In the book titled, Hitler’s Pope, the author John Cornwell starts the story of the future pope who reigned when Hitler ruled Germany, with his grandfather and Pope Pius IX, who were driven out of the City of Rome. When Pius IX fled from the city of Rome, disguised as a nun, the only man he took with him was the future pope’s grandfather. Cornwall addresses the close relationship of the two men, and thereafter identifies how the future pope’s father also was connected with the power center of the Catholic Church. In doing so he identifies the social, political and religious environment of the history from the time of Pius IX, through World War II. The overview of history is tremendously informative.

Fuula mata-duree Hitler’s Pope jedhu keessatti, barreessaan John Cornwell, seenaa phaaphaasii gara fuulduraa isa yeroo Hitler Jarmanii bulchaa turetti mootummaa isaa geggeesse sanaa, akaakayyuu isaa fi Phaaphaasii Pius IX kanneen Magaalaa Roomaa keessaa ari’amanii turan irraa jalqaba. Yommuu Pius IX uffata dubartii qulqulluu fakkaatuun of dhokfatee magaalaa Roomaa keessaa baqate, nama isa wajjin geesse tokkicha akaakayyuu phaaphaasii gara fuulduraa sanaa ture. Cornwell hariiroo dhihoo namoota lamaan sanaa ilaallata; achiis abbaa phaaphaasii gara fuulduraa sanaas akkamitti giddugala aangoo Waldaa Kaatolikii wajjin walitti hidhata qaba ture akka ta’e ibsa. Kana gochuudhaanis, haala hawaasummaa, siyaasaa fi amantii seenaa yeroo Pius IX irraa kaasee hanga lola Addunyaa Lammaffaatti ture adda baasa. Ilaalchi waliigalaa seenaa kanaa baay’ee odeeffannoo qabeessa dha.

“Another step in papal assumption was taken, when, in the eleventh century, Pope Gregory VII proclaimed the perfection of the Roman Church. Among the propositions which he put forth was one declaring that the church had never erred, nor would it ever err, according to the Scriptures. But the Scripture proofs did not accompany the assertion. The proud pontiff also claimed the power to depose emperors, and declared that no sentence which he pronounced could be reversed by anyone, but that it was his prerogative to reverse the decisions of all others.

«Հերթական քայլը պապական յուրացման ճանապարհին կատարվեց, երբ տասնմեկերորդ դարում Հռոմի Գրիգոր VII պապը հռչակեց Հռոմեական եկեղեցու կատարելությունը։ Նրա առաջադրած դրույթների մեջ կար նաև մեկը, ըստ որի՝ եկեղեցին երբեք չէր սխալվել և, Սուրբ Գրքերի համաձայն, երբեք էլ չէր սխալվելու։ Բայց այդ պնդմանը Սուրբ Գրքից բերված ապացույցներ չէին ուղեկցում։ Հպարտ քահանայապետը նաև իրեն վերագրում էր կայսրերին գահընկեց անելու իշխանություն և հայտարարում էր, որ իր արձակած որևէ վճիռ ոչ ոք չի կարող չեղարկել, մինչդեռ իր արտոնությունն էր չեղարկել բոլոր մյուսների որոշումները»։

“A striking illustration of the tyrannical character of this advocate of infallibility was given in his treatment of the German emperor, Henry IV. For presuming to disregard the pope’s authority, this monarch was declared to be excommunicated and dethroned. Terrified by the desertion and threats of his own princes, who were encouraged in rebellion against him by the papal mandate, Henry felt the necessity of making his peace with Rome. In company with his wife and a faithful servant he crossed the Alps in midwinter, that he might humble himself before the pope. Upon reaching the castle whither Gregory had withdrawn, he was conducted, without his guards, into an outer court, and there, in the severe cold of winter, with uncovered head and naked feet, and in a miserable dress, he awaited the pope’s permission to come into his presence. Not until he had continued three days fasting and making confession, did the pontiff condescend to grant him pardon. Even then it was only upon condition that the emperor should await the sanction of the pope before resuming the insignia or exercising the power of royalty. And Gregory, elated with his triumph, boasted that it was his duty to pull down the pride of kings.” The Great Controversy, 57.

“इस अचूकता के पक्षधर के अत्याचारी स्वभाव का एक अत्यन्त प्रभावशाली उदाहरण उसके द्वारा जर्मन सम्राट, हेनरी IV, के साथ किए गए व्यवहार में प्रकट हुआ। पोप के अधिकार की अवहेलना करने का साहस करने पर, इस सम्राट को बहिष्कृत और पदच्युत घोषित कर दिया गया। अपने ही राजकुमारों द्वारा त्याग दिए जाने और उनकी धमकियों से आतंकित होकर—जिन्हें पोपीय आदेश द्वारा उसके विरुद्ध विद्रोह के लिए उकसाया गया था—हेनरी ने यह आवश्यकता अनुभव की कि वह रोम के साथ मेल करे। अपनी पत्नी और एक विश्वासयोग्य सेवक के साथ वह मध्यशीत ऋतु में आल्प्स पार कर गया, ताकि वह पोप के सामने अपने को दीन करे। उस दुर्ग पर पहुँचने पर, जहाँ ग्रेगरी एकान्त में चला गया था, उसे उसके रक्षकों के बिना बाहरी प्रांगण में ले जाया गया, और वहाँ, शीतकाल की कठोर ठंड में, सिर उघाड़े और नंगे पाँव, दयनीय वस्त्र पहने हुए, वह पोप की उपस्थिति में आने की अनुमति की प्रतीक्षा करता रहा। जब तक उसने तीन दिन तक उपवास करते हुए और अंगीकार करते हुए समय न बिताया, तब तक उस परमाध्यक्ष ने उसे क्षमा प्रदान करने की कृपा न की। तब भी यह केवल इस शर्त पर हुआ कि सम्राट राजचिह्नों को पुनः धारण करने या राजसत्ता का प्रयोग करने से पहले पोप की स्वीकृति की प्रतीक्षा करेगा। और ग्रेगरी, अपनी विजय से उन्मत्त होकर, डींग मारता था कि राजाओं के अभिमान को गिरा देना उसका कर्तव्य है।” The Great Controversy, 57.

Gregory VII was an “advocate of infallibility,” but the ridiculous claim was not made an official doctrine (dogma), until Pius IX, who made the foolish claim an established doctrine at the first Vatican Council. The doctrine was passed July 18, 1870, one hundred and fifty years to the day before the first disappointment of the one hundred and forty-four thousand.

Gregory VII dia “mpanohana ny tsy mety diso”, kanefa io filazana mahatsikaiky io dia tsy natao ho foto-pampianarana ofisialy (dogma) raha tsy tamin’i Pius IX, izay nametraka io filazana adaladala io ho foto-pampianarana raikitra tamin’ny Konsily Vatikana Voalohany. Nankatoavina tamin’ny 18 Jolay 1870 io foto-pampianarana io, zato sy dimampolo taona katroka talohan’ny fahadisoam-panantenana voalohan’ny iray hetsy sy efatra alina sy efatra arivo.

What is informative about the history is that when Pius IX organized the first Vatican Council, and implemented his doctrine of infallibility, his motivation was brought about by his hatred of what was called “modernism.” It was not rooted in the idea that a pope could make no errors when defining biblical doctrines, it was a defense of the papal opposition to the influence that had been produced by the French Revolution. It was directed against what would ultimately be known as Communism.

Ce qui est instructif dans cette histoire, c’est que lorsque Pie IX organisa le premier concile du Vatican et mit en œuvre sa doctrine de l’infaillibilité, sa motivation fut suscitée par sa haine de ce que l’on appelait le « modernisme ». Elle n’était pas enracinée dans l’idée qu’un pape ne pouvait commettre aucune erreur lorsqu’il définissait des doctrines bibliques ; elle constituait une défense de l’opposition papale à l’influence qu’avait produite la Révolution française. Elle était dirigée contre ce qui finirait par être connu sous le nom de communisme.

The French Revolution brought about an upheaval in the ruling structure of European nations, with a particular hatred for the monarchy that is the papacy. It was an Italian Republican revolt that had temporarily driven Pius IX, and his right-hand man out of Rome. The “modernism,” that was represented by the various philosophies that were produced by the French Revolution was Pius IX’s, arch enemy, and his doctrine of infallibility was designed to sustain every claim that the pope made against the modernists ideas that were produced by the French Revolution.

La Révolution française provoqua un bouleversement dans la structure dirigeante des nations européennes, avec une haine particulière pour la monarchie qu’est la papauté. Ce fut une révolte républicaine italienne qui chassa temporairement Pie IX et son bras droit de Rome. Le « modernisme », représenté par les diverses philosophies issues de la Révolution française, était l’ennemi juré de Pie IX, et sa doctrine de l’infaillibilité était destinée à soutenir toutes les prétentions que le pape formulait contre les idées modernistes produites par la Révolution française.

Daniel chapter eleven, verse forty identifies that in 1798, the king of the south (atheistic France), delivered the deadly wound to the king of the north (the papacy).

Daniel chapit onz, vèsè karant, idantifye ke an 1798, wa sid la (Lafrans ateyis) te bay wa nò a (papote a) blesi mòtèl la.

Pius IX’s doctrine of infallibility was connected with the war represented by verse forty of Daniel eleven, and from the latter part of 1869 to the following year Pius IX called together the first Vatican Council, known as Vatican 1, for the purpose of confirming that the pope was the head of Catholicism, and that Catholicism was the head of all the churches, as had been proclaimed by Justinian’s decree in the year 533.

Ke thuto ya go se palelwe ga Pius IX e ne e amana le ntwa e e emelwang ke temana ya masome a mane ya Daniele kgaolo ya bolesome le bongwe, mme go tloga kwa karolong ya bofelo ya ngwaga wa 1869 go fitlha mo ngwageng o o latelang, Pius IX o ne a bitsa Lekgotla la ntlha la Vatican, le le itsiweng e le Vatican I, ka maikaelelo a go tlhomamisa gore mopapa e ne e le tlhogo ya Bokatholika, le gore Bokatholika e ne e le tlhogo ya dikereke tsotlhe, jaaka go ne go begilwe mo taolong ya Justinian ya ngwaga wa 533.

The Second Vatican Council, also known as Vatican II, was held from 1962 to 1965. It was a landmark event in the history of the Catholic Church, and one of the most significant ecumenical councils in modern times. The council convened under the leadership of Pope John XXIII and continued during the pontificate of Pope Paul VI after John XXIII’s death in 1963. It is important to recognize the distinct difference between these two councils.

Ko Warmi Kanɓe Fatikan ɗiɗaɓo, mo anndiri kadi e inde Vatican II, waɗaama daga 1962 haa 1965. Noon woni waɗɗere mawnde e tariika Ekklesiya Katolika, e gooto e nder konngi ekumenikaji ɓurɗi teddude e jamanuuji kesɗitini. Kongol ngol hawriti ley dow laamu Papa Yohanna XXIII, e ɗum jokkondiri e nder pontifikaa Papa Bulus VI caggal maayde Yohanna XXIII e 1963. Ena muhimmi maaɗa faamu ceede mum keewnde hakkunde ɗii konngi ɗiɗi.

The first council was to establish what is called the “primacy,” of the pope, meaning that the pope is the supreme ruler, teacher and shepherd of the Church, responsible for preserving and interpreting the doctrines of faith. His authority consisted in defining dogmas, issuing doctrinal decrees, and making authoritative pronouncements on matters of faith and morals, known as papal infallibility. It includes the pope’s jurisdictional authority over the universal church, including the power to appoint bishops, regulate the sacraments, and govern the church’s administration.

A primeira konsílyu foi pa establi loke ta yamá e “primacía” di e papa, ku ta nifiká ku e papa ta e gobernante, maestro i pastor supremo di e Iglesia, responsabel pa preservá i interpretá e doctrinan di fe. Su outoridat tabata konsistí den definí dogmanan, emití dekretunan doktrinal, i hasi pronunsiamientunan outoritativo tokante asuntunan di fe i moral, konosí komo infalibilidat papal. Esaki ta inkluí tambe e outoridat jurisdikshonal di e papa riba e iglesia universal, inkluyendo e poder pa nombrá obispunan, regulá e sakramentunan, i goberná e administrashon di e iglesia.

The second council was to redirect the church into an ecumenical entity. The councils were directly opposite propositions. The conservative first council was contradicted by the liberal second council. Those two factions were as different as night and day, and the prophecy that is attributed to the three secrets of Fatima identify an internal war fitly represented by these two councils.

Kuṅxoxo lwa vumbirhi a ri ta kongomisa kereke leswaku yi va nhlangano wa vumun’we bya tikereke. Mintsombano leyi a yi ri swivulwa leswi kanetanaka hi ku kongoma. Kuṅxoxo ro sungula, ra vuhlayiseki bya ndhavuko, ri kanetiwe hi kuṅxoxo ra vumbirhi, ra ntshunxeko. Mavandla wolawo mambirhi a ma hambane ku fana ni vusiku ni nhlikanhi, naswona vuprofeta lebyi vitaniwaka swihundla swinharhu swa Fatima byi kombisa nyimpi ya le ndzeni leyi yimeleriweke hi mfanelo hi mintsombano leyi mimbirhi.

The prophecy identifies a class who uphold the primacy represented by Pius IX as being represented by what is either called the “white pope,” the “good pope,” or the “good bishop”, and the other class, associated with Vatican II, are represented by the “black pope,” or the “bad pope,” or the “bad bishop.” The controversy of the two political concepts is represented when you visit the shrine of the miracle of Fatima, in Fatima, Portugal. When entering, the walkway is set between a statue of a black pope on one side, and a white pope on the other side.

Profetiam exhibet ordinem quendam, qui primatum, quem Pius IX repraesentat, tuetur, tamquam eo significari qui sive “papa albus”, sive “bonus papa”, sive “bonus episcopus” appellatur; alter vero ordo, cum Vaticano II coniunctus, significatur per “papam nigrum”, sive “malum papam”, sive “malum episcopum.” Contentio horum duorum conceptuum politicorum repraesentatur, cum sanctuarium miraculi Fatimae, Fatimae in Lusitania, visitas. Ingredienti deambulacrum inter statuam papae nigri ex una parte et papae albi ex altera disponitur.

It therefore becomes part of the heritage of the man that would ultimately become what the book identifies as Hitler’s pope, that his roots are entwined in the struggle between modernism (the king of the south), and papal primacy (the king of the north).

لهٰذا یہ اس شخص کے ورثے کا ایک حصہ بن جاتا ہے جو بالآخر وہ بنا جسے کتاب ہٹلر کا پوپ قرار دیتی ہے، کہ اس کی جڑیں جدیدیت (جنوب کے بادشاہ) اور پاپائی بالادستی (شمال کے بادشاہ) کے مابین کشمکش میں پیوست ہیں۔

It is to be understood that the author of the book we are considering was a Catholic of good standing, and his stated purpose for writing the book was to shed light upon the claim that the pope that reigned during World War 2 had supported Hitler, the Nazi’s or had any culpability in the holocaust against the Jews, and others. When Cornwell addresses Pius XII’s grandfather, who was the right-hand man that ordained the Vatican 1 council, the history of the struggle between the kings of the south and north is being acted out in that very history. When the “Republicanism” revolution reached Italy, for about a year, the Italians drove Pius IX out of the city of Rome, and from then on, even after he returned, all the papacy has ever owned was the one hundred and ten acres, known as Vatican City.

要理解的是，我们所考察之书的作者乃是一位声誉良好的天主教徒，而他写作此书所宣示的目的，是要阐明这样一种指控：即在第二次世界大战期间在位的教皇曾支持希特勒、纳粹，或对针对犹太人及其他人的大屠杀负有任何罪责。 当康威尔论及庇护十二世的祖父——那位主持筹划梵蒂冈第一届大公会议的得力助手——之时，南方王与北方王斗争的历史，正是在那段历史之中上演。 当“共和主义”的革命蔓延到意大利时，意大利人在大约一年的时间里将庇护九世逐出罗马城；自那时起，即便他后来返回，教皇制度所拥有的一切，也不过是那一百一十英亩、被称为梵蒂冈城的土地而已。

The only way he was even able to return to the Vatican is with the help of French troops, and a loan from the Rothschilds, the infamous Jewish bankers. To intelligently understand the papal complicity in the holocaust during World War II, requires some basic understanding of Europe’s attitude towards the Jews since the crucifixion of Christ. The book suggests that antisemitism and racism are two different attitudes, claiming Hitler’s hatred of the Jews was racist, for Hitler viewed the Jews as a lesser category of human beings, whereas antisemitism was the hatred of the Jews because they killed God. Whether they are one and the same, or there is actually a distinction between the two, the reality of the plight of the Jews is worth understanding.

Il ne put même retourner au Vatican qu’avec l’aide des troupes françaises et grâce à un prêt des Rothschild, les tristement célèbres banquiers juifs. Pour comprendre avec intelligence la complicité de la papauté dans l’holocauste durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, il faut avoir une connaissance élémentaire de l’attitude de l’Europe envers les Juifs depuis la crucifixion du Christ. Le livre laisse entendre que l’antisémitisme et le racisme sont deux attitudes différentes, soutenant que la haine d’Hitler envers les Juifs était de nature raciale, car Hitler considérait les Juifs comme une catégorie inférieure d’êtres humains, tandis que l’antisémitisme était la haine des Juifs parce qu’ils avaient tué Dieu. Qu’ils soient une seule et même chose, ou qu’il existe réellement une distinction entre les deux, la réalité de la condition des Juifs mérite d’être comprise.

For instance, in America today if the word “ghetto,” is used most think it is the definition of the poor, run down side of town. But the term “ghetto,” originally referred to a section of a city, especially in Venice, Italy, where Jews were compelled to live during the Middle Ages. The first ghetto was established in Venice in 1516, when the Venetian Republic confined Jews to a designated area of the city known as the “geto nuovo” (new foundry), which eventually became known as the ghetto.

Par exemple, en Amérique aujourd’hui, si l’on emploie le mot « ghetto », la plupart pensent qu’il désigne le quartier pauvre et délabré de la ville. Mais le terme « ghetto » désignait à l’origine une partie d’une ville, particulièrement à Venise, en Italie, où les Juifs étaient contraints de vivre durant le Moyen Âge. Le premier ghetto fut établi à Venise en 1516, lorsque la République de Venise confina les Juifs dans un secteur déterminé de la ville connu sous le nom de « geto nuovo » (nouvelle fonderie), qui finit par être appelé le ghetto.

In Europe through the Middle Ages, Jews were restricted as to where they could live, and also the professions they were allowed to practice. The restrictions were based upon the old definition of antisemitism, which referred to the belief that the Jews had killed God, and that all of their subsequent problems had been brought upon themselves through their own actions.

Tout au long du Moyen Âge en Europe, les Juifs furent soumis à des restrictions quant aux lieux où ils pouvaient résider, ainsi qu’aux professions qu’il leur était permis d’exercer. Ces restrictions reposaient sur l’ancienne définition de l’antisémitisme, selon laquelle les Juifs avaient tué Dieu et que tous leurs malheurs ultérieurs s’étaient attirés sur eux par leurs propres actes.

In the Middle Ages, it was an established tradition that Christians could not lend money or accept interest for a loan. The Jews were exempt from that restriction, and lending money became one of the professions that Jews were allowed to perform. The Jewish bankers, such as the Rothschild family, were the money changers in response to legal restrictions against what professions they were allowed to perform. When Pius IX needed funds to return to the Vatican, the frustration of no longer ruling the city of Rome was magnified by his need to reach out to the Jews for money.

আপনি “ff” ভাষায় অনুবাদ চেয়েছেন, কিন্তু “ff” কোন ভাষাকে নির্দেশ করছে তা স্পষ্ট নয়। অনুগ্রহ করে লক্ষ্যভাষার নাম জানান।

Prior to his being driven out of Rome Pius IX had appeared to be in one of two camps concerning the Jews and the church’s relation to the Jews. The two camps consisted of those who believed the Jews, no matter what happens to them, are simply getting what they deserve, and the other tended to show a little mercy towards the Jews. When Pius IX returned to the Vatican, after being driven out, the mercy he had sometimes manifested prior to his exile was never manifested again. Before his exile he had shut down the ghetto in the city of Rome, and after his return he re-established the ghetto, and began a taxation upon the Jews in order to regroup his financial losses.

قبل أن يُطرَد بيوس التاسع من روما، بدا وكأنه ينتمي إلى أحد معسكرين فيما يتعلق باليهود وبعلاقة الكنيسة باليهود. وكان المعسكران يتألفان من أولئك الذين كانوا يعتقدون أن اليهود، مهما يحدث لهم، إنما ينالون ما يستحقونه فحسب، ومن المعسكر الآخر الذي كان يميل إلى إظهار شيء من الرحمة نحو اليهود. وعندما عاد بيوس التاسع إلى الفاتيكان بعد أن أُخرِج منه، فإن الرحمة التي كان قد أظهرها أحيانًا قبل منفاه لم تظهر مرة أخرى قط. فقبل منفاه كان قد أغلق الحي اليهودي في مدينة روما، وبعد عودته أعاد إنشاء الحي اليهودي، وشرع في فرض ضريبة على اليهود من أجل تعويض خسائره المالية.

Pope Pius IX’s right-hand man was Marcantonio Pacelli, the grandfather of Hitler’s pope. He was an attorney that belonged to a special class of attorneys that supported the papacy. His son became part of that same elite class of attorneys, as did his grandson, who would ultimately become Hitler’s pope. After the book runs through the history of Eugenio Pacelli’s grandfather, his father, and his youth and education, it addresses the position that Pacelli took up as he began his work for the papacy. As an attorney, descending from the elite papal attorneys, he was picked to head up a department that specialized in contracts, which are called concords. In 1901 Pacelli was brought into the office of the Papal Secretariat of State.

पोप पायस नवम के दाहिने हाथ मारकान्तोनियो पाचेलेी, हिटलर के पोप के दादा थे। वे एक अधिवक्ता थे, जो उन अधिवक्ताओं के एक विशेष वर्ग से संबंध रखते थे जो पोपसत्ता का समर्थन करते थे। उनका पुत्र भी उसी विशिष्ट अधिवक्तावर्ग का अंग बना, और उनका पौत्र भी, जो अंततः हिटलर का पोप बना। पुस्तक, यूजेनियो पाचेलेी के दादा, उसके पिता, तथा उसके युवाकाल और शिक्षा के इतिहास का अनुसरण करने के बाद, उस पद का विवेचन करती है जिसे पाचेलेी ने तब ग्रहण किया जब उसने पोपसत्ता के लिए अपना कार्य आरम्भ किया। एक अधिवक्ता के रूप में, जो विशिष्ट पोपीय अधिवक्ताओं की वंशपरम्परा से आया था, उसे एक ऐसे विभाग का प्रधान नियुक्त किया गया जो अनुबन्धों में विशेषज्ञ था, जिन्हें कॉनकॉर्ड्स कहा जाता है। 1901 में पाचेलेी को पोपीय राज्य सचिवालय के कार्यालय में लाया गया।

Pacelli became the envoy to the nations. Prophetically Pacelli became the legal point of contact that consummated the fornication of the kings of the earth with the papacy. In 1903, Pius X was coronated as pope. Immediately he began to attack the “intellectual poison” that produced “relativism and skepticism.” The man who ran Pius X’s effort to eradicate “modernism” was Umberto Benigni, who worked in the same office as Pacelli. Benigni once stated of a group of world-class historians, that they were men for whom, “history is nothing but a continual desperate attempt to vomit. For this sort of human being there is only one remedy: the inquisition!” To Benigni, a historian that expressed any sympathy with the ideas that came from the French Revolution were to be executed.

Pacelli devint l’envoyé auprès des nations. Prophétiquement, Pacelli devint le point de contact juridique qui consomma la fornication des rois de la terre avec la papauté. En 1903, Pie X fut couronné pape. Aussitôt, il commença à s’attaquer au « poison intellectuel » qui engendrait « le relativisme et le scepticisme ». L’homme qui dirigea l’effort de Pie X pour éradiquer le « modernisme » était Umberto Benigni, qui travaillait dans le même bureau que Pacelli. Benigni déclara un jour, à propos d’un groupe d’historiens de renommée mondiale, qu’ils étaient des hommes pour qui « l’histoire n’est rien d’autre qu’une continuelle et désespérée tentative de vomir. Pour cette sorte d’êtres humains, il n’est qu’un seul remède : l’Inquisition ! » Pour Benigni, tout historien qui exprimait la moindre sympathie à l’égard des idées issues de la Révolution française devait être exécuté.

Officially, Benigni ran the propaganda ministry for the papacy, but unofficially he also ran a clandestine spy network, designed to identify any Catholics that had any sympathy for the “modernism,” that had originated with the king of the south. Ultimately in 1910, his work produced a directive that obliged employees of the papacy to swear an oath, called the Antimodernist Oath. It is still in force. To be employed by the Vatican you must swear to a hatred of modernist ideas, which today we would call communistic ideas.

بنینی به‌طور رسمی ادارهٔ وزارت تبلیغات پاپی را بر عهده داشت، اما به‌طور غیررسمی همچنین یک شبکهٔ مخفی جاسوسی را نیز اداره می‌کرد که برای شناسایی هر کاتولیکی طراحی شده بود که کوچک‌ترین همدلی‌ای با «مدرنیسم» داشت؛ مدرنیسمی که از پادشاه جنوب سرچشمه گرفته بود. سرانجام، در سال ۱۹۱۰، کار او به صدور دستوری انجامید که کارکنان دستگاه پاپی را ملزم می‌ساخت سوگندی یاد کنند که «سوگند ضدّ مدرنیستی» نامیده می‌شد. این سوگند هنوز هم به قوّت خود باقی است. برای آنکه در واتیکان به کار گماشته شوید، باید به بیزاری از افکار مدرنیستی سوگند بخورید؛ افکاری که امروز آن‌ها را اندیشه‌های کمونیستی می‌نامیم.

In the summary of Cronwell’s book, on the flyleaf it states, “In the first decade of the century, as a brilliant young Vatican lawyer, Pacelli helped shape an ideology of unprecedented papal power; during the 1920’s he employed cunning and blackmail to impose power in Germany. In 1933, Hitler became his perfect negotiating partner and a concordant was established that granted religious and educational advantages to the Catholic Church in exchange for Catholic withdrawal from social and political action. This ‘voluntary’ abdication of political Catholicism imposed from Rome facilitated the rise of Nazism.

क्रॉनवेल की पुस्तक के सारांश में, फ्लायलिफ़ पर यह लिखा है: “शताब्दी के प्रथम दशक में, वैटिकन के एक प्रतिभाशाली युवा विधिवेत्ता के रूप में, पाचेल्ली ने अभूतपूर्व पोपीय शक्ति की एक विचारधारा को गढ़ने में सहायता की; 1920 के दशक के दौरान उसने जर्मनी में सत्ता थोपने के लिए चातुर्य और ब्लैकमेल का उपयोग किया। 1933 में, हिटलर उसका आदर्श वार्ताकार-सहभागी बना और एक कॉनकॉर्डेट स्थापित किया गया, जिसने कैथोलिक कलीसिया को धार्मिक और शैक्षिक लाभ प्रदान किए, जिसके बदले कैथोलिकों ने सामाजिक और राजनीतिक क्रियाकलापों से अपने को अलग कर लिया। रोम से आरोपित राजनीतिक कैथोलिकवाद का यह ‘स्वैच्छिक’ परित्याग नाज़ीवाद के उदय को सुगम बना गया।”

At a cabinet meeting on July 14, 1933, Adolph Hitler expressed his opinion that very month that the concordance manufactured by Pacelli with the Nazi’s gave Germany created “an area of trust…. In the developing struggle against international Jewry.”

Tha aig coinneamh a’ chaibineit air 14 Iuchar 1933, chuir Adolph Hitler an cèill a bheachd, anns a’ mhìos sin fhèin, gun do chruthaich an co-chòrdadh a chuir Pacelli air chois leis na Nàsaich agus a thug dhan Ghearmailt “raon earbsa…. Anns an strì a bha a’ sìor-fhàs an aghaidh Iùdhachd eadar-nàiseanta.”

Cornwell’s book was not well received by Catholics who refused to accept the evidence that Pacelli was the primary reason that Hitler was able to rise to power, for Germany was a majority of Catholics. Pacelli had struck an agreement that prevented the Catholic publishing house, Catholic news agencies and Catholic schools from saying anything about the direction of Hitler from 1933 onward. The book traces the obvious anti-Semitic bent of Pacelli, who thereafter became the pope during World War II. At least three items can be established on very reliable historical sources from the book.

Le livre de Cornwell ne fut pas bien accueilli par les catholiques qui refusèrent d’accepter les preuves selon lesquelles Pacelli fut la raison principale pour laquelle Hitler put accéder au pouvoir, car l’Allemagne était majoritairement catholique. Pacelli avait conclu un accord qui empêchait la maison d’édition catholique, les agences de presse catholiques et les écoles catholiques de dire quoi que ce soit au sujet de l’orientation prise par Hitler à partir de 1933. Le livre met en évidence l’inclination manifestement antisémite de Pacelli, qui devint ensuite pape durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Au moins trois éléments peuvent être établis à partir de sources historiques très fiables d’après ce livre.

The first is the warfare of the king of the north and the king of the south, as represented in Daniel chapter eleven. In that warfare the enemies are Catholicism against atheism, the pope against Communism. The other point is that the pope employed Nazism as his proxy army against atheism during World War II, just as the pope employed apostate Protestantism in 1989, as its proxy army against the atheism of the USSR. The book also identifies the internal and external prophetic structure represented by the satanic messages that came forth from the miracle at Fatima.

A farko akwai yaƙin sarkin arewa da sarkin kudu, kamar yadda aka wakilta a Daniyel sura ta goma sha ɗaya. A cikin wannan yaƙi, maƙiyan su ne Katolika da rashin yarda da Allah, wato fafaroma da Kwaminisanci. Wani muhimmin batu kuma shi ne cewa fafaroma ya yi amfani da Naziyanci a matsayin rundunarsa ta wakilci wajen yaƙi da rashin yarda da Allah a lokacin Yaƙin Duniya na Biyu, kamar yadda fafaroma ya yi amfani da Furotesta masu ridda a shekara ta 1989 a matsayin rundunarsa ta wakilci wajen yaƙi da rashin yarda da Allah na Tarayyar Soviet ta USSR. Littafin kuma yana bayyana tsarin annabci na ciki da na waje da aka wakilta ta saƙonnin shaidan da suka fito daga mu’ujizar Fatima.

The borderline war of Raphia, represented in verses eleven and twelve of Daniel eleven, represent the war of the borderline currently playing out in the Ukraine. The ancient war was a hot war, the second is the second proxy war, with the proxy armies involved in mortal interaction. Raphia identifies the borderline war as being between the king of the north and the king of the south, but prophecy teaches that until the soon coming Sunday law, the whore of Tyre is forgotten, Jezebel is in Samaria, and Herodias skipped Herod’s birthday party. Those three witnesses of the role of the king of the north in this current history, is that she is behind the scenes pulling the strings. The hot wars, proxy wars and cold wars that happen while she is forgotten are accomplished by her proxy armies.

ថែរទាំសង្គ្រាមព្រំដែននៅរ៉ាហ្វ៊ីយ៉ា ដែលត្រូវបានតំណាងនៅក្នុងខណ្ឌទីដប់មួយ និងទីដប់ពីរ នៃ ដានីយ៉ែល ជំពូក ១១ គឺតំណាងឱ្យសង្គ្រាមព្រំដែនដែលកំពុងកើតឡើងសព្វថ្ងៃនៅអ៊ុយក្រែន។ សង្គ្រាមបុរាណនោះជាសង្គ្រាមក្តៅ; សង្គ្រាមទីពីរនេះជាសង្គ្រាមប្រូកស៊ីទីពីរ ដោយកងទ័ពប្រូកស៊ីដែលពាក់ព័ន្ធកំពុងចូលរួមក្នុងការប្រឈមមុខដាក់ជីវិតគ្នា។ រ៉ាហ្វ៊ីយ៉ាបញ្ជាក់ថា សង្គ្រាមព្រំដែននោះកើតមានរវាងស្តេចខាងជើង និងស្តេចខាងត្បូង ប៉ុន្តែទំនាយបង្រៀនថា រហូតដល់ច្បាប់ថ្ងៃអាទិត្យដែលនឹងមកដល់ឆាប់ៗនេះ ស្រីពេស្យានៃទីរ៉ុសត្រូវបានបំភ្លេច យេសេបិលស្ថិតនៅសាម៉ារី ហើយហេរ៉ូឌាសមិនបានចូលរួមពិធីខួបកំណើតរបស់ហេរ៉ូឌទេ។ សាក្សីទាំងបីនោះ ស្តីអំពីតួនាទីរបស់ស្តេចខាងជើងក្នុងប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្របច្ចុប្បន្ននេះ គឺថា នាងស្ថិតនៅពីក្រោយឆាក ដើម្បីទាញខ្សែបញ្ជា។ សង្គ្រាមក្តៅ សង្គ្រាមប្រូកស៊ី និងសង្គ្រាមត្រជាក់ ដែលកើតឡើងខណៈពេលដែលនាងត្រូវបានបំភ្លេច នោះត្រូវបានអនុវត្តដោយកងទ័ពប្រូកស៊ីរបស់នាង។

Russia is the king of the south, and it is now involved in a borderline war that is being financed by the globalists of the Western world, primarily the progressive Democrats and RINO (Republican In Name Only) Republicans in the United States. When the United States is represented as the king of the north’s proxy army in verse forty of Daniel eleven, its two prophetic characteristics are military might and financial power. The United States is accomplishing the same work in Ukraine that it did in 1989, helping the Pope against Russia, and the proxy army on the ground, defending Ukraine, is so full of Nazi supporters that even the mainstream media cannot deny it. Rome is now using the same proxy armies that she used in the hot war that was World War II, and in 1989, to war against Russia. Read the book: Hitler’s Pope, the Secret History of Pius XII.

Ruushshaan mootii kibbaa ti; yeroo ammaa immoo waraana daangaa irratti adeemsifamaa jiru keessatti hirmaachaa jirti; waraanni sunis addunyaawwanistota biyya Lixaa, addumaan Demokraatota fooyya’oo fi Ripabilikaanota RINO (maqaa qofaan Republican) Ameerikaa keessatti argaman irraa maallaqaan deeggaramaa jira. Yommuu Ameerikaan Daani’el boqonnaa kudha tokko, lakkoofsa afurtamaa keessatti akka loltoota bakka-bu’oota mootii kaabaa taatee fakkeeffamtu, amala raajii ishee lamaan humna waraanaa fi humna maallaqaa dha. Ameerikaan hojiiuma wal fakkaataa kan bara 1989 hojjettee ture Yukireen keessatti raawwachaa jirti; jechuunis, Ruushshaa irratti Paaphaasiif gargaaraa jirti; loltoonni bakka-bu’oota lafaa irratti Yukireen ittisaa jiranis hamma deggertoota Naazii guutamanii waan jiraniif, miidiyaaleen gurguddoon illee kana haalu hin danda’an. Roomaan amma loltoota bakka-bu’oota isuma isheen waraana hoo’aa jechuunis Waraana Addunyaa Lammaffaa keessatti, akkasumas bara 1989tti fayyadamte, Ruushshaa irratti waraanuuf deebitee fayyadamaa jirti. Kitaaba kana dubbisi: Hitler’s Pope, the Secret History of Pius XII.

We will continue this study in the next article.

Nous poursuivrons cette étude dans le prochain article.

“In like manner, when God was about to open to the beloved John the history of the church for future ages, He gave him an assurance of the Saviour’s interest and care for His people by revealing to him ‘One like unto the Son of man,’ walking among the candlesticks, which symbolized the seven churches. While John was shown the last great struggles of the church with earthly powers, he was also permitted to behold the final victory and deliverance of the faithful. He saw the church brought into deadly conflict with the beast and his image, and the worship of that beast enforced on pain of death. But looking beyond the smoke and din of the battle, he beheld a company upon Mount Zion with the Lamb, having, instead of the mark of the beast, the ‘Father’s name written in their foreheads.’ And again he saw ‘them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name, stand on the sea of glass, having the harps of God’ and singing the song of Moses and the Lamb.

“དེ་དང་འདྲ་བར། དཀོན་མཆོག་གིས་མ་འོངས་པའི་དུས་རབས་རྣམས་ཀྱི་ཆོས་ཚོགས་ཀྱི་ལོ་རྒྱུས་དགའ་ལྡན་ཡོ་ཧ་ནན་ལ་ཕྱེ་བར་འགྱུར་བའི་སྐབས། ཁོང་ལ་སྐྱབས་མགོན་གྱིས་རང་གི་མི་སྡེར་བཅངས་པའི་དགོངས་པ་དང་ཐུགས་སྐྱོང་ཡོད་པའི་ངེས་བརྟན་ཞིག་གནང་བ་ནི། ‘མིའི་བུ་དང་འདྲ་བ་གཅིག’ ཁོང་ལ་མངོན་པར་བྱས་པ་དེས་ཡིན། ཁོང་ནི་སྒྲོན་སྟེགས་རྣམས་ཀྱི་དབུས་སུ་ཕེབས་ཤིང་། དེ་དག་གིས་ཆོས་ཚོགས་བདུན་མཚོན་པ་ཡིན། ཡོ་ཧ་ནན་ལ་ཆོས་ཚོགས་ཀྱིས་ས་གཞིའི་དབང་ཤུགས་རྣམས་དང་བཅས་པའི་མཐའ་མའི་འཐབ་འཛིང་ཆེན་པོ་རྣམས་མཐོང་དུ་བཅུག་པའི་དུས་སུ། དེ་དང་མཉམ་དུ་དད་ལྡན་རྣམས་ཀྱི་མཐའ་མའི་རྒྱལ་ཁ་དང་ཐར་པ་ཡང་མཐོང་བའི་གནང་བ་ཐོབ། ཁོང་གིས་ཆོས་ཚོགས་དེ་གཅན་གཟན་དང་དེའི་གཟུགས་བརྙན་དང་ལྡན་པའི་འཆི་བའི་ཉེན་ཁར་གྱི་འཐབ་འཛིང་ནང་དུ་ཁྲིད་པ་མཐོང་། དེ་གཅན་གཟན་དེའི་མཆོད་པ་ཡང་འཆི་བའི་ཉེས་ཆད་ཀྱིས་བཙན་བཀོད་བྱེད་པ་མཐོང་། འོན་ཀྱང་འཐབ་མོའི་དུ་བ་དང་ཟང་ཟིང་ལས་ཕར་ལྟས་པས། ཁོང་གིས་རྩི་ཨོན་རི་ལ་ལུག་ཕྲུག་དང་མཉམ་དུ་གནས་པའི་ཚོགས་པ་ཞིག་མཐོང་། དེ་ཚོའི་དཔྲལ་བར་གཅན་གཟན་གྱི་རྟགས་ཀྱི་ཚབ་ཏུ་ ‘ཡབ་ཀྱི་མཚན་བྲིས་པ’ ཡོད། ཡང་བསྐྱར། ཁོང་གིས ‘གཅན་གཟན་ལས་དང་། དེའི་གཟུགས་བརྙན་ལས་དང་། དེའི་རྟགས་ལས་དང་། དེའི་མཚན་གྱི་ཨང་གྲངས་ལས་རྒྱལ་ཁ་ཐོབ་པ་རྣམས’ ཤེལ་གྱི་མཚོའི་སྟེང་དུ་ལངས་ཏེ། དཀོན་མཆོག་གི་རྒྱུད་མངས་ཐོགས་ནས། མོ་ཤེ་དང་ལུག་ཕྲུག་གི་གླུ་ལེན་པ་ཡང་མཐོང་།”

“These lessons are for our benefit. We need to stay our faith upon God, for there is just before us a time that will try men’s souls. Christ, upon the Mount of Olives, rehearsed the fearful judgments that were to precede His second coming: ‘Ye shall hear of wars and rumors of wars.’ ‘Nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places. All these are the beginning of sorrows.’ While these prophecies received a partial fulfillment at the destruction of Jerusalem, they have a more direct application to the last days.

«ئەو وانەیەکان بۆ سوودی ئێمەین. پێویستە باوەڕمان بە خودا پشت‌بەستنەوەی تێدا بکرێت، چونکە کاتێک لە پێشمانەوەیە کە گیانی مرۆڤان تاقی دەکاتەوە. مەسیح، لەسەر شاخی زەیتون، ئەو سزایە ترسناکانی دووبارە گوتەوە کە پێش هاتنی دووەمی ئەو دەهاتن: “گوێتان لە جەنگەکان و هەواڵی جەنگەکان دەبێت.” “نەتەوەیەک دژ بە نەتەوەیەک هەڵدەستێت، و شانشینێک دژ بە شانشینێک؛ و برسێتی و دەردەکانی کوشندە و بوومەلەرزە لە شوێنە جیاوازەکاندا دەبن. هەموو ئەمانە سەرەتای دەردەکانن.” لەگەڵ ئەوەی ئەم پێشبینییانە بە شێوەیەکی بەشی هاتنە دی لە کاتی وێرانبوونی ئۆرشەلیم، بەڵام بە شێوەیەکی ڕاستەوخۆتر پەیوەندییان بە ڕۆژانی دواوە هەیە.»

“We are standing on the threshold of great and solemn events. Prophecy is fast fulfilling. The Lord is at the door. There is soon to open before us a period of overwhelming interest to all living. The controversies of the past are to be revived; new controversies will arise. The scenes to be enacted in our world are not yet even dreamed of. Satan is at work through human agencies. Those who are making an effort to change the Constitution and secure a law enforcing Sunday observance little realize what will be the result. A crisis is just upon us.

«Мы стоим на пороге великих и торжественных событий. Пророчество быстро исполняется. Господь у дверей. Вскоре перед нами откроется период, исполненный всепоглощающего значения для всех живущих. Споры прошлого будут возобновлены; возникнут новые противоречия. Сцены, которые должны разыграться в нашем мире, ещё даже не снились людям. Сатана действует через человеческие орудия. Те, кто прилагает усилия, чтобы изменить Конституцию и добиться закона, предписывающего соблюдение воскресенья, мало сознают, каков будет результат. Кризис уже надвигается на нас.»

“But God’s servants are not to trust to themselves in this great emergency. In the visions given to Isaiah, to Ezekiel, and to John we see how closely heaven is connected with the events taking place upon the earth and how great is the care of God for those who are loyal to Him. The world is not without a ruler. The program of coming events is in the hands of the Lord. The Majesty of heaven has the destiny of nations, as well as the concerns of His church, in His own charge.” Testimonies, volume 5, 752, 753.

« Mais, dans cette grande crise, les serviteurs de Dieu ne doivent pas se fier à eux-mêmes. Dans les visions données à Ésaïe, à Ézéchiel et à Jean, nous voyons combien étroit est le lien entre le ciel et les événements qui se déroulent sur la terre, et combien grande est la sollicitude de Dieu pour ceux qui Lui sont fidèles. Le monde n’est pas sans souverain. Le déroulement des événements à venir est entre les mains du Seigneur. La Majesté du ciel tient sous sa propre garde la destinée des nations, aussi bien que les intérêts de son Église. » Testimonies, volume 5, 752, 753.