڭ ئالاھىدە ھوقۇقى ئىكەنلىكىنى جاكارلىدى.»

“A striking illustration of the tyrannical character of this advocate of infallibility was given in his treatment of the German emperor, Henry IV. For presuming to disregard the pope’s authority, this monarch was declared to be excommunicated and dethroned. Terrified by the desertion and threats of his own princes, who were encouraged in rebellion against him by the papal mandate, Henry felt the necessity of making his peace with Rome. In company with his wife and a faithful servant he crossed the Alps in midwinter, that he might humble himself before the pope. Upon reaching the castle whither Gregory had withdrawn, he was conducted, without his guards, into an outer court, and there, in the severe cold of winter, with uncovered head and naked feet, and in a miserable dress, he awaited the pope’s permission to come into his presence. Not until he had continued three days fasting and making confession, did the pontiff condescend to grant him pardon. Even then it was only upon condition that the emperor should await the sanction of the pope before resuming the insignia or exercising the power of royalty. And Gregory, elated with his triumph, boasted that it was his duty to pull down the pride of kings.” The Great Controversy, 57.

«ئه‌م وێنەیەیەکی سەرنجڕاکێش لە خەسڵەتی زەبەردەستانەی ئەم پارێزەری هەڵەنەکردن پێشکەش کرا لە شێوازی مامەڵەکردنی لەگەڵ ئیمپراتۆری ئەڵمانی، هێنریی چوارەم. بەهۆی ئەوەی بوێرانە هەوڵی پشتگوێخستنی دەسەڵاتی پاپادا، ئەم پاشایە بە دەربڕین لە کڵێسا و لادان لە تەخت محکوم کرا. هێنری، ترساو لە چۆڵبوونەوە و هەڕەشەکانی ئەو شازادانەی خۆی، کە بە فەرمانی پاپا هانیان درابوو بۆ یاخیبوون لە دژی ئەو، پێویستی بەوە هەست کرد کە ئاشتەوایی خۆی لەگەڵ ڕۆما بکات. لەگەڵ هاوسەرەکەی و خزمەتکارێکی دڵسۆزدا، لە ناو زستاندا لە چیای ئەلپەکان تێپەڕی، تاکو خۆی لەبەردەم پاپادا نزەم بکات. کاتێک گەیشتە ئەو قەڵایەی کە گڕێگۆری بۆی پاشەکشەی کردبوو، بەبێ پاسەوانەکانی بردرایە ناو حەوشەیەکی دەرەوە، و لەوێ، لە سەرمای توندی زستاندا، بە سەری ڕووت و پێی پەتی، و بە جلوبەرگێکی هەژار، چاوەڕوانی مۆڵەتی پاپای دەکرد تاکو بچێتە بەردەم. تا ئەو کاتەی سێ ڕۆژ بە بەردەوامی لە بەڕۆژووبوون و دانپێداناندا بەسەر برد، سەرۆکی کلیسا نەفەرموو بەخشینی پێ ببەخشێت. تەنانەت ئەوکاتیش تەنها لەسەر ئەو مەرجە بوو کە ئیمپراتۆر چاوەڕوانی پەسەندکردنی پاپا بێت پێش ئەوەی دووبارە نیشانەکانی پاشایەتی بەکاربهێنێت یان دەسەڵاتی شاهانە بەکارببات. و گڕێگۆری، بە سەرکەوتنەکەی خۆشحاڵ بووبوو، فیزلێدانی دەکرد کە ئەوە ئەرکی ئەوە تا لووتبەرزیی پاشاکان بخاتە خوارەوە.» The Great Controversy, 57.

Gregory VII was an “advocate of infallibility,” but the ridiculous claim was not made an official doctrine (dogma), until Pius IX, who made the foolish claim an established doctrine at the first Vatican Council. The doctrine was passed July 18, 1870, one hundred and fifty years to the day before the first disappointment of the one hundred and forty-four thousand.

Gregory VII awi “advocate of infallibility” ika, a nɔng liek la ka nɔŋɔ liɛh yɛlɛ ka taŋa dogma nɛ, Pius IX nɛ mɛ ka, Vatican Council kpiɛli gɔlɔmɛ la, yɛlɛ ka nɔŋɔ liɛh nɛ dogma tɛŋɛlɛ nɔ. Doctrine nɛ kɛ July 18, 1870, sanwɔhɔɔ kaŋa kɔɔ yɛn yiɛli kɛ la, kɔlɔgɔlɔmɛ kaŋa lɛ hundred and forty-four thousand la first disappointment la nyɔŋɔ.

What is informative about the history is that when Pius IX organized the first Vatican Council, and implemented his doctrine of infallibility, his motivation was brought about by his hatred of what was called “modernism.” It was not rooted in the idea that a pope could make no errors when defining biblical doctrines, it was a defense of the papal opposition to the influence that had been produced by the French Revolution. It was directed against what would ultimately be known as Communism.

Тарих туралы мәнді жайт мынау: ІХ Пий бірінші Ватикан кеңесін ұйымдастырып, өзінің жаңылмастық туралы ілімін енгізген кезде, оған түрткі болған нәрсе «модернизм» деп аталған ағымға деген жеккөрушілігі еді. Бұл, Киелі жазба ілімдерін анықтау барысында папа қателеспейді деген түсінікке негізделген жоқ; керісінше, бұл Француз революциясы туғызған ықпалға қарсы папалық қарсылықты қорғау болды. Бұл, түптің түбінде, Коммунизм деп аталатын нәрсеге қарсы бағытталған еді.

The French Revolution brought about an upheaval in the ruling structure of European nations, with a particular hatred for the monarchy that is the papacy. It was an Italian Republican revolt that had temporarily driven Pius IX, and his right-hand man out of Rome. The “modernism,” that was represented by the various philosophies that were produced by the French Revolution was Pius IX’s, arch enemy, and his doctrine of infallibility was designed to sustain every claim that the pope made against the modernists ideas that were produced by the French Revolution.

Revolusi Prancis telah menimbulkan suatu pergolakan dalam struktur pemerintahan bangsa-bangsa Eropa, dengan kebencian khusus terhadap monarki yang adalah kepausan. Itu adalah suatu pemberontakan Republik Italia yang untuk sementara waktu telah mengusir Pius IX, beserta tangan kanannya, dari Roma. “Modernisme,” yang diwakili oleh berbagai filsafat yang dihasilkan oleh Revolusi Prancis, adalah musuh bebuyutan Pius IX, dan doktrinnya tentang infalibilitas dirancang untuk menopang setiap tuntutan yang diajukan paus terhadap gagasan-gagasan modernis yang dihasilkan oleh Revolusi Prancis.

Daniel chapter eleven, verse forty identifies that in 1798, the king of the south (atheistic France), delivered the deadly wound to the king of the north (the papacy).

Daniel kapitulon onse, berse kuarenta, ta identifika na 1798, rey di sul (Fransia ateista), a duna e herida mortal na rey di norti (e papasia).

Pius IX’s doctrine of infallibility was connected with the war represented by verse forty of Daniel eleven, and from the latter part of 1869 to the following year Pius IX called together the first Vatican Council, known as Vatican 1, for the purpose of confirming that the pope was the head of Catholicism, and that Catholicism was the head of all the churches, as had been proclaimed by Justinian’s decree in the year 533.

Doctrine Pius IX ntawm kev tsis yuam kev tau txuas nrog tsov rog uas sawv cev los ntawm nqe plaub caug ntawm Daniel kaum ib, thiab txij thaum kawg ntawm xyoo 1869 mus txog rau xyoo tom qab ntawd Pius IX tau hu los sib sau thawj Pawg Sab Laj Vatican, uas hu ua Vatican 1, nrog lub hom phiaj los lees paub tias tus pope yog lub taub hau ntawm Catholicism, thiab tias Catholicism yog lub taub hau ntawm txhua lub koom txoos, raws li tau tshaj tawm los ntawm Justinian txoj cai tshaj tawm hauv xyoo 533.

The Second Vatican Council, also known as Vatican II, was held from 1962 to 1965. It was a landmark event in the history of the Catholic Church, and one of the most significant ecumenical councils in modern times. The council convened under the leadership of Pope John XXIII and continued during the pontificate of Pope Paul VI after John XXIII’s death in 1963. It is important to recognize the distinct difference between these two councils.

Konsili i Dytë i Vatikanit, i njohur edhe si Vatikani II, u mbajt nga viti 1962 deri më 1965. Ai ishte një ngjarje me rëndësi të madhe në historinë e Kishës Katolike dhe një nga koncilet ekumenike më domethënëse të kohëve moderne. Koncili u mblodh nën udhëheqjen e Papës Gjoni XXIII dhe vazhdoi gjatë pontifikatit të Papës Pali VI pas vdekjes së Gjonit XXIII në vitin 1963. Është e rëndësishme të njihet dallimi i qartë ndërmjet këtyre dy koncileve.

The first council was to establish what is called the “primacy,” of the pope, meaning that the pope is the supreme ruler, teacher and shepherd of the Church, responsible for preserving and interpreting the doctrines of faith. His authority consisted in defining dogmas, issuing doctrinal decrees, and making authoritative pronouncements on matters of faith and morals, known as papal infallibility. It includes the pope’s jurisdictional authority over the universal church, including the power to appoint bishops, regulate the sacraments, and govern the church’s administration.

An konseth kensa a omdher ma seyt “ar-rāsa” n il-bābā, ay maʿnāh bellī il-bābā huwa l-ḥākem il-aʿlā, il-muʿallem, u r-rāʿi n il-Knisja, w huwa l-masʾūl ʿalā ḥifẓ u tafsīr ʿaqāʾid il-īmān. Is-sulṭa tāʿu kienet tətkawwen mn taʿrīf id-dogmi, iṣdār marsūmāt ʿaqāʾidiyya, u ṣudūr taṣrīḥāt dhāt sulṭa fī umūr il-īmān u l-akhlaq, illī تُʿraf bi-ʿiṣmat il-bābā. Hādhā yashmal zāda s-sulṭa al-qaḍāʾiyya tāʿ il-bābā ʿalā l-Knisja al-kawniyya kullhā, bimā fīhā l-qudra ʿalā taʿyīn il-asāqfa, tanẓīm is-sagramenti, u ḥukm idārat il-Knisja.

The second council was to redirect the church into an ecumenical entity. The councils were directly opposite propositions. The conservative first council was contradicted by the liberal second council. Those two factions were as different as night and day, and the prophecy that is attributed to the three secrets of Fatima identify an internal war fitly represented by these two councils.

El segundo concilio debía reorientar la iglesia hacia una entidad ecuménica. Los concilios constituían proposiciones directamente opuestas. El conservador primer concilio fue contradicho por el liberal segundo concilio. Esas dos facciones eran tan diferentes como la noche y el día, y la profecía que se atribuye a los tres secretos de Fátima identifica una guerra interna adecuadamente representada por estos dos concilios.

The prophecy identifies a class who uphold the primacy represented by Pius IX as being represented by what is either called the “white pope,” the “good pope,” or the “good bishop”, and the other class, associated with Vatican II, are represented by the “black pope,” or the “bad pope,” or the “bad bishop.” The controversy of the two political concepts is represented when you visit the shrine of the miracle of Fatima, in Fatima, Portugal. When entering, the walkway is set between a statue of a black pope on one side, and a white pope on the other side.

သတင်းပရောဖက်ပြုချက်သည် Pius IX အားဖြင့် ကိုယ်စားပြုသော အဓိကအာဏာဦးစားပေးမှုကို ထိန်းသိမ်းကာကွယ်သော အုပ်စုတစ်စုကို “ပုပ်ရဟန်းမင်းဖြူ”၊ “ပုပ်ရဟန်းမင်းကောင်း” သို့မဟုတ် “ဘိရှော့ကောင်း” ဟု ခေါ်ဆိုသည့် ပုံရိပ်ဖြင့် ကိုယ်စားပြုထားပြီး၊ Vatican II နှင့် ဆက်စပ်သော အခြားအုပ်စုကို “ပုပ်ရဟန်းမင်းမည်း”၊ “ပုပ်ရဟန်းမင်းဆိုး” သို့မဟုတ် “ဘိရှော့ဆိုး” ဟူသော ပုံရိပ်ဖြင့် ကိုယ်စားပြုထားသည်။ နိုင်ငံရေးအယူအဆနှစ်ရပ်အကြားရှိ အငြင်းပွားမှုကို ပေါ်လွင်စွာ ကိုယ်စားပြုထားသည်ကို ပေါ်တူဂီနိုင်ငံ၊ Fatima မြို့ရှိ Fatima အံ့ဖွယ်ဖြစ်ရပ်၏ ဘုရားဖူးနန်းတော်သို့ သွားရောက်လည်ပတ်သောအခါ တွေ့မြင်နိုင်သည်။ ဝင်ရောက်သည့်အခါ လျှောက်လမ်းသည် တစ်ဖက်တွင် ပုပ်ရဟန်းမင်းမည်း၏ ရုပ်တုတစ်ဆူနှင့် အခြားတစ်ဖက်တွင် ပုပ်ရဟန်းမင်းဖြူ၏ ရုပ်တုတစ်ဆူအကြား၌ ချမှတ်ထားသည်။

It therefore becomes part of the heritage of the man that would ultimately become what the book identifies as Hitler’s pope, that his roots are entwined in the struggle between modernism (the king of the south), and papal primacy (the king of the north).

因此，这也就成为那个人之传承的一部分；此人最终将成为本书所指认的“希特勒的教皇”，其根源与现代主义（南方王）和教皇至上权（北方王）之间的斗争紧密交织。

It is to be understood that the author of the book we are considering was a Catholic of good standing, and his stated purpose for writing the book was to shed light upon the claim that the pope that reigned during World War 2 had supported Hitler, the Nazi’s or had any culpability in the holocaust against the Jews, and others. When Cornwell addresses Pius XII’s grandfather, who was the right-hand man that ordained the Vatican 1 council, the history of the struggle between the kings of the south and north is being acted out in that very history. When the “Republicanism” revolution reached Italy, for about a year, the Italians drove Pius IX out of the city of Rome, and from then on, even after he returned, all the papacy has ever owned was the one hundred and ten acres, known as Vatican City.

Ɔda no sɛ ɔkyerɛwfoɔ a ɔkyerɛw nwoma a yɛresusuw ho yi yɛ Katolike a wɔgye no tom yiye, na ne botae a ɔdaa no adi wɔ nwoma no a ɔkyerɛwee no mu ne sɛ ɔbɛma hann ahyerɛn asɛm a wɔde ato gua sɛ pope a odii ahenni wɔ Wiase Ko II bere mu no taa Hitler, Nazi no, anaa ɔwɔ bɔne biara mu wɔ ɔsɛe kɛse a wɔde baa Yudafoɔ ne afoforo so no mu no so. Bere a Cornwell reka Pius XII ne nana a ɔyɛɛ ɔbarima a ɔda ne nifa so, na ɔhyehyɛɛ Vatican I bagua no ho asɛm no, anafoɔ ne atifi ahene ntam akasakasa no abakɔsɛm no ara na wɔredi ho dwuma wɔ saa abakɔsɛm no mu. Bere a “Republicanism” atuatew no duu Italia no, bɛyɛ afe baako mu no, Italiafoɔ pam Pius IX fii Roma kurow no mu, na efi saa bere no reba no, mpo bere a ɔsan bae akyi no, nea papacy no wɔ daa nyinaa ne asase a ɛyɛ eka ɔha ne du, a wɔfrɛ no Vatican City no pɛ.

The only way he was even able to return to the Vatican is with the help of French troops, and a loan from the Rothschilds, the infamous Jewish bankers. To intelligently understand the papal complicity in the holocaust during World War II, requires some basic understanding of Europe’s attitude towards the Jews since the crucifixion of Christ. The book suggests that antisemitism and racism are two different attitudes, claiming Hitler’s hatred of the Jews was racist, for Hitler viewed the Jews as a lesser category of human beings, whereas antisemitism was the hatred of the Jews because they killed God. Whether they are one and the same, or there is actually a distinction between the two, the reality of the plight of the Jews is worth understanding.

La sola manera en que siquiera pudo regresar al Vaticano fue con la ayuda de las tropas francesas y de un préstamo de los Rothschild, los infames banqueros judíos. Para comprender inteligentemente la complicidad papal en el holocausto durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial, se requiere cierto entendimiento básico de la actitud de Europa hacia los judíos desde la crucifixión de Cristo. El libro sugiere que el antisemitismo y el racismo son dos actitudes distintas, al afirmar que el odio de Hitler hacia los judíos era racista, pues Hitler consideraba a los judíos como una categoría inferior de seres humanos, mientras que el antisemitismo era el odio hacia los judíos porque mataron a Dios. Ya sea que sean una misma cosa, o que realmente exista una distinción entre ambas, la realidad de la difícil situación de los judíos merece ser comprendida.

For instance, in America today if the word “ghetto,” is used most think it is the definition of the poor, run down side of town. But the term “ghetto,” originally referred to a section of a city, especially in Venice, Italy, where Jews were compelled to live during the Middle Ages. The first ghetto was established in Venice in 1516, when the Venetian Republic confined Jews to a designated area of the city known as the “geto nuovo” (new foundry), which eventually became known as the ghetto.

A mfano, katika Amerika ya leo neno “ghetto” linapotumiwa, wengi hudhani kwamba ni ufafanuzi wa sehemu maskini, iliyoharibika ya mji. Lakini neno “ghetto” hapo awali lilirejelea sehemu ya mji, hasa huko Venice, Italia, ambako Wayahudi walilazimishwa kuishi katika Enzi za Kati. Ghetto ya kwanza ilianzishwa huko Venice mwaka wa 1516, wakati Jamhuri ya Venice ilipowazuia Wayahudi katika eneo maalumu la mji lililojulikana kama “geto nuovo” (kiwanda kipya cha kuyeyusha metali), ambalo hatimaye likaja kujulikana kama ghetto.

In Europe through the Middle Ages, Jews were restricted as to where they could live, and also the professions they were allowed to practice. The restrictions were based upon the old definition of antisemitism, which referred to the belief that the Jews had killed God, and that all of their subsequent problems had been brought upon themselves through their own actions.

Avropa boyunca Orta əsrlər dövründə yəhudilərin harada yaşaya biləcəkləri, habelə hansı peşələrlə məşğul ola biləcəkləri məhdudlaşdırılmışdı. Bu məhdudiyyətlər antisemitizmin köhnə tərifinə əsaslanırdı; həmin tərif yəhudilərin Allahı öldürdüklərinə və sonrakı bütün problemlərinin öz əməlləri nəticəsində öz başlarına gəldiyinə dair inancı ifadə edirdi.

In the Middle Ages, it was an established tradition that Christians could not lend money or accept interest for a loan. The Jews were exempt from that restriction, and lending money became one of the professions that Jews were allowed to perform. The Jewish bankers, such as the Rothschild family, were the money changers in response to legal restrictions against what professions they were allowed to perform. When Pius IX needed funds to return to the Vatican, the frustration of no longer ruling the city of Rome was magnified by his need to reach out to the Jews for money.

మధ్యయుగాలలో, క్రైస్తవులు డబ్బు అప్పుగా ఇవ్వకూడదు, అప్పుపై వడ్డీ స్వీకరించకూడదు అనే స్థిరమైన సంప్రదాయం ఉండేది. యూదులు ఆ పరిమితి నుండి మినహాయింపును పొందారు; అందువల్ల డబ్బు అప్పుగా ఇవ్వడం యూదులు చేయుటకు అనుమతించబడిన వృత్తుల్లో ఒకటిగా మారింది. రోథ్‌స్చైల్డ్ కుటుంబం వంటి యూదు బ్యాంకర్లు, వారు ఏ వృత్తులు నిర్వహించుటకు అనుమతించబడినారో దాని మీద ఉన్న చట్టపరమైన ఆంక్షలకు ప్రతిస్పందనగా, నాణ్యమార్పిడివారిగా ఉండేవారు. పియస్ IXకు వాటికన్‌కు తిరిగి చేరుటకు నిధులు అవసరమైనప్పుడు, ఇకపై రోము నగరాన్ని పరిపాలించలేకపోవడమనే నిరాశ, డబ్బు కోసం యూదులను ఆశ్రయించవలసిన అవసరంతో మరింత పెరిగింది.

Prior to his being driven out of Rome Pius IX had appeared to be in one of two camps concerning the Jews and the church’s relation to the Jews. The two camps consisted of those who believed the Jews, no matter what happens to them, are simply getting what they deserve, and the other tended to show a little mercy towards the Jews. When Pius IX returned to the Vatican, after being driven out, the mercy he had sometimes manifested prior to his exile was never manifested again. Before his exile he had shut down the ghetto in the city of Rome, and after his return he re-established the ghetto, and began a taxation upon the Jews in order to regroup his financial losses.

رومه‌دن قووولماسى‌ندان اؤنجه پیوس التاسع، یهودیلر و کلیسانین یهودیلره مناسیبتی بارەسینده، گویا ایکی طرفدن بیرینه منسوب گؤرونوردو. او ایکی طرف بونلاردان عبارت ایدی: یهودیلرین باشینا نه گلیر-گلسین، ساده‌جه حق ائتدیکلرینی آلماقدا اولدوقلارینا اینانانلار، و او بیریسی کی، یهودیلره قارشى بیر قدر مرحمت گؤسترمەیه میلل‌لی ایدی. پیوس التاسع، قووولدوقدان سونرا واتیکانا قایداندا، سۈرگونو‌ندن اؤنجه بعضن اظهار ائتدیگی مرحمت، بیر ده هچ وئت اظهار اولونمادی. سۈرگونو‌ندن اؤنجه، روم شهرينده‌کی گتّونو باغلامیشدی، و قاییدیشی‌ندان سونرا گتّونو ینیدن برپا ائتدی و مالی زیانلارینی یئنه‌دن توپلاماق اوچون یهودیلرین اوستونه بیر وئرگی قویماقا باشلادی.

Pope Pius IX’s right-hand man was Marcantonio Pacelli, the grandfather of Hitler’s pope. He was an attorney that belonged to a special class of attorneys that supported the papacy. His son became part of that same elite class of attorneys, as did his grandson, who would ultimately become Hitler’s pope. After the book runs through the history of Eugenio Pacelli’s grandfather, his father, and his youth and education, it addresses the position that Pacelli took up as he began his work for the papacy. As an attorney, descending from the elite papal attorneys, he was picked to head up a department that specialized in contracts, which are called concords. In 1901 Pacelli was brought into the office of the Papal Secretariat of State.

بیا پیوس نهم کے دستِ راست مارکانتونیو پاچیلی تھے، جو ہٹلر کے پاپا کے دادا تھے۔ وہ ایک وکیل تھے اور وکلا کے ایک خاص طبقے سے تعلق رکھتے تھے جو پاپائیت کی حمایت کرتا تھا۔ ان کا بیٹا بھی اسی ممتاز طبقۂ وکلا میں شامل ہوا، اور اسی طرح ان کا پوتا بھی، جو آخرکار ہٹلر کا پاپا بنا۔ کتاب، یوجینیو پاچیلی کے دادا، اس کے والد، اور اس کے بچپن اور تعلیم کی تاریخ بیان کرنے کے بعد، اس منصب پر گفتگو کرتی ہے جسے پاچیلی نے اس وقت اختیار کیا جب اس نے پاپائیت کے لیے اپنا کام شروع کیا۔ ایک وکیل کی حیثیت سے، جو اعلیٰ پاپائی وکلا کی نسل سے تھا، اسے ایک ایسے شعبے کی سربراہی کے لیے منتخب کیا گیا جو معاہدات میں تخصص رکھتا تھا، جنہیں کونکورڈز کہا جاتا ہے۔ 1901 میں پاچیلی کو پاپائی سیکریٹریٹ آف اسٹیٹ کے دفتر میں لایا گیا۔

Pacelli became the envoy to the nations. Prophetically Pacelli became the legal point of contact that consummated the fornication of the kings of the earth with the papacy. In 1903, Pius X was coronated as pope. Immediately he began to attack the “intellectual poison” that produced “relativism and skepticism.” The man who ran Pius X’s effort to eradicate “modernism” was Umberto Benigni, who worked in the same office as Pacelli. Benigni once stated of a group of world-class historians, that they were men for whom, “history is nothing but a continual desperate attempt to vomit. For this sort of human being there is only one remedy: the inquisition!” To Benigni, a historian that expressed any sympathy with the ideas that came from the French Revolution were to be executed.

پاچেলّی به فرستادۀ ملت‌ها بدل شد. از دیدگاه نبوی، پاچلّی به آن نقطۀ تماس حقوقی تبدیل گردید که زناکاری پادشاهان زمین با پاپیّت را به کمال رسانید. در سال 1903، پیوس دهم به عنوان پاپ تاج‌گذاری شد. او بی‌درنگ حملۀ خود را بر «زهر فکری» که «نسبی‌گرایی و شک‌گرایی» را پدید می‌آورد، آغاز کرد. مردی که برنامۀ پیوس دهم را برای ریشه‌کن ساختن «تجددگرایی» اداره می‌کرد، اومبرتو بنینی بود که در همان دفتری کار می‌کرد که پاچلّی نیز در آنجا مشغول بود. بنینی زمانی دربارۀ گروهی از مورخان طراز اول جهان اظهار داشت که آنان مردانی‌اند که برای ایشان «تاریخ چیزی جز تلاشی پیوسته و نومیدانه برای استفراغ کردن نیست. برای این گونه انسان‌ها فقط یک درمان وجود دارد: تفتیش عقاید!» از نظر بنینی، هر مورخی که اندک همدلی‌ای با اندیشه‌هایی که از انقلاب فرانسه برخاسته بود ابراز می‌کرد، باید اعدام می‌شد.

Officially, Benigni ran the propaganda ministry for the papacy, but unofficially he also ran a clandestine spy network, designed to identify any Catholics that had any sympathy for the “modernism,” that had originated with the king of the south. Ultimately in 1910, his work produced a directive that obliged employees of the papacy to swear an oath, called the Antimodernist Oath. It is still in force. To be employed by the Vatican you must swear to a hatred of modernist ideas, which today we would call communistic ideas.

زَورْمَزْوَارْ, بېنیگنی پاپازْلِقْ اوچون تبلیغات نظارتی‌نی یوروتوردو، اما غَیرِرَسمی شکیلده او، جنوبون قیرالین‌دان باشلامیش اولان «مودرنزم»ه هر هانگی بیر رَغبتی اولان کاتولیکلری تعیین ائتمک اوچون قورولموش گیزلی بیر جاسوسلوق شَبَکَسینی ده اداره ائدیردی. نِهایَت ۱۹۱۰دا، اونون چالیشماسی، پاپازْلِقْ خادملرینی «آنتی‌مودرنست آندی» آدلاندیریلان بیر یمین ائتمیه مَجبور ائدن بیر تالیمات حاصل ائتدی. بو هَله ده قووَتده‌دیر. واتیکاندا ایشله‌مک اوچون، بوگون بیزیم کومونیست فیکرلر دییه‌جه‌ییمیز مودرنست فیکرلره قارشی نفرت اوزره یمین ائتمک لازیم‌دیر.

In the summary of Cronwell’s book, on the flyleaf it states, “In the first decade of the century, as a brilliant young Vatican lawyer, Pacelli helped shape an ideology of unprecedented papal power; during the 1920’s he employed cunning and blackmail to impose power in Germany. In 1933, Hitler became his perfect negotiating partner and a concordant was established that granted religious and educational advantages to the Catholic Church in exchange for Catholic withdrawal from social and political action. This ‘voluntary’ abdication of political Catholicism imposed from Rome facilitated the rise of Nazism.

En el resumen del libro de Cronwell, en la solapa se declara: «En la primera década del siglo, como brillante joven jurista del Vaticano, Pacelli ayudó a dar forma a una ideología de poder papal sin precedentes; durante la década de 1920 empleó astucia y chantaje para imponer poder en Alemania. En 1933, Hitler se convirtió en su socio negociador perfecto y se estableció un concordato que otorgó ventajas religiosas y educativas a la Iglesia Católica a cambio de la retirada católica de la acción social y política. Esta abdicación “voluntaria” del catolicismo político, impuesta desde Roma, facilitó el ascenso del nazismo. »

At a cabinet meeting on July 14, 1933, Adolph Hitler expressed his opinion that very month that the concordance manufactured by Pacelli with the Nazi’s gave Germany created “an area of trust…. In the developing struggle against international Jewry.”

1933-жь шылде 14-те өткен кабинет жыйналысында Адольф Гитлер сол айда Пачеллидің нацилермен жасап берген конкордаты Германияға «сенім аймағын.... халықаралық еврейлікке қарсы дамып келе жатқан күресте» құрды деген пікірін білдірді.

Cornwell’s book was not well received by Catholics who refused to accept the evidence that Pacelli was the primary reason that Hitler was able to rise to power, for Germany was a majority of Catholics. Pacelli had struck an agreement that prevented the Catholic publishing house, Catholic news agencies and Catholic schools from saying anything about the direction of Hitler from 1933 onward. The book traces the obvious anti-Semitic bent of Pacelli, who thereafter became the pope during World War II. At least three items can be established on very reliable historical sources from the book.

کورنوێلێس کتێبەکە لەلایەن ئەو کاتۆلیکانەوە بە باشی پێشوازی لێ نەکرا کە ڕازی نەبوون بەو بەڵگانەی بپذیرن کە پاکێلی هۆکاری سەرەکی بوو بۆ ئەوەی هیتلەر بتوانێت بگاتە دەسەڵات، چونکە ئەڵمانیا زۆرینەیەکی کاتۆلیک بوو. پاکێلی ڕێککەوتنێکی کردبوو کە ڕێگەی دەگرت لەوەی چاپخانەی کاتۆلیک، ئاژانسەکانی هەواڵی کاتۆلیک و قوتابخانە کاتۆلیکەکان لە ساڵی 1933ەوە بەدواوە هیچ شتێک دەربارەی ئاراستەی هیتلەر بڵێن. ئەو کتێبە شوێنەواری ئەو ئاراستەی دژە-جوولەکەییە ئاشکرایەی پاکێلی دەکاتەوە، کە دواتر بوو بە پاپا لە ماوەی جەنگی دووەمی جیهان. لەسەر بنەمای سەرچاوە مێژووییە زۆر متمانەپێکراوەکان، لەو کتێبەدا دەکرێت لانیکەم سێ خاڵ بسەلمێندرێت.

The first is the warfare of the king of the north and the king of the south, as represented in Daniel chapter eleven. In that warfare the enemies are Catholicism against atheism, the pope against Communism. The other point is that the pope employed Nazism as his proxy army against atheism during World War II, just as the pope employed apostate Protestantism in 1989, as its proxy army against the atheism of the USSR. The book also identifies the internal and external prophetic structure represented by the satanic messages that came forth from the miracle at Fatima.

ܩܕܡܝܬܐ ܗܝ ܩܪܒܐ ܕܡܠܟܐ ܕܓܪܒܝܐ ܘܕܡܠܟܐ ܕܬܝܡܢܐ، ܐܝܟ ܕܡܬܝܨܒܐ ܒܕܢܝܐܝܠ ܡܐܡܪܐ ܚܕܥܣܪ. ܒܗܿܘ ܩܪܒܐ ܒܥܠܕܒܒ̈ܐ ܐܝܬܝܗܘܢ ܟܬܘܠܝܩܘܬܐ ܠܘܩܒܠ ܐܬܐܝܣܡܘܣ، ܦܐܦܐ ܠܘܩܒܠ ܩܘܡܘܢܝܣܡܘܣ. ܗܿܘ ܢܘܩܕܐ ܐܚܪܢܐ ܗܘ ܕܦܐܦܐ ܐܫܬܡܫ ܒܢܐܙܝܣܡܘܣ ܐܝܟ ܚܝܠܐ ܕܫܠܝܚܘܬܗ ܠܘܩܒܠ ܐܬܐܝܣܡܘܣ ܒܙܒܢܐ ܕܩܪܒܐ ܕܬܪܝܢ ܥܠܡ̈ܐ، ܐܝܟܢܐ ܕܐܫܬܡܫ ܦܐܦܐ ܒܦܪܘܛܣܛܢܛܝܘܬܐ ܫܒܝܩܬܐ ܒܫܢܬ 1989، ܐܝܟ ܚܝܠܐ ܕܫܠܝܚܘܬܗ ܠܘܩܒܠ ܐܬܐܝܣܡܘܣ ܕܐܘܚܕܢܐ ܕܣܘܒܝܐܬ. ܘܐܦ ܟܬܒܐ ܡܫܘܕܥ ܠܡܒܢܝܢܐ ܢܒܝܘܬܝܐ ܓܘܝܐ ܘܒܪܝܐ ܕܡܬܝܨܒ ܒܐܝܓܪ̈ܬܐ ܣܛܢܝ̈ܬܐ ܕܢܦܩ ܡܢ ܬܡܝܗܘܬܐ ܕܦܐܛܝܡܐ.

The borderline war of Raphia, represented in verses eleven and twelve of Daniel eleven, represent the war of the borderline currently playing out in the Ukraine. The ancient war was a hot war, the second is the second proxy war, with the proxy armies involved in mortal interaction. Raphia identifies the borderline war as being between the king of the north and the king of the south, but prophecy teaches that until the soon coming Sunday law, the whore of Tyre is forgotten, Jezebel is in Samaria, and Herodias skipped Herod’s birthday party. Those three witnesses of the role of the king of the north in this current history, is that she is behind the scenes pulling the strings. The hot wars, proxy wars and cold wars that happen while she is forgotten are accomplished by her proxy armies.

လျာဖိယစစ်ပွဲကို ဒံယေလ ၁၁ ၏ အပိုဒ် ၁၁ နှင့် ၁၂ တို့တွင် ကိုယ်စားပြုဖော်ပြထားပြီး၊ ယင်းသည် ယခု ယူကရိန်းတွင် ဖြစ်ပွားနေသော နယ်စပ်စစ်ပွဲကို ကိုယ်စားပြုသည်။ ရှေးဟောင်းစစ်ပွဲသည် တိုက်ရိုက်အပူပြင်းစစ်ပွဲဖြစ်ခဲ့သော်လည်း၊ ဒုတိယအနေဖြင့် ယခုစစ်ပွဲသည် ကိုယ်စားလှယ်စစ်ပွဲ ဒုတိယမြောက်ဖြစ်ပြီး၊ ပါဝင်သော ကိုယ်စားလှယ်တပ်များသည် အသက်သေဆုံးမှုအထိ ရင်ဆိုင်တိုက်ခိုက်နေကြသည်။ လျာဖိယသည် ထိုနယ်စပ်စစ်ပွဲကို မြောက်ဘုရင်နှင့် တောင်ဘုရင်အကြားရှိသော စစ်ပွဲအဖြစ် သတ်မှတ်ဖော်ပြသော်လည်း၊ ပရောဖက်ပြုချက်က မကြာမီရောက်ရှိလာမည့် တနင်္ဂနွေနေ့ဥပဒေအထိ တိုင်အောင် တုရု၏ ပြည်တန်ဆာမသည် မေ့လျော့ခံရလျက်ရှိပြီး၊ ယေဇဗေလသည် သမာရိ၌ ရှိနေကာ၊ ဟေရောဒိယသည် ဟေရောဒ်၏ မွေးနေ့ပွဲကို ကျော်လွန်သွားခဲ့ကြောင်း သွန်သင်ထားသည်။ ယခုလက်ရှိသမိုင်းတွင် မြောက်ဘုရင်၏ အခန်းကဏ္ဍနှင့်စပ်လျဉ်း၍ ထိုသက်သေသုံးပါးက ဖော်ပြနေသည်မှာ၊ သူမသည် နောက်ကွယ်မှ ကြိုးဆွဲညှိနှိုင်းနေသူဖြစ်ကြောင်းပင် ဖြစ်သည်။ သူမ မေ့လျော့ခံနေရစဉ်အတွင်း ဖြစ်ပေါ်သော တိုက်ရိုက်အပူပြင်းစစ်ပွဲများ၊ ကိုယ်စားလှယ်စစ်ပွဲများနှင့် အေးစစ်ပွဲများသည် သူမ၏ ကိုယ်စားလှယ်တပ်များအားဖြင့် ဆောင်ရွက်ခြင်းခံရကြသည်။

Russia is the king of the south, and it is now involved in a borderline war that is being financed by the globalists of the Western world, primarily the progressive Democrats and RINO (Republican In Name Only) Republicans in the United States. When the United States is represented as the king of the north’s proxy army in verse forty of Daniel eleven, its two prophetic characteristics are military might and financial power. The United States is accomplishing the same work in Ukraine that it did in 1989, helping the Pope against Russia, and the proxy army on the ground, defending Ukraine, is so full of Nazi supporters that even the mainstream media cannot deny it. Rome is now using the same proxy armies that she used in the hot war that was World War II, and in 1989, to war against Russia. Read the book: Hitler’s Pope, the Secret History of Pius XII.

Урыс нь урд зүгийн хаан мөн бөгөөд эдүгээ Баруун ертөнцийн глобалистууд, юуны түрүүнд Америкийн Нэгдсэн Улс дахь дэвшилтэт Ардчилсан намынхан болон RINO (нэр төдий Бүгд Найрамдахчууд) Бүгд Найрамдахчуудын санхүүжилттэй, дайны ирмэгт тулсан мөргөлдөөнд оролцож байна. Даниел арван нэгийн дөчдүгээр эшлэлд Америкийн Нэгдсэн Улсыг хойд зүгийн хааны төлөөлөгч цэрэг хэмээн дүрсэлсэн үед, түүний эш үзүүллэгийн хоёр шинж нь цэргийн хүч чадал болон санхүүгийн эрх мэдэл юм. Америкийн Нэгдсэн Улс 1989 онд хийсэнтэйгээ адил ажлыг Украинд гүйцэтгэж, Ромын Папад Урысын эсрэг тусалж байгаа бөгөөд Украйныг хамгаалан газар дээр нь тулалдаж буй төлөөлөгч цэрэг нь нацистуудыг дэмжигчдээр тийм дүүрэн байгаа тул бүр гол урсгалын хэвлэл мэдээлэл ч үүнийг үгүйсгэж чадахгүй байна. Ром одоо Дэлхийн хоёрдугаар дайн хэмээх халуун дайнд, мөн 1989 онд ашиглаж байсан тэр л төлөөлөгч цэргүүдээ Урысын эсрэг дайн хийхэд ашиглаж байна. Энэ номыг унш: Hitler’s Pope, the Secret History of Pius XII.

We will continue this study in the next article.

Ñande jaikundaha ko estudio rehe ambue artículo-pe.

“In like manner, when God was about to open to the beloved John the history of the church for future ages, He gave him an assurance of the Saviour’s interest and care for His people by revealing to him ‘One like unto the Son of man,’ walking among the candlesticks, which symbolized the seven churches. While John was shown the last great struggles of the church with earthly powers, he was also permitted to behold the final victory and deliverance of the faithful. He saw the church brought into deadly conflict with the beast and his image, and the worship of that beast enforced on pain of death. But looking beyond the smoke and din of the battle, he beheld a company upon Mount Zion with the Lamb, having, instead of the mark of the beast, the ‘Father’s name written in their foreheads.’ And again he saw ‘them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name, stand on the sea of glass, having the harps of God’ and singing the song of Moses and the Lamb.

“同樣地，當上帝將要向蒙愛的約翰啟示教會未來世代的歷史時，祂藉著向他顯明那「好像人子的一位」，在燈臺中間行走，來向他保證救主對祂子民的關懷與眷顧；那燈臺象徵七個教會。當約翰蒙指示看見教會與地上權勢之間最後重大的爭戰時，他也蒙准得見忠信之人最終的勝利與拯救。他看見教會被帶入與獸及其像致命的衝突之中，並且對那獸的敬拜在死的威脅之下被強制推行。但當他越過戰場的煙霧與喧囂而望時，他看見有一班人在錫安山上與羔羊同站；他們額上所寫的，不是獸的印記，乃是「父的名」。他又看見「那些勝了獸和獸的像，並牠名字數目的人，都站在玻璃海上，拿著上帝的琴」，並且唱摩西和羔羊的歌。”

“These lessons are for our benefit. We need to stay our faith upon God, for there is just before us a time that will try men’s souls. Christ, upon the Mount of Olives, rehearsed the fearful judgments that were to precede His second coming: ‘Ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars.’ ‘Nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. All these are the beginning of sorrows.’ While these prophecies received a partial fulfillment at the destruction of Jerusalem, they have a more direct application to the last days.

“Ene kaŋfɔrɔw yi bɛ taa anw ka nafamà ye. An ka an dannaya sigi Ala la, ka bɔ fɔ an yɛrɛ ta kɛnɛ kan waati dɔ bɛ na min bɛ mɔgɔw niw ka jusu sɛgɛsɛgɛ. Kristu, kàlen tugu kan, ye sariya jugumanw minw tun ka kɛ a filen kɛlɛn na, olu fɔ ko: ‘Aw bɛ kɛliw ni kɛli kumaaw mɛn.’ ‘Siyaya dɔ bɛ wuli ka kɛ siyaya dɔ kan, masaya dɔ fana ka kɛ masaya dɔ kan; minɔgɔ bɛ kɛ, bana-juguw ni dugukolonyɔgɔnaw fana bɛ kɛ yɔrɔ caman na. O bɛɛ ye toorow daminɛ ye.’ Nɔgɔn-koorɔsiw nin ye kɛ dunuya-jikɛlan dɔ sɔrɔ Yerusalɛm halaki waati, nka u ka baarakɛli tɛgɛlen bɛ ka taa tile labanw ma.”

“We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecy is fast fulfilling. The Lord is at the door. There is soon to open before us a period of overwhelming interest to all living. The controversies of the past are to be revived; new controversies will arise. The scenes to be enacted in our world are not yet even dreamed of. Satan is at work through human agencies. Those who are making an effort to change the Constitution and secure a law enforcing Sunday observance little realize what will be the result. A crisis is just upon us.

“ñuqanchikmi hatun, llakikuywan hunt’asqa ruwaykunapa punku punkunapi sayashanchik. Willakuyqa utqayman hunt’akushan. Señorqa punkupin kashan. Manaraq unaychu ñawpaqninchikpi kicharikunqa llapa kawsakkunapaq ancha mancharikuypaq, llapaq sonqonta hap’iq pacha. Ñawpaq tiempoq ch’axwaykunaqa kutimunqanku; musuq ch’axwaykunapas hatarinqanku. Kay pachanchikpi ruwaypaq kaq rikch’ariykunaqa manaraqpas muskhoypi hina yuyasqachu kanku. Satanásqa runa yanapakuqkuna vasitawan llamk’ashan. Constituciónta tikrayta munaspa, domingo punchaw waqaychayta kamachiq leyta hap’ichiyta maskhaqkunaqa imayna tukukuynin kananta manam allinta yachankuchu. Crisisqa ñam qayllaypi kashan.”

“But God’s servants are not to trust to themselves in this great emergency. In the visions given to Isaiah, to Ezekiel, and to John we see how closely heaven is connected with the events taking place upon the earth and how great is the care of God for those who are loyal to Him. The world is not without a ruler. The program of coming events is in the hands of the Lord. The Majesty of heaven has the destiny of nations, as well as the concerns of His church, in His own charge.” Testimonies, volume 5, 752, 753.

“Garkuaꞌra Dious ngkuzáꞌa ni korang ti ikabiâ ti maragup a panamdaman ya. Takan ti mga panagpakita a in-atad ku Isaias, ku Ezekiel, am ku Juan, makitâ tayo nu mapia ya pagkadikit ku langit ti mga kapangyarihan a magyari ku tana, am nu pira ya kàg pamaalintak ku Dious para ku mga tapat nikanián. Yawa a kalibutan ay awan ti maggúruk. Ya panukád ku mga magyari a padáyun a umadene ay adda ku lima ku Apú Dious. Ya Kadayawan ku langit ay i lima na ya kapalaran ku mga nasyun, pati ya mga pakaseknan ku Simbaan na.” Testimonies, volume 5, 752, 753.