The previous article ended with the paragraph that read, “The treaty marriage of 313 represents the final treaty marriage of the papal power with the United States—the premier king of Revelation seventeen’s ten kings; a two horned power that is typified by the two horned power of France. The history that began with Clovis in 496 and ultimately led to the decree of Justinian in 533 and the enthronement of the papacy in 538, represents the history of 1989 unto the Sunday law.”
Atik ki te vin anvan an te fini ak paragraf sa a, ki te di: “Maryaj alyans lan nan ane 313 la reprezante dènye maryaj alyans pouvwa papal la ak Etazini—wa prensipal la pami dis wa Revelasyon disèt yo; yon pouvwa ki gen de kòn, ki se yon tip pouvwa ki gen de kòn Lafrans lan. Istwa ki te kòmanse ak Clovis an 496 e ki, finalman, te mennen nan dekrè Jistenyen an an 533 ak enthronizasyon papote a an 538, reprezante istwa depi 1989 rive jis nan lwa dimanch la.”
Ronald Reagan was typified by Clovis in 496 and Donald Trump is typified by Justinian in 533. Justinian’s decree came five years before the papacy ascended the throne in 538, and the Edict of Milan came eight years before the first Sunday law of 321. Both the decree and edict align as the waymark which precedes the Sunday law.
Ronald Reagan te gen tip li nan Clovis an 496, e Donald Trump gen tip li nan Justinian an 533. Dekrè Justinian an te vini senk ane anvan papòt la te monte sou twòn nan an 538, epi Edik Milan an te vini uit ane anvan premye lwa dimanch lan an 321. Ni dekrè a ni edik la aliyen kòm siy chemen ki vin anvan lwa dimanch lan.
Reagan
Reagan
In 1870, Italian troops captured Rome (20 September 1870). The Papal States ceased to exist as a territorial state, and Pope Pius IX became the “prisoner in the Vatican.” With no remaining papal territory recognized as a sovereign state, the United States (like many other countries) no longer maintained formal diplomatic relations with the Pope as a temporal ruler. In October of 1951, President Harry S. Truman nominated General Mark W. Clark as U.S. Ambassador to the Vatican. Strong opposition quickly arose from many Protestant churches and organizations, who argued that the appointment violated the separation of church and state. In January of 1952 General Clark withdrew his name.
Nan ane 1870, twoup Italyen yo te pran lavil Wòm (20 Septanm 1870). Eta Papal yo sispann egziste kòm yon eta teritoryal, e Pap Py IX te vin tounen “prizonye nan Vatikan an.” Kòm pa t rete okenn teritwa papal yo rekonèt kòm yon eta souveren, Etazini (tankou anpil lòt peyi) pa t kontinye kenbe relasyon diplomatik fòmèl ak Pap la kòm yon chèf tanporèl. Nan mwa Oktòb 1951, Prezidan Harry S. Truman te nonmen Jeneral Mark W. Clark kòm Anbasadè Etazini bò kote Vatikan an. Gwo opozisyon leve byen vit nan men anpil legliz ak òganizasyon pwotestan, ki te fè konnen nominasyon sa a vyole separasyon ant legliz ak leta. Nan mwa Janvye 1952, Jeneral Clark te retire non li.
On January 10, 1984, President Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul II formally agreed to establish full diplomatic relations between the United States and the Holy See. April 9, 1984 William A. Wilson (who had already been serving as Reagan’s personal representative) presented his credentials and became the first U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See.
Nan dat 10 janvye 1984, Prezidan Ronald Reagan ak Pap Jan Pòl II te dakò ofisyèlman pou etabli relasyon diplomatik konplè ant Etazini ak Sentespri Syèj la. Nan dat 9 avril 1984, William A. Wilson (ki te deja ap sèvi kòm reprezantan pèsonèl Reagan) te prezante lèt kredans li yo epi li te vin premye Anbasadè Etazini bò kote Sentespri Syèj la.
Within the thirty-three years from 1951 until 1984 the resistance of Protestantism against Catholicism dissipated. The “arms” that stood for the papacy in 496 with Clovis typify Reagan in 1984 on through to 1989. Clovis represented the removal of the religion (paganism) that was restraining the papacy from rising back into power, and by 1984 the resistance of Protestantism to the rise of the papacy had been taken away. The “daily” (paganism) had been removed, and Paul describes that removing of the resistance of paganism to the papacy as a “falling away.”
Pandan trantwa ane ki soti nan 1951 rive 1984, rezistans Pwotestantis la kont Katolik te disparèt. “Bra” ki te kanpe pou papote a an 496 avèk Clovis yo, sèvi kòm tip Reagan an 1984 jouk rive 1989. Clovis te reprezante retire relijyon an (paganis) ki t ap anpeche papote a leve ankò pou retounen sou pouvwa a, epi rive an 1984 rezistans Pwotestantis la kont monte papote a te deja wete. “Kontinyèl la” (paganis) te retire, epi Pòl dekri retire rezistans paganis la kont papote a kòm yon “apostazi.”
The symbolic church of compromise represented by Constantine the Great and the history of 313 unto 538 represented a period when a church compromised itself and fell away. The religion represented by ‘508’ which had previously restrained the inroads of papal power, typified the falling away of the Protestants in the United States. Reagan was represented by Clovis. In 496 Clovis gave his “power” to the papacy, thus typifying the “unholy alliance” that was accomplished in the Reagan years. Clovis also represented the taking away of the “daily” in 508. 508 typified 1984.
Legliz senbolik konpwomi an, ki te reprezante pa Konstanten Legran ak istwa depi 313 rive 538, te reprezante yon peryòd kote yon legliz te fè konpwomi avèk tèt li epi li te tonbe nan apostazi. Relijyon ki te reprezante pa “508” la, ki te deja anpeche avans pouvwa papal la, te tipifye apostazi Pwotestan yo Ozetazini. Reagan te reprezante pa Clovis. An 496, Clovis te bay papote a “pouvwa” li, konsa li te tipifye “alyans enpi” ki te akonpli pandan ane Reagan yo. Clovis te reprezante tou retrè “sakrifis kontinyèl” la an 508. 508 te tipifye 1984.
“This compromise between paganism and Christianity resulted in the development of ‘the man of sin’ foretold in prophecy as opposing and exalting himself above God. That gigantic system of false religion is a masterpiece of Satan’s power—a monument of his efforts to seat himself upon the throne to rule the earth according to his will.” The Great Controversy, 50.
“Konpwomi sa a ant paganis ak Krisyanis la te debouche sou devlopman ‘moun peche a’ yo te anonse davans nan pwofesi a kòm yon moun ki opoze ak Bondye epi ki leve tèt li pi wo pase Bondye. Gwo sistèm relijyon fo sa a se yon chèfdèv pouvwa Satan an—yon moniman efò li yo pou chita sou twòn nan pou l dirije tè a dapre volonte pa l.” The Great Controversy, 50.
Reagan famously called the Soviet Union an “evil empire” in a 1983 speech and regarded atheistic communism as a profound moral and spiritual threat. He and John Paul II formed a close personal and political partnership against Soviet communism. Both men saw the struggle in moral and even providential terms; Reagan privately spoke of a “Divine Plan” to bring down communism. Reagan had an interest in the Fatima apparitions (the warning that “Russia would spread her errors”), and the two leaders discussed their shared sense that God had spared their lives (both survived assassination attempts in 1981) for a purpose connected to defeating communism.
Reagan te rele Inyon Sovyetik la avèk anpil renome yon “anpi mechan” nan yon diskou li te fè an 1983, e li te konsidere kominis ate a kòm yon menas moral ak espirityèl ki te pwofon. Li menm ak Jan Pòl II te fòme yon patenarya pèsonèl ak politik ki te sere kont kominis sovyetik la. Toude mesye yo te wè lit la an tèm moral, e menm an tèm pwovidans; an prive, Reagan te pale konsènan yon “Plan Diven” pou fè kominis la tonbe. Reagan te gen enterè nan aparisyon Fatima yo (avètisman an ki di “Larisi t ap gaye erè pa li yo”), e de lidè yo te diskite sou konviksyon yo te pataje a ke Bondye te epaye lavi yo (toude te siviv tantativ asasina an 1981) pou yon objektif ki te gen rapò ak defèt kominis la.
The Disciples of Christ
Disciples Kris la
Reagan was raised in the Disciples of Christ denomination whose founding fathers directly taught that the pope of Catholicism was the antichrist. Alexander Campbell, the most prominent early leader of the Disciples of Christ church repeatedly identified the papacy as the antichrist. In debates and writings, he argued that the little horn of Daniel 7, the beast of Revelation 13, and the man of sin of 2 Thessalonians 2 all pointed to the popes of Rome. He used these identifications in public debates (including with Catholic Bishop John B. Purcell in 1837). Barton W. Stone referred to the government of the Pope as the true antichrist and the “man of sin.” Walter Scott (another early evangelist of the movement) wrote that the man of sin, the Pope of Rome, would arise in the Christian church and exalt himself above God.
Reagan te leve nan denominasyon Disciples of Christ la, kote papa fondatè li yo te anseye dirèkteman ke pap Katolik la se te antikris la. Alexander Campbell, ki te pi enpòtan dirijan premye epòk legliz Disciples of Christ la, te idantifye papote a plizyè fwa kòm antikris la. Nan deba ak nan ekriti li yo, li te soutni ke ti kòn ki nan Daniel 7 la, bèt ki nan Revelation 13 la, ak nonm peche a ki nan 2 Thessalonians 2 a, tout t ap montre sou pap Wòm yo. Li te sèvi ak idantifikasyon sa yo nan deba piblik (tankou ak Evèk Katolik John B. Purcell an 1837). Barton W. Stone te rele gouvènman Pap la vrè antikris la ak “nonm peche a.” Walter Scott (yon lòt premye evanjelis mouvman an) te ekri ke nonm peche a, Pap Wòm nan, t ap leve nan legliz kretyen an epi t ap leve tèt li pi wo pase Bondye.
Reagan’s mother Nelle, was a devout member of the Disciples of Christ denomination and was the main religious influence in his childhood. Reagan was baptized in the Disciples of Christ church in Dixon, Illinois, at age 11 and was active there as a teenager (including teaching Sunday school). He attended Eureka College, which was affiliated with the Disciples of Christ.
Manman Reagan nan, Nelle, te yon manm devwe nan denominasyon Disciples of Christ la e li te prensipal enfliyans relijye nan anfans li. Reagan te batize nan legliz Disciples of Christ la nan Dixon, Illinois, lè li te gen 11 an, epi li te aktif la pandan adolesans li (sa te gen ladan l ansèyman lekòl dimanch). Li te etidye nan Eureka College, ki te afilye ak Disciples of Christ la.
“Those who become confused in their understanding of the word, who fail to see the meaning of antichrist, will surely place themselves on the side of antichrist. There is no time now for us to assimilate with the world.” Kress Collection, 105.
“Moun ki vin konfonn nan konpreyansyon yo genyen sou pawòl la, ki pa rive wè siyifikasyon antikris la, sètènman ap mete tèt yo bò kote antikris la. Pa gen tan ankò kounye a pou nou asimile avèk lemonn.” Kress Collection, 105.
Reagan was typified by Clovis and also the compromise of Constantine the Great. Reagan was also the first of the last eight presidents since the time of the end in 1989. As the first of the last eight presidents he typifies Donald Trump, who, like unto Reagan is profoundly confused about the true aims of the papacy, and who the papacy is.
Reagan te prefigire pa Clovis, ansanm ak konpwomi Konstanten Legran an. Reagan te tou premye nan dènye uit prezidan yo depi tan lafen an an 1989. Antanke premye nan dènye uit prezidan yo, li prefigire Donald Trump, ki, menm jan ak Reagan, nan yon gwo konfizyon konsènan vrè objektif papote a, ak kiyès papote a ye.
Can two walk together, except they be agreed? Amos 3:3.
Èske de moun ka mache ansanm, si yo pa dakò? Amòs 3:3.
The sixth and final treaty marriage in Daniel chapter eleven occurs in the history that begins at the time of the end in 1989, and ends in the history of Donald Trump.
Sizyèm e dènye maryaj alyans lan nan chapit onz liv Danyèl la parèt nan istwa ki kòmanse nan tan lafen an an 1989, epi ki fini nan istwa Donald Trump.
“In the movements now in progress in the United States to secure for the institutions and usages of the church the support of the state, Protestants are following in the steps of papists. Nay, more, they are opening the door for the Papacy to regain in Protestant America the supremacy which she has lost in the Old World.” The Great Controversy, 573.
“Nan mouvman k ap fèt kounye a Ozetazini pou asire enstitisyon ak pratik legliz yo jwenn sipò leta, Pwotestan yo ap mache sou tras papis yo. Anplis sa, yo menm ap louvri pòt la pou Papatri a reprann nan Amerik Pwotestan sipremasi li te pèdi nan Ansien Mond lan.” The Great Controversy, 573.
The marriage treaty of 313 and the Edict of Milan aligns with the history of 533, and the decree of Justinian in 533 will again be implemented by a professed Christian administration, that no longer understands that to identify the papal power as a Christian institution is an oxymoron at best, and a fatal delusion at worst.
Trete maryaj 313 la ak Edit Milan an koresponn ak istwa 533 la, epi dekrè Jistinyen an nan 533 pral ankò mete an aplikasyon pa yon administrasyon ki fè pwofesyon pou li kretyen, men ki pa konprann ankò ke idantifye pouvwa papal la kòm yon enstitisyon kretyen se, nan pi bon ka, yon oksimò, e nan pi move ka, yon ilizyon mòtèl.
Church and State
Legliz ak Leta
In 457 BC, the third decree of Artaxerxes returned national sovereignty for both political and religious authority.
Nan ane 457 anvan Jezikri, twazyèm dekrè Atagzès la te retabli souverènte nasyonal la ansanm ak otorite politik ak relijye a.
And thou, Ezra, after the wisdom of thy God, that is in thine hand, set magistrates and judges, which may judge all the people that are beyond the river, all such as know the laws of thy God; and teach ye them that know them not. And whosoever will not do the law of thy God, and the law of the king, let judgment be executed speedily upon him, whether it be unto death, or to banishment, or to confiscation of goods, or to imprisonment. Ezra 7:25, 26.
Epi ou menm, Esdras, dapre sajès Bondye pa w la, ki nan men ou, etabli majistra ak jij, pou yo jije tout pèp ki lòt bò larivyè a, tout moun ki konnen lwa Bondye pa w la; epi nou menm, enstwi sila yo ki pa konnen yo. E nenpòt moun ki pa vle fè lwa Bondye pa w la, ak lwa wa a, se pou jijman egzekite san pèdi tan sou li, kit se lanmò, kit se bannisman, kit se konfiskasyon byen, oswa prizon. Ezra 7:25, 26.
The third decree provided authority to execute judgment and punishment for both the laws of God and the laws of the king. That decree marked the beginning of the twenty-three-hundred-year prophecy which concluded on October 22, 1844 when Christ suddenly came to His temple. It also marked the beginning of a two-hundred-and-fifty-year prophecy that ended in 207 BC, in the history between the battles of Raphia in 217 BC and Panium in 200 BC. The restoration of both civil and religious sovereignty in 457 BC identifies a twofold alpha that finds two omega fulfillment's. Both omega fulfillment's represent a closed door; one for the Protestant horn and the other for the Republican horn.
Twazyèm dekrè a te bay otorite pou egzekite jijman ak pinisyon ni pou lwa Bondye yo ni pou lwa wa a. Dekrè sa a te make kòmansman pwofesi de mil twa san ane a, ki te rive nan bout li le 22 oktòb 1844, lè Kris te vini san avètisman nan tanp Li a. Li te make tou kòmansman yon pwofesi de san senkant ane, ki te fini an 207 av. J.-K., nan listwa ki chita ant batay Rafya an 217 av. J.-K. ak Panyòm an 200 av. J.-K. Retablisman ni souvènte sivil la ni souvènte relijye a an 457 av. J.-K. idantifye yon alfa doub ki jwenn de akonplisman omega. Toude akonplisman omega yo reprezante yon pòt fèmen; youn pou kòn Pwotestan an, epi lòt la pou kòn Repibliken an.
The first prophecy of twenty-three hundred years represented God’s laws, and the two-hundred-and-fifty-year prophecy represented the king’s laws. The two prophecies identify the horn of Protestantism and the horn of Republicanism upon the earth beast of Revelation thirteen. The Republican horn of the earth beast is placed into the middle of verses eleven through sixteen of Daniel eleven. The seventeen-year period between Raphia and Panium is intersected by one horn from the dual prophecy of the third decree in 457 BC. The twofold prophecy identifies both the judgment of the final covenant people and also the judgment of the nation where that covenant people find their roots.
Premye pwofesi de mil twasan ane a te reprezante lwa Bondye yo, epi pwofesi de san senkant ane a te reprezante lwa wa a. De pwofesi sa yo idantifye kòn Pwotestantis la ak kòn Repiblikanis la sou bèt tè a nan Revelasyon trèz. Kòn Repibliken bèt tè a plase nan mitan vèsè onz rive sèz nan Danyèl onz. Peryòd disèt ane ki genyen ant Rafia ak Panyòm nan koupe travèse pa youn nan kòn yo soti nan pwofesi doub twazyèm dekrè a nan 457 anvan Jezikri. Pwofesi doub sa a idantifye ni jijman dènye pèp alyans lan, ni jijman nasyon kote pèp alyans sa a jwenn rasin li yo.
And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them four hundred years; And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance. Genesis 15:13, 14.
Li di Abraram: “Konnen sa avèk sètitid, desandan ou yo pral etranje nan yon peyi ki pa pa yo; yo pral sèvi moun peyi sa a, e y ap maltrete yo pandan katsan ane. Men, mwen menm, m ap jije nasyon y ap sèvi a; epi apre sa, y ap soti avèk anpil byen.” Jenèz 15:13, 14.
In the book of Ezekiel, October 22, 1844 is typified by October 22, 573 BC. One date identifies the beginning of the investigative judgment and the other identifies the sounding of the Jubilee trumpet at both the beginning and the conclusion of the judgment process. Both dates align, and both identify a closed door. 1844 represents the closing of the door of the holy place, as Christ moved into the Most Holy Place. 573 BC identifies the close of human probation where the slaves of sin who have been redeemed are given their freedom, and a new earth to dwell in.
Nan liv Ezekyèl la, 22 Oktòb 1844 la se yon tip ki koresponn ak 22 Oktòb 573 av. J.-K. Youn nan dat yo idantifye kòmansman jijman ankèt la, epi lòt la idantifye son twonpèt Jibile a ni nan kòmansman ni nan konklizyon pwosesis jijman an. Toude dat yo aliyen, epi toude idantifye yon pòt fèmen. 1844 reprezante fèmti pòt kote ki sen an, pandan Kris t ap antre nan Kote ki Trè Sen an. 573 av. J.-K. idantifye fen tan pwobasyon limanite a, kote esklav peche yo ki te rachte yo resevwa libète yo, ansanm ak yon nouvo tè pou yo rete ladan l.
And if he be not redeemed in these years, then he shall go out in the year of jubile, both he, and his children with him. For unto me the children of Israel are servants; they are my servants whom I brought forth out of the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God. Leviticus 25:54, 55.
Epi si li pa delivre nan ane sa yo, lè sa a li va soti nan ane Jibile a, ni li menm, ni pitit li yo avè l. Paske pitit Izrayèl yo se sèvitè pou mwen; yo se sèvitè pa m, mwen menm ki te fè yo sòti kite peyi Lejip la: mwen se Senyè a, Bondye nou an. Levitik 25:54, 55.
Both October 22’s represent the closed door of the soon-coming Sunday law. The period of probation given to Adventism began in 1844 and ends at the soon-coming Sunday law, and the period of probation given to the United States also ends at the soon-coming Sunday law. Both endings align with October 22’s two witnesses of 2,300 years and two hundred and fifty years.
Tou de 22 oktòb yo reprezante pòt fèmen lwa dimanch k ap vini byento a. Peryòd gras yo te bay Adventis la te kòmanse an 1844 epi li fini nan lwa dimanch k ap vini byento a, epi peryòd gras yo te bay Etazini an tou fini nan lwa dimanch k ap vini byento a. Toude fen yo aliyen ak de temwen 22 oktòb yo: 2,300 ane ak de san senkant ane.
The two hundred and fifty years that ends in the history between Raphia and Panium divides the period of the two battles into two symbolic numbers, which together possess their own peculiar meaning. Ten years after Raphia, meaning borderland and seven years before Panium which was a battle fought upon a plain and ended at a siege. Ten and seven as a symbol identify the dragon power upon several witnesses. 207 BC places Trump, the symbol of the earth beast in between verse eleven and fifteen of Daniel eleven prophetically preparing to speak as a dragon, as represented by the combination of the number ten and the number seven.
De san senkant ane ki fini nan listwa ant Raphia ak Panium divize peryòd de batay yo an de nonb senbolik, ki ansanm genyen pwòp siyifikasyon patikilye pa yo. Dis ane apre Raphia, ki vle di fwontyè, epi sèt ane anvan Panium, ki te yon batay yo te mennen sou yon plenn e ki te fini nan yon syèj. Dis ak sèt, kòm senbòl, idantifye pouvwa dragon an sou plizyè temwen. 207 av. J.-K. plase Trump, senbòl bèt ki soti sou tè a, ant vèsè onz ak kenz nan Danyèl onz, pandan l ap pwofetikman prepare pou l pale tankou yon dragon, jan sa reprezante pa konbinezon nonb dis la ak nonb sèt la.
Seventeen is also symbolic and it expands the history of Raphia to Panium beyond Panium and also before Raphia. Ptolemy IV Philopator reigned as king of Ptolemaic Egypt from 221 BC to 204 BC, and he defeated Antiochus Magnus at Raphia in 217 BC. Ptolemy began to reign before Raphia, and he reigned for ‘seventeen’ years. The number seventeen represents a historical period which begins prior to Raphia, and that extends beyond the battle of Panium and the siege of Sidon unto the close of human probation as represented by the year 330. The two-hundred-and-fifty-year prophecy for the period of the church of Smyrna began in the 64 and ended at the Edict of Milan and the marriage treaty of 313.
Disèt la se yon senbòl tou, epi li elaji istwa Rafya rive Panium, depase Panium epi tou anvan Rafya. Ptolome IV Filopatò te gouvènen kòm wa peyi Lejip ptolemeyik depi 221 anvan Jezikri rive 204 anvan Jezikri, epi li te bat Antyòkis Magnus nan Rafya an 217 anvan Jezikri. Ptolome te kòmanse gouvènen anvan Rafya, epi li te gouvènen pandan ‘disèt’ ane. Nimewo disèt la reprezante yon peryòd istorik ki kòmanse anvan Rafya, epi ki pwolonje depase batay Panium nan ak syèj Sidon an jouk rive nan fen pwobasyon lèzòm, jan ane 330 la reprezante l. Pwofesi desan-senkant ane a pou peryòd legliz Smirn lan te kòmanse nan ane 64 la epi li te fini nan Edik Milan an ak trete maryaj 313 la.
Constantine the Great represents the history of the church of Pergamos, and that history began in 313 and ended in 538. The first ‘seventeen’ years after the conclusion of the two-hundred-and-fifty-year prophecy in 313 possesses three waymarks. 313 was the Edict of Milan, 321 was the first Sunday law and the division of the empire is marked in 330. 330 represents the final Sunday law which marks the close of human probation. The number seventeen therefore begins before Raphia and ends well after the military campaign of Panium and Sidon. Verse sixteen in Daniel eleven represents the Sunday law in the United States
Konstanten Gran an reprezante listwa legliz Pègam nan, e listwa sa a te kòmanse an 313 epi li te fini an 538. Premye “disèt” ane yo apre konklizyon pwofesi de-san-senkant ane a an 313 genyen twa repè. An 313 te gen Edik Milan an, an 321 te gen premye lwa dimanch lan, epi divizyon anpi a make an 330. Ane 330 a reprezante dènye lwa dimanch lan ki make fèmti tan gras limanite. Se poutèt sa, nonb disèt la kòmanse anvan Rafia epi li fini byen apre kanpay militè Panyòm ak Sidon. Vèsè sèz nan Danyèl onz la reprezante lwa dimanch lan Ozetazini.
The Smyrna prophecy identifies the sign of the siege that is the very heart of Ezekiel’s warning message. The waymark that precedes the Sunday law, as represented by the two illustrations of the destruction of Jerusalem is the siege, but it is also the Edict of Milan, which begins the formation of the image of the beast.
Pwofesi Smirn lan idantifye siy syèj la, ki se kè menm mesaj avètisman Ezekyèl la. Siy repè ki vin anvan lwa dimanch lan, jan de ilistrasyon sou destriksyon Jerizalèm yo reprezante l, se syèj la; men li se tou Edik Milan an, ki kòmanse fòmasyon imaj bèt la.
At the siege a treaty marriage procession will occur. It is a fractal of the marriage procession that began with Reagan, as typified by Clovis in 496, but the final procession unto the marriage begins at the siege aligning with Justinian’s decree of 533, and with the Edict of Milan in 313. Both waymarks precede the Sunday law. 313 preceded the first Sunday law of 321, and the decree of 533 preceded the Sunday law at the third Counsel of Orleans in 538. Some type of legislation will fulfill the prophetic characteristics of both the decree of Justinian and the Edict of Milan, while some type of a symbolic treaty marriage will be put in place.
Nan syèj la, pral gen yon pwosesyon maryaj alyans. Sa a se yon fraktal pwosesyon maryaj ki te kòmanse avèk Reagan, jan Clovis te prefigire l an 496; men pwosesyon final la ki mennen nan maryaj la kòmanse nan syèj la, an liy avèk dekrè Jistinyen an nan 533, ansanm ak Edik Milan an nan 313. Toude repè sa yo vini anvan lwa dimanch lan. Ane 313 te vini anvan premye lwa dimanch lan an 321, epi dekrè 533 la te vini anvan lwa dimanch lan nan twazyèm Konsèy Orléans la an 538. Yon kalite lejislasyon pral akonpli karakteristik pwofetik ni dekrè Jistinyen an ni Edik Milan an, pandan yon kalite maryaj alyans senbolik pral etabli.
When that decree is made it is too late to get ready, for the door of probation is closed upon the Protestant horn as surely as it closed at the first Passover in Egypt. Thereafter the Sunday law, the next waymark identifies not simply that the image of the beast has been fully formed, but also the enforcement of the mark of the beast. The Sunday law marks the end of probation for the Republican horn, the earth beast of Revelation thirteen as certainly as Pharaoh and his host died in the Red Sea after the Passover.
Lè dekrè sa a fin fèt, li twò ta pou prepare, paske pòt tan lagras la fèmen sou kòn pwotestan an menm jan li te fèmen nan premye Pak la ann Ejip. Apre sa, lwa dimanch lan, pwochen siy sou chemen an, idantifye non sèlman ke imaj bèt la fin fòme nèt, men tou aplikasyon mak bèt la. Lwa dimanch lan make fen tan lagras la pou kòn Repibliken an, bèt tè a nan Revelasyon trèz la, avèk menm sètitid Farawon ak lame li a te mouri nan Lanmè Wouj la apre Pak la.
The two hundred and fifty years that concludes in 207 BC identifies Donald Trump, as represented by Antiochus Magnus preparing for the upcoming campaign that begins on the plain of Panium and ends with the siege of Sidon. After the Battle of Panium, the Ptolemaic commander Scopas of Aetolia fled with about 10,000 surviving troops to the city of Sidon. Antiochus pursued him and laid ‘siege’ to Sidon. The Ptolemaic government in Alexandria sent a relief force, but it failed. Facing starvation, Scopas surrendered the city. Antiochus allowed Scopas to leave; Scopas later returned to Egypt, where he was eventually executed on charges of treason and embezzlement. The siege of Sidon completed Antiochus’s conquest of Coele-Syria after Panium.
De san san senkant aneven ki fini an 207 av. J.-K. la idantifye Donald Trump, jan Antiochus Magnus reprezante l, antan l ap prepare pou kanpay k ap vini an ki kòmanse sou plenn Panium epi ki fini avèk syèj Sidon an. Apre batay Panium nan, kòmandan ptolemeyik la, Scopas d’Étolie, te pran lafuit avèk anviwon 10,000 sòlda ki te siviv pou ale nan vil Sidon. Antiochus te pouswiv li epi li te mete Sidon anba “syèj”. Gouvènman ptolemeyik ki te Alexandria a te voye yon fòs sekou, men li te echwe. Fas ak grangou, Scopas te rann vil la. Antiochus te pèmèt Scopas pati; Scopas te retounen ann Ejip apre sa, kote finalman yo te egzekite l sou akizasyon trayizon ak detounman lajan. Syèj Sidon an te konplete konkèt Antiochus sou Coele-Syria apre Panium.
Sister White identifies Uriah Smith’s book, Daniel and the Revelation as “God’s helping hand.” Smith identifies the two-step campaign of Antiochus in his commentary on verses fourteen and fifteen of Daniel eleven.
Sè White idantifye liv Uriah Smith la, Daniel and the Revelation, kòm “men èd Bondye.” Smith idantifye kanpay an de etap Antiochus la nan kòmantè li sou vèsè katòz ak kenz nan Danyèl onz.
“The tuition of the young king of Egypt was entrusted by the Roman Senate to M. Emilius Lepidus, who appointed Aristomenes, an old and experienced minister of that court, his guardian. His first act was to provide against the threatened invasion of the two confederated kings, Philip and Antiochus.
“Senatus Women an te konfye edikasyon jèn wa peyi Lejip la bay M. Emilius Lepidus, ki nonmen Aristomenes, yon ansyen minis eksperimante nan lakay wayal sa a, kòm gadyen li. Premye aksyon li te poze se te pran dispozisyon kont menas envazyon de wa ki te fè alyans yo, Filip ak Antiochus.
“To this end he despatched Scopas, a famous general of AEtolia, then in the service of the Egyptians, into his native country to raise reinforcements for the army. Having equipped an army, he marched into Palestine and Coele-Syria (Antiochus being engaged in a war with Attalus in Lesser Asia), and reduced all Judea into subjection to the authority of Egypt.
“Pou reyalize sa, li voye Scopas, yon jeneral renome soti nan Etoli, ki lè sa a te nan sèvis Ejipsyen yo, ale nan peyi natal li pou leve ranfò pou lame a. Apre li fin ekipe yon lame, li mache antre nan Palestin ak Kelesiri (Antyòkis te angaje nan yon lagè ak Atal nan Lazi Minè), epi li mete tout Jide anba soumisyon devan otorite Ejip la.
“Thus affairs were brought into a posture for the fulfillment of the verse before us. For Antiochus, desisting from his war with Attalus at the dictation of the Romans, took speedy steps for the recovery of Palestine and Coele-Syria from the hands of the Egyptians. Scopas was sent to oppose him. Near the sources of the Jordan, the two armies met. [Panium] Scopas was defeated, pursued to Sidon, and there closely besieged. Three of the ablest generals of Egypt, with their best forces, were sent to raise the siege, but without success. At length Scopas meeting, in the gaunt and intangible specter of famine, a foe with whom he was unable to cope, was forced to surrender on the dishonorable terms of life only; whereupon he and his ten thousand men were suffered to depart, stripped and naked. Here was the taking of the most fenced cities by the king of the north; for Sidon was, both in its situation and its defenses, one of the strongest cities of those times. Here was the failure of the arms of the south to withstand, and the failure also of the people which the king of the south had chosen; namely, Scopas and his Aetolian forces.” Daniel and the Revelation, 257, 258.
“Konsa zafè yo te rive nan yon dispozisyon ki te pèmèt akonplisman vèsè ki devan nou an. Paske Antiochus, apre li te sispann lagè li kont Attalus sou lòd Women yo, pran rapidman dispozisyon pou reprann Palèstin ak Cœlé-Siri nan men Ejipsyen yo. Yo te voye Scopas pou opoze avè l. Toupre sous larivyè Jouden an, de lame yo te rankontre. [Panium] Scopas te bat, yo te pouswiv li jouk Sidon, epi la yo te sènen l byen sere. Twa nan jeneral ki te pi abil ann Ejip yo, ansanm ak pi bon twoup yo, te voye pou leve syèj la, men san okenn siksè. Finalman, Scopas, lè li te rankontre, nan espekt gaunt e entanjib grangou a, yon advèsè li pa t kapab konbat, te oblije rann tèt sou kondisyon dezonorab pou yo te kite l lavi sèlman; apre sa, yo te pèmèt li menm ak dis mil moun li yo pati, dezabiye e toutouni. Men isit la te pran lavil ki te pi byen ranfòse yo pa wa nò a; paske Sidon te, ni pa sitiyasyon li ni pa defans li yo, youn nan lavil ki te pi solid nan epòk sa yo. Men isit la tou te echèk zam sid la pou reziste, ansanm ak echèk pèp wa sid la te chwazi a; sètadi, Scopas ak fòs Etoliyen li yo.” Daniel and the Revelation, 257, 258.
The two hundred and fifty years that concludes in 207 BC identifies Donald Trump. The two-hundred-and-fifty-year prophecy that ends at 313 with the treaty marriage of east and west, and the Edict of Milan is identifying the formation of the image of the beast in the United States. The church of Pergamos, which began in 313 represents the history where Christianity fell away through a compromise with the religion of paganism, in advance of the papal power taking the throne. Pergamos and the year 313, typifies the compromise that is represented by the formation of the image of the beast in the United States. It represents the compromise of Christianity and papal Rome, for the religion of Catholicism is nothing more or less than paganism disguised as a Christian institution. The two-hundred-and-fifty-year prophecy that began in 1776 and ends this year is also addressing the United States. Thus, all three two-hundred-and-fifty-year prophecies address some prophetic aspect of the earth beast of Revelation thirteen, and all three end within the prophetic lines represented by the number seventeen.
De san sankant (250) lane ki fini an 207 av. J.-C. idantifye Donald Trump. Pwofesi de san senkant lane a ki fini an 313 avèk maryaj trete lès ak lwès la, ansanm ak Edik Milan an, ap idantifye fòmasyon imaj bèt la Ozetazini. Legliz Pègam la, ki te kòmanse an 313, reprezante istwa kote Krisyanis te tonbe nan apostazi atravè yon konpwomi ak relijyon payanis, anvan pouvwa papal la te pran twòn nan. Pègam ak ane 313 la se yon tip ki reprezante konpwomi ki parèt nan fòmasyon imaj bèt la Ozetazini. Sa reprezante konpwomi ant Krisyanis ak Wòm papal la, paske relijyon Katolis la pa anyen plis ni anyen mwens pase payanis degize kòm yon enstitisyon kretyèn. Pwofesi de san senkant lane a ki te kòmanse an 1776 e ki fini ane sa a, ap pale tou de Etazini. Kidonk, tout twa pwofesi de san senkant lane yo adrese kèk aspè pwofetik sou bèt latè a nan Revelasyon trèz, epi yo tout twa fini andedan liy pwofetik nimewo disèt la reprezante.
The Sunday law is when the United States speaks as a dragon, and the speaking of a nation is the action of its legislative and judicial authorities.
Lwa dimanch lan se lè Lèzetazini pale tankou yon dragon, epi pawòl yon nasyon se aksyon otorite lejislatif ak jidisyè li yo.
“The ‘speaking’ of the nation is the action of its legislative and judicial authorities.” The Great Controversy, 442.
« La “parole” de la nation est l’action de ses autorités législatives et judiciaires. » The Great Controversy, 442.
Trump is neither a judicial or legislative authority, so the soon-coming Sunday law is accomplished by the Congress. Yet any action that provides support for the papal power, typifies the Sunday law. The decree of 533, and the edict of 313 identify the beginning of the period when the image of the beast is formed. The conclusion is the soon-coming Sunday law, and Jesus always illustrates the end with the beginning, so the action of Trump through an executive order that would provide any “concession” to the antichrist of Bible prophecy would represent the alpha of the movement that only ends at the omega, when the United States “shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law.”
Trump pa ni yon otorite jidisyè ni yon otorite lejislatif; konsa, lwa dimanch ki pral vini talè a se Kongrè a ki mete l an aplikasyon. Men, nenpòt aksyon ki bay sipò a pouvwa papal la se yon tipifikasyon lwa dimanch lan. Dekrè 533 la, ak edi 313 la, idantifye kòmansman peryòd kote imaj bèt la ap fòme. Konklizyon an se lwa dimanch ki pral vini talè a; epi Jezi toujou ilistre fen an pa kòmansman an. Se poutèt sa, aksyon Trump, atravè yon lòd egzekitif ki ta bay nenpòt “konsesyon” a antikris pwofesi Bib la, t ap reprezante alfa mouvman an, yon mouvman ki pa fini jouk nan omega a, lè Etazini “va tèlman renonse prensip gouvènman li yo pou l adopte yon lwa dimanch.”
“There are many, even of those engaged in this movement for Sunday enforcement, who are blinded to the results which will follow this action. They do not see that they are striking directly against religious liberty. There are many who have never understood the claims of the Bible Sabbath and the false foundation upon which the Sunday institution rests. Any movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy, which for so many ages has steadily warred against liberty of conscience. Sunday observance owes its existence as a so-called Christian institution to ‘the mystery of iniquity;’ and its enforcement will be a virtual recognition of the principles which are the very cornerstone of Romanism. When our nation shall so abjure the principles of its government as to enact a Sunday law, Protestantism will in this act join hands with popery; it will be nothing else than giving life to the tyranny which has long been eagerly watching its opportunity to spring again into active despotism.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.
“Gen anpil moun, menm pami sila yo ki angaje nan mouvman sa a pou fè respekte dimanch, ki avèg sou rezilta ki pral swiv aksyon sa a. Yo pa wè ke yo ap frape dirèkteman kont libète relijye. Gen anpil moun ki pa janm konprann reklamasyon Saba Bib la ak fondasyon fo sou ki enstitisyon dimanch lan chita. Nenpòt mouvman an favè lejislasyon relijye se an reyalite yon zak konsesyon bay papote a, ki pandan anpil syèk te fè lagè san rete kont libète konsyans. Obsèvans dimanch dwe egzistans li kòm yon sa yo rele enstitisyon kretyen a ‘mistè inikite a;’ epi fè respekte li pral yon rekonesans de facto prensip ki se menm wòch angilè womanis la. Lè nasyon nou an va konsa renonse ak prensip gouvènman li a pou l adopte yon lwa dimanch, pwotestantis va, nan zak sa a, mete men ak papote; sa p ap anyen lòt pase bay lavi a tirani a ki depi lontan t ap tann ak anpil anvi opòtinite pa li pou l sote ankò nan despotis aktif.” Testimonies, volume 5, 711.
Any “movement in favor of religious legislation is really an act of concession to the papacy,” and those movements occur in advance of the soon-coming Sunday law.
Nenpòt “mouvman an favè lejislasyon relijye se an reyalite yon zak konsesyon anvè papote a,” epi mouvman sa yo fèt davans anvan lwa dimanch ki pral vini talè a.
“The decree enforcing the worship of this day is to go forth to all the world. In a limited degree, it has already gone forth. In several places the civil power is speaking with the voice of a dragon, just as the heathen king spoke to the Hebrew captives.” Signs of the Times, May 6, 1897.
«Dekrè ki fè adorasyon jou sa a obligatwa a dwe pibliye pou tout lemonn. Nan yon mezi limite, li deja pibliye. Nan plizyè kote, pouvwa sivil la ap pale ak vwa yon dragon, menm jan wa payen an te pale ak kaptif ebre yo.» Signs of the Times, May 6, 1897.
We will continue these things in the next article.
N ap kontinye bagay sa yo nan pwochen atik la.