The pioneer application of the history which fulfilled verses ten through sixteen identified that Rome, who established the vision arrived in the year 200 BC, the same year as the battle of Panium, and I am suggesting that in 2025 Rome arrived and established the vision with the inauguration of Trump and Pope Leo. 2025 represents the only time a pope and President were inaugurated in the same year. The beast and its image was lifted up for all who are willing to see in 2025. Unlike the pioneers, I am applying the sequence of the verses, instead of the history that initially fulfilled the verses. I agree with the history, but am drawing upon a sequence within the verses as the framework for the history, as opposed to using the history to define the framework of the verses. I contend that the two approaches are both accurate.

തൊണ്ണൂറാം വാക്യം മുതൽ പതിനാറാം വാക്യം വരെ നിവൃത്തിയായ ചരിത്രത്തിന്റെ പയനിയർ പ്രയോഗം, ദർശനം സ്ഥാപിച്ച റോമാ ക്രി.മു. 200-ാം ആണ്ടിൽ എത്തിയതായി തിരിച്ചറിഞ്ഞു; അതേ ആണ്ടായിരുന്നു പാനിയത്തിന്റെ യുദ്ധം നടന്നതും. അതുപോലെ, 2025-ൽ ട്രംപിന്റെയും പോപ്പ് ലിയോവിന്റെയും അധികാരപ്രവേശനത്തോടുകൂടെ റോമാ എത്തി ദർശനം സ്ഥാപിച്ചതാണെന്ന് ഞാൻ നിർദ്ദേശിക്കുന്നു. ഒരു പോപ്പിനെയും ഒരു പ്രസിഡന്റിനെയും ഒരേ ആണ്ടിൽ അധികാരപ്രവേശനം നടത്തിയ ഏക സമയം 2025 ആണെന്ന് ഇത് സൂചിപ്പിക്കുന്നു. കാണാൻ സന്നദ്ധരായ എല്ലാവർക്കും വേണ്ടി 2025-ൽ മൃഗവും അതിന്റെ പ്രതിമയും ഉയർത്തിക്കാട്ടപ്പെട്ടു. പയനിയർമാരിൽനിന്ന് വ്യത്യസ്തമായി, ഞാൻ പ്രയോഗിക്കുന്നത് വാക്യങ്ങൾ ആദ്യം നിവൃത്തിയായ ചരിത്രത്തെ അല്ല, വാക്യങ്ങളുടെ ക്രമത്തെയാണ്. ആ ചരിത്രത്തോട് ഞാൻ യോജിക്കുന്നു; എങ്കിലും, ചരിത്രത്തെ വാക്യങ്ങളുടെ ഘടന നിർവചിക്കാൻ ഉപയോഗിക്കുന്നതിനു പകരം, വാക്യങ്ങളുടെ അന്തർസ്ഥമായ ഒരു ക്രമത്തെ ചരിത്രത്തിനുള്ള രൂപരേഖയായി ഞാൻ ആശ്രയിക്കുന്നു. ഈ രണ്ട് സമീപനങ്ങളും യഥാർത്ഥത്തിൽ ശരിയാണെന്നാണ് ഞാൻ വാദിക്കുന്നത്.

The Revolution of the Maccabees

Mapinduzi ya Wamakabayo

I apply the line of the Maccabees in a similar fashion. The Maccabean revolt in 167 BC was well after the battle of Panium in 200 BC, and well before Pompey captured Jerusalem in 63 BC. The line which begins at verse sixteen with general Pompey’s conquering of Jerusalem in 63 BC, and continues through to Tiberias Caesar who reigned when Jesus was crucified. The cross and Tiberias is represented in verse twenty-two of chapter eleven.

Ndzi tirhisa ntila wa Vamakabi hi ndlela leyi fanaka. Vuvukisi bya Vamakabi hi 167 BC a byi ri endzhaku swinene ka nyimpi ya Panium hi 200 BC, naswona emahlweni swinene ka loko Pompey a teka Yerusalema hi 63 BC. Ntila lowu sungulaka eka ndzimana ya vukhume na tsevu hi ku hlula ka Yerusalema hi jenerali Pompey hi 63 BC, wu ya emahlweni ku fikela eka Tiberias Caesar loyi a fumeke hi nkarhi lowu Yesu a dlayiweke emhandzini. Xihambano na Tiberias swi yimeleriwe eka ndzimana ya makume mambirhi na timbirhi ya ndzima ya vukhume na yin’we.

And with the arms of a flood shall they be overflown from before him, and shall be broken; yea, also the prince of the covenant. Daniel 11:22.

Û bi destên lehiyê ve dê ji pêşiya wî bên şûştin û şikestin; erê, herwiha serwerê peymanê jî. Daniel 11:22.

General Pompey conquering Jerusalem in 63 BC in verse sixteen, and then the cross in 31 AD in verse twenty-two, represents a line of prophecy that begins at a symbol of the Sunday law and ends with a symbol of the Sunday law. Verse twenty-three is a break in the passage, thus marking verse twenty-two as the end of the prophetic line that began in verse sixteen. Accompanied with the distinct ending of the line in verse twenty-two, is the fact that verse twenty-two is a symbol of the same waymark represented in verse sixteen, thus providing an alpha and omega witness that verses sixteen to twenty-two represents a distinct prophetic line.

Pompey Mkuu akiiteka Yerusalemu mwaka 63 KK katika aya ya kumi na sita, na kisha msalaba mwaka 31 BK katika aya ya ishirini na mbili, kunawakilisha mstari wa unabii unaoanza kwa ishara ya sheria ya Jumapili na kuishia kwa ishara ya sheria ya Jumapili. Aya ya ishirini na tatu ni pengo katika kifungu hicho, hivyo kuiweka alama aya ya ishirini na mbili kuwa ndiyo mwisho wa mstari wa unabii ulioanza katika aya ya kumi na sita. Ikiandamana na mwisho wa wazi wa mstari huo katika aya ya ishirini na mbili, ipo kweli kwamba aya ya ishirini na mbili ni ishara ya alama ile ile ya njia inayowakilishwa katika aya ya kumi na sita, hivyo kutoa ushuhuda wa alfa na omega kwamba aya ya kumi na sita hadi ya ishirini na mbili zinawakilisha mstari maalumu wa unabii.

Add to this that verses fifteen and sixteen are marking the transition from the Seleucid kingdom to the Roman power, and you see a break in continuity from the Seleucids in verse fifteen unto the Romans in verse sixteen and the line of verse sixteen to twenty-two is clearly isolated as a singular prophetic line. Verse sixteen introduces the next power who will dominate Judea, thus marking a transition of prophetic history just as with verse twenty-three. The line begins and ends with a symbol of the Sunday law, and the line ends in the twenty-second verse of the eleventh chapter.

Ku ebyo kandi ko imirongo ya cumi n’itanu n’uwa cumi n’itandatu iranga ihinduka riva ku bwami bw’Abaselewukide rijya ku butegetsi bw’Abaroma, maze ukabona ko hari ugucikamo kw’ubudakuka buva ku Baselewukide bo mu murongo wa cumi n’itanu bugera ku Baroma bo mu murongo wa cumi n’itandatu, kandi umurongo uva ku wa cumi n’itandatu ukageza ku wa makumyabiri n’ibiri usobanuwe neza ko ari umurongo umwe w’ubuhanuzi wihariye. Umurongo wa cumi n’itandatu utangiza ubutegetsi bukurikiraho buzatwara u Buyuda, bityo ukaranga ihinduka mu mateka y’ubuhanuzi nk’uko bimeze no ku murongo wa makumyabiri na gatatu. Uwo murongo utangirira kandi ugasozwa n’ikimenyetso cy’itegeko ryo ku Cyumweru, kandi ugasorezwa ku murongo wa makumyabiri n’ibiri w’igice cya cumi na rimwe.

Smith—and Three Caesars

اسمتھ—او تین قیصر

The fact that verse sixteen represents the Sunday law, as does verse twenty-two—demands that the two verses be aligned upon each other. Uriah Smith comments on verse twenty-three, and explains why it represents a history that began further back in the history of the previous verses, as opposed to representing a history that follows immediately after the cross of verse twenty-two.

Nukulu yāñga ndima ya dikumi na mutanda ivangila mwipangilo wa Dyinga dya Lumingu, bule bu ivangila ndima ya dikumi na ibidi—yilomba nde ndima ayi ibidi yalinganyikwe yimo pa yikwabo. Uriah Smith wakomenta pa ndima ya dikumi na isatu, ne walongoloka mwomwo yika ivangila lisolo lyaatandika kale-mpala mu lisolo lya ndima ya mambu a matadilu, pa kutala neivangili lisolo lya kulonda buludi panyima pa musalaba wa ndima ya dikumi na ibidi.

“‘VERSE 23. And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.’

“‘MSTARI WA 23. Na baada ya agano kufanywa naye, atatenda kwa hila; kwa maana atakuja juu, naye atakuwa hodari pamoja na watu wachache.’”

“The ‘him’ with whom the league here spoken of is made, must be the same power which has been the subject of the prophecy from the 14th verse; and that this is the Roman power is shown beyond controversy in the fulfilment of the prophecy in three individuals, as already noticed, who successively ruled over the Roman Empire; namely, Julius, Augustus, and Tiberius Caesar. The first, on returning to the fort of his own land in triumph, stumbled and fell, and was not found. Verse 19. The second was a raiser of taxes; and he reigned in the glory of the kingdom, and died neither in anger nor in battle, but peacefully in his own bed. Verse 20. The third was a dissembler, and one of the vilest of characters. He entered upon the kingdom peaceably, but both his reign and life were ended by violence. And in his reign the Prince of the covenant, Jesus of Nazareth, was put to death upon the cross. Verses 21. 22. Christ can never be broken or put to death again; hence in no other government, and at no other time, can we find a fulfilment of these events. Some attempt to apply these verses to Antiochus, and make one of the Jewish high priests the prince of the covenant, though they are never called such. This is the same kind of reasoning which endeavors to make the reign of Antiochus a fulfilment of the little horn of Daniel 8; and it is offered for the same purpose; namely, to break the great chain of evidence by which it is shown that the Advent doctrine is the doctrine of the Bible, and that Christ is now at the door. But the evidence cannot be overthrown; the chain cannot be broken.

“Liga leyi ku vulavuriwaka ha yona laha lexi endliwaka na yena, yi fanele ku va wona matimba wolawo lawa ma nga va nhlokomhaka ya vuprofeta ku sukela eka ndzimana ya 14; naswona leswaku lawa i matimba ya Rhoma swi kombisiwa handle ka ku kanakana hi ku hetiseka ka vuprofeta eka vanhu vanharhu, hilaha se swi boxiweke hakona, lava va fumeke hi ku landzelelana ehenhla ka Mfumo wa Rhoma; ku nga Julius, Augustus, na Tiberius Caesar. Wo sungula, loko a vuya hi ku hlula eka xisirhelelo xa tiko rakwe, u khunguvanyekile a wa, kutani a nga ha kumekanga. Ndzimana 19. Wa vumbirhi a a ri muhlengeleti wa swibalo; naswona u fumile eku vangameni ka mfumo, kutani a fa kungari hi vukarhi kumbe enyimpini, kambe hi ku rhula embhedeni wakwe n’wini. Ndzimana 20. Wa vunharhu a a ri mudyohi wa vuxisi, naswona a a ri un’wana wa vanhu va manyala ngopfu hi mahanyelo. U nghenele mfumo hi ku rhula, kambe vuhosi byakwe ni vutomi byakwe hinkwaswo swi hele hi madzolonga. Naswona emfun’weni wakwe, Hosi ya ntwanano, Yesu wa Nazareta, u dlayiwile emisaveni ya xihambano. Tindzimana 21, 22. Kriste a nga ka a nga ha tshoviwa kumbe ku dlayiwa nakambe; hikwalaho, a hi nge kumi ku hetiseka ka swiendlakalo leswi ehansi ka mfumo wun’wana kumbe hi nkarhi wun’wana. Van’wana va ringeta ku tirhisa tindzimana leti eka Antiochus, va tlhela va endla leswaku un’wana wa vaprista lavakulu va Vayuda a va hosi ya ntwanano, hambileswi va nga tshamiki va vitaniwa hi ndlela yoleyo. Leyi i muxaka wolowo wa ku anakanya lowu ringetaka ku endla leswaku ku fuma ka Antiochus ku va ku hetiseka ka rimhondzo leritsongo ra Daniyele 8; naswona wu nyikeriwa hi xikongomelo lexi fanaka; ku nga ku tshovelela nghilazi leyikulu ya vumbhoni lebyi kombisaka leswaku dyondzo ya Ku Vuya i dyondzo ya Bibele, ni leswaku Kriste sweswi u le nyangweni. Kambe vumbhoni lebyi a byi nge herisiwi; nghilazi leyi a yi nge tshoviwi.”

“Having taken us down through the secular events of the empire to the end of the seventy weeks, the prophet, in verse 23, takes us back to the time when the Romans became directly connected with the people of God by the Jewish league, BC 161: from which point we are then taken down in a direct line of events to the final triumph of the church, and the setting up of God’s everlasting kingdom. The Jews, being grievously oppressed by the Syrian kings, sent an embassy to Rome, to solicit the aid of the Romans, and to join themselves in ‘a league of amity and confederacy with them.’ 1 Mac.8; Prideaux, II, 234; Josephus’s Antiquities, book 12, chap.10, sec.6. The Romans listened to the request of the Jews, and granted them a decree, couched in these words:—

“Shi twatondalelamo pamwe nevyuma vya pa nsi vya bwami kufika ku mpela ya mavhiki makumi saba, muporofita, mu vesi 23, utupeleka vhutalele ku nthawi iyo Arooma vakava na chikamano chakananga na vanhu va Xikwembu hi chumelano cha Vhayuda, BC 161: kufuma pa ndzhawu iyo kutani twatondalelwa hi layini yo lulama ya zviitiko kufika ekuhluleni ka makumu ka kereke, ni kuimisweni ka mfumo wa Xikwembu wa hilaha ku nga heriki. Vhayuda, hi ku tshikileliwa ngopfu hi tihosi ta Vhasiriya, vakatuma vamanḓa eRoma, ku ya kombela mpfuno wa Arooma, ni ku tihlanganisa navho mu ‘chumelano cha vunghana ni xa nhlangano na vona.’ 1 Mac.8; Prideaux, II, 234; Josephus’s Antiquities, book 12, chap.10, sec.6. Arooma vakayingisa xikombelo xa Vhayuda, kutani vakavanyika xiboho, lexi a xi vekiwe hi marito lawa:—”

“‘The decree of the senate concerning a league of assistance and friendship with the nation of the Jews. It shall not be lawful for any that are subject to the Romans, to make war with the nation of the Jews, nor to assist those that do so, either by sending them corn, or ships, or money; and if any attack be made upon the Jews, the Romans shall assist them as far as they are able; and again, if any attack be made upon the Romans, the Jews shall assist them. And if the Jews have a mind to add to, or to take from, this league of assistance, that shall be done with the common consent of the Romans. And whatever addition shall thus be made, it shall be of force.’ ‘This decree,’ says Josephus, ‘was written by Eupolemus, the son of John, and by Jason, the son of Eleazer, when Judas was high priest of the nation, and Simon, his brother, was general of the army. And this was the first league that the Romans made with the Jews, and was managed after this manner.’

“‘Kiryarê meclîsa senatoyê li ser peymana alîkarî û hevaltiyê bi neteweya Cihûyan re. Ji bo kesên ku bindestê Romayiyan in ne rewa ye ku bi neteweya Cihûyan re şer bikin, û ne jî ewên ku wisa dikin alîkarî bikin, çi bi şandina genim, çi bi keştiyan, an jî bi pereyan; û heke êrîşek li ser Cihûyan were kirin, Romayî dê, heta qas ku dikarin, alîkariya wan bikin; û her weha, heke êrîşek li ser Romayiyan were kirin, Cihû dê alîkariya wan bikin. Û heke Cihû bixwazin ku tiştek li ser vê peymana alîkariyê zêde bikin an jê kêm bikin, ev dê bi razîbûna hevpar a Romayiyan were kirin. Û her zêdekirinek ku bi vî awayî were kirin, dê bi hêz be.’ ‘Ev biryar,’ Josephus dibêje, ‘ji aliyê Eupolemus, kurê Yûhenna, û Jason, kurê Eleazer, hat nivîsandin, dema ku Judas serokê kahînanê neteweyê bû û Simon, birayê wî, fermandarê artêşê bû. Û ev yekem peyman bû ku Romayiyan bi Cihûyan re çêkir, û bi vî awayî hate birêvebirin.’”

“At this time the Romans were a small people, and began to work deceitfully, or with cunning, as the word signifies. And from this point they rose by a steady and rapid ascent to the height of power which they afterward attained.” Uriah Smith, Daniel and the Revelation, 270, 271.

“Ni gihe Abaroma bari abantu bake, kandi batangira gukora mu buriganya, cyangwa mu mayeri, nk’uko iryo jambo ribisobanura. Kandi uhereye kuri iyo ngingo bazamukanye ugukura kudahwema kandi kwihuta, bagera ku rwego rw’ububasha rwo hejuru nyuma baje kugeraho.” Uriah Smith, Daniel and the Revelation, 270, 271.

Not only does the cross of verse twenty-two end a line with a symbol that is also at the beginning of the line, but the next verse drops back into the history which preceded the cross, to roughly thirty years after Panium and roughly one hundred years before Rome conquered Jerusalem. The waymark of the league of the Jews that Smith here identifies as 161 BC, is identified by other pioneers as 158 BC. The point I am focusing on here is not so much the date, but that verses sixteen to twenty-two represents a line of prophetic history that the Sunday law is both the alpha and omega of the line. Then once the line of verse sixteen unto twenty-two is set forth, verse twenty-three repeats and enlarges upon the history within the line of verses sixteen to twenty-two. The prophetic line of history represented by verse twenty-three is the history of the Maccabees, and the history of the Maccabees is a perfect parallel to the history of the United States.

Avesi gwa vesi twendi-tu auma laini na ishara inaopatikana pia mwanzo wa laini hiyo, bali vesi inayofuata hurudi tena katika historia iliyotangulia msalaba huo, hadi takriban miaka thelathini baada ya Panium na takriban miaka mia moja kabla ya Rumi kuiteka Yerusalemu. Alama ya njia ya mapatano ya Wayahudi ambayo Smith hapa anaitambulisha kuwa ni 161 BC, inatambulishwa na waanzilishi wengine kuwa ni 158 BC. Hoja ninayoikazia hapa si sana tarehe yenyewe, bali kwamba vesi kumi na sita hadi ishirini na mbili zinawakilisha mstari wa historia ya kinabii ambao ndani yake sheria ya Jumapili ndiyo alfa na omega ya mstari huo. Kisha, mara tu mstari wa vesi kumi na sita hadi ishirini na mbili unapowekwa wazi, vesi ishirini na tatu hurudia na kupanua historia iliyomo ndani ya mstari wa vesi kumi na sita hadi ishirini na mbili. Mstari wa kinabii wa historia unaowakilishwa na vesi ishirini na tatu ni historia ya Wamakabayo, na historia ya Wamakabayo ni ulinganifu mkamilifu na historia ya Marekani.

Two Dynasties

دوو بنەماڵەی پاشایەتی

The Maccabees represent a rebellion against the Seleucid kingdom that began during the reign of Antiochus Epiphanes. The rebellion was against the northern Seleucid kingdom and it resulted in a victory that led to one of two Judean dynasties in the period that ultimately led to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The first dynasty was the Hasmonean and the second was the Herodian. The Herodian dynasty was the second Judean government after deliverance from the northern Seleucid kingdom. It was directly connected to the Roman system, whereas; the prior Hasmonean dynasty was essentially Jewish. The Hasmonean dynasty began in 141 BC and in 37 BC the Herodian dynasty began and lasted until 70 AD.

Makabikoar, Antioko Epiphanesen erreinaldian hasi zen Seleukotar erreinuaren aurkako matxinada baten adierazgarri dira. Matxinada iparraldeko Seleukotar erreinuaren aurka izan zen, eta garaipen batekin amaitu zen; garaipen hark Judeako bi dinastietako baten sorrera ekarri zuen, azkenean K.o. 70ean Jerusalemen suntsipenera eraman zuen aldiaren barruan. Lehen dinastia Hasmonearra izan zen, eta bigarrena Herodestarra. Herodestar dinastia Judeako bigarren gobernua izan zen, iparraldeko Seleukotar erreinutik askapena lortu ondoren. Erromatar sistemarekin zuzenean lotuta zegoen; aurreko dinastia hasmonearra, berriz, funtsean judua zen. Dinastia hasmonearra K.a. 141ean hasi zen, eta K.a. 37an Herodestar dinastia hasi zen eta K.o. 70era arte iraun zuen.

The dynasties represent the government of Judea, the ancient and literal glorious land. The Maccabean revolt was from 167 to 160 BC. In 164 BC the Maccabees drove Antiochus Epiphanes out of Jerusalem and cleansed and rededicated the temple after Antiochus had desecrated it, but it was not until 141 BC that the northern Seleucid power was fully vanquished and the Hasmonean dynasty began.

Ubukombe bugereranya ubutegetsi bw’i Yudeya, igihugu cy’icyubahiro cya kera kandi nyakuri. Ubugome bw’Abamakabeya bwabaye kuva mu wa 167 kugeza mu wa 160 mbere ya Kristo. Mu wa 164 mbere ya Kristo, Abamakabeya birukanye Antiyokusi Epifane i Yerusalemu maze bahumanura kandi bongera kwitura urusengero nyuma y’uko Antiyokusi yari yararuhumanije, ariko ntibyabaye kugeza mu wa 141 mbere ya Kristo ngo ubushobozi bw’amajyaruguru bw’Abaselewukiya buneshwe burundu maze ubukombe bw’Abahasimoneya butangire.

The Herodian dynasty is a key to this line, for it was Herod the Great who called to execute the babies at the time of Jesus birth, and his son was ruling when Jesus died. Herod the Great was the father, and he was a king over Judea, but his son was only a tetrarch, meaning he was a ruler over a fourth of the kingdom, like a governor rather than a king. That is why he lacked the authority which required him to connect with Pilate to crucify Christ. Jesus’ birth was the prophetic “time of the end” in his line of prophecy, and His death represents the Sunday law. The first Herod represents 1989, and the last Herod is the Sunday law. Herod the father to Herod the son is the prophetic line of Christ.

Ubwami bwa Herode ni urufunguzo rw’uyu murongo, kuko Herode Mukuru ari we watanze itegeko ryo kwica impinja mu gihe cyo kuvuka kwa Yesu, kandi umuhungu we ni we wari utegeka igihe Yesu yapfaga. Herode Mukuru yari se, kandi yari umwami utegeka u Buyuda, ariko umuhungu we yari umutetrariki gusa, bisobanura ko yari umutware utegeka kimwe cya kane cy’ubwami, nk’umuyobozi w’intara kurusha uko yaba umwami. Ni cyo gituma yaburaga ububasha bwamusabaga kwihuza na Pilato kugira ngo babambe Kristo. Ivuka rya Yesu ryari “igihe cy’imperuka” cy’ubuhanuzi muri uwo murongo we w’ubuhanuzi, kandi urupfu rwe rugereranya itegeko ryo ku Cyumweru. Herode wa mbere ahagarariye 1989, kandi Herode wa nyuma ni itegeko ryo ku Cyumweru. Herode se kugeza kuri Herode umuhungu ni wo murongo w’ubuhanuzi bwa Kristo.

The line of the Maccabees begins with a victorious rebellion against a northern king who had enforced his Greek customs, culture as well as the Greek religion upon the Jews. The beginning of the Hasmonean dynasty represented 1798. Why so, you might ask? If one dynasty begins at a prophetic “time of the end,” as it was with the Herodian dynasty at Christ’s birth, then the other dynasty would of prophetic necessity have the same beginning. The two dynasties both begin with a time of the end, when we apply Christ birth as the “time of the end,” but the foolish never see the unsealed light associated with the time of the end.

Laini ya Wamakabayo inaanza kwa uasi wa ushindi dhidi ya mfalme wa kaskazini ambaye alikuwa ameweka juu ya Wayahudi desturi zake za Kiyunani, utamaduni wake, pamoja na dini ya Kiyunani. Mwanzo wa nasaba ya Wahasmoneo uliwakilisha mwaka 1798. Kwa nini hivyo, waweza kuuliza? Ikiwa nasaba moja huanza katika “wakati wa mwisho” wa kinabii, kama ilivyokuwa kwa nasaba ya Herode wakati wa kuzaliwa kwa Kristo, basi nasaba ile nyingine, kwa ulazima wa kinabii, ingebidi iwe na mwanzo uo huo. Nasaba hizo mbili zote huanza kwa wakati wa mwisho, tunapotumia kuzaliwa kwa Kristo kama “wakati wa mwisho,” lakini wapumbavu hawaioni kamwe nuru iliyofunuliwa inayohusiana na wakati wa mwisho.

“In ours, as in Christ’s day, there may be a misreading or misinterpreting of the Scriptures. If the Jews had studied the Scriptures with earnest, prayerful hearts, their searching would have been rewarded with a true knowledge of the time, and not only the time, but also the manner of Christ’s appearing. They would not have ascribed the glorious second appearing of Christ to his first advent. They had the testimony of Daniel; they had the testimony of Isaiah and the other prophets; they had the teaching of Moses; and here was Christ in their very midst, and still they were searching the Scriptures for evidence in regard to his coming. And they were doing unto Christ the very things that had been prophesied they would do. They were so blinded they knew not what they were doing.

“Etũ, ta Kristũ no mũthenya wake, no kũgĩkũrwo kana kũtafsiriagwo Maitũ ma Andũ a Ngai nĩ njĩra ya mahĩtia. Angĩkorwo Ayahudi nĩmo methutĩtie Maitũ ma Andũ a Ngai na ngoro cia kwĩhũũra, cia mahooya, kũrora kwao kwangĩheirwo mũgambo wa ma, wa kumenya hingo ĩyo, na ti hingo ĩyo yonyene, no o mũno wa kwoneka kwa Kristũ. Matiangĩtĩire kwoneka kwa kerũhia kũu kwa keerĩ kwa Kristũ na kwĩra guoko gwake kwa mbere. Nĩ maarĩ na ũira wa Danieli; nĩ maarĩ na ũira wa Isaia na wa anabii arĩa angĩ; nĩ maarĩ na ũrutani wa Musa; na haha nĩ haatũhĩrĩte Kristũ gatagatĩ-inĩ gao, no rĩrĩ, maarĩ o ta andũ marĩ gũcaria Maitũ ma Andũ a Ngai nĩguo maone ũira ũkoniĩte kwĩza gwake. Na maarĩ mũno makĩrĩra Kristũ ũndũ ũrĩa-rĩo watarĩirwo kũrĩ bo nĩmo marĩkĩra. Nĩmahoorirwo maitho mũno nginya matamenyaga ũrĩa maarĩ gwĩka.”

“And many are doing the same things today, in 1897, because they have not had experience in the testing messages comprehended in the first, second and third angels’ messages. There are those who are searching the Scriptures for proof that these messages are still in the future. They gather together the truthfulness of the messages, but they fail to give them their proper place in prophetic history. Therefore such are in danger of misleading the people in regard to locating the messages. They do not see and understand the time of the end, or when to locate the messages. The day of God is coming with stealthy tread; but the supposed wise and great men are prating about ‘Higher Education.’ They know not the signs of Christ’s coming, or of the end of the world.” Paulson Collection, 423, 424.

«Û gelek îro jî, di sala 1897-an de, heman tiştan dikin, ji ber ku wan di peyamên ceribandinê yên di peyamên melaîkeyê yekem, duyem û sêyem de têne têgihiştin de tecrûbe nehebûye. Hene kesên ku ji bo delîlê lêgerîna Nivîsarên Pîroz dikin ku van peyaman hîn jî di pêşerojê de ne. Ew rastbûna van peyaman kom dikin, lê ew nikarin cihê wan yê rast di dîroka pêxemberî de bidin wan. Ji ber vê yekê, ev kes di xetereyê de ne ku gel di derbarê cihkirina van peyaman de bixapînin. Ew demê dawiyê nabînin û nafahmin ku kengê divê van peyaman cih bidin. Roja Xwedê bi gavên veşartî tê; lê ew zilamên ku xwe zana û mezin dibînin, li ser “Perwerdehiya Bilind” gotinên vala dibêjin. Ew ne nîşanên hatina Mesîh dizanin, ne jî nîşanên dawiya cîhanê.» Paulson Collection, 423, 424.

Identifying Christ’s birth as the “time of the end,” and therefore as the key of bringing the line of the Maccabees into the present truth context of the latter days, is making Christ the very center of the passage, which is also evidence the application is valid.

Kumtambua kuzaliwa kwa Kristo kuwa ndiyo “wakati wa mwisho,” na kwa hiyo kuwa ufunguo wa kuuleta ukoo wa Wamakabayo katika muktadha wa kweli ya sasa ya siku za mwisho, ni kumfanya Kristo kuwa kiini chenyewe cha fungu hilo, jambo ambalo pia ni uthibitisho kwamba matumizi hayo ni halali.

The line of the Maccabees illustrates the spiritual glorious land, and the illustration begins in a period where the citizens of the glorious land break away from the king of the north’s political and religious domination. The Maccabean revolt that led to the Hasmonean dynasty represents 1776, and the revolt against the king of the north that was accomplished by the Maccabees represented the Revolutionary War. The twenty-two years of 1776 unto 1798 represents the Maccabean rebellion that led to the Hasmonean dynasty at the time of the end in 1798, which continued until the Herodian dynasty began at the time of the end in 1989. The Herodian dynasty continued until the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD.

Abakamakabeya b’ekika biraga ensi ey’ekitiibwa ey’Omwoyo, era ekifaananyi ekyo kitandikira mu kiseera abaana b’ensi ey’ekitiibwa we baava mu bufuzi n’okufuga kw’eddini okw’omukama ow’obukiikakkono. Okwekalakaasa kw’Abamakabeya okwaleeta obwakabaka bwa Bahasumoni kutegeeza 1776, era okwegolokosa eri omukama ow’obukiikakkono okwatuukirizibwa Abamakabeya kwategeeza Olutalo lw’Okwegolokosa. Emyaka amakumi abiri mu ebiri okuva mu 1776 okutuuka mu 1798 kitegeeza okujeema kw’Abamakabeya okwaleeta obwakabaka bwa Bahasumoni mu kiseera ky’enkomerero mu 1798, okwagenda mu maaso okutuusa obwakabaka bwa Baakerodi bwe bwatandika mu kiseera ky’enkomerero mu 1989. Obwakabaka bwa Baakerodi bwagenda mu maaso okutuusa Yerusaalemi lwe yazikirizibwa mu mwaka gwa 70 AD.

What is important to recognize in this line of history is twofold; it is an illustration of the ancient glorious land that typifies the modern glorious land, and it begins within a line of history that starts with verse sixteen, where Rome conquers the glorious land for the first time, thus identifying the primary theme of the line. The line of verse sixteen unto verse twenty-two represents the glorious land, and its context is the soon-coming Sunday law. The line also represents the two classes of worshippers that influence both dynastic governments. The Sadducees were less in numbers but generally controlled the Jewish religious and political systems in both dynastic periods. The religious system was managed by a priesthood, and that priesthood was also influenced by both Sadducees and Pharisees. The Hasmonean and Herodian governments were both influenced by the Pharisees and Sadducees, and the two dynasties represent the government of the United States from 1798 unto the Sunday law.

इतिहासको यस रेखामा चिन्न अत्यन्त महत्त्वपूर्ण कुरा दुईवटा छन्; यो प्राचीन गौरवशाली देशको एक दृष्टान्त हो, जसले आधुनिक गौरवशाली देशको प्रतिरूप दिन्छ, र यो त्यही इतिहासरेखाभित्र आरम्भ हुन्छ जो पद सोह्रबाट सुरु हुन्छ, जहाँ रोमले पहिलो पटक गौरवशाली देशलाई विजित गर्छ, र यसरी त्यस रेखाको मुख्य विषयलाई पहिचान गराउँछ। पद सोह्रदेखि पद बाइससम्मको रेखाले गौरवशाली देशलाई प्रतिनिधित्व गर्छ, र यसको सन्दर्भ चाँडै आउन लागेको आइतबारको व्यवस्था हो। यस रेखाले ती दुई वर्गका आराधकहरूलाई पनि प्रतिनिधित्व गर्छ जसले दुवै राजवंशीय शासनहरूलाई प्रभाव पारे। सदुकीहरू संख्यामा कम थिए, तर सामान्यतया दुवै राजवंशीय अवधिहरूमा यहूदी धार्मिक तथा राजनीतिक प्रणालीहरूलाई नियन्त्रण गर्थे। धार्मिक प्रणाली एक पुजारीवर्गद्वारा सञ्चालित थियो, र त्यो पुजारीवर्गमाथि सदुकीहरू र फरिसीहरू दुवैको प्रभाव पनि थियो। हास्मोनी र हेरोदियन दुवै शासनहरू फरिसीहरू र सदुकीहरूद्वारा प्रभावित थिए, र ती दुई राजवंशहरूले सन् १७९८ देखि आइतबारको व्यवस्थासम्म संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिकाको शासनलाई प्रतिनिधित्व गर्छन्।

The Pharisees and Sadducees represent two parties of political persuasions that are distinguished by their stand upon the issue of slavery. The Democrats are pro-slavery and the Republicans are anti-slavery; and together they interact with the political apparatus of the constitutional government of the United States. That government is the earth beast of Revelation thirteen, and the external history of the earth beast is represented by its republican horn. The internal history is represented by the protestant horn. The horns are separated on the beast, for the beast is the Constitution that separates the state horn from the church horn, but they move through history together. The republican horn has two influences either for or against slavery. The protestant horn has two influences either for the seventh-day Sabbath or the first day of the sun.

Abafarisayo n’Abasadukayo bagereranya amashyaka abiri y’imyumvire ya politiki atandukanywa n’aho ahagarara ku kibazo cy’ubucakara. Abademokarate bashyigikira ubucakara, kandi Abarepubulikani barwanya ubucakara; kandi bombi bakorana n’urwego rwa politiki rw’ubutegetsi bw’itegeko nshinga bwa Leta Zunze Ubumwe za Amerika. Ubwo butegetsi ni bwo nyamaswa yo ku isi yo mu Ibyahishuwe igice cya cumi na gatatu, kandi amateka yayo yo hanze yagereranyijwe n’ihembe ryayo rya repubulikani. Amateka yayo yo imbere yagereranyijwe n’ihembe ryayo ry’abaporotesitanti. Ayo mahembe atandukanijwe kuri iyo nyamaswa, kuko iyo nyamaswa ari Itegeko Nshinga ritandukanya ihembe rya leta n’ihembe ry’itorero, ariko mu mateka bigendana hamwe. Ihembe rya repubulikani rifite impagararizi ebyiri, haba ku ruhande rw’ubucakara cyangwa ku ruhande rwo kuburwanya. Ihembe ry’abaporotesitanti rifite impagararizi ebyiri, haba ku ruhande rw’Isabato y’umunsi wa karindwi cyangwa ku ruhande rw’umunsi wa mbere w’izuba.

Roughly thirty years after the battle of Panium the Maccabees mark the history of the United States as the sixth kingdom of Bible prophecy. Then roughly a century later, verse sixteen is fulfilled when Jerusalem is conquered, typifying the cross. Judea is the second of the three obstacles Rome subdues as it takes control of the world. General Pompey conquered Syria in 65 BC, and then Judah in 63 BC. Augustus Caesar would conquer the third obstacle at the battle of Actium in 31 BC. This history is represented in the line of verse sixteen to twenty-two.

Paniumi paghati baada ya yapata miaka thelathini, Wamakabayo huiweka alama historia ya Marekani kama ufalme wa sita wa unabii wa Biblia. Kisha, yapata karne moja baadaye, aya ya kumi na sita hutimizwa wakati Yerusalemu unatekwa, ukiwa mfano wa msalaba. Yudea ni kikwazo cha pili kati ya vizuizi vitatu ambavyo Rumi hushinda inapoitwaa dunia chini ya mamlaka yake. Jenerali Pompey aliishinda Shamu mwaka 65 KK, kisha Yuda mwaka 63 KK. Kaisari Augusto angekishinda kikwazo cha tatu katika vita vya Actium mwaka 31 KK. Historia hii imewakilishwa katika mlolongo wa aya ya kumi na sita hadi ishirini na mbili.

By the time of the cross the Maccabean history has been running for almost two hundred years. Uriah Smith identifies that the history represented by the league with the Jews in verse twenty-three is to be aligned to a starting point in history that occurred almost two hundred years before the history of the cross in verse twenty-two. The history of the cross in verse twenty-two must be aligned with verse sixteen, for verse sixteen is also the Sunday law. This means the line of the Maccabees, which is the history of the glorious land of Judah, begins well before verse sixteen’s Sunday law.

Mu gihe cy’umusaraba, amateka y’Abamakabayo yari amaze hafi imyaka magana abiri akurikirana. Uriah Smith agaragaza ko amateka ahagarariwe n’isezerano ry’ubumwe n’Abayahudi riri mu murongo wa makumyabiri na gatatu agomba guhuzwa n’intangiriro y’igihe cy’amateka yabayeho hafi imyaka magana abiri mbere y’amateka y’umusaraba ari mu murongo wa makumyabiri na kabiri. Amateka y’umusaraba ari mu murongo wa makumyabiri na kabiri agomba guhuzwa n’umurongo wa cumi na gatandatu, kuko umurongo wa cumi na gatandatu na wo ari itegeko ryo ku Cyumweru. Ibi bivuga ko umurongo w’Abamakabayo, ari wo mateka y’Igihugu Cyiza cya Yuda, utangira kera cyane mbere y’itegeko ryo ku Cyumweru ryo mu murongo wa cumi na gatandatu.

When we understand that the Millerite history illustrates the history of the one hundred and forty-four thousand, we can align the time of the end for the Millerites in 1798, with the time of the end for the one hundred and forty-four thousand in 1989. When we do this, we are overlaying the history of the first and second angels, with the history of the third angel. 1798 and 1989 are the alpha and omega waymark of the history of verse forty of Daniel eleven.

Bwe twamvwisya ukuti imbiri ya baMillerite ilalangisha imbiri ya ba handeredi umo na makumi yane na bane thousand, twinga landanya inshita ya mpela iya baMillerite mu 1798, ne nshita ya mpela iya ba handeredi umo na makumi yane na bane thousand mu 1989. Nga twacita ifi, tulebika pa cimo imbiri ya ba malaika wa kubalilapo na wa cibili, pamo ne mbiri ya malaika wa citatu. 1798 na 1989 ni mawaymarki ya alpha na omega ya mbiri ya vesi amakumi yane iya Daniele ikumi na cimo.

Verse forty begins at the “time of the end,” which is easily proved to be 1798; and when correctly understood, the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989, fulfilled verse forty, and that fulfillment was also “the time of the end.” Two “time of the ends,” in one verse, that is in the same chapter as the line of the Maccabees. The Maccabean revolt that led to the Hasmonean dynasty represents the twenty-two years from 1776 unto 1798. In 1798 the Hasmonean dynasty began and the Herodian dynasty began in 1989.

Aaya ya makumi ana huanza katika “wakati wa mwisho,” ambao inathibitika kwa urahisi kuwa ni mwaka 1798; na unapoeleweka kwa usahihi, kuanguka kwa Umoja wa Kisovieti mwaka 1989 kulitimiza aya ya makumi ana, na utimizo huo nao ulikuwa pia “wakati wa mwisho.” “Nyakati za mwisho” mbili, katika aya moja, iliyo katika sura iyo hiyo yenye mstari wa Wamakabayo. Uasi wa Wamakabayo uliopelekea nasaba ya Wahasmonea unawakilisha miaka ishirini na miwili kutoka 1776 hadi 1798. Mwaka 1798 nasaba ya Wahasmonea ilianza, na nasaba ya Herode ilianza mwaka 1989.

Verse ten of Daniel eleven identifies 1989, and verse sixteen is the Sunday law. The line of history within those verses represent three battles, and a demise of a southern king and the entrance of Rome into prophetic history. It also contains the line of two dynasties that typify the change that occurs when the earth beast of Revelation thirteen who “had two horns like a lamb, and” “spake as a dragon.” Sequentially the first Jewish dynasty is the lamb and the second Roman dynasty is the dragon. The first dynasty was Jewish, the second was Roman. Whether Jewish or Roman the earth beast had two horns.

دەنیال ١١-ی ئايەتی دەھ ١٩٨٩-ی ناساندن دکات، و ئايەتی شانزەش یاسای یەکشەممەیە. هێڵی مێژوویی ناو ئەو ئايەتاندا سێ شەڕ نیشان دەدات، و لەناوچوونی پاشای باشوور و چوونەژوورەوەی ڕۆما بۆ مێژووی پێشبینیخوازانە. هەروەها هێڵی دوو سۆلالەش تێدایە کە نموونەی ئەو گۆڕانە دەبن کە ڕوو دەدات کاتێک ئاژەڵی زەوی لە ئاشکراکردنی ١٣، کە «دوو قۆچەی وەک بەرخێکی هەبوو، و» «وەک ئەژدیها قسەی دەکرد.» بە شوێنەواری، سۆلالەی یەکەمی جولەکە بەرخەکەیە و سۆلالەی دووەمی ڕۆمانی ئەژدیهاکەیە. سۆلالەی یەکەم جولەکە بوو، سۆلالەی دووەم ڕۆمانی بوو. جا جولەکە بێت یان ڕۆمانی، ئاژەڵی زەوی دوو قۆچی هەبوو.

The Jewish dynasty represents the Protestant horn and the Roman dynasty represents the Republican horn. Both horns also possess a prophetic division of two. The Sadducees and Pharisees provide the framework of the pro-slavery Democrats as opposed to the anti-slavery Republicans; while also representing a twofold division of foolish virgins in contrast with the wise virgins. The Pharisees as foolish virgins are purged at the first disappointment and the Sadducees are purged at the second temple cleansing. The Pharisees, like unto the church of Sardis professed to have a name of life, but were dead, and are purged first, then the Sadducees who denied the power of God, denied the power and message of the Midnight Cry. The Sadducees are the covenant people who are being passed by, the Sadducees are those who are satisfied with the feelings of good emotions.

Yuda wang nêi hqo bax nêi hqo Protestan de ngà horn, Roma wang nêi hqo bax nêi hqo Republican de horn. Horn hnyi màng prophesi de hpà hnyi taq nêi. Sadducees hte Pharisees gaw pro-slavery Democrats hte anti-slavery Republicans de hkrang hprawng hpe jaw ai; dai hte rau, angwi virjin ni hte maren madoi ai chye-sha virjin ni de hpà hnyi taq hpe mung sawn dan ai. Chye-sha virjin ni ngu ai Pharisees gaw shawng na disappointment hta shingbyin ai mabyin hpe shaidaw ai; Sadducees gaw lahkawng na temple cleansing hta shaidaw ai. Pharisees gaw Sardis kaw nga ai hpung de zawn, asak nga ai amying hpe hkapla ai nngai, raitimung si mat ai ni re, dai majaw shawng shaidaw ai; dai hpang Sadducees hpe shaidaw ai, kaning rai nme law, shi ni gaw Karai Kasang de atsam hpe nyet kau ai, Midnight Cry de atsam hte sandi sa hpe mung nyet kau ai ni re. Sadducees gaw hkrum ai karai-ginsang amyu ni rai nna, lai mat kau hkrum ai ni re; Sadducees gaw mai kahtet ai myit mada hte mai ai seng ra ni hta ram sa ai ni re.

“The coming of Christ, as announced by the first angel’s message, was understood to be represented by the coming of the bridegroom. The widespread reformation under the proclamation of His soon coming, answered to the going forth of the virgins. In this parable, as in that of Matthew 24, two classes are represented. All had taken their lamps, the Bible, and by its light had gone forth to meet the Bridegroom. But while ‘they that were foolish took their lamps, and took no oil with them,’ ‘the wise took oil in their vessels with their lamps.’ The latter class had received the grace of God, the regenerating, enlightening power of the Holy Spirit, which renders His word a lamp to the feet and a light to the path. In the fear of God they had studied the Scriptures to learn the truth, and had earnestly sought for purity of heart and life. These had a personal experience, a faith in God and in His word, which could not be overthrown by disappointment and delay. Others ‘took their lamps, and took no oil with them.’ They had moved from impulse. Their fears had been excited by the solemn message, but they had depended upon the faith of their brethren, satisfied with the flickering light of good emotions, without a thorough understanding of the truth or a genuine work of grace in the heart. These had gone forth to meet the Lord, full of hope in the prospect of immediate reward; but they were not prepared for delay and disappointment. When trials came, their faith failed, and their lights burned dim.” The Great Controversy, 393.

“Ukwiya kwa Kristo, nk’uko kwatangajwe n’ubutumwa bw’umumarayika wa mbere, kwasobanuwe ko kugereranywa no kuza k’umukwe. Ivugurura ryagutse ryabayeho munsi yo kwamamaza ukuza kwe kwegereje, ryahuriranye no gusohoka kw’abakobwa b’isugi. Muri uwo mugani, nk’uko bimeze no muri uwa Matayo 24, hagereranywamo ibyiciro bibiri. Bose bari barafashe amatabaza yabo, ari yo Bibiliya, kandi mu mucyo wayo bari basohotse kujya guhura n’Umukwe. Ariko nubwo “abapfuye bafashe amatabaza yabo, ntibajyana amavuta,” “abanyabwenge bajyanye amavuta mu nzabya zabo hamwe n’amatabaza yabo.” Icyiciro cya nyuma cyari cyarakiriye ubuntu bw’Imana, imbaraga z’Umwuka Wera zivugurura kandi zimurikira, zituma ijambo ryayo riba itabaza ry’ibirenge n’umucyo umurikira inzira. Mu gutinya Imana bari barize Ibyanditswe Byera kugira ngo bamenye ukuri, kandi bari barashakanye umwete ubutungane bw’umutima n’ubw’ubuzima. Abo bari bafite uburambe bwabo bwite, kwizera Imana no kwizera ijambo ryayo, kutashoboraga gutsindwa n’igicumuro cyo gucika intege no gutinda. Abandi “bafashe amatabaza yabo, ntibajyana amavuta.” Bari baratewe kugenda n’amarangamutima y’ako kanya. Ubwoba bwabo bwari bwarakanguriwe n’ubwo butumwa bukomeye, ariko bari barishingikirije ku kwizera kwa bene Se, banyuzwe n’umucyo uhumbahumba w’ibyiyumvo byiza, badafite gusobanukirwa kuzuye kw’ukuri cyangwa umurimo nyakuri w’ubuntu mu mutima. Abo bari basohotse guhura n’Umwami, buzuye ibyiringiro by’ibihembo byegereje; ariko ntibari biteguye gutinda no gucika intege. Igihe ibigeragezo byageraga, kwizera kwabo kwaracogoraga, kandi amatabaza yabo akazima agacika intege.” Intambara Ikomeye, 393.

Whether political or religious both classes unite against the wise at the crisis at midnight. This being said, we began the article by raising the point that I am applying verse fourteen based upon its placement in the flow of the verses, in contradiction with the historical sequence represented by the verses. I employ that logic in agreement with the placement of verse twenty-three. The placement of a waymark is to correspond to its historical fulfillment. The league that the Jews made with Rome during the Maccabean time period defined where the verse would be applied. The “robbers” of verse fourteen, who establish the vision did so in 200 BC, the very year of the battle of Panium, but the battle and the robbers are two different symbols.

Iwe vyo vya kisiasa au vya kidini, makundi yote mawili huungana dhidi ya wenye hekima katika kipindi cha hatari cha usiku wa manane. Hayo yakiwa yamesemwa, tulianza makala kwa kuinua hoja kwamba ninaitumia aya ya kumi na nne kwa msingi wa mahali ilipowekwa katika mtiririko wa aya, kinyume na mfuatano wa kihistoria unaowakilishwa na aya hizo. Ninatumia mantiki hiyo kwa kupatana na mahali ilipowekwa aya ya ishirini na tatu. Kuwekwa kwa alama ya njia kunapaswa kulingana na utimilifu wake wa kihistoria. Muungano ambao Wayahudi waliufanya na Roma katika kipindi cha Wamakabayo ulifafanua mahali ambapo aya hiyo ingetumika. “Wanyang’anyi” wa aya ya kumi na nne, wanaoliimarisha ono, walifanya hivyo katika mwaka 200 KK, mwaka wenyewe wa vita vya Panium, lakini vita hivyo na wanyang’anyi ni alama mbili tofauti.

The “robbers” become part of the narrative, not to establish a direct connection with the date of the battle of Panium, but to identify the relation they made with the weakened five-year-old ruler of Egypt that was about to be defeated by Antiochus. They did not want a disruption of the importation of Egyptian wheat to the Roman Empire. The prophetic relation of Rome with the vulnerable five-year-old Egyptian king is the subject of the verse. That intercession is identifying the aftermath of the fallout that follows Putin’s attempt to include the subjection of the Ukrainian church to the Russian church as it had formerly been, before 1989. That attempt starts the progressive demise of his southern kingdom, and when Putin dies as did Ptolemy, or is somehow exiled as was Uzziah and Napoleon, he is prophetically removed and his kingdom is then being handled by a series of less competent leaders. Then, in the time of the five-year old king, papal Rome intercedes to protect its interests, which is the Ukrainian church.

“Wanyang’anyi” wanaingia katika simulizi, si ili kuthibitisha uhusiano wa moja kwa moja na tarehe ya vita vya Panium, bali ili kutambulisha uhusiano walioufanya na mtawala wa Misri aliyekuwa na umri wa miaka mitano na aliyekuwa amedhoofika, ambaye alikuwa karibu kushindwa na Antioko. Hawakutaka kuvurugika kwa uagizaji wa ngano ya Misri kuingia katika Milki ya Kirumi. Uhusiano wa kinabii wa Rumi na mfalme wa Misri mwenye umri wa miaka mitano na aliye katika hali ya udhaifu ndiyo mada ya aya hiyo. Uombezi huo unatambulisha matokeo ya anguko yanayofuata jaribio la Putin kujumuisha kutiishwa kwa kanisa la Ukrainia chini ya kanisa la Urusi kama lilivyokuwa hapo awali, kabla ya 1989. Jaribio hilo linaanzisha kudidimia kwa hatua kwa hatua kwa ufalme wake wa kusini, na Putin anapokufa kama alivyokufa Ptolemyo, au kwa namna fulani anapelekwa uhamishoni kama alivyopelekwa Uzia na Napoleon, anaondolewa kinabii, na ufalme wake kisha unasimamiwa na mfululizo wa viongozi wasio na ustadi kama yeye. Kisha, katika wakati wa mfalme mwenye umri wa miaka mitano, Rumi ya upapa inaingilia kati kulinda maslahi yake, ambayo ni kanisa la Ukrainia.

The papacy is not picking sides between Russian or Ukrainian orthodoxy; she is playing every side to bring all the religious bodies under her authority as represented in Isaiah four.

Upapa sio kwamba unachagua upande kati ya Orthodoksi ya Urusi au ya Ukraini; unacheza kila upande ili kuyaleta mashirika yote ya kidini chini ya mamlaka yako, kama inavyowakilishwa katika Isaya nne.

And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach. In that day shall the branch of the Lord be beautiful and glorious, and the fruit of the earth shall be excellent and comely for them that are escaped of Israel. And it shall come to pass, that he that is left in Zion, and he that remaineth in Jerusalem, shall be called holy, even every one that is written among the living in Jerusalem. Isaiah 4:1–3.

Na hatuku hiyo wanawake saba watamshika mtu mmoja, wakisema, Tutakula mkate wetu wenyewe, na kuvaa mavazi yetu wenyewe; ila tuuitwe kwa jina lako, ili tuondoe aibu yetu. Katika siku hiyo tawi la Bwana litakuwa zuri na lenye utukufu, na matunda ya nchi yatakuwa bora sana na yenye kupendeza kwa hao waliookoka wa Israeli. Tena itakuwa kwamba yeye atakayesalia Sayuni, na yeye atakayebaki Yerusalemu, ataitwa mtakatifu, naam, kila mmoja aliyeandikwa miongoni mwa walio hai katika Yerusalemu. Isaya 4:1–3.

The papacy takes control of all the religious bodies, represented as seven women, meaning all the churches. Those seven churches wish to be called catholic, which means universal, and they are clearly not God’s people, for they intend to wear their own apparel. The unification of all the religious bodies who wish to wear their own human garments does so in the time when those in “Jerusalem shall be called holy,” which is when the branch of the Lord transforms from a Laodicean to Philadelphian people, which is where the papacy becomes the head of all the religious bodies in the very time she will also be made the head of the political bodies.

Upapa hujitia chini ya mamlaka yake miili yote ya kidini, iliyowakilishwa kama wanawake saba, yaani makanisa yote. Makanisa hayo saba hutamani kuitwa katoliki, maana yake ni ya ulimwengu wote, na kwa wazi si watu wa Mungu, kwa maana wanakusudia kuvaa mavazi yao wenyewe. Muungano wa miili yote ya kidini inayotaka kuvaa mavazi yao wenyewe ya kibinadamu hutukia katika wakati ambao wale waliomo “Yerusalemu wataitwa watakatifu,” yaani wakati ambapo tawi la Bwana hubadilika kutoka kuwa watu wa Laodikia na kuwa watu wa Filadelfia; hapo ndipo upapa unapokuwa kichwa cha miili yote ya kidini katika wakati uleule ambapo atafanywa pia kuwa kichwa cha miili ya kisiasa.

In 1989, the Ukrainian church was a symbol of the king of the north sweeping away the Soviet Union, and Putin will seek to restore the former relationship of submission, and receive leprosy on his forehead and begin a persecution against the religion that refused his demands. That persecution took place in Ptolemy’s own nation, in the city of Alexandria, so the churches within Russia that are influenced by Rome will become Putin’s target, and his ending. As Trump prepares for the battle of Panium his open relationship with the protector of the weakened Egyptian child king is identified in 2025. The Roman power that in 200 BC protected the Egyptian child-king, will not then protect the child-king. She will help to end the child king. Rome as Egypt’s protector in 200 BC, represents Rome as Egypt’s destroyer at the battle of Panium.

لە ساڵی 1989دا، کڵێسای ئۆکراین هێمای ئەوە بوو کە پاشای باکوور یەکێتیی سۆڤیەت جاروبار بکاتەوە، و پوتین هەوڵ دەدات پەیوەندیی پێشووی ملکەچی بگەڕێنێتەوە، و گەڕبوونی پێشی لە نێوچاوانی خۆی وەربگرێت و دەست بە چەوساندنەوەیەک دژ بەو ئایینە بکات کە داواکارییەکانی ئەوی قبوڵ نەکرد. ئەو چەوساندنەوەیە لە نیشتمانی خۆیی پطۆلێمەوس، لە شارەکەی ئەسکەندەریە، ڕوویدا؛ بۆیە ئەو کڵێسایانەی لە ناو ڕووسیا هەن و بە ڕۆمەوە کاریگەر کراون، دەبنە ئامانجی پوتین، و کۆتاییی ئەو. هەروەها کاتێک ترامپ بۆ جەنگی پانیوم ئامادەکاری دەکات، پەیوەندیی ئاشکرای ئەو لەگەڵ پاراستەری منداڵ-پاشای میسری لاواز لە ساڵی 2025دا ناسراو دەکرێت. هێزی ڕۆمی، کە لە ساڵی 200 پ.ز. منداڵ-پاشای میسری پاراست، ئەوسا منداڵ-پاشا ناپارێزێت. ئەو یارمەتی دەدات بۆ کۆتایی پێهێنانی منداڵ-پاشا. ڕۆم وەک پاراستەری میسر لە ساڵی 200 پ.ز.، نوێنەرایەتیی ڕۆم دەکات وەک وێرانکەری میسر لە جەنگی پانیوم.

Millerites

Bamilleri

The Millerites did not see three Roman powers, they only saw two, but their truth was truth, just the same. The prophetic logic of Antiochus as a symbol allows us to apply verse fourteen in a history that precedes verse fifteen, even if the history which initially fulfilled the verses placed both verse fourteen and fifteen in the year 200 BC. I am claiming verse sixteen is the soon-coming Sunday law and that verse fourteen was 2025, and verse fifteen is the yet future battle of Panium. Antiochus proves the three battles are one prophetic line for he is at all three battles, but he also proves the claim I am asserting that the latter-day application of the verses, when rightly divided with line upon line methodology.

Abakristo ba Millerites ntibabonye ubwami butatu bw’Abaroma, ahubwo babonye bubiri gusa; nyamara ukuri kwabo kwari ukuri uko byagenda kose. Inyurabwenge y’ubuhanuzi yerekeye Antiyokusi nk’ikimenyetso idushoboza gushyira mu bikorwa umurongo wa cumi na kane mu mateka abanziriza umurongo wa cumi na gatanu, nubwo amateka yasohoreje ayo mirongo bwa mbere yashyize hamwe umurongo wa cumi na kane n’uwa cumi na gatanu mu mwaka wa 200 Mbere ya Kristo. Ndavuga ko umurongo wa cumi na gatandatu ari itegeko rya vuba ryo ku cyumweru, kandi ko umurongo wa cumi na kane wari uwa 2025, naho umurongo wa cumi na gatanu ukaba ari intambara ya Panium itaraza. Antiyokusi ahamya ko izo ntambara eshatu ari umurongo umwe w’ubuhanuzi, kuko ari muri izo ntambara zose uko ari eshatu; ariko kandi ahamya n’icyo mvuga, ari cyo ko ikoreshwa ry’iyo mirongo mu minsi y’imperuka, iyo igabanyijwe neza hakurikijwe uburyo bw’“umurongo ku murongo.”

Antiochus was at all three battles and in the latter days he represents the papacies proxy power in 1989 (Reagan and the USA), 2014 (Zelenskyy and the Ukraine), and then at the battle of Panium it is the same proxy power as 1989, for Jesus always represents the end with the beginning. Ronald Reagan is dead and buried, so the historical witness of Antiochus is accurate to the Millerite understanding, but subject to the rules which govern a line upon line application. The last papal proxy power in the verses is Trump, even though historically Antiochus was at all three battles. In order to fulfill verse thirteen Trump had to lose the second election, for in verse thirteen he “returns,” stronger than ever, strong enough to take a bullet through the ear, which along with the right thumb and right big toe is what was to be anointed with blood, when the priests were anointed.

Antiochus alikuwa katika vita vyote vitatu, na katika siku za mwisho anawakilisha mamlaka ya uwakala ya upapa katika mwaka 1989 (Reagan na Marekani), 2014 (Zelenskyy na Ukraini), kisha katika vita vya Panium ni mamlaka iyo hiyo ya uwakala kama ya 1989, kwa maana Yesu daima huwakilisha mwisho kwa mwanzo. Ronald Reagan amekufa na kuzikwa, kwa hiyo ushahidi wa kihistoria wa Antiochus ni sahihi kulingana na uelewa wa Kimillerite, lakini uko chini ya kanuni zinazotawala matumizi ya mstari juu ya mstari. Mamlaka ya mwisho ya uwakala wa kipapa katika aya hizo ni Trump, ijapokuwa kihistoria Antiochus alikuwa katika vita vyote vitatu. Ili kuitimiza aya ya kumi na tatu, ilimpasa Trump kushindwa katika uchaguzi wa pili, kwa maana katika aya ya kumi na tatu “anarudi,” akiwa na nguvu kuliko wakati mwingine wowote, mwenye nguvu za kutosha kupokea risasi kupitia sikio, ambalo pamoja na kidole gumba cha mkono wa kulia na kidole kikubwa cha mguu wa kulia ndivyo vilivyopaswa kutiwa mafuta kwa damu, wakati makuhani walipowekwa wakfu.

Reagan typified Trump, for Reagan is the first of the final eight presidents from the time of the end in 1989. Lincoln typified Trump, for he was the first Republican president. Lincoln was assassinated by proslavery Democrats in alliance with Rome, and both Ronald Reagan and his popish counterpart John Paul II survived assassination attempts. Trump was politically assassinated in 2020, with the stolen election in fulfillment of Revelation eleven, verse seven, and then in 2024 he was resurrected in fulfillment of verse eleven.

ரீகன் டிரம்பிற்கான முன்னுருவாக இருந்தார்; ஏனெனில் 1989 ஆம் ஆண்டில் காலத்தின் முடிவிலிருந்து இறுதியான எட்டு ஜனாதிபதிகளில் முதலாவதாக ரீகன் இருக்கிறார். லிங்கன் டிரம்பிற்கான முன்னுருவாக இருந்தார்; ஏனெனில் அவர் முதல் குடியரசுக் கட்சி ஜனாதிபதியாக இருந்தார். அடிமைத்தனத்தை ஆதரித்த ஜனநாயகக் கட்சியினர் ரோமத்துடன் கூட்டிணைந்து லிங்கனைக் கொலை செய்தனர்; மேலும் ரோனால்ட் ரீகனும், அவருடைய போப்பிய எதிர்ப்பக்கமான யோவான் பவுல் II-உம் கொலைமுயற்சிகளில் இருந்து உயிர் தப்பினர். வெளிப்படுத்தின விசேஷம் பதினொன்று, ஏழாம் வசனத்தின் நிறைவேற்றமாக, களவாடப்பட்ட தேர்தலின் மூலம் 2020 ஆம் ஆண்டில் டிரம்ப் அரசியல் ரீதியாகக் கொலைசெய்யப்பட்டார்; பின்னர் பதினொன்றாம் வசனத்தின் நிறைவேற்றமாக 2024 ஆம் ஆண்டில் அவர் உயிர்த்தெழுந்தார்.

And when they shall have finished their testimony, the beast that ascendeth out of the bottomless pit shall make war against them, and shall overcome them, and kill them. … And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them. Revelation 11:7, 11.

Bwe kandi nibamara kurangiza ubuhamya bwabo, ya nyamaswa izamuka iva ikuzimu izabarwanya, kandi izabanesha, ibice. … Maze iminsi itatu n’igice ishize, umwuka w’ubugingo uva ku Mana ubinjiramo, bahagarara ku birenge byabo; maze ubwoba bwinshi bugwira ababibonye. Ibyahishuwe 11:7, 11.

Trump’s resurrection was his “return” of verse thirteen, and it also provided a parallel of a characteristic of Rome, for Rome is “the eighth that is of the seven,” and Trump is an image of Rome.

Ukufufuka kwa Trumpi ndiko “kurudi” kwake kwa mstari wa kumi na tatu, nako pia kulitoa ulinganifu wa sifa mojawapo ya Rumi, kwa maana Rumi ni “wa nane aliye wa wale saba,” na Trumpi ni mfano wa Rumi.

And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. Revelation 17:11.

Ꮎ ᎠᎴ ᎠᏍᎦᏯ ᏥᎨᏒ, ᎠᎴ ᏂᎨᏒᎾ, ᎾᏍᎩ ᎤᏩᏒ ᎦᏚᎵᏁᎢ, ᎠᎴ ᎦᎵᏉᎩ ᎨᏒ ᎠᎦᏴᎵᎨᏍᏗ, ᎠᎴ ᎤᏲᎱᏒ ᎤᎵᏍᏔᏂᏙᎭ. ᎤᏍᏛᎢ 17:11.

Trump’s second term makes him the eighth president since Reagan, and because he was also the sixth, Trump, in alignment with the papacy is “the eight, that is of the seven.” Eight is the symbol of resurrection, which emphasizes that he, as an image of the papacy needed to have a deadly wound that was healed in order to “return.”

دەورەی دووەمی سەرۆکایەتیی ترەمپ ئەو دەکاتە هەشتەمین سەرۆک لە دوای ریگان، و چونکە هەروەها شەشەمیش بوو، ترەمپ، لە هاوتەبایی لەگەڵ پاپایەتی، «هەشتە، کە لە حەوتە.» هەشت هێمای زیندووبوونەوەیە، کە جەخت لەوە دەکاتەوە کە ئەو، وەک وێنەیەکی پاپایەتی، پێویست بوو برینێکی کوشندەی هەبێت کە چاک ببوویەوە، بۆ ئەوەی «بگەڕێتەوە.»

And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. Revelation 13:3.

E mi kubona mutu gua mitwe giake kũ ta ni kuvazwa lwafu; na livaza liake liafu kupona: ne isi yonthe igitangara ikakua munyama ucio. Uvūnuo 13:3.

When the deadly wound is healed the world “wonders after the beast,” and when Trump was resurrected as the eighth that is of the seven in 2024, he “returned” and the whole world wondered after him.

Gava birîna kujer hat derman kirin, cîhan “li pey canewerê matmayî dimîne,” û gava Trump di sala 2024-an de wekî heştemînê ku ji heftan e ji mirî rabû, ew “vegeriya” û hemû cîhan li pey wî matmayî ma.

And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them. And they heard a great voice from heaven saying unto them, Come up hither. And they ascended up to heaven in a cloud; and their enemies beheld them. Revelation 11:11, 12.

Na baada ya siku tatu na nusu, Roho ya uzima itokayo kwa Mungu ikaingia ndani yao, nao wakasimama kwa miguu yao; hofu kuu ikawashukia wale waliowaona. Nao wakasikia sauti kuu kutoka mbinguni ikiwaambia, Njoni huku juu. Nao wakapanda kwenda mbinguni katika wingu; nao adui zao wakawaona. Ufunuo 11:11, 12.

Trump “returned” in the election of 2024, and then in 2025 he and pope Leo were both inaugurated. Jesus gave a direct and fair warning, to any who wished to see.

Trump akagaruka mu matora yo mu 2024, hanyuma mu 2025 we na Papa Leo bombi bararahizwa. Yesu yatanze umuburo utaziguye kandi utabera ku muntu wese washakaga kubona.

When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand.) Matthew 24:15.

Ngiíle a̱hɨ nĩ mũkaona ũruũri wa kũnyariiria, ũrĩa wathomirwo nĩ Danieli mũnabii, wĩrĩte hekarũ-inĩ harĩa hatheku, (ũrĩa ũrathoma, nĩaigue.) Mathayo 24:15.

Mark says it perhaps a little clearer.

Maliko alisemi jambo hilo kwa uwazi zaidi kidogo.

But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing where it ought not, (let him that readeth understand,) then let them that be in Judaea flee to the mountains. Mark 13:14.

Lê dema ku hûn ê qirêjbûna wêraniyê, ya ku bi Daniel pêxember hatiye gotin, bibînin ku li cihê ku ne pêdivî ye rawestiyaye, (bila yê ku dixwîne fam bike,) hingê bila yên ku li Cihûdeyê ne birevin çiyayan. Markos 13:14.

The abomination of desolation is Rome in each of its three phases. Pagan, papal and modern Rome is each a symbol of warning for the people of God. The warning is to be recognized when Rome is in a “holy place” or where “it ought not” be. The glorious land is the holy land in Scripture, and the United States is the spiritual glorious land.

Ukuhonyozwa okuchithayo yiRoma esigabeni ngasinye kwezintathu zayo. IRoma yobuhedeni, eyobupapa, neyanamuhla, ngakunye kuwuphawu lwesixwayiso kubantu bakaNkulunkulu. Isixwayiso siyakuba siqondwe lapho iRoma isendaweni “engcwele” noma lapho “ingafanele khona” ukuba ibe khona. Izwe lenkazimulo liyizwe elingcwele emiBhalweni, kanti i-United States iyizwe lenkazimulo ngokomoya.

And the Lord shall inherit Judah his portion in the holy land, and shall choose Jerusalem again. Be silent, O all flesh, before the Lord: for he is raised up out of his holy habitation. Zechariah 2:12, 13.

Na Mukama alirya obusika bwa Yuda ng’omugabo gwe mu nsi entukuvu, era aliddamu okulonda Yerusaalemi. Musirike, mmwe bonna abalina omubiri, mu maaso ga Mukama: kubanga ayimuse okuva mu kifo kye ekitukuvu. Zekkaliya 2:12, 13.

When you see Rome standing in the holy place the Lord is choosing Jerusalem as His covenant people for the final time. When Reagan, the first of eight presidents arranged a secret alliance with the antichrist of Bible prophecy, it represented an open alliance with Rome by the eighth and last president since the time of the end in 1989. Omega symbols often reverse attributes of the alpha symbol.

Iwe mwene kuona Rumi yimele mu kibanza ekitukuvu, Omwami ali kusalapo Yerusalemu kuba bantu Be b’endagaano olw’omulundi ogw’enkomerero. Reagan, ow’olubereberye ku bakulembeze munaana, bwe yategeka obukago obw’ekyama n’omulabe wa Kristo ow’obunnabbi bwa Bayibuli, kyakiikirira obukago obw’olwatu ne Rumi obw’omukulembeze ow’omunaana era ow’enkomerero okuva mu kiseera eky’enkomerero mu 1989. Obubonero bwa Omega emirundi mingi bukyusa embeera z’obubonero bwa alpha.

The inauguration of pope Leo and Trump in 2025 is identifying an open relationship between the sea beast and the earth beast of Revelation thirteen. The reversal to an open alliance of Trump and Leo that was typified by the secret alliance of Reagan and John Paul II, informs us that the support of the Egyptian child-king that fulfilled verse fourteen in 200 BC, represents a lack of support in the latter-days.

Ukuviktwa kwa Papa Leo na Trump mwaka wa 2025 kunatambulisha uhusiano wa wazi kati ya mnyama wa baharini na mnyama wa nchi wa Ufunuo kumi na tatu. Kugeuka huku kuelekea muungano wa wazi wa Trump na Leo, uliotabiriwa kwa mfano na muungano wa siri wa Reagan na Yohana Paulo wa Pili, kunatufahamisha kwamba uungaji mkono wa mfalme-mtoto wa Misri uliotimiza aya ya kumi na nne mwaka wa 200 KK, unawakilisha kukosekana kwa uungaji mkono katika siku za mwisho.

2025 establishes the external foundational vision or prophecy, for it lifts up Rome as the warning of Rome that is identified by Daniel with the symbolism of “the abomination of desolation.” The warning of the abomination of desolation takes place in advance of the destruction represented by “desolation.” In the siege of Jerusalem under Cestius the warning was represented by the banners of Rome’s authority being placed within the sacred precincts of the sanctuary. Those who saw, understood, obeyed and left the city and were protected when the siege was re-engaged. They saw the Roman warning sign. The Christians who separated from the compromised church of Pergamos and thereafter the church of Thyatira fled into the wilderness when they saw the man of sin setting in the temple of God. Those witnesses identify a warning of the abomination of desolation spoken of by Daniel in the latter days.

2025 kuŋ bɛrɛ kɛnɛya la yaala kanaani walima annabiya ye, ka Roma kɔrɔta ka Roma ka hakilijiginya dɔ yera, min Daniel b’a dɔn taamasiyɛn na ni “halakiya ka fɔlɔfɔlɔ juguya” ye. “Halakiya ka fɔlɔfɔlɔ juguya” ka hakilijiginya bɔra ka taa ɲɛfɛ la sani halakiya min bɛ taamasiyɛn kɛ ni “halakiya” ye. Yerusalɛm ka kɔlɔsili kɔnɔ Cestius ka jamana kɔrɔ la, hakilijiginya taamasiyɛn ye Roma ka fanga ka darapɔgɔnw bila sariya yɔrɔ sunkutu kɔnɔ. Mɔgɔ minnu ye a ye, u ye a faamu, u ye a kanu, u bɔra dugu kɔnɔ, ka mara ka hɔrɔnya sɔrɔ waati min kɔlɔsili ye segin ka daminɛ tuguni. U ye Roma ka hakilijiginya taamasiyɛn ye. Kirisitanw minnu fara Pergamos ka eglizi min ye jɔya kɛra la, ani o kɔfɛ Tiatira ka eglizi, olu bɔra ka taa saheli kɔnɔ waati min u ye jurumukɛla kɛrɛnkɛrɛnna ye ka sigi Ala ka batuba kɔnɔ. Seerebaga olu bɛ Daniel ye min fɔra “halakiya ka fɔlɔfɔlɔ juguya” kan, o ka hakilijiginya dɔ jira tile labanw la.

We have repeatedly shown that 1888 was the siege of Cestius, and the conclusion of the Sunday law crisis is the siege of Titus. The Blair Sunday law bills of the 1880’s in accompaniment with the Sunday laws that were implemented in some southern states during the 1880’s was the warning of Cestius that also marked the dividing line on Sister White’s counsel on country living. Before the 1880’s her counsel was that in the future we would need to move to the country, but after the 1880’s country living was something that was to have already been accomplished. The warning sign of the Blair Bills, promoting the papal power’s mark of authority being discussed in 1880’s typified the Patriot Act at 9/11, for the angel of Revelation eighteen appeared in both those histories.

Tukalangile kwa kurudia kwamba mwaka wa 1888 ulikuwa kuzingirwa kwa Cestius, na hitimisho la msukosuko wa sheria ya Jumapili ni kuzingirwa kwa Tito. Miswada ya sheria ya Jumapili ya Blair ya miaka ya 1880, pamoja na sheria za Jumapili zilizowekwa katika utekelezaji katika baadhi ya majimbo ya kusini wakati wa miaka ya 1880, ilikuwa ndiyo onyo la Cestius ambalo pia liliashiria mstari wa utengano katika ushauri wa Sister White kuhusu kuishi mashambani. Kabla ya miaka ya 1880 ushauri wake ulikuwa kwamba wakati ujao tungehitaji kuhamia mashambani, lakini baada ya miaka ya 1880 kuishi mashambani lilikuwa jambo lililopaswa kuwa tayari limetekelezwa. Ishara ya onyo ya Miswada ya Blair, iliyokuwa ikikuza alama ya mamlaka ya nguvu ya upapa iliyoanza kujadiliwa katika miaka ya 1880, iliifananisha Sheria ya Patriot katika 9/11, kwa maana malaika wa Ufunuo kumi na nane alitokea katika historia zote hizo mbili.

9/11 was the warning of Cestius placing his authority in the holy place where it should not be, for at 9/11 Roman law replaced English law. In the Pelosi Trials of 2021 the due process clause was repudiated, and represents another footstep towards the siege of Titus, which ends at the soon-coming Sunday law in the United States. The siege is a period of time. 1888 speaks to the rebellion of the internal Protestant horn, and 9/11 speaks to the rebellion of the external Republican horn. The inauguration of the pope from the glorious land in the same year that the final president is also inaugurated represents the final warning of the abomination of desolation standing where it ought not, just before the battle of Panium. The battle of Panium leads directly into the Sunday law and the battle of Actium, which represented the third and final obstacle for pagan Rome, and then pagan Rome ruled supremely for 360 years in fulfillment of Daniel 11:24. At the Sunday law the sixth and seventh kingdoms are both conquered by Rome, and modern Rome then reigns for one symbolic hour, or forty-two symbolic months.

9/11 ilikuwa onyo la Kestio kuweka mamlaka yake mahali patakatifu ambapo haikupaswa kuwa, kwa maana katika 9/11 sheria ya Kirumi ilichukua mahali pa sheria ya Kiingereza. Katika Kesi za Pelosi za mwaka 2021, kifungu cha mchakato unaostahili kilikataliwa, na hilo linawakilisha hatua nyingine kuelekea mazingirwa ya Tito, yanayofikia mwisho katika sheria ya Jumapili inayokuja upesi nchini Marekani. Mazingirwa hayo ni kipindi cha wakati. Mwaka 1888 hunena juu ya uasi wa pembe ya Kiprotestanti ya ndani, na 9/11 hunena juu ya uasi wa pembe ya nje ya Kirepublican. Kutawazwa kwa papa kutoka nchi ya utukufu katika mwaka huohuo ambao rais wa mwisho naye pia anaapishwa kunawakilisha onyo la mwisho la chukizo la uharibifu likisimama pasipostahili, muda mfupi kabla ya vita vya Paniumu. Vita vya Paniumu huongoza moja kwa moja hadi katika sheria ya Jumapili na vita vya Aktiumu, ambavyo viliwakilisha kizuizi cha tatu na cha mwisho kwa Roma ya kipagani, na ndipo Roma ya kipagani ikatawala kwa ukuu kwa miaka 360 katika utimizo wa Danieli 11:24. Katika sheria ya Jumapili falme ya sita na ya saba zote mbili hushindwa na Roma, na ndipo Roma ya kisasa hutawala kwa saa moja ya kiishara, au miezi arobaini na miwili ya kiishara.

In verse sixteen Pompey, who has just conquered pagan Rome’s first obstacles of Syria then conquers Jerusalem. Pompey takes down Rome’s first two obstacles and Augustus Caesar conquers the third at Actium. Modern Rome first conquers the king of the south in 1989 in fulfillment of verse forty, and as typified by verse ten. Then at the Sunday law modern Rome conquers its second and third obstacle with the United States and then the United Nations immediately agrees to give their kingdom to the papal power. Pagan Rome conquered two with Pompey and then one, and papal Rome conquered one in 1989, and then its next two in verse sixteen, which is where Pompey is marked with his second conquering.

Mu msitari wa kumi na sita, Pompey, ambaye ametoka tu kushinda vizuizi vya kwanza vya Rumi ya kipagani vya Shamu, ndipo anaishinda Yerusalemu. Pompey anaangusha vizuizi viwili vya kwanza vya Rumi, na Augusto Kaisari anaishinda cha tatu huko Actium. Rumi ya kisasa kwanza inamshinda mfalme wa kusini mwaka 1989 katika utimilifu wa msitari wa arobaini, na kama ilivyotolewa kwa mfano katika msitari wa kumi. Kisha, katika sheria ya Jumapili, Rumi ya kisasa inashinda kizuizi chake cha pili na cha tatu pamoja na Marekani, na ndipo Umoja wa Mataifa mara moja unakubali kuupa ufalme wao uwezo wa upapa. Rumi ya kipagani ilishinda viwili pamoja na Pompey na kisha kimoja, na Rumi ya kipapa ilishinda kimoja mwaka 1989, na kisha viwili vyake vifuatavyo katika msitari wa kumi na sita, ambapo hapo ndipo Pompey anaonyeshwa kwa ushindi wake wa pili.

Whether it was the third obstacle at Actium for pagan Rome, or when the third obstacle, represented by the Goths being driven out of the city of Rome in 538, when Rome overcomes the third obstacle it rules supremely.

Niwaba rwari uruzitizi rwa gatatu i Actium ku Roma ya gipagani, cyangwa igihe uruzitizi rwa gatatu, rugereranywa n’Abagoti birukanwa mu mujyi wa Roma mu wa 538, rwakurwagaho, iyo Roma itsinze uruzitizi rwa gatatu itegekana ububasha busesuye.

Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets. Amos 3:7.

Eyi Yehova Mukama talikola kintu kyonna, wabula nga amaze okubikkulira abaddu be bannabbi ekyama kye. Amosi 3:7.

The Lord will surely give the final manifestation of the warning sign that is represented as the abomination of desolation in the book of Daniel, before the desolation arrives. That warning sign is the open alliance in contrast with Reagan’s secret alliance being represented in 2025. The Lord will not bring punishment, without first giving warning, and Amos is very direct about what the secret revelation to His servants is, and who it is directed at.

Omukama talirema kuwa ekiraga eky’enkomerero eky’akabonero ak’okulabula, akakiikirirwa ng’eky’omuzizo eky’okuzikirira mu kitabo kya Danyeri, okuzikirira nga tekunnatuuka. Ako kabonero ak’okulabula kwe kukwatagana okw’olwatu, nga kwawukana ku kukwatagana kwa Reagan okw’ekyama, okukikirirwa mu 2025. Omukama talireeta kubonerezebwa nga tasoose kuwa kulabula, era Amosi ayogera mu butereevu nnyo ku ekyo okubikkulirwa okw’ekyama eri abaddu Be kye kiri, era n’abo kwe kutunuulidde.

Hear this word that the Lord hath spoken against you, O children of Israel, against the whole family which I brought up from the land of Egypt, saying, You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities. Amos 3:1, 2.

Ukasomvwe eli izwi elyavuzha uYehova ngokuchasana lenu, O bana baIsraele, ngokuchasana lohlu lonke engalukhuphayo elizweni laseGibhithe, esithi, Lina lodwa engilwaziyo phakathi kwemindeni yonke yomhlaba; ngakho-ke ngizalijezisa ngenxa yabo bonke ububi benu. U-Amose 3:1, 2.

Amos is addressing the last generation of God’s chosen covenant people who are to be punished, in alignment with the 25 men who bow to the sun in Ezekiel eight. Amos is presenting the Laodicean message, which is the third angel’s message during the blotting out of sin in the time of the judgment of the living. Amos’s warning is based upon a unification of two parties.

Amosi akavhanganya khala ya vharathu vha murahu ya vhathu vha mulanga vho nangiwaho nga Mudzimu, vhane vha tea u pfiswa tshigwevho, zwi tshi elana na vhanna vha 25 vhane vha gwadamela ḓuvha kha Hesekiele 8. Amosi u khou ṋekedza mulaedza wa Laodekia, une wa vha mulaedza wa muruṅwa wa vhuraru nga tshifhinga tsha u phumulwa ha zwivhi nga tshifhinga tsha khaṱhulo ya vha tshilaho. Tsivhudzo ya Amosi yo ḓisendeka kha u farana ha madzangano mavhili.

Can two walk together, except they be agreed? Will a lion roar in the forest, when he hath no prey? will a young lion cry out of his den, if he have taken nothing? Can a bird fall in a snare upon the earth, where no gin is for him? shall one take up a snare from the earth, and have taken nothing at all? Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it? Amos 3:3–6.

Bantu babili bembela hamwe bate bakatala kwañana? Intambwe yokubula mu ishyamba, nimba ata co yafashe? Intambwe ikiri nto yotaka mu rwina rwayo, nimba ata co yafashe? Inyoni yowira mu mutego uri hasi, ahatari umutego wayitegewe? Umuntu yokura umutego hasi, kandi ata co wafashe na kimwe? Inzamba yovuzwa mu gisagara, abantu ntibatinye? Hoba ikibi mu gisagara, Uhoraho atagikoze? Amosi 3:3–6.

The warning of two walking together as one, is set within the context of a snare catching a bird from the earth. Birds are symbols of religious bodies, and the papacy is a cage of every unclean and hateful bird in Revelation.

Okulabula okw’abantu babiri okutambulira awamu ng’omuntu omu, kuteekebwa mu mbeera y’omutego okukwata enyonyi okuva ku nsi. Enyonyi zifaananyi eby’entambula z’eddiini, era obwapapa ke kaguli ak’ennyonyi zonna embi era ez’ekivve mu Kubikkulirwa.

And he cried mightily with a strong voice, saying, Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies. Revelation 18:2, 3.

Akapiga n’ijwi ikuru, ati, Babuloni ikomeye iraguye, iraguye, ihindutse ubuturo bw’abadayimoni n’igihome cya buri mwuka wanduye, n’igihome cya buri nyoni yanduye kandi yangwa. Kuko amahanga yose yanyoye ku nzoga y’uburakari bw’ubusambanyi bwayo, kandi abami b’isi basambanye na yo, kandi abacuruzi b’isi babaye abatunzi kubera ubwinshi bw’ibinezeza byayo. Ibyahishuwe 18:2, 3.

A bird in a cage is a captured bird, and when a nation commits fornication with the whore of Rome it becomes a captured bird, and the bird that is lifted up above all the other prophetic birds is the power whose threefold house is built, is established at the Sunday law, in her place, which is Shinar, which is Babylon. It is the bird that received a deadly wound in 1798, or as Zechariah states, had a lead cover placed over its basket, but was thereafter lifted up by the birds of spiritualism and apostate Protestantism.

چەڵەکی لە ناو قەفەسدا، چەڵەکێکی بەندکراوە؛ و کاتێک نەتەوەیەک لەگەڵ فاحشەی ڕۆما داوێنپیسی دەکات، ئەوە دەبێتە چەڵەکێکی بەندکراو. ئەو چەڵەکەش کە لە سەرووی هەموو ئەو چەڵەکە پێغەمبەرانەی دیکە بەرز دەکرێتەوە، هێزەکەیە کە ماڵی سێ‌لاوەیی ئەو بنیاد دەنرێت، لە یاسای یەکشەممەدا دامەزرێندرێت، لە شوێنی خۆیدا، کە شنعارە، کە بابڵۆنە. ئەوە ئەو چەڵەکەیە کە لە ساڵی 1798 زەخمێکی کوشندەی پێ گەیشت، یان وەک زەکەریا دەڵێت، سەرپۆشێکی سەرب لە سەر سەبەتەکەی دانرا؛ بەڵام پاشان لەلایەن چەڵەکەکانی ڕۆحگەری و پڕۆتستانتییە مرتەد بووەکانەوە بەرز کرایەوە.

Then the angel that talked with me went forth, and said unto me, Lift up now thine eyes, and see what is this that goeth forth. And I said, What is it? And he said, This is an ephah that goeth forth. He said moreover, This is their resemblance through all the earth. And, behold, there was lifted up a talent of lead: and this is a woman that sitteth in the midst of the ephah. And he said, This is wickedness. And he cast it into the midst of the ephah; and he cast the weight of lead upon the mouth thereof. Then lifted I up mine eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came out two women, and the wind was in their wings; for they had wings like the wings of a stork: and they lifted up the ephah between the earth and the heaven. Then said I to the angel that talked with me, Whither do these bear the ephah? And he said unto me, To build it an house in the land of Shinar: and it shall be established, and set there upon her own base. Zechariah 5:5–11.

Apo malaika oyo azalaki koloba na ngai abimaki mpe alobaki na ngai: Tombola sikoyo miso na yo, mpe tala eloko nini oyo ezali kobima. Mpe nalobaki: Ezali nini? Mpe alobaki: Oyo ezali efa oyo ezali kobima. Alobaki lisusu: Oyo nde lolenge na bango na mokili mobimba. Mpe tala, eteni moko ya plomb etombwamaki; mpe oyo ezali mwasi moko afandi na katikati ya efa. Mpe alobaki: Oyo ezali mabe. Mpe abwakaki ye na katikati ya efa; mpe abwakaki kilo ya plomb na monoko na yango. Bongo natombolaki miso na ngai, mpe natalaki, mpe tala, basi mibale babimaki, mpe mopepe ezalaki na mapapu na bango; mpo bazalaki na mapapu lokola mapapu ya nkonga; mpe batombolaki efa kati na mabele mpe likoló. Bongo nalobaki na malaika oyo azalaki koloba na ngai: Wapi bazali komema efa oyo? Mpe alobaki na ngai: Mpo na kotongela yango ndako na mokili ya Shinare; mpe ekolendisama, mpe ekotia kuna likoló ya moboko na yango moko. Zakaria 5:5–11.

Amos’s snare catches the bird from the earth, for it represents the alliance that precedes the soon-coming Sunday law where the earth-bird is captured, and according to Amos the alliance is a rebuke to Laodicean Seventh-day Adventism, for there will be a warning trumpet blown in the city, which they will refuse to hear.

Mutego wa Amosi ufata inyoni ivuye ku isi, kuko ushushanya ubufatanye bubanziriza itegeko ry’Umunsi wa Ku Cyumweru rigiye kuza vuba, aho inyoni y’isi ifatirwa; kandi dukurikije Amosi, ubwo bufatanye ni igihano cyo gucyaha Ubudivantisiti bw’Umunsi wa Karindwi bwa Lawodikiya, kuko hazavuzwa impanda y’umuburo mu murwa, ariko bo bazanga kuyumva.

Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the Lord hath not done it? Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets. The lion hath roared, who will not fear? the Lord God hath spoken, who can but prophesy? Amos 3:6–8.

ئەگەر لە شارێکدا کەرنەیەک لێ بدرێت، ئایا خەڵک ناترسان؟ ئەگەر لە شارێکدا بەڵایەک هەبێت، ئایا یەزدان ئەوەی نەکردووە؟ بەڕاستی، پەروەردگاری یەزدان هیچ شتێک ناکات، مەگەر نهێنی خۆی بۆ خزمەتکارەکانی، پێغەمبەران، ئاشکرا بکات. شێر هاوار کردووە؛ کێ ناترسێت؟ پەروەردگاری یەزدان قسەی کردووە؛ کێ دەتوانێت پێشبینی نەکات؟ عامۆس 3:6–8.

The Lion who roars is the Lion of the tribe of Judah, who represents Christ when He seals and unseals His prophetic Word. The open alliance of 2025 is the siege of Cestius and the symbol of the robbers of God’s people is established when you see two walking together that should never co-exist. Rome allied and aligned with Protestants is an oxymoron, for to be a Protestant means to protest against Rome.

Enkinyambu ekuguma ni yo Nkinyambu yo mu kika kya Yuda, ekiraga Kristo bwe asiba kandi asiburura Ekigambo kye eky’obunabbi. Obukagano obweriire bwa 2025 ni bwo kuzingeekwa kwa Cestius, kandi akamanyiso k’abanyagi b’abantu ba Ruhanga katekibwaho obu muraabona babiri nibatambula hamwe kandi batasaine kubaho hamwe na kakye. Roma okukwatana kandi okushoroorana n’Abapurotesitante ni ekigambo ekirimu okweteeraniza okutali kumwe, ahabw’okuba kuba Omupurotesitante nikimanyisa kurwanisa Roma.

We will continue these things in the next article.

Tukukokeka kusosa makambo aya mu artikle ilanda.

Too Late to Escape the Snare

شکانی دەمە دیر بۆ ڕزگاربوون لە داوەکە

“And let it be remembered, it is the boast of Rome that she never changes. The principles of Gregory VII and Innocent III are still the principles of the Roman Catholic Church. And had she but the power, she would put them in practice with as much vigor now as in past centuries. Protestants little know what they are doing when they propose to accept the aid of Rome in the work of Sunday exaltation. While they are bent upon the accomplishment of their purpose, Rome is aiming to re-establish her power, to recover her lost supremacy. Let the principle once be established in the United States that the church may employ or control the power of the state; that religious observances may be enforced by secular laws; in short, that the authority of church and state is to dominate the conscience, and the triumph of Rome in this country is assured.

“Kandi na ikumbukwe, ni majivuno ya Roma kwamba habadiliki kamwe. Kanuni za Gregory VII na Innocent III bado ndizo kanuni za Kanisa Katoliki la Roma. Nalo, kama lingekuwa tu na mamlaka, lingezitekeleza kwa nguvu ile ile sasa kama katika karne zilizopita. Waprotestanti hawatambui kwa kiasi kidogo wanachokifanya wanapopendekeza kukubali msaada wa Roma katika kazi ya kuitukuza Jumapili. Wakati wao wameazimia kutimiza kusudi lao, Roma inalenga kuimarisha tena mamlaka yake, na kurejesha ukuu wake uliopotea. Kanuni hiyo ikishawekwa mara moja nchini Marekani kwamba kanisa laweza kutumia au kudhibiti mamlaka ya serikali; kwamba maadhimisho ya kidini yaweza kulazimishwa kwa sheria za kiraia; kwa kifupi, kwamba mamlaka ya kanisa na serikali yatwale dhamiri, ndipo ushindi wa Roma katika nchi hii umehakikishwa.

“God’s word has given warning of the impending danger; let this be unheeded, and the Protestant world will learn what the purposes of Rome really are, only when it is too late to escape the snare. She is silently growing into power. Her doctrines are exerting their influence in legislative halls, in the churches, and in the hearts of men. She is piling up her lofty and massive structures in the secret recesses of which her former persecutions will be repeated. Stealthily and unsuspectedly she is strengthening her forces to further her own ends when the time shall come for her to strike. All that she desires is vantage ground, and this is already being given her. We shall soon see and shall feel what the purpose of the Roman element is. Whoever shall believe and obey the word of God will thereby incur reproach and persecution.” The Great Controversy, 581.

“Ilizwi la Xikwembu ri nyikele xitsundzuxo hi khombo leri tshinelaka; loko leswi swi honisiwa, kutani misava ya Vaprotestente yi ta tiva leswi maqhinga ya Rhoma ma nga swona hakunene, ntsena loko se swi hlwele ngopfu ku baleka ntlhamu. Yena u kula hi matimba hi ku miyela. Tidyondzo ta yena ti tirhisa nkucetelo wa tona etiholweni ta vumbiwa bya milawu, etikerekeni, ni le timbilwini ta vanhu. U tshama a ri karhi a hlengeleta swivumbeko swa yena leswi tlakukeke ni leswi tiyeke, eswihundleni swa swona laha ku xaniseka ka yena ka khale ku nga ta tlhela ku phindhiwa kona. Hi vunya naswona a nga ehleketiwi, u tiyisa matimba ya yena leswaku a tlakusa makungu ya yena n’wini loko nkarhi wo ba wu ta fika. Hinkwaswo leswi a swi navelaka i ndhawu ya ku kuma nkateko wa ku hlula, naswona leswi se wa swi nyikiwa. Ku nga ri khale hi ta vona naswona hi ta twa leswaku xikongomelo xa nchumu wa Rhoma i yini. Mani na mani loyi a nga ta pfumela ni ku yingisa rito ra Xikwembu u ta kuma xisandzu ni ku xanisiwa hikwalaho ka swona.” The Great Controversy, 581.

“There is a world lying in wickedness, in deception, and delusion, in the very shadow of death,—asleep, asleep. Who are feeling travail of soul to awaken them? What voice can reach them? My mind is carried to the future when the signal will be given, ‘Behold the Bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet Him.’ But some will have delayed to obtain the oil for replenishing their lamps, and too late they will find that character, which is represented by the oil, is not transferable. That oil is the righteousness of Christ. It represents character, and character is not transferable. No man can secure it for another. Each must obtain for himself a character purified from every stain of sin.” Bible Echo, May 4, 1896.

“دەوروبەریەك هەیە كە لە خراپەکاریدا، لە فریب و گومڕاییدا، لە هەمان سێبەری مەرگدا خەوتووە، خەوتووە. کێن ئەوانەی ئازاری ڕۆح هەست پێدەکەن بۆ ئەوەی ئەوان بەهۆش بهێننەوە؟ کام دەنگ دەتوانێت بگاتەیان؟ مێشکم بۆ داهاتوو دەبردرێت، کاتێک ئاماژەکە دەدرێت: ‘ئاوەتا، زاوا دێت؛ بڕۆن بۆ پێشوازیی لێ بکەن.’ بەڵام هەندێک دوا دەخەن لە بەدەستهێنانی ڕۆن بۆ پڕکردنەوەی چرایەکانیان، و دواتر زۆر درەنگ دەزانن کە ئەو سیرەتەی کە ڕۆن پێی نیشان دەدرێت، ناگوێزرێتەوە. ئەو ڕۆنە ڕاستودروستیی مەسیحە. ئەو نوێنەرایەتیی سیرەت دەکات، و سیرەت ناگوێزرێتەوە. هیچ مرۆڤێک ناتوانێت بۆ کەسێکی تر ئەوە دابین بکات. هەر یەکێک دەبێت بۆ خۆی سیرەتێک بەدەست بهێنێت کە لە هەموو لکەیەکی گوناه پاک کراوەتەوە.” Bible Echo, May 4, 1896.

“As I viewed poor souls dying for want of the present truth, and some who professed to believe the truth were letting them die by withholding the necessary means to carry forward the work of God, the sight was too painful, and I begged of the angel to remove it from me. I saw that when the cause of God called for some of their property, like the young man who came to Jesus (Matthew 19:16–22) they went away sorrowful, and that soon the overflowing scourge would pass over and sweep their possessions all away, and then it would be too late to sacrifice earthly goods, and lay up a treasure in heaven.” Early Writings, 49.

“Ez min temaşa dikir ku canên belengaz ji ber neheqîtiya rastiya heyî dimirin, û hin kesên ku xwe wek bawermendên rastiyê didan nîşan, bi girtina amûrên pêwîst ji bo pêşxistina xebata Xwedê wan dihêlin ku bimrin, ew dîtin pir êşdar bû, û min ji meleketê xwest ku wê ji min rake. Min dît ku gava doza Xwedê ji bo hin milkê wan gazî dikir, mîna ciwanê ku hate cem Îsa (Matthew 19:16–22), ew bi xemgînî diçûn, û ku zû belayê leheng avabûyî dê derbas bibe û hemû mal û milkê wan bişoşe, û hingê êdî dê pir dereng be ku tiştên dinyayî qurban bikin û xezîneyek li ezmanan kom bikin.” Early Writings, 49.

“Judas saw that his entreaties were in vain, and he rushed from the hall exclaiming, It is too late! It is too late! He felt that he could not live to see Jesus crucified, and in despair went out and hanged himself.” The Desire of Ages, 722.

“Yudas wamona kuti mapembedzero ghake ghakaŵa ghawaka, ndipo wakachimbira kufuma mu holo, wakachemerezganga, Kwachedwa chomene! Kwachedwa chomene! Wakamanya kuti wangakhalaso chara kuti wawone Yesu wakupayikika pa mphinjika, ndipo mu kutaya mtima wakafumamo na kukajipayika yekha.” The Desire of Ages, 722.